The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain
|
|
- Millicent Martin
- 4 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Compensators To improve the performance of a given plant or system G f(s) it may be necessary to use a compensator or controller G c(s). Compensator Plant G c (s) G f (s) The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain (d) phase margin or (e) gain margin ---- in frequency domain. If the given plant does not satisfy 2 or 3 conditions specified from the above, a compensator circuit may be necessary to modify the overall plant characteristics (i.e of G c(s) G f(s)) to satisfy the given specifications. The controllers used are typically (other than P, I, D combination controllers) Lead compensator (to speed up transient response, margin of stability and improve error constant in a limited way) Lag compensator (to improve error constant or steady-state behavior while retaining transient response) Lead Lag compensator (A combination of the above two i.e. to improve steady state as well as transient). Lead Compensator:- is so called since it adds phase angle so that the phase curve of the combined system is lifted above the line so much as to provide the necessary phase margin. A compensator 1 1 gives an angle Ф c. If 1, then Ф c is positive. (or lead). In pole - zero form, it is given as G c = = = with = Z c/ P c also gives a lead angle. 1
2 Lead compensator can be realized with electrical or mechanical components G c(s) Letting = R 1 C; and = R 2 /(R 1 +R 2) < 1 G c(s) = / / = = --- (1) with τ = B 1 / K 1 α = K 1 /( K 1 + K 2) Y(s)/X(s) = + 1) / 1) The phase difference for G c(s) given by eqn. (1). is Ø c or tan Ф = 1 /1 dф /d = 0 gives the frequency for maximum phase difference as ω - which is the geometric mean of corner frequencies. The max. phase lead is given as tan Ф or Ф Ф The maximum gain is 20 log 1/ at high frequency, and the gain at ω G c(ω = = or log G c(ω =10 log, db is the gain contribution by compensator at the mean frequency. or sin Ф 2
3 Design of Compensator for a system Design can be carried on in frequency domain or in time domain using Root-locus Both methods are explained for lead & lag compensator cases. Let us consider Frequency domain approach first in each case. Lead Compensator : Design procedure steps For the given plant determine K v or K a based on specification Draw Bode Plot and check whether adequate Ф is provided If is specified, find the required phase margin from approx relation 0.01 Ф margin Or Ф margin = becomes the specified phase margin Determine the phase lead to be introduced by controller from Ф e = Ф s Ф uc + Where Ф s is the specified phase margin, Ф uc - phase margin of uncompensated system, and to account for shift of cross-over frequency. Let Ф m = Ф l, then determine from Ф Ф (If Ø m is more than 60 0, it is desirable to provide two identical networks each providing ½ the phase) Draw a line 10 log1/ below 0, db on the uncompensated Bode plot and mark the corresponding frequency 1 = 1/ = m ; 2 = 1/ = m / ; G c(s) = (= / / ) Compensated system is G c(s) G f(s) G c G f Example (from Nagrath & Gopal) Lead Compensator in frequency domain To design a compensator for a system G f(s) = so that Acceleration Error Const. Ka = 10, and phase margin = 350. K a = s 2 G(s) s = K = 10. Hence choose K= 10 Draw Bode Plot for G f(s) =.. Phase margin is -33 0, system quite unstable. Phase lead to be introduced by network = 35 0 (-33 0 ) +. 3
4 Chose 12 to 14 0 as gain slope in high. Thus Ф e = = Being high, two networks in tandem are required With Ф m = (1-sin 41 0 )/(1+sin 41 0 ) = log 1/ for lead network occurs at the frequency where Ф is maximum. Hence check the frequency c2 where the gain of UC system is -10 log 1/ (actually 2 x -10log 1/ in this case as 2 networks are used). c2 = 6.3 rad/sec (at db) = m c2 = 6.3 rad/sec should be designed as the mean frequency ( m ) Thus 1 = m = 2.8 r/sec ; 2 = m = 14.0 r/sec ; Thus G e(s) =.. =.. and the compensated plant is (
