FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS

Transcription

1 FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS DRAFT REPORT for October, 0 FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS

2 TABLE of CONTENTS SCOPE of the WORK. FACILITIES ASSESSMENT DEFINITIONS FACILITY CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT PROCESS.. INTERPRETING the FACILITY CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT DATA.. PRELIMINARY CAPITAL REPLACEMENT and CAPITAL RENEWAL BUDGETING. - SUMMARY :: FCI SCORES / CAPITAL REPLACEMENT & CAPITAL RENEWAL BUDGETING ANALYSIS SORTED BY FCI HIGHEST TO LOWEST x GRADE LEVEL GROUP SUMMARY :: FCI SCORES / CAPITAL REPLACEMENT & CAPITAL RENEWAL BUDGETING ANALYSIS SORTED BY FCI HIGHEST TO LOWEST SUMMARY ANALYSIS :: REPLACEMENT VERSUS CAPITAL RENEWAL + MODERNIZATION.. 0 SORTED BY FCI HIGHEST TO LOWEST :: SCHOOLS WITH GREATEST FACILITIES NEEDS DETAILED FACILITY CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS [BY SCHOOL FACILITY] FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS

3 SCOPE of the WORK In late Spring of 0, HBA Architecture & Interior Design was contracted by Norfolk Public Schools to perform Facilities s Assessments for all of its school facilities with the exception of those either recently constructed or those school facilities currently under construction. The purpose of conducting Facilities s Assessments is twofold:.) To develop Facility Index [FCI] scores for each school facility so that this information can be used to support the Facilities Master Planning process and ultimately inform the decision making process as to whether school facilities should be replaced or modernized. School Board Staff grouped the schools in order of their perceived priority of need as follows: Category Original sixteen () School Facilities believed to have the most need in terms of facilities improvements Category All other School Facilities older than years [new or modernization] Category School Facilities 0 years old or less [new or modernization].) To develop Preliminary Capital Budgets and Capital Renewal Budgets for CIP planning. Note: The scope of this study excluded Maury HS, Madison Alternative Center, Camp Young, Coronado Open Campus, and JJ Roberts. FACILITIES ASSESSMENT DEFINITIONS The following terms and abbreviations define the various types of facilities assessments and analysis that have been performed by HBA Architecture in the context of this study: - Index: A numeric score between 0 and which quantifies the condition of building and/or site systems and components in the context of their anticipated useful life. 0 = new and.0 = exceeded useful life. FCI - Facility Index: A numeric score between 0 and which quantifies the condition of a site/ building facility or group of building facilities on the same site. FCI = Sum of all [SCls x relative value of each system or component as a percentage of the total value of the facility]. As with the, 0 = new and.0 = exceeded useful life. This score allows us to compare the condition of facilities against other facilities in a school division and also against the average or median FCI conditions for the school division. FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS

4 FACILITY CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT PROCESS Over the span of approximately weeks, HBA Architecture s Educational K- Studio Director, Michael Ross, AIA, and our Senior K- Architect, Hasten, Jr., AIA, visited each school site along with Hazelette, a former NPS Director of School Planning and Transportation. For each visit, we were accompanied by a senior maintenance staff person from the Department of Facilities Management and also by each school s head custodian. During the course of our site visits, our team members visually observed the conditions of all site and building systems and components and each of us gave each system or component a [ Index] score based on its observed condition and/or supplementary information provided by our NPS representative guides. The average of our three separate scores was then calculated. Each averaged score was then weighted by a percentage factor that represents the cost value of each system or component divided by the total cost value of all systems and components. The sum of these weighted scores equals the total Facility Index [FCI] of each school campus. INTERPRETING the FACILITY CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT DATA Facilities s: The generally accepted standards for FCI Facility Index ratings are as follows: POOR FCI >.00 FAIR.00 < FCI <. GOOD.000 > FCI Three () of six () High Schools have an FCI greater than.00 (Maury HS relative FCI is assumed). One () of six () High Schools has an FCI less than.000. Three () of eight () Middle Schools have an FCI greater than.00, and a th MS is very close with an FCI of. One () of eight () Middle Schools has an FCI less than.000. Twenty-one () of thirty-six () Elementary Schools have an FCI greater than.00. Seven () of thirty-six () Elementary Schools have an FCI less than.000. FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS

5 Facility Age: The average age of NPS six () high school facilities is years old. The average age of NPS s eight () middle school facilities is years old. The average age of NPS s thirty-six () elementary school facilities is years old. The average age of all fifty (0) NPS school facilities is years old. According to the National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES), the national average age of all school facilities nationwide is years, and the average age of school facilities in the US Southeast Region is years. Therefore, NPS school facilities are, on average, years older than the national average and years older than the regional average. PRELIMINARY CAPITAL REPLACEMENT and CAPITAL RENEWAL BUDGETING Definitions: Capital Improvement A facilities project that adds building area or provides for extensive renovations to an existing facility. Capital A facilities project that replaces an older facility with a new facility. Capital Renewal A facilities project that replaces a school building system and component that has reached the end of its useful life. Current Capital Value - The cost to totally replace a school facility of equal size and character to the existing school in today s dollars, including soft costs such as design, testing and contingencies, based on the existing facility s total gross building area. Current Capital Renewal Value - The cost to totally replace a school building s systems and components in today s dollars, including soft costs such as design, testing and contingencies, based on the existing facility s total gross building area. This renewal cost is less than replacement cost because building structural elements and infrastructure are typically not included in renewal strategies. This value is usually equated to a full Renovation. Capital Renewal Cost / SF - The cost per square foot of building area to totally replace a school building s systems and components in today s dollars, including soft costs such as design, testing and contingencies. This renewal cost is less than replacement cost because building structural elements and infrastructure are typically not included in renewal strategies. st Century Modernization - The estimated cost to modify and adapt existing facilities to provide modern learning environments that support current and future educational programming. FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS

6 Findings and Analysis: School Facilities Managers typically utilize one of the following two methodologies when developing projected annual budget expenditures for [building system and building component replacements and/or renewals]..) Building a Capital Renewal Budget by Projects as prioritized by critical need, or.) Utilizing a school facilities industry standard of.00% of Total Current Capital Renewal Value per year to establish recommended overall levels of funding for Capital Renewal Budgets and then identifying specific renewal projects and recommended replacement timeframes based on critical need. Norfolk Public Schools currently uses the first methodology of building a Capital Renewal Budget by projects as prioritized by critical need. This methodology is a good system for identifying critical building system and component renewal needs, but it typically tends to undershoot the big picture needs of the school facility in the context of maintaining all building systems and components in good condition and replacing or renewing them promptly when they have exceeded their useful life. A typical result of this methodology is that some building systems and components tend to be neglected, and over time the FCI of the facility steadily increases such that a major renovation project is needed every or 0 years to catch up Methodology is a more proactive approach to planning and budgeting for Capital Renewal Projects as it builds in a steady funding mechanism and timetable to replace facility systems and components as they wear out, and not after they have completely failed. This methodology has an added benefit of providing less stress on the quality of the learning environments and the people who work in them. For these reasons, we recommend that the Methodology be utilized to establish required annual Capital Renewal Budget allocations and replace facility systems and components as they reach the end of their useful life. Summary Data: Estimated Annual Expenditure (in 0 dollars) necessary for Capital Renewal s (Methodology )... $ M (Note - Should be escalated % per year for construction cost inflation) Priority [ >.] in 0 dollars ( to years) $ M Please note that the estimated cost of Priority Capital Renewal s is more than times the Estimated Annual Expenditure Necessary for Capital Renewal s ( x $ M - $$0 M). This is an indication that have been deferred due to a lack of available funding. Priority [ >.] in 0 dollars (0 to years). FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS $ M

7 It is important to note that the Capital Renewal Budget planning scenario outlined in Methodology essentially maintains the school division s division-wide FCI score at its current level at the point time in which this funding level is initiated. If it is the desire of the school division and the community to lower the division-wide FCI score to the level of or below, which is generally considered Good, then a higher level of annual funding for Capital Renewal will be required - at least until such point in time that the division-wide FCI reaches the target level. At this point funding can be reduced back to the.00% Total Current Capital Renewal Value per year recommended level for FCI maintenance. It is also extremely important to note that the Capital Renewal Budget planning scenarios outlined above do very little to improve educational adequacy deficiencies which may be present in the division s school facilities, as the focus of Capital Renewal is replacing and renewing building systems and components in kind along with code compliance and/or energy usage improvements. Additional funding in the form of Capital Improvement Projects will be required to adequately address deficiencies related to student capacity and utilization and/or to improve the capacity of learning environments to support the desired educational programs. FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS

8 NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS :: LONG RANGE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN SUMMARY :: FACILITY CONDITION INDEX [FCI] SCORES / CAPITAL REPLACEMENT & CAPITAL RENEWAL BUDGETING ANALYSIS HBA Architecture & Interior Design SORTED BY FCI - HIGHEST to LOWEST x GRADE LEVEL GROUP Draft :: September, 0 FCI Replace Renovate Capital Renewal s by Priority Capital Renewal School Name Red = Category [See definitions below] Black = Category Blue = Category Gross Building Area [SF] Age of Original Building Facility Index [FCI] Current Capital Value Current Capital Renewal Value Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] Priority +++ [ >.] Capital Renewal Cost / SF Cost of >. Capital Renewals / Cost to Replace Cost of >. Capital Renewals / Cost to Renovate Lake Taylor High School, $,, $,, $,, $,,0 $ 0,,0 $,, $,, $.% 0.% Booker T. Washington High School, $ 0,,0 $,0,0 $,, $,, $,0 $,, $,, $.% 0.% Norfolk Technical Center, 0. $,, $,0, $,, $, $,, $,0, $,, $.%.% Granby High School [Modernization], 0. $,, $ 0,, $ - $ - $ - $,, $,, $.%.% Norview High School, 0. $,0,0 $,0, $ - $ 0,0 $ - $ - $ 0,0 $ 0.%.% Azalea Gardens Middle School 0, 0. $,,0 $,, $,, $,, $,, $,0, $,0,0 $.%.% Rosemont Middle School,0 0.0 $,, $,, $,0,0 $,,0 $,, $,0, $,, $.%.% Lake Taylor Middle School, 0. $,, $,0, $,0, $,,0 $,, $,, $,0, $.% 0.0% Northside Middle School, 0. $,,0 $,, $,, $,0, $,, $,, $,, $ 0.%.% Ruffner Middle School, $,, $,,00 $ - $ - $,0,0 $,, $,, $.0% 0.0% Discovery Academy at Lakewood - 0, $ 0,, $,00, $ - $ - $,0, $ 0,0, $,, $.%.% Norview Middle School, $,,0 $,, $ - $ - $,, $,, $,0, $.%.0% Blair Middle School [Modernization], 0. $,0, $,, $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ % 0.00% Larrymore Elementary School, $ 0,, $,, $,, $,, $,, $, $,, $.%.% Calcott Elementary School,00 0. $,, $,, $,,0 $,, $,,0 $, $,,0 $.%.% Willard Elementary School -,00 0. $,, $,, $,0, $,, $,00,0 $ - $,0, $.%.0% P.B. Young Elementary School, 0. $,00,0 $,, $,, $,,0 $,0, $, $,,0 $.%.% Ingleside Elementary School,00 0. $,,0 $ 0,,00 $,,0 $,, $,,0 $,0, $,, $.0%.% Jacox Elementary School, $,0, $,0, $,,0 $,, $,,0 $, $,0,0 $ 0.%.% Willoughby Elementary School, $,,0 $ 0,, $,0, $,, $,, $,, $,, $.%.% Easton Preschool,00 0. $ 0,0,0 $,, $,, $,, $,0, $ 00,0 $,0, $.%.% Poplar Halls Elementary School, $,0,0 $,,0 $,, $,0,0 $, $,00 $,, $.%.% Berkley Early Childhood Center, 0.0 $,, $,,0 $,,0 $,00, $,, $,0, $,0, $.%.0% Oceanair Elementary School,0 0. $,, $,0, $,00, $ 0, $,0, $, $,, $.%.% Granby Elementary School,0 0. $,,0 $,, $,, $,,0 $,, $,, $,, $.% 00.00% Suburban Park Elementary School,0 0. $,, $ 0,, $,,0 $ 0,0 $,, $,,0 $ 0,00, $.%.% Chesterfield Academy,0 0.0 $,, $ 0,, $,00, $,00 $,, $,,0 $,, $.%.