Mobility. Millbrae General Plan Update. Public Review Draft Existing Conditions Report 5-1 August 2016

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Mobility. Millbrae General Plan Update. Public Review Draft Existing Conditions Report 5-1 August 2016"

Gwendoline Dawson
5 years ago
Views:

1 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-1 ugust 2016

2 B 5-1 CU II orthern an ateo County esidents Percent of mployment ocation orkplaces orthern an ateo County 46% outhern an ateo County 10% an Francisco 31% anta Clara County 8% ast Bay 5% otal 100.0% ource: U.. Census Bureau, merican Community urvey five-year estimates. pecial abulation: Census ransportation Planning, downloaded arch 16, he merican Community urvey does not provide readily accessible tabulations of commute destinations for smaller cities such as illbrae; therefore, the totals for reported cities in northern an ateo County (outh an Francisco, an ateo) were compiled to represent illbrae patterns. 5-2 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

3 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 B 5-2 CU H City of illbrae and an ateo County esidents mployees ravel ode an ateo an ateo illbrae illbrae County County rive lone 71.4% 69.0% 67.6% 71.9% Carpool 9.5% 10.5% 11.9% 10.5% Public ransit 11.1% 10.1% 9.1% 7.0% Bike 0.3% 1.7% 0.3% 1.3% alk 2.0% 2.4% 2.7% 2.5% elecommute 3.4% 4.9% 5.7% 5.0% ther 2.3% 1.4% 2.8% 1.8% otal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% ource: merican Community urvey, 2014, as summarized by the etropolitan ransportation Commission. Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-3 ugust 2016

4 B 5-3 CII VI City of illbrae Collision everity otal Percent Fatal % Injury (evere) % Injury (ther Visible) % Injury (Complaint of Pain) % otal % ource: ransportation Injury apping ystem (I) based on tatewide Integrated raffic ecords ystem (I), downloaded arch 15, FIGU 5-1 PC F CII B CII VI ource: ransportation Injury apping ystem (I) based on tatewide Integrated raffic ecords ystem (I) downloaded arch 15, Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

5 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 B 5-4 CII VHIC P City of illbrae Vehicle Involvement otal Percent Pedestrian Collision % Bicycle Collision % otorcycle Collision % ruck Collision % uto nly % otal % ource: ransportation Injury apping ystem (I) based on tatewide Integrated raffic ecords ystem (I) downloaded arch 15, Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-5 ugust 2016

6 5-6 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

Figure 5-2: Collisions within City of illbrae 2010-2014 C I P K BU I P K J U I P C BI CU BKI C F G IG K BBU P K FIHU U K CVI 280 BVI BB KPU VG UU BC HCI I CFI IV BI P JUI KI BV CPUCHI HH CPI CP IG PK

G IB U H P BI B P HZ PUC C PI GI PP C C U V C P K B BC IV H CHBU P U I P K K HIC I VICI I IB C BUIG þ 82 FCIC II IP ß/ 101 F C I C B BV I I HCK QUI PI B I P K I B CU I C P K G UCHI B I I C GU C

7 Figure 5-2: Collisions within City of illbrae C I P K BU I P K J U I P C BI CU BKI C F G IG K BBU P K FIHU U K CVI 280 BVI BB KPU VG UU BC HCI I CFI IV BI P JUI KI BV CPUCHI HH CPI CP IG PK G H I C U C U B I P K C VI G CZZI IB I BKHI VI G PK PU VJ U H ICH U VI PI CP I H CI BI VI C PIG V CJ CI ICH IC F G H I P K U IC HII JI X B C P K I B C H U Z P K B ZI CI P CH VI I P K U I V I P K IG C G IB U H P BI B P HZ PUC C PI GI PP C C U V C P K B BC IV H CHBU P U I P K K HIC I VICI I IB C BUIG þ 82 FCIC II IP ß/ 101 F C I C B BV I I HCK QUI PI B I P K I B CU I C P K G UCHI B I I C GU C Intermodal ransportation tation: B/Caltrain/Future H Fatal Injury (evere) B F P K I B BH Injury (ther Visible) Injury (Complaint of Pain) ecreation (Includes Parks) illbrae City imits ource: illbrae Bicycle and Pedestrian ransportation Plan, ugust 2009, Kittelson & ssociates. ap ate: 6/14/ i

8 5-8 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

9 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-9 ugust 2016

10 5-10 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

IV H CHBU K K HIC I I þ 82 VICI IB C BUIG FCIC II IP ß/ 101 F C I C B BV I I HCK QUI PI H I G H I C K CU G UCHI B I I C GU C I C K Intermodal ransportation tation:

11 Figure 5-3: treet Classification Z J C BI C CU C K BKI F G K IG K FIHU BBU U 280 BVI BB KPU VG UU CVI BU BC HCI I CFI IV BI P JUI KI BV CPUCHI HH CPI CP IG PK C VI G CZZI IB I BKHI VI G PK PU U H ICH U VI VJ PI CP I H CI BI VI C PIG V U CJ CI ICH IC HII JI IC F X B B ZI CI P CH VI IG U C G IB I U H P BI B P HZ PUC C C PI GI PP C B BC IV H CHBU K K HIC I I þ 82 VICI IB C BUIG FCIC II IP ß/ 101 F C I C B BV I I HCK QUI PI H I G H I C K CU G UCHI B I I C GU C I C K Intermodal ransportation tation: B/Caltrain/Future H egional outes ajor rterials I C BH K inor rterials Collector treets illbrae City imits ource: ilbrae General Plan, ovember, 1998 ap ate: 6/14/ i

