arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 10 Jul 2017
|
|
- Christopher Franklin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Locating the Gribov horizon arxiv:76.468v [hep-ph Jul 7 Fei Gao, Si-Xue Qin, Craig D. Roberts, and Jose Rodríguez-Quintero 4 Department of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 87, China Department of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 4, P.R. China Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 649, USA 4 Departamento de Física Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva E-7, Spain (Dated: 5 June 7) We explore whether a tree-level expression for the gluon two-point function, supposed to express effects of an horizon term introduced to eliminate the Gribov ambiguity, is consistent with the propagator obtained in simulations of lattice-regularised quantum chromodynamics (QCD). In doing so, we insist that the gluon two-point function obey constraints that ensure a minimal level of consistency with parton-like behaviour at ultraviolet momenta. In consequence, we are led to a position which supports a conjecture that the gluon mass and horizon scale are equivalent emergent massscales, each with a value of roughly.5 GeV; and wherefrom it appears plausible that the dynamical generation of a running gluon mass may alone be sufficient to remove the Gribov ambiguity.. Introduction. When quantising continuum chromodynamics, a gauge fixing condition must be imposed upon the gluon fields. Except in particular cases [ 9, that cannot be completed consistently without adding ghost fields to the Lagrangian [. The classical theory s gauge invariance is then replaced by BRST symmetry [,, which can be used in perturbation theory to prove, e.g. renormalisability of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Typically, however, the auxiliary condition meant to select a unique element from each class of equivalent configurations (a gauge field orbit) is nonperturbatively inadequate [ 9. An unknown (probably infinite) number of configurations remain, each related to the identified element by a nonperturbative gauge transformation, and all contributing equally to the functional integral that should define the theory. This impedes a rigorous mathematical formulation of QCD; and hence the domain of gauge field integration must be restricted further [,. Contemporary efforts to realise a gauge fixing procedure that selects a unique configuration from each gauge field orbit are described in Ref. [. The analysis is typically undertaken in Landau gauge, because, e.g.: it is a linear covariant gauge; a fixed point of the renormalisation group; and readily implemented in lattice-qcd. Prominent amongst associated schemes is a modification of the standard QCD action to include an horizon term : γ d 4 x h(x), () h(x) = g f abc A b µ(x)[m ad (x, x)f dec A e µ(x), where g is the coupling, {A a µ} represents the gluons, and M ab (x, y) = [ δ ab + µ f abc A c µ(x)δ 4 (x y) () is the Landau gauge Faddeev-Popov operator. The scale γ is fixed via the horizon condition : h[γ = d(n ), where d(n ), d = 4, N =, is the number of components of the gluon field, and the expectation value indicates gauge-field integration in the presence of γ. (Issues of BRST (a-)symmetry, renormalisability, etc., of such an action are canvassed elsewhere, e.g. Refs. [, 4.) The procedure just described ensures that only those solutions of the Landau-gauge auxiliary condition which produce non-negative values for the Faddeev-Popov determinant (Det M ) contribute in the gauge-field integration, i.e. it restricts the integration to those Landaugauge configurations which lie within the so-called first Gribov region, Ω, whose boundary, δω, the Gribov horizon, is defined by Landau-gauge configurations for which Det M =. The importance of these requirements is clear: DetM is necessary to ensure the existence of a unique solution of the gauge fixing condition and DetM is required if the determinant is to be represented using ghost fields. The first Gribov region has other significant properties [: Ω contains the trivial A µ configuration, so a connection with perturbation theory is maintained; and it is intersected by each gauge orbit at least once, convex, and compact. It follows that all gauge orbits are represented by configurations within Ω and any set of Gribov copies within Ω is bounded. The procedure summarised here refines the original scheme [; and its implementation capitalises on a finding [5 that one may equivalently define the first Gribov region to be the set of relative minima of the functional F A [U = d 4 x [A a µ(x) U [A a µ(x) U, () where [A a µ U is a gauge transformation of the field A a µ and the minimisation proceeds by choosing those configurations on each orbit which minimise this norm. Plainly, there can be more than one relative minima; and the set of gauge-equivalent minima identifies the Gribov copies tied to a given configuration. From this perspective, the Landau-gauge ambiguity is resolved if the gauge field integration is restricted to those configurations for which F A [U is an absolute minimum. The domain of such configurations defines the fundamental modular region, Λ Ω, and quantisation of QCD may then properly be achieved by integrating only over A a µ Λ. However, an issue remains [8: no practical, local scheme has yet been devised to achieve this restriction in continuum QCD.
2 Our discussion highlights that the Gribov horizon, δω, might play an important role in rigorously defining the scope of gauge sector interactions. Its existence is: imposed via γ > in Eq. (), whose value is dynamically determined; and known to have the potential to modify the infrared (IR) behaviour of the gluon two-point Schwinger function [6. Hence, writing g γ = m 4 γ, one may identify m γ as an interaction-induced mass scale whose value characterises the location of the Gribov horizon. Implemented as described, the gauge-fixed action is non-local because it involves M. At the cost of introducing additional fields, an equivalent local action can be derived, yielding a tree-level gluon propagator for a theory whose gauge fields all lie within Ω [, : D γ µν(k) = T µν (k)d γ (k ), D γ (k ) = k k 4 + Ng γ, (4) T µν (k) = δ µν k µ k ν /k. It is now plausible to suppose that Eq. (4) expresses the dominant IR features of the gauge-fixed gluon propagator and hence the scheme employed could be validated through comparison with Landau-gauge results for this Schwinger function obtained using lattice-qcd (lqcd). The most striking feature of Eq. (4) is that D γ (k ) as k and it is now clear that such behaviour is not found in QCD. Instead, the gluon sector is characterised by a nonperturbativelygenerated IR mass-scale, which ensures the gluon dressing function is nonzero and finite at k = [7. One must therefore conclude that, notwithstanding its strengths, the scheme of Refs. [, is incomplete. A modification to the gauge-fixing scheme of Refs. [, is canvassed in Refs. [,. It admits the possibility that the ghost fields used to localise the horizon term develop a nonzero dimension-two condensate, whose presence further modifies the gluon propagator [, : D γ (k ) D(k ) = k + M k 4 + k m + λ 4, (5) where λ 4 = Ng γ µ M, m = M µ, with µ A a µa a µ and M related to the ghost-field condensate, both computed within an hadronic