Structural insight into Slit Robo signalling
|
|
- Doris Daniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Structural insight into Slit Robo signalling Erhard Hohenester 1 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K. Abstract Drosophila Slit and its vertebrate orthologues Slit1 Slit3 are secreted glycoproteins that play important roles in the development of the nervous system and other organs. Human Slits are also involved in a number of pathological situations, such as cancer and inflammation. Slits exert their effects by activating receptors of the Robo (Roundabout) family, which resemble cell adhesion molecules in their ectodomains and have large, mainly unstructured cytosolic domains. HS (heparan sulfate) is required for Slit Robo signalling. The hallmark of Slit proteins is a tandem of four LRR (leucine-rich repeat) domains, which mediate binding to the IG (immunoglobulin-like) domains of Robos. A major question is how Slit binding is translated into the recruitment of effector molecules to the cytosolic domain of Robo. Detailed structure function studies have shown that the second LRR domain of Slit (D2) binds to the first two IG domains of Robo, and that HS serves to stabilize the Slit Robo interaction and is required for biological activity of Slit D2. Very recently, the crystal structure of a minimal Slit Robo complex revealed that the IG1 domain of Robo is bound by the concave face of Slit D2, confirming earlier mutagenesis data. To define the mechanism of Robo transmembrane signalling, these structural insights will have to be complemented by new cell biology and microscopy approaches. Introduction Slit was first identified in Drosophila as a protein secreted by a subset of glia cells along the midline of the developing CNS (central nervous system) [1]. Mutations in the slit gene result in a collapse of the regular ladder-like arrangement of longitudinal and commissural (crossing) axon tracts. This phenotype suggested that Slit is somehow involved in interactions between midline glia cells and commissural axons. Genetic screening uncovered further genes whose mutation resulted in severely perturbed commissures, one of which, roundabout (robo),encodes a transmembrane protein expressed on the axon growth cones [2,3]. The cell-surface expression of Drosophila Robo is regulated by the product of the commissureless gene [4]. These findings were unified in a molecular mechanism, when it was realized that Slit is a ligand for Robo receptors and that Robo signalling results in repulsion of axons away from the midline in both invertebrates and vertebrates [5 7]. Since this seminal discovery, Slit Robo signalling has been widely studied in the developing nervous system, and the fundamental mechanisms of axon guidance at the CNS midline are now firmly established [8,9]. Slit and Robo function is not confined to the nervous system, however. The vertebrate proteins have additional important roles in the development of the lung, kidney and mammary gland, and have been implicated in human pathology (e.g. cancer and inflammation) [10 12]. The intracellular consequences of Key words: axon guidance, heparan sulfate, immunoglobulin-like domain, leucine-rich repeat, Robo, Slit. Abbreviations used: Abl, Abelson tyrosine kinase; CAM, cell adhesion molecule; CNS, central nervous system; DCC, deleted in colorectal cancer; EGF, epidermal growth factor; FN3, fibronectin type 3; HS, heparan sulfate; HSPG, HS proteoglycan; IG, immunoglobulin-like; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; Robo, Roundabout; SOS, Son of sevenless; SPR, surface plasmon resonance. 1 e.hohenester@imperial.ac.uk Robo activation are only partially understood, but good progress has been made in identifying molecules that link Slit Robo signalling to cytoskeletal dynamics and protein synthesis [13,14]. The purpose of this brief review is to discuss the Slit Robo system from a structural biologist s perspective. I will summarize what is known about the structure of Slit and Robo, the molecular details of their interaction and the mechanism of transmembrane signalling by Robo. Slit structure Invertebrates have a single Slit, whereas vertebrates have three homologous proteins: Slit1 Slit3 [9]. The hallmark of Slits is a unique tandem of four LRR (leucine-rich repeat) domains at the N-terminus, termed D1 D4. This large ( 900 residues) region is followed by six EGF (epidermal growth factor)- like domains, a laminin G-like domain, one (invertebrates) or three (vertebrates) EGF-like domains, and a C-terminal cystine knot domain (Figure 1). Crystal structures of D2 and D3 have revealed the architecture of the Slit LRR domains [15 17]. Each LRR domain consists of an N-terminal cysteine-rich cap, an array of five to seven LRRs, and a C-terminal cysteinerich cap. Each LRR contains a central LXXLXLXXN motif that contributes one β-strand to the curved sheet that makes up the concave face of the LRR domain (Figure 1). The four LRR domains of Slit are connected by short linkers containing a cysteine residue that forms a disulfide bridge with a cysteine residue at the convex back of the preceding domain. These tethers are not compatible with a fully extended conformation of the D1 D4 region of Slit, but whether they impose a defined higher-order structure remains to be seen. We previously suggested that the D1 D4 region may be dimerized through interactions made by the D4 domain [15]; however, a definitive biophysical study has shown that Biochemical Society Annual Symposium No. 75 Biochem. Soc Trans. (2008) 36, ; doi: /bst
2 252 Biochemical Society Transactions (2008) Volume 36, part 2 Figure 1 Structures of Slit and Robo (A) Schematic drawing of Drosophila Slit and Robo interacting via their D2 and IG1 domains respectively (see the text). The cleavage site of Slit (see the text) is indicated by a pair of scissors. The cytosolic domain of Robo is predicted to contain many intrinsically unstructured regions. Four linear motifs involved in Drosophila Robo function (see the text) are labelled CC0 CC3. Other Robos have the same ectodomain structure, but do not contain all four motifs. (B) Cartoon drawing of the human Slit2 D2 crystal structure [17], with the cap segments and LRRs coloured pink and cyan respectively. Residues previously identifiedto be critical for Robo binding [15] are shown in light brown. (C)Cα traces of two crystal structures of human Robo1 IG1 IG2 [17], illustrating flexibility at the domain junction. The structures (coloured light brown and green respectively) were superimposed on their IG1 domains. Key residues involved in Slit binding [17] are shown in cyan. (D) Cartoon drawing of the Slit2 D2 Robo1 IG1 complex structure [17]. Slit2 D2 is coloured cyan and purple and shown in the same orientation as in (B). Robo1 IG1 is coloured light brown. HS-binding residues in Slit2 D2 [22] and putative HS-binding residues in Robo1 IG1 (see the text) are shown in green. D1 D4 is a monomer in solution (C. Baldock and E. Hohenester, unpublished work). Drosophila Slit and mammalian Slit2 are processed in vivo and in cell culture by proteolytic cleavage after the fifth EGF-like domain [5]. Studies in vitro have shown that the N-terminal Slit fragment retains full biological activity as a Robo ligand, whereas the C- terminal fragment is inactive [18,19]. Whether the C-terminal Slit region is dispensable for Slit function in vivo is not known. Robo structure Caenorhabditis elegans has a single Robo (Sax-3), Drosophila has three Robos (Robo, Robo2 and Robo3) and vertebrates have four Robos (Robo1/Dutt1, Robo2, Robo3/Rig-1, Robo4/Magic Roundabout). At the Drosophila midline, all three Robos transduce a repellent signal, and the combinatorial expression of the three Robos specifies the lateral positioning of longitudinal axon tracts. At the vertebrate midline, Robo3 antagonizes the repellent signal from Robo1 and Robo2, and thus is functionally analogous to the Commissureless protein