12 5-12 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

13 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-13 ugust 2016

14 5-14 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

15 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-15 ugust 2016

16 B 5-5 G I FFIC VU City of illbrae I treet egment egional outes 82/l Camino Count ear 19,300 eal. of illbrae ve /l Camino 31,000 eal Btwn illbrae and Center /l Camino 22,400 eal. of Center 2014 U 101. of illbrae ve ,000 U 101. of illbrae ve ,000 I-280. of rousdale ,000 I-280 Btwn rousdale & Hillcrest ,000 I-280 Btwn illbrae & arkspur ,000 I-280. of arkspur ,000 ocal treets 1 lpine ay Btwn Clearfield & pringfield lta oma el Centro nita rive aurel venue Broadway Btwn Center & udeman ,650 9 Broadway Btwn aylor & eadow Glen , Broadway () Btwn illbrae & agnolia California rive Btwn Irwin & urchison , Center treet Btwn Broadway & l Camino eal , Center treet Btwn l Camino eal & an nselmo , Clearfield rive Btwn lpine & l Capitan , Clearfield rive Btwn iverton & lpine , Crestview rive. of iverton , Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

17 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 B 5-5 G I FFIC VU City of illbrae I treet egment Count ear 22 Crestview rive Btwn uolomne & pringfield , Cypress venue. of Park el Centro t lta oma ast illbrae 22, venue Btwn ld Bayshore & U 101 n-amp Hazel venue Btwn Hillcrest & aylor Hazel venue Btwn aurel & aylor Helen rive t leepy Hollow orth , Helen rive t leepy Hollow ast , Helen rive t arkspur , Helen rive Btwn agnolia & aurel , Hillcrest Boulevard t inorca , Hillcrest Boulevard t Vista Grande , Hillcrest Boulevard. of inda Vista , Hillcrest Boulevard. of inda Vista , Hillcrest Boulevard Btwn Palm & Hazel , a Cruz venue t Poplar arkspur rive t Pinehurst , arkspur rive t Pump tation (. of Crestview) , arkspur rive t idgewood , aurel venue t nita , aurel venue Btwn Hazel & aylor inda Vista t Hillcrest 2008 n/a 53 omita venue t pur Property , agnolia venue Btwn Park & Capuchino , agnolia venue. of ichmond , agnolia venue Btwn udeman & Green Hills , illbrae venue Btwn l Camino eal & ollins , illbrae venue Btwn lder & Palm , illbrae venue Btwn kyline & Vallejo , illbrae venue Btwn Palm & lder , illbrae venue. of Palm , urchison rive Btwn Conejo & Valencia , urchison rive Btwn arcella & equoia , urchison rive Btwn. shton & arcella , ld Bayshore Hwy Btwn Burlingame & illbrae , Palm venue Btwn ansdale & ichmond ,960 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-17 ugust 2016

18 B 5-5 G I FFIC VU City of illbrae I treet egment Count ear 83 Palm venue Btwn ansdale & aylor , Palm venue. of illbrae Park Boulevard. of Cypress , Park Boulevard. of Cypress , Poplar venue t a Cruz , Poplar venue. of aylor , ichmond rive t agnolia , ichmond rive Btwn ioga & Geraldine , idgewood rive t arkspur , iverton rive. of Crestview , ollins oad Btwn Burlingame & drian ,860 anta Florita 3, venue t Bayview kyline Boulevard t Fire House (. of iverton) , kyline Boulevard Btwn illbrae & Hillcrest , kyline Boulevard Btwn iverton & arkspur , leepy Hollow ane Btwn hwahnee & Helen , pringfield rive Btwn lpine & Crestview aylor Boulevard t lder , aylor Boulevard Btwn l Camino eal & Broadway , aylor Boulevard. of Poplar , aylor Boulevard Btwn Hazel & aurel , uolomne rive Btwn Crestview & uolomne Vista Grande t Hillcrest , Broadway. of Hillcrest , omita venue Btwn anta Barbara & Bayview , urchison rive. of agnolia , idgewood rive. of omita , /l Camino eal. of illbrae ,990 ources: Caltrans raffic ata Branch City of illbrae traffic counts, 2006 to ote: egment numbers are not continuous due to exclusion of selected segments with inaccurate or outdated count data Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

