Developmental instability, hybridization and heterozygosity in stick insects of the genus Bacillus
|
|
- Nickolas Charles
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society The Linnean Society of London, 2006? ? Original Article DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY, HYBRIDIZATION AND HETEROZYGOSITY IN BACILLUS D. H. ANDERSEN ET AL. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 87, With 2 figures Developmental instability, hybridization and heterozygosity in stick insects of the genus Bacillus (Insecta; Phasmatodea) with different modes of reproduction DITTE HOLM ANDERSEN 1,2 *, CINO PERTOLDI 2,3,4, VOLKER LOESCHCKE 2 and VALERIO SCALI 1 1 Dipartimento di Biologia Evoluzionistica Sperimentale, Via Selmi 3, I Bologna, Italy 2 Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Building 540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3 Department of Applied Biology, Estación Biológica Doñana, CSIC, Pabellón del Perú, Avda. Maria Luisa, s/n, S Seville, Spain 4 Department of Wildlife Ecology & Biodiversity, National Environmental Research Institute, Kalø Grenåvej 14, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark Received 26 July 2004; accepted for publication 9 March 2005 Several genetic factors are assumed to influence developmental instability (DI). One is the level of heterozygosity, with higher levels often being associated with decreased DI; another is genetic incompatibility in hybrids, which in several cases has been shown to increase DI. The genus Bacillus includes species which have both amphigonic heterozygous reproducing populations and homozygous parthenogenetic reproducing populations (B. rossius rossius and ). Furthermore, Bacillus includes hybrid parthenogenetic species, which have very high levels of almost fixed heterozygosities (B. atticus, B. whitei, B. lynceorum). We investigated the phenotypic variance (σ 2 p) and the impact of hybridization and level of heterozygosity on DI in females from these populations and species of Bacillus. DI was estimated as fluctuating asymmetry (FA) for three bilateral traits: the labial palpus, the maxillary palpus and the antenna. For the labial palpus and maxillary palpus we found, in general, a lower level of DI in the amphigonic females compared with parthenogenetic counterparts from the same species and with parthenogenetic females from the three hybrid species. A higher DI of the antenna was found in the hybrid species when compared with both parthenogenetic and amphigonic populations of the nonhybrid species, suggesting that the genes controlling antenna development are located on the sex chromosomes. The development of the investigated bilateral characters in the hybrid species seemed to be affected more by factors relating to genetic incompatibilities as a consequence of hybridization than by the stabilizing force of increased heterozygosity. Only few differences in σ 2 p were observed, supporting the possibility that the observed differences in DI are related mainly to internal genetic factors The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 87, ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: fluctuating asymmetry genetic incompatibility parthenogenesis phenotypic variance polyploids species hybrids. INTRODUCTION In nature interspecific hybridization is not a rare phenomenon. Hybrids can arise from crosses between *Corresponding author. ditte.andersen@biology.au.dk genetically well-differentiated bisexual species and may persist through unusual modes of reproduction (Dowling & Secor, 1997). Interspecific hybrids arise when heterospecific matings lead to the production of zygotes that occasionally can overcome developmental constraints. Most natural hybrid populations show female-biased or all-female progeny as male gameto- 249
2 250 D. H. ANDERSEN ET AL. genesis and/or development is more severely affected by hybridization compared with that of females (Turelli & Orr, 2000; Presgraves, 2003). Female oogenesis is also altered in hybrids, but some eggs may be functional and self-activating. A few hybrid progeny may thus hatch whose descendants can persist in time and become a hybrid all-female species if their modified gametogenesis stabilizes and their fertility increases in subsequent generations (Marescalchi, Pijnacker & Scali, 1991). Multiple hybridization events may create allopolyploid hybrids, and enhance the genetic variation in the hybrids (Marescalchi & Scali, 2003). Polyploidy is often associated with parthenogenetic reproduction and the hybrids may be able to combine the main advantage of sexual reproduction (genetic diversity) with the advantages of unisexual reproduction (faster population growth and the possibility of colonization by one individual) which would only be possible for a sexually reproducing female already mated (Bullini, 1994). Hybridization may affect the fecundity and development of hybrid individuals due to the accumulation of genes that cause recessive incompatible epistatic interactions between the parental species (Presgraves, 2003). Genetic incompatibilities in the hybrids may decrease their ability to develop an optimal phenotype due to increased developmental instability (DI). Developmental stability refers to the ability of an organism to buffer its developmental processes against environmental and genetic disturbance and ensures common developmental outcomes under specified conditions (Zakharov, 1992). DI results when developmental noise or stress affects the buffering capacity of the processes related to development that provide developmental stability (Lens et al., 2000). Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) is a very common measure of DI and is known to be elevated due to both environmental stress factors (Kristensen et al., 2003, 2004) and genetic factors, such as hybridization (Andersen et al., 2002), loss of genetic variation (Lens et al., 2000; Pertoldi et al., 2003), degree of protein heterozygosity (Leary et al., 1985), episodes of directional selection (Manning & Chamberlain, 1993) and mutations (Clarke & McKenzie, 1987, 1992). DI also contributes to the phenotypic variance (σ 2 p) of individuals. σ 2 p in a sexually reproducing population is given by: σ 2 p = σ 2 g + σ 2 e + (GxE) + cov(ge) + DI, where σ 2 g and σ 2 e are the genetic and environmental variance, respectively, (GxE) is the genotype environmental interaction and cov(ge) is the genotype environmental covariance (Pertoldi, Kristensen & Loeschcke, 2001a). Since both genetic and environmental factors affect σ 2 p, σ 2 p of a quantitative character can only be used as a measure of DI in populations with no genetic variance and no environmental variance among the individuals. Another phenomenon that can be observed in some hybrids is increased fitness in the hybrids compared with their parental populations, referred to as hybrid vigour (Rieseberg & Carney, 1998). The underlying genetic mechanisms are not clearly understood but the increased fitness in some hybrids is generally ascribed to an increase in heterozygosity (Alibert et al., 1997). The advantages of being more heterozygous could be due to dominant alleles which mask deleterious recessive alleles or to overdominance, i.e. generally heterozygous individuals are more fit than are more homozygous individuals (Rieseberg & Carney, 1998). This could be due to increased flexibility in the production of biochemical products and increased metabolic flexibility (Mitton, 1993). The expression of hybrid vigour is often restricted to the F1 generation in sexually reproducing populations since meiotic recombination and segregation in the F1 individuals split epistatic and additive coadapted interactions among loci derived from the two parents. This may result in decreased fitness and increased DI in the F2 progeny or in later generations (Ross & Robertson, 1990; Andersen et al., 2002). Polyploidy is also known to affect FA. Some investigations have found that an increased level of ploidy and therefore very high levels of heterozygosity might decrease FA (Leary et al., 1985; Scheerer, Thorgaard & Seeb, 1987; Mesaros, Tucic & Tucic, 1994). However, in most cases elevated ploidy is disadvantageous as ploidy can significantly alter the developmental pattern and physiology of cells, which might result in an increase in FA. Elevated ploidy prolongs celldivision time and consequently slows down the developmental rate, which might make allopolyploids inferior to their diploid ancestors (Keller & Gerhardt, 2000). GENUS BACILLUS The genus Bacillus Latreille, is a good experimental set of taxa for investigating the effects of hybridization, different levels of heterozygosity, and polyploidy on DI because of its highly variable reproductive systems and variation in ploidy levels. The genus is known to include the bisexual B. grandii Nascetti & Bullini, the bisexual B. rossius (Rossi) which also has all-female facultative parthenogenetic populations, the automictic parthenogen B. atticus Brunner, and their related hybrids: the apomictic B. whitei (B. rossius/grandii grandii) Nascetti & Bullini, and the apomictic triploid B. lynceorum (B. rossius/ grandii grandii/atticus) Bullini, Nascetti & Bianchi Bullini.
