arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 5 Dec 1995

Transcription

1 Theral Inflation and the Moduli Proble David H. Lyth School of Physics and Cheistry, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, U.K. Ewan D. Stewart Research Center for the Early Universe, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan (Septeber 1995) arxiv:hep-ph/951004v 5 Dec 1995 In supersyetric theories a field can develop a vacuu expectation value M 10 3 GeV, even though its ass is of order 10 to 10 3 GeV. The finite teperature in the early Universe can hold such a field at zero, corresponding to a false vacuu with energy density V 0 M. When the teperature falls below V 1/4 0, the theral energy density becoes negligible and an era of theral inflation begins. It ends when the field rolls away fro zero at a teperature of order, corresponding to of order 10 e-folds of inflation which does not affect the density perturbation generated during ordinary inflation. Theral inflation can solve the Polonyi/oduli proble if M is within one or two orders of agnitude of 10 1 GeV. I. INTRODUCTION There is at present a standard odel of the Universe before nucleosynthesis, which is described in any reviews and several textbooks. According to this odel, an early era of inflation sets the initial conditions for a Hot Big Bang, which starts far above the critical teperature for the electroweak transition (T 100 GeV) and continues without interruption until the present atter doinated era begins. This picture is pleasingly siple, but it is by no eans andatory in the context of current thinking about the fundaental interactions beyond the Standard Model. To be precise, it will not be valid if one or ore scalar fields have a sufficiently large vev (vacuu expectation value) while at the sae tie having an alost flat potential. The reason is that the particle species corresponding to the oscillation around such a vev is typically both abundant and long lived, which odifies the siple picture in a significant and soeties disasterous way. Extending an old terinology [1], we shall call a scalar field with a large vev and a flat potential a flaton field, or siply a flaton. 1 Although flaton fields are by no eans inevitable, they are natural in the context of odern particle theory and in our opinion their possible cosological consequences should be taken very seriously. Soe aspects of the cosology of flaton fields are already well known [1,3 10], and in a recent note [11] we drew attention to a new feature which we tered theral inflation. The present paper, along with two ore in preparation [1,13], ais to give a systeatic account of the subject. Let us begin by being ore precise about what is eant by a large vev, and a potential which is alost flat. These ters are defined with respect to the energy scale 10 to 10 3 GeV, which is the scale of supersyetry breaking as defined by the asses of the supersyetric partners of known particles [14]. The vev is defined as the position of the iniu of the potential, and a large vev M is one satisfying M 10 3 GeV. An alost flat potential V is one whose curvature V 1/ is of order 10 to 10 3 GeV (except near any points of inflexion) out to field values uch bigger than 10 3 GeV, and if the field has a large vev this is supposed to be true out to at least the vev. For an alost flat potential the particle ass is therefore of order 10 to 10 3 GeV. Fro now on we drop the qualifier alost, referring siply to a flat potential. The ost widely discussed flaton candidates are the oduli occurring in superstring theory. The potential of a odulus is indeed flat, and if its vev is nonzero it is typically of order the anck scale M = (8πG) 1/ = GeV. A odulus with such a vev is known to be fatal to the standard cosology since the corresponding particles are very abundant and do not decay before nucleosynthesis [,16 0]. As we shall see, the failure to decay 1 Note the etyology. The ter flaton refers to the flat potential, not to inflation. Conversely, the failiar word inflaton refers to the field which is slowly rolling during inflation. We shall also use the ter flaton to denote the particle species corresponding to a flaton field. A field with these properties occurred in the first exaple [15] of a nonrenoralizable supersyetry-breaking hidden sector, which contained a single coplex field. It was called the Polonyi field, and the associated proble [] was called the Polonyi proble. Most of what we say concerning the oduli applies to any species with these properties. 1

2 before nucleosynthesis is likely to persist for any flaton with a vev exceeding GeV, aking all such flatons fatal to the standard cosology [7]. Moduli are by no eans the only flaton candidates. On the contrary, any field (in the observable sector) with a vev uch bigger than 10 3 GeV is likely to have a flat potential, and so to be a flaton. The reason, as we discuss in detail below, is that it is natural to construct all available ass scales fro just the two basic scales and M. Apart fro the oduli, the ost failiar exaples of fields with nonzero vevs are those which are charged under a continuous syetry, the vev then indicating a spontaneous breakdown of the syetry. If the syetry is local then the field is by definition a higgs field, and presuably the exaples of this type occurring in nature (apart fro the higgs fields breaking electroweak syetry) are the higgs fields breaking the GUT syetry, whose vevs are of order GeV. Alternatively the syetry could be global, a likely candidate for this case being the Peccei-Quinn field with a vev perhaps of order GeV. On the other hand, it akes perfect sense for a field to have a nonzero vev even if it is not charged under any continuous syetry. For exaple, a right-handed neutrino ass ight be generated by a vev, without lepton nuber being a good syetry [1,13]. As entioned already, oduli as well as any other flatons with a vev bigger than GeV are fatal to the standard cosology. How are we to solve this oduli proble if it exists? The usual recipe for getting rid of unwanted relics in cosology is to invoke an early epoch of inflation, lasting at least 50 to 60 Hubble ties or so. Such an era is also desirable for other reasons [,3], one of which is that it can generate an adiabatic density perturbation of the right agnitude to explain the cosic icrowave background anisotropy and large scale structure. To do this the potential at the end of inflation ust satisfy V 1/4 < GeV [4], and the lowest value of V 1/4 that has been proposed in a plausible odel is V 1/ GeV [5,6]. Inflation at such a high scale does not solve the