Synthesizing Arbitrary Photon States in a Superconducting Resonator John Martinis UC Santa Barbara
|
|
- Gwenda Simon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Synthesizing Arbitrary Photon States in a Superconducting Resonator John Martinis UC Santa Barbara Quantum Integrated Circuits Quantum currents & voltages Microfabricated atoms Digital to Analog Converter Classical: V = a[0] 1 + a[1] 2 + a[2] 4 + a[9] 512 Quantum: Ψ = α α α α 9 9
2 Outline Qubit coupled to resonator Fock states Arbitrary states Wigner tomography Metrology: Accurate control of qubits Qubit coupled to mechanical resonator Potential application Violation of Bell s Inequality
3 Josephson Qubits & Nonlinearity LC oscillator (linear): no qubit possible U(Φ) 1 0 Josephson junction: non-linear inductance with 1 photon (low loss) I 1.7 nm Al AlOx Al Phase qubit - tunable with I
4 Josephson Phase Qubit (1) State Preparation Wait for decay to g (20 mk ; kt << hω10 ; 6 GHz) I I 0 (2) Qubit logic with current bias I DC current shifts energy; σ z Microwaves for transition; σ x, σ y time (3) State Measurement: pulse I Fast single shot high fidelity e : tunnel (96%) g : no tunnel (2%) few ns current pulse e g
5 Qubit Coupled to Photons (Harmonic Oscillator) Qubit-resonator first demonstrated in Saclay (1987), GHz coupling easy in phase qubits Design follows cqed (Yale) Readout through qubit (Saclay87, NIST), high fidelity Similar to ion traps (NIST), Rydberg (ENS) Qubit control Qubit C C resonator control (λ/2 total) Resonator e g qubit stimulated emission 5Ω 4Ω 3Ω 2Ω Ω 0 resonator (H.O.)
6 Calibration with Qubit Spectroscopy I saturate meas. Coupling turned on & off via qubit bias = 40 MHz Current bias
7 Generating Fock States: Pumping Photons One by One g e
8 Fock States: Swap oscillations depend on n Stimulated Emission
9 Fock States: Swap frequency scales as n1/2
10 Fock States: Photon number distribution for 1
11 Fock States: Photon number distribution for 2
12 Fock States: Photon number distribution for 3
13 Fock States: Photon number distribution for 4
14 Fock States: Photon number distribution for 5
15 Coherent states coherent state State preparation: Qubit Res. g 0 Gaussian pulse, vary ampl. α swap time τ meas. vary swap time to probe resonator state Gaussian pulse amp. Poisson distribution swap time τ (ns)
16 Generating Arbitrary States Desired final state ψ = 0.577( i 2 ) g Law and Eberly, PRL (1996) Reverse-engineer final state by building pulse sequence backwards arrow indicates complex amplitude of corresponding basis state 2g 1g 0g υχσβ πηασε θυβιτ γρουπ 1e 0e zero amplitude Energy level representation of desired state υχσβ
17 Generating Arbitrary States Desired final state ψ = 0.577( i 2 ) g res. 0 qubit g g ( i) 0e g e 2g 1g 1e 0e Qubit and resonator into resonance Transfer 2g amplitude into 1e 2g amplitude now zeroed 2g 0g 1e π
18 Generating Arbitrary States Desired final state ψ = 0.577( i 2 ) g res. 0 qubit g g ( i) 0e g e ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g 2g 1g 1e 0e e g 1e 1g Microwaves to transfer to Transfer amplitude into 1e amplitude now zeroed 1e 0g 1g Ampl. phase
19 Generating Arbitrary States Desired final state ψ = 0.577( i 2 ) g res. 0 qubit g g ( i) 0e g e ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g 2g 1g 1e 0e Correct phase by waiting 1g 0g 0e
20 Generating Arbitrary States Desired final state ψ = 0.577( i 2 ) g res. 0 qubit g g ( i) 0e g e ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e 2g 1e Transfer 1g amplitude into 0e 1g 0g 0e 1g 0e
21 Generating Arbitrary States Desired final state ψ = 0.577( i 2 ) g res. 0 qubit g g ( i) 0e g e ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e ψ = ( i) 0g initial ground state 2g 1g 1e 0e Microwaves to transfer e to Transfer 0e amplitude into 0g g 0e 0g 0g Ampl. phase
22 Generating Arbitrary States Desired final state ψ = 0.577( i 2 ) g res. qubit 2g 1g 0g 0 g ψ = ( i) 0g 1e 0e g ( i) 0e g e ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e g ( i) 0g + ( i) 0e initial ground state 0g Phase of does not matter Run sequence in reverse
23 Generating Arbitrary States: Quantum Digital to Analog Converter ψ = Now try: ψ = 1 + i 3 a b Measure using qubit and watching evolution (usual method): Fourier transform yields number composition: 1 photon 3 photons Cannot distinguish based on this measure!
