Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017.

Transcription

1 Traffic Impact Analysis for the STARBUCKS STORE Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES January 2017 Submitted By

2 January 5, 2017 Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. Transportation Engineering Associate II Development Services 6262 Van Nuys Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Van Nuys, California RE: Proposed Starbucks: 9900 Balboa Boulevard, City of Los Angeles Dear Mr. Aitchison: This traffic impact analysis has been prepared in accordance with City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation s (LADOT) Traffic Study Policies and Procedures (TSPP) dated August The proposed Starbucks restaurant is located at the northeast corner of the Balboa Boulevard and Lassen Street intersection in the Northridge area of the City of Los Angeles. The preparation process for this study included development of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with LADOT, ongoing work with LADOT staff, and our professional evaluations of traffic factors pertinent to the study area. The analysis is based on traffic data collected, information provided by Starbucks/their representatives, comments from LADOT, review of the study area, and use of pertinent reference materials. Overall, this report presents evaluations of potential traffic impacts (and/or absence of impacts). Figure 1 shows the general vicinity of the proposed Starbucks. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed 2,240 square foot (sf) Starbucks restaurant with drive-through would include demolition of an existing and currently occupied medical-dental use building. Figure 2 shows the site plan for the proposed Starbucks. The site will have access at both Balboa Boulevard and Lassen Street based on the existing striping for the adjacent roadways, and 23 parking spaces are planned to be provided. For purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that the Starbucks would be occupied in EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY ROADWAYS AND TRAFFIC VOLUMES Based upon input from LADOT staff during the MOU process, six study intersections were determined as critical locations that required analysis: Balboa Boulevard at Lassen Street, Balboa Boulevard at Mayall Street, Balboa Boulevard at Superior Street-Citronia Street, Balboa Boulevard at Devonshire Street, Louise Avenue at Lassen Street, and Hayvenhurst Avenue at Lassen Street. 211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208, Fullerton, CA (714) FAX (714) aga@albertgrover.com

3 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 2

4 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 3

5 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 4 Balboa Boulevard has a general north-south alignment with the northerly terminus at Foothill Boulevard after a loop of the roadway, while to the south it ends at Ventura Boulevard. In the study area, Balboa Boulevard is essentially a six-lane roadway divided by left turn lanes. The intersection of Balboa Boulevard and Lassen Street is signalized. Lassen Street is an east-west roadway that becomes Filmore Street to the east and ends at the Oakwood Memorial Park and Cemetery to the west. It has four lanes divided by left turn lanes in the study area. Mayall Street is an east-west roadway which to the east forms a T intersection at Woodman Avenue and to the west becomes Fullerfarm Street. In the study area, Mayall Street is essentially a two-lane undivided roadway with on-street parking allowed on both sides of the street. The intersection of Mayall Street and Balboa Boulevard is signalized. Louise Avenue has a north-south alignment and continues to the north beyond the SR-118 Freeway, ending in a residential tract at Rushing Drive. To the south, it ends at Victory Boulevard. In the study area, there are two undivided lanes north of Lassen Street, with bicycle lanes and on-street parking provided on both sides. South of Lassen Street there are four divided travel lanes. The Louise Avenue and Lassen Street intersection is signalized. Hayvenhurst Avenue is a north-south roadway which extends to the north just beyond the SR-118 Freeway and ending at Rinaldi Street. To the south, Hayvenhurst Avenue terminates at Roscoe Boulevard. In the study area, Hayvenhurst Avenue has four divided travel lanes. The intersection of Hayvenhurst Avenue and Lassen Street is controlled with a traffic signal. Superior Street-Citronia Street is an east-west roadway that is Superior Street west of Balboa Boulevard and Citronia Street east of Balboa Boulevard. Citronia Street terminates in a T intersection at Gerald Avenue, while Superior Street ends at Zelzah Avenue. In the study area, there are two undivided travel lanes. The intersection of Balboa Boulevard and Superior Street-Citronia Street is signalized. Devonshire Street is an east-west roadway which becomes Arleta Avenue east of the I-405 Freeway. To the west, Devonshire Street becomes Shadow Oak Drive at the Chatsworth Park South. In the study area, Devonshire Street is a four-lane divided roadway. The intersection of Balboa Boulevard and Devonshire Street is signalized. A professional traffic count firm, Counts Unlimited, conducted the peak period traffic counts and turning movement counts on Tuesday, November 15, 2016 during the 7:00-10:00 AM and 3:00-6:00 PM peak periods. The counts were summarized per LADOT procedures for use in the intersection analyses, and the summary worksheets are provided in Appendix A.