% Sherwood Forest Elementary School, $,00, $,0, $,, $, $,, $,0 $,0, $.0%.% Norview Elementary School,0 0. $,, $ 0,00,0 $,, $, $,0, $,000 $,, $.0%.% Lindenwood Elementary School,00 0. $,0, $,, $,, $, $,, $,, $,, $.%.% Tidewater Park Elementary School, 0.0 $ 0,,0 $,0, $, $, $,, $,, $,, $.%.% St. Helena Elementary School,0 0. $,, $,, $,, $, $,, $, $,, $.%.% Little Creek Elementary School - Tarpon, 0. $,, $ 0,0, $,00 $,0, $,, $,0, $,, $.%.% Little Creek Elementary School - Nancy, $,0,0 $,, $, $,00, $,, $,, $,00, $.% 0.00% Fairlawn Elementary School,00 0. $,,0 $ 0,,00 $,0 $,,0 $,,0 $, $,, $.% 0.0% Tarrallton Elementary School, $,, $,, $ 0,0 $,0, $,,0 $, $,0, $ 0.0%.% Sewells Point Elementary School 0,00 0. $,, $ 0,, $,, $,0 $,, $,,0 $,, $ 0 0.%.% Tanners Creek Elementary School, $,, $,, $,0 $,,0 $,, $,, $,,0 $.% 0.% Willard Elementary School - 0 Add., 0. $,, $,00, $,0, $ - $ - $, $,,0 $.%.0% Bayview Elementary School [Modernization],0 0. $,,0 $,0, $ - $ - $,0 $,, $,, $ 0.0%.% Ghent K - School 0,00 0. $,0, $ 0,0, $ - $,0 $,, $,, $,,00 $.%.0% Monroe Elementary School, $,, $,, $ - $ - $,,0 $,, $,, $.%.% Taylor Elementary School, 0. $,, $,,0 $ - $ - $, $ 0, $, $.%.% Coleman Place Elementary School, 0 0. $,, $,, $ - $ - $ - $ 0, $ 0, $ 0.% 0.0%,, SF $,0,0, $ 0,, $,, $ 0,0, $,, $ 0,, $,, x.00% (note ) Estimated Annual Expenditure Necessary for Capital Renewal s $,0, ( in - Should be escalated % per year for construction cost inflation) note : The Industry Standard for budgeting of Capital Renewal s is % of Total Current Capital Renewal Value per year. This factor assumes that Capital Renewal s have not been significantly deferred SCHOOL FACILITIES EXCLUDED from the SCOPE of this ASSESSMENT STUDY CATEGORY DEFINITIONS Maury High School,000 0 [ Modernization] Category Original sixteen () School Facilities believed to have the most need in terms of facilities improvements Madison Alternative Center,0 Category All other School Facilities older than years [new or modernization] Camp Young, Category School Facilities 0 years old or less [new or modernization] Coronado Open Campus,0 JJ Roberts 0, Crossroads PK- Richard Bowling Elementary School Southside Stem Campostella Larchmont Elementary School Ocean View Elementary School Camp Allen Elementary, - - () SUPPORT FACILITIES EXCLUDED from the SCOPE of this ASSESSMENT STUDY Bellmore Complex,0 Transportation Facility, Improvements Cost Model (include 0% Soft Costs for Design, FF&E, Technology, and Contingency) High School - Current Capital Cost/SF in $ 0. Middle School - Current Capital Cost/SF in $. Elementary School - Current Capital Cost/SF in $. High School - Current Capital Renewal Cost/SF in $ 0. Middle School - Current Capital Renewal Cost/SF in $.0 Elementary School - Current Capital Renewal Cost/SF in $.

