APPENDIX G. Section 10. Outfall 009, December 7, 2009 Test America Analytical Laboratory Report

Transcription

1 APPENDIX G Section 10 Outfall 009, December 7, 2009 Test America Analytical Laboratory Report NPDES Page 448 of 1088

2 NPDES Page 449 of 1088

3 NPDES Page 450 of 1088

4 NPDES Page 451 of 1088

5 NPDES Page 452 of 1088

6 NPDES Page 453 of 1088

7 NPDES Page 454 of 1088

8 NPDES Page 455 of 1088

9 NPDES Page 456 of 1088

10 NPDES Page 457 of 1088

11 NPDES Page 458 of 1088

12 NPDES Page 459 of 1088

13 NPDES Page 460 of 1088

14 NPDES Page 461 of 1088

15 NPDES Page 462 of 1088

16 NPDES Page 463 of 1088

17 NPDES Page 464 of 1088

18 NPDES Page 465 of 1088

19 NPDES Page 466 of 1088

20 NPDES Page 467 of 1088

21 NPDES Page 468 of 1088

22 NPDES Page 469 of 1088

23 NPDES Page 470 of 1088

24 NPDES Page 471 of 1088

25 NPDES Page 472 of 1088

26 NPDES Page 473 of 1088

27 NPDES Page 474 of 1088

28 NPDES Page 475 of 1088

29 NPDES Page 476 of 1088

30 NPDES Page 477 of 1088

31 NPDES Page 478 of 1088

32 NPDES Page 479 of 1088

33 NPDES Page 480 of 1088

34 NPDES Page 481 of 1088

35 NPDES Page 482 of 1088

36 NPDES Page 483 of 1088

37 . Test America Version 6/29/09 CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Page 1 of 2 Client Name/Address: Project: MWH-Arcadia Boeing-SSFL NPDES ANALYSIS REQUIRED 618 Michillinda Ave, Suite 200 Semi-Annual Outfall 009 /../ Arcadia, CA GRAB Field readings: Stormwater at WS-13 Test America Contact: Joseph Doak I Project Manager: Bronwyn Kelly Phone Number:..t (626) Sampler: $ :bca...ws~v-. Fax Number: co (626) ~ (9 Sample Sample Container #of Sampling o/l Description Matrix Type Cant. DatelTime r R;;iH~ Preservative Bottle # Outfall 009 W 1LAmber 2 17.tl/"'i - \\ \'Z.. HCI 1A,1B ( X I I I-... ~ LJ.J <0 <0 ~ <ll <fj Temp of = 4to-" ph = ". >~ Time of readings = \ \ \"2- (5 Comments r t ~ These Samples are the Grab Portion of Outfall 009 for thisfttorm event. Compo~ samples will follow and are to be added to this work order. DatelTime: ~7luJ&~'-M/J:)) Turn-around time: (Check) 11./,./&7J 1):3f ~our: 72 Hour: 10Day: ~ I A 48 Hour: 5 Day: Normal: Relinq ~l:b;h~. ~ DatelTime: vjrl{jlttrv;f//1z. ""5~B~~;;;~:~ f-f1 (?<>r' 't7ss 1111'2~ Sample Integrity: ( heck) Intact: On Ice: )< 3~be.-. RelinrUiShed By V DatelTime: Received By DatelTime: ~ Data Requirements: (Check) No Level IV: All Level IV: NPDES Level IV: L ~... NPDES Page 484 of 1088