6 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 5 INTERSECTION ANALYSES - EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing AM peak period volumes were referenced for use in the intersection analyses. The existing volumes at the study intersections during the peak commuter s hours are shown in Figure 3. Turning movement volumes can also be referenced from the CMA intersection analyses worksheet provided in Appendix B. For consistency of analysis and as required, the CMA spreadsheets were used in this study to analyze the study location. These worksheets also document the current intersection geometries and pertinent field data used in the existing conditions analyses, which was collected during field observations of the study area. Where appropriate, right turn lanes were assumed if functional width is available even if the lanes are not striped, which is consistent with traffic engineering practices. In addition, signal phasing information was noted, and LADOT provided input for the ATSAC/ATCS assumptions (the study intersection is assumed to have ATSAC/ATCS capabilities), which was inputted into the CMA analyses as well. In general terms, the CMA intersection analysis methodology provides ratios of the peak period intersection volumes for the various lane movements to the corresponding intersection lane capacities (essentially, the same as Intersection Capacity Utilization, or ICU, analyses). The volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios for the critical intersection movements are then identified to determine the overall intersection operations. CMA analyses also include traffic signal factors such as lost time due to signal phasing (similar to Highway Capacity Manual analyses), and account for the presence of City of Los Angeles ATSAC/ATCS signal coordination systems, as referenced above. The ability of the LADOT spreadsheet to include specific consideration of ATSAC/ATCS presence was another justification for use of the CMA methodology. The CMA analysis results in overall intersection v/c ratios. Similar to a school grading system, specified ranges of v/c values (similar to test scores) correspond to Levels of Service (LOS) that indicate intersection operations (similar to the school letter grades) that range from LOS A, the best, to LOS F, the worst Appendix B contains the specific v/c ranges that correspond to the different LOS intersection operation results. General practice for traffic analyses are that LOS A through LOS D/E operations at roadway intersections are considered to have acceptable operations, while LOS E/F findings are typically defined as over capacity operation. LADOT, however, has specific definitions and requirements related to Significant Impact Thresholds, which are included in Appendix C. The LADOT thresholds are based on the LOS, combined with specific allowed increases in the v/c ratio, before an impact is indicated. This is a worst case factor which additionally served as justification for use of the LADOT methodology. Table 1 on page 7 summarizes the results of the intersection analyses findings under existing conditions which form the basis for determining if significant Starbucks generated impacts are anticipated. The specific measures of traffic impacts are detailed in the following report sections and are incorporated in the LADOT worksheets. All six of the study intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak periods. The CMA worksheets are provided in Appendix B.

7 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 6

8 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 7 TABLE 1 INTERSECTION ANALYSES SUMMARY EXISTING AND EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITION CMA / LOS EXISTING EXISTING + PROJECT INTERSECTION AM PM AM PM Balboa Boulevard & Lassen Street / C / B / C / B Balboa Boulevard & Mayall Street / A / A / A / A Balboa Boulevard & Superior Street-Citronia Street / A / A / A / A Balboa Boulevard & Devonshire Street / D / D / D / D Louise Avenue & Lassen Street / C / B / C / B Hayvenhurst Avenue & Lassen Street / D / B / D / B PROJECT CONDITIONS TRIP GENERATION A Starbucks restaurant with a drive-through is proposed to be constructed at the project site subsequent to the demolition of an existing and currently occupied medical-dental use building. Trip generation analyses were completed to document the net trip generation effects of the proposed Starbucks. The evaluations were developed in conjunction with LADOT staff during the MOU process, which resulted in the trip generation totals assumed and analyzed. The following is a brief summary of the general trip generation process applied: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) rates were applied to the current uses as well as the proposed Starbucks. In order to quantify potential trip increases/decreases, ITE trip rates were referenced from the Trip Generation Manual (9 th Ed. 2012). The trip generation rates used, land use sizes, and resulting trip ends generated are summarized in Table 2 on the following page. For a coffee/espresso shop use, the ITE trip generation rates are based on the building area and were used in the intersection analyses. Years of research and field studies have documented the fact that many land uses will have passby trip reduction factors. It is known (especially for coffee/espresso shops) that a significant percentage of future customers come from the existing traffic already on adjacent roadways. These pass-by trips, therefore, do not generate added traffic (e.g., a person is already traveling on Balboa Boulevard or Lassen Street may stop for coffee, which does not generate added traffic). Pass-by trip credits (reductions) of 50% were applied to the trip generation results. This credit was referenced from the LADOT standard allowed percentage reductions for the category of uses which also includes small shopping centers, fast food restaurants, gas stations, dry cleaners, etc. The ITE Trip Generation Manual contains pass-by study findings specific for coffee/espresso shops. Those findings indicate that the pass-by reductions may actually be in the 89% range; however, to provide a conservative evaluation, the LADOT percentage of 50% was used in these analyses.

