RC Transformation in Connecticut

Transcription

1 DCN: May 05 RC Transformation in Connecticut Recommendation: Close Turner US Army Reserve Center, Fairfield, CT, close Sutcovey US Army Reserve Center, Waterbury, CT; close Danbury US Army Reserve Center Danbury, CT and relocate units to a new Armed Forces Reserve Center and Maintenance Facility in Newtown, CT if the Army is able to acquire land suitable for the construction of the facilities adjacent to the existing CT Army National Guard Armory in Newtown, CT. The new AFRC and OMS shall have the capability to accommodate units from the following facilities: Connecticut Army National Guard Armories in Naugatuck, Norwalk and New Haven, CT if the state decides to relocate those National Guard units. Close the US Army Reserve Center, Middletown, CT, the Organizational Maintenance Shop, Middletown, CT; the SGT Libby US Army Reserve Center, New Haven, CT; the Organizational Maintenance Shop, New Haven, CT; the Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Activity #69, Milford, CT and relocate units to a new Armed Forces Reserve Center, Organizational Maintenance Shop and Army Maintenance Support Activity in Middletown, Connecticut, if the Army is able to acquire land suitable for the construction of the facilities. The new AFRC, OMS and AMSA shall have the capability to accommodate units from the following facilities: Connecticut Army National Guard Armories in Putnam, Manchester, New Britain and the CTARNG facility in Newington, CT if the state decides to relocate those National Guard units. Justification: This recommendation transforms Reserve Component facilities throughout the State of Connecticut. The implementation of this recommendation will enhance military value, improve homeland defense capability, greatly improve training and deployment capability, create significant efficiencies and cost savings, and is consistent with the Army s force structure plans and Army transformational objectives. This recommendation is the result of a state-wide analysis of Reserve Component installations and facilities conducted by a team of functional experts from Headquarters, Department of the Army, the Office of the State Adjutant General, and the Army Reserve Regional Readiness Command. This recommendation closes five US Army Reserve Centers, one Army Maintenance Support Activity and two Organizational Maintenance Shops throughout the state of Connecticut and constructs two Armed Forces Reserve Centers and collocated Organizational Maintenance Shops and one Army Maintenance Support Activity capable of accommodating National Guard and Reserve units. The Department understands that the State of Connecticut will close seven Connecticut Army National Guard Centers: Naugatuck, Norwalk, New Haven, Putnam, Manchester, New Berlin and Newington, Connecticut. The Armed Forces Reserve Centers will have the capability to accommodate these units if the State decides to relocate the units from these closed facilities into the new AFRCs. The implementation of this recommendation will enhance military value, improve homeland defense capability, greatly improve training and deployment capability, create Page 1 of 3

2 11 May 05 significant efficiencies and cost savings, and is consistent with the Army s force structure plans and Army transformational objectives. This recommendation considered feasible locations within the demographic and geographic areas of the closing facilities and affected units. The sites selected were determined as the best locations because they optimize the Reserve Components ability to recruit and retain Reserve Component soldiers and to train and mobilize units impacted by this recommendation. This recommendation provides the opportunity for other Local, State, or Federal organizations to partner with the Reserve Components to enhance Homeland Security and Homeland Defense at a reduced cost to those agencies. Although not captured in the COBRA analysis, this recommendation avoids an estimated $52,080,200 in mission facility renovation costs and procurement avoidances associated with meeting AT/FP construction standards and altering existing facilities to meet unit training and communications requirements. Consideration of these avoided costs would reduce costs and increase the net savings to the Department of Defense in the 6-year BRAC implementation period, and in the 20-year period used to calculate NPV. Payback: The total estimated one-time cost to the Department of Defense to implement this recommendation is $128.6M. The net of all costs and savings to the Department of Defense during the implementation period is a cost of $107.0M. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementation are $5.8M with a payback expected in 36 years. The net present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years is a cost of $47.5M. Economic Impact on Communities: Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 26 jobs (18 direct and 8 indirect jobs) over the period in the Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT metropolitan area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment. Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 33 jobs (21 direct and 12 indirect jobs) over the period in the New Haven-Milford, CT metropolitan area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment. The aggregate economic impact of all recommended actions on these economic regions of influence was considered and is at Appendix B of Volume I. Community Infrastructure Assessment: A review of the community attributes revealed no significant issues regarding the ability of the infrastructure of the communities to support missions, forces, and personnel. There are no known community infrastructure impediments to implementation of all recommendations affecting the installations in this recommendation. Page 2 of 3