oduli proble, because although it sufficiently dilutes oduli present before inflation they are regenerated with an unacceptable abundance afterwards. We show in [11], and in uch ore detail below, that to avoid excessive regeneration one requires ( V 1 4 < GeV 10 7 to 10 8 GeV T R ) 1 4 (1) where T R is the reheat teperature. An era of inflation at such a low energy scale sees ipossible to realize in the context of sensible particle physics, if it is required also to produce the cosological density perturbation. Randall and Thoas [18] therefore suggested that the density perturbation is produced by an era of inflation at the usual high energy scale, while a second era of inflation at a low energy scale solves the oduli proble. However, even without the constraint of producing the density perturbation it is difficult to construct a odel of inflation giving a sufficiently low energy scale, within the usual paradig where there is an inflaton field rolling slowly down the potential. The reason stes fro the fact that a necessary condition for slow roll is that the inflaton ass (or ore precisely the curvature V 1/ evaluated while the field is rolling) be uch less than the Hubble paraeter H V 1/ /M. The bound displayed in Eq. (1) corresponds to a very low ass < 10 MeV. The central purpose of this paper is to explore the fact that a flaton field can lead to a copletely different type of inflation, called theral inflation [11], which can solve the oduli proble provided that the vev M is within one or two orders of agnitude of 10 1 GeV. During theral inflation the flaton field is held at the origin by finite teperature effects so that no field is rolling. The potential during theral inflation is the value V 0 of the flaton potential at the origin, which is of order M. With M 10 1 GeV this gives V 1/ GeV which can satisfy Eq. (1). Theral inflation starts when the theral energy density falls below V 0 which corresponds to a teperature roughly V 1/4 0, and it ends when the finite teperature becoes ineffective at a teperature of order, so the nuber of e-folds is 1 ln(m/) 10. It turns out that this can sufficiently dilute the oduli existing before theral inflation (especially if reheating after theral inflation is delayed) and it will not interfere with the density perturbation generated during ordinary inflation. There is also the intriguing possibility that two or ore bouts of theral inflation can occur in quick succession, allowing an even ore efficient solution of the oduli proble. The present paper and its two successors are copleentary to recent papers by Dine, Randall and Thoas [0,7]. The latter focus on fields with a flat potential but zero vev. These fields too are liable to be oscillating in the early Universe and if they carry nonzero lepton or baryon nuber they can lead to baryogenesis (the Affleck-Dine echanis). However baryogenesis in this way works only if there is no theral inflation, and that in turn is a viable possibility only if there is no oduli proble. The two sets of papers therefore represent utually exclusive scenarios for the early Universe, and only tie will tell which if either is correct. The rest of this paper is divided into two ain sections plus a concluding one. In Section we study the effective potential expected for flatons, both in the early Universe and in the present era when it reduces to the ordinary low energy effective potential. Special attention is paid to the case of oduli, which is different fro that of other flatons because the oduli potential vanishes if supersyetry is unbroken. The flaton decay rate is also estiated. The

3 reheat process for hoogeneous flaton oscillations is considered, taking account of possible paraetric resonance. In Section 3 a systeatic account is given of the history of the Universe, assuing that theral inflation occurs and that there is a oduli proble. The concluding section suarizes the results, and points to future directions of research. II. FLAT POTENTIALS AND FLATONS In a generic supersyetric gauge theory there will be a large nuber of directions in the space of the coplex scalar fields 3 in which the potential V is exactly flat, before supersyetry breaking and non-renoralizable ters are taken into account. (This is true, for exaple, in the Minial Supersyetric Standard Model.) After these effects are taken into account the potential is still alost flat, in the sense that the energy scale V 1/ specifying the curvature of the potential is only of order 10 to 10 3 GeV, out to field values any orders of agnitude bigger than this scale. In this paper we are interested in flaton fields, which by definition correspond to flat directions with a nonzero vev. The central thee of this paper is that flaton fields are cosologically significant, because they typically lead to theral inflation, and because they in any case oscillate hoogeneously until a relatively late epoch. A field with a nonzero vev is by definition either a higgs field or a gauge singlet. We will focus on the latter case in this paper, since a straightforward interpretation of the data indicate that the vev of the GUT higgs field is of order GeV which is too high to give viable theral inflation. Note, though, that in soe GUT odels there are additional higgs fields with uch saller vevs [8]. The cosology of a given flaton field is largely deterined by the for of its effective potential. One needs to know both the low energy effective potential which is relevant at the present era, and the effective potential in the early Universe. Also, since the case of oduli is soewhat different fro that of flatons in general we treat the oduli in a separate subsection after the general discussion. A. The low energy effective potential Consider a coplex flaton field φ. In the liit where the potential is absolutely flat there is a global U(1) syetry under the transforation φ e iα φ, with an arbitrary choice for the origin of φ. In the full theory this syetry ay survive for one choice of the origin, at least to a good approxiation, or it ay be so badly broken as to be unrecognizable. Global U(1) syetry We begin by considering the case where the syetry survives. Extensions of the Standard Model can indeed contain spontaneously broken global U(1) syetries, a well known exaple being the Peccei-Quinn syetry associated with the axion [9,,3,30,31]. We initially suppose that the U(1) syetry is exact. The potential then depends on φ only through φ, and assuing an effective theory that is valid right up to the anck scale, the potential in the flat direction is typically of the for V = V 0 0 φ + n=1 λ n M n φ n+4 () The φ ter coes fro soft supersyetry breaking, which eans that 0 10 to 10 3 GeV, and the higher order ters are non-renoralizable ters. The diensionless couplings λ n are at ost of order 1, if the theory is indeed valid up to the anck scale. The crucial feature of this potential, which distinguishes it fro the potential of a generic field and akes it flat, is the absence of a ter λ φ 4 with λ 1. Such a ter can be forbidden by discrete or continuous gauge syetries, in cobination with supersyetry. Supersyetry breaking then generates a λ φ 4 ter with a suppressed coupling 3 Each scalar field is coplex in supersyetric theories because supersyetry relates it to the two degrees of freedo associated with a left- or right-handed spin-half field. In this paper we are assuing that the fields are canonically noralized in the regie of interest. (One cannot in general canonically noralize the fields exactly over an extended region of field space.) 3

