N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS
|
|
- Aubrie Green
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK P E R N O N - S H A R E E V E N HEAD ASH PROD. 11/5/9 1/15/9 01/15/93 0/15/93 03/15/93 06/0/93 06/0/93 PASTURE PASTURE PASTURE PASTURE PASTURE HARVEST HARVEST A A A A A A A P A S T U R E H H E A T P A S T U R E H H E A T P A S T U R E H H E A T P A S T U R E K H E A T P A S T U R E H H E A T HHEAT DEFIIENY PHT. HHEAT OOOO N.00 N OOOO N.00 N oooo N N oooo N N oooo N N oooo N oooo N DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF INPUT INPUT NAHE NUHBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD O F N O N - O R S H A R E U N I T S A S H V A R I. 0/15/9 PREHARVEST 09/10/9 PREHARVEST 09/15/9 PREHARVEST 09/15/9 PREHARVEST 10/10/9 PREHARVEST 10/10/9 PREHARVEST 1/15/9 PREHARVEST 1/15/9 PREHARVEST 1/15/9 PREHARVEST 0/8/93 PREHARVEST 06/0/93 HARVEST 06/0/93 HARVEST 06/30/93 H E E G H E E E G H G G K HISELING ROP INSURANE FERTILIZER (N) FERTILIZER APPL. DRILLING SEED PARATHION GLEAN AERIAL APPL. PIKUP TRUK USTOH HARVEST USTOH HAULING LAND HARGE 5 FT HHEAT HHEAT DUAL GRAIN HHEAT 3/4 TON HHEAT HHEAT KHEAT Information presented is prepared solely as a ganaral guida and is not intonded to recognize or predict the casts and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Thaso projactions woro collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication. 3.36
2 ROP PRODUTS REPORT October 13, 1993 rop Product Name Price Unit Weight ash per of per Flow Unit Mes. Unit Row OTTON LINT.500 lb. 1.OOOO 0 OTTONSEED ton DEFIIENY PMT. OTTON.1800 lb DEFIIENY PMT. SORGHUM.6300 cwt DEFIIENY PMT. WHEAT.500 bu GUAR cwt HAY ALFALFA ton HAY BERMUDA ton HAY SORGHUM ton PASTURE WHEAT.3000 lb/g SORGHUM cwt WHEAT bu J ^ \ Information prasontad is praparad solely as a ganaral guide and is not intondod to racogniza or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Those projactions wara collected and davalopad by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extansion Service and approved for publication. 3.3
3 TRATORS, IMPLEMENTS AND EQUIPMENT OTOBER 13, 1993 DESRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR HI) SPEED (HI/H) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE S A L V A G E V A L U E ( X ) URRENT HARKET VALUE L E A S E P A Y H E N T ( $ ) ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX A N N U A L I N S U R A N E ( $ ) ON FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT #1 DEPREIATION FATOR #1 YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF..AL.) F U E L U S E ( D E F.. A L. ) R & H A L. ( # 1, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) TRATOR TRATOR 100 HP DI TRATOR TRATOR 15 HP DI TRATOR TRATOR 150 HP DI TOR TRATOR TRATOR OnDODSQ DP LT.MiiUBjniianea o= HIT IBUUJUDOB TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR 5 HP 40 HP 5 HP DI DI DI DESRIPTION IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR HI) SPEED (HI/H) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR (A/HR) (X) (HR) ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT #1 DEPREIATION FATOR #1 YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) F U E L U S E ( D E F., A L. ) R & H A L. ( # 1, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) BEDDER HISEL HISEL ULTIVATOR ULTIVATOR ULTIVATOR 19 FT 5 FT 9 ROH FIELD ROLLING Information presented Is preparod solely as a ganaral guida and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. Those projections wara collected and davolopad by staff mambars of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approved for publication. 3.38
4 DESRIPTION IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR HI) SPEED (HI/H) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR (X) (HR) ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT #1 DEPREIATION FATOR #1 YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & H A L. ( # 1, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) DIS-TANDEH DIS--TANDEH DRILL PUNTER PLANTER PLOH 14 FT 1 FT GRAIN T HLDBOARD DESRIPTION IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IMPLEMENT EQUIPHENT FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR HI) SPEED (HI/H) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (X) (HR) OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT #1 DEPREIATION FATOR #1 YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF.,AL.) R & H A L. ( # 1, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) SAND FIGHTER SHREDDER SPRAYER SPRAYER STRIPPER GRINDER/MIXER 4 ROH 5 FT HOUNTED OTTON Information prasented is prepared solely as a ganaral guida and is not intondod to racognizo or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projactions wara collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Texas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approvad for publication. 3.39
