LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY"

Transcription

1 LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Project Summary Location SR 16 & W. Church St. Interchange Newark, Ohio Licking County PID Study Sponsor ODOT District 5 Proposed Work Add Left Turn Lane on SR 16 Eastbound Exit Ramp at West Church Street Study Area: Proposed Improvement: Add LT Lane on SR 16 EB Exit Ramp at W. Church St. HCS Analysis Points: Freeway Analysis SR 16 EB, upstream of West Church Street Diverge SR 16 EB, upstream of West Church Street Merge SR 16 EB, downstream of West Church Street Merge Ramp Analysis SR 16 EB Diverge to West Church Street SR 16 EB Merge from West Church Street Ohio Dept. of Transportation Page 1 of 6 Revised 1/26/2016 District 5

2 LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Intersection Analysis SR 16 EB Ramp at West Church Street SR 16 WB Ramp at West Church Street/Country Club Drive West Church Street at North 30 th Street* *The No-Build condition is based on the proposed improvements included with LIC-CR , PID The project includes an added turn lane, increased turning radii, sidewalk replacement, curb ramps, upgraded traffic signal, and resurfaced pavement. The project is scheduled for construction in Problem Description The State Route 16 at West Church Street interchange is located in the western portion of the city of Newark and is currently the first grade separated interchange on State Route 16 upon entry into the city of Newark from the west. The interchange provides access to Country Club Drive, which has become an important arterial due to development in the area and particularly as a result of the growth of several institutions, including; OSU-Newark, Central Ohio Technical College, and Mount Vernon Nazarene University. These are primarily commuter campuses and during peak hours, particularly in the morning, vehicle queues on the State Route 16 eastbound exit ramp occasionally extend back to mainline State Route 16. The existing State Route 16 Eastbound Exit Ramp at West Church Street consists of a single lane under signalized control and the purpose of this project is to modify the ramp to provide for a second lane. Traffic Analysis Posted Speed Limits (of Roadways within the Study Area): State Route West Church Street 35 Country Club Drive 35 North 30 th Street 35 Freeway Analysis Results: SR 16 EB Mainline Analysis West of W. Church St. Exit Exit Ramp East of W. Church St. Exit Ramp East of W. Church St. Entrance Ramp LOS 2037 AM No-Build Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS 2037 AM Build Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS 2037 PM No-Build Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS 2037 PM Build Density (pc/mi/ln) B 17.9 B 17.9 C 24.7 C 24.7 A 10.9 A 10.9 C 18.3 C 18.3 B 12.9 B 12.9 C 21.6 C 21.6 Ohio Dept. of Transportation Page 2 of 6 Revised 1/26/2016 District 5

3 LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Ramp Analysis Results: SR 16 EB Ramp Analysis LOS 2037 AM No-Build Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS 2037 AM Build Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS 2037 PM No-Build Density (pc/mi/ln) LOS 2037 PM Build Density (pc/mi/ln) W. Church St. Diverge W. Church St. Merge B 16.2 B 16.2 C 23.2 C 23.2 B 12.0 B 12.0 C 20.0 C 20.0 Intersection Analysis Results: Signalized Intersection Analysis LOS 2037 AM No-Build Delay (sec/veh) LOS 2037 AM Build Delay (sec/veh) LOS 2037 PM No-Build Delay (sec/veh) LOS 2037 PM Build Delay (sec/veh) SR 16 WB Exit Ramp at West Church St/Country Club Dr EB Appoach C 32.3 C 32.3 D 47.5 D 47.5 WB Appoach D 53.1 D 53.1 E 64.7 E 64.7 NB Approach C 25.7 C 25.7 C 20.5 C 20.5 SB Approach D 51.1 D 51.1 E 63.0 E 63.0 Overall Intersection D 36.4 D 36.4 D 42.1 D 42.1 SR 16 EB Exit/Entrance Ramp at West Church Street EB Approach E 79.1 C 31.8 E 65.5 C 31.1 NB Approach F 80.1 C 32.7 E 62.3 C 25.5 SB Approach D 43.0 C 28.1 E 65.8 C 30.6 Overall Intersection E 69.2 C 31.1 E 64.5 C 29.1 West Church Street at North 30 th Street EB Approach C 26.7 C 26.7 C 31.6 C 31.6 WB Approach C 28.8 C 28.8 C 30.5 C 30.5 NB Approach B 19.2 B 19.2 C 25.3 C 25.3 SB Approach C 29.3 C 29.3 C 29.3 C 29.3 Overall Intersection C 24.7 C 24.7 C 28.9 C 28.9 Ohio Dept. of Transportation Page 3 of 6 Revised 1/26/2016 District 5

4 LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Turn Lane Lengths: Intersection/Turn Lane SR 16 WB Exit Ramp at W. Church St./Country Club Dr. Calculated Length* No Block Length Existing Length Proposed Length WBLT ** SR 16 EB Ramp at W. Church St. EBLT n/a 600 NBLT ** W. Church St. at N. 30 th St.# EBLT # # n/a 100 # EBRT # # # WBLT # # # NBRT # # n/a 315 # *Calculated Turn Lane Length includes 50 taper and storage per Figures 401-7E, 401-9E, and E of Section 400 of the ODOT Location and Design Manual Volume 1. Deceleration on the off ramps is assumed to occur prior to the beginning of the turn lane taper. **This length is beyond the scope of the project. At the SR 16 EB Ramp, the AM/PM Peak NB left turning volumes are 50/60 vehicles per hour, so not accommodating for through blockage should have a minimal negative affect. #See LIC-CR , PID plan sheets in Appendices. Construction to be completed in Conclusion: The IOS verifies that the SR 16 level of service is not degraded between the design year no-build condition and the design year build condition. The study meets the requirements of the Ohio Department of Transportation. Ohio Dept. of Transportation Page 4 of 6 Revised 1/26/2016 District 5

5 LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY No-Build SR 16 EB Exit Ramp at West Church Street Ohio Dept. of Transportation Page 5 of 6 Revised 1/26/2016 District 5

6 LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Build SR 16 EB Exit Ramp at West Church Street with Left Turn Lane Ohio Dept. of Transportation Page 6 of 6 Revised 1/26/2016 District 5

7 APPENDIX A Certified Traffic

8 INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION TO: Jonathan Ryan, District 8 FROM: Drew Hurst, P.E., Transportation Planner, Office of Statewide Planning and Research SUBJECT: LIC , PID DATE: September 14, 2015 In reply to a request dated September 3, 2015, plates are attached showing the 2017/2037 ADT, A.M. and P.M. DHV turning movement forecasts. Please use the following design designations: Country Club Dr Church St Church St SR 16 WB Ramp north leg south leg west leg east leg 2017 ADT: 16,420 18,510 5,530 2, ADT: 19,620 22,170 6,350 2,920 K: DHV: 1,840 2, D: T24: TD: Church St SR 16 EB Ramps north leg south leg west leg 2017 ADT: 18,510 15,560 9, ADT: 22,170 18,930 11,340 K: DHV: 2,060 1,790 1,320 D: T24: TD:

9 30th St Church St north leg south leg west leg east leg 2017 ADT: ,280 12,790 6, ADT: ,940 16,350 7,980 K: DHV: 60 1,400 1, D: T24: TD: SR 16 west of Church St east of Church St 2017 ADT: 44,310 42, ADT: 52,170 49,930 K: DHV: 4,120 4,050 D: T24: TD: If you have any questions, please contact me at (614) c: M. Byram, OSPR G. Giaimo, OSPR File