9 NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS :: LONG RANGE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN SUMMARY :: FACILITY CONDITION INDEX [FCI] SCORES / CAPITAL REPLACEMENT & CAPITAL RENEWAL BUDGETING ANALYSIS HBA Architecture & Interior Design SORTED BY FCI - HIGHEST to LOWEST Draft :: September, 0 FCI Replace Renovate Capital Renewal s by Priority Capital Renewal School Name Red = Category [See definitions below] Black = Category Blue = Category Gross Building Area [SF] Age of Original Building Facility Index [FCI] Current Capital Value Current Capital Renewal Value Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] Priority +++ [ >.] Capital Renewal Cost / SF Cost of >. Capital Renewals / Cost to Replace Cost of >. Capital Renewals / Cost to Renovate Larrymore Elementary School, $ 0,, $,, $,, $,, $,, $, $,, $.%.% Calcott Elementary School,00 0. $,, $,, $,,0 $,, $,,0 $, $,,0 $.%.% Willard Elementary School -,00 0. $,, $,, $,0, $,, $,00,0 $ - $,0, $.%.0% P.B. Young Elementary School, 0. $,00,0 $,, $,, $,,0 $,0, $, $,,0 $.%.% Ingleside Elementary School,00 0. $,,0 $ 0,,00 $,,0 $,, $,,0 $,0, $,, $.0%.% Jacox Elementary School, $,0, $,0, $,,0 $,, $,,0 $, $,0,0 $ 0.%.% Willoughby Elementary School, $,,0 $ 0,, $,0, $,, $,, $,, $,, $.%.% Easton Preschool,00 0. $ 0,0,0 $,, $,, $,, $,0, $ 00,0 $,0, $.%.% Poplar Halls Elementary School, $,0,0 $,,0 $,, $,0,0 $, $,00 $,, $.%.% Berkley Early Childhood Center, 0.0 $,, $,,0 $,,0 $,00, $,, $,0, $,0, $.%.0% Oceanair Elementary School,0 0. $,, $,0, $,00, $ 0, $,0, $, $,, $.%.% Azalea Gardens Middle School 0, 0. $,,0 $,, $,, $,, $,, $,0, $,0,0 $.%.% Granby Elementary School,0 0. $,,0 $,, $,, $,,0 $,, $,, $,, $.% 00.00% Suburban Park Elementary School,0 0. $,, $ 0,, $,,0 $ 0,0 $,, $,,0 $ 0,00, $.%.% Chesterfield Academy,0 0.0 $,, $ 0,, $,00, $,00 $,, $,,0 $,, $.%.% Rosemont Middle School,0 0.0 $,, $,, $,0,0 $,,0 $,, $,0, $,, $.%.% Sherwood Forest Elementary School, $,00, $,0, $,, $, $,, $,0 $,0, $.0%.% Norview Elementary School,0 0. $,, $ 0,00,0 $,, $, $,0, $,000 $,, $.0%.% Lindenwood Elementary School,00 0. $,0, $,, $,, $, $,, $,, $,, $.%.% Lake Taylor High School, $,, $,, $,, $,,0 $ 0,,0 $,, $,, $.% 0.% Lake Taylor Middle School, 0. $,, $,0, $,0, $,,0 $,, $,, $,0, $.% 0.0% Tidewater Park Elementary School, 0.0 $ 0,,0 $,0, $, $, $,, $,, $,, $.%.% St. Helena Elementary School,0 0. $,, $,, $,, $, $,, $, $,, $.%.% Little Creek Elementary School - Tarpon, 0. $,, $ 0,0, $,00 $,0, $,, $,0, $,, $.%.% Little Creek Elementary School - Nancy, $,0,0 $,, $, $,00, $,, $,, $,00, $.% 0.00% Booker T. Washington High School, $ 0,,0 $,0,0 $,, $,, $,0 $,, $,, $.% 0.% Fairlawn Elementary School,00 0. $,,0 $ 0,,00 $,0 $,,0 $,,0 $, $,, $.% 0.0% Northside Middle School, 0. $,,0 $,, $,, $,0, $,, $,, $,, $ 0.%.% Tarrallton Elementary School, $,, $,, $ 0,0 $,0, $,,0 $, $,0, $ 0.0%.% Norfolk Technical Center, 0. $,, $,0, $,, $, $,, $,0, $,, $.%.% Sewells Point Elementary School 0,00 0. $,, $ 0,, $,, $,0 $,, $,,0 $,, $ 0 0.%.% Tanners Creek Elementary School, $,, $,, $,0 $,,0 $,, $,, $,,0 $.% 0.% Willard Elementary School - 0 Add., 0. $,, $,00, $,0, $ - $ - $, $,,0 $.%.0% Bayview Elementary School [Modernization],0 0. $,,0 $,0, $ - $ - $,0 $,, $,, $ 0.0%.% Granby High School [Modernization], 0. $,, $ 0,, $ - $ - $ - $,, $,, $.%.% Ghent K - School 0,00 0. $,0, $ 0,0, $ - $,0 $,, $,, $,,00 $.%.0% Ruffner Middle School, $,, $,,00 $ - $ - $,0,0 $,, $,, $.0% 0.0% Discovery Academy at Lakewood - 0, $ 0,, $,00, $ - $ - $,0, $ 0,0, $,, $.%.% Norview Middle School, $,,0 $,, $ - $ - $,, $,, $,0, $.%.0% Monroe Elementary School, $,, $,, $ - $ - $,,0 $,, $,, $.%.% Taylor Elementary School, 0. $,, $,,0 $ - $ - $, $ 0, $, $.%.% Blair Middle School [Modernization], 0. $,0, $,, $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ % 0.00% Norview High School, 0. $,0,0 $,0, $ - $ 0,0 $ - $ - $ 0,0 $ 0.%.% Coleman Place Elementary School, 0 0. $,, $,, $ - $ - $ - $ 0, $ 0, $ 0.% 0.0%,, SF $,0,0, $ 0,, $,, $ 0,0, $,, $ 0,, $,, x.00% (note ) Estimated Annual Expenditure Necessary for Capital Renewal s $,0, ( in - Should be escalated % per year for construction cost inflation) note : The Industry Standard for budgeting of Capital Renewal s is % of Total Current Capital Renewal Value per year. This factor assumes that Capital Renewal s have not been significantly deferred SCHOOL FACILITIES EXCLUDED from the SCOPE of this ASSESSMENT STUDY CATEGORY DEFINITIONS Maury High School,000 0 [ Modernization] Category Original sixteen () School Facilities believed to have the most need in terms of facilities improvements Madison Alternative Center,0 Category All other School Facilities older than years [new or modernization] Camp Young, Category School Facilities 0 years old or less [new or modernization] Coronado Open Campus,0 JJ Roberts 0, Crossroads PK- Richard Bowling Elementary School Southside Stem Campostella Larchmont Elementary School Ocean View Elementary School Camp Allen Elementary, - - () SUPPORT FACILITIES EXCLUDED from the SCOPE of this ASSESSMENT STUDY Bellmore Complex,0 Transportation Facility, Improvements Cost Model (include 0% Soft Costs for Design, FF&E, Technology, and Contingency) High School - Current Capital Cost/SF in $ 0. Middle School - Current Capital Cost/SF in $. Elementary School - Current Capital Cost/SF in $. High School - Current Capital Renewal Cost/SF in $ 0. Middle School - Current Capital Renewal Cost/SF in $.0 Elementary School - Current Capital Renewal Cost/SF in $.