5 Lag Compensator can be realized as shown Letting = R 2 C ; = (R 1 + R 2) /R 2 > 1 The transfer function becomes G c(s) = ( (also 1 ) Ø c which is ve as >1 Hence the contribution to phase angle of G f(c) is negative where ρ = (K 1+K 2)/K 1 >1 Note: Relations for Ф max (at the geometric mean of = & = ) etc. are similar to lead compensator. However, lag (or decreasing the phase difference further is undesirable). The characteristic taken advantage is high frequency gain attenuation (reduction by 20log decibels) with very little decrease in phase. 5
6 Lag Compensator Design procedure This can be used only when there is a range of Ф more than in G f(s), since phase lag increases due to lag compensator. The Compensator relies on reducing the gain of the compensated plant in the critical region to make it adequately stable. Find the open-loop gain necessary to satisfy the required condition Find the frequency ω c2 when uncompensated system makes Ø 2 =Ø s + where is 5 0 to 15 0 to account for phase lag due to network Measure the gain of UC system at ω c2, and equate it to 20 log and find. Choose upper corner frequency ω 2 (= 1/) of network one octave or decade below ω c2, (ω 2 = ω c2 /2 ie. Octave or ω c2 /10 for decade) Knowing &, ω 2 (= 1/); w 1 (= 1/); G c = ( Following example will clarify: Example: Design a lag compensator so that the plant G f(s) = the specifications: ξ = 0.4, t s = 1.0 sec; K v= 5; meets Solution: K v = s G(s) s o = k/4 => K=20 ; Using approximation Ø s = ξ/0.01 = 0.4/0.01 = 40 0 (Bode plot for the system) G f(s) = is as shown. When amplitude ratio, in log terms G f(jω) is zero, the Ф curve is 4 0 below , Ф 2 < Hence the system is unstable. To the required Ф s = 40 0, add = 10 0 to compensate for negative Ф s. Ф = =
7 Frequency where Ф = is 0.6 rad/sec (ω c2 ) choose ω 2 at 2 octaves less than ω c2 ω 2 = 0.6/2 2 = 0.15 rad/sec Also the gain at A has to be brought down to 0 when Ф = Hence 20 log = 19, or = = 1/ = 0.15/8.91 = Hence the compensator to be implemented is G c(s) = ( =... The compensated plant is G c(s) G f(s)type equation here. = Compensator Design Root Locus Approach (Time-domain) Lead Compensator design procedure:: Translate the desired specifications into a dominant pair of complex poles in the Root Locus. (complex plane). If the given system G f(s) is such that G f(s) at S d then a compensator needs to be designed such that G f(s) G c(s) at Sd or G c(s) d G f(s) d = Φ (A) ie. the pole-zero pair of compensator have to contribute Φ. From the above figure, we have from properties of s, z c / n = Φ Φ So that zc /pc = and pc/n = Φ Φ Φ and d/d = z c /p = sin 7
8 (to reduce the effect of gain due to compensator, it is desirable to have large ). which leads to = ½ ( Φ (B) Thus after locating Sd in the complex plane, knowing = Cos -1 ξ, and Ø from (A), locate z c from (B), as well as p c Knowing z c and p c, the compensator is (s+z c)/(s+p c) Example Lead Compensator design - Time domain Design a compensator is give ξ = 0.5 and n = 2 for the system G f(s) = Solution: Given the damping ratio ξ = 0.5(=Cos -1 ) and n of the dominant complex pole pair, the point S d to pass through the root locus of the compensated plant is Sd= - ξ n j n1 ξ 2 ) = -1 j 1.73 = Cos = 60 0 Φ = -180 G f(s d) = ( ) = 60 0 ν= ½ ( Φ) = ( 60 60/2= 30 0 However, locating oz so that ν =30 0 makes Z c coincide with the pole of (-1,0) of the given system. Hence choose Z c = -1.2 close to -1 Now draw OP c so that angle Z c O P c = Φ = 60 0 P c cuts the real axis at so that G c =. =. Also the gain at Sd(= 1+ j 1.73) for the compensated system is K = s. s+1. s+4. s / s+1.2 ==30, in which s, s+1 etc are the lengths of vectors which can be measured and substituted. Hence compensated system = G f G c = 30(s +1.2) / s(s+1) (s+4) (s+4.95) 8
