PAPER Sensitivity of Time Response to Characteristic Ratios
|
|
- Calvin Hart
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 520 IEICE TRANS FUNDAMENTALS, VOLE89 A, NO2 FEBRUARY 2006 PAPER Sensitivity of Time Response to Characteristic Ratios Youngchol KIM a), Member, Keunsik KIM b), and Shunji MANABE, Nonmembers SUMMARY In recent works [], [4], it has been shown that the damping of a linear time invariant system relates to the so-called characteristic ratios (α k, k,, n ) which are defined by coefficients of the denominator of the transfer function However, the exact relations are not yet fully understood For the purpose of exploring the issue, this paper presents the analysis of time response sensitivity to the characteristic ratio change We begin with the sensitivity of output to the perturbations of coefficients of the system denominator and then the first order approximation of the α k perturbation effect is computed by an explicit transfer function The results are extended to all-pole systems in order to investigate which characteristic ratios act dominantly on step response The same analysis is also performed to a special class of systems whose denominator is composed of so called K-polynomial Finally, some illustrative examples are given key words: sensitivity, characteristic ratios Introduction In control system design, time response specifications, mainly overshoot and the speed of response, are the most popular ways of describing transient response In [], some classical studies regarding transient response are reviewed The essence of these studies by Naslin [2] and Kessler [3] is to characterize the transient response in terms of coefficients of the characteristic polynomial rather than by its roots by defining the characteristic ratios Naslin claimed that the characteristic ratios are closely related to the overshoot of the system step response It was shown that all-pole systems with characteristic polynomials that share the same characteristic ratios give remarkably similar step responses This led to the new design techniques called the characteristic ratio assignment (CRA) in [] and the coefficient diagram method (CDM) [4] Kitamori [5] has investigated a partial model matching method based on the so called Independency from successors: IFS, wherein he suggested a standard form of all pole type reference model that can be simply applied to the problem of obtaining good transient responses with PID controller He has also pointed out that the step responses are mostly affected by the coefficients of lower-order terms in transfer function but are little affected Manuscript received August 2, 2004 Manuscript revised June 27, 2005 Final manuscript received November 4, 2005 The author is with the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Korea The author is with the School of Automobile Engineering, Ajou Motor College, Korea The author is at Fujisawa-shi, Japan a) yckim@cbuackr b) kskim@motorackr DOI: 0093/ietfec/e89 a2520 by those of higher-order terms The CDM and CRA methods require properly choosing the characteristic ratios in order to build a target model that meets the desired time response However, the analytical relationship between time response and α k is not yet known This paper presents some new results about the time response characteristics of α k by analyzing the sensitivity of step response to the α k perturbations To consider the sensitivity of output y(t,α k )ofa system having a parameter of interest, α k, we compute the effect of a perturbation α k on the nominal response by using Taylor s series expansion, y(t,α k + α k ) y(t,α k ) + y α k +, () α k for k, 2,, n The first order approximation of the α k perturbation effect is y k (t) y α k (2) α k This function can be generated from the system itself as shown by Franklin et al [6] and Perkins et al [8] The output sensitivity model in [8] is derived using superposition and several block diagram manipulations However, the process of obtaining it is somewhat complicated In the present paper, we provide a new method for directly generating the time response sensitivity relative to the individual characteristic ratio change This sensitivity represents how effectively each characteristic ratio relates to the time response In a later section, we will establish the fact that the overshoot of the step response of all-pole systems is largely affected by the characteristic ratios,α 2 and α 3 This means that the rest of the α k s have little effect on the step response but are crucial for maintaining stability In [], a method that obtains a special all-pole system with small or no overshoot has been proposed This characteristic polynomial is completely characterized by the principal characteristic ratio and the remaining characteristic ratios are fixed functions of We call the polynomial K polynomial here It was also shown that the stability of K polynomial is always preserved for any 2 This paper also deals with the sensitivity analysis of K polynomial to the perturbation Some examples are given for illustration 2 Definitions and Preliminary Results In this section, we develop some preliminary results of time Copyright c 2006 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers
2 KIM et al: SENSITIVITY OF TIME RESPONSE TO CHARACTERISTIC RATIOS 52 Fig Kessler s 2 loop structure response sensitivity to coefficient changes Consider a linear system whose transfer function is T(s) n(s) δ(s) b ms m + b m s m + + b 0 (3) a n s n + a n s n + + a 0 The characteristic ratios are defined as: a2,α 2 a2 2,,α n a2 n (4) a 0 a 2 a a 3 a n 2 a n and the generalized time constant is defined to be τ : a (5) a 0 Conversely, the coefficients a i of δ(s) may also be represented in terms of α i s and τ as follows: a a 0 τ (6) a 0 τ i a i, for i2,, n (7) α i α 2 i 2α3 i 3 αi 2 2 αi Although the analytical relationships between damping and characteristic ratio are not yet known, the dependency can be explained by using the Kessler s multiple loop structure [3] For the purpose of this discussion, let us consider the 2-loop system shown in Fig The transfer function of the overall system is T(s) + τ s [ + τ 2 s( + τ 3 s)] τ τ 2 τ 3 s 3 + τ τ 2 s 2 + τ s + According to Eq (4), the characteristic ratios of T(s) are τ, α 2 τ 2 (8) τ 2 τ 3 Now, we first consider the dynamics of the inner loop system Its transfer function and the characteristic ratio are as follows: T i (s) + τ 2 s( + τ 3 s) τ 2 τ 3 s 2 + τ 2 s +, α τ 2 α 2 (9) τ 3 Secondly, if we assume that with τ >τ 2 τ 3, T(s) can be approximated as follows: T(s) + τ s( + τ 2 s) τ τ 2 s 2 + τ s + :T 