TYPE OF WORK IN THIS REPORT EXTENT OF WORK (IN METRIC UNITS) APPORTIONED (incl. support) GEOLOGICAL (scale, area) Photo interpretation

Transcription

1

2 TYPE OF WORK IN THIS REPORT EXTENT OF WORK (IN METRIC UNITS) ON WHICH CLAIMS PROJECT COSTS APPORTIONED (incl. support) GEOLOGICAL (scale, area) Ground, mapping 1:10000, 570ha , , Photo interpretation GEOPHYSICAL (line-kilometres) Ground Magnetic Electromagnetic Induced Polarization Radiometric Seismic Other Airborne GEOCHEMICAL (number of samples analysed for...) Soil Silt Rock 9 samples , Other DRILLING (total metres; number of holes, size) Core Non-core RELATED TECHNICAL Sampling/assaying Petrographic Mineralographic Metallurgic PROSPECTING (scale, area) PREPARATORY / PHYSICAL Line/grid (kilometres) Topographic/Photogrammetric (scale, area) Legal surveys (scale, area) Road, local access (kilometres)/trail Trench (metres) Underground dev. (metres) Other TOTAL COST:

3 FOGHORN CREEK PROPERTY VAVENBY GEOLOGICAL MAPPING AND INTERPRETATION EASTERN PART Mineral Tenures , , , , , , , , NTS Map 82M5W Kamloops Mining Division Lat ' 6" N, Long ' 21" W Event Number Owner and Operator M.G. Jones, G.A. Jones, D.G. Bailey Report By David G. Bailey, Ph.D., P.Geo. BAILEY GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS (CANADA) Ltd. 604 Westview Place North Vancouver B.C., Canada V7N 3X6 January 15, 2014 Amended September 25, 2014

4 CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION General Statement Location, Access, Physiography and Climate Mineral Tenures Eploration History Current Programme 6 3. GEOLOGY Regional Geology Eastern Foghorn Property Geology - Lithology Structural Geology and Metamorphism Mineralization and Hydrothermal Alteration DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS EXPENDITURE STATEMENT REFERENCES CERTIFICATE 16 Page TABLE 1. Foghorn Property Mineral Tenures 4 FIGURES 1. Location 3 2. Mineral Tenement Plan 5 3. Regional Geology 8 4. Geology: East Foghorn Creek Property Rear Pocket 1. Map Stations 2. Geochemical Analyses APPENDICES

5 1. SUMMARY The Foghorn property, located within NTS Map 82M5/W comprises nine mineral tenures covering an area of 1, hectares located about seven kilometres south of Birch Island on the North Thompson River, east of the town of Clearwater which, in turn, lies about 120 km north of the regional centre of Kamloops. The property is within an upland area which at lower elevations is covered by dense fir and cedar forest. Subalpine vegetation dominates above about 1,800 metres above sea level. The area has a maimum relief of about 650 metres from Foghorn Mountain, the highest point at 2,012 m ASL, to Foghorn Creek which is at about 1,350 m ASL. The area is snow covered from late October - November to late June - July. Eploration of the area began in the early 1900's and lead to the discovery of lead-zinc-silver veins to the west and south of Foghorn Mountain and the copper-lead-zinc stratiform volcanogenic deposit of Lydia located within Foghorn Creek valley. By 1918 about 300m of drifting and crosscutting on two levels had been undertaken at Lydia. Apart from a property-wide aeromagnetic survey in 1979, modern eploration of the property has been essentially targeting the Lydia area and the base metal - silver veins in the Foghorn Mountain area in the western part of the property. Some drilling has also been carried out in the northeastern part of the property where disseminated to semimassive pyrite mineralization has been eposed by trenching. The Foghorn property is underlain by rocks of the Paleozoic Eagle Bay Assemblage and, in the western part, the Fennell Formation of Paleozoic - Mesozoic age. Most of the property covers chlorite schist, quartz - chlorite schist, sericite schist and quartz - sericite schist of the Eagle Bay Assemblage, interpreted as representing a bimodal volcanic suite deposited in a Paleozoic arc or back arc setting. The Fennell Formation, on the other hand is composed of mainly mafic volcanic rocks that are thought to represent seafloor basalt deposited in a back arc basin that formed along the eastern margin of Quesnellia. Silver - bearing veins of the Foghorn Mountain area are hosted by rocks of the Fennell Formation whereas massive to disseminated stratiform sulphide mineralization occurs within metavolcanic rocks of the Eagle Bay Assemblage. The geology of area between the Lydia sulphide deposit and sulphide mineralization in the northeastern part of the Foghorn property is poorly understood as no detailed geological mapping had been undertaken over this area. Because of the possibility that sulphide mineralization in the northeast may occur within the same stratigraphic horizon as Lydia to the southwest with the implication that additional sulphide zones may occur in between the two occurrences, this area was mapped at 1:10,000 scale in an attempt to test this concept. 1