3 DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY, HYBRIDIZATION AND HETEROZYGOSITY IN BACILLUS 251 BACILLUS GRANDII GRANDII B. grandii is endemic to three tiny Sicilian areas. The species is very rare and recent observations (V. Scali, pers. observ.) indicate that the habitat of B. g. grandii is decreasing. Furthermore, its area of distribution has been invaded by B. whitei, which may threat the persistence of B. g. grandii in the future. BACILLUS ROSSIUS B. rossius spreads over most of the western Mediterranean basin with two Italian subspecies B. r. rossius and. B. r. rossius is found on the Thyrrenian and Ligurian coasts of the Italian mainland, on Sicily and on the north-western part of Sardinia. is found along the Adriatic coast, on Sicily and on south-eastern Sardinia (Fig. 1). Previous studies of protein heterozygosity from samples of the two subspecies B. r. rossius and (which also included populations collected close to our collecting sites), gave heterozygosity values of H = and H = 0.033, respectively (Mantovani & Scali, 1991). The heterozygosity in the parthenogenetic reproducing populations of the two species is zero. This is due to an automictic mechanism that can be viewed as gamete multiplication, which, after diploidization, generates a female offspring homozygous at all loci in one generation (Scali et al., 2003). BACILLUS ATTICUS B. atticus is a thelytokous obligate parthenogen with very complex population genetics. This can be explained by its reproduction mechanism, in which automixis occurs before the second meiotic division. This leads to a slow but cumulative change from heterozygous combinations to homozygous ones (Mareschalchi, Pijnacker & Scali, 1993). Allozyme heterozygosity of B. atticus populations from Sicily has been estimated to be 0.1 < H < 0.2 (Mantovani, Scali & Tinti, 1990). The origin of B. atticus is not fully understood but it is known that it has a rather close relationship with B. grandii (Marescalchi & Scali, 2003) and investigations have suggested that B. atticus arose not as a result of interspecific hybridization but more likely through a complex of interracial hybridization events (Marescalchi & Scali, 1997). BACILLUS WHITEI AND BACILLUS LYNCEORUM The apomictic hybrids B. whitei and the triploid B. lynceorum reproduce by a process that allows invariant transmission of fixed heterozygous loci of the maternal genome to the thelytokous progeny, with very few exceptions (Marescalchi et al., 1991). The Figure 1. Map showing the collecting sites of Bacillus populations. 1, parthenogenetic B. rossius rossius; 2, amphigonic B. r. rossius; 3, parthenogenetic ; 4, amphigonic ; 5, B. whitei; 6, B. lynceorum; 7, B. atticus; 8, B. grandii grandii. hybrid species B. whitei and B. lynceorum reflect fully the genetic structure of their two and three ancestral species, respectively, with heterozygosity estimates around H = 0.7 due to the great differentiation of B. rossius on one side and B. grandii/b. atticus on the other (Scali et al., 2003). AIMS OF THE STUDY As described above, the reproductive mode in the genus Bacillus ranges from sexual in B. r. rossius and to automictic in the parthenogenetic populations of B. r. rossius, and B. atticus and apomictic in B. whitei and B. lynceorum. Furthermore, the level of heterozygosity
4 252 D. H. ANDERSEN ET AL. ranges from zero in the parthenogenetic populations of B. r. rossius and to high in the interspecific hybrids B. whitei and B. lynceorum. All these factors make the genus very suitable for our investigation of factors affecting DI. The first aim of this study was to investigate if there exists in Bacillus a general relationship between the level of heterozygosity and measures of DI. Another aim was to investigate the main factors affecting DI in the hybrids. The hybrid species of Bacillus have successfully established large and thriving populations and the origins of the hybrid species have been estimated to more than 1 Mya (Scali et al., 2003). A factor that may contribute to the success of the hybrids could be their increased heterozygosity, which could also have an antagonistic effect on DI. On the other hand, the genetic structure of the hybrids still reflects their parental genomes since no or very little recombination occurs in B. whitei and B. lynceorum, and recombination rates in the race hybrids B. atticus are rather low. This means that all hybrids may still suffer from the established genetic incompatibilities between their parental taxa, since selection cannot act to reestablish more fit hybrids. It was therefore possible to evaluate whether it is mainly the stabilizing force of increased heterozygosity or the destabilizing force of genetic incompatibilities that affect DI in the hybrids. Lastly, we compared the sexually reproducing females with the parthenogenetic females within the same species to evaluate whether higher levels of heterozygosity without genetic incompatibilities affect the DI level. MATERIAL AND METHODS Specimens from populations of B. r. rossius and were collected during October B. r. rossius were collected on the Thyrrenian coast of Tuscany; the parthenogenetic individuals of B. r. rossius came from just north of the Ombrone river and the sexually reproducing individuals from just south of the same river (Fig. 1). Specimens of parthenogenetic and amphigonic were collected on the Adriatic coast at Grottamare and Torino di Sangro Marina, respectively. The Sicilian hybrid parthenogenetic individuals were collected during October B. atticus were collected on the Iblean area at Scoglitti, B. lynceorum at Fontane Bianche and Cassibile, and B. whitei at Canicattini Bagni (Fig. 1). Sicilian collections also included Ponte Manghisi, which is the locality of the very rare B. g. grandii. Unfortunately it was only possible to obtain five specimens of pure B. g. grandii since the habitat of this endemic species has been invaded by the parthenogenetic B. whitei. We were therefore unable to include an analysis of B. g. grandii in our investigation. With the exception of B. atticus, which feeds on lentisk, all populations of Bacillus were collected on bramble. Collected specimens were preserved in 95% alcohol before being measured. We measured three bilateral traits and three unilateral traits. The bilateral traits considered were the antenna, the labial palpus, and the maxillary palpus, and were measured using a binocular microscope with a digital filar eyepiece (Los Angeles Scientific Instrument Company, Inc., USA). The unilateral traits, which were the mesonotum, metanotum and abdomen, were measured with a digital calliper to the nearest 0.1 mm. For all statistical analyses each population was analysed separately and from the sexually reproducing B. r. rossius and only female populations were analysed. Due to the large number of tests, a Bonferroni correction (Rice, 1989) was applied. Following Miller (1981), we made a separate probability statement for each trait. STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF FA FA was estimated as the difference in length between each bilateral pair of traits (right left side). To determine whether the obtained data displayed the statistical properties of FA, which is characterized by a normal distribution with a mean of zero (Palmer & Strobeck, 1986), a t-test was applied to test for deviations of the mean values from zero, and Shapiro Wilk s test was conducted to check for normality (Zar, 1984). MEASUREMENT ERROR To estimate measurement error for the bilateral traits a subsample of 30 B. whitei individuals was measured twice, the second set of measurements being made without reference to the first set. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to test for significance of FA relative to measurement error (the difference between the two independent measures of FA) following Palmer & Strobeck (1986). To quantify possible errors associated with measuring the unilateral traits, 20 parthenogenetic individuals were taken arbitrarily and for each individual the three traits were measured ten times. The within-individual coefficient of variation for each mean was taken as an estimate of the measurement error, adding Haldane s (1955) correction for small sample size. CORRELATION OF FA WITH BODY SIZE AND AMONG TRAITS A t-test for possible associations between body size and FA was conducted because such correlations may affect the interpretation of DI (Palmer, 1994). Spearman s rank correlation test (Zar, 1984) was applied to