medium [. Following this method, which supports a nonzero value for the gluon propagator in the far-ir, one can obtain fair agreement with lqcd results for the gluon two-point function [4 6. Herein, we revisit this issue, using lattice simulations to constrain the parameters in Eq. (5) after imposing novel constraints; and this enables us to develop new insights into their implications and meaning.. Partonic Constraints. Owing to asymptotic freedom, and notwithstanding confinement and dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, the scalar functions characterising any one of the two-point Schwinger functions associated with QCD s elementary excitations can be defined as positive on k [, ) and must then be convex-down and fall no faster than /k, with modest logarithmic corrections, on P = {k k > k P, for some k P > Λ QCD }. Denoting such a function by S(k ), then equally, as may be shown using the operator product expansion [7, τ P < /Λ QCD such that σ(τ), the configuration space dual of S(k ), is convex-down on P τ = {τ < τ < τ P }. It is commonly assumed that such duals are straightforwardly related by cos-transform [8. This is a strong claim because one cannot prove nonperturbatively that the transform yields the same function obtained by computing the correlator directly in configuration space. Nevertheless, it is currently impossible to do better; and under this assumption, the impact of these convexity requirements (partonic constraints) on D(k ) in Eq. (5) may be elucidated by considering the associated costransform: (τ) = P (τ) [ ( + M /λ )s ϕ/ cos(τλs ϕ/ ) ( M /λ )c ϕ/ sin(τλs ϕ/ ), (6) where P (τ) = exp( τλc ϕ/ )/(λs ϕ ), s ϕ = [ c ϕ /, s ϕ/ = [ c ϕ/ /, c ϕ = cos ϕ = m /(λ ), c ϕ/ = cos ϕ = [ + m /(4λ ) /. The Schwinger function in Eq. (5) is that of a massive excitation, in which case a propagator consistent with the partonic constraint would behave as exp( mass τ). In order to ensure this, it is sufficient to demand M = λ, λ µ (sufficient), (7) for then (τ) M=λ = P (τ)[ + O(τ λ s ϕ/ ). Of course, a necessary condition for convexity of (τ) on τ is that (τ) be positive on this domain: d dτ (τ) = τ= which is positive so long as 4λc ϕ/ [ µ /λ, (8) µ λ (necessary). (9). Intepreting -QCD Results. We now explore the impact of the partonic constraints in Eqs. (7), (9) on the description of lqcd results for the gluon twopoint function using Eq. (5). To proceed, we assume that at some renormalisation scale, ζ GZ, D(k ; ζ GZ ) := D(k ) in Eq. (5) is a valid representation of that part of the full gluon two-point function which is essentially nonperturbative. There is then a domain of IR momenta, k [, k, with k to be determined, whereupon Eq. (5) should be capable of describing the lqcd propagator, D #, computed at a known renormalisation scale, ζ #, after they are both evolved to a common point ζ GeV, typical of hadron physics. On k > k, the usual logarithms and anomalous dimensions will be generated by renormalisation. Since they are absent from Eq. (5), this formula must thereupon fail. The gluon two-point function is multiplicatively renormalisable, so this perspective can be expressed thus: k [, k : D(k ; ζ ) = D # (k ; ζ ), D(k ; ζ ) = z (ζ ; ζ GZ)D(k ; ζ GZ), D # (k ; ζ ) = D # (k ; ζ #)/[ζ D # (ζ ; ζ #), (a) (b) (c)
3 TABLE I. Panel A. Analysis of large-volume quenched lqcd results [ (ζ # = 4. GeV, k max = 4.5 GeV) using the twopoint function in Eq. (5). Row : unconstrained fit using simulation results on the entire available domain, k = k max. Row : unconstrained fit on an IR domain. Row : fit respecting the parton-sufficient condition, Eq. (7). Row 4: fit respecting the parton-necessary condition, Eq. (9), imposing the upper bound. Row 5: fit respecting Eq. (9) and requiring m γ = m g (see Sec. 5). Panel B. As Panel A, but for unquenched results (N f = 4) [9. Panel C. kip position of the inflection point in D(k ; ζ ) when computed using the coefficients listed in the rows above, e.g. A means Panel A, Row ; τ z location of the first zero in the associated (τ); τ F related parton-persistence or fragmentation length. (All dimensioned quantities in GeV, except τ z, τ F, in fm.) (A) quenched k ζ λ M z M/λ µ/λ unconstrained ζ sufficient ζ necessary ζ nec. +m γ = m g ζ (B) unquenched k ζ λ M z M/λ µ/λ unconstrained ζ sufficient ζ i necessary ζ nec. +m γ = m g ζ (C) A A A A4 A5 B B B B4 B5 k ip τ z τ F where z, k are fit parameters. We will judge the interpretation reasonable so long as z, k GeV, in which event it is natural to identify ζ = k. There are five parameters: z, k = ζ, and M, µ, λ in Eq. (5). They are determined simultaneously by minimising the rms relative-difference between the two sides of Eq. (a) for a given value of k, then optimising k [, kmax by seeking that value which produces the global minimum for this rms relative-difference, where k max is the largest momentum at which lqcd results are available. We first analyse the large-volume quenched simulations in Ref. [ (ζ # = 4. GeV, k max = 4.5 GeV), wherewith our procedure yields the results in Table IA. For this purpose the 64 4 and 8 4 lattices are indistinguishable [6: we use the latter. Row reports the coefficients that achieve a best fit on the entire domain of available lattice momenta, i.e. k := k max, unvaried, with ζ fixed at the value found to produce the global minimum when k is optimised, viz. determined in producing Row. The fit s quality is apparent in Fig. A: the ultraviolet (UV) behaviour is represented well at the cost of a poorer description of the IR. This is unsurprising, given the preponder- D(k,ζ ) [ /GeV D(k,ζ ) [ /GeV k [GeV Unc. All Unc. IR M=λ Unc. All Unc. IR M=λ k [GeV FIG.. Upper panel - (A). Fit to quenched lattice results [, determined as described in connection with Eqs. (): dotted (brown) curve Row of Table IA, unconstrained, unbounded fit; dot-dashed (green) curve Row, Table IA, unconstrained, bounded fit; dashed (blue) curve Row, satisfying the sufficient condition for partonic behaviour, Eq. (7); and solid (black) curve Row 4, necessary condition, Eq. (9). Lower panel - (B). As upper panel, but for unquenched results (N f = 4) [9. (The curves and points associated with the unconstrained fits have been rescaled by (/.). This eliminates an offset from the constrained results owing to the small difference in optimal scales: ζ =. GeV cf. ζ =. GeV.) ance of UV lattice results in the sample domain; and, consequently, z deviates greatly from unity, indicating that on k [, kmax the lqcd output possesses material perturbative contributions, which cannot be captured by Eq. (5). The fit nevertheless exhibits an IR inflection point [at kip = (.6 GeV), signalling that the spectral function associated with this propagator is not positive-definite. Such behaviour is widely interpreted as an indicator of confinement [8 5. It is expressed in (τ) of Eq. (6) via a non-terminating series of zeros, with the first located at τ z =.4 fm: at this scale, even the most tenuous connection with partonic behaviour is lost. (Such inflection points and zeros are listed in Table IC.) Row in Table IA lists the coefficients obtained when fitting the quenched results on an IR domain with upper bound k, as described in connection with Eqs. (). Here, z is closer to unity, so an interpretation using Eq. (5) is more credible. The result is the dot-dashed
