Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Basic Feedback Analysis & Design


 Phoebe Daniel
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Basic Feedback Analysis & Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
2
3 Routh s Stability Criterion Given characteristic equation Factor out any roots at the origin and multiply by  if needed D G (s) = s n + a s n + + a n s + a n, How to determine stability? (without using MATLAB :) Necessary condition: All coefficients of characteristic polynomial be positive, ie a i > 0 Any coefficient missing ( = 0) or negative, then poles are outside LHP Necessary and Sufficient condition: System is stable iff all the elements in the first column of Routh array are positive AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 3 / 28
4 Routh s Stability Criterion Routh Array where Row n s n a 2 a 4 Row n s n a a 3 a 5 Row n 2 s n 2 b b 2 b 3 Row n 3 s n 3 c c 2 c 3 Row 2 s 2 Row s Row 0 s 0 [ ] a2 det a a 3 b = a [ ] a a det 3 b b 2 c = b [ ] a4 det a a 5 b 2 = a [ ] a a det 5 b b 3 c 2 = b There are two special cases! See webappendix of textbook AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 4 / 28
5 Stabilizing Gain Example One parameter r + e u y C P y design parameter Given P (s) = s+ s(s )(s+6) and C(s) = K Characteristic Equation Numerator of + P C No pole zero cancellation s 3 + 5s 2 + (K 6)s + K = 0 Routh s Table Stabilizing Gains s 3 K 6 s 2 5 K s 4K 30 5 s 0 K 4K 30 > 0, K > 0 5 K > 75, K > 0 AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 5 / 28
6 Stabilizing Gain Example 2 Two parameters r + e u y C P y Given P (s) = (s+)(s+2), C(s) = K + K I s Characteristic Equation Numerator of + P C No pole zero cancellation Routh s Table s 3 + 3s 2 + (2 + K)s + K I = 0 s K s 2 3 K I s 6+3K K I 3 s 0 K I Stabilizing Gains K > K I /3 2, K I > 0 AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 6 / 28
7 Stabilizing Gain Example Two parameters (contd) r + e u y C P y Stabilizing Gains K > K I /3 2, K I > 0 Given P (s) = (s+)(s+2), C(s) = K + K I s Step Response 4 K=,KI= K=0,KI=5 2 Amplitude Time (seconds) What about performance? AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 7 / 28
8 Step Response Time Domain Performance Specification 5 Step Response Amplitude Time Second Order System: poles = σ ± jω d, ω n = σ 2 + ω 2 d, ζ = σ/ω n M p = e πζ/ ζ 2 t r = 8 t s = 46 ω n σ AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 8 / 28
9 Step Response Time Domain Performance Specification Second Order Systems Desired Location of Poles M p = e πζ/ ζ 2 t r = 8 t s = 46 ω n σ ω n 8/t r ζ ζ(m p ) σ 46/t s Adjust K, K I to satisfy additional performance related constraints Controller gain tuning AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 9 / 28
10 Routh s Stability Criterion Conditions that ensure Re p i < α, for α > 0 Given polynomial s n + a s n + + a n s + a n = 0 Modify Routh s stability criterion to ensure Re p i < α, for α > 0 Replace s := q α and substitute in polynomial to get q n + b q n + + b n q + b n = 0 Apply Routh s criterion to the polynomial in q AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 0 / 28
11 Routh s Stability Criterion Example r + e u y C P y Given P (s) = s 2 +4s+ and controller C(s) = K + K 2 /s Find range of values for K, K 2 such that all poles are left of α Characteristic equation: s 3 + 4s 2 + (K + )s + K 2 Substitute s := q α, with α = Apply Routh s criterion q 3 + q 2 + (K 4)q K + K AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya / 28
12 Routh s Stability Criterion Example (contd) Polynomial in q q 3 + q 2 + (K 4)q K + K Routh s Table s 3 K 4 s 2 K 2 K + 2 s 2K K s 0 K 2 K Inequalities 2K K 2 6 > 0, K 2 K + 2 > 0 AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 2 / 28
13 Routh s Stability Criterion Example (contd) K K K K (a) 2K K 2 6 > 0, K 2 K + 2 > 0, Poles left of (b) K K 2 /4 + > 0, K 2 > 0, Poles left of 0 AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 3 / 28
14