5 DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY, HYBRIDIZATION AND HETEROZYGOSITY IN BACILLUS 253 determine whether the absolute value of FA of each of the bilateral traits was correlated with the sum of the mesonotum, metanotum and abdomen, which was taken as an estimate of insect body size. Finally we used Spearman s rank correlation test to check for correlations of the absolute value of FA among the different traits. COMPARISON OF FA AND σ 2 P AMONG POPULATIONS FA was estimated as FA 1 (the mean value of the absolute FA) and as FA 4 [the variance of (r l)] (following Palmer & Strobeck, 1986). Some individuals showed very strong asymmetries exceeding three standard deviations of the signed values of (r l) of the three bilateral traits. These individuals were considered phenodeviants and FA values of their traits were not included in further analyses. A permutation t-test (1000 permutations) was applied to test for significant differences in FA 1 among the populations. This test should be more accurate for small sample sizes and non-normal distributions like the distribution of the absolute value of FA, which was half normal. An F-test was used to test for significant differences in FA 4. Due to a highly significant correlation between the size of the right side of the bilateral traits and the unilateral traits (matrix available from D.H.A. on request), we estimated the σ 2 p as the variance of body size (mesonotum + metanotum + abdomen). An F-test was applied to test for differences in σ 2 p among populations. RESULTS STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF FA There was one deviation from zero of the mean of the trait (r l) distributions for the labial palpus (one-sample t-test: < P < 0.94, 24 < d.f. < 76) and there were two significant deviations from zero for the maxillary palpus (one-sample t-test: 0.01 < P < 0.056, 24 < d.f. < 78). There were two significant deviations for the antenna (one-sample t-test: < P < 0.91, 20 < d.f. < 76). We determined that it would not affect our results to include the samples in which significant deviations from zero were found, as the deviations were probably due to small sample size and the significance disappeared when we removed one or two extreme values. There were two deviations from normality out of 21 tests (Shapiro Wilk s test: < P < 0.96, 20 < d.f. < 76); these were in both cases due to leptokurtic distributions. MEASUREMENT ERROR The interaction mean square (MS) containing information about FA was tested against error MS (reflecting measurement error), showing that FA was significantly larger than measurement error for all three traits (P < 0.001). The measurement error for the three unilateral traits was low, with a mean value of 0.13%. CORRELATION OF FA WITH BODY SIZE AND AMONG TRAITS There was a significant correlation between body size and absolute FA in 14% of the cases, with all significant results showing a negative relationship. There was no correlation among absolute FA for the three bilateral traits for B. atticus B. whitei, and B. lynceorum (0.05 < r s < 0.44, 19 < N < 23, 0.05 < P < 0.83). In the parthenogenetic population of B. r. rossius, there were highly significant positive correlations among absolute FA of all three traits (0.36 < r s < 0.69, N = 77, P < 0.001). In the parthenogenetic population of, there was a highly significant postive correlation between absolute FA of the maxillary palpus and the labial palpus (r s = 0.87, N = 73, P < 0.001) but there was no correlation with the absolute FA of the antenna (0.04 < r s < 0.01, N = 73, 0.42 < P < ). In the amphigonic individuals of B. r. rossius and B. redtenbacheri, there were highly significant positive correlations between FA of the maxillary palpus and the antenna (0.53 < r s < 0.68, 48 < N < 77, P < 0.001), but there was no correlation with the labial palpus (0.08 < r s < 0.29, 48 < N < 77, 0.5 < P < 0.57). COMPARISON OF FA AND σ 2 P AMONG POPULATIONS There were several significant differences in both FA 1 and FA 4 among the individuals from the seven populations. There was no significant difference in FA between the two sexually reproducing populations and they always exhibited the lowest levels of both FA 1 and FA 4 (Table 1, Fig. 2). The highest levels of FA were in B. lynceorum in almost all comparisons (Table 1, Fig. 2). For the labial palpus and the maxillary palpus the permutation t-test showed no significant differences in FA 1 among the five parthenogenetic reproducing populations. However, for almost all comparisons between the amphigonic females of B. r. rossius and and the parthenogenetic populations, FA 1 was lower in the amphigonic individuals (except for the maxillary palpus of B. whitei) (Table 1, Fig. 2). In general, for the antenna of the parthenogenetic hybrids B. whitei, B. lynceorum and B. atticus, there was a significantly higher FA 1 when compared with the amphigonic and parthenogenetic individuals of B. r. rossius and (Table 1, Fig. 1). There was no difference in antenna FA 1 among
6 254 D. H. ANDERSEN ET AL. Table 1. Upper half of each trait analysis presents t-test for differences in FA 1 and lower half F-test for differences in FA 4 for the labial palpus, maxillary palpus and antenna between the hybrid parthenogenetic populations of Bacillus whitei, B. lynceorum and B. atticus and the parthenogenetic and amphigonic populations of B. rossis rossius and labial palpus (n) FA 4 \(n) FA 1 ± SE B. whitei (26) ± B. lynceorum (24) ± B. atticus (25) ± B. r. rossius parth. (79) ± parth. (73) ± B. r. rossius amph. (48) ± amph. (35) ± B. whitei (26) n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s. 2.82** B. lynceorum (24) n.s n.s n.s n.s. 2.92*** 3.19*** B. atticus (25) n.s n.s n.s n.s. 3.34*** 3.66*** B. r. rossius parth. (76) n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s. parth. (73) n.s n.s n.s n.s. 5.13*** 5.50*** B. r. rossius amph. (48) *** 6.25*** 5.37*** 4.28*** 6.66*** 0.82 n.s. (35) *** 7.62*** 6.55*** 5.21*** 8.11*** 1.22 n.s amph. maxillary palpus (n) FA 4 \(n) FA 1 ± SE (29) ± (25) ± (25) ± (77) ± (73) ± (48) ± (35) ± B. whitei (29) ** 1.15 n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s. B. lynceorum (26) *** 2.08 n.s n.s n.s. 4.46*** 4.16*** B. atticus (25) n.s. 5.37*** 0.26 n.s n.s. 3.36*** 2.85 n.s B. r. rossius parth. (79) ** 2.79*** 1.92 n.s n.s. 4.77** 3.94 n.s parth. (73) *** 2.31 n.s n.s n.s. 6.37*** 5.66*** B. r. rossius amph. (48) *** 31.68*** 5.90*** 11.36*** 13.71*** 0.70 n.s (35) n.s *** 4.51*** 8.69*** 10.48*** 1.31 n.s amph. antenna (n) FA 4 \(n) FA 1 ± SE (22) ± (23) ± (19) ± (77) ± (73) ± (48) ± (35) ± B. whitei (23) n.s n.s n.s. 3.07*** 3.66*** 3.56*** B. lynceorum (24) *** 1.34 n.s. 4.18*** 4.35*** 4.62*** 4.58*** B. atticus (21) *** 1.31 n.s. 3.69*** 3.95*** 4.35*** 4.29*** B. r. rossius parth. (77) n.s *** 20.18*** 0.57 n.s n.s. 1.5 n.s. (73) *** 21.46*** 28.19*** 1.40 n.s n.s n.s. parth. B. r. rossius amph. (48) *** 45.65*** 59.97*** 2.97*** 2.13 n.s n.s. amph. (35) *** 43.89*** 57.66*** 2.86*** 2.05 n.s n.s. Due to the large number of tests conducted a Bonferroni test (Rice, 1989) was applied. Following Miller (1981) we made a separate probability statement for each trait (k = 21). The values are the t and F-values, respectively. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n.s., not significant.
