arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 8 Jun 2018

Transcription

1 Single-pole Nature of the Detectable Λ(405) Khin Swe Myint, Yoshinori Akaishi, Maryam Hassanvand and Toshimitsu Yamazaki, arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 8 Jun 08 Department of Physics, Mandalay University, Mandalay, Union of Myanmar RIKEN Nishina Center, Wako, Saitama , Japan Department of Physics, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan , Iran Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo , Japan (Received ) We have investigated the single-pole nature of the detectable Λ(405) in detail, by employing a chiral model having double poles of a KN-πΣ coupled channel T-matrix. The effects of the st pole and the nd pole on the observed πσ mass spectrum in the Λ(405) region were analyzed almost separately by means of the eneralized Optical Potential. It is concluded that the st pole is responsible for both peak structures seen in the T πσ KN (T ) and T πσ πσ(t ) invariant-mass spectra, and the nd pole due to an energy-dependent chiral interaction provides continuum amplitudes affecting the shape of the peak structures of the st pole in experimentally observable spectrum of the Λ(405).. Introduction The Λ(405) is nominally accepted as being a quasi-bound state of the KN system ) decaying to πσ, or/and a resonance state in the πσ channel coupled to a KN state (Feshbach resonance ) ), with strangeness S= and isospin I=0. The precise mass and width of the Λ(405) is still somewhat ambiguous due to not only limited experimental data, but also theoretical problems of model-dependent analyses, one of which is a single- or double-pole nature of the Λ(405), as discussed in this paper. The phenomenological analyses 3) 5) contributing to the present PD value, a mass of Me/c and a width of 50.5±.0 Me, 6) were conducted on the basis of the single-pole nature of the Λ(405). Recently, a very large number of data sets on the photo-production of the Λ(405) were provided in the γp K + π 0± Σ 0 reaction experiment at center-ofmass energies of.95 < W <.85 e by the CLAS collaboration. 7) There have appeared theoretical papers 8) 0) analyzing the CLAS data based on chiral dynamics, where the double-pole structure ),) of the Λ(405) is strongly claimed. As summarized in Meissner and Hyodo s report, 3) the st pole coupled mainly to the KN channel lies at around Me/c mass region, fairly higher than the PD value, though the nd pole coupled to the πσ channel distributes in a rather wide mass-range. A recent phenomenological analysis of the CLAS data based on the single-pole nature has extracted pole positions with statistical confidence 4) consistent with the PD value of the Λ(405). Thus, whether the Λ(405) is of a single pole or of double poles 5) is a current issue to be studied as a basic problem for practical data analyses. Since Λ(405) typeset using PTPTEX.cls er.0.9

2 K. S. Myint, Y. Akaishi, M. Hassanvand and T. Yamazaki is observed mainly through the πσ mass spectra, we introduce the concept of a detectable Λ(405) as a pole or poles of a KN-πΣ coupled-channel T-matrix, which make(s) peak structures in the πσ invariant-mass spectra to appear below the KN threshold. We employ the I=0 part of a two-channel treatment of the chiral dynamics presented by Hyodo and Weise, 6) and investigate the issue by asking how their double poles relate to the formation of peak structures in the πσ mass spectra. For this purpose, we use generalized optical potentials. A main aim of this paper is to derive theoretically the nature of the detectable Λ(405) through its formation mechanism. This paper is organized as follows. In Section we give a formulation by developing the use of generalized optical potentials. In Section 3 the formation mechanism of peak structures in the πσ mass spectra is investigated in relation to the chiral double poles. The single-pole or double-pole nature of the Λ(405) is discussed in Section 4. Conclusions are given in Section 5... Problem and model setting. Formulation As stated in Introduction, we define the detectable Λ(405) as a pole or poles of an I=0 KN-πΣ coupled-channel T-matrix that make(s) peak structures in the detectable πσ mass spectra below the KN threshold. In order to make our logic transparent we set a simplified model without any loss of essential dynamics: we employ a two-channel treatment of the I=0 part of the chiral dynamics given by Hyodo and Weise (H-W), 6) i ( s) = M i (4π) ij ( s) = C ij Ei +M i 4f ( s M i M j ) M i E j +M j M j, (.) which is the leading-order Weinberg-Tomozawa term of H-W s eq.(), with the loop function, i of H-W s eq.(3), { a i (µ)+ln M i ln φ } ++(s)φ + (s). s µ + m i M i +s s ln m i M i The double poles exist at Ξ pole = M pole c iγ pole / as + q i φ + (s)φ (s) (.) st pole : Ξ st pole = 43 i7 Me, (.3) nd pole : Ξ nd pole = 398 i73 Me. (.4) In the present model the I=0 T-matrix consists of basic T I=0 matrices. Hereafter, we use simplified notations as πσ KN and TI=0 πσ πσ T T I=0 πσ KN and T T I=0 πσ πσ, (.5) where and indicate the KN and πσ channels, respectively. The basic πσ invariant-mass spectra are T spectrum : T (E) k (E), (.6)