5 DESRIPTION EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR HI) SPEED (HI/H) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE S A LVA G E VA L U E ( X ) URRENT HARKET VALUE L E A S E PAY H E N T ( $ ) ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT #1 DEPREIATION FATOR #1 YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF..AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & H A L. ( # 1, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) HAYRAK-FEEDER SPRAYER STOK TAK TRAILER OTTON TRAILER STOK HATER SYSTEH ^ Information presented is prepared solely as a goneral guida and is not Intondod to rocognizo or predict tha costs and raturns from any ona particular farm or ranch oparation. These projections were collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication. 3.40
6 USTOM OPERATION RESOURES October 13, 1993 custom Oper a t l o n P r i c e U n i t ash per of Flow Unit Measure Row AERIAL APPL. 3 acre 4 USTOM BALING.80 bale 4 USTOM BALING ALFALFA 5 ton 4 USTOM HARVEST GUAR 1 acre 4 USTOM HARVEST SORGHUM 1 acre 4 USTOM HARVEST WHEAT 1 acre 4 USTOM HAULING GUAR.5 cwt. 4 USTOM HAULING SORGHUM.5 cwt. 4 USTOM HAULING WHEAT.11 bu. 4 FERTILIZER APPL..15 acre 4 FERTILIZER APPL. DUAL 3.5 acre 4 HAUL & STAK.40 bale 4 HAULING & MKTG. STOKERS.5 cwt. 4 HERBIIDE APPL.. 15 acre 4 HIRED SPOT SPRAY 4 acre 4 INSETIIDE APPL 3.00 acre 4 SPRIGGING USTOM.50 acre 4 STRIPPING USTOM.0 lb. 4 Information prasontad is praparad sololy as a ganaral guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. These projactions ware collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approvad for publication. 3.43
7 LABOR RESOURES OTOBER 13, 1993 DESRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR FIRST NAHE LIVESTOK LABOR OPERATOR LABOR QUALIFYING NAHE O S T O R V A L U E ( S / H R ) 6 6 TOTAL HAGE BENEFITS (X) L A B O R T Y P E ( A, B ) A B Information prasontad is prepared solely as a goneral guida and Is not intondod to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. Thaso projactions were collected and developed by staff mambars of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approved for publication. 3.44
8
9 -I " > o
10 B-14KL03) TEXAS AGRIULTURAL EXTENSION SERVIE. THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Z e r l e L. a r p e n t e r, D i r e c t o r. o l l e g e S t a t i o n, Te x a s TEXAS LIVESTOK ENTERPRISE BUDGETS TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS DISTRIT Projected for 1993 Data collected and submitted by Stanley Bevers E d u c a t i o n a l p r o g r a m s c o n d u c t e d b y t h e Te x a s A g r i c u l t u r a l E x t e n s i o n S e r v i c e s e r v e p e o p l e o f a l l a g e s r e g a r d l e s s o f s o c i o e c o n o m i c l e v e l, r a c e, c o l o r, s e x, r e l i g i o n o r n a t i o n a l o r i g i n. o o p e r a t i v e E x t e n s i o n W o r k i n A g r i c u l t u r e a n d H o m o E c o n o m i c s. T h e Te x a s A S M U n i v e r s i t y S y s t e m a n d t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D e p a r t m e n t o f A g r i c u l t u r e c o o p e r a t i n g. D i s t r i b u t e d i n f u r t h e r a n c e o f t h e A c t s o f o n g r e s s o f M a y 8, , a s a m e n d e d, and June 30, ISO New
11 ^ ^ 1
12 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, OW-ALF PRODUTION Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head ============================================================================== Your P R O D U T I O N D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t R e t u r n E s t i m a t e U L L O W S O. I O H d c w t H E I F E R A L V E S H d c w t " H U N T I N G L E A S E a c r e S T O K E R S T E E R S H d c w t T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e OPERATING INPUT or USTOM OPERATION Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit ost N A T I V E P A S T U R E a c r e R A N G E U B E S l b S A L E S O M M I S S I O N $ SALT AND MINERAL lb V E T. M E D I I N E O W - A L F h e a d Fuel 5.48 Lube 0.55 R e p a i r. 6 0 T o t a l O P E R A T I N G I N P U T a n d U S T O M O P E R A T I O N o s t s Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f o s t Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y D o l I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWNERSHIP OST Description (Depredation, Taxes, and Insurance) ost M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t 3 5. L i v e s t o c k T o t a l O W N E R S H I P o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LABOR OST Description Input Use Unit Average ost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r T o t a l L A B O R o s t s _,. R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LAND OST Description Input Use Unit Rate of ost Return PASTURE RENT Annual Lease Acre T o t a l L A N D o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t WARNING- No Management ost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t Total Projected ost of Production JP^V Information prasontad is prepared solely as a ganaral guide and is not intended to racognlso or predict the costs and returns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. Thaso projactions wore eel looted and developed by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extonslon Sorvica and approved for publication. L3.1