7 DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY, HYBRIDIZATION AND HETEROZYGOSITY IN BACILLUS FA labial palpus maxillary palpus antenna B. whitei B. lynceorum B. atticus B. r. rossius parth Population B. r. redtenbacheri parth B. r. rossius sex B. r. redtenbacheri sex Figure 2. FA 1 of the labial palpus, maxillary palpus and antenna in the hybrid parthenogenetic populations Bacillus whitei, B. lynceorum, B. atticus and the parthenogenetic and amphigonic populations of B. rossius rossius and (see Table 1 for significant differences among populations). Error bars represent the standard error. the amphigonic and parthenogenetic individuals of B. r. rossius and as well as among the hybrid B. whitei, B. lynceorum and B. atticus. The results for FA 4 showed more or less the same trends as those for FA 1. There were always highly significantly lower levels of FA 4 of the labial palpus in the amphigonic females compared with the parthenogenetic populations (Table 1). For the maxillary palpus, sexual populations showed in almost all cases significantly lower levels of FA 4 compared with parthenogenetic ones (Table 1). For the antenna, B. lynceorum and B. atticus showed significantly higher levels of FA 4 than did all the other populations. There were significantly lower levels of FA 4 in the amphigonic females compared with all the other populations except for the parthenogenetic (Table 1). There were only two significant differences in σ 2 p of insect body size: σ 2 p was highly significantly increased in the amphigonic B. r. rossius compared with both the parthenogenetic hybrid B. whitei and the amphigonic (Table 2). pathways differently (Parson, 1990). Unlike many other studies of FA (e.g. Pertoldi, Scali & Loeschcke, 2001b; Andersen et al., 2002), in several cases we found a highly significant correlation of FA among traits at the individual level in the amphigonic and parthenogenetic reproducing populations of B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacher. The high correlation of FA among the three investigated traits cannot be explained by the same (group of) genes controlling the development of all three bilateral traits since the observed pattern for antenna FA indicates the genes that control antenna development to have a distinct chromosomal location on the sex chromosomes (discussed below). The high correlation of FA among these traits could arise if the three traits reflect the underlying organism-wide developmental stability (Lerner, 1954). There was no correlation among the FA of traits in the hybrid populations. This could be due to the hybrids possession of genes that have not undergone selection for optimal development together. Hybridization may therefore lead to different levels of DI or vulnerability of the three traits. DISCUSSION CORRELATION OF FA AMONG TRAITS Differences in FA between traits can be explained by different levels of DI; these might vary depending on differences in selection and canalization, where traits closely related to fitness are believed to be subject to stronger selection and canalization for optimal development (Palmer & Strobeck, 1986). Furthermore, different traits may have trait-specific developmental windows; in such a developmental window, one trait may be more vulnerable to stress factors than are other traits. Differences in DI among traits may also arise if different (groups of) genes control the development of distinct traits, influencing developmental OVERALL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HETEROZYGOSITY AND FA Our results clearly indicate that the amphigonic females are less developmentally instable than are both the homozygous parthenogenetic females of B. r. rossius and and the highly fixed heterozygous hybrid parthenogenetic reproducing females. This investigation did not, therefore, find any evidence for a general relationship between heterozygosity and FA. The factors determining the higher level of FA in the hybrid parthenogenetic females compared with the amphigonic females are probably very different from the factors leading to a higher FA in the parthenoge-
8 256 D. H. ANDERSEN ET AL. Table 2. F-test of the variance of body size among the hybrid parthenogenetic populations of Bacillus whitei, B. lynceorum, B. atticus and the parthenogenetic and amphigonic females of B. rossis rossius and B. whitei B. lynceorum B. atticus B. r. rossius parth. parth. B. r. rossius amph. amph. (n) σ 2 p body size (43) (25) (25) (78) (73) (48) (35) B. whitei 2.86 n.s n.s n.s n.s *** 1.06 n.s. B. lynceorum 1.42 n.s n.s n.s n.s 3.04 n.s. B. atticus 1.08 n.s n.s n.s n.s. B. r. rossius parth n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s. parth. B. r. rossius amph *** Due to the large number of tests conducted a Bonferroni test (Rice, 1989) was applied. Following Miller (1981) we made a separate probability statement for each trait (k = 21). The values in the table are F-values.***P < 0.001; n.s., not significant. netic populations of B. r. rossius and compared with their amphigonic counterparts. HETEROZYGOSITY AND FA IN PARTHENOGENETIC AND AMPHIGONIC BACILLUS ROSSIUS The higher FA in the parthenogenetic populations of B. r. rossius and compared with the sexually reproducing females could be due to the almost complete homozygous genome in these females. The complete homozygosity could make the parthenogenetic B. r. rossius and less able to control their development against external and internal disturbances, compared with their amphigonic counterparts, which possess a more heterozygous genome. This observation is also in agreement with other investigations finding that homozygous individuals are less stable compared with more heterozygous ones (Leary et al., 1985; Hutchison & Cheverud, 1995). The increased FA in parthenogenetic females of B. r. rossius and compared with the amphigonic females of the same species, was however, found only in the labial palpus and the maxillary palpus, but not in the antenna. The reason for the lack of differences in FA of the antenna between the parthenogenetic B. r. rossius and and the amphigonic females could be explained by the location of the genes controlling antennal development on the sex chromosomes. The males are hemizygous and therefore the genes controlling antennal development being located on the sex chromosomes would expose them to selection against recessive sublethal mutations in the males. The parthenogenetic mechanism in B. r. rossius and generates a female offspring homozygous at all loci in one generation (Scali et al., 2003). The genes controlling the development of the labial and maxillary palpus may therefore be homozygous for recessive sublethal alleles. This is because these genes have not been subject to the strong kind of selection against these alleles as the genes responsible for development of the antenna. This may explain why FA was increased in these two traits but not in the antenna. The location of the genes controlling development of the antenna on the sex chromosomes has also been suggested by Pertoldi et al. (2001b) due to the finding of significantly higher FA in the antenna of the males compared with the amphigonic females of both B. r. rossius and. HETEROZYGOSITY AND FA IN BACILLUS HYBRIDS The factors leading to the observed higher FA in the hybrid parthenogenetic populations of Bacillus compared with the amphigonic females probably have a very different cause than have the factors responsible
9 DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY, HYBRIDIZATION AND HETEROZYGOSITY IN BACILLUS 257 for the higher FA in parthenogenetic B. r. rossius and compared with the amphigonic females. All hybrids were found to have considerably higher levels of heterozygosity compared with the amphigonic females, but the higher heterozygosity was not associated with lower levels of FA. The increased FA could arise from genetic incompatibilities of the heterospecific genomes affecting development in the hybrid individuals. These incompatibilities may evolve in the parental species by substitutions in one species of advantageous or neutral mutations that have never occurred in combination with those of other species and therefore have harmful effects when brought together in hybrids. On average, the alleles involved in these hybrid incompatibilities are thought to be partially recessive (Turelli & Orr, 2000; Presgraves, 2003). The trend seems to be that B. lynceorum has the highest levels of FA, which could be explained by the fact that B. lynceorum is affected by incompatibilities from three different genomes. Furthermore, the genetic incompatibilities may affect the development of all three traits, explaining why the antenna FA was increased in the hybrid parthenogenetic females but not in the parthenogenetic populations of B. r. rossius and. It could be argued that the observed differences in FA among the populations are due not to genetic factors (homozygosity on one side and hybridization on the other) but to differences in external environmental factors since the populations are allopatric. In a previous study of FA in parthenogenetic and amphigonic populations of B. r. rossius and, Pertoldi et al. (2001b) found a higher FA in the parthenogenetic females compared with the amphigonic females and the investigated populations were allopatric. In our study the investigated females of the parthenogenetic and amphigonic B. r. rossius were living in sympatry. Our results confirm the results found for the nonsympatric populations, which justifies our ascribing the observed differences in FA mainly to internal genetic factors rather than to external environmental factors. COMPARISON OF σ 2 P AMONG POPULATIONS Contrary to the study of Pertoldi et al. (2001b) we did not find significantly higher levels of σ 2 p in the amphigonic females compared with their parthenogenetic counterparts in both B. r. rossius and. In the amphigonic females, σ 2 p was of both genetic and environmental origin, whereas σ 2 p in the parthenogenetic B. r. rossius and was due only to σ 2 e and DI due to the lack of σ 2 g. The reason for the lack of increased σ 2 p in the amphigonic females, even though the genetic component contributes to σ 2 p, could therefore be the increased contribution of DI to σ 2 p in the parthenogenetic females. The homozygosity of the parthenogenetic females could also make them less able to buffer their development against environmental factors, increasing the contribution from σ 2 e. In fact, only two significant differences in σ 2 p were found (Table 2). Higher σ 2 g is one factor that could contribute to the observed higher σ 2 p in the amphigonic B. r. rossius compared with the amphigonic females of and the hybrid parthenogenetic B. whitei, since σ 2 g has been shown to be lower in amphigonic (Mantovani & Scali, 1991) and not present in B. whitei (Marescalchi et al., 1991). The three hybrid parthenogenetic populations are characterized by high heterozygosity but low genetic variability, and σ 2 p should therefore reflect mainly DI and σ 2 e. The pattern observed for σ 2 p reflected very well the pattern found for FA, with B. lynceorum having the highest σ 2 p, followed by B. atticus and then B. whitei; this could indicate that the environmental component contributes equally to the σ 2 p observed in the three hybrid populations (Table 2). The equal contribution from σ 2 e to σ 2 p in these three populations also supports our ascribing the observed differences in FA mainly to internal genetic factors rather than to differences in external environmental factors. CONCLUSION This study found no general relationship between heterozygosity and DI. In the nonhybrid species of B. rossius the homozygous parthenogenetic females were more asymmetric than were their amphigonic counterparts, which could be due to differences in heterozygosity. The level of FA was also considerably higher in the ten times more heterozygous hybrid species than it was in the amphigonic females. In these cases the increased FA probably arose due to genetic incompatibilities between the genomes of the parental species, leading to decreased DI in the hybrids. The interest in studying FA has very often been due to its relation to fitness. Our study found that hybridization might lead to increased levels of FA, but it should be stressed that this relation does not seem to be correlated with fitness. All three hybrid species have existed for more than 1 Myr (Scali et al., 2003) and they have in several cases been able to invade or even out-compete their parental species, for instance on Sicily, where B. whitei has invaded the habitat of B. g. grandii, and B. lynceorum has invaded the habitat of both B. atticus and B. whitei. In the hybrid species there seems, therefore, to be an uncoupling of the negative impact of hybridization on development from the impact on fitness. This could be due to the very