15 Disturbance Rejection d r + u + + e y C P y A Let P (s) := (s/p +)(s/p 2 +), and C(s) := K Total response Y (s) = = P C + P C R(s) + P + P C D(s) AK (s/p + )(s/p 2 + ) + AK R(s) + A (s/p + )(s/p 2 + ) + AK D(s) Steady state value with feedback lim sy (s) = AK s 0 + AK ( ) lim sr(s) + s 0 A + AK ( ) lim sd(s) s 0 AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 5 / 28
16 Robustness to Plant Uncertainty r + e u y C P y Transfer function from reference to output G yr (s) = P C + P C = AK (s/p + )(s/p 2 + ) + AK Suppose A A + δa What is the effect on T (s) = G yr (s)? steady state gain AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 6 / 28
17 Robustness to Plant Uncertainty (contd) T ss = δt ss = dt ss da δa AK + AK K = ( + AK) 2 δa ( ) ( AK = + AK + AK ) δa A = δt ss T ss = δa + AK A AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 7 / 28
18
19 Analysis of Steady State Error r + e u y C P y E(s) = + P C R(s) = e ss = lim s s 0 + L(s) = lim s 0 + L(s) s k Investigate e ss 0 for various values of k s k+ Value of k r(t) 0 (t) e ss = constant = Type 0 t e ss = constant = Type I 2 t 2 /2! e ss = constant = Type II AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 9 / 28
20 Steady State Error Type Zero r + e u y C P y Type 0 System Constant steady state error to step reference k = 0 e ss = lim s 0 + L(s) s k = lim s 0 + L(s) = + K p Position Error Constant K p K p = lim L(s) s 0 AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 20 / 28
21 Steady State Error Type One r + e u y C P y Type System Constant steady state error to ramp reference k = e ss = lim s 0 + L(s) = lim s 0 + L(s) s k s = lim s 0 sl(s) = K v Velocity Error Constant K v K v = lim sl(s) s 0 AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 2 / 28
22 Steady State Error Type Two r + e u y C P y Type 2 System Constant steady state error to parabolic reference k = 2 e ss = lim s 0 + L(s) = lim s 0 + L(s) s k s 2 = lim s 0 s 2 L(s) = K a Acceleration Error Constant K a K a = lim s 2 L(s) s 0 AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 22 / 28
23 Steady State Error Summary r + e u y C P y Various Constants K p = lim s 0 L(s) Steady State Errors K v = lim s 0 sl(s) K a = lim s 0 s 2 L(s) Step Ramp Parabola Type 0 +K p Type I 0 K v Type II 0 0 K a AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 23 / 28
24 Steady State Error Summary (contd) r + e u y C P y Quickly identify ability to track polynomials Robustness property higher type tracks lower order polynomials Can be extended to study G yd and other transfer functions AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 24 / 28
25 Truxal s Formula Let T (s) := G yr (s) be given by T (s) = K Πm i= (s z i) Π n i= (s p i) Most common case: e ss to step is zero = Type I system DC gain lim s 0 T (s) = System error E(s) = R(s)( T (s)) System error due to ramp e ss = lim se(s) = lim s( T (s)) s 0 s 0 s 2 = lim T (s) s 0 s Using L Hopital s rule dt e ss = lim s 0 ds = K v for type I systems AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 25 / 28
26 Truxal s Formula Contd Let T (s) := G yr (s) be given by Using L Hopital s rule T (s) = K Πm i= (s z i) Π n i= (s p i) dt e ss = lim s 0 ds = K v for type I systems K v is related to the slope of T (s) at origin AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 26 / 28
27 Truxal s Formula Contd Let T (s) := G yr (s) be given by Rewrite Truxal s Formula T (s) = K Πm i= (s z i) Π n i= (s p i) dt e ss = lim T(0) = s 0 ds T d = lim log T (s) s 0 ds d = lim s 0 ds ( ) m n log(k) + log(s z i ) log(s p i ) K v = m i= i= z i n p i= i i= AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 27 / 28
28 Truxal s Formula Design Implication K v = m i= z i n p i= i Observe effect of pole/zero location on /K v Useful for design of dynamic compensators Example Third order type I system has closedloop poles 2 ± 2j, 0 The system has one zero Where should it be for K v = 0? AERO 422, Instructor: Raktim Bhattacharya 28 / 28
Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Dynamic Response
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Dynamic Response Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. . Previous Class...........