3 11 May 05 Environmental Impact: This recommendation has no impact on air quality, cultural, archeological, or tribal resources; dredging; land use constraints or sensitive resource areas; marine mammals, resources, or sanctuaries; noise; threatened and endangered species or critical habitat; waste management; water resources; or wetlands. This recommendation will require spending approximately $0.2M for waste management and/or environmental compliance activities. These costs were included in the payback calculation. This recommendation does not otherwise impact the costs of environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities. The aggregate environmental impact of all recommended BRAC actions affecting the installations in this recommendation has been reviewed. There are no known environmental impediments to implementation of this recommendation. Page 3 of 3

4 Draft Deliberative Document -- For Discussion Purposes Only -- Do Not Release Under FOIA Recommendation Supporting Information RC Transformation in Connecticut 25-Apr-05 Competing Recommendations and Other Information: There are no potential or known competing recommendations that could conflict with this recommendation. This recommendation combines the following previously approved candidate recommendations into a single candidate recommendation; USA-0081, USA Force Structure Capabilities: The Reserve Component continues to be an important and necessary part of the Army s force structure to meet its current and future operational requirements. This recommendation is consistent with and supports the Army s Force Structure Plan submitted with the FY 06 Budget Documents, and provides the necessary capacity and capability to support the units affected by this action. It considers essential manning, training, organizing, equipping, and sustaining requirements, as well as approved transformational initiatives to ensure the Army and Department of Defense have the capabilities necessary to meet mission requirements. Component in Connecticut in accordance with the Force Structure Plan and the total Army Analysis process. MVA Results: The Department of the Army has more than 4000 Reserve Component facilities across the United States. Because of the sheer numbers of these facilities, the process the Army had developed for arriving at a quantitative military value score for its 97 major installations (including leases) was not practical for its Reserve Component facilities. Additionally, if measured by the active process, which valued training lands and ranges among other things, the Reserve Component facilities would not have compared well against the active installations. For these reasons, it was the military judgment of the Department of the Army that it needed to craft a unique approach for ascertaining the overall military value of Reserve Component facilities. A team of functional experts from Headquarters, Department of the Army, the Office of the State Adjutant General, and the Army Reserve Regional Readiness Command conducted a military value assessment of state-owned and Army Reserve sub-threshold facilities. These facilities were assessed, specifically against DoD Criteria one through four, in their ability to support joint stationing options that enhance Army and DoD transformation; their ability to enhance Reserve Component operations training, mobilization and power projection capabilities; their ability to sustain recruiting and retention; their ability to consolidate functions wherever appropriate, to include schools, personnel, logistics, and other management functions; their ability to relocate Reserve Component units and activities from leased and encroached properties that do not meet anti-terrorism and force- Draft Deliberative Document -- For Discussion Purposes Only -- Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 1 of 4

5 Draft Deliberative Document -- For Discussion Purposes Only -- Do Not Release Under FOIA Recommendation Supporting Information RC Transformation in Connecticut 25-Apr-05 protection requirements onto established military facilities; and their ability to ensure the future readiness of Army forces while reducing the long-term costs of sustaining the base structure. The assessments were certified by the Office of the Adjutant General and the Army Reserve Regional Readiness Command, validated by the Army Audit Agency, analyzed by the Army Basing Study Group, and utilized for deliberations. Proposal closes lower value installations (in terms of the condition of the facilities, encroachment, proper size building, military vehicle parking and storage for the type of unit) and consolidates onto existing higher value installations where geographically feasible or onto a new installation of higher value because it meets the requirements of the Army s Stationing Strategy for Reserve Component installations. Middletown: This location is within 45 miles of the Connecticut Army National Guard training sites of East Haven and Stones Ranch Military Reservation. They provide a combination of eight qualification ranges, light maneuver area, MOUT collective training facility, light demolition range and land navigation range on a total of 5,866 acres. This recommendation will significantly improve readiness and home station training opportunities by collocating U.S. Army Reserve and Army National Guard Combat, Combat Support and Combat Service Support units. This collocation of multiple and varied units will allow for more effective communications, more realistic training venues and create cross-functional career development opportunities. The new AFRCs will enhance distributed learning and professional skills / sustainment training. Implementation of this recommendation will enhance individual soldier and unit readiness by providing modern facilities for Reserve Component personnel and units to execute the Train/Alert/Deploy process in support of mobilization/demobilization operations. Collocation of multiple units into joint use, multi-functional centers provides substantially improved homeland defense capabilities throughout the State of Connecticut. Upon activation of the unit/units for emergency contingency missions, the centers will provide critical enhanced communications infrastructure and staging areas for a more rapid response. The capacity of the facilities allows for a response by larger, more capable task organized forces. Due to the existence of federally controlled enclaves and secure communication capabilities, the centers may also provide a platform for interagency participation and cooperation in response to a wide range of emergency homeland defense situations. Draft Deliberative Document -- For Discussion Purposes Only -- Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 2 of 4