4 4 TABLE II. Dimension-two condensate, m A, Eq. (); gluon mass-scale, m g = λ /M; and Gribov horizon parameter, m γ, Eq. (), inferred by fitting lattice results using Eq. (5) subject to the parton constraints in Eqs. (7), (9), and also subject to Eq. (9) plus m γ = m g (see Sec. 5). The resolving scale is ζ = GeV. (Λ MOM(N f =) QCD =.45(+5)( 9) and Λ MOM(N f =4) QCD =.56(±) [ All dimensioned quantities in GeV.) sufficient necessary nec. +m γ = m g N f m A m g m γ m A m g m γ m A m γ = m g i (green) curve in Fig. A. Here, kip = (.46 GeV) and the first zero in (τ) lies at τ z =.99 fm. Notably, however, neither the sufficient nor necessary condition for partonic behaviour, Eqs. (7), (9), is satisfied; and inspection reveals that (τ) has an inflection point at τ =.78 fm. Such a striking nonperturbative effect located deep in the UV is in direct conflict with perturbation theory. Hence, this fit, too, should be rejected as unrealistic. It is thus appropriate now to describe the fit to lattice results that respects the sufficient condition for partonconsistent behaviour, Eq. (7): parameters in Row of Table IA and dashed (blue) curve in Fig. A. In this instance: z is close to unity; D(k ; ζ) has a global maximum at k = (.8 GeV) and an inflection point at kip = (.48 GeV). The appearance of a global maximum at k > is, perhaps, unexpected, but neither continuum nor lattice analyses of QCD s gauge sector can exclude this possibility. In fact, contributions from massless-ghost loops in the gluon vacuum polarisation may produce just such an effect [5, 5. It is noteworthy that constraining the behaviour of a two-point function on τ, viz. a far-uv domain, inaccessible to lattice simulations, enables extraction of more reliable information about the behaviour of the function at IR momenta, a domain within which lattice results are concentrated. The associated (τ) is convex on a domain extending beyond its first zero, at τ z =.96 fm. In this instance one may also ask after the persistence of partonic behaviour, in which connection we define a hadronisation length as that scale, τ H, whereat (τ H )/ P (τ H ) =, i.e. the configuration-space Schwinger function deviates from a partonic propagator by 5%. Here, τ H =.67 fm. The fit also yields a value for the A in-hadron condensate, appearing in the operator product expansion of the gluon two-point function [, 6, 4, 5, 56, 57: g A = µ =: m A. () Phenomenologically: m A ( GeV) ; but this fit gives (.86 GeV), as reported in Table II. Row 4 in Table IA specifies the Eq. (9)-consistent fit, which is the solid (black) curve in Fig. A: little visually distinguishes the results obtained from the sufficient and necessary parton constraints. Here: z is close to unity; D(k ; ζ) has an inflection point at kip = (.48 GeV) ; and (τ) is convex on a domain that extends beyond its first zero, located at τ z =.97 fm, with τ H =.8 fm. We now turn to unquenched (N f = 4) results [9 (ζ # = 4. GeV, volume 48 96). Our procedure yields the results listed in Table IB. As evident in Fig. B, there is a paucity of unquenched results at IR momenta, one consequence of which is a need to bound the fitting window in order achieve any reasonable description. Thus, the first row in Table IB lists the coefficients required to achieve a best fit on k kmax, k max = 4. GeV, with ζ fixed at the value found to produce the global minimum when k is optimised, viz. determined in producing Row. The fit is poor at IR momenta (see the dotted (brown) curve in Fig. B), owing to the scarcity of results, which also entails that the fit does not describe a manifestly confined excitation: D(k ; ζ) has no inflection point at spacelike momenta and (τ ) >. Furthermore, as in the analogous quenched case, z is far from unity owing to the presence of material perturbative contributions to the lqcd results on this fitting domain. Row in Table IB specifies the fit to unquenched results on k [, ζ, ζ =. GeV. Again, z is quite different from unity. The result: dot-dashed (green) curve in Fig. B, possesses a first-order inflection point, viz. the first k -derivative of D(k ; ζ) exhibits an inflection point at kip = (. GeV), and yields a form for (τ) whose first zero lies at τ z =.5 fm. Notably, as with the analogous quenched case, neither Eq. (7) nor Eq. (9) is satisfied; and inspection reveals that (τ) has an inflection point at τ =. fm. Hence, this fit is unrealistic. The impact of the sufficient condition, Eq. (7), on fitting the unquenched propagator is expressed in Row, Table IB. Shown as the dashed (blue) curve in Fig. B, it displays an inflection point at kip = (.4 GeV). Computed therefrom, (τ) is convex on a domain that extends beyond its first zero, at τ z =.5 fm, with τ F =.66 fm. Once again, imposing a physical constraint on the behaviour of a two-point function at far-uv momenta has enabled extraction of more reliable information about its IR behaviour. Notwithstanding these features, z is still too large for us to be confident that the unquenched results are consistent with Eq. (5), especially because µ < and hence A a µa a µ has the wrong sign when compared with contemporary phenomenology. Imposing Eq. (9) (necessary) when analysing the unquenched propagator yields Row 4 of Table IB and the two-point function depicted by the solid (black) curve in Fig. B. There is a clear difference between the impact of the sufficient and necessary conditions. The necessary condition ensures z and the fit is characterised by kip = (.4 GeV), τ z =. fm, and τ F =.7 fm. 4. Gribov Horizon Parameter. Using the coefficients in Table I, one can compute the Gribov horizon scale: m 4 γ := g [ γ = N λ 4 + µ M, () with the results listed in Table II and compared with the
5 5 dressed-gluon mass-scale inferred from the same ensembles: m g = λ /M. The pattern of the results in Table II is readily explained. For instance, compared with the unquenched values, the sizes of the quenched results are typically smaller owing to the paucity of unquenched IR data, which leads that fit to a focus on UV momenta and thus, usually, increased magnitudes for λ, M, µ. Likewise, the sizes obtained with the parton-sufficient constraint, Eq. (7), are normally smaller than those found with the necessary constraint, Eq. (9), because the latter also forces larger magnitudes for λ, M, µ. Focusing now on the Gribov parameter itself, the sufficient condition entails m γ < m g, whereas the necessary condition favours m γ m g. These outcomes are embedded in Eq. (), e.g. implementing Eq. (7), one has m 4 γ m 4 g N= [ = λ 6 µ 5λ, () which is negative for all values of µ consistent with Eq. (7). On the other hand, enforcing Eq. (9): m 4 γ m 4 g N= λ 6 [ λ + M 6 λ6 M. (4) 4 The rhs is positive M >.4 λ, a condition satisfied by all fits except, naturally, those obtained using Eq. (7). Which constraint, then, is more realistic? The value of m A suggests the necessary condition is better aligned with phenomenology. (The unconstrained fits produce unrealistically large values of m A and are thus excluded.) Notably, for µ > the sufficient condition always produces a global maximum in D(k ; ζ) at k >. Hence, a preference for the necessary condition places an upper bound on the strength of contributions from massless-ghost loops to the gluon vacuum polarisation. 