arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 12 Jul 2013

Transcription

1 Theoretical analysis of Λ(1405) (Σπ) 0 mass sectra roduced in + +Λ(1405)+K + reactions Maryam Hassanvand 1,, Seyed Zafarollah Kalantari, Yoshinori Akaishi 1,3, and Toshimitsu Yamazaki 1,4 1 RIKEN, Nishina Center, Wako, Saitama , Jaan Deartment of Physics, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan , Iran 3 College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Funabashi, Chiba , Jaan and 4 Deartment of Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo , Jaan (Dated: January 8, 014; ublished in PRC 87, 0550 (013) + Errata) arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 1 Jul 013 We formulated the Λ(1405) (abbreviated as Λ ) (Σπ) 0 invariant-mass sectra roduced in + + Λ + K + reactions, in which both the incident channel for a quasi bound K state and its decay rocess to (Σπ) 0 were taken into account realistically. We calculated M(Σπ) sectral shaes for various theoretical models for Λ. These asymmetric and skewed shaes were then comared with recent exerimental data of HADES, yielding M(Λ ) = MeV/c and Γ = 6 ± 10 MeV, where the interference effects of the KN-Σπ resonance with the I = 0 and 1 Σπ continuum are considered. The nearly isotroic roton distribution observed in DISTO and HADES is ascribed to a short collision length in the roduction of Λ, which justifies the high sticking mechanism of Λ and the articiating roton into K. PACS numbers: v, n, 1.30.Fe, f I. INTRODUCTION The Λ(1405) resonance discovered in 1961 [1] (called herein Λ ) has strangeness S = -1, sin-arity J = ( 1 ), and isosin I = 0. It has been interreted as a quasi bound state of K embedded in the Σ+π continuum since Dalitz-Tuan s original rediction []. In recent years, Akaishi et al. derived henomenologically a comlex KN interaction (called here the AY interaction) [3 5] based on the mass and width of Λ(1405), M = MeV/c and Γ = 50± MeV [6 8], [the so-called Λ(1405) ansatz]. They alied this very attractive interaction to few-nucleon systems involving one and two K s, and found nuclear bound states with unusually high nuclear density [3, 9 1]. On the other hand, a totally different framework with a double-ole structure of Λ(1405) has emerged on the basis of chiral SU(3) dynamics (called here Chiral), on which Λ(1405) is claimed to consist of two oles around 140 and 1390 MeV/c, which are couled mainly to KN and Σπ channels, resectively [13, 14]. Then, the resulting weakly attractive KN interaction leads to much shallower K bound states [15, 16]. Thus, it is vitally imortant to determine the location ofthek resonance,whetherλ(1405)islocatedat1405 MeV/c or above 140 MeV/c, from exerimental data without rejudice. For this urose we have to treat the Λ(1405) structure with the AY model and the Chiral model on equal footing to be comared with exerimental data. To resolve this issue, observations of M(Σπ) sectra associated with resonant formation of Λ in the stoed-k absortion in 3,4 He [17], and also in d [18] have been roosed. Whereas old bubble-chamber exeriments of stoed K in 4 He [19] indicated a reference of Λ(1405) over Λ(140) [8, 18], a much more recise exeriment with a deuteron target is exected at J-PARC [0]. Alternatively, Jido et al. [1] roosed an in-flight K reaction on d, whereas Miyagawa and Haidenbauer [] questioned the effectiveness of this method. In any case, old data on the in-flight K +d reaction by Braun et al. [3] had a large statistical uncertainty in distinguishing Λ(140) and Λ(1405), according to our statistical analysis. Future exeriments at J-PARC of both stoed-k [0] and in-flight K [4] on d are exected to give a convincing conclusion. Recent exeriments on high-energy collisions have roduced imortant data on the roduction of Λ(1405): + +Λ +K +, Λ Σ +,0, +π,0,+. (I.1) The ANKE exeriment at COSY with an incident kinetic energy (T ) of.83 GeV by Zychor et al. [5] has yielded a (Σ 0 π 0 ) 0 invariant-mass sectrum. It was analyzed by Geng and Oset [6] based on chiral SU(3) dynamics. They showed that the reaction in the Λ roduction region is dominated by the T 1 k rocess, and they claimed that the sectrum