4 λ ( 0 /M ). Such a ter is negligible for flaton fields which are not oduli and we have lost nothing by oitting it fro Eq. (). (The case of oduli will be discussed in a oent, and in ore detail in Section.5.) As the notation suggests, we have in ind the case where the ass-squared at the origin, 0, is negative. This eans that the vev of φ does not vanish but rather has a value M 0. To estiate M, suppose first that all of the λ s are of the sae order. Then as one increases φ, the φ 6 ter coes in first, leading to M = (3λ 1 ) 1/4 1/ 0 M 1/ λ 1/ to GeV. Now suppose instead that this ter is negligible, so that the φ 8 ter coes in first. Then M = (4λ ) 1/6 1/3 0 M /3 λ 1/ GeV. If ore ters are absent the vev will be raised further so the predicted range is M > 1010 GeV. In the entire regie φ < M the curvature V 1/ of the potential is only of order 0, which is of order 10 to 10 3 GeV. In particular the ass of the flaton particle is of this order, and fro now on we shall generally use it instead of 0 when writing down order of agnitude estiates. The requireent V (M) = 0 gives V 0 M, corresponding to ( ) V 1/4 ( ) 1/ 0 M 10 6 GeV (3) GeV If the nth ter doinates in Eq. (), then 4 = (n + 1) 0 (4) M n+ M n = [(n + 1)(n + )λ n ] 1 (5) V 0 = [(n + )] 1 M (6) Rather than the non-renoralizable ters being suppressed by the anck scale, they ight be generated by integrating out particles with GUT scale asses and so instead be suppressed by M GUT GeV. This would correspond to taking λ n < (M /M GUT ) n and would give the soewhat looser lower bound M > 109 GeV (7) We noted a oent ago that in Eq. () the φ 4 ter has a coupling λ (/M ) which is any orders of agnitude less than 1. It ay happen that the sae is true of one or ore further ters. But for a flaton which is not a odulus one expects to find, at not too high order, a ter whose coupling λ n is not any orders of agnitude less than 1. As a result, one expects the vev of flaton which is not a odulus to be several orders of agnitude below M. By contrast one expects for a odulus that all couplings are strongly suppressed, because the potential of a odulus vanishes exactly when supersyetry is unbroken. A natural order of agnitude for the couplings of a odulus is (/M ) aking the vev of order M, though there are other possibilities. We shall discuss oduli in ore detail in Section.5. The flat potential Eq. () is not at all what cosologists generally assue when they consider spontaneous syetry-breaking in the early Universe. Rather they assue, as for instance in the textbooks [,3,3] and the reviews [9,33] that the potential is like the Standard Model higgs potential 5 V = λ( φ M ) (8) with λ 1. For the Standard Model higgs, whose vev is of order 10 GeV, this potential is indeed natural fro the viewpoint of supergravity; it siply corresponds to a non-flat direction, in which there is a λ φ 4 ter. But when M is uch bigger than it becoes far less natural, and in our view Eq. () rather than Eq. (8) should be regarded as the default case. So far we have taken the U(1) syetry to be exact, so that the goldstone boson corresponding to the angular direction is assless. If the syetry is broken the goldstone boson will acquire a ass. This ass is by definition uch less than that of the flaton if the syetry is only slightly broken. On the other hand, as we now discuss the syetry ay be strongly broken which eans that the would-be goldstone boson becoes just another flaton particle. 4 The ass-squared of the flaton particle is 1 V (M) because the canonically noralized coplex field φ is related to the canonically noralized real flaton particle field δφ by φ = M + δφ/. 5 In the case of the Standard Model φ is a doublet and the syetry is SU() but this is an irrelevant coplication for our purpose. 4

5 No U(1) syetry As a siple exaple, consider the superpotential W = (λ/4m )φ 4 with λ 1. After supersyetry breaking the corresponding potential is of the for ( V (φ) = V 0 0 φ + AW + Bφ W ( λcφ = V 0 0 φ c.c. M ) φ + c.c. + ) + λ φ 6 with 0 and the agnitudes of A, B and C all of order 10 to 10 3 GeV. In this exaple U(1) has been broken down to Z 4 (which leaves φ 4 invariant), and there are four vacua each with the sae vev φ = M λ 1/ 1/ 0 M 1/. In a given vacuu there are now two particles with ass 10 to 10 3 GeV; one of the is the one corresponding to the radial oscillation that we considered before, and the other is the would-be goldstone boson corresponding to the angular oscillation. We shall generally refer to the both as flatons. Note that in the regie φ M the U(1) syetry is approxiately restored, since the ter 0 φ doinates. The Z 4 syetry surviving in this exaple has ensured that there are no linear ters in the expansion of φ about the origin, and this feature will becoe crucial when we consider the effective potential in the early Universe. Of course any Z n syetry will do for this purpose, and it does not need to be exact. In our discussion 0 has been taken to be negative. If it is positive the potential has a iniu at the origin. If this is also the position of the vev (ie., if it is the absolute iniu) then the field is not a flaton and does not concern us. It can however happen, as for instance in the odel of [34], that the origin corresponds to a false vacuu, with higher order ters generating a large vev so that we are dealing with a flaton. Theral inflation with such a flaton is viable only if tunneling to the true vacuu is rapid, which is typically not the case. For siplicity we shall fro now on ake frequent use of the notation appropriate to the case where there is a U(1), writing the potential as a function only of φ and using to denote the ass of the flaton particle. M W