0(s) Then the characteristic ratio of T 0 (s) becomes αˆ τ (0) τ 2 Furthermore, it is easily seen that the damping ratio of an second-order system is identical to ζ 2 Since the allpole system of arbitrary order is also developed in the same manner, we can say from Eqs (9), (0) that the characteristic ratio of an all-pole system is closely related to the damping It was shown in [] that τ represents the speed of the response of a system with denominator δ(s) The speed of time response can be controlled by the generalized time constant independent on the characteristic ratios As mentioned in the introduction, our concern of interest is to find out how the step response of the system in Eq (3) changes as each characteristic ratio changes We now define the unnormalized function sensitivity to the perturbation of the j-th coefficient of δ(s) as USa T j : T(s) () /a j Let the unit step response of the unnormalized function sensitivity be ya s j (t) That is, Ya s j (s) USa T j (s) R(s) wherethe input R(s) /s As shown earlier, the effect of a perturbation a j about a nominal a j can be similarly evaluated by a Taylor s series: y(t, a j + a j ) y(t, a j ) + y a j +, (2) for j 0,, 2,, n y(t, a j ) : y a j can be determined by the following Lemma, which will be used for the proof of the main results in a later section Lemma : Consider a linear system in Eq (3) Then the unnormalized function sensitivity and the first order approximation of output response change to the perturbation of j-th coefficient of δ(s) are determined by (i) USa T j a js j T(s), for j 0,,, n (3) δ(s) (ii) y(t, a j ) a j ya s a j (t) (4) j Proof: It is straightforward to derive part (i) For the proof of part (ii), let us consider the Taylor s series of T(s) when a j perturbs T(s, a j + a j ) T(s, a j ) + T a j +, for j 0,, 2,, n The first order approximation of a j perturbation effect, T(s, a j ), becomes as follows: T(s, a j ): T a j a j USa T a j j Since y(t, a j ) is the step response of T(s, a j ), the proof is completed
3 522 We now introduce another type of sensitivity that has the relative form It is seen from Eqs (6) and (7) that the coefficients of δ(s) are nonlinear functions of the characteristic ratios We define the coefficient sensitivity as S a j α k : /a j α k (5) α k /α k a j α k The following relationship will be used in the derivation of the main result We state the Lemma without the proof Lemma 2: For the linear system in Eq (3), the coefficient sensitivity of a j with respect to the perturbation of α k is { S a j ( j k) ifk < j, for k, 2,, n, α k (6) 0, if k j, j 0,, 2,, n 3 Time Response Sensitivity to Characteristic Ratio Change In this section, we will present how the step response changes as the characteristic ratio changes Time response sensitivities are studied for three cases: () a general transfer function as in Eq (3), (2) all-pole systems of degree n,(3)a special class of all-pole system whose denominator shall be composed of K polynomial 3 Time Response Sensitivity: A General Case We first define the other unnormalized function sensitivity relative to characteristic ratios as follows: US T α k : T(s) α k /α k (7) Recall Eqs () and (2) Let the unit step response of US T α k be Y s α k (s) That is, Y s α k (s) US T α k R(s), (8) where R(s) /s yα s k (t) indicates the inverse Laplace transform of Yα s k (s) Then the following Theorem states that y(t) in Eq (2) can be computed by an explicit transfer function Theorem : Given a stable T(s) as in Eq (3), the unnormalized function sensitivity and the first order approximation of step response perturbation to the α k change are determined by (i) US T α k : jk+ ( j k)a j s j T(s) (9) δ(s) (ii) y k (t) α k yα s α k (t), for k,, n (20) k Proof: Since δ(s) is stable, all a j are non-zero and positive Therefore, T : T(s, a 0, a,, a n ) is continuously differentiable with respect to a j and the coefficients a j are also differentiable to α k because they are functions of α k s Using the so-called chain rule we have IEICE TRANS FUNDAMENTALS, VOLE89 A, NO2 FEBRUARY 2006 T α k T a k+ + T a k+2 (2) a k+ α k a k+2 α k + T + a k+3 + T a n a k+3 α k a n α k Eq (22) was derived using the fact that a j is the function of α k for only k ( j ) Now rewrite Eqs () and (5) as T USa T a j, j (22) a j S a j α α k α k k (23) From Eqs (7) and (22), (23), we have US T α k α k T α k jk+ US T a j S a j α k (24) Using Lemma and Lemma 2 in this sequence, Eq (24) becomes USα T k ( j k)a j s j n(s) jk+ ( j k)a j s j T(s) δ(s) jk+ Therefore, part (i) has been proven The proof of part (ii) is similar to the one of Lemma Thus, from Eq (7), it is easily seen that T k (s) : T(s,α k ) T α k α k USα T α k α k k Since y k (t) is identical to the step response of T k (s), the proof is completed Remark : (The effect of τ on the output sensitivity function): So far, we have only dealt with the time response sensitivity for characteristic ratios under the assumption that the generalized time constant is constant In [], it was shown that if two systems, whose generalized time constants are τ and τ 2 respectively, share the same characteristic ratios, then the step response is exactly time-scaled by factor β τ /τ 2 From this result, it is easy to derive that ( ) yτ s 2 (t) yτ s β t, (25) where yτ s k (t)fork, 2 indicate the output sensitivity functions of the systems having τ k while their characteristic ratios share the same values Example : (Time response sensitivities when and α 3 perturb): Consider the system in Eq (3) of which n(s) s 3 + 5s 2 + s + 5 δ(s) s s s s s 3
4 KIM et al: SENSITIVITY OF TIME RESPONSE TO CHARACTERISTIC RATIOS s 2 + 5s + 5 The generalized time constant is τ and the characteristic ratios of the nominal model are [,,α 6 ][2285, 777, 65, 65, 777, 2285] Let the step response of the nominal system be y o (t) Consider that α k for k, 3 are changed by ±0% individually while the rest of α k s are fixed at the same values as the nominal system The y p (t) denotes the step response of the corresponding perturbed model Then the first-order approximation y k (t) of step response perturbation corresponding to the deviation of α k, α k ±0α k is computed by using (9) and (20) Neglecting all the higher-order terms in (), the estimated value of y p (t) may be defined by y s α k (t) : y o (t) + y k (t) (26) Figure 2 and Fig 3 show y s and step responses for the cases where is changed by 0%, respectively The estimated output y s (t) is shown closely along with the true response y p (t) As predicted by part (ii) of Theorem, the parameter perturbation effect either increases or decreases according to the sign of y k (t) Figure 4 and Fig 5 show the cases where α 3 is changed by ±0% The results are almost the same However, it is noted that the profile of yα s 3 has the largest value at the second extremum, and the shape is quite different from that of yα s In order to look into the reason furthermore, rewriting (8) and (9), Yα s (a 2 s + 2a 3 s a 7 s 6 n(s) ) (27) Yα s 3 (a 4 s 3 + 2a 5 s 4 + 3a 6 s 5 + 4a 7 s 6 n(s) ) (28) Let the impulse response of H(s) : n(s) denote h(t) Taking the inverse Laplace transform to (27) and (28), we have yα s (t) a 2 h (t) + 2a 3 h (t) + + 6a 7 h (6), (29) yα s 3 (t) a 4 h (3) (t) + 2a 5 h (4) (t) + 3a 6 h (5) (t) (30) +4a 7 h (6), where h (n) indicates the n-th derivative of h(t) Comparing (29) with (3), it reveals evidently that yα s k (t) does not contain lower-order derivatives of h(t) than that of the k th As a result, the shapes of yα s k (t) shall be different according to the order k Also, it is remarkable that yα s k (t) depends on H(s) as well Fig 2 Step responses and output sensitivity function with (Example ) Fig 4 Step responses and output sensitivity function with α 3 (Example ) Fig 3 Step responses and output sensitivity function with 09 (Example ) Fig 5 Step responses and output sensitivity function with 09α 3 (Example )
5 524 IEICE TRANS FUNDAMENTALS, VOLE89 A, NO2 FEBRUARY Dominant Characteristic Ratios of All-Pole Systems Since the transient response is generally affected by zeros as well as poles, it is more appropriate to consider the all-pole systems in order to study the pure time response sensitivity of the characteristic ratio This section presents the issue As a result, we will establish the fact that the transient response of all-pole systems is dominantly affected by only the principal characteristic ratios,α 2 and α 3 Consider the stable all-pole system T A (s) a 0 δ(s) a 0 (3) a n s n + a n s n + + a 0 Then from Eq (9) in Theorem, the unnormalized function sensitivity for T A (s) isgivenby US T A α k : T A(s) α k /α k jk+ ( j k)a j s j T A (s) (32) δ(s) For the sake of convenience, we describe the output sensitivity functions Yα s k US T A α k R(s) when the degree of δ(s)is n 7 Yα s a 0(a 2 s + 2a 3 s 2 + 3a 4 s a 7 s 6 ) Yα s 2 a 0(a 3 s 2 + 2a 4 s 3 + 5a 7 s 6 ) (33) Yα s 5 a 0(a 6 s 5 + 2a 7 s 6 ) Yα s 6 a 0(a 7 s 6 ) Before going on to Eq (33), we introduce two important properties regarding the relationships between τ, α k and coefficients of δ(s) As mentioned in Remark (see also []), the change of τ in Eqs (6), (7), make the output sensitivity function in the time domain merely time-scaled In other words, the minimum and the maximum values of yτ s k remain the same regardless of the τ change Thus, we may set τ without loss of generality as long as we deal with the sensitivity problems of α k The other property comes from results developed in [9] and [4] Several sufficient conditions for stability in [9] are in terms of the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial Rewriting the conditions in terms of α k, a real polynomial is stable if one of the following is satisfied (i) αi α i+ > 4656 for i, 2,, n 2, (ii) α i 2374( α i + α i+ )fori, 2,, n 2 Furthermore, Lipatov and Sokolov discovered the fact that if α k 4forallk, 2,, n, then every root of δ(s) is distinctively located on the negative real axis Manabe [4] has investigated the problem of obtaining good transient response of control systems by means of the characteristic ratio and the generalized time constant (which he calls the stability index and the equivalent time constant) According to his observations, the all-pole system of any degree of which its characteristic ratios are 25,α i 2for i 2, 3,, n gives good damping Now, recalling that τ, and if we substitute the conditions of Lipatov and Sokolov above into Eq (7), it is obvious that higher degree coefficients of δ(s) should be much smaller than those of lower degree In other words, the following inequality holds: a 0 a > a 2 > a 3 > > a n, Applying this relationship to Eq (33) results in y s max > y s α 2 max > > y s α 6 max (34) where y s α k max indicates the maximum value of the impulse response of Y s α k According to (20) and (26), the α k that gives rise to the large y s α k (t) should dominantly act on step response However, it is difficult to quantitatively determine by what characteristic ratios its step response is significantly connected, because y s α k (t) depends upon δ(s) We have observed through many simulations that only three principal characteristic ratios,, α 2 and α 3, are the most dominant factors dictating the damping of transient response This means that the above result accords well the Kitamori s assertion which was cited in the introduction The following example explains this Example 2: Consider a stable all-pole system that is of Type I, n 7andτ The values of the characteristic ratios for the nominal model are chosen to be the same values as those in Example The coefficients of corresponding δ(s) are given as follows: [a 0, a,, a 7 ] [5, 5, 6565, 67, 024, , 0 3, ] Comparing the values of a 2, a 3, a 4 with a 6, a 7,itisverified immediately from Eq (33) that Eq (34) holds The problem of interest is to show by which values of α k for k, 2,, n the transient response is largely affected To do this, we make one characteristic ratio at a time either increased by 25 times or decreased by 08 times while the rest of α k s are fixed at nominal values Since every pole is real and negative if α k 4forallk, increasing the value more than 25 times is of no use The decreasing factor was determined near the marginal value for which the stability condition of Lipatov and Sokolov is not lost For all these cases, step responses and output sensitivity functions have been computed Figure 6 Fig 9 show the results for four cases The effects of α k for k 5 are vanishingly small and can be neglected In the figures, y 25 (t) andy 08 (t) indicate the step response of T A (s) for which only one α k is changed to 25α k and 08α k, respectively It is shown that,α 2 and α 3 have much greater influence than the rest
