BIBO STABILITY AND ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY
|
|
- Louise Pitts
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BIBO STABILITY AND ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY FRANCESCO NORI Abstract. In this report with discuss the concepts of bounded-input boundedoutput stability (BIBO) and of Lyapunov stability. Examples are given to motivate the theoretical framework. 1. Introduction and motivation Many phenomena in nature can be modeled with the use of a dynamical systems. The mathematical models used to describe the swinging of a clock pendulum, the flow of water in a pipe, or the number of fish each spring in a lake are examples of dynamical systems. In the following we give two examples; the first introduces a discrete time dynamical system; the second a continuous time one. Example 1.1 (Discrete time population model). Let us consider a dynamical model which describes the number of individuals within a population. Let s divide the population into two classes, nominally elder people and younger people. Let x 1 (t) be the number of elder individuals at time t = 0, 1, 2,... ; let x 2 (t) be the number of young individuals and u(t) be the immigrants which are assumed to belong only to the younger class. Obviously, the total number of individuals in the population is given by y(t) = x 1 (t) + x ( 2). A possible dynamical system which describes the population growing across time is the following: (1.1) (1.2) where: and where: } x 1 (t + 1) = βx 2 (t) : state transition x 2 (t + 1) = α 1 x 1 (t) + α 2 x 2 (t) + u(t) y(t) = x 1 (t) + x 2 (t) } x 1 (0) = x 1,0 initial condition. x 2 (0) = x 2,0 β: survival factor α 1 : nativity factor for the elder individuals α 2 : nativity factor for the younger individuals x1 : x 2 system state u(t): system input y(t): system output The model is such that given the initial condition x 1,0, x 2,0 and the evolution of the input u(t), t = 0, 1, 2..., it is possible to determine x 1 (t) and x 2 (t) for every time sample t = 0, 1, 2... Interesting questions can be posed given the model. Suppose for example that the number of individuals is limited, i.e. 0 < u(t) < u max for every 1
2 2 FRANCESCO NORI time sample t. Can we then guarantee that the population y(t) = x 1 (t) + x 2 (t) will also be limited across time, i.e. 0 < y(t) < y max for every time sample t? What it (surprisingly) turns out is that the answer can be no for certain choice of the parameters β, α 1 and α 2. Example 1.2 (Continuous time predator-prey model: Lodka-Volterra). Let us consider a dynamical model which describes the number of predators and preys within an isolated ecosystem. The number of preys at time t is denoted with the variable x 1 (t) while the number of predators is denoted with the variable x 2 (t). A possible description of the system dynamical evolution is given by the following dynamical system: (1.3) (1.4) where: and: 1 dt (t) = αx 1(t) βx 1 (t)x 2 (t) 2 dt (t) = γx 2(t) + δx 1 (t)x 2 (t) y(t) = x 1 (t) + x 2 (t) } x 1 (0) = x 1,0 initial condition. x 2 (0) = x 2,0 } : state transition α: prey nativity rate γ: predator mortality rate β: prey mortality rate due to predators δ: predator nativity x1 : x 2 system state y(t): system output The above dynamical system has an equilibrium in x 1 = γ δ = x 1,eq, x 2 = α β = x 2,eq. Practically, if for some t we have x 1 (t ) = x 1,eq and x 2 (t ) = x 2,eq, then: { 1 dt = αx 1,eq βx 2,eq x 2,eq = 0 2 dt = γx 2,eq + δx 1,eq x 2,eq = 0, and therefore the number of predators and preys will remain constantly x 1,eq, y 2,eq, i.e.: (1.6) x 1 (t) = x 1,eq, x 2 (t) = x 2,eq t > t. Given the interesting properties of the equilibrium point, it results natural to ask whether the equilibrium point is attractive, i.e. if the number of preys and the number of predators will always end up to be x 1,eq and x 2,eq, respectively. Sophisticate analysis tools that will be presented in the following show that the equilibrium is indeed attractive. Example 1.3 (Continuous time car model). Let s consider the following dynamical model: m d2 p (1.7) (t) = bdp(t) + u(t), dt2 dt p(0) = p 0, dp dt (0) = ṗ 0 which can be used to model the forward motion of a car in presence of a viscous friction (see 1 pages 24 to 27). Specifically we have:,
3 STABILITY 3 m: mass of the car p(t): car position p(0): car initial dp dt (t): car velocity dt (t2 ): car acceleration b: viscous friction coefficient u(t): force produced by the engine d 2 p The dynamic model above can be rearranged as follows: 1 dt (t) = x } 2(t) 2 dt (t) = bx : state transition (1.8) 2(t) + u(t) y(t) = x 1 (t) (1.9) where: (1.10) and: } x 1 (0) = p 0 initial condition. x 2 (0) = ṗ 0 u(t): y(t): x 1 (t) = p(t) x 2 (t) = dp dt (t). y(t) = p(t) x1 : system state x 2 system input system output The above dynamical equations are such that given u(t), t 0, + there exists a unique output y(t), t 0, + ); the proof of this claim is non-trivial and the interested reader should refer to BIBO stability: continuous time case In the previous example we have seen that a continuous dynamical system can be seen as a map from the input function u(t), t 0, + ) to the output function y(t), t 0, + ). In this section we propose necessary and sufficient conditions for guaranteeing that a given continuous dynamical system is BIBO stable. Roughly speaking, BIBO stability assures that a limited input will lead to a limited output Linear, causal, time-invariant SISO systems. Let us a consider a generic map A from the input function u(t), t 0, + ) 1 to the output function y(t), t (, + ). These maps are the so called single-input single-output (SISO) systems. Practically: (2.1) u : 0, + ) R To simplify the notation we will write y = A(u). A y : (, + ) R., 1 We here assume that the function u(t) is identically null for t < 0, that is u(t) = 0, t (, 0.