38 I est AmenCa Version 6/29/09 CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM. Client Name/Address: MWH-Arcadia 618 Michillinda Ave, Suite 200 Arcadia, CA Test America Contact: Joseph Doak Project Manager: Bronwyn Kelly Sampler: s: "i0. '-"l$ 0""- Sample Sample Container Description Matrix Type Outfall 009 W 1L Poly I Outfall 009 Dup W 1L Poly Outfall 009 W 1L Amber W 500 ml Poly 500 ml Poly 2.5 Gal Cube #01 Cont. Project: Boeing-SSFL NPDES.,~ISemi-Annual Outfall 009 eomp@8ite G"RV\~ Stormwater at WS-13 ;-j\z/'l'r'''''\wz.f HNO a 1 HNO a mlamber I 1 W 1 Gal Poly I 1 W 1L Poly I 1 Phone Number: (626) 568~6691 Fax Number: (626) Sampling Date/Time Preservative None None None None None None. None Bottle # 2A J1 2B 3A, 3B ~ 4A,4B 5-6A _,. 6B _ 7 of- 8 / /.0 a. I i / U. -e.$ U IE.0 0 C/) ::c iii f:: f! III "iii III a. (j) <:: ",- " III ~ 01 III <:: Ill'. III ~ / " ~ :0 0 0 u IE z "iii +,., > "0 0 0 u <:: z 0::_ 79 r-.. C/) 8 o 01 U...'- I-I I- U X - X X d X ".' I,' / C/) o I- X ~~ ~~ ~~;;jc;: o - 0 eo ecf~g rnloo_ (j)~~e OJ-M ~_ ~~ g'~ :: ol.!.-'-o,'n C/) CD ::> Ol v..n..~ "'-::'SNSO ~gg;g~ o Ol.- Ol 0 0'> -~-O) rom'ct:'o;':- :9-i~~~ ~E]gch :g:@ E:OU....'I:: 0 ro 0 <.9I-UO::... X ~ 'Lj 'x :=. u 'c e.s:: U X 5:- ANALYSIS REQUIRED <3 I,.' <3 /" tj- / iii 2 III ~ "0 ~ ooj).!!l o "iiii= 00; I-I X " (,~~ ~ 72 Hour 5 Day: 1- J +'J,'t': (2(7/ ex:; ;7:~1~~:;le 1~/cheCk) On Ice: X ualemme.; Received By Date/Time: Data Requirements:(Check) No Level IV: _ All Level IV: _ Page 2 of 2 I \-\-0 L \> \j\a \:-",\ ~ 0\-"\ ~\ e:-j Comments \--\-OL\) I\LL Unfiltered and unpreserved analysis nly test if first or second rain events of the year ~Iter w/in 24hrs of receipt at lab 10 Day: _ Normal: X 3,~UV.-::tt l ;2v NPDESLevel IV: ~ J NPDES Page 485 of 1088

39 I C;:)L/"'\Illt::lll,;d Version 6/29109 Client Name/Address: MWH-Arcadia 618 Michillinda Ave, Suite 200 Arcadia, CA :it> Test America Contact Joseph Doak Project: Boeing-SSFL NPDES I~i A""t1ttl-Outfall 009 GRAB KClUTI""~ Stormwater at WS-13 CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM /, ANALYSIS REQUIRED Page 1 of 2 Fie.ld readings: Project Manager: Bronwyn Kelly Sampler: '$»"",,w S e.v-. Sample I Sample I Contailler Description Matrix Type Outfall = w 1LAmber I---::: " ot. ConI, Phone Number: (626) Fax Number: (626) Sampling DatefTime 2 117,/lfcc\..\\\z.. r--= Praserv~tj\(e Hel ---r Bottle 1# ~ I.U J: ~to,... <U III ~ Ci 00 <5 la,1b t I X = J j----t-- --t--- Temp of.:: "'\ t;,. ~. ph= I,t;. /.. ~ C 0 Time of readings = \\\"Z.. Comments -- ~.t,., ~I'-..,...1'-... Relinquished By DalefTime: 7ZlJ!H1l;l?tc 'L("/&J1 I):); 72Hou,,_ 10Day.-X_ Relinquished By Daterrime: 5 Day: Normal: Relinquished By Daterrime: Received 8y DalefTime: Sample Integrity: (Check) Inlact. Onl;c.e: X Dala Requiremonts (Chock) No Lovel IV: All le'lol IV: NPDES Level IV: L NPDES Page 486 of 1088