6 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 General Statement In October 2013 geological mapping at a scale of 1:10,000 was undertaken over mineral tenures , and , the eastern part of the Foghorn property area (Figure 2). This work was carried out to test the possibility that sulphide mineralization on mineral tenure , drill tested by Esso Minerals Ltd. in 1984, occurs at the same stratigraphic position as the stratiform volcanogenic mineralization of the Lydia showing located about 1.5 km to the southwest of where Esso drilled. Because volcanogenic sulphide deposits of Lydia - type rarely occur in isolation, it was thought that there may be a possibility of additional deposits of this nature occurring along strike from Lydia in a poorly eposed area etending to the northeast where no previous mapping had been carried out other than small scale regional mapping by the BC Geological Survey (Schiarizza, 1986). 2.2 Location, Access, Physiography and Climate The property is located to the east and south of the North Thompson River in south central British Columbia (Figure 1) at an elevation of between about 1,300 and 2,000 metres above sea level. The nearest major centre is the city of Kamloops about 120 km to the south although food, fuel and accommodation is available in the towns of Clearwater to the southwest of the property and Vavenby to the north. The main access road to the property is via the Jones Creek Forest Service road from the village of Birch Island on the North Thompson River. The property covers mainly an upland area with a gentle topography ecept in deeply incised creek valleys. Vegetation is mainly coniferous (fir and cedar) forest which, in places, has been partially logged, and which, at higher elevations is interspersed with subalpine grassland. Snow free months are from Late May to Late October which limits geological mapping, prospecting and geophysical surveying to this period. However, provided that the Jones Creek road is open (which depends on winter logging activities) geophysical surveying and drilling may be conducted year round. 2.3 Mineral Tenures The Foghorn property comprises nine contiguous mineral tenements covering 1, hectares (18.09 km 2 ) (Figure 2). Tenements are listed in Table Eploration History Eploration of the Foghorn property began in the early 1900's resulting in the discovery of the Foghorn silver-lead-zinc-copper veins adjacent to Foghorn Mountain (Minfile No 82M- 29). In 1915 a 60 metre adit was driven along with12 metre vertical shaft on these from which 2

7 0 50 KILOMETRES 100 Mile House Clearwater Birch Island FOGHORN PROPERTY Birch Island Cache Creek 97 FOGHORN PROPERTY BOUNDARY FOGHORN PEAK 5 Kamloops GRANITE PEAK Foghorn Creek North Thompson River Southern Yellowhead Highway Lute Creek 5 Jones Creek Jones Creek Road Dunn Peak Protected Area KILOMETRES FOGHORN PROPERTY LOCATION AND ACCESS Figure