More informationProportional, Integral & Derivative Control Design. Raktim Bhattacharya
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Proportional, ntegral & Derivative Control Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency ResponseDesign Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries
. AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace
More informationECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27
1/27 ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability Feedback System Consider the feedback system u + G ol (s) y Figure 1: A unity feedback system
More informationEEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems
EEE 84: Introduction to feedback systems Summary 6 8 8 x 7 7 6 Level() 6 5 4 4 5 5 time(s) 4 6 8 Time (seconds) Fig.. Illustration of BIBO stability: stable system (the input is a unit step) Fig.. step)
More informationSECTION 4: STEADY STATE ERROR
SECTION 4: STEADY STATE ERROR MAE 4421 Control of Aerospace & Mechanical Systems 2 Introduction Steady State Error Introduction 3 Consider a simple unity feedback system The error is the difference between
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steadystate Steadystate errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationRadar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.
Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter
More informationLecture 4 Classical Control Overview II. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore
Lecture 4 Classical Control Overview II Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore Stability Analysis through Transfer Function Dr. Radhakant
More informationTest 2 SOLUTIONS. ENGI 5821: Control Systems I. March 15, 2010
Test 2 SOLUTIONS ENGI 5821: Control Systems I March 15, 2010 Total marks: 20 Name: Student #: Answer each question in the space provided or on the back of a page with an indication of where to find the
More informationLast week: analysis of pinionrack w velocity feedback
Last week: analysis of pinionrack w velocity feedback Calculation of the steady state error Transfer function: V (s) V ref (s) = 0.362K s +2+0.362K Step input: V ref (s) = s Output: V (s) = s 0.362K s
More informationChapter 7  Solved Problems
Chapter 7  Solved Problems Solved Problem 7.1. A continuous time system has transfer function G o (s) given by G o (s) = B o(s) A o (s) = 2 (s 1)(s + 2) = 2 s 2 + s 2 (1) Find a controller of minimal
More informationSteady State Errors. Recall the closedloop transfer function of the system, is
Steady State Errors Outline What is steadystate error? Steadystate error in unity feedback systems Type Number Steadystate error in nonunity feedback systems Steadystate error due to disturbance inputs
More informationModule 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOTLOCUS. Solutions
Cambridge University Engineering Dept. Third Year Module 3F: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER ROOTLOCUS Solutions. (a) For the system L(s) = (s + a)(s + b) (a, b both real) show that the rootlocus
More informationAutomatic Control Systems (FCS) Lecture 8 Steady State Error
Automatic Control Systems (FCS) Lecture 8 Steady State Error Introduction Any physical control system inherently suffers steadystate error in response to certain types of inputs. A system may have no
More informationFundamental of Control Systems Steady State Error Lecturer: Dr. Wahidin Wahab M.Sc. Aries Subiantoro, ST. MSc.