13 GROSS INOME Description ULL OWS HEIFER ALVES HUNTING LEASE STOKER STEERS Total GROSS Income VARIABLE OST Description BARN F E N E 1 M I L E Interest - O Borrowed NATIVE PASTURE PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON RANGE UBES SALES OMMISSION SALT AND MINERAL SHED SPRAYER STOK TRAILER STOK VET. MEDIINE OW-ALF WATER WORKING PENS Total VARIABLE OST Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, 1993, ow-alf Production Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t O.IOHd cwt Hd Wt acre Hd cwt Total Total B-141(L03) Your Estimate GROSS INOME minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description Machinery and Equipment Livestock Land Total FIXED ost Total of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Unit Acre Acre 94.9 Total / " "Hl jhv Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intondod to recognise or predict the costs and returns from any ona particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projections were collected and davoloped by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication. L3.
14 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, STOKER ALF BUDGET - PULL OFF WHEAT MARH 1 Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head ============================================================================== Your P R O D U T I O N D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t R e t u r n E s t i m a t e F E E D E R S T E E R S 0. 9 H d c w t T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e OPERATING INPUT or USTOM OPERATION Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit ost HAY bale M I S E L L A N E O U S S T O K E R h e a d S A L T & M I N E R A L S T O K E R l b S T O K E R S T E E R S c w t V E T. M E D I I N E S T O K E R h e a d W H E A T P A S T U R E m o H A U L I N G & M K T G. S T O K E R S c w t Fuel 1. Lube 0.1 R e p a i r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G I N P U T a n d U S T O M O P E R A T I O N o s t s Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit 30.8 A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f o s t Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y D o l I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T o s t s. 4 3 Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit 8.35 OWNERSHIP OST Description (Depredation, Taxes, and Insurance) ost M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t L i v e s t o c k T o t a l O W N E R S H I P o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t. 4 9 LABOR OST Description Input Use Unit Average ost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r T o t a l L A B O R o s t s 6. 9 R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t WARNING- No Land ost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t WARNING- No Management ost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t Total Projected ost of Production JPN Information prasontad is praparad solely as a ganaral guida and is not intended to recognise or predict the costs and raturns from any ona particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approved for publication. L3.9
15 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B K L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, Stocker alf Budget - Pull off Wheat March 1 Texas Rolling Plains District (3) P r o j e c t e d o s t s a n d R e t u r n s p e r H e a d ^ ^ \ Y o u r ) G R O S S I N O M E D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t T o t a l E s t i m a t e F E E D E R S T E E R S 0. 9 H d c w t T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e V A R I A B L E O S T D e s c r i p t i o n _ T o t a l H A U L I N G & M K T G. S T O K E R S. 0 HAY 8.00 I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d M I S E L L A N E O U S S T O K E R. 0 0 P I K U P T R U K 3 / 4 T O N S A L T & M I N E R A L S T O K E R S T O K E R S T E E R S T R A I L E R S T O K 0. 1 V E T. M E D I I N E S T O K E R 3. 5 W H E A T P A S T U R E T o t a l V A R I A B L E O S T Break-Even Price, Total Variable ost $ per cwt. of FEEDER STEERS G R O S S I N O M E m i n u s V A R I A B L E O S T FIXED OST Description Unit Total M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t A c r e L i v e s t o c k Total FIXED ost 9.3 Break-Even Price, Total ost $ 88.0 per cwt. of FEEDER STEERS Total of ALL ost N E T P R O J E T E D R E T U R N S "" "^fsv Information presented is prepared solely as a ganaral guida and is not intended to recognise or predict the costs and raturns from any ona particular farm or ranch operation. Thosa projactions wara collected and davalopad by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Sorvica and approvad for publication. L3.10
