Introduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31


 Alexander Willis
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured : frequencydomain uncertainty, unmodeled dynamics, nonlinearity Robust Control Objective : Design a controller satisfying stability and performance for a set of models Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
2 Model Uncertainty and Feedback The aim of feedback is to overcome the model uncertainty r(t) e(t) u(t) K G +  v(t) y(t) Whatever the plant model is, large GK leads to T = GK 1 (good tracking) 1+GK 1 S = 0 (good disturbance rejection) 1+GK For an openloop stable system : K = 0 (robust stability) K (good performance) Loopshaping : G(jω)K(jω) should be large in the frequencies where good performances are desired and small where the stability is critical. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
3 Basic Definitions Stability : A transfer function G (s) is stable if it is analytic in the closed Right Half Plane RHP (Re s 0). Properness : G(s) isproper if G(j ) is finite (deg den deg num) G(s) isstrictly proper if G (j ) =0(degden> deg num) G(s) isbiproper if (deg den = deg num) Internal Stability : A closedloop system is internally stable if the transfer functions from all external inputs to all internal signals are stable. For a unity feedback system the following four transfer functions should be stable. 1 1+GK G 1+GK K 1+GK GK 1+GK Wellposedness : A closedloop system with unity feedback is wellposed iff 1 + GK 0. This condition is met if GK( ) 1 orifgk is strictly proper (a feedback system with G =1, K = 1 is not wellposed). Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
4 Internal Stability Theorem A unity feedback system is internally stable if and only if there are no zeros in Re s 0 in the characteristic polynomial where N G N K + M G M K =0 G = N G M G, K = N K M K or the following two conditions hold : (a) The transfer function 1+GK has no zeros in Re s 0. (b) There is no polezero cancellation in Re s 0 when the product GK is formed. or the Nyquist plot of GK does not pass through the point 1 and encircles it n times counterclockwise, where n denotes the number of unstable poles of G and K. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
5 Norms for Signals Consider piecewise continuous signals mapping (, + ) tor. Anorm must have the following four properties : 1 u 0 (positivity) 2 au = a u, a R (homogenity) 3 u =0 u(t) =0 t (positive definiteness) 4 u + v u + v (triangle inequality) 1Norm : u 1 = u(t) dt ( ) 1/2 2Norm : u 2 = u 2 (t)dt ( u 2 2 is the total signal energy) Norm : u =sup u(t) t ( 1/p pnorm : u p = u(t) dt) p 1 p Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
6 Norms for Systems (SISO) Consider linear, timeinvariant, causal and finitedimensional systems. y(t) =g(t) u(t), y(t) = g(t τ)u(τ)dτ, G (s) =L[g(t)] 2Norm : This norm is bounded if G (s) is strictly proper and has no pole on the imaginary axis. ( 1 ) 1/2 G 2 = G (jω) 2 dω 2π Norm : is bounded if G (s) has no pole on the imaginary axis. G =sup G (jω) ω Parseval s theorem : (for stable systems) ( 1 1/2 ( G 2 = G (jω) dω) 2 = g(t) 2 dt 2π ) 1/2 Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
7 Norms for Systems (MIMO) Given G(s) a multiinput multioutput system 2Norm : This norm is defined as ( 1 G 2 = trace [G (jω)g (jω)] dω 2π Norm : The H norm is defined as G =sup ω G (jω) =sup σ[g (jω)] ω ) 1/2 Remark : The infinity norm has an important property (submultiplicative) GH G H Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
8 Computing the Norms How to compute the 2norm : Suppose that G has bounded twonorm, we have : G 2 2 = 1 2π = 1 2πj G (jω) 2 dω = 1 j G( s)g (s)ds 2πj j G ( s)g (s)ds Then by the residue theorem, G 2 2 equals the sum of the residues of G( s)g(s) at its poles in the left halfplane (LHP). Example Compute the two norm of the following transfer function : G (s) = 1 τs +1 Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