24 State Tomography of Harmonic Oscillator
25 State Tomography of Harmonic Oscillator P = ( ) p n n
26 State Tomography of Harmonic Oscillator P = ( ) p n n
27 Wigner Tomography of Fock State 7 Theory Experiment υχσβ πηασε θυβιτ γρουπ υχσβ
28 Wigner Tomography, 0 + N states:
29 Wigner Tomography: States with phase υχσβ πηασε θυβιτ γρουπ υχσβ
30
31
32 Off-Diagonal Decay of Density Matrix (decay cascade) 0 + N (far-element decay)
33 3-state Schrodinger Cat : Voodoo Cat ψ = 2e i0 Ψ dead + 2e i2π /3 Ψ alive + 2e i4π /3 Ψ zombie = ( 2!) n n n= 0,3,6,9 Digitally programmed cat! n Ψ alive Ψ dead Im(α) Ψ zombie Re(α) + 20 ps -
34 3-state Schrodinger Cat : Voodoo Cat ψ = 2e i0 + 2e i2π /3 + 2e i4π /3 = ( 2!) n n n= 0,3,6,9 n Ψ dead Ψ alive Ψ zombie Ψ alive Ψ dead Im(α) Ψ zombie Re(α)
35 Collapse of Schrodinger Cat State Quantum feature disappears first, and the classical peaks merge later
36 Accurate Pulse Shaping I Q Shaped µ-wave Perfect by feedback Use measured waveform to corrected digital inputs µwave amplitude [a.u] Measured waveform time [ns] 8
37 Fast pulses: 2-state errors at 10-4 ω 21 ω pulse power 8ns 4ns ω 21 ω 10 Gaussian pulses: Minimum width in time and frequency 2 error π pulse π-π FT theory Spectrum analyzer Quantum simulation τ [ns]
38 SWAP pulses: Correction with qubit as sampling o-scope offset P 1 Problem: Pulses not flat Distortions going to qubit For times ~ 10 ns: D/A s: ~1% Op-amps: ~1% O-scope: ~0.5% Z X,Y τ delay π pulse P 1 [%] Qubit measures change of resonance frequency offset If design well: Measure ~2% change with exponential curve Correct with D/A waveform τ delay
39 High Fidelity SWAP (coupling) Operation Unoptimized pulse GRAPE optimized pulse (theory) detuning time (ns) time (ns) 95.8% fidelity % fidelity Fidelity limited by finite risetime Fidelity restored through overshoots We used simple Gaussian overshoots (improved swapping)
40 Swap Calibration (S) Qubit-resonator swap (P) Qubit-resonator phase
41
42
43 Phase Qubit coupled to Mechanical Resonator Aaron O connell Andrew Cleland 6.24 GHz piezoelectric 13 fab layers!
44 Drive Qubit: Avoided Level Crossing Spectroscopy Drive Mech. Resonator: See Response weak strong
45 Mechanical Resonator in Quantum Ground State On resonance, no extra population from resonator
46 Time Dynamics Experiments Qubit Qubit + M-Res M-Res P e =3.8 ns T 1 = 17 ns good swaps; 2g= 134 MHz T 1 = 6.1 ns, T 2 ~2T 1
47 Drive Coherent State & Measure with Qubit experiment simulation Oscillation frequency increases with drive, as expected Coherence time too short to see frequencies in FT
48 Potential Application : Couple to Optical Photons Idea: Oskar Painter and coworkers, CalTech Optical Photons Raman many MHz 6 GHz Mechanical Resonator piezo 100 MHz 6 GHz Phase Qubit optical and mechanical cavity Key idea: Photons & Phonons similar λ Mode matched Strong coupling possible Possible to integrate? Many experimental hurdles Basic ideas being demonstrated
49 Bell Violation - Motivation Bell violation proves entangled-state correlations are quantum 01> - 10> Global test of DiVincenzo criteria (all >90% in one device) Initialization, single qubit gates, entanglement, measurement Close detector loophole (0, 1, not measured) Both states always measured, as needed for quantum computer. As 0 or 1, no correction to measurement Don t throw away (calibrate out) ANY errors. Results from other experiments (S > 2) : Altepeter Rowe Moehring Optics Express Oct 05 Nature Feb 01 PRL Aug ± (28sec) 2.25 ± 0.03 (80sec) ± (80min) First violation in solid-state
50 All measurements along z-axis must rotate state 01>-e iφ 10> Measuring the Inequality (CHSH) measure (a,a ) x (b,b ) directions a a a a b b b b α a z β b p ab 00> p ab 01> p ab 10> p ab 11> p a b 00> p a b 01> p a b 10> p a b 11> p ab 00> p ab 01> p ab 10> p ab 11> p a b 00> p a b 01> p a b 10> p a b 11> S = E ab + E a b - E ab + E a b HVT: QM: -2 S S 2 2 FMinSearch experiment directly to find angles α, β for largest S
51 Simultaneous Measurement: Understanding Crosstalk C cpl I bias I bias I1> I0> I1> I0> I1> I1> Measurement crosstalk turns I01>, I10> into I11> (10% to 20% of events) introduces correlation!
