ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT
|
|
- Bartholomew Tyler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT STREAM: BASIN: South Fork Mill Creek Mill Creek / Columbia River DATES: September 7 9, 5 SURVEY CREW: REPORT PREPARED BY: Brian Bangs / LaNoah Babcock Staci Stein STREAM ORDER: BASIN AREA: 7.68 km FIRST ORDER TRIBUTARIES: 7 USGS MAPS: Brown Creek ECOREGION: Columbia Plateau: Pleistocene Lake Basins HUC NUMBER: 775 LLID: GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The South Fork Mill Creek habitat survey began at the confluence with Mill Creek and continued upstream 5,7 meters ending at the Mill Creek Falls. Three reaches were designated based on property ownership and channel morphology. In the lower reaches the channel was constrained by alternating terraces and hillslopes within a broad valley and in the upper reach the channel was hillslope constrained in a narrow valley. Land use was watershed restricted area and rural residential. Cobble, boulder, and gravel were the primary substrate types. Rapids, cascades, riffles, and scour pools were the dominant habitat types. Large wood volume was low for the surveyed stream. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zones were hardwoods -cm (based on four riparian transects). REACH DESCRIPTIONS: Reach : Reach : (TN-RE-SSW) Length 84 meters. Reach one began at the confluence with Mill Creek and ended at the property boundary. The channel was alternating terrace and hillslope constrained in a broad valley floor within terraces. The average valley width index was 6. (range: 6.-6.). Land use for the reach was rural residential. The average unit gradient was.8 percent. Rapids (6%) and riffles (5%) were the dominate stream habitats. Cobble (%), gravel (6%), boulder (%), and sand (4%) were the primary stream substrates. Active bank erosion was % for the reach. Large wood volume was low at.7m /m. The average residual pool depth was.6m. No riparian transect was conducted in this reach. (TNS-RE-S7NW) Length 795 meters. Reach two began at the restricted watershed area boundary. The channel was alternating terrace and hillslope constrained in a broad valley floor within terraces. The average valley width index was 4.9 (range:.5-6.). Land use for the reach was watershed restricted area. The average unit gradient was. percent. Riffles (9%), rapids (5%), and scour pools (9%) were the dominate stream habitats. Cobble (%), boulder (6%), gravel (%), and sand (%) were the primary stream substrates. Active bank erosion was 6% of the reach length. Large wood volume
2 was low at 5.m /m. The average residual pool depth was.5m. The trees found most frequently South Fork Mill Creek (continued) in the riparian zones were hardwoods -cm (based on one riparian transect). There is a water filtration plant in the reach. Reach : (TN-RE-S8SE) Length,5 meters. The channel was hillslope constrained in a moderate V-shaped valley floor. The average valley width index was. (range:.-4.). Land use for the reach was watershed restricted area. The average unit gradient was 4.5 percent. Cascades (4%), rapids (%), and scour pools (%) were the dominate stream habitats. Cobble (%), boulder (7%), gravel (9%), and sand (%) were the primary stream substrates. Bank erosion was % of the reach length. Large wood volume was low at 5.7m /m. The average residual pool depth was.68m. The trees most frequently in the riparian zones were hardwoods -cm (based on three riparian transects). COMMENTS: No fish were observed by the crew. Mill Creek Falls (8m high bedrock wall) is a barrier to upstream fish migration. The crew noted several human caused features which are potential fish migration barriers. At unit #46 (55m) is a.85m high concrete slab at the water treatment plant; at unit #6 (746m) is a.85 high cement structure at the gauging station; and at unit #65 (89m) is a.m high fish ladder. There are several unnamed tributaries and spring seeps entering the creek.
3 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 REACH BRIDGE \ CULVERT TRIBUTARY ELEVATION (meters) 4 5 DEBRIS JAM MASS FAILURE FILTRATION PLANT MILL CREEK FALLS 5 RESERVOIR RD DISTANCE (meters) 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 PERCENT SHADE ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
4 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 PERCENT SILT AND ORGANICS ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters) 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 PERCENT SILT, ORGANICS, AND SAND ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
5 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 PERCENT GRAVEL ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters) 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 PERCENT BEDROCK ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
6 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 NUMBER OF BOULDERS (running average per m.) ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters) 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 POOLS > OR = TO METER DEEP ELEVATION (meters) 4 5 DEPTH (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
