Schrödinger Workshop 2012
|
|
- Gordon Ward
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Schrödinger Workshop 2012 Structure Based Virtual Screening -Various Approaches Jas Bhachoo Senior Applications Scientist Structure Based Virtual Screening Virtual screening is a cost-effective early stage lead generation method How do we design a successful structure based virtual screening campaign? 1
2 The road to success : What we have found Careful protein preparation Know your target Careful ligand preparation Enumerate states and conformations Pilot screening Know the best combination of constraints and scores Screening Post-screening processing Purchase and assay Questions we will be Asking Today Do we have a crystal structure or an homology model? Is the target drug-able? What is the quality of the model - electron density? Understanding the binding site: big small buried pockets general-properties? Are there known ligands for this target, and how can I use that information? How to screen compounds How to improve the quality of screened outputs? How to filter and cluster the output from screen to manageable numbers for synthesis or purchase 2
3 Putting everything together Tailored Protocols for XYZ Protein v Databases 1. CACDB2010 lead/drug-like set. 2. Phase mining, with multiple hypotheses, of CACDB phase database using ABCDE as queries (shape similarity > 0.6 or top 0.5%). * 3. Fingerprint-based similarity search of whole CACDB using HTS hits as queries (Tanimoto>= 0.6 or top 0.5%). * v ABCDE pocket of XYZ 1. Receptor of ABCDE site with HB to Res123 (-C=O and NH) and/or Res 122 (-NH) on chain A. 2. Receptor of ABCDE site with HB to Res123 (-C=O and NH) and/or Res 122 (-NH) on chain B. 3. Receptor of ABCDE site with HB to Res123 (-C=O and NH) on both chain A and B v Glide HTVS Two conformations of ligandsfor SP docking Glide shows dependency on input conformations (25 % top scoring) v Glide SP* Three conformations of ligandsfor XP docking ConfGen/MM/multiple FFs (15 % top scoring) *: Combined structures taken directly to XP v Glide XP* (post-processing of ensemble) 1. Mine for poses with desirable interactions, i.e., hydrogen bonding. 2. Rescore with Epik state and strain penalties 3. Take top scoring 5000 to next step for visualization 4. Select molecules for sourcing with help of clustering tools Target structure preparation, prediction and characterization 3
4 Problems with PDB structures XP GlideScore = -6.9 kcal/mol Lys58 rotamer χ 1 = χ 2 = χ 3 = χ 4 = Extremely rare Lys rotamer Crystallographic refinement (PrimeX) XP GlideScore = -8.7 kcal/mol Lys58 rotamer χ 1 = χ 2 = χ 3 = χ 4 = Most common Lys rotamer 4
5 Challenges in homology modeling Accurate alignment High sequence identity is straight forward and can produce high quality structures Low sequence identity requires assistance and manual editing Depends on human intervention, experimental data Model refinement Side chain conformation Loop conformation Binding site conformation Depends strongly on the quality of the force field High Resolution Protein Structure Prediction: Comparative Modeling Query sequence Blast/PSI-Blast Align Template(s), PSI-Blast Profile (PSSM), Query Secondary Structure Predictions, Multiple Structure Alignment Profile Query/Template Alignment Build Refine Homology model Refined protein structure Validate Protein Report 5
6 Alignments of GPCRs: Example Sequence alignment between human β 2 -adrenergic and human Melaninconcentrating hormone-1 sequences using the Align GPCR mode Align GPCR mode correctly aligned all helices, including the challenging helix 5, without any user intervention. All gaps in the alignment are located in the intracellular and extracellular loop regions, and not in TM regions Representation of loops - Variable Dielectric Constants G es 1 qq = ( ) 2 r ε 2 ε ε qq i j i j i< j ij in( ij) in( ij) sol ij GB ε = max( ε, ε ) in( ij) in() i in( j) f continuum solvent ε=80 ε=2 ε=1 ε=4 Reparametrization of internal dielectric constants for charged side chains: Lys = 4 Glu = 3 Asp = 2 Arg = 2 His = 2 Others = 1 6
7 Improvement of solvation model impacts on loop prediction accuracy Number of Cases Uniform Dielectric Variable Dielectric RMSD (Å) Uniform + Hydrophobic Variable + Hydrophobic 6 residue residue residue residue Tips and tricks Induced fit docking to generate bioactive conformations Prime side chain predictions, Macromodel side chain conformation search and hand tweaks if needed Molecular dynamics simulations to measure the stability of your protein model 7
8 Screening 1 LigandBased Methods Putting everything together Tailored Protocols for XYZ Protein v Databases 1. Screening_Inital_Data.SDF 2. Canvas > Filter using Properties > Filtered Set for 3D Screeing.mae 3. Convert to 3d with chemical enumeration 4. Prepare the protein chemically accurate and minimised 5. Characterise the protein 6. Dock xtaly bound ligandfor initial test 7. Dock 3d prepared ligand dataset v Glide HTVS v ABCDE pocket of XYZ 1. Create e-pharmuse for ligandbased screening of FXA_db 2. Shape based searching using xtal ligand> searching FX_db (25 % top scoring) v Glide SP* (15 % top scoring) v Glide XP* (post-processing of ensemble) 1. Mine for poses with desirable interactions, i.e., hydrogen bonding. 2. Rescore with Epik state and strain penalties 3. Take top scoring 5000 to next step for visualization 4. Select molecules for sourcing with help of clustering tools 8
9 Ligand preparation 2D Perspective Smart filtering of your screening deck for optimal druglike and leadlike properties (REOS, Ligparse, Ligfilter) 3D Perspective Chemically accurate ligand structures (tautomers, ionization states, stereoisomers..) Multiple input ligand conformations Confgen and MacroModel Estimate state penalties Fingerprints in Canvas Fingerprints are defined by fragments used Rules of making fragment are different how you define the path through the molecule, linearly or via torsions, or through pre-defined libraries like MACCS Available MACCS and Custom MACCS & Custom are fragment based More specific Torsion Pairwise Triplet Linear (default) Daylight Dendritic Molprint2D Radial Circular SciTegic Others are based on topology (exhaustive) 9
10 High Performance Chemical Spreadsheet Canvas /home/dixon/project1.cnv (Master view) File Edit View Insert Chemistry Structure 7-Methyltestosterone OH O Chlorpheniramine N Bupropion O Cl N Phenylpropanolamine OH NH 2 Guaifenesin O O H N OH Cl OH MW Data Query Applications Maestro Help ALogP H-bond Acceptors H-bond Donors Project1 Files + Bayes Clustering PDR_LinFP PDR_RadFP MLR CCR4 Estrogen_a Estrogen_b + RP Charts LogP_HBA Rot_bonds Structures/properties retrieved from SQLite database as needed Scroll smoothly through 10 6 compounds, hundreds of columns Create custom views from sorting, filtering, and chart selections Fingerprints in Canvas Linear Dendritic Radial MOLPRINT2D Pairwise Triplet Torsion MACCS keys 10
