C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
|
|
- Beryl Floyd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment of local producers, county Extension agents-agriculture, financial insti tution representatives, farm machinery dealers and others knowledgeable of the area. Variation in yields, production inputs and production practices should be expected for particular farms. Budgets for all major crops produced in the area are included for two levels of management, when applicable. Crop yields are directly related to levels of management. These differences are due largely to timing of operational practices which may not be evident in the budgets. The machinery inventory is applicable to both typical and high level management. In some bud gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned. Budgets for establishing permanent type pasture grasses were prepared and used for prorating estab lishment costs in the respective pasture and hay budgets. Forage crops include expenses only be cause it is expected that the income will be derived from livestock enterprises. Land charges were based on the customary land lord's crop share less his proportionate share of certain production and harvesting inputs. A per acre land charge was made when crop share was not used.
2 C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W I TEW WEIGHT UNIT P R I C E O R QUANTITY VALUE OR EACH COST/UNIT COST G R O S S R E C E I P T S STEER CALVES HEIFER CALVES CULL COWS TOTAL CWT. CWT. CUT J2Z*5JD VA R I A B L E C O S T S COASTAL PASTURE N AT LV E PA S T U R E HAY PROTEIN SUPP.20% SALT MINERALS VET MEDICINE MISC EXPENSE MARKETING MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE.REP) E Q U E P M E N T < F U E L. L U B E. R E P ) L A B O R. T R A C T O R f c M A C H I N E R Y LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON CPER.CAP., T C TA L VA R I A E L E C C S T S 3. I N C O M E A E O V E V A R I A B L E C O S T S 4. FIXED COSTS COASTAL PASTURE N AT I V E PA S T U R E I N T. C N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. ON BEEF BULL FUR. DEPR. ON OTHER EQUIP. O T H E R F C. M A C h & E Q U I P. TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL CCSTS ACRE ACRE CWT CVkT CWT HEAD HEAD ooo 5.50 HEAD DOL DOL HRS HRS HRS DCL _jt DOL DCL DOL DCL DCL DCL DCL. 12* NET RETURNS C O W S. 3 H E I F E R, 1 B U L L U N I T. Y E A R R O U N D C A L V I N G. G R A O E G O O D C A L V E S, RAISED REPLACEMENT EVERY 8 YR.. 80% CALF CROP, 2% COW DEATH LOSS. P R E P A R E D B Y C E C I L P A R K E R, T A E X. C O L L E G E S T A T I O N, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D
3 STCCKER CALF PRODUCTION TEXAS BLACKLANDS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER CALF I TEM WEIGHT UNIT EACH PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS STOCKER STEERS TOTAL 6.25 CWT JLa* VARIABLE COSTS SMALLGRAINPAST. NATIVE PASTURE BULL CALVES 8-10% PRO FEED HAY VET MEDICINE SALE COMM SALT MINERALS DEATH LOSS 3% MACHINERY! FUEL,LUBE.REP J EQUIPMENTiFUEL.LUBE,REP ) LABOR, TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR. EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS ACRE ACRE CWT CWT CteT I 1.86 HEAD HEAD CfcT HEAD DCL DOL HRS HRS HRS f DCL. 0.C X2L*3_ v INCOME ABCVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXED COSTS S.G. PASTURE NATIVE PASTURE INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. ON OTHER EGUIF. OTHER FC, MACH & EQUIP. TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS ACRE ACRE DOL DCL DCL. _ - 4. x 3 J NET RETURNS STEER UNIT.250 PCUNDS GAIN/STEER.STOCKING RATE 1.5 HEAD/ACRE.NATIVE PASTURE WITH FEED IN NOVEMEER.SWALL GRAIN WINTER PASTURE.DECEMBER-MAY.3 % DEATH LOSS. P R E PA R E D B Y C E C I L PA R K E R, TA E X, C O L L E G E S TAT I O N, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D
4 D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITHOUT SILAGE I TEM WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS MILK 1.00 CWT. BULL CALVES 1.00 HEAD BREEDING HEIFERS 1.00 HEAD CULL COWS CWT. BULL 1.00 HEAD TCTAL * VARIABLE COSTS GRAIN MIX HAY PASTURE VET MEDICINE BREEDING SUPPLIES MGMT RECORDS UTILITIES HAULING SALT MILK REPLACER MISC EXPENSE MACHINERY!FUEL,LUBE.REP) EQUIPMENT(FUEL.LUBE,REP> LABOR. TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXED CCSTS LAND CHARGE I N T. O N L I V E S TO C K C A P I TA L INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. CN DAIRY COW FURCH DEPR. CN OTHER ECUIP. OTHER FC. MACH & EQUIP. TOTAL FIXEC COSTS TOTAL COSTS CWT CWT HI AUMS HEAD HEAD HEAD HEAD HEAD CWT LBS LBS OC DCL DCL DOL HRS HRS DOL ±2jl&2~ ACRE DOL DOL DCL DOL DCL. 3J^0_2_ NET RETURNS COW DAIRY LBS. PRODUCTION PER COW. EARN IS DOUBLE 6 HERRINGBONE. FEEDING OUTSIDE MILKING RARLCR. 25% REPLACEMENT, 3% DEATH LOSS ON COWS P R E PA R E D E Y C E C I L PA R K E R. TA E X, C O L L E G E S TAT I O N. T E X A S P R O J E C T E D
