D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE
|
|
- Lynette Tucker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE ITEM WEIGHT JNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT 3UANTITY VALUE OR COST h k ' C S S R E C E I P T S M I L K 1, 0 0 C U T. B U L L C A L V E S I. 0 0 n E A O B R E E D I N G H E I F c P S H E A D C U L L C O W S C k i T. R E P L A C E M E N 1 C O f c S 1, 0 0 H E A D EiULL 1,00 HEAC TOTAL *00 0* ~: 2 0,? CO 21*00. I em VARIABLE COSTS GR A 1N MIX nav SILAGE PASTURE VET MEDICINE SPEEDING SUPPLIES WGMT SFCORDS Ul 1LI TIES r.auling SAL T MLK REPLACER KISC EXPANSE MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE REP) ECU IPMENTiFuEL*LUBE*REP) LABCR, T3ACTCS MACHINERY LABOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST CN C^ER.CAF., TCTAL VARIABLE CCSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS C«* T 6.50 e6.:.q CWT TCN 14* C ALMS 8* HEAC 11,40 I.00 1 I.40 HEAD 10*00 1* HEAD I HEAO HEAD I CtoT ,25 LBS * LBS. 0*30 40* OCL *00 10,CO DCL DOL. 4,07 HRS ,50 I I. 25 HRS * DCL JUJ FIXED COSTS LAND CHARGE INT. GN LtVf. STOCK CAPITAL I NT» ON OTr.ES EQUIPMENT DEPR. CN C/1RV COW PU^Ch CEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP. CTHER FC, KAOi EQUIP, YrTAL FIXED COSTS TCTAL CCSTS ACRE DOL. DCL. DCL. DCL, DOL ,1 1 li * I 444,00 tiiet RETURNS COW DAIRY LBS. PRODUCTION PER COW, BARN IS DCUBt-E 6 HERRINGBGNE, rcfdlng OUTSIDE MILKING PARLCR, 25X REPLACEMENT, 3% DEATH LOSS CN COkS. P R E PA R E D B Y J A C K J E N K I N S, TA E X, D A L L A S. T E X A S P R C J E C T = D
2 La!<j- FWCOUCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIR.F PEGICN?»*-.MATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER CCw WITHOUT SILAGE J. '.'I M WErGMT E A C H UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT GUANTITY V A L U E O R COST G^C>L NCCtTIPTS M I I. :\ 1.00 CwT, 10* ,30 r. ULL CAi VES 1,00 HEAC 1 5.CO EJRFEONG HEIFERS 1.00 he AD cull cc*s CUT. 25* ,50 «FPLiCEMENT CCtoS 1.00 HEAD CUL L 1.00 HEAD C5 25+0ut r. r a! v. \ R J A l - L c ' C O S T S G R A. '. N M I X C * T, HA* ^ A o t u R c CWT, A L M S \ t : Y M - O l C l N F : H E A D [ ~f-f0_;ng HEAD S U P T - u i t S H E A O MGM"! RtCORDS: HEAD L T U. I T i e S H E A C HAUL IN v. CWT. - Ai.. "» LBS, M I L K K E P l A C E P l b s, M I.. C. E X P E N S E D C L, > A C H i N t R Y < F U E L. L L B E. R E P ) D C L «F O U I P N J E N T I F U E L. L U 9 F. R E P ) D C L. laticr, TRACER f. MACHINERY HRS, L A B O r fi L I V E S T O C K H R S. INTEREST ON OPERrCA?., DCL. T C T A L V A R I A B L E C C S T S I N C O ^ u ' A fi O v c V A R I A B L E C C S I S 6.50 r ; , y? * C 0 1 7,00 I : o o. o c 2* " * l.cc 10* *60 1 J EC ?1XEC CCSTS L A N ; " ) C H A R G E - A C R E I * - T. C N L I V E S T O C K C / P I T A L D C L. INT. CN OTHER EQUIPMENT DCL. DE:v?f GN DAIRY COW PURCH DCL. D5PR. LN OTHER ECU IF. DOL. OTncR >' C» MACH EQUIP, OCL. TCTAL FIXED COSTS OC il TOTAL CGSTS ?-»r" T RETURNS o * U A H v. * 3 S O 0 I. U S * P R O D U C T I t N P E R C O * B A R N I S D C l - C E 6 H E R R I N G 9 0 N E. : n G o o I M D E M I L K I N G P A «L C K i 2 5 X R E P L A C E M E N T, 3 % D E A T H L O S S C N C O W S. i R F : ;. t! Y J A C K J E N K I N S * T A E X, D A L L A S, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D
