H. Yüksel, M.D. Kistler & T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, , 2009 M.D. Kistler & H. Yüksel (arxiv: )

Transcription

1 H. Yüksel, M.D. Kistler & T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, , 2009 M.D. Kistler & H. Yüksel (arxiv: ) ü

2

3 Spectra of Electrons & Positrons (Summer 2008) Primary Sources: e accelerated in supernova remnants Secondary Sources: e ± from collisions between cosmic rays & ISM protons e e + Excess Model Prediction: e + /(e +e + )

4 New Data Since Fall 2008 PAMELA ATIC Fermi HESS

5 Renewed Interest M.Pospelov and A.Ritz, : Secluded DM - A.Nelson and C.Spitzer, : Slightly Non-Minimal DM - Y.Nomura and J.Thaler, : DM through the Axion Portal - R.Harnik and G.Kribs, : Dirac DM - D.Feldman, Z.Liu, P.Nath, : Hidden Sector - T.Hambye, : Hidden Vector - Yin, Yuan, Liu, Zhang, Bi, Zhu, : Leptonically decaying DM - K.Ishiwata, S.Matsumoto, T.Moroi, : Superparticle DM - Y.Bai and Z.Han, : sued DM - P.Fox, E.Poppitz, : Leptophilic DM - C.Chen, F.Takahashi, T.T.Yanagida, : Hidden-Gauge-Boson DM - K.Hamaguchi, E.Nakamura, S.Shirai, T.T.Yanagida, : Decaying DM in Composite Messenger - E.Ponton, L.Randall, : Singlet DM - A.Ibarra, D.Tran, : Decaying DM - S.Baek, P.Ko, : U(1) Lmu-Ltau DM - C.Chen, F.Takahashi, T.T.Yanagida, : Decaying Hidden-Gauge-Boson DM - I.Cholis, G.Dobler, D.Finkbeiner, L.Goodenough, N.Weiner, : 700+ GeV WIMP - E.Nardi, F.Sannino, A.Strumia, : Decaying DM in TechniColor - K.Zurek, : Multicomponent DM - M.Ibe, H.Murayama, T.T.Yanagida, : Breit-Wigner enhancement of DM annihilation - E.Chun, J.-C.Park, : sub-gev hidden U(1) in GMSB - M.Lattanzi, J.Silk, : Sommerfeld enhancement in cold substructures - M.Pospelov, M.Trott, : super-wimps decays DM - Zhang, Bi, Liu, Liu, Yin, Yuan, Zhu, : Discrimination with SR and IC - Liu, Yin, Zhu, : DMnu from GC - M.Pohl, : electrons from DM - J.Hisano, M.Kawasaki, K.Kohri, K.Nakayama, : DMnu from GC - A.Arvanitaki, S.Dimopoulos, S.Dubovsky, P.Graham, R.Harnik, S.Rajendran, : Decaying DM in GUTs - R.Allahverdi, B.Dutta, K.Richardson-McDaniel, Y.Santoso, : SuSy B-L DM- S.Hamaguchi, K.Shirai, T.T.Yanagida, : Hidden-Fermion DM decays - D.Hooper, A.Stebbins, K.Zurek, : Nearby DM clump - C.Delaunay, P.Fox, G.Perez, : DMnu from Earth - Park, Shu, : Split- UED DM -.Gogoladze, R.Khalid, Q.Shafi, H.Yuksel, : cmssm DM with additions - Q.H.Cao, E.Ma, G.Shaughnessy, : Dark Matter: the leptonic connection - E.Nezri, M.Tytgat, G.Vertongen, : Inert Doublet DM - C.-H.Chen, C.-Q.Geng, D.Zhuridov, : Fermionic decaying DM - J.Mardon, Y.Nomura, D.Stolarski, J.Thaler, : Cascade annihilations (light non-abelian new bosons) - P.Meade, M.Papucci, T.Volansky, : DM sees the light - D.Phalen, A.Pierce, N.Weiner, : New Heavy Lepton - T.Banks, J.-F.Fortin, : Pyrma baryons - Goh, Hall, Kumar, : Leptonic Higgs - K.Bae, J.-H. Huh, J.Kim, B.Kyae, R.Viollier, : electrophilic axion Nicole F. Bell, James B. Dent, et al., arxiv: : Electroweak Bremsstrahlung in Dark Matter Annihilation Very incomplete list adopted from Cirelli

6 What About Low Energies? PAMELA Clem et al. Charge Sign Dependent Solar Modulation Burger, Bieber, Clem, Matthaeus, Pei, Stanev, Yüksel (in prep.)