40 I est America Version 6/29/09 CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Client Name/Address: : Project: I MWH-Arcadia ANALYSIS REQUIRED Boei~;~;.~DES,/ ~~\)-\W,t,Q ;' -<>(S 618 Michillinda Ave, Suite 200 'iv.~i.,putfall './..s._,x: ~(! R~"":,S.l:i '4 I I Page 2 of 2 Arcadia, CA GeMPQilI"Fli G 'li?.1a.. il. Slormwater at WS-13 8,-:8: co ::i ('3 / "'0"'0 -- 0') () Test America Contact: Joseph Doak ro U10-,Q '.i /' r.n Qi~oE MeL () OJ-M::J_,/ ~ (/'100 ''::T'"'' ij ~ ~.I / iii ~'2e~c; III iu c: "CIllO::>", u; \.Jv.~', \ :::E OJ Z.C'.I ~'- Project Manager: Bronwyn Kelly Cl iii Phone Number: ~SNOO III c: () a; 0 :a tcie';:c! \~ (;,\-', \\ 0:"_ ~) u z ~ :::E (626) l:! + g~.a~5 'ij "0 III iii ~--g-m ';( OJ,Sampler: S' t'j.,~.$" "'" Fax Number: :- "0 0 :- 0 0 u c: Z <5.E-J:"~C') I- <Il (626) III 0:_!!!. <C-~E"T u,!q Sample Sample Container g 0_ ~ Jill-, '" oil E :c :::> CIl #of Sampling Description a CIl '" ::l E.- () Malrix Type COni. e :i! 1-. Dale/Time Preservatfve BoUie #I o OJ () \,: 0 e:eo~c:i.c o Cl I-J: I- () I- "l-llo:.. II I-J: Ouifall009 W Comments IL Poly 1 \7;/110'\' \\\,z. HNO, 2A X " \-\-OL \) Outfall 009 Oup W ll Poly 1 HNO, 26 X Outfall 009 W 1lAmber 2 None 3A, 38 ~ X "'\ ~\LL Outfall 009 W 500 ml Poly 2 None 4A, 4B X Outfall 009 W 500 ml Poly 1 None 5 - X Outfall 009 W 2,5 Gal Cube 1 None 5A -, 500 ml Amoor 1 None 68 "'- OUlfall009 W 1 Gal Poly 1 None, 7 Outfall 009 W 1L Poly 1 ""'.. None 8. X Unfll'lored and \Jnpros'l;)~'"\'l:~d analysis X nly lost II Orst or second rain e.. ents of U,e vear X ~lter w/in 24hrs of receipt at lab {:.~~ \S COC Page 2 of 2 a.re samples for Outfall 009 for this storm event. Tilese must be added ta tile fia~e work 'order for COC Page 1 'of 2 fer Outfall 009 for the same event. ~7J;~i!7'J'll~--"'~;1;7~t :~I~ Ttlm.aroun<llime, (Check) ~~._ 72 Hou~ 10Day:. If:}s ~~N'I Pi ~8 Hour: 5 Day:.. _ Helinquished By Normal: X DalelTima: Re aived By -...:;,. poalemme: i Samplo Integrity (Check) Inlact Relintjuished By Onlee: X Dale/Time: Received By Date/Time: Dala RequilOmams: (ClleCk) No LevollV: Allte'l"IIV NPOES LC'IoIIV: ~C?o::co;::-, NPDES Page 487 of 1088

41 NPDES Page 488 of 1088

42 NPDES Page 489 of 1088

43 NPDES Page 490 of 1088

44 NPDES Page 491 of 1088

45 NPDES Page 492 of 1088

46 NPDES Page 493 of 1088

47 NPDES Page 494 of 1088

48 NPDES Page 495 of 1088

49 NPDES Page 496 of 1088

50 NPDES Page 497 of 1088

51 NPDES Page 498 of 1088

52 NPDES Page 499 of 1088

53 NPDES Page 500 of 1088

54 NPDES Page 501 of 1088

55 NPDES Page 502 of 1088

56 NPDES Page 503 of 1088

57 NPDES Page 504 of 1088

58 Lot # D9L Report Cover Page... 1 Case Narrative... 2 Executive Summary - Detection Highlights... 4 Methods Summary... 5 Method / Analyst Summary... 6 Sample Summary... 7 QC Data Association Summary... 8 Metals Forms... 9 Metals Forms (cont.) Sample Receipt Documents Chain of Custody Supporting Documentation Mercury Metals Raw Data Total Number of Pages in this Package NPDES Page 505 of 1088

