IEC Work on modelling Generic Model development IEC expected outcome & timeline

Transcription

1 IEC Work on modelling Generic Model development IEC 64-7 expected outcome & timeline Jens Fortmann, REpower Systems, Germany Poul Sørensen, DTU, Denmark

2 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Overview Overview IEC 64-7: Scope, Timeline IEC 64-7: Validation based on IEC 64- Three Examples of Type III / IV model development (still work in progress) Reactive Power Control Generator Model Aerodynamic Model Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen, -6-6

3 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development IEC TC 88 (Technical Committee for wind power) - list of working groups 64- Design requirements for wind turbines 64- Safety for small wind turbines 64-3 Design requirements for offshore wind turbines 64-4 Wind turbine gearboxes 64-5 Wind turbine rotor blades 64- Acoustic niose measurement techniques 64- Power performance 64-3 Measurement of mechanical loads 64- Measurement and assessment of power quality Conformity testing and certification rules and procedures 64-3 Full scale structural testing of rotor blades 64-4 Lightning protection of wind turbines 64-5 Communication Availability 64-7 Electrical simulation models for wind power generation 3 Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

4 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development purpose Part wind turbines Definition of generic terms and parameters for wind turbine models Specification of dynamic simulation models: Standard models for generic wind turbine topologies/ concepts / configurations on the market. A method to create models for future wind turbine concepts. Specification of a method for validation of wind turbine simulation models Part wind power plants Definition of generic terms and parameters for wind power plant models Specification a method to create models for wind power plants including wind turbines, auxiliary equipment and wind power plant controller. Specification of a method for validation of wind power plant simulation models 4 Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

5 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Potential users of the standard TSOs and DSOs are end users of the models, performing power system stability studies as part of the planning as well as the operation of the power systems, wind plant owners are typically responsible to provide the wind power plant models to TSO and/or DSO prior to plant commissioning, wind turbine manufacturers will typically provide the wind turbine models to the owner, developers of software for power system simulation tools will use the standard to implement standard wind power models as part of the software library, and education and research communities, who can also benefit from the generic models, as the manufacturer specific models are typically confidential. 5 Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

6 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Purpose of models IEC 64-7 models are developed to represent wind power generation in studies of large-disturbance short term voltage stability phenomena, but they will also be applicable to study other dynamic short term phenomena: Classification of power system stability according to IEEE/CIGRE Joint Task Force on Stability Terms and Definitions. ( IEEE 4) 6 Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

7 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Validation procedure limitations The validation is limited by the available tests defined by IEC 64-. These include FRT Active power setpoint control (including response to frequency-changes) Reactive power setpoint control (including voltage control) The test and measurement procedures introduce errors which limit the possible accuracy as specified in the validation procedure Validation of steady state reactive power capability is not included 7 Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

8 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development IEC 64-7 timeline Part Part 8 Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

9 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Validation: FRT Measurement setup according to IEC 64-3-phase khz or higher according to IEC 64- Calculation of positive sequenc eaccording to IEC 64- Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

10 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Validation: Filtering of measurment and simulation Measured Voltage (pu) phase - phase phase Measured Voltage (pu) phase - phase phase Measured Voltage (pu) instantaneus voltage.5 positive sequence voltage negative sequence voltage Measured Voltage (pu) instantaneus voltage.5 positive sequence voltage negative sequence voltage Simulated Voltage (pu).5 instantaneus voltage positive sequence voltage negative sequence voltage time [s] Simulated Voltage (pu).5 instantaneus voltage positive sequence voltage negative sequence voltage time [s] Both measurement and simulation have to be filtered Hz filter limit proposed as best compromise (models are not expected to be accurate beyond Hz) Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen, -6-6

11 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Why generic Models Generic models : open model structure only parameters are manufacturer dependent Advantages of generic models for the user + Fully documented model + All model components have been thoroughly tested + Clear (although not simple!), logically designed model structure + physical relationships clearly visible + Implementations available in many simulation environments + User does not have to rely on manufacturer support if the simulation system is updated to a newer version the simulation environment is replaced/extended Limits of generic models for the user Compromise between different implementations, no exact fit possible Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen, -6-6