19 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-19 ugust 2016

20 evel of ervice () < 10 B 5-6 HIGH CPCI U V F VIC CII IGIZ ICI verage elay (seconds/ vehicle) B > 10 and < 20 C > 20 and < 35 > 35 and < 55 > 55 and < 80 F > 80 escription Very ow elay: his level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during a green phase. ost vehicles do not stop at all. hort cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. inimal elays: his level of service generally occurs with good progression, short cycle lengths, or both. ore vehicles stop than at, causing higher levels of average delay. cceptable elay: elay increases due to fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level of service. he number of vehicles stopping is significant, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. pproaching Unstable peration/ignificant elays: he influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. onger delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume/capacity ratios. any vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Unstable peration/ubstantial elays: hese high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume/capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. xcessive elays: his level, considered unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with oversaturation (that is, when arrival traffic volumes exceed the capacity of the intersection). It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. ource: Highway Capacity anual (HC), 2010, ransportation esearch Board, ashington, C Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

21 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 B 5-7 HIGH CPCI U V F VIC CII UIGIZ ICI evel of verage elay ervice () (seconds/vehicle) escription < 10 Very ow elay B > 10 and < 15 inimal elays C > 15 and < 25 cceptable elay > 25 and < 35 pproaching Unstable peration and/or ignificant elays > 35 and < 50 Unstable peration and/or ubstantial elays F > 50 xcessive elays ource: Highway Capacity anual, 2010, ransportation esearch Board, ashington,.c. Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-21 ugust 2016

22 B 5-8 ICI V F VIC (XIIG CII) o. orth-outh Cross treet ast-est Cross treet raffic Control Peak- Hour elay (seconds) 1 l Camino eal Hillcrest Boulevard ignal 2 l Camino eal a Cruz venue 1-ay top 3 l Camino eal Victoria venue ignal 4 l Camino eal illbrae venue ignal 5 l Camino eal urchison rive ignal 7 California rive urchison rive 2-ay top 8 ollins oad illbrae venue ignal 9 U 101 B amps illbrae venue ignal 10 U 101 B amps illbrae venue ignal 11 l Camino eal ilva venue ignal 12 l Camino eal eadow Glen venue ignal 13 l Camino eal Center treet ignal 14 l Camino eal Park Place ignal 15 ld Bayshore Highway illbrae venue ignal 16 agnolia venue illbrae venue ignal B 15 P B 20 /F 1/>50 P F/F >50/>50 B 16 P B P 52 B 17 P C 29 /C 8/17 P /C 9/15 C 31 P P B 12 8 P 7 8 P B 18 B 17 P C 26 B 16 P B 16 C 27 P B 19 B 12 P B 16 C 30 P Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

23 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 B 5-8 ICI V F VIC (XIIG CII) o. orth-outh Cross treet ast-est Cross treet raffic Control Peak- Hour elay (seconds) 17 Broadway a Cruz venue ll-ay top 18 Broadway Hillcrest Boulevard ll-ay top 19 Broadway eadow Glen venue ll-ay top 20 agnolia venue aylor Boulevard ll-ay top 21 agnolia venue illwood rive ll-ay top 22 inorca ay Camino lto/aylor ll-ay top 23 equoia venue urchison rive ll-ay top 24 gden rive urchison rive ll-ay top 25 osswood ane Helen rive 1-ay top 26 aurel/barcelona udeman ane ll-ay top 27 l Camino eal Park Boulevard 1-ay top 28 kyline Boulevard Hillcrest Boulevard ll-ay top 29 kyline Boulevard arkspur rive ll-ay top 30 aurel venue ichmond rive ll-ay top 8 P 9 B 10 P B 13 B 13 P C 16 B 13 P C 19 B 11 P 8 B 11 P 7 B 11 P 9 B 13 P B 11 /C 3/21 P /B 4/10 B 12 P 8 /F 3/>50 P F/F >50/>50 C 17 P 27 C 17 P 35 B 14 P 10 ote: For 1-ay and 2-ay top, and elay represent average of all vehicles passing through intersection/vehicles on most difficult movement. ource: Kittelson & ssociates, Inc.,2016. Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-23 ugust 2016

24 5-24 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

25 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-25 ugust 2016

26 5-26 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

27 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-27 ugust 2016

28 5-28 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

29 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-29 ugust 2016

30 5-30 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

31 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-31 ugust 2016

32 5-32 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

Figure 5-4: Bicycle Facilities and ff-treet rails J U I P an ndreas rail C BI CU BKI G eadows lementary chool C F ¹º IG K FIHU BBU U K pur rail Crystal prings rail 280 C I P K BVI ¹º BB KPU CVI BU BC

VJ PI Capuchino High chool U H ICH CP I H ¹º CI BI VI C PIG V U CJ ¹º CI ICH IC HII JI IC F X B C P K I B C H U Z P K omita Park lementary chool VI B ZI CI IG P CH I P K U I V I P K C G IB U H P BI B