10

11

12

13 APPENDIX B Highway Capacity Results

14 SR 16 Mainline and Ramps

15 AM DHV

16 BASIC FREEWAY WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/f2kd790.tmp Page 1 of 1 10/26/2015 BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENTS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Highway/Direction of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 From/To West of the Church St Off Ramp Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period AM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Oper.(LOS) Flow Inputs Des.(N) Volume, V 2010 veh/h Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 AADT veh/day %Trucks and Buses, P T 1 Peak-Hr Prop. of AADT, K %RVs, P R 0 Peak-Hr Direction Prop, D General Terrain: Level DDHV = AADT x K x D veh/h Grade % Length mi Up/Down % Calculate Flow Adjustments f p 1.00 E R 1.2 E T 1.5 f HV = 1/[1+P T (E T - 1) + P R (E R - 1)]0.995 Speed Inputs Lane Width Rt-Side Lat. Clearance Number of Lanes, N 2 Total Ramp Density, TRD ft ft ramps/mi FFS (measured) 60.0 Base free-flow Speed, BFFS LOS and Performance Measures Operational (LOS) v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV 1074 pc/h/ln x f p ) S 60.0 D = v p / S 17.9 pc/mi/ln LOS Glossary N - Number of lanes V - Hourly volume B S - Speed D - Density v p - Flow rate FFS - Free-flow speed LOS - Level of service BFFS - Base free-flow speed DDHV - Directional design hour volume Calc Speed Adj and FFS f LW f LC TRD Adjustment Planning Data FFS 60.0 Design (N) Design (N) Design LOS v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV x f p ) S D = v p / S Required Number of Lanes, N Factor Location pc/h/ln pc/mi/ln E R - Exhibits 11-10, f LW - Exhibit 11-8 E T - Exhibits 11-10, 11-11, f LC - Exhibit 11-9 f p - Page TRD - Page LOS, S, FFS, v p - Exhibits 11-2, 11-3 Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 10/26/ :22 AM

17 RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/r2kf682.tmp Page 1 of 1 1/7/2016 RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Freeway/Dir of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 Junction Church St Off Ramp Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period AM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Inputs Upstream Adj Ramp Yes No L up = On Off ft Freeway Number of Lanes, N 2 Ramp Number of Lanes, N 1 Acceleration Lane Length, L A Deceleration Lane Length L D 725 Freeway Volume, V F 2010 Ramp Volume, V R 790 Downstream Adj Ramp Yes V u = veh/h Freeway Free-Flow Speed, S FF 60.0 Ramp Free-Flow Speed, S FR 45.0 V D = veh/h Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions (pc/h) V (Veh/hr) PHF Terrain %Truck %Rv f HV f p v = V/PHF x f HV x f p Freeway Level No Ramp Level UpStream DownStream Merge Areas Diverge Areas Estimation of v 12 Estimation of v 12 V 12 = V F ( P FM ) L EQ = (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) P FM = using Equation (Exhibit 13-6) V 12 = pc/h V 3 or V av34 pc/h (Equation or 13-17) Is V 3 or V av34 > 2,700 pc/h? Yes No Is V 3 or V av34 > 1.5 * V 12 /2 Yes No If Yes,V 12a = Capacity Checks pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) L down = V 12 = V R + (V F - V R )P FD L EQ = (Equation or 13-13) On Off P FD = using Equation (Exhibit 13-7) V 12 = 2149 pc/h V 3 or V av34 0 pc/h (Equation or 13-17) Is V 3 or V av34 > 2,700 pc/h? Yes No Is V 3 or V av34 > 1.5 * V 12 /2 Yes No If Yes,V 12a = pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Capacity Checks Actual Capacity LOS F? Actual Capacity LOS F? V FO Exhibit 13-8 V F 2149 Exhibit No V FO = V F - V R 1296 Exhibit No V R 853 Exhibit No Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? Actual Max Desirable Violation? V R12 Exhibit 13-8 V Exhibit :All No Level of Service Determination (if not F) Level of Service Determination (if not F) D R = v R V L A D R = (pc/mi/ln) LOS = (Exhibit 13-2) Speed Determination M S = (Exibit 13-11) S R = (Exhibit 13-11) S 0 = (Exhibit 13-11) S = (Exhibit 13-13) D R = D R = V L D 16.2 (pc/mi/ln) LOS = B (Exhibit 13-2) Speed Determination D s = (Exhibit 13-12) S R = 53.3 (Exhibit 13-12) S 0 = N/A (Exhibit 13-12) S = 53.3 (Exhibit 13-13) Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/ :49 PM ft

18 BASIC FREEWAY WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/f2k98df.tmp Page 1 of 1 10/26/2015 BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENTS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Highway/Direction of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 From/To Church St Off and On Ramps Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period AM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Oper.(LOS) Flow Inputs Des.(N) Volume, V 1220 veh/h Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 AADT veh/day %Trucks and Buses, P T 1 Peak-Hr Prop. of AADT, K %RVs, P R 0 Peak-Hr Direction Prop, D General Terrain: Level DDHV = AADT x K x D veh/h Grade % Length mi Up/Down % Calculate Flow Adjustments f p 1.00 E R 1.2 E T 1.5 f HV = 1/[1+P T (E T - 1) + P R (E R - 1)]0.995 Speed Inputs Lane Width Rt-Side Lat. Clearance Number of Lanes, N 2 Total Ramp Density, TRD ft ft ramps/mi FFS (measured) 60.0 Base free-flow Speed, BFFS LOS and Performance Measures Operational (LOS) v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV 652 pc/h/ln x f p ) S 60.0 D = v p / S 10.9 pc/mi/ln LOS Glossary N - Number of lanes V - Hourly volume A S - Speed D - Density v p - Flow rate FFS - Free-flow speed LOS - Level of service BFFS - Base free-flow speed DDHV - Directional design hour volume Calc Speed Adj and FFS f LW f LC TRD Adjustment Planning Data FFS 60.0 Design (N) Design (N) Design LOS v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV x f p ) S D = v p / S Required Number of Lanes, N Factor Location pc/h/ln pc/mi/ln E R - Exhibits 11-10, f LW - Exhibit 11-8 E T - Exhibits 11-10, 11-11, f LC - Exhibit 11-9 f p - Page TRD - Page LOS, S, FFS, v p - Exhibits 11-2, 11-3 Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 10/26/ :24 AM

19 RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/r2kc07a.tmp Page 1 of 1 1/7/2016 RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Freeway/Dir of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 Junction Church St On Ramp Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period AM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Inputs Upstream Adj Ramp Yes No L up = On Off ft Freeway Number of Lanes, N 2 Ramp Number of Lanes, N 1 Acceleration Lane Length, L A 875 Deceleration Lane Length L D Freeway Volume, V F 1220 Ramp Volume, V R 230 Downstream Adj Ramp Yes V u = veh/h Freeway Free-Flow Speed, S FF 60.0 Ramp Free-Flow Speed, S FR 30.0 V D = veh/h Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions (pc/h) V (Veh/hr) PHF Terrain %Truck %Rv f HV f p v = V/PHF x f HV x f p Freeway Level Ramp Level UpStream DownStream Merge Areas Diverge Areas Estimation of v 12 Estimation of v 12 V 12 = V F ( P FM ) L EQ = (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) P FM = using Equation (Exhibit 13-6) V 12 = 1304 pc/h V 3 or V av34 0 pc/h (Equation or 13-17) Is V 3 or V av34 > 2,700 pc/h? Yes No Is V 3 or V av34 > 1.5 * V 12 /2 Yes No If Yes,V 12a = pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Capacity Checks No L down = V 12 = V R + (V F - V R )P FD L EQ = (Equation or 13-13) P FD = using Equation (Exhibit 13-7) V 12 = pc/h V 3 or V av34 pc/h (Equation or 13-17) On Off Is V 3 or V av34 > 2,700 pc/h? Yes No Is V 3 or V av34 > 1.5 * V 12 /2 Yes No If Yes,V 12a = pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Capacity Checks Actual Capacity LOS F? Actual Capacity LOS F? V F Exhibit 13-8 V FO 1552 Exhibit 13-8 No V FO = V F - V R Exhibit 13-8 V Exhibit 13- R 10 Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? Actual Max Desirable Violation? V R Exhibit :All No V 12 Exhibit 13-8 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Level of Service Determination (if not F) D R = v R V L A D R = V L D D R = 12.0 (pc/mi/ln) D R = (pc/mi/ln) LOS = B (Exhibit 13-2) Speed Determination M S = (Exibit 13-11) S R = 54.8 (Exhibit 13-11) S 0 = N/A (Exhibit 13-11) S = 54.8 (Exhibit 13-13) LOS = (Exhibit 13-2) Speed Determination D s = (Exhibit 13-12) S R = (Exhibit 13-12) S 0 = (Exhibit 13-12) S = (Exhibit 13-13) Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/ :51 PM ft