9 Computing the Norms How to compute the norm : Choose a fine grid of frequency points {ω 1,...,ω N },then SISO : G max 1 k N G (jω k) MIMO : G max 1 k N σ[g (jω k)] or alternatively, solve d G(jω) 2 dω =0 Example Compute the infinity norm of G(s) = as +1 bs +1 a, b > 0 If a b If a < b Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
10 Inputoutput relationships If we know how big the input is, how big is the output going to be? Proofs : If u(t) =δ(t) theny(t) = Output Norms for Two Inputs u(t) δ(t) sin(ωt) y 2 G 2 y g G(jω) g(t τ)δ(τ)dτ = g(t), so y 2 = g 2 = G 2 If u(t) =δ(t) theny(t) =g(t), so y = g If u(t) =sin(ωt) theny(t) = G(jω) sin(ωt + φ), so y 2 = and y = G(jω) Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
11 Inputoutput relationships Norms for Signals and Systems System Gains : u 2 =1 u =1 y 2 G y G 2 g 1 Entry (1,1) : We have y 2 2 = 1 G(jω) 2 U(jω) 2 dω G 2 1 U(jω) 2 dω 2π 2π = G 2 U 2 2 = G 2 u 2 2 Entry(2,1) : According to the CauchySchwartz inequality ( ) 1/2 ( y(t) = g(t τ)u(τ)dτ g 2 (t τ)dτ u 2 (τ)dτ = g 2 u 2 = G 2 u 2 y G 2 u 2 ) 1/2 Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
12 Asymptotic Tracking Internal Model Principle : For perfect asymptotic tracking of r(t), the loop transfer function L = GK must contain the unstable poles of r(s). Theorem Assume that the feedback system is internally stable and n=d=0. (a) If r(t) is a step, then lim e(t) =r(t) y(t) =0iff t S =(1+L) 1 has at least one zero at the origin. (b) If r(t) is a ramp, then lim e(t) =0iffS has at least two t zerosattheorigin. (c) If r(t) =sin(ωt), then lim e(t) =0iffS has at least one t zero at s = jω. FinalValue Theorem : If y(s) has no poles in Re s 0 except possibly one pole at s =0then: lim y(t) = lim sy(s) t s 0 Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
13 Nominal Performance Tracking performance can be quantified in terms of a weighted norm of the sensitivity function 1 Sensitivity Function : TF from r to tracking error e : S = 1+GK Complementary Sensitivity Function : TF from r to y : T = GK 1+GK S is the relative sensitivity of T with respect to relative perturbations in G : T /T S = lim G 0 G/G = dt G dg T Performance Specification : 2 K (1 + GK ) GK G(1 + GK ) = (1 + GK ) 2 = GK 1 1+GK 1 r(t) is any sinusoid of amplitude 1 filtered by W 1, then the max. amp. of e is W 1 S. 2 In some applications good performance is achieved if S(jω) < W 1 (jω) 1, ω or W 1 S < 1 W 1 (jω) < 1+L(jω), ω Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
14 Nominal Performance In many control applications, the nominal performance can be defined as W 1 S < 1 where W 1 (s) is typically a lowpass filter It guarantees small S(jω) at low frequencies. Graphical interpretation : The nominal performance in the frequencydomain is given by : Im W 1 (jω) W 1 (jω)s(jω) < 1 ω W 1 (jω) 1 1+L(jω) < 1 ω, Re W 1 (jω) < 1+L(jω), ω L(jω) Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
15 Model Uncertainty We cannot exactly model the physical systems so there is always the modeling errors. The best technique is to define a model set which can be structured or unstructured. Structured model set such as parametric uncertainty 1 G = { s 2 + as +1 : a min a a max } or multimodel uncertainty G = {G 0, G 1, G 2, G 3 } Unstructured model set such as unmodeled dynamics or disk uncertainty G = {G 0 + : γ} or frequencydomain uncertainty G = {G (jω) S 1 (jω) < G (jω) < S 2 (jω) } Conservatism : Controller design for a model set greater than the real model set leads to a conservative design. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
16 Model Uncertainty Unstructured uncertainty : Additive uncertainty G = G + W 2 1 Multiplicative uncertainty Feedback uncertainty G = G = G (1 + W 2 ) 1 G 1+ W 2 G or G = G 1+ W 2 1 G :truemodel : normbounded uncertainty G : nominal model W 2 : weighting filter Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
17 Model Uncertainty Example (Multimodel to multiplicative uncertainty) m frequencyresponse models are identified. Find the multiplicative uncertainty model and the weighting filter. if G = G (1 + W 2 ) G G 1= W 2 G (jω) 1 G (jω) 1 W 2(jω) Let G k (jω) be the frequency response of the model at the kth experiment and G(jω) that of the nominal model (e.g. the mean value). max G k (jω i ) k G (jω i ) 1 W 2(jω i ) i Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
