Appendix J: Transportation and Circulation

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Appendix J: Transportation and Circulation"

Transcription

1 Appendix J: Transportation and Circulation J 1: Transportation Analysis Report J 2: Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) Approval Letter J 3: Construction Traffic Analysis

2

3 J 1: Transportation Analysis Report

4

5 TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT FOR PROPOSED 6250 SUNSET PROJECT Prepared for: ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. Prepared by: Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, California (310) September 2014

6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 6250 Sunset Project (the Project) is a proposed residential/commercial mixed-use Project within the Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area. The Project Site is located at Sunset Boulevard and Leland Way on the south side of Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue. The Project Site is bounded by Leland Way to the south and North El Centro Avenue to the east. Currently, the Project Site is developed with an approximately 38, 280 square foot building constructed in the late 1930 s as the Earl Carroll Theatre (ECT Building), and a surface parking lot with accessory structures. The ECT Building has been used by the Nickelodeon on Sunset Corporation (Nickelodeon) as a sound stage for television productions with associated offices since the early 1980 s. The Project would protect and retain the ECT Building and would construct a new seven-story mixed-use building on the western portion of the Project Site that would include 200 apartment units and 4,700 square feet of ground floor commercial use. For purposes of a conservative traffic analysis, a Project completion year of 2017 has been assumed and conversion of the ECT Building to creative office was analyzed as a potential scenario. Upon completion, it is estimated that the Project would generate approximately 1,358 new trips per day at area intersections, including 111 AM and 115 PM peak-hour trips assuming the existing ECT Building remains as the current mix of creative office, Studio and support uses, or 1,473 new trips per day at area intersections, including 132 AM and 121 PM peak-hour trips assuming all of the existing ECT Building becomes creative office use. Parking for the Project would be provided within a four level parking structure that would serve residential and commercial uses within the new building as well as the uses within the ECT Building for 316 vehicles (236 residential spaces, 10 spaces for the commercial i

7 use, and 70 spaces for the ECT Building). The parking structure would include two levels of subterranean parking, an at-grade parking level, and an above grade parking level. The proposed parking supply is expected to meet the requirements of the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code. In addition, the Project would comply with the LAMC bicycle parking requirements by providing 246 long-term and short-term bicycle stalls. Vehicular access to parking would be provided via a driveway on Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue for commercial parking access, and a driveway on Leland Way between Vine Street and El Centro Avenue for residential parking access. The Driveway along Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue would be controlled by the existing signal at this intersection with solid and flashing northbound red phases added for Project traffic exiting the commercial parking area, and the southbound approach will be restriped to add a right-turn only lane to facilitate the traffic at this intersection. The traffic study presented herein analyzed existing (2014) and future (2017) AM and PM peak-hour traffic conditions at 13 critical intersections in the vicinity of the Project site. The cumulative traffic conditions attributable to 67 potential related projects in the surrounding area were also analyzed. The Project is not anticipated to have significant traffic impacts at any of the 13 study intersections under the existing and future conditions. Project traffic impacts were also analyzed for Congestion Management Program (CMP) locations. No significant regional traffic impacts were determined for the CMP monitoring intersections or freeway locations. In addition, the Project s transit impacts on the public transit system were analyzed based on existing available transit capacity. No significant transit impacts were identified. ii

8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction... 1 Project Description... 4 Environmental Setting... 6 Freeways... 7 Streets and Highways... 8 Existing (2014) Traffic Volumes Public Transit Analysis of Existing (2014) Traffic Conditions Project Traffic Trip Generation Trip Distribution Trip Assignment Project Parking and Vehicular Access With Project Traffic Conditions Significant Traffic Impact Criteria Existing (2014) With Project Conditions Future (2017) Without and With Project Conditions Traffic Growth Related Projects Highway System Improvements Analysis of Future (2017) Without and With Project Traffic Conditions Regional Traffic Impact Analysis Per Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Transit Impact Analysis Mitigation Measures Appendix A LADOT Signed Traffic Study Memorandum of Understanding Appendix B Traffic Counts Appendix C Study Intersection Geometrics and Signal Phasing Appendix D Project Trip Generation Rates Appendix E Related Projects Trip Generation Rates & Equations Appendix F Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Worksheets iii

9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page 1 Project Site Vicinity and Study Intersections Location Map Project Site Plan Existing (2014) Traffic Volumes Project Trip Distribution Percentages Net Project Traffic Volumes Existing (2014) With Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Related Projects Locations Related Projects Traffic Volumes Future (2017) Traffic Volumes Without Project Future (2017) Traffic Volumes With Project LIST OF TABLES Table No. Page 1 Critical Movement Volume Ranges Levels of Service Level of Service as a Function of CMA Values CMA Summary Existing (2014) Conditions Project Trip Adjustment Factors Project Trip Generation Directional Trip Distribution Significant Project Traffic Impact Criteria CMA Summary Existing (2014) Without and With Project Related Projects Location, Description, and Trip Generation CMA Summary Future (2017) Without and With Project Project Transit Trip Summary iv

10 INTRODUCTION The Project under consideration is a residential/commercial mixed-use development. As shown in Figure 1, Project Site Vicinity Map, the Project Site is located in the Hollywood community of the City of Los Angeles, and is also within the Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area. The Project site is located at Sunset Boulevard and Leland Way, on the south side of Sunset Boulevard at Argyle Avenue. The Project Site is bounded by Leland Way to the south and North El Centro Avenue to the east. Currently, the Project site is developed with the ECT Building and a surface parking lot with accessory structures. The Project would retain the ECT Building and construct a new seven-story mixed-use building on the western portion of the Project Site that would include 200 apartment units and 4,700 square feet of commercial use. Crain & Associates has been retained to assess the potential impacts of the Project on the surrounding roadway system. The analysis that follows was prepared in accordance with the assumptions, methodology, and procedures approved by the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT). The LADOT signed Traffic Study Memorandum of Understanding is included in Appendix A. This report presents the results of an analysis of existing (2014) and future (2017) traffic conditions before and after completion of the Project. The analysis contains a detailed evaluation of traffic conditions during the AM and PM peak hours at the following 13 study intersections: o Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway Southbound Off-Ramp & Vine Street o Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway Northbound On-Ramp & Argyle Avenue o Selma Avenue & Vine Street 1

11

12 o Selma Avenue & Argyle Avenue o Sunset Boulevard & Vine Street o Sunset Boulevard & Argyle Avenue o Sunset Boulevard & El Centro Avenue o Sunset Boulevard & Gower Street o Sunset Boulevard & Van Ness Avenue o Sunset Boulevard & Wilton Place o De Longpre Avenue & Vine Street o Fountain Avenue & Vine Street o Fountain Avenue & El Centro Avenue The locations of these study intersections relative to the Project Site are shown on Project Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1). These locations include key intersections along the primary access routes to and from the site, and are those locations expected to be most directly impacted by Project traffic. 3

13 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project is a proposed residential/ /commercial mixed-use Project within the Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area. The Project Site is located at Sunset Boulevard and Leland Way on the south side of Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue and is bounded by Leland Way to the south and North El Centro Avenue to the east. Currently, the Project Site is developed with the ECT Building, and a surface parking lot with accessory structures. The ECT Building has been used by Nickelodeon as a sound stage for television productions with associated offices since the early 1980 s. The Project would protect and retain the ECT Building and would construct a new mixed-use building on the western portion of the Project Site that would include 200 apartment units and 4,700 square feet of ground floor commercial use. For purposes of a conservative traffic analysis, a Project completion year of 2017 has been assumed and conversion of the ECT Building to creative office was analyzed as a potential scenario. The Project Site plan is provided as Figure 2. Parking for the Project would be provided within a four level parking structure that would serve residential and commercial uses within the new building as well as the uses within the ECT Building. The parking structure would include two levels of subterranean parking, an at-grade parking level, and an above grade parking level that would provide 316 spaces. The proposed parking supply is expected to meet the requirements of the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code. Vehicular access to parking will be provided via a driveway on Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue for commercial parking access, and a driveway on Leland Way between Vine Street and El Centro Avenue for residential parking access. The Driveway along Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue will be controlled by the existing signal at this intersection with solid and flashing northbound red phases added for Project traffic exiting the commercial parking area, and the southbound approach will be restriped to add a right-turn only lane to facilitate the traffic at this intersection. 4

14

15 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Project is located on the south side of Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue. Located within the Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area, the area surrounding the Project Site is primarily developed with commercial and medium- and high-density residential uses. In addition, the Southern California Hospital of Hollywood is located south of the Project Site on De Longpre Avenue. Commercial uses near the Project include studios and offices as well as local and regional-serving retail and restaurant establishments. The commercial uses are primarily concentrated along major arterials including Sunset Boulevard, Hollywood Boulevard, Cahuenga Boulevard and Vine Street. Several other theaters and entertainment-oriented destinations are located within the Project area. There are a number of theaters located approximately one-quarter mile from the Project Site. These theaters include the Pantages Theater and the James A. Doolittle Theater. The Hollywood Palladium is located east of the Project Site, on the north side of Sunset Boulevard. The ArcLight Cinerama Dome is located west of the Project Site, on the south side of Sunset Boulevard between Ivar Avenue and Vine Street. Northwest of the Project Site, tourist attractions are concentrated along Hollywood Boulevard, including Mann Chinese Theater, Kodak Theater and the Hollywood and Highland mixed-use development. Further south between Leland Way and De Longpre Avenue are facilities and parking areas associated with the Southern California Hospital of Hollywood. Residential development in the Project area is primarily multi-family in nature. Near the Project Site, medium density residential development consisting of a three story apartment complex and one-story bungalow-style apartments are located south of the 6

16 Project Site along Leland Way. Multi-family residential developments are also located south of the Project, along De Longpre Avenue, Afton Place, and Fountain Avenue east of Vine Street. Although single-family residences are interspersed throughout portions of the Project area, single-family residential development is primarily concentrated north of Franklin Avenue, in the Hollywood Hills. Some light industrial uses in the Project area are located along portions of Sunset Boulevard north and east of the Project Site. These light industrial uses are primarily movie, radio and television studios, and auxiliary facilities for the entertainment industry. The Project Site and surrounding uses are well-served by Major and Secondary Highways, including Sunset Boulevard, Franklin Avenue, Yucca Street, Hollywood Boulevard, Fountain Avenue, Cahuenga Boulevard, Vine Street, and Gower Street. In addition, surface street access to and from the Hollywood Freeway (US-101) is provided within one-half mile north from the Project Site. These transportation facilities and other local roadways are described in more detail below. Freeways The Hollywood Freeway (US-101) extends in a northwesterly/southeasterly direction through the Project area. Northwest of the Project Site, the Hollywood Freeway provides a direct route through the Cahuenga Pass to the San Fernando Valley. Near Downtown Los Angeles, the Hollywood Freeway interchanges with the Harbor/Pasadena Freeways (I-110/SR-110). The Hollywood Freeway extends southeast of Downtown where it merges with the Golden State Freeway (I-5). In the vicinity of the Project Site, the Hollywood Freeway provides four travel lanes per direction. Surface street access is provided on Hollywood Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard approximately one-half mile east of the Project Site. Less than one-half mile north of the Project Site, a southbound off-ramp is provided on Vine Street. Northbound 7

17 and southbound on-ramps are provided on Argyle Avenue, and northbound and southbound off-ramps are provided on Gower Street. According to the most current (2012) data available through the Caltrans Website, traffic volumes on the Hollywood Freeway, between Sunset Boulevard and Argyle Avenue, are approximately 189,000 vehicles per day (VPD), with peak-hour volumes of approximately 11,700 vehicles per hour (VPH). Streets and Highways Franklin Avenue is an east-west roadway located north of the Project Site. Designated a Secondary Highway, this roadway provides access through the Hollywood Community, from Sierra Bonita Avenue to its eastern terminus at Saint George Street in the Los Feliz community. North of the Project Site, a southbound Hollywood Freeway off-ramp is provided at the intersection of Franklin Avenue/Vine Street and a northbound freeway on-ramp is provided at the intersection of Franklin Avenue/Argyle Avenue. Franklin Avenue generally provides two travel lanes per direction within an approximate 55- to 70-foot wide roadway. Left-turn channelization is provided at major intersections. Selma Avenue, a local street, provides east-west access between Highland Avenue and Gower Street. In the Project vicinity, this street has one travel lane in each direction within an approximately 40-foot roadway width. Sunset Boulevard is a Major Highway Class II, which provides continuous access between Downtown Los Angeles and the Cities of West Hollywood, Beverly Hills, and Santa Monica. This roadway forms the northern boundary of the Project Site. Sunset Boulevard is the northernmost east-west thoroughfare south of the Santa Monica Mountains and is heavily used by both local and commuter traffic. A northbound Hollywood Freeway off-ramp and southbound freeway on-ramp are located on Sunset 8

18 Boulevard, approximately half a mile east of the Project Site. In the Project vicinity, Sunset Boulevard provides three travel lanes in each direction plus left-turn channelization within an approximately 70- to 80-foot roadway width. De Longpre Avenue, an east-west local street south of the Project Site, has one through lane in each direction and eastbound left-turn channelization within a roadway width of approximately 40 feet at its intersection with Vine Street. Fountain Avenue, a Secondary Highway, extends easterly from La Cienega Boulevard to its eastern terminus near its intersection with Hollywood Boulevard, less than two miles northeast of the Project. North of the Project, this east-west roadway provides one travel lane per direction plus on-street parking within an approximately 40-foot roadway width. Vine Street is a north-south Major Highway Class II between Franklin Avenue and Melrose Avenue, where it transitions to Rossmore Avenue. North of Franklin Avenue, Vine Street is designated a Collector Street. Immediately south of Franklin Avenue, a southbound Hollywood Freeway off-ramp is located on Vine Street. Near the Project Site, Vine Street provides two travel lanes per direction plus left-turn channelization, within an approximately 65- to 75-foot roadway width. The Hollywood Walk of Fame branches down both sides of Vine Street between Yucca Street and Sunset Boulevard. Argyle Avenue extends from north of Franklin Avenue to its southern terminus at Sunset Boulevard. Argyle Avenue is a local street throughout its length. A southbound Hollywood Freeway on-ramp is provided on Argyle Avenue between Franklin Avenue and Yucca Street. In the Project vicinity, Argyle Avenue provides one travel lane per direction within an approximately 45- to 50-foot roadway width. Left-turn channelization is provided on Argyle Avenue at major intersections. 9