3 Single-pole nature of the detectable Λ(405) 3 T spectrum : T (E) k (E), (.7) where E is the total energy ( s) and k is the π(or Σ) momentum in the center-ofmass system of on-shell decay particles, πσ. The two basic spectra of the present model are shown in Fig. together with the double-pole positions. The peak position T spectrum KN threshold T spectrum E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] nd pole st pole Fig.. I=0 πσ invariant-mass spectra, T spectrum and T spectrum, obtained from the twochannel treatment of the chiral dynamics of H-W. 6) The double-pole positions are also shown. of the T spectrum is close to the position of the nd pole. This proximity could induce a misunderstanding about the relation between the nd pole and the peak structure of the T spectrum. The relation is a main problem to be solved in this paper... eneralized optical potential In order to investigate the property of double poles appearing in T-matrices of the present chiral dynamics we introduce generalized optical potentials for two coupledchannelsof KN (channel)andπσ (channel). Thefundamentalquantities that are relevant to the πσ invariant-mass spectra are the transition-matrix elements, T and T, which obey the following coupled-channel T-matrix equation: [ ] [ ] [ ][ ][ ] T T = + 0 T T, (.8) T T 0 T T where i is the i-channel loop integral. By the use of generalized optical potentials, defined as opt (Ξ) = (Ξ) + (Ξ), (.9) opt (Ξ) =, (Ξ) (.0)

4 4 K. S. Myint, Y. Akaishi, M. Hassanvand and T. Yamazaki (Ξ) =, (.) (Ξ) opt opt (Ξ) = + (Ξ) (Ξ), (.) the solutions of each T-matrix element are exactly given by T (Ξ) = T (Ξ) = T (Ξ) = T (Ξ) = opt (Ξ) (Ξ) opt (Ξ), (.3) opt (Ξ) (Ξ) opt (Ξ), (.4) opt (Ξ) (Ξ) opt (Ξ), (.5) opt (Ξ) (Ξ) opt (Ξ), (.6) where Ξ is a complex total-energy variable in the center-of-mass system. The relation { opt (Ξ) (Ξ)}{ (Ξ) (Ξ)} = { (Ξ) (Ξ)}{ (Ξ) opt (Ξ)} (.7) is useful for forthcoming discussions. In the case of an energy-dependent interaction the ij s also depend on Ξ. An advantage of using the generalized optical potentials is that any effects of doublepoles on detectable mass spectracan beexamined almost separately. The following relations are derived with Eqs.(.9) (.6) at real total energies, E, in the mass region below the KN threshold: π Im T (E) = T (E) ( π ) Im (E), (.8) π Im T (E) = T (E) ( π ) Im (E). (.9) The right-hand sides of Eqs.(.8) and (.9) are related to the detectable πσ invariant-mass spectra, T spectrum and T spectrum, respectively. The left-hand sides are strength functions, which are observable also through missing-mass spectra of such reactions as d(k,n)x. 3. T-matrix poles and peak structures in the πσ mass spectra 3.. Characteristics of T πσ KN (T ) invariant-mass spectrum We investigate the characteristics of the T spectrum in relation to the st pole, which is naturally considered to be the origin of the peak structure. The detectable T invariant-mass spectrum is given by the following T-matrix of Eq.(.5) with a real total-energy (invariant-mass) variable, E: T (E) = opt (E) (E) (E) (E)