6 Draft Deliberative Document -- For Discussion Purposes Only -- Do Not Release Under FOIA Recommendation Supporting Information RC Transformation in Connecticut 25-Apr-05 This recommendation will enhance recruitment and retention of the men and women in the Reserve Component by setting the conditions for better home station training and increased support for family readiness operations for mobilized reservists. Capacity Analysis Results: The Department of the Army has more than 4000 Reserve Component facilities across the United States. Because of the sheer numbers of these facilities, the process the Army had developed for arriving at a quantitative military value score for its 97 major installations (including leases) was not practical for its Reserve Component facilities. Additionally, if measured by the active process, which valued training lands and ranges among other things, the Reserve Component facilities would not have compared well against the active installations. For these reasons, it was the military judgment of the Department of the Army that it needed to craft a unique approach for ascertaining the overall military value of Reserve Component facilities. A team of functional experts from Headquarters, Department of the Army, the Office of the State Adjutant General, and the Army Reserve Regional Readiness Command conducted a military value assessment of state-owned and Army Reserve sub-threshold facilities. These facilities were assessed, specifically against DoD Criteria one through four, in their ability to support joint stationing options that enhance Army and DoD transformation; their ability to enhance Reserve Component operations training, mobilization and power projection capabilities; their ability to sustain recruiting and retention; their ability to consolidate functions wherever appropriate, to include schools, personnel, logistics, and other management functions; their ability to relocate Reserve Component units and activities from leased and encroached properties that do not meet anti-terrorism and forceprotection requirements onto established military facilities; and their ability to ensure the future readiness of Army forces while reducing the long-term costs of sustaining the base structure. The assessments were certified by the Office of the Adjutant General and the Army Reserve Regional Readiness Command, validated by the Army Audit Agency, analyzed by the Army Basing Study Group, and utilized for deliberations. Proposal closes lower value installations (in terms of the condition of the facilities, encroachment, proper size building, military vehicle parking and storage for the type of unit) and consolidates onto existing higher value installations where geographically feasible or onto a new installation of higher value because it meets the requirements of the Army s Stationing Strategy for Reserve Component installations. Middletown: This location is within 45 miles of the Connecticut Army National Guard training sites of East Haven and Stones Ranch Military Reservation. They provide a combination of eight qualification ranges, light maneuver area, MOUT collective Draft Deliberative Document -- For Discussion Purposes Only -- Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 3 of 4

7 Draft Deliberative Document -- For Discussion Purposes Only -- Do Not Release Under FOIA Recommendation Supporting Information RC Transformation in Connecticut 25-Apr-05 training facility, light demolition range and land navigation range on a total of 5,866 acres. This recommendation will significantly improve readiness and home station training opportunities by collocating U.S. Army Reserve and Army National Guard Combat, Combat Support and Combat Service Support units. This collocation of multiple and varied units will allow for more effective communications, more realistic training venues and create cross-functional career development opportunities. The new AFRCs will enhance distributed learning and professional skills / sustainment training. Implementation of this recommendation will enhance individual soldier and unit readiness by providing modern facilities for Reserve Component personnel and units to execute the Train/Alert/Deploy process in support of mobilization/demobilization operations. Collocation of multiple units into joint use, multi-functional centers provides substantially improved homeland defense capabilities throughout the State of Connecticut. Upon activation of the unit/units for emergency contingency missions, the centers will provide critical enhanced communications infrastructure and staging areas for a more rapid response. The capacity of the facilities allows for a response by larger, more capable task organized forces. Due to the existence of federally controlled enclaves and secure communication capabilities, the centers may also provide a platform for interagency participation and cooperation in response to a wide range of emergency homeland defense situations. This recommendation will enhance recruitment and retention of the men and women in the Reserve Component by setting the conditions for better home station training and increased support for family readiness operations for mobilized reservists. The existing facilities are outdated and can no longer support the current/evolving force structure/equipment changes and associated training requirements. The units affected by this recommendation require 556,630 Usable Square Feet (USF) of space while the closing facilities provided only 323,220 USF. See Table. *** End of Report *** Draft Deliberative Document -- For Discussion Purposes Only -- Do Not Release Under FOIA Page 4 of 4