5. Conclusion. Reflecting upon our results, consider that in the context of QCD augmented by the horizon term, Eq. (), there are three scenarios. (i) If g γ = m 4 γ m 4 g, then the Gribov horizon affects UV modes of the gluon. The validity of standard perturbation theory shows this is not the case. Consequently, g γ m 4 g is unrealistic: had it been favoured by lqcd results, then it would have been necessary to discard either or both those results and the horizon condition. (ii) The converse, m γ m g, would have indicated that the gluon mass alone is sufficient to screen IR gluon modes, in which case the Gribov ambiguity could have no physical impact and any horizon term is redundant. (iii) Our analysis indicates that QCD occupies the middle ground: m γ m g, with each of a size (.5 GeV) that one readily associates with emergent gauge-sector phenomena. In this scenario, the gluon mass and the horizon scale play a nearly equal role in screening longwavelength gluon modes, thereby dynamically eliminating Gribov ambiguities. Moreover, together they set a confinement scale of roughly fm, identified with the location of the first zero in the configuration-space gluon two-point function. We therefore conjecture that the D(k,ζ ) [ /GeV D(k,ζ ) [ /GeV k [GeV m g 4 =g γ m g 4 =g γ k [GeV FIG.. Upper panel - (A). Dot-dashed (purple) curve fit to quenched lattice results [, obtained as described in connection with Eqs. (), imposing Eq. (9) and m γ = m g. (Best fit coefficients in Table. I.) Solid (black) curve, for comparison, the µ = λ curve from Fig.. Lower panel - (B). Same as upper panel, but for unquenched results (N f = 4) [9. gluon mass and horizon condition are equivalent emergent phenomena. Plainly, unquenched lqcd results with better sensitivity to IR momenta are crucial before anything more can be said with certainty; but if the quenched results are a reasonable guide, then such improvement would increase the likelihood that m γ = m g is realised. In the meantime, one can readily check whether m γ = m g is consistent with available lqcd results; and, as apparent in Fig., that is certainly the case. In this particular realisation of Scenario (iii), the horizon term, and the A and ghost-field condensates may all be absorbed into a single running gluon mass, m g (k ), whose dynamical appearance alone is then sufficient to eliminate the Gribov ambiguity and complete the definition of QCD. Acknowledgments. We are grateful for insightful comments from D. Binosi, L. Chang, D. Dudal, C. Mezrag and J. Papavassiliou. Research supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, contract no. 45; National Key Basic Research Program of China, contract nos. GCB844 and 5CB8569; U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, contract no. DE-AC-6CH57; and Spanish MEyC, under grant no. FPA4-56-C--P.
6 6 [ V. N. Gribov, Nucl. Phys. B 9, (978). [ W. Konetschny, Phys. Lett. B 9, 6 (98), [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B5,5(98). [ D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B, 5 (989). [4 L. Baulieu and D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B 9, 6 (98). [5 H. S. Chan and M. B. Halpern, Phys. Rev. D, 54 (986). [6 J. C. Vink and U.-J. Wiese, Phys. Lett. B 89, (99). [7 P. O. Bowman, U. M. Heller and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D66, 455 (). [8 A. G. Williams, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 5, 54 (). [9 J. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. D 7, 45 (5). [ L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, Phys. Lett. B 5, 9 (967). [ C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora, Annals Phys. 98, 87 (976). [ I. V. Tyutin, (975), Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism, arxiv:8.58 [hep-th. [ N. Vandersickel and D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rept. 5, 75 (). [4 D. Dudal, S. P. Sorella and N. Vandersickel, Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 8 (). [5 M. A. L. Capri et al., Phys. Rev. D 7, 56 (5). [6 D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B, 59 (989). [7 A. C. Aguilar and J. Papavassiliou, JHEP 6, (6). [8 A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, PoS LAT7, 97 (7). [9 A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 46 (8). [ A. Aguilar, D. Binosi and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. D 78, 5 (8). [ D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. D 78, 6547 (8). [ S. J. Brodsky and R. Shrock, Phys. Lett. B 666, 95 (8). [ I. Bogolubsky, E. Ilgenfritz, M. Muller-Preussker and A. Sternbeck, Phys. Lett. B 676, 69 (9). [4 O. Oliveira and P. Bicudo, J. Phys. G 8, 45 (). [5 A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. D 84, 856 (). [6 P. Boucaud et al., Few Body Syst. 5, 87 (). [7 A. Aguilar, D. Binosi and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. D 86, 4 (). [8 D. Binosi, L. Chang, J. Papavassiliou and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B 74, 8 (5). [9 A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi and J. Papavassiliou, Front. Phys. China, (6). [ A. K. Cyrol, L. Fister, M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski and N. Strodthoff, Phys. Rev. D 94, 545 (6). [ D. Binosi, C. Mezrag, J. Papavassiliou, C. D. Roberts and J. Rodríguez-Quintero, (arxiv:6.485 [nucl-th), Process-independent strong running coupling. [ D. Dudal, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. D 77, 75 (8). [ S. J. Brodsky, C. D. Roberts, R. Shrock and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Rev. C 85, 65 (). [4 D. Dudal, O. Oliveira and N. Vandersickel, Phys. Rev. D 8, 7455 (). [5 A. Cucchieri, D. Dudal, T. Mendes and N. Vandersickel, Phys. Rev. D 85, 945 (). [6 D. Dudal, O. Oliveira and J. Rodríguez-Quintero, Phys. Rev. D 86, 55 (). [7 K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. 79, 499 (969). [8 F. T. Hawes, C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 49, 468 (994). [9 A. Ayala, A. Bashir, D. Binosi, M. Cristoforetti and J. Rodríguez-Quintero, Phys. Rev. D 86, 745 (). [4 H. J. Munczek and A. M. Nemirovsky, Phys. Rev. D 8, 8 (98). [4 M. Stingl, Phys. Rev. D 4, 86 (986), [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D6,65(987). [4 C. D. Roberts, A. G. Williams and G. Krein, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7, 567 (99). [4 C. J. Burden, C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Phys. Lett. B85, 47 (99). [44 P. Maris, Phys. Rev. D 5, 489 (994). [45 M. Bhagwat, M. Pichowsky and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Rev. D 67, 549 (). [46 C. D. Roberts, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 6, 5 (8). [47 A. Bashir, A. Raya, S. Sánchez-Madrigal and C. D. Roberts, Few Body Syst. 46, 9 (9). [48 A. Bashir, A. Raya and J. Rodríguez-Quintero, Phys. Rev. D 88, 54 (). [49 S.-X. Qin and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 88, 567 (). [5 P. Lowdon, J. Math. Phys. 57, (6). [5 W. Lucha and F. F. Schöberl, Phys. Rev. D 9, 566 (6). [5 A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi, D. Ibañez and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. D 89, 858 (4). [5 D. Binosi, C. D. Roberts and J. Rodriguez-Quintero, Phys. Rev. D 95, 49 (7). [54 P. Boucaud et al., Phys. Rev. D 79, 458 (9). [55 B. Blossier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 6 (). [56 B. Blossier et al., Phys. Rev. D 89, 457 (4). [57 P. Boucaud et al., Phys. Rev. D 6, 4 ().
arxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 28 Nov 2018
High Precision Statistical Landau Gauge Lattice Gluon Propagator Computation arxiv:1811.11678v1 [hep-lat] 28 Nov 2018 David Dudal KU Leuven Kulak, Department of Physics, Etienne Sabbelaan 53 bus 7657,
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 31 Jan 2011
What Lattice QCD tell us about the Landau Gauge Infrared Propagators arxiv:.5983v [hep-lat] 3 Jan Centro de Física Computacional, Departamento de Física, Universidade de Coimbra, 34-56 Coimbra, Portugal
More informationPoS(QCD-TNT-II)030. Massive gluon propagator at zero and finite temperature
Massive gluon propagator at zero and finite temperature Attilio Cucchieri a,b, David Dudal b, a and Nele Vandersickel b a Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 369,
More informationJoannis Papavassiliou Department of Theoretical Physics and IFIC University of Valencia-CSIC
The dynamics of the gluon mass Joannis Papavassiliou Department of Theoretical Physics and IFIC University of Valencia-CSIC Worshop on Functional Methods in Hadron and Nuclear Physics 2-25 August, 27 ECT*
More informationWhat s up with IR gluon and ghost propagators in Landau gauge? A puzzling answer from huge lattices
What s up with IR gluon and ghost propagators in Landau gauge? A puzzling answer from huge lattices and Tereza Mendes Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 369, 13560-970
More informationInfrared Propagators and Confinement: a Perspective from Lattice Simulations
Infrared Propagators and Confinement: a Perspective from Lattice Simulations Tereza Mendes University of São Paulo & DESY-Zeuthen Work in collaboration with Attilio Cucchieri Summary Lattice studies of
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 1 May 2011
arxiv:1.17v1 [hep-lat] 1 May 11 Electric and magnetic Landau-gauge gluon propagators in finite-temperature SU() gauge theory Attilio Cucchieri ab, a a Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de
More informationChiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD
Chiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD Mario Mitter Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Trieste, September 206 M. Mitter (U Heidelberg) χsb in continuum QCD Trieste, September 206 / 20 fqcd collaboration
More informationarxiv: v3 [hep-lat] 30 Jan 2018
The lattice Landau gauge gluon propagator: lattice spacing and volume dependence Orlando Oliveira and Paulo J. Silva Centro de Física Computacional, Departamento de Física, Universidade de Coimbra, - Coimbra,
More informationThe static potential in the Gribov-Zwanziger Lagrangian
The static potential in the Gribov-Zwanziger Lagrangian Theoretical Physics Division, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom E-mail:
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 7 Nov 2018
arxiv:1811.337v1 [hep-th] 7 Nov 18 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, USA E-mail: lowdon@slac.stanford.edu Local formulations of quantum field theory provide a powerful framework
More informationInfra-Red. Infra-red dog
A Ghost Story Gluons and ghosts in the IR and the UV Berlin, June 15, 2009 Ph.,Boucaud, F De soto, J.-P. Leroy, A. Le Yaouanc, J. Micheli, O. Pène, J. Rodriguez- Quintero, A.Lokhov and C. Roiesnel I. Gluons
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 14 Jan 2010
arxiv:00.2584v [hep-lat] 4 Jan 200 Numerical test of the Gribov-Zwanziger scenario in Landau gauge Attilio Cucchieri Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 369, 3560-970
More informationAn exact result for the behavior of Yang-Mills Green functions in the deep infrared region
An exact result for the behavior of Yang-Mills Green functions in the deep infrared region MG12, Paris, 17 July 2009 Kei-Ichi Kondo* (Univ. of Tokyo/hiba Univ., Japan) Based on K.-I. Kondo, Kugo-Ojima
More informationProcess-independent effective coupling
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Process-independent effective coupling From QCD Green s functions to phenomenology Jose Rodríguez-Quintero Daniele Binosi Cédric Mezrag Joannis Papavassiliou
More informationPoS(LATTICE 2007)338. Coulomb gauge studies of SU(3) Yang-Mills theory on the lattice
Coulomb gauge studies of SU() Yang-Mills theory on the lattice a,b, Ernst-Michael Ilgenfritz a, Michael Müller-Preussker a and Andre Sternbeck c a Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Physik, 489
More informationOn the Landau gauge three-gluon vertex
On the Landau gauge three-gluon vertex M. Vujinovic, G. Eichmann, R. Williams, R. Alkofer Karl Franzens University, Graz PhD Seminar talk Graz, Austria, 13.11.2013. M. Vujinovic et al. (KFU, Graz) On the
More informationRichard Williams. Collaborators: Alkofer, Eichmann, Fischer, Heupel, Sanchis-Alepuz
Richard Williams Collaborators: Alkofer, Eichmann, Fischer, Heupel, Sanchis-Alepuz 2 baryons mesons glueballs hybrids tetraquarks pentaquarks Extracting hadron poles from Green s functions 3 Extracting
More information(De-)Confinement from QCD Green s functions
(De-)Confinement from QCD Green s functions Christian S. Fischer JLU Giessen March 2012 with Jan Luecker, Jens Mueller, Christian Kellermann, Stefan Strauss Christian S. Fischer (JLU Giessen) (De-)Confinement
More informationA New Perspectives on QCD Condensates and Dark Energy. Stan Brodsky. Applications of AdS/QCD and Light-Front Holography to Hadron Physics
Applications of AdS/QCD and Light-Front Holography to Hadron Physics A New Perspectives on QCD Condensates and Dark Energy Experimental and Theoretical Challenges to Probing Dark Energy A Workshop sponsored
More informationBethe Salpeter studies of mesons beyond rainbow-ladder Complutense Unviversity of Madrid
Bethe Salpeter studies of mesons beyond rainbow-ladder Complutense Unviversity of Madrid Richard Williams C. S. Fischer and RW, Phys. Rev. D 78 2008 074006, [arxiv:0808.3372] C. S. Fischer and RW, Phys.