52 Solution: Resonator Coupling Device Fabrication by Haohua Wang Photography by Erik Lucero
53 Negligible Measurement Crosstalk (0.005) Off resonance, Rabi only one qubit Probability of x1>, 1x> [%] (94% visibility) Amplitude of x1>, 1x> [a.u.] % Crosstalk % Crosstalk t [ns] Frequency [MHz] 3% stray tunneling of I1>, + 0.5% crosstalk
54 Creating Entanglement through a Resonator 100 Probability of 01>, 10>, or 11> [%] Qubit A 0 π 80 t Reson Qubit B 0 swap Swap time t [ns]
55 Checking the Entanglement (15 o Z rotation for 01>-e iφ 10> ) raw data measure corrected Trace-Fidelity compared to Bell Singlet State: 88.3% (92.1%) Entanglement of Formation: (0.449)
56 Sequence Qubit A 0 π α/α Resonator 0 Qubit B 0 β/β Qubit A t i-swap Qubit B t i-swap
57 Results (optimized for maximum S) Axes: ab a b ab a b p 00> p 01> p 10> p 11> 41.6% 34.1% 15.8% % 35.3% 17.6% % 10.5% 13.5% 39.0% 36.1% 40.7% 11.4% 11.9% E xy : ,010 runs each to find probabilities Repeated 6,720 times over 8 hours S = ± S = 2.355, corrected for single-qubit measure fidelities
58 Can the experiment be trusted? Axes: ab a b ab a b p 00> p 01> p 10> p 11> E xy : If you turn off all control electronics and take the data you get: S = ± Gross errors with artificially introduced correlations can yield S > 2!
59 Checking the Experiment 1) Sequence parameters, (a,a ) & (b,b ) make sense 2.5 2) Measure phase 3) Measure delay 2.1 T1, T 2 decay S 1.0 S Phase (meas. plane) of a, a [deg] Delay of (a,a ) to (b,b ) [ns]
60 Global Test of Independent Measurement Suggested by R. Alicki: Measurement of only qubit A should not depend on axis of B meas: ab a b ab a b P P P P E S difference P 1x (a) P 1x (a ) P x1 (b) P x1 (b ) Of order measured x-talk
61 4) Error Budget (from simulation) T 1 : Qubit relaxes back into the ground-state for T 1 s = 392ns, 296ns, and 2.55µs T 2 : Qubit loses phase information for T 2 s = 146ns, 135ns, and 5.26µs Visibilities: Qubit states are misidentified during tunneling for Visibilities = 94.6% and 93.4% Experimental Result: (0.5% better than simulation) -T 2 assumes uncorrelated dephasing - Simulation uses theoretically optimal angles Everything but coherence and measurement seems perfect! (Only problems are single qubit errors)
62 P 01 [%] 100 Swap Fidelity Data vs. Simulation Error < 1% after 3+1 swaps! t [ns] Entangler spec. s: 10 ns, on/off = 1000, ~ 1% errors
63 Conclusions Superconducting qubits: Accurate quantum control with electrical signals Electrical resonator: Deterministic generation of complex states Most complex of ANY experimental system Mechanical resonator: first to Cool to ground state Manipulate quantum state Bell Violation: First in solid state Close detection loophole all errors low Acknowledgements: Photons Max Hofheinz Haohua Wang Resonators Phonons Aaron O connell Andrew Cleland Bell Violation Markus Ansmann Matthew Neeley Radek Bialczak Erik Lucero James Wenner Daniel Sank Martin Weides Michael Lenander
64 Decay of Fock States Master Equation (no phase info.) dpi ( t) dt Pi ( t) = + T i i+ 1 ( t) P T i+ 1 Normalized fourier amplitude n = n = n = 5 (a) (c) (e) n = n = n = 6 1 (b) (d) (f) t d (µs) t d (µs) (exp.) (thy.) n T n T 1 /n (µs)
65 Density matrix and Wigner tomography State preparation Delay D(α) State readout: bring the qubit on resonance with the resonator for τ Readout qubit P1 Measure P k (α) Direct Wigner tomography τ (ns) Matrix inversion W 2 π ( α ) = ( 1) k P ( α ) 1681 pts 88.9% k Im(α ) k D. Leibfried, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4281(1996) 60 pts 84.7% Re(α )
Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator
Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator Max Hofheinz, Haohua Wang, Markus Ansmann, R. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. O Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J.M. Martinis,
More informationViolation of Bell s inequality in Josephson phase qubits
Correction notice Violation of Bell s inequality in Josephson phase qubits Ken-Markus Ansmann, H. Wang, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, Max Hofheinz, Erik Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides,
More informationViolation of Bell s inequality in Josephson phase qubits
Violation of Bell s inequality in Josephson phase qubits Markus Ansmann, H. Wang, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, Max Hofheinz, Erik Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides, J. Wenner, A. N. Cleland,
More informationSynthesising arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator
Synthesising arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator Max Hofheinz 1, H. Wang 1, M. Ansmann 1, Radoslaw C. Bialczak 1, Erik Lucero 1, M. Neeley 1, A. D. O Connell 1, D. Sank 1, J. Wenner
More informationSupplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition
Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition Shi-Biao Zheng 1, You-Peng Zhong 2, Kai Xu 2, Qi-Jue Wang 2, H. Wang 2, Li-Tuo Shen 1, Chui-Ping
More informationElectrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits
1.0 10 0.8 01 switching probability 0.6 0.4 0.2 00 P. Bertet & R. Heeres SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group 11 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 swap duration (ns) Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting
More informationProcess Tomography of Quantum Memory in a Josephson Phase Qubit coupled to a Two-Level State
Process Tomography of Quantum Memory in a Josephson Phase Qubit coupled to a Two-Level State Matthew Neeley, M. Ansmann, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, N. Katz, Erik Lucero, A. O Connell, H. Wang,
More informationDriving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian
Qubit Control Driving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian Hamiltonian for microwave drive Unitary transform with and Results in dispersive approximation up to 2 nd order in g Drive induces Rabi oscillations
More informationState tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity. Abstract
State tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity Matthias Steffen, M. Ansmann, R. McDermott, N. Katz, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, Erik Lucero, Matthew Neeley, E.M. Weig, A.N. Cleland,
More informationQuantum Computing and the Technical Vitality of Materials Physics
Quantum Computing and the Technical Vitality of Materials Physics David DiVincenzo, IBM SSSC, 4/2008 (list almost unchanged for some years) Physical systems actively considered for quantum computer implementation
More informationSupplementary Information for Controlled catch and release of microwave photon states
Supplementary Information for Controlled catch and release of microwave photon states Yi Yin, 1, Yu Chen, 1 Daniel Sank, 1 P. J. J. O Malley, 1 T. C. White, 1 R. Barends, 1 J. Kelly, 1 Erik Lucero, 1 Matteo
More informationFlorent Lecocq. Control and measurement of an optomechanical system using a superconducting qubit. Funding NIST NSA/LPS DARPA.
Funding NIST NSA/LPS DARPA Boulder, CO Control and measurement of an optomechanical system using a superconducting qubit Florent Lecocq PIs Ray Simmonds John Teufel Joe Aumentado Introduction: typical
More informationViolation of Bell Inequalities
Violation of Bell Inequalities Philipp Kurpiers and Anna Stockklauser 5/12/2011 Quantum Systems for Information Technology Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox (1935) Goal: prove that quantum mechanics is incomplete
More informationExploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities. Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris
Exploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris Experiments in which single atoms and photons are manipulated in high Q cavities are modern
More informationDistributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED
Distributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED M. Baur, A. Fedorov, L. Steffen (Quantum Computation) J. Fink, A. F. van Loo (Collective Interactions) T. Thiele, S. Hogan (Hybrid
More informationSingle Microwave-Photon Detector based on Superconducting Quantum Circuits
17 th International Workshop on Low Temperature Detectors 19/July/2017 Single Microwave-Photon Detector based on Superconducting Quantum Circuits Kunihiro Inomata Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
More informationJohn Stewart Bell Prize. Part 1: Michel Devoret, Yale University
John Stewart Bell Prize Part 1: Michel Devoret, Yale University SUPERCONDUCTING ARTIFICIAL ATOMS: FROM TESTS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS TO QUANTUM COMPUTERS Part 2: Robert Schoelkopf, Yale University CIRCUIT
More informationExploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits
Exploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits Jürgen Lisenfeld, Alexander Bilmes, Georg Weiss, and A.V. Ustinov Physikalisches Institut, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe,
More informationIntroduction to Circuit QED Lecture 2
Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Experiment Michel Devoret Luigi Frunzio Rob Schoelkopf Andrei Petrenko Nissim Ofek Reinier Heeres Philip Reinhold Yehan Liu Zaki Leghtas Brian
More informationSuperconducting phase qubits
Quantum Inf Process (2009) 8:81 103 DOI 10.1007/s11128-009-0105-1 Superconducting phase qubits John M. Martinis Published online: 18 February 2009 The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open
More informationHybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble
Hybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble, Cécile GREZES, Andreas DEWES, Denis VION, Daniel ESTEVE, & Patrice BERTET Quantronics Group, SPEC, CEA- Saclay Collaborating
More informationThe Nobel Prize in Physics 2012
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2012 Serge Haroche Collège de France and École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France David J. Wineland National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and University of Colorado
More informationCollège de France abroad Lectures Quantum information with real or artificial atoms and photons in cavities
Collège de France abroad Lectures Quantum information with real or artificial atoms and photons in cavities Lecture 6: Circuit QED experiments synthesing arbitrary states of quantum oscillators. Introduction