11 Practical 1 Fast Screening Using 2D Approaches (.../Cheminformatics) Create a Canvas project and import FXA_all_initial_data.sdf / *ligprep.out Note you may want to start from different points 2D filtering > 3D preparation > 2D Filtering... 3D preparation > Shape filtering > 2D Filtering... Generate molecular properties Applications -> Molecular properties Incorporate the results Filter by properties using Data -> Property Filter Scatter plots Similarity Searches if you have data on known ligands Clustering data with different Clustering methods Path dependent fingerprint methods Linear fingerprint codes for all linear path up to 7 bonds codes up to 14 bonds for ring closures Dendritic fingerprint codes for branches up to 5 bonds 11
12 Circular fingerprint methods Radial fingerprint (Extended Connectivity fingerprint) generated by fragmenting a structure into pieces that grow radially from each heavy atom over a series of iterations (4 by default) Each atom identified by its atom type and connecting bond types. MOLPRINT2D fingerprint each heavy atom in a structure is characterized by an environment that consists of all other heavy atoms within a distance of two bonds Pairwise, Triplet and Torsion fingerprints Pairwise fingerprint two atom types and the distance separating them: Type i -Type j -d ij. Triplet fingerprint three atoms and the distances separating them Torsion fingerprint every fragment consists of a linear path of four atoms that are differentiated by type 12
13 What are the recommendations? There is no single best setting for all targets and query molecules. Pairwise and Triplet methods exhibit size dependency. Without prior knowledge about the performance of fingerprint methods for a target, the best choice can be MOLPRINT2D, Dendritic Fingerprint combination Fingerprint averaging: modal fingerprint More specific atom typing schemes (Daylight, Mol2, Carhart) are best but probably less suited for lead hopping Practical 2 Preparing 3D Ligands for 3D Screening (.../Ligand preparation) In Maestro import a simple example of starting ligands Import 2D_variations.sdf In the first structure note, it has two ionisable groups, an ammonium counter ion and there are three chiral centres (two marked) Run LigPrep Default options Start and Append new entries as a new group Observe results in Maestro Tile and label the structures to see them individually In the first structure note, carboxylate is unprotonated, pyridine is both protonated and unprotonated, the variety of R/S chiralities In Maestro import FXA_ligprep-out.mae Only first few ligands using the Advanced options. We do not need to see the entire file as it is very large. 13
14 Conformer Generation Lets see the White Paper Screening 2 Structure Based Methods 14
15 Protein preparation wizard prepare and repair PDB structures Cleaning up raw PDB files Assign bond order Add hydrogen atoms Delete unwanted part of the system Optimize the hydrogen bond networks (flip of residues like ASN, GLN, tautomer determination: HIE, HID or protonation state HIP ) Remove putative clashes in your structure (ideally with diffraction data) Missing information Important side-chains are missing Important loops are missing Practical 3 (.../Virtual Screening) Preparing a PDB Structure for Virtual Screening Download 1FJS structures in Protein preparation wizard. Extra: go to EDS ( and download the CNS format map (2mFo-DFc) for 1FJS; Examine the electron density Notes on electron density: do the residues ligand protein water sit in the electron density or is there an anomoloy?... Prepare 1FJS Set up Glide grids (Applications -> Glide -> Receptor grid generation) 15
16 Characterize the binding pocket - Sitemap Early stage analysis tool Summarises key parts of the protein structure Find potential binding sites Characterize known binding sites Is the binding site drug-able? Potential binding sites characterized by Hydrophobic, hydrophilic, hbond donor/acceptor isosurfaces, volume etc Scoring used to determine drug-ability Site points can be used to define Glide grids (treat as ligand entry) Validated for site druggability Halgren, T., "New Method for Fast and Accurate Binding-site Identification and Analysis", Chem. Biol. Drug Des., 2007, 69, Halgren, T., "Identifying and Characterizing Binding Sites and Assessing Druggability, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2009, 49, SiteMap Feature Detection Thrombin (1ett) 16
17 Druggability Dataset Druggable Prodrug/transporUndruggable ACE-1 Acetylcholinesterase Cathepsin K Aldose reductase Thrombin PTP-1B cabl kinase Neuraminidase Caspase 1 (ICE-1) CDK2 IMPDH HIV integrase Cyclooxygenase 2 Penicillin binding protein DNA gyrase B HIV RT (nucleotide site) EGFR kinase Enoyl reductase Factor X Fungal Cyp51 HIV RT (NNRTI site) HIV-1 Protease HMG CoA reductase MDM2 P38 kinase PDE 4D PDE 5A Thrombin -diverse set of pharmaceutically relevant targets -widely used in benchmark studies to study the properties of binding sites SiteMap Druggability Results MAP POD is from Cheng et al. Undruggable Difficult 17
18 Practical 4 (.../Virtual Screening) Property Mapping the Xtal Structure Run Sitemap for 1FJS Try Evaluate... Tasks. Analyse the results. Where are the hydrophobic areas and polar areas? * Is the target druggable? * See next slide Rule of thumb * Things to look out for in SiteMap The active site of factor Xa is divided into four sub pockets as S1, S2, S3 and S4. The S1 subpocket determines the major component of selectivity and binding. The S2 sub-pocket is small, shallow and not well defined. It merges with the S4 subpocket. The S3 sub-pocket is located on the rim of the S1 pocket and is quite exposed to solvent. The S4 sub-pocket has 3 ligand binding domains, namely the hydrophobic box, the cationic hole and the water site. Factor Xa inhibitors generally bind in an L-shaped conformation,where one group of the ligand occupies the anionic S1 pocket lined by residues Asp189, Ser195, and Tyr228, and anothergroup of the ligand occupies the aromatic S4 pocket lined by residues Tyr99, Phe174, and Trp228. Typically, a fairly rigid linker group bridges these two interaction sites. 18