in Drosophila [9]. All Robos, with the exception of Robo4 (a receptor expressed in the vasculature and not the CNS [20]), share the same ectodomain architecture reminiscent of CAMs (cell adhesion molecules), consisting of five IG (immunoglobulin-like) domains followed by three FN3 (fibronectin type 3) repeats (Figure 1). Robo4 has only two IG and two FN3 domains. Crystal structures are available of IG1 IG2 of human Robo1 [17] and of Drosophila Robo (N. Fukuhara, J.A. Howitt and E. Hohenester, unpublished work). They show two canonical I-set IG domains in a relatively extended arrangement, but with evidence of substantial flexing at the domain junction (Figure 1). The cytosolic Robo domains are poorly conserved, with the notable exception of several conserved linear motifs, CC0 CC3, which occur in different combinations in different Robos [9]. Intriguingly, the Robo cytosolic domains are predicted to contain little regular secondary structure and may thus belong to the class of intrinsically unstructured protein regions. If indeed lacking a compact structure, the 500 cytosolic residues of Robos would occupy a very large volume of space and be able to interact simultaneously with many adaptor molecules (see below). Slit Robo interaction Slit binding has been demonstrated biochemically for all Robos, expect for Robo4. Early studies using transfected cells showed that the Slit Robo interaction is of high apparent affinity (dissociation constant K d of 10 nm)
3 Biochemical Society Annual Symposium No. 75: Structure and Function in Cell Adhesion 253 and evolutionarily conserved: human Slit2 binds to cells expressing Drosophila Robo, and Drosophila Slit binds to cells expressing rat Robo1 or Robo2 [5,7,19]. To study this interaction in more detail, we developed a solid-phase assay. Using a panel of recombinant Drosophila Slit proteins, we showed that all three Drosophila Robos bind to a common site in Slit D2 [15]. Analysis of sequence conservation between invertebrate and vertebrate Slits revealed that the concave face, but not the convex face, of D2 is highly conserved, and site-directed mutagenesis confirmed that the concave face of Slit D2 indeed harbours the common binding site for all Drosophila Robos (Drosophila Slit residues Tyr 402, Leu 424, Tyr 450 and His 472 ). As expected from sequence conservation, vertebrate Slits also have their Robo-binding sites in D2 [17,21]. Importantly, we have shown that human Slit2 D2 is able to induce the collapse of Xenopus retinal axon growth cones in vitro, demonstrating that the minimal Robo-binding domain is biologically active [22]. The corresponding Slit-binding site on Robo was mapped using domain-deletion constructs of human Robo1 and Robo2 [23]. Deletion of IG1 or IG2 abolished the interaction of human Slit2, whereas the IG3 IG5 region was not required for binding; that the FN3 domains are not required had been shown previously [18]. Morlot et al. [17] recently reported a K d of 8 nm, obtained by SPR (surface plasmon resonance) analysis, for the interaction of human Robo1 IG1 IG2 with human Slit2 D2. Also using SPR, we obtained a much lower K d of 20 μm for the interaction of the corresponding Drosophila proteins, Robo IG1 IG2 and Slit D2 (N. Fukuhara, J.A. Howitt and E. Hohenester, unpublished work). The reason for the 1000-fold discrepancy in dissociation constants is unclear at present, but is unlikely to be the result of a genuine difference between the two species, given the high degree of conservation of Slit and Robo proteins. The stoichiometry of the minimal Slit Robo complex is 1:1, as determined by size-exclusion chromatography of Drosophila Robo IG1 IG2 and Slit D2 [22]. An important advance was achieved recently with the structure determination of a 1:1 complex between human Slit2 D2 and Robo1 IG1 [17] (Figure 1). The membranedistal IG1 domain of Robo1 is bound by the concave face of Slit2 D2, as predicted, and all Slit residues demonstrated previously to be critical for Robo binding indeed make interactions with Robo (Slit2 D2 residues Tyr 356, Leu 378, Tyr 404 and His 426 ). In addition, a conserved patch of charged residues near the N-terminal cap of Slit2 D2 is also involved in Robo1 binding. In total, complex formation buries 1400 Å 2 (1 Å= 0.1 nm) of solvent-accessible surface area in a bipartite interface. Although not as conspicuously conserved as their counterparts on Slit2 D2, the major Slit-binding residues of Robo1 IG1 are conserved in other Robos (except in Robo4, as expected), suggesting that the mode of binding is largely conserved in other pairings. Apolar Slit-binding residues (Thr 86,Met 120,Leu 122,Phe 128 and Leu 130 ) are contributed by β-strands B, D and E of Robo1, and polar Slit-binding residues (Glu 72,Asn 88 and Lys 90 )byβ-strands A and B. The C-terminus of Robo IG1 in the complex is distant from the interface with Slit2 D2, and the structure thus does not explain why deletion of IG2 had such a dramatic effect on Slit2 binding [23]. Deletion of IG2 may have compromised the folding of IG1, or residues in Robo IG2 may indeed be required for Slit binding; this question should be addressed by further structure analysis or mutagenesis. HS (heparan sulfate) and Slit Robo signalling Substantial evidence has been accumulated that Slit Robo signalling strictly requires HS [24,25]. HS chains consist of repeating sulfated disaccharide units that are attached to secreted or membrane-associated core proteins to form HSPGs (HS proteoglycans). Slit Robo signalling in vitro can be abolished by enzymatic digestion of cell-surface HS or by addition of excess heparin (a more highly and uniformly sulfated variant of HS) [26,27]. Slit Robo signalling in vivo can be abolished by genetic ablation of enzymes involved in HS biosynthesis [28 30] or HSPG core proteins [31,32]. A requirement for HS has emerged as a common feature of many signalling systems, including morphogens, growth factors and guidance cues [33]. Of particular relevance to this review, HS/heparin has been shown to be required for signalling by Netrin and Frazzled/DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer), another ligand receptor pair crucial for CNS midline patterning [34] (see below). Results from genetic experiments in Drosophila suggested that the HSPG syndecan regulates both the distribution and efficiency of Slit [31]. Syndecans have not been implicated in the regulation of mammalian Slits. Rather, biochemical studies have identified the HSPG glypican-1 as a high-affinity receptor for human Slit2 and have shown that both natural cleavage products of Slit2 are recognized by glypican-1 [35]. Consistent with these results, we mapped HS/heparinbinding sites to two separate regions of Drosophila Slit: the LRR domains D1 and D2, and the C-terminal cystine knot domain [22]. HS binding by the C-terminal domain of Slit is unlikely to account for the strict HS-dependence of Slit Robo signalling, given that the N-terminal, but not the C-terminal, Slit fragment is biologically active in vitro [18,19]. HS binding by Slit D2 is of great interest, as this domain harbours the Robo-binding site of all Slits [15]. We found that Drosophila Slit D2 and Robo IG1 IG2 associate with a heparin-derived oligosaccharide in solution to form a ternary complex of 1:1:1 stoichiometry. This minimal complex appears to recapitulate the signalling complex at the axon cell membrane: residues in a conserved basic patch in the C-terminal cap of human Slit2 D2 (Lys 461,Arg 462, Lys 466,Arg 467,Lys 472 and Lys 475 ) are required not only for heparin binding, but also for HS-dependent Slit2 D2-induced collapse of Xenopus retinal axon growth cones in vitro [22]. The structure of the ternary Slit Robo HS signalling complex is unknown at present. In the crystal structure of the binary complex of human Slit2 D2 and Robo1 IG1 [17], the HS-binding site of Slit2 D2 remains fully exposed and formation of a ternary complex is thus sterically feasible.
