FlexPepDock In a nutshell
|
|
- Caren McGee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FlexPepDock In a nutshell All Tutorial files are located in FlexPepdock refinement Step 1 Step 3 - Refinement Step 4 - Selection of models Measure of fit FlexPepdock Ab-initio Step 1 - Preparing the structure for modeling Step 3 - Ab-initio run Step 4 - Selection of models FlexPepBind Step 1 - Preparation of the model Step 3 - Threading the peptide sequence Step 4 - FlexPepDock runs Step 5 - Specificity prediction & analyzing results Glossary FlexPepBind Fit measures Options (aka flags ) Refinement Ab-initio FlexPepdock refinement Raveh B, London N, Schueler-furman O. Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins. Proteins. 2010;78(9): The Refinement protocol is intended for cases where an approximate, coarse-grain model of the interaction is available. The protocol iteratively optimizes the peptide backbone and its rigid-body orientation relative to the receptor protein, in addition to on-the-fly side-chain
2 optimization. The final result is a high resolution model of the peptide-receptor complex with side chains of binding motifs modeled at nearly atomic accuracy. The protocol is able to account for a considerable diversity of peptide conformations within a given binding site. However, it is not intended for cases where the peptide backbone is unknown (the ab-initio protocol is best optimized for these cases). Here we show a successful example starting from an extended conformation, but the protocol is intended for cases where the peptide s backbone is more or less in the correct position and the protocol brings it to high resolution accuracy. Let s start with a refinement run to model a high resolution structure of the Serine-Threonine kinase Chk1 (bound complex PDB 1nvr, free receptor PDB 2x8d). Our starting structure will be the bound receptor with the extended peptide located in its binding site. We want to use the receptor s side chains in our run: they are an important part of the input starting structure since many receptors undergo only minor changes upon peptide docking. Usually if a native structure is not supplied, the starting structure is used as reference instead. Step 1 The first thing you should do is to modify a file called paths to set the relevant paths necessary for the execution of Rosetta. ROSETTA_DB - the path to Rosetta Database ROSETTA_BIN - the path to the bin directory in the Rosetta installation A first preliminary step in our protocol involves the packing of the side-chains in each monomer to remove internal clashes that are not related to inter-molecular interactions The pre-packing stage guarantees a uniform conformational background in non-interface regions, prior to molecular docking. The main flags in the prepacking step are: -unboundrot - takes extra rotamers from the unbound structure. It is worth noting that although our example uses a native.pdb file as an input for unboundrot, the file is actually the native unbound structure and not the bound receptor. -flexpep_prepack - The prepacking flag To prepack the starting structure, simply run prepack_example. For further details on the flags used in this run you can take a look at the prepack_flags file. The resulting structure is start.ppk.pdb. You may want to open it in PyMOL and compare it to the start.pdb structure, and see the changes that have occurred. This will be the starting structure for the next step. Step 3 - Refinement This is the main part of the protocol. In this step, the peptide backbone and its rigid-body orientation are optimized relative to the receptor protein using the Monte-Carlo with Minimization approach, in addition to on-the-fly side-chain optimization. An optional low-resolution (centroid) pre-optimization may improve performance further. When using the FlexPepDock server, results sent to the user are based on a combination of 100 decoys created by using the low-resolution
3 pre-optimization and 100 that are created without using it. For this reason, in this run we provide you with two flag files that enable you to create results similar to the ones provided by the server. For this step use these two commands: run_example_nolowresolution run_example_withlowresolution Notice that the only difference between the provided flag files is the flag - flexpepdocking:lowres_preoptimize. Also notice the unique flags such as -flexpep_score_only (rescores the input PDB structures, and outputs elaborate statistics about them in the score file). For a production run it is recommended to produce 200 decoys. In this demonstration only 4 will be created by you, but we provide you a folder with 200 decoys resulting from the runs that have been described here. Step 4 - Selection of models A typical analysis of a Rosetta simulation usually involves plotting RMS vs total score. Attached is a general total_score Vs. all atom RMSD plot and a plot of reweighted_score Vs. all atom RMSD. Here are some additional ways to analyze the results we get: 1. Interface score (I_sc) - calculation of scoring based only on interface residues. 2. Peptide score (pep_sc) - calculation of scoring based on the peptide and the interface residues 3. Reweighted score (reweighted_sc) - Experience has shown that a calculated reweighted score (=I_sc + pep_sc + total_score), works better than the general score12 function in the case of flexible peptides docking onto their receptors. Measure of fit 1. rms(ca,bb,all)_if -RMSD between output model and the native structure, over all peptide interface (heavy/backbone/c-alpha) atoms 2. startrms(all,ca,bb) - RMSD between start and native structures, over all peptide (heavy/backbone/c-alpha) atoms FlexPepdock Ab-initio Raveh B, London N, Zimmerman L, Schueler-furman O. Rosetta FlexPepDock ab-initio: simultaneous folding, docking and refinement of peptides onto their receptors. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e The Ab-initio protocol extends FlexPepDock by incorporating fragment-based sampling during the sampling phase. For this protocol, no initial information of the peptide backbone is required, only a placement of an arbitrary peptide starting structure of the peptide within the approximate binding pocket. In the preliminary phase of the protocol, a library of trimer, pentamer and nonamer (where available) backbone fragments is generated, using the general fragment picker protocol. At the end of the fragment picking process, the library should contain 500 fragments from each