φ (9) (10) B. The flaton decay rate There is a general expectation that a flaton particle corresponding to oscillations around a vev M will couple only weakly to particles with ass uch less than M. In particular, one expects [1,5,6,8 11] that the flaton decay rate Γ is at ost of order 3 /M. Consider first the decay into a pair of identical spin zero particles which correspond to a real field ψ, with the renoralizable effective interaction λ φ ψ. Setting φ equal to its vev this interaction gives a contribution λm to the ass-squared ψ. Barring a precise cancellation,6 it follows that λ < 1 ( ψ ) (11) M where the right hand side is at ost 1 8 (/M) or the decay would be forbidden by energy conservation. Substituting φ = M + δφ/, one finds that the flaton decay rate corresponding to this interaction is Γ = λ 8π ( ) M 1 4 ψ / (1) Maxiizing this expression subject to the constraint Eq. (11) gives Γ < /M. This effective interaction with a coupling of order λ (/M) is quite natural. For instance an interaction φ X ight give soe field X a ass of order M, and then an interaction ψ X would generate it through the diagra with a single X loop. 6 It has been pointed out to us by G. Dvali that such a cancellation does occur in an SU(5) GUT where the doublet-triplet splitting proble is solved by a fine tuned cancellation. In such a case the decay rate has the unsuppressed value Γ. When the proble is solved in a ore acceptable way this need not be so, but we will not pursue the point here because our ain focus is not on the GUT. 5

6 For an effective interaction involving ore powers of the fields and/or derivatives the arguents are generally less precise, but one expects suppression because such ters are non-renoralizable and therefore involve inverse powers of soe scale M which is presuably at least of order M. Consider for instance a ter involving one power of φ and two of ψ, with n derivatives. Its coefficient is expected to be at ost of order λ M n with λ M, and since the energy of all particles is of order (in the φ rest frae) this gives the decay rate Eq. (1) with λ (/M) n. For n > 1 this is uch saller than the upper liit Eq. (11), but for n = 1 it is bigger by a factor (/ ψ ) leading to Γ (8π) 1 3 /M. On the basis of this discussion, we shall assue that with γ < 1. Γ = 10 γ 3 /M (13) The decay into goldstone bosons A definite exaple of a derivative coupling is provided by the decay of the radial flaton into the angular flaton, or goldstone boson. Near the vev, the canonically noralized radial field s and angular field a are defined by φ = ( s + M)exp(ia/ M) (14) Expanding the canonical kinetic ter L kin = µ φ µ φ to first order in s, one finds the canonical kinetic ters for s and a plus an interaction ter L int = s M µ a µ a (15) The coefficient is of the advertised for λ /M, with λ = M/. The goldstone bosons produced by this coupling can be cosologically dangerous, because their interaction can be too weak to theralize the. This will be discussed in connection with the axion in [1] (see also [31]). The flaton freeze-out teperature Though we have focussed on the decay rate, siilar considerations apply to collision rates. The rates for collisions involving a flaton and other light particles are suppressed at energies well below M, and therefore the freeze-out teperature below which flaton particles cease to be in theral equilibriu is very roughly of order M. Note that this applies only in the true vacuu, where the flaton field is oscillating about the vev. C. The effective potential in the early Universe In the early Universe, the interaction of a given field with other fields will alter the effective potential of that field, and in particular the effective flaton potential V (φ) will be altered. We should first clarify what is eant by the effective potential V (φ). There is in reality a single effective potential V (φ, ψ,...), which is a function of all the scalar fields. It is natural to define the effective potential of any individual field as the full potential with all other fields held at their vevs, and this is the definition that we had in ind for the low energy effective potential V (φ). However in the early Universe all sufficiently light scalar fields are significantly displaced fro their vevs, either hoogeneously in the anner we have been discussing for flatons, or inhoogeneously as for instance if the field is in theral equilibriu. Instead of evaluating the full effective potential V (φ, ψ,...) with the other fields at their vevs one should set the equal to their current tie-averaged values, so that for instance a ter ψ φ is replaced by ψ φ. In addition, the actual for of the full effective potential is affected by the presence of particles with nonzero spin and also by kinetic ters, so that the effective potential V early (φ, ψ,...) in the early Universe is different fro the low energy effective potential V low (φ, ψ,...) which applies at present. For both of these reasons, the effective potential V early (φ) in the early Universe is different fro the low energy effective potential V low (φ) which applies at present. Although the for of the effective potential V (φ) changes with the history of the Universe, its gradient will always vanish at the origin provided that it is invariant under at least a Z n syetry. This tends to be at least approxiately true in siple odels, and we shall take it for granted in what follows. Let us pause briefly though to see why such a 6

7 syetry is coon. If the full potential V (φ, ψ,...) is expanded as a power series in all of the fields each individual ter will be invariant under one or ore Z n syetries unless it consists of just the first power of one field. For instance the ter φ ψ is invariant under a Z acting on φ, and another acting on ψ. As we discussed in Section.1, only a few leading ters will be iportant in practice, so it is reasonable that one or ore Z n syetries will be approxiately present in the full potential. Then the question of whether or not the potential V (φ) of an individual field possesses an approxiate Z n syetry depends on the for of the full potential, but again this is not unreasonable. Taking it for granted that the gradient of V (φ) vanishes at the origin, let us ask what is the effective ass-squared V (0) in the early Universe. (We continue to assue for siplicity that there is a U(1) syetry, so that V is a function only of φ.) First consider the era of ordinary inflation. It has been known for soe tie [3,4,8,6] that by looking at the for of the full potential predicted by N = 1 supergravity one can identify contributions of order ±H to the ass-squared