Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin"

Samson Dorsey
5 years ago
Views:

1 Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin Christopher Konrad, US Geological Survey Tim Beechie, NOAA Fisheries

projects working in opposition to each other; functional floodplains

2 Managing floodplains for multiple benefits Rationale: large-scale projects must incorporate broader objectives; more efficient than projects working in opposition to each other; functional floodplains are capable with risk reduction 3. Managing floodplains for multiple benefits

3 Uses of Puget Sound Floodplains Source: NOAA C-CAP Source: Washington Department of Ecology 15% of urban areas 30% of highly developed urban areas 70% of cultivated land 2. Social values of floodplains

5 km Side channel Springbrook Fine-scale heterogeneity/diversity of habitats Flood-mediated disturbance

4 Ecological characteristics Cut bank Backwater Lateral Pool Island Gravel bar/riffle Chute Determinants Lateral and longitudinal connectivity with river Vertical zonation 0.5 km Side channel Springbrook Fine-scale heterogeneity/diversity of habitats Flood-mediated disturbance regime Full representation of successional stages Mid-to late seral stage Early seral stage New colonization 1. Floodplains as landforms and ecosystems

5 Overview of assessment Goal: identify areas where ecological function can be improved and flood-related risk can be reduced Audience: 1 o regional planners, state and federal policy makers and funders; 2 o local floodplain managers with information needs Geographic scope: valleys of 17 major rivers draining to Puget Sound Resolution: attributes (topography, land cover, etc.) indicating function and risk are represented on 10 m grids Output: primarily categorical (1, 2, 3) that is transparent rather than ordinal (1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd ) that has implicit valuation

6 Where are opportunities? 1. Current ecological function can be improved by re-connecting floodplain areas to rivers and/or changing land cover/land use >> Assess current functions 2. Flood risk can be reduced by enhancing protection, increasing resilience, or reducing exposure >> Assess current risks

7 Ecological functions of floodplains 1. Store and convey floods 2. Supply and retain sediment and wood in river networks 3. Retain and transform nutrients and contaminants 4. Support forest ecosystems 5. Provide aquatic habitats

8 Floodplain fragmentation Roads, levees, and railroads fragment floodplains and disconnect some fragments from rivers. Valley bottom; above floodplain Total area (sq km) Floodplain, connected Floodplain, disconnected <10 <100 <1000 >1000 Fragment size (ha = 2.5 acres)

9 Function 4: support floodplain forests Stillaguamish River at the confluence with Pilchuck River Connected floodplain with forest, wetland Connected floodplain with modified cover Disconnected floodplain with forest, wetland Disconnected floodplain with modified cover

10 Risk: Hazard+ Exposure Hazards 1. Inundation during floods 2. Channel occupation Exposure 1. Key facilities 2. Land uses (agriculture, medium/high development) 3. Transportation corridors (roads)

11 Key facilities 1251 Class A or B water systems 47 Municipal wastewater treatment facilities or large septic systems 191 Fire stations, hospitals, or emergency medical service facilities 2. Social values of floodplains

12 Logic models to produce categories of function or risk Function 1. Store and route floods: 3: connected river area, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads 2: connected low floodplain, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads; 1: connected high floodplain, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads; -1: disconnected floodplain, undeveloped -2: connected floodplain with medium/high development Function 3a. De-nitrification: 2: Wetland, shallow groundwater, or hydric soils; no impervious surfaces, soil>30% silt /clay, >2% organic material 2: Wetland, shallow groundwater, or hydric soils; no impervious surfaces, soil >30% silt/clay, <2% organic material 4. Assessment of ecological functions and risks to people

is connected or 1 o of disconnection Development

13 Opportunities to combine flood risk reduction and improved ecological function Criteria: Fragment is connected or 1 o of disconnection Development or key facilities At least 10 ha of undeveloped land

14 Opportunities to increase flood conveyance and aquatic habitat in floodplain units with relatively narrow active channels Channel width (m) Wide Narrow Drainage area (sq km)