5 Single-pole nature of the detectable Λ(405) 5 = (E) (E) (E) opt (E), (3.) where Eq.(.7) is used. We introduce an arbitrary factor, f, as f (3.) into opt. Figure (a) shows the spectra at varied f from to 0 in steps of 0. together with pole trajectoris of Fig. (b). The peak structure of the T spectrum at f = changes to threshold-cusp structures at f < 0.7, where the KN quasi-bound state disappears. This clearly indicates that the origin of the peak structure in the T invariant-mass spectrum is the st pole, which satisfies opt (Ξ st pole) (Ξ st pole) = 0. In fact, the curve at f =0 denotes that the nd pole from cannot produce any peak structure without the st pole. Thus, the peak structure of the T spectrum is confirmed to be a typical Feshbach resonance ) caused by the st pole. The shift of the peak position from the st pole position is due to the KN threshold effect, as is well-known. (a) T spectrum f = KN threshold to [-,+] Re Ξ [Me] 0.9 f =.0 st pole [+,-] sheet nd pole f =.0 (b) -50 Im Ξ [Me] E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] -00 Fig.. (a) Change of the T -spectrum shape at varied f = 0, where is weakened to f. The f =.0 (black) curve is identical to the T spectrum in Fig.. (b) Trajectories of the st and nd poles. The st pole moves towards the higher-mass side with decreasing f and goes out of the [+(ch.), (ch.)] Riemann sheet, while the nd pole stays on the [+, ] sheet. 3.. Characteristics of T πσ πσ (T ) invariant-mass spectrum This subsection deals with an investigation into characteristics of the T spectrum, which reveals the nature and origin of the Λ(405) from another side than T. The detectable T invariant-mass spectrum is given by the following T-matrix with a real total-energy (or invariant-mass) variable, E: T (E) = opt (E) (E) opt (E). (3.3)

6 6 K. S. Myint, Y. Akaishi, M. Hassanvand and T. Yamazaki Inordertoexamine theroleof thendpole, which iscaused bytheenergy-dependent (Ξ) according to chiral dynamics, 6) we introduce two arbitrary factors, f and f, into the optical potential as opt = f + f. (3.4) By varying the values of the factors from one to zero, we study how the st pole and the nd pole affect the T spectrum. (a) (b) T spectrum f = KN threshold Re Ξ [Me] 0.4 f =.0 st pole [+,-] sheet -50 nd pole f =.0 Im Ξ [Me] E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] -00 Fig. 3. (a) Change of the T -spectrum shape at varied f = 0 with fixedf =. The f =.0 (black) curve is identical to the T spectrum in Fig.. (b) Trajectories of the st and nd poles. The nd pole rapidly escapes from the relevant Λ(405) mass region as f decreases. In the first case, f is varied from to 0, while f is fixed at. The obtained spectra are shown in Fig. 3(a), where the spectrum retains the peak structure even at f = 0 (red curve) when no effect is expected from the nd pole. This indicates that the st pole is the seed growing to the peak structure in the detectable T spectrum (f =.0 curve). As another possibility, it might be thought that the nd pole contribution is the difference between the f = and f =0 curves, which is the major part of the peak structure. However, this idea is wrong, because the nd pole stays far away from the relevant Λ(405) mass region at least for f < 0.7 as seen in Fig. 3(b). In the next case, f is fixed at and f is varied from to 0. Figure 4(a) shows the obtained spectra. It can beseen that the peak structureconverges to the st pole position with decreasing values of f, and finally disappears at f = 0. Since the interaction,, is kept unchanged, the nd pole still exists at f = 0 with M pole = 388 Me/c,Γ = 9 Me as denoted in 4(b) (see also Eq. (3.6)). Although one might expect a rise due to the nd pole at this f = 0, the corresponding (blue) curve has no such structure below the KN threshold. Thus, Fig. 4 shows again that the origin of the peak structure in the T invariant-mass spectrum is not the nd pole.