33 Figure 5-4: Bicycle Facilities and ff-treet rails J U I P an ndreas rail C BI CU BKI G eadows lementary chool C F ¹º IG K FIHU BBU U K pur rail Crystal prings rail 280 C I P K BVI ¹º BB KPU CVI BU BC Glen aks ontessori P K VG UU HCI I CFI IV BI P JUI CPUCHI I P K HH CPI KI BV CP IG PK C VI G ¹º CZZI IB I BKHI VI G PK I P K PU ¹º Green Hills G lementary H I C U C U B chool l rai C amp awye r U VI VJ PI Capuchino High chool U H ICH CP I H ¹º CI BI VI C PIG V U CJ ¹º CI ICH IC HII JI IC F X B C P K I B C H U Z P K omita Park lementary chool VI B ZI CI IG P CH I P K U I V I P K C G IB U H P BI B P HZ PUC G H I P K t. unstan's ¹º chool aylor iddle chool P K C PI GI PP C C U V C P K B BC IV H CHBU K HIC I I þ 82 VICI IB il p ur ra C ¹º pring Valley chool ¹º BUIG FCIC II IP ß/ 101 F C I C B BV I I HCK QUI PI CU ills High chool I C P K B I P K I B G UCHI B I I C GU C Intermodal ransportation tation: B/Caltrain/Future H ¹º chools B F P K I B BH Bike rail (Class 1) Bike rail (Class 1) Proposed Bike ane (Class 2) Bike oute (Class 3) Bike oute (Class 3) Proposed ecreation (Includes Parks) illbrae City imits Bay rail ource: illbrae Bicycle and Pedestrian ransportation Plan, ugust 2009, Kittelson & ssociates. ap ate: 6/14/ i

34 5-34 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

35 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-35 ugust 2016

36 5-36 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

37 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-37 ugust 2016

38 5-38 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

39 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-39 ugust 2016

40 5-40 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

41 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-41 ugust 2016

42 B 5-9 CI PU I illbrae ransit Center irection Peak Period Baby Bullet imited top ocal orthbound 6:26, 6:47, 7:26, 7:47, 8:26, 8:50 7:01, 7:19, 8:01, 8:19, 9:01, 9:19, 9:47, 10:53 5:35, 6:10, 10:20, 11:20 P 5:07, 5:27, 6:09, 6:28, 7:07 outhbound 7:15, 7:32, 8:15, 8:32, 9:15 P 4:25, 4:49, 5:30, 5:49, 6:30, 6:49 ource: Caltrain website, arch :43, 4:45, 4:59, 5:45, 6:01, 6:45, 6:59, 7:43, 6:29, 6:48, 7:01, 7:48, 8:01, 8:48, 9:01, 9:55 2:55, 3:55, 4:56, 5:14, 5:56, 6:14, 6:56, 7:14 12:15, 1:15, 2:15, 3:20, 4:12, 7:55, 8:35, 9:35, 10:35, 11:35 5:19, 5:49, 9:31, 10:31, 11:31 12:31, 1:31, 2:31, 3:31, 7:54, 9:04, 10:04, 11:04, 12: Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

43 CPI KI BV CP IG PK C VI G ¹º CZZI IB I BKHI VI G PK PU ¹º U H ICH U VI VJ PI CP I H ¹º CI BI VI C PIG V U CJ ¹º CI ¹º ICH

KX HIC I I þ 82 VICI IB C ¹º ¹º BUIG FCIC II IP ß/ 101 F CI C B BV I I HCK QUI PI CU! 391!46 G UCHI B! 390! 292 I!

43 Figure 5-5: ransit ervice! 141 BU C BI CU BKI C F G ¹º IG K FIHU BBU U K 280 BVI ¹º BB KPU VG UU CVI BC HCI I CFI IV BI P JUI CPUCHI HH!43 CPI KI BV CP IG PK C VI G ¹º CZZI IB I BKHI VI G PK PU ¹º U H ICH U VI VJ PI CP I H ¹º CI BI VI C PIG V U CJ ¹º CI ¹º ICH IC HII JI IC F X B B ZI CI P CH VI IG U C G IB U H P BI B P HZ PUC C PI GI PP C B BC IV H CHBU K! KX HIC I I þ 82 VICI IB C ¹º ¹º BUIG FCIC II IP ß/ 101 F CI C B BV I I HCK QUI PI CU! 391!46 G UCHI B! 390! 292 I! C I C GU C Intermodal ransportation tation: B/Caltrain/Future H! 397 Bus tops ¹º chools B ail Caltrain ail BH! 359 amrans Bus outes illbrae City imits ource: amrans GF ata xchange, Caltrans, ilbrae Bicycle and Pedestrian ransportation Plans ugust, 2009 ap ate: 6/14/ i

44 5-44 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

45 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-45 ugust 2016

46 5-46 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

47 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-47 ugust 2016

48 B 5-10 FCIC II IP CIVI ir raffic Control ower perations Count Percent Change ir Carrier 335, , % ir axi (charters) 81,051 59, % Civil viation (private) 12,623 13, % ilitary 2,813 2, % otal 431, , % otal irport Passengers Percent Change omestic 36,804,461 38,805, % International 10,269,701 11,243, % hrough Passengers 80,938 18,414 n/a otal 47,155,100 50,067, % Cars xited Percent Change Garage and ot xits 3,530,144 3,550, % ource: an Francisco International irport. nalysis of cheduled irline raffic, Comparative raffic eport. ecember, Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