20 BASIC FREEWAY WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/f2kfea6.tmp Page 1 of 1 10/26/2015 BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENTS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Highway/Direction of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 From/To East of Church St On Ramp Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period AM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Oper.(LOS) Flow Inputs Des.(N) Volume, V 1450 veh/h Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 AADT veh/day %Trucks and Buses, P T 1 Peak-Hr Prop. of AADT, K %RVs, P R 0 Peak-Hr Direction Prop, D General Terrain: Level DDHV = AADT x K x D veh/h Grade % Length mi Up/Down % Calculate Flow Adjustments f p 1.00 E R 1.2 E T 1.5 f HV = 1/[1+P T (E T - 1) + P R (E R - 1)]0.995 Speed Inputs Lane Width Rt-Side Lat. Clearance Number of Lanes, N 2 Total Ramp Density, TRD ft ft ramps/mi FFS (measured) 60.0 Base free-flow Speed, BFFS LOS and Performance Measures Operational (LOS) v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV 775 pc/h/ln x f p ) S 60.0 D = v p / S 12.9 pc/mi/ln LOS Glossary N - Number of lanes V - Hourly volume B S - Speed D - Density v p - Flow rate FFS - Free-flow speed LOS - Level of service BFFS - Base free-flow speed DDHV - Directional design hour volume Calc Speed Adj and FFS f LW f LC TRD Adjustment Planning Data FFS 60.0 Design (N) Design (N) Design LOS v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV x f p ) S D = v p / S Required Number of Lanes, N Factor Location pc/h/ln pc/mi/ln E R - Exhibits 11-10, f LW - Exhibit 11-8 E T - Exhibits 11-10, 11-11, f LC - Exhibit 11-9 f p - Page TRD - Page LOS, S, FFS, v p - Exhibits 11-2, 11-3 Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 10/26/ :25 AM

21 PM DHV

22 BASIC FREEWAY WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/f2kb3f3.tmp Page 1 of 1 10/26/2015 BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENTS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Highway/Direction of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 From/To West of the Church St Off Ramp Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period PM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Oper.(LOS) Flow Inputs Des.(N) Volume, V 2770 veh/h Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 AADT veh/day %Trucks and Buses, P T 1 Peak-Hr Prop. of AADT, K %RVs, P R 0 Peak-Hr Direction Prop, D General Terrain: Level DDHV = AADT x K x D veh/h Grade % Length mi Up/Down % Calculate Flow Adjustments f p 1.00 E R 1.2 E T 1.5 f HV = 1/[1+P T (E T - 1) + P R (E R - 1)]0.995 Speed Inputs Lane Width Rt-Side Lat. Clearance Number of Lanes, N 2 Total Ramp Density, TRD ft ft ramps/mi FFS (measured) 60.0 Base free-flow Speed, BFFS LOS and Performance Measures Operational (LOS) v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV 1481 pc/h/ln x f p ) S 60.0 D = v p / S 24.7 pc/mi/ln LOS Glossary N - Number of lanes V - Hourly volume C S - Speed D - Density v p - Flow rate FFS - Free-flow speed LOS - Level of service BFFS - Base free-flow speed DDHV - Directional design hour volume Calc Speed Adj and FFS f LW f LC TRD Adjustment Planning Data FFS 60.0 Design (N) Design (N) Design LOS v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV x f p ) S D = v p / S Required Number of Lanes, N Factor Location pc/h/ln pc/mi/ln E R - Exhibits 11-10, f LW - Exhibit 11-8 E T - Exhibits 11-10, 11-11, f LC - Exhibit 11-9 f p - Page TRD - Page LOS, S, FFS, v p - Exhibits 11-2, 11-3 Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 10/26/ :26 AM

23 RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/r2kcbb6.tmp Page 1 of 1 1/7/2016 RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Freeway/Dir of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 Junction Church St Off Ramp Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period PM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Inputs Upstream Adj Ramp Yes No L up = On Off ft Freeway Number of Lanes, N 2 Ramp Number of Lanes, N 1 Acceleration Lane Length, L A Deceleration Lane Length L D 725 Freeway Volume, V F 2770 Ramp Volume, V R 720 Downstream Adj Ramp Yes V u = veh/h Freeway Free-Flow Speed, S FF 60.0 Ramp Free-Flow Speed, S FR 45.0 V D = veh/h Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions (pc/h) V (Veh/hr) PHF Terrain %Truck %Rv f HV f p v = V/PHF x f HV x f p Freeway Level No Ramp Level UpStream DownStream Merge Areas Diverge Areas Estimation of v 12 Estimation of v 12 V 12 = V F ( P FM ) L EQ = (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) P FM = using Equation (Exhibit 13-6) V 12 = pc/h V 3 or V av34 pc/h (Equation or 13-17) Is V 3 or V av34 > 2,700 pc/h? Yes No Is V 3 or V av34 > 1.5 * V 12 /2 Yes No If Yes,V 12a = Capacity Checks pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) L down = V 12 = V R + (V F - V R )P FD L EQ = (Equation or 13-13) On Off P FD = using Equation (Exhibit 13-7) V 12 = 2962 pc/h V 3 or V av34 0 pc/h (Equation or 13-17) Is V 3 or V av34 > 2,700 pc/h? Yes No Is V 3 or V av34 > 1.5 * V 12 /2 Yes No If Yes,V 12a = pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Capacity Checks Actual Capacity LOS F? Actual Capacity LOS F? V FO Exhibit 13-8 V F 2962 Exhibit No V FO = V F - V R 2185 Exhibit No V R 777 Exhibit No Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? Actual Max Desirable Violation? V R12 Exhibit 13-8 V Exhibit :All No Level of Service Determination (if not F) Level of Service Determination (if not F) D R = v R V L A D R = (pc/mi/ln) LOS = (Exhibit 13-2) Speed Determination M S = (Exibit 13-11) S R = (Exhibit 13-11) S 0 = (Exhibit 13-11) S = (Exhibit 13-13) D R = D R = V L D 23.2 (pc/mi/ln) LOS = C (Exhibit 13-2) Speed Determination D s = (Exhibit 13-12) S R = 53.4 (Exhibit 13-12) S 0 = N/A (Exhibit 13-12) S = 53.4 (Exhibit 13-13) Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/ :52 PM ft