19 El Centro Avenue forms the eastern boundary of the Project s south parcel. This local street extends north-south between Melrose Avenue and Hollywood Boulevard. In the Project vicinity, El Centro Avenue provides one travel lane per direction within an approximately 35-foot roadway width. Gower Street, located east of the Project Site, is a north-south Secondary Highway between Franklin Avenue and Melrose Avenue. North of Franklin Avenue and south of Melrose Avenue, Gower Street is a local street. Gower Street terminates to the south at 1st Street in the Hancock Park Community. Approximately half a mile northeast of the Project Site, the Hollywood Freeway accesses the surface street network with northbound and southbound off-ramps on Gower Street between Franklin Avenue and Yucca Street. Gower Street provides one travel lane per direction plus left-turn channelization within an approximately 50-foot roadway width. Van Ness Avenue is a Collector Street south of Hollywood Boulevard and a Local Street to the north. This north-south oriented roadway provides discontinuous access from north of Franklin Avenue to its southern terminus at Wilshire Boulevard. Van Ness Avenue provides continuous access from north of Franklin Avenue to Hollywood Boulevard, where it discontinues. Van Ness Avenue resumes continuous service at the Hollywood Freeway southbound off-ramp, located north of Sunset Boulevard. Near the Project, Van Ness Avenue provides one travel lane per direction plus left-turn channelization within an approximately 30-foot roadway width. Wilton Place extends southerly from north of Franklin Avenue to 18th Street, north of the Santa Monica Freeway (I-10). Wilton Place provides discontinuous service south of the Santa Monica Freeway (I-10) to its terminus at 186th Street in the City of Torrance. In the vicinity of the Project, Wilton Place is designated a Secondary Highway between Franklin Avenue and Beverly Boulevard. North of Franklin Avenue, Wilton Place is 10

20 designated a Local Street and south of Beverly Boulevard Wilton Place is a Collector Street. Near the Project Site, Wilton Place provides two travel lanes per direction within an approximately 40- to 45-foot roadway width. Existing (2014) Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes for existing conditions at the study intersections were obtained from manual traffic counts conducted in October 2012 through December In accordance with LADOT Traffic Study Policies and Procedures, the traffic counts conducted for this study cover the weekday morning and afternoon peak commute periods. Peak-hour volumes were determined individually for each intersection based on the combined four highest consecutive 15-minute volumes for all vehicular movements at the intersection. An annual ambience growth factor of 1.0 percent was compounded and applied to the 2012 and 2013 volumes to represent existing volumes for the year The volumes were compared with counts conducted for the Hollywood Palladium project traffic study for the 11 intersections included in both studies. The Palladium counts were conducted in August through October At the 11 common intersections, on an intersection by intersection basis, the higher of the growth factored volumes from each study was determined. The volumes with the greater intersection value were used in this analysis. Weekday peak-hour volumes at the study intersections used in the analysis are detailed on the pages that follow and are illustrated in Figures 3(a) and 3(b). The manual intersection traffic count data sheets are provided in Appendix B. 11

21

22

23 Information pertaining to intersection widths and geometrics, bus stop locations, on-street parking restrictions, and traffic signal operations were obtained from both field checks and City engineering plans. The existing lane configuration and traffic control conditions for the 13 study intersections are illustrated in Appendix C. Public Transit The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) and Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) provide an extensive system of bus lines in the Hollywood Community. A number of MTA and LADOT bus routes are within reasonable walking distance from the Project Site (less than approximately one-quarter mile), providing access for residents, employees and patrons of the Project. Additionally, the proximity of the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station (which is two blocks to the north) allows immediate access to the Metro Red Line subway rail system. The public transit routes serving the Project are described in detail below. MTA Bus Service Lines 2 and 302 are east-west oriented routes which operate between Downtown Los Angeles, Hollywood, Beverly Hills, Westwood and Pacific Palisades via Sunset Boulevard. Line 2 provides service between Pacific Palisades and Downtown Los Angeles. Line 2 provides stops in the Project vicinity on Sunset Boulevard at Vine Street and Gower Avenue. Line 302 follows the same route but provides limited stops along Sunset Boulevard from Beverly Drive to Figueroa Street/Cesar Chavez Avenue. A limited stop that serves the site is provided at Vine Street. Line 2 operates daily with headways of approximately 10 to 15 minutes during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Saturday service is provided approximately 14

24 every 15 minutes. Sunday and holiday service operates on headways of approximately 20 to 30 minutes. Line 302 operates on weekdays only. Lines 180 and 181 operate between Altadena, Pasadena, Eagle Rock, Glendale, Los Feliz and Hollywood. Near the Project Site, Lines 180 and 181 travel along Hollywood Boulevard, with a stop provided at the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station and stops on Hollywood Boulevard at Argyle Avenue and El Centro Avenue. These lines operate weekdays on headways of approximately 20 to 35 minutes during peak hours. Saturday, Sunday and holiday service is provided on headways of approximately 20 minutes. Line 210 provides service between Redondo Beach, Torrance, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Mid-City, Hancock Park and Hollywood. Near the Project Site, Line 210 operates on Vine Street, with stops provided at Sunset Boulevard and at the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station. Line 210 operates daily on headways of 10 to 20 minutes during peak hours. Lines 212 and 312 provide service between Hawthorne, Inglewood, Baldwin Hills and Hollywood, via La Brea Avenue. Line 312 provides limited stops throughout the route. Weekday service is provided on headways of approximately 15 to 30 minutes. Line 312 does not operate on Saturday, Sunday or holidays. Saturday, Sunday and holiday service is provided on Line 212 with headways of approximately 30 minutes. Lines 212 and 312 stop at the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station. Line 217 has north-south service from north of the Santa Monica Freeway (I-10) through the City of West Hollywood and the Hollywood community, via Fairfax Avenue. Near the Project Site, Line 217 operates on Hollywood Boulevard, with stop provided at the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station. Line 217 operates 15

25 Monday through Saturday on headways of approximately 10 to 15 minutes. Sunday and holiday service operates on headways of approximately 15 to 30 minutes. Line 780, the Hollywood/Glendale/Pasadena Metro Rapid line, is part of the greater Metro Rapid Program, which uses a bus signal priority system in combination with frequent stops limited to major intersections in order to minimize travel time. Line 780 provides east-west service between Pasadena, Eagle Rock, Glendale, Los Feliz, Mid City, Park La Brea, West Hollywood and Hollywood. In the vicinity of the Project Site, Line 780 operates on Hollywood Boulevard, with a stop provided at the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station. Service is provided weekdays only, on headways of approximately 10 to 30 minutes. MTA Rail Service Metro Red Line provides rail transportation through Downtown Los Angeles, Mid- Wilshire, and North Hollywood. In the vicinity of the Project Site, the Red Line operates east-west service underneath Hollywood Boulevard. The Metro Red Line Hollywood/Vine Transit Station is located two blocks north of the Project Site. Approximately three-quarters of a mile northwest of the Project Site, there is another Metro Red Line stop at the Hollywood/Highland Transit Station, as well as a stop one mile to the northeast at the Hollywood/Western Transit Station. These Metro Red Line stops provide bicycle storage and park-and-ride lots to encourage multi-modal transportation. With a stop also available at Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles, the Red Line links with the other rail lines and transit ways, providing access to Mid- Wilshire, Long Beach, Redondo Beach, Norwalk, Chatsworth, Culver City and Pasadena. The Red Line operates between 4:30 AM and 12:00 AM, with headways in the Project area ranging from approximately 10 to 20 minutes throughout the day. 16

26 LADOT Bus Service DASH Hollywood provides local access throughout the Hollywood community. Near the Project Site, DASH Hollywood operates along Argyle Avenue and Hollywood Boulevard. Stops within walking distance from the Project Site are provided on Hollywood Boulevard at Argyle Avenue and on Argyle Avenue at the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station. DASH Hollywood operates everyday, including holidays, on approximately 30 minute headways. The Hollywood DASH provides transfer opportunities to the Hollywood/Wilshire DASH, Beachwood Canyon DASH and the Hollywood/West Hollywood DASH, further extending access to and from the Project Site. DASH Hollywood/Wilshire provides north-south access between Hollywood Boulevard and Wilshire Boulevard. Near the Project Site, DASH Hollywood/Wilshire operates along Argyle Avenue and Sunset Boulevard. Stops within walking distance from the Project Site are provided on Sunset Boulevard at El Centro Avenue and on Argyle Avenue at the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station. DASH Hollywood/Wilshire operates Monday through Friday on approximately 25 minute headways. DASH Beachwood Canyon provides north-south access between Beachwood Canyon and Sunset Boulevard. Near the Project Site, DASH Beachwood Canyon runs southbound on El Centro Avenue, westbound on Sunset Boulevard, northbound on Vine Street, and eastbound on Hollywood Boulevard. Stops are provided on Argyle Avenue at the Hollywood/Vine Metro Red Line Transit Station, and on Vine Street at Sunset Boulevard. DASH Beachwood Canyon operates Monday through Saturday on headways of approximately 25 minutes. 17

27 When transfer opportunities are considered, the Project is well served by public transit. Thus, it is expected that some of the person trips generated by the Project will utilize public transportation as their primary travel mode instead of private vehicles. Analysis of Existing (2014) Traffic Conditions An analysis of existing weekday AM and PM peak-hour traffic conditions was performed at the 13 study intersections listed below. These intersections were determined in consultation with LADOT. 1. Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway Southbound Off-Ramp & Vine Street 2. Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway Northbound On-Ramp & Argyle Avenue 3. Selma Avenue & Vine Street 4. Selma Avenue & Argyle Avenue 5. Sunset Boulevard & Vine Street 6. Sunset Boulevard & Argyle Avenue 7. Sunset Boulevard & El Centro Avenue 8. Sunset Boulevard & Gower Street 9. Sunset Boulevard & Van Ness Avenue 10. Sunset Boulevard & Wilton Place 11. De Longpre Avenue & Vine Street 12. Fountain Avenue & Vine Street 13. Fountain Avenue & El Centro Avenue The traffic analysis was performed through the use of established traffic engineering techniques. The methodology used in this study for the analysis and evaluation of traffic operations at each study intersection is based on procedures outlined in Circular Number 212 of the Transportation Research Board. 1 In the discussion of Critical 1 Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Circular Number 212, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.,

28 Movement Analysis (CMA) for signalized intersections, procedures have been developed for determining operating characteristics of an intersection in terms of the Level of Service (LOS) provided for different levels of traffic volume and other variables, such as the number of signal phases. The term "Level of Service" describes the quality of traffic flow. Levels of Service A to C operate quite well. Level D typically is the level for which a metropolitan area street system is designed. Level E represents volumes at or near the capacity of the highway which might result in stoppages of momentary duration and fairly unstable flow. Level F occurs when a facility is overloaded and is characterized by stop-and-go traffic with stoppages of long duration. A determination of the LOS at an intersection, where traffic volumes are known or have been projected, can be obtained through a summation of the critical movement volumes at that intersection. Once the sum of critical movement volumes has been obtained, the values indicated in Table 1 can be used to determine the applicable LOS. "Capacity" represents the maximum total hourly movement volume of vehicles in the critical lanes which has a reasonable expectation of passing through an intersection under prevailing roadway and traffic conditions. For planning purposes, capacity equates to the maximum value of Level of Service E, as indicated in Table 1. The CMA indices used in this study were calculated by dividing the sum of critical movement volumes by the appropriate capacity value for the type of signal control present at the study intersections. Thus, the LOS corresponding to a range of CMA values is shown in Table 2. By applying this analysis procedure to the study intersections, the CMA value and the corresponding LOS for existing (2014) traffic conditions were calculated, as shown in Table 3. The CMA calculation worksheets for existing conditions are included in Appendix F. 19

29 Table 1 Critical Movement Volume Ranges* For Determining Levels of Service Maximum Sum of Critical Volumes (VPH) Level of Two Three Four or Service Phase Phase More Phases A B 1,050 1, C 1,200 1,140 1,100 D 1,350 1,275 1,225 E 1,500 1,425 1,375 F Not Applicable Note: * For planning applications only, i.e., not appropriate for operations and design applications. Also, a computerized traffic signal coordination system, such as Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control (ATSAC), increases these values by approximately seven percent. With the addition of a further upgrade, such as Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS), an additional three percent increase in these values occurs. As shown in Table 3, relatively good Levels of Service (LOS A to C) have been determined for most of the study intersections. The intersection of Sunset Boulevard/Vine Street, located west of the Project, is currently operating at LOS E during the morning peak hour and LOS D during the PM peak hour. South of the Project, the intersection of Fountain Avenue/Vine Street is currently operating at LOS D during the AM peak hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour. 20

30 Table 2 Level of Service As a Function of CMA Values Level of Volume/Capacity Delay per Vehicle Service Ratio (sec / veh) Definition A <= 10 Excellent. No vehicle waits longer than one red light and no approach phase is fully used. B > Very Good. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C > Good. Occasionally, drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D > Fair. Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. E > Poor. Respresents the most vehicles that intersection approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. F Greater than > 80 Failure. Backups from nearby intersections or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Tremendous delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. * Source: LADOT Traffic Study Policies and Procedures, June

31 Table 3 Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Summary Existing (2014) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Intersection CMA LOS CMA LOS 1. Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway SB Off-Ramp & F F Vine Street 2. Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & C B Argyle Avenue 3. Selma Avenue & Vine Street A A 4. Selma Avenue & Argyle Avenue A A 5. Sunset Boulevard & Vine Street E D 6. Sunset Boulevard & Argyle Avenue A A 7. Sunset Boulevard & El Centro Avenue A A 8. Sunset Boulevard & Gower Street C C 9. Sunset Boulevard & Van Ness Avenue B B 10. Sunset Boulevard & Wilton Place A A 11. De Longpre Avenue & Vine Street A A 12. Fountain Avenue & Vine Street D E 13. Fountain Avenue & El Centro Avenue A A 22

32 PROJECT TRAFFIC The following section describes the methodology used to determine the trip generation, distribution and assignment of the Project. Driveway access and parking for the Project are also described in this section. Trip Generation Traffic-generating characteristics of many land uses, including the residential, office, retail/restaurant uses proposed for the Project, have been surveyed and documented in studies conducted under the auspices of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). This information is available in the manual, Trip Generation, 9th Edition, 2012, published by ITE. To be conservative, for retail/restaurant component of the Project, the greater generation rates between retail and restaurant land uses were used for each period to account for the entire area being a single use. The trip generation rates in the ITE manual are nationally recognized, and are used as the basis for most traffic studies conducted in the City of Los Angeles and the surrounding region. However, Studios and Support uses are not included in the ITE manual. Instead, empirical trip generation rates from the Universal Studios Project are utilized in this analysis. Accordingly, for this analysis, the ITE Trip Generation rates and empirical trip generation rates from the Universal Studios Project, provided in Appendix D, were used to determine the daily, AM and PM peak-hour trips generated by the proposed and existing site uses. The rates used to calculate the Project trip generation present a conservative condition, as these rates do not account for such trip-reducing factors as multi-purpose trips, extensive transit usage or pass-by trips. These factors play a significant role in determining the actual traffic generating characteristics of a particular Project, and therefore, adjustments to the traffic generation estimates were deemed appropriate. 23