19 Tips and tricks Make sure your structure is chemically accurate! Use multiple structures, even different chains from same PDB Induced fit docking to generate bioactive conformations Prime side chain predictions, Macromodel side chain conformation search and hand tweaks if needed Molecular dynamics simulations to understand flexibility of the structure Molecular dynamics simulations to measure the stability of your protein model Pre-screen Pilot screens to evaluate performance of different combinations of constraints (EFs; GlideScores; Chemical matter eyeballing for a motif ). Check if co-crystallised ligand can be docked with Standard Docking. If large RMS to native. Find out why: Are there any crystal mates? Constraints, multiple protein input conformations (see VSW GUI for Glide), QPLD Screen your database! 19
20 Glide Overview The conformations then enter the Glide Filter This is a series of hierarchical filters which are used to rapidly eliminate poses of the ligand which cannot correspond to a welldocked solution. Protein & ligand preparation Calculate Coulomb & vdw grids Docking algorithm 3 Modes: HTVS 3-5 secs/lig SP 30-50secs/lig XP 3-5mins/lig Ligandconformations Site-point Search Diameter Test/Subset Test Greedy Score Refinement Minimisation core O H N N sidechain group S O - sidechain group center diameter O Final Score Top hits Additional Information: Glide Implementation Details The value of GlideScore is determined as follows: 0.065E GlideScore = E coul E Metal + P BuryP + P + E + E + Site The P BuryP is a penalty term for burying polar functionality in a hydrophobic environment. The P RotB is a penalty term for freezing rotatable bonds. The Site term rewards polar, but non-hydrogen bonding interactions in the site. vdw RotB Lipo HBond + 20
21 Glide SP: Enrichment Summary Average enrichment in recovering actives in top 1% of decoys (Average of 65 systems) EF(1%) Glide: A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring.1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy. R. A. Friesner, J. L. Banks, R. B. Murphy, T. A. Halgren, J. J. Klicic, D. T. Mainz, M. P. Repasky, E. H. Knoll, M. Shelley, J. K. Perry, D. E. Shaw, P. Francis, and P. S. Shenkin. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, Glide: A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring.2. Enrichment Factors in Database Screening. T. A. Halgren, R. B. Murphy, R. A. Friesner, H. S. Beard, L. L. Frye, W. T. Pollard, and J. L. Banks. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, Extra Precision Glide: Docking and Scoring Incorporating a Model of Hydrophobic Enclosure for Protein-Ligand Complexes. Friesner,R.A.; Murphy, R. B.; Repasky,M. P.; Frye, L. L.; Greenwood, J. R.; Halgren,T. A.; Sanschagrin, P. C.; Mainz, D. T., J. Med. Chem., 2006, 49, Comparative Performance of Several Flexible Docking Programs and Scoring Functions: Enrichment Studies for a Diverse Set of Pharmaceutically Relevant Targets. Zhou, Z.; Felts, A. K.; Friesner, R. A.; Levy, R. M., J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2007, 47, Practical 5 Virtual Screening: Docking and Visualising Poses Generate the Glide Grid for 1fjs Use the fully prepared protein and co-crystralised ligand as starting point for Glide > Receptor Grid Generation Define the ligand inside the Grid panel Start the job 1fjs-grid.zip is the output Dock the 1fjs ligand using this Grid file In Glide > Ligand Docking, Settings tab > browse for the 1fjs grid file, choose SP mode In Ligands tab > choose selected entry and ensure the 1fjs ligand only is highlited in the Project Table Start the job Selfdock-1fjs-sp-pv.mae is the output Use Maestro to view the result(s)... Overlay Sitemap result! Glide Virtual Screening Workflow is powerful interface for setting up a series of screens, especially for an ensemble of receptors 21
22 Enjoy Lunch Thanks for you attention so far!!. What do I do with 1000s hits? Pose Filter based on known interactions (Script menu) Filter poses based on pharmacophore (Phase) 22
23 More Post-processing Filter based on Strain Rescore (Script menu) Calculating Prime MM-GBSA or Macromodel Embrace Selection of Hits If resources are limited, only the most diverse ligands are selected for experimental measurements Practical: Run this script on VSW results output (96 XP ligands) Use fingerprints to cluster hits and choose cluster representatives 23
24 Structural Interaction Fingerprints Original publication: Chuaqui et al., J. Med. Chem. 47 (2005) (Biogen) Basic algorithm Begin with pre-docked poses For each ligand, generate fingerprint based on types of contact with the receptor Use the fingerprints for filtering, similarity searching, and clustering Structural Interaction Fingerprints compound 1 compound 2 compound 3 compound n psift Residue1 Residue 2 Residue N bit1 = contact bit2 = backbone bit3 = side chain bit4 = polar bit5 = hydrophobic bit6 = HB acceptor bit7 = HB donor bit8 = aromatic (addition to paper) bit9 = charge (addition to paper) 24
25 Structural Interaction Fingerprints (Demo or Practical) Calculate Fingerprints Visualize contacts with Interaction Matrix Interactive Analysis of Contacts Picking in the matrix displays the residue and the interaction 25
26 Interactive Distance Matrix Visual Inspection The different filtering methods reduce the number of hit The final selection should be done by human visual inspection of the protein ligand interactions. Possible selection criterias: Does the ligand have strange docked conformations? Does the protein ligand interactions fit SiteMap results? Does the ligand have good ligand efficiencies? 26
27 Post-screen Pose filter (Scripts -> Docking post-processing-> Pose filter) Filter based on Interaction fingerprints, ligand strain energy, ligand efficiency Reserve slots for compounds with somewhat lower GlideScores that came via ligand based methods (show high similiarity using techniques we ve seen lately) Visualize 5-10x the number of compounds to be wet-screened by several people; balance leadlike vs. druglike; tabulate votes Cluster results by chemotype (e.g. spectral clustering) and only order up to 2-4 best examples from each cluster for testing Practical 6 Post-Docking Analysis; SIFTs and Clustering Use the Workspace Style toolbar to visualize the docked poses Analyse the interaction pattern Scripts->Cheminformatics->Interaction fingerprints Cluster by chemotype Scripts->Cheminformatics-> clustering 27
28 Glide XP Visualiser Practical 7 Understanding Extra Precision Docking, XPVisuliaser Do Glide Score in Place with the co-crystalized ligand IFJS using XP and toggle on Write XP descriptor information Examine the XP descriptors in Applications-> Glide -> XP Visualizer (read in your *xpdes file) Use Help... To understand the terms in the scoring function... Leads to Practical 4b 28