7 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 PIECES OF LARGE WOOD ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters) 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 VOLUME OF LARGE WOOD (cubic meters) ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
8 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) 5 45 KEYPIECES OF LARGE WOOD ELEVATION (meters) DISTANCE (meters)
9 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/9/5 REACH TN-RE-SSW REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Valley Width Index Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Constrained Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) % % % 6. VWI Range: 6-6 Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = First Terrace n = Width: Depth:..8 Width: Height: 84, ( ( ) ) ( ( ) ) W:D ratio: 9.8 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):. Stream Flow Type: Average Unit Gradient: LF.8% Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C):. -. Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary RR D D.7.7 Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: % Reach avg: 7% Undercut Banks: 7% Range: 5-8 All pieces (>=m x.5m): Volume (m ): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel
10 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/7/5 REACH TN-RE-S7NW REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Valley Width Index Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Constrained Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) % % % Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain 4.9 VWI Range:.5-6 Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = 5 First Terrace n = Width: Depth:.7. Width: Height: 795, ( 9-6 (.6 - ) ).5.6 ( ( ) ) W:D ratio:.8 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.4 Stream Flow Type: Average Unit Gradient: LF.% Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C): Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary CR D D Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: 6% Reach avg: 74% Undercut Banks: % Range: All pieces (>=m x.5m): Volume (m ): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel
11 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/7/5 REACH TN-RE-S8SE REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) Valley Width Index Constrained % % %. VWI Range: - 4 Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = 9 First Terrace n = Width: Depth: Width: Height:,5 8, ( (. -.6 ) ) ( - ( - ) ) W:D ratio:. Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.4 Stream Flow Type: Average Unit Gradient: LF 4.5% Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C): Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary CR D S.. Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: % Reach avg: 79% Undercut Banks: % Range: - All pieces (>=m x.5m): Volume (m ): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel
12 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/9/5 REACH TN-RE-SSW REACH HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk POOL-LATERAL SCOUR RAPID/BOULDERS 55.., RIFFLE Total: ,48 5 Avg: HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools.% Scour Pools % Glides.% Riffles % Rapids 55..,54 6.% Cascades.% Step/Falls.% Dry.% Culverts.% POOL SUMMARY All Pools: Total Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km. Primary Channel Length # / Km. Pools >=m deep:.. Complex pools (LWD pieces>=): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): Residual pool depth (avg):.6
13 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/7/5 REACH TN-RE-S7NW REACH HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk CASCADE/BOULDERS POOL-LATERAL SCOUR POOL-PLUNGE POOL-STRAIGHT SCOUR RAPID/BOULDERS RIFFLE RIFFLE W/ POCKETS STEP/BOULDERS STEP/COBBLE STEP/STRUCTURE.9. 5 Total: ,795,4 Avg: HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools.% Scour Pools % Glides.% Riffles 8..8, 9.46% Rapids % Cascades % Step/Falls % Dry.% Culverts.% POOL SUMMARY All Pools: Total 5 Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km 8.7 Primary Channel Length # / Km 8.9 Pools >=m deep:.. Complex pools (LWD pieces>=): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): Residual pool depth (avg):.5
14 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/7/5 REACH TN-RE-S8SE REACH HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk CASCADE/BOULDERS 6, ,49, DRY CHANNEL POOL-ALCOVE POOL-DAMMED POOL-LATERAL SCOUR , POOL-PLUNGE , POOL-STRAIGHT SCOUR RAPID/BOULDERS 9, ,7, 4 6 RIFFLE , RIFFLE W/ POCKETS STEP/BEDROCK.8. 6 STEP/BOULDERS STEP/COBBLE STEP/STRUCTURE Total: 4, ,456,499 Avg: HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools % Scour Pools ,58.8% Glides.% Riffles ,89 9.7% Rapids 9, ,7.9% Cascades 6, ,49 4.9% Step/Falls % Dry % Culverts.% POOL SUMMARY 86 74,, All Pools: Total Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km 8. Primary Channel Length # / Km 9. Pools >=m deep: 9..5 Complex pools (LWD pieces>=): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): Residual pool depth (avg):.68