7 Single-pole nature of the detectable Λ(405) 7 (a) T spectrum f = KN threshold E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] nd pole (b) Re Ξ [Me] f =.0 st pole [+,-] sheet f = Im Ξ [Me] -00 Fig. 4. (a) Change of the T -spectrum shape at varied f = 0 with fixedf =. The f =.0 (black) curve is identical to the f =.0 (black) curve in Fig. 3. (b) Trajectories of the st and nd poles. When f is switched on, a singular structure starts at the st pole position Moving pole for the detectable T spectrum The next step of our investigation is to answer why the nd pole produces no peak structure of the f =0 spectrum (blue curve) in Fig. 4(a). The relevant nd pole, Ξ pole, is obtained from the following equation: to be T (Ξ pole) = (Ξ pole) (Ξ pole ) = 0, (3.5) Ξ pole = 388 i96 Me, (3.6) as given in H-W s eq.(9), 6) which shifts to the position of Eq. (.4) in the f = case. Then, one may consider to apply a T matrix with this nd pole, T (E) = [ (Ξ pole) (E) ], (3.7) tothet spectrumat thedetectable real E. Actually, someauthors ),7) whoclaim the two pole structure of the Λ(405) recommend to use a Breit-Wigner amplitude, corresponding to Eq. (3.7), from the nd pole for data analyses. But, it should be noticed that the correct T matrix to be used for the observable T spectrum of Eq. (.7) is T (E) = [ (E) (E) ]. (3.8) In order to reveal the difference between the effects of (Ξ pole ) and of (E), we define reference T-matrix with a parameter, Ξ prm, to fix the, and investigate T ref (Ξ;Ξ prm ) [ (Ξ prm) (Ξ) ], (3.9) T ref (E;E +i ImΞ pole f), (3.0)

8 8 K. S. Myint, Y. Akaishi, M. Hassanvand and T. Yamazaki where includes a positive imaginary (source) term proportional to f. We have varied the imaginary part of with the factor f ranging from to 0. The resultant spectra are shown in Fig. 5. It is seen that, with a large value of Im Ξ pole at f=, a peak structure of the Breit-Wigner type appears in the spectrum. However, the peak structure decreases and finally disappears with no imaginary part at f =0, which is just the experimentally observable case. This is numerical evidence that the nd pole produces no peak in the detectable T invariant-mass spectrum. KN threshold T spectrum f = nd pole E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] Fig. 5. Dependence of the T spectra on the positive imaginary (source) term of. The f= (blue) curve is identical to the f = (blue) curve in Fig. 4(a). Re Ξ Me Observation irtual state f = E E E 3 E 4 E 5 axis region E 5 Moving poles Ξ pole (E n ; f ) E 4-00 Me E 3 The nd pole E E f =0. f =0.4 f = f = -00 f =.0 Im Ξ Fig. 6. Behavior of moving poles, Ξ pole (E n;f), defined in the text.

9 Single-pole nature of the detectable Λ(405) 9 The pole of the reference T matrix of Eq. (3.0) is obtained as a solution of the following equation: (E +i ImΞ pole f) (Ξ) = 0, (3.) for given E and f. The solution Ξ pole (E;f) moves, through and boundary condition, 8),9) as E changes. Such a moving pole 9) is depicted in Fig. 6 by taking discrete E s from E =350 Me to E 5 =430 Me in steps of 0 Me. Each nearly vertical path in Fig. 6 shows the motion of the moving pole, Ξ pole (E n ;f), obtained from the fixed imaginary part with f =.0. As the imaginary part approaches zero, the moving pole shifts in the virtual-state region apart far from the original position of the nd pole. Since T (E)=T ref(e;ξ prm = E at f= 0), the moving pole with f=0, i.e. decaying-state pole discussed in ref., 8),0) is responsible for the detectable T (E) of Eq. (3.8). Thus, it is clearly shown that the nd pole position of Eq. (3.6) cannot be related to the peak position in the observed T spectrum Formation mechanism of the peak structure in the T spectrum We want to know the formation mechanism of the peak structure in the T spectrum of the coupled-channel system. Firstly we investigate the spectrum shape of the nd pole term. This shape problem was fully discussed in reen s function formalism by Morimatsu and Yazaki (see Fig. 7 depicted from fig. 8 of Ref. ) ). Following their procedure, we extract the contribution of the nd pole by using Eq.(.9) and Eq.(.6) with an expansion of the denominator, opt (E) (E), of T (E) into a power series of (E Ξ nd pole ), π Im T (E) = π Im A nd pole + the remaining part, E Ξ nd pole (3.) A nd pole = opt (Ξ nd pole) / d opt dξ (Ξ nd pole). (3.3) The nd-pole term has a spectrum shape of π (Re A nd pole) Γ/ (E E nd pole) +Γ /4 (Im A nd pole) (E E nd pole) π (E E nd pole) +Γ, (3.4) /4 where Ξ nd pole = E nd pole iγ/. At the pole position, E nd pole, the (Re A nd pole) part gives a peak (or depression), but the (Im A nd pole ) part exhibits an inflection) of the relevant curve. Figure 8(a) shows the nd-pole term (blue curve) and the remaining part (brown curve) of the T spectrum (black curve). In the nd-pole term a plateau appears not at the pole position, but above the KN threshold. This shift of the plateau from the pole position is due to a large imaginary part of the residue, A nd pole 3.37 i8.7, which comes mostly from the (Ξ nd pole) with a strongly-positive imaginary component. At the same time, this imaginary (source) component of the is indispensable for the existence of the nd pole. ) Thus, it is revealed that the