develos a ronounced strength around 140 MeV/c, which differs from the 1405MeV/c eak in Hemingway s data [7] analyzed by the T k rocess [6, 7] (see also Akaishi et al. [8]). This result might have been acceted as evidence for a double-ole structure of Λ redicted by chiral SU(3) dynamics [13, 14], if the statistics of the data were good enough. The ANKE data were also analyzed by Esmaili et al. [18], who, on the contrary, showed from a fair statistical comarison between the two models that the data were in more favor of the AY model, but the statistical significance was not sufficient to conclusively distinguish between Chiral and AY models. Thus, new data from HADES of GSI, which have just been ublished [9, 30], are valuable for solving the resent controversy. In the resent aer we formulate the sectral shae of the (Σπ) 0 mass to rovide theoretical guides to analyze exerimental data of (Σπ) 0 mass sectra from the above

2 reaction. We take into account both the formation and the decay rocesses of Λ(1405) in reactions realistically, following our KN Σπ couled-channel formalism [5]. In this way, we derivethe generalformofthe sectral function, which is not symmetric, but skewed with resect to the ole osition. Then, we analyze (Σ + π + ) 0 sectra from HADES at T = 3.50 GeV [30]. (a) π Σ K+ Λ * π ± m Σ II. FORMULATION A. Couled-channel treatment of Λ Our couled-channel treatment of Λ(1405) is described in [5, 18]. We emloy a set of searable otentials with a Yukawa-tye form factor, k i v ij k j = g( k i )U ij g( k j ), (II.) g( k) = Λ Λ + k, U ij = 1 π µ i µ j 1 Λ s ij, (II.3) (II.4) where i (j) stands for the KN channel, 1, or the πσ channel,, and µ i (µ j ) is the reduced mass of channel i (j). Twoofthenon-dimensionalstrengtharameters,s 11 and s 1, with a fixed s are adjusted so as to reroduce a set of assumed M and Γ values for the Λ ole [5]. The transition matrices, satisfy k i t ij k j = g( k i)t ij g( k j ), (II.5) T ij = U ij + U il G l T lj, (II.6) l G l = µ l 1 d q g( q) kl g( q). (II.7) q +iǫ The solution is given in a matrix form by with T = [1 UG] 1 U (UG) lj = s lj µj µ l Λ (Λ ik j ), (II.8) (II.9) where k j is a relative momentum in channel j. Among the matrix elements, T 11, T 1, T 1 and T, the exerimentally observable quantities below the K + N thresholdare (1/π)ImT 11, T 1 k and T k, where thesecondtermwithg (k )g (k 1 )isaσπ invariant-mass sectrum from the conversionrocess, KN Σπ (which we call the T 1 invariant mass ). The T 1 invariant mass coincides with the KN missing-mass sectrum in the mass region below the K +N threshold, as denoted by relation [18], that ImT 11 = T 1 ImG. (II.10) (b) K - K+ Λ * π ± m Σ FIG. 1: (Color online) Feynman diagrams for the + +K + +Λ +K + +(Σπ) 0 reaction for (a) the rocess via T and (b) the rocess via T 1. The third term with g 4 (k ) is a Σπ invariant-mass sectrum from the scattering rocess, Σπ Σπ (which we call the T invariant mass ). B. Λ (Σπ) 0 sectrum shae The diagram for the reaction Eq. (I.1) is shown in Fig. 1. The decay rocesses via T 1 and T are also given in this figure. The kinematical variables in the c.m. of the collision for both the formation and the decay rocesses are given in Fig.. In the resent reaction we use T 1 k because the incident channel to bring Λ(1405) is K + together with K + [see Fig. 1(b)]. This was also concluded by Geng and Oset [6], who studied the reaction mechanism in detail. The T k sectrum would be alicable when Σ and π mesons are available in the incident channel, as shown in Fig. 1(a). The T k sectrum is characterized by a large tail [18] in the higher-mass region u to the kinematical limit, which can in rincile be recognizable by an observed sectrum. Exerimentally, however, a bum in the uer-tail region may be masked by an ambiguous shae of the continuous background, and may thus be difficult to extract. We may allow a small admixture of T k in our likelihood analysis of the exerimental data. The T 1 k and T k curves of the Chiral model, as given by Hyodo and Weise [15] as well as those of the AYmodel, areshownin Fig. 1(uer) ofref. [18]. They will be comared with the new HADES data at the end of the resent aer.