7 Plan of My Talk Brief Introduction: What is this Excess? What about Dark Matter? Nearby Cosmic Accelerators Positrons from a Nearby source Beyond the Positron Excess How to test these models? Concluding Remarks Bonus Material

8

9 What to look for: Annihilating dark matter Decaying dark matter Where to look at: g-rays from Galactic Center, Galactic Halo, Dwarf Satellites, Nearby Galaxies, Cosmic sources ν s from the Sun, Galactic Halo Anti-particle spectrum measured in solar neighborhood

10 Gogoladze, Khalid, Shafi, Yuksel Fermi favors: <sv> ~ cm 3 /s cc m - m + e - e + + (Neutrinos)

11 Neutrino Limits on Dark Matter Annihilation Cross Section Even Neutrinos are overproduced Yuksel, Horiuchi, Beacom, Ando Beacom, Bell, Mack

12

13 Geminga: Radio quite First pulsar to be discovered through gamma rays Until recently, no evidence of a high energy activity beyond immediate neighborhood Displacement of up to ~100 pc since its birth is possible

14 Milagro Galactic Plane Survey

15 ~ 100 pc More Distant PWN by HESS HESS J , Aharonian et al. Distance ~ 3.9 ± 0.4 kpc Age ~ 21,400 year Energy > 10^48 erg Multi-TeV Electrons Being Measured

16 Caraveo et al. (2003) Fermi Sky Map HESS J If placed at ~200 PC

17 Implications of TeV Gamma Rays from Geminga Milagro detection puts Geminga among growing class of TeV PWNe Detection of TeV gamma rays indicates the existence of a nearby cosmic ray accelerator: If gamma rays have a leptonic origin, the source is young & close enough to make a significant contribution to CR electrons & positrons We can go beyond simply assuming pulsar s are responsible for the observed positron/electron excess

18 What Makes Positrons? Goldreich & Julian (1969) Goldreich Julian Current: Pair production multiplicity: could be > 10 4 as shown for some other sources 100 TeV electrons are needed to produce > 20 TeV gamma rays The age of Geminga: is much larger than the IC cooling time on CMB: Fresh Pair Production at the source

19 TeV Gamma Rays from Geminga De Jager Yuksel, Kistler, Stanev

20

21 Blast from the Past Assuming breaking via magnetic dipole radiation, Pulsar spin down luminosity evolves as: The injection rate of relativistic electrons and positrons by Geminga: Geminga was much stronger in the past and dominated the TeV sky: Multi-GeV positrons are reaching us today from that time

22 Diffusion According to Syrovatsky

23 Energy Losses Local Particle Density

24 Time-Dependent Propagation From a Point Source Atoyan, Aharonian & Volk (1995) Age and Energy Loss Rate Distance and Diffusion Parameterization

25 Diffusion Parameters Ptuskin et al Di Bernardo et al In units of: We focus on two parameterizations bracketing above values: Slow Diffusion: Fast Diffusion:

26 Local Bubble & Local Conditions Welsh et al. 2003

27 Accounting for the Observations by Geminga Contributions Dotted, Solid, Dashed lines correspond to Yuksel, Kistler, Stanev

28

29 Diffuse Gamma Ray Limits (>100TeV) CORSICA Photon Proton 10 TeV Muon poor fraction of the showers observed yields upper limits on diffuse gamma ray flux contributions to UHECR fluxes Casa-Mia KASCADE GRAPES

30 Electromagnetic Showers Published limits on gamma ray intensity are derived ignoring any plausible e ± contribution HESS Both gamma and e ± will initiate an electromagnetic cascade & shower Cannot differ more than one interaction length, while shower starting point already fluctuates even more Limits on diffuse gamma ray fluxes are applicable to e ± fluxes as well

31 Cosmic e ± Spectrum vs. Cosmic Ray Protons + Nuclei Cosmic Rays e ± Measurements and Limits Kistler, Yüksel

32 What Can Be Out There? Due to severe energy losses, very high energy particles cannot travel too far: 100 TeV particles cannot reach from distances larger than ~ kpc Contributions proportional to ~1/r 3 Only a few nearby sources such as Geminga, Vela X, Vela SN remnant could contribute in high energy regime For very small t and/or very high E : Superluminal problems in Syrovatsky s Solution: v dif could exceed speed of light: We do not want tachyonic particles:

33 Resolution: Diffusion According to Jüttner Motivated by similarity between Maxwell distribution and diffusion equation (e.g. review by Dunkel et al. 2007, Cubero et al. 2007, Aloisio et al. 2008) Superluminal velocities ( v > c) are forbidden Smooth transition to Diffusive regime at large t and/or small E

34 Constraints from >10 TeV Regime Kistler, Yüksel Milagro (Future HAWK) can test ~ TeV

35

36 Money Shots: Possible Solution for Excess e ± Problem Motivated by TeV Gamma Rays from Geminga Milagro Yüksel, Kistler, Stanev

37 Concluding Remarks Diffuse gamma rays limits are applicable to CR e ± Past observations already yield strong limits which can be improved even further If there is a Positive Signal in >10TeV Region: Astrophysical sources: Possibly very strong anisotropy Insisting particle theorists may need to come up with a even more exciting dark matter models If No Detection or Stronger Limits >10TeV Region: Further constraining the parameters of astrophysical scenarios which are suggested to explain PAMELA/HESS/Fermi observations