24 BASIC FREEWAY WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/f2k430b.tmp Page 1 of 1 10/26/2015 BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENTS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Highway/Direction of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 From/To Church St Off and On Ramps Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period PM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Oper.(LOS) Flow Inputs Des.(N) Volume, V 2050 veh/h Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 AADT veh/day %Trucks and Buses, P T 1 Peak-Hr Prop. of AADT, K %RVs, P R 0 Peak-Hr Direction Prop, D General Terrain: Level DDHV = AADT x K x D veh/h Grade % Length mi Up/Down % Calculate Flow Adjustments f p 1.00 E R 1.2 E T 1.5 f HV = 1/[1+P T (E T - 1) + P R (E R - 1)]0.995 Speed Inputs Lane Width Rt-Side Lat. Clearance Number of Lanes, N 2 Total Ramp Density, TRD ft ft ramps/mi FFS (measured) 60.0 Base free-flow Speed, BFFS LOS and Performance Measures Operational (LOS) v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV 1096 pc/h/ln x f p ) S 60.0 D = v p / S 18.3 pc/mi/ln LOS Glossary N - Number of lanes V - Hourly volume C S - Speed D - Density v p - Flow rate FFS - Free-flow speed LOS - Level of service BFFS - Base free-flow speed DDHV - Directional design hour volume Calc Speed Adj and FFS f LW f LC TRD Adjustment Planning Data FFS 60.0 Design (N) Design (N) Design LOS v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV x f p ) S D = v p / S Required Number of Lanes, N Factor Location pc/h/ln pc/mi/ln E R - Exhibits 11-10, f LW - Exhibit 11-8 E T - Exhibits 11-10, 11-11, f LC - Exhibit 11-9 f p - Page TRD - Page LOS, S, FFS, v p - Exhibits 11-2, 11-3 Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 10/26/ :26 AM

25 RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/r2k2b2.tmp Page 1 of 1 1/7/2016 RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Freeway/Dir of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 Junction Church St On Ramp Date Performed 10/26/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period PM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Inputs Upstream Adj Ramp Yes No L up = On Off ft Freeway Number of Lanes, N 2 Ramp Number of Lanes, N 1 Acceleration Lane Length, L A 875 Deceleration Lane Length L D Freeway Volume, V F 2050 Ramp Volume, V R 370 Downstream Adj Ramp Yes V u = veh/h Freeway Free-Flow Speed, S FF 60.0 Ramp Free-Flow Speed, S FR 30.0 V D = veh/h Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions (pc/h) V (Veh/hr) PHF Terrain %Truck %Rv f HV f p v = V/PHF x f HV x f p Freeway Level Ramp Level UpStream DownStream Merge Areas Diverge Areas Estimation of v 12 Estimation of v 12 V 12 = V F ( P FM ) L EQ = (Equation 13-6 or 13-7) P FM = using Equation (Exhibit 13-6) V 12 = 2192 pc/h V 3 or V av34 0 pc/h (Equation or 13-17) Is V 3 or V av34 > 2,700 pc/h? Yes No Is V 3 or V av34 > 1.5 * V 12 /2 Yes No If Yes,V 12a = pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Capacity Checks No L down = V 12 = V R + (V F - V R )P FD L EQ = (Equation or 13-13) P FD = using Equation (Exhibit 13-7) V 12 = pc/h V 3 or V av34 pc/h (Equation or 13-17) On Off Is V 3 or V av34 > 2,700 pc/h? Yes No Is V 3 or V av34 > 1.5 * V 12 /2 Yes No If Yes,V 12a = pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-19) Capacity Checks Actual Capacity LOS F? Actual Capacity LOS F? V F Exhibit 13-8 V FO 2592 Exhibit 13-8 No V FO = V F - V R Exhibit 13-8 V Exhibit 13- R 10 Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? Actual Max Desirable Violation? V R Exhibit :All No V 12 Exhibit 13-8 Level of Service Determination (if not F) Level of Service Determination (if not F) D R = v R V L A D R = V L D D R = 20.0 (pc/mi/ln) D R = (pc/mi/ln) LOS = C (Exhibit 13-2) Speed Determination M S = (Exibit 13-11) S R = 54.2 (Exhibit 13-11) S 0 = N/A (Exhibit 13-11) S = 54.2 (Exhibit 13-13) LOS = (Exhibit 13-2) Speed Determination D s = (Exhibit 13-12) S R = (Exhibit 13-12) S 0 = (Exhibit 13-12) S = (Exhibit 13-13) Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/ :53 PM ft

26 BASIC FREEWAY WORKSHEET file:///c:/users/jryan1/appdata/local/temp/f2k9f8f.tmp Page 1 of 1 10/26/2015 BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENTS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst Jonathan Ryan Highway/Direction of Travel SR 16/Eastbound Agency or Company ODOT D5 From/To East of Church St On Ramp Date Performed 9/18/2015 Jurisdiction City of Newark Analysis Time Period PM Peak Build/No-Build Analysis Year 2037 Project Description LIC , PID Oper.(LOS) Flow Inputs Des.(N) Volume, V 2420 veh/h Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 AADT veh/day %Trucks and Buses, P T 1 Peak-Hr Prop. of AADT, K %RVs, P R 0 Peak-Hr Direction Prop, D General Terrain: Level DDHV = AADT x K x D veh/h Grade % Length mi Up/Down % Calculate Flow Adjustments f p 1.00 E R 1.2 E T 1.5 f HV = 1/[1+P T (E T - 1) + P R (E R - 1)]0.995 Speed Inputs Lane Width Rt-Side Lat. Clearance Number of Lanes, N 2 Total Ramp Density, TRD ft ft ramps/mi FFS (measured) 60.0 Base free-flow Speed, BFFS LOS and Performance Measures Operational (LOS) v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV 1294 pc/h/ln x f p ) S 60.0 D = v p / S 21.6 pc/mi/ln LOS Glossary N - Number of lanes V - Hourly volume C S - Speed D - Density v p - Flow rate FFS - Free-flow speed LOS - Level of service BFFS - Base free-flow speed DDHV - Directional design hour volume Calc Speed Adj and FFS f LW f LC TRD Adjustment Planning Data FFS 60.0 Design (N) Design (N) Design LOS v p = (V or DDHV) / (PHF x N x f HV x f p ) S D = v p / S Required Number of Lanes, N Factor Location pc/h/ln pc/mi/ln E R - Exhibits 11-10, f LW - Exhibit 11-8 E T - Exhibits 11-10, 11-11, f LC - Exhibit 11-9 f p - Page TRD - Page LOS, S, FFS, v p - Exhibits 11-2, 11-3 Copyright 2015 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010 TM Version 6.70 Generated: 10/26/ :26 AM

27 Intersections

28 AM DHV

29 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ODOT D5 Duration, h 0.25 Analyst Jonathan Ryan Analysis Date Oct 26, 2015 Area Type CBD Jurisdiction City of Newark Time Period AM Peak_2037_No Build/Build PHF 0.92 Urban Street Church St/Country Club Dr Analysis Year 2037 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection SR 16 WB Ramp & Chu File Name SR 16 WB & Church St.xus Project Description AM Peak_2037_No Build/Build Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C E D D B D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 32.3 C 53.1 D 25.7 C 51.1 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 36.4 D Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.7 B 2.7 B 2.2 B 2.1 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.6 A 1.2 A 1.6 A 1.0 A Copyright 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/2016 1:38:47 PM

30 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ODOT D5 Duration, h 0.25 Analyst Jonathan Ryan Analysis Date Oct 26, 2015 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Newark Time Period AM Peak_No Build PHF 0.92 Urban Street Church St/County Club Dr Analysis Year 2037 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection SR 16 EB Ramp & Chur File Name SR 16 EB & Church St.xus Project Description AM Peak_2037_No Build Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s 90.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) F C F D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 79.1 E F 43.0 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 69.2 E Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.7 B 2.3 B 1.9 A 2.1 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.9 A 1.9 A 1.1 A Copyright 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/2016 1:35:24 PM

31 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ODOT D5 Duration, h 0.25 Analyst Jonathan Ryan Analysis Date Oct 26, 2015 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Newark Time Period AM Peak_Build PHF 0.92 Urban Street Church St/County Club Dr Analysis Year 2037 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection SR 16 EB Ramp & Chur File Name SR 16 EB & Church St.xus Project Description AM Peak_2037_Build Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) D C B C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.8 C C 28.1 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.1 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.7 B 2.3 B 1.9 A 2.3 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.9 A 1.9 A 1.1 A Copyright 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/2016 1:32:48 PM