4 254 Biochemical Society Transactions (2008) Volume 36, part 2 Robo residues involved in HS/heparin binding have not been identified but are likely to exist, given that Drosophila IG1 IG2 binds heparin quite avidly [22]. The putative HS-binding site of Robo might involve a patch of conserved basic residues centred on the E-F loop of IG1 (Lys 81,Arg 131, Arg 136 and Lys 137 in human Robo1), which in the binary complex is situated 35 Å from the HS-binding site of Slit2 D2. At least five HS disaccharide units would be required to contact both Slit D2 and Robo IG1 simultaneously, which intriguingly corresponds to the minimal HS size capable of disrupting Xenopus retinal axon targeting [36]. Another interesting question relates to the specificity of Slit HS (and possibly Robo HS) interactions. Unlike heparin, where the sugar backbone is highly and relatively uniformly modified by sulfation, HS is heterogeneous: regions of low sulfation alternate with highly sulfated heparin-like stretches. To determine which HS sequences support Slit binding and Slit Robo signalling, Shipp and Hsieh-Wilson [37] used microarrays of heparin derivatives. Human Slit2 binding to heparin was strongly dependent on 6-O-sulfation and N-sulfation, whereas 2-O-sulfation was less important. These preferences were validated in functional assays using brain explants, in which the various heparin derivatives were tested for their ability to inhibit axon guidance and neuronal cell migration [37]. Mechanism of Robo transmembrane signalling A major unresolved question is how Slit binding to the membrane-distal IG1 domain of Robo is transmitted across the cell membrane to initiate downstream signalling. Other transmembrane receptors react to ligand binding either by conformational changes within a stable oligomeric assembly (e.g. integrins [38]), by ligand-induced dimerization (e.g. receptor tyrosine kinases [39]) or by clustering at points of cell cell or cell matrix contact (e.g. immune receptors [40]). Given that Robo ectodomains resemble CAMs and Robos indeed mediate homophilic binding [41], Slit Robo signalling may well involve a change in oligomeric status of Robo. The cytosolic domains of Robos are catalytically inactive. Abl (Abelson tyrosine kinase) is associated with Robo [42] and plays an important role in mediating the interaction of Robo with N-cadherin [43], but it is not believed that the activity of Abl (or another kinase stably associated with Robo) accounts for all of the downstream effects of Robo activation [14]. Rather, it is thought that several catalytically inactive adaptors bind to the cytosolic domain of Robo and that these interactions are somehow regulated by Slit. srgap1 (Slit Robo Rho GTPase-activating protein 1) has been shown to bind to the proline-rich CC3 motif of mammalian Robo1 and mediate the Slit-dependent inactivation of the Rho family GTPase, Cdc42 (cell division cycle 42) [44]. The adaptor protein Dock/Nck also binds to CC3 (as well as to CC2) and mediates the Slit-dependent recruitment of SOS (Son of sevenless), which in turn activates another Rho GTPase, Rac [45,46]. These examples illustrate how Slit Robo signalling could alter cytoskeletal dynamics through regulation of Rho family members. Inhibitor studies have also implicated PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase), MAPKs (mitogen-activated protein kinases) and localized protein synthesis [27,47], but the adaptor molecules linking Robo activation to these pathways have yet to be identified. There are intriguing mechanistic parallels between Slit Robo signalling on the one hand and Netrin DCC signalling on the other hand. Netrin can be considered to be the attractive counterpart of the repellent Slit at the CNS midline, but the two proteins are structurally unrelated (Netrin is homologous with the N-terminus of laminin chains) [8]. In contrast, DCC shares with Robo a CAM-like ectodomain and also has a large cytoplasmic domain that appears to contain little regular secondary structure. A genetic study in Drosophila using chimaeric receptors showed that the signalling outcome is specified by the cytosolic domain: a Robo DCC chimaera (Robo ectodomain DCC cytosolic domain) is an attractive Slit receptor and a DCC Robo chimaera is a repulsive netrin receptor [48]. This important result implies a common mechanism of transmembrane signalling for Robo and DCC. Furthermore, the cytosolic domains of the two receptors have been shown to interact physically, and Slit-activated Robo has been suggested to silence the attractive Netrin DCC signal once an axon has reached the CNS midline [49]. How does binding of Slit to Robo (or Netrin to DCC) alter the accessibility of short linear motifs, so that the various adaptor molecules can gain access to these sequences? In the case of DCC, it appears that the cytosolic domain has an inherent tendency to oligomerize (via a conserved motif termed P3), but oligomerization is repressed in the unstimulated receptor [50]. Similarly, the isolated cytosolic domain of Robo has been shown to be constitutively active [43]. These findings favour a mechanism whereby the cytoplasmic domains of DCC and Robo are held in an inactive state in the absence of ligand. One way in which this could be achieved is through lateral association of the inactive receptors, plausibly mediated by their CAM-like domains. If ligand binding were incompatible with this mode of self-association, activation would result from the disruption of receptor dimers or higher oligomers, thereby freeing up the cytosolic domains for adaptor binding and downstream signalling (Figure 2). Alternatively, receptors could become oligomerized as a result of ligand binding, as has been suggested for DCC [50]. One conceptual problem with the latter scenario is that it is not easy to see how the cytosolic domain would be prevented from oligomerizing in the absence of ligand. Clearly, knowledge of the receptors oligomeric status (with and without ligand) would help in unravelling the mechanism of transmembrane signalling, but this information is not easy to obtain experimentally. A combination of structural, biochemical and microscopy techniques will have to be deployed to make any real progress in this area. Frustratingly, the recently determined Slit and Robo structures have not shed much light on the signalling mechanism. With regard to the first model (ligand-induced disruption of receptor dimers/oligomers), no consistent mode of Robo
5 Biochemical Society Annual Symposium No. 75: Structure and Function in Cell Adhesion 255 Figure 2 Possible mechanisms of Slit Robo transmembrane signalling Signalling is assumed to be the result of a change in oligomeric state of Robo (monomer dimer transitions are shown for clarity, but the same principles could be applied to transitions between higher oligomers). (A) Slit binding may convert an inactive Robo dimer into an active monomer. In this scenario, the role of HS would be to stabilize the 1:1 Slit Robo complex. (B) Slit binding may convert an inactive Robo monomer into an active Robo dimer. HS would be required for formation of a 2:2 Slit Robo complex. Only the biologically active Slit D2 domain [22] is shown for clarity. self-association can be discerned from four independent structures of IG1 IG2 of human and Drosophila Robo [17] (N. Fukuhara, J.A. Howitt and E. Hohenester, unpublished work). With regard to the second model, the 1:1 stoichiometry of the minimal Slit Robo complex [17,22] seemingly rules out a model invoking ligand-induced receptor oligomerization. However, multiple Slit Robo complexes could be assembled on a single HS chain, and this might provide an explanation for the strict HS dependence of Slit Robo signalling. To resolve this question, further biophysical and structural studies of ternary complexes should be pursued with urgency. Finally, it would be invaluable to know more about the structure of the cytosolic domain of Robo, but this domain represents a formidable challenge owing to its large content of non-regular structure. I apologize to all authors whose work I was unable to cite because of space