4 4 FRANCESCO NORI Definition 2.1 (Past of a function with respect to the time instant T ). Given a function f(t), t, + ) and a scalar T R its past P T f with respect to the time instant T is a function (P T f)(t), t, T ) defined as follows: { f(t) if t < T (2.2) (P T f)(t) =. 0 if t T Definition 2.2 (Causality of a SISO map). We say that a map A of type (2.1) is causal if and only if P T (Au) = P T A(P T u) for all possible values of T. Roughly speaking a system is causal if the value of the output at time t is determined only by the values assumed by the input in the time instants before t. Equivalently, y(t) is determined only by u(τ) with τ 0, t. Remark 2.3. It can be shown that if the map (2.1) is causal then y = Au is such that y(t) = 0 for any t < 0. This is a consequence that u(t) = 0 for any t < 0. Definition 2.4 ( -delayed function). Given a function f(t), t (, + ) and a scalar R, the -delayed function σ f is a function (σ f)(t), t (, + ) defined as follows: (2.3) (σ f)(t) = f(t + ) t (, + ). Definition 2.5 (Time invariance of a SISO map). We say that a map A of type (2.1) is time invariant if and only if A(σ u) = σ (Au) for all possible values of T. Roughly speaking a system is time invariant if applying the same input at different time instants produces the same response. Definition 2.6 (Linear SISO map). We say that a map A of type (2.1) is linear if and only if: A(α 1 u 1 + α 2 u 2 ) = α 1 (Au 1 ) + α 2 (Au 2 ), for all α 1, α 2, u 1 and u 2. Roughly speaking a system is linear if scaling the input produces a scaled output. At the same time, summing two inputs produces an output which is the sum of the two outputs produced by applying the inputs individually. Remark 2.7. If a SISO map is linear, then Au = 0 if u(t) for all t 0, + ). The proof is trivial and therefore left to the reader. In the previous definitions we characterized SISO systems in terms of linearity, causality and time-invariance. A map which can be proven to linear, causal and time-invariant is convolution integral. Let h(t) be a function defined for positive t i.e. h : 0, + R. The convolution integral associated to h is given by: (2.4) y(t) = (Au)(t) = t It can be shown that the map described by: (2.5) u : 0, + ) R 0 h(t σ)u(σ)dσ = (h u)(t). A y(t) = t 0 h(t σ)u(σ)dσ is linear, causal and time-invariant. What it turns out is that the converse is also true. Loosely speaking, any SISO map of type (2.1) which is linear, causal, timeinvariant map can be described by a convolution integral (2.5) for a suitably chosen h.
5 STABILITY 5 Remark 2.8. In order to express any linear, causal, time-invariant system as a convolution integral it is necessary expand the set of the considered h. Consider for example the identity map y = Au = u which returns an output which is identical to the input. Obviously this map is linear, causal and time-invariant. However, it cannot be expressed as a convolution integral (2.5) if we only restrict h to be a function. A broader class must be considered, nominally the set of distributions D R. The interested reader should refer to a more advance textbook. Theorem 2.9. If a map A : D R D R is linear, causal and time-invariant, then it can be expressed as a convolution integral Au = h u with h D R BIBO stability of SISO systems. We here give necessary and sufficient conditions for guaranteeing that a given linear, causal, time-invariant map of type (2.1) is BIBO stable. Definition 2.10 (BIBO stability). We say that a given map of type (2.1) is BIBO stable if and only if for every limited input the output is itself limited. Mathematically: (2.6) sup t u(t) < + sup y(t) < + with y = Au. t Theorem Consider a linear, causal, time-invariant map A : D R D R. Let h D R be a description of the same map with a convolution integral, i.e.: (2.7) Au = h u u D R. The following statements are equivalent: (2.8) The map A is BIBO stable. The function h(t) is such that: + 0 h(t) dt < BIBO stability of SISO systems with rational transfer function. Consider a linear, causal, time-invariant map A : D R D R whose convolution integral is described by h D R. Let H(s), s C be the Laplace transform of the convolution function h. The function H(s) is usually called the transfer function associated to A. We here consider a special class of maps, nominally those that are described by rational transfer functions, i.e.: (2.9) H(s) = n(s) d(s) = α 0 + α 1 s + + α m s m β 0 + β 1 s + + β n s n. Practically, we consider systems whose transfer functions are the fraction of two polynomial. For this specific class of systems the following theorem holds. Theorem Consider a linear, causal, time-invariant map A : D R D R and suppose that its transfer function, H(s), is rational i.e.: (2.10) H(s) = n(s) d(s) = α 0 + α 1 s + + α m s m β 0 + β 1 s + + β n s n. The following statements are equivalent: The map A is BIBO stable.