33 Trip reductions related to the Project are expected to occur as a result of multipurpose or internal trips within the site. This type of trip generally occurs at integrated mixed-use developments containing a variety of uses. For example, in this case, some of the residents and employees of the apartment and office are expected to use on-site retail/restaurant uses, thereby reducing some of the trips that these uses would otherwise generate. Thus, the advantages of a mixed-use Project need to be considered for reasonable evaluation of the trip-making potential of such a Project. The use of public transportation is another important consideration in the evaluation of the Project s trip making potential. As noted previously in the Public Transit section, transit service within the study area is extensive. Significant transit use is not accounted for in the ITE trip generation rates; therefore, appropriate adjustments were made to the Project trip generation to account for transit usage. The internal and transit/walk-in percentages were agreed to with LADOT as part of the MOU development process. In order to confirm the reasonableness of the adjusted trip generation estimates, the project s residential trip estimates were compared with the baseline trip generation estimates for high-rise and mid-rise apartments using the ITE Trip Generation manual (Land Use Codes 222 and 223, respectively). The majority of the existing and proposed residential development in the vicinity of the project, as well as the project itself, would meet the definition of one of these two land use categories. Based on the ITE trip rates, a 200-unit high-rise apartment building would be expected to generate approximately 61 AM and 76 PM peak-hour trips prior to trip reductions. A 200-unit mid-rise apartment building would be expected to generate approximately 69 AM and 85 PM peak-hour trips prior to trip reductions. These peak-hour totals are lower than the adjusted 77 AM and 92 PM peak-hour trip estimates for the residential component in the All Creative Office (lower generating) Scenario. Therefore, these reductions are considered both reasonable and conservative. 24

34 Trip reduction factors for the Project also account for the presence of pass-by trips. These are trips that are due to an intermediate stop at the Project Site during an existing or previously planned trip. These intermediate stops may be for a planned purpose (such as a visit to a retail store on the way home from work), or they may be spur-of-the-moment impulse trips. Accounting for these adjustments more realistically reflects the fact that some trips related to the Project will be multi-purpose trips, and that some Project trips are already on the street system for another purpose and, therefore, are not contributing additional traffic to the surrounding roadway network. The differentiation between pass-by trips versus internal and transit trips is important with regard to the assessment of potential Project traffic impacts at intersections adjacent to the proposed Project Site. Per LADOT traffic study policies and procedures, the pass-by type of trip discount is not appropriate for application to the site driveways or site adjacent intersections. These vehicle trips will eventually travel past the site (and through the site adjacent intersections) and are not eliminated due to the existence of the Project. However, the trip ends to and from the site do not represent new vehicle trips at area intersections. Internal and transit trips, on the other hand, do not represent vehicle trips at the Project driveways. While this type of person trip is not eliminated by the Project s development, no private vehicle trip is generated as the trip occurs by walking or by transit. Thus, the site will serve the same number of patrons, but generate fewer vehicle trips. A summary of the baseline trip generation adjustment factors, which were discussed with and agreed to by LADOT, are presented in Table 4. 25

35 Table 4 Project Trip Adjustment Factors Internal Capture Transit/Walk-in Usage Pass-By Trips Apartment 6%-17%* 15% 0% Office (Proposed) 10% 15% 0% Retail (Proposed) 10% 10% 50% Off/Studio/Sup (Existing) 0% 15% 0% * The value used was adjusted so the internal trip ends on the site balanced with the other uses, and varied by time of day. The results of the Project trip generation calculations, including adjustments for internal, transit and pass-by trips, and the removal of existing site uses, are summarized in Table 5. As shown in this table, it is estimated that the Project will generate approximately 1,358 new trips per day at area intersections, including 111 AM and 115 PM peak-hour trips if assuming the existing ECT Building remains partially creative office and the rest Studio and support uses as it is today, or 1,473 new trips per day at area intersections, including 132 AM and 121 PM peak-hour trips assuming the ECT Building becomes entirely creative office use. To be conservative, the higher trip generations from the All Creative Office scenario were analyzed in the following sections. Trip Distribution Estimation of the directional distribution of Project trips was the next step in the analytical process. This trip distribution pattern for the Project was determined by considering the nature of the Project uses, existing traffic patterns, characteristics of the 26

36 Table 5(a) Project Trip Generation Existing Creative Office and Studio ITE Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Land-Use Trips In Out Total In Out Total Currently Proposed Project Trips 220 Apartments 200 Apt.s 1, Creative Office * 13,510 sf Production Studio ** 13,471 sf Support ** 5,144 sf /932 Shopping Center*** 4,700 sf Subtotal 2, Less Internal Trips Apartments Based on Other Uses (132) (2) (5) (7) (12) (6) (18) Creative Office -10% (29) (3) (1) (4) (2) (8) (10) Production Studio -10% (8) Support -10% (2) Shopping Center -10% (93) (2) (1) (3) (4) (4) (8) Subtotal (264) (7) (7) (14) (18) (18) (36) Less Transit/Walk-in Apartments -15% (181) (3) (12) (15) (11) (6) (17) Creative Office -15% (39) (5) (1) (6) (2) (11) (13) Production Studio -15% (11) (1) (1) Support -15% (3) Shopping Center -10% (84) (1) (1) (2) (3) (4) (7) Subtotal (318) (9) (14) (23) (16) (22) (38) Proposed Site Driveway Trips Residential 1, Commercial 1, Total 2, * General office formulas used so as to follow normal LADOT procedures and not limit usage of the building. ** Measured rates from Universal Studios used as no rates are available from ITE. *** The greater generation was used for each period to account for the entire area being a single use. Existing Site Trips * 710 Creative Office 14,103 sf ** Production Studio 13,471 sf ** Support 5,144 sf Subtotal Transit/Walk-in Creative Office -15% (44) (5) (1) (6) (2) (12) (14) Production Studio -15% (12) (1) (1) Support -15% (3) Subtotal (59) (5) (1) (6) (2) (13) (15) Existing Site Driveway Trips

37 Table 5(a) (continued) Project Trip Generation Existing Creative Office and Studio ITE Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Land-Use Trips In Out Total In Out Total Project Study Intersections Net Trip Impacts Site Adjacent Intersections Residential 1, Commercial Total 1, Pass-by Trips Prop. Shopping Center -50% (377) (6) (4) (10) (15) (16) (31) Other Area Intersections Residential 1, Commercial Total 1, * General office formulas used so as to follow normal LADOT procedures and not limit usage of the building. ** Measured rates from Universal Studios used as no rates are available from ITE. 28

38 Table 5(b) Project Trip Generation All Creative Office ITE Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Land-Use Trips In Out Total In Out Total Currently Proposed Project Trips 220 Apartments 200 Apt.s 1, Creative Office * 32,125 sf Production Studio ** - sf Support ** - sf /932 Shopping Center*** 4,700 sf Subtotal 2, Less Internal Trips Apartments Based on Other Uses (148) (2) (9) (11) (14) (6) (20) Creative Office -10% (55) (7) (1) (8) (2) (10) (12) Production Studio -10% Support -10% Shopping Center -10% (93) (2) (1) (3) (4) (4) (8) Subtotal (296) (11) (11) (22) (20) (20) (40) Less Transit/Walk-in Apartments -15% (178) (3) (11) (14) (10) (6) (16) Creative Office -15% (75) (9) (1) (10) (3) (13) (16) Production Studio -15% Support -15% Shopping Center -10% (84) (1) (1) (2) (3) (4) (7) Subtotal (337) (13) (13) (26) (16) (23) (39) Proposed Site Driveway Trips Residential 1, Commercial 1, Total 2, * General office formulas used so as to follow normal LADOT procedures and not limit usage of the building. ** Measured rates from Universal Studios used as no rates are available from ITE. *** The greater generation was used for each period to account for the entire area being a single use. Existing Site Trips * 710 Creative Office 14,103 sf ** Production Studio 13,471 sf ** Support 5,144 sf Subtotal Transit/Walk-in Creative Office -15% (44) (5) (1) (6) (2) (12) (14) Production Studio -15% (12) (1) (1) Support -15% (3) Subtotal (59) (5) (1) (6) (2) (13) (15) Existing Site Driveway Trips

39 Table 5(b) (continued) Project Trip Generation All Creative Office ITE Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Land-Use Trips In Out Total In Out Total Project Study Intersections Net Trip Impacts Site Adjacent Intersections Residential 1, Commercial Total 1, Pass-by Trips Prop. Shopping Center -50% (377) (6) (4) (10) (15) (16) (31) Other Area Intersections Residential 1, Commercial Total 1, * General office formulas used so as to follow normal LADOT procedures and not limit usage of the building. ** Measured rates from Universal Studios used as no rates are available from ITE. surrounding roadway system, geographic location of the Project and its proximity to freeways and major travel routes, employment centers to which residents would likely be attracted, and areas from which patrons of the retail uses would likely be attracted. Based on these factors, the overall Project distributions were determined, and are summarized in Table 6. Trip Assignment Table 6 Directional Trip Distribution Direction Project North 15% South 30% East 30% West 25% Total 100% The directional distribution percentages shown in Table 6 were then disaggregated and assigned to specific routes and intersections within the study area that are expected to 30

40 be used to access the Project. These Project trip assignment percentages are presented in Figures 4(a) and 4(b) for the Project. These percentages were reviewed and approved by LADOT. Applying these inbound and outbound percentages to the Project trip generation previously calculated in Table 5 for each of the proposed uses, net Project traffic volumes at the 13 study intersections were determined for the AM and PM peak hours, as shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), respectively. Per LADOT traffic study policies and procedures, no pass-by trip reductions were applied to Project trips at the Project driveways or the site adjacent intersection of Sunset Boulevard/Argyle Avenue. The results of this traffic assignment provide the necessary level of detail to conduct the traffic impact analysis. Project Parking and Vehicular Access Parking for the Project will be provided in multi-level above and subterranean parking garages underneath the apartment buildings. The parking structures will provide approximately 316 spaces. The proposed parking supply is expected to meet the requirements of the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code. In addition, the Project would comply with the LAMC bicycle parking requirement by providing 246 long-term and short-term bicycle stalls. Vehicular access for commercial parking will be provided via a driveway on Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue, and a driveway on Leland Way between Vine Street and El Centro Avenue for residential parking access. The Driveway along Sunset Boulevard opposite Argyle Avenue will be controlled by the existing signal at this intersection with solid and flashing northbound red phases added for exiting Project traffic, and the southbound approach will be restriped to add a right-turn only lane to facilitate the traffic at this intersection. 31

41

42

43

44

45 WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This report analyzes the traffic conditions under the Existing and Existing Plus Project scenarios in addition to Future Without Project and Future With Project scenarios. This section analyzes these conditions to determine the Project traffic impacts under both the existing and future conditions. Significant Traffic Impact Criteria LADOT defines a significant traffic impact attributable to a Project based on a stepped scale with intersections experiencing high volume-to-capacity ratios being more sensitive to additional traffic than those operating with more available capacity. According to LADOT policy, a significant impact is identified as an increase in the CMA value due to Project-related traffic of or more when the final (with Project) Level of Service is LOS E or F, a CMA increase of or more when the final Level of Service is LOS D, or a CMA increase of or more at LOS C. No significant impacts are deemed to occur at LOS A or B, as these operating conditions exhibit sufficient surplus capacities to accommodate large traffic increases with little effect on traffic delays. These criteria are summarized in Table 7. Table 7 LADOT Criteria for Significant Traffic Impact LOS Final CMA Value Project-Related Increase in CMA Value C > equal to or greater than D > equal to or greater than E, F > equal to or greater than Existing (2014) With Project Conditions The analysis of existing traffic conditions at the study intersections for existing year (2014) was performed as described previously. The Existing intersection volumes for 36

46 the AM, and PM peak hours were shown previously on Figures 3(a) and 3(b), respectively. These estimates are the "benchmark" volumes used in determining Project traffic impacts on the existing street system. Traffic volumes generated by the Project shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b) were then added to the Existing (2014) volumes to form the Existing With Project intersection volumes, as depicted on Figures 6(a) and 6(b). These volumes were used to determine traffic impacts directly attributable to the proposed Project. Table 8 presents the results of the CMA and LOS analysis of the Existing (2014) and Existing With Project conditions. As shown in Table 8, none of the thirteen study intersections would be significantly impacted by Project traffic under Existing (2014) conditions. (The CMA worksheets are included in Appendix F.) Future (2017) Without and With Project Conditions A number of projects are either planned for development or under construction in the Project area. These related projects could contribute to traffic in and around the Project vicinity in the near future. For this reason, analysis of the future traffic has been expanded to include traffic that may be generated by yet undeveloped or unoccupied projects. In order to evaluate future traffic conditions in the Project area, an analysis of the existing (2014) traffic volumes was first conducted, as described previously. For the analysis of future conditions for the study year of 2017, an ambient growth factor of 1.0 percent per year, compounded annually, was applied to the existing volumes at the 13 study intersections. The result provides the baseline traffic volumes for the analysis of future (2017) conditions. Although the inclusion of the annual growth factor generally accounts for area-wide traffic increases, for the purposes of providing a conservative analysis of the 37

47

48

49 Table 8 CMA and LOS Summary Existing (2014) With Project Traffic Conditions Peak Without Project With Project No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS Impact 1. Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway AM F F SB Off-Ramp & Vine Street PM F F Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway AM C C NB Off-Ramp & Argyle Avenue PM B C Selma Avenue & AM A A Vine Street PM A A Selma Avenue & AM A A Argyle Avenue PM A A Sunset Boulevard & AM E E Vine Street PM D D Sunset Boulevard & AM A A Argyle Avenue PM A A Sunset Boulevard & AM A A El Centro Avenue PM A A Sunset Boulevard & AM C C Gower Street PM C C Sunset Boulevard & AM B B Van Ness Avenue PM B B Sunset Boulevard & AM A A Wilton Place PM A A De Longpre Avenue & AM A A Vine Street PM A A Fountain Avenue & AM D D Vine Street PM E E Fountain Avenue & AM A A El Centro Avenue PM A A

50 potential cumulative effects, the traffic generated by related projects in the study area was also added to the future baseline traffic volumes. The total future volumes, including related projects, provide the basis for the Without Project condition. Finally, Project traffic was analyzed as an incremental addition to the Future (2017) Without Project condition to determine the Future (2017) With Project condition. Traffic Growth Based on an analysis of the trends in traffic growth in the Hollywood Community over the last several years, an annual traffic growth factor of 1.0 percent for the area street system was applied, as approved by LADOT. This growth factor was assumed to account for increases in traffic due to potential projects not yet proposed or projects outside the study area. Compounded annually, the growth factor was applied to the existing traffic volumes to develop the estimated baseline volumes for the study year Related Projects In addition to the use of the ambient growth rate, listings of potential related projects in the study area that might be developed within the study time frame were obtained from LADOT, City of West Hollywood, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), and recent studies of projects in the area. A review of the information currently available indicated that a total of 67 projects within an approximate 1.5- mile radius of the Project could add traffic to the study intersections. Some of the number of trips expected to be generated by the related projects were provided by LADOT and the EIR document of the recent studies of projects. Trip generation rates and equations used to calculation the rest of related projects trip generations are from Trip Generation, 9th Edition, 2012, published by ITE, which are included in Appendix E. The locations of these related projects 41

