NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO
|
|
- Julian Golden
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Smart Property Advisors Ltd Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared by: SMART PROPERTY ADVISORS LTD Laurier Avenue West tel1 Ottawa, ON tel2 Project Number: Date: JULY 2013
2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND NOISE SOURCES NOISE RECEPTORS NOISE LEVELS AT RECEPTORS RECOMMENDATIONS... 2 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D Site Location STAMSON Output Files Noise Plan Building Elevation View and Floorplans
3 Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the Report ) has been prepared by Smart Property Advisors Ltd. ( Consultant ) for the benefit of the client ( Client ) in accordance with the agreement between Consultant and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the Agreement ). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the Information ): is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the Limitations ); represents Consultant s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified; has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time. Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. Consultant accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared and, in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, is not responsible for any variability in such conditions, geographically or over time. Consultant agrees that the Report represents its professional judgement as described above and that the Information has been prepared for the specific purpose and use described in the Report and the Agreement, but Consultant makes no other representations, or any guarantees or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the Report, the information or any part thereof. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any estimates or opinions regarding probable construction costs or construction schedule provided by Consultant represent Consultant s professional judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Since Consultant has no control over market or economic conditions, prices for construction labour, equipment or materials or bidding procedures, Consultant, its directors, officers and employees are not able to, nor do they, make any representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to such estimates or opinions, or their variance from actual construction costs or schedules, and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising there from or in any way related thereto. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk. Except (1) as agreed to in writing by Consultant and Client; (2) as required by-law; or (3) to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client. Consultant accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Report or the Information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report or any of the Information ( improper use of the Report ), except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of Consultant to use and rely upon the Report and the Information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use. This Statement of Qualifications and Limitations is attached to and forms part of the Report and any use of the Report is subject to the terms hereof.
4 Distribution List # of Hard Copies PDF Required Association/Company Name 1 YES NMR Engineering Revision Log Revision # Revised By Date Issue/Revision Description 0 SB/MJT 07/16/2013 Issued for Submission Smart Property Advisors Signatures Report Prepared By: Shawn Bhatia. P.Eng., M.Eng. Report Reviewed By: Michael J. Thivierge, P.Eng., P.E. Stamp
5 1.0 INTRODUCTION This noise report was prepared for the proposed Isabella Street residential building at 114 Isabella in Ottawa, ON. The purpose of this report is to assess the sound levels resulting from potential noise sources and makes recommendations per the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG). This report is being submitted on behalf of the developer, NMR Engineering, in support of the proposed site plan control application. 2.0 BACKGROUND The subject land is bounded by existing residential building to the East (Retirement Life Community), Isabella Street to the North, an existing restaurant to the West and existing residential to the South. The land is currently vacant. Figure 1 (in Appendix A) shows the site location. 3.0 NOISE SOURCES The first noise source used in this study was Isabella Street, which is identified in the Transportation Master Plan as a one way 2 lane urban arterial road with an annual average daily traffic volume of 7,500 vehicles per day with an assumed 92% of traffic occurring during the day and 8% at night. The traffic volume is assumed to have 7% medium truck traffic and 5% heavy truck traffic. Isabella Street has a posted speed limit is 50 km/hr. The second noise source used in this study was highway 417, which consists of 6 lane divided roadway, with an annual average daily traffic volume of 18,333 vehicles per day per lane. The traffic volume was divided into 3 eastbound lanes and 3 westbound lanes. The day/night traffic split as well as truck traffic percentages are as described above and conform to the City of Ottawa ENCG. The highway posted speed limit is 100 km/hr. The highway is approximately 7 meters higher than the base of the proposed building. Noise source height used was 1.5m. There are no airports or aircraft noises that could affect the development. 4.0 NOISE RECEPTORS The noise receptor for the outdoor living area (OLA) condition was taken 3m from the back of building and at 1.5m in height. There are no balconies to be considered as OLA. For the indoor conditions, the receptor was located on the front face of the building. The receptor heights of 2.5m for daytime (living room) and 4.5m for nighttime (bed room), were selected. The elevation view and floor plans of the proposed building are included in the Appendix D.