restrictions. Research in my laboratory is supported by the Wellcome Trust. E.H. is a Wellcome Senior Research Fellow. References 1 Rothberg, J.M., Hartley, D.A., Walther, Z. and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (1988) slit: an EGF-homologous locus of D. melanogaster involved in the development of the embryonic central nervous system. Cell 55, Seeger, M., Tear, G., Ferres-Marco, D. and Goodman, C.S. (1993) Mutations affecting growth cone guidance in Drosophila: genes necessary for guidance toward or away from the midline. Neuron 10, Kidd, T., Brose, K., Mitchell, K.J., Fetter, R.D., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Goodman, C.S. and Tear, G. (1998) Roundabout controls axon crossing of the CNS midline and defines a novel subfamily of evolutionarily conserved guidance receptors. Cell 92, Keleman, K., Ribeiro, C. and Dickson, B.J. (2005) Comm function in commissural axon guidance: cell-autonomous sorting of Robo in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 8, Brose, K., Bland, K.S., Wang, K.H., Arnott, D., Henzel, W., Goodman, C.S., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Kidd, T. (1999) Slit proteins bind Robo receptors and have an evolutionarily conserved role in repulsive axon guidance. Cell 96, Kidd, T., Bland, K.S. and Goodman, C.S. (1999) Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila. Cell 96, Li, H.S., Chen, J.H., Wu, W., Fagaly, T., Zhou, L., Yuan, W., Dupuis, S., Jiang, Z.H., Nash, W., Gick, C. et al. (1999) Vertebrate slit, a secreted ligand for the transmembrane protein roundabout, is a repellent for olfactory bulb axons. Cell 96, Dickson, B.J. (2002) Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Science 298, Dickson, B.J. and Gilestro, G.F. (2006) Regulation of commissural axon pathfinding by slit and its Robo receptors. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, Wu, J.Y., Feng, L., Park, H.T., Havlioglu, N., Wen, L., Tang, H., Bacon, K.B., Jiang, Z., Zhang, X. and Rao, Y. (2001) The neuronal repellent Slit inhibits leukocyte chemotaxis induced by chemotactic factors. Nature 410, Hinck, L. (2004) The versatile roles of axon guidance cues in tissue morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 7, Chedotal, A., Kerjan, G. and Moreau-Fauvarque, C. (2005) The brain within the tumor: new roles for axon guidance molecules in cancers. Cell Death Differ. 12, Guan, K.L. and Rao, Y. (2003) Signalling mechanisms mediating neuronal responses to guidance cues. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, Garbe, D.S. and Bashaw, G.J. (2004) Axon guidance at the midline: from mutants to mechanisms. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39, Howitt, J.A., Clout, N.J. and Hohenester, E. (2004) Binding site for Robo receptors revealed by dissection of the leucine-rich repeat region of Slit. EMBO J. 23, Morlot, C., Hemrika, W., Romijn, R.A., Gros, P., Cusack, S. and McCarthy, A.A. (2007) Production of Slit2 LRR domains in mammalian cells for structural studies and the structure of human Slit2 domain 3. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 63, Morlot, C., Thielens, N.M., Ravelli, R.B., Hemrika, W., Romijn, R.A., Gros, P., Cusack, S. and McCarthy, A.A. (2007) Structural insights into the Slit Robo complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, Chen, J.H., Wen, L., Dupuis, S., Wu, J.Y. and Rao, Y. (2001) The N-terminal leucine-rich regions in Slit are sufficient to repel olfactory bulb axons and subventricular zone neurons. J. Neurosci. 21, Nguyen Ba-Charvet, K.T., Brose, K., Ma, L., Wang, K.H., Marillat, V., Sotelo, C., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Chedotal, A. (2001) Diversity and specificity of actions of Slit2 proteolytic fragments in axon guidance. J. Neurosci. 21, Huminiecki, L., Gorn, M., Suchting, S., Poulsom, R. and Bicknell, R. (2002) Magic roundabout is a new member of the roundabout receptor family that is endothelial specific and expressed at sites of active angiogenesis. Genomics 79,
6 256 Biochemical Society Transactions (2008) Volume 36, part 2 21 Fouquet, C., Di Meglio, T., Ma, L., Kawasaki, T., Long, H., Hirata, T., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Chedotal, A. and Nguyen-Ba-Charvet, K.T. (2007) Robo1 and robo2 control the development of the lateral olfactory tract. J. Neurosci. 27, Hussain, S.A., Piper, M., Fukuhara, N., Strochlic, L., Cho, G., Howitt, J.A., Ahmed, Y., Powell, A.K., Turnbull, J.E., Holt, C.E. and Hohenester, E. (2006) A molecular mechanism for the heparan sulfate dependence of slit robo signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 281, Liu, Z., Patel, K., Schmidt, H., Andrews, W., Pini, A. and Sundaresan, V. (2004) Extracellular Ig domains 1 and 2 of Robo are important for ligand (Slit) binding. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 26, Lee, J.S. and Chien, C.B. (2004) When sugars guide axons: insights from heparan sulphate proteoglycan mutants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, Van Vactor, D., Wall, D.P. and Johnson, K.G. (2006) Heparan sulfate proteoglycans and the emergence of neuronal connectivity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, Hu, H. (2001) Cell-surface heparan sulfate is involved in the repulsive guidance activities of Slit2 protein. Nat. Neurosci. 4, Piper, M., Anderson, R., Dwivedy, A., Weinl, C., van Horck, F., Leung, K.M., Cogill, E. and Holt, C. (2006) Signaling mechanisms underlying Slit2-induced collapse of Xenopus retinal growth cones. Neuron 49, Inatani, M., Irie, F., Plump, A.S., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Yamaguchi, Y. (2003) Mammalian brain morphogenesis and midline axon guidance require heparan sulfate. Science 302, Bulow, H.E. and Hobert, O. (2004) Differential sulfations and epimerization define heparan sulfate specificity in nervous system development. Neuron 41, Lee, J.S., von der Hardt, S., Rusch, M.A., Stringer, S.E., Stickney, H.L., Talbot, W.S., Geisler, R., Nusslein-Volhard, C., Selleck, S.B., Chien, C.B. and Roehl, H. (2004) Axon sorting in the optic tract requires HSPG synthesis by ext2 (dackel) and extl3 (boxer). Neuron 44, Johnson, K.G., Ghose, A., Epstein, E., Lincecum, J., O Connor, M.B. and Van Vactor, D. (2004) Axonal heparan sulfate proteoglycans regulate the distribution and efficiency of the repellent slit during midline axon guidance. Curr. Biol. 14, Steigemann, P., Molitor, A., Fellert, S., Jackle, H. and Vorbruggen, G. (2004) Heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecan promotes axonal and myotube guidance by slit/robo signaling. Curr. Biol. 14, Lin, X. (2004) Functions of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in cell signaling during development. Development 131, Matsumoto, Y., Irie, F., Inatani, M., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Yamaguchi, Y. (2007) Netrin-1/DCC signaling in commissural axon guidance requires cell-autonomous expression of heparan sulfate. J. Neurosci. 27, Ronca, F., Andersen, J.S., Paech, V. and Margolis, R.U. (2001) Characterization of Slit protein interactions with glypican-1. J. Biol. Chem. 276, Irie, A., Yates, E.A., Turnbull, J.E. and Holt, C.E. (2002) Specific heparan sulfate structures involved in retinal axon targeting. Development 129, Shipp, E.L. and Hsieh-Wilson, L.C. (2007) Profiling the sulfation specificities of glycosaminoglycan interactions with growth factors and chemotactic proteins using microarrays. Chem. Biol. 14, Luo, B.H., Carman, C.V. and Springer, T.A. (2007) Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, Hubbard, S.R. and Miller, W.T. (2007) Receptor tyrosine kinases: mechanisms of activation and signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, Davis, S.J. and van der Merwe, P.A. (2006) The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat. Immunol. 7, Hivert, B., Liu, Z., Chuang, C.Y., Doherty, P. and Sundaresan, V. (2002) Robo1 and Robo2 are homophilic binding molecules that promote axonal growth. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 21, Bashaw, G.J., Kidd, T., Murray, D., Pawson, T. and Goodman, C.S. (2000) Repulsive axon guidance: Abelson and Enabled play opposing roles downstream of the roundabout receptor. Cell 101, Rhee, J., Mahfooz, N.S., Arregui, C., Lilien, J., Balsamo, J. and VanBerkum, M.F. (2002) Activation of the repulsive receptor Roundabout inhibits N-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, Wong, K., Ren, X.R., Huang, Y.Z., Xie, Y., Liu, G., Saito, H., Tang, H., Wen, L., Brady-Kalnay, S.M., Mei, L. et al. (2001) Signal transduction in neuronal migration: roles of GTPase activating proteins and the small GTPase Cdc42 in the Slit Robo pathway. Cell 107, Fan, X., Labrador, J.P., Hing, H. and Bashaw, G.J. (2003) Slit stimulation recruits Dock and Pak to the roundabout receptor and increases Rac activity to regulate axon repulsion at the CNS midline. Neuron 40, Yang, L. and Bashaw, G.J. (2006) Son of sevenless directly links the Robo receptor to rac activation to control axon repulsion at the midline. Neuron 52, Wang, B., Xiao, Y., Ding, B.B., Zhang, N., Yuan, X., Gui, L., Qian, K.X., Duan, S., Chen, Z., Rao, Y. and Geng, J.G. (2003) Induction of tumor angiogenesis by Slit Robo signaling and inhibition of cancer growth by blocking Robo activity. Cancer Cell 4, Bashaw, G.J. and Goodman, C.S. (1999) Chimeric axon guidance receptors: the cytoplasmic domains of slit and netrin receptors specify attraction versus repulsion. Cell 97, Stein, E. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2001) Hierarchical organization of guidance receptors: silencing of netrin attraction by slit through a Robo/DCC receptor complex. Science 291, Stein, E., Zou, Y., Poo, M. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2001) Binding of DCC by netrin-1 to mediate axon guidance independent of adenosine A2B receptor activation. Science 291, Received 29 October 2007 doi: /bst
Report. Functional Diversity of Robo Receptor Immunoglobulin Domains Promotes Distinct Axon Guidance Decisions
Current Biology 20, 567 572, March 23, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.021 Functional Diversity of Robo Receptor Immunoglobulin Domains Promotes Distinct Axon Guidance
More information5- Semaphorin-Plexin-Neuropilin
5- Semaphorin-Plexin-Neuropilin 1 SEMAPHORINS-PLEXINS-NEUROPILINS ligands receptors co-receptors semaphorins and their receptors are known signals for: -axon guidance -cell migration -morphogenesis -immune
More informationConclusions. The experimental studies presented in this thesis provide the first molecular insights
C h a p t e r 5 Conclusions 5.1 Summary The experimental studies presented in this thesis provide the first molecular insights into the cellular processes of assembly, and aggregation of neural crest and
More informationAxon Guidance. Multiple decision points along a growing axon s trajectory Different types of axon guidance cues:
Axon Guidance Multiple decision points along a growing axon s trajectory Different types of axon guidance cues: Contact mediated - requires direct contact by growth cone Long range - growth cone responds
More informationSlit proteins: molecular guidance cues for cells ranging from neurons to leukocytes Kit Wong, Hwan Tae Park*, Jane Y Wu* and Yi Rao
583 Slit proteins: molecular guidance cues for cells ranging from neurons to leukocytes Kit Wong, Hwan Tae Park*, Jane Y Wu* and Yi Rao Recent studies of molecular guidance cues including the Slit family
More informationReading. Lecture VI. Making Connections 9/17/12. Bio 3411 Lecture VI. Making Connections. Bio 3411 Monday September 17, 2012
Lecture VI. Making Connections Bio 3411 Monday September 17, 2012!! 1! Reading NEUROSCIENCE: 5 th ed, pp!507?536! 4 th ed, pp 577-609 Bentley, D., & Caudy, M. (1983). Nature, 304(5921), 62-65. Dickson,
More informationThe N-terminal Leucine-Rich Regions in Slit Are Sufficient To Repel Olfactory Bulb Axons and Subventricular Zone Neurons
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 2001, 21(5):1548 1556 The N-terminal Leucine-Rich Regions in Slit Are Sufficient To Repel Olfactory Bulb Axons and Subventricular Zone Neurons Jin-hui Chen, 1 Leng
More informationAxon guidance I. Paul Garrity March 15, /9.013
Axon guidance I Paul Garrity March 15, 2004 7.68/9.013 Neuronal Wiring: Functional Framework of the Nervous System Stretch reflex circuit Early theories of axonogenesis Schwann: many neurons link to form
More informationHierarchical Organization of Guidance Receptors: Silencing of Netrin Attraction by Slit Through a Robo/DCC Receptor Complex
Hierarchical Organization of Guidance Receptors: Silencing of Netrin Attraction by Slit Through a Robo/DCC Receptor Complex Elke Stein and Marc Tessier-Lavigne* Axonal growth cones that cross the nervous
More informationADAM FAMILY. ephrin A INTERAZIONE. Eph ADESIONE? PROTEOLISI ENDOCITOSI B A RISULTATO REPULSIONE. reverse. forward
ADAM FAMILY - a family of membrane-anchored metalloproteases that are known as A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease proteins and are key components in protein ectodomain shedding Eph A INTERAZIONE B ephrin
More informationCOMPUTER SIMULATION OF DIFFERENTIAL KINETICS OF MAPK ACTIVATION UPON EGF RECEPTOR OVEREXPRESSION
COMPUTER SIMULATION OF DIFFERENTIAL KINETICS OF MAPK ACTIVATION UPON EGF RECEPTOR OVEREXPRESSION I. Aksan 1, M. Sen 2, M. K. Araz 3, and M. L. Kurnaz 3 1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester,
More informationSignal Transduction Phosphorylation Protein kinases. Misfolding diseases. Protein Engineering Lysozyme variants
Signal Transduction Phosphorylation Protein kinases Misfolding diseases Protein Engineering Lysozyme variants Cells and Signals Regulation The cell must be able to respond to stimuli Cellular activities
More informationCHAPTER 1 THE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY OF THE FGF19 SUBFAMILY
CHAPTER 1 THE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY OF THE FGF19 SUBFAMILY Andrew Beenken and Moosa Mohammadi* Department of Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. *Corresponding Author:
More informationAmneh Auben. Abdulrahman Jabr. Diala Abu-Hassan
21 Amneh Auben Abdulrahman Jabr Diala Abu-Hassan Matrix polysaccharides Extracellular matrix (ECM): It s a collection of components that fills the spaces outside the cell or between the cells. ---------
More informationCell Cell Communication in Development
Biology 4361 Developmental Biology Cell Cell Communication in Development June 25, 2008 Cell Cell Communication Concepts Cells in developing organisms develop in the context of their environment, including
More informationA Theoretical Model of Axon Guidance by the Robo Code
NOTE Communicated by Arjen van Ooyen A Theoretical Model of Axon Guidance by the Robo Code Geoffrey J. Goodhill geoff@georgetown.edu Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington,
More informationMigration of Neurons During Embryonic Development. Christine Simmons Saint Louis University April 15 th, 2008
Migration of Neurons During Embryonic Development Christine Simmons Saint Louis University April 15 th, 2008 Embryonic Development of the CNS Central Nervous System (CNS) arises from Surface ectoderm Skin,
More informationAxon Guidance at the Midline: From Mutants to Mechanisms
Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 39:319 341, 2004 Copyright c Taylor & Francis Inc. ISSN: 1040-9238print / 1549-7798online DOI: 10.1080/10409230490906797 Axon Guidance at the Midline:
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women s Hospital VA Boston Healthcare System 2.79J/3.96J/BE.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women s Hospital VA Boston Healthcare System 2.79J/3.96J/BE.441/HST522J INTEGRINS I.V. Yannas, Ph.D. and M. Spector, Ph.D. Regulator
More informationZool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 5 4/27/15
Name: Trask Zool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 5 4/27/15 Answer each of the following short answer questions in the space provided, giving explanations when asked to do so. Circle the correct answer or answers
More informationSupplementary Figure 1 Schematic overview of ASTNs in neuronal migration. (a) Schematic of roles played by ASTNs 1 and 2. ASTN-1-mediated adhesions