of every field. For the inflaton field(s) these contributions have to cancel because otherwise inflation will not occur, but for a generic field one does not expect a cancellation. Assuing that flatons are not inflatons, the conclusion is that their ass-squared during inflation is (at least) of order ±H. After inflation it is not so clear what the ass-squared will be. In the extree case where the interaction is of only gravitational strength one expects a contribution of the sae order, ±H [0]. We noted earlier that in the true vacuu, the interaction of flaton particles with other light particles is suppressed, so one at first sight expects soething like this estiate to hold for a flaton field. However, that suppression occurs because the vev of the flaton field is large (the flaton particles correspond to sall oscillations around the vev). Near the origin the flaton field can have unsuppressed interactions with light fields. To see why, take as an exaple the interaction 1 λ φ ψ that we considered earlier. When φ is at its vev this gives a contribution λm to ψ. Barring cancellations, λ ust therefore be sall if ψ is sall. But suppose that in contrast ψ is of order M and is generated by this interaction. Then there is a coupling λ 1, and for flaton field values near the origin the ψ field becoes light. The result is that near the origin the flaton field has an unsuppressed interaction with the light field ψ. If φ is a higgs field, charged by definition under a gauge syetry, a coupling of this kind to at least the gauge bosons and gauginos is inevitable. In the case where φ is neutral under all gauge syetries, which is our focus here, such a coupling is not inevitable but it is still quite natural; for instance, in odels of the kind discussed in [1,13,1] a flaton field couples in this way to the right handed neutrino and sneutrino. Assuing that the flaton field near the origin indeed has unsuppressed interactions with one or ore particle species having effective ass of order φ, it will be in theral equilibriu in the regie φ < T. (The upper liit coes fro the fact that at a given teperature particles with ass bigger than T becoe too rare too aintain theral equilibriu.) The finite teperature correction to the effective potential gives the flaton an effective ass-squared [1,35] of order (T 0 ), which gives the effective potential a local iniu at the origin for T bigger than soe critical teperature T C 0. (As usual, 0 denotes the effective zero-teperature ass-squared at the origin, and denotes the flaton particle ass which is the paraeter we norally focus on. Recall that both 0 and are of order 10 to 10 3 GeV.) In addition to the local iniu at the origin, the effective potential retains its true iniu at φ = M except at very high teperatures T > M, but there is no significant tunneling between the two [1,35]. To suarize this discussion, if the flaton field has gravitational strength interactions its ass-squared is expected to be of order ±H. If, on the other hand, it has unsuppressed interactions then it will be in theral equilibriu in the regie φ < T and in this regie there will be a necessarily positive ass-squared of order T (M /H)H. These are the ost iportant possibilities for the effective ass-squared but others exist, especially during inflation where one ight have a coupling to the inflaton field, say of the for ψ φ inf (in particular, hybrid inflation [5] akes essential use of such a coupling). As in this exaple, the positivity of the potential tends to require that such a coupling again gives a positive ass-squared. D. The cosology of fields with flat potentials In the light of what we have done so far there are the following four possibilities for the cosology of a field with a flat potential. (i) The field sits at the origin. If the iniu of the potential is at the origin throughout the history of the Universe then the field will sit there apart fro theral and quantu fluctuations. In that case it does not undergo hoogeneous oscillations in the early Universe, and we are not concerned with it here. It will in general have 7

8 unsuppressed interactions (at least if it is not a odulus) and the corresponding particle species will be produced through particle collisions and decays involving these interactions. (ii) The field oscillates about the origin. Now suppose that although the iniu of the low energy effective potential is at the origin, the iniu in the early Universe is displaced because there is a negative ass-squared of order H. In that case the field will start to oscillate about the origin at the epoch H. The oscillation is generally short lived, because the particles corresponding to it generally have unsuppressed couplings (except perhaps for oduli). If there is no theral inflation the oscillation can however lead to viable baryogenesis through the Affleck-Dine echanis [7]. (iii) Theral inflation occurs. In the two reaining cases the vev is nonzero, so that we are dealing by definition with a flaton field. Theral inflation, which is the focus of the present paper, occurs if the flaton field is held at zero in the early Universe by the finite teperature. It ends when the teperature falls to soe critical value T C (provided that the zero-teperature effective potential has no barrier separating the origin fro the vev), after which the flaton field starts to oscillate about the vev. The oscillation around the vev ight persist for a long tie because the coupling of flaton particles to other light particles is suppressed (Section., and Section.6 below). (iv) Flatons not leading to theral inflation. In the fourth case the flaton field fails to be held at the origin by the finite teperature of the early Universe. This will occur if the flaton has an effective ass-squared H which prevents it fro ever being near the origin. It will also occur whatever the sign of the ass-squared, if the interaction of the flaton field is suppressed even near the origin. When H falls to a value of order the flaton ass, the field starts to oscillate about the vev, with an initial aplitude of order M. (The initial aplitude is equal to M if the initial field value is at the origin. If the field is displaced fro the origin by a ass-squared of order H, its value is typically of order M when the field starts to oscillate.) As in the previous case the oscillation ight last for a long tie. E. The oduli potential What we have done so far, including the suary of the last subsection, applies in essence to all flaton fields including any which are oduli. On the other hand, oduli do have soe properties which distinguish the fro other scalar