10 NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS :: LONG RANGE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN SUMMARY ANALYSIS :: REPLACEMENT VERSUS CAPITAL RENEWAL + MODERNIZAITON HBA Architecture & Interior Design SORTED BY FCI - HIGHEST to LOWEST :: SCHOOLS WITH GREATEST FACILITIES NEEDS [BY FCI] Draft :: October, 0 FCI Replace Renovate Capital Renewal (from previous summaries) st Century Modernization School Name Red = Category Black = Category Blue = Category Gross Building Area [SF] Age of Original Building Facility Index [FCI] Current Capital Value Current Capital Renewal Value Priority +++ [ >.] + Modernization to Achieve st Century Learning Environments ** = Capital Renewal + st Century Modernization Cost of Capital Renewal + Modernization / Cost to Replace *** Larrymore Elementary School, $ 0,, $,, $,, + $,, = $,,.0% Calcott Elementary School,00 0. $,, $,, $,,0 + $,0, = $,0,0.% Willard Elementary School -,00 0. $,, $,, $,0, + $,0, = $,0,0.% P.B. Young Elementary School, 0. $,00,0 $,, $,,0 + $,, = $,,.% Ingleside Elementary School,00 0. $,,0 $ 0,,00 $,, + $,00, = $,,0.0% Jacox Elementary School, $,0, $,0, $,0,0 + $,0, = $,,0.% Willoughby Elementary School, $,,0 $ 0,, $,, + $,0,0 = $,,0.% Easton Preschool,00 0. $ 0,0,0 $,, $,0, + $,, = $,,0.% Poplar Halls Elementary School, $,0,0 $,,0 $,, + $,, = $,0,.% 0 Berkley Early Childhood Center, 0.0 $,, $,,0 $,0, + $,, = $,,0.% Oceanair Elementary School,0 0. $,, $,0, $,, + $,, = $,, 0.% Azalea Gardens Middle School 0, 0. $,,0 $,, $,0,0 + $,, = $,0,.% Granby Elementary School,0 0. $,,0 $,, $,, + $,0, = $,,0.% Suburban Park Elementary School,0 0. $,, $ 0,, $ 0,00, + $,, = $,,.% Chesterfield Academy,0 0.0 $,, $ 0,, $,, + $,0, = $ 0,,.% Rosemont Middle School,0 0.0 $,, $,, $,, + $,, = $,,.% ** Modernizations to Achieve st Century Learning Environments are estimated to be 0% of the cost of Total. A more refined cost estimate may be calculated if an Educational Adequacy Assessment is performed and a Conceptual Modernization Design is developed for each facility being considered. *** When this factor exceeds %, it is generally assumed that Total is a better long-term value than Capital Renewal + Modernization Improvements. 0