9 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 8 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Units Daily In Out Total In Out Total Trip Generation Rates: -Coffee/Doughnut shop per TSF % 49% % 50% Medical-Dental Office per TSF % 21% % 72% 3.57 Trip Ends Generated: Proposed Starbucks Project: -Starbucks w/ Drive-Thru 2,240 SF (50% Pass-by credit) (Existing Medical-Dental) (2,240 SF) Subtotal (no Pass-by credits) Totals (with Pass-by credits) Pass-by Source: Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition; Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); 2012 and City of LA input. Note: Daily & peak Trip Ends generated are rounded to the nearest 1, per previous City of LA input. Source: Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition; Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); 2012 Coffee/Doughnut shop rates are "with drive-through," per Manual code (937). Medical-Dental Office (720) rates were used for the existing use. TSF = 1,000 square feet It should also be noted that internal trip reduction factors are allowed, but were not applied in this study given that the proposed Starbucks would be located adjacent to another property but without joint access. Even though other properties may be accessed without affecting some study intersections (which would be similar to some level of internal/non-vehicle trips), no reductions were assumed. The trip generation rates applied to the proposed Project are shown in Table 2. The results show that the net trip generations (before any pass-by considerations) are 1,834 daily trip ends with 225 (115 In, 110 Out) AM peak period, and 96 (48 In, 48 Out) PM peak period trip ends. Table 2 also shows the total increases after the (conservative) pass-by reductions are applied. The Starbucks would generate an added 836 daily trip ends with 107 (53 In, 54 Out) AM peak period trip ends and 40 (22 In, 18 Out) during the PM peak period. Due to the subtraction of the existing uses and different travel patterns on a daily and peak period basis, the results are not necessarily proportional. In summary, the trip generation estimates used in this traffic study are a conservative representation of anticipated future traffic impacts. The actual net impacts should be less because worst case assumptions were utilized. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Trip distribution patterns for the proposed Starbucks were developed based upon the type of land use proposed, potential trip attractors in the area, the surrounding street system, and other pertinent considerations. Based on the general distribution patterns, specific trip assignment percentages at each of the study intersections were identified. These trip assignment percentages (at each of the study locations)

10 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 9 during the AM and PM peak periods are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. The trip end totals in Table 2 were then assigned to the surrounding street system based on the trip assignment percentages, resulting in the Project Only traffic volumes shown in Figure 6. The following are some of the pertinent worst case factors applied in the analyses (and reflected in the volumes shown in Figure 6) at the study intersections: It should be noted, the 50% pass-by reduction recommended for application to Starbucks is based on a general category that includes other types of land uses. Evidence (i.e., ITE Trip Generation Handbook data, etc.) suggest the actual pass-by reductions documented for a coffee/espresso shop are much greater (an approximate 89% range) than 50%. It is also known there are many Starbucks options that exist, which is another reason we believe there is increased expectation for pass-by patrons and a reduced potential for people to travel out of their normal driving route(s) to visit this particular Starbucks store (if built). However, in order to be very conservative and consistent with LADOT assumptions, only half of the Starbucks trips were considered pass-by. This reduction was applied to both inbound and outbound trips in analyzing the six study locations. As noted, a zero reduction was assumed even though the actual pass-by percentage indicated in the ITE publication is an approximate 89% reduction (for both inbound and outbound.) We believe the analyses applied at the study intersections represents worst case evaluations of potential traffic impacts. EXSTING + PROJECT CONDITIONS PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS The Starbucks generated trip increases were added to the existing traffic volumes and conditions so potential impacts could be quantified. These Exiting + Project evaluations serve to satisfy informational requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The TSPP, however, has adopted Significant Impact Thresholds (the reference is provided in Appendix C) which are based on future traffic conditions. These analyses are presented later in this study and serve as the basis for any mitigation requirements. The Existing + Project intersection volumes are illustrated in Figure 7. These volumes were evaluated based on the existing lane geometries so specific Starbucks related traffic impacts could be identified. The calculations and findings are documented in the CMA worksheets. The intersection analyses findings for Existing + Project conditions are summarized in Table 1. The proposed Starbucks is not expected to have any significant environmental impact.