8 ADDER COMBINED SUMMARY REPORT (ADDER v6.10) - Page 1/2 Report Created 04/25/ :27:06 AM ADDER Data File: J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\Final Review Cobra 6.1\USA-0236v2 RC Transform in CT\USA-0236v3 RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\CT 04_22.ADR Starting Year : 2006 Final Year : 2008 Payback Year : 2044 (36 Years) NPV in 2025($K): 47,513 1-Time Cost($K): 128,558 Net Costs in 2005 Constant Dollars ($K) Total Beyond MilCon 8,604 95, ,205 0 Person 0-1,178-3,621-4,619-4,619-4,619-18,657-4,619 Overhd , , Moving Missio 0 0-1,845-1,845-1,845-1,845-7,380-1,845 Other , ,110 0 TOTAL 9, ,413-4,755-5,554-5,554-5, ,030-5, Total POSITIONS ELIMINATED Off Enl Civ TOT POSITIONS REALIGNED Off Enl Stu Civ TOT Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 1 of 9

9 ADDER COMBINED SUMMARY REPORT (ADDER v6.10) - Page 2/2 Report Created 04/25/ :27:06 AM ADDER Data File: J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\Final Review Cobra 6.1\USA-0236v2 RC Transform in CT\USA-0236v3 RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\CT 04_22.ADR Costs in 2005 Constant Dollars ($K) Total Beyond MilCon 8,604 95, ,205 0 Person Overhd 33 3,018 3,541 3,464 3,464 3,464 16,983 3,464 Moving Missio Other , ,422 0 TOTAL 9, ,564 3,836 3,464 3,464 3, ,405 3,464 Savings in 2005 Constant Dollars ($K) Total Beyond MilCon Person 0 1,571 3,881 4,619 4,619 4,619 19,310 4,619 Overhd ,553 2,553 2,553 2,553 11,373 2,774 Moving Missio 0 0 1,845 1,845 1,845 1,845 7,380 1,845 Other TOTAL 580 2,152 8,591 9,017 9,017 9,017 38,375 9,238 Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 2 of 9

10 ADDER DETAIL REPORT (ADDER v6.10) - Page 1/3 Report Created 04/25/ :27:06 AM ONE-TIME COSTS Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON 8,604 95, ,205 CIV SALARY Civ RIF Civ Retire CIV MOVING Per Diem POV Miles Home Purch HHG Misc House Hunt PPP RITA FREIGHT Packing Freight Vehicles Unemployment Info Tech Prog Manage Supt Contrac Mothball Time Move MIL MOVING Per Diem POV Miles HHG Misc Elim PCS HAP / RSE Environmental Msn Contract Time Other , ,233 TOTAL ONE-TIME 9, , ,538 Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 3 of 9

11 ADDER DETAIL REPORT (ADDER v6.10) - Page 2/3 Report Created 04/25/ :27:06 AM RECURRINGCOSTS Total Beyond -----($K) Sustainment 0 2,064 2,064 2,064 2,064 2,064 10,321 2,064 Recap , BOS Civ Salary TRICARE Off Salary Enl Salary House Allow Mission Activ Misc Recur , TOTAL RECUR 0 2,992 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464 16,847 3,464 TOTAL COST 9, ,564 3,836 3,464 3,464 3, ,405 3,464 ONE-TIME SAVES Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON Time Move Mil Moving Environmental Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME RECURRINGSAVES Total Beyond -----($K) FAM HOUSE OPS Sustainment 0 0 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 5,001 1,471 Recap , BOS , Civ Salary ,110 1,110 1,110 4,634 1,110 Off Salary , Enl Salary ,389 2,884 2,884 2,884 11,989 2,884 House Allow Procurement Mission Activ 0 0 1,845 1,845 1,845 1,845 7,379 1,845 Misc Recur TOTAL RECUR 580 2,152 8,279 9,017 9,017 9,017 38,063 9,238 TOTAL SAVINGS 580 2,152 8,591 9,017 9,017 9,017 38,375 9,238 Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 4 of 9