51 are shown in Figure 7. The related project descriptions and their trip generation estimates are summarized in Table 9. As noted previously, the ambient traffic growth rate is generally sufficient to estimate increases in traffic volumes at the study locations. However, for a more conservative estimate of cumulative traffic volumes, the trips generated by the related projects were also included. For the analysis of Future (2017) Without Project traffic conditions, the related projects trip generation was assigned to the study area circulation system, using methodologies similar to those previously described for Project trip assignment. The total related projects traffic volumes assigned to the study intersections are illustrated in Figures 8(a) and 8(b) for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Highway System Improvements A number of traffic improvements have been implemented in the study area in recent years to make more efficient and effective use of the existing street system. All of the signalized study intersections are now operating under the City s Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS), in addition to the previously implemented ATSAC (Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control) System. ATCS/ATSAC is a highly sophisticated computerized system that continually monitors traffic demand at signalized intersections within the system, and modifies traffic signal timing in real time to maximize capacity and decrease delay. The ATSAC signal enhancements have been recognized to increase intersection capacities by approximately seven percent at locations where it has been installed and the upgraded ATCS system is able to increase capacity by another three percent for a total intersection capacity increase of ten percent. These intersection capacity improvements have been incorporated in the analysis of existing (2014) and future (2017) traffic conditions. 42

52

53 Table 9 Related Projects Location, Description, and Trip Generation AM PK HR PM PK HR ADDRESS SIZE PROJECT DESCRIPTION DAILY IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 3,000 sf Synagogue Chapel Expansion st Private School Expansion N Las Palmas Avenue [1] 29 du Condominium 1, du Apartment W Sunset Boulevard [1] 44 du Apartment ,900 sf Other N Highland Avenue [1] 76 du Apartment ,500 sf Retail Lanewood Avenue [1] 43 du Apartment N Highland Avenue [1] 118 du Apartment W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 17,717 sf High-Turnover Restaurant 1, N Cherokee Avenue [1] 66 du Apartment W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 11,400 sf Quality Restaurant 1, W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 10,402 sf Restaurant 547 (16) (11) (27) ,074 sf Office W Selma Avenue [1] 85,000 sf Office W Selma Avenue [1] 85 rm Hotel 2, ,840 sf Restaurant/Club N Vine Street [1] 44,000 sf Museum (79) 15 (2) 13 (62) 2 (59) 35,231 sf Storage N Vine Street [1] 118 rm Hotel W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 80 rm Hotel 1,020 (19) 11 (8) ,290 sf High-Turnover Restaurant N Argyle Avenue [1] 169,463 sf Office ,200 sf Retail N Vine Street Millennium Hollywood [2] 9, du Residential 254 rm Hotel 80,000 sf Sports/Fitness Club 264,303 sf General Office 100,000 sf Retail 25,000 sf Quality Restaurant 44

54 Table 9 (continued) Related Projects Location, Description, and Trip Generation AM PK HR PM PK HR ADDRESS SIZE PROJECT DESCRIPTION DAILY IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL W Hollywood Boulevard Pantages Theatre Office Building [3] 1, ,000 sf Office W Hollywood Boulevard Hollywood Gateway (Blvd 6200) [4] 9, ,018 du Apartment 24 du Live/Work 175,000 sf Retail N Vine Street Selma & Vine [5] 1, ,996 sf Office 2,613 sf Quality Restaurant W Yucca Street [1] 108 du Apartment du Live/Work 13,442 sf Office 6,177 sf Other N Argyle Avenue [1] 225 rm Hotel 1, W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 176 du Apartment 1, ,200 sf Retail N Highland Avenue [1] 248 rm Apartment 1, ,710 sf Retail N Highland Avenue [1] 100 enrolschool (1) empl Staff W Sunset Boulevard Columbia Square [6] 9, du Condominium 200 du Apartment 380,000 sf Office 125 rm Hotel 20,000 sf Quality Restaurant 11,000 sf Fast Food without Drive-Through 10,300 sf Specialty Retail N Vine Street [1] 306 du Apartment 3, ,000 sf Retail 45

55 Table 9 (continued) Related Projects Location, Description, and Trip Generation AM PK HR PM PK HR ADDRESS SIZE PROJECT DESCRIPTION DAILY IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL W Sunset Boulevard [1] 311 du Condominium 1, ,000 sf Office 5,000 sf Retail 8,500 sf Other N Gordon Street Center [7] n/a st Student 4 staff Faculty 12 staff Administrative Staff 6,400 sf Specialty Retail W Sunset Boulevard Sunset Bronson Studios [8] 2, ,929 gsf Office N Highland Avenue Indigo Hotel [9] rm Hotel W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 108 du Apartment ,937 sf Specialty Retail W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 278 du Condominium 1,267 (3) ,500 sf Retail W Hollywood Boulevard [1] 4,648 sf Restaurant ,000 sf Deli W Sunset Boulevard [1] 163,862 sf Discount Retail (Target) 4, ,877 sf Shopping Center Melrose Avenue Paramount (Project M) [10] 9, ,033 Project Buildout Year 2038, 1/4 of the total project trips are assumed for Year , W Santa Monica Boulevard [1] 84 du Apartment ,885 sf Retail 4,665 sf Other W Santa Monica Boulevard Paseo Plaza [11] 6, du Apartment 377,900 sf Retail N Gower Street [1] 21 du Apartment du Condominium N Wilcox Avenue [1] 100 du Apartment

56 Table 9 (continued) Related Projects Location, Description, and Trip Generation AM PK HR PM PK HR ADDRESS SIZE PROJECT DESCRIPTION DAILY IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL W Romaine Street [1] 114,725 sf Office n/a ,927 sf Other 38,072 sf Studio Seward Street [1] 130,000 sf Office 1, Romaine Street Hollywood Center Studios [12] ,155 sf Studio Office 1,970 sf Storage N Seward Street Seward & Romaine [13] 2, ,568 sf Office 4,000 sf Quality Restaurant W Santa Monica Boulevard [1] 786 du Mid-Rise Apartments 1, ,000 sf Restaurant 5,500 sf Coffee Shop 12,700 sf Retail W Santa Monica Boulevard [1] 13,387 sf Pharmacy/Drug Store 262 (27) (31) (58) W Santa Monica Boulevard [1] 348 du Apartment 2, ,000 sf Retail 45,000 sf Office 8,100 sf Other N La Brea Avenue [1] 88,750 sf Office ,000 sf Retail N La Brea Avenue [1] 179 du Apartment 2, ,550 sf Supermarket N Highland Avenue [1] 806 sf Coffee Shop Along Hollywood Freeway between 44 acre Hollywood Central Park Bronson Avenue and Santa Monica Boulevard La Brea Avenue [14] 8,833 sf Retail du Apartment Santa Monica Boulevard [14] n/a Movietown 1, SW corner Santa Monica Boulevard/Formosa Aven n/a Warner Studios 4,

57 Table 9 (continued) Related Projects Location, Description, and Trip Generation AM PK HR PM PK HR ADDRESS SIZE PROJECT DESCRIPTION DAILY IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL La Brea Avenue [14] 187 du Apartment 1, ,664 sf Convenience Store ,089 sf Restaurant ,300 sf Coffee Shop ,506 sf Bank , Santa Monica Boulevard [14] 184 du Apartment 1, ,300 sf Convenience Store ,800 sf Restaurant ,250 sf Pharmacy ,000 sf Bank , La Brea Avenue [14] n/a Apartment/Office Santa Monica Boulevard [14] n/a Mixed-Use Project (Faith Plating) 1, W Sunset Boulevard [15] 598 du Apartment 3, rm Hotel 2, ,000 sf Retail/Restaurant 1, , Sunset Boulevard sf Office 2, ,000 sf Retail 1, , Sunset Boulevard 10 fuel Gas Station 1, Hollywood Boulevard 12,255 sf Drinking Place 1, sf Restaurant , Melrose Avenue 96 du Condominium ,350 sf Retail Hollywood Boulevard 42,869 sf Museum n/a ,405 sf Retail

58 Table 9 (continued) Related Projects Location, Description, and Trip Generation AM PK HR PM PK HR ADDRESS SIZE PROJECT DESCRIPTION DAILY IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Sunset Boulevard 50 rm Hotel Gramercy Place 350 st Private Middle/High School Highland Avenue 496 du Condominium 2, rm Hotel 2, ,200 sf Office 2, ,400 sf Retail 2, , , Wilcox Avenue 225 rm Hotel 1, Hollywood Boulevard 195 rm Hotel 1, ,000 sf Retail 1, , Western Avenue 52 du Apartment ,500 sf Retail Source: [1] Trip generations from LADOT database. [2] Traffic Impact Study Report for Proposed Millennium Hollywood Development, June [3] Traffic Impact Report for Proposed Pantages Theatre Office Building, April [4] Traffic Impact Report for Proposed Blvd 6200 Mixed-Use Project in Hollywood Redevelopment Plan Area, March [5] Traffic Impact Study Report for Proposed Office Building Project at 1601 & 1605 N. Vine Street, Hollywood, September [6] Traffic Impact Report for Columbia Square Project in Hollywood, May [7] Draft Environmental Impact Report for Emerson College Los Angeles Center, October [8] Traffic Study Technical Letter for Sunset Bronson Studios, May [9] Traffic Impact Analysis for the Proposed Indigo Hotel Project, December [10] Traffic Study Memorandum Of Understanding, September 30, [11] Traffic Impact Report for Proposed Paseo Plaza Hollywood Mixed Use Project, City of Los Angeles, December [12] Traffic Study for Hollywood Center Studios, July [13] Traffic Impact Study Report for Proposed Office Project at 959 Seward Street in Hollywood, March [14] Trip generation from City of West Hollywood Related Projects List,March 17, [15] To be conservative, assumed the greatest (Option 2) trip generations. 49

59

60

61 In order to accurately forecast future (2017) traffic conditions in the Project area, an investigation into anticipated transportation improvements to the street system serving the Project area was conducted. A review of the Bureau of Engineering s Uniform Project Reporting System website found no street improvement projects that could affect any of the 13 study intersections or future year analyses. No City street improvement projects that could affect any of the 13 study intersections or future year analyses were identified. As a project feature and to facilitate traffic at the Project driveway intersection Sunset Boulevard and Argyle Avenue, the southbound approach will be converted from one shared lane to one left/through-shared lane, and one right-turn only lane. The signal at this driveway intersection will be updated to include a solid and flashing northbound red phases for the exiting Project traffic. Analysis of Future (2017) Traffic Conditions, Without and With Project The analysis of future traffic conditions at the study intersections was performed using the same analysis procedures described previously in this report. As described earlier, for the analysis of future Project traffic impacts, the current roadway system s geometric and signal operation characteristics were assumed to prevail. Future (2017) baseline traffic volumes for the without Project condition were determined by combining area ambient traffic growth with the total related projects traffic volumes. The Future (2017) Without Project traffic volumes are illustrated in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Net Project volumes [Figures 5(a) and 5(b)] were then combined with the Future (2017) Without Project traffic volumes to develop the Future (2017) With Project volumes, which were used to determine traffic impacts directly attributable to the Project. 52

62

63

64 The Future With Project morning and afternoon peak-hour traffic volumes are shown in Figures 10(a) and 10(b), respectively. The results of the analysis of future traffic conditions at the study intersections are summarized in Table 10. As shown in this table, although the addition of Project traffic will increase the CMA value at all of the study intersections during both peak hours, the incremental Project traffic additions will not result in a change in level of service at any study intersection. Prior to the addition of Project traffic, it is estimated that 7 of the study intersections will continue to have good levels of service (LOS A through LOS C) during both peak hours. For the Future (2017) With Project condition, these 7 intersections will continue to operate at LOS A through LOS C during both peak hours. One study intersection is forecast to operate at LOS D or better during one peak hour. The remaining 6 study intersections are expected to operate at LOS E or F during one or both peak hours. As shown in Table 10, none of the thirteen study intersections would be significantly impacted by Project traffic under Future (2017) conditions. (The CMA worksheets are included in Appendix F.) Regional Traffic Impact Analysis Per Congestion Management Plan (CMP) To address the increasing public concern that traffic congestion is impacting the quality of life and economic vitality of the State of California, Proposition 111 enacted the Congestion Management Program (CMP) in The intent of the CMP is to provide the analytical basis for transportation decisions through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) process. A countywide approach has been established by the MTA, the local CMP agency, designating a highway network that includes all state highways and principal arterials within the County. The Level of Service at each CMP monitoring station is supervised by local jurisdictions in order to implement the statutory requirements of the CMP. If Level of Service standards deteriorate, then local 55

65

66

67 Table 10 Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) Summary Future (2017) Traffic Conditions - Without and With Project Peak Without Project With Project No. Intersection Hour CMA LOS CMA LOS Impact 1. Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway AM F F SB Off-Ramp & Vine Street PM F F Franklin Avenue/US-101 Freeway AM D D NB Off-Ramp & Argyle Avenue PM E E Selma Avenue & AM C C Vine Street PM D D Selma Avenue & AM B B Argyle Avenue PM C C Sunset Boulevard & AM F F Vine Street PM F F Sunset Boulevard & AM C B Argyle Avenue PM D C Sunset Boulevard & AM B B El Centro Avenue PM C C Sunset Boulevard & AM E E Gower Street PM F F Sunset Boulevard & AM E E Van Ness Avenue PM F F Sunset Boulevard & AM C C Wilton Place PM D D De Longpre Avenue & AM A A Vine Street PM B B Fountain Avenue & AM E E Vine Street PM F F Fountain Avenue & AM A A El Centro Avenue PM A A