29 Structure based pharmacophore Glide XP Fragment Docking Top Hits Neuraminidase 29
30 Which are the important features? Which are the important features?
31 Optimal Site Selection Methods Protein PDB structure preparation Fragments ionization/tautomer states generated Glide XP modified settings Increase number of poses generated for initial docking stage Wider scoring window for filtration on initial poses Increase number of poses per ligand for energy minimization Write XP Descriptor Information Writes atom-level energy terms H-bond Electrostatic and vdw Hydrophobic enclosure π-π and π-cation 31
32 Practical 8 Generating a Structure Based Pharmacophore for Screening... Using the 1fjs-xp-pv.mae as the pose-viewer file, generate e-pharmacophore by using Scripts->Post-docking processing- > e-pharmacophore (< 1 min) Single ligand option Create hypothesis Search the Phase database using Applications -> Phase -> Find matches to hypothesis (< 1 min for search) Database: FXA_db_phasedb Choose hypothesis in workspace (or selected entry) Use existing conformations View results in Maestro Fitness is the output column Use right click fix on highlited row to fix the original pharmacophore in the workspace. Arrow-through results. Use all possible known information Use all available information about target and its ligand preferences 2D similarity Pharmacophore Shape based 32
33 Do still have some energy?? Practical 9 (if you have energy!) Shape Based Searching Use the VDW shape of a ligand to search for molecules of a similar shape Use Shape query from workspace Generate conformations during search Options reveal more stringency in addition to shape Shape sim is the output column View results in Maestro as before 33
34 Putting everything together Tailored Protocols for XYZ Protein v Databases v ABCDE pocket of XYZ 1. CACDB2010 lead/drug-like set. 2. Phase mining, with multiple hypotheses, of CACDB phase database using half and whole of ABCDE as queries (shape similarity > 0.6 or top 0.5%). * 3. Fingerprint-based similarity search of whole CACDB using HTS hits as queries (Tanimoto>= 0.6 or top 0.5%). * 1. Receptor of ABCDE site with HB to Res123 (-C=O and NH) and/or Res 122 (-NH) on chain A. 2. Receptor of ABCDE site with HB to Res123 (-C=O and NH) and/or Res 122 (-NH) on chain B. 3. Receptor of ABCDE site with HB to Res123 (-C=O and NH) on both chain A and B v Glide HTVS (25 % top scoring) v Glide SP* * Two conformations of ligandsfor XP docking *: Combined structures taken directly to XP v Glide XP* (15 % top scoring) * Three conformations of ligandsfor XP docking (post-processing of ensemble) 1. Mine for poses with desirable interactions, i.e., hydrogen bonding. 2. Rescore with Epik state and strain penalties 3. Take top scoring 5000 to next step for visualization 4. Select molecules for sourcing with help of clustering tools Summary Virtual screening needs careful planning and preparation Post-process the results using different tools and re-score, rerank Products and tools that have been discussed today: PrimeX, Prime, Macromodel, Sitemap, Glide, Epik, Canvas, Phase, Prime MM-GBSA, Interaction fingerprint, Spectral clustering, Strain rescore, Pose filter, e-pharmacophore 34
35 Thanks for your attention! Enjoy your next session We d appreciate your online feedback J 35
Schrödinger Workshop 2013
Schrödinger Workshop 2013 Structure Based Virtual Screening -Various Approaches Jas Bhachoo Schrodinger Senior Applications Scientist Your Files for Today 4 main directories Open the latest *prjzip file
More informationThe Schrödinger KNIME extensions
The Schrödinger KNIME extensions Computational Chemistry and Cheminformatics in a workflow environment Jean-Christophe Mozziconacci Volker Eyrich Topics What are the Schrödinger extensions? Workflow application
More informationIntroduction to Structure Preparation and Visualization
Introduction to Structure Preparation and Visualization Created with: Release 2018-4 Prerequisites: Release 2018-2 or higher Access to the internet Categories: Molecular Visualization, Structure-Based
More informationThe Schrödinger KNIME extensions
The Schrödinger KNIME extensions Computational Chemistry and Cheminformatics in a workflow environment Jean-Christophe Mozziconacci Volker Eyrich KNIME UGM, Berlin, February 2015 The Schrödinger Extensions
More informationMM-GBSA for Calculating Binding Affinity A rank-ordering study for the lead optimization of Fxa and COX-2 inhibitors
MM-GBSA for Calculating Binding Affinity A rank-ordering study for the lead optimization of Fxa and COX-2 inhibitors Thomas Steinbrecher Senior Application Scientist Typical Docking Workflow Databases
More informationSchrodinger ebootcamp #3, Summer EXPLORING METHODS FOR CONFORMER SEARCHING Jas Bhachoo, Senior Applications Scientist
Schrodinger ebootcamp #3, Summer 2016 EXPLORING METHODS FOR CONFORMER SEARCHING Jas Bhachoo, Senior Applications Scientist Numerous applications Generating conformations MM Agenda http://www.schrodinger.com/macromodel
More informationConformational Searching using MacroModel and ConfGen. John Shelley Schrödinger Fellow
Conformational Searching using MacroModel and ConfGen John Shelley Schrödinger Fellow Overview Types of conformational searching applications MacroModel s conformation generation procedure General features
More informationKd = koff/kon = [R][L]/[RL]
Taller de docking y cribado virtual: Uso de herramientas computacionales en el diseño de fármacos Docking program GLIDE El programa de docking GLIDE Sonsoles Martín-Santamaría Shrödinger is a scientific
More informationUsing Phase for Pharmacophore Modelling. 5th European Life Science Bootcamp March, 2017
Using Phase for Pharmacophore Modelling 5th European Life Science Bootcamp March, 2017 Phase: Our Pharmacohore generation tool Significant improvements to Phase methods in 2016 New highly interactive interface
More informationDOCKING TUTORIAL. A. The docking Workflow
2 nd Strasbourg Summer School on Chemoinformatics VVF Obernai, France, 20-24 June 2010 E. Kellenberger DOCKING TUTORIAL A. The docking Workflow 1. Ligand preparation It consists in the standardization
More informationUser Guide for LeDock
User Guide for LeDock Hongtao Zhao, PhD Email: htzhao@lephar.com Website: www.lephar.com Copyright 2017 Hongtao Zhao. All rights reserved. Introduction LeDock is flexible small-molecule docking software,