Supplementary Figure 1 Schematic overview of ASTNs in neuronal migration. (a) Schematic of roles played by ASTNs 1 and 2. ASTN-1-mediated adhesions undergo endocytosis into clathrin-coated vesicles dependent
More informationGraduate Institute t of fanatomy and Cell Biology
Cell Adhesion 黃敏銓 mchuang@ntu.edu.tw Graduate Institute t of fanatomy and Cell Biology 1 Cell-Cell Adhesion and Cell-Matrix Adhesion actin filaments adhesion belt (cadherins) cadherin Ig CAMs integrin
More informationCell-Cell Communication in Development
Biology 4361 - Developmental Biology Cell-Cell Communication in Development October 2, 2007 Cell-Cell Communication - Topics Induction and competence Paracrine factors inducer molecules Signal transduction
More informationC. elegans L1 cell adhesion molecule functions in axon guidance
C. elegans L1 cell adhesion molecule functions in axon guidance Biorad Lihsia Chen Dept. of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development Developmental Biology Center C. elegans embryogenesis Goldstein lab, UNC-Chapel
More informationCell-Cell Communication in Development
Biology 4361 - Developmental Biology Cell-Cell Communication in Development June 23, 2009 Concepts Cell-Cell Communication Cells develop in the context of their environment, including: - their immediate
More informationCellular Neurobiology BIPN 140 Fall 2016 Problem Set #8
Cellular Neurobiology BIPN 140 Fall 2016 Problem Set #8 1. Inductive signaling is a hallmark of vertebrate and mammalian development. In early neural development, there are multiple signaling pathways
More informationNGF - twenty years a-growing
NGF - twenty years a-growing A molecule vital to brain growth It is twenty years since the structure of nerve growth factor (NGF) was determined [ref. 1]. This molecule is more than 'quite interesting'
More informationElucidating Slit-Independent Mechanisms of Robo Receptors Regulating Neural Circuit. Formation and Head Morphogenesis in C. elegans.
Elucidating Slit-Independent Mechanisms of Robo Receptors Regulating Neural Circuit Formation and Head Morphogenesis in C. elegans by Chia-Hui Chen Department of Neurobiology Duke University Date: Approved:
More informationRNA Synthesis and Processing
RNA Synthesis and Processing Introduction Regulation of gene expression allows cells to adapt to environmental changes and is responsible for the distinct activities of the differentiated cell types that
More informationAny protein that can be labelled by both procedures must be a transmembrane protein.
1. What kind of experimental evidence would indicate that a protein crosses from one side of the membrane to the other? Regions of polypeptide part exposed on the outside of the membrane can be probed
More informationCells to Tissues. Peter Takizawa Department of Cell Biology
Cells to Tissues Peter Takizawa Department of Cell Biology From one cell to ensembles of cells. Multicellular organisms require individual cells to work together in functional groups. This means cells
More informationThe Molecular Biology of Axon Guidance
Thursday, January 25, 2001 Science -- Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman 274 (5290): 1123 Page: 1 Institution: HARVARD UNIVERSITY Sign In as Individual FAQ The Molecular Biology of Axon Guidance Marc Tessier-Lavigne
More informationCell Death & Trophic Factors II. Steven McLoon Department of Neuroscience University of Minnesota
Cell Death & Trophic Factors II Steven McLoon Department of Neuroscience University of Minnesota 1 Remember? Neurotrophins are cell survival factors that neurons get from their target cells! There is a
More informationThe EGF Signaling Pathway! Introduction! Introduction! Chem Lecture 10 Signal Transduction & Sensory Systems Part 3. EGF promotes cell growth
Chem 452 - Lecture 10 Signal Transduction & Sensory Systems Part 3 Question of the Day: Who is the son of Sevenless? Introduction! Signal transduction involves the changing of a cell s metabolism or gene
More informationWe used the PSI-BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) to search the
SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS - in silico protein analysis We used the PSI-BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) to search the Protein Data Bank (PDB, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/) and the NCBI non-redundant
More informationCell Adhesion and Signaling
Cell Adhesion and Signaling mchuang@ntu.edu.tw Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology 1 Transactivation NATURE REVIEWS CANCER VOLUME 7 FEBRUARY 2007 85 2 Functions of Cell Adhesion cell cycle proliferation
More informationMolecular Cell Biology 5068 In Class Exam 2 November 8, 2016
Molecular Cell Biology 5068 In Class Exam 2 November 8, 2016 Exam Number: Please print your name: Instructions: Please write only on these pages, in the spaces allotted and not on the back. Write your
More informationSupporting Information
Supporting Information Manning et al. 1.173/pnas.8131415 SI Text RM1 Motif. This Monosiga-specific motif of 22 aa is repeated 8 13 times in the extracellular regions of two RTKA s, one RTKG, and 4 other
More informationSignal transduction by Cell-Cell and Cell-Matrix contacts
Signal transduction by Cell-Cell and Cell-Matrix contacts - Integrins as central adhesion receptors - - Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) as a central signal molecule - Structure of Cell/Cell and Cell/Matrix
More informationLecture 10: Cyclins, cyclin kinases and cell division
Chem*3560 Lecture 10: Cyclins, cyclin kinases and cell division The eukaryotic cell cycle Actively growing mammalian cells divide roughly every 24 hours, and follow a precise sequence of events know as
More informationTransmembrane Domains (TMDs) of ABC transporters
Transmembrane Domains (TMDs) of ABC transporters Most ABC transporters contain heterodimeric TMDs (e.g. HisMQ, MalFG) TMDs show only limited sequence homology (high diversity) High degree of conservation
More informationMechanical Proteins. Stretching imunoglobulin and fibronectin. domains of the muscle protein titin. Adhesion Proteins of the Immune System
Mechanical Proteins F C D B A domains of the muscle protein titin E Stretching imunoglobulin and fibronectin G NIH Resource for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics Theoretical Biophysics Group,
More informationChem Lecture 10 Signal Transduction
Chem 452 - Lecture 10 Signal Transduction 111202 Here we look at the movement of a signal from the outside of a cell to its inside, where it elicits changes within the cell. These changes are usually mediated
More informationBiol403 - Receptor Serine/Threonine Kinases
Biol403 - Receptor Serine/Threonine Kinases The TGFβ (transforming growth factorβ) family of growth factors TGFβ1 was first identified as a transforming factor; however, it is a member of a family of structurally
More informationNMR study of complexes between low molecular mass inhibitors and the West Nile virus NS2B-NS3 protease
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2009 NMR study of complexes between low molecular mass inhibitors and the West Nile
More informationStructure and function of AMPA receptors
J Physiol 554.2 pp 249 253 249 Topical Review Structure and function of AMPA receptors Eric Gouaux Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University,
More informationBio 127 Section I Introduction to Developmental Biology. Cell Cell Communication in Development. Developmental Activities Coordinated in this Way
Bio 127 Section I Introduction to Developmental Biology Cell Cell Communication in Development Gilbert 9e Chapter 3 It has to be EXTREMELY well coordinated for the single celled fertilized ovum to develop
More informationActivation of a receptor. Assembly of the complex
Activation of a receptor ligand inactive, monomeric active, dimeric When activated by growth factor binding, the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylates the neighboring receptor. Assembly
More informationNeurite initiation. Neurite formation begins with a bud that sprouts from the cell body. One or several neurites can sprout at a time.
