Puerto Rico Transportation Asset Management Plan

Transcription

1 Puerto Rico Transportation Asset Management Plan PR-TAMP April 12, 2018

2 April 12, 2018 The Project Team Gordon Proctor Shobna Varma Jose Carro, P.E. Zaida Rico, P.E., Ph.D. www. cmapr.com 2

3 Plan Requirements Due April 30, 2018 Plan must include how PRTHA Will meet Federal pavement and bridge targets Show the adoption of good asset management practices and show Sustain highway conditions in the future 3

4 PRHTA s Unique Challenges Maria Insolvency Backlog of investment needs Few documented asset management processes 4

5 Requirements, Consequence Must complete a certifiable TAMP Must set targets Must eventually achieve targets of: <10% poor NHS bridge < 5% poor Interstate pavements Set and achieve a National Highway System pavement target If no TAMP, Federal participation falls to 65% If targets not eventually met: PRHTA loses some flexibility and must increase spending for pavements and/or bridges 5

6 Puerto Rico Network Summary Road Type Length (Mi) PRHTA Managed Concession Managed Total Lane Miles % of Total Lane Mi Length (Mi) Lane Miles % of Total Lane Mi Length (Mi) Lane Miles % of Total Lane Mi Interstate , % % , % NHS , % % , % Non-NHS 4, , % % 4, , % Total 4, , % % 4, , % 6

7 Pavement Surface Type Pavement Surface Type 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 7.9% 13.6% 37.3% 92.0% 99.5% 86.4% 62.7% INT NHS OTHER TOTAL OTHER CONCRETE ASPHALT 7

8 Pavement Measures and Criteria 8

9 Pavement Condition Summary Lane Miles per Condition Percentage of System System Good Fair Poor Not Measured Total Good Fair Poor Not Measured Total INT , % 73.3% 16.2% 0.0% 100.0% NHS , , % 73.1% 5.6% 20.0% 100.0% OTHER 2.5 1, , , % 20.0% 0.5% 79.5% 100.0% Total , , , % 34.5% 3.0% 60.6% 100.0% 9

10 Key Challenges Investment strategies for Interstate, NHS pavements Pavements in poor condition Seriously underfunded before Maria Require substantial investment to meet Federal target Interstate Pavement % Poor 5.0% 16.2% TARGET 2016 CONDITION 10

11 Pavement Evaluation INT Asphalt Rutt Rutt Concrete Fault Fault <.2 <.3 <=.4 >.4 <.2 <.3 <=.4 >.4 <.1 <=.15 >.15 <.05 <=.15 >.15 IRI G F1 F2 P IRI G F1 F2 P IRI G F1 P IRI G F1 P <95 G G G G <110 F F F F <130 F F F F <=170 F F F F >170 P P P P Crack G G G G Crack P P P P Crack G G G Crack P P P <5 <5 <5 <5 >20 >20 >20 >20 <5 <5 <5 >15 >15 >15 NHS Asphalt Rutt Rutt Concrete Fault Fault <.2 <.3 <=.4 >.4 <.2 <.3 <=.4 >.4 <.1 <=.15 >.15 IRI G F1 F2 P IRI G F1 F2 P IRI G F1 P IRI G F1 P <95 G G G G <110 F F F F <130 F F F F <=170 F F F F >170 P P P P Crack G G G G Crack P P P P Crack G G G Crack P P P <5 <5 <5 <5 >20 >20 >20 >20 <5 <5 <5 >15 >15 >15 11

12 Recommendations for Measured Segments Strategy Interstate NHS Non-NHS Total Lane Miles % Lane Miles % Lane Miles % Lane Miles Preservation % % % 1, % Rehabilitation % % % % Replacement % % % % Total % 1, % % 2, % % 12

13 Recommendations for the Interstate System Evaluate quality of concrete pavements for future projects, as most poor lane miles are in concrete pavements. Monitor asphalt pavements, so they don t degrade to poor. Evaluate projects to improve its pavement, especially to correct roughness and cracking. Evaluate projects to improve roughness at all roads, especially at PR-2, PR-52, and PR-53, which had the more amount of poor IRI lane miles among Interstates. Evaluate projects to improve rutting or faulting at all roads, especially at PR-3, PR-53, and PR-26, which are the interstate highways in fair condition with more amount of lane miles with this type of defect. 13