fields ( atter fields ) and as a result the general discussion acquires a soewhat different flavour when applied to the. The low energy effective potential of a odulus vanishes exactly if supersyetry is unbroken. After supersyetry breaking its potential is generally thought to be flat, so that its curvature V 1/ is everywhere of order 10 to 10 3 GeV (except near points of inflexion). If a odulus has a nonzero vev, then as we discuss in a oent its vev is generally expected to be of order M. To a large extent its properties can then be obtained siply by setting M = M in forulas that apply to flatons in general, but there are soe special features. These arise because one is forced to consider field variations of order M, in contrast with atter fields where one need only consider uch saller variations (typically of order the vev M M for a flaton field which is not a odulus). In order to talk about a nonzero vev for any field there has to be a well defined origin, which will be defined as a point which is invariant ( fixed ) under the group of syetries under which the field transfors. For atter fields this defines a unique origin, such that the syetry group consists of linear operators in field space. For oduli the syetries are ore coplicated, and there are in general an infinite nuber of fixed points with a separation of order M (though only a finite nuber are physically distinct because the syetry is a discrete gauge syetry). If the vev of a odulus is at a fixed point it is natural to say that it vanishes, and otherwise it is natural to define the vev as the distance to the nearest fixed point. These are the conventions that we have had in ind, without explicitly stating the. The stateent that the vev of soe odulus is of order M just eans that it is not close to any particular fixed point. As with other fields, a odulus can have unsuppressed interactions with other light fields only if it is close to a fixed point. Each of the four possibilities for the cosology of a flaton field listed in the last subsection exists for a odulus. If possibility (i) holds for all oduli then there is no oduli proble. Assuing that this is not the case, let us look at the expected for of the effective potential of a odulus Φ. For siplicity we will pretend that Φ is real, and take it to be canonically noralized. Before supersyetry breaking is taken into account the potential V (Φ) vanishes. With the breaking taken into account the potential in the true vacuu (the low energy potential) is generally thought to be of the for ( ) Φ V true = MS 4 f = 1 M Φ (Φ Φ 1) +... (16) Here the supersyetry breaking scale M S is related to the scale 10 to 10 3 GeV by M S (M ) 1/ to GeV, and f(x) is a function whose value and low order derivatives are typically of order 1 in the regie x < 1. 8

9 We have expanded the potential about its vev Φ 1. Note that the potential vanishes in the liit M S 0 of unbroken supersyetry, in accordance with the fact that we are dealing with a odulus. In the early Universe there will be additional supersyetry breaking because of the nonzero energy density ρ, leading to an additional contribution to the potential of the for [3,4,6,0] ( ) Φ V cos = ρ g = α H (Φ Φ ) +... (17) M The function g(x) has value and low order derivatives of order 1 (aking α 1). The iniu of this potential is located at a different value Φ, which is displaced fro the true vev Φ 1 by a distance Φ 0 = Φ Φ 1 M. We have in ind the case where both Φ 1 and Φ are nonzero (case (iv) of the last subsection) and of order M. If Φ = 0 but Φ 1 0 (case (iii)) there is also a oduli proble, but it ight be rendered insoluble by doain walls (though in analyzing this possibility within a given odel one will have to reeber that the discrete syetries under which the oduli transfor are gauge syetries). If Φ 1 = 0 but Φ 0 (case (ii)) there is no oduli proble if the relevant oduli have unsuppressed couplings near the origin. Although Eq. (16) is the siplest possibility for the potential of a odulus there are others, which could lead to a vev below the anck scale. For exaple, if supersyetry breaking is due to hidden sector gaugino condensation then the oduli potential ight include ters of the for µ n φ +4 /M n+ where µ is related to vevs arising fro gaugino condensation. These ters still vanish when supersyetry is unbroken, as is required for a odulus, but they ight generate a vev below the anck scale. For exaple the GUT Higgs could be a Wilson line odulus, with a vev of order GeV generated in this way [36]. In considering the oduli proble we assue in this paper that at least soe oduli have a vev of order M. F. The flaton reheat teperature Let us quantify the stateent that the flaton field oscillations in the early Universe last for a long tie. The oscillation of a flaton field with vev M has initial aplitude φ 0 M. The corresponding energy density is ρ φ 1 φ 0, and the nuber density of the flaton particles is n φ 1 φ 0. These particles have no rando otion because the field is hoogeneous, so they constitute atter as opposed to radiation. If the flaton is associated with theral inflation, the oscillation coences after theral inflation and iediately doinates the energy density. If not, the oscillation coences at the earlier epoch H, and ay or ay not coe to doinate the energy density. If the oscillation aplitude decreased like a 3/, where a is the scale factor of the Universe, then the energy per cooving volue of the flaton field would be conserved. In fact, the energy drains away through the interactions of the flaton field so that the oscillation aplitude decreases faster. If the oscillation aplitude is sufficiently sall and the interactions are sufficiently weak, each flaton particle decays independently so that the rate at which the energy drains away is siply the particle decay rate Γ. It has practically all disappeared soon after the tie ( ) ( Γ 1 3γ M 300 GeV secs (18) GeV where we have used Eq. (13). Setting this tie equal to H 1 and assuing that the decay products theralize proptly we arrive at an estiate of the reheat teperature, ( T D g 1 4 Γ 1 1 M 3γ ) GeV ( GeV (19) M 300 GeV where g 10 is the effective nuber of species at T = T D. 7 7 The following results will be used without coent in the text. The entropy density of radiation at teperature T is s = (4/3)ρ/T = (π /45)g T 3 = 1.01g 1/4 ρ 3/4, where g (T) is the effective nuber of particle species in theral equilibriu, and ρ = (π /30)g T 4 is the energy density. As the Universe expands the scale factor a increases. The energy density in relativistic particles (radiation) is proportional to a 4 and that in non-relativistic particles is proportional to a 3. In theral equilibriu the entropy a 3 s in a cooving volue is constant and so is g 1/3 at. According to the Standard Model, g 1/4 is in the range 1 to for T < 100 MeV, and then rises sharply to becoe 3, finally rising to 4 when T > 103 GeV in supersyetric extensions of the Standard Model. We use the appropriate value in our estiates. 9