3 3CAT BUDGET TEXAS GRANDE PRAIRIE REGICN ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER A'UMAL UNIT (6 :»GES) I T-f:M WEIGHT UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT GUANTITY VALUE OR COST G*'CSS RECEIPTS A&JLT MOHAIR A I J MOHAIR '<. ID GOATS TOTAL -,/A^! AfiLE COSTS 1.00 LBS. I.00 LBS HEAD 35,00 HEAD 2*50 48,00 120*00 3* *00 1, *20 0*13 2* A N G E S U P P L E M E N T L E S. A L T M I N E R A L S L B S. S T M E D I C I N E D O L. Hr. ARI NC HEAC A L E C C 1 M M D O L, I S C E a P E N S E D C L. A C H I. N E P Y C F U E L. L U B E. R E P ) D C L. S u i P M c r ; T ( F U E L. L U 3 E. R E P ) D C L. AFiOR. TRACTOR MACHINERY HRS, AUCR. EQUIPMENT HRS, A F * C R. I I v ' E S T O C K H R S. NTER ST CN OPER.CAP., DCL, T O T A L V A R I A E L E C C S T S 3. I N C O M E A E O V E V A R I A B L E C G S T S CO CO 3* * * CC , C.6E 1, CO V84.. 2* FIXEC COSTS LAND RENT ACRE INT. ON LIVESTOCK CAPITAL DDL. INT. CN OTHER EQUIPMENT DOL. D E P R. C S B T L L I E S P U R C H D C L. O E R R * C N H O R S E D O L. DEPR. Cr^ OTHER EQUIP* DCL* OTHER FC. MACH ECUIP. DOL. TOTAL FIX50 COSTS * , 67 15,, f.. TOTAL CCSTS fc. NET RETJRNS "OX KID CROP, 1 BUCK PER 5C DOES, 7X DEATH LOSS.SPARED BY JACK JENKINS, TAEX, DALLAS, TEXAS X REPLACEMENT* PRCJECTED !li
4 St zep SUCC-ET TEXAS GRANDE PRAIRIE REGICN ESTIMATED CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER ANIMAL UNIT ( 5 EWE3J I Tf M W IGHT UNIT PRICE CR CCST/UN IT QUANTIFY VALUE Qrt CCST '-RCi? RECEIPTS WOOL J. AMPS t«r b TOTAL I.00 7C.00 ICO.00 LES, LBS. LBS , I C.S VARI jtl-\..e COSTS S a < > f -» C - M E N T, 2 C X L E S, S A L 1 C M I N E R A L S L B S. w E l M E D I C I N E D C L. ^HEARING DGL. S A L E C C M M D C L. M I S i. E X P E N S E D O L. MAO'INERY/FuEL.LUBt *REPI DCL. bq-j ifmentc FUEL,LUBc.REPJ DOL. LABOR, TRACTCP MACHINERY HRS. LABuP, EQUIPMENT HRS. l. A B :.. R, L I V E S T O C K H R S. intrrest ON OPER.CAP., DCL. TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS INCOME AeOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIX5L. CGSTS LAND RENT ACRE INT, ON LIVESTOCK CAPITAL DCL. INT. ON OTHcP EQUIPMENT DOL. CGPF.. ON RAMS PURCHASED DCL. D E P R. C N H O i ^ S E D C L. D E P R - C N O T. - E R E Q U I P. D C L. CThER FC. MACH ECUIP. DCL. TCJAL FIX5C COSTS TOTAL CCSTS OC is * l.co 3, *00 5.0C CO * CO 5.00 I <r ,50 0*68 1.7C CO * ,00 10.CO ,10 223* C * * jl NET FFTURNS % LAME CROP, i RAM PER 33 EttES. 3% DEATH LOSS, FINEwCCL EWES SSERELT LAMFS* 2C% REPLACEMENT* PA R E D LY J A C K J E N K I N S * TA E X, C A L L A S, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D
5 F E E D E R P I G F R C D U C T I L N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R 5 C» I TEM GFP._S RECEIPTS WEIGHT UNIT P R I C E O R C U A N T I T V V A L u E O S CCST/UN IT CCST r O T AL 50*00 L5S C VA^IASLE COSTS SCH FEED GEST. SC* FEED LACT. PIC STARTER HOAR FEED *'ET MEDICINE MARKETING MISC EXPENSE MAC HINERY(FUEL*LUBE.REP) ECUIPMENTi FUEL,LUBE*REF> I. A30R, TRACTOR MACHINERY LA3GR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIV5STCCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAF. TOTAL VARIA2LE CCSTS 3. I N C O M E A B O V E VA P I A B L E C C S T S i. FiXcL CCSTS L A;.iO RENT I N T. C N L I V E S T O C K C A P I TA L INT. CN OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR, CN SOW PURCHASED DEPP.* CN ficar PURCHASED DEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP. OTHER rc. MACH ECUIP. TOTAL FIXEC COSTS C T C. T.» L C O S T S CtaT CWT CWT. 1C30 8* CWT * HEAD C.50 16*00 8.0C HEAD *00 16.OC HEAD * DOL, DOL HRS * HRS * HRS * DCL *06 14*2 X ACRE DOL * DCL DCL DCL DCL DOL e5 '.. NE *' R 7LRNS " SOW UNIT. FALL-SPRING FARROWING. 56 DAY WEANING, 16 PICS AEANEO PER SOW PER YEAR. - R E PA P E D E Y J A C K J E N K I N S * TA E X. D A L L A S. T E X A S PROJECTED