9 Lag Compensator Time Domain Method: Lag compensator is designed when the steady state response needs improvement, while transient performance is satisfactory. As the transient performance is satisfactory, the technique lies in ensuring that the root locus passes through the same Sd as for the uncompensated system while the error constant is improved. Therefore pole P is chosen close to origin and zero to its left so that β =Z c /P c >1 where Φ = PSZ is 2 to 5 0 and OSZ < 10 0, We can establish value of β using the following reasoning: Gain of UC system at Sd = K uc.... (Sd) =. Similarly K c (Sd) =..... X Since a b, we have K uc (S d) = K c (S d) Now, Error Constant K e c = K c (Sd) x = K uc (Sd) x Ke uc. Hence β = = Ke c /Ke uc Thus β can be chosen as the ratio of the expected Error Constant to the Error Constant of the given system 9
10 Example: Design a lag compensator for the system G f (s) = to meet the following specs: Damping ratio = ζ = 0.5; settling time t s =10 secs & K v 5 sec -1 Solution: From t s = 10 = 4/ζ n n = 4/ 10 x 0.5 = 0.8 Thus Sd = - ζ n + j 1 ζ 2 n = j 0.7 Sd lies on the uncompensated system as well. At Sd, gain of the UC system is K uc = OS x SA x SB = 0.8 x 0.9 x 3.7 = 2.66 Velocity Error Constant of UC system K uc v = s G f (s) = 2.66/(1 x 4) = so Thus β = K v desired / K v existing = 5/0.666 = 7.5 Say β = 10 to counter the effect of negative phase difference due to lag compensator. Now to locate the pole and zero, Draw a line from S to Z c so that OSZ c = 6 0. (small value) Determine OZ e = 0.1 (measure) Since β = Z c/p c, P c = Z/10 = 0.1/10 = 0.01 Also as the gain compensated system may be treated as the same as of UC system in which case.. G f G c =, which is the Compensated plant transfer function.... Or get K = = 2.2 instead of 2.66, by measuring the line lengths from the figure. ** ** ** 10
ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
Systems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8 - Solutions HW 8 - Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot
Transient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n
Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2
Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 5
Outline Outline Outline 1 What is 2 Outline What is Why use? Sketching a 1 What is Why use? Sketching a 2 Gain Controller Lead Compensation Lag Compensation What is Properties of a General System Why use?
Dynamic Compensation using root locus method
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 9 Dynamic Compensation using root locus method [] (Final00)For the system shown in the
Systems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering
Homework 7 - Solutions
Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
Exercises for lectures 13 Design using frequency methods
Exercises for lectures 13 Design using frequency methods Michael Šebek Automatic control 2016 31-3-17 Setting of the closed loop bandwidth At the transition frequency in the open loop is (from definition)
CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION
CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION Objectives Students should be able to: Draw the bode plots for first order and second order system. Determine the stability through the bode plots.
Root Locus Design Example #3
Root Locus Design Example #3 A. Introduction The system represents a linear model for vertical motion of an underwater vehicle at zero forward speed. The vehicle is assumed to have zero pitch and roll
EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 6.2 Solutions. PI Controller For the system G = K (s+)(s+3)(s+8) HW 6.2 Solutions in negative feedback operating at a damping ratio of., we are going to design a PI controller
(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 30 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 9: of and using Techniques McMaster University Winter 2017 2 / 30 Outline 1 2 3 4 / 30 domain analysis Analyze closed loop using open loop
Module 5: Design of Sampled Data Control Systems Lecture Note 8
Module 5: Design of Sampled Data Control Systems Lecture Note 8 Lag-lead Compensator When a single lead or lag compensator cannot guarantee the specified design criteria, a laglead compensator is used.