8 Table 1 Foghorn Property Mineral Tenures Tenure No. Claim Name Area (ha) Good to Date Foggy Dec CW Dec. 12, Birch Dec Foghorn Dec Lydia Dec Keystone Dec F Dec Dec. 7, Dec Total 1, a representative sample was reported to contain trace gold, 16 oz/ton silver, 17.7% lead, 6.6% copper and 16.5% zinc (Ref.). Other vein-type base metal showings with silver were discovered to the north of the original Foghorn occurrence, such as the Chidgrin showing, about 0.5 km to the north of Foghorn. Also in the early 1900's, the Lydia copper-lead-zinc deposit was discovered, a stratiform volcanogenic deposit located to the east of the Foghorn workings (Figure 3). By 1918 about 300m of drifting and crosscutting had been completed on two levels. In 1968 Royal Canadian Ventures Ltd. carried out geological, magnetic, electromagnetic and soil geochemical surveys over the Lydia area (Vollo, 1968a, 1968b, 1969). In 1970 Imperial Oil reportedly (in Dawson, 1979) conducted over 300m of surface and 475m of underground diamond drilling on the Lydia showings, followed, in 1972 by Noranda Eploration Company Ltd. who carried out geological mapping and magnetic and soil geochemical surveys (Heim, et al., 1972) and 700m of diamond drilling in five holes. During the period Craigmont Mines Ltd. drilled 18 holes to the west of Foghorn Mountain, apparently targeting electromagnetic anomalies identified during a Dighem II airborne electromagnetic survey (Fraser and Dvorak, 1979). While most of these drill holes did not intersect significant mineralization, one hole intersected 29.5 g/t silver over 10.5m (Vollo, 1979, 1980, 1981). 4

9 FOGHORN MOUNTAIN GRANITE MOUNTAIN Foghorn Creek FOGHORN PROPERTY TENEMENT PLAN Grid: UTM NAD 83, Zone METRES Figure

10 In 1982 Esso Resources Canada Limited began an eploration programme consisting of soil sampling, geological mapping and electromagnetic surveying (Everett and Cooper, 1983) followed by drilling three diamond holes on the Foggy claim (Marr and Everett, 1984) (current tenure ) This drilling, while encountering anomalous lead, zinc and silver in massive to semi-massive pyrite, did not intersect ore grade material. Gemstar Resources Ltd. claimed the Foggy area in 1990 and recognized a siliceous ehalite unit to the west of Esso s work (Shearer and Butler, 1990). However, holes drilled into the ehalite unit failed to intersect significant mineralization although anomalous silver and gold values were encountered. 2.5 Current Program Although small parts of the eastern part of the Foghorn property had been mapped (Hein et al., 1972; Marr and Everett, 1984; Shearer and Butler, 1990), a large area had not been mapped apart from BCGS s regional work (Schiarizza, 1986). In 2013 the eastern part of the Foghorn property was mapped at 1:10,000 scale in an attempt to determine whether the geology east of Foghorn Creek could be related to that to the west of the creek. Principally, mapping was carried out to determine whether the stratigraphic horizon that hosts the sulphide occurrences in the easternmost part of the property (on Tenure ) be the eastern etension of the stratigraphic sequence that hosts the Lydia massive sulphide occurrence. Mapping control was by GPS using a Garmin GPSmap 60CS instrument into which NTS Map 82M had been downloaded. A station location accuracy of 3-6 metres was achieved throughout the mapping program. Location data were downloaded from the GPS instrument into an Ecel data file and plotted as XY coordinates on a plan at a scale of 1:10,000 generated by Golden Software s Surfer. This was then overlaid on a topographic base map at the same scale and the geology interpreted from structural and lithological data. Location data are listed in Appendi 1. Representative samples of sulphide-bearing rock were taken during mapping for chemical analysis, results of which are given in Appendi 2. During mapping it was found that parts of the Foghorn Creek area could not be mapped safely without rock climbing equipment and, thus, are still not adequately mapped. Lithologies could be determined from debris at the foot of the bluffs but structural data could not be obtained. 6