More informationIdentifying Interaction Hot Spots with SuperStar
Identifying Interaction Hot Spots with SuperStar Version 1.0 November 2017 Table of Contents Identifying Interaction Hot Spots with SuperStar... 2 Case Study... 3 Introduction... 3 Generate SuperStar Maps
More informationLigand Scout Tutorials
Ligand Scout Tutorials Step : Creating a pharmacophore from a protein-ligand complex. Type ke6 in the upper right area of the screen and press the button Download *+. The protein will be downloaded and
More informationThe PhilOEsophy. There are only two fundamental molecular descriptors
The PhilOEsophy There are only two fundamental molecular descriptors Where can we use shape? Virtual screening More effective than 2D Lead-hopping Shape analogues are not graph analogues Molecular alignment
More informationFlexibility and Constraints in GOLD
Flexibility and Constraints in GOLD Version 2.1 August 2018 GOLD v5.6.3 Table of Contents Purpose of Docking... 3 GOLD s Evolutionary Algorithm... 4 GOLD and Hermes... 4 Handling Flexibility and Constraints
More informationPerforming a Pharmacophore Search using CSD-CrossMiner
Table of Contents Introduction... 2 CSD-CrossMiner Terminology... 2 Overview of CSD-CrossMiner... 3 Searching with a Pharmacophore... 4 Performing a Pharmacophore Search using CSD-CrossMiner Version 2.0
More informationCreating a Pharmacophore Query from a Reference Molecule & Scaffold Hopping in CSD-CrossMiner
Table of Contents Creating a Pharmacophore Query from a Reference Molecule & Scaffold Hopping in CSD-CrossMiner Introduction... 2 CSD-CrossMiner Terminology... 2 Overview of CSD-CrossMiner... 3 Features
More informationExamples of Protein Modeling. Protein Modeling. Primary Structure. Protein Structure Description. Protein Sequence Sources. Importing Sequences to MOE
Examples of Protein Modeling Protein Modeling Visualization Examination of an experimental structure to gain insight about a research question Dynamics To examine the dynamics of protein structures To
More informationViewing and Analyzing Proteins, Ligands and their Complexes 2
2 Viewing and Analyzing Proteins, Ligands and their Complexes 2 Overview Viewing the accessible surface Analyzing the properties of proteins containing thousands of atoms is best accomplished by representing
More informationIntroduction to Comparative Protein Modeling. Chapter 4 Part I
Introduction to Comparative Protein Modeling Chapter 4 Part I 1 Information on Proteins Each modeling study depends on the quality of the known experimental data. Basis of the model Search in the literature
More informationDr. Sander B. Nabuurs. Computational Drug Discovery group Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics Radboud University Medical Centre
Dr. Sander B. Nabuurs Computational Drug Discovery group Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics Radboud University Medical Centre The road to new drugs. How to find new hits? High Throughput
More informationTowards Physics-based Models for ADME/Tox. Tyler Day
Towards Physics-based Models for ADME/Tox Tyler Day Overview Motivation Application: P450 Site of Metabolism Application: Membrane Permeability Future Directions and Applications Motivation Advantages
More informationBiologically Relevant Molecular Comparisons. Mark Mackey
Biologically Relevant Molecular Comparisons Mark Mackey Agenda > Cresset Technology > Cresset Products > FieldStere > FieldScreen > FieldAlign > FieldTemplater > Cresset and Knime About Cresset > Specialist
More informationThe Schrödinger KNIME extensions
The Schrödinger KNIME extensions Computational Chemistry and Cheminformatics in a workflow environment Jean-Christophe Mozziconacci Volker Eyrich KNIME UGM, Zurich, February 2014 The Schrödinger extensions
More informationVirtual Libraries and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery Processes using KNIME
Virtual Libraries and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery Processes using KNIME Iván Solt Solutions for Cheminformatics Drug Discovery Strategies for known targets High-Throughput Screening (HTS) Cells
More informationProtein-Ligand Docking Methods
Review Goal: Given a protein structure, predict its ligand bindings Protein-Ligand Docking Methods Applications: Function prediction Drug discovery etc. Thomas Funkhouser Princeton University S597A, Fall
More informationPreparing a PDB File
Figure 1: Schematic view of the ligand-binding domain from the vitamin D receptor (PDB file 1IE9). The crystallographic waters are shown as small spheres and the bound ligand is shown as a CPK model. HO
More informationNew approaches to scoring function design for protein-ligand binding affinities. Richard A. Friesner Columbia University
New approaches to scoring function design for protein-ligand binding affinities Richard A. Friesner Columbia University Overview Brief discussion of advantages of empirical scoring approaches Analysis
More informationDocking with Water in the Binding Site using GOLD
Docking with Water in the Binding Site using GOLD Version 2.0 November 2017 GOLD v5.6 Table of Contents Docking with Water in the Binding Site... 2 Case Study... 3 Introduction... 3 Provided Input Files...
More informationWeek 10: Homology Modelling (II) - HHpred
Week 10: Homology Modelling (II) - HHpred Course: Tools for Structural Biology Fabian Glaser BKU - Technion 1 2 Identify and align related structures by sequence methods is not an easy task All comparative
More informationIntroduction. OntoChem
Introduction ntochem Providing drug discovery knowledge & small molecules... Supporting the task of medicinal chemistry Allows selecting best possible small molecule starting point From target to leads
More informationIntroduction to Spark
1 As you become familiar or continue to explore the Cresset technology and software applications, we encourage you to look through the user manual. This is accessible from the Help menu. However, don t
More informationICM-Chemist-Pro How-To Guide. Version 3.6-1h Last Updated 12/29/2009
ICM-Chemist-Pro How-To Guide Version 3.6-1h Last Updated 12/29/2009 ICM-Chemist-Pro ICM 3D LIGAND EDITOR: SETUP 1. Read in a ligand molecule or PDB file. How to setup the ligand in the ICM 3D Ligand Editor.