3 3 K - (a) (b) k 0 (E,k ) (E3,k3) Λ * Ѳ (E K,k 0 ) (E π,k π ) (E,-k 0 ) Λ* Ѳ K + (E 1,k 1 ) -k 0 K + π 0 Σ 0 (E,k ) FIG. : (Color online) Kinematical variables in the center of mass of the collision for (a) the formation rocess, W form, and (b) the decay channel, G(x). C. Sectral function in the reaction: S(x) Now, we consider the sectrum function of the invariant mass, S(x), in the case of reactions. We comose it in the imulse aroximation framework by using the incident channel function, W form (x), and the decay channel one, G(x), as follows: with S(x) = W form (x) G(x), x = M(Σπ). (II.11) (II.1) G(x) is exressed in terms of the T matrices, T and T 1, as shown in Figs. 1-(a) and 1-(b). Each function calculated for an assumed M of the Λ ole is shown in Fig. 3. D. Formation rocess function: W form The Λ formation from collision is calculated in a similar way as was done in [4]. We aly an imulse aroximation to the formation rocess of Fig. 1 with a model imulse t matrix, r Λ, r (Λ ) K + t r = T 0 δ( r Λ K +) d r ex( r/b) b δ( r Λ r)δ( r r), r (II.13) where r a b = r a r b, T 0 is a strength arameter, and b = m B c/ is a range which affects the deendence of the reaction amlitude on the momentum transfer to the adjacent roton in the K + Λ rocess. Then, the Λ formation robability is given as follows: W form (x) = T0 E 0 (π) 3 ( c) 6 k 0 ( 1 ) de 1 dω 1 dω 1+b Q k 1 k E 1 E [ 1+ E E 3 ( 1+ k 1 k cosθ K + )] 1(II.14) where E 0 and k 0 are the initial energy and momentum in the c.m. frame, as given by k 0 = 1 [ 1 M T ]1. (II.15) The other quantities, k,e, and E 3, become functions of x due to conservation of momentum and energy, which is alied to all the articiating articles to take recoil effects into account. Also, θ K + = (θ θ K +) is the angle between K + and, b is the range of the reaction, and the momentum transfer, Q, is Q = [k 0 +k k 0 k cosθ ] 1. (II.16) As can be seen from the factor, 1/(1+b Q ), a shorter range of b can effectively moderate the strong suression due to a large momentum transfer, Q, in a high-energy collision. Figure 3(b) shows the behavior of W form (x) for T =.50,.83, and 3.50 GeV, the curves of which are normalized at x = 1400MeV/c. They have resective kinematical uer limits, which make the mass distribution dam toward the kinematical limit. As a result, the observed sectrum shae, S(x), changes, as demonstrated in Fig. 3(a), whereas G(x) is indeendent of T. E. Decay rocess function: G(x) The decay rate of Λ(1405) to (Σπ) 0 is calculated by taking into account the emitted Σ and π articles realistically, following the generalized otical otential formalism in Feshbach theory [31], given by Akaishi et al. [5, 8]. The decay function, G(x), is not simly a Lorentzian, but is skewed because the kinematic freedom of the decay articles is limited, articularly, when the

4 4 + MM(K ) [MeV/c ] FIG. 4: (Color online) Incident energy deendence of the absolute values of the sectral function at m B = 770 MeV/c and (θ,θ K +) = (90,180 ). with λ(x,m 1,m ) (x+m 1 +m )(x+m 1 m ) (x m 1 +m )(x m 1 m ). (II.0) FIG. 3: (Color online) Normalized sectral functions S(x) (a) comosed oftheformation-rocess functionw form (b)andthe decay-rocess function G(x) (c) for T =.50,.85 and 3.50 GeV. m B = 770 MeV/c and (θ,θ K +) = (90,180 ). The M value of Λ is assumed to be 1405 MeV/c, as indicated by the vertical dashed line. incident roton energy, T, decreases and aroaches the roduction threshold. Its general form is given as G(x) = (π)5 c E π E Σ E π +E Σ Re[ k(x)] k(x) t k0 (x), (II.17) where the relative momenta in the entrance and exit channels of Fig. (b) are calculated by and k 0 (x) = c λ(x,m K,M ) x k(x) = c λ(x,m π,m Σ ) x (II.18) (II.19) It should be noticed that λ(x,m K,M ) becomes negativeataroundx = 1400MeV/c, wherewemustchoosea ositive Im k on the hysical Riemann sheet. This case corresonds to direct excitation of the Λ quasi bound state from the channel. In the case of AY, the T matrix is for the T 1 rocess, and k t1 k0 = g( k)t 1 g( k 0 ) Λ g( k) = Λ + k (II.1) (II.) with Λ = m B c/, m B being the mass of an exchanged boson, and k is the relative momentum of Σ and π. The shae of G(x), as given by Eq.