6 5.0 NOISE LEVELS AT RECEPTORS Noise levels were determined at the critical receptor locations using STAMSON 5.0 modelling software. Appendix B contains the software output reports. The Leq 16hr and Leq 8hr results of the model can be summarized in the table below. Table 5.1: MODEL OUTPUT Indoor Day (2.5m) Indoor Night (4.5m) OLA (1.5m) dba dba dba Proposed Building RECOMMENDATIONS The building has Leq 16hr and Leq 8hr values that are higher than 65 dba and 60 dba respectively so mitigation measures are required. It is recommended that air conditioning be provided. Additionally, building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria. A few examples of building component considerations are: Acoustic treatment of walls and roof; Selection of windows and doors; Installation of sound reducing fittings in ducts and opening to the outside. Additionally, it is recommended that a type D warning clause is registered on title and is added to all future leases and purchase and sale agreements. The type D warning clause is as follows: "This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of the Environment's noise criteria." The building has an OLA noise level greater than 60 dba so mitigation measures were investigated. With a barrier along the front lot line, the noise level is marginally reduced. The table below summarizes the effects of the front barrier height on OLA noise level reduction. 114 Isabella Street Noise Report July 2013 Page 2
7 Table 5.2: FRONT BARRIER HEIGHT VS OLA Barrier Height OLA (1.5m) (m) (dba) Since the required barrier height was above 4.5m, alternative noise mitigation measures were investigated. Drastically lowering the site grading to allow the OLA to be within the shadow zone requires extensive excavation and retaining wall installation and is therefore not considered an option. Extending the back building face to reduce the angle of exposed road segment is also not possible due to the current proposed rear yard already being only 3 meters. A 3m noise fence located 3m from the rear lot line reduces the OLA noise level to dba. The table below summarizes the effects of the rear barrier height on OLA noise level reduction. Table 5.3: REAR BARRIER HEIGHT VS OLA Barrier Height OLA (1.5m) (m) (dba) To reduce the OLA noise level to 55 dba, the developer would have to provide a 3.7m noise fence between the parking area and the OLA. Tuf Barrier noise fence as manufactured by Atlantic Industries Ltd (or equivalent) is recommended for installation and use. We trust this is satisfactory, Michael J Thivierge, P.Eng 114 Isabella Street Noise Report July 2013 Page 3
8 APPENDIX A (Figure 1 Site location)
9 SITE LOCATION
10 APPENDIX B (STAMSON output files)
11 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :06:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: isab_in.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Indoor Noise Levels Road data, segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00
12 Data for Segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : deg Angle2 : deg : 1.00 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00
13 Road data, segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)
14 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : deg Angle2 : deg : 1.00 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00
15 Road data, segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)
16 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 2.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00
17 Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 2.50! 1.98! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba
18 Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 2.50! 0.60! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba
19 Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba
20 Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 2.25! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba
21 Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 1.24! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba
22 Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 68.49
23 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :09:48 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: thola.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Outdoor Noise Levels Road data, segment # 1: Baskin N (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00
24 Data for Segment # 1: Baskin N (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00
25 Road data, segment # 2: Baskin S (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Baskin S (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)
26 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00
27 Results segment # 1: Baskin N (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba
28 Results segment # 2: Baskin S (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba
29 Results segment # 1: Baskin N (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba
30 Results segment # 2: Baskin S (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 56.65
31 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:21 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: isa_barr.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Outdoor Noise Level w/barrier Road data, segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00
32 Data for Segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 1 House density : 20 % Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : deg Angle2 : deg : 3.70 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00
33 Road data, segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Car traffic volume : 44527/3872 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 3542/308 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 2530/220 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)
34 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height Elevation : deg Angle2 : deg : 3.70 m : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00
35 Road data, segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Car traffic volume : 6072/528 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 483/42 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 345/30 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: ISABELLA (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)
36 Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 Barrier height : deg Angle2 : deg : 3.70 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation Receiver elevation Barrier elevation : m : m : m Reference angle : 0.00
37 Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.89! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba
38 Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.84! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba
39 Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (day) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.62! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba
40 Results segment # 1: HWY 417 EB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 4.75! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba
41 Results segment # 2: HWY 417 WB (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 4.72! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba
42 Results segment # 3: ISABELLA (night) Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 4.38! ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba
43 TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 60.57
44 APPENDIX C (Noise Plan)
45
46
47 APPENDIX D (Building elevation view and floorplans)
48
49
50
51
52
Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario
407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-042 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Tony Kazarian AK Global Management Inc. 680 Eagleson Road Ottawa, Ontario K2M 2G9 Canada Prepared By: Omar Daher, B.Eng.,
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario
Conservancy Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 151 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Andrew Finnson Barrhaven Conservancy East Inc. Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Principal Omar Daher,