68 jurisdictions must prepare a deficiency plan to meet conformance standards outlined by the countywide plan. The local CMP requires that all CMP monitoring intersections be analyzed where a Project would likely add 50 or more trips during the peak hours. The nearest such intersections are Santa Monica Boulevard/Highland Avenue and Santa Monica Boulevard/Western Avenue, located approximately one mile southwest and southeast of the Project, respectively. A review of the Project trip distribution and net Project traffic additions to the study vicinity shows that the Project will not add 50 or more trips to these CMP intersections. It is estimated that the Project would generate at most 4 trips (1 inbound, 3 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 4 trips (2 eastbound, 2 westbound) during the PM peak hour at the intersection of Santa Monica Boulevard/Highland Avenue. At the intersection of Santa Monica Boulevard/Western Avenue, the Project is expected to contribute at most 6 trips (2 westbound, 4 eastbound) during the AM peak hour and 6 trips (3 westbound, 3 eastbound) during the PM peak hour. As these volumes are below the threshold of 50 trips, no further CMP intersection analysis is warranted. In addition, any CMP freeway monitoring segment where a Project is expected to add 150 or more trips in any direction during the peak hours is to be analyzed. The nearest CMP freeway monitoring segment is the Hollywood Freeway (US-101) south of Santa Monica Boulevard. Based on the Project trip generation described earlier in this report, assuming the existing building becomes creative office use that generate relatively more trips, the Project is expected to add approximately 132 trips during the AM peak hour (52 inbound, 80 outbound) and 121 trips during the PM peak hour (71 inbound, 50 outbound) to the adjacent street system. These amounts are less than the freeway 59

69 threshold of 150 directional trips. Therefore, no significant Project impact to any CMP freeway monitoring location is forecast and no additional freeway analysis is necessary. Transit Impact Analysis The traffic study area is well served by a number of public transit operators, including the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and LADOT DASH. The Project site s proximity to Metro Rail stations links it to Amtrak, Metrolink, other Metro Rail services, Metro Transitway and numerous bus routes. There is a Metro Rail Line (Red) and about 9 bus lines operated by Metro and LADOT with stops within approximately one-quarter mile walking distance of the Project site. These routes, which are described in the Environmental Setting section of the report, have headways ranging from 10 to 30 minutes for most service lines during peak hours. To be conservative, 18 service buses/trains per hour during weekday peak hours (one train and 9 bus lines with 30 minute headways) were assumed for this analysis. The analysis of Project impacts on transit was performed by determining if the Project transit trips could be absorbed by the available capacity on the rail and bus lines serving the area. Project transit impacts were analyzed using the transit trips results from the Project automobile trip generation calculations in Table 5. In Table 5, adjustments for the transit trips are combined with walk-in trips. To be conservative, Table 11 includes walk-in trips as Project transit trips. In addition, an average automobile occupancy factor of 1.2 was utilized to translate the Table 5 automobile trip generation to person trips. As shown in Table 11, on an average weekday, the Project would generate transit demand of approximately 278 person trips per day, including 20 person trips during the AM peak hour and 24 person trips during the PM peak hour. This equates to an estimated average of 1.2 transit riders during AM peak hour and 1.4 transit riders during PM peak hour transit vehicle serving the area from the Project. 60

70 Table 11 Project Transit Trip Summary Daily AM Peak Hr. PM Peak Hr. Project Transit Automobile Trip Credit: Project Transit Person Trips: (1.2 person trips per automobile trip) Ave. Project Ridership/Transit Veh (based on 20 trains and buses) Given that the capacity of a standard bus is 40 riders, an articulated bus capacity is 60 riders and a train capacity is greater, this level of ridership is not considered to have a significant impact. 61

71 MITIGATION MEASURES Project impacts at thirteen intersections in the area surrounding the Project, on the CMP network of roadways and on the transit system were analyzed in this study. As indicated in the preceding analyses, the Project is not expected to significantly impact any of the study intersections, the CMP system or the transit system. Therefore, no transportation mitigation measures are recommended. 62

72 APPENDIX A LADOT SIGNED TRAFFIC STUDY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89 APPENDIX B TRAFFIC COUNTS

90 VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY N/S STREET: PERIOD: VINE STREET AM PEAK HOUR E/W STREET: DATE: Wed FRANKLIN AVE/101 SB OFF RAMP December 11, 2013 Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, CA MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Tel: (310) TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00-7: :15-7: N 7:30-7: VINE STREET 7:45-8: :00-8: , :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: :45-10: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AM PEAK HOUR: 365 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 773 7:00-8: ,250 2,616 7:45-8:45 7:15-8: ,338 2,896 7:30-8: ,445 3, :45-8: ,528 3,314 * 8:00-9: ,475 3,260 8:15-9: ,501 3,304 8:30-9: ,471 3,213 8:45-9: ,399 3,121 9:00-10: ,369 3, FRANKLIN AVE/101 SB OFF RAMP PERIOD: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: Wed December 11, MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 3:00-3: :15-3: VINE STREET 3:30-3: :45-4: , :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PM PEAK HOUR: 430 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 494 3:00-4: ,612 5:00-6:00 3:15-4: ,645 3:30-4: , :45-4: ,605 4:00-5: ,699 4:15-5: ,912 4:30-5: ,073 4:45-5: ,009 3,213 5:00-6: ,050 3,259 * FRANKLIN AVE/101 SB OFF RAMP

91 Project ID: CA12_5476_002 NS/EW Streets: City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Argyle Ave Argyle Ave NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CARS AM Franklin Ave EASTBOUND Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 Franklin Ave WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 7.98% 26.60% 65.43% 34.23% 55.96% 9.81% 2.46% 84.31% 13.23% 17.21% 81.98% 0.81% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 900 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized

92 Project ID: CA12_5476_002 NS/EW Streets: City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Argyle Ave NORTHBOUND Argyle Ave CARS PM Franklin Ave SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 Franklin Ave WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 12.65% 25.12% 62.23% 33.70% 54.19% 12.11% 2.59% 91.05% 6.36% 15.00% 83.89% 1.10% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 300 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized

93 PROJECT#: N/S Street: E/W Street: DATE: CITY: A M Adult Pedestrians PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES CA12_5476_002 Argyle Ave Franklin Ave 11/28/2012 DAY: 11/28/2012 City of Hollywood School-Aged Pedestrians T I M E NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG T I M E EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB 7:00 AM :00 AM :15 AM :15 AM :30 AM :30 AM :45 AM :45 AM :00 AM :00 AM :15 AM :15 AM :30 AM :30 AM :45 AM :45 AM :00 AM :00 AM :15 AM :15 AM :30 AM :30 AM :45 AM :45 AM TOTALS TOTALS P M Adult Pedestrians School-Aged Pedestrians TIME NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG TIME EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB 3:00 PM :00 PM :15 PM :15 PM :30 PM :30 PM :45 PM :45 PM :00 PM :00 PM :15 PM :15 PM :30 PM :30 PM :45 PM :45 PM :00 PM :00 PM :15 PM :15 PM :30 PM :30 PM :45 PM :45 PM TOTALS TOTALS

94 Project ID: CA12_5476_002 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services NS/EW Streets: Argyle Ave Argyle Ave Franklin Ave Franklin Ave Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 33.33% 33.33% 33.33% 0.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0.00% % 0.00% 0.00% % 0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 900 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BIKES AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

95 Project ID: CA12_5476_002 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services NS/EW Streets: Argyle Ave Argyle Ave Franklin Ave Franklin Ave Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 0.00% % 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% % 0.00% 28.57% 57.14% 14.29% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 300 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BIKES PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

96 Project ID: CA12_5476_002 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 31.58% 0.00% 68.42% 0.00% 0.00% % 0.00% % 0.00% 87.50% 12.50% 0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 900 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BUSES NS/EW Streets: Argyle Ave Argyle Ave Franklin Ave Franklin Ave AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

97 Project ID: CA12_5476_002 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 35.29% 0.00% 64.71% 0.00% % 0.00% 92.86% 7.14% 0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 300 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BUSES NS/EW Streets: Argyle Ave Argyle Ave Franklin Ave Franklin Ave PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

98 Project ID: CA12_5476_002 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% % 40.00% 50.00% 10.00% 1.89% 58.49% 39.62% 33.33% 61.11% 5.56% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 900 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized HEAVY TRUCKS NS/EW Streets: Argyle Ave Argyle Ave Franklin Ave Franklin Ave AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

99 Project ID: CA12_5476_002 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 20.00% 80.00% 0.00% 60.00% 40.00% 10.53% 68.42% 21.05% 15.79% 78.95% 5.26% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 300 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized HEAVY TRUCKS NS/EW Streets: Argyle Ave Argyle Ave Franklin Ave Franklin Ave PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

100 VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY N/S STREET: PERIOD: VINE STREET AM PEAK HOUR E/W STREET: DATE: Tue SELMA AVENUE December 3, 2013 Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, CA MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Tel: (310) TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00-7: :15-7: N 7:30-7: VINE STREET 7:45-8: :00-8: , :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: :45-10: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AM PEAK HOUR: 69 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 56 7:00-8: , ,029 8:00-9:00 7:15-8: , ,159 7:30-8: , , :45-8: , ,263 8:00-9: , ,344 * 8:15-9: , ,328 8:30-9: , ,271 8:45-9: , ,248 9:00-10: , , SELMA AVENUE PERIOD: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: Tue December 3, MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 3:00-3: :15-3: VINE STREET 3:30-3: :45-4: :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PM PEAK HOUR: 127 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 89 3:00-4: ,523 5:00-6:00 3:15-4: ,671 3:30-4: , :45-4: ,777 4:00-5: ,638 4:15-5: ,589 4:30-5: ,628 4:45-5: , ,722 5:00-6: , ,898 * 36 1, SELMA AVENUE

101 VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY N/S STREET: PERIOD: ARGYLE AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR E/W STREET: DATE: Tue SELMA AVENUE November 19, 2013 Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, CA MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Tel: (310) TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00-7: :15-7: N 7:30-7: ARGYLE AVENUE 7:45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: :45-10: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AM PEAK HOUR: 72 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 90 7:00-8: :30-9:30 7:15-8: :30-8: :45-8: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: * 8:45-9: :00-10: SELMA AVENUE PERIOD: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: Tue November 19, MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 3:00-3: :15-3: ARGYLE AVENUE 3:30-3: :45-4: :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PM PEAK HOUR: 136 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 110 3:00-4: :00-6:00 3:15-4: :30-4: :45-4: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-5: ,043 5:00-6: ,087 * SELMA AVENUE

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111 VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY N/S STREET: PERIOD: ARGYLE AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR E/W STREET: DATE: Thu SUNSET BOULEVARD December 12, 2013 Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, CA MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Tel: (310) TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00-7: :15-7: N 7:30-7: ARGYLE AVENUE 7:45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: :45-10: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AM PEAK HOUR: 884 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL :00-8:00 1 1, ,234 7:45-8:45 7:15-8:15 1 1, ,593 7:30-8:30 2 1, , :45-8:45 2 1, ,838 * 8:00-9:00 1 1, ,826 8:15-9:15 1 1, ,580 8:30-9:30 0 1, ,392 8:45-9:45 0 1, ,308 9:00-10:00 0 1, , SUNSET BOULEVARD PERIOD: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: Thu December 12, MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 3:00-3: :15-3: ARGYLE AVENUE 3:30-3: :45-4: :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PM PEAK HOUR: 1440 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL :00-4:00 0 1, , ,854 5:00-6:00 3:15-4:15 0 1, , ,884 3:30-4:30 1 1, , , :45-4:45 1 1, , ,957 4:00-5:00 1 1, , ,904 4:15-5:15 1 1, , ,898 4:30-5:30 0 1, , ,916 4:45-5:45 0 1, , ,070 5:00-6:00 0 1, , ,129 * SUNSET BOULEVARD

112 Project ID: CA12_5476_005 NS/EW Streets: City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services El Centro Ave El Centro Ave NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CARS AM Sunset Blvd EASTBOUND Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 Sunset Blvd WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 31.63% 30.03% 38.34% 9.94% 54.70% 35.36% 1.52% 94.07% 4.41% 3.66% 95.42% 0.92% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 745 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized

113 Project ID: CA12_5476_005 NS/EW Streets: City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services El Centro Ave NORTHBOUND El Centro Ave CARS PM Sunset Blvd SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 Sunset Blvd WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 15.72% 40.69% 43.59% 23.40% 48.30% 28.30% 1.12% 95.32% 3.56% 4.03% 94.60% 1.37% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized

114 PROJECT#: N/S Street: E/W Street: DATE: CITY: A M Adult Pedestrians PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES CA12_5476_005 El Centro Ave Sunset Blvd 11/28/2012 DAY: 11/28/2012 City of Hollywood School-Aged Pedestrians T I M E NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG T I M E EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 9:45 AM TOTALS TOTALS P M Adult Pedestrians School-Aged Pedestrians TIME NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG TIME EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 5:45 PM TOTALS TOTALS

115 Project ID: CA12_5476_005 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services NS/EW Streets: El Centro Ave El Centro Ave Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 33.33% 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% % 0.00% 0.00% 93.33% 6.67% 0.00% % 0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 745 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BIKES AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

116 Project ID: CA12_5476_005 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services NS/EW Streets: El Centro Ave El Centro Ave Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 41.67% 50.00% 8.33% 14.29% 71.43% 14.29% 4.35% 93.48% 2.17% 0.00% 98.39% 1.61% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BIKES PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

117 Project ID: CA12_5476_005 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : % 0.00% 0.00% 25.00% 0.00% 75.00% 0.00% 97.56% 2.44% 0.00% % 0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 745 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BUSES NS/EW Streets: El Centro Ave El Centro Ave Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

118 Project ID: CA12_5476_005 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 0.00% % 0.00% 0.00% % 0.00% 0.00% % 0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BUSES NS/EW Streets: El Centro Ave El Centro Ave Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

119 Project ID: CA12_5476_005 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 25.00% 50.00% 25.00% 25.00% 37.50% 37.50% 1.35% 93.24% 5.41% 5.31% 92.04% 2.65% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 745 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized HEAVY TRUCKS NS/EW Streets: El Centro Ave El Centro Ave Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

120 Project ID: CA12_5476_005 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 20.00% 40.00% 40.00% 62.50% 25.00% 12.50% 1.89% 98.11% 0.00% 0.00% 97.30% 2.70% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized HEAVY TRUCKS NS/EW Streets: El Centro Ave El Centro Ave Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

121 Project ID: CA12_5476_010 NS/EW Streets: City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Gower St Gower St NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CARS AM Sunset Blvd EASTBOUND Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 Sunset Blvd WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 8.98% 67.06% 23.96% 14.99% 77.10% 7.92% 3.55% 90.64% 5.80% 5.98% 92.20% 1.83% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 745 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized

122 Project ID: CA12_5476_010 NS/EW Streets: City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Gower St NORTHBOUND Gower St CARS PM Sunset Blvd SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 Sunset Blvd WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 6.72% 77.93% 15.35% 11.76% 77.10% 11.13% 4.65% 92.04% 3.31% 4.48% 89.56% 5.96% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized

123 PROJECT#: N/S Street: E/W Street: DATE: CITY: A M Adult Pedestrians PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES CA12_5476_010 Gower St Sunset Blvd 11/28/2012 DAY: 11/28/2012 City of Hollywood School-Aged Pedestrians T I M E NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG T I M E EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 9:45 AM TOTALS TOTALS P M Adult Pedestrians School-Aged Pedestrians TIME NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG TIME EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 5:45 PM TOTALS TOTALS