49 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-49 ugust 2016

50 5-50 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

51 100' 150' V B 150' B U 0 B V B G I P K C B I U 150' U I C U B C B I I HI 100' C F F H 9 I C G B V B HI GH U 35 G HI 50' I F B HI I I C V I U 150' 100' 150' I C F B U K 35 H U B I HI B K I B V I F G ource: C/CG Comprehensive irport and Use Compatibility Plan for the irport and Use Plan ap ate: 2012 nvirons ofovember an Francisco irport, icondo & ssociates. Per 14 CF PartComprehensive 77, International developers proposing structures taller than H apfor ate: ovember 2012 the nvirons of an Francisco International irport the indicated elevations must file Form with the F at B an ateo bove Ground evel H IG FI V G HI V V B H G U H IB B B C G HU V B U B V K B F C P C HI H U G HI B H H I C C I V I C U B K G B B an ateo 200 Feet Hillsborough F H HU V B GH U B 35 H HU V V IU C C I H V Hillsborough Hillsborough B an ateo P U I G P I HI C G HI P P P V H U G K B B P HU K H H ' Burlingame 50 ' H IG C FI I C C V B B I 20 U K illbrae 1 H IG V B H FI B B B HU I H HU U 0' P P 0' Burlingame 50 ' 1 G HU 15 Intermodal ransportation tation: International irport B/Caltrain/Future H ' Burlingame 0' 10 1 U FI I 6' B HI C B I an Francisco an Francisco Bay B H I H IG V surface rising 1 foot vertically for every 100 feet horizontally) from 77.9(c) - oadways, the railroads, waterways are evaluated nearestand point of the nearest runway. he 100:1 surface is based on heights above shown surfaceas providing follows: for vehicles; by specified 200 mobile and more QUI amounts or by theg height off theifici highest object normally 20,000 Feet imit From earest unway traversing the transportation corridor; 77.9(c) - oadways, railroads, and waterways are evaluated levation bovemust ean eaf evel B tation 100 structure proponent file Form , otice of based on heights above surface providing for vehicles; by specified Construction or lteration, for any proposed construction 77.9(d) - ny constructionproposed or CI alteration on any public-use or tation amounts or by the height of theground highest (G) mobile object normally Heights of 100:1 urface bove military airport (or heliport). or alteration that meets any of the following otification Criteria traversing theboundary transportation corridor; unicipal described in 14 CF Part 77.9: errain Penetrations of irspace urface tructure proponents or their representatives file via traditional ailroad- nymay 77.9(d) or alteration on any public-use or ess than 30construction height more than 200 feet above ground level (G) at paper forms via U mail, or 77.9(a) online at- the F s / website, Freeway military airport (or heliport). its site; oad tructure proponents or feet theirof representatives may file3,200 via traditional (b) - ithin 20,000 a runway more than feet in paper formsexceeding via U mail, or online at the F s / website, length, and a 100:1 slope imaginary surface (i.e., a G ote: surface rising 1 foot vertically for every 100 feet horizontally) from point of the nearest runway. he 100:1 surface is B tation the nearest Per 14 CF Part 77, developers proposing structures taller than shown asand follows: 200 more CI tation G the indicated elevations must fileimit FormFrom with unway the F at 20,000 Feet earest unicipal 77.9(c) -before oadways, railroads, and ea waterways are due evaluated leastboundary 30 days the proposed However, B tation levation boveconstruction. ean evel 100 based on heights above surface providing for vehicles;as by specified ailroad to local requirements for a favorable F determination CI tation amounts or byofthe height of the highest mobile object normally Heights 100:1 urface Ground a contingency for project approval, it isbove advisable to file (G) the Freeway traversing the transportation corridor; unicipal Boundary Form as errain soon as Penetrations possible because the F can take of irspace urface oad ailroad several months to undertake aeronautical reviews. 77.9(d) - ny construction or alteration on any public-use or ess than 30 military airport (or heliport). Freeway ote: ource: oad tructure proponents their representatives may file via traditional or Per 14 CF Part 77, developers proposing structures taller than paper forms via U mail, online at the F s / website, icondo & ssociates, Inc. andorjacobs Consultancy, ote: the indicated elevations must file Form with B, theection F at77.9. based on 14 CF Part , ubpart least 30 days before the proposed construction. However, due Per 14 CF 77, developers to local requirements for a favorable F Part determination as proposing structures taller than H 200 and more G a contingency for project approval, it is advisable to file thefile Form with the F at the indicated elevations must least 30 before thecan proposed However, due 77.9(c) - days oadways, railroads, waterways are evaluated Form as soon as possible because the F takeand construction. B tation H 9 based on heights above surface providingf for vehicles; by specified several months to undertake aeronautical reviews. to local requirements for a favorable determination as CI tation amounts or by the the highest object normally a contingency forheight projectofapproval, it is mobile advisable to file the 0 transportation corridor; 0.6 traversingunicipal the ource: Form as Boundary soon as possible because the F can take iles severalailroad to undertake 77.9(d) - months ny construction or aeronautical alteration onreviews. any public-use or V V icondo &ssociates, Inc. and Jacobs Consultancy, Freeway military airport (or heliport). H CF Part 77, ubpart based 1on B, ection ource:oad ource: C/CG Comprehensive irport Use Compatibility Plan for tructure proponents or and their representatives may file via the traditional xhibit IV-12 forms U mail, or online atuse the F s / website, H icondo &via ssociates, Inc. and Jacobs Consultancy, nvironsource: of anpaper Francisco International irport, icondo & ssociates. F IFICI F C/CG Comprehensive irport and Compatibility Plan for the ote: on 14 CF Part 77, ubpart B,--icondo ection ap ate: ovember FIIG QUI UH nvirons ofbased an2012 