Fundamental of Control Systems Steady State Error Lecturer: Dr. Wahidin Wahab M.Sc. Aries Subiantoro, ST. MSc. Electrical Engineering Department University of Indonesia 2 Steady State Error How well can
More informationBangladesh University of Engineering and Technology. EEE 402: Control System I Laboratory
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department EEE 402: Control System I Laboratory Experiment No. 4 a) Effect of input waveform, loop gain, and system
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Steadystate error Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling Analysis Design Laplace
More information7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM
ROOT LOCUS TECHNIQUE. Values of on the root loci The value of at any point s on the root loci is determined from the following equation G( s) H( s) Product of lengths of vectors from poles of G( s)h( s)
More informationCHAPTER 7 STEADYSTATE RESPONSE ANALYSES
CHAPTER 7 STEADYSTATE RESPONSE ANALYSES 1. Introduction The steady state error is a measure of system accuracy. These errors arise from the nature of the inputs, system type and from nonlinearities of
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationRoot Locus. Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples. School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Root Locus  1
Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus  1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: D 0.09 Position
More information7.1 Introduction. Apago PDF Enhancer. Definition and Test Inputs. 340 Chapter 7 SteadyState Errors
340 Chapter 7 SteadyState Errors 7. Introduction In Chapter, we saw that control systems analysis and design focus on three specifications: () transient response, (2) stability, and (3) steadystate errors,
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the splane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationControl of Electromechanical Systems
Control of Electromechanical Systems November 3, 27 Exercise Consider the feedback control scheme of the motor speed ω in Fig., where the torque actuation includes a time constant τ A =. s and a disturbance
More informationCourse Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.
Course Summary Unit 1: Introduction Unit 2: Modeling in the Frequency Domain Unit 3: Time Response Unit 4: Block Diagram Reduction Unit 5: Stability Unit 6: SteadyState Error Unit 7: Root Locus Techniques
More informationSome special cases
Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 87 11.3.1 Some special cases Routh table is easy to form in most cases, but there could be some cases when we need to do some extra work. Case 1: The first
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationLecture 10: Proportional, Integral and Derivative Actions
MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Systems Lecture 10: Proportional, Integral and Derivative Actions Stability Concepts BIBO Stability and The RouthHurwitz Criterion Dorf, Sections 6.1, 6.2, 7.6 Cleveland State
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a lineartimeinvariant
More informationDESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 6.2 Solutions. PI Controller For the system G = K (s+)(s+3)(s+8) HW 6.2 Solutions in negative feedback operating at a damping ratio of., we are going to design a PI controller
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS. Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated using cones: Stable Neutral Unstable
ECE4510/5510: Feedback Control Systems. 5 1 STABILITY ANALYSIS 5.1: Boundedinput boundedoutput (BIBO) stability Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated
More informationME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 2016 MIDTERM EXAMINATION II
ME 30 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 06 Course Instructors Dr. Tuna Balkan, Dr. Kıvanç Azgın, Dr. Ali Emre Turgut, Dr. Yiğit Yazıcıoğlu MIDTERM EXAMINATION II May, 06 Time Allowed: 00 minutes Closed Notes and
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:3012:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (23 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:3012:30 Today: Recap
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationBASIC PROPERTIES OF FEEDBACK
ECE450/550: Feedback Control Systems. 4 BASIC PROPERTIES OF FEEDBACK 4.: Setting up an example to benchmark controllers There are two basic types/categories of control systems: OPEN LOOP: Disturbance r(t)
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture : Different Types of Control Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Limits of Proportional Feedback Performance
More informationSECTION 7: STEADYSTATE ERROR. ESE 499 Feedback Control Systems
SECTION 7: STEADYSTATE ERROR ESE 499 Feedback Control Systems 2 Introduction SteadyState Error Introduction 3 Consider a simple unityfeedback system The error is the difference between the reference
More informationAlireza Mousavi Brunel University
Alireza Mousavi Brunel University 1 » Control Process» Control Systems Design & Analysis 2 OpenLoop Control: Is normally a simple switch on and switch off process, for example a light in a room is switched
More informationIf you need more room, use the backs of the pages and indicate that you have done so.
