Plan of the Lecture. Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design.


 Kristina Ellis
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Plan of the Lecture Review: design using Root Locus; dynamic compensation; PD and lead control Today s topic: PI and lag control; introduction to frequencyresponse design method Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design. Reading: FPE, Sections , 6.
2 Recap: Lead & Lag Compensators Consider a general controller of the form K s + z s + p K, z, p > 0 are design parameters Depending on the relative values of z and p, we call it: a lead compensator when z < p a lag compensator when z > p Why the name lead/lag? think frequency response jω + z = (jω + z) (jω + p) = ψ φ jω + p if z < p, then ψ φ > 0 (phase lead) if z > p, then ψ φ < 0 (phase lag) z p!
3 Approximate PI via Dynamic Compensation PI control achieves the objective of stabilization and perfect steadystate tracking of constant references; however, just as with PD earlier, we want a stable controller. Here s an idea: replace K s + s More generally, if z = K I /K P, then by K s +, where p is small s + p replace K s + z s by K s + z s + p, where p < z This is lag compensation (or lag control)! We use lag controllers as dynamic compensators for approximate PI control.
4 Approximate PI via Lag Compensation G c (s) = K s + z s + p, p < z G p(s) = s How good is this controller? Tracking a constant reference: assuming closedloop stability, the FVT gives e( ) = = + G c (s)g p (s) s=0 + K s+z = s=0 (s+p)(s ) Kz p Check for stability: no RHP poles for + G c (s)g p (s) (s + p)(s ) + K(s + z) = 0 s 2 + (K + p )s + Kz p = 0 Conditions for stability: K > p, Kz > p
5 Approximate PI via Lag Compensation Tracking a constant reference: if the stability conditions K > p, Kz > p are satisfied, then the steadystate error is e( ) = Kz p this will be close to zero (and negative) if Kz p is large. Lag compensation does not give perfect tracking (indeed, it does not change system type), but we can get as good a tracking as we want by playing with K, z, p. On the other hand, unlike PI, lag compensation gives a stable controller.
6 Effect of Lag Compensation on Root Locus L(s) = s + (s + p)(s ) Intuition: By choosing p very close to zero, we can make the root locus arbitrarily close to PI root locus (stable for large enough K). Let s check: Try p = 0. Compare to PI root locus: What do we see? Compared to PD vs. lead, there is no qualitative change in the shape of RL, since we are not changing #(poles) or #(zeros).
7 More Pole Placement As before, we can choose z lag for a fixed p lag (or vice versa) based on desired pole locations. The procedure is exactly the same as the one we used with lead. (In fact, depending on the pole locations, we may end up with either lead or lag.) Main technique: select parameters to satisfy the phase condition (points on RL must be such that L(s) = 80 ). Caveat: may not always be possible!
8 Pole Placement via RL Let G p (s) = s, G c(s) = K s + z s + p Problem: given p = 2, find K and z to place poles at 2 ± 3j. Desired characteristic polynomial: (s + 2) = s 2 + 4s + 3, damping ratio ζ = Im s given 3 Must have o z (to be selected) ' 2 = 90 x 2 0 x ' = 35 Re ψ }{{} angle from i s to zero ϕ }{{} i = 80 angles from s to poles So, we want ψ = 80 + i ϕ i
9 Pole Placement via RL Im o z (to be selected) s given ' 2 = 90 x x ' = 35 Re We have ϕ = 35, ϕ 2 = 90 We want ψ = 80 + i ϕ i Must have ψ = = 405 = 45 mod 360 Thus, we should have z = 5 Im s given 3 = 45 ' 2 = 90 ' = 35 o x z = 5 0 x 2 Re
10 Let G p (s) = s, G c(s) = K s + z s + p Problem: given p = 2, find z to place poles at 2 ± 3j. Solution: we already found that we need z = 5 resulting characteristic polynomial: (s )(s + 2) + K(s + 5) s 2 + (K + )s + 5K 2 compare against desired characteristic polynomial: s 2 + 4s + 3 = K + = 4, 5K 2 = 3 so we need K = 3 compute s.s. tracking error: Kz p = 6.5 5%
11 Story So Far PD control: provides stability, allows to shape transient response specs replace noncausal Dcontroller Ks with a causal, stable lead controller K s + z s + p, where p > z this introduces a zero in LHP (at z), pulls the root locus into LHP shape of RL differs depending on how large p is PI control: provides stability and perfect steadystate tracking of constant references replace unstable Icontroller K/s with a stable lag controller K s + z s + p, where p < z this does not change the shape of RL compared to PI
12 What About PID Control? Obvious solution combine lead and lag compensation. We will develop this further in homework and later in the course using frequencyresponse design methods which are the subject of several lectures, starting with today s.
