TECHNICAL DESIGN CALCULATION REPORT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TECHNICAL DESIGN CALCULATION REPORT"

Transcription

1 TECHNICAL DESIGN CALCULATION REPORT Design Of Timber Structures Project: Residential building Location: Villazzano City: Trento Address: Via della Villa, 22/A Province: Trento Client: Building company: Structural designer: Date: Thursday, July 2, 2015

2

3 Design codes and standards 1. EN Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings 2. EN Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures - Part 1-8: Design of joints 3. EN Eurocode 5 Design of timber structures - Part 1-1: General - Common rules and rules for buildings 4. EN 338 Structural timber - Strength classes 5. EN 1194 Timber structures - Glued laminated timber - Strength classes and determination of characteristic values 6. EN Timber structures - Glued laminated timber and glued solid timber - Requirements

4

5 General description of the building Location Region: Province: City: Place: Trentino-alto Adige Trento Trento Villazzano Address: Via della Villa, 22/A Latitude: Longitude: Elevation mamsl: 193 m Description Number of storeys: 2 Building length: Building width: Building height: m 17.3 m 7.7 m

6 Three-dimensional view Southeast

7 Three-dimensional view Northwest

8 Three-dimensional view South West

9 Three-dimensional view North East

10

11 Calculation software used Calculation software features The software used is TimberTech Buildings, developed by Timber Tech s.r.l., start-up of the University of Trento (Italy). Technical specifications Name: Version: Software Producer: TimberTech Buildings R Timber Tech s.r.l. Via della Villa, 22/A I Villazzano Trento (TN) Italy License registered to Timber Tech s.r.l.

12

13 Materials Wooden materials The materials used in the project are listed in the following tables. Descr. ff mm,kk ff tt,0,kk ff tt,90,kk ff cc,0,kk ff cc,90,kk ff vv,kk EE 0,mmmmmmmm EE 0,05 EE 90,mmmmmmmm GG mmmmmmmm ρρ kk Description Characteristic bending strength Characteristic tensile strength along the grain Characteristic tensile strength perpendicular to the grain Characteristic compressive strength along the grain Characteristic compressive strength perpendicular to the grain Characteristic shear strength Mean value of modulus of elasticity along the grain Fifth percentile value of modulus of elasticity along the grain Mean value of modulus of elasticity perpendicular to the grain Mean value of shear modulus Characteristic density ff vv,kk,iiiiiiiiiiiiii Characteristic in-plane shear strength of CLT panel ff RR,kk ff TT,kk GG RR,mmmmmmmm Characteristic rolling shear strength Torsional resistance of the glued interfaces Mean value of rolling shear modulus Homogeneous glued-laminated timber Descr. ff mm,kk [MPa] ff tt,00,kk [MPa] ff tt,9999,kk [MPa] ff cc,00,kk [MPa] ff cc,9999,kk [MPa] ff vv,kk [MPa] EE 00,mmmmmmmm [MPa] EE 00,0000 [MPa] EE 9999,mmmmmmmm [MPa] GG mmmmmmmm [MPa] ρρ kk [kg/m 3 ] GL 24h

14 CLT Descr ff mm,kk [MPa] ff tt,00,kk [MPa] ff tt,9999,kk [MPa] ff cc,00,kk [MPa] ff cc,9999,kk [MPa] ff vv,kk,pppppppppp [MPa] ff RR,kk [MPa] ff vv,kk,llllllllll [MPa] ff TT,kk [MPa] EE 00,mmmmmmmm [MPa] EE 00,0000 [MPa] EE 9999,mmmmmmmm [MPa] GG mmmmmmmm [MPa] GG RR,mmmmmmmm [MPa] ρρ kk [kg/m 3 ] C 24 LAM C 24 LAM Screws Manufacturer Code Descr. Type l [mm] d1 [mm] d2 [mm] ff uuuu [MPa] HBS 10 x 120 HBS10120 HBS 10 x

15 Calculation method and numerical model Model Description Hypothesis adopted for the elements The timber walls are constrained at the base by means of connection systems capable of transmitting both in-plane and out-of-plane actions. The floors are schematized simply supported by the walls or by the beams and the columns are modelled with hinged ends. The horizontal elements are considered infinitely rigid in their plane and with three degrees of freedom: two translational and one rotational. In the analysis, in presence of horizontal loads, some elements may be defined as secondary : this mean that their strength and stiffness are neglected in the calculation of the response of the building. In the model these elements are represented in terms of mass and they are designed only for vertical loads. Rigid body rocking Forces on hold-down / tie-down The hold-down or tie-down systems are used to prevent the rotation of the wall caused by the overturning moment of the horizontal force. The hold-down, placed on the in-tension edge of the wall, is loaded by a force equal to TT = MM 3 3 bb NN 2 1 ffffff aaaaaaaaaaaa hoooooo dddddddd nn aaaaaa 0 ffffff iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii hoooooo dddddddd where: bb NN is the lever arm for the internal couple, assumed equal to 0.9 ll, where ll is the length of the wall is the axial vertical load acting on the wall MM 3 3 is the moment acting in the plane of the wall nn aaaaaa is the number of connections present at each corner of the wall