15 STREAM SUMMARY Number Total Avg Avg Total Substrate Large Units Length Width Depth Area Percent Wetted Area Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk (#>.5m) 68 5, , ,5 Habitat Group Wetted Area (m ) Percent Dammed & BW Pools Scour Pools Glides Riffles Rapids Cascades Step/Falls Dry 6,,858 8,79 8, %.%.% 5.6% 5.9% 4.%.4%.7% Culverts.% Unsurveyed.%
16 : HABITAT DISTRIBUTION REACH REACH WETTED AREA (m^) WETTED AREA (m^) DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY 9 8 REACH 7 WETTED AREA (m^) DAM POOL SCOUR GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY POOL
17 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/7/5 RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH REACH Summary of Riparian Zone (-m) transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >5" dbh/ ft 89 6 Diameter class (cm) -5cm 5-cm -5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone Zones - - meters - meters - meters - meters Conifer Hardwood Conifer Hardwood Conifer Hardwood Conifer Hardwood Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone - meters - meters - meters (%) (%) (%) Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone - meters - meters - meters (%) (%) (%) 4 5
18 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/7/5 RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH REACH Summary of Riparian Zone (-m) transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >5" dbh/ ft Diameter class (cm) -5cm 5-cm -5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone Zones - - meters - meters - meters - meters Conifer Hardwood Conifer Hardwood Conifer Hardwood Conifer Hardwood Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone - meters - meters - meters (%) (%) (%) Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone - meters - meters - meters (%) (%) (%)
19 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY - RIPARIAN SURVEY 9/7/5 Summary of Riparian Zone (-m) for all reaches 4 transects Summary of riparian zone (- feet) extrapolated to, feet along stream Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >5" dbh/ ft Average number of trees in a 5-m wide band Diameter class (cm) Zones - - meters Conifer Hardwood -5cm 5-cm -5cm 5-9cm >9cm
20 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/7/5 RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach Reach Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass >9 Notes 48 LF HS Conifer 655, Hardwood LF HS 9 Conifer Hardwood 48 LF HS 5 Conifer WATER Hardwood FILTRATION PLANT 48 RT HS 4 65 Conifer Hardwood 48 RT HS 8 8 Conifer Hardwood 4 48 RT HS 7 6 Conifer Hardwood 5
21 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 5/4/6 Survey Date: 9/7/5 RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach Reach Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass >9 Notes 78 LF HT 9 6 Conifer 68, Hardwood LF HT Conifer Hardwood 5 78 LF HT 55 5 Conifer Hardwood 78 RT HS Conifer STEEP CLIFF Hardwood FACE 78 RT HS Conifer Hardwood 78 RT HS Conifer Hardwood 9 LF HS 75 9 Conifer 68, Hardwood LF HS Conifer Hardwood 9 LF HS 9 Conifer Hardwood 9 RT HS Conifer Hardwood 5 9 RT HS Conifer Hardwood 9 RT HS Conifer U 9 TRIB IS Hardwood 4 M AWAY 8 LF HS Conifer 64, Hardwood 54 8 LF HS Conifer Hardwood 5 8 LF HS Conifer Hardwood 8 8 RT HT 45 5 Conifer Hardwood 8 RT SC 65 Conifer Hardwood 8 RT HS Conifer 4 Hardwood
22 Comment Summary REACH# UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST. (m) COMMENTS NOTE ESTIMATOR RI 6 LI/ CA-CT, D, D, RR NOTE NUMERATOR POCKETS UP TO.5 M DEEP RI 46 POCKETS UP TO.4 M DEEP 6 LP 84 END OF PRIVATE LAND 7 RB 86 WATERSHED LAND 8 RI 9 D5, D, WATERSHED CB 987 SS/ 4 RP 8 POCKETS UP TO.4 M DEEP 8 RI 4 DJ, SS/, D5, D, WATERSHED 9 RI 49 BC BC, CS/CS SB 5 CS/CS CONCRETE AT TOP RESEVIOR RD BRIDGE SOME CONCRETE AT TOP, BLDRS LP 57 SOME CONCRETE RP 8 CA-CT, D, D5, WATERSHED RI /HS 7 LP 9 CS/ BOULDERS FROM ROAD BED 8 RB BC FOOTBRIDGE 9 LP BC LP 6 DJ, CE/ SCREENED CE/, CHLORENE SMELL 4 RP 6 WATER MONITORING DEVICE WATER MONITORING DEVICE,STAIRS 5 RB 76 CE/ CE/, T=C, WATER PLANT RUNOFF 6 RP 97 U 6 = DIAM =.45 M, H =.4 M CULV DIAM=.45M, OUT OF PLANT 7 SP 4 NUMBER OF DEAD CRAYFISH 4 RB 457 CS/ CA-CT, D, D5 PLACED BOULDERS 4 RP 47 CE/ MAX POCKET DEPTH =.4 M 4 RB 5 /SS SS VALLEY DRY 44 RB 54 DRY /SS WATER FACILITIES TO RIGHT 45 PP 54 CS RIPRAP TO BREAK FLOW FROM STEP 46 SS 55 PA H =.85M, WATER TREATMENT PLAN H =.85 M, CONCRETE SLAB 47 RI 55 WATER TREATMENT PLANT AREA CONCRETE SLAB 48 RB 576 CA-CT, D5, S