12 ADDER DETAIL REPORT (ADDER v6.10) - Page 3/3 Report Created 04/25/ :27:06 AM ONE-TIME NET Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON 8,604 95, ,205 Civ Retir/RIF Civ Moving Info Tech Other Mil Moving HAP / RSE Environmental Misn Contract Time Other , ,921 TOTAL ONE-TIME 9, , ,246 RECURRING NET Total Beyond -----($K) FAM HOUSE OPS Sustainment 0 2, , Recap , BOS , Civ Salary ,110-1,110-1,110-4,634-1,110 TRICARE Mil Salary 0-1,197-2,952-3,509-3,509-3,509-14,676-3,509 House Allow Procurement Mission Activ 0 0-1,845-1,845-1,845-1,845-7,379-1,845 Misc Recur , TOTAL RECUR ,815-5,554-5,554-5,554-21,216-5,774 TOTAL NET COST 9, ,413-4,755-5,554-5,554-5, ,030-5,774 Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 5 of 9

13 Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 6 of 9

14 ADDER INPUT DATA REPORT (ADDER v6.10) Report Created 04/25/ :27:05 AM ADDER Data File: J:\RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT\Final Review Cobra 6.1\USA-0236v2 RC Transform in CT\USA-0236v3 RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\CT 04_22.ADR COBRA Scenario Files used: E:\USA-0236v2 RC Transform in CT\USA-0236v2 RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT\AFRC Newtown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR K:\RC PAT\Cantwell 6.10\6.10 redos\usa-0236v2 RC Transform in CT\USA-0236v2 RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5- COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 7 of 9

15 ADDER COMBINED NET PRESENT VALUES REPORT (ADDER v6.10) Report Created 04/25/ :27:05 AM Year Cost($) Adjusted Cost($) NPV($) ,033,702 8,909,826 8,909, ,412, ,567, ,477, ,755,287-4,438, ,039, ,553,751-5,042, ,997, ,553,751-4,904, ,092, ,553,751-4,771, ,321, ,774,401-4,825,604 99,495, ,774,401-4,694,167 94,801, ,774,401-4,566,311 90,235, ,774,401-4,441,936 85,793, ,774,401-4,320,950 81,472, ,774,401-4,203,259 77,268, ,774,401-4,088,773 73,180, ,774,401-3,977,406 69,202, ,774,401-3,869,072 65,333, ,774,401-3,763,688 61,569, ,774,401-3,661,175 57,908, ,774,401-3,561,455 54,347, ,774,401-3,464,450 50,882, ,774,401-3,370,088 47,512, ,774,401-3,278,295 44,234, ,774,401-3,189,003 41,045, ,774,401-3,102,143 37,943, ,774,401-3,017,649 34,925, ,774,401-2,935,456 31,990, ,774,401-2,855,502 29,134, ,774,401-2,777,726 26,357, ,774,401-2,702,068 23,654, ,774,401-2,628,471 21,026, ,774,401-2,556,878 18,469, ,774,401-2,487,236 15,982, ,774,401-2,419,490 13,562, ,774,401-2,353,589 11,209, ,774,401-2,289,484 8,919, ,774,401-2,227,124 6,692, ,774,401-2,166,463 4,526, ,774,401-2,107,455 2,418, ,774,401-2,050, , ,774,401-1,994,215-1,625,506 Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 8 of 9

16 ADDER COMBINED ONE-TIME COST REPORT (ADDER v6.10) Report Created 04/25/ :27:05 AM (All values in 2005 Constant Dollars) Category Cost Sub-Total Construction Military Construction 104,205,348 Total - Construction 104,205,348 Personnel Civilian RIF 416,616 Civilian Early Retirement 13,080 Eliminated Military PCS 192,336 Unemployment 31,157 Total - Personnel 653,189 Overhead Program Planning Support 77,584 Support Contract Termination 0 Mothball / Shutdown 58,180 Total - Overhead 135,764 Moving Civilian Moving 0 Civilian PPP 141,984 Military Moving 0 Freight 0 Information Technologies 0 One-Time Moving Costs 0 Total - Moving 141,984 Other HAP / RSE 0 Environmental Mitigation Costs 189,000 Mission Contract Startup and Termination 0 One-Time Unique Costs 23,232,640 Total - Other 23,421, Total One-Time Costs 128,557, One-Time Savings Military Construction Cost Avoidances 0 Military Moving 0 One-Time Moving Savings 0 Environmental Mitigation Savings 0 One-Time Unique Savings 312, Total One-Time Savings 312, Total Net One-Time Costs 128,245,925 Criterion 5-COBRA Newtown, CT.doc Page 9 of 9