Francisco International irport, &I ssociates. U 50' levation Intermodal ransportation tation: 10' B/Caltrain/Future H levation I 101 levation 9' 100' levation 13' errain Penetrations of irspace urface (d) - ny construction or30alteration on anyground public-use or essmore thanthan 77.9(a) - height 200 feet above level (G) at itsairport site; (or heliport) military tructure proponents or20,000 their representatives maymore file via traditional (b) - ithin feet of a runway than 3,200 feet in paperlength, forms via mail, or online at the F s /surface website,(i.e., a andu exceeding a 100:1 slope imaginary 200 and more ' B V B V U I B B C U B K P B H K an Francisco International irport levation levation Feet Feet BIF H I B V the nearest point of the nearest runway. he 100:1 surface is levation bove ean ea evel shown as follows: F IFICI QUI 200 and more Heights of 100:1 urface bove Ground 20,000(G) Feet imit From earest unway 77.9(c) - oadways, railroads, and are evaluated errain Penetrations of100 irspace urface levation eanform ea evel structure proponent mustbove file waterways F , otice of basedproposed on heights above surface providing for by specified Construction or lteration, for vehicles; any proposed construction ess thanamounts 30 orheights by thethat height of the highest mobile Ground object normally ofmeets 100:1 urface (G) or alteration any of the bove following otification Criteria the transportation corridor; traversing described in 14 CF Part 77.9: an Francisco Bay levation 13' H P I B V G P levation 10' B V B I H K G P I B K P P K levation 13' levation C 11' H P I H P H K B levation 10' levation 5' V H C HU V G VI U levation B B 0' H 20 ' levation levation 13' 9' I C I I an an ndreas ndreas ake ake I 82 illbrae K Pacifica I 1 10 P 0 P G I C H U C ' 0' 200 Feet bove Ground evel levation B 6'1 11' B 101 outh an Francisco H 1 I H C B U V 1 B QU IH V C V I B U an an ndreas ndreas ake ake 200 Feet U C H B B G I Pacifica I I B 50' 100 G K levation 13' V 10' C IF QU G 101 I VI H I I K V I H C J C J U levation H H levation Feet C levation Feet G I 11' I C B IF QU BUI K H H I 101 B U V V C C P 82 I U CH levation B I H I I C 13' 101 V C 82 G K V V I V Intermodal ransportation tation: I VV G V I V I B/Caltrain/Future H levation B CK G IH J V K levation H G13' I B H V C I C H B I B Z 10' I U B G K 101 VI 280 I K I H C C U J U C H levation H G H 4 I P 82 C 11' QU B BU K IF H H I 3 U V B U C C V C H P 82 H I I C 5 H U C B I I H I 101 V C 82 H I V B I Z I V V 280 B H K G I V V H H I B V 9 C 4 I B H Z I P G VI ower svr ower Crystal Crystal prings prings280 svr I U K U C I H C J U H V H H G B 4 H I CH 5 C BU QU K IF H H 6 I HI I G HU V V K U an Bruno BU V 5' 50 10' Burlingame 82 0' 50 illbrae ' levation H H B an an ndreas ndreas ake ake V U U B B HI C V I C I G V illbrae C P P 380 I CH C H C I V B G levation 10' 101 V H B V I G I V U V V J I Pacifica V H HUI K V U an ake anndreas ndreas ake Pacifica B BU H I V an Bruno V I illbrae I K an an ndreas ndreas ake ake I G C G I C I G V I V H G B V P P CH I I I HU U B U C G H C Pacifica V I H levation Figure 5-6: F otification Form equiremnts outh ide B Filing V V G levation levation Feet Feet levation 13' B K P B 50' 100' levation 11' 77.9(b) - ithin 20,000 feet of athan runway more than 3,200 feet in ess 77.9(a) -30 height more than 200 feet above ground level (G) at length, and exceeding a 100:1 slope imaginary surface (i.e., a its site; surface rising 1 foot vertically for every 100 feet horizontally) from the nearest point of the nearest runway. he 100:1 surface is (b) - ithin 20,000 feet of a runway more than 3,200 feet in shown as follows: length, and exceeding a 100:1 slope imaginary surface (i.e., a ,000 Feet imit From earest surface rising 1unway foot vertically for every 100 feet horizontally) from an Francisco Bay an Francisco International irport 13' Feet levation levation Feet B P I G P I 380 an Francisco Bay levation 13' levation an Francisco 10' International irport levation U G I HI levation 9' outh an Francisco 1 1 I levation 10' levation levation 6' 10' 101 I V J C V H BU C an Bruno BC I levation 6' V G levationlevation 5' 9' I HU I V J V HI V C C I I G V V V BU U B C an Bruno G H 380 G levation levation Feet Feet 77.9(b) - ithin 20,000 feet of a runway more than 3,200 feet in F IFICI QUI length, and exceeding a 100:1 slope imaginary surface (i.e., a surface rising 1 foot vertically for every 100 feet horizontally) from the nearest point of the nearest runway. structure proponent must file F Form , otice he of 100:1 surface is shown follows: for any proposed construction Proposed Construction or as lteration, F IFICI QUI or alteration that meets any of20,000 the following otification Criteria Feet imit From earest unway described in 14 CF Part 77.9: levation bove ean ea evel 100 structure proponent must file F Form , otice of Proposed Construction or lteration, for any proposed construction 77.9(a) - height Heights more thanof 200 feet above ground level Ground (G) at (G) urface bove or100:1 alteration that meets any of the following otification Criteria its site; described in 14 CF Part 77.9: errain Penetrations of irspace urface an Francisco Bay an Francisco International irport outh an Francisco levation 10' 6' levation 5' I V H J V U HI B I G 380 I HU outh an Francisco levation an Bruno BU levation 9' 77.9(a) - height more than 200 feet above ground level (G) at its site; C H I G V ca V V I H levation 5' U B G H I G V 380 I HU structure proponent must file F Form , otice of Proposed Construction or lteration, for any proposed construction or alteration that meets any of the following otification Criteria described in 14 CF Part 77.9: I G H F IFICI QUI outh an Francisco Figure 5-6: F otification Form Filing equiremnts outh ide Figure 5-6: F otification Form Filing equiremnts outh ide G least 30 days before the proposed construction. However, due B tation iles to local requirements for a favorable F determination as City/County of Governments CIssociation tation a contingency for project approval, it is advisable to file the County, 0.6 of 0an ateo California unicipal Boundary C/CG