Engraving Machine Example
Engraving Machine Example MCE44 - Fall 8 Dr. Richter November 24, 28 Basic Design The X-axis of the engraving machine has the transfer function G(s) = s(s + )(s + 2) In this basic example, we use a proportional
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
Frequency Response Analysis
Frequency Response Analysis Consider let the input be in the form Assume that the system is stable and the steady state response of the system to a sinusoidal inputdoes not depend on the initial conditions
r + - FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic
MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June, One sheet of hand-written notes (two pages). Present your reasoning and calculations clearly. Inconsistent etchings will not be graded. Write answers
Root Locus Design Example #4
Root Locus Design Example #4 A. Introduction The plant model represents a linearization of the heading dynamics of a 25, ton tanker ship under empty load conditions. The reference input signal R(s) is
Root Locus Methods. The root locus procedure
Root Locus Methods Design of a position control system using the root locus method Design of a phase lag compensator using the root locus method The root locus procedure To determine the value of the gain
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING SUBJECT QUESTION BANK : EC6405 CONTROL SYSTEM ENGINEERING SEM / YEAR: IV / II year
Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : 0. LS_D_ECIN_Control Systems_30078 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucnow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 0-4546 CLASS TEST 08-9 ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we
Chapter 6 - Solved Problems
Chapter 6 - Solved Problems Solved Problem 6.. Contributed by - James Welsh, University of Newcastle, Australia. Find suitable values for the PID parameters using the Z-N tuning strategy for the nominal
100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
R10 JNTUWORLD B 1 M 1 K 2 M 2. f(t) Figure 1
Code No: R06 R0 SET - II B. Tech II Semester Regular Examinations April/May 03 CONTROL SYSTEMS (Com. to EEE, ECE, EIE, ECC, AE) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 75 Answer any FIVE Questions All Questions carry
Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types
Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types Venkata Sonti Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India, 562 This
ME 475/591 Control Systems Final Exam Fall '99
ME 475/591 Control Systems Final Exam Fall '99 Closed book closed notes portion of exam. Answer 5 of the 6 questions below (20 points total) 1) What is a phase margin? Under ideal circumstances, what does
IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION. K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok
IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok Considering marginal control systems, a useful technique, contributing to the method of multi-stage compensation is suggested. A
Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus
1 Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus Prof. Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning
FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequency-response methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
6.1 Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closed-loop characteristic equation is K + z 0.
6. Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K (i) Gz () z 4. (ii) Gz K () ( z+ 9. )( z 9. ) (iii) Gz () Kz ( z. )( z ) (iv) Gz () Kz ( + 9. ) ( z. )( z 8. ) (i)
Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.
Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter
Course roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system
ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of nd-order systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer
Course Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.
Course Summary Unit 1: Introduction Unit 2: Modeling in the Frequency Domain Unit 3: Time Response Unit 4: Block Diagram Reduction Unit 5: Stability Unit 6: Steady-State Error Unit 7: Root Locus Techniques
Proportional plus Integral (PI) Controller
Proportional plus Integral (PI) Controller 1. A pole is placed at the origin 2. This causes the system type to increase by 1 and as a result the error is reduced to zero. 3. Originally a point A is on
Appendix A: Exercise Problems on Classical Feedback Control Theory (Chaps. 1 and 2)
Appendix A: Exercise Problems on Classical Feedback Control Theory (Chaps. 1 and 2) For all calculations in this book, you can use the MathCad software or any other mathematical software that you are familiar
Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
Unit 8: Part 2: PD, PID, and Feedback Compensation
Ideal Derivative Compensation (PD) Lead Compensation PID Controller Design Feedback Compensation Physical Realization of Compensation Unit 8: Part 2: PD, PID, and Feedback Compensation Engineering 5821:
Systems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 2: Drawing Bode Plots, Part 2 Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Simple Plots Real Zeros Real Poles Complex
Design of a Lead Compensator
Design of a Lead Compensator Dr. Bishakh Bhattacharya Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering IIT Kanpur Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc - Funded by MHRD The Lecture Contains Standard Forms of
R a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.
SET - 1 II B. Tech II Semester Supplementary Examinations Dec 01 1. a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies..