4 category of secondary structure type, i.e., a helix, extended beta strand and coiled-coil loop (with a total of 1,500 fragments for a given query peptide)]. Similar to the refinement protocol, the input to the protocol is an initial model of the peptideprotein complex. It is assumed that the receptor backbone is approximately correct, and that the peptide is initially positioned close to the correct binding site, albeit with arbitrary backbone conformation. Most of our studies, as well as this example, are based on results starting from extended peptide backbone conformations superimposed on a randomly selected anchor residue, but the protocol is designed to work for any arbitrary peptide starting conformation Step 1 - Preparing the structure for modeling First, extract the file abinitio.tar.gz to obtain the necessary files for the tutorial. Since the ab-initio protocol doesn t require the approximate structure of the peptide - only the approximate binding site and the sequence - we start with a peptide-receptor complex in which the peptide is extended. Specifically, in this example we use the unbound structure of 1NVR (pdb-id 2x8d) with its original substrate peptide extended (the 5th residue serves as an anchor point). The first thing you should do is to modify a file called paths to set the relevant paths necessary for the execution of Rosetta. ROSETTA_DB - the path to Rosetta Database ROSETTA_BIN - the path to the bin directory in the Rosetta installation The first step in the Ab-initio protocol as we ve previously mentioned, is the generation of fragment libraries. Since this step requires several more applications (such as blastpgp, psipred, etc) that aren t usually installed on conventional laptops, we ll provide you these libraries. If you do want to generate the fragment libraries yourself, from the root dir of the tutorial, run: scripts/prep_abinitio.sh, to automate the process of the fragment creation. Notice that the pre-generated fragment libraries are located in the frag directory. Same as the refinement protocol. To prepack the starting structure, simply run prepack_example. The output of this prepacking step serves as the input to the main Ab-Initio protocol. Step 3 - Ab-initio run A typical ab initio run includes - 1. Fast, low resolution modeling - the peptide is folded and docked over the surface of the receptor protein using a low-resolution representation of the complex. Results in a coarse-grained model of the peptide-protein complex. 2. High-resolution optimization of the coarse-grained models with the Rosetta FlexPepDock refinement protocol you ve already seen. The recommended amount of sampling for an ab-initio protocol is ~50,000 decoys. Indeed, this protocol is computationally intensive and could take several days on a typical cluster. If you still
5 wish to experience the joy of running the simulation (even for a smaller amount of decoys) you can try and run the run_example script (in the flags file, change the number of structures you would like to generate). The main flags we re using in the ab-initio protocol are: -flexpepdocking:lowres_abinitio - the Ab initio protocol flag -flexpepdocking:pep_refine - include this flag if you want to include a refinement step after modeling in low resolution -flexpepdocking:flexpep_score_only - include additional scoring terms unique to FlexPepDock. Step 4 - Selection of models A typical analysis of a Rosetta simulation usually involves plotting RMS vs total score. In addition to the scoring terms mentioned above, FlexPepDock abinitio includes several more scoring terms; one of them is bestrms_5mer_all, which indicates the RMS of the 5mer fragment that was closest to the native. FlexPepBind London N, Gulla SV, Keating AE, Schueler-furman O. In--silico and in--vitro elucidation of BH3 binding specificity towards Bcl--2. Biochemistry. 2012; Rosetta FlexPepBind is a protocol for the prediction of peptide binding specificity. It evaluates the binding potential of different peptides, based on structural models of the corresponding peptide-receptor complexes. For a given peptide, we thread the desired sequence onto the peptide in the native structure, while keeping the side chains of the receptor fixed. We then use Rosetta FlexPepD ock in full-atom mode (i.e. without centroid pre-optimization; see above) to refine the structure of the complex with the threaded target peptide (All of the peptide s sidechains as well at the receptor s interface side-chains are flexible). We create models and score the sequence (see below) to evaluate the binding ability of the specific peptide sequence. As an example, we will use the interaction between a Bcl-2 protein and a BH3 only peptide (See London N, Gulla S, Keating A, Schueler--Furman O (2012). In silico and in vitro elucidation of BH3 binding specificity towards Bcl--2. Biochemistry, doi: /bi ). The Bcl-2 protein family contains key regulators of programmed cell death, tumorigenesis and cellular responses to anti-cancer therapy. Note that this protocol might be simplified for specific systems. For calculation of Farnesyltransferase specificity for example, minimization of the peptide backbone only instead of a full run of FlexPepDock was also able to distinguish peptide substrates (see London et al. (2011) PLoS CB 7:e for more details). Step 1 - Preparation of the model The first input of the protocol is a peptide-protein complex. We will use the supplied template for Mcl-1 (pdb: 2pqk) as our example.