6 A R. V O w t o H I N i y n H O G P R C C L C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E 3 L G I C N Z 5 "i I iv, m T y i> CCS IS AND RETURNS PER SCte WE CGHT UNIT P R I C E C R COST/UNIT CUANTITY V A L U E 0 4 CCST RECEIPTS -xtj-:?? hoc T l T AL C 0 HEAD C.40 i 6.CO <toc OC :l / f. L e c c s r s JOW f -."EC GE57. C U * 1= t fc D L A C T.- I G IT ARTE R b O A f - F 6 E 0 F i-ni I J HI KG RATICN VcT MtUICJNc fa ARK r. T ING MISt E*PEN5t M A C I -. I N E R Y < F J L * L U B E. R E P ) LOUIPMENKFUEL.LUBE.REP) LAaC^, TRACTCR MACHINERY LA3GR. EQUIPMENT LA6C;. LIVE5TCCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP., T C T A L V A R I A E L E C C S T S i K e C V P A B O V E V A R I A B L E C O S T S FIXEC CCSTS LAN!.' WENT I N T. C N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L INT. CN CTHER EQUIPMENT 2EPZ* CN SOW PURCHASEC DcPF* C1^ BCAR PURCHASED DEPC CN OTHER ECUIP. O T h F f f : " C, M A C i - E Q U I P. TCTAL F I XED COSTS T C 7 a L COSTS C*.T CkT CUT CO 629 -jc CWT CWT. 7,61 1C HEAD HEAD I HE*C CC DCL DCL. 5.5A HRS C J HRS. 2*50 2* HRS *00 55.CC DOL, 0* J_t22r 1326*12; ACRE * DCL * DCL DCL C DOL DCL DCL, Nc T P 1 URNS - 7 7, 7 icw JNil. FALL-SPRING FARROWING. 56 CAY WEANING, I C S k E a N E D P E P S O W P E R Y E A R F E E D C C N V E R S I C N. A R F D P V J A C K J E N K I N S. T A E X, D A L L A S. T E X A S PROJECTED
7 FINISHING HOGS TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGICN ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PEP HOG! TEM WEIGHT UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY V A L U c O R CC3T G? < 0 - S R E C E I P T S SLAUGHTER HGC5 TOTAL LES. 0, 4 0 I. 0 0 SL l22_ W.?.'I ABLE COSTS FINISHING RATION CWT. ^ S. d D E R " I G S L B S. vf7 mecicine head marketing heac M i S C E X P E N S E H E A D O f A T H L O S S - 2 X H E A C MACHINERY(FUEL.LU6E.REPI DOL. EOUIPMENTIFUEL.LUBE.REPi DOL. LA60R, TRACTOR S MACHINERY HRS* LABCP.9 EQUIPMENT HRS* L A & O R. L I V E S T C C K H R S, INTEREST ON OPER.CAP., DOL. TOTAL VARIAELE CCSTS * ,50 1* , , ,72 I COO ,50 0*00 COl 2, »3e 0*10 36* $ 3.. I N C O M E A E 3 V E VA R I A B L E C C S T S FIXcC COSTS LAND RENT ACRE 40*00 0* INT. ON OTHER EOUIPMENT DCL. 0*10 0* r\.pr. CN OTHER EQUIP. DCL OTHER FC. MACH EQUIP. DCL. TCTAL FIXEC COSTS iufia ';. TOTAL CCSTS *:» "* *r r P! T.. -5 \. >. 1 * 0 H. -. C r '? : Y a? F E C P E R S i j f. C H, P O U N D S F E E O P * i H C U N O G A I N. i ". C r A T h L C S? = A i E C.? V J i C K j : K : n «, T a a. C A L L A i, T E X A S P R C J C T C I " / I