EE 343 Exam II Ahmad F. Taha Spring 206 Your Name: Your Signature: Exam duration: hour and 30 minutes. This exam is closed book, closed notes, closed laptops, closed phones, closed tablets, closed pretty
More informationSECTION 5: ROOT LOCUS ANALYSIS
SECTION 5: ROOT LOCUS ANALYSIS MAE 4421 Control of Aerospace & Mechanical Systems 2 Introduction Introduction 3 Consider a general feedback system: Closed loop transfer function is 1 is the forward path
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : RouthHurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationPD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada
PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closedloop
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationEE451/551: Digital Control. Chapter 3: Modeling of Digital Control Systems
EE451/551: Digital Control Chapter 3: Modeling of Digital Control Systems Common Digital Control Configurations AsnotedinCh1 commondigitalcontrolconfigurations As noted in Ch 1, common digital control
More informationMethods for analysis and control of dynamical systems Lecture 4: The root locus design method
Methods for analysis and control of Lecture 4: The root locus design method O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.inpg.fr www.gipsalab.fr/ o.sename 5th February 2015 Outline
More informationCompensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus
1 Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus Prof. Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning
More informationControl Systems. Root Locus & Pole Assignment. L. Lanari
Control Systems Root Locus & Pole Assignment L. Lanari Outline rootlocus definition main rules for hand plotting root locus as a design tool other use of the root locus pole assignment Lanari: CS  Root
More informationChapter 6 SteadyState Analysis of ContinuousTime Systems
Chapter 6 SteadyState Analysis of ContinuousTime Systems 6.1 INTRODUCTION One of the objectives of a control systems engineer is to minimize the steadystate error of the closedloop system response
More information100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
More informationLecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control
ME 233, UC Berkeley, Spring 2014 Xu Chen Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control Big picture review of integral control in PID design example: 0 Es) C s) Ds) + + P s) Y s) where P s)
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 OpenLoop Process The study of dynamics was limited to openloop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationEECE 460 : Control System Design
EECE 460 : Control System Design SISO Pole Placement Guy A. Dumont UBC EECE January 2011 Guy A. Dumont (UBC EECE) EECE 460: Pole Placement January 2011 1 / 29 Contents 1 Preview 2 Polynomial Pole Placement
More informationAn Introduction to Control Systems
An Introduction to Control Systems Signals and Systems: 3C1 Control Systems Handout 1 Dr. David Corrigan Electronic and Electrical Engineering corrigad@tcd.ie November 21, 2012 Recall the concept of a
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 5
Outline Outline Outline 1 What is 2 Outline What is Why use? Sketching a 1 What is Why use? Sketching a 2 Gain Controller Lead Compensation Lag Compensation What is Properties of a General System Why use?
More informationHomework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More information1 An Overview and Brief History of Feedback Control 1. 2 Dynamic Models 23. Contents. Preface. xiii
Contents 1 An Overview and Brief History of Feedback Control 1 A Perspective on Feedback Control 1 Chapter Overview 2 1.1 A Simple Feedback System 3 1.2 A First Analysis of Feedback 6 1.3 Feedback System
More informationMethods for analysis and control of. Lecture 4: The root locus design method
Methods for analysis and control of Lecture 4: The root locus design method O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.inpg.fr www.lag.ensieg.inpg.fr/sename Lead Lag 17th March
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationExercise 1 (A Nonminimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 559 Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Nonminimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 2
Outline Outline Outline Review of Material from Lecture 2 New Stuff  Outline Review of Lecture System Performance Effect of Poles Review of Material from Lecture System Performance Effect of Poles 2 New
More informationS I X SOLUTIONS TO CASE STUDIES CHALLENGES. Antenna Control: Stability Design via Gain K s s s+76.39K. T(s) =
S I X Stability SOLUTIONS TO CASE STUDIES CHALLENGES Antenna Control: Stability Design via Gain From the antenna control challenge of Chapter 5, Make a Routh table: 76.39K s 3 +151.32s 2 +198s+76.39K s
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We
More informationChapter 15  Solved Problems
Chapter 5  Solved Problems Solved Problem 5.. Contributed by  Alvaro Liendo, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Consider a plant having a nominal model given by G o (s) = s + 2 The aim of the
More informationIMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration
Computers and Chemical Engineering 28 (2004) 281 290 IMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration Ibrahim Kaya Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 81 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 81 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequencyresponse methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationQuadratic Stability of Dynamical Systems. Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
.. Quadratic Stability of Dynamical Systems Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Quadratic Lyapunov Functions Quadratic Stability Dynamical system is quadratically stable if
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #14 Wednesday, February 5, 2003 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Chapter 7 Synthesis of SISO Controllers
More information06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance.