10 258 D. H. ANDERSEN ET AL. strong selection acting on the modified gametogenesis in the hybrid species during the first reproduction event securing optimal fitness. Further parthenogenetic reproducing individuals have a two-fold fitness advantage compared with sexually reproducing individuals, under stable environmental conditions (Barton & Charlesworth, 1998). It could also be speculated that the lack of long-distance dispersal in adult stick insects and larval instars, due to their strong addiction to their food plants (Mantovani, Passamonti & Scali, 2001), could result in inbreeding depression in some sexual populations, and this could give the parthenogenetic hybrid species an advantage. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable and useful comments on the manuscript. The work was supported by grants from the Danish Natural Sciences Research Council ( ) to Ditte Holm Andersen, and by grants from the Danish Natural Sciences Research Council ( and ) and the Marie Curies Fellowship of the European Community Host Development program under contract number HPMD-CT to Cino Pertoldi. REFERENCES Alibert P, Fel-Clair F, Manolakou K, Britton-Davidian J, Auffray J Developmental stability, fitness and trait size in laboratory hybrids between European subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 51: Andersen DH, Pertoldi C, Scali V, Loeschcke V Intraspecific hybridization, developmental stability and fitness in Drosophila mercatorum. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4: Barton NH, Charlesworth B Why sex and recombination? Science 281: Bullini L Origin and evolution of animal hybrid species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: Clarke GM, McKenzie JA Developmental stability of insecticide resistant phenotypes in blowfly; a result of canalising natural selection. Nature 325: Clarke GM, McKenzie JA Coadaptation, developmental stability, and fitness of insecticide resistance genotypes in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina: a review. Acta Zoologica Fennica 191: Dowling TE, Secor C The role of hybridisation and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 28: Haldane JBS The measurement of variation. Evolution 9: 484. Hutchison DW, Cheverud JM Fluctuating asymmetry in tamarin (Saguinus) cranial morphology: intra- and interspecific comparisons between taxa with varying levels of genetic heterozygosity. Journal of Heredity 86: Keller MJ, Gerhardt HC Polyploidy alters advertisment call structure in gray treefrogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biology Sciences 268: Kristensen TN, Pertoldi C, Andersen DH, Loeschcke V The use of fluctuating asymmetry and phenotypic variability as indicators of developmental instability: a test of a new method employing clonal organisms and high temperature stress. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: Kristensen TN, Pertoldi C, Pedersen LD, Andersen DH, Bach L, Loeschcke V The increase of fluctuating asymmetry in a monoclonal strain of collombolans after chemical exposure discussing a new method for estimating the environmental variance. Ecological Indicators 4: Leary RF, Allendorf FW, Knudsen KL, Thorgaard GH Heterozygosity and developmental stability in gynogenetic diploid and triploid rainbow trout. Heredity 54: Lens L, Van Dongen S, Galbusera P, Schenck T, Matthysen E, Van De Casteele T Developmental instability and inbreeding in natural bird populations exposed to different levels of habitat disturbance. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: Lerner IM Genetic homeostasis. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd. Manning JT, Chamberlain AT Fluctuating asymmetry, sexual selection and canine teeth in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biology Sciences 251: Mantovani B, Passamonti M, Scali V The mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene in Bacillus stick insects: Ancestry of hybrids, androgenesis, and phylogenetic relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: Mantovani B, Scali V Allozyme characterization of Sardinian Bacillus rossius (Rossi) and B. atticus Brunner (Insecta Phasmatodea). Genetica 83: Mantovani B, Scali V, Tinti F Allozymatic characterisation and taxonomy of Sicilian Bacillus atticus (Insecta Phasmatodea). Biologisches Zentralblatt 109: Marescalchi O, Pijnacker LP, Scali V Cytology of parthenogenesis in Bacillus whitei and Bacillus lynceorum (Insecta Phasmatodea). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 20: Marescalchi O, Scali V Chromosomal and NOR patterns in the polyclonal stick insect Bacillus atticus atticus (Insecta; Phasmatodea). Genome 40: Marescalchi O, Scali V Automictic parthenogenesis in the diploid-triploid stick insect Bacillus atticus and its flexibility leading to heterospecific diploid hybrids. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 43: Mareschalchi O, Pijnacker LP, Scali V Automictic parthenogenesis and its genetic consequence in Bacillus atticus atticus (Insecta Phasmatodea). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 24: Mesaros GB, Tucic B, Tucic N Directional and fluctuating asymmetry in sexual and asexual Otiorhynchus alpicola populations. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 32:
11 DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY, HYBRIDIZATION AND HETEROZYGOSITY IN BACILLUS 259 Miller RG Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: McGraw-Hill. Mitton JB Enzyme heterozygosity, metabolism, and developmental stability. Genetica 89: Palmer AR Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. In: Markov TA, ed. Developmental instability: its origins and evolutionary implications. Dordrecht: Kluwer, Palmer AR, Strobeck C Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 17: Parson PA Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress. Biological Review 65: Pertoldi C, Andersen DH, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V Consequences of a reduction in genetic variance on developmental instability estimators. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: Pertoldi C, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V. 2001a. A new method for estimating environmental variability for clonal organisms, and the use of fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of developmental instability. Journal of Theoretical Biology 210: Pertoldi C, Scali V, Loeschcke V. 2001b. Developmental instability in sexual reproducing and parthenogenetic populations of Bacillus rossius rossius and Bacillus rossius redtenbacheri. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: Presgraves DC A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163: Rice WR Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: Rieseberg LH, Carney SE Transley review no Plant hybridisation. New Phytology 140: Ross KG, Robertson JL Developmental stability, heterozygosity, and fitness in two introduced fire ants (Solenopsis invicta and S. richteri) and their hybrid. Heredity 64: Scali V, Passamonti M, Mareschalchi O, Mantovani B Linkage between sexual and asexual lineages: genome evolution in Bacillus stick insects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: Scheerer PD, Thorgaard GH, Seeb JE Performance and developmental stability of triploid tiger trout (Brown trout FF Brook trout MM). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116: Turelli M, Orr HA Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154: Zakharov VM Population phenogenetics: analysis of developmental stability in natural populations. Acta Zoologica Fennica 191: Zar JH Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Major questions of evolutionary genetics. Experimental tools of evolutionary genetics. Theoretical population genetics.
Evolutionary Genetics (for Encyclopedia of Biodiversity) Sergey Gavrilets Departments of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-6 USA Evolutionary
More informationLinking levels of selection with genetic modifiers
Linking levels of selection with genetic modifiers Sally Otto Department of Zoology & Biodiversity Research Centre University of British Columbia @sarperotto @sse_evolution @sse.evolution Sally Otto Department
More informationMicroevolutionary changes show us how populations change over time. When do we know that distinctly new species have evolved?
Microevolutionary changes show us how populations change over time. When do we know that distinctly new species have evolved? Critical to determining the limits of a species is understanding if two populations
More informationNOTES CH 24: The Origin of Species
NOTES CH 24: The Origin of Species Species Hummingbirds of Costa Rica SPECIES: a group of individuals that mate with one another and produce fertile offspring; typically members of a species appear similar
More informationSpeciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Title goes here. Some Key Tenets of the Modern Synthesis
Carol Eunmi Lee 11/9/17 Speciation Increasing genetic distance Fitness Mating between different species Mating between relatives Inbreeding Depression Hybrid Vigor Outbreeding Depression 2 Darwin s Origin
More informationUON, CAS, DBSC, General Biology II (BIOL102) Dr. Mustafa. A. Mansi. The Origin of Species
The Origin of Species Galápagos Islands, landforms newly emerged from the sea, despite their geologic youth, are filled with plants and animals known no-where else in the world, Speciation: The origin
More informationReproduction and Evolution Practice Exam
Reproduction and Evolution Practice Exam Topics: Genetic concepts from the lecture notes including; o Mitosis and Meiosis, Homologous Chromosomes, Haploid vs Diploid cells Reproductive Strategies Heaviest
More informationThere are 3 parts to this exam. Use your time efficiently and be sure to put your name on the top of each page.