11 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 10

12 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 11

13 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 12

14 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 13

15 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 14 MITIGATION MEASURES Since Table 1 shows that the Starbucks is not expected to cause any significant traffic impact at the study intersections, no mitigation measures are anticipated to be needed. However, this must be confirmed by the future conditions analyses per LADOT requirements. FUTURE: PRE-PROJECT CONDITIONS (EXISTING + AMBIENT GROWTH + RELATED PROJECTS) Analyses of future conditions, both with and without the Starbucks, were conducted at the study intersections. Traffic growth factors were taken into consideration when analyzing future conditions, which included ambient growth and planned future development (both cumulative and related projects). AMBIENT GROWTH AND RELATED PROJECTS The ambient growth and related projects traffic assumptions serve to create baseline traffic conditions for a future year, which was assumed to be Ambient growth accounts for general traffic increases. The related projects growth factor accounts for new potential developments which may be occupied within the same time frame as the Starbucks restaurant. These potential developments were addressed through a growth rate, plus some potential projects were specifically analyzed and included. There was coordination with LADOT in the development of a rate to address both the ambient growth and related projects and their potential effects on the study intersection. A growth factor of 2% per year was used and is expected to provide a reasonable (and conservative) projection of future traffic conditions, since this rate was applied to all intersection movements at each study location. The application of the growth factor is documented in the CMA worksheets. In addition to the growth factor increases, LADOT provided a list of specific projects to be included in these analyses. The list of related projects was noted, the potential impacts on the study intersections analyzed, and their potential traffic effects were included in the evaluations. In order to provide a worst case scenario, each of the related projects were assumed to be 100% constructed and occupied, though it is likely some of the traffic will not exist until after completion of the proposed Starbucks. We were provided traffic information for two additional projects located at Parthenia Street and Plummer Street. Based on the traffic analyses for those developments, the potential traffic increases were included in these evaluations. Added details regarding the assumptions made regarding these related projects are provided in Appendix D. The cumulative traffic effects of these related projects are shown in Figure 8 and can also be referenced from the CMA worksheets.

16 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 15

17 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 16 EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS RELATED PROJECTS ANALYSIS (WITHOUT PROJECT) The existing intersection volumes were increased using the ambient growth and related projects assumptions identified above so the CMA analyses could be updated for future traffic conditions (without the Starbucks). These future traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 9. The CMA worksheets also document these volumes at the study intersections. The results of the CMA analyses are summarized in Table 3. Under pre-project conditions, five of the six study intersections operate at LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak periods. The Balboa Boulevard and Devonshire Street intersection operates at LOS D and E during the AM and PM peak periods, respectively. TABLE 3 INTERSECTION ANALYSES SUMMARY PRE-PROJECT AND POST-PROJECT CONDITIONS FUTURE FUTURE PRE-PROJECT POST-PROJECT (Includes: Existing Vol., Related Projects, Growth (Pre-Project + Project) INTERSECTION AM PM AM PM Balboa Boulevard & Lassen Street / C / C / C / C Balboa Boulevard & Mayall Street / A / A / A / A Balboa Boulevard & Superior Street-Citronia Street / A / A / A / A Balboa Boulevard & Devonshire Street / D / E / D / E Louise Avenue & Lassen Street / C / C / C / C Hayvenhurst Avenue & Lassen Street / D / B / D / B FUTURE: POST-PROJECT CONDITIONS (PRE-PROJECT + PROJECT) PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS The proposed trips shown in Figure 6 were added to the pre-project traffic volumes so that post-project (pre-project + project) conditions could be evaluated. The resulting post-project traffic volumes are shown in Figure 10. The CMA analyses were again applied to the study intersection. The CMA summary worksheet documents the post-project calculations and is included in Appendix B. As shown in Table 3, all six of the study intersections maintain the same LOS and there are no significant traffic impacts caused by the proposed Starbucks. Since the Starbucks will not generate any significant impact in spite of the various worst case assumptions incorporated, no mitigation measures are anticipated.