More informationSuperconducting Qubits Lecture 4
Superconducting Qubits Lecture 4 Non-Resonant Coupling for Qubit Readout A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, PRA 69, 062320 (2004) Measurement Technique Dispersive Shift
More informationDoing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED
Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED Ren-Shou Huang, Alexandre Blais, Andreas Wallraff, David Schuster, Sameer Kumar, Luigi Frunzio, Hannes Majer, Steven Girvin, Robert
More informationQuantum computation and quantum information
Quantum computation and quantum information Chapter 7 - Physical Realizations - Part 2 First: sign up for the lab! do hand-ins and project! Ch. 7 Physical Realizations Deviate from the book 2 lectures,
More informationExperimental Quantum Computing: A technology overview
Experimental Quantum Computing: A technology overview Dr. Suzanne Gildert Condensed Matter Physics Research (Quantum Devices Group) University of Birmingham, UK 15/02/10 Models of quantum computation Implementations
More informationMetastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator
Metastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator R. VIJAYARAGHAVAN Daniel Prober Robert Schoelkopf Steve Girvin Department of Applied Physics Yale University 3-16-2006 APS March Meeting I. Siddiqi
More informationCoherent oscillations in a charge qubit
Coherent oscillations in a charge qubit The qubit The read-out Characterization of the Cooper pair box Coherent oscillations Measurements of relaxation and decoherence times Tim Duty, Kevin Bladh, David
More informationDynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits
Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits Dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting coplanar waveguide Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 147003 (2009) Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting microwave
More informationElectrical Quantum Engineering with Superconducting Circuits
1.0 10 0.8 01 switching probability 0.6 0.4 0.2 00 Electrical Quantum Engineering with Superconducting Circuits R. Heeres & P. Bertet SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group 11 0.0 0 100 200 300 400
More informationSuperconducting Qubits
Superconducting Qubits Fabio Chiarello Institute for Photonics and Nanotechnologies IFN CNR Rome Lego bricks The Josephson s Lego bricks box Josephson junction Phase difference Josephson equations Insulating
More informationNon-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout
Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout Irinel Chiorescu Delft University of Technology Quantum Transport group Prof. J.E. Mooij Kees Harmans Flux-qubit team visitors
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 14 Aug 2012
Controlled catch and release of microwave photon states Yi Yin, 1 Yu Chen, 1 Daniel Sank, 1 P. J. J. O Malley, 1 T. C. White, 1 R. Barends, 1 J. Kelly, 1 Erik Lucero, 1 Matteo Mariantoni, 1, 2 A. Megrant,
More informationControlling the Interaction of Light and Matter...
Control and Measurement of Multiple Qubits in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics Andreas Wallraff (ETH Zurich) www.qudev.ethz.ch M. Baur, D. Bozyigit, R. Bianchetti, C. Eichler, S. Filipp, J. Fink, T. Frey,
More informationJosephson qubits. P. Bertet. SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group
Josephson qubits P. Bertet SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group Outline Lecture 1: Basics of superconducting qubits Lecture 2: Qubit readout and circuit quantum electrodynamics Lecture 3: 2-qubit
More informationDifferential Phase Shift Quantum Key Distribution and Beyond
Differential Phase Shift Quantum Key Distribution and Beyond Yoshihisa Yamamoto E. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University National Institute of Informatics (Tokyo, Japan) DPS-QKD system Protocol System
More informationSuperconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering
Superconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering Nov. 2009 Lin Tian University of California, Merced & KITP Collaborators: Kurt Jacobs (U Mass, Boston) Raymond Simmonds (Boulder)
More informationINTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD
INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD Hanhee Paik IBM Quantum Computing Group IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY USA
More informationQuantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Circuit QED
Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Circuit QED Eperiment Rob Schoelkopf Michel Devoret Andreas Wallraff David Schuster Hannes Majer Luigi Frunzio Andrew Houck Blake Johnson Emily Chan Jared Schwede
More information10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics
AS-Chap. 10-1 10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics AS-Chap. 10-2 Analogy to quantum optics Superconducting quantum circuits (SQC) Nonlinear circuits Qubits, multilevel systems Linear circuits Waveguides,
More informationMotion and motional qubit