(II.17), includes the momenta k 0 and k, which are functions of T. However, the function G(x) is shown to deend only on the invariant-mass x; namely, G(x) is a unique function of x and does not deend on T. It is bounded by the lower end (M l = M Σ +m π = 138 MeV/c ) and the uer end (M u = M +m K = 143 MeV/c ). It is to be noted that the osition of the eak in G(x) is significantly lower than the osition of the ole (M = 1405 MeV/c ) in T 1, as assumed here and indicated by the vertical dashed line. Furthermore, the osition of the eak(orcentroid)ofs(x) islowereddue tothe formation channel function W form (x).

5 5 + +Λ+K Λ Counts [arb. units] T=.5 GeV Σ 0 T=.85 GeV Σ 0* /Λ * FIG. 6: (Color online) Normalized angular distributions of the outgoing roton for different exchanged boson masses, m B = 000, 770 and 140 MeV/c, at T = 3.50GeV M(K + ) [GeV/c ] B. Behavior near the roduction threshold of T FIG. 5: (Color online) Exerimental sectra of M(K + ) in the ΛK + reaction at T =.50 and.85 GeV in DISTO exeriments. Taken from [33]. III. NUMERICAL RESULTS In this section we resent results from numerical calculations, and we discuss their hysical imlications. The imortance of the resent work is to consider both W form (x) and G(x) functions. In most illustrative samles, we alied the AY model with the Particle Data Grou (PDG) arameters of [7], M = 1407 MeV/c and Γ = 50 MeV. To comare the Chiral model with the AY model on equal footing, we also alied the same rocedure as above to Hyodo-Weise s T matrices to obtain realistic sectrum shaes S(x). A. Deendence on the incident energy, T For Eqs. (II.11), (II.14), and (II.17) again, it is clear that the sectral function deends on the incident roton energy due to the W form (x) function and G(x). Figure 4 shows absolute values of sectral functions S(x) for various incident energies (T ) at m B = 770 MeV/c and (θ,θ K +) = (90,180 ). The shae of S(x) is nearly the same, but toward the reaction threshold (T thresh =.4 GeV) not only does the absolute value diminish, but also the sectral shae changes drastically, as shown in Fig. 3(a) for the normalized sectral functions at T = 3.50,.83and.50GeV.Themostextremecaseisseenat T =.50 GeV, where the main art of x > 1400MeV/c is missing due to the kinematical constraint, and a very skewed comonent below 1400 MeV/c aears. The above rediction is indeed in good agreement with the observed sectra of DISTO at T =.50 and.85 GeV [33], as shown in Fig. 5. Even in such a very skewed sectrum, one can extract the decay function, G(x), from an observed sectral function by taking the ratio DEV[G(x)] S(x)obs W form (x) (III.3) using a calculated W form function. This is a kind of thedeviation sectrum methodintroducedinstoed-k sectroscoy [18]. C. Angular distribution and correlation The cross section of this reaction has substantial angular deendence (Fig. 6), but the bound-state eak is distinct at any angle, and we can choose (θ,θ K +) = (90,180 ), because the cross section is modest and the eak-to-background ratio remains large. The normalized cross sections (sectral shaes) at various angles are found to be nearly the same. Since the two incident rotons are indistinguishable, the Λ(1405) formation rocess is angular symmetric, as shown in Fig. 6. We can write σ(θ,θ K +) = σ(π θ, θ K +) (III.4) for θ = 0 90 and θ K + = According to Eq. (II.14) and Eq. (II.16), W form, and thus the sectral function, S(x), are related to the outgoing roton angle, θ, and the angle between the outgoing roton and K +, θ K +, as shown in Fig. 7. Although these curves look different, the sectrum shae does not deend on the angle. We choose and use θ = 90, θ K + = 180 in all of the following calculations.