10 As has been discussed recently in connection with ordinary inflation, the assuption that each flaton particle decays independently need not be correct [37 41] (see also [4,8]). Instead, paraetric resonance effects can drain away uch of the oscillation energy as soon as the oscillation starts, leaving behind only soe fraction to decay at the single particle decay rate. The energy drained away goes initially into the creation of arginally relativistic scalar particles. All species are produced which have sufficient coupling to the flaton, including the flaton itself. (We are not aware of any discussion of the possibility of the production of bosons with spin 1 or higher through paraetric resonance and it ay be that this also occurs. Ferions are not produced in significant nuber because of Pauli blocking.) If nothing happens to the produced scalar particles they will becoe non-relativistic after a few Hubble ties, and are expected to decay at their one-particle decay rate. 8 If, on the other hand, they theralize then they turn into highly relativistic radiation. At the present tie it is not clear whether paraetric resonance can really create particles which theralize successfully. However, it is clear that the flaton coponent of the produced particles cannot theralize because here one knows that the interaction is too weak. Furtherore, one expects that the energy density of the produced flatons will be a significant fraction of the total energy density [43]. Thus, even if the other produced particles theralize proptly one expects that a significant fraction of non-theralized energy will reain, and that a significant fraction of that energy will be in flaton particles. Any theralized radiation produced by paraetric resonance will redshift away, so independently of the details one expects that a few Hubble ties after the end of theral inflation the energy density is doinated by non-relativistic scalar particles, including the flatons and perhaps other species. Each species will decay at the single-particle decay rate, so we expect eventually to find only the longest-lived species, which doinates the energy density until it decays. For siplicity we shall assue in what follows that this species is the flaton itself, and we shall also ignore the effect of any radiation produced by particle decay. Thus we are in effect assuing that soon after theral inflation has ended, soe fraction ǫ of the energy is in non-relativistic flaton particles which decay according to the one-particle decay rate, with the reainder in theralized radiation. This should describe the real situation at least approxiately, provided that any non-flaton particles produced decay at least as rapidly as the flatons. The iportant special case ǫ = 1 is considered, and the possibility that ǫ ay be very sall is not discounted. However, as as discussed above, this latter case sees unlikely because one expects that paraetric resonance will convert a significant fraction of the energy density into flaton particles which interact too weakly to theralize. The upshot of this discussion is that despite the possible occurrence of paraetric resonance, one expects that the eventual reheat teperature after theral inflation is still the teperature T D calculated fro the single-particle decay rate, as given by Eq. (19). If T D is indeed the reheat teperature, the requireent that it be not too low places strong restrictions on M. In order not to upset nucleosynthesis one ust have T D > 10 MeV, which requires M < 1014 GeV (taking < 10 3 GeV). 9 However, if R parity is respected as is usually supposed, there is a stable LSP which iposes a uch stronger constraint. Indeed, to bring the LSP into theral equilibriu so that it is not over-produced (and can naturally have the correct abundance to be the dark atter), one needs T D substantially in excess of the LSP decoupling teperature which is of order 1 GeV. Thus one needs M < 101 GeV. Finally, one ight wish to generate baryon nuber through the electroweak transition which would require T D > 100 GeV corresponding to M < 1010 GeV. In view of the fact that these liits are perhaps rather conservative (since one expects γ to be significantly less than 1, and does not anticipate as high as 10 3 GeV) this last requireent is hardly likely to be satisfied, but other baryogenesis echaniss exist as discussed in [13]. 8 When the the particles have becoe non-relativistic one ight think that paraetric resonance will recoence, since the wavenuber of the corresponding scalar field is negligible copared with its frequency. However, the collection of nonrelativistic particles corresponds to a superposition of alost-classical quantu states, not to any one such state, since the phases of the corresponding fields are uncorrelated, so it is not clear that the paraetric resonance foralis applies. More iportantly, the aplitude of the would-be classical oscillation will typically be too sall for paraetric resonance to occur. We are indebted to A. D. Linde for helpful correspondence about this issue. 9 In [11] we estiated M < 1016 GeV. The extra factor 100 cae fro three different sources. First we used the very naive estiate Γ 3 /M, corresponding to γ 1/ = 10. Second, we set g 1/ = 1 where as the true value is ore like 10 1/. Third, we rounded up our estiate of T D to the nearest power of ten which eant ultiplying it by of order 10 1/. It so happened that each of these approxiations went the sae way to give the factor