23 Comment Summary REACH# UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST. (m) COMMENTS NOTE ESTIMATOR NOTE NUMERATOR 49 RB 576 ACW =.5, T=C COMES IN FROM TREATMENT POND 5 SP 58 U49=COMES FROM A SETTLING PO 55 SB 68 H =.6 M H =.6 M, CH-MV 58 CB 78 CH-MV, D, S 6 SS 746 PA H =.85 M, PA, GAUGING STATION 6 PP 8 CE/ CE/ H=.85 M, THRU CEMENT STRUCTURE 6 SC 86 NOT MUCH FLOW,CHANNEL DIVERTED 65 SS 89 PA H =. M, PA 66 SS 89 PA CE, H =.4 M, DIAM =.6 M H =. M, FISH LADDER U65=VERY LOW FLOW THROUGH UNIT 67 LP 89 HOLDING TANK, U 66 = H =.4 M 7 SS 854 H =.65 M, OVER CONCRETE WALL H=.65M, CEMENT WALL, POSS WEIR 7 RI 897 GAUGING STATION, BC GUAGE STATION, FOOTBRIDGE 74 RB TERRACE/HS 75 SB H =.65 M H =.65 M 76 RB 5 /LI SMALL LANDSLIDE 77 LP 89 /SS 78 RB 5 CA-CT, D5, S 79 RB 98 POWERLINE CROSSING HS/TERRACE, ROAD BED 8 RB 6 HT/LT 8 RB 6 WL RATTLESNAKE 8 RB 5 WL SS/ RATTLESNAKE DIPPER 86 RB 448 HT/HS 9 RB 66 T = C AT 8 T = C AT 8 98 SP 856 CH-MV, D5, D HS/NEAR HS CB 98 DJ, LI/ RB 4 SS/ SS/ HS/LT, ALDERS 5-, SS IS DRY 4 SB H =.65 M H =.65 M 5 CB 77 SS/ SS/ 7 CB 45 /TJ DJ, /TJ SS IS DRY UNNAMED TRIB, NOT MARKED
24 Comment Summary REACH# UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST. (m) COMMENTS NOTE ESTIMATOR NOTE NUMERATOR 8 RI 45 ACW =. M 68, RI 7 CH-MV, D5, D CB 4 SS/ SS/ SS IS DRY 5 SB 5 H =.5 M H =.5 M 6 RB 564 SS/ SS IS DRY 9 RB 589 CH-MV, D5, D RB 74 SS/ SS IS DRY DC 74 CONNECTS TO UNIT 8 RB 899 CH-SV, C9, D5 CB 4 /LI 5 SB 474 H =.4 M H =.4M, LOW FLOW WATER 6 PP 484 SS/ 7 SB 485 H =. M H =. M 8 CB 48 TJ/ 64, 54 9 DC 48 WIDTH=ACW TRIB UNIT 4 DC 48 WIDTH=ACW CHNL IS DRY 4 RP 46 POCKETS OF.5,. M DEEP 45 CB 475 MANY OLD GROWTH TREES SEEPS INTO AL THROUGH ROCKS 46 AL 475 NEAR UPPER END OF SURVEY 48 PP 44 CH-SV, D, S 5 SB 4445 H =.8 M H =.8 M 55 CB 4599 SS/ 57 CB 476 /SS, /SS /SS 58 RB 476 CH-SV, D5, C5 6 CB 4899 SOME POCKETS UP TO.8 M DEEP 6 CB 494 SS/ SS/ 6 LP DOUG FIR RI 54 SS/ 67 PP 568 DEPTH ESTIMATED
25 Comment Summary REACH# UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST. (m) COMMENTS NOTE ESTIMATOR 68 SR 57 PN H = 8. M, PN NOTE NUMERATOR MILL CREEK FALLS
26 NORTH FORK U R START U R 4 ST REACH SOUTH FORK U R START REACH U 7 R START REACH U 55 R START U 47 R START U 68 END Name: BROWN CREEK Date: //6 Scale: inch equals 6 feet Location: 45 ' 6." N 9'.8" W Caption: SUMMER 5 (COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN) HABITAT STREAM SURVEY Copyright (C) 998, Maptech, Inc.
27 South Fork Mill Creek (Columbia) Summer 5 Reach Unit 6 Reach Reach Unit 65 Reach Unit 9 Reach Unit 68
REACH 1 T37S-R14W-S07NW
OREGON DEPT. FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 3//3 Survey Date: 7/3/ REACH T37S-R4W-S7NW REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT RESTORATION MONITORING STREAM HABITAT REPORT. Peggy Kavanagh, Trevan Cornwell TOLEDO SOUTH Coast Range Lora Tennant
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT RESTORATION MONITORING STREAM HABITAT REPORT STREAM: GCG: 2-MC SITE ID: 489 BASIN: YAQUINA TREATMENT DATE: 24 SURVEY DATE: 2/27/24 SURVEY CREW: USGS MAPS: ECOREGION: REPORT
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT STREAM: BASIN: Basin Creek Willow Creek DATE: July 9 3, 9 SURVEY CREW: REPORT PREPARED BY: USGS MAPS: ECOREGION: Nicole Bushey / Emily Zimmermann Staci Stein
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT STREAM: BASIN: SURVEY TYPE: South Sister Creek (U-5) Smith River Pre-Tx DATE: January 7, 4 SURVEY CREW:
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT STREAM: BASIN: SURVEY TYPE: Munson Creek (NC-342) Tillamook River Post-Tx DATE: February 2, 28 SURVEY
More informationODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT. Jennifer Bock / Eric Evans / LaNoah Babcock HUC NUMBER: LLID:
ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT STREAM: BASIN: South Fork Dixie Creek Burnt River DATES: July 6, September 3-7, SURVEY CREW: REPORT PREPARED BY: Jennifer Bock / Eric Evans / LaNoah Babcock
More informationA Guide To Interpreting Stream Survey Reports. Scott C. Foster Charles H. Stein Kim K. Jones. Edited by Patricia A. Bowers
A Guide To Interpreting Stream Survey Reports Scott C. Foster Charles H. Stein Kim K. Jones Edited by Patricia A. Bowers Aquatic Inventories Project Natural Production Program Oregon Department of Fish
More informationDETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6. The Eklutna River was divided into study reaches (figure 1) prior to this site visit. Prominent geologic or
More informationAppendix E Rosgen Classification
Appendix E Stream Type s Using the morphometric parameters described above, stream reaches are classified into 7 major stream types (Aa+ through G) based on s (1996) criteria. The relevant stream classifications
More informationRiparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.
Riparian Assessment vs. Monitoring Riparian Assessment What is a healthy stream? Determine stream/riparian health Determine change or trend, especially in response to mgmt Classification = designation
More informationRosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road
Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road Prepared for Poly Met Mining Inc. September 2013 Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road Prepared for Poly Met Mining Inc. September
More informationConceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar
Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed Chris Farrar Several features of creeks affect the interactions between surface and groundwater. This conceptual model uses the
More information!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!