6 6 FIG. 7: (Color online) The sectral functions for various angles, (θ, θ K +), for T = 3.50 GeV and m B = 770 MeV/c. D. Deendence on the exchanged boson mass Figure 6 shows the normalized angular distributions of the outgoing roton, θ, for various masses of the exchanged boson, m B = 000, 770 and 140 MeV/c, at T = 3.50 GeV. The nearly isotroic angular distribution with a large boson mass exlains the exerimental data of HADES at T = 3.50 GeV [9, 30], which shows that the roton angular distributions together with Λ(1405) and Λ(150) are nearly isotroic. A similar behavior is observedin the DISTO data at T =.85GeV (see Fig. 5 of the resent aer and Refs. [33, 34]). Such a short collision length as revealed in the roduction of Λ(1405) in the reaction is one of the key mechanisms (Λ doorway) resonsible for forming K from high sticking of Λ and [4]. On the other hand, it is well known that the roton emitted in the ordinary + Λ + K + reaction has shar forward and backward distributions, indicating that the mediating boson is m B = m π [3 34]. IV. χ FITTING OF HADES DATA A. HADES data In this section we analyze the recent HADES data for charged final states of Σ π + and Σ + π in a collision at T = 3.50 GeV. The data we use are the missing-mass sectra, MM(K + ), deduced by the HADES grou, as given in Fig. 1 of [30], which are corrected for accetance and efficiency of the detector system. They are exressed as Y(x) = Y Λ (x)+y Σ (x)+y Λ150 (x)+y NonRes (x), (IV.5) with Y Λ forλ, Y Σ forσ(1385),y Λ150 forλ(150), and Y NonRes for the non resonant continuum. The HADES grou decomosed the exerimental data, Y(x), by the above four comonents, which were obtained by model simulations, among which the Σ(1385) and the Λ(150) comonents were determined by using the exerimental data. The shae of the non-resonant Σπ continuum was simulated. In their fitting they cautiously excluded the area around 1400 MeV/c for MM(K + ) in order not to bias the finally extracted shae of the Λ resonance. Then, they found that a simulation of the Λ region by using a relativistic s-wave Breit-Wigner distribution with a width of 50 MeV/c and a ole mass of 1385 MeV/c can reroduce the exerimental data very well, but using instead the nominal mass of 1405 MeV/c fails. This conclusion deends on their assumtion of the symmetric Breit-Wigner shae, which is not valid in the case of a broad resonance with adjacent endoints, M(Σ + π) and M( + K ), as we have seen. Thus, in turn, we decided to set u an excess comonent, Y Λ (x), by subtracting the given three comonents from the exerimental sectrum Y(x) as Y Λ (x) = Y(x) Y Σ (x) Y Λ150 (x) Y NonRes (x), (IV.6) where the statistical errors of Y(x) are inherited to Y Λ (x). B. Interference effects between the KN resonance and the Σπ continuum Before going into the analysis of the HADES data we discuss ossible interference effects between the KN resonance and the Σπ continuum. 1. Interference with the I = 1 Σπ continuum The charge-basis T matrices are related to the isosinbasis T matrices as T Σ+ π 1 3 T I=0 + 1 T I=1 + 3 Re[T I=0T I=1 ], (IV.7) T Σ π T I=0 + 1 T I=1 3 Re[T I=0T I=1 ], (IV.8) where T I= is neglected. The HADES Σ + π and Σ π + data show similar behavior: the χ best-fit mass of each of the two sectra is obtained to be very close to one another. This means that the interference term between I = 0 and I = 1 has only a small effect on the resonance sectral shae. Then, we can treat the I = 1 contribution as a art of Y NonRes in the analysis of the I =0Λ resonance,disregardingtheinterferenceesecially for the sum of the Σ + π and Σ π + data.