12 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Classification of Generic Models according to electrical system Type I GB ASG C Type II GB ASG C Compensation Compensation Type III GB ASG C CH L CR MSC LSC Type IV GB SG/ ASG C CH L MSC LSC Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen, -6-6

13 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Modeling three examples of structure and physical model background Three examples: Reactive power setpoints several options DFG Generator Model - physics and Parameter calculation from data sheet Aerodynamic Model good accuracy and transparent physical structure Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

14 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Control Representation for Type III and IV : power control Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

15 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Control Representation for Type III and IV : reactive power control Options for normal operation voltage setpoint Power factor setpoint reactive power setpoint Options during FRT voltage control using table active or reactive current priority voltage dependant limitation of active and reactive current Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

16 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Control Representation: current limitation Reactive current limitation as function of voltage total turbine current limit (reactive power priority) Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

17 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development DFG Generator model: general form Turbine voltage angle term vim x WT terminal i p,ref k CP + st CI i p + st CD i re i q,ref k + i q Transformation + st CP stci CD v x term re i im -- Converter rotor -- equations -- stator -- equations Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

18 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development DFG Generator Model: calculation of Parameter z from data sheet DFG voltage and flux equations () () (3) (4) with dψ S vs = rsis + + jωψ S dt dψ R v = r i + + j( ω ω ) ψ dt R R R R R ψ = li + li S R S S h R ψ = l i + l i l S = lh + l l = l + l R h h S R R σs σr Description using current source/norton equivalent for simulation implementation by inserting (3) and (4) in () v = z i + v S S z r j l with l v = jω ψ = jω k ψ h = S + ω R lr ' l l = ls l l k h R = l R h R i v SC = z i S R R The 3rd order model for the positive sequence model is derived by setting the stator flux derivate to zero. z v S Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

19 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development DFG Generator Model: Example of Validation phase angle change Measurement and simulation of fast phase angle change Voltage angle (positive sequence) [deg] Active power (instantaneus) [pu] Active Power (positive sequence) [pu] measurement simulation time [sec] Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

20 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Physical representation: Aerodynamic Model based on partial derivatives Aerodynamic model + Suitable for partial load and full load + Allows active power reduction at higher wind speeds + Supports speed variation following grid faults and programmed inertia + Clear physical background with very limited number of parameters Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen, -6-6

21 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Aerodynamic Model: Model reduction using Taylor series cp = f ( Θ, λ) aero Blade angle v λ = = v Tip-speed ratio r r w Ω r v w Taylor-series: f ( a) f ( a) f x = f a + x a + x a +!! ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )... cpaero = cp aero cp + Θ cp ΔΘ + λ λ= const Θ= const Δλ λ, n= const Θ, v= const Θ, n= const P = P + P + P Θ n ΔΘ =Θ Θ Δ λ = λ λ with 3 PAero = ρπ R vw cp P P P Paero = P + ΔΘ+ Δ n+ Δv Θ n v Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen, -6-6 with and Change of wind speed modeled by changing P

22 -.7. IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Aerodynamic Model: Model reduction using Taylor series. Static representation. Partial derivatives 3. Partial derivatives along Power coefficient Cp of turbine rotor Change of power dp/dθ operation trajectory tip-speed-ratio λ in pu operation at low wind speeds optimum operation point operation at high wind speeds Blade angle θ in deg Power capture of turbine rotor wind speed in pu Wind speed in pu Blade angle θ in deg Wind speed in pu dp/dθ [pu/deg] -.5 dp/dθ (±. ) dp/dθ (+5 ) Blade angle θ in deg Blade angle θ in deg Change of power dp/dn Blade angle θ in deg.5 Wind speed in pu Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen, dp/dn [pu/pu] -3-4 dp/dn (±%) dp/dn (-5%)

23 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Aerodynamic Model: Comparison to cp-table at grid fault Simulation of grid fault of a MW wind turbine using the proposed aerodynamic model (blue) and comparison the simulation using a cp-table representation (green). Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

24 IEC 64-7 Generic Model development Summary Generic Models Simplified model with limited number of parameters Flexible configuration Clear physical background Fully documented and logically designed model structure Thoroughly tested components Availability in different simulation environments expected in Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,

25 Questions? REpower Systems AG All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from REpower Systems AG. Jens Fortmann, Poul Sørensen,