6 6 FRANCESCO NORI (2.11) The roots λ 1,..., λ n of the polynomial d(s) are all in the left half complex plane, i.e.: Re(λ i ) < 0, i = 1, 2,... n, where Re(z) denotes the real part of the complex number z. Theorem Consider a BIBO stable dynamical system described by the convolution y = h u with transfer function H(s). Let the input be: (2.12) u(t) = A sin(ωt + φ) Then the output y(t) is such that: (2.13) t 0, + ). y(t) t + A W (iω) sin(ωt + φ + argw (iω)). where W (jω) and argw (iω)) are respectively the modulus and the argument of the complex number W (iω). Practically, the steady state output is again a sinusoid scaled by W (jω) and delayed by argw (iω)). Remark The above theorem can be used to approximate the steady state output when the input u(t) is periodic. Using the Fourier approximation we have: (2.14) u(t) N A n sin(nωt + φ n ) n=0 and using the linearity of the system we have: N (2.15) y(t) t + A n W (inω) sin(nωt + φ n + argw (inω)). n=0 Example Consider a linear, causal, time-invariant map whose transfer function is: (2.16) s + 1 H(s) = (s + 1)(s + 2). Since the transfer function is rational we can use the previous theorem and check the BIBO stability by computing the roots λ 1, λ 2 of the denominator polynomial d(s) = (s + 1)(s + 2). We have λ 1 = 1, λ 2 = 2 and therefore the system is BIBO stable. Example Consider a linear, causal, time-invariant map whose transfer function is: (2.17) s + 1 H(s) = s 2 + 2s + 3. Again, the BIBO stability can be checked by computing the roots λ 1, λ 2 of the denominator polynomial d(s) = s 2 + 2s + 3. We have: (2.18) λ 1,2 = b ± b 2 4ac 2a = 2 ± = 1 ± 2i. Therefore, we have λ 1 = 1+ 2i and λ 2 = 1 2i. Since, Re(λ 1 ) = Re(λ 2 ) = 1 the system is BIBO stable.
7 STABILITY 7 3. Continuous time dynamical system Definition 3.1. A continuous time dynamical system is a differential relation of the form: (3.1) where: y(t) = and: { dt x 1 (t). x n (t) y 1 (t). y p (t) = f(x(t), u(t)) y(t) = h(x(t), u(t)) x(0) = x 0, R n : state vector u(t) = R p : output vector x 0 = f : R n R m R n : h : R n R p R n : u 1 (t). u m (t) x 1,0. x n,0 t 0, + ) R m : R n : state transition function output function input vector initial state vector We will here consider a restrict class of dynamical systems, nominally linear dynamical systems. Linear systems are those characterized by a linear state transition function and a linear output function, i.e.: (3.2) { dt = Ax(t) + Bu(t) y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t) x(0) = x 0. The system (3.2) is a special case of linear, causal, time-invariant system when we make the following two additional assumptions: SISO (single input single output) systems, i.e. systems such that the input u(t) and the output y(t) are scalars. the system initial condition is zero 2, i.e. x 0 = 0, so that u(t) = 0, t 0, + ) implies y(t) = 0, t 0, + ). Under these two assumptions, the system can be expressed as a convolution integral. The transfer function of the system turns out to be (see 3): (3.3) H(s) = C(sI A) 1 B + D which can be easily proven to be rational. Example 3.2. Let us consider the dynamical model (1.8) described in Example 1.3. The system can be easily written in the form (3.2) with the following definitions: x1 (t) 0 1 0, A =, B =, C = x 2 (t) 0 b 1 1 0, D = 0. 2 This assumption is necessary to guarantee that y = 0 if u(t) = 0 for all t in 0, + ).
8 8 FRANCESCO NORI Let s compute the system transfer function: H(s) = C(sI A) 1 B = s s + b 1 = s s(s+b) 0 1 = 1 s(s + b). 0 1 s+b The denominator polynomial is d(s) = s(s+b) which has roots λ 1 = 0 and λ 2 = b. Since Re(λ 1 ) = 0 the system is not BIBO stable. However, if we consider a new input ũ(t) = u(t) + kx 1 (t) we obtain: (3.4) with: { dt = Ax(t) + Bũ(t) y(t) = Cx(t) x1 (t) 0 1 0, A =, B =, C = x 2 (t) k b 1 1 0, D = 0. Easy computations lead to: H(s) = 1 s 2 + bs + k. Taking k = 3 and b = 2 the system is BIBO stable with respect to the new input ũ (compare with Example 2.16). More in general, it can be proven that the system is BIBO stable for any k > 0 and b > Lyapunov stability: continuous time case As opposed to BIBO stability, we here consider the concept of Lyapunov stability which is not related to the input-output properties of a dynamical system. Specifically, Lyapunov stability applies only to unforced (no control input) dynamical systems. It is used to study the behavior of dynamical systems under initial perturbations around equilibrium points. Consider an unforced dynamical system described by the following differential equation 3 : (4.1) dt (t) = f(x(t)) x(0) = x 0. Definition 4.1 (Equilibrium point). We say that x eq is an equilibrium point for the system (4.1) if f(x eq ) = 0. Remark 4.2. If at time t the system state x falls into an equilibrium point, then it will remain in the equilibrium point for t > t. In particular if x 0 = x eq, then x eq, t 0, + )., 3 Such a system can be obtained from (3.1) considering an identically null input, i.e. u(t) = 0, for every t 0, + ).