13 The FrequencyResponse Design Method Recall the frequencyresponse formula: sin(!t) M sin(!t + ) G(s) where M = M(ω) = G(jω) and φ = φ(ω) = G(jω) Derivation:. u(t) = e st y(t) = G(s)e st 2. Euler s formula: sin(ωt) = ejωt e jωt 3. By linearity, 2j sin(ωt) G(jω)ejωt G( jω)e jωt 2j = M(ω)ej(ωt+φ(ω)) M(ω)e j(ωt+φ(ω)) 2j = M(ω) sin(ωt + φ(ω)) G(jω) = M(ω)e jφ(ω)
14 The FrequencyResponse Design Method sin(!t) M sin(!t + ) G(s) where M = M(ω) = G(jω) and φ = φ(ω) = G(jω) Let s apply this formula to our prototype 2ndorder system: ω 2 n G(s) = s 2 + 2ζω n s + ωn 2 M(ω) = G(jω) = ω 2 n ω 2 + 2jζω n ω + ωn 2 = ( ) ω 2 ω n + 2ζ ω ω n j = [ ( ) ] ω 2 2 ( ) ω n + 4ζ 2 ω 2 ω n
15 The FrequencyResponse Design Method For our prototype 2ndorder system: G(s) = M(ω) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζω n s + ωn 2 [ ( ) ] ω 2 2 ( = ) ω n + 4ζ 2 ω 2 ω n + (4ζ 2 2) ( ) ω 2 ( ω n + ω ) 4 ω n MHwL z=ê2 z=ê 2 z= w w n
16 Frequency Response Parameters Here is a typical frequency response magnitude plot: MHwL.0 M r 0.8 / p ! r! BW w ω r resonant frequency M r resonant peak ω BW bandwidth
17 Frequency Response Parameters MHwL.0 M r 0.8 / p ! r! BW w We can get the following formulas using calculus: ω r = ω n 2ζ 2 M r = 2ζ ζ (valid for ζ < ; for ζ, ω r = 0) ω BW = ω n ( 2ζ 2 ) + ( 2ζ 2 ) 2 + }{{} = for ζ=/ 2 so, if we know ω r, M r, ω BW, we can determine ω n, ζ and hence the timedomain specs (t r, M p, t s )
18 Frequency Response & TimeDomain Specs All information about time response is also encoded in frequency response!! MHwL.0 M r 0.8 / p ! r! BW w small M r better damping large ω BW large ω n smaller t r
19 FrequencyResponse Design Method: Main Idea R + K G(s) Y Twostep procedure:. Plot the frequency response of the openloop transfer function KG(s) [or, more generally, D(s)G(s)], at s = jω 2. See how to relate this openloop frequency response to closedloop behavior. We will work with two types of plots for KG(jω):. Bode plots: magnitude KG(jω) and phase KG(jω) vs. frequency ω (could have seen it earlier, in ECE 342) 2. Nyquist plots: Im ( KG(jω) ) vs. Re ( K(jω) ) [Cartesian plot in splane] as ω ranges from to +
20 Note on the Scale Horizontal (ω) axis: we will use logarithmic scale (base 0) in order to display a wide range of frequencies. Note: we will still mark the values of ω, not log 0 ω, on the axis, but the scale will be logarithmic: ! Equal intervals on log scale correspond to decades in frequency.
21 Note on the Scale Vertical axis on magnitude plots: Reason: we will also use logarithmic scale, just like the frequency axis. (M e jφ )(M 2 e jφ 2 ) = M M 2 log(m M 2 ) = log M + log M 2 this means that we can simply add the graphs of log M (ω) and log M 2 (ω) to obtain the graph of log ( M (ω)m 2 (ω) ), and graphical addition is easy. Decibel scale: (M) db = 20 log 0 M (one decade = 20 db)
22 Note on the Scale Vertical axis on phase plots: we will plot the phase on the usual (linear) scale. Reason: ( ) (M e jφ )(M 2 e jφ 2 ) = (M ) M 2 e j(φ +φ 2 ) = φ + φ 2 this means that we can simply add the phase plots for two transfer functions to obtain the phase plot for their product.