32 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ODOT D5 Duration, h 0.25 Analyst Jonathan Ryan Analysis Date Nov 12, 2015 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Newark Time Period AM Peak_No Build/Build PHF 0.92 Urban Street Church St Analysis Year 2037 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Church St & 30th St File Name Church St & 30th St.xus Project Description AM Peak_2037_No Build/Build Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C C B C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 26.7 C 28.8 C 19.2 B 29.3 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 24.7 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.3 B 2.4 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.6 A 1.0 A 1.3 A 0.5 A Copyright 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/2016 1:39:47 PM

33 PM DHV

34 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ODOT D5 Duration, h 0.25 Analyst Jonathan Ryan Analysis Date Oct 26, 2015 Area Type CBD Jurisdiction City of Newark Time Period PM Peak_2037_No Build/Build PHF 0.92 Urban Street Church St/Country Club Dr Analysis Year 2037 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection SR 16 WB Ramp & Chu File Name SR 16 WB & Church St.xus Project Description PM Peak_2037_No Build/Build Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) D F D C A E E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 47.5 D 64.7 E 20.5 C 63.0 E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 42.1 D Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.7 B 2.7 B 2.2 B 2.1 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.8 A 1.0 A 1.5 A 1.2 A Copyright 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/2016 1:44:20 PM

35 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ODOT D5 Duration, h 0.25 Analyst Jonathan Ryan Analysis Date Oct 26, 2015 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Newark Time Period PM Peak_No Build PHF 0.92 Urban Street Church St/County Club Dr Analysis Year 2037 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection SR 16 EB Ramp & Chur File Name SR 16 EB & Church St.xus Project Description PM Peak_2037_No Build Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) F C F E E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 65.5 E E 65.8 E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 64.5 E Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.7 B 2.3 B 1.9 A 2.1 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.8 A 2.0 A 1.3 A Copyright 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/2016 1:45:34 PM

36 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ODOT D5 Duration, h 0.25 Analyst Jonathan Ryan Analysis Date Oct 26, 2015 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Newark Time Period PM Peak_Build PHF 0.92 Urban Street Church St/County Club Dr Analysis Year 2037 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection SR 16 EB Ramp & Chur File Name SR 16 EB & Church St.xus Project Description PM Peak_2037_Build Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C B C C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.1 C C 30.6 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 29.1 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.7 B 2.3 B 1.9 A 2.3 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.8 A 2.0 A 1.3 A Copyright 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/2016 1:50:09 PM

37 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Agency ODOT D5 Duration, h 0.25 Analyst Jonathan Ryan Analysis Date Nov 12, 2015 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Newark Time Period PM Peak_No Build/Build PHF 0.92 Urban Street Church St Analysis Year 2037 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Church St & 30th St File Name Church St & 30th St.xus Project Description PM Peak_2037_No Build/Build Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h Signal Information Cycle, s Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase Case Number Phase Duration, s Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s Green Extension Time ( g e ), s Phase Call Probability Max Out Probability Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/ln Queue Service Time ( g s ), s Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s Green Ratio ( g/c ) Capacity ( c ), veh/h Volume-to-Capacity Ratio ( X ) Available Capacity ( c a ), veh/h Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/ln ( 95 th percentile) Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ ) ( 95 th percentile) Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh Control Delay ( d ), s/veh Level of Service (LOS) C C C C C C B C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.6 C 30.5 C 25.3 C 29.3 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.9 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.3 B 2.4 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.9 A 1.1 A 1.9 A 0.5 A Copyright 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 Streets Version 6.70 Generated: 1/7/2016 1:48:17 PM

38 APPENDIX C Turn Lane Length Calculations

39 LIC SR PID Minor Interchange Study Turn Lane Length Calculations STORAGE + DEC CELERATION + DIVERGING TA APER LENGTH NO-BLOCK LE ENGTH SR 16 WB Exit Ramp at West Church Street/ Country Club Drive WESTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE AM Design Hour PM Design Hour Design Speed () Intersection Control Signal Signal Signal Signal Cycle Length (sec.) Turning Vehicles/Hour Total Approach Vehicles/Hour % Turns 20% 21% 31% 32% Condition A A A A Cycles/Hour Vehicles/Cycle Vehicles/Cycle (Round) (S) Storage Length (ft.) (D) Deceleration Length (ft.) (B) Bay Length (ft.) = (S) + (D) (T) Diverging Taper (ft.) (L 1 ) Length (ft.) = (B) + (T) Number of Through Lanes Through Vehicles/Hour Through Vehicles/Hour/Lane Through Vehicles/Cycle Vehicles/Cycle (Round) (S 2 ) No-Block Storage (ft.) (T) Diverging Taper (ft.) (L 2 ) No-Block Length (ft.) H:\PROJECTS\2015\201511_16Ch_Ramp\Correspondence\IMS\201511_TurnLaneLengthCalculations 12/8/2015

40 LIC SR PID Minor Interchange Study Turn Lane Length Calculations STORAGE + DEC CELERATION + DIVERGING TA APER LENGTH NO-BLOCK LE ENGTH SR 16 EB Ramps at West Church Street EASTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE AM Design Hour PM Design Hour NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE AM Design Hour PM Design Hour Year 2017 Year 2037 Year 2017 Year 2037 Year 2017 Year 2037 Year 2017 Year 2037 Design Speed () Intersection Control Signal Signal Signal Signal Signal Signal Signal Signal Cycle Length (sec.) Turning Vehicles/Hour Total Approach Vehicles/Hour % Turns 67% 66% 53% 51% 6% 6% 6% 7% Condition A A A A A A A A Cycles/Hour Vehicles/Cycle Vehicles/Cycle (Round) (S) Storage Length (ft.) (D) Deceleration Length (ft.) (B) Bay Length (ft.) = (S) + (D) (T) Diverging Taper (ft.) (L 1 ) Length (ft.) = (B) + (T) Number of Through Lanes Through Vehicles/Hour Through Vehicles/Hour/Lane Through Vehicles/Cycle Vehicles/Cycle (Round) (S 2 ) No-Block Storage (ft.) (T) Diverging Taper (ft.) (L 2 ) No-Block Length (ft.) H:\PROJECTS\2015\201511_16Ch_Ramp\Correspondence\IMS\201511_TurnLaneLengthCalculations 12/8/2015

41

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary Page 2.0 Introduction 2.1 DEVELOPMENT

More information

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study Columbia Falls, Montana Prepared For: TD&H Engineering 450 Corporate Drive, Suite 101 Kalispell, MT 59901 June, 2018 130 South Howie Street Helena, Montana

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For MANUFACTURING COMPANY Prepared For: Airway Heights, WA Prepared By: SUNBURST ENGINEERING, P. S. 4310 S. Ball Dr. Veradale, WA 99037 April, 2013 TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY Manufacturing

More information

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone: JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 Email: jackpflum1@gmail.com Telephone: 513.919.7814 MEMORANDUM REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed Soccer

More information

CEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes)

CEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes) CEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes) Fall 2009 Please write your name on this cover. Please write your last name on all other exam pages This exam is NOT open book, but you are allowed to use one 8.5x11

More information

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management Transportation Impact Analysis Market Street PDP Nassau County, Florida Submitted to Nassau County Growth Management Prepared for TerraPointe Services, Inc. Prepared by VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

More information

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output Rev. April 29, 2005 MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output Table of

More information

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1. Overview In this chapter we explore the models on which the HCM capacity analysis method for signalized intersections are based. While the method has

More information

1 h. Page 1 of 12 FINAL EXAM FORMULAS. Stopping Sight Distance. (2 ) N st U Where N=sample size s=standard deviation t=z value for confidence level

1 h. Page 1 of 12 FINAL EXAM FORMULAS. Stopping Sight Distance. (2 ) N st U Where N=sample size s=standard deviation t=z value for confidence level Page 1 of 12 FINAL EXAM FORMULAS Stopping Sight Distance 2 2 V V d 1.47Vt 1.075 i f a 2 2 Vi Vf d 1.47Vt 30( f 0.01 G) Where d = distance (ft) V = speed (mph) t = time (sec) a=deceleration rate (ft/sec

More information

>

> The grade length should include 5% of the length of the ertical cures at the start and end of the grade. With two consecutie upgrades, 50% of the length of the ertical cure joining them should be included.