Neurite initiation. Neuronal maturation initiation f-actin polarization and maturation tubulin stage 1: "spherical" neuron stage 2: neurons extend several neurites stage 3: one neurite accelerates its
More informationEnhancing Specificity in the Janus Kinases: A Study on the Thienopyridine. JAK2 Selective Mechanism Combined Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Molecular BioSystems. This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Supporting Information Enhancing Specificity in the Janus Kinases: A Study on the Thienopyridine
More informationSupplemental table S7.
Supplemental table S7. GO terms significantly enriched in significantly up-regulated genes of the microarray. K: number of genes from the input cluster in the given category. F: number of total genes in
More information1. The plasma membrane of eukaryotic cells is supported by a. actin filaments. b. microtubules. c. lamins. d. intermediate filaments.
ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF CELL MECHANICS Homework #2 (due 1/30/13) This homework involves comprehension of key biomechanical concepts of the cytoskeleton, cell-matrix adhesions, and cellcell adhesions.
More informationHost-Pathogen interaction-ii. Pl Path 604 PN Sharma Department of Plant Pathology CSK HPKV, Palampur
Host-Pathogen interaction-ii Pl Path 604 PN Sharma Department of Plant Pathology CSK HPKV, Palampur-176062 It was originally believed that gene-for-gene resistance was conferred by a direct interaction
More informationSemiotic modelling of biological processes: Semiotic processes in the immune system João Queiroz a,b,c & Charbel El-Hani b,c,d
Semiotic modelling of biological processes: Semiotic processes in the immune system João Queiroz a,b,c & Charbel El-Hani b,c,d a. Institute of Arts and Design, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
doi:10.1038/nature17991 Supplementary Discussion Structural comparison with E. coli EmrE The DMT superfamily includes a wide variety of transporters with 4-10 TM segments 1. Since the subfamilies of the
More informationSignal Transduction. Dr. Chaidir, Apt
Signal Transduction Dr. Chaidir, Apt Background Complex unicellular organisms existed on Earth for approximately 2.5 billion years before the first multicellular organisms appeared.this long period for
More informationTable 1. Kinetic data obtained from SPR analysis of domain 11 mutants interacting with IGF-II. Kinetic parameters K D 1.
Kinetics and Thermodynamics of the Insulin-like Growth Factor II (IGF-II) Interaction with IGF-II/Mannose 6-phosphate Receptor and the function of CD and AB Loop Solvent-exposed Residues. Research Team:
More informationIntroduction to Comparative Protein Modeling. Chapter 4 Part I
Introduction to Comparative Protein Modeling Chapter 4 Part I 1 Information on Proteins Each modeling study depends on the quality of the known experimental data. Basis of the model Search in the literature
More information7.012 Problem Set 1. i) What are two main differences between prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells?
ame 7.01 Problem Set 1 Section Question 1 a) What are the four major types of biological molecules discussed in lecture? Give one important function of each type of biological molecule in the cell? b)
More informationRANK. Alternative names. Discovery. Structure. William J. Boyle* SUMMARY BACKGROUND
RANK William J. Boyle* Department of Cell Biology, Amgen, Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA * corresponding author tel: 805-447-4304, fax: 805-447-1982, e-mail: bboyle@amgen.com
More informationSunhats for plants. How plants detect dangerous ultraviolet rays
Sunhats for plants How plants detect dangerous ultraviolet rays Anyone who has ever suffered sunburn will know about the effects of too much ultraviolet (UV) radiation, in particular UV-B (from 280-315
More information7.06 Cell Biology EXAM #3 April 21, 2005
7.06 Cell Biology EXAM #3 April 21, 2005 This is an open book exam, and you are allowed access to books, a calculator, and notes but not computers or any other types of electronic devices. Please write
More informationReport. CED-10/Rac1 Mediates Axon Guidance by Regulating the Asymmetric Distribution of MIG-10/Lamellipodin
Current Biology 18, 808 813, June 3, 2008 ª2008 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.050 CED-10/Rac1 Mediates Axon Guidance by Regulating the Asymmetric Distribution of MIG-10/Lamellipodin
More informationAnalysis of correlated mutations in Ras G-domain
www.bioinformation.net Volume 13(6) Hypothesis Analysis of correlated mutations in Ras G-domain Ekta Pathak * Bioinformatics Department, MMV, Banaras Hindu University. Ekta Pathak - E-mail: ektavpathak@gmail.com;
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Fig. 1 Influences of crystal lattice contacts on Pol η structures. a. The dominant lattice contact between two hpol η molecules (silver and gold) in the type 1 crystals. b. A close-up view of the hydrophobic
More information13-3. Synthesis-Secretory pathway: Sort lumenal proteins, Secrete proteins, Sort membrane proteins
13-3. Synthesis-Secretory pathway: Sort lumenal proteins, Secrete proteins, Sort membrane proteins Molecular sorting: specific budding, vesicular transport, fusion 1. Why is this important? A. Form and
More informationVisual pigments. Neuroscience, Biochemistry Dr. Mamoun Ahram Third year, 2019
Visual pigments Neuroscience, Biochemistry Dr. Mamoun Ahram Third year, 2019 References Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/nbk11522/#a 127) The
More informationGene regulation I Biochemistry 302. Bob Kelm February 25, 2005
Gene regulation I Biochemistry 302 Bob Kelm February 25, 2005 Principles of gene regulation (cellular versus molecular level) Extracellular signals Chemical (e.g. hormones, growth factors) Environmental
More informationJCB. A novel Dbl family RhoGEF promotes Rho-dependent axon attraction to the central nervous system midline in Drosophila and overcomes Robo repulsion
JCB Report A novel Dbl family RhoGEF promotes Rho-dependent axon attraction to the central nervous system midline in Drosophila and overcomes Robo repulsion Greg J. Bashaw, 1,2 Hailan Hu, 2 Catherine D.
More informationSupplementary Figures
Supplementary Figures Supplementary Fig. S1: Normal development and organization of the embryonic ventral nerve cord in Platynereis. (A) Life cycle of Platynereis dumerilii. (B-F) Axonal scaffolds and
More informationSupplemental Data. Structure of the Rb C-Terminal Domain. Bound to E2F1-DP1: A Mechanism. for Phosphorylation-Induced E2F Release
Supplemental Data Structure of the Rb C-Terminal Domain Bound to E2F1-DP1: A Mechanism for Phosphorylation-Induced E2F Release Seth M. Rubin, Anne-Laure Gall, Ning Zheng, and Nikola P. Pavletich Section
More informationRibosome readthrough
Ribosome readthrough Starting from the base PROTEIN SYNTHESIS Eukaryotic translation can be divided into four stages: Initiation, Elongation, Termination and Recycling During translation, the ribosome
More informationBioinformatics Practical for Biochemists
Bioinformatics Practical for Biochemists Andrei Lupas, Birte Höcker, Steffen Schmidt WS 2013/14 03. Sequence Features Targeting proteins signal peptide targets proteins to the secretory pathway N-terminal
More informationProgramme Last week s quiz results + Summary Fold recognition Break Exercise: Modelling remote homologues
Programme 8.00-8.20 Last week s quiz results + Summary 8.20-9.00 Fold recognition 9.00-9.15 Break 9.15-11.20 Exercise: Modelling remote homologues 11.20-11.40 Summary & discussion 11.40-12.00 Quiz 1 Feedback
More informationNature Structural and Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1. Definition and assessment of ciap1 constructs.