23 Scale Convention for Bode Plots magnitude phase horizontal scale log log vertical scale log linear Advantage of the scale convention: we will learn to do Bode plots by starting from simple factors and then building up to general transfer functions by considering products of these simple factors.
Homework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationReview: transient and steadystate response; DC gain and the FVT Today s topic: systemmodeling diagrams; prototype 2ndorder system
Plan of the Lecture Review: transient and steadystate response; DC gain and the FVT Today s topic: systemmodeling diagrams; prototype 2ndorder system Plan of the Lecture Review: transient and steadystate
More informationECE 486 Control Systems
ECE 486 Control Systems Spring 208 Midterm #2 Information Issued: April 5, 208 Updated: April 8, 208 ˆ This document is an info sheet about the second exam of ECE 486, Spring 208. ˆ Please read the following
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 2: Drawing Bode Plots, Part 2 Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Simple Plots Real Zeros Real Poles Complex
More informationFrequency domain analysis
Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 20102011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 20102011
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency ResponseDesign Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)
C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s)  H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8  Solutions. HW 8  Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8  Solutions HW 8  Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot
More informationTransient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n
Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2
More informationDESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
More informationResponse to a pure sinusoid
Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences ES 145/215  INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEMS ANALYSIS WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS Fall Lecture 14: The Bode Plot Response to a pure sinusoid
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 5: Transfer Functions. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 5: Transfer Functions Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 20, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 5: Control Systems I 20/10/2017
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 6.2 Solutions. PI Controller For the system G = K (s+)(s+3)(s+8) HW 6.2 Solutions in negative feedback operating at a damping ratio of., we are going to design a PI controller
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a lineartimeinvariant
More informationNyquist Criterion For Stability of Closed Loop System
Nyquist Criterion For Stability of Closed Loop System Prof. N. Puri ECE Department, Rutgers University Nyquist Theorem Given a closed loop system: r(t) + KG(s) = K N(s) c(t) H(s) = KG(s) +KG(s) = KN(s)
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 30 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 9: of and using Techniques McMaster University Winter 2017 2 / 30 Outline 1 2 3 4 / 30 domain analysis Analyze closed loop using open loop
More informationProcess Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040)
Firstorder systems Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040) Arun K. Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras January  April 010 Lectures: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri Extra class: Thu A firstorder
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering
More informationDynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis
Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #7 Solution Posted: Friday, Nov., 7. Nise problem 5 from chapter 8, page 76. Answer:
More informationCourse roadmap. Step response for 2ndorder system. Step response for 2ndorder system
ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of ndorder systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition adings: Guzzella, Chapter 9.4 6 Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Emilio Frazzoli Institute
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steadystate Steadystate errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequencyresponse methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationCourse Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.
Course Summary Unit 1: Introduction Unit 2: Modeling in the Frequency Domain Unit 3: Time Response Unit 4: Block Diagram Reduction Unit 5: Stability Unit 6: SteadyState Error Unit 7: Root Locus Techniques
More informationThe Frequencyresponse Design Method
Chapter 6 The Frequencyresponse Design Method Problems and Solutions for Section 6.. (a) Show that α 0 in Eq. (6.2) is given by α 0 = G(s) U 0ω = U 0 G( jω) s jω s= jω 2j and α 0 = G(s) U 0ω = U 0 G(jω)
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 5
Outline Outline Outline 1 What is 2 Outline What is Why use? Sketching a 1 What is Why use? Sketching a 2 Gain Controller Lead Compensation Lag Compensation What is Properties of a General System Why use?
More informationThe FrequencyResponse
6 The FrequencyResponse Design Method A Perspective on the FrequencyResponse Design Method The design of feedback control systems in industry is probably accomplished using frequencyresponse methods
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems 4 1 STABILITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES 41: Bilinear transformation Three main aspects to controlsystem design: 1 Stability, 2 Steadystate response, 3 Transient response
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are
More informationRadar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.
Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition Readings: Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control
More informationELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
More informationSolutions to SkillAssessment Exercises
Solutions to SkillAssessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)
More informationControl for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e
Control for Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e Motion Systems m F Introduction Timedomain tuning Frequency domain & stability Filters Feedforward Servooriented
More information7.2 Controller tuning from specified characteristic polynomial
192 Finn Haugen: PID Control 7.2 Controller tuning from specified characteristic polynomial 7.2.1 Introduction The subsequent sections explain controller tuning based on specifications of the characteristic
More informationBoise State University Department of Electrical Engineering ECE461 Control Systems. Control System Design in the Frequency Domain
Boise State University Department of Electrical Engineering ECE6 Control Systems Control System Design in the Frequency Domain Situation: Consider the following block diagram of a type servomechanism:
More informationCHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION
CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION Objectives Students should be able to: Draw the bode plots for first order and second order system. Determine the stability through the bode plots.
More information8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance
8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance Example G(s)= v (s) v 1 (s) = 1 1+s L R + s LC L + Secondorder denominator, of the form 1+a 1 s + a s v 1 (s) + C R Twopole lowpass filter example v (s) with
More informationR10 JNTUWORLD B 1 M 1 K 2 M 2. f(t) Figure 1
Code No: R06 R0 SET  II B. Tech II Semester Regular Examinations April/May 03 CONTROL SYSTEMS (Com. to EEE, ECE, EIE, ECC, AE) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 75 Answer any FIVE Questions All Questions carry
More informationThe loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)
Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2). Loop shaping 2. Performance limitations The loop shaping paradigm. Estimate performance and robustness of the feedback system from the loop transfer L(jω)
More informationLecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design.
ISS0031 Modeling and Identification Lecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design. Aleksei Tepljakov, Ph.D. September 30, 2015 Linear Dynamic Systems Definition
More informationClass 13 Frequency domain analysis
Class 13 Frequency domain analysis The frequency response is the output of the system in steady state when the input of the system is sinusoidal Methods of system analysis by the frequency response, as
More information1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I
MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June 9, Problem. ( points) Consider a plant in feedback with the PI controller G(s) = (s + 3)(s + )(s + a) C(s) = K P + K I s. (a) (4 points) For a given constant
More informationECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27
1/27 ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability Feedback System Consider the feedback system u + G ol (s) y Figure 1: A unity feedback system
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : RouthHurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationToday (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
More informationOverview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piecewise linear approximations Firstorder terms Secondorder terms (complex poles & zeros)
Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piecewise linear approximations Firstorder terms Secondorder terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 6: Generalized and Controller Design Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Generalized? What about changing OTHER parameters
More informationStep Response Analysis. Frequency Response, Relation Between Model Descriptions
Step Response Analysis. Frequency Response, Relation Between Model Descriptions Automatic Control, Basic Course, Lecture 3 November 9, 27 Lund University, Department of Automatic Control Content. Step
More informationR. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder
R. W. Erickson Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder 8.1. Review of Bode plots Decibels Table 8.1. Expressing magnitudes in decibels G db = 0 log 10
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using the
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using
More informationECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design
ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design A Brief Tutorial on Control Design Instructor: Professor John T. Wen TA: Ben Potsaid http://www.cat.rpi.edu/~wen/ecse4962s04/ Don t Wait Until The Last Minute! You got
More informationExercises for lectures 13 Design using frequency methods
Exercises for lectures 13 Design using frequency methods Michael Šebek Automatic control 2016 31317 Setting of the closed loop bandwidth At the transition frequency in the open loop is (from definition)
More information6.1 Sketch the zdomain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closedloop characteristic equation is K + z 0.
6. Sketch the zdomain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K (i) Gz () z 4. (ii) Gz K () ( z+ 9. )( z 9. ) (iii) Gz () Kz ( z. )( z ) (iv) Gz () Kz ( + 9. ) ( z. )( z 8. ) (i)
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationIf you need more room, use the backs of the pages and indicate that you have done so.