More informationCombiGlide 2.8. User Manual. Schrödinger Press
CombiGlide User Manual CombiGlide 2.8 User Manual Schrödinger Press CombiGlide User Manual Copyright 2012 Schrödinger, LLC. All rights reserved. While care has been taken in the preparation of this publication,
More informationComputational chemical biology to address non-traditional drug targets. John Karanicolas
Computational chemical biology to address non-traditional drug targets John Karanicolas Our computational toolbox Structure-based approaches Ligand-based approaches Detailed MD simulations 2D fingerprints
More informationStructure based drug design and LIE models for GPCRs
Structure based drug design and LIE models for GPCRs Peter Kolb kolb@docking.org Shoichet Lab ACS 237 th National Meeting, March 24, 2009 p.1/26 [Acknowledgements] Brian Shoichet John Irwin Mike Keiser
More informationHit Finding and Optimization Using BLAZE & FORGE
Hit Finding and Optimization Using BLAZE & FORGE Kevin Cusack,* Maria Argiriadi, Eric Breinlinger, Jeremy Edmunds, Michael Hoemann, Michael Friedman, Sami Osman, Raymond Huntley, Thomas Vargo AbbVie, Immunology
More informationProtein-Ligand Docking Methods
Review Goal: Given a protein structure, predict its ligand bindings Protein-Ligand Docking Methods Applications: Function prediction Drug discovery etc. Thomas Funkhouser Princeton University S597A, Fall
More informationPose Prediction with GOLD
Pose Prediction with GOLD Version 3.0 November 2018 GOLD v5.7.0 Table of Contents The Purpose of Docking... 2 GOLD s Evolutionary Algorithm... 3 A Checklist for Docking... 3 GOLD and Hermes... 3 Redocking
More informationStructural biology and drug design: An overview
Structural biology and drug design: An overview livier Taboureau Assitant professor Chemoinformatics group-cbs-dtu otab@cbs.dtu.dk Drug discovery Drug and drug design A drug is a key molecule involved
More informationCSD. CSD-Enterprise. Access the CSD and ALL CCDC application software
CSD CSD-Enterprise Access the CSD and ALL CCDC application software CSD-Enterprise brings it all: access to the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD), the world s comprehensive and up-to-date database of
More informationConformational Sampling of Druglike Molecules with MOE and Catalyst: Implications for Pharmacophore Modeling and Virtual Screening
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 1773 1791 1773 Conformational Sampling of Druglike Molecules with MOE and Catalyst: Implications for Pharmacophore Modeling and Virtual Screening I-Jen Chen* and Nicolas
More informationSeeSAR 7.1 Beginners Guide. June 2017
SeeSAR 7.1 Beginners Guide June 2017 Part 1: Basics 1 Type a pdb code and press return or Load your own protein or already existing project, or Just load molecules To begin, let s type 2zff and download
More informationProtein Structure Prediction
Page 1 Protein Structure Prediction Russ B. Altman BMI 214 CS 274 Protein Folding is different from structure prediction --Folding is concerned with the process of taking the 3D shape, usually based on
More informationBioengineering & Bioinformatics Summer Institute, Dept. Computational Biology, University of Pittsburgh, PGH, PA
Pharmacophore Model Development for the Identification of Novel Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors Edwin Kamau Dept Chem & Biochem Kennesa State Uni ersit Kennesa GA 30144 Dept. Chem. & Biochem. Kennesaw
More informationSimilarity Search. Uwe Koch
Similarity Search Uwe Koch Similarity Search The similar property principle: strurally similar molecules tend to have similar properties. However, structure property discontinuities occur frequently. Relevance
More informationDesign and Synthesis of the Comprehensive Fragment Library
YOUR INNOVATIVE CHEMISTRY PARTNER IN DRUG DISCOVERY Design and Synthesis of the Comprehensive Fragment Library A 3D Enabled Library for Medicinal Chemistry Discovery Warren S Wade 1, Kuei-Lin Chang 1,
More informationDISCRETE TUTORIAL. Agustí Emperador. Institute for Research in Biomedicine, Barcelona APPLICATION OF DISCRETE TO FLEXIBLE PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING:
DISCRETE TUTORIAL Agustí Emperador Institute for Research in Biomedicine, Barcelona APPLICATION OF DISCRETE TO FLEXIBLE PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING: STRUCTURAL REFINEMENT OF DOCKING CONFORMATIONS Emperador
More information5.1. Hardwares, Softwares and Web server used in Molecular modeling
5. EXPERIMENTAL The tools, techniques and procedures/methods used for carrying out research work reported in this thesis have been described as follows: 5.1. Hardwares, Softwares and Web server used in
More informationProtein-Ligand Docking Evaluations
Introduction Protein-Ligand Docking Evaluations Protein-ligand docking: Given a protein and a ligand, determine the pose(s) and conformation(s) minimizing the total energy of the protein-ligand complex
More informationDocking. GBCB 5874: Problem Solving in GBCB
Docking Benzamidine Docking to Trypsin Relationship to Drug Design Ligand-based design QSAR Pharmacophore modeling Can be done without 3-D structure of protein Receptor/Structure-based design Molecular
More informationICM-Chemist How-To Guide. Version 3.6-1g Last Updated 12/01/2009
ICM-Chemist How-To Guide Version 3.6-1g Last Updated 12/01/2009 ICM-Chemist HOW TO IMPORT, SKETCH AND EDIT CHEMICALS How to access the ICM Molecular Editor. 1. Click here 2. Start sketching How to sketch
More informationCHAPTER-5 MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDIES
CHAPTER-5 MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDIES 156 CHAPTER -5 MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDIES 5. Molecular docking studies This chapter discusses about the molecular docking studies of the synthesized compounds with different
More informationChemogenomic: Approaches to Rational Drug Design. Jonas Skjødt Møller
Chemogenomic: Approaches to Rational Drug Design Jonas Skjødt Møller Chemogenomic Chemistry Biology Chemical biology Medical chemistry Chemical genetics Chemoinformatics Bioinformatics Chemoproteomics
More informationUsing AutoDock for Virtual Screening
Using AutoDock for Virtual Screening CUHK Croucher ASI Workshop 2011 Stefano Forli, PhD Prof. Arthur J. Olson, Ph.D Molecular Graphics Lab Screening and Virtual Screening The ultimate tool for identifying
More informationType II Kinase Inhibitors Show an Unexpected Inhibition Mode against Parkinson s Disease-Linked LRRK2 Mutant G2019S.