8:30 Sign in Hoosic River Revival Coalition!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(! 12-#30+4/#"5-(60 9:00 Welcome and Introductions 9:15 Goals for Today s Program: A Description of the Planning Process 9:30 First Session:
More informationWhy Geomorphology for Fish Passage
Channel Morphology - Stream Crossing Interactions An Overview Michael Love Michael Love & Associates mlove@h2odesigns.com (707) 476-8938 Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage 1. Understand the Scale of the
More informationAquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.
Aggradation raising of the streambed by deposition that occurs when the energy of the water flowing through a stream reach is insufficient to transport sediment conveyed from upstream. Alluvium a general
More informationGENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO
GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO Prepared For Trout Unlimited 300 North Main Street, Hailey, Idaho, 83333 Prepared By P. O. Box 8578, 140 E. Broadway, Suite 23,
More informationDan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time
Broad-Scale Models Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time Assess Potential for Fish Use and Productivity Assess
More informationAPPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS. Quantico Creek Watershed Assessment April 2011
APPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS Basin 615, South Fork of Quantico Creek - Project Reach Descriptions Reach Name: 615-A Coordinates (NAD 83, Virginia State Plane North): 11796510.57, 6893938.95 to 11801555.79,
More informationPolyMet NorthMet Project
RS 26 Draft-01 December 8, 2005 RS26 Partridge River Level 1 Rosgen Geomorphic Survey Rosgen Classification Partridge River from Headwaters to Colby Lake Prepared for PolyMet NorthMet Project December
More informationAPPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013
APPENDIX E GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2 Introduction Keystone Restoration Ecology (KRE) conducted geomorphological monitoring in
More informationHabitat Assessment. Peggy Compton UW-Extension Water Action Volunteers Program Coordinator
Habitat Assessment Peggy Compton UW-Extension Water Action Volunteers Program Coordinator Adapted from a presentation by Jean Unmuth, Water Quality Biologist, WI DNR dnr.wi.gov www.uwex.edu erc.cals.wisc.edu
More informationFish Passage at Road Crossings
Fish Passage at Road Crossings 1 Crossing Design Workshop Outline 1:00 to 2:00 Intro, Design Overview, Channel Width 2:00 to 2:15 Break 2:15 to 3:15 No-Slope, Stream Simulation Design 3:15 to 3:30 Break
More informationStream Classification
Stream Classification Why Classify Streams? Communication Tool Describe Existing Conditions & Trends Describe Restoration Goals Research Tool Morphologic Stream Classification Systems Schumm (1977) Alluvial
More informationADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN
ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN Conor Shea - Hydrologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Partnerships Program Arcata, CA Learning Objectives Examine
More informationLimitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %
Stream Stability Assessment & BEHI Surveys Joe Rathbun MDEQ Water Resources Division rathbunj@michigan.gov 517--373 517 373--8868 Stability Stream can transport its water and sediment inputs without changing
More informationRapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s
Establishing Current Reference Conditions Rates and concentrations of suspended-sediment transport vary over time and space due to factors such as precipitation characteristics and discharge, geology,
More informationStream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012
Stream Geomorphology Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012 What Functions do Healthy Streams Provide? Flood mitigation Water supply Water quality Sediment storage and transport Habitat Recreation Transportation
More informationAssignment 1. Measuring River Characteristics- Vernon Creek. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Field Techniques EESc 435
Assignment 1 Measuring River Characteristics- Vernon Creek Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Field Techniques EESc 435 Amanda Jardine 30100093 Jaime McDonald 14177083 Erica Massey 50870088 April 28, 2012 Introduction
More informationCR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District
CR AAO Bridge Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District Old County Road AAO Bridge Map courtesy of Marquette County Silver Lake Basin McClure Basin
More informationAssessment. Assessment
2001 SPRINGBROOK CREEK RESTORATION - THREE YEAR POST-CONSTRUCTION REVIEW - Presented by Bruce Henderson and Andy Harris 2005 River Restoration Northwest Symposium Skamania Lodge, Washington www.hendersonlandservices.com
More informationLower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project
Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Project Location The project is located in the South Fork McKenzie River Watershed,
More informationStream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)
Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics Pierre Y. Julien Malaysia 2004 Objectives Brief overview of environmental river mechanics and stream restoration: 1. Typical problems in environmental
More informationYUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY Representative Site Selection Above Englebright Reservoir Stream Fish, Aquatic BMI, Aquatic Mollusks Yuba County Water Agency Yuba River Development Project FERC Project No. 2246
More informationAppendix III-A Descriptions of Channel Habitat Types
Appendix III-A Descriptions of Channel Habitat Types Table of Contents Channel Habitat Typing Background... 3 Small Estuarine Channel (ES)... 7 Large Estuarine Channel (EL)... 9 Low Gradient Large Floodplain
More informationFlood and Stream Restoration
2 3 4 Pedestrian bridge under construction 3 CSPs perched on DS side Large area of sand deposition Bottom layer of gabions has been scoured out large bar of gabion stone Gabions slumping bank slope failure
More informationSALMONID HABITAT ASSESSMENT UPPER MILLER CREEK