59 TestAmerica 1 NPDES Page 506 of 1088

60 TestAmerica 2 NPDES Page 507 of 1088

61 TestAmerica 3 NPDES Page 508 of 1088

62 TestAmerica 4 NPDES Page 509 of 1088

63 TestAmerica 5 NPDES Page 510 of 1088

64 TestAmerica 6 NPDES Page 511 of 1088

65 TestAmerica 7 NPDES Page 512 of 1088

66 TestAmerica 8 NPDES Page 513 of 1088

67 TestAmerica 9 NPDES Page 514 of 1088

68 TestAmerica 10 NPDES Page 515 of 1088

69 TestAmerica 11 NPDES Page 516 of 1088

70 TestAmerica 12 NPDES Page 517 of 1088

71 TestAmerica 13 NPDES Page 518 of 1088

72 TestAmerica 14 NPDES Page 519 of 1088

73 TestAmerica 15 NPDES Page 520 of 1088

74 TestAmerica 16 NPDES Page 521 of 1088

75 TestAmerica 17 NPDES Page 522 of 1088

76 TestAmerica 18 NPDES Page 523 of 1088

77 TestAmerica 19 NPDES Page 524 of 1088

78 TestAmerica 20 NPDES Page 525 of 1088

79 TestAmerica 21 NPDES Page 526 of 1088

80 TestAmerica 22 NPDES Page 527 of 1088

81 TestAmerica 23 NPDES Page 528 of 1088

82 TestAmerica 24 NPDES Page 529 of 1088

83 TestAmerica 25 NPDES Page 530 of 1088

84 TestAmerica 26 NPDES Page 531 of 1088

85 TestAmerica 27 NPDES Page 532 of 1088

86 TestAmerica 28 NPDES Page 533 of 1088

87 TestAmerica 29 NPDES Page 534 of 1088

88 TestAmerica 30 NPDES Page 535 of 1088

89 TestAmerica 31 NPDES Page 536 of 1088

90 TestAmerica 32 NPDES Page 537 of 1088

91 TestAmerica 33 NPDES Page 538 of 1088

92 TestAmerica 34 NPDES Page 539 of 1088

93 TestAmerica 35 NPDES Page 540 of 1088

94 TestAmerica 36 NPDES Page 541 of 1088

95 TestAmerica 37 NPDES Page 542 of 1088

96 TestAmerica 38 NPDES Page 543 of 1088

97 TestAmerica 39 NPDES Page 544 of 1088

98 TestAmerica 40 NPDES Page 545 of 1088

99 TestAmerica 41 NPDES Page 546 of 1088

100 TestAmerica 42 NPDES Page 547 of 1088

101 TestAmerica 43 NPDES Page 548 of 1088

102 TestAmerica 44 NPDES Page 549 of 1088

103 TestAmerica 45 NPDES Page 550 of 1088

104 TestAmerica 46 NPDES Page 551 of 1088

105 TestAmerica 47 NPDES Page 552 of 1088

106 TestAmerica 48 NPDES Page 553 of 1088

107 TestAmerica 49 NPDES Page 554 of 1088

108 TestAmerica 50 NPDES Page 555 of 1088

109 TestAmerica 51 NPDES Page 556 of 1088

110 TestAmerica 52 NPDES Page 557 of 1088

111 TestAmerica 53 NPDES Page 558 of 1088

112 TestAmerica 54 NPDES Page 559 of 1088

113 TestAmerica 55 NPDES Page 560 of 1088

114 TestAmerica 56 NPDES Page 561 of 1088

115 TestAmerica 57 NPDES Page 562 of 1088

116 TestAmerica 58 NPDES Page 563 of 1088

117 TestAmerica 59 NPDES Page 564 of 1088

118 TestAmerica 60 NPDES Page 565 of 1088

119 TestAmerica 61 NPDES Page 566 of 1088

120 TestAmerica 62 NPDES Page 567 of 1088

121 TestAmerica 63 NPDES Page 568 of 1088

122 TestAmerica 64 NPDES Page 569 of 1088

123 TestAmerica 65 NPDES Page 570 of 1088

124 TestAmerica 66 NPDES Page 571 of 1088

125 TestAmerica 67 NPDES Page 572 of 1088

126 TestAmerica 68 NPDES Page 573 of 1088

127 TestAmerica 69 NPDES Page 574 of 1088

128 TestAmerica 70 NPDES Page 575 of 1088

129 TestAmerica 71 NPDES Page 576 of 1088

130 TestAmerica 72 NPDES Page 577 of 1088

131 TestAmerica 73 NPDES Page 578 of 1088

132 TestAmerica 74 NPDES Page 579 of 1088

133 TestAmerica 75 NPDES Page 580 of 1088

134 TestAmerica 76 NPDES Page 581 of 1088

135 TestAmerica 77 NPDES Page 582 of 1088

136 TestAmerica 78 NPDES Page 583 of 1088

137 TestAmerica 79 NPDES Page 584 of 1088

138 NPDES Page 585 of 1088

139 NPDES Page 586 of 1088

140 NPDES Page 587 of 1088

141 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 588 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 1 of 15