Supplementary Figure 1 Definition and assessment of ciap1 constructs. (a) ciap1 constructs used in this study are shown as primary structure schematics with domains colored as in the main text. Mutations
More informationAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy I: Fluorescence (Foster) Resonance Energy Transfer
Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy I: Fluorescence (Foster) Resonance Energy Transfer 3.0 Pax 2.5 2.0 1200 800 400 GFP- Pax GFP-Pax + FATmCherry FAT FAT 1.5 Lifetime (ns) 0 1500 2000 2500 3000 Average lifetime
More information1. Ras-Interactors from the RASOMICS database
Transformation by ras oncogenes induces the deregulation of intracellular signalling cascades that are critical elements in cell growth control. Ras genes code for small GTPases that act as GDP/ GTP-regulated
More informationReception The target cell s detection of a signal coming from outside the cell May Occur by: Direct connect Through signal molecules
Why Do Cells Communicate? Regulation Cells need to control cellular processes In multicellular organism, cells signaling pathways coordinate the activities within individual cells that support the function
More informationSupplementary Figure 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of GFP oligomer variants with different linkers. Oligomer mixtures were applied to a PAGE gel containing
Supplementary Figure 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of GFP oligomer variants with different linkers. Oligomer mixtures were applied to a PAGE gel containing 0.1% SDS without boiling. The gel was analyzed by a fluorescent
More informationRegulation and signaling. Overview. Control of gene expression. Cells need to regulate the amounts of different proteins they express, depending on
Regulation and signaling Overview Cells need to regulate the amounts of different proteins they express, depending on cell development (skin vs liver cell) cell stage environmental conditions (food, temperature,
More informationSecondary Structure. Bioch/BIMS 503 Lecture 2. Structure and Function of Proteins. Further Reading. Φ, Ψ angles alone determine protein structure
Bioch/BIMS 503 Lecture 2 Structure and Function of Proteins August 28, 2008 Robert Nakamoto rkn3c@virginia.edu 2-0279 Secondary Structure Φ Ψ angles determine protein structure Φ Ψ angles are restricted
More informationMechanical Proteins. Stretching imunoglobulin and fibronectin. domains of the muscle protein titin. Adhesion Proteins of the Immune System
Mechanical Proteins F C D B A domains of the muscle protein titin E Stretching imunoglobulin and fibronectin G NIH Resource for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics Theoretical Biophysics Group,
More informationAxonal repulsion is a major force guiding the formation of the
Cross GTPase-activating protein (CrossGAP) Vilse links the Roundabout receptor to Rac to regulate midline repulsion Hailan Hu*, Ming Li, Juan-Pablo Labrador*, Jason McEwen*, Eric C. Lai*, Corey S. Goodman*,
More informationChapter 9 DNA recognition by eukaryotic transcription factors
Chapter 9 DNA recognition by eukaryotic transcription factors TRANSCRIPTION 101 Eukaryotic RNA polymerases RNA polymerase RNA polymerase I RNA polymerase II RNA polymerase III RNA polymerase IV Function
More informationSlit Stimulation Recruits Dock and Pak to the Roundabout Receptor and Increases Rac Activity to Regulate Axon Repulsion at the CNS Midline
Neuron, Vol. 40, 113 127, September 25, 2003, Copyright 2003 by Cell Press Slit Stimulation Recruits Dock and Pak to the Roundabout Receptor and Increases Rac Activity to Regulate Axon Repulsion at the
More informationBE 159: Signal Transduction and Mechanics in Morphogenesis
BE 159: Signal Transduction and Mechanics in Morphogenesis Justin Bois Caltech Winter, 2018 2018 Justin Bois. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0. 5 Delta-Notch
More informationTypes of biological networks. I. Intra-cellurar networks
Types of biological networks I. Intra-cellurar networks 1 Some intra-cellular networks: 1. Metabolic networks 2. Transcriptional regulation networks 3. Cell signalling networks 4. Protein-protein interaction
More informationFW 1 CDR 1 FW 2 CDR 2
Supplementary Figure 1 Supplementary Figure 1: Interface of the E9:Fas structure. The two interfaces formed by V H and V L of E9 with Fas are shown in stereo. The Fas receptor is represented as a surface
More informationwith%dr.%van%buskirk%%%
with%dr.%van%buskirk%%% How$to$do$well?$ Before$class:$read$the$corresponding$chapter$ Come$to$class$ready$to$par9cipate$in$Top$Hat$ Don t$miss$an$exam!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$ But$I m$not$good$with$science
More informationReferences on Kinetics and Mechanisms
References on Kinetics and Mechanisms Excellent reference for all aspects of enzyme kinetics including important elements of Metabolic Control Analysis of relevance to systems analysis of enzyme function
More informationTranslation. A ribosome, mrna, and trna.
Translation The basic processes of translation are conserved among prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Prokaryotic Translation A ribosome, mrna, and trna. In the initiation of translation in prokaryotes, the Shine-Dalgarno
More informationCELL-CELL COMMUNICATION
CELL-CELL COMMUNICATION paracrine & juxtacrine signalling autocrine & intracrine signalling methods to study cell-cell communication: attraction & repulsion chemotaxis & chemokinesis substrate preference
More informationCHAPTER 13 PROKARYOTE GENES: E. COLI LAC OPERON
PROKARYOTE GENES: E. COLI LAC OPERON CHAPTER 13 CHAPTER 13 PROKARYOTE GENES: E. COLI LAC OPERON Figure 1. Electron micrograph of growing E. coli. Some show the constriction at the location where daughter
More informationThe neuron as a secretory cell
The neuron as a secretory cell EXOCYTOSIS ENDOCYTOSIS The secretory pathway. Transport and sorting of proteins in the secretory pathway occur as they pass through the Golgi complex before reaching the
More informationAdvanced Topics in RNA and DNA. DNA Microarrays Aptamers
Quiz 1 Advanced Topics in RNA and DNA DNA Microarrays Aptamers 2 Quantifying mrna levels to asses protein expression 3 The DNA Microarray Experiment 4 Application of DNA Microarrays 5 Some applications
More informationEnergy and Cellular Metabolism
1 Chapter 4 About This Chapter Energy and Cellular Metabolism 2 Energy in biological systems Chemical reactions Enzymes Metabolism Figure 4.1 Energy transfer in the environment Table 4.1 Properties of
More informationBig Idea 3: Living systems store, retrieve, transmit and respond to information essential to life processes. Tuesday, December 27, 16
Big Idea 3: Living systems store, retrieve, transmit and respond to information essential to life processes. Enduring understanding 3.B: Expression of genetic information involves cellular and molecular
More information6 Mechanotransduction
6.1 Motivation The process of converting physical forces into biochemical signals and integrating these signals into the cellular response is referred to as mechnotransduction [11, 20]. To fully understand
More information5A Effects of receptor clustering and rebinding on intracellular signaling
5A Effects of receptor clustering and rebinding on intracellular signaling In the analysis of bacterial chemotaxis, we showed how receptor clustering can amplify a biochemical signal through cooperative
More informationTranscription Regulation And Gene Expression in Eukaryotes UPSTREAM TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS
Transcription Regulation And Gene Expression in Eukaryotes UPSTREAM TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS RG. Clerc March 26. 2008 UPSTREAM TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS Experimental approaches DNA binding domains (DBD) Transcription
More information