11 3. GEOLOGY 3.1 Regional Geology The Foghorn property area is underlain by two main groups of rocks, the Devonian to Permian Fennell Formation, consisting of oceanic basalt and associated sedimentary rocks and the Lower Cambrian to Mississippian Eagle Bay Assemblage that is composed of sedimentary and volcanic rocks deposited in an oceanic or back-arc setting. The Fennell Formation, part of the Upper Paleozoic Slide Mountain Group, has been thrust over the Eagle Bay Assemblage, probably during the lowermost Jurassic. The southern part of the area, to the south of the Foghorn property, is underlain by the Baldy Batholith, a Cretaceous intrusion largely of granodiorite composition. A generalized map of the geology of the area (after Schiarizza, 1986) in which the Foghorn property occurs is shown in Figure 3. Lithologies of the Eagle Bay Assemblage are dominated by sericite and chlorite schist, interpreted to be a metamorphosed bimodal volcanic assemblage of basalt or andesite and rhyolite of arc or back arc provenance. The Fennell Formation, on the other hand, is dominated by marine basalt of oceanic provenance, part of the Slide Mountain Group of Upper Paleozoic - Mesozoic age which formed between the Quesnel volcanic arc to the west and the North American continent to the east. Rocks of the Eagle Bay Assemblage have been metamorphosed to greenschist facies of regional metamorphism ecept in the southeastern part of the Foghorn property and to the east where gneissic tetures developed in rocks of mainly dioritic and granodioritic composition and which are possibly of Devonian age (Schiarizza, 1986). 3.2 Eastern Foghorn Property Geology - Lithology The eastern part of the Foghorn property is underlain by orthogneiss and metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Eagle Bay Assemblage. Orthogneiss (Unit 1 - see Figure 4) underlies the southeastern part of the property and appears to be the oldest unit within the property area. This unit has been radiometrically dated as Devonian age (Goutier, 1986). Although dominantly of granodioritic composition, more mafic phases are not uncommon. Unit 2 comprises chorite schist, a unit that hosts the major metal occurrences within the eastern part of the property, that of the Lydia massive sulphide occurrences and, in the eastermost part of the property, the Birch showings of pyrite with minor sphalerite and galena. While characterized by its significant chlorite content and only small amounts of sericite or none, its quartz content is highly variable. In general the eastern part of the unit, that to the east of Foghorn Creek, has a significantly greater quartz content than that to the west of Foghorn Creek. In addition, the eastern part of Unit 2 hosts significant amounts of pyrite along with minor to trace amounts of other sulphides. 7

12 Raft Batholith CLEARWATER Quesnel Volcanosedimentary Assemblage Slide Mountain Group - including Fennel Formation Eagle Bay Assemblage Foghorn Creek Property Baldy Batholith Shuswap Metamorphic Comple Adams Lake 0 51 Eagle Bay Assemblage Shuswap Lake 0 51 SICAMOUS KAMLOOPS KILOMETRES 1190 Figure 3. Location of the Foghorn Creek property in its regional geological setting. Only pre-tertiary assemblages are shown. 8

13 Sericite - quartz schist is the dominant lithology of Unit 3 but relative amounts of quartz and sericite are highly variable throughout the unit. This unit occurs in the southeast part of the property and to the west of Foghorn Creek. Unit 4 which has been recognized only to the east of Foghorn Creek is differentiated from Unit 3 in that it has narrow interbeds of chorite schist whereas chorite schist has not been recognized within Unit 3. Commonly adjacent to chlorite schist - sericite schist contacts the rocks of Unit 4 contain disseminated pyrite in amounts up to about 10% and, in places, narrow pyritic lamellae conformable to the foliation of the host rocks. Pyrite is absent from the quartz - sericite schist unit to the west of Foghorn Creek. Unit 5 also has not been recognized to the west of the Foghorn Creek. It comprises chorite - carbonate ± sericite ± quartz schist. Because of generally poor eposure, subunits based on relative proportions of its constituent minerals could not be defined and, thus, despite a wide variation in the unit s individual components, all schist outcrops that contained recognizable carbonate were included within Unit 4. Because carbonate-bearing rocks were found only in a single area (see Figure 4), it is thought justified to group these rocks as a separate unit. Shearer and Butler (1990) also recognized these carbonate - bearing schists as a single unit and considered that the carbonate was ankerite. However, because the carbonate occurs in all rocks of the unit, both chlorite - rich and chlorite - poor and, indeed, is used to define the unit, it is thought that the carbonate is more likely to be siderite rather than ankerite given the varying magnesium contents of the rocks Structural Geology and Metamorphism Almost all rocks within the eastern part of the Foghorn property have a well defined structural fabric, generally epressed as a schistosity ecept within gneissic rocks in the southern part of the property where the fabric is epressed as a compositional banding. However, often a foliation has also developed in these rocks that parallels the gneissosity. All rocks of units 2,3 and 4 have a schistosity that strikes to the northeast and dips moderately to the northwest. Minor folds were not recognized during mapping ecept at one locality (Station 28) where the fold aes were parallel to foliation. At this locality foliation dip at 52 0 to the northwest while fold aial planes dip at a shallower angle at 36 0 to the northwest. Possibly these minor folds represent a later, nonpenetrative, deformation event. Because of the lack of observations to the contrary, it is thought that the fabric epressed in the schists underlying the property was formed to the last major deformation event of regional aspect. The distribution of outcrops of a sericite schist unit that appears to be surrounded by carbonate - bearing rocks of Unit 4 (Figure 4) suggests that these rocks have been folded isoclinally about a northeasterly - striking ais. If the strata young to the northwest away from Unit 1 which could be interpreted as basement to the stratigraphic succession, then this fold could be antiformal 9