6 KIM et al: SENSITIVITY OF TIME RESPONSE TO CHARACTERISTIC RATIOS 525 Fig 6 Step responses and output sensitivity function when changes (Example 2) Fig 9 Step responses and output sensitivity function when α 4 changes (Example 2) remains for most stable T(s)in(3) 33 Time Response Sensitivity for A Special System with K Polynomial In the present section, we consider a special class of systems whose denominator shall be composed of K polynomial [] The K polynomial δ k (s) is defined as the polynomial whose coefficients are generated using Eqs (6),(7) and the following function: Fig 7 Step responses and output sensitivity function when α 2 changes (Example 2) Fig 8 Step responses and output sensitivity function when α 3 changes (Example 2) Remark 2: (The dominant characteristic ratios of system including zeros): The dominance of characteristic ratios on the step response has been analyzed for the all pole type transfer functions For the case where system T(s) contains zeros, higher-order characteristic ratios over, α 2 and α 3 may be connected to the time response This is the reason that as shown in (27) (3), y s α k (t) depends upon not only the denominator of T(s) but also the numerator However, it is our observations that the dominance of three, α 2 and α 3 (i) > 2 (35) (ii) α k sin ( ) ( ) kπ n + sin π n 2sin ( ), (36) kπ n for k 2,, n For instance, when n 6 and choose 2464, (37) results in [ α 2 α 3 α 4 α 5 ] [ ] Then it is easy to generate a δ k (s) using (6) and (7) In [], it was shown that such an all-pole system T A (s) a 0 δ k (s) guarantees the stability and its frequency magnitude function is monotonically decreasing Furthermore, it is important to note that the K polynomial is generated by only for a given τ Let sdefinet K (s) n(s) δ k (s) Now, we are going to examine the time response sensitivity when perturbs Note that T K (s) is a function of only when τ and a 0 are given Lemma 3: The coefficient sensitivity of T K (s) relative to the change is determined by S a j : /a j / j (k ) (37) k Proof: The proof is omitted here Let the unit step response of US T K be Yα ks (s) That is, Yα ks (s) US T K R(s), where R(s) /s y ks (t) indicates the inverse Laplace transform of Yα ks (s) Then, similarly to Section 3, we have the following result Theorem 2: Given a T K (s) as in Eq (3), the unnormalized
7 526 IEICE TRANS FUNDAMENTALS, VOLE89 A, NO2 FEBRUARY 2006 function sensitivity and the first order approximation of step response perturbation to the change are determined by (i) US T K : j a j s j δ k (s) T K(s) j (k ), (38) (ii) y(t, ) y ks α (t) (39) Proof: Since T K (s) is in the form of Eq (3), by Eq (3) we have US T K a j : T K(s) a js j n(s) /a j δ 2 k (s), for j, 2,, n (40) From Eq (22), T K k a j US T K a j (4) Since T K (s) T K (s, a 0, a,, a n ) is stable because K polynomial is always stable and its coefficients are continuously differentiable with respect to, by using the chain rule, we have T K T K a 2 + T K a T K a n (42) a 2 a 3 a n By Eqs (5), (6) and (4), the unnormalized function sensitivity of T K (s) is given as US T K : T k / j US T K a j S a j (43) Finally, by substituting Eq (40) and Lemma 3 into Eq (43), part (i) is proven The proof of part (ii) is trivial because it is derived in the same manner as Theorem Acknowledgment This work was supported by grant NoR from the Basic Research Program of the Korea Science & Engineering Foundation References [] YC Kim, LH Keel, and SP Bhattachayya, Transient response control via characteristic ratio assignment, IEEE Trans Autom Control, volac-48, no2, pp , Dec 2003 [2] P Naslin, Essentials of Optimal Control, Boston Technical Publishers, Cambridge, MA, 969 [3] C Kessler, Ein Beitrag zur Theorie mehrschleifiger Regelungen, Regelungstechnik, vol8, no8, pp26 266, 960 [4] S Manabe, Coefficient diagram method, Proc 4th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace, pp99 20, Seoul, Korea, 998 [5] T Kitamori, A method of control system design based upon partial knoweldge about controlled process, Trans of Society of Instrument and Control Engineers in Japan, vol5, no4, pp , 979 [6] GF Franklin, JD Powel, and A Emani-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002 [7] LP Huelsman, Active and Passive Analog Filter Design: An Introduction, McGraw-Hill, 993 [8] WR Perkins, PV Kokotovic, T Bourret, and JL Schiano, Sensitivity function methods in control system education, Proc IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education, pp23 28, Massachusetts, USA, 99 [9] AV Lipatov and NI Sokolov, Some sufficient conditions for stability and instability of continuous linear stationary systems, Automation and Remote Coontrol, vol39, pp285 29, 979 [0] K S Kim, YC Kim, LH Keel, and SP Bhattacharyya, PID controller design with response specifications, Proc 2003 American Control Conference, pp , Denver, CO, Conclusions When we deal with the problem of time response control of a linear system, it has been mainly carried out in root space Recently, instead of pole and zero, a different method that uses the relationships between coefficients of characteristic polynomial and time response such as overshoot and response rate has started to attract attention The idea was initially provided by Naslin in the mid of 960s [2] The present paper presented some new results in this regard Through the analysis of time response sensitivities to the characteristic ratios, we have shown how the parameters relate to the step response In particular, if it is the all-pole system, the damping of step response is dominantly characterized by only,α 2 and α 3 If we recall that the speed of response for a given LTI system is completely characterized by the generalized time constant τ [], we can conclude after all that the dominant factors representing transient response behavior are,α 2, α 3 and τwehavealsoanalyzed the sensitivity of time response to a special class of system of which the denominator is composed of K polynomial [] These results can be useful for constructing a reference model by means of the characteristic ratio, as shown in CRA [], [0] and CDM [4] Youngchol Kim received his BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Korea Univ, Korea in 98, and his MS and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from Seoul National Univ, Korea in 983 and 987 respectively Since March 988, he has been with the School of Electrical &Computer Eng, Chungbuk National Univ, Korea, where he is currently a Professor He was a post-doctoral fellow at Texas A&M Univ, , and a visiting research fellow at the COE-ISM, Tennessee State Univ / Vanderbilt Univ, He served as an Associate Editor for the Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers, He is the director of Technical Society of Control and Instrument, KIEE since 2004 He is a member of IEEE, KIEE, IEEK, and ICASE His current research interests include robust control and low-order controller design in parameter space
