Electron counting with quantum dots

Transcription

1 Electron counting with quantum dots Klaus Ensslin Solid State Physics Zürich with S. Gustavsson I. Shorubalko R. Leturcq T. Ihn A. C. Gossard Time-resolved charge detection Single photon detection Time-resolved single electron interference

2 Spectroscopy of source electronic states pg k B T_ drain E C source quantum dot drain S N-1 k B T E C E D G SD (10-3 e 2 /h) N N+1 E C (+ ) V PG (mv)

3 Quantum point source contact as a charge detector pg G QPC k B T_ drain E C 2e 2 /h N-1 G SD (10-3 e 2 /h) N N+1 E C (+ ) V P M. Field et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1311 (1993) V PG (mv)

4 A few electron source quantum dot pg drain M. Sigrist

5 Detection of single electron transport source quantum dot drain k B T T e = 350 mk

6 Determination of the individual tunneling rates Exponential distribution of waiting times for independent events S =< in >, D =< out > N N+1

7 Measuring the current by counting electrons N N+1 Count number n of electrons entering the dot within a time t 0 : I = e<n>/t 0 Max. current = few fa (bandwidth = 30 khz) BUT no absolute limitation for low current and noise measurements here: I few aa, S I A 2 /Hz

8 Histogram of current fluctuations Poisson distribution for asymmetric coupling Sub-Poisson distribution for symmetric coupling Theory: Hershfield et al., PRB 47, 1967 (1993) Bagrets & Nazarov, PRB 67, (2003) Expt: Gustavsson et al., PRL 96, (2006)

9 Higher order correlations of electron transport shot noise skewness kurtosis Gustavsson et al, PRB 75, (2007)

10 Double quantum dot in a ring G1 I QPC G2 see also: electron counting in double dots: Fujisawa et al., Science 312, 1634 (2006)

11 ~khz ~GHz ~khz

12 Aharonov-Bohm with cotunneling Co-tunneling Electrons are injected from the right lead They pass through either the upper or lower arm The interference take place in the left QD

13 Double slit experiment <-> Aharonov Bohm

14 Aharonov-Bohm oscillations counts / s B - F i e l d [ m T ] huge visibility! >90% little decoherence - > due to long dwell time in the collecting dot? requires the couplings of upper and lower arm to be well symmetrized

15 Temperature dependence AB amplitude stable below T=400mK Destruction most likely due to thermal broadening

16 Double quantum dot in a ring G1 I QPC G2 characterization of tunnel rates

17 Charge stability from counting n, m + 1 n + 1, m + 1 step height n, m ms log 10 (counts) (0,1) (1,1) (0,0) (1,0) n + 1, m

18 High bias regime Counts/s sequential tunneling dot states aligned with source or drain cotunneling

19 Triangles at zero bias across dot linear scale log scale n, m+1 n,m n+1, m+1 n+1,m V QPC =300 μv

20 Different biases across the QPC Counts/s G2 [mv] The triangles grow with increasing bias G1 [mv]

21 Microwave emission of a QPC Voltage biased tunnel junction Emission spectrum Linear increase with bias Cut-off at f=ev bias /h ev bias S I ( ) = 4e2 h ev T(1 T) 1 e (ev )/k BT spectral noise density for the emission side ( > 0) R. Aguado and L. Kouwenhoven, PRL 84, 1986 (2000)

22 Tunable noise detector The detuning of the quantum dots acts as a selective frequency filter I QPC The detuning is easily changed with gate voltages R. Aguado and L. Kouwenhoven, PRL 84, 1986 (2000)

23 detector signal absorption process

24 Double dot detuning vs. QPC Level separation of the DQD dashed line: bias No counts in the region with ev QPC <! t : tunnel coupling : detuning

25 Bias dependence of the count rate Linear increase of absorption rate as soon as ev QPC >

26 Measuring the spectrum absorption rate of the DQD in the presence of the QPC: abs = 4 e2 2 t 2 Z l 2 h 2 S I ( / ) 2 : capacitive lever arm of QPC on DQD Z l : zero frequency impedance of leads connecting QPC to voltage source Clear cut-off at = ev QPC Gustavsson et al., PRL 99, (2007)

27 Single photon detection by a quantum dot quantum optics wave length of photon: 500 nm semiconductor nanostructures wave length of photon: 10 mm size of atom: 1 nm size of quantum dot: 100 nm

28 Single-photon, single-electron detection e -

29 Towards THZ photons InAs nanowire dots up to 50% detector signal Strong coupling between dot (InAs) and detector (GaAs 2DEG)

30 Time-resolved charge detection in InAs nanowire dots

31 Simon Gustavsson Thank you Renaud Leturcq Ivan Shorubalko Thomas Ihn Plans: - time resolution - correlation experiments - spin blockade - graphene