2009 NOISE MANAGEMENT REPORT. Working with our Community for a Quieter Future

Transcription

1 29 I T PT orking with our ommunity for a Quieter Future

2 T rea of esponsibility autical iles for ircraft rriving/eparting at Toronto Pearson Figure 1 Toronto Pearson International irport oise anagement Program ajor ighway I I I I ZI K J ommercial K K B KI /2 4 V 6 5 /2 B V I 42 I I B I VI T I P K otes: 1) The T is responsible for registering and responding to noise compalints within a distance of nautical miles related to aircraft arriving to or departing from Toronto Pearson. I I a I KVI KVI 2) omplaints from aircraft oeprations within nautical miles of the Toronto Pearson perimeter not operating to or from Toronto Pearson are referred to Transport anada or the related airport. s I 4T T autical iles for ircraft rriving/eparting Toronto Pearson International irport i le I I I B IT I 9T IT IT T rea of esponsibility TT IT T IPT T P V B I B I T V egional irport 1 IZ B T K xtended unway entrline KI I I I I II II F Pearson irport perating rea V V I T T I I T V TT TT I FF J TT K V T II V I KIP / unicipal Boundary V BT T I 24 / 6 1 IX I V aterbody 41 V K Industrial and esource I I K P P VI IPT I B Parks and ecreation pen rea BI V I T BI V / V I I 5 K I P I VIT I I I V FI BI IX BPT BPT K I BPT IPT I K I overnment and Institutional K 2 24 I I P T T B V V P V I I esidential F T T ajor oad VI BTTPT I ic ut ) xtended runway centrelines show the approximate flight path of arriving aircraft during final approach. The actual flight paths can vary slightly depending on wind, weather, and individual aircraft operation. al 5 4) The Pearson irport perating rea uses well-defined natural or man-made boundaries to approximate the F composite contour consisting of the 1996 and 2 F. kilometres 25 5) The source of the underlying map data is TI patial Inc. The release date is January 29. reater Toronto irports uthority trategic Planning & evelopment I July, 29 nnual Percentage of pecific ovements by ircraft Type Figure 2 25 hapter anufactured Turboprop 2 hapter ushkit perations by the irbus 2 series, the Boeing next generation (), anadair egional Jet (J) and mbraer egional Jet (J) totalled just under 5 per cent of all aircraft movements. These aircraft were all manufactured to meet hapter requirements and are among the quietest aircraft that operate at the airport. on-jet aircraft operations accounted 16 per cent of total aircraft hapterfor anufactured movements in 29. The most common turboprop aircraft operating at Turboprop Toronto Pearson was the twin engine e avilland ash 8, representing per cent of all movements at the airport. hapter ushkit 5 ircraft Type 25 B2 6 9 FFJ 28 J 8 B5 J - B B19 B6 2 erie s J/ J B Percentage of aircraft movements 8 /9/1 19 P J

3 onthly omparison of unway ovements and oise omplaints Figure 5 oise omplaints by peration Figure 4 4.% 6 5 umber of omplaints umber of ovements 25 2.% umber of omplaints 2 umber of ovements 2 ircraft epartures 6% 5 ircraft rrivals on unway perations Jan Feb ar pr ay Jun Jul ug ep ct ov ec on unway perations include I inspections, maintenance run-ups, helicopter operations and unknown sources. onthly omparison of oise omplaints and allers Figure 5 5 omplaints allers umber of omplaints 2 Jan Feb ar pr ay Jun Jul ug ep ct ov ec

4 omparison of oise omplaints by unway peration Figure 6 Total unway omplaints = 1,864 Total unway ovements = 5, P P P P P P 6 P P ote: on unway omplaints 8 missed approaches, 19 I inspections, 1 unknown. 558 P P omparison of oise Top Five allers vs. ll ther allers omplaints by unicipality Figure 8 Figure umber of omplaints (inset numbers in white correspond to complaints made by one caller) umber of allers 1% % 2.4%.2% 4.4% Brampton ississauga Toronto ther* outheast Brampton entral Brampton 69.9% outhwest ississauga Toronto orthwest ississauga ll thers

5 omparison of ircraft ovement and oise omplaints by unway peration Figure 9 IV PT unway ovements omplaints unway ovements omplaints rrive epart rrive epart rrive epart rrive 91 5 epart rrive 912 epart 558 rrive epart rrive epart rrive epart rrive epart rrive epart Total rr Total ep Total ll unways on unway omplaints * 44 Total omplaints 198 *The remaining 44 complaints were registered against missed approaches, I inspections, maintenance run-ups, helicopter operations and unknown sources. onthly nforcement Investigations Figure 5 rrivals ight epartures umber of Investigations 2 Investigations: rrival 2 ight 88 eparture ssociated with complaints: 28 Jan Feb ar pr ay Jun Jul ug ep ct ov ec