142 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 589 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 2 of 15

143 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 590 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 3 of 15

144 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 591 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 4 of 15

145 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 592 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 5 of 15

146 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 593 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 6 of 15

147 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 594 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 7 of 15

148 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 595 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 8 of 15

149 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 596 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 9 of 15

150 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 597 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 10 of 15

151 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 598 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 11 of 15

152 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 599 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 12 of 15

153 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 600 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 13 of 15

154 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 601 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 14 of 15

155 TestAmerica St. Louis NPDES Page 602 of 1088 Lot F9L ISL0771 Revised-2 15 of 15

156 APPENDIX G Section 11 Outfall 010, October 14, 2009 MECX Data Validation Report NPDES Page 603 of 1088

157 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Boeing SSFL NPDES SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP: ISJ1376 Prepared by MEC X, LP East Vassar Drive Aurora, CO NPDES Page 604 of 1088

158 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 I. INTRODUCTION Task Order Title: Boeing SSFL NPDES Contract Task Order: D.00 Sample Delivery Group: ISJ1376 Project Manager: B. Kelly Matrix: Water QC Level: IV No. of Samples: 1 No. of Reanalyses/Dilutions: 0 Laboratory: TestAmerica-Irvine Table 1. Sample Identification Client ID Laboratory ID Sub-Laboratory ID Matrix Collected Method Outfall 010 ISJ , F9J , D9J Water 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM 1613, 245.1, 900, 901.1, 903.0, 904, 905, 906.0, ASTM II. Sample Management No anomalies were observed regarding sample management. The samples in this SDG were received at TestAmerica-Irvine within the temperature limits of 4 C ±2 C. The sample for the Method 1613 analysis was received below the temperature limits at Vista and TestAmerica- Denver; however, the sample was not noted to be frozen or damaged. The sample was received at ambient temperature at TestAmerica-St. Louis; however, due to the nonvolatile nature of the analytes, no qualifications were required. According to the case narrative for this SDG, the samples were received intact, on ice, and properly preserved, if applicable. The COCs were appropriately signed and dated by field and/or laboratory personnel. As the samples were transported by courier to TestAmerica-Irvine and Vista, custody seals were not required. Custody seals were intact at TestAmerica-Denver and TestAmerica-St. Louis. If necessary, the client ID was added to the sample result summary by the reviewer. 1 Revision 1 NPDES Page 605 of 1088

159 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 Data Qualifier Reference Table Qualifier Organics Inorganics U J N NJ UJ R The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. The associated value is the quantitation limit or the estimated detection limit for dioxins or PCB congeners. The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample. The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence to make a "tentative identification." The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte that has been "tentatively identified" and the associated numerical value represents its approximate concentration. The analyte was not deemed above the reported sample quantitation limit. However, the reported quantitation limit is approximate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely measure the analyte in the sample. The data are unusable. The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and to meet quality control criteria. The presence or absence of the analyte cannot be verified. The material was analyzed for, but was not detected above the level of the associated value. The associated value is either the sample quantitation limit or the sample detection limit. The associated value is the sample detection limit or the quantitation limit for perchlorate only. The associated value is an estimated quantity. Not applicable. Not applicable. The material was analyzed for, but was not detected. The associated value is an estimate and may be inaccurate or imprecise. The data are unusable. The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and to meet quality control criteria. The presence or absence of the analyte cannot be verified. 2 Revision 1 NPDES Page 606 of 1088

160 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 Qualification Code Reference Table Qualifier Organics Inorganics H Holding times were exceeded. Holding times were exceeded. S C Surrogate recovery was outside QC limits. Calibration %RSD or %D was noncompliant. The sequence or number of standards used for the calibration was incorrect Correlation coefficient is < R Calibration RRF was <0.05. %R for calibration is not within control limits. B L Q Presumed contamination as indicated by the preparation (method) blank results. Laboratory Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate %R was not within control limits. MS/MSD recovery was poor or RPD high. Presumed contamination as indicated by the preparation (method) or calibration blank results. Laboratory Control Sample %R was not within control limits. MS recovery was poor. E Not applicable. Duplicates showed poor agreement. I Internal standard performance was ICP ICS results were unsatisfactory. unsatisfactory. A Not applicable. ICP Serial Dilution %D were not within control limits. M Tuning (BFB or DFTPP) was Not applicable. noncompliant. T Presumed contamination as indicated Not applicable. by the trip blank results. + False positive reported compound Not applicable. was not present. - False negative compound was Not applicable. present but not reported. F Presumed contamination as indicated by the FB or ER results. Presumed contamination as indicated by the FB or ER results. $ Reported result or other information was incorrect.? TIC identity or reported retention time has been changed. Reported result or other information was incorrect. Not applicable. 3 Revision 1 NPDES Page 607 of 1088