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 121 Parkdale Avenue Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE 14-010 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Michel Gagnon 98 Rue Lois Gatineau, Québec J8Y 3R7 Prepared By: Thomas Couper, B.A.Sc.,
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-002 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Leanne Moussa Allsaints 10 Blackburn Avenue K1N 6P8 Ottawa, Ontario Prepared
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario Prepared for: Madison Liverpool Limited 369 Rimrock Road Toronto, Ontario, M3J 3G2 Prepared by Victor
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario
Conservancy Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 151 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Andrew Finnson Barrhaven Conservancy East Inc. Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Principal Omar Daher,
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 590 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-019 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Kevin Yemm Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa,
More informationFeasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario
Feasibility Noise Assessment Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-067 - Feasibility Noise Prepared For: Stuart Craig 2300 Yonge Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E4
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 560 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-034 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Kevin Yemm Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa,
More informationTraffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario
383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-104 - Prepared For: Anand Aggarwal 2507701 Ontario Inc. Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa, Ontario K1K 0R8 Prepared
More informationJ. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES
J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES NPC-115 NPC-115 Construction Equipment 1. Scope This Publication sets sound emission standards for various items of new construction
More informationTransportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario
383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-111 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Neil Malhotra Claridge Homes 2001-210 Gladstone Avenue Ottawa, ON K2P 0Y6 Prepared By: Michael Lafortune,
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 1003 Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-031 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Kent Bugatsch Inc. 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3K7
More informationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street DETAILED NOISE STUDY Prepared by: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. 240 Michael Cowpland Drive,
More information3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Kanata, Ontario K2M 1P6 December 2017 Novatech File No. 117077 Ref No.: R-2017-192 December 19,
More informationTransportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment 3960 & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18 039 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Alex Turner 225 Metcalfe Street, Suite 708 Ottawa, Ontario K2P
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE14-121 - Traffic Noise REV 1 Prepared For: 2253664 Ontario Inc. Roberto Campagna 24 George Street West Ottawa, Ontario
More information115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY
Dix B 115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY Prepared for: UNIFORM URBAN DEVELOPMENTS Suite 300, 117 Centrepointe Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2G 5X3 Prepared by: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario
Environmental Noise Assessment St-Charles Market Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-120 - Noise Prepared For: Jenna Maw LineBox Studio Inc. 126 York Street, Suite 502 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5T2 Prepared By: Michael
More informationpatersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For
Geotechnical Engineering patersongroup Environmental Engineering Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Materials Testing Building Science Archaeological Services Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed
More informationEnvironmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment City Park Redevelopment Phase 2 Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-068 Noise & Vibration Phase 2 November 13, 2018 PREPARED FOR Stuart Craig RioTrin Prop (Gloucester
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 809 Richmond Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-024 - Transportation Noise Prepared For: Walter Boyce OCEF Corp 200-368 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1R 5C1 Prepared By:
More informationEnvironmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
s 1220-1226 Place D Orleans Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-154 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Choice Properties REIT 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 500 Toronto, ON M4T 2S5 c/o Pamela Whyte Parsons
More informationREP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18
REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18 2013-10-15 Simon Taggart Project Coordinator The Taggart Group 3187 Albion Road South Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8Y3 T: 613.526.2400 ext 320 C: 613.857.0353
More informationpatersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For
Geotechnical Engineering patersongroup Environmental Engineering Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Materials Testing Building Science Archaeological Services Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise R2 Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise R3 Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army 2 Overlea
More informationAppendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)
Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3) Detroit River International Crossing Study STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 21-02-2007 01:14:41 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT
More information1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8
Durham Live Tourist Destination Page 2 of 24 29 May 2014 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8 5.1 ROAD & RAIL
More informationDETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE
SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers REPORT NO. WA10-93 REVISION 3 DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE SUBMITTED TO: BALLANTRY
More informationSTAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Appeal by Fast Signs of the Decision of the Chief Building Official for One Variance Respecting a Proposed First Party Wall Sign 10-21 Four Seasons Place Date: January 18,
More informationJEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:
JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 Email: jackpflum1@gmail.com Telephone: 513.919.7814 MEMORANDUM REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed Soccer
More informationNoise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department
Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department Produced by Traffic Noise & Air Quality Unit November 2007 Contact: brian.mcmanus@dublincity.ie Ph;
More informationSHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT
SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT 175 Zoo Park Road Town of Wasaga Beach Date: September 2017 Prepared for: Simcoe County Housing Corporation Prepared by: MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited
More informationPOLICY MANUAL. Hamlets/Residential named hamlets within the County of Grande Prairie whose roads are hard surfaced.