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TERRE HAUTE CONVENTION CENTER WABASH AVENUE & 9 TH STREET TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA PREPARED FOR 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phone: (317) 202-0864 Fax: (317)

More information

Approved Corrections and Changes for the Highway Capacity Manual 2000

Approved Corrections and Changes for the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Approved Corrections and Changes for the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Updated 7/8/2005 Previous update 2/27/2004 TRB Committee AHB40, Highway Capacity and Quality of Service Unless stated otherwise, corrections

More information

Signalized Intersections

Signalized Intersections Signalized Intersections Kelly Pitera October 23, 2009 Topics to be Covered Introduction/Definitions D/D/1 Queueing Phasing and Timing Plan Level of Service (LOS) Signal Optimization Conflicting Operational

More information

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE Village of Greene, Chenango County, New York Prepared for: VILLAGE OF GREENE 49 Genesee Street Greene, NY 13778 Prepared by: LARSON DESIGN GROUP 1000

More information

US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study

US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study VISSIM Calibration Document Draft April 13, 2018 Page i Table of Contents 1. Overview... 1 2. Data Types... 2 3. Model Parameter Adjustments...

More information

CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design

CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design TOPIC: Level of Service (LOS) at Traffic Signals 1 Course Outline Introduction to Transportation Highway Users and their Performance Geometric Design Pavement

More information

Airline Road: is a two lane residential roadway adjacent to the west side of the proposed school site with a speed limit of 30 mph.

Airline Road: is a two lane residential roadway adjacent to the west side of the proposed school site with a speed limit of 30 mph. HIGHLAND PARK ISD TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT FOR PROPOSED HPISD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ON NORTHWEST HIGHWAY BETWEEN AIRLINE ROAD AND DURHAM IN THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of

More information

Per your request and authorization, we have prepared this traffic evaluation for the above referenced project.

Per your request and authorization, we have prepared this traffic evaluation for the above referenced project. Memorandum To: From: Re: Marc Stout, P.E. City Engineer, City of Roseville Chris Gregerson, P.E., T.E. Matt Weir, P.E., T.E., PTOE Douglas Boulevard Coffee Kiosk Traffic Evaluation Roseville, California

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) February 2015 Revised: August 2015 April 2016 July 2016 September 2016 Prepared for: KB Home

More information

FREEWAY WEAVING. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 24 CONTENTS EXHIBITS

FREEWAY WEAVING. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 24 CONTENTS EXHIBITS CHAPTER 24 FREEWAY WEAVING CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 24-1 Scope of the Methodology...24-1 Limitations of the Methodology...24-1 II. METHODOLOGY...24-1 LOS...24-2 Weaing Segment Parameters...24-3 Determining

More information

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review CVS Derwood Montgomery County, Maryland May 27, 2016 Local Area Transportation Review Prepared for: JC Bar Properties, Inc. Steve Fleming, PE 415 Fallowfield Road, Suite 301 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011

More information

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015 MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS... 3 Proposed Development... 3 Methodology... 3 Phase 1 Development...

More information

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Subject: Revised Castle Hills BASIS Charter School Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Castle Hills,

More information

Appendix I: Traffic Study

Appendix I: Traffic Study City of Fontana Sierra Lakes Commerce Center Draft EIR Appendix I: Traffic Study FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN JN)\0144\01440050\EIR\1 ADEIR\01440050 Sec99 99 Appendix Dividers.doc THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY

More information

Appendix C Traffic Study

Appendix C Traffic Study Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendix C Traffic Study Schofield Generating Station Project, Hawaii October 2015 C-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement This page intentionally left blank. Schofield

More information

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005 FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005 Prepared For: EDAW, Inc. 1420 Kettner Boulevard, Suite 620

More information

APPENDIX. Sutter Street Bicycle Lanes Stockton, CA January 2010

APPENDIX. Sutter Street Bicycle Lanes Stockton, CA January 2010 APPENDIX reet Bicycle Lanes Stockton, CA January 2010 1. Traffic count locations 2. Turning movement counts o AM PEAK - El Dorado Street at Ingram Street o PM PEAK - El Dorado Street at Ingram Street o

More information

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Square One Drive Extension Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Environmental Study Report Appendix B Transportation and Traffic Analysis Report TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT FINAL DRAFT

More information

Impact of Day-to-Day Variability of Peak Hour Volumes on Signalized Intersection Performance

Impact of Day-to-Day Variability of Peak Hour Volumes on Signalized Intersection Performance Impact of Day-to-Day Variability of Peak Hour Volumes on Signalized Intersection Performance Bruce Hellinga, PhD, PEng Associate Professor (Corresponding Author) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,

More information

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES TRAFFIC STUDY PREPARED FOR: 3000 E. IMPERIAL, LLC. 6940 Beach Boulevard, D-501 Buena Park, California 90621 PREPARED BY: OCTOBER 5, 2017 translutions the transportatio n solutions

More information

Traffic signal design-ii

Traffic signal design-ii CHAPTER 4. TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN-II NPTEL May 3, 007 Chapter 4 Traffic signal design-ii 4.1 Overview In the previous chapter, a simple design of cycle time was discussed. Here we will discuss how the cycle

More information

Appendix B. Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation

Appendix B. Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation Appendix B Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation Technical Memorandum Planning Level Traffic for Northridge Sub-Area Study Office of Statewide Planning and Research Modeling & Forecasting Section

More information

KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12

KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12 KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 1 Site Location and Study Area...

More information

Traffic flow theory involves the development of mathematical relationships among

Traffic flow theory involves the development of mathematical relationships among CHAPTER 6 Fundamental Principles of Traffic Flow Traffic flow theory involves the development of mathematical relationships among the primary elements of a traffic stream: flow, density, and speed. These

More information

Traffic Impact Study

Traffic Impact Study Traffic Impact Study Statham DRI One University Parkway Prepared for: Barrow County Prepared by: October 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary i Section 1. Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Methodology

More information

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 6711 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA Prepared for: NVR, Inc. Prepared by: Wells + Associates, Inc. Michael J. Workosky, PTP, TOPS, TSOS John J. Andrus William L. Zeid, PE 703.917.6620 May 4, 2017

More information

Chapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics

Chapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics Chapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 Contents 2 Introduction The Nature of Traffic Flow Approaches to Understanding Traffic Flow Parameters Connected with Traffic Flow Categories of Traffic Flow The

More information

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015 DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015 May 20, 2015 Mr. Dan Biswas, VP of Development CJS DEVELOPMENT II, LLC 5111 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 200 Scottsdale, CA 85250

More information

S.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning

S.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning Seattle-acoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning Port of Seattle PO OF SEAE Aviation Planning Airport Operations January 24, 2013 Summary he Port is planning to relocate the cell phone

More information

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors]

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors] CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors] Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Belpre (OH) and Marietta (OH) Fiscal Year 2009 Report WOOD WASHINGTON

More information

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report Local Transportation and Traffic Data Travel Time and Delay Data for Belpre and Marietta, Ohio Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission CONTINUING

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017.

