NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO"

Julian Golden
5 years ago
Views:

1 Smart Property Advisors Ltd Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared by: SMART PROPERTY ADVISORS LTD Laurier Avenue West tel1 Ottawa, ON tel2 Project Number: Date: JULY 2013

2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND NOISE SOURCES NOISE RECEPTORS NOISE LEVELS AT RECEPTORS RECOMMENDATIONS... 2 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D Site Location STAMSON Output Files Noise Plan Building Elevation View and Floorplans

3 Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the Report ) has been prepared by Smart Property Advisors Ltd. ( Consultant ) for the benefit of the client ( Client ) in accordance with the agreement between Consultant and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the Agreement ). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the Information ): is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the Limitations ); represents Consultant s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified; has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time. Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. Consultant accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared and, in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, is not responsible for any variability in such conditions, geographically or over time. Consultant agrees that the Report represents its professional judgement as described above and that the Information has been prepared for the specific purpose and use described in the Report and the Agreement, but Consultant makes no other representations, or any guarantees or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the Report, the information or any part thereof. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any estimates or opinions regarding probable construction costs or construction schedule provided by Consultant represent Consultant s professional judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Since Consultant has no control over market or economic conditions, prices for construction labour, equipment or materials or bidding procedures, Consultant, its directors, officers and employees are not able to, nor do they, make any representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to such estimates or opinions, or their variance from actual construction costs or schedules, and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising there from or in any way related thereto. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk. Except (1) as agreed to in writing by Consultant and Client; (2) as required by-law; or (3) to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client. Consultant accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Report or the Information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report or any of the Information ( improper use of the Report ), except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of Consultant to use and rely upon the Report and the Information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use. This Statement of Qualifications and Limitations is attached to and forms part of the Report and any use of the Report is subject to the terms hereof.

SB/MJT 07/16/2013 Issued for Submission Smart Property Advisors Signatures Report

4 Distribution List # of Hard Copies PDF Required Association/Company Name 1 YES NMR Engineering Revision Log Revision # Revised By Date Issue/Revision Description 0 SB/MJT 07/16/2013 Issued for Submission Smart Property Advisors Signatures Report Prepared By: Shawn Bhatia. P.Eng., M.Eng. Report Reviewed By: Michael J. Thivierge, P.Eng., P.E. Stamp

5 1.0 INTRODUCTION This noise report was prepared for the proposed Isabella Street residential building at 114 Isabella in Ottawa, ON. The purpose of this report is to assess the sound levels resulting from potential noise sources and makes recommendations per the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG). This report is being submitted on behalf of the developer, NMR Engineering, in support of the proposed site plan control application. 2.0 BACKGROUND The subject land is bounded by existing residential building to the East (Retirement Life Community), Isabella Street to the North, an existing restaurant to the West and existing residential to the South. The land is currently vacant. Figure 1 (in Appendix A) shows the site location. 3.0 NOISE SOURCES The first noise source used in this study was Isabella Street, which is identified in the Transportation Master Plan as a one way 2 lane urban arterial road with an annual average daily traffic volume of 7,500 vehicles per day with an assumed 92% of traffic occurring during the day and 8% at night. The traffic volume is assumed to have 7% medium truck traffic and 5% heavy truck traffic. Isabella Street has a posted speed limit is 50 km/hr. The second noise source used in this study was highway 417, which consists of 6 lane divided roadway, with an annual average daily traffic volume of 18,333 vehicles per day per lane. The traffic volume was divided into 3 eastbound lanes and 3 westbound lanes. The day/night traffic split as well as truck traffic percentages are as described above and conform to the City of Ottawa ENCG. The highway posted speed limit is 100 km/hr. The highway is approximately 7 meters higher than the base of the proposed building. Noise source height used was 1.5m. There are no airports or aircraft noises that could affect the development. 4.0 NOISE RECEPTORS The noise receptor for the outdoor living area (OLA) condition was taken 3m from the back of building and at 1.5m in height. There are no balconies to be considered as OLA. For the indoor conditions, the receptor was located on the front face of the building. The receptor heights of 2.5m for daytime (living room) and 4.5m for nighttime (bed room), were selected. The elevation view and floor plans of the proposed building are included in the Appendix D.