SALMONID HABITAT ASSESSMENT UPPER MILLER CREEK GRADY RANCH, MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 2011 Prepared for: Skywalker Properties Ltd. 5858 Lucas Valley Road Nicasio, California 94946 Prepared by: WRA,
More informationPENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0 LYCOMING COUNTY S.R.15, SECTION C41 FINAL HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT STEAM VALLEY RUN STREAM RELOCATION DATE: June, 2006 REVISED:
More informationC. STUDENT FIELD DATA SHEETS
C. STUDENT FIELD DATA SHEETS Student Name Date Time Stream Location Parameter to find Your Group s Results Units trial trial average Transparency cm Water Temperature Air Temperature Weather N sunny N
More informationThe River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant
The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration Dr Jenny Mant Jenny@therrc.co.uk Understanding your catchment Hydrology Energy associated with the
More informationWhy Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough
Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough Several examples of alternatives to the County s design approach have been suggested. A common theme of these proposals is a less comprehensive effort focusing
More informationNatural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes
Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes Excerpts from Chapters 2 and 3 Photo Photo by Jane by Jane Herbert Herbert Did you know? Twenty-four species of amphibians, 25 species of reptiles,
More informationAddressing the Impact of Road-Stream Crossing Structures on the Movement of Aquatic Organisms
Scott Jackson University of Massachusetts Amherst Addressing the Impact of Road-Stream Crossing Structures on the Movement of Aquatic Organisms Dams Sub-standard Culverts Excessive Velocities Inlet Drop
More informationUpper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop
Presentation to the Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop by Michael Rodgers River Engineer US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District August 17, 2007 Engineering
More informationGeomorphic Assessment of the Middle and Lower Swan Lake Watershed, Calhoun Division of Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge.
Geomorphic Assessment of the Middle and Lower Swan Lake Watershed, Calhoun Division of Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge Report Figures 33 34 Figure 1. Location of Middle and Lower Swan Lake watersheds
More informationBusiness. Meteorologic monitoring. Field trip? Reader. Other?
Business Meteorologic monitoring Field trip? Reader Other? Classification Streams Characterization Discharge measurements Why classify stream channels? Why Classify Stream Channels? Provides a common language
More informationImportant Copyright Information
Important Copyright Information The following content is provided for educational purposes by the workshop presenter. This content may or may not have been peer reviewed. Information, opinions and recommendations
More informationMISSION CREEK WATERSHED (2002 Report Year 4)
Stream Channel Monitoring Program for the MISSION CREEK WATERSHED (2002 Report Year 4) (Penticton Forest District) Prepared for RIVERSIDE FOREST PRODUCTS LTD. Prepared by DOBSON ENGINEERING LTD. #4, 1960
More informationFluvial Driven Alluvial Fans
Fluvial Driven Alluvial Fans Restoration Project Evaluations - Examples from the Russian and Napa River Watersheds Mia Docto Masters Thesis UC Berkeley 1. Basic Fan Description 2. Fluvial Driven Fan Characteristics
More informationGEOL 652. Poudre River Fieldtrip
GEOL 652. Poudre River Fieldtrip One of the more difficult variables to measure and/or estimate when studying flow in natural channels is that of roughness. Roughness, usually approximated with Manning
More informationCarmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018
Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018 EXISTING CONDITION The proposed Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project
More informationSurface Water and Stream Development
Surface Water and Stream Development Surface Water The moment a raindrop falls to earth it begins its return to the sea. Once water reaches Earth s surface it may evaporate back into the atmosphere, soak
More informationCase Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords
Case Study : Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords Location Crossing Description Washington. Okanagan National Forest. Methow Valley Ranger District. Chewuch river basin, East Chewuch Road. The Twenty-mile Creek
More informationCASE STUDIES. Introduction
Introduction The City of Winston-Salem faces the challenge of maintaining public infrastructure (e.g., water and sewer lines, storm drains, roads, culverts and bridges) while minimizing the potential impacts
More informationRAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Rail Environment Conference November 2016 AGENDA Objective Background Benefits
More informationGully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion
Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES Gully erosion A complex of processes whereby the removal of soil is characterised by incised channels in the landscape. NSW Soil Conservation Service,
More informationAppendix G. Meso-Habitat Surveys. DRAFT Annual Technical Report
Appendix G Meso-Habitat Surveys DRAFT Annual Technical Report Draft March 2010 1.0 Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 6 1.0 Introduction The following appendix includes a report provided by the California Department
More informationEFFECTS OF RIPARIAN RETENTION (IN WATERSHEDS) ON ALLUVIAL FANS
EFFECTS OF RIPARIAN RETENTION (IN WATERSHEDS) ON ALLUVIAL FANS TIM GILES GEOMORPHOLOGIST FLNRO EFFECTS OF RIPARIAN RETENTION (IN WATERSHEDS) ON ALLUVIAL FANS Description of alluvial fans Three case studies
More informationRiver Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien
River Restoration and Rehabilitation Pierre Y. Julien Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado River Mechanics and Sediment Transport Lima Peru
More information-- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island
Re-inventing Government Creek -- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island Jon Houghton, Ph.D. and Derek Ormerod, M.S., P.E. - Pentec Environmental/Hart Crowser,
More informationErosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.