14 Bridges System NHS Non-NHS Total Manager Amount % Amount % Amount % PRHTA % 1, % 2, % Metropistas % 0 0.0% % Autopistas de Puerto Rico 1 0.0% 0 0.0% % Total % 1, % 2, % 14

15 PRHTA Managed Bridges PRHTA managed bridges have a total of area of 2.16 million square meters. A 35% of the bridges are part of the NHS. These bridges carry 70% if total bridge deck area. PRHTA Managed Bridges Amount Area (square meters) NHS 817 1,516, Others 1, , Total 2,316 2,162, %NHS 35% 70% % Others 65% 30% % Total 100% 100% 15

16 Bridges Measures and Criteria The National Bridge Inventory system rates bridges in 9 categories, where 0 is Failed and 9 is Excellent. Three primary components comprise the rating of most bridges, such as the stringers, tee beams, box beams, slabs and others that are common in Puerto Rico. These three are the deck, superstructure, and the substructure, which are all rated on the 0-9 scale. 16

17 Bridge Measures and Criteria Rate Good Fair Poor Score Condition Definition Criteria N Not applicable Not applicable 9 Excellent Excellent condition 8 Very good No problems noted. 7 Good Some minor problems noted. 6 Satisfactory Structural elements show some minor deterioration. 5 Fair 4 Poor 3 Serious 2 Critical 1 Imminent Failure All primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spelling or scour. Advanced section loss noted. Deterioration. Spelling or scour. Loss of section, deterioration, spelling or scour has seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present. Advanced deterioration or primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge Is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in light service. 0 Failed Out of service - beyond corrective action 17

18 Bridges Condition PRHTA Managed Bridge Condition % 4.3% 2.5% 16.6% 19.7% 27.0% 72.3% 59.6% 68.5% 9.4% 9.2% 9.3% %NHS % OTHERS % TOTAL Poor Fair Good N/A 18

19 Key Challenge: Bridge Progress 19

20 Bridge Evaluation NHS NHS NHS Area Area Area Super\Deck Super\Deck Super\Deck ,792 32, ,771 53, , , ,331 3, , , , Substructure Substructure Substructure Count Count Count Super\Deck Super\Deck Super\Deck Substructure Substructure Substructure

21 Recommendations for PRHTA Managed Bridges Recommended Strategy NHS Non-NHS Total Substructure Superstructure Deck Num Structure Sq Area of Deck Num Structure Sq Area of Deck Num Structure Sq Area of Deck Replace Replace Replace 10 17, ,239 Rehabilitation Replace Replace ,277 Preservation Replace Replace 1 1, ,344 Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Replace 11 21, ,367 Preservation Rehabilitation Replace 1 1, ,816 Rehabilitation Preservation Replace 14 34, ,541 Preservation Preservation Replace 12 32, ,220 Rehabilitation Preservation Preservation 15 37, ,997 Preservation Preservation Preservation , ,180 Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation , ,938 Rehabilitation Preservation Rehabilitation , ,864 Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Preservation ,004 Preservation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation , ,440 Preservation Preservation Rehabilitation , ,557 Preservation Rehabilitation Preservation ,302 Total 738 1,491,775 1, ,313 1,940 2,089,088 21

22 MPO Requirements (4) An MPO shall integrate in the metropolitan transportation planning process, the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets described in other State transportation plans including: (i) The State asset management plan for the NHS Code of Federal Regulation (d) (2) (4) 22

23 What Does This Mean? Pavement, bridge conditions receive higher funding priority for programming Many communities will benefit from bridge, pavement projects PRHTA must adopt a long-term bridge and pavement preservation program FHWA will review actions annually for consistency 23

24 Annual Consistency Review Annually after July 2019: FHWA must make annual consistency review Is the plan implemented? Are investments consistent with the plan? Investments Processes Targets 24

25 Undergoing Activities Draft plan: Set bridge, pavement targets Estimate cost to achieve targets Describe investment strategies to sustain bridge, pavement conditions Submit draft plan by April 30,