6 Check that the paths you are directed to are : ROSETTA_DB - the path to Rosetta Database ROSETTA_BIN - the path to the bin directory in the Rosetta installation (as described in the ab-initio section). As described before, the second preliminary step in the protocol involves the packing of the side-chains in each monomer to remove internal clashes that are not related to inter-molecular interactions. The pre-packing stage guarantees a uniform conformational background in non-interface regions, prior to molecular docking. The main flags in the prepacking step are: -unboundrot - takes extra rotamers from the receptor structure and biases towards these side chain conformations (note: in this case unbound, the template for side chain conformations, is the receptor structure). -flexpep_prepack - The prepacking flag To prepack the starting structure, simply run prepack_example, also supplied in scripts: $ROSETTA_BIN/FlexPepDocking.linuxgccrelease -s 2pqk.pdb -native 2pqk.pdb -databa se $ROSETTA_DB -ex1 -ex2aro -unboundrot 2pqk.pdb -flexpep_prepack -nstruct 1 The output of this step will be used as input for step 4 in the protocol. An example output can be found in input files - 2pqk.prepacked.pdb. Step 3 - Threading the peptide sequence In this step, the different peptide sequences for which we wish to examine binding affinity are threaded onto the model. The sequence we wish to use for the peptide can be supplied in a text file, and will be threaded unto the structure using design. The supplied script makeresfile_example can be used to create a resfile for any desired sequence. However, for the purpose of this example we will use the supplied resfile resfile.mcl1 that designs a specific sequence - the peptide NOXA. For this step use the design_example, also supplied in scripts: $ROSETTA_BIN/fixbb.linuxgccrelease -database $ROSETTA_DB -s 2pqk.pdb -resfile resfile.mcl1 -nstruct 1 The output of this step will also be used for the next step in the protocol. An example output of this step can be found in input files - 2pqk.designed.pdb. However, the designed peptide should be cut and pasted into the prepacked receptor, which will be acquired by extracting the receptor from the output of step 2. To save time, the prepacked receptor and the designed peptide were extracted and used to create the starting structure for the next step. It can be found in input files under the name 2pqk.start.pdb, and will be used as input for the next step, step 4 - running FlexPepDock. Step 4 - FlexPepDock runs In this step, FlexPepDock is used for the different threaded peptide sequences. For this step use the FlexPepDock_example, also supplied in scripts: $ROSETTA_BIN/ FlexPepDocking.linuxgccrelease -database $ROSETTA_DB -rbmcm -torsionsmcm -ex1 - ex2aro -s 2pqk.start.pdb -native 2pqk.designed.pdb -unboundrot 2pqk.designed.pdb -nstruct 1000 The recommended amount of sampling for a FlexPepBind protocol is anywhere between 100 and 1,000 decoys, depending on the case at hand. In this case, 1,000 decoys were used for thorough sampling. Of course, it is possible to change the number of structures you would like
7 to generate. Since this run takes a while, an example of top 5 decoys of this run are supplied in the output files, as well as a.pse file showing the top 5 decoys. Note - the top 5 decoys supplied here are the output of the runs made in London et al. (2012). Biochemistry, doi: /bi Step 5 - Specificity prediction & analyzing results FlexPepBind can be used for the straight-forward purpose of assessing binding affinities of a set of peptides to a receptor. However, an interesting expansion of this protocol can be assessing binding specificity. For example, the NOXA BH3 peptide binds to Mcl-1 but not Bcl-xL, while the BAD peptide binds to Bcl-xL but not Mcl-1 (see Table 3 in London et al., Biochemistry...). Therefore, the protocol described can be applied on the different receptors with the different peptides, to determine binding specificity in addition to binding affinity. We ve performed it with Mcl-1 and NOXA, and now it can be performed the same way for Bcl-xL and BAD. The template used for Bcl-xL is supplied and named 3io8. The template used for Mcl-1 is, as mentioned, 2pqk. The resfiles used to thread the peptides NOXA and BAD are supplied and named resfile.mcl1 and resfile.bclxl, respectively. It is worth mentioning that every receptor-peptide complex has its own range of energetic scores, and therefore, when comparing two different receptor-peptide complexes, the score threshold that distinguishes binders from non-binders might very likely be different for each complex. Meaning, a specific peptide might get a score x in complex with receptor A, which in the context of that complex indicates it s a binder, but get a better score y in a complex with receptor B, but still be considered as a non-binder in that context - depending on the score ranges of the different complexes A & B. For the relevant thresholds of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1, see Table 2 in London et al. (2012). Biochemistry, doi: /bi ). Below are details about scores by which it is possible to analyze the results: In order to evaluate the binding ability of different peptides to a given receptor, the resulting scores can be compared to the scores obtained for a range of peptides with known binding ability (see Figure 2 in London et al. (2012). Biochemistry, doi: /bi ). The main scoring functions used are detailed in the Glossary below. The scoring function was slightly adjusted for each system. Bcl-2 receptor-bh3 peptide interactions: Two minor adjustments to score12 were made (in order to obtain results as in London et al. (2012). Biochemistry, doi: /bi , these adjustments need to be included): The penalty for the burial of the carboxyl oxygen atom of the aspartate side chain is increased (the Gfree parameter of the Lazaridis-Karplus solvation potential was modified from -10 to for this atom type). This was added to better account for a group of sequences that received poor experimental binding values in the TRAIN set, but good peptide scores. Inspection of the structural models detected a buried Asp that explains the discrepancy. A weak short-range coulombic electrostatic energy term was added with weight 0.5 (added option []). In addition, we assessed each model by its weighted score (see Glossary below).
8 Farnesylation peptide substrates: Peptide_score_NoRef: Same as peptide score (see Glossary below), less a constant reference energy for each amino acid. This scoring function was found to perform well in our studies of Farnesyltransferase peptide substrate specificity (London et al Identification of a novel class of Farnesylation targets by structure-based modeling of binding specificity. PLoS CB 7:e ) Glossary Interface score (I_sc) - calculation of scoring based only on interface residues. the energy of pair-wise interactions across the peptide-protein interface. Peptide score (pep_sc) - calculation of the score of the peptide (including internal peptide energy as well as interactions with interface residues) Reweighted score (reweighted_sc) - Experience has shown that a calculated reweighted score (=I_sc + pep_sc + total_score), works better than the general score12 function in the case of flexible peptides docking onto their receptors. Fit measures rms(ca,bb,all)_if -RMSD between output model and the native structure, over all peptide interface (heavy/backbone/c-alpha) atoms startrms(all,ca,bb) - RMSD between start and native structures, over all peptide (heavy/backbone/c-alpha) atoms Options (aka flags ) Refinement -flexpepdocking:lowres_preoptimize - low-resolution pre-optimization. -flexpep_score_only - rescores the input PDB structures, and outputs elaborate statistics about them in the score file). Ab-initio -flexpepdocking:lowres_abinitio - the Ab initio protocol flag -flexpepdocking:pep_refine - include this flag if you want to include a refinement step after modeling in low resolution -flexpepdocking:flexpep_score_only - include additional scoring terms unique to FlexPepDock.