5 F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C W ITEM G R O S S R E C E I P T S WEIGHT UNIT EACH P R I C E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY VA L U E O R COST i PIGS TOTAL LES Z6. jlq _ 576.OC 2. VARIABLE COSTS SOW FEED GEST. SOW FEED LACT. PIG STARTER BOAR FEED VET. MED (PIGSJ VET. MED (SOWS) SALE COMM MISG EXPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL,LUBE,REP ) E Q U I P M E N T! F U E L. L U B E. R E P * L A B O R, T R A C T O R & M A C H I N E R Y LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST CN OPER.CAP., T O T A L V A R I A B L E C C S T S I N C O M E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C O S T S CWT CWT I 1.62 CWT CWT HEAD HEAD HEAD HEAD DOL DCL HRS HRS HRS DCL JL^A^fi FIXEO COSTS LAND RENT DOL I N T. C N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L D C L INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DCL DEPR. ON BOAR PURCHASED DOL DEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP. DCL O T H E R F C, M A C H & E G U I P. D O L - TOTAL FIXED CCSTS 5. TOTAL CCSTS * NET RETURNS S O W U N I T, F A L L - S P R I N G F A R R O W I N G, 5 6 D A Y W E A N I N G, 1 6 P I G S W E A N E D P E R S O W P E R Y E A R, A P P L I C A B L E T O W E L L D R A I N E D S A N O Y S O I L S. P R E P A R E D B Y C E C I L P A R K E R, T A E X. C O L L E G E S T A T I O N, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D
6 FINISHING HOGS TEXAS BLACKLANDS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER HOG I TEM WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS S L A U G H T E R H O G S TGTAL 2. V A R I A B L E C O S T S LBS S ap_0_ FINISHING RATION FEEDER PIGS VET MEDICINE MARKETING MISC EXPENSE DEATH L0SS=2% M A C H I N E R Y ( F U E L. L U B E. R E P ) EQUIPMENT(FUEL.LUBE.REP ) LABiOR. TRACTOR. MACHINERY LABOR. EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. T C TA L VA R I A B L E C C S T S CWT. LBS. HEAD HEAD HEAD HEAD DCL. DOL. HRS. HRS. HRS. DOL C * I N C O M E A B O V E V A R I A B L E C O S T S 4. FIXED COSTS LAND RENT INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP. OTHER FC. MACH & ECUIP. TOTAL FIXED CCSTS 5. TOTAL COSTS DOL DCL DOL DOL. QjlQJ NET RETURNS F E D P E R Y E A R F E D P E R B U N C H, P O U N D S F E E D P E R F O U N D G A I N, 2 X D E AT H L O S S. P R E P A R E D E Y C E C I L P A R K E R, T A E X. C O L L E G E S T A T I O N. T E X A S P R O J E C T E D
7 TEXAS BLACKLANDS REGION Assumed Prices Paid and Received by Farmers \J Item Unit Price Prices paid (1976) Seed Cottonseed (acid delinted) Grain sorghum Wheat O a t s ( t y p i c a l ) O a t s ( h i g h l e v e l ) Sudangrass Corn Ryegrass Klei ngrass Tarn Wintergreen Harding Ferti Iizer Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassuim Fuel and lubricants G a s o l i n e ( b u l k d e l l v e r y - $. 0 9 t a x r e f u n d ) Diesel Labor Typical management High level management Custom rates Cotton stripping and hauling Combining grain sorghum (7.00 minimum) Hauling grain sorghum C o m b i n i n g w h e a t / o a t s ( t y p i c a l ) Combining wheat/oats (high level) Hauling wheat/oats Comb i n i ng corn Hauling corn Cut, rake and bale hay HauIi ng hay Applying herbicide/insecticide (aerial) Cotton ginning F e r t i l i z e r s p r e a d e r Interest on operating capital pis ga hour hour acre acre bu. bu. bale bale acre acre percent $ I
8
9 r -2- I tern Unit Price Prices received (1976) Cotton Ii nt Cottonseed Grain Sorghum Corn Wheat Oats Sorghum hay CoastaI hay Oat hay Kleingrass hay ton bu. bu. bu. ton ton ton ton \J These price assumptions are not to be prospective prices. nterpreted as predictions or
10 " > ^» TEXAS BLACKLANDS REGION Estimated Machinery and Equipment Cost Per Hour of Use Machinery Purchase Estimated Estimated Fixed Costs Variable Costs Item and Size Price Years of Use Hours of Use Per Hour Per Hour Tractor HP $15, $3.87 $5.74 Tractor HP 13, Tractor - 75 HP 10, Tractor - 40 HP 4, Pickup - 1/2 ton 5, Chisel - 13 feet 1, Chisel - 19 feet 2, Cultivator - 13 feet 1, J Cultivator - 19 feet 2, ' Disk - 13 feet 1, Disk - 19 feet 2, Drill - 11 feet 1, Herbicide appl feet Herbicide appl feet Lister/bedder - 13 feet 1, Lister/bedder - 19 feet 1, Planter - 13 feet 1, Planter - 19 feet 2, Shredder - 13 feet 1, Shredder - 19 feet 3, Spike harrow - 15 feeit Sprayer - 25 feet Roller - 13 feet Roller - 19 feet
11
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More information30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More informationHARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More informationTEXAS UPPER GULF COAST
r r TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Upper Gulf Coast Region are based on estimates of yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the
More informationCOTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER
C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationC3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationD A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE
D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE ITEM WEIGHT JNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT 3UANTITY VALUE
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationU.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M
More informationFUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationUNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE
48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON
More informationT I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS
OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE
More informationCOW-CALF PROOUCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE UNIT CWT. CWT. CWT.