8 KIM et al: SENSITIVITY OF TIME RESPONSE TO CHARACTERISTIC RATIOS 527 Keunsik Kim was born in Yesan, Korea, on May, 2, 963 He received his BS and MS degrees in Electronic Engineering from Hanyang University, Korea in 985 and 987, respectively, and his PhD degree in Electronic Engineering from Chungbuk National University, Korea in 2003 During , he worked in Agency for Defence Development (ADD), Korea In 994, he was employed by Korea Automotive Technology Institute as a research engineer In 996, he joined Ajou Motor College, where he is currently an associate professor His research interests include low-order controller design and robust control in parameter space Shunji Manabe received BE from Tokyo Univ in 952, MS from the Ohio State Univ in 954, and PhD in engineering from Tokyo Univ in 962 He has been engaged in system design of various control systems at Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, such as motor control, radar antenna control, computer control, and spacecraft control From 990 to 2000, he taught contol theory at Tokai University His current interest is the development of the Coefficient Diagram Method, a new simple and efficient control design approach He is a member of IEEE, AIAA, IEE-J, SICE, and IFAC aerospace technical committee He has served as an editor and board member at IEE-J and SICE on various occasions
A Note on Bode Plot Asymptotes based on Transfer Function Coefficients
ICCAS5 June -5, KINTEX, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea A Note on Bode Plot Asymptotes based on Transfer Function Coefficients Young Chol Kim, Kwan Ho Lee and Young Tae Woo School of Electrical & Computer Eng., Chungbuk
More informationRobust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Using Coefficient Diagram Method
International Journal of Electrical Engineering. ISSN 0974-2158 Volume 7, Number 2 (2014), pp. 257-270 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
More informationLinear Feedback Control Using Quasi Velocities
Linear Feedback Control Using Quasi Velocities Andrew J Sinclair Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849 John E Hurtado and John L Junkins Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 A novel approach
More informationDesign and Stability Analysis of Single-Input Fuzzy Logic Controller
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 30, NO. 2, APRIL 2000 303 Design and Stability Analysis of Single-Input Fuzzy Logic Controller Byung-Jae Choi, Seong-Woo Kwak,
More informationTuning Method of PI Controller with Desired Damping Coefficient for a First-order Lag Plus Deadtime System
PID' Brescia (Italy), March 8-0, 0 FrA. Tuning Method of PI Controller with Desired Damping Coefficient for a First-order Lag Plus Deadtime System Yuji Yamakawa*. Yohei Okada** Takanori Yamazaki***. Shigeru
More informationRecent Development of Coefficient Diagram Method
Recent Development of Coefficient Diagram Method Shunji Manabe*, Young-Chol Kim *Tokai University, Control Engineering Department 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka-shi, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan Tel: +81-466-23-2601,
More informationA FEEDBACK STRUCTURE WITH HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES IN REGULATOR. Ryszard Gessing
A FEEDBACK STRUCTURE WITH HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES IN REGULATOR Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationTHIS paper deals with robust control in the setup associated
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 50, NO 10, OCTOBER 2005 1501 Control-Oriented Model Validation and Errors Quantification in the `1 Setup V F Sokolov Abstract A priori information required for
More informationComputation of Stabilizing PI and PID parameters for multivariable system with time delays
Computation of Stabilizing PI and PID parameters for multivariable system with time delays Nour El Houda Mansour, Sami Hafsi, Kaouther Laabidi Laboratoire d Analyse, Conception et Commande des Systèmes
More informationPolynomial-based Inertia Ratio Controller Design for Vibration Suppression in Two-Mass System
Polynomial-based Inertia Ratio Controller Design for Vibration Suppression in Two-Mass System Yue Qiao Univ. of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. Joint Institute Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai
More informationResearch Article On Complementary Root Locus of Biproper Transfer Functions
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 9, Article ID 779, pages doi:.55/9/779 Research Article On Complementary Root Locus of Biproper Transfer Functions Marcelo C. M. Teixeira, Edvaldo Assunção,
More informationSimulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach
Simulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach Ufuk Bakirdogen*, Matthias Liermann** *Institute for Fluid Power Drives and Controls (IFAS),
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationParameter Derivation of Type-2 Discrete-Time Phase-Locked Loops Containing Feedback Delays
Parameter Derivation of Type- Discrete-Time Phase-Locked Loops Containing Feedback Delays Joey Wilson, Andrew Nelson, and Behrouz Farhang-Boroujeny joey.wilson@utah.edu, nelson@math.utah.edu, farhang@ece.utah.edu
More informationModel-based PID tuning for high-order processes: when to approximate
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 25 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 25 ThB5. Model-based PID tuning for high-order processes: when to approximate
More informationQUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS
Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2003, Vol. 13, No. 2, 179 184 QUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS PINI GURFIL Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
More informationThe Complete Set of PID Controllers with Guaranteed Gain and Phase Margins
Proceedings of the th IEEE onference on Decision and ontrol, and the European ontrol onference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 ThA7.5 The omplete Set of PID ontrollers with Guaranteed Gain and Phase Margins
More informationAnalyzing the Stability Robustness of Interval Polynomials
1 Analyzing the Stability Robustness of Interval Polynomials Prof. Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Correspondence concerning this paper should be sent to
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION - Vol. XII - Lyapunov Stability - Hassan K. Khalil
LYAPUNO STABILITY Hassan K. Khalil Department of Electrical and Computer Enigneering, Michigan State University, USA. Keywords: Asymptotic stability, Autonomous systems, Exponential stability, Global asymptotic
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationUniversity of Science and Technology, Sudan Department of Chemical Engineering.
ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 Design and Decoupling of Control System for a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) Georgeous, N.B *1 and Gasmalseed, G.A, Abdalla, B.K (1-2) University
More informationAn Adaptive LQG Combined With the MRAS Based LFFC for Motion Control Systems
Journal of Automation Control Engineering Vol 3 No 2 April 2015 An Adaptive LQG Combined With the MRAS Based LFFC for Motion Control Systems Nguyen Duy Cuong Nguyen Van Lanh Gia Thi Dinh Electronics Faculty
More informationDr. Ian R. Manchester
Dr Ian R. Manchester Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationOn the Cross-Correlation of a p-ary m-sequence of Period p 2m 1 and Its Decimated
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL 58, NO 3, MARCH 01 1873 On the Cross-Correlation of a p-ary m-sequence of Period p m 1 Its Decimated Sequences by (p m +1) =(p +1) Sung-Tai Choi, Taehyung Lim,
More informationCDM based controller design for nonlinear heat exchanger process
Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci, Vol.17, No.2, 2009, c TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/elk-0905-45 CDM based controller design for nonlinear heat exchanger process Erkan İMAL Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
More informationMANY adaptive control methods rely on parameter estimation
610 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 52, NO 4, APRIL 2007 Direct Adaptive Dynamic Compensation for Minimum Phase Systems With Unknown Relative Degree Jesse B Hoagg and Dennis S Bernstein Abstract
More informationTime Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationClosed-Form Design of Maximally Flat IIR Half-Band Filters
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS II: ANALOG AND DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 49, NO. 6, JUNE 2002 409 Closed-Form Design of Maximally Flat IIR Half-B Filters Xi Zhang, Senior Member, IEEE,
More informationStability Margin Based Design of Multivariable Controllers
Stability Margin Based Design of Multivariable Controllers Iván D. Díaz-Rodríguez Sangjin Han Shankar P. Bhattacharyya Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University College Station,
More informationCONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN CONFORMABLE TO PHYSICAL ACTUALITIES
3rd International Conference on Advanced Micro-Device Engineering, AMDE 2011 1 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN CONFORMABLE TO PHYSICAL ACTUALITIES 2011.12.8 TOSHIYUKI KITAMORI 2 Outline Design equation Expression
More informationModeling and Control Overview
Modeling and Control Overview D R. T A R E K A. T U T U N J I A D V A N C E D C O N T R O L S Y S T E M S M E C H A T R O N I C S E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T P H I L A D E L P H I A U N I
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationFair and Square Computation of Inverse -Transforms of Rational Functions
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 55, NO. 2, MAY 2012 285 Fair and Square Computation of Inverse -Transforms of Rational Functions Marcos Vicente Moreira and João Carlos Basilio Abstract All methods
More informationImplementation Issues for the Virtual Spring
Implementation Issues for the Virtual Spring J. S. Freudenberg EECS 461 Embedded Control Systems 1 Introduction One of the tasks in Lab 4 is to attach the haptic wheel to a virtual reference position with
More informationDetermining the Optimal Decision Delay Parameter for a Linear Equalizer
International Journal of Automation and Computing 1 (2005) 20-24 Determining the Optimal Decision Delay Parameter for a Linear Equalizer Eng Siong Chng School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological
More informationH State-Feedback Controller Design for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems Using Fuzzy Weighting-Dependent Lyapunov Functions
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL 11, NO 2, APRIL 2003 271 H State-Feedback Controller Design for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems Using Fuzzy Weighting-Dependent Lyapunov Functions Doo Jin Choi and PooGyeon
More informationResearch Article Partial Pole Placement in LMI Region
Control Science and Engineering Article ID 84128 5 pages http://dxdoiorg/11155/214/84128 Research Article Partial Pole Placement in LMI Region Liuli Ou 1 Shaobo Han 2 Yongji Wang 1 Shuai Dong 1 and Lei
More informationFilter Design for Linear Time Delay Systems
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 49, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2001 2839 ANewH Filter Design for Linear Time Delay Systems E. Fridman Uri Shaked, Fellow, IEEE Abstract A new delay-dependent filtering
More informationAn asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability
1 An asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability Daniel Liberzon and Hyungbo Shim Abstract For continuous-time nonlinear systems with inputs, we introduce the notion of an asymptotic
More informationPOSITIVE REALNESS OF A TRANSFER FUNCTION NEITHER IMPLIES NOR IS IMPLIED BY THE EXTERNAL POSITIVITY OF THEIR ASSOCIATE REALIZATIONS
POSITIVE REALNESS OF A TRANSFER FUNCTION NEITHER IMPLIES NOR IS IMPLIED BY THE EXTERNAL POSITIVITY OF THEIR ASSOCIATE REALIZATIONS Abstract This letter discusses the differences in-between positive realness
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS, AND AUTOMATION Vol. III Controller Design - Boris Lohmann
CONROL SYSEMS, ROBOICS, AND AUOMAION Vol. III Controller Design - Boris Lohmann CONROLLER DESIGN Boris Lohmann Institut für Automatisierungstechnik, Universität Bremen, Germany Keywords: State Feedback
More informationRadar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.
Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter
More informationBIBO STABILITY AND ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY
BIBO STABILITY AND ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY FRANCESCO NORI Abstract. In this report with discuss the concepts of bounded-input boundedoutput stability (BIBO) and of Lyapunov stability. Examples are given to
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationOutput Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems
International Journal of Automation and Computing 3 2006 25-22 Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Keylan Alimhan, Hiroshi Inaba Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Denki University,
More informationLMI Based Model Order Reduction Considering the Minimum Phase Characteristic of the System
LMI Based Model Order Reduction Considering the Minimum Phase Characteristic of the System Gholamreza Khademi, Haniyeh Mohammadi, and Maryam Dehghani School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Shiraz
More informationPAPER Closed Form Expressions of Balanced Realizations of Second-Order Analog Filters
565 PAPER Closed Form Expressions of Balanced Realizations of Second-Order Analog Filters Shunsuke YAMAKI a), Memer, Masahide ABE ), Senior Memer, and Masayuki KAWAMATA c), Fellow SUMMARY This paper derives
More informationPrediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate
www.scichina.com info.scichina.com www.springerlin.com Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate WEI Chen & CHEN ZongJi School of Automation
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 2, 2018 J. Tani, E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 7:
More informationAttitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis
AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, & Dynamics Revised Submission, December, 22 Attitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis Jonathan Lawton Raytheon Systems Inc. Tucson, Arizona 85734 Randal W. Beard
More informationTransient Response of a Second-Order System
Transient Response of a Second-Order System ECEN 830 Spring 01 1. Introduction In connection with this experiment, you are selecting the gains in your feedback loop to obtain a well-behaved closed-loop
More informationNOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS: The copyright law of the United States (title 17, U.S. Code) governs the making of photocopies or
NOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS: The copyright law of the United States (title 17, U.S. Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Any copying
More informationDATA receivers for digital transmission and storage systems
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS II: EXPRESS BRIEFS, VOL. 52, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2005 621 Effect of Loop Delay on Phase Margin of First-Order Second-Order Control Loops Jan W. M. Bergmans, Senior
More informationResearch Article Stabilizing of Subspaces Based on DPGA and Chaos Genetic Algorithm for Optimizing State Feedback Controller
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2012, Article ID 186481, 9 pages doi:10.1155/2012/186481 Research Article Stabilizing of Subspaces Based on DPGA and Chaos Genetic Algorithm for Optimizing State
More informationBECAUSE this paper is a continuation of [9], we assume
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL. 15, NO. 2, APRIL 2007 301 Type-2 Fuzzistics for Symmetric Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: Part 2, Inverse Problems Jerry M. Mendel, Life Fellow, IEEE, and Hongwei Wu,
More informationStability and composition of transfer functions
Problem 1.1 Stability and composition of transfer functions G. Fernández-Anaya Departamento de Ciencias Básicas Universidad Iberoaméricana Lomas de Santa Fe 01210 México D.F. México guillermo.fernandez@uia.mx
More informationMRAGPC Control of MIMO Processes with Input Constraints and Disturbance
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 9 Vol II WCECS 9, October -, 9, San Francisco, USA MRAGPC Control of MIMO Processes with Input Constraints and Disturbance A. S. Osunleke,
More informationRELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing
RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More informationA Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants
00 ECTI TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY VOL., NO.2 NOVEMBER 2005 A Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants Kou Yamada Nobuaki Matsushima, Non-members
More informationGenerating passive systems from recursively defined polynomials
Generating passive systems from recursively defined polynomials Luigi Fortuna and Mattia Frasca Abstract In single-input single-output linear time-invariant systems, and in particular in filter modelling
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationAttitude Control of a Bias Momentum Satellite Using Moment of Inertia
I. INTRODUCTION Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Satellite Using Moment of Inertia HYOCHOONG BANG Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology HYUNG DON CHOI Korea Aerospace Research Institute
More informationOptimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems
1 Optimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems Prof Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning this paper should
More informationAdaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Disturbance
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2018, 8(2): 31-35 DOI: 10.5923/j.control.20180802.01 Adaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Saeed Kashefi *, Majid Hajatipor Faculty of
More informationMULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 1, No. 8 (215) 113-1115 School of Engineering, Taylor s University MULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS
More informationKrylov Techniques for Model Reduction of Second-Order Systems
Krylov Techniques for Model Reduction of Second-Order Systems A Vandendorpe and P Van Dooren February 4, 2004 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present a Krylov technique for model reduction of
More informationFast Step-response Evaluation of Linear Continuous-time Systems With Time Delay in the Feedback Loop
Proceedings of the 7th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-, 28 Fast Step-response Evaluation of Linear Continuous-time Systems With Time Delay in the
More informationControl of Electromechanical Systems
Control of Electromechanical Systems November 3, 27 Exercise Consider the feedback control scheme of the motor speed ω in Fig., where the torque actuation includes a time constant τ A =. s and a disturbance
More informationL 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 27 WeB1.1 L 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown Dimension
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS OF DAMPED SDOF SYSTEMS WITH TWO TIME DELAYS IN STATE FEEDBACK
Journal of Sound and Vibration (1998) 214(2), 213 225 Article No. sv971499 STABILITY ANALYSIS OF DAMPED SDOF SYSTEMS WITH TWO TIME DELAYS IN STATE FEEDBACK H. Y. HU ANDZ. H. WANG Institute of Vibration
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Root Locus
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationIDENTIFICATION AND DAHLIN S CONTROL FOR NONLINEAR DISCRETE TIME OUTPUT FEEDBACK SYSTEMS
Journal of ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 57, NO. 6, 2006, 329 337 IDENTIFICATION AND DAHLIN S CONTROL FOR NONLINEAR DISCRETE TIME OUTPUT FEEDBACK SYSTEMS Narayanasamy Selvaganesan Subramanian Renganathan
More informationPAPER A Low-Complexity Step-by-Step Decoding Algorithm for Binary BCH Codes
359 PAPER A Low-Complexity Step-by-Step Decoding Algorithm for Binary BCH Codes Ching-Lung CHR a),szu-linsu, Members, and Shao-Wei WU, Nonmember SUMMARY A low-complexity step-by-step decoding algorithm
More informationProfessional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to Innovative Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sponsor: Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Cosponsor: Science Engineering and Business Club Professional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to
More informationDURING THE last two decades, many authors have
614 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I: FUNDAMENTAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 44, NO 7, JULY 1997 Stability the Lyapunov Equation for -Dimensional Digital Systems Chengshan Xiao, David J Hill,
More informationA GENERALIZED SECOND ORDER COMPENSATOR DESIGN FOR VIBRATION CONTROL OF FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES
A GENERALIZED SECOND ORDER COMPENSATOR DESIGN FOR VIBRATION CONTROL OF FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES Hyochoong ~ a n and ~ t Brij N. Agrawalt Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California t Abstract In this paper,
More informationA Plane Wave Expansion of Spherical Wave Functions for Modal Analysis of Guided Wave Structures and Scatterers
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 51, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2003 2801 A Plane Wave Expansion of Spherical Wave Functions for Modal Analysis of Guided Wave Structures and Scatterers Robert H.