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017. Traffic Impact Analysis for the STARBUCKS STORE Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES January 2017 Submitted By January 5, 2017 Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. Transportation Engineering

More information

Design Priciples of Traffic Signal

Design Priciples of Traffic Signal Design Priciples of Traffic Signal Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering Prof. Tom V. Mathew Contents 1 Overview 1 2 Definitions and notations 2 3 Phase design 3 3.1 Two phase signals.................................

More information

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT 6.9 Suffolk 6-54 VMT Population and Travel Characteristics Population 14.5% change 2014 1,529,202 VHD Daily Totals 2014 251,060 49.3% change 2040 1,788,175 2040 374,850 VMT Daily Totals 2014 39,731,990

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SOUTH BAY SALT POND RESTORATION PROJECT PHASE 2

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SOUTH BAY SALT POND RESTORATION PROJECT PHASE 2 APPENDIX G TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SOUTH BAY SALT POND RESTORATION PROJECT PHASE 2 South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project Phase II May 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report Traffic Impact

More information

h CIVIL ENGINEERING FLUID MECHANICS section. ± G = percent grade divided by 100 (uphill grade "+")

h CIVIL ENGINEERING FLUID MECHANICS section. ± G = percent grade divided by 100 (uphill grade +) FLUID MECHANICS section. TRANSPORTATION U.S. Customary Units a = deceleration rate (ft/sec ) A = absolute value of algebraic difference in grades (%) e = superelevation (%) f = side friction factor ± G

More information

Brandywine Road Speed Study FINAL REPORT

Brandywine Road Speed Study FINAL REPORT Brandywine Road Speed Study FINAL REPORT City of Albuquerque Brandywine Road Speed Study Final Report Albuquerque, New Mexico City of Albuquerque May, 2016 Brandywine Road Speed Study Final Report City

More information

Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes

Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes Fairview Ave. and Main St. Improvements and Local Streets Plan Appendices Ada County Highway District Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes January 3, 207 Appendices

More information

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Prepared by: Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite

More information

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections: MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 6, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: CC: MELANIE KNIGHT BRAD BYVELDS/ JENNIFER LUONG 1050 SOMERSET STREET PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OUR FILE NO. 111152 NEIL MALHOTRA The purpose of this memo

More information

Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County

Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County TIP No. U-2827 B WBS # 34872.1.1 June 2013 Prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by Project

More information

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity Report Title Report Date: 2009 Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity Principle Investigator Vendor Name and Address Name Drakopoulos, Alex «Vendor» Affiliation Marquette University Address 263 Haggerty Hall

More information

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5 Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5 Streets and s... 5 Traffic Volumes... 8 Recent and Anticipated Development... 10 Crash Analysis... 10 Projected Traffic Volumes... 11 Trip Generation...

More information

Critchfield Rd / SR-129

Critchfield Rd / SR-129 NOVEMBER 27, 2017 Critchfield Rd / SR-129 Intersection Safety Study Alternatives Report CRITCHFIELD INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY Contents Introduction...1 Purpose...2 Existing Conditions...2 Proposed Alternatives...2

More information

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity Thomas Notbohm, P.E. Wisconsin Department of Transportation Thomas.Notbohm@dot.state.wi.us Alex Drakopoulos Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Marquette University,

More information

Bruce Freeman Rail Trail

Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Functional Design Report Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Station Road to Concord Town Line Sudbury, Massachusetts PREPARED FOR Town of Sudbury Planning and Community Development 287 Old Sudbury Road Sudbury,

More information

FUNDAMENTALS OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING By Jon D. Fricker and Robert K. Whitford

FUNDAMENTALS OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING By Jon D. Fricker and Robert K. Whitford FUNDAMENTALS OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING By Jon D. Fricker and Robert K. Whitford This table includes typos Dr. Saito found besides the ones listed in the authors official errata sheet. Please note that

More information

ROADWAY DESIGN CALCULATIONS

ROADWAY DESIGN CALCULATIONS ROADWAY DESIGN CALCULATIONS Interim Interchange at SR 400 (I-4) and Daryl Carter Parkway FPID: 441113-1-52-01 60% (Phase II) Prepared by: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 150 North Orange Avenue, Suite 200

More information

I-95/I-85 INTERCHANGE ROADWAY SAFETY ASSESSMENT

I-95/I-85 INTERCHANGE ROADWAY SAFETY ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT I-95/I-85 INTERCHANGE ROADWAY SAFETY ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Prepared by: 117306012.B MARCH 2013 Final Report March 2013 I-95/I-85 Interchange ROADWAY SAFETY ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Prepared

More information

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road Date: October 28, 2008 To: From: Toronto and East York Community Council Director, Transportation

More information

CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS

CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS 1. Overview In this chapter we will explore the models on which the HCM capacity analysis method for two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) intersections

More information

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING PREPARED BY DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT October

More information

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

Signalized Intersection Delay Models Transportation System Engineering 56. Signalized Intersection Delay Models Chapter 56 Signalized Intersection Delay Models 56.1 Introduction Signalized intersections are the important points or nodes within

More information

Traffic Signal Timing: Green Time. CVEN 457 & 696 Lecture #18 Gene Hawkins

Traffic Signal Timing: Green Time. CVEN 457 & 696 Lecture #18 Gene Hawkins Traffic Signal Timing: Green Time CVEN 457 & 696 Lecture #18 Gene Hawkins The Problem N 25 134 77 128 643 216 181 517 171 111 154 56 NBLT = 181 vph NBTR = 688* vph SBLT = 216 vph SBTR = 771* vph WB = 321*

More information

MEMORANDUM (DRAFT) DRAFT

MEMORANDUM (DRAFT) DRAFT 117 Commercial St. NE, Suite 310 Salem, OR 97301 503.391.8773 www.dksassociates.com MEMORANDUM (DRAFT) DATE: February 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Alex Dupey, MIG Scott Mansur, PE, PTOE; Garth Appanaitis,

More information

FDOT Level 2 Roundabout b/c Evaluation

FDOT Level 2 Roundabout b/c Evaluation FDOT Level 2 Roundabout b/c Evaluation This spreadsheet tool compares the cost of a roundabout to the cost of a traditional intersection, as specified by the user. A traditional intersection is defined

More information

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945 Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945 Introduction The Brigham Young University Institute of Transportation Engineers student chapter (BYU ITE) completed

More information

Information for File MVP RMM

Information for File MVP RMM Information for File MVP-2013-03320-RMM Applicant: City of St. Cloud Corps Contact: Ryan Malterud Address: 180 Fifth Street East, Suite 700, St. Paul, MN 55101 E-Mail: Ryan.M.Malterud@usace.army.mil Phone:

More information

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006 DRAFT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF TAMU CC Prepared for 3D/International, Inc. 1900 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 November 2006 Interim Review Only Document Incomplete:

More information

PROPOSED PROJECT. Section PROJECT DESCRIPTION

PROPOSED PROJECT. Section PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Environmental Assessment describes the proposed improvements

More information

PRADO BASIN SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. May 31, 2016

PRADO BASIN SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. May 31, 2016 PRADO BASIN SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS May 31, 2016 Kunzman Associates, Inc. PRADO BASIN SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS May 31, 2016 Prepared by: Perrie Ilercil,

More information

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

Signalized Intersection Delay Models Chapter 35 Signalized Intersection Delay Models 35.1 Introduction Signalized intersections are the important points or nodes within a system of highways and streets. To describe some measure of effectiveness

More information

March Grade Crossing Analysis

March Grade Crossing Analysis March 2014 Grade Crossing Analysis T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M South Florida Freight and Passenger Rail Enhancement Study Phase 1A - Rehabilitate Existing Northwood Connection; FPID: 434948-1

More information

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability (http://mobility.tamu.edu/mmp) Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability This report is a supplement to:

More information

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS 3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS In order to better determine future roadway expansion and connectivity needs, future population growth and land development patterns were analyzed as part of