10 0 K. S. Myint, Y. Akaishi, M. Hassanvand and T. Yamazaki S pole A = Ξ pole = M pole i Γ / π E Ξ res ( E ) Im, pole ReA res > 0 ImA res = 0 Γ ReA res = 0 ImA res > 0 Γ ReA res = 0 ImA res < 0 Γ ReA res < 0 ImA res = 0 M pole M pole E E E E Peak Γ M pole M pole Inflection-L Inflection-R Depression Fig. 7. Relationship between spectral shape and residue of a pole term in strength function, which was originally given in ref. ) (a) T spectrum Remaining part nd pole position KN threshold nd pole term opt = + Remaining part w/o st pole effect (b) f KN threshold f = nd pole term w/o st pole effect E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] f =.0 Fig. 8. (a) Breakdown of the T spectrum. The contributions of the nd-pole term (blue curve) and of the remaining part (brown curve) are shown. The remaining part includes the st-pole term. The T spectrum (black curve) is identical to the f =.0 (black) one in Fig. 3(a). (b) Substantial contributions of the nd-pole term and of the remaining part when the st pole effect is removed as explained in Fig. 9. Both the contributions are on the same order. nature of the nd pole inherited from the energy-dependent (Ξ) is incompatible with the formation of a peak-shaped structure at the pole position. Figure 8(b) denotes substantial contributions of the nd-pole term and of the remaining part when the st pole effect is removed in a way as explained in Fig. 9. The pole term and the remaining continuum part are of same order, making the strength function positive definite. This means that phenomenological assignment of only a Breit-Wigner poleterm amplitude to the nd pole ( for example 7) ) is a partial procedure and is not justified.

11 Single-pole nature of the detectable Λ(405) opt = + f = f KN threshold E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] Fig. 9. (a) Effects of the position shift of the st pole on the T spectrum. An arbitrary factor, f, is varied from to -0, while shifting the st-pole position. The f =-0 (blue) curve is close to the f = (blue) one in Fig. 4. The f =.0 (black) curve is identical to the f =.0 (black) one in Fig. 4. (b) Movements of the st and nd poles. The st pole moves towards the higher-mass side with decreasing f and goes out of the [+(ch.), (ch.)] sheet, while the nd pole stays on the [+, ] sheet. The st pole is a possible origin of the peak structure in the Λ(405) region, as suggested from the remaining-part curve (brown one) in Fig. 8(a). In fact, the residue of the st pole is A st pole +i.33, the positive imaginary part of which means a peak appearance at the lower-mass side than the st-pole position. In order to confirm the peak formation due to the st pole, we introduce an arbitrary factor, f, to shift the st-pole position, as (E) f (E) into opt (E). Figure 9 shows the effects of the shift of the st-pole position on the T spectrum. As the st pole moves towards the higher-mass side with decreasing f and goes out of the [+(ch.), (ch.)] Riemann sheet which is relevant to the Λ(405), the peak structure gradually damps and disappears in spite of a persistent existence of the nd pole on the [+, ] sheet. Thus, it is confirmed that the peak structure of the T spectrum comes from the st pole. The T mass spectrum is also studied by the phase-shift contributions from each term of the optical potential of Eq. (3.4). Figure 0 shows phase shifts of πσ scattering, δ c, δ res and δ, calculated from, and the total opt, respectively. These phase shifts, (δ c, δ res and δ), are connected to the T spectra of the f = (blue) curve of Fig. 4(a), the f = (red) curve of Fig. 3(a) and the f =.0 (black) curve of Fig. 4(a), respectively, through the steps of δ forward scattering amplitude Im T T spectrum. The last step by the optical relation of Eq. (.9) holds for real E below the KN threshold. Although the phase shift δ c of is a main concern of the nd pole, it does not reach 90 in Fig. 0 and the corresponding spectrum (blue curve) in Fig. 4(a) gives no evidence of resonance-peak formation. On the other hand, the phase shift from