Type II Kinase Inhibitors Show an Unexpected Inhibition Mode against Parkinson s Disease-Linked LRRK2 Mutant G219S. Min Liu@&*, Samantha A. Bender%*, Gregory D Cuny@, Woody Sherman, Marcie Glicksman@ Soumya
More informationLigand-receptor interactions
University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland 11 22 March 2013 Ligand-receptor interactions Dr. Pavel Polishchuk A.V. Bogatsky Physico-Chemical Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Odessa, Ukraine
More informationStructure-based maximal affinity model predicts small-molecule druggability
Structure-based maximal affinity model predicts small-molecule druggability Alan Cheng alan.cheng@amgen.com IMA Workshop (Jan 17, 2008) Druggability prediction Introduction Affinity model Some results
More informationToward an Understanding of GPCR-ligand Interactions. Alexander Heifetz
Toward an Understanding of GPCR-ligand Interactions Alexander Heifetz UK QSAR and ChemoInformatics Group Conference, Cambridge, UK October 6 th, 2015 Agenda Fragment Molecular Orbitals (FMO) for GPCR exploration
More informationVirtual screening in drug discovery
Virtual screening in drug discovery Pavel Polishchuk Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine Palacky University pavlo.polishchuk@upol.cz Drug development workflow Vistoli G., et al., Drug Discovery
More informationBioSolveIT. A Combinatorial Approach for Handling of Protonation and Tautomer Ambiguities in Docking Experiments
BioSolveIT Biology Problems Solved using Information Technology A Combinatorial Approach for andling of Protonation and Tautomer Ambiguities in Docking Experiments Ingo Dramburg BioSolve IT Gmb An der
More informationSupporting Online Material for
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5742/1868/dc1 Supporting Online Material for Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins Philip Bradley, Kira M. S. Misura, David Baker*
More informationLigandScout. Automated Structure-Based Pharmacophore Model Generation. Gerhard Wolber* and Thierry Langer
LigandScout Automated Structure-Based Pharmacophore Model Generation Gerhard Wolber* and Thierry Langer * E-Mail: wolber@inteligand.com Pharmacophores from LigandScout Pharmacophores & the Protein Data
More informationApril, The energy functions include:
REDUX A collection of Python scripts for torsion angle Monte Carlo protein molecular simulations and analysis The program is based on unified residue peptide model and is designed for more efficient exploration
More informationFlexPepDock In a nutshell
FlexPepDock In a nutshell All Tutorial files are located in http://bit.ly/mxtakv FlexPepdock refinement Step 1 Step 3 - Refinement Step 4 - Selection of models Measure of fit FlexPepdock Ab-initio Step
More informationVersion 1.2 October 2017 CSD v5.39
Mogul Geometry Check Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Example 1. Using Mogul to assess intramolecular geometry... 3 Example 2. Using Mogul to explain activity data... 5 Conclusions... 8 Further Exercises...
More informationVirtual screening for drug discovery. Markus Lill Purdue University
Virtual screening for drug discovery Markus Lill Purdue University mlill@purdue.edu Lecture material http://people.pharmacy.purdue.edu/~mlill/teaching/eidelberg/ I.1 Drug discovery Cl N Disease I.1 Drug
More informationGOLD User Guide. 5.5 Release. To access our new format tutorials please
GOLD User Guide A Component of the GOLD Suite 5.5 Release Copyright 2016 Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre Registered Charity No 800579 To access our new format tutorials please visit the GOLD web
More informationJoana Pereira Lamzin Group EMBL Hamburg, Germany. Small molecules How to identify and build them (with ARP/wARP)
Joana Pereira Lamzin Group EMBL Hamburg, Germany Small molecules How to identify and build them (with ARP/wARP) The task at hand To find ligand density and build it! Fitting a ligand We have: electron
More informationSupplementary Material. Table of Contents. Evaluation of the test compounds using Lipinski s rule 2
Supplementary Material Table of Contents Pages Evaluation of the test compounds using Lipinski s rule 2 Characterization of compounds PB3, PB6, PB10, PB11, PB12, PB14, PB15, PB17, PB19 2-6 Docking Methodology
More informationTutorial. Getting started. Sample to Insight. March 31, 2016
Getting started March 31, 2016 Sample to Insight CLC bio, a QIAGEN Company Silkeborgvej 2 Prismet 8000 Aarhus C Denmark Telephone: +45 70 22 32 44 www.clcbio.com support-clcbio@qiagen.com Getting started
More informationBuild_model v User Guide
Build_model v.2.0.1 User Guide MolTech Build_model User Guide 2008-2011 Molecular Technologies Ltd. www.moltech.ru Please send your comments and suggestions to contact@moltech.ru. Table of Contents Input
More informationThe Long and Rocky Road from a PDB File to a Protein Ligand Docking Score. Protein Structures: The Starting Point for New Drugs 2
The Long and Rocky Road from a PDB File to a Protein Ligand Docking Score Protein Structures: The Starting Point for New Drugs 2 Matthias Rarey Stefan Bietz Nadine Schneider Sascha Urbaczek University
More informationNovel Quinoline and Naphthalene derivatives as potent Antimycobacterial agents
ovel Quinoline and aphthalene derivatives as potent Antimycobacterial agents Ram Shankar Upadhayaya a, Jaya Kishore Vandavasi a, Ramakant A. Kardile a, Santosh V. Lahore a, Shailesh S. Dixit a, Hemantkumar
More informationβ1 Structure Prediction and Validation
13 Chapter 2 β1 Structure Prediction and Validation 2.1 Overview Over several years, GPCR prediction methods in the Goddard lab have evolved to keep pace with the changing field of GPCR structure. Despite
More informationRetrieving hits through in silico screening and expert assessment M. N. Drwal a,b and R. Griffith a
Retrieving hits through in silico screening and expert assessment M.. Drwal a,b and R. Griffith a a: School of Medical Sciences/Pharmacology, USW, Sydney, Australia b: Charité Berlin, Germany Abstract:
More informationMarvin. Sketching, viewing and predicting properties with Marvin - features, tips and tricks. Gyorgy Pirok. Solutions for Cheminformatics
Marvin Sketching, viewing and predicting properties with Marvin - features, tips and tricks Gyorgy Pirok Solutions for Cheminformatics The Marvin family The Marvin toolkit provides web-enabled components
More informationBuilding 3D models of proteins
Building 3D models of proteins Why make a structural model for your protein? The structure can provide clues to the function through structural similarity with other proteins With a structure it is easier
More informationComputational Chemistry in Drug Design. Xavier Fradera Barcelona, 17/4/2007
Computational Chemistry in Drug Design Xavier Fradera Barcelona, 17/4/2007 verview Introduction and background Drug Design Cycle Computational methods Chemoinformatics Ligand Based Methods Structure Based
More informationDifferent conformations of the drugs within the virtual library of FDA approved drugs will be generated.