Protein structure prediction. CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Oct. 10 and 12, 2017 Ron Dror
Protein structure prediction CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Oct. 10 and 12, 2017 Ron Dror 1 Outline Why predict protein structure? Can we use (pure) physics-based methods? Knowledge-based methods Two major
More informationProtein Structure Prediction, Engineering & Design CHEM 430
Protein Structure Prediction, Engineering & Design CHEM 430 Eero Saarinen The free energy surface of a protein Protein Structure Prediction & Design Full Protein Structure from Sequence - High Alignment
More informationProtein structure prediction. CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Oct. 10 and 12, 2017 Ron Dror
Protein structure prediction CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Oct. 10 and 12, 2017 Ron Dror 1 Outline Why predict protein structure? Can we use (pure) physics-based methods? Knowledge-based methods Two major
More informationAssignment 2 Atomic-Level Molecular Modeling
Assignment 2 Atomic-Level Molecular Modeling CS/BIOE/CME/BIOPHYS/BIOMEDIN 279 Due: November 3, 2016 at 3:00 PM The goal of this assignment is to understand the biological and computational aspects of macromolecular
More informationTemplate Free Protein Structure Modeling Jianlin Cheng, PhD
Template Free Protein Structure Modeling Jianlin Cheng, PhD Associate Professor Computer Science Department Informatics Institute University of Missouri, Columbia 2013 Protein Energy Landscape & Free Sampling
More informationCMPS 6630: Introduction to Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. Tertiary Structure Prediction
CMPS 6630: Introduction to Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Tertiary Structure Prediction Tertiary Structure Prediction Why Should Tertiary Structure Prediction Be Possible? Molecules obey the
More informationCMPS 3110: Bioinformatics. Tertiary Structure Prediction
CMPS 3110: Bioinformatics Tertiary Structure Prediction Tertiary Structure Prediction Why Should Tertiary Structure Prediction Be Possible? Molecules obey the laws of physics! Conformation space is finite
More informationSupporting Online Material for
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5742/1868/dc1 Supporting Online Material for Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins Philip Bradley, Kira M. S. Misura, David Baker*
More informationMolecular Modeling Lecture 7. Homology modeling insertions/deletions manual realignment
Molecular Modeling 2018-- Lecture 7 Homology modeling insertions/deletions manual realignment Homology modeling also called comparative modeling Sequences that have similar sequence have similar structure.
More informationProtein Structure Prediction
Page 1 Protein Structure Prediction Russ B. Altman BMI 214 CS 274 Protein Folding is different from structure prediction --Folding is concerned with the process of taking the 3D shape, usually based on
More informationDesign of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy
Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy Brian Kuhlman, Gautam Dantas, Gregory C. Ireton, Gabriele Varani, Barry L. Stoddard, David Baker Presented by Kate Stafford 4 May 05 Protein
More informationTemplate Free Protein Structure Modeling Jianlin Cheng, PhD
Template Free Protein Structure Modeling Jianlin Cheng, PhD Professor Department of EECS Informatics Institute University of Missouri, Columbia 2018 Protein Energy Landscape & Free Sampling http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/archive/mdd/v03/i09/html/willis.html
More informationIntroduction to Comparative Protein Modeling. Chapter 4 Part I
Introduction to Comparative Protein Modeling Chapter 4 Part I 1 Information on Proteins Each modeling study depends on the quality of the known experimental data. Basis of the model Search in the literature
More informationBasics of protein structure
Today: 1. Projects a. Requirements: i. Critical review of one paper ii. At least one computational result b. Noon, Dec. 3 rd written report and oral presentation are due; submit via email to bphys101@fas.harvard.edu
More informationApril, The energy functions include:
REDUX A collection of Python scripts for torsion angle Monte Carlo protein molecular simulations and analysis The program is based on unified residue peptide model and is designed for more efficient exploration
More informationDISCRETE TUTORIAL. Agustí Emperador. Institute for Research in Biomedicine, Barcelona APPLICATION OF DISCRETE TO FLEXIBLE PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING:
DISCRETE TUTORIAL Agustí Emperador Institute for Research in Biomedicine, Barcelona APPLICATION OF DISCRETE TO FLEXIBLE PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING: STRUCTURAL REFINEMENT OF DOCKING CONFORMATIONS Emperador
More informationRosetta Density-fitting Tutorial Frank DiMaio, January 2010
Rosetta Density-fitting Tutorial Frank DiMaio, January 2010 This tutorial is intended to guide users to several different ways Rosetta may be used to solve various problems in structure fitting into low-resolution
More informationProgramme Last week s quiz results + Summary Fold recognition Break Exercise: Modelling remote homologues
Programme 8.00-8.20 Last week s quiz results + Summary 8.20-9.00 Fold recognition 9.00-9.15 Break 9.15-11.20 Exercise: Modelling remote homologues 11.20-11.40 Summary & discussion 11.40-12.00 Quiz 1 Feedback
More informationUser Guide for LeDock
User Guide for LeDock Hongtao Zhao, PhD Email: htzhao@lephar.com Website: www.lephar.com Copyright 2017 Hongtao Zhao. All rights reserved. Introduction LeDock is flexible small-molecule docking software,
More informationHomology Modeling (Comparative Structure Modeling) GBCB 5874: Problem Solving in GBCB
Homology Modeling (Comparative Structure Modeling) Aims of Structural Genomics High-throughput 3D structure determination and analysis To determine or predict the 3D structures of all the proteins encoded
More informationProtein Dynamics. The space-filling structures of myoglobin and hemoglobin show that there are no pathways for O 2 to reach the heme iron.