124 Project ID: CA12_5476_010 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services NS/EW Streets: Gower St Gower St Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 40.00% 60.00% 0.00% 9.09% 63.64% 27.27% 6.67% 93.33% 0.00% 1.96% 96.08% 1.96% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 745 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BIKES AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

125 Project ID: CA12_5476_010 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services NS/EW Streets: Gower St Gower St Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 0.00% % 0.00% 0.00% % 0.00% 5.66% 90.57% 3.77% 0.00% 98.21% 1.79% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BIKES PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

126 Project ID: CA12_5476_010 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 54.55% 9.09% 36.36% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 2.38% 85.71% 11.90% 7.81% 92.19% 0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 745 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BUSES NS/EW Streets: Gower St Gower St Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

127 Project ID: CA12_5476_010 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 31.25% 25.00% 43.75% 58.82% 41.18% 0.00% 0.00% 83.72% 16.28% 10.81% 86.49% 2.70% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized BUSES NS/EW Streets: Gower St Gower St Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

128 Project ID: CA12_5476_010 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 24.14% 27.59% 48.28% 13.04% 73.91% 13.04% 8.22% 86.30% 5.48% 3.64% 94.55% 1.82% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 745 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized HEAVY TRUCKS NS/EW Streets: Gower St Gower St Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

129 Project ID: CA12_5476_010 City: City of Hollywood Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: WEDNESDAY Date: 11/28/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : APPROACH %'s : 13.33% 66.67% 20.00% 16.67% 77.78% 5.56% 1.67% 95.00% 3.33% 5.00% 82.50% 12.50% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL : PEAK HR FACTOR : CONTROL : Signalized HEAVY TRUCKS NS/EW Streets: Gower St Gower St Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

130 VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY N/S STREET: PERIOD: VAN NESS AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR E/W STREET: DATE: Thu SUNSET BOULEVARD December 12, 2013 Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, CA MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Tel: (310) TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00-7: :15-7: N 7:30-7: VAN NESS AVENUE 7:45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: :45-10: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AM PEAK HOUR: 1025 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL :00-8: , ,280 7:45-8:45 7:15-8: , ,455 7:30-8: , , :45-8: , , ,796 * 8:00-9: , ,669 8:15-9: , ,581 8:30-9: , ,596 8:45-9: , ,454 9:00-10: , , SUNSET BOULEVARD PERIOD: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: Thu December 12, MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 3:00-3: :15-3: ,010 VAN NESS AVENUE 3:30-3: :45-4: :00-4: ,065 4:15-4: :30-4: :45-5: ,020 5:00-5: ,057 5:15-5: , :30-5: :45-6: ,051 1-HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PM PEAK HOUR: 1825 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL :00-4: , , ,879 5:00-6:00 3:15-4: , , ,971 3:30-4: , , , :45-4: , , ,942 4:00-5: , , ,969 4:15-5: , , ,961 4:30-5: , , ,136 4:45-5: , , ,135 5:00-6: , , ,166 * SUNSET BOULEVARD

131

132 VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY N/S STREET: PERIOD: VINE STREET AM PEAK HOUR E/W STREET: DATE: Tue DE LONGPRE AVENUE December 10, 2013 Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, CA MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Tel: (310) TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00-7: :15-7: N 7:30-7: VINE STREET 7:45-8: :00-8: , :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: :45-10: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AM PEAK HOUR: 20 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 23 7:00-8: , ,760 9:00-10:00 7:15-8: , ,022 7:30-8: , , :45-8: , ,328 8:00-9: , ,292 8:15-9: , ,285 8:30-9: , ,273 8:45-9: , ,328 9:00-10: , ,341 * DE LONGPRE AVENUE PERIOD: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: Tue December 10, MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 3:00-3: :15-3: VINE STREET 3:30-3: :45-4: :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PM PEAK HOUR: 82 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 36 3:00-4: , ,304 5:00-6:00 3:15-4: , ,411 3:30-4: , , :45-4: , ,627 4:00-5: , ,678 4:15-5: , ,767 4:30-5: , ,806 4:45-5: , ,851 5:00-6: , ,865 * 72 1, DE LONGPRE AVENUE

133 VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY N/S STREET: PERIOD: VINE STREET AM PEAK HOUR E/W STREET: DATE: Tue FOUNTAIN AVENUE November 19, 2013 Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, CA MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Tel: (310) TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00-7: :15-7: N 7:30-7: VINE STREET 7:45-8: :00-8: , :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: :45-10: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AM PEAK HOUR: 208 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 516 7:00-8: , ,227 9:00-10:00 7:15-8: , ,612 7:30-8: , , :45-8: , ,962 8:00-9: , ,064 8:15-9: , ,206 8:30-9: , ,378 8:45-9: , , ,507 9:00-10: , ,531 * FOUNTAIN AVENUE PERIOD: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: Tue November 19, MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 3:00-3: :15-3: VINE STREET 3:30-3: :45-4: , :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PM PEAK HOUR: 731 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 339 3:00-4: ,890 5:00-6:00 3:15-4: ,854 3:30-4: , :45-4: , ,908 4:00-5: , ,059 4:15-5: , ,282 4:30-5: , , ,497 4:45-5: , , ,672 5:00-6: , , ,755 * 52 1, FOUNTAIN AVENUE

134 VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY N/S STREET: PERIOD: EL CENTRO AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR E/W STREET: DATE: Wed FOUNTAIN AVENUE November 20, 2013 Crain & Associates 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470 Culver City, CA MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Tel: (310) TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 7:00-7: :15-7: N 7:30-7: EL CENTRO AVENUE 7:45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: :00-9: :15-9: :30-9: :45-10: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AM PEAK HOUR: 274 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 498 7:00-8: :45-9:45 7:15-8: :30-8: :45-8: :00-9: :15-9: ,019 8:30-9: ,047 8:45-9: ,058 * 9:00-10: , FOUNTAIN AVENUE PERIOD: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: Wed November 20, MINUTE WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 3:00-3: :15-3: EL CENTRO AVENUE 3:30-3: :45-4: :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: HOUR WESTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PM PEAK HOUR: 511 TOTALS L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL 356 3:00-4: ,051 5:00-6:00 3:15-4: ,064 3:30-4: , :45-4: ,082 4:00-5: ,110 4:15-5: ,164 4:30-5: ,195 4:45-5: ,262 5:00-6: ,266 * FOUNTAIN AVENUE

135 APPENDIX C STUDY INTERSECTIONS GEOMETRICS AND SIGNAL PHASING

136

137 APPENDIX D PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES

138 LU Use/Description Appendix D Project Trip Generation Rates Equations (if available), Rates (otherwise) 220 Apartment Daily: T = ( 6.06 * D) AM Peak Hour: T = ( 0.49 * D) Inbound 20% Outbound 80% PM Peak Hour: T = ( 0.55 * D) Inbound 65% Outbound 35% 710 Office Daily: LN (T) = 0.76 * LN (X) AM Peak Hour: LN (T) = 0.80 * LN (X) Inbound 88% Outbound 12% PM Peak Hour: T = ( 1.12 * X) Inbound 17% Outbound 83% 820 Shopping Center (Retail) Daily: LN (T) = 0.65 * LN (X) AM Peak Hour: LN (T) = 0.61 * LN (X) Inbound 62% Outbound 38% PM Peak Hour: LN (T) = 0.67 * LN (X) Inbound 48% Outbound 52% 932 High-Turnover Restaurant Daily: T = * (X) AM Peak Hour: T = * (X) Inbound 55% Outbound 45% PM Peak Hour: T = 9.85 * (X) Inbound 60% Outbound 40% * Production Studios (Stages) Daily: T = 5.91 * (X) AM Peak Hour: T = 0.20 * (X) Inbound 63% Outbound 37% PM Peak Hour: T = 0.43 * (X) Inbound 40% Outbound 60% D-1

139 LU Use/Description Equations (if available), Rates (otherwise) * Support Daily: T = 4.14 * (X) AM Peak Hour: T = 0.61 * (X) Inbound 65% Outbound 35% PM Peak Hour: T = 0.57 * (X) Inbound 45% Outbound 55% Notes: LU = Land-Use category code in the ITE Trip Generation Manual D = Dwelling unit T = Trip X = Area in KSF Source: ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition, 2012, except * Assumed Universal Studios Stage and Support uses trip generation empirical rates. D-2

140 APPENDIX E RELATED PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION RATES

141 Appendix E Project Trip Generation Rates & Equations Apartment (per du) LU 220 Daily: T = 6.65 (DU) AM Peak Hour: T = 0.51 (DU); I/B = 20%, O/B = 80% PM Peak Hour: T = 0.62 (DU); I/B = 65%, O/B = 35% Residential Condominium (per du) LU 230 Daily: T = 5.81 (DU) AM Peak Hour: T = 0.44 (DU); I/B = 17%, O/B = 83% PM Peak Hour: T = 0.52 (DU); I/B = 67%, O/B = 33% Hotel (per room) LU 310 Daily: T = 8.17 (R) AM Peak Hour: T = 0.53 (R); I/B = 59%, O/B = 41% PM Peak Hour: T = 0.60 (R); I/B = 51%, O/B = 49% County Park (per acre) LU 412 Daily: T = 2.28 (Ac) AM Peak Hour: T = 0.02 (Ac); I/B = 61%, O/B = 39% PM Peak Hour: T = 0.09 (Ac); I/B = 61%, O/B = 39% Private School (per student) LU 536 Daily: T = 2.48 (S) AM Peak Hour: T = 0.81 (S); I/B = 61%, O/B = 39% PM Peak Hour: T = 0.17 (S); I/B = 43%, O/B = 57% Museum (per 1,000 sq. ft.) LU 580 Daily: T = n/a AM Peak Hour: T = 0.28 (A); IB = 86%, O/B = 14% PM Peak Hour: T = 0.18 (A); I/B = 16%, O/B = 84% General Office Building (per 1,000 sf) LU 710 Daily: Ln(T) = 0.76 Ln(A) AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(A) ; I/B = 88%, O/B = 12% PM Peak Hour: T = 1.12 (A) ; I/B = 17%, O/B = 83% Variety Store (per 1,000 sq. ft.) LU 814 Daily: T = (A) AM Peak Hour: [1] T = 3.81 (A); IB = 62%, O/B = 38% PM Peak Hour: [1] T = 6.82 (A); I/B = 48%, O/B = 52% E-1

142 Shopping Center (per 1,000 sq. ft.) LU 820 Daily: Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(A) AM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.61 Ln(A) ; IB = 62%, O/B = 38% PM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.67 Ln(A) ; I/B = 48%, O/B = 52% Drinking Place (per 1,000 sq. ft.) LU 925 Daily: [2] T = (A) AM Peak Hour: T = 2.78 (A); I/B = 75%, O/B = 25% PM Peak Hour: T = (A); I/B = 66%, O/B = 34% High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (per 1,000 sq. ft.) LU 932 Daily: T = (A) AM Peak Hour: T = (A); I/B = 55%, O/B = 45% PM Peak Hour: T = 9.85 (A); I/B = 60%, O/B = 40% Gasoline/Service Station (per Fueling Position) LU 944 Daily: T = (F) AM Peak Hour: T = (F); I/B = 51%, O/B = 49% PM Peak Hour: T = (F); I/B = 50%, O/B = 50% Where: T = trip ends A = building size in 1,000's of square feet I/B = inbound percentages Ac = acres O/B = outbound percentages DU = dwelling units LU = ITE land use code R = rooms F = fueling position S = students Source: Trip Generation, 9th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Note: [1] Am and PM inbound/outbound percentages not available; Assumed LU820 Shopping Center split. [2] Daily peak hour rate not available; Assumed Land Use 931 daily and AM peak hour rates. E-2

143 APPENDIX F CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS (CMA) WORKSHEETS

144 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: VINE ST. Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: FRANKLIN AVE./US-101 FWY. SB OFF Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 2 NB-- 0 SB-- 2 NB-- 0 SB-- 2 NB-- 0 SB-- 2 NB-- SB-- EB-- 1 WB-- 3 EB-- 1 WB-- 3 EB-- 1 WB-- 3 EB-- 1 WB-- 3 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right WESTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 465 North-South: 465 North-South: 514 North-South: 514 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 1543 East-West: 1548 East-West: 1762 East-West: 1767 East-West: 0 SUM: 2008 SUM: 2013 SUM: 2276 SUM: 2281 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): F F F F A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 1 Result

145 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: VINE ST. Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: FRANKLIN AVE./US-101 FWY. SB OFF Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 2 NB-- 0 SB-- 2 NB-- 0 SB-- 2 NB-- 0 SB-- 2 NB-- SB-- EB-- 1 WB-- 3 EB-- 1 WB-- 3 EB-- 1 WB-- 3 EB-- 1 WB-- 3 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Through-Right Right WESTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 676 North-South: 676 North-South: 768 North-South: 768 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 1061 East-West: 1066 East-West: 1289 East-West: 1294 East-West: 0 SUM: 1737 SUM: 1742 SUM: 2057 SUM: 2062 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): F F F F A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 2 Result

146 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: ARGYLE AVE. Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: FRANKLIN AVE./US-101 FWY. NB ON-R Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 3 SB-- 0 NB-- 3 SB-- 0 NB-- 3 SB-- 0 NB-- 3 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 3 WB-- 0 EB-- 3 WB-- 0 EB-- 3 WB-- 0 EB-- 3 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Left-Through Through Through-Right Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Through-Right Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 182 North-South: 185 North-South: 353 North-South: 356 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 947 East-West: 947 East-West: 1012 East-West: 1012 East-West: 0 SUM: 1129 SUM: 1132 SUM: 1365 SUM: 1368 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): C C D D A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 3 Result

147 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: ARGYLE AVE. Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: FRANKLIN AVE./US-101 FWY. NB ON-R Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 3 SB-- 0 NB-- 3 SB-- 0 NB-- 3 SB-- 0 NB-- 3 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 3 WB-- 0 EB-- 3 WB-- 0 EB-- 3 WB-- 0 EB-- 3 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Left-Through Through Through-Right Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Through-Right Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 366 North-South: 368 North-South: 608 North-South: 610 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 732 East-West: 732 East-West: 802 East-West: 802 East-West: 0 SUM: 1098 SUM: 1100 SUM: 1410 SUM: 1412 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B C E E A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 4 Result

148 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SELMA AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VINE STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 670 North-South: 676 North-South: 787 North-South: 793 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 261 East-West: 262 East-West: 423 East-West: 424 East-West: 0 SUM: 931 SUM: 938 SUM: 1210 SUM: 1217 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A C C A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 5 Result

149 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SELMA AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VINE STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 618 North-South: 620 North-South: 755 North-South: 757 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 320 East-West: 322 East-West: 614 East-West: 616 East-West: 0 SUM: 938 SUM: 942 SUM: 1369 SUM: 1373 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A D D A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 6 Result