161 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 Qualification Code Reference Table Cont. D P DNQ *II, *III The analysis with this flag should not be used because another more technically sound analysis is available. Instrument performance for pesticides was poor. The reported result is above the method detection limit but is less than the reporting limit. Unusual problems found with the data that have been described in Section II, "Sample Management," or Section III, "Method Analyses." The number following the asterisk (*) will indicate the report section where a description of the problem can be found. The analysis with this flag should not be used because another more technically sound analysis is available. Post Digestion Spike recovery was not within control limits. The reported result is above the method detection limit but is less than the reporting limit. Unusual problems found with the data that have been described in Section II, "Sample Management," or Section III, "Method Analyses." The number following the asterisk (*) will indicate the report section where a description of the problem can be found. 4 Revision 1 NPDES Page 608 of 1088

162 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 III. Method Analyses A. EPA METHOD 1613 Dioxin/Furans Reviewed By: L. Calvin Date Reviewed: November 24, 2009 The sample listed in Table 1 for this analysis was validated based on the guidelines outlined in the MEC X Data Validation Procedure for Dioxins and Furans (DVP-19, Rev. 0), USEPA Method 1613, and the National Functional Guidelines Chlorinated Dioxin/Furan Data Review (9/05). Holding Times: Extraction and analytical holding times were met. The water sample was extracted and analyzed within one year of collection. Instrument Performance: Instrument performance criteria were met. Following are findings associated with instrument performance. o o GC Column Performance: A Windows Defining Mix (WDM) containing the first and last eluting congeners of each descriptor and isomer specificity compounds was not analyzed prior to the initial calibration sequence or at the beginning of each analytical sequence; however, the first and last eluting congeners and isomer specificity compounds were added to the midpoint of the initial calibration and to the continuing calibration standards. The GC column performance in the calibrations was acceptable, with the height of the valley between the closely eluting isomers and 2,3,7,8-TCDD reported as less than 25%. Mass Spectrometer Performance: The mass spectrometer performance was acceptable with the static resolving power greater than 10,000. Calibration: Calibration criteria were met. o o Initial Calibration: Initial calibration criteria were met. The initial calibration was acceptable with %RSDs 20% for the 16 native compounds (calibration by isotope dilution) and 35% for the one native and all labeled compounds (calibration by internal standard). The relative retention times and ion abundance ratios were within the Method 1613 QC limits for all standards. Continuing Calibration: Calibration verification (VER) consisted of a mid-level standard (CS3) analyzed at the beginning of each analytical sequence. The VERs were acceptable with the concentrations within the acceptance criteria listed in Table 6 of EPA Method The ion abundance ratios and relative retention times were within the method QC limits. Blanks: The method blank had no target compound detects above the EDL. One peak in the blank reported as an EMPC for total HpCDD was also present in sample Outfall Revision 1 NPDES Page 609 of 1088