9 STABILITY 9 The Lyapunov theoretical framework helps in characterizing a given equilibrium point. In particular, it helps in discriminating two different situations, nominally stable equilibria and unstable equilibria. Roughly speaking, an equilibrium point is said to be stable if when the system is displaced from the equilibrium there are forces that drive the system back to the equilibrium (see Figure 1). Otherwise the equilibrium is said to be unstable (see Figure 3). Figure 1. The picture shows the intuitive idea of stable equilibrium point. Figure 2. The picture shows the intuitive idea of unstable equilibrium point. Definition 4.3 (Stable equilibrium point). Consider the system (3.1) and let x eq be an equilibrium point. The equilibrium point x eq is said to be stable if for every neighborhood U of x eq there exists a neighborhood V such that for every initial condition x 0 V the system trajectory remains in U, i.e. x(t) U, for all t 0, + ). Definition 4.4 (Unstable equilibrium point). Consider the system (3.1) and let x eq be an equilibrium point. The equilibrium point x eq is said to be unstable if it is not stable. Definition 4.5 (Asymptotically stable equilibrium point). Consider the system (3.1) and let x eq be an equilibrium point. The equilibrium point x eq is said to be asymptotically stable if it is stable and for every initial condition the trajectory tends to x eq, i.e. x(t) t + x eq. Example 4.6 (Second order harmonic oscillator). We here consider a very simple oscillator, made of a mass m attached to a spring of stiffness k. Let p be the
10 10 FRANCESCO NORI Figure 3. The picture shows the intuitive idea of unstable equilibrium point. Figure 4. Spring. position of the mass in a fixed reference frame. written as follows (4.2) d 2 p dt 2 (t) = ω2 p(t) p(0) = p 0, dp dt (0) = ṗ 0. The system dynamics can be where ω 2 = k/m. In this specific case the trajectory of the system can be explicitly computed, and therefore we can easily determine if a given equilibrium is stable. Let s first write the dynamics in the form (4.1). We have: (4.3) dt (t) = x2 (t) ω 2 x 1 (t) x(0) = p0 ṗ 0, where we have chosen: p(t) (4.4) dp dt (t). Given the initial condition the trajectory followed by the system is: p0 cos(ωt) + ṗ0 ω sin(ωt) (4.5). ωp 0 sin(ωt) + ṗ 0 cos(ωt) Notice that 0 0 = xeq is an equilibrium point and we can therefore ask if it is stable. All we have to prove is that the trajectories of the system remain in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of x eq. Indeed, it can be easily seen that this can be achieved choosing a small enough initial condition p 0, ṗ 0. Therefore, the equilibrium is stable. Example 4.7. We here consider a simple system whose dynamics are described as follows: (4.6) d 2 p dt 2 (t) = ω2 p(t) p(0) = p 0, dp dt (0) = ṗ 0.
11 STABILITY 11 Once again, in this specific case the trajectory of the system can be explicitly computed, and therefore we can easily determine if a given equilibrium is stable. Let s first write the dynamics in the form (4.1). We have: dt (t) = x2 (t) p0 (4.7) ω 2 x(0) =, x 1 (t) ṗ 0 where we have chosen: p(t) (4.8) dp dt (t). Given the initial condition the trajectory followed by the system is: ( ) ( ) 1 2 p 0 + ṗ0 ω e ωt p 0 ṗ0 ω e (4.9) ωt 1 2 (ωp 0 + ṗ 0 ) e ωt 1 2 (ωp. 0 ṗ 0 ) e ωt Notice that 0 0 = xeq is an equilibrium point and we can therefore ask if it is stable. However, the system trajectory always diverges for suitably chosen initial conditions. Therefore the equilibrium is unstable. Example 4.8 (Damped second order harmonic oscillator). We here consider again the oscillator in Figure 4 but adding a viscous friction b. The system dynamics can be written as follows d 2 p (4.10) dt 2 (t) = ω2 p(t) β dp dt (t) p(0) = p 0, dp dt (0) = ṗ 0. where ω 2 = k/m and β = b/m. Let s first write the dynamics in the form (4.1). We have: (4.11) dt (t) = x 2 (t) ω 2 x 1 (t) βx 2 (t) x(0) = p0 ṗ 0. To simplify the computations let s assume β = 2ω. Given the initial condition the trajectory followed by the system is: p 0 e ωt + (ṗ 0 + ωp 0 )te (4.12) ωt ωp 0 e ωt + (ṗ 0 + ωp 0 )e ωt ω(ṗ 0 + ωp 0 )te ωt. Notice that 0 0 = xeq is an equilibrium point and we can therefore ask if it is stable. It can be easily seen that this can be achieved choosing a small enough initial condition p 0, ṗ 0. Moreover, the equilibrium is asymptotically stable since x(t) t + x eq Lyapunov stability theorem. In this section we given a fundamental tool for characterizing an equilibrium without explicitly computing the trajectories of the considered system. Theorem 4.9 (Lyapunov stability theorem). Let x eq be an equilibrium point for the differential equation described by: (4.13) dt (t) = f(x(t)) x(0) = x 0. If there exists a function V : R n R such that: V has a minimum in x eq, i.e. V (x) > V (x eq ) for all x R n ;