More information

EVALUATION OF SAFETY PERFORMANCES ON FREEWAY DIVERGE AREA AND FREEWAY EXIT RAMPS. Transportation Seminar February 16 th, 2009

EVALUATION OF SAFETY PERFORMANCES ON FREEWAY DIVERGE AREA AND FREEWAY EXIT RAMPS. Transportation Seminar February 16 th, 2009 EVALUATION OF SAFETY PERFORMANCES ON FREEWAY DIVERGE AREA AND FREEWAY EXIT RAMPS Transportation Seminar February 16 th, 2009 By: Hongyun Chen Graduate Research Assistant 1 Outline Introduction Problem

More information

2014 Data Collection Project ITE Western District

2014 Data Collection Project ITE Western District 2014 Data Collection Project ITE Western District Project Completed By: Oregon State University OSU ITE Student Chapter 101 Kearney Hall Corvallis, OR 97331 Student Coordinator: Sarah McCrea (OSU ITE Student

More information

Local Calibration Factors for Implementing the Highway Safety Manual in Maine

Local Calibration Factors for Implementing the Highway Safety Manual in Maine Local Calibration Factors for Implementing the Highway Safety Manual in Maine 2017 Northeast Transportation Safety Conference Cromwell, Connecticut October 24-25, 2017 MAINE Darryl Belz, P.E. Maine Department

More information

From LOS to VMT, VHT and Beyond Through Data Fusion: Application to Integrate Corridor Management

From LOS to VMT, VHT and Beyond Through Data Fusion: Application to Integrate Corridor Management University of California Center for Economic Competitiveness in Transportation From LOS to VMT, VHT and Beyond Through Data Fusion: Application to Integrate Corridor Management Final Report UCCONNECT -

More information

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 6, June ISSN

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 6, June ISSN International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 6, June-2018 109 Quantifying Traffic Congestion by Studying Traffic Flow Characteristics in Wolaita Sodo Town, Ethiopia Mengistu

More information

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance Endo Engineering Traffic Engineering Air Quality Studies Noise Assessments July 13, 2015 Mr. Ed Freeman Pinnacle View, LLC P.O. Box 1754 Lake Oswego, OR 97035-0579 Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan

More information

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672 October 29, 2018 Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc. 1810 S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672 SUBJECT: CANYON STEEL FOCUSED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Carter Redish: Urban

More information

Control Delay at Signalized Diamond Interchanges Considering Internal Queue Spillback Paper No

Control Delay at Signalized Diamond Interchanges Considering Internal Queue Spillback Paper No Publish Information: Xu, H., H. Liu, and Z. Tian (00). Control Delay at Signalized Interchanges Considering Internal Queue Spillback. Journal of Transportation Research Record, No.73, 3 3. Control Delay

More information

Cumulative Count Curve and Queueing Analysis

Cumulative Count Curve and Queueing Analysis Introduction Traffic flow theory (TFT) Zhengbing He, Ph.D., http://zhengbing.weebly.com School of traffic and transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University September 27, 2015 Introduction Outline 1 Introduction

More information

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer March 2, 2018 The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer GO 10 is targeting the week of March 19 to close the Sunland Park Drive flyover entrance ramp to I 10

More information

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

III. FORECASTED GROWTH III. FORECASTED GROWTH In order to properly identify potential improvement projects that will be required for the transportation system in Milliken, it is important to first understand the nature and volume

More information

Draft Final Report. SHRP2 Project L08 Incorporation of Travel Time Reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual. Prepared For: SHRP2

Draft Final Report. SHRP2 Project L08 Incorporation of Travel Time Reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual. Prepared For: SHRP2 SHRP2 Project L08 Incorporation of Travel Time Reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual Draft Final Report DISCLAIMER This report is furnished only for review by members of the SHRP2 project panel

More information

ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL IV

ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL IV ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL IV Evaluation of the Adaptive Traffic Control System in Park City, Utah Dr. Peter T. Martin Associate Professor Aleksandar Stevanovic Research Associate Ivana Vladisavljevic Research

More information

ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared For: Paul Conzelman SC Development 2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 140 Irvine, CA 92612 Prepared By: 2030 Main Street, Suite 1200

More information

FREEWAY FLOW MODELS. Jan LOHOFF. Ruhr University. Phone E Mail

FREEWAY FLOW MODELS. Jan LOHOFF. Ruhr University. Phone E Mail FREEWAY FLOW MODELS Werner BRILON Institute for Transportation and Traffic Engineering Ruhr University Universitaetsstrasse 15 D 4481 Bochum, GERMANY Phone +49 34 3 5936 Fax +49 34 3 14151 E Mail werner.brilon@rub.de

More information

St. Tammany: Transportation Systems Management Study (Covington) RPC Project No. (LA21-COV) State Project No F.A.P. No.

St. Tammany: Transportation Systems Management Study (Covington) RPC Project No. (LA21-COV) State Project No F.A.P. No. St. Tammany: Transportation Systems Management Study (Covington) RPC Project o. (LA21-COV) State Project o. 700-52-0197 F.A.P. o. P-5208(514) LA 21 (Boston Street) Lee Lane to ew Hampshire Street Prepared

More information

Trip Generation Calculations

Trip Generation Calculations Trip Generation Calculations A HORIZON AIR ALLEGIANT AI R EMPLOYEES Daily Trip Generation Daily Trip Generation Daily Trip Generation Directional Flights (per day): 20 Directional Flights (per day): 2.8

More information

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project September 15, 2015 Mr. Bill Johnson Coldwell Banker 511 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Greenbrae, CA 94904 Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project Dear Mr. Johnson; As requested, W-Trans

More information

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842 Speed Limit Review Montague Road, West End CEB06842 CEB06842 Prepared for Brisbane City Council 2 November 2016 Speed Limit Review Montague Road, West End Document Information Prepared for Brisbane City

More information

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008 TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008 Highway work zones in the Staunton District The following is a list of highway work that might affect traffic in the Staunton transportation district during

More information

Mn/DOT s Office of Transportation Data and Analysis TRAFFIC DATA AND MNESALS

Mn/DOT s Office of Transportation Data and Analysis TRAFFIC DATA AND MNESALS Mn/DOT s Office of Transportation Data and Analysis TRAFFIC DATA AND MNESALS Traffic Forecasts and Analysis Section MnPAVE Training Spring, 2002 Presenter: Tom Nelson - (651) 297-1194 email - tom.nelson@dot.state.mn.us

More information

Appendix B.1 EMME Model Calibration Memo

Appendix B.1 EMME Model Calibration Memo Appendix B.1 EMME Model Calibration Memo itrans 144 Front Street West, Suite 655 Toronto, ON M5J 2L7 Tel: (416) 847-0005 Fax: (905) 882-1557 www.hdrinc.com www.itransconsulting.com File: 2.0 Memorandum

More information

Standard Highway Sign Border Specifications

Standard Highway Sign Border Specifications Standard Highway Sign Border Specifications A Radius Radius B C SIGN SIZE SIGN SIZE Variable Radius B C SIGN SIZE BORDER WIDTHS A B C CORNER RADIUS 18 4 30 36 48 60.375.375.375 1.375.375.438 1.5.5.375.65

More information

2015 Grand Forks East Grand Forks TDM

2015 Grand Forks East Grand Forks TDM GRAND FORKS EAST GRAND FORKS 2015 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE DRAFT REPORT To the Grand Forks East Grand Forks MPO October 2017 Diomo Motuba, PhD & Muhammad Asif Khan (PhD Candidate) Advanced Traffic Analysis

More information

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY...

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY... TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY... 1 1.1 Purpose and Study Objective... 1 1.2 Executive Summary... 1 2.0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS... 5 2.1 Granville Parkway (South Intersection)... 8 2.2 Tuscany

More information