11 III. COSMOLOGY WITH THERMAL INFLATION We now give a systeatic account of the history of the early Universe in the case where there is theral inflation. We assue that there is a oduli proble because this provides the strongest otivation for theral inflation, and assue that at least soe of the oduli have a vev of order M. We also assue that any radiation produced by paraetric resonance proptly theralizes. With these assuptions there are the following eras which we shall consider in turn. 1. Ordinary inflation.. Matter doination by the hoogeneous oscillation of the inflaton (unless full reheating occurs proptly). 3. Full reheating, which leads to radiation doination if it occurs before the oduli start to oscillate. 4. Hoogeneous oscillation of the oduli, starting at the epoch H Φ. If reheating has previously occurred there is now atter doination by the oduli. If it has not occurred the oduli and inflaton atter densities are roughly coparable, and reain so until full reheating (of the inflaton atter). We assue that full reheating takes place before the beginning of theral inflation. 5. Theral inflation. 6. Matter doination by the hoogeneous oscillation of the flaton field which caused theral inflation (unless reheating occurs proptly). 7. Full reheating of the flaton atter, leading to radiation doination before nucleosynthesis after which the history of the Universe is the standard one. A. Before theral inflation One expects the Universe to start with an era of ordinary inflation [,3], whether or not there is a later epoch of theral inflation. During this era, the energy density ρ is doinated by the potential V of the scalar fields, with all except the inflaton field (or fields) fixed. The inflaton field slowly rolls down the potential, because in its direction the flatness conditions M V /V 1 and V H are satisfied [,3]. We noted earlier that in the context of supergravity the second of these conditions requires cancellations. Although these ight be accidental it is attractive to suppose that they occur by virtue of soe syetry. One suitable syetry (ost easily ipleented in the context of hybrid inflation [5]) was suggested in [6,44,45] and another has been proposed in [46]. A third possibility is to invoke a global U(1) syetry as in [47], but this is probleatical because the inflaton potential vanishes in the liit where the syetry is exact so that the agnitude of V is difficult to control. 10 To avoid generating too uch large scale cb anisotropy the potential at the end of ordinary inflation ust satisfy [4] V 1/4 < GeV (0) At soe epoch after ordinary inflation reheating occurs, which by definition eans that practically all of the energy density theralizes (except for the contribution of oduli). If reheating is propt the reheat teperature is T R (V/g ) 1/4. A naive estiate of the tie taken for reheat would be that it is the decay tie of a single inflaton particle, which typically leads to a uch lower reheat teperature. However propt conversion of a large fraction of the energy density into arginally relativistic particles is likely. In the coonly discussed case where inflation ends with the oscillation of a hoogeneous inflaton field this is expected to occur through the paraetric resonance effect that we considered already for the case of theral inflation. It is also expected to occur in the case of hybrid inflation though a quantitative account of this case has not yet been given, and will be ore coplicated because 10 An alternative idea [48] is to suppose that the potential is exactly flat (or at least uch flatter than that of the inflaton field) in the direction of at least one field, say a odulus, which couples to the inflaton. The inflaton potential then depends on the value of this field, which will vary fro place to place in the Universe allowing the possibility that we live in a region where the inflaton potential happens to be sufficiently flat. But this just pushes back to another level the proble of finding cancellations which keep the potential flat in soe direction. 11

12 spatial gradients are probably iportant fro the beginning [6]. As we discussed earlier these arginally relativistic particles ay then theralize proptly leading to full or partial reheating. 11 Moduli (ore precisely, those oduli if any which are flatons with M M ) are produced both before and after theral inflation, and we shall call the oduli fro these sources respectively big bang oduli and theral inflation oduli. When H Φ the odulus potential is given by Eq. (17), so that Φ is shifted fro its true vacuu value by Φ 0 = Φ Φ 1 M. Φ will depend on the coposition of the Universe and so Φ 0 will change at any phase transitions, such as the end of inflation, but Φ will rapidly settle down to its new iniu as it is critically daped. However, at the epoch H Φ it starts to oscillate about the iniu of its low energy effective potential, and after H has fallen significantly below Φ, the oscillations will no longer be critically daped and so are uch ore dangerous. During theral inflation H Φ, so the effective potential is doinated by V true but V cos still gives a sall contribution, so the position of the iniu is shifted slightly fro the true vacuu value. Oversiplifying a bit, we can estiate the shift by adding together V true and V cos which gives V = 1 Φ (Φ Φ 1) + α H (Φ Φ ) +... (1) = 1 Φ δφ + α H (δφ Φ 0 ) +... () = 1 ( Φ + αh ) ( αh ) δφ Φ + Φ αh (3) where δφ = Φ Φ 1 is the displaceent of Φ fro its vev. In the last line α is of order 1, so the iniu of the odulus potential is shifted during theral inflation by an aount of order (H/ Φ ) M [11]. To estiate roughly the abundance of big bang oduli, we can assue that the odulus field starts to oscillate about its vev when H Φ with aplitude of order Φ 0 M. The energy density ρ Φ Φ Φ 0/ is of order the total energy density. If reheating has already occurred one can crudely set the radiation energy density equal to the total energy density which leads to the estiate n Φ s Φ 0 10M 3/ 1/ Φ (4) (In this expression s is the entropy density, and we are using the standard results suarized in the footnote after Eq. (19).) If reheating occurs later the oduli energy density is a fixed fraction of the total until reheating, and again setting the radiation density equal to the total density after reheating one finds n Φ s Φ 0 H1/ R 10M 3/ Φ (5) It is described in the Appendix how a ore sophisticated calculation leads to the sae results. We shall assue that full reheating occurs before the onset of theral inflation (except for the contribution of oduli). The opposite case will be discussed in [13]. These estiates for the oduli apply to any flaton not giving rise to theral inflation (option (iv) of Section.4), if Φ 0 is replaced by M. B. Theral Inflation Theral inflation will occur if one or ore of the flaton fields is trapped at the origin in the early Universe. For the oent we suppose that only one is trapped. 11 Note, though, that an extreely low fraction of the energy density cannot theralize because theralization requires that the interaction rate per particle exceeds H. If the decay products are charged under soe gauge syetry, this requires αg T > H where α is the gauge coupling. Setting α g 1/ 10 1, one finds that it is satisfied only if the fraction is bigger than V/(10 16 GeV) 4. This constraint does not see to have been noted before in the literature. 1