More informationFit to Gluon Propagator and Gribov Formula
arxiv:hep-lat/0012024v3 12 Nov 2001 Fit to Gluon Propagator and Gribov Formula Attilio Cucchieri and Daniel Zwanziger IFSC-USP, Caixa Postal 369, 13560-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil Physics Department, New
More informationChiral Symmetry Breaking. Schwinger-Dyson Equations
Critical End Point of QCD Phase-Diagram: A Schwinger-Dyson Equation Perspective Adnan Bashir Michoacán University, Mexico Collaborators: E. Guadalupe Gutiérrez, A Ahmad, A. Ayala, A. Raya, J.R. Quintero
More informationLattice QCD Study for Gluon Propagator and Gluon Spectral Function
Lattice QCD Study for Gluon Propagator and Gluon Spectral Function, Takumi Iritani, Arata Yamamoto Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawaoiwake, Sakyo, Kyoto 66-852, Japan E-mail: suganuma@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 17 Apr 2014
Non-perturbative features of the three-gluon vertex in Landau gauge Milan Vujinovic, Reinhard Alkofer arxiv:404.4474v [hep-ph] 7 Apr 204 Institut für Physik, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz
More informationScalar particles. Axel Maas. 7 th of May 2010 Delta 2010 Heidelberg Germany
Scalar particles Axel Maas 7 th of May 2010 Delta 2010 Heidelberg Germany Scalar particles - Properties in Landau gauge(s) Axel Maas 7 th of May 2010 Delta 2010 Heidelberg Germany Aim Describe gauge theories
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 26 Sep 2003 THE 2PPI EXPANSION: DYNAMICAL MASS GENERATION AND VACUUM ENERGY
LTH 601 November 16, 2016 21:26 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings arxiv:hep-th/0309241v1 26 Sep 2003 THE 2PPI EXPANSION: DYNAMICAL MASS GENERATION AND VACUUM ENERGY D. DUDAL AND H. VERSCHELDE Ghent
More informationRecent results for propagators and vertices of Yang-Mills theory
Introduction Dyson-Schwinger equations Extending truncations Summary and conclusions Recent results for propagators and vertices of Yang-Mills theory Markus Q. Huber arxiv:1808.05227 Institute of Theoretical
More informationQCD from quark, gluon, and meson correlators
QCD from quark, gluon, and meson correlators Mario Mitter Brookhaven National Laboratory Frankfurt, October 7 M. Mitter (BNL) Correlators of QCD Frankfurt, October 7 / fqcd collaboration - QCD (phase diagram)
More informationQCD Green Functions:
QCD Green Functions: What their Infrared Behaviour tells us about Confinement! Reinhard Alkofer FWF-funded Doctoral Program Hadrons in Vacuum, Nuclei and Stars Institute of Physics Theoretical Physics
More informationCovariance, dynamics and symmetries, and hadron form factors
Covariance, dynamics and symmetries, and hadron form factors Craig D. Roberts cdroberts@anl.gov Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory Exclusive Reactions at High Momentum Transfer, 21-24May/07,
More informationAnalytical study of Yang-Mills theory from first principles by a massive expansion
Analytical study of Yang-Mills theory from first principles by a massive expansion Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Catania, Italy Infrared QCD APC, Paris Diderot University, 8-10 November
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 8 Dec 2018
BRST invariant d = condensates in Gribov-Zwanziger theory arxiv:8.54v [hep-ph] 8 Dec 08 KU Leuven Campus Kortrijk Kulak, Department of Physics, Etienne Sabbelaan 53 bus 7657, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium. E-mail:
More informationYang-Mills Propagators in Landau Gauge at Non-Vanishing Temperature
Yang-Mills Propagators in Landau Gauge at Non-Vanishing Temperature Leonard Fister, Jan M. Pawlowski, Universität Heidelberg... work in progress ERG Corfu - September 2 Motivation ultimate goal: computation
More informationDescribing Gluons. Axel Maas. 28 th of July 2009 Pathways to Confinement Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Describing Gluons Axel Maas 28 th of July 2009 Pathways to Confinement Rio de Janeiro Brazil Overview Gauge freedom in Yang-Mills theory Supported by the FWF Slides left: 56 (in this section: 0) Overview
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 29 Nov 2018
BRST invariant d = condensates in Gribov-Zwanziger theory D. Dudal,, C. P. Felix, L. Palhares, F. Rondeau,, D. Vercauteren + KU Leuven Campus Kortrijk Kulak, Department of Physics, Etienne Sabbelaan 53
More informationThermodynamics of an exactly solvable confining quark model
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Thermodynamics of an exactly solvable confining quark model To cite this article: Bruno W. Mintz 26 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 76 422 View the article
More informationChiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD
Chiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD Mario Mitter Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg GSI, February 9, 216 M. Mitter (U Heidelberg) χsb in continuum QCD GSI, February 216 1 / 29 fqcd collaboration
More informationGluon Propagator and Gluonic Screening around Deconfinement
Gluon Propagator and Gluonic Screening around Deconfinement Tereza Mendes Instituto de Física de São Carlos University of São Paulo Work in collaboration with Attilio Cucchieri Screening at High T At high
More informationSome remarks on relational nature of gauge symmetry
Some remarks on relational nature of gauge symmetry M. M. Amaral UERJ Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Instituto de Física Departamento de Física Teórica Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, 20550-013
More informationThe symmetries of QCD (and consequences)
The symmetries of QCD (and consequences) Sinéad M. Ryan Trinity College Dublin Quantum Universe Symposium, Groningen, March 2018 Understand nature in terms of fundamental building blocks The Rumsfeld
More informationFunctional RG methods in QCD
methods in QCD Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Heidelberg LC2006 May 18th, 2006 methods in QCD motivation Strong QCD QCD dynamical symmetry breaking instantons χsb top. dofs link?! deconfinement
More informationQCD phase structure from the functional RG
QCD phase structure from the functional RG Mario Mitter Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Dubna, November 216 M. Mitter (U Heidelberg) QCD phase structure from the frg Dubna, November 216 1 / 23 fqcd
More informationThe Role of the Quark-Gluon Vertex in the QCD Phase Transition
The Role of the Quark-Gluon Vertex in the QCD Phase Transition PhD Seminar, 05.12.2012 Markus Hopfer University of Graz (A. Windisch, R. Alkofer) Outline 1 Motivation A Physical Motivation Calculations
More informationSabbelaan 53 bus 7657, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium 3 Ghent University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Krijgslaan 281-S9, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Lattice Landau gauge gluon propagator at finite temperature: non-zero Matsubara frequencies and spectral densities arxiv:7.847v [hep-lat] 2 Oct 27 Paulo J. Silva, Orlando Oliveira, David Dudal 2,3, Martin
More informationLaboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS et Université Paris-Sud XI, Bâtiment 210, Orsay Cedex, France
Vacuum expectation value of A 2 from LQCD. O. Pène Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS et Université Paris-Sud XI, Bâtiment 210, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France E-mail: olivier.pene@th.u-psud.fr Benoit Blossier,
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 15 Nov 2016
Few-Body Systems manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) arxiv:6.966v [hep-lat] Nov 6 P. J. Silva O. Oliveira D. Dudal P. Bicudo N. Cardoso Gluons at finite temperature Received: date / Accepted:
More informationOn bound states in gauge theories with different matter content
On bound states in gauge theories with different matter content Reinhard Alkofer Institute of Physics, Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Graz Bound states in QCD and beyond St. Goar, March
More informationA Dyson-Schwinger equation study of the baryon-photon interaction.