18 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 17

19 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 18

20 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 19 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS With the passage of the gas tax increase (Proposition 111) in June 1990, came a requirement that each urbanized area in the State with a population of 50,000 or more adopt a Congestion Management Program (CMP). A program was developed for Los Angeles County, with input from local and regional agencies, and a summary of the efforts was published in the Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County. Included in the CMP are guidelines for satisfying CMP traffic impact analysis requirements. This Project does not add 50 or more peak period trips to any CMP arterial monitoring intersection. In addition, no mainline freeway sections would be impacted by 150 or more trips during the AM or PM peak periods. Therefore, no significant CMP traffic impacts are anticipated to be generated by the proposed Starbucks. The Balboa Boulevard and Victory Boulevard intersection is the nearest CMP monitoring location, which is significantly south of the study area. The nearest mainline freeway segments would be the SR-118 Freeway to the north and I-405 Freeway to the east, nearly two miles from proposed Starbucks site, and would not be significantly impacted by the proposed Project. PARKING The City of Los Angeles parking code was referenced when reviewing the parking requirements for the proposed Starbucks to assure compliance with the parking standards. It is required that there be one parking space for each 100 sf based on the building area. The proposed Starbucks will be 2,240 sf, so one space per 100 sf = 22.4 spaces. The Site Plan shows that 23 on-site parking spaces will be provided, which will adequately meet the parking demand needs. SITE TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS There are two access points proposed for the project site: one at Balboa Boulevard and one at Lassen Street. Both will be full-access driveways located away from the intersection (a maximum distance allowed within the project site boundaries). A double-yellow stripe (associated with left turn lanes) and two-way left turn lane striping exists on Balboa Boulevard and Lassen Street along the project frontage, respectively. The two driveways and their planned access movements are anticipated to adequately serve the proposed Project. Both driveways will involve curb-cut construction work in the public right-of-way, which means engineering plans will be required and approved by the City of Los Angeles. The approved driveway plans and construction should provide designs to adequately serve the anticipated traffic (which will be comprised mostly of passenger vehicles). Starbucks truck deliveries typically occur once per day during early morning hours before the store opens. Two-axle truck are used for the deliveries and, since they occur before the store opens for business, they can park at virtually any acceptable on-site location and not be in conflict with customer vehicle traffic. These planned deliveries should be adequately accommodated by the project site.

21 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 20 SUMMARY Traffic and parking factors for the proposed Starbucks at the northeast corner of Balboa Boulevard and Lassen Street were examined and the potential impacts documented. The traffic analyses examined existing, existing + project, future pre-project, and post-project conditions. The potential traffic impacts were evaluated and the potential need for mitigation/improvement measures was addressed. The City of Los Angeles parking code requirements were reviewed, as well as access and on-site circulation factors associated with the proposed Starbucks. The principal findings of this study are listed below. 1) Under Existing conditions, all six of the study intersections operate at LOS D or better for both AM and PM peak period conditions. 2) The trip generation potential for the proposed Starbucks is based on worst case assumptions. The trip generation results are based on the work completed in conjunction with LADOT staff. The pass-by percentage reductions applied in the analyses are lower than ITE data (suggesting greater pass-by trip reduction assumptions could have been supported). In addition, no internal trip reductions were applied; therefore, the traffic analyses contained in this study would be considered a worst case evaluation. 3) For Existing + Project conditions, the six study intersections were analyzed and no significant traffic impact are expected to be generated by the Starbucks (even using the worst case trip generation assumptions) as shown in Table 1. 4) Under future Pre-Project conditions, five of the six study intersections will have LOS D or better operations during both the AM and PM peak periods. The Balboa Boulevard and Devonshire Street intersection will have LOS D and E during the AM and PM peak periods, respectively. 5) For Post-Project (Pre-Project + Project) conditions, the same LOS results will be maintained at all six study intersections. In addition, no significant traffic impacts are shown to be generated by the Starbucks per LADOT adopted standards; therefore, no mitigation measures are anticipated to be needed. 6) The City of Los Angeles parking requirements were reviewed. The parking code indicates that 22.4 parking spaces would be needed to satisfy code requirements for the Starbucks. The site plan shows a total of 23 parking spaces would be provided, so the proposed parking supply was found to be acceptable. 7) This study included an evaluation of access and on-site circulation factors. Overall the proposed access and on-site circulation is anticipated to provide acceptable operations.