POLICY MANUAL Legal References: Policy department: Public Works Department Cross References: N7 Adoption Date: January 19, 2005 Revision Date: June 20, 2005 Motion# 06/662/2005 October 20, 2014 Motion#
More informationWEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project
WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary Page 2.0 Introduction 2.1 DEVELOPMENT
More informationAPPENDIX IV MODELLING
APPENDIX IV MODELLING Kingston Transportation Master Plan Final Report, July 2004 Appendix IV: Modelling i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVE... 1 3.0 URBAN TRANSPORTATION MODELLING
More informationFOR SALE. Chapel Lane, West Ella, East Yorkshire, HU10 7SE RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION AND NEW BUILD OPPORTUNITY
Chapel Lane, West Ella, East Yorkshire, HU10 7SE FOR SALE RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION AND NEW BUILD OPPORTUNITY Conversion, extension and adaptation of former chapel to form a detached three bedroom dwelling
More informationYorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON
ASSESSMENT REPORT - Project: 16419 Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON Prepared for: Oxford Properties Group Royal Bank Plaza North Tower 200
More informationBUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013)
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION TELEPHONE (949) 724-6300 BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013) Payment: When a plan is required by the Administrative Authority to be submitted, a plan check
More informationSpeed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842
Speed Limit Review Montague Road, West End CEB06842 CEB06842 Prepared for Brisbane City Council 2 November 2016 Speed Limit Review Montague Road, West End Document Information Prepared for Brisbane City
More informationGIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE
Proceedings of the 9 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes island, Greece, 1 3 September 2005 GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE A. KONSTANTINIDIS 1, K. EVANGELIDIS
More informationCity of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy
City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy The purpose of this policy is to outline the level of service that the City of Camrose delivers regarding the maintenance of roads in winter conditions. 1.
More informationApril 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213
Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Subject: Revised Castle Hills BASIS Charter School Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Castle Hills,
More informationSnow and Ice Removal
Policy # 6.6 Procedure # - Replaces 5.10 & 5.10A Revises - Date Approved February 10, 2014 Method of Approval Resolution #17 1. PRINCIPLES The City of Dauphin desires to maintain the City streets, lanes,
More informationMEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:
MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 6, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: CC: MELANIE KNIGHT BRAD BYVELDS/ JENNIFER LUONG 1050 SOMERSET STREET PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OUR FILE NO. 111152 NEIL MALHOTRA The purpose of this memo
More informationDESIGN BULLETIN No. 39/2006 (Revised June 2007) June 2007 Amendment to Design Bulletin #39/2006
Design Bulletin 39 - Revised Tender Submission Requirements DESIGN BULLETIN No. 39/2006 (Revised June 2007) TENDER SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS June 2007 Amendment to Design Bulletin #39/2006 This amendment
More informationMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3 Submitted to: The Ministry of Transportation 1201 Wilson Avenue Downsview, Ontario M3M 1J8 Submitted
More informationREPORT OF PHYSICAL EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT Section 15 - Mineral Tenure Act Regulation
1. EVENT NUMBER(S) 1234567 4. RECORDED HOLDER Doe 123 Main Street REPORT OF PHYSICAL EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT Section 15 - Mineral Tenure Act Regulation Mineral Titles and Policy Branch Ministry of
More informationAssessment & Specifications for Noise Controls
Project 772600 Rev 1 Cargill North Vancouver Grain Terminal Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Background...1 1.2 Site Description...1 2. SOUND LEVEL
More informationCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE Policy No: DSP-OO3 Release Date: January 1, 2014 Effective Date: January 1, 2014 Revision Date: March 1, 2018 TITLE: The City Policy for Site Specific
More informationThe results of KCB s site inspection observations and our recommendations for further work are presented herein.