11 Lake Taylor High School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0,000 Building Area [HS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $,0 $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $,, $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $,0 INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $,0 $ - $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $. $ - $,, $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $,,0 $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $ 0. $,, $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $,, $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $, $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ 0, $ - $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $,,0 $ - $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ 0,, $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $ 0. $,,0 $,,0 $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $,,0 SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $,, $,,0 $ 0,,0 $,, Remarks: $,, Chiller 00 - Athletic Track Restoration 00 - Electrical Upgrades 00 - Exterior Masonry Repairs 00 - Partial Foam Roof 00 - Auditorium Asbestos Abatement 00 - Stadium Lights 0 - CCTV & Media Communications Upgrades 0 - Cooling Tower 0 - Partial Roof No Mechanical Fresh Air Ventilation in Classrooms Gym Bleacher Does not include 0% Roof scheduled for 0

12 Booker T Washington High School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0,000 Building Area [HS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $,0, $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $,00, $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $,, $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,,0 INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $,0 INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $,0 $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $,0 $ - $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $. $ - $,, $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $,,0 FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $,, $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $, $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,, $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ 0,, $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $ 0. $,, $,, $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $,, PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0.0 $,, $,, $,0 $,, Remarks: $,, Athletic Track Restoration 00 - Elevator Addition 00 - Electrical Upgrades 00 - Fire Alarm Upgrades 00 - Stage Lighting & Dimming s 0 - CCTV and Media Communications Upgrade 0 - East Parking Lot Renovation 0 - West Parking Lot Renovation 0 - Auditorium Seating

13 Norfolk Technical Center School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0, Building Area s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $ 0, $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $,, $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,0,0 $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $,0 INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $, INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $, SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $, $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0 FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $, $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $ - $ 0, $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,0, $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,0, $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $ - $ - $, $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $,, $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0 PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $,, $, $,, $,0, Remarks: $,, New Elevator 00 - Lighting / Ceiling Upgrade 00 - Chiller 0 - Roof

14 Granby High School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0, Building Area Total Renovation & Additions: [HS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,,0 DOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,,00 INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ 0, INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $,0, PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $ - $ - $ - $,, Remarks: $,, Security Upgrades 0 - New Chiller & Cooling Tower

15 Norview High School School Building Date: 00 Assessment Date: //0, Building Area [HS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ 0, $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $ - $ 0,0 $ - $ - Remarks: $ 0,0 0 of Chlllers are + 0 years old Exterior Metal Doors are in poor condition

16 Azalea Gardens Middle School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0 0, Building Area [MS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $, STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ 0, $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ 0, EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,, $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $,0 $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $,, $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $, $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $, $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $, $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $, $ - $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $, $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $, $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $,,0 $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $,, $,, $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0 PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $,, $,, $,, $,0, Remarks: $,0,0 0 - New Gym Bleachers Auditorium HVAC 0- - Parking Lot 0 - Gym HVAC No Mechanical Fresh Air ventilation in Classrooms story building requires Elevator for ADA compliance Metal Roof Retrofit +/- years old and has many leaks

17 Rosemont Middle School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0,0 Building Area [MS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ 0, STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $, STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ 0, EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $,, $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0, $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $,,0 $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0, INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $, INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $, INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $, SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ 0, $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $ - $, $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, NA ELEVATOR SYSTEMS 0.00 $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $ 0, $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0, $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $ - $,, $,, $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $,0, $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0.0 $,0,0 $,,0 $,, $,0, Remarks: $,, 0 Approximately % of the facility contains Central Administrative Office Space Classrooms dedicated to division-wide Special Education

18 Lake Taylor Middle School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0, Building Area [MS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $, $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $,0,0 $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $, INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $, INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,0 $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ 0, $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $, $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $, $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $,, $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS $. $,,0 $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $. $ - $,, $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $, $ - $ - $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $,0, $,,0 $,, $,, Remarks: $,0, Chiller 00 - Partial Roof 0- - Exterior Masonry Repairs 0 - Gym Bleacher story building requires Elevator for ADA compliance Facility is used as an Emergency Shelter