+ Erosion Surface Water moving, transporting, and depositing sediment. + Surface Water 2 Water from rainfall can hit Earth s surface and do a number of things: Slowly soak into the ground: Infiltration
More informationForest Service AOP Meeting Objectives of Stream Simulation: Examples and Talking Points
Forest Service AOP Meeting Objectives of Stream Simulation: Examples and Talking Points Traci Sylte, P.E. Hydrology/Fluvial Geomorphology Lolo National Forest Is It True? Are Road Crossings a Dam with
More informationHow Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?
How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin? Bruce Rhoads Department of Geography University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
More information1.0 Appendix. Appendix A In-stream LWD Data Collection Sheet In Stream LWD Data Collection Stream Site: Coordinates:x y Crew: Date: Dia-4.
1.0 Appendix Appendix A In-stream LWD Data Collection Sheet In Stream LWD Data Collection Stream Site: Coordinates:x y Crew: Date: Shot ID-1 Shot Id-2 Shot Id-3 Shot Id-4 Tagid LWD Criteria Dia-1 (cm)
More informationAppendix F Channel Grade Control Structures
Stream Simulation Appendix F Channel Grade Control Structures This appendix briefly describes permanent grade control structures that are sometimes needed in the upstream and/or downstream reaches adjacent
More informationStream Simulation: A Simple Example
Stream Simulation: A Simple Example North Thompson Creek, CO Paul T. Anderson U.S.D.A. Forest Service Here s How We Started May 2011 2-1 USDA-Forest Service Here s How We Finished Forest Service Aquatic
More informationCase Study 14. Rocky Creek Vented Box Culvert Ford
Case Study. Rocky Creek Vented Box Culvert Ford Location West Central Arkansas. Ouachita National Forest; Oden Ranger District. Rocky Creek crossing on Forest Road 887 (Muddy Gibbs Road). Crossing Description
More informationBUREAU OF CLEAN WATER. Appendix C Biological Field Methods C1. Habitat Assessment DECEMBER 2013
BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER Appendix C Biological Field Methods C1. Assessment DECEMBER 2013 HABITAT ASSESSMENT The Department has adopted the habitat assessment methods outlined in EPA s Rapid Bioassessment
More informationSCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS
DESIGN METHODS B: SEDIMENT TRANSPORT PROCESSES FOR STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN PETER KLINGEMAN OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPT., CORVALLIS 2 ND ANNUAL NORTHWEST STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN SYMPOSIUM
More informationAvoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles
Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles J. Steven Kite, WVU Neal Carte, WVDOT Will Harman, Michael Baker Corp. Donald D. Gray, WVU Photo: W. Gillespie North
More informationSession C1 - Applying the Stream Functions Pyramid to Geomorphic Assessments and Restoration Design
University of Massachusetts - Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish
More informationNORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA
QUAKER RUN Stream and Wetland Restoration As-Built Completion Report and First Year Monitoring Data Coal Township NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA Upstream Before Upstream After Prepared for: COAL TOWNSHIP 805
More informationLong Valley Meadow Restoration Project
Long Valley Meadow Restoration Project USDA Forest Service Mogollon Rim Ranger District Coconino National Forest Coconino County, Arizona T13N, R9E, Section 12 and T13N, R10E, Sections 6 and 7 Gila and
More informationSECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET
SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET INTRODUCTION A sediment budget has been constructed for the for the time period 1952-2000. The purpose of the sediment budget is to determine the relative importance of different
More informationElevation (ft) Slope ( ) County CONDITION CATEGORY. Parameter Natural Condition Slightly impacted Moderately Impacted Heavily Impacted
Version: 8/25/14 Meadow Name Date : / / MM DD YYYY GPS Location:. N. W GPS Datum (e.g., WGS 84, NAD 27) Elevation (ft) Slope ( ) County Watershed (HUC8) Landowner USGS Quad Name Observers: 7.5 or 15 (circle
More informationImplementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns
Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project Leslie A. Berns "...to acquire... and hold lands... for the purpose of protecting and preserving the flora, fauna and scenic beauties...
More informationChannel Assessments of Selected Watersheds within TFL 52
Channel Assessments of Selected Watersheds within TFL 52 prepared for: West Fraser Mills Ltd. Quesnel, BC prepared by: John Berry, M.Sc., R.P.F. Victoria, BC Channel Assessments TFL 52 Summary SUMMARY
More informationMINISTRY OF FORESTS, LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCE OPERATIONS, POST-WILDFIRE RISK ANALYSIS PRELIMINARY REPORT
MINISTRY OF FORESTS, ANDS AND NATURA RESOURCE OPERATIONS, POST-WIDFIRE RISK ANAYSIS PREIMINARY REPORT NOTE: The results given on this form are preliminary in nature and are intended to be a warning of
More informationHAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE
HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE ROAD, PROJECT CONSTRUCTED IN 1 DAY, MARCH 10, 2009 BY
More informationScience EOG Review: Landforms
Mathematician Science EOG Review: Landforms Vocabulary Definition Term canyon deep, large, V- shaped valley formed by a river over millions of years of erosion; sometimes called gorges (example: Linville
More informationFish Passage and Abundance around Grade Control Structures on Incised Streams in Western Iowa
Fish Passage and Abundance around Grade Control Structures on Incised Streams in Western Iowa John Thomas Hungry Canyons Alliance Mary Culler Iowa State University / Missouri DNR Dimitri Dermisis IIHR
More informationField Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah
Intermountain Center for River Rehabilitation and Restoration, Utah State University 31 July 2018 Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah I.