July 14, 2015 Central Region 401, 4902 51 Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8 Mr. Tony Penney, P.Eng. Construction Engineer Dear Mr. Penney: June 25, 2015 Site Inspection Report The above site was visited
More informationSnow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy
Page 1 CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Effective Date: Approved By: Approved On: March 17, 2015 City Council March 16, 2015 Revision Date: Resolution #: ------ PURPOSE: The City of Airdrie is responsible
More informationAPPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report
APPENDIXD Traffic Noise Technical Report Environmental Assessment - Lincoln County, SD 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Louise Avenue November 2017 F I N A L R E P O R T TRAFFIC NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT
More informationVIKING INSPECTION PROPERTY 4921 U.S. Hwy. 85, Williston, ND 58801
SALE PRICE: $799,000 LOT SIZE: +/-2.49 Acres BUILDING SIZE: +/-3,800 SF DRIVE-IN DOORS 2 CEILING HEIGHT: 16' YEAR BUILT: 2007 ZONING: Commercial PROPERTY OVERVIEW Highly visible, hard-to-find small shop/office/apartment
More informationHOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:
HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT Prepared for: David Johnston Architect Prepared By: BaseTech Consulting Inc. 309 Roywood Crescent Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 1A6 BCI Project No.
More informationUTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO
UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO Prepared by: Bowman Consulting 63 Park Point Dr. Suite 1 Golden, CO 841 (33)-81-29 June 29, 215 Revised August 14, 215 Revised September 3, 215
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
REPORT REFERENCE: SA 4968 rev 1 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT British Standard 8233: 2014. CLIENT: MJ Gleeson SITE: Berengrave Nursery, 61 Berengrave Road, Rainham, Kent, ME 7NL SURVEY DATES: Noise
More informationGeotechnical Completion Report Knights Stream Park Stage3A Development (Lots 107 to 148)
Aurecon New Zealand Limited Unit 1, 150 Cavendish Road Casebrook Christchurch 8051 PO Box 1061 Christchurch 8140 New Zealand T F E W +64 3 366 0821 +64 3 379 6955 christchurch@aurecongroup.com aurecongroup.com
More informationPolicy Title: Snow Removal & Ice Control Policy #: PW
Village of Fruitvale Corporate Policy Manual Policy Title: Snow Removal & Ice Control Policy #: PW-2012-01 Section: PUBLIC WORKS Initially Approved: 2012 06 04 Last Reviewed: 2013 05 06 Council Approval:
More informationPW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works
Policy Statement: The Village of Kitscoty will provide snow and ice control on municipal streets and sidewalks according to determined priorities. Purpose: To provide direction and information to employees
More informationRe: Draft OPA 320 Recommended Amendments to Various Neighbourhood Policies Statutory Public Meeting to be held on Monday 16 November 2015
PG8.5.5 ANALOGICA George S. Belza Partner 9 Madeline Road Toronto, Ontario Canada M2N 2S7 T: 416 223 9584 F: 416 223 5665 E: belana@axxent.ca E-Mailed to: pgmc@toronto.ca Wednesday 04 November 2015 Planning
More informationEngineer's Report. Main Street Business Area. Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year )
Engineer's Report for the Main Street Business Area Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year 2008-09) Prepared under the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982
More informationGUIDELINES FOR FILMING IN TOMBALL, TEXAS
GUIDELINES FOR FILMING IN TOMBALL, TEXAS I. PURPOSE The following guidelines are intended to protect the personal and property rights of our Tomball, Texas residents and businesses. The City Manager reserves
More informationEXHIBIT H LOT 317 GRADING AND SITE PLAN
EXHIBIT H LOT 317 GRADING AND SITE PLAN EXHIBIT I LOT 317 ELEVATIONS ridge height 4915'-6" GENERAL & KEYED NOTES ridge height 4905'-9" 3 7 4 A5.1 1 5 ridge height 4910'-6" 2 ridge height 4906'-3" 1 Provide
More informationFor personal use only OZ MINERALS CARRAPATEENA COPPER GOLD PROJECT SOUTH AUSTRALIA 27 MARCH 2012
OZ MINERALS CARRAPATEENA COPPER GOLD PROJECT SOUTH AUSTRALIA 27 MARCH 2012 WWW.OZMINERALS.COM DISCLAIMER This presentation has been prepared by OZ Minerals Limited ( OZ Minerals ) and consists of written
More informationINVESTORS AND CAPITAL MARKETS DAY O c t o b e r 15-16, 2015
INVESTORS AND CAPITAL MARKETS DAY O c t o b e r 15-16, 2015 N A S : The B e n c h m a r k S t a i n l e s s S t e e l P l a y e r M A R Y J E A N R I L E Y N A S V i c e P r e s i d e n t, F i n a n c
More informationAppendix C Benchmarking Cost Estimates
REPORT Appendix C Benchmarking Cost Estimates C-1 Table C-1 Permits, Notifications & Location Services Notes: Costs associated with delays in construction have not been included in this estimate OneCall