17 SCENARIO ERROR REPORT (COBRA v6.10) Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:31 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT OVERHEAD/SUSTAINMENT: New Middletown AFRC had a Sustainment budget of $0K with 0 SF of facities. Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 1 of 75

18 COBRA REALIGNMENT SUMMARY REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 1/2 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:32 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Starting Year : 2006 Final Year : 2008 Payback Year : 2050 (42 Years) NPV in 2025($K): 31,443 1-Time Cost($K): 74,911 Net Costs in 2005 Constant Dollars ($K) Total Beyond MilCon 4,981 55, ,327 0 Person ,268-3,266-3,266-3,266-12,736-3,266 Overhd , , Moving Missio Other , ,572 0 TOTAL 5,591 69,006-2,168-2,946-2,946-2,946 63,590-3, Total POSITIONS ELIMINATED Off Enl Civ TOT POSITIONS REALIGNED Off Enl Stu Civ TOT Summary: PIMS # 20 AFRC Middletown, CT USA # 81 Close the US Army Reserve Center, Middletown, CT, the Organizational Maintenance Shop, Middletown, CT; the SGT Libby US Army Reserve Center, New Haven, CT; the Organizational Maintenance Shop, New Haven, CT; the Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Activity #69, Milford, CT and relocate units to a new Armed Forces Reserve Center, Organizational Maintenance Shop and Army Maintenance Support Activity in Middletown, Connecticut, if the Army is able to acquire land suitable for the construction of the facilities. The new AFRC, OMS and AMSA shall have the capability to accommodate units from the following facilities: Connecticut Army National Guard Armories in Putnam, Manchester, New Britain and the CTARNG facility in Newington, CT if the state decides to relocate those National Guard units. Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 2 of 75

19 COBRA REALIGNMENT SUMMARY REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 2/2 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:32 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Costs in 2005 Constant Dollars ($K) Total Beyond MilCon 4,981 55, ,327 0 Person Overhd 31 1,740 2,140 2,083 2,083 2,083 10,162 2,083 Moving Missio Other , ,884 0 TOTAL 5,983 70,293 2,435 2,083 2,083 2,083 84,962 2,083 Savings in 2005 Constant Dollars ($K) Total Beyond MilCon Person ,527 3,266 3,266 3,266 13,219 3,266 Overhd ,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 7,668 1,869 Moving Missio Other TOTAL 392 1,287 4,604 5,030 5,030 5,030 21,372 5,178 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 3 of 75

20 COBRA PERSONNEL/SF/SUSTAINMENT/RECAP/BOS DELTAS REPORT (COBRA v6.10) Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:31 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Personnel Base Start* Finish* Change %Change Middletown USARC % SGT Libby USARC % USAR AMSA # % Putnam Armory % Manchester Armory % New Britain Armory % Newington Armory % New Middletown AFRC % TOTAL % Square Footage Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per Middletown USARC 14, , % 794 SGT Libby USARC 37, , % 1,786 USAR AMSA #69 16, , % 0 Putnam Armory 13, , % 0 Manchester Armory 75, , % 0 New Britain Armory 26, , % 0 Newington Armory 33, , % 0 New Middletown AFRC 0 320, ,505 0% TOTAL 217, , ,605 47% -2,631 Base Operations Support (2005$) Base Start* Finish* Change %Change Chg/Per Middletown USARC 111, , % 6,211 SGT Libby USARC 198, , % 9,457 USAR AMSA #69 109, , % 0 Putnam Armory 9, , % 0 Manchester Armory 30, , % 0 New Britain Armory 10, , % 0 Newington Armory 18, , % 0 New Middletown AFRC % TOTAL 488, , % 12,531 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 4 of 75