Quantized motion Motion and motional qubit... > > n=> > > motional qubit N ions 3 N oscillators Motional sidebands Excitation spectrum of the S / transition -level-atom harmonic trap coupled system & transitions
More informationStrong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit
Strong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit Wiebke Guichard Olivier Buisson Frank Hekking Laurent Lévy Bernard Pannetier Aurélien Fay Ioan Pop Florent Lecocq Rapaël Léone Nicolas Didier
More informationCavity QED with Rydberg Atoms
Cavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris Lecture 3: Quantum feedback and field state reconstruction in Cavity QED experiments. Introduction to Circuit
More informationFrom trapped ions to macroscopic quantum systems
7th International Summer School of the SFB/TRR21 "Control of Quantum Correlations in Tailored Matter 21-13 July 2014 From trapped ions to macroscopic quantum systems Peter Rabl Yesterday... Trapped ions:
More informationSuperconducting Qubits. Nathan Kurz PHYS January 2007
Superconducting Qubits Nathan Kurz PHYS 576 19 January 2007 Outline How do we get macroscopic quantum behavior out of a many-electron system? The basic building block the Josephson junction, how do we
More informationQuantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits. Io-Chun Hoi 許耀銓
Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits 許耀銓 Outline Motivation: Quantum network Introduction to superconducting circuits Quantum nodes The single-photon router The cross-kerr
More informationParity-Protected Josephson Qubits
Parity-Protected Josephson Qubits Matthew Bell 1,2, Wenyuan Zhang 1, Lev Ioffe 1,3, and Michael Gershenson 1 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Jersey 2 Department of Electrical
More informationContent of the lectures
Content of the lectures Lecture 1 Introduction to quantum noise, squeezed light and entanglement generation Quantization of light, Continuous-variable, Homodyne detection, Gaussian states, Optical parametric
More informationDeterministic Coherent Writing and Control of the Dark Exciton Spin using Short Single Optical Pulses
Deterministic Coherent Writing and Control of the Dark Exciton Spin using Short Single Optical Pulses Ido Schwartz, Dan Cogan, Emma Schmidgall, Liron Gantz, Yaroslav Don and David Gershoni The Physics
More informationSupercondcting Qubits
Supercondcting Qubits Patricia Thrasher University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Superconducting qubits are electrical circuits based on the Josephson tunnel junctions and have the ability to
More informationDipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator
Dipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator 200 µm J. Basset, D.-D. Jarausch, A. Stockklauser, T. Frey, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin and A. Wallraff Quantum
More informationCIRCUIT QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS WITH ELECTRONS ON HELIUM
CIRCUIT QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS WITH ELECTRONS ON HELIUM David Schuster Assistant Professor University of Chicago Chicago Ge Yang Bing Li Michael Geracie Yale Andreas Fragner Rob Schoelkopf Useful cryogenics
More informationJosephson-Junction Qubits
Josephson-Junction Qubits John Martinis Kristine Lang, Ray Simmonds, Robert McDermott, Sae Woo Nam, Jose Aumentado, Dustin Hite, Dave Pappas, NST Boulder Cristian Urbina, (CNRS/CEA Saclay) Qubit 8µm Atom
More informationIon trap quantum processor
Ion trap quantum processor Laser pulses manipulate individual ions row of qubits in a linear Paul trap forms a quantum register Effective ion-ion interaction induced by laser pulses that excite the ion`s
More informationCMSC 33001: Novel Computing Architectures and Technologies. Lecture 06: Trapped Ion Quantum Computing. October 8, 2018
CMSC 33001: Novel Computing Architectures and Technologies Lecturer: Kevin Gui Scribe: Kevin Gui Lecture 06: Trapped Ion Quantum Computing October 8, 2018 1 Introduction Trapped ion is one of the physical
More informationIBM quantum experience: Experimental implementations, scope, and limitations
IBM quantum experience: Experimental implementations, scope, and limitations Plan of the talk IBM Quantum Experience Introduction IBM GUI Building blocks for IBM quantum computing Implementations of various
More informationPhysics is becoming too difficult for physicists. David Hilbert (mathematician)
Physics is becoming too difficult for physicists. David Hilbert (mathematician) Simple Harmonic Oscillator Credit: R. Nave (HyperPhysics) Particle 2 X 2-Particle wave functions 2 Particles, each moving
More informationThe Quantum Supremacy Experiment
The Quantum Supremacy Experiment John Martinis, Google & UCSB New tests of QM: Does QM work for 10 15 Hilbert space? Does digitized error model also work? Demonstrate exponential computing power: Check
More informationLecture 11, May 11, 2017
Lecture 11, May 11, 2017 This week: Atomic Ions for QIP Ion Traps Vibrational modes Preparation of initial states Read-Out Single-Ion Gates Two-Ion Gates Introductory Review Articles: D. Leibfried, R.