More informationSuperstorm Sandy Willis Re s post-event field damage survey preliminary report
HURRICANE DAMAGE SURVEY REPORT event November 8, 2012 Superstorm Sandy Willis Re s post-event field damage survey preliminary report Immediately after Sandy s landfall, representatives of Willis Re s Catastrophe
More informationFebruary 22, 2016 AG File No
Ainley Graham & Associates Limited 1-50 Grant Timmins Drive, Kingston, Ontario, K7M 8N2 Tel: (343) 266-0002 Fax: (343) 266-0028 E-mail Kingston@ainleygroup.com February 22, 2016 AG File No. 15062-1 Ministry
More informationAugust 10, 2007 File:
August 10, 2007 File: 15-85-72 Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation Room 301, Provincial Building 9621-96 Avenue Peace River, AB T8S 1T4 Attention: Mr. Ed Szmata PEACE REGION (PEACE HIGH LEVEL AREA)
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FIRM TO PERFORM A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF THE MARKET STREET PARKADE FACILITY REFERENCE RFP 14-148 Addendum Issued: August 22, 2014 ADDENDUM No. 2 Page 1 of
More informationCommittee Meeting November 6, 2018
Committee Meeting November 6, 2018 Agenda Where we are in the process Land Use Plan Transportation Element Housing & Neighborhoods Elements Next Steps Schedule November 6: Plan Elements December: Plan
More informationZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg
ZONING DITRICT REGULATION Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Agricultural Uses Horticulture P P P P P P P P P 39.06.002a Crop Production P P P 39.06.002a Type I Animal Production Type II Animal
More information1600 Prairie Drive , FAX
Hennepin County Transportation Department Transportation Department 612-596-0300, Phone 1600 Prairie Drive 612-321-3410, FAX Medina, MN 55340-5421 www.hennepin.us December 30, 2015 Subject: Bottineau Boulevard
More informationKEY: R-1 Low Density Residential. R-2 Medium Density Residential. R-3 High Density Residential. S-C Service Commercial. D-C Downtown Commercial
KEY: R-1 Low Density Residential R-2 Medium Density Residential R-3 High Density Residential S-C Service Commercial D-C Downtown Commercial M-C Medical Commercial H-I Heavy Industrial PARKING MATRIX A
More informationCity of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA
City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study Submitted by 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.261.3050 January 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the Beach Access and Parking
More informationPublished in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008
Evaluation on Lighting Condition and Visual Legibility of Road Surfaces and Traffic Signs in Bandung City Mangkuto, R.A.; Soelami, F.X.N.; Soegijanto, R.M. Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd
More informationCOPPER RANCH SKETCH PLAN
SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP CONTACTS: THE TOWN OF ERIE LAND SUMMARY CHART TYPE AREA (AC.) % OF TOTAL AREA PARKS AND OPEN SPACE SUMMARY (RESIDENTIAL ONLY - 13.5 ACRES/216 UNITS) REQUIRED (ACRES) PROVIDED (ACRES)
More informationCounty of San Diego, Planning & Development Services
County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services E N V I R O N M E N T A L R E V I E W U P D A T E A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A P P L I C A T I O N S C O V E R E D B Y A P R E V I O U S L Y C O M
More informationVehicle Motion Equations:
1 Vehicle Motion Equations: v = at + v (2.2.4) x x = v2 2 v 2a (2.2.6) v 2 = v 2 + 2a(x x ) (2.2.6) x = 1 2 at2 + v t + x (2.2.7) D b = x cos α (2.2.10) x = vt D b = v 2 v 2 2g(f G) (2.2.14) e + f s =
More informationDirective on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise
Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise This Directive has been ratified by the European Parliament and is awaiting publication in the Official Journal.( around 23/5/02) The Directive
More informationVillages at Riverdale Thornton, CO
FINAL UTILITY REPORT Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO October 14, 216 Revised: March 29, 217 JN: 1539 Prepared for: PCS Group, Inc. 11 16 th Street #3 B-18 Denver, CO 8265 P: 33.531.495 Prepared by:
More informationVIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS
VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS Christopher D. McDonald, PE, PTOE Regional Operations Director, Southwest Region NRITS and ITS Arizona Annual Conference October
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CLOSING DATE:
Request for Proposals 110 Westlake Drive City of West Lake Hills 110 Westlake Drive REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CLOSING DATE: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 City of West Lake Hills Request for Proposals 1 I. INTRODUCTION
More informationMAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.