8 C LW - C A L F a 0 3 U C T I C N T E X A S G R A N C P f c A l H X J z R E C I C N c S T t ^ AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E P 1 C O * IMPROVED PASTURE HEM *:ilgl-it UNIT F.\CH P R I C E C R COST/UN I V QUANTITY VALUE OR COST i. w f ;. «l - s q f C E i P - S SLALGHTE- STEERS 53 COO L E S >'. A JGHTER HE I F tir A9C OO LES TCT^L C. 4& C.4*: /A1* I JBLF. COST S COASTAL PASTURE f. USTCM bal I KG :.a,_t G MINERALS SUPPLEMENT 2CX ^AR«*fc'T ING.\'_T MEDICINE - 'ISC EXPENSE r-j^chf.seryl FUEL! LUBE* REP) OU IPMENTIFI/EiAlUBE.REPI L.'.BCP. TRACTCR MACHINERY LABOR. EQUIPMENT t. ABOR, LIVESTOCK * NT RE ST 3N OPER.CAP,, T G T A L V A R I A E L E C C S T S I i v i C ' u - E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C O S T S AC3E * 6 f 48,33 HEAD d.8c 1* HEAC 3*00 1* LBS. 0* HEAD 5*10 l.oc.10 HEAD OC 5.00 HEAO 3, DOL* I2.7fc DCL HRS* 2* HRS. 2* HRS. 2*50 6* DCL * IXEO CCSTS LAS": CHARGE ACRE I N I * O N L l V E i T O C K C A P I T A L DCL* INT. OK' OTHER EQUIPMENT DOL. re*p. CN &EEF COW FUR DOL. OFPR. CN BEEF BJLL DCL. uep»'«, CK HCRSE DCL. fhprc. CN OTHER EQUIP. DCL. " i > H E A i F C - VA C - E Q U I P. DCl. TOVAL -IXEC -COSTS * * IS * J» "CO. AL COST 219*56 :.. M F - v - H c T u n» V _ CO* HERD, 2 2ULLS, 90 PERCENT CALF CROP 12-1/2 PERCENT REPLACEMENT,» p * : p 4 f i - 0 b y J A C K J E N K I N S., T A E X, D A L L A S. T E X A S P R O J E C T E D W
9 COW- CALF f- RODuCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGICN LiSTlMAlLC COSTS AND RETURNS PER CCW NATIVE RANGE WtlGHT t ACri UNIT P«I C E OR COST/UNIT QUANTI"Y VAL r, OK ROSS <«.. CEIPTS DAUGHTER STEERS S L A L G H T R H E i F R T C " A LfcS, LES, , *-* v'a4 1 AtJLE COSTS 'tang: IMPPUVEWEN HAY SAL T M I NEPAL S 3UP Pi r>'ent, 20% VS.T f" CICIN VARKETIMG MISC EXPENSE M AC rt I N r P Y ( F UE I. L'JtJ EvRE0) EQUIPMENT!FUEL.LUBE.REP) LA3CP, TRACTCfi MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT uabcs, LIVESTOCK I N T E R E S T O. - y O P E R. C A P., T O TA L VA r T l A B L E C C S T S INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE CCSTS HLAD bale he Ar> LES. HEAC HEAD DCL. DOL. DOL. HRS. HRS. HRS. DCL C CO A.CO I CO I *0C l.co 3. CC 16.7-* FIXEC CCSTS LAND CHARGC ACRE I N T - G N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L D C L, INT. GN OTH'E* EQUIPMENT DCL, DEPR. ON &ZEF COW PUR DCL. DEPR* CN BEEF BULL DCL. DEPfi. CN H C R S E D C L. DEPP* CN OTHER EOU IF DCL. OTHER FC* MACH EQUIP, DCL. TCTAL FIXED COSTS , * * CO * TOTAL CCSTS N E T R I i, R N S - 4 4, 6 0.? COW HERD* 4 BULLS. 84 PERCENT CALF CROP 12-1/2 PERCENT REPLACEMENT. P A R E D F Y J A C K J E N K I N S. T A E X * D A L L A S, T E X A S P R O J E C T E D
10 GOAT BUDGET TEXAS GRANDE PRAIRIE REGICN ESTIMATED COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ANIMAL UNIT (6 DOES) IDEM WEIGHT UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS ADULT MOHAIR KID MOHAIR KID GOATS DOES TOTAL 1.00 LBS* 1*00 LBS* 1.00 HEAD 85*00 HEAD 2*50 3*50 18*00 0* *20 25*20 1* ,01 VARIABLE COSTS RANGE SUPPLEMENT SALT MINERALS VET MEDICINE SHEARING SALE COMM MISC EXPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE.REP) EQUCPMENT(FUEL,LUBE.REPI LABOR. TRACTOR MACHINEPY LABOR. EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP,, TOTAL VARIAELE CCSTS 3, INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS LES, ,00 9.4S LBS, , DOL, 2, HEAC 1, DOL, 1,00 I.00 1,00 DOL, 1,00 6, DCL, 11,38 DCL, 0,44 HRS, 2,50 2,14 5,34 HRS, 2,50 0, HRS, 2,50 8,00 20,00 DOL. 0,10 26, ,51 FIXEC COSTS LAND RENT INT. ON LIVESTOCK CAPITAL INT, ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR, CK BILLIES PURCH DEPR. CK HORSE DEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP. OTHER FC, MACH ECUIP, TOTAL FIXEO COSTS TOTAL COSTS ACRE DOL, DOL, DCL, DOL, DCL, DOL, 4, ,10 10,00 40, ,05 122, , _ 3*82. t 92,44 163,94 6, NET RETURNS 5,07 40X KID GROP. I BUCK PER 5C DOES. 7* DEATH LOSS. 20* REPLACEMENT, P R E P A R E D B Y J A C K J E K I ^ N S. T A E X. D A L L A S, T E X A S P R C J E C T E D