163 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 and reported as part of the total HpCDD result. The sample result was qualified as estimated, J. Blank Spikes and Laboratory Control Samples: OPR recoveries were within the acceptance criteria listed in Table 6 of Method Field QC Samples: Field QC samples were evaluated, and if necessary, qualified based on method blanks and other laboratory QC results affecting the usability of the field QC data. Any remaining detects were used to evaluate the associated site samples. Following are findings associated with field QC samples: o o Field Blanks and Equipment Rinsates: This SDG had no identified field blank or equipment rinsate samples. Field Duplicates: There were no field duplicate samples identified for this SDG. Internal Standards Performance: The labeled standard recoveries were within the acceptance criteria listed in Table 7 of Method Compound Identification: Compound identification was verified. The laboratory analyzed for polychlorinated dioxins/furans by EPA Method Compound Quantification and Reported Detection Limits: Compound quantitation was verified by recalculating any sample detects and a representative number of blank spike concentrations. The laboratory calculated and reported compound-specific detection limits. No target compound results were reported as EMPCs by the laboratory. The laboratory does not include EMPCs in the results reported for totals; therefore, no totals were qualified for EMPCs. Any detects between the estimated detection limit (EDL) and the reporting limit (RL) were qualified as estimated, J, and coded with DNQ, in order to comply with the NPDES permit. Nondetects are valid to the estimated detection limit (EDL). B. EPA METHOD Mercury Reviewed By: P. Meeks Date Reviewed: November 23, 2009 The sample listed in Table 1 for this analysis were validated based on the guidelines outlined in the MEC X Data Validation Procedure for Metals (DVP-5, Rev. 0 and DVP-21, Rev. 0), EPA Method 245.1, and the National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review (7/02). Holding Times: The analytical holding times 28 days for mercury, was met. Tuning: Not applicable to this analysis. 6 Revision 1 NPDES Page 610 of 1088

164 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 Calibration: Calibration criteria were met. The mercury initial calibration r 2 value was and all initial and continuing calibration recoveries were within %. Blanks: Mercury was reported in a CCB bracketing the total mercury analysis at µg/l; therefore, nondetected total mercury in the sample was qualified as estimated, UJ. Method blanks and CCBs had no other detects. Interference Check Samples: Not applicable to this analysis. Blank Spikes and Laboratory Control Samples: Recoveries were within laboratoryestablished QC limits. Laboratory Duplicates: No laboratory duplicate analyses were performed on the sample in this SDG. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate: MS/MSD analyses were performed on the sample in this SDG. All recoveries were below the control limit; therefore, nondetected total and dissolved mercury in the sample were qualified as estimated, UJ. The total RPD exceeded the control limit; nondetected total mercury in the sample was qualified as estimated, UJ. Serial Dilution: No serial dilution analyses were performed on the sample in this SDG. Internal Standards Performance: Not applicable to this analysis. Sample Result Verification: Calculations were verified and the sample results reported on the sample result summary were verified against the raw data. No transcription errors or calculation errors were noted. Any detects between the method detection limit and the RL were qualified as estimated, J, and coded with DNQ, in order to comply with the NPDES permit. Reported nondetects are valid to the MDL. Field QC Samples: Field QC samples were evaluated, and if necessary, qualified based on method blanks and other laboratory QC results affecting the usability of the field QC data. Any remaining detects were used to evaluate the associated site samples. Following are findings associated with field QC samples: o o Field Blanks and Equipment Rinsates: This SDG had no identified field blank or equipment rinsate samples. Field Duplicates: There were no field duplicate samples identified for this SDG. 7 Revision 1 NPDES Page 611 of 1088

165 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 C. VARIOUS EPA METHODS Radionuclides Reviewed By: P. Meeks Date Reviewed: December 3, 2009 The samples listed in Table 1 for these analyses were validated based on the guidelines outlined in the EPA Methods 900.0, 901.1, 903.1, 904.0, 905.0, 906.0, and ASTM Method D-5174, and the National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review (10/04). Holding Times: The tritium sample was analyzed within 180 days of collection. Aliquots for gross alpha and gross beta and gamma spectroscopy were prepared one day beyond the five-day analytical holding time for unpreserved samples; therefore, results for these analytes were qualified as estimated, J, for detects and, UJ, for nondetects.. Aliquots for radium-226, radium-228, strontium-90, and total uranium gamma spectroscopy were prepared within the five-day holding time for unpreserved aqueous samples. Calibration: The laboratory calibration information included the standard certificates and applicable preparation/dilutions logs for NIST-traceability. The gross alpha detector efficiency was less than 20%; therefore, nondetected gross alpha in the sample was qualified as estimated, UJ. The gross beta detector efficiency was greater than 20%. The tritium aliquot was spiked for efficiency determination; therefore, no calibration was necessary. The tritium, strontium, and radium-228 detector efficiency for the sample was at least 20% and was considered acceptable. The strontium chemical yield was at least 90% and was considered acceptable. Tha radium-226 and radium-228 barium chemical yields were at least 65% and were considered acceptable. The radium-228 tracer, yttrium oxalate, yield was approximately 100%. The gamma spectroscopy analytes were determined at the maximum photopeak energy. The kinetic phosphorescence analyzer (KPA) was calibrated immediately prior to the sample analysis. All KPA calibration check standard recoveries were within % and were deemed acceptable. Blanks: Strontium was detected in the method blank at 0.47 pci/l but was not detected in the site sample. There were no other analytes detected in the method blanks. Blank Spikes and Laboratory Control Samples: The recoveries and uranium, strontium, radium-226, and radium-228 RPDs were within laboratory-established control limits. Laboratory Duplicates: No laboratory duplicate analyses were performed on the sample in this SDG. 8 Revision 1 NPDES Page 612 of 1088