7 7. Interference with I = 0 Σπ continuum Λ(1405) ( = Λ ) is a I = 0 L = 0 KN resonance state couled with the I = 0 L = 0 Σπ continuum. Our theoretical sectrum curves in Fig. 11 already include the KN threshold effect and also the interference effect with the I = 0 L = 0 Σπ continuum, because we have solved a KN-Σπ couled-channel T-matrix equation. Thanks to the searation of Y NonRes by the HADES grou we need not calculate contributions from the I = 0 L 1 Σπ continuum and I = 1 all L Σπ continuum, which cause no interference to the I = 0 L = 0 Λ resonance and therefore can be treated as Y NonRes : this is a great advantage of the HADES data for extracting the resonance-ole arameters, the mass and the width of Λ. Now we estimate the effect of the KN threshold and the effect of interference with the I = 0 L = 0 Σπ continuum. By fixing the mass of Λ to be 1405 MeV/c, we change AMY s interaction strengths, s 11,s 1 = s 1, so as to reroduce a given width range of MeV. The obtained mass sectra are discussed below. Figure 8 shows the KN threshold effect on the Σπ invariant mass sectrum, t 1 k, where the interference effect is suressed by utting s = 0. When the width is narrow enough, the sectrum is almost symmetric with a eak close to the ole osition. When the width becomes wide, the eak osition is lowered from the ole osition and the sectrum shae is skewed: this is the KN threshold effect on the sectrum. Figure 9 shows resultswhenthe interferenceeffectwith thei =0L=0Σπ continuum is switched on. The interference effect is not so large for the transition mass sectrum, t 1 k, since the entrance channel to form Λ has no Σπ continuum comonent. On the other hand, Fig. 10showsresults ofthe conventional mass sectrum, t k, including the interference effect with the I = 0 L = 0 Σπ continuum. The interference effect is rather large, since the entrance going to Λ consists of just Σπ continuum comonents, which make the resonance shae deform areciably. The eak shift comes almost from the interference with the I = 0 L = 0 Σπ continuum, as seen from an inflection at the ole osition and a succeeding interference minimum (see Fig. 8(b) of [35]). The CLAS data [36] seem to be a case of t k where the couling with the Σπ continuum becomes significant. The interference between I = 0 and I = 1 Σπ amlitudes gives rise to a strong charge deendence of Σ + π, Σ 0 π 0, and Σ π + mass sectra. The HADES data are well fitted with the transition mass sectrum, t 1 k, as seen from the resemblance between Γ = 60 or 50 MeV curves of Fig. 9 and (a) or (b) of Fig. 11. It is noted that the eak shift takes lace mainly due to the KN threshold effect in this case. [MeV] t 1 k without interference M (Σ π) [MeV/c ] Pole osition - K threshold FIG. 8: Transition mass sectrum, t 1 k, includingthe KN threshold effect. All the heights are normalized to a same value. [MeV] t k 1 with interference M (Σ π) [MeV/c ] Pole osition K - threshold FIG. 9: Transition mass sectrum, t 1 k, including both the KN threshold effect and the interference effect with the I = 0 L = 0 Σπ continuum. All the heights are normalized to a same value. C. Deduced mass and width TheHADES sectra, asgivenin Fig. 1of[30], indicate that the sectra of the two charged channels are similar to each other, yielding nearly the same M values. This