21 COBRA PERSONNEL/SF/SUSTAINMENT/RECAP/BOS DELTAS REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 2 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:31 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Sustainment (2005$) Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per Middletown USARC 65, , % 3,655 SGT Libby USARC 171, , % 8,181 USAR AMSA #69 66, , % 0 Putnam Armory 63, , % 0 Manchester Armory 345, , % 0 New Britain Armory 123, , % 0 Newington Armory 153, , % 0 New Middletown AFRC 10 1,179,573 1,179, % TOTAL 989,210 1,179, ,363 19% -4,881 Recapitalization (2005$) Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per Middletown USARC 25, , % 1,427 SGT Libby USARC 67, , % 3,197 USAR AMSA #69 31, , % 0 Putnam Armory 24, , % 0 Manchester Armory 134, , % 0 New Britain Armory 48, , % 0 Newington Armory 59, , % 0 New Middletown AFRC 0 537, ,340 0% TOTAL 391, , ,661 37% -3,735 Sustain + Recap + BOS (2005$) Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per Middletown USARC 203, , % 11,294 SGT Libby USARC 437, , % 20,835 USAR AMSA #69 207, , % 0 Putnam Armory 98, , % 0 Manchester Armory 510, , % 0 New Britain Armory 181, , % 0 Newington Armory 230, , % 0 New Middletown AFRC 10 1,716,913 1,716, % TOTAL 1,869,589 1,716, ,676-8% 3,915 Plant Replacement Value (2005$) Base Start Finish Change %Change Chg/Per Middletown USARC 2,646, ,646, % 147,022 SGT Libby USARC 6,914, ,914, % 329,276 USAR AMSA #69 3,214, ,214, % 0 Putnam Armory 2,563, ,563, % 0 Manchester Armory 13,884, ,884, % 0 New Britain Armory 4,960, ,960, % 0 Newington Armory 6,158, ,158, % 0 New Middletown AFRC 0 55,345,986 55,345,986 0% TOTAL 40,342,900 55,345,986 15,003,086 37% -384,694 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 5 of 75

22 COBRA PERSONNEL/SF/SUSTAINMENT/RECAP/BOS DELTAS REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 3 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:31 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT * "Start" and "Finish" values for Personnel and BOS both include the Programmed Installation Population (non-brac) Changes, so that only changes attributable to the BRAC action are reflected in the "Change" columns of this report. Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 6 of 75

23 TOTAL COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 1/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:32 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT ONE-TIME COSTS Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON 4,981 55, ,327 CIV SALARY Civ RIF Civ Retire CIV MOVING Per Diem POV Miles Home Purch HHG Misc House Hunt PPP RITA FREIGHT Packing Freight Vehicles Unemployment Info Tech Prog Manage Supt Contrac Mothball Time Move MIL MOVING Per Diem POV Miles HHG Misc Elim PCS HAP / RSE Environmental Misn Contract Time Other , ,724 TOTAL ONE-TIME 5,983 68, ,911 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 7 of 75

24 TOTAL COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 2/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT RECURRINGCOSTS Total Beyond -----($K) Sustainment 0 1,179 1,179 1,179 1,179 1,179 5,898 1,179 Recap , BOS Civ Salary TRICARE Off Salary Enl Salary House Allow Mission Activ Misc Recur , TOTAL RECUR 0 1,717 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 10,051 2,083 TOTAL COST 5,983 70,293 2,435 2,083 2,083 2,083 84,962 2,083 ONE-TIME SAVES Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON Time Move Mil Moving Environmental Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME RECURRINGSAVES Total Beyond -----($K) FAM HOUSE OPS Sustainment , Recap , BOS , Civ Salary , Off Salary , Enl Salary ,401 1,895 1,895 1,895 7,539 1,895 House Allow Procurement Mission Activ Misc Recur TOTAL RECUR 392 1,287 4,292 5,030 5,030 5,030 21,060 5,178 TOTAL SAVINGS 392 1,287 4,604 5,030 5,030 5,030 21,372 5,178 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 8 of 75

25 TOTAL COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 3/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT ONE-TIME NET Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON 4,981 55, ,327 Civ Retir/RIF Civ Moving Info Tech Other Mil Moving HAP / RSE Environmental Misn Contract Time Other , ,412 TOTAL ONE-TIME 5,983 68, ,439 RECURRING NET Total Beyond -----($K) FAM HOUSE OPS Sustainment 0 1, , Recap BOS , Civ Salary , TRICARE Mil Salary ,838-2,395-2,395-2,395-9,664-2,395 House Allow Procurement Mission Activ Misc Recur , TOTAL RECUR ,208-2,946-2,946-2,946-11,009-3,095 TOTAL NET COST 5,591 69,006-2,168-2,946-2,946-2,946 63,590-3,095 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 9 of 75

26 COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 4/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Base: Middletown USARC, CT ONE-TIME COSTS Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON CIV SALARY Civ RIFs Civ Retire CIV MOVING Per Diem POV Miles Home Purch HHG Misc House Hunt PPP RITA FREIGHT Packing Freight Vehicles Unemployment Info Tech Prog Manage Supt Contrac Mothball Time Move MIL MOVING Per Diem POV Miles HHG Misc Elim PCS HAP / RSE Environmental Misn Contract Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 10 of 75