18 Model Uncertainty Example (Parametric to multiplicative uncertainty) { } k Suppose that G(s) = :0.1 k 10. s 2 G(s) = k 0 s 2 G(jω) G(jω) 1 W 2(jω) max k 0.1 k 10 1 k 0 W 2(jω) Thebestvaluefork 0 is 5.05 which gives W 2 (s) =4.95/5.05 Example (Parametric to feedback uncertainty) { } 1 s 2 :0.4 a 0.8 take a = , as +1 So G(s) = where G(s) = 1 s s +0.2 s +1 = 1 s s +1, G (s) 1+ W 2 (s)g (s) W 2(s) =0.2s Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
19 Model Uncertainty Example (Timedelay to multiplicative uncertainty) Assume that G(s) = 1 and G(s) =e τs 1 where 0 τ 0.1. s 2 s 2 G(jω) G(jω) 1 W 2(jω) e τjω 1 W 2 (jω) ω,τ 10 Bode Diagram Using the Bode diagram we can find W 2 (s) = 0.21s 0.1s +1 Magnitude (db) Frequency (rad/s) Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
20 Robust Stability Robustness : A controller is robust with respect to a closedloop characteristic, if this characteristic holds for every plant in G Robust Stability : A controller is robust in stability if it provides internal stability for every plant in G. Stability margin : For a given model set with an associate size, it can be defined as the largest model set stabilized by a controller. Stability margin for an uncertainty model : Given G = G (1 + W 2 ) with β, the stability margin for a controller C is the least upper bound of β. Im L Modulus margin : The distance from 1 to the openloop Nyquist curve. M m = inf 1 L(jω) =inf 1+L(jω) ω ω [ ] 1 1 = sup = S 1 ω 1+L(jω) 1 M m L(jω) 1 Re L Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
21 Robust Stability Theorem (Small Gain) Suppose H is stable and has bounded infinity norm and let γ>0. The following feedback loop is internally stable for all stable (s) with (s) H(s) 1/γ if and only if H <γ Robust stability condition for plants with additive uncertainty : K G = G+ W 2 H = W 2 1+GK Closedloop system is internally stable for all 1 iff W 2 KS < 1 W 2 r(t) + K G y(t)  Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
22 Robust Stability Robust stability condition for plants with multiplicative uncertainty : GK G = G(1+ W 2 ) H = W 2 W 2 1+GK r(t) + K G y(t) Closedloop system is internally  stable for all 1 iff W 2 T < 1. Proof : Assume that W 2 T < 1. We show that the winding number of 1+GK around zero is equal to that of 1 + GK. 1+ GK =1+GK(1+ W 2 )=1+GK+GK W 2 =1+GK+(1+GK)T W 2 1+ GK =(1+GK)(1 + W 2 T ) so wno { (1 + GK)} =wno{(1 + GK)} +wno{(1 + W 2 T )}. But wno {(1 + W 2 T )} = 0 because W 2 T < 1. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
23 Robust Stability Robust stability condition for plants with feedback uncertainty (1) : G 1 G = H = W 2 1+ W 2 1+GK Closedloop system is internally stable for all 1 iff W 2 S < 1. W 2 r(t) K G  y(t)  Robust stability condition for plants with feedback uncertainty (2) : G G = 1+ W 2 G H = W G 2 1+GK r(t) Closedloop system is internally  stable for all 1 iff W 2 GS < 1. K W 2  G y(t) Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
24 Robust Stability The robust stability condition for systems with multiplicative uncertainty is defined as W 2 T < 1 where W 2 (s) is typically a highpass filter. It guarantees small T (jω) at high frequencies, where unmodelled dynamics are large. Graphical interpretation : The robust stability condition in the frequencydomain is given by : Im W 2 (jω)t (jω) < 1 ω W 2 (jω)l(jω) 1+L(jω) < 1 ω, 1 Re W 2 (jω)l(jω) < 1+L(jω), ω W 2 L L Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
25 Robust Performance Nominal performance condition : W 1 S < 1 Robust stability condition for multiplicative uncertainty : W 2 T < 1 Robust performance for multiplicative uncertainty : W 2 T < 1and W 1 S < 1 where : 1 S = 1+ GK = 1 1+GK (1+ W 2 ) = 1 (1 + GK )(1+ W 2 T ) = S 1+ W 2 T or W 2 T < 1and W 1 S 1+ W 2 T < 1 Theorem A necessary and sufficient condition for robust performance of a plant model with multiplicative uncertainty is W 1 S + W 2 T < 1 Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