11 S H E E P B U D G E T T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N O R E T U R N S P E R A N I M A L U N I T ( 5 E W E S ) ITEM EIGHT UNIT P R I C E O R CCST/UNIT QUANTITY VA L U E O R COST G R O S S R E C E I P T S WOOL LAMBS EWES TOTA^ 1.00 LBS* * C00 LBS* *00 100*00 LBS* 0*18 C.85 15* V A R I A E L E C O S T S SUPPLEMENT, 20% SALT MINERALS VET MEDICINE SHEARING: SALE CCMM MISC EXPENSE M A C H I N E R Y * F U E L. L U B E. R E P S EQUIPMENT! FUEL *LUBE*REP_ LABOR, TRACTCR MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LApOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP. T O TA L VA R I A B L E C C S T S I N C O M E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C O S T S FIXED COSTS LAND RENT I N T. O N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L INT* ON OTHER EQUIPMENT D E P R * O N R A M S P U R C H A S E D DEPP* CN HORSE DEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP. OTHER FC* MACH ECUIP. TCTAL FIXEC COSTS TOTAL CCSTS LES oOC LBS. 0o DCL. 3o75 looo 3*75 DGL* *00 5*00 OCL* 0*60 SoOO 3»00 DOL* o00 5o00 DCL DOL* 0*44 HRS* 2o50 2c 14 5*34 HRS. 2*50 0,68 1*70 HRS* 2*50 8o DCL. OolO 21 o oll ACRE 4*00 10* DCL* O.IO 223o DOL* Oo *50 12o25 DCL* 0*64 DCL* 0.67 DCL* 15o 17 DOLo 9*95 101*21 k o NET RETURNS 23*98 I C 0 % L A M B C R O P. 1 R A M P E R 3 3 E U E S o 3 % D E AT H L O S S. F I N E t f l C C L E t a E S C F C S S E R E D L A M B S * 2 0 & R E P L A C E M E N T * P R E P A R E D E Y J A C K J E N K I N S * T A E X, D A L L A S. T E X A S PROJECTED 1977«78
12 FEEDER PIG FRODUCTICN TEXAS GRANDE PRAIRIE REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER SOW ITEM WEIGHT UNIT PRICE OR CO ST/UN IT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS PIGS TOTAL LBS. 0*72 16*00 3X-ufijQ. 576*00 4* VARIABLE COSTS SOW FEED GEST* SOW FEED LACT. PIG STARTER BOAR FEED VET MEDICINE MARKETING MISC EXPENSE MACHINERYCFUEL*LUBE,REP) EQUIPMENT!FUEL*LUBE*REP) LABOR* TRACTOR MACHINERY LABOR* EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP*. TOTAL VARIAELE CCSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXEC COSTS LAND RENT INT. CN LIVESTOCK CAPITAL INT* ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR* CN SOW PURCHASED DEPR* ON BOAR PURCHASED DEPR* CN OTHER EQUIP* OTHER FC. MACH ECUIP. TOTAL FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS CWT* 8* *52 CWT. 8* *62 CWT* 10* *40 CWT* 8* *35 HEAO 0* CO 8.0C HEAD * HEAD * DOL* 33*54 DOL* 5.91 HRS* 2*50 6* HRS* 2*50 2*05 5*12 HRS* 2*50 14*00 35,00 OOL* 0*10 148*06 14*31-432,02 143,98 ACRE 40*00 0*25 10,00 DOL* 0*10 121*50 12,15 OCL. 0*10 204*80 20*48 DCL* DOL* 6.00 DCL* OOL* 1 3 * *87 80*85 6 NET RETURNS 15 SOW UNIT* FALL-SPRING FARROWING. 56 DAY WEANING. 1 6 P I G S L E A N E D P E R S O W P E R Y E A R. P R E P A R E D E Y J A C K J E N K I N S. T A E X * O A L L A S T E X A S PROJECTED