MAY 5, 2011 Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street Jacobs Engineering Group Group Inc. Inc. 1 Introductions Agenda Overview of Interchange Project Overview of noise barrier
More informationDRAFT. PRELIMINARY LANDSLIDE MODELING for KRAMER AVENUE LANDSLIDE SITKA, ALASKA. Prepared for: Andrew Friske 210 Kramer Ave. Sitka, Alaska 99835
PRELIMINARY LANDSLIDE MODELING for KRAMER AVENUE LANDSLIDE SITKA, ALASKA Prepared for: Andrew Friske 210 Kramer Ave. Sitka, Alaska 99835 Prepared by: Northern Geotechnical Engineering, Inc. d.b.a. Terra
More informationAGGREGATE RESOURCES OF ONTARIO (ARO) METADATA
AGGREGATE RESOURCES OF ONTARIO (ARO) METADATA GENERAL INFORMATION Official Name of the Data Set or Information Holding: Aggregate Resources of Ontario Acronyms are Used to Identify the Data Set or Information
More informationCOULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?
COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD? October 9, 2003 Paul D. Schomer Schomer & Associates Champaign, IL 61821 INTRODUCTION Statement of Problem On the evening of November 21, 1991, a NJ State Trooper gave chase
More informationHistoric Cultural Properties Inventory (HCPI) Base Form (FORM 1)
Historic Cultural Properties Inventory (HCPI) Base Form (FORM 1) Historic Preservation Division, New Mexico Office of Cultural Affairs For HPD Office use only: HCPI No. District No. NRHP: SRCP: Criteria:
More informationRock Scaling Recommendations Logan Creek Drive Cut Slope
Rock Scaling Recommendations Logan Creek Drive Cut Slope US 50, Milepost DO 8.47 to DO 8.61 Douglas County, Nevada January 2008 MATERIALS DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS
More informationTable 1 - Infiltration Rates
Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100-300 Hagey Boulevard, Waterloo ON N2L 0A4 November 14, 2017 File: 161413228/10 Attention: Mr. Michael Witmer, BES, MPA, MCIP, RPP City of Guelph 1 Carden Street Guelph ON N1H
More informationAuckland Transport. Auckland Council. Statement of Evidence of Simon John Ferneyhough
Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of Notices of Requirement to enable the construction, operation and maintenance of the City Rail Link Between Auckland Transport Requiring Authority
More informationTraffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Statham DRI One University Parkway Prepared for: Barrow County Prepared by: October 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary i Section 1. Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Methodology
More informationThat Council give first three readings to District of Squamish Cemetery Bylaw No , Amendment Bylaw No. 1931, 2006
REPORT TO: Council FOR: Regular PRESENTED: October 3, 2006 FILE: FROM: Department of Recreation, Parks and Tourism SUBJECT: Amendment to Cemetery Bylaw No. 1532, 1998 Recommendation: That Council give
More informationResolution Number: (2) Resolution Title: Snow Policy Date Signed: 11/26/12. DAVIS COUNTY Snow Policy Resolution
Resolution Number: 112612(2) Resolution Title: Snow Policy Signed: 11/26/12 DAVIS COUNTY Snow Policy Resolution A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH THE POLICY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE IN RESPECT TO CLEARANCE OF SNOW
More informationChapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming
Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming Chapter 11 Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems Kumares Sinha and Samuel Labi 1 2 Real Experiences of Transportation Noise
More informationISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Test code for machine tools Part 5: Determination of the noise emission
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 230-5 First edition 2000-08-01 Test code for machine tools Part 5: Determination of the noise emission Code d'essai des machines-outils Partie 5: Détermination de l'émission
More information6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment County Road 27 to St John s Road Town of Innisfil, ON September 6, 2016 APPENDIX L: TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MEMORANDUM Accessible formats are available
More information