26 Robust Performance Graphical interpretation : The robust performance condition for systems with multiplicative uncertainty is given by : W 1 S + W 2 T < 1 Im W 1 (jω) 1+L(jω) + W 2 (jω)l(jω) 1+L(jω) < 1 ω W 1 (jω) + W 2 (jω)l(jω) < 1+L(jω), ω W 11 W 2 L L Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
27 Limit of Performance Algebraic Constraints : S + T =1so S(jω) and T (jω) cannot both be less than 1/2 at the same frequency. A necessary condition for robust performance is that : min{ W 1 (jω), W 2 (jω) } < 1, ω So at every frequency either W 1 or W 2 must be less than 1. Typically W 1 is monotonically decreasing and W 2 is monotonically increasing. If p is a pole and z azeroofl both in Re s 0then: S(p) =0 S(z) =1 T (p) =1 T (z) =0 Analytic Constraints : Bounds on the weights W 1 and W 2 : W 1 S W 1 (z) W 2 T W 2 (p) Proof from the Maximum Modulus Theorem : F = sup F (s) Re s>0 Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
28 Analytic Constraints Definition (AllPass and MinimumPhase Transfer Functions) Defin M as the set of stable transfer functions with bounded infinity norm. F (s) Mis allpass if F (jω) =1 ω G(s) Mis minimumphase if it has no zeros in Re s > 0. Every function G Mcan be presented as G = G ap G mp Suppose that z and p are the only zero and pole of G in the closed RHP and K has neither poles nor zeros there. Then : S ap (s) = s p s + p S(z) =1 S mp (z) =Sap 1 + p (z) =z z p W 1(z) z + p Then : W 1 S = W 1 S mp W 1 (z)s mp (z) = Similarly : T ap (s) = s z s + z, T (p) =1 W 2T z p W 2(p) p + z p z Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
29 Analytic Constraints Example Consider the inverse pendulum problem. y m (M + m)ẍ + ml( θ cos θ θ 2 sin θ) = u m(ẍ cos θ + l θ g sin θ) = d x u l Linearized model : ( ) x = θ 1 s 2 [Mls 2 (M + m)g] ls 2 g ls 2 s 2 M+m m s2 M ( ) u d Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
30 Analytic Constraints Example Measuring x : T ux = ls 2 g s 2 [Mls 2 (M + m)g] RHP poles and zeros : z = (M + m)g g/l p =0, 0, Ml If m M W 2 T 1( W 2 (p) is an increasing function) the system is difficult to control. The best case is m/m and l large. Measuring y or θ : T uθ = 1 Mls 2 (M + m)g T uy = g s 2 [Mls 2 (M + m)g] Since there is no RHP zero a larger l gives a smaller p so the system is easier to stabilize. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
31 Analytic Constraints Theorem (The Waterbed Effect) Suppose that G has a zero at z with Re z > 0 and : M 1 := max S(jω) ω 1 ω ω 2 M 2 := S Then there exist positive constants c 1 and c 2, depending only on ω 1,ω 2 and z, such that : Theorem (The Area Formula) c 1 log M 1 + c 2 log M 2 log S 1 ap (z) 0 Assume that the relative degree of L is at least 2. Then 0 log S(jω) dω = π(log e) i Re p i where {p i } denotes the set of poles of L in Re s > 0. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Robust Control ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE. Alireza Karimi Laboratoire d Automatique
Robust Control ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE Alireza Karimi Laboratoire d Automatique Course Program 1. Introduction 2. Norms for Signals and Systems 3. Basic Concepts (stability and performance)
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 5: Uncertainty and Robustness in SISO Systems [Ch.7(8)] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 5:Uncertainty and Robustness () FEL3210 MIMO
More informationRobust Control 3 The Closed Loop
Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /2/2002 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions Traditional Performance Measures Time
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency ResponseDesign Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Norms for Signals and Systems
. AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System Norms for Signals and. Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Norms for Signals ...