13 FA R R O W T O F I N I S H H O G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S O W ITEM WEIGHT UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY VA L U E O R CCST 1 G R O S S R E C E I P T S SLAUGHTER HOGS TCTAL 22CC0 HE*D 0* V A R I A E L E C O S T S SOW FEED GEST. SOW FEED LACT* PIG STARTER BOAR FEED FINISHING RATICN VET MEDICINE MARKETING MISG EXPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE.REP) EQU IPMENTC FUEL.LUBE REP) LAB03. TRACTCR MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP*. T O TA L VA R I A B L E C C S T S CWT* 8*25 5* CWT* CfcT. 10*30 8* CWT * CWT* 7*61 1C HEAD * HEAD * HE*D 2*00 16o0C DCL* DCL* 5.54 HRS* 2*50 6.3C HRS* 2*50 2* HRS* 2*50 22* DOL* 0*10 30* INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXEC CCSTS LAND RENT I N T. C N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L INT* ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR* CN SOW PURCHASEC D E P R * C K B C A R P U R C H A S E D DEPR. CN OTHER EQUIP* OTHER FC. MACH EQUIP. TCTAL FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS ACRE 40* DOL* 0*10 121* DCL* * DOL C DOL* 6*00 DCL DCL NET RETURNS SOW UNIT* FALL-SPRING FARROWING. 56 PAY WEANING, 1 6 P I G S W E A N E D P E R S O W P E R Y E A R. 3 * 5 F E E D C O N V E R S I C N * P R E P A R E D B Y J A C K J E K K I N S, T A E X, D A L L A S * T E X A S PROJECTED
14 FINISHING HOGS TEXAS GRANO PRAIRIE REGICN ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER HOG ITEM WEIGHT UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS SLAUGHTER HOGS TOTAL 240*00 LES *00 VARIABLE COSTS FINISHING RATION FEEDER PIGS VET MEDICINE MARKETING MISC EXPENSE DEATH LOSS-2% MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE,REP) EQUIPMENT(FUEL,LUBE,REP) LABOR, TRACTOR MACHINERY LABCR, EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP., TOTAL VARIAELE CCSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXEC COSTS LANO RENT INT, ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR, ON OTHER EQUIP, OTHER FC, MACH EQUIP. TCTAL FIXEC COSTS TOTAL CCSTS CWT. 8*25 6, LBS , HEAD , HEAC 1,00 1, HEAD 0,75 1, HEAC 0,72 1, DOL, 2.00 DOL, 0.00 HRS, 2,50 0, HRS, 2,50 0, HRS, 2,50 0, DOL, 0, ACRE 40,00 0, DOL. 0,10 0, DCL DGL NET PETURNS FED PER YEAR, 120 FED PER BUNCH, 3.50 POUNDS FEED PER PCUND GAIN, 2% DEATH LOSS. P R E PA R E D F Y J A C K J E f ^ K I N S. TA E X. C A L L A S, T E X A S P R C J E C T E C
15 TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION Assumed Prices Paid and Received by Farmers 1/ Item Unit Price Prices Paid (1979) Seed Cottonseed (Acid Delinted) Grain Sorghum Wheat Oats Sudangrass Corn Ryegrass Barley Kleingrass Fertilizer Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium Fuel and Lubricants Gasoline (Bulk Delivery-$.09 Tax Rfnd.) Diesel Labor Custom Rates Cotton Stripping and Hauling Combining Grain Sorghum ($5.00 Min.) Hauling Grain Sorghum Combining Wheat/Oats Hauling Wheat/Oats Combining Corn Hauling Corn Cut, Rake and Bale Hay Hauling Hay Applying Herbicide/Insecticide (Aerial) Cotton Ginning Fertilizer Spreader pis gal. gal. hour cwt. cwt. cwt. acre cwt. bu. bu. bale bale acre cwt. acre
16 Texas Grand Prairie Region Item Unit Price Interest on Operating Capital percent $. 1 0 Prices Received (1979) Cotton Lint Cottonseed Grain Sorghum Corn Wheat Oats Barley Sorghum Hay Coastal Hay Oat Hay Kleingrass Hay.50 ton cwt bu bu bu bu ton ton ton ton ~ > 1/ These price assumptions are not to be intrepreted as predictions or prospective prices.