1 * G R O S S R E C E I P T S COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST STEER CALVES HEIFER
More informationTEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
More informationImpact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationTEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"
More informationWorld Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts. Lockup Briefing April 10, 2013
World Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts Lockup Briefing World Wheat Production Country or Region estimate 2012/13 previous month Million Tons Percent Percent
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationRICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationRICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationPROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.
c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc
More informationN o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS
More informationRICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More information1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More information2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
More informationrw^vr! h1 t\v?vc - hlrr TEXAS EL PASO ! L ' _ \.V
r - hlrr M H ^ _ ^ t t _ ^ ^ 1 _ V H T. h1 t\v?vc rw^vr! i ^ _.! L ' _ \.V L... r TEXAS EL PASO FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas El Paso Re gion are based on estimates of yields, production input
More informationSOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,527 pigs sold from 18 shelters Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationBUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More informationCorn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets
Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Contents Acknowledgments... 2 2017 Budget Committees... 2 2017 Planning Budgets... 3 Budgets for Agricultural Enterprises... 3 Methods and Procedures...
More informationProjections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.
Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD
More informationEM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and
More informationPROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION^ THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED
More informationEconomics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More information2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst
2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst Budgeting Assumptions Everyone's situation is different so no budget is accurate for
More informationDelaware County Census Data
Number of s Owners Percent of s Operated by Owner Percent of Tenancy Number of Renters Number of Managers No Return 94 90 96 4 4 0 0 42 35 83 17 6 1 1 62 56 90 10 6 0 4 19 11 58 42 4 4 0 137 114 83 17
More informationPEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationPROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.
24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241
More informationCOTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2007-01 December 2007 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationMercer County Census Data (10% Sample)
Total Number of s Sample Number of s Owners Rents for Money Rents for Crop Percent of s Operated by Owner Percent of Tenancy Tilled Acres Cool Spring 143 14 10 1 3 71 29 653 Deer Creek 107 11 11 0 0 100
More informationCOTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationThe Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
More informationEconomic Impacts of Agriculture and Forestry in Tennessee, 2009
Institute of Agriculture Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forestry in Tennessee, 2009 by Jamey Menard, Burton English, and Kim Jensen Agri Industry Modeling
More informationJ J ) " '- ACRE L SO DAYS
L I S T I N G O F. - \ A M E S E T A N D P R I C - V E C T O R REGION number: DATE: 131480 151 PASTURE MAINT. 152 SM. GR. PASTURE 153 PASTURE. TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL
More informationUNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT
42 PEANUTS. ORYLANO. OEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION PEANUTS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST PEANUT
More informationEM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County
EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing
More informationEconomic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms
& RESEARCH Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms Working Paper 12-2 July 2012 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012
More informationEconomic Impacts of Agriculture and Forestry in Tennessee, 1997
Institute of Agriculture Department of Agricultural Economics Research Series 04-01 July 2001 Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Forestry in Tennessee, 1997 by Burton English, Kim Jensen, and Jamey Menard
More information. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO
_- LISTING OF THE NAME SET AMI PRICE VECTOR REGION NUMBERS DATES 101480 151 PASTURE 152 SM. gr. PASTURE 133 PAST E«TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL 157 COASTAL RYEGRASS 158
More information