12 12 FRANCESCO NORI The function V (x) defined as: (4.14) V (x) = x f(x), x = x 1... x n is negative semi-definite, i.e.: (4.15) V (x) 0 x R n. Then, the equilibrium x eq is stable and the function V (x) is said to be a Lyapunov function for the given system. Proof. Let s first observe that evaluated on a system trajectory x(t), the function V (x) equals the time derivative of the function V (x(t)), i.e.: (4.16) 0 V (x(t)) = d dt V (x(t)). We now prove that given a neighborhood U, we can find a neighborhood W such that if x 0 W then x(t) U for every t. Given U let V min be the minimum value assumed by V on the border of U. Now choose a neighborhood W so that the maximum value assumed by V on W is less then V min. We claim that if x 0 W then x(t) U for every t. Suppose by contradiction that the system crosses the border of U at time t > 0. Therefore V (x( t)) V min. At the same time since x 0 W, we have V (x(0)) < V min. Using the two conditions we have V (x( t)) > V (x(0)) with t > 0 which is incompatible with d dtv (x(t)) 0. Theorem 4.10 (Lyapunov asymptotic stability theorem). Let x eq be an equilibrium point for the differential equation described by: (4.17) dt (t) = f(x(t)) x(0) = x 0. If there exists a function V : R n R such that: V has a minimum in x eq, i.e. V (x) > V (x eq ) for all x R n ; The function V (x) defined as: (4.18) V (x) = x f(x), x = x 1... x n is negative definite, i.e.: (4.19) V (x) < 0 x R n, x x eq Proof. See 4. Then the equilibrium is asymptotically stable. Example 4.11 (Second order harmonic oscillator). We here consider a the oscillator, proposed in Example 4.6. Let the candidate Lyapunov function be: (4.20) V (x) = 1 2 x ω2 x 2 1, which clearly satisfies V (x) > 0, for all x x eq. We have: (4.21) and since: (4.22) x = x 1 x 2 = x 1 f(x) = x2 x 2 = ω 2 x 1 x 2, ω 2 x 1
13 STABILITY 13 we get: (4.23) V (x) = ω 2 x x 1 x 2 2 ω 2 = 0, x 1 which is identically zero. Therefore, the given equilibrium is stable. We cannot say that the equilibrium is asymptotically stable because V (x) is not strictly less then zero. Example We here consider a damped oscillator like (see Example 4.8). Let the candidate Lyapunov function be: V (x) = 1 2 x ω2 x (4.24) (x 2 + 2ωx 1 ) 2 + ω 2 x which clearly satisfies V (x) > 0, for all x x eq. We have: x = (4.25) and since: (4.26) we get: x 1 x 2 = x 1 x 2 = 6ω 2 x 1 + 2ωx 2 2ωx 1 + 2x 2, x f(x) = 2 ω 2 x 1 2ωx 2 V (x) = 6ω 2 x 1 + 2ωx 2 2ωx 1 + 2x 2 x 2 ω 2 x 1 2ωx 2 = 2ω 3 x 2 1 2ωx 2 2, which clearly satisfies V (x) < 0 for every x x eq. Therefore, the given equilibrium is asymptotically stable. References 1. G. Franklin, J. Powell, and A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback control of dynamic systems, Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, Alberto Isidori, Nonlinear control systems: Third edition, Springer, T. Kailath, Linear systems, Prentice Hall, J. E. Slotine and W. Li, Applied nonlinear control, Prentice-Hall International Eds., address: iron@liralab.it
Richiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationLyapunov Stability Theory
Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS
C. Melchiorri (DEI) Automatic Control & System Theory 1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND SYSTEM THEORY STABILITY ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS Claudio Melchiorri Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell Energia Elettrica e
More information3 Stability and Lyapunov Functions
CDS140a Nonlinear Systems: Local Theory 02/01/2011 3 Stability and Lyapunov Functions 3.1 Lyapunov Stability Denition: An equilibrium point x 0 of (1) is stable if for all ɛ > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such
More informationTransform Solutions to LTI Systems Part 3
Transform Solutions to LTI Systems Part 3 Example of second order system solution: Same example with increased damping: k=5 N/m, b=6 Ns/m, F=2 N, m=1 Kg Given x(0) = 0, x (0) = 0, find x(t). The revised
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture 1: Introduction
Nonlinear Control Lecture 1: Introduction Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2011 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 1 1/15 Motivation
More informationLecture 4. Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability. Eugenio Schuster. Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University.
Lecture 4 Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 4 p. 1/86 Autonomous Systems Consider the autonomous system ẋ
More informationModeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems
Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems Dr. Guillaume Ducard Fall 2017 Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control ETH Zurich, Switzerland G. Ducard c 1 / 57 Outline 1 Lecture 13: Linear System - Stability
More informationLMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control
LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 15: Nonlinear Systems and Lyapunov Functions Overview Our next goal is to extend LMI s and optimization to nonlinear
More informationIntroduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems
p. 1/5 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems p. 2/5 Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t, x) f(t, x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t
More informationLinear and Nonlinear Oscillators (Lecture 2)
Linear and Nonlinear Oscillators (Lecture 2) January 25, 2016 7/441 Lecture outline A simple model of a linear oscillator lies in the foundation of many physical phenomena in accelerator dynamics. A typical
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 5: Calculating the Laplace Transform of a Signal Introduction In this Lecture, you will learn: Laplace Transform of Simple
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Dynamic Response
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Dynamic Response Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. . Previous Class...........
More information2 Lyapunov Stability. x(0) x 0 < δ x(t) x 0 < ɛ
1 2 Lyapunov Stability Whereas I/O stability is concerned with the effect of inputs on outputs, Lyapunov stability deals with unforced systems: ẋ = f(x, t) (1) where x R n, t R +, and f : R n R + R n.