More informationMICROWAVE RESET A NEW METHOD FOR RESETTING A MULTIWELL JOSEPHSON PHASE QUBIT. Isaac Storch. A senior thesis submitted to the faculty of
MICROWAVE RESET A NEW METHOD FOR RESETTING A MULTIWELL JOSEPHSON PHASE QUBIT by Isaac Storch A senior thesis submitted to the faculty of University of California, Santa Barbara in partial fulfillment of
More informationQuantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED
Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED Ren-Shou Huang, Alexandre Blais, Andreas Wallraff, David Schuster, Sameer Kumar, Luigi Frunzio, Hannes Majer, Steven Girvin, Robert Schoelkopf
More informationLecture 2, March 2, 2017
Lecture 2, March 2, 2017 Last week: Introduction to topics of lecture Algorithms Physical Systems The development of Quantum Information Science Quantum physics perspective Computer science perspective
More informationLecture 2: Double quantum dots
Lecture 2: Double quantum dots Basics Pauli blockade Spin initialization and readout in double dots Spin relaxation in double quantum dots Quick Review Quantum dot Single spin qubit 1 Qubit states: 450
More informationCircuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014
Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014 Introduction Theory details Strong coupling experiment Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical
More informationEngineering the quantum probing atoms with light & light with atoms in a transmon circuit QED system
Engineering the quantum probing atoms with light & light with atoms in a transmon circuit QED system Nathan K. Langford OVERVIEW Acknowledgements Ramiro Sagastizabal, Florian Luthi and the rest of the
More informationLecture 2, March 1, 2018
Lecture 2, March 1, 2018 Last week: Introduction to topics of lecture Algorithms Physical Systems The development of Quantum Information Science Quantum physics perspective Computer science perspective
More informationInteraction between surface acoustic waves and a transmon qubit
Interaction between surface acoustic waves and a transmon qubit Ø Introduction Ø Artificial atoms Ø Surface acoustic waves Ø Interaction with a qubit on GaAs Ø Nonlinear phonon reflection Ø Listening to
More informationLecture 8, April 12, 2017
Lecture 8, April 12, 2017 This week (part 2): Semiconductor quantum dots for QIP Introduction to QDs Single spins for qubits Initialization Read-Out Single qubit gates Book on basics: Thomas Ihn, Semiconductor
More information10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics
AS-Chap. 10-1 10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics AS-Chap. 10-2 Analogy to quantum optics Superconducting quantum circuits (SQC) Nonlinear circuits Qubits, multilevel systems Linear circuits Waveguides,
More informationMechanical quantum resonators
Mechanical quantum resonators A. N. Cleland and M. R. Geller Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara CA 93106 USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Georgia, Athens,
More informationQuantum Logic Spectroscopy and Precision Measurements
Quantum Logic Spectroscopy and Precision Measurements Piet O. Schmidt PTB Braunschweig and Leibniz Universität Hannover Bad Honnef, 4. November 2009 Overview What is Quantum Metrology? Quantum Logic with
More informationLecture 2 Version: 14/08/29. Frontiers of Condensed Matter San Sebastian, Aug , Dr. Leo DiCarlo dicarlolab.tudelft.
Introduction to quantum computing (with superconducting circuits) Lecture 2 Version: 14/89 Frontiers of Condensed Matter San Sebastian, Aug. 28-3, 214 Dr. Leo DiCarlo l.dicarlo@tudelft.nl dicarlolab.tudelft.nl
More informationQIC 890/891, Module 4: Microwave Parametric Amplification in Superconducting Qubit Readout experiments
QIC 890/891, Module 4: Microwave Parametric Amplification in Superconducting Qubit Readout experiments 1 Instructor: Daryoush Shiri Postdoctoral fellow, IQC IQC, June 2015, WEEK-2 2 Parametric Amplifiers
More information2015 AMO Summer School. Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I. Io-Chun, Hoi
2015 AMO Summer School Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I Io-Chun, Hoi Outline 1. Introduction to quantum electrical circuits 2. Introduction to superconducting artificial
More informationQuantum Computation with Neutral Atoms
Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Marianna Safronova Department of Physics and Astronomy Why quantum information? Information is physical! Any processing of information is always performed by physical
More informationQuantum Reservoir Engineering
Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Quantum Reservoir Engineering Towards Quantum Simulators with Superconducting Qubits SMG Claudia De Grandi (Yale University) Siddiqi Group (Berkeley)
More informationΓ43 γ. Pump Γ31 Γ32 Γ42 Γ41
Supplementary Figure γ 4 Δ+δe Γ34 Γ43 γ 3 Δ Ω3,4 Pump Ω3,4, Ω3 Γ3 Γ3 Γ4 Γ4 Γ Γ Supplementary Figure Schematic picture of theoretical model: The picture shows a schematic representation of the theoretical
More informationRemote entanglement of transmon qubits
Remote entanglement of transmon qubits 3 Michael Hatridge Department of Applied Physics, Yale University Katrina Sliwa Anirudh Narla Shyam Shankar Zaki Leghtas Mazyar Mirrahimi Evan Zalys-Geller Chen Wang
More informationQuantum simulation with superconducting circuits
Quantum simulation with superconducting circuits Summary: introduction to quantum simulation with superconducting circuits: quantum metamaterials, qubits, resonators motional averaging/narrowing: theoretical
More informationSuperconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172)
Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172) Thilo Bauch (bauch@chalmers.se) Quantum Device Physics Laboratory, MC2, Chalmers University of Technology Qubit proposals for implementing
More informationCavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits
Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits Andreas Wallraff (ETH Zurich) www.qudev.ethz.ch M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, S. Filipp, J. Fink, A. Fragner, M. Göppl, P. Leek, P. Maurer, L. Steffen,
More informationLes Houches School of Physics Lecture 1: Piezoelectricity & mechanical resonators
Les Houches School of Physics Lecture 1: Piezoelectricity & mechanical resonators Institute for Molecular Engineering Andrew Cleland August 2015 Ecole de Physique Les Houches πιέζειν ήλεκτρον Piezoelectricity
More informationCircuit QED with electrons on helium:
Circuit QED with electrons on helium: What s the sound of one electron clapping? David Schuster Yale (soon to be at U. of Chicago) Yale: Andreas Fragner Rob Schoelkopf Princeton: Steve Lyon Michigan State:
More informationQuantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173
Quantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173 Date and time: Tuesday, 7 October 015, 08:30-1:30. Examiners: Jonas Bylander (070-53 44 39) and Thilo Bauch (0733-66 13 79). Visits around 09:30 and 11:30.