16 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, STOKER ALF BUDGET - GRAZEOUT Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head ============================================================================== Your P R O D U T I O N D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t R e t u r n E s t i m a t e F E E D E R S T E E R S H E A V Y 0. 9 H d c w t T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e OPERATING INPUT or USTOM OPERATION Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit ost HAY bale M I S E L L A N E O U S S T O K E R h e a d S A L T & M I N E R A L S T O K E R l b S T O K E R S T E E R S c w t V E T. M E D I I N E S T K R h e a d V E T. M E D I I N E S T K R h e a d ' W H E A T P A S T U R E m o H A U L I N G & M K T G. S T O K E R S. 9 0 W t Fuel.0 Lube 0.0 R e p a i r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G I N P U T a n d U S T O M O P E R A T I O N o s t s Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f o s t Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y D o l I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWNERSHIP OST Description (Depreciation, Taxes, and Insurance) ost M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t. 0 4 L i v e s t o c k T o t a l O W N E R S H I P o s t s. 1 0 R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LABOR OST Description Input Use Unit Average ost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t 1. 3 H r T o t a l L A B O R o s t s. 3 9 R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t WARNING- No Land ost Specified Residual returns to management and profit WARNING- No Management ost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t Total Projected ost of Production J ^ \ Information prasontad is prepared solely as a goneral guida and is not intonded to recognise or predict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projactions woro collected and dovaloped by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. L3.ll
17 GROSS INOME Description FEEDER STEERS HEAVY Total GROSS Income VARIABLE OST Description HAULING & MKTG. STOKERS HAY Interest - O Borrowed MISELLANEOUS STOKER PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON SALT & MINERAL STOKER STOKER STEERS TRAILER VET. MEDIINE VET. MEDIINE WHEAT Total VARIABLE OST Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, 1993, Stocker alf Budget - Grazeout Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head STOK STKR 1 STKR PASTURE Q u a n t i t y U n i t 0.9Hd cwt. Break-Even Price, Total Variable ost $ GROSS INOME minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description Machinery and Equipment Livestock Total FIXED ost Break-Even Price, Total ost $ Total of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS $ / Unit.500 Total Total per cwt. of FEEDER STEERS Unit Acre 69. per cwt. of FEEDER STEERS Total B-14KL03) Your Estimate Information presented is prepared solely as a ganaral guida and is not intended to racegnlso or pradict tha costs and returns from any ona particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projactions were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approvad for publication. L3.1
18 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, FARROW TO FINISH HOG PRODUTION Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head ==================================================================== == Your P R O D U T I O N D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t R e t u r n E s t i m a t e M A R K E T H O G S H d. 0 0 c w t T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e OPERATING INPUT or USTOM OPERATION Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit ost BOAR FEED 0.0 cwt FINISHING RATION cwt PIG STARTER cwt S A L E S O M M I S S I O N H O G S h e a d SOW FEED GESTAT Wt SOW FEED LATAT cwt V E T. M E D I I N E H O G S h e a d V E T. M E D I I N E P I G S h e a d V E T. M E D I I N E S O W S h e a d Fuel Lube 3.15 R e p a i r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G I N P U T a n d U S T O M O P E R A T I O N o s t s Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f o s t Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y D o l " 5 8 I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWNERSHIP OST Description (Depreciation, Taxes, and Insurance) ost M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t L i v e s t o c k. 1 4 T o t a l O W N E R S H I P o s t s. 9 1 R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LABOR OST Description Input Use Unit Average ost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r O t h e r H r T o t a l L A B O R o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LAND OST Description Input Use Unit Rate of ost Return LAND HARGE HOGS Annual Lease Acre T o t a l L A N D o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t WARNING- No Management ost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t Total Projected ost of Production Information prasontad Is praparad sololy as a ganaral guida and is not intondod to recognlsa or predict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. Thosa projactions wara collected and davalopad by staff members of tho Taxas Agricultural Extension Sorvica and approvad for publication. L3.3