More informationNonlinear System Analysis
Nonlinear System Analysis Lyapunov Based Approach Lecture 4 Module 1 Dr. Laxmidhar Behera Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. January 4, 2003 Intelligent Control
More informationSTABILITY. Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential equations. and used the Laplace transform to help find step and impulse
SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS: PAPER 3C1 HANDOUT 4. Dr David Corrigan 1. Electronic and Electrical Engineering Dept. corrigad@tcd.ie www.sigmedia.tv STABILITY Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential
More informationVibrations Qualifying Exam Study Material
Vibrations Qualifying Exam Study Material The candidate is expected to have a thorough understanding of engineering vibrations topics. These topics are listed below for clarification. Not all instructors
More informationExercises Lecture 15
AM1 Mathematical Analysis 1 Oct. 011 Feb. 01 Date: January 7 Exercises Lecture 15 Harmonic Oscillators In classical mechanics, a harmonic oscillator is a system that, when displaced from its equilibrium
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 0.1 Model prerequisites Consider ẋ = f(t, x). We will make the following basic assumptions
More informationProf. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE281A Homework set 1 Linearization & phase portrait
Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE28A Homework set Linearization & phase portrait. For each of the following systems, find all equilibrium points and determine the type of each isolated equilibrium. Use
More information2.161 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.6 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. MASSACHUSETTS
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Input-Output Stability. Nonlinear Control
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Input-Output Stability L Stability Input-Output Models: y = Hu u(t) is a piecewise continuous function of t and belongs to a linear space of signals The space of bounded
More informationLecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design.
ISS0031 Modeling and Identification Lecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design. Aleksei Tepljakov, Ph.D. September 30, 2015 Linear Dynamic Systems Definition
More informationECE504: Lecture 8. D. Richard Brown III. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 28-Oct-2008
ECE504: Lecture 8 D. Richard Brown III Worcester Polytechnic Institute 28-Oct-2008 Worcester Polytechnic Institute D. Richard Brown III 28-Oct-2008 1 / 30 Lecture 8 Major Topics ECE504: Lecture 8 We are
More informationControl Systems. Frequency domain analysis. L. Lanari
Control Systems m i l e r p r a in r e v y n is o Frequency domain analysis L. Lanari outline introduce the Laplace unilateral transform define its properties show its advantages in turning ODEs to algebraic
More informationIntroduction to Modern Control MT 2016
CDT Autonomous and Intelligent Machines & Systems Introduction to Modern Control MT 2016 Alessandro Abate Lecture 2 First-order ordinary differential equations (ODE) Solution of a linear ODE Hints to nonlinear
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis
Topic # 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Fall 010 16.30/31 Lyapunov Stability Analysis Very general method to prove (or disprove) stability of
More information1 Lyapunov theory of stability
M.Kawski, APM 581 Diff Equns Intro to Lyapunov theory. November 15, 29 1 1 Lyapunov theory of stability Introduction. Lyapunov s second (or direct) method provides tools for studying (asymptotic) stability
More informationECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS. Lecture 6 Mathematical Representation of Physical Systems II 1/67
1/67 ECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS Lecture 6 Mathematical Representation of Physical Systems II State Variable Models for Dynamic Systems u 1 u 2 u ṙ. Internal Variables x 1, x 2 x n y 1 y 2. y m Figure
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 8 Time Varying and Perturbed Systems
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 8 Time Varying and Perturbed Systems Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t,x) f(t,x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t 0 and all x D, (0 D). The origin
More information21 Linear State-Space Representations
ME 132, Spring 25, UC Berkeley, A Packard 187 21 Linear State-Space Representations First, let s describe the most general type of dynamic system that we will consider/encounter in this class Systems may
More informationMath 215/255 Final Exam (Dec 2005)
Exam (Dec 2005) Last Student #: First name: Signature: Circle your section #: Burggraf=0, Peterson=02, Khadra=03, Burghelea=04, Li=05 I have read and understood the instructions below: Please sign: Instructions:.
More informationGeorgia Institute of Technology Nonlinear Controls Theory Primer ME 6402
Georgia Institute of Technology Nonlinear Controls Theory Primer ME 640 Ajeya Karajgikar April 6, 011 Definition Stability (Lyapunov): The equilibrium state x = 0 is said to be stable if, for any R > 0,
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 15, 2017 Control Systems I (151-0591-00L) Prof Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 44 Number of Points: 52 Permitted aids: Important:
More informationCDS Solutions to the Midterm Exam
CDS 22 - Solutions to the Midterm Exam Instructor: Danielle C. Tarraf November 6, 27 Problem (a) Recall that the H norm of a transfer function is time-delay invariant. Hence: ( ) Ĝ(s) = s + a = sup /2
More informationMCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems
MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability - I Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Definition of Stability - Lyapunov Sense Lyapunov
More informationEE 380. Linear Control Systems. Lecture 10
EE 380 Linear Control Systems Lecture 10 Professor Jeffrey Schiano Department of Electrical Engineering Lecture 10. 1 Lecture 10 Topics Stability Definitions Methods for Determining Stability Lecture 10.
More informationL = 1 2 a(q) q2 V (q).