Protein Dynamics The space-filling structures of myoglobin and hemoglobin show that there are no pathways for O 2 to reach the heme iron. Below is myoglobin hydrated with 350 water molecules. Only a small
More informationCS612 - Algorithms in Bioinformatics
Fall 2017 Protein Structure Detection Methods October 30, 2017 Comparative Modeling Comparative modeling is modeling of the unknown based on comparison to what is known In the context of modeling or computing
More informationBuilding 3D models of proteins
Building 3D models of proteins Why make a structural model for your protein? The structure can provide clues to the function through structural similarity with other proteins With a structure it is easier
More informationWhy Do Protein Structures Recur?
Why Do Protein Structures Recur? Dartmouth Computer Science Technical Report TR2015-775 Rebecca Leong, Gevorg Grigoryan, PhD May 28, 2015 Abstract Protein tertiary structures exhibit an observable degeneracy
More informationALL LECTURES IN SB Introduction
1. Introduction 2. Molecular Architecture I 3. Molecular Architecture II 4. Molecular Simulation I 5. Molecular Simulation II 6. Bioinformatics I 7. Bioinformatics II 8. Prediction I 9. Prediction II ALL
More informationproteins Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field
proteins STRUCTURE O FUNCTION O BIOINFORMATICS Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field Dong Xu1 and Yang Zhang1,2* 1 Department
More informationMolecular Modeling Lecture 11 side chain modeling rotamers rotamer explorer buried cavities.
Molecular Modeling 218 Lecture 11 side chain modeling rotamers rotamer explorer buried cavities. Sidechain Rotamers Discrete approximation of the continuous space of backbone angles. Sidechain conformations
More informationFrancisco Melo, Damien Devos, Eric Depiereux and Ernest Feytmans
From: ISMB-97 Proceedings. Copyright 1997, AAAI (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. ANOLEA: A www Server to Assess Protein Structures Francisco Melo, Damien Devos, Eric Depiereux and Ernest Feytmans Facultés
More informationGiri Narasimhan. CAP 5510: Introduction to Bioinformatics. ECS 254; Phone: x3748
CAP 5510: Introduction to Bioinformatics Giri Narasimhan ECS 254; Phone: x3748 giri@cis.fiu.edu www.cis.fiu.edu/~giri/teach/bioinfs07.html 2/15/07 CAP5510 1 EM Algorithm Goal: Find θ, Z that maximize Pr
More informationExamples of Protein Modeling. Protein Modeling. Primary Structure. Protein Structure Description. Protein Sequence Sources. Importing Sequences to MOE
Examples of Protein Modeling Protein Modeling Visualization Examination of an experimental structure to gain insight about a research question Dynamics To examine the dynamics of protein structures To
More informationPrediction and refinement of NMR structures from sparse experimental data
Prediction and refinement of NMR structures from sparse experimental data Jeff Skolnick Director Center for the Study of Systems Biology School of Biology Georgia Institute of Technology Overview of talk
More informationProtein Structure Prediction
Protein Structure Prediction Michael Feig MMTSB/CTBP 2009 Summer Workshop From Sequence to Structure SEALGDTIVKNA Folding with All-Atom Models AAQAAAAQAAAAQAA All-atom MD in general not succesful for real
More informationFlexibility and Constraints in GOLD
Flexibility and Constraints in GOLD Version 2.1 August 2018 GOLD v5.6.3 Table of Contents Purpose of Docking... 3 GOLD s Evolutionary Algorithm... 4 GOLD and Hermes... 4 Handling Flexibility and Constraints
More informationTemplate-Based Modeling of Protein Structure
Template-Based Modeling of Protein Structure David Constant Biochemistry 218 December 11, 2011 Introduction. Much can be learned about the biology of a protein from its structure. Simply put, structure
More informationDOCKING TUTORIAL. A. The docking Workflow
2 nd Strasbourg Summer School on Chemoinformatics VVF Obernai, France, 20-24 June 2010 E. Kellenberger DOCKING TUTORIAL A. The docking Workflow 1. Ligand preparation It consists in the standardization
More informationAdvanced Certificate in Principles in Protein Structure. You will be given a start time with your exam instructions
BIRKBECK COLLEGE (University of London) Advanced Certificate in Principles in Protein Structure MSc Structural Molecular Biology Date: Thursday, 1st September 2011 Time: 3 hours You will be given a start
More informationProtein Structures: Experiments and Modeling. Patrice Koehl
Protein Structures: Experiments and Modeling Patrice Koehl Structural Bioinformatics: Proteins Proteins: Sources of Structure Information Proteins: Homology Modeling Proteins: Ab initio prediction Proteins:
More informationAbstract. Introduction
In silico protein design: the implementation of Dead-End Elimination algorithm CS 273 Spring 2005: Project Report Tyrone Anderson 2, Yu Bai1 3, and Caroline E. Moore-Kochlacs 2 1 Biophysics program, 2
More informationTHE TANGO ALGORITHM: SECONDARY STRUCTURE PROPENSITIES, STATISTICAL MECHANICS APPROXIMATION
THE TANGO ALGORITHM: SECONDARY STRUCTURE PROPENSITIES, STATISTICAL MECHANICS APPROXIMATION AND CALIBRATION Calculation of turn and beta intrinsic propensities. A statistical analysis of a protein structure
More informationMolecular Modeling. Prediction of Protein 3D Structure from Sequence. Vimalkumar Velayudhan. May 21, 2007
Molecular Modeling Prediction of Protein 3D Structure from Sequence Vimalkumar Velayudhan Jain Institute of Vocational and Advanced Studies May 21, 2007 Vimalkumar Velayudhan Molecular Modeling 1/23 Outline