A Dyson-Schwinger equation study of the baryon-photon interaction. Diana Nicmorus in collaboration with G. Eichmann A. Krassnigg R. Alkofer Jefferson Laboratory, March 24, 2010 What is the nucleon made
More informationGreen s Functions and Topological Configurations
Green s Functions and Toological Configurations Deartment of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Physics, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Universitätslatz, A-8 Graz, Austria and Deartment of Comlex Physical
More informationQCD Phase Transitions and Green s Functions Heidelberg, 7 May 2010 Lorenz von Smekal
QCD Phase Transitions and Green s Functions Heidelberg, 7 May 2010 Lorenz von Smekal 1 Special Credit and Thanks to: Reinhard Alkofer Jens Braun Christian Fischer Holger Gies Lisa Haas Axel Maas Kim Maltman
More informationFaddeev equations: a view of baryon properties
E-mail: diana.nicmorus@uni-graz.at G. Eichmann E-mail: ge.eichmann@uni-graz.at A. Krassnigg E-mail: andreas.krassnigg@uni-graz.at R. Alkofer E-mail: reinhard.alkofer@uni-graz.at We present a calculation
More informationBethe Salpeter studies of mesons beyond rainbow-ladder
Bethe Salpeter studies of mesons beyond rainbow-ladder Richard Williams 1 st June 2010 12th International Conference on Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure of the Nucleon College of William and Mary,
More informationScalar QCD. Axel Maas with Tajdar Mufti. 5 th of September 2013 QCD TNT III Trento Italy
Scalar QCD Axel Maas with Tajdar Mufti 5 th of September 2013 QCD TNT III Trento Italy Scalar QCD Bound States, Elementary Particles & Interaction Vertices Axel Maas with Tajdar Mufti 5 th of September
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 23 Mar 2015
Equivalence between two different field-dependent BRST formulations Sudhaker Upadhyay Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 08016, India Bhabani Prasad Mandal Department
More informationPoS(Baldin ISHEPP XXII)015
and Gribov noise in the Landau gauge gluodynamics JINR, Dubna E-mail: bogolubs@jinr.ru I propose a way of a Gribov noise suppression when computing propagators in lattice approach and show the results
More informationDepartment of Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawaoiwake, Sakyo, Kyoto , Japan
, Takumi Iritani, Arata Yamamoto Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawaoiwake, Sakyo, Kyoto 66-852, Japan E-mail: suganuma@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp Hideaki Iida The Institute of Physical and
More informationProperties of gauge orbits
Properties of gauge orbits Axel Maas 18 th of June 2010 XXVIII International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory Villasimius Sardinia/Italy Why gauge-fixing? Slides left: 16 (in this section: 2) Why gauge-fixing?
More informationRichard Williams. Hèlios Sanchis-Alepuz
Richard Williams Hèlios Sanchis-Alepuz Introduction 2 Idea: Information on hadron properties encoded in Green s functions EM form-factors Dyson-Schwinger Approach Nonpert. Covariant Multi-scale Symmetries
More informationInfrared properties of the gluon mass equation
European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear Physics and Related Areas (ECT*), and Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Villa Tambosi, Strada delle Tabarelle 286, I-38123 Villazzano (TN) Italy. E-mail: binosi@ectstar.eu
More informationQuark-gluon interactions in QCD
Quark-gluon interactions in QCD AYSE KIZILERSU (CSSM, University of Adelaide) Australia Collaborators : Jonivar Skullerud (Maynooth, Ireland ) Andre Sternbeck (Jena, Germany) QCD DOWNUNDER! -4 July 7!
More informationThe Role Of Magnetic Monopoles In Quark Confinement (Field Decomposition Approach)
The Role Of Magnetic Monopoles In Quark Confinement (Field Decomposition Approach) IPM school and workshop on recent developments in Particle Physics (IPP11) 2011, Tehran, Iran Sedigheh Deldar, University
More informationTheoretical outlook. D. Kharzeev
High Energy Physics in the LHC Era, Valparaiso, Chile, 2012 QCD Workshop on Chirality, Vorticity, and Magnetic Field In Heavy Ion Collisions, UCLA, January 21-23, 2015 Theoretical outlook D. Kharzeev Supported
More informationNon-perturbative momentum dependence of the coupling constant and hadronic models
Non-perturbative momentum dependence of the coupling constant and hadronic models Pre-DIS Wokshop QCD Evolution Workshop: from collinear to non collinear case April 8-9, 2011 JLab Aurore Courtoy INFN-Pavia
More informationQCD Phases with Functional Methods
QCD Phases with Mario PhD-Advisors: Bernd-Jochen Schaefer Reinhard Alkofer Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz Institut für Physik Fachbereich Theoretische Physik Rab, September 2010 QCD Phases with Table of
More informationGluon propagators and center vortices at finite temperature arxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 26 Oct 2009
ITEP-LAT-29-5 at finite temperature arxiv:9.4828v [hep-lat] 26 Oct 29 Integrated Information Center, Kochi University, Akebono-cho, Kochi, 78-852, Japan E-mail: tsaito@rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp M. N. Chernodub
More informationLight-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics
Light-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics David G. Robertson Department of Physics, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 Abstract Light-cone quantization of (3+1)-dimensional electrodynamics is
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 21 Mar 2018
Perturbative Yang Mills theory without Faddeev Popov ghost fields Helmuth Huffel and Danijel Markovic Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. (Dated: September
More informationA Lattice Study of the Glueball Spectrum
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 35 (2001) pp. 288 292 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 35, No. 3, March 15, 2001 A Lattice Study of the Glueball Spectrum LIU Chuan Department of Physics,
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 11 Mar 2015
Justifying the Naive Partonic Sum Rule for Proton Spin Xiangdong Ji a,b,c, Jian-Hui Zhang a, Yong Zhao c arxiv:1409.6329v2 [hep-ph] 11 Mar 2015 a INPAC, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao
More informationarxiv:hep-lat/ v1 6 Oct 2000
1 Scalar and Tensor Glueballs on Asymmetric Coarse Lattices C. Liu a, a Department of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China arxiv:hep-lat/0010007v1 6 Oct 2000 Scalar and tensor glueball
More informationLocal Quantum Field Theory and Confinement in QCD
Local Quantum Field Theory and Confinement in QCD Peter Lowdon (24th May 2017) Outline 1. LQFT: an axiomatic approach to QFT 2. Consequences of LQFT 3. Confinement and the cluster decomposition property
More informationChiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD
Chiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD Mario Mitter Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Graz, April 19, 2016 M. Mitter (U Heidelberg) χsb in continuum QCD Graz, April 19, 2016 1 / 34 fqcd collaboration
More informationQuark tensor and axial charges within the Schwinger-Dyson formalism
Quark tensor and axial charges within the Schwinger-Dyson formalism, Takahiro M. Doi, Shotaro Imai, Hideo Suganuma Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwake,
More informationThe Infrared Behavior of Landau Gauge Yang-Mills Theory in d=2, 3 and 4 Dimensions
The Infrared Behavior of Landau Gauge Yang-Mills Theory in d=2, 3 and 4 Dimensions Markus Huber 1 R. Alkofer 1 C. S. Fischer 2 K. Schwenzer 1 1 Institut für Physik, Karl-Franzens Universität Graz 2 Institut
More informationHamiltonian Flow in Coulomb Gauge Yang-Mills Theory
Hamiltonian Flow in Coulomb Gauge Yang-Mills Theory Universität Tübingen Institut für Theoretische Physi Auf der Morgenstelle 4 D-7076 Tübingen Germany E-mail: hugo.reinhardt@uni-tuebingen.de Marus Leder
More informationBulk and shear viscosities for the Gribov-Zwanziger plasma
EPJ Web of Conferences will be set by the publisher DOI: will be set by the publisher c Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 215 Bulk and shear viscosities for the Gribov-Zwanziger plasma Wojciech
More informationChirality: from QCD to condensed matter
High Energy Physics in the LHC Era, Valparaiso, Chile, 2012 Intersections between QCD and condensed matter, Schladming, Styria, Austria, March 1-6, 2015 Chirality: from QCD to condensed matter D. Kharzeev
More informationThe Polyakov Loop and the Eigenvalues of the Dirac Operator
The Polyakov Loop and the Eigenvalues of the Dirac Operator Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA E-mail: soeldner@bnl.gov Aiming at the link between confinement and
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 15 Jul 2013
Compact Stars in the QCD Phase Diagram III (CSQCD III) December 2-5, 202, Guarujá, SP, Brazil http://www.astro.iag.usp.br/~foton/csqcd3 Phase diagram of strongly interacting matter under strong magnetic
More informationString Theory and The Velo-Zwanziger Problem
String Theory and The Velo-Zwanziger Problem Rakibur Rahman Scuola Normale Superiore & INFN, Pisa February 10, 2011 DAMTP, University of Cambridge M. Porrati A. Sagnotti M. Porrati, RR and A. Sagnotti,
More informationHelicity/Chirality. Helicities of (ultra-relativistic) massless particles are (approximately) conserved Right-handed
Helicity/Chirality Helicities of (ultra-relativistic) massless particles are (approximately) conserved Right-handed Left-handed Conservation of chiral charge is a property of massless Dirac theory (classically)
More informationThe Mandelstam Leibbrandt prescription and the Discretized Light Front Quantization.