19 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, Farrow to Finish Hog Production Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head Your G R O S S I N O M E D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t T o t a l E s t i m a t e M A R K E T H O G S H d. 0 0 c w t T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e V A R I A B L E O S T D e s c r i p t i o n T o t a l BOAR FEED 5. BOAR PEN 1-00 F A R R O W I N G H O U S E. 5 0 FINISHING RATION GRINDER/MIXER.49 I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d 4. 4 L I V E S T O K L A B O R P I K U P T R U K 3 / 4 T O N PIG STARTER 1.98 S A L E S O M M I S S I O N H O G S SOW FEED GESTAT SOW FEED LATAT T R A I L E R S T O K V E T. M E D I I N E H O G S V E T. M E D I I N E P I G S V E T. M E D I I N E S O W S W A T E R S Y S T E M T o t a l V A R I A B L E O S T B r e a k - E v e n P r i c e, To t a l Va r i a b l e o s t $ p e r c w t. o f M A R K E T H O G S G R O S S I N O M E m i n u s V A R I A B L E O S T FIXED OST Description Unit Total M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t A c r e L i v e s t o c k Land Acre 8.00 Total FIXED ost 4.49 B r e a k - E v e n P r i c e, To t a l o s t $ p e r c w t. o f M A R K E T H O G S Total of ALL ost N E T P R O J E T E D R E T U R N S /**at v Information prasontad is prepared solely as a ganaral guida and is not intondod to recognise or predict the cost! and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. Thosa projections were collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. L3.4
20 /^-^ J0^\ P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, FEEDER PIG PRODUTION Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head ============================================================================== Your P R O D U T I O N D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t R e t u r n E s t i m a t e F E E D E R P I G S H d l b T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e OPERATING INPUT or USTOM OPERATION Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit ost BOAR FEED 0.0 cwt PIG STARTER cwt S A L E S O M M I S S I O N P I G S h e a d SOW FEED GESTAT Wt SOW FEED LATAT cwt V E T. M E D I I N E P I G S h e a d V E T. M E D I I N E S O W S h e a d Fuel Lube 3.15 R e p a i r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G I N P U T a n d U S T O M O P E R A T I O N o s t s Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f o s t Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y D o l I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWNERSHIP OST Description (Depreciation, Taxes, and Insurance) ost M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t L i v e s t o c k. 1 4 T o t a l O W N E R S H I P o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LABOR OST Description Input Use Unit Average ost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r O t h e r H r T o t a l L A B O R o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LAND OST Description Input Use Unit Rate of ost Return LAND HARGE HOGS Annual Lease Acre T o t a l L A N D o s t s. 6 6 R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t WARNING- No Management ost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t Total Projected ost of Production /#*N Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and Is not intondod to rocognisa or predict the costs and raturns from any ona particular farm or ranch oparation. Those projections were collected and devoloped by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approvad for publication. L3.5