More informationLecture 2 and 3: Review of forces (ctd.) and elementary statistical mechanics. Contributions to protein stability
Lecture 2 and 3: Review of forces (ctd.) and elementary statistical mechanics. Contributions to protein stability Part I. Review of forces Covalent bonds Non-covalent Interactions: Van der Waals Interactions
More informationProtein Structure Prediction
Protein Structure Prediction Michael Feig MMTSB/CTBP 2006 Summer Workshop From Sequence to Structure SEALGDTIVKNA Ab initio Structure Prediction Protocol Amino Acid Sequence Conformational Sampling to
More informationCAP 5510 Lecture 3 Protein Structures
CAP 5510 Lecture 3 Protein Structures Su-Shing Chen Bioinformatics CISE 8/19/2005 Su-Shing Chen, CISE 1 Protein Conformation 8/19/2005 Su-Shing Chen, CISE 2 Protein Conformational Structures Hydrophobicity
More informationProtein Structure Prediction II Lecturer: Serafim Batzoglou Scribe: Samy Hamdouche
Protein Structure Prediction II Lecturer: Serafim Batzoglou Scribe: Samy Hamdouche The molecular structure of a protein can be broken down hierarchically. The primary structure of a protein is simply its
More informationStructural Bioinformatics (C3210) Molecular Docking
Structural Bioinformatics (C3210) Molecular Docking Molecular Recognition, Molecular Docking Molecular recognition is the ability of biomolecules to recognize other biomolecules and selectively interact
More informationBioinformatics. Macromolecular structure
Bioinformatics Macromolecular structure Contents Determination of protein structure Structure databases Secondary structure elements (SSE) Tertiary structure Structure analysis Structure alignment Domain
More informationBuild_model v User Guide
Build_model v.2.0.1 User Guide MolTech Build_model User Guide 2008-2011 Molecular Technologies Ltd. www.moltech.ru Please send your comments and suggestions to contact@moltech.ru. Table of Contents Input
More informationProtein Modeling. Generating, Evaluating and Refining Protein Homology Models
Protein Modeling Generating, Evaluating and Refining Protein Homology Models Troy Wymore and Kristen Messinger Biomedical Initiatives Group Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Homology Modeling of Proteins
More informationNeural Networks for Protein Structure Prediction Brown, JMB CS 466 Saurabh Sinha
Neural Networks for Protein Structure Prediction Brown, JMB 1999 CS 466 Saurabh Sinha Outline Goal is to predict secondary structure of a protein from its sequence Artificial Neural Network used for this
More informationCMPS 6630: Introduction to Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. Structure Comparison
CMPS 6630: Introduction to Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Structure Comparison Protein Structure Comparison Motivation Understand sequence and structure variability Understand Domain architecture
More informationIntroduction to Structure Preparation and Visualization
Introduction to Structure Preparation and Visualization Created with: Release 2018-4 Prerequisites: Release 2018-2 or higher Access to the internet Categories: Molecular Visualization, Structure-Based
More informationOpenDiscovery: Automated Docking of Ligands to Proteins and Molecular Simulation
OpenDiscovery: Automated Docking of Ligands to Proteins and Molecular Simulation Gareth Price Computational MiniProject OpenDiscovery Aims + Achievements Produce a high-throughput protocol to screen a
More informationConformational Sampling in Template-Free Protein Loop Structure Modeling: An Overview
# of Loops, http://dx.doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201302003 CSBJ Conformational Sampling in Template-Free Protein Loop Structure Modeling: An Overview Yaohang Li a,* Abstract: Accurately modeling protein loops
More informationProtein Structure Determination
Protein Structure Determination Given a protein sequence, determine its 3D structure 1 MIKLGIVMDP IANINIKKDS SFAMLLEAQR RGYELHYMEM GDLYLINGEA 51 RAHTRTLNVK QNYEEWFSFV GEQDLPLADL DVILMRKDPP FDTEFIYATY 101
More informationLife Science Webinar Series
Life Science Webinar Series Elegant protein- protein docking in Discovery Studio Francisco Hernandez-Guzman, Ph.D. November 20, 2007 Sr. Solutions Scientist fhernandez@accelrys.com Agenda In silico protein-protein
More informationTutorial: Structural Analysis of a Protein-Protein Complex
Molecular Modeling Section (MMS) Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences University of Padova Via Marzolo 5-35131 Padova (IT) @contact: stefano.moro@unipd.it Tutorial: Structural Analysis
More informationThe Schrödinger KNIME extensions
The Schrödinger KNIME extensions Computational Chemistry and Cheminformatics in a workflow environment Jean-Christophe Mozziconacci Volker Eyrich Topics What are the Schrödinger extensions? Workflow application
More informationHOMOLOGY MODELING. The sequence alignment and template structure are then used to produce a structural model of the target.
HOMOLOGY MODELING Homology modeling, also known as comparative modeling of protein refers to constructing an atomic-resolution model of the "target" protein from its amino acid sequence and an experimental
More informationICM-Chemist-Pro How-To Guide. Version 3.6-1h Last Updated 12/29/2009
ICM-Chemist-Pro How-To Guide Version 3.6-1h Last Updated 12/29/2009 ICM-Chemist-Pro ICM 3D LIGAND EDITOR: SETUP 1. Read in a ligand molecule or PDB file. How to setup the ligand in the ICM 3D Ligand Editor.