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY EXAM #1 Fall 2017 There are 3 parts to this exam. Use your time efficiently and be sure to put your name on the top of each page. Part I. True (T) or False (F) (2 points each). Circle
More informationThe Origin of Species
The Origin of Species Introduction A species can be defined as a group of organisms whose members can breed and produce fertile offspring, but who do not produce fertile offspring with members of other
More informationConceptually, we define species as evolutionary units :
Bio 1M: Speciation 1 How are species defined? S24.1 (2ndEd S26.1) Conceptually, we define species as evolutionary units : Individuals within a species are evolving together Individuals of different species
More informationSpeciation. Today s OUTLINE: Mechanisms of Speciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Geographic Models of speciation. (1) Mechanisms of Speciation
Speciation Today s OUTLINE: (1) Geographic Mechanisms of Speciation (What circumstances lead to the formation of new species?) (2) Species Concepts (How are Species Defined?) Mechanisms of Speciation Last
More informationThere are 3 parts to this exam. Take your time and be sure to put your name on the top of each page.
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY BIOS 30305 EXAM #2 FALL 2011 There are 3 parts to this exam. Take your time and be sure to put your name on the top of each page. Part I. True (T) or False (F) (2 points each). 1)
More informationThe Origin of Species
The Origin of Species A. Macroevolution: Up to this point we have discussed changes in alleles or microevolution, with evolution this is the evolution of new. is the origin of a new species. There are
More informationSPECIATION. REPRODUCTIVE BARRIERS PREZYGOTIC: Barriers that prevent fertilization. Habitat isolation Populations can t get together
SPECIATION Origin of new species=speciation -Process by which one species splits into two or more species, accounts for both the unity and diversity of life SPECIES BIOLOGICAL CONCEPT Population or groups
More informationScience Unit Learning Summary
Learning Summary Inheritance, variation and evolution Content Sexual and asexual reproduction. Meiosis leads to non-identical cells being formed while mitosis leads to identical cells being formed. In
More informationProcesses of Evolution
15 Processes of Evolution Forces of Evolution Concept 15.4 Selection Can Be Stabilizing, Directional, or Disruptive Natural selection can act on quantitative traits in three ways: Stabilizing selection
More informationMutation, Selection, Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and Nonrandom Mating Results in Evolution
Mutation, Selection, Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and Nonrandom Mating Results in Evolution 15.2 Intro In biology, evolution refers specifically to changes in the genetic makeup of populations over time.
More informationSpeciation. Today s OUTLINE: Mechanisms of Speciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Geographic Models of speciation. (1) Mechanisms of Speciation
Speciation Today s OUTLINE: (1) Geographic Mechanisms of Speciation (What circumstances lead to the formation of new species?) (2) Species Concepts (How are Species Defined?) Mechanisms of Speciation Last
More informationBiology. Revisiting Booklet. 6. Inheritance, Variation and Evolution. Name:
Biology 6. Inheritance, Variation and Evolution Revisiting Booklet Name: Reproduction Name the process by which body cells divide:... What kind of cells are produced this way? Name the process by which
More informationgenome a specific characteristic that varies from one individual to another gene the passing of traits from one generation to the next
genetics the study of heredity heredity sequence of DNA that codes for a protein and thus determines a trait genome a specific characteristic that varies from one individual to another gene trait the passing
More informationCurriculum Map. Biology, Quarter 1 Big Ideas: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes (BIO1.LS1)
1 Biology, Quarter 1 Big Ideas: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes (BIO1.LS1) Focus Standards BIO1.LS1.2 Evaluate comparative models of various cell types with a focus on organic molecules
More informationThe theory of evolution continues to be refined as scientists learn new information.
Section 3: The theory of evolution continues to be refined as scientists learn new information. K What I Know W What I Want to Find Out L What I Learned Essential Questions What are the conditions of the
More informationSpeciation. Today s OUTLINE: Mechanisms of Speciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Geographic Models of speciation. (1) Mechanisms of Speciation
Speciation Today s OUTLINE: (1) Geographic Mechanisms of Speciation (What circumstances lead to the formation of new species?) (2) Species Concepts (How are Species Defined?) Mechanisms of Speciation Last
More informationEssential Questions. Meiosis. Copyright McGraw-Hill Education
Essential Questions How does the reduction in chromosome number occur during meiosis? What are the stages of meiosis? What is the importance of meiosis in providing genetic variation? Meiosis Vocabulary
More informationName Class Date. KEY CONCEPT Gametes have half the number of chromosomes that body cells have.
Section 1: Chromosomes and Meiosis KEY CONCEPT Gametes have half the number of chromosomes that body cells have. VOCABULARY somatic cell autosome fertilization gamete sex chromosome diploid homologous
More informationCHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS. Section C: Genetic Variation, the Substrate for Natural Selection
CHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS Section C: Genetic Variation, the Substrate for Natural Selection 1. Genetic variation occurs within and between populations 2. Mutation and sexual recombination
More informationSpeciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Title goes here. Some Key Tenets of the Modern Synthesis
Carol Eunmi Lee 11/10/16 Speciation Increasing genetic distance Fitness Mating between different species Mating between relatives Inbreeding Depression Hybrid Vigor Outbreeding Depression 2 Darwin s Origin
More informationChapter Chemical Uniqueness 1/23/2009. The Uses of Principles. Zoology: the Study of Animal Life. Fig. 1.1
Fig. 1.1 Chapter 1 Life: Biological Principles and the Science of Zoology BIO 2402 General Zoology Copyright The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. The Uses of
More informationDarwinian Selection. Chapter 7 Selection I 12/5/14. v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution. v natural selection
Chapter 7 Selection I Selection in Haploids Selection in Diploids Mutation-Selection Balance Darwinian Selection v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution ² descent with modification ² change in allele
More informationChapter 13 Meiosis and Sexual Reproduction
Biology 110 Sec. 11 J. Greg Doheny Chapter 13 Meiosis and Sexual Reproduction Quiz Questions: 1. What word do you use to describe a chromosome or gene allele that we inherit from our Mother? From our Father?
More informationChapter 17: Population Genetics and Speciation
Chapter 17: Population Genetics and Speciation Section 1: Genetic Variation Population Genetics: Normal Distribution: a line graph showing the general trends in a set of data of which most values are near
More informationPart 2- Biology Paper 2 Inheritance and Variation Knowledge Questions
Part 2- Biology Paper 2 Inheritance and Variation Knowledge Questions AQA TRILOGY Biology (8464) from 2016 Topic T4.6 Inheritance, variation and evolution Topic Student Checklist R A G Describe features
More informationChapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity. Sunday, October 1, 17
Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity CHAPTER INTRO: The Dung of the Devil Read and Answer Questions Provided Module 14 The Biodiversity of Earth After reading this module you should be able to understand
More informationHEREDITY AND VARIATION
HEREDITY AND VARIATION OVERVIEW Students often do not understand the critical role of variation to evolutionary processes. In fact, variation is the only fundamental requirement for evolution to occur.
