OUTLINE. Many of us secretly dream of six months without gravity COURSE DESCRIPTION

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "OUTLINE. Many of us secretly dream of six months without gravity COURSE DESCRIPTION"

Winfred Norman
5 years ago
Views:

1 GEOL OUTLINE POTENTIAL FIELD METHODS GEOL POTENTIAL FIELD METHODS Many of us secretly dream of six months without gravity Allan Fotheringham COURSE DESCRIPTION This course will examine the processing and interpretation of potential field data. Labs will focus on the processing of gridded potential field data, that is, interpolation to a grid, regional residual separation, continuation, vertical and horizontal derivatives, Werner and Euler deconvolution and depth estimates. Forward Modeling of selected profiles will be performed with GMSYS. MARKING SCHEME Mid Term Exam 25% Labs 25% Final Exam 50% The text is: Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetics Applications by Richard Blakeley. Also useful are: An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics by John Reynolds; Interpretation of Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies for Non Specialists, these are notes 1

2 for a short course given by the Canadian Geophysical Union. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics by Grant and West; Gravity and Magnetics in Oil Prospecting by Nettleton; Time Sequence Analysis in Geophysics by Kanasewich. Other literature (eg SEG extended abstracts and SAGEEP papers) will be referred to as needed. Labs and handouts are available in pdf format on PAWS SUMMARY WEEK 1 Uses of potential fields (gravity and magnetics) in geophysics. Definition of a Potential Field. The fundamental ambiguity of potential fields -its origin, and the limitations it puts on interpretation. A review of the drift correction, latitude, free air, and Bouguer corrections and how they relate to survey design. Leveling in aeromag. WEEK 2 Simple concepts of survey design, station spacing vs. target depth. Flight line and tie line spacing in aeromag. The terrain density, and the terrain correction. Methods of determining the terrain density: Nettleton, co-variance, scatterplot and others. WEEK 3 Introduction to processing. Gravity vs. magnetics in terms of targets, processing, interpretation. 1-D Fourier transforms and convolutions WEEK 4 2-D Fourier Transforms and convolutions. The use of 2-D transforms in potential fields. WEEK 5 Regional-residual separation, and anomaly separation. Graphical, spectral factorization, polynomial fitting and other techniques are discussed. WEEK 6 Gauss Theorem and the derivation of the excess mass calculation. Limitations on the excess mass, corrections for under-sampled flanks. WEEK 7 Magnetic potentials. The fundamental differences between gravity and magnetics as 2

3 potential fields. WEEK 8 Downward continuation in integral form and in FFT form. Upward continuation. Limitations on the depths or heights to which data can be continued. WEEK 9 The equivalent stratum and its use. The region of validity of equivalent strata. WEEK 10 Survey parameters and survey design. WEEK 11 Second vertical derivative, uses, examples, problems. Source depth estimates for gravity and mag. Locating the center of mass in gravity. WEEK 12 First vertical derivative and horizontal derivatives, strike filters, trend filters. Reduction to pole. WEEK 13 New methods in potential field processing and interpretation: Werner deconvolution, Euler deconvolution, fractals and potential fields. Trends in exploration, high resolution magnetics and vector magnetics, the analytic signal. LABS All Labs must be completed within one week. LAB 1 Drift corrections on mag and gravity data. Examination of repeats. All gravity (with elevations) and mag data should be on disk in a suitable format before the first LAB. LAB 2 Latitude, free air and Bouguer corrections. Profiles of all three should be presented at the end of the labs. LAB 3 Gridding and Contouring. LAB 4 Exercise on Fourier transforms I and II LAB 5 Terrain Density determination with Nettleton, scatterplots, covariance etc. LAB 6 Terrain corrections for gravity profiles. 3

4 LAB 7 Regional residual separation. LAB 8 Depth estimates. LAB 9 Gravity and Mag modeling with GM-SYS. LAB 10 DIPOLE and DIPOLE2 on MATLAB. Their use in simple modeling. LAB 11 Leveling in aeromag surveys. REFERENCES Bell, Robin, Gravity Gradiometry. Scientific American. June 98, p74. Chapin, David The theory of the Bouguer gravity anomaly. The Leading Edge, May Chapin, David, Gravity instruments: past, present and future. The Leading Edge, 17, * Cordell, L., and V.J.S. Grauch, Reconciliation of the discrete and integral Fourier transforms. Geophys. 47, No Debeglia, N. and J. Corpel 1998 Automatic 3-D interpretation of potential field data using analytic signal derivatives. Geophys. 62 No * Ebner E. Developments in potential field methods and their application to petroleum exploration in western Canada. A four part series in the Recorder, Jan, March, June, and Sept Fairhead, J.D., M Green, Denizar Blitzkow, 2003, The use of GPS in gravity surveys. The Leading Edge, 22, No 10, p Grauch, V.J.S., and Campbell, Does draping aeromagnetic data reduce terrain induced effects? Geophysics 49,

5 LaCoste, L A new calibration method for gravity meters, Geophys. 56, # LaCoste, L Gravity meter calibration at LaCoste and Romberg, Geophysics, 56, # * LeFehr, T.R., Standardization in gravity reduction, Geophysics, 56, LeFehr, T.R., An exact solution for the gravity curvature, Geophysics, 56, # Fedi, M. T. Quarta, and A. DeSantis, Inherent power law behaviour of magnetic field power spectra from a Spector and Grant ensemble, Geophys, 63 No Ferris, C., Gravity anomaly resolution at the Garber field. Geophys 52, No Grant, F.S., Review of data processing and interpretation methods in gravity and magnetics Geophysics, 37, Grauch V.J.S., Limitations on digital filtering of the DNAG magnetic data set for the conterminous US. Geophys. 58, # Gupta, V.K. and Ramain N Some aspects of regional residual separation of gravity anomalies in a precambrian terrain. Geophysics, Hammer, S., Critique of terrain corrections for gravity stations. Geophys. 47, Hammer, S., Terrain corrections for gravimeter stations. Geophys. 4, Hinze, W.J., Bouguer Reduction Density, why 2.67? Geophysics 56,No Jackson, B.H., A case for upward continuation as a standard separation filter for potential field maps, Geophysics, 52, No

6 Negi J.G., Convergence and divergence in downward continuation. Geophysics, 32, Nettleton, L.L., Regionals, residuals and structures Geophys 19, Nowell, D.A.G., Gravity Terrain Corrections - An Overview, J. Appl. Geophys. 42, Pilkington, M., and W.R. Roest, Draping aeromagnetic data in areas of rugged topography. J. Appl. Geophys. 29, Pilkington, M. and W. Roest, Removing varying directional trends from aeromagnetic data. Geophys. 63 No Ander, M.E LaCoste&Romberg gravity meter: System Analysis and Instrumental Errors, Geophys, 64, N Rauth,M., and T. Strohmer, Smooth approximation of potential fields from noisy scattered data. Geophys. 63. No * Rymer, H A contribution to precision microgravity data analysis using Lacoste Romberg gravity meters. Geophys. Jour. 89, Xia, J., D.R. Sprowl, and D. Adkins-Heljeson, Correction of topographic distortions in potential-field data: A fast and accurate approach, Geophysics, 58, # Also, the Geological Survey of Canada, publishes summaries of papers by its staff on the WWW. The Regional Geophysics Section has a list of several topical summaries. * THESE ARE VERY IMPORTANT AND YOU SHOULD READ THEM. 6

Introduction to the use of gravity measurements in Ge111A

Introduction to the use of gravity measurements in Ge111A Background & basic intuition Data reduction Use of the instrument See Reynolds for detailed quantitative discussion What and Why Gravity measures