EE 343 Exam II Ahmad F. Taha Spring 206 Your Name: Your Signature: Exam duration: hour and 30 minutes. This exam is closed book, closed notes, closed laptops, closed phones, closed tablets, closed pretty
More informationSingular Value Decomposition Analysis
Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Introduction Introduce a linear algebra tool: singular values of a matrix Motivation Why do we need singular values in MIMO control
More informationThe requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot  in time domain
Compensators To improve the performance of a given plant or system G f(s) it may be necessary to use a compensator or controller G c(s). Compensator Plant G c (s) G f (s) The requirements of a plant may
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More informationDue Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5
Due Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5 You may use Matlab/Simulink wherever applicable. Consider the standard, unityfeedback closed loop control system shown below where G(s) = /[s q (s+)(s+9)]
More informationExercise 1 (A Nonminimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 559 Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Nonminimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,
More informationFrequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems
ME 328, Spring 203, Prof. Rajamani, University of Minnesota Frequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems Complex Numbers: Recall that every complex number has a magnitude and a phase. Example: z
More informationLecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types
Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types Venkata Sonti Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India, 562 This
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 505900 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationFrequency Response Analysis
Frequency Response Analysis Consider let the input be in the form Assume that the system is stable and the steady state response of the system to a sinusoidal inputdoes not depend on the initial conditions
More informationProportional plus Integral (PI) Controller
Proportional plus Integral (PI) Controller 1. A pole is placed at the origin 2. This causes the system type to increase by 1 and as a result the error is reduced to zero. 3. Originally a point A is on
More informationPD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada
PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closedloop
More informationSoftware Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques
Software Engineering 3DX3 Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques Dr. Ryan Leduc Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Material based on Control Systems Engineering by N. Nise. c 2006, 2007
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationAMME3500: System Dynamics & Control
Stefan B. Williams May, 211 AMME35: System Dynamics & Control Assignment 4 Note: This assignment contributes 15% towards your final mark. This assignment is due at 4pm on Monday, May 3 th during Week 13
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationK(s +2) s +20 K (s + 10)(s +1) 2. (c) KG(s) = K(s + 10)(s +1) (s + 100)(s +5) 3. Solution : (a) KG(s) = s +20 = K s s
321 16. Determine the range of K for which each of the following systems is stable by making a Bode plot for K = 1 and imagining the magnitude plot sliding up or down until instability results. Verify
More informationECE 345 / ME 380 Introduction to Control Systems Lecture Notes 8
Learning Objectives ECE 345 / ME 380 Introduction to Control Systems Lecture Notes 8 Dr. Oishi oishi@unm.edu November 2, 203 State the phase and gain properties of a root locus Sketch a root locus, by
More information6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson
Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closedloop behavior what we want it to be. To review:  G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For
More informationPM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers
PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers Santiago Garrido, Luis Moreno Abstract This paper presents the graphical chromatic representation of the phase and the magnitude
More informationControl Systems. Root Locus & Pole Assignment. L. Lanari
Control Systems Root Locus & Pole Assignment L. Lanari Outline rootlocus definition main rules for hand plotting root locus as a design tool other use of the root locus pole assignment Lanari: CS  Root
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University
Case Study ME375 Frequency Response  1 Case Study SUPPORT POWER WIRE DROPPERS Electric train derives power through a pantograph, which contacts the power wire, which is suspended from a catenary. During
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Dynamic Response
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Dynamic Response Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. . Previous Class...........
More informationCDS 101/110: Lecture 10.3 Final Exam Review
CDS 11/11: Lecture 1.3 Final Exam Review December 2, 216 Schedule: (1) Posted on the web Monday, Dec. 5 by noon. (2) Due Friday, Dec. 9, at 5: pm. (3) Determines 3% of your grade Instructions on Front
More informationR a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Forcecurrent and ForceVoltage analogies.
SET  1 II B. Tech II Semester Supplementary Examinations Dec 01 1. a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Forcecurrent and ForceVoltage analogies..
More informationFrequency Response Techniques
4th Edition T E N Frequency Response Techniques SOLUTION TO CASE STUDY CHALLENGE Antenna Control: Stability Design and Transient Performance First find the forward transfer function, G(s). Pot: K 1 = 10
More informationExercise 1 (A Nonminimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 559 Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Nonminimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we
More informationDiscrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture
Discrete Systems Mark Cannon Hilary Term 22  Lecture 4 Step response and pole locations 4  Review Definition of transform: U() = Z{u k } = u k k k= Discrete transfer function: Y () U() = G() = Z{g k},
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING SUBJECT QUESTION BANK : EC6405 CONTROL SYSTEM ENGINEERING SEM / YEAR: IV / II year
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:3012:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (23 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:3012:30 Today: Recap
More information