More informationUNIT 8 BIOLOGY: Meiosis and Heredity Page 148
UNIT 8 BIOLOGY: Meiosis and Heredity Page 148 CP: CHAPTER 6, Sections 1-6; CHAPTER 7, Sections 1-4; HN: CHAPTER 11, Section 1-5 Standard B-4: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the molecular
More informationHeredity and Evolution
CHAPTER 9 Heredity and Evolution Multiple Choice Questions 1. Exchange of genetic material takes place in (a) vegetative reproduction (b) asexual reproduction (c) sexual reproduction (d) budding 2. Two
More informationBig Idea #1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life
BIG IDEA! Big Idea #1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life Key Terms for this section: emigration phenotype adaptation evolution phylogenetic tree adaptive radiation fertility
More informationThe Origin of Species
LECTURE PRESENTATIONS For CAMPBELL BIOLOGY, NINTH EDITION Jane B. Reece, Lisa A. Urry, Michael L. Cain, Steven A. Wasserman, Peter V. Minorsky, Robert B. Jackson Chapter 24 The Origin of Species Lectures
More informationChapter 10 Sexual Reproduction and Genetics
Sexual Reproduction and Genetics Section 1: Meiosis Section 2: Mendelian Genetics Section 3: Gene Linkage and Polyploidy Click on a lesson name to select. Chromosomes and Chromosome Number! Human body
More information4. Identify one bird that would most likely compete for food with the large tree finch. Support your answer. [1]
Name: Topic 5B 1. A hawk has a genetic trait that gives it much better eyesight than other hawks of the same species in the same area. Explain how this could lead to evolutionary change within this species
More informationHomework Assignment, Evolutionary Systems Biology, Spring Homework Part I: Phylogenetics:
Homework Assignment, Evolutionary Systems Biology, Spring 2009. Homework Part I: Phylogenetics: Introduction. The objective of this assignment is to understand the basics of phylogenetic relationships
More informationChapter 14 The Origin of Species
Chapter 14 The Origin of Species PowerPoint Lectures for Biology: Concepts & Connections, Sixth Edition Campbell, Reece, Taylor, Simon, and Dickey Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture by Joan
More informationLesson 4: Understanding Genetics
Lesson 4: Understanding Genetics 1 Terms Alleles Chromosome Co dominance Crossover Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Dominant Genetic code Genome Genotype Heredity Heritability Heritability estimate Heterozygous
More informationRoadmap. Sexual Selection. Evolution of Multi-Gene Families Gene Duplication Divergence Concerted Evolution Survey of Gene Families
1 Roadmap Sexual Selection Evolution of Multi-Gene Families Gene Duplication Divergence Concerted Evolution Survey of Gene Families 2 One minute responses Q: How do aphids start producing males in the
More informationOhio Tutorials are designed specifically for the Ohio Learning Standards to prepare students for the Ohio State Tests and end-ofcourse
Tutorial Outline Ohio Tutorials are designed specifically for the Ohio Learning Standards to prepare students for the Ohio State Tests and end-ofcourse exams. Biology Tutorials offer targeted instruction,
More informationThe Origin of Species
Chapter 24 The Origin of Species PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece Lectures by Chris Romero, updated by Erin Barley with contributions from Joan Sharp
More informationEvolution - Unifying Theme of Biology Microevolution Chapters 13 &14
Evolution - Unifying Theme of Biology Microevolution Chapters 13 &14 New Synthesis Natural Selection Unequal Reproductive Success Examples and Selective Forces Types of Natural Selection Speciation http://www.biology-online.org/2/11_natural_selection.htm
More informationSpeciation and Patterns of Evolution
Speciation and Patterns of Evolution What is a species? Biologically, a species is defined as members of a population that can interbreed under natural conditions Different species are considered reproductively
More information1. The diagram below shows two processes (A and B) involved in sexual reproduction in plants and animals.
1. The diagram below shows two processes (A and B) involved in sexual reproduction in plants and animals. Which statement best explains how these processes often produce offspring that have traits not
More informationHeredity and Evolution
Heredity and Variation Heredity and Evolution Living organisms have certain recognisable heritable features such as height, complexion, colour of hair and eyes, shape of nose and chin etc. These are called
More informationChapter 11 INTRODUCTION TO GENETICS
Chapter 11 INTRODUCTION TO GENETICS 11-1 The Work of Gregor Mendel I. Gregor Mendel A. Studied pea plants 1. Reproduce sexually (have two sex cells = gametes) 2. Uniting of male and female gametes = Fertilization
More informationGENETICS - CLUTCH CH.22 EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS.
!! www.clutchprep.com CONCEPT: OVERVIEW OF EVOLUTION Evolution is a process through which variation in individuals makes it more likely for them to survive and reproduce There are principles to the theory
More informationProcesses of Evolution
Processes of Evolution Microevolution Processes of Microevolution How Species Arise Macroevolution Microevolution Population: localized group of individuals belonging to the same species with the potential
More informationNatural Selection. Population Dynamics. The Origins of Genetic Variation. The Origins of Genetic Variation. Intergenerational Mutation Rate
Natural Selection Population Dynamics Humans, Sickle-cell Disease, and Malaria How does a population of humans become resistant to malaria? Overproduction Environmental pressure/competition Pre-existing
More informationNatural Selection results in increase in one (or more) genotypes relative to other genotypes.
Natural Selection results in increase in one (or more) genotypes relative to other genotypes. Fitness - The fitness of a genotype is the average per capita lifetime contribution of individuals of that
More informationX-Sheet 3 Cell Division: Mitosis and Meiosis
X-Sheet 3 Cell Division: Mitosis and Meiosis 13 Key Concepts In this session we will focus on summarising what you need to know about: Revise Mitosis (Grade 11), the process of meiosis, First Meiotic division,
More informationSexual Reproduction. Page by: OpenStax
Sexual Reproduction Page by: OpenStax Summary Sexual reproduction was an early evolutionary innovation after the appearance of eukaryotic cells. The fact that most eukaryotes reproduce sexually is evidence
More informationEvolutionary Patterns, Rates, and Trends
Evolutionary Patterns, Rates, and Trends Macroevolution Major patterns and trends among lineages Rates of change in geologic time Comparative Morphology Comparing body forms and structures of major lineages
More informationAP Biology Evolution Review Slides
AP Biology Evolution Review Slides How would one go about studying the evolution of a tetrapod limb from a fish s fin? Compare limb/fin structure of existing related species of fish to tetrapods Figure
More informationExam 1 PBG430/
1 Exam 1 PBG430/530 2014 1. You read that the genome size of maize is 2,300 Mb and that in this species 2n = 20. This means that there are 2,300 Mb of DNA in a cell that is a. n (e.g. gamete) b. 2n (e.g.
More informationChapter 6 Meiosis and Mendel
UNIT 3 GENETICS Chapter 6 Meiosis and Mendel 1 hairy ears (hypertrichosis)- due to holandric gene. (Y chromosome)-only occurs in males. Appears in all sons. 2 Polydactyly- having extra fingers Wendy the
More informationCh. 10 Sexual Reproduction and Genetics. p
Ch. 10 Sexual Reproduction and Genetics p. 270 - 10.1 Meiosis p. 270-276 Essential Question Main Idea! Meiosis produces haploid gametes Where are the instructions for each trait located in a cell?! On
More informationMeiosis and Mendel. Chapter 6
Meiosis and Mendel Chapter 6 6.1 CHROMOSOMES AND MEIOSIS Key Concept Gametes have half the number of chromosomes that body cells have. Body Cells vs. Gametes You have body cells and gametes body cells
More informationEVOLUTION Unit 1 Part 9 (Chapter 24) Activity #13
AP BIOLOGY EVOLUTION Unit 1 Part 9 (Chapter 24) Activity #13 NAME DATE PERIOD SPECIATION SPECIATION Origin of new species SPECIES BIOLOGICAL CONCEPT Population or groups of populations whose members have
More informationUnit 7: Evolution Guided Reading Questions (80 pts total)
AP Biology Biology, Campbell and Reece, 10th Edition Adapted from chapter reading guides originally created by Lynn Miriello Name: Unit 7: Evolution Guided Reading Questions (80 pts total) Chapter 22 Descent
More information11-1 The Work of Gregor Mendel. The Work of Gregor Mendel
11-1 The Work of Gregor Mendel The Work of Gregor Mendel Gregor Mendel s Peas! Gregor Mendel s Peas Genetics is the scientific study of heredity. " Gregor Mendel was an Austrian monk. His work was important
More information(Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!)
POPULATION GENETICS AND MICROEVOLUTIONARY THEORY FINAL EXAMINATION (Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!) 1. Briefly define (5 points each): a) Average
More informationUnfortunately, there are many definitions Biological Species: species defined by Morphological Species (Morphospecies): characterizes species by
1 2 3 4 5 6 Lecture 3: Chapter 27 -- Speciation Macroevolution Macroevolution and Speciation Microevolution Changes in the gene pool over successive generations; deals with alleles and genes Macroevolution
More information5/31/2012. Speciation and macroevolution - Chapter
Speciation and macroevolution - Chapter Objectives: - Review meiosis -Species -Repro. Isolating mechanisms - Speciation -Is evolution always slow -Extinction How Are Populations, Genes, And Evolution Related?
More informationCONSERVATION AND THE GENETICS OF POPULATIONS
CONSERVATION AND THE GENETICS OF POPULATIONS FredW.Allendorf University of Montana and Victoria University of Wellington and Gordon Luikart Universite Joseph Fourier, CNRS and University of Montana With
More informationUNIT 3: GENETICS 1. Inheritance and Reproduction Genetics inheritance Heredity parent to offspring chemical code genes specific order traits allele
UNIT 3: GENETICS 1. Inheritance and Reproduction Genetics the study of the inheritance of biological traits Heredity- the passing of traits from parent to offspring = Inheritance - heredity is controlled
More information2. What is meiosis? The process of forming gametes (sperm and egg) 4. Where does meiosis take place? Ovaries- eggs and testicles- sperm
Name KEY Period Biology Review Standard 3 Main Idea Explain the significance of meiosis and fertilization in genetic variation. How I can demonstrate what a smart. Person I am 1. What is fertilization?