The Mandelstam Leibbrandt prescription and the Discretized Light Front Quantization. Roberto Soldati Dipartimento di Fisica A. Righi, Università di Bologna via Irnerio 46, 40126 Bologna, Italy Abstract
More informationMany faces of the Landau gauge gluon propagator at zero and finite temperature
Many faces of the Landau gauge gluon propagator at zero and finite temperature positivity violation, spectral density and mass scales Pedro Bicudo 3, Nuno Cardoso 3, David Dudal 2, Orlando Oliveira 1,
More informationNumerical Study of Gluon Propagator and Confinement Scenario in Minimal Coulomb Gauge
hep-lat/0008026 NYU-TH-PH-19.8.00 BI-TP 2000/19 arxiv:hep-lat/0008026v1 31 Aug 2000 Numerical Study of Gluon Propagator and Confinement Scenario in Minimal Coulomb Gauge Attilio Cucchieri and Daniel Zwanziger
More informationThe Landau gauge gluon and ghost propagators in 4D SU(3) gluodynamics in large lattice volumes
HU-EP-07/47 ADP-07-11/T651 The Landau gauge gluon and ghost propagators in 4D SU(3) gluodynamics in large lattice volumes a, E.-M. Ilgenfritz b, M. Müller-Preussker b, and A. Sternbeck c a Joint Institute
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 20 Feb 2016
More on the non-perturbative Gribov-Zwanziger quantization of linear covariant gauges M. A. L. Capri, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, and S. P. Sorella Departamento de Física
More informationQuasi-particle degrees of freedom in finite temperature SU(N) gauge theories
Quasi-particle degrees of freedom in finite temperature SU(N) gauge theories P. Castorina a,b, V. Greco a,c, D. Jaccarino a,c,d, D. Zappalà b1 a Dipart. Fisica, Università di Catania, Via S. Sofia 64,
More informationIntroduction to perturbative QCD and factorization
Introduction to perturbative QCD and factorization Part 1 M. Diehl Deutsches Elektronen-Synchroton DESY Ecole Joliot Curie 2018 DESY Plan of lectures 0. Brief introduction 1. Renormalisation, running coupling,
More informationThe lattice gluon propagator in numerical stochastic perturbation theory
The lattice gluon propagator in numerical stochastic perturbation theory E.-M. Ilgenfritz 1, H. Perlt 2 and A. Schiller 2 1 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2 Universität Leipzig 8th Leipzig Workshop on
More informationSymmetries Then and Now
Symmetries Then and Now Nathan Seiberg, IAS 40 th Anniversary conference Laboratoire de Physique Théorique Global symmetries are useful If unbroken Multiplets Selection rules If broken Goldstone bosons
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Jul 2004
IUHET-473 arxiv:hep-th/040717v1 0 Jul 004 Gauge Invariance and the Pauli-Villars Regulator in Lorentz- and CPT-Violating Electrodynamics B. Altschul 1 Department of Physics Indiana University Bloomington,
More informationLattice Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety
Lattice Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety Jack Laiho (Scott Bassler, Simon Catterall, Raghav Jha, Judah Unmuth-Yockey) Syracuse University June 18, 2018 Asymptotic Safety Weinberg proposed idea that
More informationProperties of canonical fermion determinants with a fixed quark number
Properties of canonical fermion determinants with a fixed uark number Julia Danzer Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Austria E-mail: julia.danzer@uni-graz.at Institute of Physics, University of
More informationDynamical Construction of Glueballs in Pure Gluodynamics
Dynamical Construction of Glueballs in Pure Gluodynamics Rajan Dogra Department of Technical Education, U.T., Chandigarh, # 3291, Sector 27 D, Chandigarh 160 019, India, E-mail: rajandogra_2000@yahoo.com
More informationAsymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass. Mikhail Shaposhnikov Quarks 2010, Kolomna, June 6-12, 2010
Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass Mikhail Shaposhnikov Quarks 2010, Kolomna, June 6-12, 2010 Based on: C. Wetterich, M. S., Phys. Lett. B683 (2010) 196 Quarks-2010, June 8, 2010 p.
More informationIs the up-quark massless? Hartmut Wittig DESY
Is the up-quark massless? Hartmut Wittig DESY Wuppertal, 5 November 2001 Quark mass ratios in Chiral Perturbation Theory Leutwyler s ellipse: ( mu m d ) 2 + 1 Q 2 ( ms m d ) 2 = 1 25 m s m d 38 R 44 0
More informationQCD, Wilson loop and the interquark potential
QCD, Wilson loop and the interquark potential Marco Frasca Twelfth Workshop on Non-Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, Paris, June 10-13, 2013 Plan of the Talk Plan of the talk Classical field theory
More information2. HEAVY QUARK PRODUCTION
2. HEAVY QUARK PRODUCTION In this chapter a brief overview of the theoretical and experimental knowledge of heavy quark production is given. In particular the production of open beauty and J/ψ in hadronic
More informationSpectral Properties of Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma
Lattice27 : 2, Aug., 27 Spectral Properties of Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma Masakiyo Kitazawa (Osaka Univ.) F. Karsch and M.K., arxiv:78.299 Why Quark? Because there are quarks. in the deconfined phase
More information