14 Unit 1 comprises a separate structural domain to the Eagle Bay Assemblage schists. Both gneissosity and foliation in rocks of Unit 1 strike to the northwest, normal to the foliation attitudes of the schist units. Because schists that outcrop to the west of Foghorn Creek cannot be traced across the creek to its east side, a northerly - trending fault that, essentially, is located within the Foghorn Creek valley, is interpreted to divide the two parts (Figure 4). Regional metamorphic grade of the gneiss of Unit 1 is probably not higher than that of amphibolite facies in that no minerals that indicate a higher metamorphic grade were recognized in the few outcrops eamined. The schist assemblage is of greenschist facies of regional metamorphism. While the stable assemblage of quartz - sericite - chlorite - carbonate characterizes this assemblage, in many paces, especially in the those rocks to the east of Foghorn Creek, where significant hydrothermal alteration appears to have occurred in places, a predeformation hydrothermal overprint has altered the primary mineralogy. 3.4 Mineralization and Hydrothermal Alteration Within the area mapped there are two zones of significant sulphide mineralization, that of the Lydia showing to the west of Foghorn Creek, a volcanogenic massive sulphide occurrence, and the Birch showings the east of Foghorn Creek, a zone of semimassive to disseminated pyrite with accessory sphalerite, galena and chalcopyrite. Minor amounts of pyrite mineralization also occur in the northern part of the property seemingly associated with the contact zones of thin chlorite schist bands within sericite schist (Unit 3). None of the rock samples taken from these zones were significantly anomalous in base metals or silver (Appendi 2). Hydrothermal alteration associated with the Lydia occurrence could not be eamined owing to now dense forest cover and lack of outcrop. A sample of dump material (Sample No Appendi 2), confirmed its anomalous copper and silver content but no in situ samples could be collected of either ore material of hydrothermally - altered wall rock. During mapping reported herein, significant premetamorphic hydrothermal alteration that could be associated with mineralization, dominantly pyritic, was not identified in hand specimen. Shearer and Butler (1990) described a unit of quartz and carbonate (Station 41, Appendi 1) that appears to at, or near the northern contact of Unit 4 with Unit 3 (Figure 4). This they ascribed as an ehalite that is anomalous in gold and silver. During the current program this could not verified because of lack of eposure. Small quartz-rich segregations are not uncommon within sericite schist units but whether these represent quartz veins transposed into the plane of foliation during deformation or hydrothermal segregations is not known. 10