Physics 3550, Fall 2011 Motion near equilibrium - Small Oscillations Relevant Sections in Text: 5.1 5.6 Motion near equilibrium 1 degree of freedom One of the most important situations in physics is motion
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 13: Stability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 13: Stability p.1/20 Outline Input-Output
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationME 680- Spring Representation and Stability Concepts
ME 680- Spring 014 Representation and Stability Concepts 1 3. Representation and stability concepts 3.1 Continuous time systems: Consider systems of the form x F(x), x n (1) where F : U Vis a mapping U,V
More informationComplex Dynamic Systems: Qualitative vs Quantitative analysis
Complex Dynamic Systems: Qualitative vs Quantitative analysis Complex Dynamic Systems Chiara Mocenni Department of Information Engineering and Mathematics University of Siena (mocenni@diism.unisi.it) Dynamic
More informationIdentification Methods for Structural Systems
Prof. Dr. Eleni Chatzi System Stability Fundamentals Overview System Stability Assume given a dynamic system with input u(t) and output x(t). The stability property of a dynamic system can be defined from
More informationStability of Stochastic Differential Equations
Lyapunov stability theory for ODEs s Stability of Stochastic Differential Equations Part 1: Introduction Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Strathclyde Glasgow, G1 1XH December 2010
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 14: Controllability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 14: Controllability p.1/23 Outline
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)
More information6.003 Homework #6 Solutions
6.3 Homework #6 Solutions Problems. Maximum gain For each of the following systems, find the frequency ω m for which the magnitude of the gain is greatest. a. + s + s ω m = w This system has poles at s
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationQUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS
Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2003, Vol. 13, No. 2, 179 184 QUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS PINI GURFIL Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 2, 2018 J. Tani, E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 7:
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationCH.6 Laplace Transform
CH.6 Laplace Transform Where does the Laplace transform come from? How to solve this mistery that where the Laplace transform come from? The starting point is thinking about power series. The power series
More informationSome solutions of the written exam of January 27th, 2014
TEORIA DEI SISTEMI Systems Theory) Prof. C. Manes, Prof. A. Germani Some solutions of the written exam of January 7th, 0 Problem. Consider a feedback control system with unit feedback gain, with the following
More informationFinal Exam December 20, 2011
Final Exam December 20, 2011 Math 420 - Ordinary Differential Equations No credit will be given for answers without mathematical or logical justification. Simplify answers as much as possible. Leave solutions
More informationDr. Ian R. Manchester
Dr Ian R. Manchester Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus
More informationME Fall 2001, Fall 2002, Spring I/O Stability. Preliminaries: Vector and function norms
I/O Stability Preliminaries: Vector and function norms 1. Sup norms are used for vectors for simplicity: x = max i x i. Other norms are also okay 2. Induced matrix norms: let A R n n, (i stands for induced)
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries
. AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace
More information10 Transfer Matrix Models
MIT EECS 6.241 (FALL 26) LECTURE NOTES BY A. MEGRETSKI 1 Transfer Matrix Models So far, transfer matrices were introduced for finite order state space LTI models, in which case they serve as an important
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 2.1 Dynamic Behavior
CDS 11/11a: Lecture.1 Dynamic Behavior Richard M. Murray 6 October 8 Goals: Learn to use phase portraits to visualize behavior of dynamical systems Understand different types of stability for an equilibrium
More information1 Pushing your Friend on a Swing
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MITES 017 Physics III Lecture 05: Driven Oscillations In these notes, we derive the properties of both an undamped and damped harmonic oscillator under the influence
More informationSolution of Additional Exercises for Chapter 4
1 1. (1) Try V (x) = 1 (x 1 + x ). Solution of Additional Exercises for Chapter 4 V (x) = x 1 ( x 1 + x ) x = x 1 x + x 1 x In the neighborhood of the origin, the term (x 1 + x ) dominates. Hence, the
More informationChapter 1 Fundamental Concepts
Chapter 1 Fundamental Concepts 1 Signals A signal is a pattern of variation of a physical quantity, often as a function of time (but also space, distance, position, etc). These quantities are usually the
More informationINC 341 Feedback Control Systems: Lecture 2 Transfer Function of Dynamic Systems I Asst. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto
INC 341 Feedback Control Systems: Lecture 2 Transfer Function of Dynamic Systems I Asst. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto Department of Control Systems and Instrumentation Engineering King Mongkut s University
More informationApplication of Simple Harmonics Modeling a Shock
Undergraduate Journal of Mathematical Modeling: One + Two Volume 8 2017 Fall 2017 Issue 1 Article 1 Application of Simple Harmonics Modeling a Shock Kai Raymond University of South Florida Advisors: Thomas
More informationLinear Systems. Chapter Basic Definitions
Chapter 5 Linear Systems Few physical elements display truly linear characteristics. For example the relation between force on a spring and displacement of the spring is always nonlinear to some degree.
More informationMath Assignment 5
Math 2280 - Assignment 5 Dylan Zwick Fall 2013 Section 3.4-1, 5, 18, 21 Section 3.5-1, 11, 23, 28, 35, 47, 56 Section 3.6-1, 2, 9, 17, 24 1 Section 3.4 - Mechanical Vibrations 3.4.1 - Determine the period
More informationDamped harmonic motion
Damped harmonic motion March 3, 016 Harmonic motion is studied in the presence of a damping force proportional to the velocity. The complex method is introduced, and the different cases of under-damping,
More informationẋ n = f n (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (5) y 1 = g 1 (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (6) y p = g p (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (7)
EEE582 Topical Outline A.A. Rodriguez Fall 2007 GWC 352, 965-3712 The following represents a detailed topical outline of the course. It attempts to highlight most of the key concepts to be covered and
More informationAnalysis of periodic solutions in tapping-mode AFM: An IQC approach
Analysis of periodic solutions in tapping-mode AFM: An IQC approach A. Sebastian, M. V. Salapaka Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University Ames, IA 5004 USA Abstract The feedback
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 2.1 Dynamic Behavior
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 2.1 Dynamic Behavior Richard M. Murray 6 October 28 Goals: Learn to use phase portraits to visualize behavior of dynamical systems Understand different types of stability for an equilibrium
More information18.03SC Practice Problems 14
1.03SC Practice Problems 1 Frequency response Solution suggestions In this problem session we will work with a second order mass-spring-dashpot system driven by a force F ext acting directly on the mass:
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling and Linearization. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch Jacopo Tani
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling and Linearization Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3 Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 28, 2018 J. Tani, E.