More informationHomework 9: Protein Folding & Simulated Annealing : Programming for Scientists Due: Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 11:59 PM
Homework 9: Protein Folding & Simulated Annealing 02-201: Programming for Scientists Due: Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 11:59 PM 1. Set up We re back to Go for this assignment. 1. Inside of your src directory,
More informationProtein Structure Determination from Pseudocontact Shifts Using ROSETTA
Supporting Information Protein Structure Determination from Pseudocontact Shifts Using ROSETTA Christophe Schmitz, Robert Vernon, Gottfried Otting, David Baker and Thomas Huber Table S0. Biological Magnetic
More informationFrom Amino Acids to Proteins - in 4 Easy Steps
From Amino Acids to Proteins - in 4 Easy Steps Although protein structure appears to be overwhelmingly complex, you can provide your students with a basic understanding of how proteins fold by focusing
More informationHomology modeling. Dinesh Gupta ICGEB, New Delhi 1/27/2010 5:59 PM
Homology modeling Dinesh Gupta ICGEB, New Delhi Protein structure prediction Methods: Homology (comparative) modelling Threading Ab-initio Protein Homology modeling Homology modeling is an extrapolation
More informationPROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING REFINEMENT USING RESTRAINT MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS
TASKQUARTERLYvol.20,No4,2016,pp.353 360 PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING REFINEMENT USING RESTRAINT MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS MARTIN ZACHARIAS Physics Department T38, Technical University of Munich James-Franck-Str.
More informationSupplementary Information
1 Supplementary Information Figure S1 The V=0.5 Harker section of an anomalous difference Patterson map calculated using diffraction data from the NNQQNY crystal at 1.3 Å resolution. The position of the
More informationProtein Structure Prediction and Protein-Ligand Docking
Protein Structure Prediction and Protein-Ligand Docking Björn Wallner bjornw@ifm.liu.se Jan. 24, 2014 Todays topics Protein Folding Intro Protein structure prediction How can we predict the structure of
More informationIntroduction to" Protein Structure
Introduction to" Protein Structure Function, evolution & experimental methods Thomas Blicher, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis Learning Objectives Outline the basic levels of protein structure.
More informationProtein Structures. Sequences of amino acid residues 20 different amino acids. Quaternary. Primary. Tertiary. Secondary. 10/8/2002 Lecture 12 1
Protein Structures Sequences of amino acid residues 20 different amino acids Primary Secondary Tertiary Quaternary 10/8/2002 Lecture 12 1 Angles φ and ψ in the polypeptide chain 10/8/2002 Lecture 12 2
More information7.91 Amy Keating. Solving structures using X-ray crystallography & NMR spectroscopy
7.91 Amy Keating Solving structures using X-ray crystallography & NMR spectroscopy How are X-ray crystal structures determined? 1. Grow crystals - structure determination by X-ray crystallography relies
More informationPymol Practial Guide
Pymol Practial Guide Pymol is a powerful visualizor very convenient to work with protein molecules. Its interface may seem complex at first, but you will see that with a little practice is simple and powerful
More informationTools for Cryo-EM Map Fitting. Paul Emsley MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Tools for Cryo-EM Map Fitting Paul Emsley MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology April 2017 Cryo-EM model-building typically need to move more atoms that one does for crystallography the maps are lower resolution
More informationAlpha-helical Topology and Tertiary Structure Prediction of Globular Proteins Scott R. McAllister Christodoulos A. Floudas Princeton University
Alpha-helical Topology and Tertiary Structure Prediction of Globular Proteins Scott R. McAllister Christodoulos A. Floudas Princeton University Department of Chemical Engineering Program of Applied and
More informationBioinformatics: Secondary Structure Prediction
Bioinformatics: Secondary Structure Prediction Prof. David Jones d.jones@cs.ucl.ac.uk LMLSTQNPALLKRNIIYWNNVALLWEAGSD The greatest unsolved problem in molecular biology:the Protein Folding Problem? Entries
More informationContact map guided ab initio structure prediction
Contact map guided ab initio structure prediction S M Golam Mortuza Postdoctoral Research Fellow I-TASSER Workshop 2017 North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC Outline Ab initio structure prediction:
More information09/06/25. Computergestützte Strukturbiologie (Strukturelle Bioinformatik) Non-uniform distribution of folds. Scheme of protein structure predicition
Sequence identity Structural similarity Computergestützte Strukturbiologie (Strukturelle Bioinformatik) Fold recognition Sommersemester 2009 Peter Güntert Structural similarity X Sequence identity Non-uniform
More information114 Grundlagen der Bioinformatik, SS 09, D. Huson, July 6, 2009
114 Grundlagen der Bioinformatik, SS 09, D. Huson, July 6, 2009 9 Protein tertiary structure Sources for this chapter, which are all recommended reading: D.W. Mount. Bioinformatics: Sequences and Genome
More informationIntroduction to Computational Structural Biology
Introduction to Computational Structural Biology Part I 1. Introduction The disciplinary character of Computational Structural Biology The mathematical background required and the topics covered Bibliography
More informationNMR, X-ray Diffraction, Protein Structure, and RasMol
NMR, X-ray Diffraction, Protein Structure, and RasMol Introduction So far we have been mostly concerned with the proteins themselves. The techniques (NMR or X-ray diffraction) used to determine a structure
More informationMulti-Scale Hierarchical Structure Prediction of Helical Transmembrane Proteins
Multi-Scale Hierarchical Structure Prediction of Helical Transmembrane Proteins Zhong Chen Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Email: zc@csbl.bmb.uga.edu