a. Closed-loop system; b. equivalent transfer function Then the CLTF () T is s the poles of () T are s from a contribution of a
Root Locus Simple definition Locus of points on the s- plane that represents the poles of a system as one or more parameter vary. RL and its relation to poles of a closed loop system RL and its relation
Frequency Response Techniques
4th Edition T E N Frequency Response Techniques SOLUTION TO CASE STUDY CHALLENGE Antenna Control: Stability Design and Transient Performance First find the forward transfer function, G(s). Pot: K 1 = 10
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R + - E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram
Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback
EEE 184 Project: Option 1
EEE 184 Project: Option 1 Date: November 16th 2012 Due: December 3rd 2012 Work Alone, show your work, and comment your results. Comments, clarity, and organization are important. Same wrong result or same
EE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10
Copyright S. Ikenaga 998 All rights reserved EE 4343/5329 - Control System Design Project LECTURE EE 4343/5329 Homepage EE 4343/5329 Course Outline Design of Phase-lead and Phase-lag compensators using
ECE 388 Automatic Control
Lead Compensator and PID Control Associate Prof. Dr. of Mechatronics Engineeering Çankaya University Compulsory Course in Electronic and Communication Engineering Credits (2/2/3) Course Webpage: http://ece388.cankaya.edu.tr
6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson
Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closed-loop behavior what we want it to be. To review: - G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For
Chapter 9: Controller design
Chapter 9. Controller Design 9.1. Introduction 9.2. Effect of negative feedback on the network transfer functions 9.2.1. Feedback reduces the transfer function from disturbances to the output 9.2.2. Feedback
Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
Stability of CL System
Stability of CL System Consider an open loop stable system that becomes unstable with large gain: At the point of instability, K( j) G( j) = 1 0dB K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) =± 180 o 180 o Closed
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #7 Solution Posted: Friday, Nov., 7. Nise problem 5 from chapter 8, page 76. Answer:
10ES-43 CONTROL SYSTEMS ( ECE A B&C Section) % of Portions covered Reference Cumulative Chapter. Topic to be covered. Part A
10ES-43 CONTROL SYSTEMS ( ECE A B&C Section) Faculty : Shreyus G & Prashanth V Chapter Title/ Class # Reference Literature Topic to be covered Part A No of Hours:52 % of Portions covered Reference Cumulative
Discrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture
Discrete Systems Mark Cannon Hilary Term 22 - Lecture 4 Step response and pole locations 4 - Review Definition of -transform: U() = Z{u k } = u k k k= Discrete transfer function: Y () U() = G() = Z{g k},
(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =
126 INTRDUCTIN T CNTR ENGINEERING 10( s 1) (a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: (. 02s 1)(. 001s 1) (b) Find the expected percent overshoot for a step input for the closed-loop system
Meeting Design Specs using Root Locus
Meeting Design Specs using Root Locus So far, we have Lead compensators which cancel a pole and move it left, speeding up the root locus. PID compensators which add a zero at s=0 and add zero, one, or
Table of Laplacetransform
Appendix Table of Laplacetransform pairs 1(t) f(s) oct), unit impulse at t = 0 a, a constant or step of magnitude a at t = 0 a s t, a ramp function e- at, an exponential function s + a sin wt, a sine fun
Boise State University Department of Electrical Engineering ECE461 Control Systems. Control System Design in the Frequency Domain
Boise State University Department of Electrical Engineering ECE6 Control Systems Control System Design in the Frequency Domain Situation: Consider the following block diagram of a type- servomechanism:
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are
ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)
C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s) - H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)
INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a linear-time-invariant
Asymptotic Bode Plot & Lead-Lag Compensator
Asymptotic Bode Plot & Lead-Lag Compensator. Introduction Consider a general transfer function Ang Man Shun 202-2-5 G(s = n k=0 a ks k m k=0 b ks k = A n k=0 (s z k m k=0 (s p k m > n When s =, transfer
Plan of the Lecture. Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design.