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 3. Fundamental properties IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs2012/ 2012 1 Example Consider the system ẋ = f
More informationDifferential and Difference LTI systems
Signals and Systems Lecture: 6 Differential and Difference LTI systems Differential and difference linear time-invariant (LTI) systems constitute an extremely important class of systems in engineering.
More informationNonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems. p. 1/1
Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems p. 1/1 p. 2/1 Converse Lyapunov Theorem Exponential Stability Let x = 0 be an exponentially stable equilibrium
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture 4: Stability Analysis I
Nonlinear Control Lecture 4: Stability Analysis I Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2010 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 4 1/70
More informationPredictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly s Wings in Brazil set off a Tornado
Chapter 4 Dynamic Behavior Predictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly s Wings in Brazil set off a Tornado in Texas? Talk given by Edward Lorenz, December 972 meeting of the American Association for the
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 5: Transfer Functions. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 5: Transfer Functions Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 20, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 5: Control Systems I 20/10/2017
More informationMath 221 Topics since the second exam
Laplace Transforms. Math 1 Topics since the second exam There is a whole different set of techniques for solving n-th order linear equations, which are based on the Laplace transform of a function. For
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 2 Stability of Equilibrium Points
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 2 Stability of Equilibrium Points Basic Concepts ẋ = f(x) f is locally Lipschitz over a domain D R n Suppose x D is an equilibrium point; that is, f( x) = 0 Characterize and
More informationCDS Solutions to Final Exam
CDS 22 - Solutions to Final Exam Instructor: Danielle C Tarraf Fall 27 Problem (a) We will compute the H 2 norm of G using state-space methods (see Section 26 in DFT) We begin by finding a minimal state-space
More informationLecture 8. Chapter 5: Input-Output Stability Chapter 6: Passivity Chapter 14: Passivity-Based Control. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 8 Chapter 5: Input-Output Stability Chapter 6: Passivity Chapter 14: Passivity-Based Control Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture
More informationSolution of Linear State-space Systems
Solution of Linear State-space Systems Homogeneous (u=0) LTV systems first Theorem (Peano-Baker series) The unique solution to x(t) = (t, )x 0 where The matrix function is given by is called the state
More informationSection 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations
Section 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations Second order linear equations with constant coefficients serve as mathematical models for mechanical and electrical oscillations. For example, the motion
More informationThe Harmonic Oscillator
The Harmonic Oscillator Math 4: Ordinary Differential Equations Chris Meyer May 3, 008 Introduction The harmonic oscillator is a common model used in physics because of the wide range of problems it can
More informationChapter 6: The Laplace Transform. Chih-Wei Liu
Chapter 6: The Laplace Transform Chih-Wei Liu Outline Introduction The Laplace Transform The Unilateral Laplace Transform Properties of the Unilateral Laplace Transform Inversion of the Unilateral Laplace
More informationL2 gains and system approximation quality 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 24: MODEL REDUCTION L2 gains and system approximation quality 1 This lecture discusses the utility
More informationGATE EE Topic wise Questions SIGNALS & SYSTEMS
www.gatehelp.com GATE EE Topic wise Questions YEAR 010 ONE MARK Question. 1 For the system /( s + 1), the approximate time taken for a step response to reach 98% of the final value is (A) 1 s (B) s (C)
More informationDynamical Systems & Lyapunov Stability
Dynamical Systems & Lyapunov Stability Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Ordinary Differential Equations Existence & uniqueness Continuous dependence
More informationMath 1302, Week 8: Oscillations
Math 302, Week 8: Oscillations T y eq Y y = y eq + Y mg Figure : Simple harmonic motion. At equilibrium the string is of total length y eq. During the motion we let Y be the extension beyond equilibrium,
More informationMinimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality
Minimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality Christian Ebenbauer Institute for Systems Theory in Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany ce@ist.uni-stuttgart.de
More informationExplanations and Discussion of Some Laplace Methods: Transfer Functions and Frequency Response. Y(s) = b 1
Engs 22 p. 1 Explanations Discussion of Some Laplace Methods: Transfer Functions Frequency Response I. Anatomy of Differential Equations in the S-Domain Parts of the s-domain solution. We will consider
More information28. Pendulum phase portrait Draw the phase portrait for the pendulum (supported by an inextensible rod)
28. Pendulum phase portrait Draw the phase portrait for the pendulum (supported by an inextensible rod) θ + ω 2 sin θ = 0. Indicate the stable equilibrium points as well as the unstable equilibrium points.
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability Passivity: Memoryless Functions y y y u u u (a) (b) (c) Passive Passive Not passive y = h(t,u), h [0, ] Vector case: y = h(t,u), h T =
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationLinear Control Systems Solution to Assignment #1
Linear Control Systems Solution to Assignment # Instructor: H. Karimi Issued: Mehr 0, 389 Due: Mehr 8, 389 Solution to Exercise. a) Using the superposition property of linear systems we can compute the
More informationControl Systems. Internal Stability - LTI systems. L. Lanari
Control Systems Internal Stability - LTI systems L. Lanari outline LTI systems: definitions conditions South stability criterion equilibrium points Nonlinear systems: equilibrium points examples stable
More informationMODELING OF CONTROL SYSTEMS
1 MODELING OF CONTROL SYSTEMS Feb-15 Dr. Mohammed Morsy Outline Introduction Differential equations and Linearization of nonlinear mathematical models Transfer function and impulse response function Laplace
More information