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationControl Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith
Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017314 4.1 Inputoutput controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure
More informationMEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems
MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Frequency Domain Design Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University 5/8/25 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions
More informationUncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems
Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Outline Nature of uncertainty (models and signals). Physical sources of model uncertainty. Mathematical
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationSingular Value Decomposition Analysis
Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Introduction Introduce a linear algebra tool: singular values of a matrix Motivation Why do we need singular values in MIMO control
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #20 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Closedloop system analysis Bounded Gain Theorem Robust Stability Fall 2007 16.31 20 1 SISO Performance Objectives Basic setup: d i d o r u y G c (s) G(s) n control
More informationIntro to Frequency Domain Design
Intro to Frequency Domain Design MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions
More informationRobust stability and Performance
122 c Perry Y.Li Chapter 5 Robust stability and Performance Topics: ([ author ] is supplementary source) Sensitivities and internal stability (Goodwin 5.15.4) Modeling Error and Model Uncertainty (Goodwin
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 505900 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationAn Internal Stability Example
An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several polezero cancellations between the controller and
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steadystate Steadystate errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries
. AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace
More informationMEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems
MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Frequency Domain Design Intro Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /5/27 Outline Closed Loop Transfer
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #11 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Relative Stability: Stability
More informationRobust fixedorder H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization
Robust fixedorder H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization Alireza Karimi, Gorka Galdos and Roland Longchamp Abstract A new approach for robust fixedorder H controller design by
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationModel Uncertainty and Robust Stability for Multivariable Systems
Model Uncertainty and Robust Stability for Multivariable Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Devron Profile Control Solutions Outline Representing model uncertainty.
More informationRobust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming
Robust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming Gorka Galdos, Alireza Karimi and Roland Longchamp Abstract A quadratic programming approach is proposed to tune fixedorder
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Dynamic Response
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Dynamic Response Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. . Previous Class...........
More informationMTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan
MTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan Outline Motivation & Background: H2 Tracking Performance Limits: new paradigm Explicit analytical solutions with examples H2 Regulation
More informationRobust Control. 2nd class. Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room
Robust Control Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) 2nd class Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room 2. Nominal Performance 2.1 Weighted Sensitivity [SP05, Sec. 2.8,
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition adings: Guzzella, Chapter 9.4 6 Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Emilio Frazzoli Institute
More informationDESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #19 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Stengel Chapter 6 Question: how well do the large gain and phase margins discussed for LQR map over to DOFB using LQR and LQE (called LQG)? Fall 2010 16.30/31 19
More information(Continued on next page)
(Continued on next page) 18.2 Roots of Stability Nyquist Criterion 87 e(s) 1 S(s) = =, r(s) 1 + P (s)c(s) where P (s) represents the plant transfer function, and C(s) the compensator. The closedloop characteristic
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Basic Feedback Analysis & Design
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Basic Feedback Analysis & Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Routh s Stability
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS. Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated using cones: Stable Neutral Unstable
ECE4510/5510: Feedback Control Systems. 5 1 STABILITY ANALYSIS 5.1: Boundedinput boundedoutput (BIBO) stability Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 58 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3
More informationThe loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)
Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2). Loop shaping 2. Performance limitations The loop shaping paradigm. Estimate performance and robustness of the feedback system from the loop transfer L(jω)
More informationLecture 1: Feedback Control Loop
Lecture : Feedback Control Loop Loop Transfer function The standard feedback control system structure is depicted in Figure. This represend(t) n(t) r(t) e(t) u(t) v(t) η(t) y(t) F (s) C(s) P (s) Figure
More informationMAE 143B  Homework 9
MAE 143B  Homework 9 7.1 a) We have stable firstorder poles at p 1 = 1 and p 2 = 1. For small values of ω, we recover the DC gain K = lim ω G(jω) = 1 1 = 2dB. Having this finite limit, our straightline
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition Readings: Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 101 Robust Performance
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 11 Robust Performance Richard M. Murray 1 December 28 Goals: Describe how to represent uncertainty in process dynamics Describe how to analyze a system in the presence of uncertainty
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using
More informationDesign Methods for Control Systems
Design Methods for Control Systems Maarten Steinbuch TU/e Gjerrit Meinsma UT Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Winter term 20022003 Schedule November 25 MSt December 2 MSt Homework # 1 December 9
More informationProblem Set 5 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 5 Solutions The problem set deals with Hankel
More informationMAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions
MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions Question 1. SIGNALS: Design of a noisecancelling headphone system. 1a. Based on the lowpass filter given, design a highpass filter,
More informationPrüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 29. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationLecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design.