21 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, Feeder P1g Production Texas Rolling Plains District (3) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head Your G R O S S I N O M E D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t T o t a l E s t i m a t e F E E D E R P I G S H d l b T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e V A R I A B L E O S T D e s c r i p t i o n T o t a l BOAR FEED 5. BOAR PEN 1.00 F A R R O W I N G H O U S E. 5 0 GRINDER/MIXER 5.63 I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d. 4 0 L I V E S T O K L A B O R P I K U P T R U K 3 / 4 T O N PIG STARTER 1.98 S A L E S O M M I S S I O N P I G S SOW FEED GESTAT SOW FEED LATAT T R A I L E R S T O K V E T. M E D I I N E P I G S 1. 9 V E T. M E D I I N E S O W S ' W A T E R S Y S T E M ~ ~ T o t a l V A R I A B L E O S T Break-Even Price, Total Variable ost $ 0.88 per lb. of FEEDER PIGS G R O S S I N O M E m i n u s V A R I A B L E O S T FIXED OST Description Unit Total M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t A c r e Livestock Land Acre Total FIXED ost Break- Even Price, Total ost $ 1. 4 per lb. of FEEDER PIGS Total of ALL ost N E T P R O J E T E D R E T U R N S Information prasontad is praparad solely as a general guida and is not intondod to racognlsa or predict tha costs and raturns from any ana particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projections were collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approvad for publication. L3.6
22 J ^ P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 0 3 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, FINISHING HOGS Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head ============================================================================== Your P R O D U T I O N D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t R e t u r n E s t i m a t e M A R K E T H O G S H d. 0 0 c w t T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e OPERATING INPUT or USTOM OPERATION Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit ost F E E D E R P I G S l b FINISHING RATION cwt S A L E S O M M I S S I O N H O G S h e a d V E T. M E D I I N E H O G S h e a d Fuel.10 Lube 0.1 R e p a 1 r 1. 1 T o t a l O P E R A T I N G I N P U T a n d U S T O M O P E R A T I O N o s t s Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f o s t Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y D o l I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l A P I T A L I N V E S T M E N T o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWNERSHIP OST Description (Depreciation, Taxes, and Insurance) ost M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t T o t a l O W N E R S H I P o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LABOR OST Description Input Use Unit Average ost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r O t h e r H r T o t a l L A B O R o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t WARNING- No Land ost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t WARNING- No Management ost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t Total Projected ost of Production 11.1 JF*v Information presented is preparad solely as a goneral guida and is not intondod to recognise or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. Those projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication. L3.
23 GROSS INOME Description MARKET HOGS Total GROSS Income VARIABLE OST Description FEEDER PIGS FINISHING FLOOR FINISHING RATION GRINDER/MIXER Interest - O Borrowed LIVESTOK LABOR PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON SALES OMMISSIONHOGS TRAILER STOK VET. MEDIINE HOGS WATER SYSTEM Total VARIABLE OST Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 13, 1993, Finishing Hogs Te x a s R o l l i n g P l a i n s D i s t r i c t ( 3 ) 1993 Projected osts and Returns per Head flreak-even Price, Total Variable ost GROSS INOME minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description Machinery and Equipment Total FIXED ost Break-Even Price, Total ost $ Total of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Q u a n t i t y U n i t 0.98Hd.00 cwt. $ per cwt Unit Acre $ / Unit per cwt. of MARKET HOGS Total Total of MARKET HOGS Total B-141(L03) Your Estimate Information prasontad is praparad solely as a ganaral guida and is not intondod to recognise or predict the costs and raturns from any ona particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projactions ware collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extansion Sorvica and approvad for publication. L3.8
24 LIVESTOK PRODUTS REPORT October 13, 1993 Livestock Name Price Unit Weight ash per of per Fl ow Unit Mes. Unit Row ULL OWS FEEDER PIGS FEEDER STEERS FEEDER STEERS HEIFER ALVES HUNTING LEASE MARKET HOGS STOKER STEERS HEAVY cwt lb OOOO cwt cwt cwt OOOO acre 1.OOOO cwt cwt I n f o r m a t i o n p r e s e n t e d i s p r e p a r e d s o l e l y a s a g e n e r a l g u i d e a n d i s n o t i n t e n d e d t o i a n d r a t u r n s f r o m a n y o n e p a r t i c u l a r f a r m o r r a n c h o p e r a t i o n. T h e s e p r o j e c t i o n s w e n s t a f f m e m b e r s o f t h e Te x a s A g r i c u l t u r a l E x t e n s i o n S e r v i c e a n d a p p r o v e d f o r p u b l i c a t L3.13 jredict the costs id developed by
PRODUCT NAHE DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAHE NUHBER CASH FIXED LANDLORD
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993. B-124K02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD.