Chapter 3 Molecular Modeling 3.1. Introduction In this study pharmacophore models will be created to screen a virtual library of FDA approved drugs for compounds that may inhibit MA-A and MA-B. The virtual
More informationBUDE. A General Purpose Molecular Docking Program Using OpenCL. Richard B Sessions
BUDE A General Purpose Molecular Docking Program Using OpenCL Richard B Sessions 1 The molecular docking problem receptor ligand Proteins typically O(1000) atoms Ligands typically O(100) atoms predicted
More informationProtein structure prediction. CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Oct. 10 and 12, 2017 Ron Dror
Protein structure prediction CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Oct. 10 and 12, 2017 Ron Dror 1 Outline Why predict protein structure? Can we use (pure) physics-based methods? Knowledge-based methods Two major
More informationest Drive K20 GPUs! Experience The Acceleration Run Computational Chemistry Codes on Tesla K20 GPU today
est Drive K20 GPUs! Experience The Acceleration Run Computational Chemistry Codes on Tesla K20 GPU today Sign up for FREE GPU Test Drive on remotely hosted clusters www.nvidia.com/gputestd rive Shape Searching
More informationCMPS 3110: Bioinformatics. Tertiary Structure Prediction
CMPS 3110: Bioinformatics Tertiary Structure Prediction Tertiary Structure Prediction Why Should Tertiary Structure Prediction Be Possible? Molecules obey the laws of physics! Conformation space is finite
More informationTutorial: Structural Analysis of a Protein-Protein Complex
Molecular Modeling Section (MMS) Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences University of Padova Via Marzolo 5-35131 Padova (IT) @contact: stefano.moro@unipd.it Tutorial: Structural Analysis
More informationProtein structure prediction. CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Oct. 10 and 12, 2017 Ron Dror
Protein structure prediction CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Oct. 10 and 12, 2017 Ron Dror 1 Outline Why predict protein structure? Can we use (pure) physics-based methods? Knowledge-based methods Two major
More informationProtein Structure Prediction and Protein-Ligand Docking
Protein Structure Prediction and Protein-Ligand Docking Björn Wallner bjornw@ifm.liu.se Jan. 24, 2014 Todays topics Protein Folding Intro Protein structure prediction How can we predict the structure of
More informationEnsemble Docking with GOLD
Ensemble Docking with GOLD Version 2.0 November 2017 GOLD v5.6 Table of Contents Ensemble Docking... 2 Case Study... 3 Introduction... 3 Provided Input Files... 5 Superimposing Protein Structures... 6
More informationMolecular Modeling Lecture 7. Homology modeling insertions/deletions manual realignment
Molecular Modeling 2018-- Lecture 7 Homology modeling insertions/deletions manual realignment Homology modeling also called comparative modeling Sequences that have similar sequence have similar structure.
More informationPortal. User Guide Version 1.0. Contributors
Portal www.dockthor.lncc.br User Guide Version 1.0 Contributors Diogo A. Marinho, Isabella A. Guedes, Eduardo Krempser, Camila S. de Magalhães, Hélio J. C. Barbosa and Laurent E. Dardenne www.gmmsb.lncc.br
More informationCMPS 6630: Introduction to Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. Tertiary Structure Prediction
CMPS 6630: Introduction to Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Tertiary Structure Prediction Tertiary Structure Prediction Why Should Tertiary Structure Prediction Be Possible? Molecules obey the
More informationContents 1 Open-Source Tools, Techniques, and Data in Chemoinformatics
Contents 1 Open-Source Tools, Techniques, and Data in Chemoinformatics... 1 1.1 Chemoinformatics... 2 1.1.1 Open-Source Tools... 2 1.1.2 Introduction to Programming Languages... 3 1.2 Chemical Structure
More informationBiochemistry,530:,, Introduc5on,to,Structural,Biology, Autumn,Quarter,2015,
Biochemistry,530:,, Introduc5on,to,Structural,Biology, Autumn,Quarter,2015, Course,Informa5on, BIOC%530% GraduateAlevel,discussion,of,the,structure,,func5on,,and,chemistry,of,proteins,and, nucleic,acids,,control,of,enzyma5c,reac5ons.,please,see,the,course,syllabus,and,
More informationStructure Investigation of Fam20C, a Golgi Casein Kinase
Structure Investigation of Fam20C, a Golgi Casein Kinase Sharon Grubner National Taiwan University, Dr. Jung-Hsin Lin University of California San Diego, Dr. Rommie Amaro Abstract This research project
More informationGenerating Small Molecule Conformations from Structural Data
Generating Small Molecule Conformations from Structural Data Jason Cole cole@ccdc.cam.ac.uk Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre 1 The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre About us A not-for-profit,
More informationCSD. Unlock value from crystal structure information in the CSD
CSD CSD-System Unlock value from crystal structure information in the CSD The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) is the world s most comprehensive and up-todate knowledge base of crystal structure data,
More informationPhysiochemical Properties of Residues
Physiochemical Properties of Residues Various Sources C N Cα R Slide 1 Conformational Propensities Conformational Propensity is the frequency in which a residue adopts a given conformation (in a polypeptide)
More informationReceptor Based Drug Design (1)
Induced Fit Model For more than 100 years, the behaviour of enzymes had been explained by the "lock-and-key" mechanism developed by pioneering German chemist Emil Fischer. Fischer thought that the chemicals
More informationPose and affinity prediction by ICM in D3R GC3. Max Totrov Molsoft
Pose and affinity prediction by ICM in D3R GC3 Max Totrov Molsoft Pose prediction method: ICM-dock ICM-dock: - pre-sampling of ligand conformers - multiple trajectory Monte-Carlo with gradient minimization
More informationPharmDock: A Pharmacophore-Based Docking Program
Purdue University Purdue e-pubs Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology Faculty Publications Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology 4-16-2014 PharmDock: A Pharmacophore-Based
More information