More informationLysozyme pka example - Software. APBS! >!Examples! >!pka calculations! >! Lysozyme pka example. Background
Software Search this site Home Announcements An update on mailing lists APBS 1.2.0 released APBS 1.2.1 released APBS 1.3 released New APBS 1.3 Windows Installer PDB2PQR 1.7.1 released PDB2PQR 1.8 released
More informationKd = koff/kon = [R][L]/[RL]
Taller de docking y cribado virtual: Uso de herramientas computacionales en el diseño de fármacos Docking program GLIDE El programa de docking GLIDE Sonsoles Martín-Santamaría Shrödinger is a scientific
More informationGetting To Know Your Protein
Getting To Know Your Protein Comparative Protein Analysis: Part III. Protein Structure Prediction and Comparison Robert Latek, PhD Sr. Bioinformatics Scientist Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research
More information1 Introduction. command intended for command prompt
Guest Lecture, Smith College, CS 334, BioInformatics 21 October 2008 GROMACS, Position Restrained MD, Protein Catalytic Activity Filip Jagodzinski 1 Introduction GROMACS (GROningen MAchine for Chemistry
More informationCHAPTER 29 HW: AMINO ACIDS + PROTEINS
CAPTER 29 W: AMI ACIDS + PRTEIS For all problems, consult the table of 20 Amino Acids provided in lecture if an amino acid structure is needed; these will be given on exams. Use natural amino acids (L)
More informationBiochemistry,530:,, Introduc5on,to,Structural,Biology, Autumn,Quarter,2015,
Biochemistry,530:,, Introduc5on,to,Structural,Biology, Autumn,Quarter,2015, Course,Informa5on, BIOC%530% GraduateAlevel,discussion,of,the,structure,,func5on,,and,chemistry,of,proteins,and, nucleic,acids,,control,of,enzyma5c,reac5ons.,please,see,the,course,syllabus,and,
More informationHOWTO, example workflow and data files. (Version )
HOWTO, example workflow and data files. (Version 20 09 2017) 1 Introduction: SugarQb is a collection of software tools (Nodes) which enable the automated identification of intact glycopeptides from HCD
More informationUsing Phase for Pharmacophore Modelling. 5th European Life Science Bootcamp March, 2017
Using Phase for Pharmacophore Modelling 5th European Life Science Bootcamp March, 2017 Phase: Our Pharmacohore generation tool Significant improvements to Phase methods in 2016 New highly interactive interface
More informationBioinformatics: Secondary Structure Prediction
Bioinformatics: Secondary Structure Prediction Prof. David Jones d.t.jones@ucl.ac.uk Possibly the greatest unsolved problem in molecular biology: The Protein Folding Problem MWMPPRPEEVARK LRRLGFVERMAKG
More information1-D Predictions. Prediction of local features: Secondary structure & surface exposure
1-D Predictions Prediction of local features: Secondary structure & surface exposure 1 Learning Objectives After today s session you should be able to: Explain the meaning and usage of the following local
More informationPacking of Secondary Structures
7.88 Lecture Notes - 4 7.24/7.88J/5.48J The Protein Folding and Human Disease Professor Gossard Retrieving, Viewing Protein Structures from the Protein Data Base Helix helix packing Packing of Secondary
More informationCAP 5510: Introduction to Bioinformatics CGS 5166: Bioinformatics Tools. Giri Narasimhan
CAP 5510: Introduction to Bioinformatics CGS 5166: Bioinformatics Tools Giri Narasimhan ECS 254; Phone: x3748 giri@cis.fiu.edu www.cis.fiu.edu/~giri/teach/bioinff18.html Proteins and Protein Structure
More informationReview. CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Nov. 30 and Dec. 5, 2017 Ron Dror
Review CS/CME/BioE/Biophys/BMI 279 Nov. 30 and Dec. 5, 2017 Ron Dror 1 Information on the exam The exam will focus on high-level concepts You may use two (single-sided) pages of notes, but the emphasis
More informationSyllabus BINF Computational Biology Core Course
Course Description Syllabus BINF 701-702 Computational Biology Core Course BINF 701/702 is the Computational Biology core course developed at the KU Center for Computational Biology. The course is designed
More informationWe used the PSI-BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) to search the
SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS - in silico protein analysis We used the PSI-BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) to search the Protein Data Bank (PDB, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/) and the NCBI non-redundant
More informationLigand Scout Tutorials
Ligand Scout Tutorials Step : Creating a pharmacophore from a protein-ligand complex. Type ke6 in the upper right area of the screen and press the button Download *+. The protein will be downloaded and
More informationStatistical Machine Learning Methods for Bioinformatics IV. Neural Network & Deep Learning Applications in Bioinformatics
Statistical Machine Learning Methods for Bioinformatics IV. Neural Network & Deep Learning Applications in Bioinformatics Jianlin Cheng, PhD Department of Computer Science University of Missouri, Columbia
More informationProtein Structure Prediction
Protein Structure Prediction Notes from Chapter 5 of Computational Biology an Application-Oriented View by A.P. Gultyaev 1 Protein Structure Prediction Primary Structure Secondary Structure Prediction
More informationStructure to Function. Molecular Bioinformatics, X3, 2006
Structure to Function Molecular Bioinformatics, X3, 2006 Structural GeNOMICS Structural Genomics project aims at determination of 3D structures of all proteins: - organize known proteins into families
More informationLysinebasedTrypsinActSite. A computer application for modeling Chymotrypsin
LysinebasedTrypsinActSite A computer application for modeling Chymotrypsin Version.2 May 2006 LysTAS A computer application for modeling chymotrypsin Version.2 May 2006 Table of Contents Page. Introduction
More informationModeling for 3D structure prediction
Modeling for 3D structure prediction What is a predicted structure? A structure that is constructed using as the sole source of information data obtained from computer based data-mining. However, mixing
More information