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More informationProjections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.
Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD
More informationC3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More informationTexas Panhandle & South Plains Districts
k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell
More informationProjections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after April 20, NUMBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after April 0, 1990. B-14K05) DATE STAGE PRODUTION 05/05/90 FIRST UTTING 06//90 SEOND UTTING 07/15/90 THIRD UTTING 09/0/90 FOURTH
More informationPRODUCT NAHE NUMBER HEIGHT NUMBER UNITS
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r A p r i l 0, 1 9 9 0. B-14K0) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTIO TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationC O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationPROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More information30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationC4.46 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L A B O R L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E (
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationPrice Unit Weight Cash per of per Flow
ROP PRODUTS REPORT pril 5, 1986 rop Product Name ORN OTTON LINT OTTONSEED DEFIIENY PMT. ORN DEFIIENY PMT. OTTON DEFIIENY PMT. SORGHUM FLX GRZING HY HY OSTL HY SORGHUM KLEINGRSS SEED PENUTS PIK DIVERSION
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationUnit Measure Row : = = = = = = ======= ==== 3 acre bale ton acre ton 42
Auto or Truck Resources D e s c r i p t i o n A u t o o r o r TTr r u c k Pirst ame H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationOTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR HIRED LABOR LIVESTOCK LABOR OPERATOR LABOR A B A
LABOR RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTIO FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE COST OR VALUE TOTAL HAGE BEEFITS LABOR TYPE ($/HR) (A,B) OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR HIRED LABOR LIVESTOCK LABOR OPERATOR LABOR
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More informationCOTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationF E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationPROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.
24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241
More information2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,527 pigs sold from 18 shelters Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
More informationU.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More informationEM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More informationImpact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
More informationEM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County
EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing
More informationEconomics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
More informationThe Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
More informationBUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
More information2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst
2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst Budgeting Assumptions Everyone's situation is different so no budget is accurate for
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationTEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationEAST TEXAS DISTRICT 9
TEXAS DISTRIT 9 Texas Agricultural Extension Service The Texas A&M University System B-141(09) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Southeast Texas District Projected for 1994 Dr. Arthur R. Gerlow, District 9
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More information1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
More informationTEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
More informationUNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE
48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationHARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
More informationFUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,
More informationENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
More informationRICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER
C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment
More informationC OPERATING INPUT RESOURCES April 20, 1990
OPERATIG IPUT RESOURCES April 20, 1990 Operating :[nput Price Unit Cash per of Flow Unit Measure Row ================ ======== ======== ======= == = = 32-0-0.63 gal. 45 4-29-2 1.10 gal. 45 ALLOTMET LEASE.20
More informationRICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationRICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationEconomic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms
& RESEARCH Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms Working Paper 12-2 July 2012 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012
More informationCorn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets
Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Contents Acknowledgments... 2 2017 Budget Committees... 2 2017 Planning Budgets... 3 Budgets for Agricultural Enterprises... 3 Methods and Procedures...
More informationAgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016
AgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016 AGDEX 821-62 December, 2017 ECONOMICS OF BEEKEEPING IN ALBERTA 2016 Emmanuel Anum Laate Economics Section Economics and Competitiveness Branch Alberta
More informationThe Talking Farm Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016
Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016 Table of Contents: Treasurer's Report 1 Page: Financial Statements: Statements of Financial Position 2 Statements of Activities
More informationCOTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2007-01 December 2007 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationT I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS
OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE
More informationCOTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationWorld Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts. Lockup Briefing April 10, 2013
World Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts Lockup Briefing World Wheat Production Country or Region estimate 2012/13 previous month Million Tons Percent Percent
More informationSOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationLINEAR PROGRAMMING BASIC CONCEPTS AND FORMULA
CHAPTER 11 LINEAR PROGRAMMING Basic Concepts 1. Linear Programming BASIC CONCEPTS AND FORMULA Linear programming is a mathematical technique for determining the optimal allocation of re- sources nd achieving
More informationPEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More information