22 Mr. Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. January 5, 2017 Page 21 We trust that these analyses will be of assistance to you, LADOT, and others. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, ALBERT GROVER and ASSOCIATES Dave Roseman, T.E. Principal Transportation Engineer Kaidence\ \Report\Starbucks 9900 Balboa Letter Report.docx

23 APPENDIX A Count Summary Worksheets

24 City Of Los Angeles Department Of Transportation MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY STREET: North/South East/West Balboa Boulevard Devonshire Street Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE N/B S/B E/B W/B DUAL- WHEELED BIKES BUSES N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME AM PK 15 MIN PM PK 15 MIN AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL (Rev Oct 06)

25 City Of Los Angeles Department Of Transportation MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY STREET: North/South East/West Balboa Boulevard Lassen Street Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE N/B S/B E/B W/B DUAL- WHEELED BIKES BUSES N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME AM PK 15 MIN PM PK 15 MIN AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL (Rev Oct 06)

26 City Of Los Angeles Department Of Transportation MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY STREET: North/South East/West Balboa Boulevard Mayall Street Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE 0 N/B S/B E/B W/B DUAL- WHEELED BIKES BUSES N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME AM PK 15 MIN PM PK 15 MIN AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL (Rev Oct 06)

27 City Of Los Angeles Department Of Transportation MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY STREET: North/South East/West Balboa Boulevard Superior Street/Citronia Street Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE 0 N/B S/B E/B W/B DUAL- WHEELED BIKES BUSES N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME AM PK 15 MIN PM PK 15 MIN AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL (Rev Oct 06)

28 City Of Los Angeles Department Of Transportation MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY STREET: North/South East/West Hayvenhurst Avenue Lassen Street Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE N/B S/B E/B W/B DUAL- WHEELED BIKES BUSES N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME AM PK 15 MIN PM PK 15 MIN AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL (Rev Oct 06)

29 City Of Los Angeles Department Of Transportation MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY STREET: North/South East/West Louise Avenue Lassen Street Day: Tuesday Date: November 15, 2016 Weather: CLEAR Hours: 7-10AM 3-6PM Staff: CUI School Day: YES District: West Valley I/S CODE N/B S/B E/B W/B DUAL- WHEELED BIKES BUSES N/B TIME S/B TIME E/B TIME W/B TIME AM PK 15 MIN PM PK 15 MIN AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR NORTHBOUND Approach SOUTHBOUND Approach TOTAL XING S/L XING N/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total N-S Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL EASTBOUND Approach WESTBOUND Approach TOTAL XING W/L XING E/L Hours Lt Th Rt Total Hours Lt Th Rt Total E-W Ped Sch Ped Sch TOTAL TOTAL (Rev Oct 06)

30 APPENDIX B CMA Intersection Analyses (LOS Worksheets)

31 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Devonshire St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 639 North-South: 643 North-South: 654 North-South: 658 North-South: 658 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 642 East-West: 643 East-West: 655 East-West: 656 East-West: 656 SUM: 1281 SUM: 1286 SUM: 1309 SUM: 1314 SUM: 1314 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): D D D D D REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/16/2016-1:46 AM 1 CMA-Balboa&Devonshire