More informationChapter 27: Evolutionary Genetics
Chapter 27: Evolutionary Genetics Student Learning Objectives Upon completion of this chapter you should be able to: 1. Understand what the term species means to biology. 2. Recognize the various patterns
More informationName Class Date. Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Prentice Hall. 33
Chapter 11 Introduction to Genetics Chapter Vocabulary Review Matching On the lines provided, write the letter of the definition of each term. 1. genetics a. likelihood that something will happen 2. trait
More informationEVOLUTION ALGEBRA Hartl-Clark and Ayala-Kiger
EVOLUTION ALGEBRA Hartl-Clark and Ayala-Kiger Freshman Seminar University of California, Irvine Bernard Russo University of California, Irvine Winter 2015 Bernard Russo (UCI) EVOLUTION ALGEBRA 1 / 10 Hartl
More informationWhat is a sex cell? How are sex cells made? How does meiosis help explain Mendel s results?
CHAPTER 6 3 Meiosis SECTION Heredity BEFORE YOU READ After you read this section, you should be able to answer these questions: What is a sex cell? How are sex cells made? How does meiosis help explain
More informationIntroduction to Genetics
Introduction to Genetics The Work of Gregor Mendel B.1.21, B.1.22, B.1.29 Genetic Inheritance Heredity: the transmission of characteristics from parent to offspring The study of heredity in biology is
More informationLecture 14 Chapter 11 Biology 5865 Conservation Biology. Problems of Small Populations Population Viability Analysis
Lecture 14 Chapter 11 Biology 5865 Conservation Biology Problems of Small Populations Population Viability Analysis Minimum Viable Population (MVP) Schaffer (1981) MVP- A minimum viable population for
More informationis the scientific study of. Gregor Mendel was an Austrian monk. He is considered the of genetics. Mendel carried out his work with ordinary garden.
11-1 The 11-1 Work of Gregor Mendel The Work of Gregor Mendel is the scientific study of. Gregor Mendel was an Austrian monk. He is considered the of genetics. Mendel carried out his work with ordinary
More informationBiology 213 Summer 2004 Midterm III Choose the most correct answer and mark it on the scantron sheet. (2 pts each)
Biology 213 Summer 2004 Midterm III Choose the most correct answer and mark it on the scantron sheet. (2 pts each) 1. Evolution is a. a change in allele frequency in a population b. occurred in the past
More information- point mutations in most non-coding DNA sites likely are likely neutral in their phenotypic effects.
January 29 th, 2010 Bioe 109 Winter 2010 Lecture 10 Microevolution 3 - random genetic drift - one of the most important shifts in evolutionary thinking over the past 30 years has been an appreciation of
More informationBiology 110 Survey of Biology. Quizzam
1. Mendel conducted his most memorable experiments on A) peas. B) roses. C) guinea pigs. D) fruit flies. E) clones. 2. Varieties of plants in which self-fertilization produces offspring that are identical
More informationEVOLUTION. Evolution - changes in allele frequency in populations over generations.
EVOLUTION Evolution - changes in allele frequency in populations over generations. Sources of genetic variation: genetic recombination by sexual reproduction (produces new combinations of genes) mutation
More informationMechanisms of Evolution Microevolution. Key Concepts. Population Genetics
Mechanisms of Evolution Microevolution Population Genetics Key Concepts 23.1: Population genetics provides a foundation for studying evolution 23.2: Mutation and sexual recombination produce the variation
More informationQ2 (4.6) Put the following in order from biggest to smallest: Gene DNA Cell Chromosome Nucleus. Q8 (Biology) (4.6)
Q1 (4.6) What is variation? Q2 (4.6) Put the following in order from biggest to smallest: Gene DNA Cell Chromosome Nucleus Q3 (4.6) What are genes? Q4 (4.6) What sort of reproduction produces genetically
More informationTitle: WS CH 18.1 (see p ) Unit: Heredity (7.4.1) 18.1 Reading Outline p Sexual Reproduction and Meiosis
Title: WS CH 18.1 (see p.612-625) Unit: Heredity (7.4.1) 18.1 Reading Outline p. 612-625 NPD A. What is sexual reproduction? (p615) 1. _ produces an offspring when genetic materials from two different
More informationLecture WS Evolutionary Genetics Part I 1
Quantitative genetics Quantitative genetics is the study of the inheritance of quantitative/continuous phenotypic traits, like human height and body size, grain colour in winter wheat or beak depth in
More informationSolutions to Even-Numbered Exercises to accompany An Introduction to Population Genetics: Theory and Applications Rasmus Nielsen Montgomery Slatkin
Solutions to Even-Numbered Exercises to accompany An Introduction to Population Genetics: Theory and Applications Rasmus Nielsen Montgomery Slatkin CHAPTER 1 1.2 The expected homozygosity, given allele
More informationEvolution. Before You Read. Read to Learn
Evolution 15 section 3 Shaping Evolutionary Theory Biology/Life Sciences 7.e Students know the conditions for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in a population and why these conditions are not likely to appear
More informationWhat do we mean by a species? Morphological species concept. Morphological species concept BIOL2007 SPECIES AND BIODIVERSITY. Kanchon Dasmahapatra
BIOL2007 SPECIES AND BIODIVERSITY Kanchon Dasmahapatra What are species? How do species differ from each other? Biodiversity: How many species are there? What do we mean by a species? Darwin proved species
More informationInbreeding depression due to stabilizing selection on a quantitative character. Emmanuelle Porcher & Russell Lande
Inbreeding depression due to stabilizing selection on a quantitative character Emmanuelle Porcher & Russell Lande Inbreeding depression Reduction in fitness of inbred vs. outbred individuals Outcrossed
More informationThe phenotype of this worm is wild type. When both genes are mutant: The phenotype of this worm is double mutant Dpy and Unc phenotype.
Series 2: Cross Diagrams - Complementation There are two alleles for each trait in a diploid organism In C. elegans gene symbols are ALWAYS italicized. To represent two different genes on the same chromosome:
More informationGenetics (patterns of inheritance)
MENDELIAN GENETICS branch of biology that studies how genetic characteristics are inherited MENDELIAN GENETICS Gregory Mendel, an Augustinian monk (1822-1884), was the first who systematically studied
More informationThese next few slides correspond with 23.4 in your book. Specifically follow along on page Use your book and it will help you!
These next few slides correspond with 23.4 in your book. Specifically follow along on page 462-468. Use your book and it will help you! How does natural selection actually work? Natural selection acts
More information9-1 The Work of Gregor
9-1 The Work of Gregor 11-1 The Work of Gregor Mendel Mendel 1 of 32 11-1 The Work of Gregor Mendel Gregor Mendel s Peas Gregor Mendel s Peas Genetics is the scientific study of heredity. Gregor Mendel
More informationTHE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. LV NOVEMBER, 1955 No. 6 AN OUTLINE OF THE PROCESS OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION DONALD J. BORROR Department of Zoology and Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 10 THE
More informationChapter 2 Section 1 discussed the effect of the environment on the phenotype of individuals light, population ratio, type of soil, temperature )
Chapter 2 Section 1 discussed the effect of the environment on the phenotype of individuals light, population ratio, type of soil, temperature ) Chapter 2 Section 2: how traits are passed from the parents
More informationSexual Reproduction and Genetics
Chapter Test A CHAPTER 10 Sexual Reproduction and Genetics Part A: Multiple Choice In the space at the left, write the letter of the term, number, or phrase that best answers each question. 1. How many
More information1/30/2012. Review. Speciation and macroevolution - Chapter
Speciation and macroevolution - Chapter Objectives: - Review meiosis -Species -Repro. Isolating mechanisms - Speciation -Is evolution always slow -Extinction Review Meiosis: division of cells that results
More informationKEY: Chapter 9 Genetics of Animal Breeding.
KEY: Chapter 9 Genetics of Animal Breeding. Answer each question using the reading assigned to you. You can access this information by clicking on the following URL: https://drive.google.com/a/meeker.k12.co.us/file/d/0b1yf08xgyhnad08xugxsnfvba28/edit?usp=sh
More information