166 DATA VALIDATION REPORT Project: SSFL NPDES SDG:ISJ1376 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate: No MS/MSD analyses were performed for the sample in this SDG. Method accuracy and precision was evaluated based on the LCS/LCSD results. Sample Result Verification: An EPA Level IV review was performed for the sample in this data package. The sample results and MDAs reported on the sample result form were verified against the raw data and no calculation or transcription errors were noted. Any detects between the MDA and the RL were qualified as estimated, J, and coded with DNQ, in order to comply with the NPDES permit. Reported nondetects are valid to the MDA. Field QC Samples: Field QC samples were evaluated, and if necessary, qualified based on method blanks and other laboratory QC results affecting the usability of the field QC data. Any remaining detects were used to evaluate the associated site samples. Following are findings associated with field QC samples: o o Field Blanks and Equipment Rinsates: This SDG had no identified field blank or equipment rinsate samples. Field Duplicates: There were no field duplicate samples identified for this SDG. 9 Revision 1 NPDES Page 613 of 1088

167 NPDES Page 614 of 1088

168 Validated Sample Result Forms: ISJ1376 Analysis Method ASTM Sample Name Outfall 010 Matrix Type: WATER Validation Level: IV Lab Sample Name: ISJ Sample Date: 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Analyte CAS No Result Value RL MDL Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Qualifier Validation Notes Total Uranium pci/l Ja J DNQ Analysis Method Sample Name Outfall 010 Lab Sample Name: ISJ EPA MOD Analyte CAS No Result Value Sample Date: RL Matrix Type: MDL WATER 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Level: IV Validation Qualifier Gross Alpha pci/l U UJ H,C Gross Beta pci/l J H Analysis Method Sample Name Outfall 010 Lab Sample Name: ISJ EPA MOD Analyte CAS No Result Value Sample Date: RL Matrix Type: MDL WATER 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Qualifier Validation Notes Validation Level: IV Cesium pci/l U UJ H Potassium pci/l U UJ H Analysis Method Sample Name Outfall 010 Lab Sample Name: ISJ EPA MOD Analyte CAS No Result Value Sample Date: RL Matrix Type: MDL WATER 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Qualifier Radium (226) pci/l U U Analysis Method Sample Name Outfall 010 Lab Sample Name: ISJ EPA 904 MOD Sample Date: Matrix Type: WATER 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Validation Notes Validation Level: IV Validation Notes Validation Level: IV Analyte CAS No Result Value RL MDL Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Qualifier Radium pci/l U U Validation Notes Thursday, December 10, 2009 Page 1 of 2 NPDES Page 615 of 1088

169 Analysis Method EPA 905 MOD Sample Name Outfall 010 Matrix Type: WATER Lab Sample Name: ISJ Sample Date: 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Validation Level: IV Analyte CAS No Result Value RL MDL Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Qualifier Strontium pci/l U U Analysis Method Sample Name Outfall 010 Lab Sample Name: ISJ EPA MOD Analyte CAS No Result Value Sample Date: RL Matrix Type: MDL WATER 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Qualifier Tritium pci/l U U Analysis Method MCAWW Sample Name Outfall 010 Lab Sample Name: ISJ Analyte CAS No Result Value Sample Date: RL Matrix Type: MDL WATER 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Notes Validation Level: IV Validation Qualifier Validation Notes Validation Level: IV Mercury ND ug/l UJ B Analysis Method Sample Name Outfall 010 Lab Sample Name: ISJ MCAWW DISS Sample Date: Matrix Type: WATER 10/14/2009 8:00:00 AM Validation Notes Validation Level: IV Analyte CAS No Result Value RL MDL Result Units Lab Qualifier Validation Qualifier Mercury, dissolved ND ug/l U Validation Notes Thursday, December 10, 2009 Page 2 of 2 NPDES Page 616 of 1088