32 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Devonshire St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 624 North-South: 626 North-South: 638 North-South: 639 North-South: 639 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 749 East-West: 749 East-West: 764 East-West: 764 East-West: 764 SUM: 1373 SUM: 1375 SUM: 1402 SUM: 1403 SUM: 1403 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): D D E E E REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/16/2016-1:45 AM 1 CMA-Balboa&Devonshire

33 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 541 North-South: 543 North-South: 553 North-South: 556 North-South: 556 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 747 East-West: 770 East-West: 761 East-West: 784 East-West: 784 SUM: 1288 SUM: 1313 SUM: 1314 SUM: 1340 SUM: 1340 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): C C C C C REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/15/2016-3:54 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Lassen

34 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 502 North-South: 506 North-South: 513 North-South: 517 North-South: 517 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 674 East-West: 687 East-West: 688 East-West: 700 East-West: 700 SUM: 1176 SUM: 1193 SUM: 1201 SUM: 1217 SUM: 1217 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B B C C C REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/15/2016-3:54 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Lassen

35 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Mayall St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right North-South: 533 North-South: 538 North-South: 546 North-South: 551 North-South: 551 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 107 East-West: 109 East-West: 109 East-West: 111 East-West: 111 SUM: 640 SUM: 647 SUM: 655 SUM: 662 SUM: 662 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/15/2016-9:10 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Mayall

36 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Mayall St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right North-South: 500 North-South: 502 North-South: 512 North-South: 513 North-South: 513 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 99 East-West: 99 East-West: 101 East-West: 101 East-West: 101 SUM: 599 SUM: 601 SUM: 613 SUM: 614 SUM: 614 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/15/2016-9:10 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Mayall

37 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Superior-Citronia Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right North-South: 600 North-South: 604 North-South: 614 North-South: 618 North-South: 618 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 150 East-West: 152 East-West: 154 East-West: 156 East-West: 156 SUM: 750 SUM: 756 SUM: 768 SUM: 774 SUM: 774 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/15/ :06 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Superior-Citronia

38 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Balboa Blvd. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Superior-Citronia Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right North-South: 506 North-South: 507 North-South: 518 North-South: 519 North-South: 519 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 132 East-West: 132 East-West: 134 East-West: 134 East-West: 134 SUM: 638 SUM: 639 SUM: 652 SUM: 653 SUM: 653 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/15/ :06 PM 1 CMA-Balboa&Superior-Citronia

39 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Hayvenhurst Ave. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 616 North-South: 619 North-South: 634 North-South: 637 North-South: 637 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 758 East-West: 764 East-West: 774 East-West: 780 East-West: 780 SUM: 1374 SUM: 1383 SUM: 1408 SUM: 1417 SUM: 1417 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): D D D D D REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/16/2016-3:22 AM 1 CMA-Hayvenhurst&Lassen

40 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Hayvenhurst Ave. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 443 North-South: 443 North-South: 456 North-South: 456 North-South: 456 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 609 East-West: 613 East-West: 621 East-West: 625 East-West: 625 SUM: 1052 SUM: 1056 SUM: 1077 SUM: 1081 SUM: 1081 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B B B B B REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/16/2016-3:21 AM 1 CMA-Hayvenhurst&Lassen

41 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Louise Ave. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 491 North-South: 491 North-South: 504 North-South: 504 North-South: 504 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 714 East-West: 719 East-West: 729 East-West: 733 East-West: 733 SUM: 1205 SUM: 1210 SUM: 1233 SUM: 1237 SUM: 1237 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): C C C C C REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/16/2016-2:17 AM 1 CMA-Louise&Lassen

42 WESTBOUND EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: Louise Ave. Year of Count: 2016 Ambient Growth: (%): 2 Conducted by: SSS Date: East-West Street: Lassen St. Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: Project: Starbucks, 9900 Balboa No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 327 North-South: 328 North-South: 336 North-South: 337 North-South: 337 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 750 East-West: 752 East-West: 765 East-West: 768 East-West: 768 SUM: 1077 SUM: 1080 SUM: 1101 SUM: 1105 SUM: 1105 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B B C C C REMARKS: Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 12/16/2016-3:09 AM 1 CMA-Louise&Lassen

43 APPENDIX C LADOT Traffic Study Policies & Procedures Definitions/Requirements

44

45

46

47 APPENDIX D Related Projects Analyses

48

49

50

51