More informationCavity Quantum Electrodynamics (QED): Coupling a Harmonic Oscillator to a Qubit
Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (QED): Coupling a Harmonic Oscillator to a Qubit Cavity QED with Superconducting Circuits coherent quantum mechanics with individual photons and qubits...... basic approach:
More informationSolid-state quantum communications and quantum computation based on single quantum-dot spin in optical microcavities
CQIQC-V -6 August, 03 Toronto Solid-state quantum communications and quantum computation based on single quantum-dot spin in optical microcavities Chengyong Hu and John G. Rarity Electrical & Electronic
More informationSingle Spin Qubits, Qubit Gates and Qubit Transfer with Quantum Dots
International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi : Quantum Spintronics and Related Phenomena June 22-23, 2012 Varenna, Italy Single Spin Qubits, Qubit Gates and Qubit Transfer with Quantum Dots Seigo Tarucha
More informationProspects for Superconducting Qubits. David DiVincenzo Varenna Course CLXXXIII
Prospects for Superconducting ubits David DiVincenzo 26.06.2012 Varenna Course CLXXXIII uantum error correction and the future of solid state qubits David DiVincenzo 26.06.2012 Varenna Course CLXXXIII
More informationChapter 6. Exploring Decoherence in Cavity QED
Chapter 6 Exploring Decoherence in Cavity QED Serge Haroche, Igor Dotsenko, Sébastien Gleyzes, Michel Brune, and Jean-Michel Raimond Laboratoire Kastler Brossel de l Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond
More informationCircuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing
Circuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing Himadri Barman Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research Bangalore, India. QCMJC Talk, July 10, 2012 Outline Basics of quantum
More informationCoherence and optical electron spin rotation in a quantum dot. Sophia Economou NRL. L. J. Sham, UCSD R-B Liu, CUHK Duncan Steel + students, U Michigan
Coherence and optical electron spin rotation in a quantum dot Sophia Economou Collaborators: NRL L. J. Sham, UCSD R-B Liu, CUHK Duncan Steel + students, U Michigan T. L. Reinecke, Naval Research Lab Outline
More informationGround state cooling via Sideband cooling. Fabian Flassig TUM June 26th, 2013
Ground state cooling via Sideband cooling Fabian Flassig TUM June 26th, 2013 Motivation Gain ultimate control over all relevant degrees of freedom Necessary for constant atomic transition frequencies Do
More informationAmplification, entanglement and storage of microwave radiation using superconducting circuits
Amplification, entanglement and storage of microwave radiation using superconducting circuits Jean-Damien Pillet Philip Kim s group at Columbia University, New York, USA Work done in Quantum Electronics
More informationMesoscopic field state superpositions in Cavity QED: present status and perspectives
Mesoscopic field state superpositions in Cavity QED: present status and perspectives Serge Haroche, Ein Bokek, February 21 st 2005 Entangling single atoms with larger and larger fields: an exploration
More informationQuantum information processing with individual neutral atoms in optical tweezers. Philippe Grangier. Institut d Optique, Palaiseau, France
Quantum information processing with individual neutral atoms in optical tweezers Philippe Grangier Institut d Optique, Palaiseau, France Outline Yesterday s lectures : 1. Trapping and exciting single atoms
More informationBuilding Blocks for Quantum Computing Part V Operation of the Trapped Ion Quantum Computer
Building Blocks for Quantum Computing Part V Operation of the Trapped Ion Quantum Computer CSC801 Seminar on Quantum Computing Spring 2018 1 Goal Is To Understand The Principles And Operation of the Trapped
More informationP 3/2 P 1/2 F = -1.5 F S 1/2. n=3. n=3. n=0. optical dipole force is state dependent. n=0
(two-qubit gate): tools: optical dipole force P 3/2 P 1/2 F = -1.5 F n=3 n=3 n=0 S 1/2 n=0 optical dipole force is state dependent tools: optical dipole force (e.g two qubits) ω 2 k1 d ω 1 optical dipole
More informationNiels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University. Eugene Polzik
Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Eugene Polzik Ensemble approach Cavity QED Our alternative program (997 - ): Propagating light pulses + atomic ensembles Energy levels with rf or microwave separation
More informationCavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris
Cavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris A three lecture course Goal of lectures Manipulating states of simple quantum systems has become an important
More information