52 5-52 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

Figure 5-6: F otification Form 7460-1 Filing equiremnts outh ide Figure 5-7: 14 CF Part 77 irport Imaginary urfaces outh ide 28 28 28 2 8 50 ' 150' V V 0 B V B BU F BU 3 B F 0' 15 0' 15 C C 100' 0'

53 Figure 5-6: F otification Form Filing equiremnts outh ide Figure 5-7: 14 CF Part 77 irport Imaginary urfaces outh ide ' 150' V V 0 B V B BU F BU 3 B F 0' 15 0' 15 C C 100' 0' 10 0' V C B I F C H 50' I I B I C K B B HI I I I HI I F U V I B 4 PH ource: ource: C/CG Comprehensive irport and Use Compatibility Plan for the nvirons of an Francisco International irport, icondo & ssociates. H icondo & ssociates, Inc. and Jacobs Consultancy, ap ate: ovember 2012 based on 14 CF Part 77, ubpart B, ection ource: C/CG Comprehensive irport and Use Compatibility Plan for the xhibit IV-15 nvirons of an Francisco International irport, icondo & ssociates. H ap ate: ovember CF P 77 IP IGI UFC -- UH I H I 9 Comprehensive irport and Use Plan iles for the nvirons of an Francisco International irport G V H 82 H 5 B HI G 3 HI I ' U U I PH V B B B HU an ateo H Z I B B I H V HU P P an ateo Hillsborough V Z I I B B B I Per 14 CF Part H 77, developers proposing structures taller than the indicated elevations must file Form with the F at least 30 days before the proposed construction. However, due 14 CF Part 77 urfaces: City and County of an Francisco, to local requirements for a favorable F determination as icondo & ssociates, Inc., 2010 a contingency for project approval, it is advisable to file the as possible 0.5 because the F can take Form as soon iles several months to undertake aeronautical reviews. ources: P U H C an ateo U 82 H IG U FI U B V U B HU I P 82 ote: H IG I V BU H V I C C B H I V H I 82 P G C G 35 CH H U I C C U G HI I V C BU V K H I B P U H I C I 101IG V B GH U B V GH B U F K K VI Hillsborough H B V G HI C J I K 280 V G I BU B K U I K I P B HI C C I K VI U C F HP V V B K V G G oad I H V CI tation I FI I CK J G 101 V I C C C K VV HU 0' U I V 77.9(d) - ny construction or alteration on any public-use or military airport (or heliport). I 0' Burlingame CK VI B J 200 and more 77.9(c) - oadways, railroads, and waterways are evaluated based on heights above surface providing for vehicles; by specified amounts or by the height of the highest mobile object normally traversing the transportation corridor; unicipal Boundary 14 CF Part 77 urfaces: City and County of an Francisco, ailroad icondo & ssociates, Inc., 2010 Freeway H IG G I B tation B V V tructure proponents or their representatives may file via traditional paper forms via U mail, or online at the F s / website, QU I V 101 B K P V B V B Heights of 100:1 urface bove Ground (G) Isometric rawing of 14 CF Part 77, ection errain Penetrations of irspace urface Civil irport Imaginary urfaces C/CG iles B G P I P K 77.9(b) - ithin egional Park or ecreation rea20,000 feet of a runway more than 3,200 feet in length, and exceeding a 100:1 slope imaginary surface (i.e., a unicipal Boundary surface rising 1 foot vertically for every 100 feet horizontally) from the nearest point of the nearest runway. he 100:1 surface is ailroads shown as follows: Freeways 20,000 Feet imit From earest unway oads levation bove ean ea evel 100 U ' ' 50 V B P K V B P K U P K 5 0' ' 0' ' 0' 10 G I P V U 10 0' ' 15 ' 0' ' 15 ' 0' 16 Isometric rawing of 14 CF Part 77, ection its site; Civil irport Imaginary urfaces CI tations G FI I P B 300' 250' ' B B tations 77.9(a) - height more than 200 feet above ground level (G) at HU H 20 V IF B ' 100' ess than 30 B HU C H I V 0' Burlingame Burlingame I 200' U C H B B 10 I IF 350' I Ho rizontal urface C 163.2' I 300' QU ailroads structure proponent must file F Form , otice of 14 CF Part 77 Civil irport Imaginary urfaces Proposed Construction or lteration, for any proposed construction Freeways levation Contour, feet that meets any of the following