More informationUpper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California
Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California Mike Rudd (Project Manager), Charley Miller & Chad Krofta Declines in Tahoe s Water Clarity The
More informationHW #2 Landscape Travel from A to B 12,
HW #2 Landscape 2016 Section: Name: ate: 1. ase your answer(s) to the following question(s) on the map below, which represents two bridges that cross the Green River. Letters,, and represent locations
More informationGeomorphic Importance of Winter Peak Flows and Annual Snowmelt Hydrographs in a Sierra Nevada Boulder-Bedrock River
Geomorphic Importance of Winter Peak Flows and Annual Snowmelt Hydrographs in a Sierra Nevada Boulder-Bedrock River Scott McBain and Bill Trush McBain & Trush, Inc. Clavey River and Cherry Creek vicinity
More informationUPPER KETTLE CREEK FISH HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN TRIBUTARIES ADDENDUM
UPPER KETTLE CREEK FISH HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN TRIBUTARIES ADDENDUM For: Kettle Creek Watershed Association and Trout Unlimited March 2005 1000 Commerce Park Drive Williamsport, PA 17701 Phone (570)
More informationWaterbury Dam Disturbance Mike Fitzgerald Devin Rowland
Waterbury Dam Disturbance Mike Fitzgerald Devin Rowland Abstract The Waterbury Dam was completed in October 1938 as a method of flood control in the Winooski Valley. The construction began in April1935
More informationLittle Blackfoot TPA 2009 Sediment and Habitat Assessment QAQC Review March 9, 2010
Little Blackfoot TPA 2009 Sediment and Habitat Assessment QAQC Review March 9, 2010 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW Sediment and habitat monitoring in the Little Blackfoot TPA was conducted in July of 2009 as outlined
More informationDo you think sediment transport is a concern?
STREAM RESTORATION FRAMEWORK AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT BASICS Pete Klingeman 1 What is Your Restoration Project Like? k? Do you think sediment transport is a concern? East Fork Lewis River, WA Tidal creek,
More informationTechnical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth
Technical Memorandum To: From: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth 5777 Central Avenue Suite 228 Boulder, CO 80301 www.otak.com Copies: [Electronic submittal] Date: 10/19/2017 Subject:
More informationStep 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes
Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes When disturbed, streams go through a series of adjustments to regain equilibrium with the flow and sediment supply of their watersheds. These adjustments often
More informationAPPENDIX E Geomorphic Channel Surveys. October 2004
APPENDIX E October 2004 Tessera Consulting Gretchen E. Hayes In association with Sonoma Ecology Center Elisabeth Micheli Cynthia Rossi Rebecca Lawton Contents Objective... E-1 Methods... E-1 Preparation...
More informationWhen Creek Meets Valley Wall: Prioritizing Erosion Mitigation alongside the Oshawa Landfill
1 When Creek Meets Valley Wall: Prioritizing Erosion Mitigation alongside the Oshawa Landfill Robin McKillop 1, Dan McParland 1 & Cassie Scobie 2 TRIECA conference March 22-23, 2017 1 Palmer Environmental
More informationTom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013
Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire 1 May 2013 1 Hydrology 2 Basic Hydrology Low flows most common Flows that fill the stream to the banks and higher are much less common Filling the stream to the
More informationGriswold Creek August 22, 2013
Creek August 22, 2013 1 Lake Erie Protection Fund Creek Study ver Evaluate the overall condition of Creek Determine stable channel dimensions & appropriate restoration techniques Starting Stat gpoint for
More informationStep 6: Rapid Habitat Assessment (RHA)
Step 6: Rapid Habitat Assessment (RHA) Background Physical processes, combined with chemical constituents and biological interactions, are what determine biological productivity and diversity; and, in
More informationSurface Water Short Study Guide
Name: Class: Date: Surface Water Short Study Guide Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. The three ways in which a stream carries
More informationCase Study 8. North Fork Nooksack River In-channel Project
Case Study 8 Project Overview The North Fork Nooksack In-channel project was developed cooperatively between the USDA Forest Service and the Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Association (NSEA), with the objectives
More informationGeomorphic Assessment of City Center Athletic Club Development Impacts on Existing Stream Channel Stability, Lenexa, KS.
Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute (OEWRI) Geomorphic Assessment of City Center Athletic Club Development Impacts on Existing Stream Channel Stability, Lenexa, KS. Final report to Olsson
More informationOBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT
STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT Greg Babbit Graduate Research Assistant Dept. Forestry, Wildlife & Fisheries Seneca Creek, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia OBJECTIVES Introduce basic
More information7.1 COMPONENTS OF THE HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION 7.2 HABITAT SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAMPLING REACH 7.3 LOGISTICS AND WORK FLOW 7
7 PHYSICAL HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION...97 7.1 COMPONENTS OF THE HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION...101 7.2 HABITAT SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAMPLING REACH...103 7.3 LOGISTICS AND WORK FLOW...105 7.4 THALWEG
More information