8 8 t k with interference Pole osition K - threshold a substantial deviation from the exerimental data. Furthermore, we can find best-fit values of(m,γ) from drawing confidence contour curves by varying the arameters (M,Γ) in a lane. The results are shown in Fig. 1. From this contour maing we obtain the following bestfit values with 68% confidence levels (1σ) errors: [MeV] M = MeV/c, Γ = 6±10 MeV. (IV.30) (IV.31) The best-fit curves are shown together with the exerimental oints in Fig. 11. The M value thus obtained from the resent analysis of the new HADES data confirms the traditional value [7, 8] M (Σ π) [MeV/c ] FIG. 10: Conventional mass sectrum, t k, including both the KN threshold effect and the interference effect with thei =0L=0Σπ continuum. All theheights are normalized to a same value. fact indicates that the Σπ resonance is formed by nearly ure charged states, Σ + π and Σ π +, without isosin mixing. It also justifies the use of T 1 for the analysis of M(Σπ) in the case of reactions. On the other hand, the statistical fluctuation of each charged-channel sectrum is rather large. Thus, for the final analysis we use the sum data of HADES (Σ + π +Σ π + ), which is resented in Fig. 1(c) of [30]. Keeing the last three comonents of Eq. (IV.6) fixed, we fit the exerimental data of Y Λ (x) with n = 1 data oints in the range of 1300 to 1550 MeV/c (closed oints with error bars in Fig. 11) by assumed theoretical functions S(x). Generally, the exerimental histogram, N i, i = 1,..., n, with resectivestatistical errors, σ i, is fitted to a theoretical curve, S(x;M,Γ), with x = MM(K + ) involving the mass M and width Γ as free arameters by minimizing the χ value: χ (M,Γ) = n ( ) Ni S(x i ;M,Γ). (IV.9) i=1 Figure 11 shows the results of the χ fitting, where the HADES data (Σ + π + Σ π + ) at T = 3.50 GeV [30] are comared with best-fit theoretical sectral functions, S(x). The resent AY treatment (hereafter called HKAY), with the PDG values (M = MeV/c and Γ = 50 MeV [8]) adoted, gives a remarkable fitting with χ = 11, which is comarable with the statistically exected value, < χ > ex 19. On the other hand, the Chiral model gives much larger χ values of 111, when T 1 is chosen, and of 39, when T is chosen. Another Chiral model sectrum by Geng and Oset [6] is almost identical to HW s T 1. Thus, the chiral models indicate σ i V. CONCLUDING REMARKS We have resented results of our calculation for the sectral shae of MM(K + ) in the Λ K + reaction based on the KN-Σπ couled-channel treatment. We took into account both the entrance rocess and the decay rocess. The formation robability, W form, of Λ in a collision and the decay rate, G(x), to (Σπ) 0 were formulated. The sectral function is given by S(x) = W form G(x). It was found to be asymmetric and skewed due to the kinematic limitation imosed by the entrance channel. The eak of S(x) is not located at the ole osition. With this tool in hand we analyzed the recent HADES data. The interference effects of the KN-Σπ resonance withi =0and1Σπ continuumareconsidered. Although the observed sectra of MM(K + ) aear to show the eak osition at around 1385 MeV/c, the χ fitting by our theoretical sectral functions rovided M = MeV/c. This value is in good agreementwith the values obtained from a recent analysis [17] of an old exerimental data of stoed-k in 4 He [19], taken u as the udated PDG value (M = MeV/c ) [8]. On the other hand, the Chiral model with M 140 MeV/c cannot reroduce the exerimental data. The Faddeev method is suitable for treating final-state interactions of three articles. However, it is difficult to aly this method to the resent high-energy -induced rocesses where so many artial waves are involved. On the other hand, for the low-energyk +d reaction Révai [37] succeeded in extracting the Λ(1405) resonance structure by using the Faddeev method. We are considering an analysis future data of stoed K on d, roosed in [18, 0], by fully taking account of final-state interactions in the Faddeev formalism. The roton angular distribution in Λ roduction was also calculated. The isotroic distribution observed in HADES [30] and DISTO [33, 34] were exlained by a short-range collision with an intermediate boson mass heavier than the ρ meson mass. This is consistent with the calculated large cross section for the roduction