Chapter 06 Feedback 06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance. Lesson of the Course Fondamenti di Controlli Automatici of
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationFEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and ClosedLoop Control Systems 3. Why ClosedLoop Control? 4. Case Study  Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. SteadyState Errors in Unity Feedback Control
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 505900 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationExercise 1 (A Nonminimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 559 Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Nonminimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
OpenLoop controller An OpenLoop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, nonlinear dynamics and parameter
More informationMAE 143B  Homework 9
MAE 143B  Homework 9 7.1 a) We have stable firstorder poles at p 1 = 1 and p 2 = 1. For small values of ω, we recover the DC gain K = lim ω G(jω) = 1 1 = 2dB. Having this finite limit, our straightline
More informationDelhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : 0. LS_D_ECIN_Control Systems_30078 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucnow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolata Patna Web: Email: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 04546 CLASS TEST 089 ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
More informationSoftware Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques
Software Engineering 3DX3 Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques Dr. Ryan Leduc Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Material based on Control Systems Engineering by N. Nise. c 2006, 2007
More informationAppendix A MoReRT Controllers Design Demo Software
Appendix A MoReRT Controllers Design Demo Software The use of the proposed ModelReference Robust Tuning (MoReRT) design methodology, described in Chap. 4, to tune a twodegreeoffreedom (2DoF) proportional
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Feedback Control  1
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More information1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I
MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June 9, Problem. ( points) Consider a plant in feedback with the PI controller G(s) = (s + 3)(s + )(s + a) C(s) = K P + K I s. (a) (4 points) For a given constant
More information12.7 Steady State Error
Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/01 106 1.7 Steady State Error For first order systems we have noticed an overall improvement in performance in terms of rise time and settling time. But there
More informationThe loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)
Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2). Loop shaping 2. Performance limitations The loop shaping paradigm. Estimate performance and robustness of the feedback system from the loop transfer L(jω)
More informationTime Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuoustime, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 2, 2018 J. Tani, E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 7:
More information(Continued on next page)
(Continued on next page) 18.2 Roots of Stability Nyquist Criterion 87 e(s) 1 S(s) = =, r(s) 1 + P (s)c(s) where P (s) represents the plant transfer function, and C(s) the compensator. The closedloop characteristic
More informationH 2 Optimal State Feedback Control Synthesis. Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
H 2 Optimal State Feedback Control Synthesis Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Motivation Motivation w(t) u(t) G K y(t) z(t) w(t) are exogenous signals reference, process
More informationEE Control Systems LECTURE 9
Updated: Sunday, February, 999 EE  Control Systems LECTURE 9 Copyright FL Lewis 998 All rights reserved STABILITY OF LINEAR SYSTEMS We discuss the stability of input/output systems and of statespace
More informationRoot Locus Design Example #3
Root Locus Design Example #3 A. Introduction The system represents a linear model for vertical motion of an underwater vehicle at zero forward speed. The vehicle is assumed to have zero pitch and roll
More informationHANDOUT E.22  EXAMPLES ON STABILITY ANALYSIS
Example 1 HANDOUT E.  EXAMPLES ON STABILITY ANALYSIS Determine the stability of the system whose characteristics equation given by 6 3 = s + s + 3s + s + s + s +. The above polynomial satisfies the necessary
More informationController Design using Root Locus
Chapter 4 Controller Design using Root Locus 4. PD Control Root locus is a useful tool to design different types of controllers. Below, we will illustrate the design of proportional derivative controllers
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Norms for Signals and Systems
. AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System Norms for Signals and. Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Norms for Signals ...
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 101 Robust Performance
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 11 Robust Performance Richard M. Murray 1 December 28 Goals: Describe how to represent uncertainty in process dynamics Describe how to analyze a system in the presence of uncertainty
More information