Plan of the Lecture Review: design using Root Locus; dynamic compensation; PD and lead control Today s topic: PI and lag control; introduction to frequency-response design method Goal: wrap up lead and
INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING Dundigal, Hyderabad ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK
Course Name Course Code Class Branch INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING Dundigal, Hyderabad -500 043 ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BAN : CONTROL SYSTEMS : A50 : III B. Tech
6.302 Feedback Systems
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.302 Feedback Systems Fall Term 2005 Issued : November 18, 2005 Lab 2 Series Compensation in Practice Due
Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the
Root Locus Techniques
4th Edition E I G H T Root Locus Techniques SOLUTIONS TO CASE STUDIES CHALLENGES Antenna Control: Transient Design via Gain a. From the Chapter 5 Case Study Challenge: 76.39K G(s) = s(s+50)(s+.32) Since
Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040)
First-order systems Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040) Arun K. Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras January - April 010 Lectures: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri Extra class: Thu A first-order
PD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada
PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closed-loop
Feedback design for the Buck Converter
Feedback design for the Buck Converter Portland State University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland, Oregon, USA December 30, 2009 Abstract In this paper we explore two compensation
8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance
8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance Example G(s)= v (s) v 1 (s) = 1 1+s L R + s LC L + Second-order denominator, of the form 1+a 1 s + a s v 1 (s) + C R Two-pole low-pass filter example v (s) with
Time Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
H(s) = s. a 2. H eq (z) = z z. G(s) a 2. G(s) A B. s 2 s(s + a) 2 s(s a) G(s) 1 a 1 a. } = (z s 1)( z. e ) ) (z. (z 1)(z e at )(z e at )
.7 Quiz Solutions Problem : a H(s) = s a a) Calculate the zero order hold equivalent H eq (z). H eq (z) = z z G(s) Z{ } s G(s) a Z{ } = Z{ s s(s a ) } G(s) A B Z{ } = Z{ + } s s(s + a) s(s a) G(s) a a
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
Introduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter
Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter i i in R out Assignment: Perform a Complete e in C e Dynamic System Investigation out of the RC Low-Pass
NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni
NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni-625531 Question Bank for the Units I to V SE05 BR05 SU02 5 th Semester B.E. / B.Tech. Electrical & Electronics engineering IC6501
CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES
CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES 1. Introduction The steady state error is a measure of system accuracy. These errors arise from the nature of the inputs, system type and from nonlinearities of
Introduction to Root Locus. What is root locus?
Introduction to Root Locus What is root locus? A graphical representation of the closed loop poles as a system parameter (Gain K) is varied Method of analysis and design for stability and transient response
Robust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
AMME3500: System Dynamics & Control
Stefan B. Williams May, 211 AMME35: System Dynamics & Control Assignment 4 Note: This assignment contributes 15% towards your final mark. This assignment is due at 4pm on Monday, May 3 th during Week 13
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
ME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION
ME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION POBLEM 1 (25%) negligible mass wheels negligible mass wheels v motor no slip ω r r F D O no slip e in Motor% Cart%with%motor%a,ached% The coupled
9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design
9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design In some feedback schemes we have additional degrees-offreedom outside the feedback path. For example, feed forwarding known disturbance signals or reference signals. In
Loop shaping exercise
Loop shaping exercise Excerpt 1 from Controlli Automatici - Esercizi di Sintesi, L. Lanari, G. Oriolo, EUROMA - La Goliardica, 1997. It s a generic book with some typical problems in control, not a collection
Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steady-state Error and Type 0, Type
MAE 142 Homework #2 (Design Project) SOLUTIONS. (a) The main body s kinematic relationship is: φ θ ψ. + C 3 (ψ) 0 + C 3 (ψ)c 1 (θ)
MAE 42 Homework #2 (Design Project) SOLUTIONS. Top Dynamics (a) The main body s kinematic relationship is: ω b/a ω b/a + ω a /a + ω a /a ψâ 3 + θâ + â 3 ψˆb 3 + θâ + â 3 ψˆb 3 + C 3 (ψ) θâ ψ + C 3 (ψ)c
EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014
EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014 December 19, 2014 Your PRINTED FULL NAME Your STUDENT ID NUMBER Number of additional sheets 1. No computers, no tablets, no connected device (phone etc.) 2. Pocket
1 x(k +1)=(Φ LH) x(k) = T 1 x 2 (k) x1 (0) 1 T x 2(0) T x 1 (0) x 2 (0) x(1) = x(2) = x(3) =
567 This is often referred to as Þnite settling time or deadbeat design because the dynamics will settle in a Þnite number of sample periods. This estimator always drives the error to zero in time 2T or
Control Systems. University Questions
University Questions UNIT-1 1. Distinguish between open loop and closed loop control system. Describe two examples for each. (10 Marks), Jan 2009, June 12, Dec 11,July 08, July 2009, Dec 2010 2. Write
Chapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steady-state Steady-state errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
Automatic Control (MSc in Mechanical Engineering) Lecturer: Andrea Zanchettin Date: Student ID number... Signature...
Automatic Control (MSc in Mechanical Engineering) Lecturer: Andrea Zanchettin Date: 29..23 Given and family names......................solutions...................... Student ID number..........................