27 COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 5/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Base: Middletown USARC, CT RECURRINGCOSTS Total Beyond -----($K) Sustainment Recap BOS Civ Salary TRICARE Off Salary Enl Salary House Allow Mission Activ Misc Recur TOTAL RECUR TOTAL COSTS ONE-TIME SAVES Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON Time Move Mil Moving Environmental Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME RECURRINGSAVES Total Beyond -----($K) FAM HOUSE OPS Sustainment Recap BOS Civ Salary , Off Salary Enl Salary , House Allow Procurement Mission Activ Misc Recur TOTAL RECUR ,670 1,670 1,670 5,993 1,680 TOTAL SAVINGS ,670 1,670 1,670 5,993 1,680 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 11 of 75

28 COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 6/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Base: Middletown USARC, CT ONE-TIME NET Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON Civ Retir/RIF Civ Moving Info Tech Other Mil Moving HAP / RSE Environmental Misn Contract Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME RECURRING NET Total Beyond -----($K) FAM HOUSE OPS Sustainment Recap BOS Civ Salary , TRICARE Mil Salary ,114-1,114-1,114-3,898-1,114 House Allow Procurement Mission Activ Misc Recur TOTAL RECUR ,670-1,670-1,670-5,993-1,680 TOTAL NET COST ,670-1,670-1,670-5,649-1,680 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 12 of 75

29 COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 7/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Base: SGT Libby USARC, CT ONE-TIME COSTS Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON CIV SALARY Civ RIFs Civ Retire CIV MOVING Per Diem POV Miles Home Purch HHG Misc House Hunt PPP RITA FREIGHT Packing Freight Vehicles Unemployment Info Tech Prog Manage Supt Contrac Mothball Time Move MIL MOVING Per Diem POV Miles HHG Misc Elim PCS HAP / RSE Environmental Misn Contract Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 13 of 75

30 COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 8/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Base: SGT Libby USARC, CT RECURRINGCOSTS Total Beyond -----($K) Sustainment Recap BOS Civ Salary TRICARE Off Salary Enl Salary House Allow Mission Activ Misc Recur TOTAL RECUR TOTAL COSTS ONE-TIME SAVES Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON Time Move Mil Moving Environmental Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME RECURRINGSAVES Total Beyond -----($K) FAM HOUSE OPS Sustainment Recap BOS Civ Salary , Off Salary , Enl Salary , House Allow Procurement Mission Activ Misc Recur TOTAL RECUR ,201 2,201 2,201 2,201 9,833 2,227 TOTAL SAVINGS ,201 2,201 2,201 2,201 9,833 2,227 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 14 of 75

31 COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 9/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Base: SGT Libby USARC, CT ONE-TIME NET Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON Civ Retir/RIF Civ Moving Info Tech Other Mil Moving HAP / RSE Environmental Misn Contract Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME RECURRING NET Total Beyond -----($K) FAM HOUSE OPS Sustainment Recap BOS Civ Salary , TRICARE Mil Salary ,281-1,281-1,281-1,281-5,766-1,281 House Allow Procurement Mission Activ Misc Recur TOTAL RECUR ,201-2,201-2,201-2,201-9,833-2,227 TOTAL NET COST ,183-2,201-2,201-2,201-9,466-2,227 Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 15 of 75

32 COBRA REALIGNMENT DETAIL REPORT (COBRA v6.10) - Page 10/27 Data As Of 04/21/ :13:58, Report Created 04/25/ :11:33 AM RC Transform in CT-Criterion 5-COBRA\Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT\AFRC Middletown, CT_QC_Checkedkw.CBR Option Pkg Name: AFRC Middletown, CT Base: USAR AMSA #69, CT ONE-TIME COSTS Total -----($K) CONSTRUCTION MILCON CIV SALARY Civ RIFs Civ Retire CIV MOVING Per Diem POV Miles Home Purch HHG Misc House Hunt PPP RITA FREIGHT Packing Freight Vehicles Unemployment Info Tech Prog Manage Supt Contrac Mothball Time Move MIL MOVING Per Diem POV Miles HHG Misc Elim PCS HAP / RSE Environmental Misn Contract Time Other TOTAL ONE-TIME Criterion 5-COBRA Middletown, CT.doc Page 16 of 75