15 4. DISCUSSION The interpretation of the geology described in this report suggests that the map area is underlain by two disparate assemblages separated by an inferred fault that follows, more or less, the Foghorn Creek valley. The geology to the east side of the inferred fault does not have a counterpart to west, either in stratigraphic succession or in its type of mineralization. Disseminated pyrite is widespread within chlorite schist and at contacts with sericite schist and chlorite schist in the eastern part of the map area. No such relationship appears to eist to the west of Foghorn Creek although the Foghorn Creek is densely forested and apparently devoid of outcrop other than bluffs that could not be accessed during the work discussed herein. The Lydia volcanogenic massive sulphide occurrence to the west of Foghorn Creek is quite different in both mineralogy and habit to sulphide occurrences to the east of Foghorn Creek which ehibit some similarity in both habit of mineralization and stratigraphy to the sulphide deposit of Harper Creek two kilometers to the east, a deposit of over 800,000 tonnes in the measured and indicated reserve categories of over 0.38% copper (at a cutoff grade of 0.2% copper) as stated by Yellowhead Mining Inc. ( ). Since mineralization and inferred associated wallrock alteration are premetamorphic, it is difficult without more detailed study to ascribe an origin for the dominantly pyritic mineralization in chlorite and sericite schist east of Foghorn Creek. Yellowhead Mining Inc. considers Harper Creek to be of volcanogenic origin although Belik (1973) considered the mineralization be metamorphogenic. Sulphide mineralization in Eagle Bay Assemblage rocks in the northeastern part of the Foghorn Creek property appears to occur more or less at the same stratigraphic level as mineralization at Harper Creek and, thus, it is likely that similar processes operated to deposit sulphide mineralization in both areas. The Lydia deposit is clearly of volcanogenic origin and is an eample of a stratabound massive sulphide deposit similar to others elsewhere within the Eagle Bay Assemblage. It occurs within chlorite schist, interpreted to be metabasalt, at or near the contact with quartz - sericite schist, interpreted as metarhyolite or metadacite. The habit of mineralization at Lydia, that of massive to semimassive sulphides, is quite different from the largely disseminated sulphide mineralisation to the east of Foghorn Creek. 11

16 5. CONCLUSIONS The main conclusion from mapping the eastern part of the Foghorn Creek property is that the stratigraphy to the east of Foghorn Creek does not etend to west of the creek. A fault is inferred to underlie the Foghorn Creek valley with the rocks on its eastern side being displaced downwards relative to those to the west. Thus, the stratigraphy to the east of Foghorn Creek is probably at a higher structural level than those to the west of the fault. If this is the case then the chlorite schist unit that hosts mainly disseminated to semimassive pyritic mineralization with anomalous copper, lead and zinc in the eastern part of the map area ( the Birch showing of Marr and Everett, 1984) may not be correlative to the chlorite schist unit that hosts the Lydia showing. Pyrite mineralization with sericite and chorite schist to the northwest of the Birch occurrence has no counterpart to the west of Foghorn Creek. Multiple levels of sulphide mineralization east of Foghorn Creek is somewhat similar to mineralization at Harper Creek to the east of the Foghorn Creek property ecept that the Foghorn Creek property significant chalcopyrite with ancillary galena and sphalerite has not been identified within the Foghorn Creek property. 12

17 6. EXPENDITURE STATEMENT Geological mapping Geologist: 3 $900/day Field assistant: 3 $450/day Vehicle hire - e Vancouver 1,781 $0.65/km Food and accommodation Sample analyses Map compilation and interpretation: 1.5 days Report preparation: 2.5 days

18 7. REFERENCES Dawson, J.M., 1979: Report on diamond drilling of the Foghorn Mountain property, Kamloops Mining Division. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Everett, C.C. and Cooper, W.G., 1983: Geochemical and geophysical report on the Foggy A group. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Fraser, D.C. and Dvorak, Z, 1979: DIGHEM II survey of Foghorn Mountain, British Columbia. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Goutier, F.M., 1986: Galena lead isotope study of mineral deposits in the Eagle Bay Formation, southeastern British Columbia. Univ. B.C., M.Sc. Thesis (unpubl.) Heim, R.C., Knauer, J.D., Walker, J.T. and Belik, G.D., 1972: Geochemical survey, geophysical survey and geological survey on the FH 1-6, FH 9-11, FH 14-18, FH 22 and Foghorn fraction mineral claims. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Marr, J.M. and Everett, C.C., 1984: Drilling assessment report on the Foggy A group. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Schiarizza, P., 1986: Geology of the Vavenby area (82M/2 and parts of 5 and 11). B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, 1:50,000 map, Open File Shearer, J.F. and Butler, S.P., 1990: Geological, geochemical, geophysical and diamond drilling report on the Birch 1-5 claims, North Thompson River area, Kamloops Mining Division. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Vollo, N.B., 1968a: Geophysical report on an EM-16 survey on the 82M/12 FH group. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Vollo, N.B., 1968b: Geophysical report on a magnetometer survey on the 82M/12 FH group. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Vollo, N.B., 1969: Geochemical report on the 82M/12 FH group at Birch Island, BC. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report