9 9 dσ/dm [µb/(mev/c )] - - HADES Σ π Σ + π MeV/c HKAY(1405, 6) χ =9 PDG(1405.1, 50) χ =14 HW, T 1 χ = 111 χ = 39 HW, T + MM(K ) [MeV/c ] FIG. 11: (Color online) Comarison of HADES data (Σ + π + Σ π +, closed squares) at T = 3.50 GeV [30] with best-fit theoretical sectral functions S(x). (a) Best-fit HKAY curves (with χ = 9.5, M = MeV/c, and Γ = 6±10 MeV). (b) AY model with the PDG arameters (with χ = 14, M = MeV/c, and Γ = 50 MeV [8]). The Chiral model using HW s T 1 [with χ = 111, (c)] and T [with χ = 40, (d)]. of K in collisions [4], which has recently been observed in DISTO exeriments [3]. PDG VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PDG FIG. 1: (Color online) Confidence level contours from χ fitting of the HADES data of Σ + π + Σ π + at T = 3.50 GeV. The PDG values are also shown. This work is suorted by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology of Iran and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Monbu kagakusho of Jaan. One of us (T Y) acknowledges suort by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany. [1] M.H. Alston et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 698 (1961). [] R.H. Dalitz and S.F. Tuan, Ann. Phys. (NY) 8, 100

10 10 (1959). [3] Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. C 65, (00). [4] T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi, Phys. Rev. 76, (007). [5] Y. Akaishi, K. S. Myint and T. Yamazaki, Proc. Jn. Acad. B 84, 64 (008); htts:// [6] R.H. Dalitz and A. Deloff, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 17, 89 (1991). [7] K. Nakamura et al., (Particle Data Grou), J. Phys. G 37, (010). [8] J. Beringer et al., (Particle Data Grou), Phys. Rev. D 86, (01). [9] T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi, Phys. Lett. B 535, 70 (00). [10] A. Doté, H. Horiuchi, Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Lett. B 590, 51 (004). [11] A. Doté, H. Horiuchi, Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. C 70, (004). [1] T. Yamazaki, A. Doté, and Y. Akaishi, Phys. Lett. B 587, 167 (004). [13] D. Jido, J.A. Oller, E. Oset, A. Ramos and U.G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A 75, 181 (003). [14] V. K. Magas, E. Oset and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, (005). [15] T.HyodoandW.Weise, Phys.Rev.C 77, (008). [16] A. Doté, T. Hyodo, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. C 79, (009). [17] J. Esmaili, Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Lett. B 686, 3 (010). [18] J. Esmaili, Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. C 83, (011). [19] B. Riley, I-T. Wang, J.G. Fetkovich and J.M. McKenzie, Phys. Rev. D 11, 3065 (1975). [0] T. Suzuki, J. Esmaili and Y. Akaishi, EPJ Web Conf. 3, (010). [1] D. Jido, E. Oset and T. Sekihara, Eur. Phys. J. A 4, 57 (009). [] K. Miyagawa and J. Haidenbauer, Phys. Rev. C 85, (01). [3] O. Braun et al., Nucl. Phys. B 19, 1 (1977). [4] J-PARC E31 exeriment; htt://j-arc-j/nuclpart/ac 0907/df/Noumi.df.. [5] I. Zychor et al., Phys. Lett. B 660, 167 (008). [6] L. S. Geng and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. A 34, 405 (007). [7] R.J. Hemingway, Nucl Phys. B 53, 74 (1985). [8] Y. Akaishi, T. Yamazaki, M. Obu, and M. Wada, Nucl., Phys. A 835, 67 (010). [9] G. Agakishiev et al. (HADES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 85, (01). [30] G. Agakishiev et al. (HADES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 87, 0501 (013). [31] H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (NY) 5, 357 (1958); 19, 87 (196). [3] T. Yamazaki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 1350 (010). [33] P. Kienle et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 48 (01) 183. [34] K. Suzuki et al. (rivate communication). [35] O. Morimatsu and K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys. A 483, 493 (1988). [36] K. Moriya et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, (013). [37] J. Révai, arxiv: [nucl-th].