ISS0031 Modeling and Identification Lecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design. Aleksei Tepljakov, Ph.D. September 30, 2015 Linear Dynamic Systems Definition
More informationLecture 7 (Weeks 1314)
Lecture 7 (Weeks 1314) Introduction to Multivariable Control (SP  Chapters 3 & 4) Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 7 (Weeks 1314) p.
More informationNyquist Criterion For Stability of Closed Loop System
Nyquist Criterion For Stability of Closed Loop System Prof. N. Puri ECE Department, Rutgers University Nyquist Theorem Given a closed loop system: r(t) + KG(s) = K N(s) c(t) H(s) = KG(s) +KG(s) = KN(s)
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequencyresponse methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 22: The Nyquist Criterion Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Complex Analysis The Argument Principle The Contour
More informationROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)
C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s)  H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More informationExercise 1 (A Nonminimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 559 Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Nonminimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we
More information2.161 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.6 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. MASSACHUSETTS
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #4 16.31 Feedback Control Stability in the Frequency Domain Nyquist Stability Theorem Examples Appendix (details) This is the basis of future robustness tests. Fall 2007 16.31 4 2 Frequency Stability
More informationExercise 1 (A Nonminimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 559 Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Nonminimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,
More informationRobust and Optimal Control, Spring A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization
Robust and Optimal Control, Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization A.2 Sensitivity and Feedback Performance A.3
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationPlan of the Lecture. Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design.
Plan of the Lecture Review: design using Root Locus; dynamic compensation; PD and lead control Today s topic: PI and lag control; introduction to frequencyresponse design method Goal: wrap up lead and
More informationLecture 9: Input Disturbance A Design Example Dr.Ing. Sudchai Boonto
DrIng Sudchai Boonto Department of Control System and Instrumentation Engineering King Mongkuts Unniversity of Technology Thonburi Thailand d u g r e u K G y The sensitivity S is the transfer function
More informationLet the plant and controller be described as:
Summary of Fundamental Limitations in Feedback Design (LTI SISO Systems) From Chapter 6 of A FIRST GRADUATE COURSE IN FEEDBACK CONTROL By J. S. Freudenberg (Winter 2008) Prepared by: Hammad Munawar (Institute
More informationStability and Robustness 1
Lecture 2 Stability and Robustness This lecture discusses the role of stability in feedback design. The emphasis is notonyes/notestsforstability,butratheronhowtomeasurethedistanceto instability. The small
More informationDigital Control Systems
Digital Control Systems Lecture Summary #4 This summary discussed some graphical methods their use to determine the stability the stability margins of closed loop systems. A. Nyquist criterion Nyquist
More informationAn Overview on Robust Control
Advanced Control An Overview on Robust Control P C Scope Keywords Prerequisites allow the student to assess the potential of different methods in robust control without entering deep into theory. Sensitize
More informationAnalysis of DiscreteTime Systems
TU Berlin DiscreteTime Control Systems 1 Analysis of DiscreteTime Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin DiscreteTime
More informationLecture 6. Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 6 Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 6 p. 1/73 6.1 General
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the splane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationChapter Stability Robustness Introduction Last chapter showed how the Nyquist stability criterion provides conditions for the stability robustness of
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter Stability
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a lineartimeinvariant
More informationChapter 9 Robust Stability in SISO Systems 9. Introduction There are many reasons to use feedback control. As we have seen earlier, with the help of a
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 9 Robust
More informationCHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION
CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION Objectives Students should be able to: Draw the bode plots for first order and second order system. Determine the stability through the bode plots.