otification Criteria or alteration oads in 14 CF Part 77.9: described ources: 250' C B H IF QU C ' H Intermodal ransportation tation: B/Caltrain/Future H 200' Intermodal ransportation tation: B/Caltrain/Future H H BC HI IU H B H CH I U H I V B B K B V I I I H U H K B CH I U P P P P P G I I V U G B V B P P H ' ' '.2 ' ' P I G. 2' 163 C U HI C H G HI C B I ' 250 I V ' ' 50 ' ' 0 ' ' ' 50 ' ' 0 ' 19 K I G U CI tations egional Park or ecreation rea F IFICI QUI unicipal Boundary G levation 13' levation Contour, feet B tations 19 = 10.0' 1 = 10.3' V 1 I levation ' = 11.3' = 13.1' 1 1levation C B 10' 101 H 1 levation 1 11' B CH H B I 28 = 7' 12. I B V V 1 = 10. 3' C U IC H B H I Horizontal urface ' 1 1 = 11.3' V 5 illbrae B V 0 ' V I I I H HI C 200 Feet an Francisco Bay 28 = 12.7' U illbrae an an ndreas ndreas ake ake C V I G C I levation levation Feet Feet V levation 6' ' G U an an ndreas ndreas ake ake H 19 = 8.8' G B an an ndreas ndreas ake ake illbrae I H 14 CF Part 77 Civil irport Imaginary urfaces 100' an Francisco International irport an Francisco levation levation Feet Feet Bay levation levation 9' an Francisco 10' 19 = 10.0' Bay an Francisco International irport 28 = 13. an Francisco 1' levation levation Feet Feet International irport levation 5' 10 = 5.4' 10 = 5.9' V B C K C I I C Pacifica V G I I V C C HI B C G I J I C V an Bruno C BU HI I U B an Bruno G J V I V an Bruno C I G V I 380 I HU I HU HI C V I U V BH J 19 = 8.8' outh an Francisco outh an Francisco = 5.9' G H 7H G I 380 I I HU C C H ' 10 = 5.4' U B G outh an Francisco H 7H 16 H City/County ssociation of Governments of an ateo County, California

54 5-54 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

55 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-55 ugust 2016

56 5-56 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

57 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 B 5-11 XIU VHIC IGH II City of illbrae aximum Gross Vehicle eight treet egment 27,000 pounds l Camino eal ll within city limits illbrae venue Between U 101 and l Camino eal ( 82) 8,500 pounds illbrae venue Between l Camino eal ( 82) and kyline Boulevard kyline Boulevard Between illbrae venue and arkspur rive ld Bayshore Highway Between south city limits and illbrae venue ollins oad Between south city limits and illbrae venue illbrae venue Between Bayshore Highway and U 101 urchison rive Between California rive and l Camino eal ( 82) 6,000 pounds ll other ource: illbrae unicipal Code Chapter 4.40, February Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-57 ugust 2016

58 5-58 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

59 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-59 ugust 2016

60 B 5-12 PKIG UPP City of illbrae ype of Parking owntown Core rea xtended Parking tudy rea Private off-street 998 1,636 Public off-street Public on-street 723 1,865 otal 1,959 3,826 ource: Kimley-Horn and ssociates. owntown illbrae 2002 emand and upply tudy Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

61 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-61 ugust 2016

62 5-62 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

63 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-63 ugust 2016

64 5-64 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

65 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-65 ugust 2016

66 5-66 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

67 obility illbrae General Plan Update 5 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport 5-67 ugust 2016

68 5-68 Public eview raft xisting Conditions eport ugust 2016

Prospect City Limits/Project Study Area. County Boundary

Prospect City Limits/Project Study Area. County Boundary I SP G FS P IG 841 P B C H B F P CK S F T T I H I J C S S TH S F G FF CI S FI I H PP C K G I H JFF S I B T C S ST T I B I G P H SC IG B B H F I G G H I C F P CH S H I I Prospect City imits/project Study