17 - 3 - O s - O D J CD O -O S- 03 CU i - Q. S- ODHcr.NrvHroisMv.oiv-o^HCMCONroLf)HrsLnfo ocncx>r^ooto^^o^tor^t^oolo" 3-r>--.oooo'3-ojojco--0 cr> r^ co ro ^t- to oo in 4-> s- IO 75 O O o X <*ioroon'*^-co'd-,^ctico-_o<t(ohrhntnhihrnln i^rocdo'^rhn'-'cooj'hroiocouicmocmai'ctlnlnai a i- CD CD X a_ I D C O H M H O OO CO oo oj co oo oo o OJ OJ QJ IO i. =3 O s_ qj Cl QJ to T3 LO CD +-> «4- ro o E *r to 4-> i- IO Z3 LU O ooooooooooooooooooooooo O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L O L O O O l O l D ' t l D O O ^ O O O C O C O ' t ' t W M C M W C O N M n L n C O C O t O C O O O O J O O t - H i l i I O O O J < I i I i I CU Q- Q io o CJ 4-J c QJ _3 cr QJ to a ro QJ 4-> 4- ro O E r </) 4-> s- <o ro U 1 >- CD t 0 C 0 0 J «v t - O C 0 O O O C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 < - _ i O O O O O O D_ O td c ro 00 X UJ S- c x: u ro a QJ 4-> ro E i +J to QJ to ro sz CD U CJ i!_.!-- _3 CX Q- O O O O L O O O O O O O L O O O L O O O O O L O O O O o o o L o o o L n o L o o o o o o L o r ^ o o o o o o o u n i _ o 0 ( N i r ) H C O «t o r o c O ' N f T H c v j c O ( 0 ' * «t r - i N " * c T * r o L n c o o ^ c O l o o o o o o o c o c o OJ OO i l o o H H H C \ l f O < * f O H O ^ QJ O +J _r H W ' i - ^ O O W ' t i n C O O H C V K O t W l O O C M ^ - ^ O C O 4J -p 4-J 4_> +j... L_.U_.U_U_. u_ +-> 4-> j 4-> U_ LU U- co cn oo cn +-> 4-> u_.. u_. r^ H H H H U. U. +-> 4-> Q_ a.. a. _: +j ro cn t-h oo.. U. U _ o X III ou. OJ i i i-h i-h C O C D ) i - H 4-> 4-> 4-» r-i QJ 1 i-h i-h i-h U_ U_ CO CT) u. N LO o l o o r - ^ S - < I «1 i-h 1 r^-r~ OO O N ^ t C V J 1 _o _a oj qj i i LO VO <3- s- oo t 1 ««\oo E E i S - S - T D T D _ OO 1 1 s- QJ I < T-H i- QJ OJ i QJ QJ TD TD Cti Cti <=? 1 1 O J c -a O TD TD I I I Q J Q J «d " I O 1 C t i C t i J r - c > C C s- CQ CO S- s- «3- to CO O ro s_ S- S- S- ro ro ro ( _) i - S _ W S - S - Q J S- QJ s. ro CJ o O O O Q - r > h- J QJ QJ S- S_ QJ CL) TD aj as. i. QJ Q. ro e +J +j+j-p i i i c_ >>>>CU QJ 4-> 4-> TD.>> Q. QJ QJ 1! e: qj o CJ CJ CJ. to 4-> CJ CJ _ r o r o 4 - > 4 - > c c q j C O! - I 1 i- 4-> 4-> ro ro ro ro cj -r- t - to to ro t - s _ c / j t o r o r o s - i- S_ r i ro i 1 1 i_ s_ i~ s- _- : -3 1! S- Q - Q _ - t r : Q J O O S- _3 i 1 h- 1 D- o o O O C J 3 co to _i _i Q. a. (/) OO OO Q_T Qi 1 o
18
19 COASTAL 8ERMUDAGRASS ESTAB., DRYLAND, TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RE- INS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRCDUCTION TOTAL 0,0 VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST FERTI ) FERTILIZER APPLI CUSTOM SPRIGGING HERBICIDE MACHINERY TRACTORS LABOR-TRACTOR MACHINERY) INTEREST ON OP, CAP, SUBTOTAL. PRE-HARVEST HARVEST COSTS SU8T0TAL. HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLF COST 3, INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXEO COSTS MACHINERY TRACTORS LAND (NET RENT I TOTAL FIXED COSTS ACRE , ACRE ,00 4,00 ACRE 18, ,00 ACRE ACRE 4»59 1, ACRE ,00 6,70 HOUR ,57 DOL x19 66, $ $ -66,75 $ ACRE ,35 ACRE ACRE x00 $ TOTAL COSTS 6, NET RETURNS $ $ , 36 PRFPARED BY JAMES DENTON. TAEX, STEPHFNVILLE, TEXAS PROJECTED
20 COASTAL BERMUDAGRASS ESTAB,, DRYLAND, TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT ^ OPERATION ITEM NO, DATE FUEL,OIL. FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB,,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE PICKUP 10 JAN P I C K U P 1 0 F E B PICKUP 10 MAR SPRAYER HERBICID 6,40 APR ,38 1,68 PICKUP 10 APR PICKUP 10 AUG PICKUP 10 SEPT P I C K U P 1 0 N O V CHISEL 2.30 DEC , D I S K - T A N D E M 2, 3 4 D E C , p i c k u p i o d e c o. i o _ 0 x l A & i a a - 0 x x 2 4 TOTALS ,62 ^ PREPARED BY JAMFS DENTCN, TAEX, STEPHENVILLE. TEXAS PROJECTED 1 BUDGET IDENTIFICATTCN NUMBER ANNUAL CAPITAL MONTH 12
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More informationC O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More information30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationCOTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More informationHARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER
C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationTEXAS UPPER GULF COAST
r r TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Upper Gulf Coast Region are based on estimates of yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the
More informationUNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE
48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON
More informationPROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More informationENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationFUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More informationTEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationC3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More informationU.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M
More informationCOW-CALF PROOUCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE UNIT CWT. CWT. CWT.