150 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SELMA AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: ARGYLE AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left- North-South: 364 North-South: 367 North-South: 529 North-South: 532 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 233 East-West: 234 East-West: 603 East-West: 604 East-West: 0 SUM: 597 SUM: 601 SUM: 1132 SUM: 1136 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A B B A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 7 Result

151 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SELMA AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: ARGYLE AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left- North-South: 280 North-South: 283 North-South: 525 North-South: 528 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 340 East-West: 340 East-West: 774 East-West: 774 East-West: 0 SUM: 620 SUM: 623 SUM: 1299 SUM: 1302 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A C C A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 8 Result

152 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VINE STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 769 North-South: 777 North-South: 901 North-South: 909 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 608 East-West: 609 East-West: 759 East-West: 761 East-West: 0 SUM: 1377 SUM: 1386 SUM: 1660 SUM: 1670 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): E E F F A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 9 Result

153 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VINE STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 619 North-South: 623 North-South: 845 North-South: 849 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 640 East-West: 647 East-West: 888 East-West: 895 East-West: 0 SUM: 1259 SUM: 1270 SUM: 1733 SUM: 1744 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): D D F F A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 10 Result

154 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: ARGYLE AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Left-Through Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Left-Through Through Right North-South: 165 North-South: 179 North-South: 353 North-South: 171 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 646 East-West: 666 East-West: 901 East-West: 931 East-West: 0 SUM: 811 SUM: 845 SUM: 1254 SUM: 1102 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A C B A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 11 Result

155 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: ARGYLE AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Left-Through Through Through-Right Right Left-Through-Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Left-Through Through Right North-South: 244 North-South: 261 North-South: 490 North-South: 298 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 576 East-West: 594 East-West: 912 East-West: 930 East-West: 0 SUM: 820 SUM: 855 SUM: 1402 SUM: 1228 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A D C A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 12 Result

156 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: EL CENTRO AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left- Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 163 North-South: 169 North-South: 258 North-South: 276 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 584 East-West: 587 East-West: 817 East-West: 820 East-West: 0 SUM: 747 SUM: 756 SUM: 1075 SUM: 1096 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A B B A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 13 Result

157 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: EL CENTRO AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left- Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 342 North-South: 354 North-South: 448 North-South: 460 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 588 East-West: 605 East-West: 797 East-West: 814 East-West: 0 SUM: 930 SUM: 959 SUM: 1245 SUM: 1274 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A C C A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 14 Result

158 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: GOWER STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 681 North-South: 687 North-South: 786 North-South: 792 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 590 East-West: 596 East-West: 808 East-West: 814 East-West: 0 SUM: 1271 SUM: 1283 SUM: 1594 SUM: 1606 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): C C E E A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 15 Result

159 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: GOWER STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 729 North-South: 729 North-South: 1029 North-South: 1029 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 595 East-West: 599 East-West: 895 East-West: 899 East-West: 0 SUM: 1324 SUM: 1328 SUM: 1924 SUM: 1928 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): C C F F A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 16 Result

160 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VAN NESS AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 547 North-South: 547 North-South: 625 North-South: 626 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 645 East-West: 647 East-West: 890 East-West: 892 East-West: 0 SUM: 1192 SUM: 1194 SUM: 1515 SUM: 1518 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B B E E A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 17 Result

161 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VAN NESS AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 517 North-South: 517 North-South: 675 North-South: 675 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 673 East-West: 675 East-West: 1000 East-West: 1002 East-West: 0 SUM: 1190 SUM: 1192 SUM: 1675 SUM: 1677 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): B B F F A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 18 Result

162 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: WILTON PLACE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 338 North-South: 338 North-South: 371 North-South: 371 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 610 East-West: 611 East-West: 861 East-West: 862 East-West: 0 SUM: 948 SUM: 949 SUM: 1232 SUM: 1233 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A C C A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 19 Result

163 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: SUNSET BOULEVARD Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: WILTON PLACE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right North-South: 326 North-South: 326 North-South: 407 North-South: 407 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 703 East-West: 705 East-West: 971 East-West: 973 East-West: 0 SUM: 1029 SUM: 1031 SUM: 1378 SUM: 1380 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A D D A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 20 Result

164 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: DE LONGPRE AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VINE STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left- North-South: 701 North-South: 709 North-South: 854 North-South: 862 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 92 East-West: 95 East-West: 99 East-West: 102 East-West: 0 SUM: 793 SUM: 804 SUM: 953 SUM: 964 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 21 Result

165 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: DE LONGPRE AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VINE STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left- North-South: 741 North-South: 747 North-South: 949 North-South: 955 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 191 East-West: 191 East-West: 196 East-West: 199 East-West: 0 SUM: 932 SUM: 938 SUM: 1145 SUM: 1154 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A B B A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 22 Result

166 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: FOUNTAIN AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VINE STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 749 North-South: 756 North-South: 895 North-South: 902 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 623 East-West: 624 East-West: 699 East-West: 700 East-West: 0 SUM: 1372 SUM: 1380 SUM: 1594 SUM: 1602 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): D D E E A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 23 Result

167 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: FOUNTAIN AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: VINE STREET Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Right NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Right Left Through Right WESTBOUND Left Through Right North-South: 698 North-South: 703 North-South: 880 North-South: 885 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 832 East-West: 832 East-West: 899 East-West: 899 East-West: 0 SUM: 1530 SUM: 1535 SUM: 1779 SUM: 1784 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): E E F F A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 24 Result

168 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: FOUNTAIN AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: EL CENTRO AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: AM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left- Left Left-Through Through Through-Right Right WESTBOUND Left Left-Through Through Through-Right Right North-South: 221 North-South: 229 North-South: 269 North-South: 277 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 559 East-West: 559 East-West: 635 East-West: 635 East-West: 0 SUM: 780 SUM: 788 SUM: 904 SUM: 912 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 25 Result

169 Level of Service Workheet (Circular 212 Method) I/S #: North-South Street: FOUNTAIN AVENUE Year of Count: 2014 Ambient Growth: (%): 1 Conducted by: Date: 5/19/ East-West Street: EL CENTRO AVENUE Projection Year: 2017 Peak Hour: PM Reviewed by: HS Project: No. of Phases Opposed Ø'ing: N/S-1, E/W-2 or Both-3? Right Turns: FREE-1, NRTOR-2 or OLA-3? NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- 0 SB-- 0 NB-- SB-- EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- 0 WB-- 0 EB-- WB-- ATSAC-1 or ATSAC+ATCS-2? Override Capacity EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PLUS PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/O PROJECT FUTURE CONDITION W/ PROJECT FUTURE W/ PROJECT W/ MITIGATION MOVEMENT No. of Lane Project Total Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Added Total No. of Lane Volume Lanes Volume Traffic Volume Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Volume Volume Lanes Volume Left Through Through-Right Right Left- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND Left Through Through-Right Right Left- Left Left-Through Through Through-Right Right WESTBOUND Left Left-Through Through Through-Right Right North-South: 193 North-South: 200 North-South: 226 North-South: 233 North-South: 0 CRITICAL VOLUMES East-West: 557 East-West: 557 East-West: 626 East-West: 626 East-West: 0 SUM: 750 SUM: 757 SUM: 852 SUM: 859 SUM: 0 VOLUME/CAPACITY (V/C) RATIO: V/C LESS ATSAC/ATCS ADJUSTMENT: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS): A A A A A Version: 1i Beta; 8/4/2011 REMARKS: PROJECT IMPACT Change in v/c due to project: v/c after mitigation: Significant impacted? NO Fully mitigated? N/A 5/19/2014-5:45 PM 26 Result

170

171 J 2: Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) Approval Letter

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005 FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005 Prepared For: EDAW, Inc. 1420 Kettner Boulevard, Suite 620

More information

Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles

Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles Traffic Study August 31, 2015 AECOM 515 South Flower Street, 4 th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Job Number: 60323255

More information

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management Transportation Impact Analysis Market Street PDP Nassau County, Florida Submitted to Nassau County Growth Management Prepared for TerraPointe Services, Inc. Prepared by VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

More information

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES TRAFFIC STUDY PREPARED FOR: 3000 E. IMPERIAL, LLC. 6940 Beach Boulevard, D-501 Buena Park, California 90621 PREPARED BY: OCTOBER 5, 2017 translutions the transportatio n solutions

More information

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Prepared by: Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite

More information

Traffic Impact Study

Traffic Impact Study Traffic Impact Study Statham DRI One University Parkway Prepared for: Barrow County Prepared by: October 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary i Section 1. Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Methodology

More information

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review CVS Derwood Montgomery County, Maryland May 27, 2016 Local Area Transportation Review Prepared for: JC Bar Properties, Inc. Steve Fleming, PE 415 Fallowfield Road, Suite 301 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017.

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017. Traffic Impact Analysis for the STARBUCKS STORE Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES January 2017 Submitted By January 5, 2017 Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. Transportation Engineering

More information

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING PREPARED BY DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT October

More information

Appendix I: Traffic Study

Appendix I: Traffic Study City of Fontana Sierra Lakes Commerce Center Draft EIR Appendix I: Traffic Study FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN JN)\0144\01440050\EIR\1 ADEIR\01440050 Sec99 99 Appendix Dividers.doc THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY

More information

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone: JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 Email: jackpflum1@gmail.com Telephone: 513.919.7814 MEMORANDUM REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed Soccer

More information

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT 6.9 Suffolk 6-54 VMT Population and Travel Characteristics Population 14.5% change 2014 1,529,202 VHD Daily Totals 2014 251,060 49.3% change 2040 1,788,175 2040 374,850 VMT Daily Totals 2014 39,731,990

More information

City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA

City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study Submitted by 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.261.3050 January 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the Beach Access and Parking

More information

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS 2018 WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS Introduction Woodruff Road is the main road to and through the commercial area in Greenville, South Carolina. Businesses along the corridor have

More information

CHAPTER 3 TRANSPORTATION

CHAPTER 3 TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 3 TRANSPORTATION This chapter presents information on transportation impacts of Section 2 of the Project that have changed from those identified in the published Westside Subway Extension Final

More information

SHADE/SHADOW REPORT. For the Proposed 8777 Washington Project. Culver City, CA. Prepared for:

SHADE/SHADOW REPORT. For the Proposed 8777 Washington Project. Culver City, CA. Prepared for: SHADE/SHADOW REPORT For the Proposed 8777 Washington Project Culver City, CA Prepared for: VITRUVIAN CULVER CITY LLC (THE APPLICANT) 5822 WEST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA 90232 Prepared

More information

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary Page 2.0 Introduction 2.1 DEVELOPMENT

More information

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 Appendix C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 CONTENTS List of Figures-... 3 List of Tables... 4 Introduction... 1 Application of the Lubbock Travel Demand

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) February 2015 Revised: August 2015 April 2016 July 2016 September 2016 Prepared for: KB Home

More information

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Subject: Revised Castle Hills BASIS Charter School Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Castle Hills,

More information

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 6711 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA Prepared for: NVR, Inc. Prepared by: Wells + Associates, Inc. Michael J. Workosky, PTP, TOPS, TSOS John J. Andrus William L. Zeid, PE 703.917.6620 May 4, 2017

More information

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E. California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study Jim Daisa, P.E. What We Did in the Study Develop trip generation rates for land uses in urban areas of California Establish a California urban land use trip

More information

for sale HOLLYWOOD HILLS CENTURY CITY BEVERLY HILLS WEST HOLLYWOOD MELROSE AVE ROMAINE ST 843 NORTH LA BREA AVE WARING AVE WILLOUGHBY AVE

for sale HOLLYWOOD HILLS CENTURY CITY BEVERLY HILLS WEST HOLLYWOOD MELROSE AVE ROMAINE ST 843 NORTH LA BREA AVE WARING AVE WILLOUGHBY AVE CENTURY CITY BEVERLY HILLS HOLLYWOOD HILLS WEST HOLLYWOOD MELROSE AVE WARING AVE 843 NORTH LA BREA AVE WILLOUGHBY AVE ROMAINE ST N LA BREA AVE HOLLYWOOD - OWNER-USER OR REDEVELOPMENT SITE for sale Table

More information

MEMORANDUM. Trip Generation Analysis

MEMORANDUM. Trip Generation Analysis MEMORANDUM To: RMC Architects From: Matthew Palmer, PE Subject: Trip Generation, Parking Analysis & Level of Service Project: Port of Everett, GTC #13-053 Date: August 25, 2014 The trip generation and

More information

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project September 15, 2015 Mr. Bill Johnson Coldwell Banker 511 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Greenbrae, CA 94904 Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project Dear Mr. Johnson; As requested, W-Trans

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS SHADE/SHADOW

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS SHADE/SHADOW IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS SHADE/SHADOW 1. INTRODUCTION Potential effects of the Proposed Project related to visual character, views and light/glare are addressed in Section IV.A,

More information

Appendix C Traffic Study

Appendix C Traffic Study Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendix C Traffic Study Schofield Generating Station Project, Hawaii October 2015 C-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement This page intentionally left blank. Schofield

More information

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

III. FORECASTED GROWTH III. FORECASTED GROWTH In order to properly identify potential improvement projects that will be required for the transportation system in Milliken, it is important to first understand the nature and volume

More information

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road Date: October 28, 2008 To: From: Toronto and East York Community Council Director, Transportation

More information

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections: MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 6, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: CC: MELANIE KNIGHT BRAD BYVELDS/ JENNIFER LUONG 1050 SOMERSET STREET PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OUR FILE NO. 111152 NEIL MALHOTRA The purpose of this memo

More information

HALFF 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Aikin Elementary School Dallas, Texas North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081

HALFF 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Aikin Elementary School Dallas, Texas North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081 30280 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN Exhibit 572B Aikin Elementary School Planned Development District No. 572 Approved City Plan Commission October20, 2016 July 12, 2016 Prepared for HALFF AVO 31586 PHO1

More information

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015 MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS... 3 Proposed Development... 3 Methodology... 3 Phase 1 Development...