More informationA NEW APPROACH TO MIXED H 2 /H OPTIMAL PI/PID CONTROLLER DESIGN
Copyright 2002 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NEW APPROACH TO MIXED H 2 /H OPTIMAL PI/PID CONTROLLER DESIGN Chyi Hwang,1 ChunYen Hsiao Department of Chemical Engineering National
More informationFrequency domain analysis
Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 20102011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 20102011
More informationMAE 143B  Homework 9
MAE 43B  Homework 9 7.2 2 2 3.8.6.4.2.2 9 8 2 2 3 a) G(s) = (s+)(s+).4.6.8.2.2.4.6.8. Polar plot; red for negative ; no encirclements of, a.s. under unit feedback... 2 2 3. 4 9 2 2 3 h) G(s) = s+ s(s+)..2.4.6.8.2.4
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 17: Robust Stability Readings: DDV, Chapters 19, 20 Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology April 6, 2011 E. Frazzoli
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationTheory of Robust Control
Theory of Robust Control Carsten Scherer Mathematical Systems Theory Department of Mathematics University of Stuttgart Germany Contents 1 Introduction to Basic Concepts 6 1.1 Systems and Signals..............................
More informationClass 13 Frequency domain analysis
Class 13 Frequency domain analysis The frequency response is the output of the system in steady state when the input of the system is sinusoidal Methods of system analysis by the frequency response, as
More information1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I
MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June 9, Problem. ( points) Consider a plant in feedback with the PI controller G(s) = (s + 3)(s + )(s + a) C(s) = K P + K I s. (a) (4 points) For a given constant
More informationA brief introduction to robust H control
A brief introduction to robust H control JeanMarc Biannic System Control and Flight Dynamics Department ONERA, Toulouse. http://www.onera.fr/staff/jeanmarcbiannic/ http://jm.biannic.free.fr/ European
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationSubject: Optimal Control Assignment1 (Related to Lecture notes 110)
Subject: Optimal Control Assignment (Related to Lecture notes ). Design a oil mug, shown in fig., to hold as much oil possible. The height and radius of the mug should not be more than 6cm. The mug must
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationAnalysis of DiscreteTime Systems
TU Berlin DiscreteTime Control Systems TU Berlin DiscreteTime Control Systems 2 Stability Definitions We define stability first with respect to changes in the initial conditions Analysis of DiscreteTime
More informationL 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 1113, 27 WeB1.1 L 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown Dimension
More informationLoop shaping exercise
Loop shaping exercise Excerpt 1 from Controlli Automatici  Esercizi di Sintesi, L. Lanari, G. Oriolo, EUROMA  La Goliardica, 1997. It s a generic book with some typical problems in control, not a collection
More informationRadar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.
Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter
More informationLecture 4 Stabilization
Lecture 4 Stabilization This lecture follows Chapter 5 of DoyleFrancisTannenbaum, with proofs and Section 5.3 omitted 17013 IOCUPC, Lecture 4, November 2nd 2005 p. 1/23 Stable plants (I) We assume that
More informationProblem Set 4 Solution 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 4 Solution Problem 4. For the SISO feedback
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 5. 2. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid 
More informationChapter 15  Solved Problems
Chapter 5  Solved Problems Solved Problem 5.. Contributed by  Alvaro Liendo, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Consider a plant having a nominal model given by G o (s) = s + 2 The aim of the
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using the
More informationHomework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid 
More informationFrequency Response Techniques
4th Edition T E N Frequency Response Techniques SOLUTION TO CASE STUDY CHALLENGE Antenna Control: Stability Design and Transient Performance First find the forward transfer function, G(s). Pot: K 1 = 10
More informationControl Systems. Root Locus & Pole Assignment. L. Lanari
Control Systems Root Locus & Pole Assignment L. Lanari Outline rootlocus definition main rules for hand plotting root locus as a design tool other use of the root locus pole assignment Lanari: CS  Root
More information(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =
126 INTRDUCTIN T CNTR ENGINEERING 10( s 1) (a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: (. 02s 1)(. 001s 1) (b) Find the expected percent overshoot for a step input for the closedloop system
More information