19 Vollo, N.B., 1979: Diamond drilling, Foggy 2 and 3 claims. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Vollo, N.B., 1980: Diamond drilling, Foggy 2 and 3 and Joseph 7 claims. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report Vollo, N.B., 1981: Diamond drilling, Foggy 2 and 3 and Joseph 7 claims. B.C. Department of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report

20 8. CERTIFICATE I, David Gerard Bailey of 604 Westview Place, North Vancouver, British Columbia, hereby certif y that: 1. I am a geological consultant and principal of Bailey Geological Consultants (Canada) Ltd. of the above address; 2. I hold degrees in geology from Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand (B.Sc.(Hons.), 1973) and Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario (Ph.D., 1978); 3. I have practiced the profession of geologist continuously since graduation; 4. I am a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia; 5. I hold memberships in the Society of Economic Geologists, the Geological Association of Canada, the Association of Eploration Geochemists, the Geological Society of America and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; 6. I personally carried out the work described in the report. Dated at North Vancouver this 15 th day of January,

21 APPENDIX 1 MAP STATIONS

22 Easting Northing Lithology Mineralization Sample No Quartz chlorite schist Quartz chlorite schist Quartz chlorite schist cp,py,sph Quartz chlorite schist Quartz chlorite schist Quartz chlorite schist Granodiorite gneiss Quartz chlorite schist Quartz chlorite schist Granodiorite gneiss Quartz chlorite schist Quartz chlorite schist Quartz chlorite schist Quartz chlorite sericite schist py 64702, Quartz sericite schist py Chlorite sericite schist Chlorite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist py Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist py Quartz sericite schist py Quartz sericite schist py Silicified schist py Chlorite schist py Quartz sericite chlorite schist Quartz sericite chlorite schist Quartz sericite schist Chlorite quartz schist, silicified py Sericite schist Granodiorite gneiss Granodiorite gneiss Chlorite schist Chlorite schist Chlorite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite chlorite carbonate schist Quartz sericite chlorite carbonate schist Quartz sericite chlorite carbonate schist Quartz sericite chlorite carbonate schist py Quartz sericite chlorite carbonate schist Quartz sericite chlorite carbonate schist Quartz sericite chlorite carbonate schist Chlorite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist Quartz sericite schist

23 APPENDIX 2 GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSES

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31 LEGEND DEVONIAN - PERMIAN 5 Quartz-sericite-chorite-carbonate schist Quartz-sericite schist with thin chorite schist interbeds Quartz-sericite schist, sericite schist Chlorite schist LYDIA cp,sph,ga,py Cu >10000 Pb 47 Zn 741 Ag Cu 6 Pb 4 Zn 49 Ag < Foghorn Creek py Cu 35 Pb 102 Zn 104 Ag 0.3 py py py py Cu 438 Pb 52 Zn 142 Ag Cu 106 Pb 33 Zn 93 Ag < Cu 100 Pb 30 Zn 29 Ag Cu 94 Pb 11 Zn 145 Ag < BIRCH (FOGGY) py Cu 306 Pb 361 Zn 500 Ag 2.5 py Lute Creek Cu 1005 Pb 930 Zn 579 Ag 13.5 DEVONIAN 1 py cp sph ga Cu 35 Pb 102 Zn 104 Ag 0.3 Orthogneiss: granodioritic to dioritic compositions. Minor mafic dykes SYMBOLS Large outcrop or several small outcrops Small outcrop Foliation Lithological contact: known, approimate, inferred Fault: inferred Limit of mapping Pyrite Chalcopyrite Sphalerite Galena Adit Road Topographic contour: contour interval approimately 15 metres Stream Foghorn property outline Rock sample location (grab sample) Sample number Analytical results: Cu - copper (ppm) Pb - lead (ppm) Zn - zinc (ppm) Ag - silver (ppm) METRES FOGHORN CREEK PROPERTY GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION EASTERN PART Map Datum: UTM Nad 83, Zone 11 Geology by DGB, October, 2013 Compilation by DGB, January, 2014 Scale: 1:10,000 FIGURE 4