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For MANUFACTURING COMPANY Prepared For: Airway Heights, WA Prepared By: SUNBURST ENGINEERING, P. S. 4310 S. Ball Dr. Veradale, WA 99037 April, 2013 TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY Manufacturing

More information

RE: Existing and Future Parking Demand Analysis St. Joseph Center Expansion

RE: Existing and Future Parking Demand Analysis St. Joseph Center Expansion HAND DELIVERED December 12, 2003 Mr. James S. Bancroft Chair, Board of Directors St. Joseph Center 204 Hampton Drive Venice, California 90291-8633 RE: Existing and Future Parking Demand Analysis St. Joseph

More information

ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared For: Paul Conzelman SC Development 2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 140 Irvine, CA 92612 Prepared By: 2030 Main Street, Suite 1200

More information

Travel Demand Management Plan

Travel Demand Management Plan Travel Demand Management Plan Tryg s & Apartment Building 8 West Lake Street Minneapolis, MN AUTHORIZED PROPERTY REPRESENTATIVE: By Dated: Mr. Johnny Carlson Trammell Crow Chicago Development, Inc. 5 South

More information

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into Appendix A Expanding the GSATS Model Area into North Carolina Jluy, 2011 Table of Contents LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE 1. Introduction... 1 1.1 Background... 1 1.2 Existing Northern Extent of

More information

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672 October 29, 2018 Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc. 1810 S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672 SUBJECT: CANYON STEEL FOCUSED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Carter Redish: Urban

More information

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer March 2, 2018 The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer GO 10 is targeting the week of March 19 to close the Sunland Park Drive flyover entrance ramp to I 10

More information

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line PDD 631 Geographic Information Systems for Public Policy, Planning & Development GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line Biying Zhao 6679361256 Professor Barry Waite and Bonnie Shrewsbury May 12 th, 2015 Introduction

More information

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability (http://mobility.tamu.edu/mmp) Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability This report is a supplement to:

More information

Trip and Parking Generation Study of Orem Fitness Center-Abstract

Trip and Parking Generation Study of Orem Fitness Center-Abstract Trip and Parking Generation Study of Orem Fitness Center-Abstract The Brigham Young University Institute of Transportation Engineers student chapter (BYU ITE) completed a trip and parking generation study

More information

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5 Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5 Streets and s... 5 Traffic Volumes... 8 Recent and Anticipated Development... 10 Crash Analysis... 10 Projected Traffic Volumes... 11 Trip Generation...

More information

FOR LEASE LA BREA CROSSING N. La Brea Ave.

FOR LEASE LA BREA CROSSING N. La Brea Ave. CLASS A OFFICE BUILDINGS LOCATED 1 MILE FROM HOLLYWOOD PARK FOOTBALL STADIUM FOR LEASE CROSSING 101 111 N. La Brea Ave. Inglewood, California PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Close Proximity to Crenshaw/LAX Metro Stop

More information

Alternatives Analysis Report

Alternatives Analysis Report 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), in coordination with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and the Orange County Transportation

More information

Regional Performance Measures

Regional Performance Measures G Performance Measures Regional Performance Measures Introduction This appendix highlights the performance of the MTP/SCS for 2035. The performance of the Revenue Constrained network also is compared to

More information

KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12

KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12 KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 1 Site Location and Study Area...

More information

Prepared for: San Diego Association Of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101

Prepared for: San Diego Association Of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101 Activity-Based Travel Model Validation for 2012 Using Series 13 Data: Coordinated Travel Regional Activity Based Modeling Platform (CT-RAMP) for San Diego County Prepared for: San Diego Association Of

More information

Westside Extension Los Angeles, California

Westside Extension Los Angeles, California Westside Extension Los Angeles, California Rail~Volution 2010 Portland, Oregon Monica Villalobos AECOM History of Westside Suburban Growth in the Westside (1920 1970 s) LA Centers Concept + Employment

More information

15.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Calculations

15.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Calculations 15.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Calculations 15.1 Introduction Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs were calculated for each of the four alternatives being considered in the analysis. No Build Alternative

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TERRE HAUTE CONVENTION CENTER WABASH AVENUE & 9 TH STREET TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA PREPARED FOR 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phone: (317) 202-0864 Fax: (317)

More information

Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011

Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011 Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011 Prepared by: Data Management Group Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto Telephone: (416) 978-3916 Table

More information

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works Policy Statement: The Village of Kitscoty will provide snow and ice control on municipal streets and sidewalks according to determined priorities. Purpose: To provide direction and information to employees

More information

Septem ber 28, 2016 EL PASO, Texas

Septem ber 28, 2016 EL PASO, Texas September 28, 2016 EL PASO, Texas Crews from Paso del Norte Trackworks will finalize underground utility work and begin laying rail on a portion of Kansas Street thru Downtown El Paso in the coming weeks,

More information

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output Rev. April 29, 2005 MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output Table of

More information

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS 3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS In order to better determine future roadway expansion and connectivity needs, future population growth and land development patterns were analyzed as part of

More information

2011 South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process. Executive Summary

2011 South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process. Executive Summary 2011 South Western Region Travel Monitoring Program Executive Summary Prepared by: South Western Regional Planning Agency 888 Washington Blvd, 3rd Floor Stamford, CT 06901 Telephone: 203.6.5190 Facsimile:

More information

FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT February 2018 FIRST ISSUE Prepared by: JG AFRIKA (PTY) LTD Branch: Cape Town PO Box 38561 Postal code: 7430 Telephone: 021 530 1800 Email: wink@

More information

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities University of Maryland School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Fall, 2014 Neighborhood Locations and Amenities Authors: Cole Greene Jacob Johnson Maha Tariq Under the Supervision of: Dr. Chao

More information

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

APPENDIX IV MODELLING APPENDIX IV MODELLING Kingston Transportation Master Plan Final Report, July 2004 Appendix IV: Modelling i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVE... 1 3.0 URBAN TRANSPORTATION MODELLING

More information

January 12, Mr. Ryan Granger TMGB Wilson, LLC 2221 Health Drive SW, Suite 2200 Wyoming, Michigan 49519

January 12, Mr. Ryan Granger TMGB Wilson, LLC 2221 Health Drive SW, Suite 2200 Wyoming, Michigan 49519 January 12, 2018 Mr. Ryan Granger TMGB Wilson, LLC 2221 Health Drive SW, Suite 2200 Wyoming, Michigan 49519 Re: Proposed Reserve at Rivertown Mixed-Use Development Updated Trip Generation and Site Driveway

More information

Date: April 3, 2018 Revised May 15, Project #: Re: Burlington Mall Retail Collection Transportation Evaluation

Date: April 3, 2018 Revised May 15, Project #: Re: Burlington Mall Retail Collection Transportation Evaluation To: Chuck Schneider Burlington S&S, LLC 225 West Washington Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: April 3, 2018 Revised May 15, 2018 Project #: 13482.01

More information

Background and Planning Context 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION

Background and Planning Context 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION Chapter 1: Background and Planning Context 1.1 INTRODUCTION Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company ( Metro-North or the Project Sponsor ) is proposing the construction of a new, expanded parking garage

More information

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10 From: Date: Subject: Staff December 14, 2018 Council Meeting Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review

More information

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Square One Drive Extension Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Environmental Study Report Appendix B Transportation and Traffic Analysis Report TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT FINAL DRAFT

More information

Guidelines on Using California Land Use/Transportation Planning Tools

Guidelines on Using California Land Use/Transportation Planning Tools Guidelines on Using California Land Use/Transportation Planning Tools 1. Selecting Ds Analysis Modules Appropriate to a Region In almost all cases, the appropriate Ds Analysis Module to use for analysis

More information

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study Columbia Falls, Montana Prepared For: TD&H Engineering 450 Corporate Drive, Suite 101 Kalispell, MT 59901 June, 2018 130 South Howie Street Helena, Montana

More information

CHAPTER 2 ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED IN THIS FINAL SEIS

CHAPTER 2 ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED IN THIS FINAL SEIS CHAPTER 2 ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED IN THIS FINAL SEIS This chapter provides the Project background, summarizes the history of the development of alternatives, and identifies and describes the Project elements

More information

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945 Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945 Introduction The Brigham Young University Institute of Transportation Engineers student chapter (BYU ITE) completed

More information

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report Local Transportation and Traffic Data Travel Time and Delay Data for Belpre and Marietta, Ohio Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission CONTINUING

More information

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY GENERAL The purpose of this policy is to set up acceptable procedures and policies for the winter maintenance of public areas in the City of

More information

Mapping Accessibility Over Time

Mapping Accessibility Over Time Journal of Maps, 2006, 76-87 Mapping Accessibility Over Time AHMED EL-GENEIDY and DAVID LEVINSON University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; geneidy@umn.edu (Received

More information

Attachment A. Page 1 of 15

Attachment A. Page 1 of 15 Page 1 of 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to conduct a parking market rate analysis of pay parking facilities surrounding the Manchester area. The market rate analysis was conducted

More information

Attachment E: CADP Design Shadow Analysis

Attachment E: CADP Design Shadow Analysis Attachment E: CADP Design Shadow Analysis June 6, 2016 TO: Don Lewis San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 SUBJECT: 2060 Folsom Street 17 th & Folsom

More information

Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit. Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District

Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit. Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District TABLE OF CONTENTS Complete Communities Daily Trips Live/Work Ratio Commuting Local

More information

930 Old Northern Rd & 4 Post Office Rd, Glenorie

930 Old Northern Rd & 4 Post Office Rd, Glenorie Proposed Mixed Use Development 930 Old Northern & 4, Glenorie TRAFFIC AND PARKING ASSESSMENT REPORT 13 December 2016 Ref 16264 Suite 6, 20 Young Street, Neutral Bay NSW 2089 - PO Box 1868, Neutral Bay

More information

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors]

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors] CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors] Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Belpre (OH) and Marietta (OH) Fiscal Year 2009 Report WOOD WASHINGTON

More information

Regional Performance Measures

Regional Performance Measures G Performance Measures Regional Performance Measures Introduction This appendix highlights the performance of the MTP/SCS for 2035. The performance of the Revenue Constrained network also is compared to

More information

South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report

South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report South Western Region Travel Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report Prepared by: South Western Regional Planning Agency 888 Washington Boulevard Stamford, CT 06901 Telephone:

More information

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050 George Mason University Center for Regional Analysis Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 21 to 25 Prepared for the Fairfax County Department of Planning and Zoning Lisa

More information

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance Endo Engineering Traffic Engineering Air Quality Studies Noise Assessments July 13, 2015 Mr. Ed Freeman Pinnacle View, LLC P.O. Box 1754 Lake Oswego, OR 97035-0579 Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan

More information

Appendix B. Durham Region Travel Demand Model Calibration

Appendix B. Durham Region Travel Demand Model Calibration Appendix B Durham Region Travel Demand Model Calibration AECOM 300 Water Street 905 668 9363 tel Whitby, ON, Canada L1N 9J2 905 668 0221 fax www.aecom.com To Ron Albright, Municipality of Clarington Page

More information

Jordan Harrison, Planner III, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department

Jordan Harrison, Planner III, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department Date November 18, 2015 To: Through: From: Subject: Recreation and Park Commission Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Director, Capital & Planning Division Jordan Harrison, Planner III,

More information

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL SECTION: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: SNOW & ICE CONTROL POLICY 2012/2013 GOAL: Pages: 1 of 10 Approval Date: Dec. 3, 2012 Res. # 1001/2012 To annually identify the winter maintenance costs

More information

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015 DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015 May 20, 2015 Mr. Dan Biswas, VP of Development CJS DEVELOPMENT II, LLC 5111 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 200 Scottsdale, CA 85250

More information

225 Bush Street Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA phone fax

225 Bush Street Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA phone fax 225 Bush Street Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA 94104 415.896.5900 phone 415.896.0332 fax www.esassoc.com memorandum date July 29, 2009 to from subject Craig Nikitas, San Francisco Planning Department Daniel

More information

Encapsulating Urban Traffic Rhythms into Road Networks

Encapsulating Urban Traffic Rhythms into Road Networks Encapsulating Urban Traffic Rhythms into Road Networks Junjie Wang +, Dong Wei +, Kun He, Hang Gong, Pu Wang * School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan,

More information

CITY OF BEAVER DAM SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICY

CITY OF BEAVER DAM SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICY CITY OF BEAVER DAM SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICY Revised January, 2016 Approved by Operations Committee: February 1, 2016 This snow and ice removal policy guides Public Works personnel with deicing, plowing,

More information

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT 175 Zoo Park Road Town of Wasaga Beach Date: September 2017 Prepared for: Simcoe County Housing Corporation Prepared by: MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited

More information

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary StanCOG Transportation Model Program Adopted By the StanCOG Policy Board March 17, 2010 What are Transportation Models? General Summary Transportation Models are technical planning and decision support

More information

Trip Generation Characteristics of Super Convenience Market Gasoline Pump Stores

Trip Generation Characteristics of Super Convenience Market Gasoline Pump Stores Trip Generation Characteristics of Super Convenience Market Gasoline Pump Stores This article presents the findings of a study that investigated trip generation characteristics of a particular chain of

More information

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1. Overview In this chapter we explore the models on which the HCM capacity analysis method for signalized intersections are based. While the method has

More information

2129 NORTH MAIN STREET HOTE PROJECT ULI SHARED PARKING STUDY City of Santa Ana, California

2129 NORTH MAIN STREET HOTE PROJECT ULI SHARED PARKING STUDY City of Santa Ana, California 2129 NORTH MAIN STREET HOTE PROJECT ULI SHARED PARKING STUDY City of Santa Ana, California Prepared for: NET DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 3130 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Prepared by: RK ENGINEERING GROUP,

More information

Final City of Colusa STREETS & ROADWAYS MASTER PLAN. October J Street Suite 390 Sacramento, CA 95814

Final City of Colusa STREETS & ROADWAYS MASTER PLAN. October J Street Suite 390 Sacramento, CA 95814 Final City of Colusa STREETS & ROADWAYS MASTER PLAN October 2009 660 J Street Suite 390 Sacramento, CA 95814 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 Report Organization...1 II. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY... 2

More information

The Urbana Free Library Parking and Transportation Study

The Urbana Free Library Parking and Transportation Study CHAMPAIGN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION The Urbana Free Library Parking and Transportation Study Final Report 7/18/2013 Champaign Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study (CUUATS) TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006 DRAFT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF TAMU CC Prepared for 3D/International, Inc. 1900 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 November 2006 Interim Review Only Document Incomplete:

More information

2014 Data Collection Project ITE Western District

2014 Data Collection Project ITE Western District 2014 Data Collection Project ITE Western District Project Completed By: Oregon State University OSU ITE Student Chapter 101 Kearney Hall Corvallis, OR 97331 Student Coordinator: Sarah McCrea (OSU ITE Student

More information

Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County

Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County TIP No. U-2827 B WBS # 34872.1.1 June 2013 Prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by Project

More information

I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11. Then, I-10 West at Resler closes for 27 hours on Feb 25

I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11. Then, I-10 West at Resler closes for 27 hours on Feb 25 NEWS RELEASE a TxDOT Project For immediate release EL PASO DISTRICT Jennifer Wright (915) 790-4340 Jennifer.Wright3@txdot.gov February 9, 2018 I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11

More information

Updating the Urban Boundary and Functional Classification of New Jersey Roadways using 2010 Census data

Updating the Urban Boundary and Functional Classification of New Jersey Roadways using 2010 Census data Updating the Urban Boundary and Functional Classification of New Jersey Roadways using 2010 Census data By: Glenn Locke, GISP, PMP 1 GIS-T May, 2013 Presentation Overview Purpose of Project Methodology

More information