More informationPID CONTROLLER SYNTHESIS FREE OF ANALYTICAL MODELS
PID CONTROLLER SYNTHESIS FREE OF ANALYTICAL MODELS L.H. Keel,1 S.P. Bhattacharyya, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA Abstract: In this
More informationMaximizing the Closed Loop Asymptotic Decay Rate for the Two-Mass-Spring Control Problem
Maximizing the Closed Loop Asymptotic Decay Rate for the Two-Mass-Spring Control Problem Didier Henrion 1,2 Michael L. Overton 3 May 12, 2006 Abstract We consider the following problem: find a fixed-order
More informationThe Relation Between the 3-D Bode Diagram and the Root Locus. Insights into the connection between these classical methods. By Panagiotis Tsiotras
F E A T U R E The Relation Between the -D Bode Diagram and the Root Locus Insights into the connection between these classical methods Bode diagrams and root locus plots have been the cornerstone of control
More informationInternal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems
Internal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems Asma Mezzi Tunis El Manar University, Automatic Control Research Laboratory, LA.R.A, National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT),
More informationDisturbance Rejection in Parameter-varying Web-winding Systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Disturbance Rejection in Parameter-varying Web-winding Systems Hua Zhong Lucy Y. Pao Electrical and Computer Engineering
More informationECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design
ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design A Brief Tutorial on Control Design Instructor: Professor John T. Wen TA: Ben Potsaid http://www.cat.rpi.edu/~wen/ecse4962s04/ Don t Wait Until The Last Minute! You got
More informationYunhi Cho and Young-One Kim
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 41 (2004), No. 1, pp. 27 43 ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF THE LIMITS OF THE EVEN AND ODD HYPERPOWER SEQUENCES Yunhi Cho Young-One Kim Dedicated to the memory of the late professor Eulyong
More informationDesign and Analysis of a Novel L 1 Adaptive Controller, Part I: Control Signal and Asymptotic Stability
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 4-6, 26 ThB7.5 Design and Analysis of a Novel L Adaptive Controller, Part I: Control Signal and Asymptotic Stability
More informationVibration Suppression of a 2-Mass Drive System with Multiple Feedbacks
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 11, November 2015 168 Vibration Suppression of a 2-Mass Drive System with Multiple Feedbacks L. Vidyaratan Meetei, Benjamin
More informationDelay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
International Journal of Automation and Computing 7(2), May 2010, 224-229 DOI: 10.1007/s11633-010-0224-2 Delay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
More informationIMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION. K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok
IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok Considering marginal control systems, a useful technique, contributing to the method of multi-stage compensation is suggested. A
More informationResearch Article Simplified Robotics Joint-Space Trajectory Generation with a via Point Using a Single Polynomial
Robotics Volume, Article ID 75958, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/.55//75958 Research Article Simplified Robotics Joint-Space Trajectory Generation with a via Point Using a Single Polynomial Robert L. Williams
More informationVibration and motion control design and trade-off for high-performance mechatronic systems
Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Munich, Germany, October 4-6, 2006 WeC11.5 Vibration and motion control design and trade-off for high-performance mechatronic
More informationReview of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis
D1 APPENDIX D Review of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis Consider a network with input x(t) and output y(t) as shown in Figure D-1. If an input x 1 (t) produces an output y 1 (t), and an input x
More informationFormulation of L 1 Norm Minimization in Gauss-Markov Models
Formulation of L 1 Norm Minimization in Gauss-Markov Models AliReza Amiri-Simkooei 1 Abstract: L 1 norm minimization adjustment is a technique to detect outlier observations in geodetic networks. The usual
More informationANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF DISTURBANCE OBSERVER AS AN ADD-ON ROBUST CONTROLLER
ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF DISTURBANCE OBSERVER AS AN ADD-ON ROBUST CONTROLLER Hyungbo Shim (School of Electrical Engineering, Seoul National University, Korea) in collaboration with Juhoon Back, Nam Hoon
More informationOptimum Sampling Vectors for Wiener Filter Noise Reduction
58 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 50, NO. 1, JANUARY 2002 Optimum Sampling Vectors for Wiener Filter Noise Reduction Yukihiko Yamashita, Member, IEEE Absact Sampling is a very important and
More informationEvaluation Performance of PID, LQR, Pole Placement Controllers for Heat Exchanger
Evaluation Performance of PID, LQR, Pole Placement Controllers for Heat Exchanger Mohamed Essahafi, Mustapha Ait Lafkih Abstract In industrial environments, the heat exchanger is a necessary component
More informationEEE 480 LAB EXPERIMENTS. K. Tsakalis. November 25, 2002
EEE 480 LAB EXPERIMENTS K. Tsakalis November 25, 2002 1. Introduction The following set of experiments aims to supplement the EEE 480 classroom instruction by providing a more detailed and hands-on experience
More information