6 5.0 NOISE LEVELS AT RECEPTORS Noise levels were determined at the critical receptor locations using STAMSON 5.0 modelling software. Appendix B contains the software output reports. The Leq 16hr and Leq 8hr results of the model can be summarized in the table below. Table 5.1: MODEL OUTPUT Indoor Day (2.5m) Indoor Night (4.5m) OLA (1.5m) dba dba dba Proposed Building RECOMMENDATIONS The building has Leq 16hr and Leq 8hr values that are higher than 65 dba and 60 dba respectively so mitigation measures are required. It is recommended that air conditioning be provided. Additionally, building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria. A few examples of building component considerations are: Acoustic treatment of walls and roof; Selection of windows and doors; Installation of sound reducing fittings in ducts and opening to the outside. Additionally, it is recommended that a type D warning clause is registered on title and is added to all future leases and purchase and sale agreements. The type D warning clause is as follows: "This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of the Environment's noise criteria." The building has an OLA noise level greater than 60 dba so mitigation measures were investigated. With a barrier along the front lot line, the noise level is marginally reduced. The table below summarizes the effects of the front barrier height on OLA noise level reduction. 114 Isabella Street Noise Report July 2013 Page 2

7 Table 5.2: FRONT BARRIER HEIGHT VS OLA Barrier Height OLA (1.5m) (m) (dba) Since the required barrier height was above 4.5m, alternative noise mitigation measures were investigated. Drastically lowering the site grading to allow the OLA to be within the shadow zone requires extensive excavation and retaining wall installation and is therefore not considered an option. Extending the back building face to reduce the angle of exposed road segment is also not possible due to the current proposed rear yard already being only 3 meters. A 3m noise fence located 3m from the rear lot line reduces the OLA noise level to dba. The table below summarizes the effects of the rear barrier height on OLA noise level reduction. Table 5.3: REAR BARRIER HEIGHT VS OLA Barrier Height OLA (1.5m) (m) (dba) To reduce the OLA noise level to 55 dba, the developer would have to provide a 3.7m noise fence between the parking area and the OLA. Tuf Barrier noise fence as manufactured by Atlantic Industries Ltd (or equivalent) is recommended for installation and use. We trust this is satisfactory, Michael J Thivierge, P.Eng 114 Isabella Street Noise Report July 2013 Page 3

8 APPENDIX A (Figure 1 Site location)

9 SITE LOCATION

10 APPENDIX B (STAMSON output files)

11 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :06:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: isab_in.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Indoor Noise Levels Road data, segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00

12 Data for Segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : deg Angle2 : deg : 1.00 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00

13 Road data, segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

14 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : deg Angle2 : deg : 1.00 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00

15 Road data, segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

16 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00

17 Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 2.50! 1.98! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba

18 Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 2.50! 0.60! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba

19 Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba

20 Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 2.25! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba

21 Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 1.24! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba

22 Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 68.49

23 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :09:48 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: thola.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Outdoor Noise Levels Road data, segment # 1: Baskin N (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00

24 Data for Segment # 1: Baskin N (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00

25 Road data, segment # 2: Baskin S (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Baskin S (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

26 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00

27 Results segment # 1: Baskin N (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba

28 Results segment # 2: Baskin S (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba

29 Results segment # 1: Baskin N (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba

30 Results segment # 2: Baskin S (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 56.65

31 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:21 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: isa_barr.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Outdoor Noise Level w/barrier Road data, segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00

32 Data for Segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 1 House density : 20 % Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : deg Angle2 : deg : 3.70 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00

33 Road data, segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

34 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : deg Angle2 : deg : 3.70 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00

35 Road data, segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)

36 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height : deg Angle2 : deg : 3.70 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00

37 Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.89! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba

38 Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.84! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba

39 Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.62! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba

40 Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 4.75! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba

41 Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 4.72! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba

42 Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 4.38! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba

43 TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 60.57

44 APPENDIX C (Noise Plan)

47 APPENDIX D (Building elevation view and floorplans)

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-042 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Tony Kazarian AK Global Management Inc. 680 Eagleson Road Ottawa, Ontario K2M 2G9 Canada Prepared By: Omar Daher, B.Eng.,