19 Northside Middle School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0, Building Area [MS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ 0, $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $, EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ 0,0 $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $, $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $,, $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0,0 $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ 0, $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ 0,0 $ - $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $,0 $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $, FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $, $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $, $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $ 0, $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0, $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,0, $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $ - $ - $,0, $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,,0 SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $,0, $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $,, $,0, $,, $,, Remarks: $,, New Parking Lot 00 - Gym & Stage Floor 00 - Electrical Upgrade 0 - Canopy s 0 - Exterior Masonry Repairs Asbestos ceilings in Classrooms and nd floor Corridor Moisture intrusion through exterior walls still evident Stepped "thrones" in Boys' Restrooms? May be in NAS Flight Accident Potential Zone - Need to verify story building requires Elevator for ADA compliance

20 Ruffner Middle School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0,000 Building Area [MS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,,0 $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,00, ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ 0, $ - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $,0 $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,0,0 $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $ - $ - $,, $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0.0 $ - $ - $,0,0 $,, Remarks: $,, Cooling Tower 0 - Gym Floor

21 Discovery at Lakewood - [Lafayette Winona] School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0 0,000 Building Area [MS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0, DOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $,, INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0, INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ 0, SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $, EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $,0 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,,0 HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $ - $ - $,0, $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0.0 $ - $ - $,0, $ 0,0, Remarks: $,, Electrical Upgrade 0 - Cooling Tower 0 - Fire Alarm Panel 0 - New Playground Limited Area Sprinkler at Atrium / Lobby

22 Norview Middle School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0,000 Building Area [MS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0, INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $, EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0, FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ 0, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $,, HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $ - $ - $,, $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $,0, SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $ - $ - $,, $,, Remarks: $,0, 0

23 Blair Middle School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0, Building Area Total Renovation & Additions: 00 [MS] s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - Remarks: $ - 0

24 Larrymore Elementary School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0, Building Area s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $, $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $, $ - $ - $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $,, $ - $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $, $ - $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $, $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $, $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $, $ - $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $, $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ 0, FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $ 00,0 $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $, $ - $ - ELEVATOR SYSTEMS $ 0. $, $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $ - $,0 $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $,, $ - $ - $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $,0 $ - $,0 $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ - $, SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $,, $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0.0 $,, $,, $,, $, Remarks: $,, Parking Lot Renovations 0 - Hard Surface Playground No Mechanical Fresh Air Ventilation in Classrooms story building requires Elevator for ADA compliance

25 Calcott Elementary School School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0,00 Building Area s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ 0, $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $, $ - $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ 0, $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $, $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $, $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $, $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $,0 $ - $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $,0 $ - $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $, $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $,0 $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $, $ - $ - NA ELEVATOR SYSTEMS 0.00 $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $ 0, $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $ - $ - $, $, ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ 0,0 $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $,,0 $ - $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $, $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $,,0 $,, $,,0 $, Remarks: $,,0 0 Built-up roof appears to be original ( years old) ~0% of Ceiling contains Asbestos

26 Willard Elementary School - Original Building School Building Date: Assessment Date: //0,00 Building Area s Cost in 0 Priority [ >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] [. > >.] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ 0, $ - STRUCTURAL WALL / FRAME SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $, $ - STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $, $ - ROOFING SYSTEMS $. $ 0, $ - $ - DOOR SYSTEMS $. $, $ - $ - WINDOW SYSTEMS $.0 $, $ - $ - $ - INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS $ 0. $ - $ - $, $ - INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS $.0 $ - $ - $,0 $ - INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $,0 $ - $ - EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS $. $ - $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [BUILT-IN] COMPONENTS $. $,0 $ - $ - $ - FURNISHINGS [LOOSE] COMPONENTS $. $ - $, $ - $ - NA ELEVATOR SYSTEMS 0.00 $ 0. $ - $ - $ - $ - NA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.00 $.0 $ - $ 0, $ - $ - PLUMBING SYSTEMS $. $ - $,0 $ - $ - HVAC SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $,, $ - ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS / $. $, $ - $, $ - ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS $. $ - $ - $ 0,0 $ - SITE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS $.0 $ - $ - $,,0 $ - SITE PLAYGROUNDS & ATHLETICS $. $ - $ - $, $ - PRELIMINARY FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0. $,0, $,, $,00,0 $ - Remarks: $,0, Parking Lot Renovation 0 - Cooling Tower Built-up roof appears to be original ( years old) ~0% of Ceiling contains Asbestos