1 * G R O S S R E C E I P T S COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST STEER CALVES HEIFER
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationT I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS
OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE
More informationTEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
More informationUNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT
42 PEANUTS. ORYLANO. OEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION PEANUTS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST PEANUT
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationImpact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationPROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.
c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc
More informationWorld Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts. Lockup Briefing April 10, 2013
World Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts Lockup Briefing World Wheat Production Country or Region estimate 2012/13 previous month Million Tons Percent Percent
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationPROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.
24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More informationPROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION^ THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED
More informationN o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,527 pigs sold from 18 shelters Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationrw^vr! h1 t\v?vc - hlrr TEXAS EL PASO ! L ' _ \.V
r - hlrr M H ^ _ ^ t t _ ^ ^ 1 _ V H T. h1 t\v?vc rw^vr! i ^ _.! L ' _ \.V L... r TEXAS EL PASO FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas El Paso Re gion are based on estimates of yields, production input
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationP a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9
P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9 J A R T a l s o c o n c l u d e d t h a t a l t h o u g h t h e i n t e n t o f N e l s o n s r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p l a n i s t o e n h a n c e c o n n e
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationA L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W
A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W Volume 52 Fall 2000 Number 1 B E F O R E D I S A B I L I T Y C I V I L R I G HT S : C I V I L W A R P E N S I O N S A N D TH E P O L I T I C S O F D I S A B I L I T Y I N
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationJ J ) " '- ACRE L SO DAYS
L I S T I N G O F. - \ A M E S E T A N D P R I C - V E C T O R REGION number: DATE: 131480 151 PASTURE MAINT. 152 SM. GR. PASTURE 153 PASTURE. TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL
More informationORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
More informationUNIT CWT TON LBS. ACRE APPL APPL APPL ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL. CWT. CWT. CWT. CWT. ACRE HOUR CWT*
36 WATERMELONS. NORTHEAST TEXAS REGION EST IMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE CF COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WATERMELONS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS
More information. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO
_- LISTING OF THE NAME SET AMI PRICE VECTOR REGION NUMBERS DATES 101480 151 PASTURE 152 SM. gr. PASTURE 133 PAST E«TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL 157 COASTAL RYEGRASS 158
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More informationT h e C S E T I P r o j e c t
T h e P r o j e c t T H E P R O J E C T T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S A r t i c l e P a g e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A s s es s m e n t o f t h e U F O / E T I P h e n o m e n o n M a y 1 9 9 1 1 E T
More informationEM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and
More information'f^ CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY
63 CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RECFIPTS FROM PRODUCTION 0.0
More information176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s
A g la di ou s F. L. 462 E l ec tr on ic D ev el op me nt A i ng er A.W.S. 371 C. A. M. A l ex an de r 236 A d mi ni st ra ti on R. H. (M rs ) A n dr ew s P. V. 326 O p ti ca l Tr an sm is si on A p ps
More informationMercer County Census Data (10% Sample)
Total Number of s Sample Number of s Owners Rents for Money Rents for Crop Percent of s Operated by Owner Percent of Tenancy Tilled Acres Cool Spring 143 14 10 1 3 71 29 653 Deer Creek 107 11 11 0 0 100
More informationEconomics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
More informationThe Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
More information2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
More information1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
More informationRICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationSwine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report Sept 17, 2015
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report Sept 17, 2015 Information current as of 12:00 pm MDT, 09/16/2015 This report provides
More informationPEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationProjections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.
Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD
More informationSwine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1
RFAA083 Swine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1 Walker, Randy 2 SELECTION OF GILTS Select gilts to be retained for the breeding herd at five to six months of age or when they weigh 200 lb or more.
More informationEM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County
EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing
More informationEconomic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms
& RESEARCH Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms Working Paper 12-2 July 2012 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012
More informationSwine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report June 30, 2016
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report June 30, 2016 Information current as of 12:00 pm MDT, 06/29/2016 This report provides
More informationRICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationDelaware County Census Data
Number of s Owners Percent of s Operated by Owner Percent of Tenancy Number of Renters Number of Managers No Return 94 90 96 4 4 0 0 42 35 83 17 6 1 1 62 56 90 10 6 0 4 19 11 58 42 4 4 0 137 114 83 17
More information