12 K. S. Myint, Y. Akaishi, M. Hassanvand and T. Yamazaki 80 deg opt δ = + δ c δ res δ δ c δ res KN threshold E res E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] Fig. 0. Behavior of the πσ scattering phase shifts calculated from, and the total opt. and the corresponding spectrum (red curve) in Fig. 3(a) clearly show a resonance formation due to the st pole, which is determined essentially by the equation, [ (Ξ) (Ξ)] = 0. The coherent sum of δ c and δ res gives rise to the total phase shift, δ, shown by an envelope (black curve) in Fig. 0. The T invariant-mass spectrum at f =.0 (black curve) in Fig. 4(a) related to the δ can be decomposed approximately as (E) eiδc sin δ c Γ res / (E)+ E E res +iγ res / k (E), (3.5) where the contribution from the δ res is expressed by using a Breit-Wigner amplitude with st-pole resonance parameters, E res and Γ res. With the help of this expression the peak structure in Fig. 4(a) is explained as follows. The nd pole term plus the remaining part from provides the continuum spectrum at f = (blue curve). The deviation of the T spectrum at f =.0 (black curve) from the continuum one at f = (blue curve) is the st-pole contribution when the st pole is embedded in the sizable continuum. Thus, it is reconfirmed that the peak seen in the T spectrum is never the original peak of the nd pole, but a remnant of the st pole after its interference with the continuum spectrum. 4. Discussion In the previous sections we discussed in detail the characteristics and origin of the detectable T and T spectra of the coupled channel KN-πΣ meson-baryon dynamics. It is shown that the nd pole of Λ(405) is not responsible for the peak structures observed in both the T and T spectra. According to this finding, we will present a brief critical review on earlier theoretical analyses based on the double-pole picture of the Λ(405) resonance. 7),3),4)

13 Single-pole nature of the detectable Λ(405) 3 Channel K - + p 43 (a) (b) st pole BW pole k nd pole BW pole k ~60 Me 39 [Me] Channel Σ + + π - BW i φ pole e + BW pole k E = IM(πΣ)c [Me] Fig.. (a) Schematic picture of the double poles, and(b) a spectrum model with two Breit-Wigner (B-W) amplitudes corresponding to the double poles and their coherent sum supposing the T spectrum. The spectrum curves are plotted, as an example, with the best-fit parameters for HADES data given in Ref. 3) Figure (a) is a schematic picture of the double poles, where the st pole has a main component in the KN channel and the nd pole does in the πσ channel, and Fig. (b) is a model with two Breit-Wigner (B-W) amplitudes corresponding to the double poles and their coherent sum. Jido et al. explained the behavior of the T spectrum with two B-W amplitudes. ),7) However, we now know that their explanation is wrong because the nd pole term is no longer dominating, but forms a continuum background together with the sizable remaining part denoted in Fig. 8(b). A naive assignment of a B-W amplitude to the nd pole is not justified, as discussed in Subsection 3.4. Siebenson and Fabbietti 3) analyzed the HADES data phenomenologically by employing the two-pole model, where they assumed the Λ(405) consisting of double poles, and parameterized the observed peak as a coherent sum of the B-W amplitudes. Although the HADES data was well reproduced with double poles of (M pole c,γ)=(48, 58) and (375, 46) Me, there is no physical reason to relate one of the B-W amplitudes to the chiral nd pole, because the nd pole produces no peak structure in the detectable spectrum. On the other hand, Hassanvand et al. 5) treated the same HADES data in a framework of single pole, and determined a best-fitted value of (M pole c,γ)=( ,6±0) Me with statistical confidence intervals. This single-pole fit is more successful, contributing to the present PD value of the Λ(405), 405. Me, than the above-mentioned double-pole fit. One evidence for the two-pole nature of the Λ(405) was claimed by Magas et al. 4) through their analyses on reactions, K p π 0 π 0 Σ 0 of Prakhov et al. 5) and π p K 0 πσ of Thomas et al. 6) It was argued that the former reaction has a higher probability of forming an intermediate state of the st pole (in that reference, the second state with higher mass), while the latter reaction favors the formation of