15 Fish-related products Delineation of rivers Upstream length of Chinook-bear stream: green > 400 km, red < 100 km

Summary Assessment of ecological functions and flood-related risks to people on floodplains along 17 major rivers in Puget Sound basin will be published by USGS in 2014, geospatial information will

16 Summary Assessment of ecological functions and flood-related risks to people on floodplains along 17 major rivers in Puget Sound basin will be published by USGS in 2014, geospatial information will be available on-line Contributes basic information (delineation of low floodplains, river areas, and fragmentation) and integrates disparate information to facilitate regional planning and management of floodplains..

17 Additional slides

18 Floodplain Recovery Target Puget Sound Partnership 2020 floodplain recovery target includes restoration of 15% of degraded floodplain. Meets minimal criteria for functional 1067 sq km of degraded floodplain (disconnected or modified land cover)

Differentiating types of floodplain based on relative

elevation of the land surface relative to the river (

19 Differentiating types of floodplain based on relative elevation Land surface elevation relative to river Land surface elevation from LiDAR, 1.8 m 10 m 0 m GIS based method for determining the elevation of the land surface relative to the river ( Height above Water Surface, Jones 2006) 1. Floodplains as landforms and ecosystems

20 Delineating high floodplain, low floodplain, and river areas Elevation of land relative to river Apply threshold 1. Floodplains as landforms and ecosystems Low floodplain

Channel movement across floodplains links physical process to biological structure 100 200 Frequency of channel occupation 300 400 500 600 700 800 Channel occupies nearly the same location from 1936

21 Channel movement across floodplains links physical process to biological structure Frequency of channel occupation Channel occupies nearly the same location from 1936 to 2002, little interaction with floodplain 900 Channel actively 1000 migrating, re-occupies many of the same locations but allows forest succession in other locations to older seral stages Middle Green River, WA Konrad, CP 2012, Journal of Geophysical Research 117, G00N13

22 Integrated floodplain management Levee setbacks Puyallup River, WA Floodplain reconnected by levee setback Seasonal use Yolo Bypass, CA Raising infrastructure - farm equipment pads Konrad et al. 2008, River Research and Applications 24

23 FLOODPLAIN FUNCTIONS 1. Store and route floods fn1 = fp * vb_undev - 2 * (fp > 0) * (1 - vb_mhdev)*(1-vb_undev) 3: connected river area, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads 2: connected low floodplain, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads; 1: connected high floodplain, undeveloped, no roads/levees/railroads; 0: not floodplain or road/levee/railroad -1: disconnected floodplain, undeveloped -2: connected floodplain with low development 1a. Store floodwater fn1a = (dstage_high dz_ned) * (fp > 0) (fp == -1) > 0: depth of water over floodplain during a nominal flood in meters; 0: valley bottom areas outside of floodplain; road/levee/railroad -1: disconnected areas of floodplain 1b. Convey floods fn1b = (fp > 1) * (vb_undev) * (riv_grad_ned) hydraulic gradient (m/m) 0: areas outside of LiDAR coverage; disconnected floodplain; high floodplain; valley bottom; or road/levee/railroad 2. Regulate sediment and wood supplies in river networks 4: forest areas adjacent to river composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads 3: undeveloped areas adjacent to river composed of unconsolidated material without forest; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads 2: forested connected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads 1: undeveloped connected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material without forest; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads, 0: not erodible material; floodplain with roads, levees, or railroads; valley bottom areas outside of floodplain -1: developed areas adjacent to river composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads -2: developed, connected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, levees, or railroads -3: undeveloped disconnected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material -4: developed disconnected floodplain composed of unconsolidated material; no impervious, roads, railroads, or levees -5: areas adjacent to river composed of unconsolidated material, with impervious, roads, levees, or railroads 2a Supply sediment

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Project Location The project is located in the South Fork McKenzie River Watershed,