14 4 K. S. Myint, Y. Akaishi, M. Hassanvand and T. Yamazaki the nd pole (the first state with lower mass). Then, the different shapes of these two reaction spectra were interpreted as being evidence of the two poles. But there is no connection between the nd pole and the peak behavior of Thomas et al. s data, since neither of the basic T and T spectra has peaks related to the nd pole, as we discussed in Section 3. In spite of the authors claim, no evidence for the chiral double poles of the Λ(405) was obtained there. Recently, some results of the chiral double poles have been listed in Meissner and Hyodo s table. 3) It should be mentioned, concerning the findings given in Subsections 3.3 and 3.4, that the listed nd pole positions and widths are of supplementary information on not peak but continuum contributions to the spectrum for the Λ(405), as long as they are concerned with the observed CLAS data. 5. Conclusion In this paper we have given detailed accounts of the characteristics and origin of detectable T and T spectra in the KN-πΣ coupled channel system. With the use of generalized optical potentials, each spectrum is decomposed into contributions from the st pole, the nd pole and the remaining part. Summary results are given in Figs. (a)(b) and 9. The st pole is responsible for both the peak structures in the T and T invariant-mass spectra. The nd pole due to the energy-dependent chiral interaction provides a continuum amplitude appreciably affecting the shape of the peak formed by the st pole in the detectable T spectrum. In other words, the supposition of a peak structuredueto the nd pole aroundthe nd pole position is of total misunderstanding, as long as it is concerned with the experimentally observed Λ(405). Finally, it is concluded that experimentally observed Λ(405) resonance is not of double-pole nature, but of single-pole nature formed as the Feshbach resonance. ) No evidence for the chiral nd pole can be obtained from any experimental data in the relevant Λ(405) mass region, because all detected decay particles are on-shell. The single-pole nature of the Λ(405) would provide a unique starting basis 7),8) for current studies of the production and the structure of anti-kaonic nuclei. Acknowledgments The authors thank Prof. O. Morimatsu and Prof. K. Yazaki for critical discussions. They acknowledge the receipt of rant-in-aid for Scientific Research of Monbu-Kagakusho of Japan. References ) R.H. Dalitz and S.F. Tuan, Ann. Phys. 8 (959) 00. ) H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. 5 (958) 357; 9 (96) 87. 3) R.H. Dalitz and A. Deloff, J. Phys. 7 (99) 89. 4) J. Esmaili, Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Lett. B 686 (00) 3. 5) M. Hassanvand, S.Z. Karantari, Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. C 87 (03) ) C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data roup), Chin. Phys. C 40 (06) 0000.

15 Single-pole nature of the detectable Λ(405) 5 7) K. Moriya et al., Phys. Rev. C 87 (03) ) L. Roca and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 87 (03) ) M. Mai and U.-. Meissner, Eur. Phys. J. A 5 (05) 30. 0) S.X. Nakamura and D. Jido, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys D0. ) J.A. Oller and U.-. Meissner, Phys. Lett. B 500 (00) 63. ) D. Jido, J. A. Oller, E. Oset, A. Ramos and U.-. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A 75 (003) 8. 3) U.-. Meissner and T. Hyodo, Pole structure of the Λ(405) region, in K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data roup), Chin. Phys. C 38 (04) and 05 update. 4) M. Hassanvand, Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, ArXiv: [nucl-th]. 5) Y. Akaishi, T. Yamazaki, M. Obu and M. Wada, Nucl. Phys. A 835 (00) 67. 6) T. Hyodo and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. C 77 (008) ) D. Jido, T. Sekihara, Y. Ikeda, T. Hyodo, Y. Kanada-En yo and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A 835 (00) 59. 8) Y. Akaishi, K.S. Myint and T. Yamazaki, Proc. Jpn. Acad. B 84 (008) 64. 9) T. Koike and T. Harada, Phys. Rev. C 80 (009) ) P.L. Kapur and R.E. Peierls, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 66 (938) 77. ) O. Morimatsu and K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys. A 483 (988) 493; Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33 (994) 679. ) Y. Ikeda, H. Kamano and T. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 4 (00) ) J. Siebenson and L. Fabbietti, Phys. Rev. C 88 (03) ).K. Magas, E. Oset and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (005) ) S. Prakhov et al., Phys. Rev. C 70 (004) ) D.W. Thomas et al., Nucl. Phys. B 56 (973) 5 7) Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. C 65 (00) ) T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi, Phys. Lett. B 535 (00) 70.