16 Figure: Calculation model for determining the tensile force acting on the hold-down Structural elements The following table shows the positions of the individual walls. The last four columns show the coordinates of the corners of each wall. 1 e 1 indicate the coordinates of the starting point of the wall 2 e 2 indicate the coordinates of the end point of the wall Wall name Type of wall Element resistant to horizontal loads Height [m] Length [m] Altitude [m] 1 [m] 1 [m] 2 [m] 2 [m] Wall 1 CLT es Wall 11 CLT es Wall 13 CLT es Wall 14 CLT es Wall 15 CLT es Wall 20 CLT es Wall 21 CLT es Wall 22 CLT es Wall 23 CLT es Wall 25 CLT es Wall 26 CLT es

17 Wall 27 CLT es Wall 29 CLT es Wall 3 CLT es Wall 30 CLT No Wall 31 CLT es Wall 33 CLT es Wall 34 CLT es Wall 35 CLT es Wall 36 CLT es Wall 37 CLT No Wall 38 CLT es Wall 39 CLT es Wall 4 CLT es Wall 42 CLT es Wall 43 CLT es Wall 46 CLT es Wall 54 CLT es Wall 6 CLT es Wall 61 CLT es Wall 62 CLT es Wall 63 CLT es Wall 64 CLT No Wall 66 CLT es Wall 67 CLT es Wall 71 CLT es

18 Wall 72 CLT es Wall 72 CLT es Wall 73 CLT es Wall 74 CLT No Wall 75 CLT No Wall 76 CLT No Wall 77 CLT No Wall 78 CLT No Wall 8 CLT es Wall 9 CLT es Wall2 CLT No Wall3 CLT es The following table shows the positions of the columns. e are the coordinates of the point where the column is located Column name Height [m] Altitude [m] [m] [m] Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column

19 Wall horizontal stiffness The wall stiffness can be estimated considering the contributions of all the components, as shown below. CLT walls The overall stiffness of CLTwalls is calculated taking into account the contribution of the following components: CLT panel (k LAM) shear connections angle s (k a) hold-down or tie-down (k h) Figure: Mechanical model for determining the CLT walls overall stiffness The following table indicates the positions of the walls and their equivalent shear stiffness. Wall name Type of wall Element resistant to horizontal loads Height [m] Length [m] Equivalent shear stiffness [kn/m] Wall 1 CLT es Wall 11 CLT es Wall 13 CLT es

20 Wall 14 CLT es Wall 15 CLT es Wall 20 CLT es Wall 21 CLT es Wall 22 CLT es Wall 23 CLT es Wall 25 CLT es Wall 26 CLT es Wall 27 CLT es Wall 29 CLT es Wall 3 CLT es Wall 30 CLT No Wall 31 CLT es Wall 33 CLT es Wall 34 CLT es Wall 35 CLT es Wall 36 CLT es Wall 37 CLT No Wall 38 CLT es

21 Wall 39 CLT es Wall 4 CLT es Wall 42 CLT es Wall 43 CLT es Wall 46 CLT es Wall 54 CLT es Wall 6 CLT es Wall 61 CLT es Wall 62 CLT es Wall 63 CLT es Wall 64 CLT No Wall 66 CLT es Wall 67 CLT es Wall 71 CLT es Wall 72 CLT es Wall 72 CLT es Wall 73 CLT es Wall 74 CLT No Wall 75 CLT No

22 Wall 76 CLT No Wall 77 CLT No Wall 78 CLT No Wall 8 CLT es Wall 9 CLT es Wall2 CLT No Wall3 CLT es Types of structural elements and sign conventions Linear elements The linear elements are used to model beams and columns. They have a local reference system with respect to which stress/force components are shown. The sign convention adopted is shown in the figure below. Force Description Unit of measure N Axial force kn M3-3 Bending moment about local axis 3 kn m V2 Shear along local axis 2 kn M2-2 Bending moment about local axis 2 kn m V3 Shear along local axis 3 kn

23 Figure: sign conventions for beams Figure: sign conventions for columns

24 Wall elements The walls, regardless of type, have the following sign conventions. In-plane stresses Out-of-plane stresses (plate) Stress Description Unit of measure n Axial stress (per unit length) kn/m m3-3 Bending moment about local axis 3 (per unit length) knm/m v2 Shear along local axis 2 (per unit length) kn/m m2-2 Bending moment about local axis 2 (per unit length) knm/m v3 Shear along local axis 3 (per unit length) kn/m In-plane stresses Out-of-plane stresses (plate) Force Description Unit of measure N Total axial force kn M3-3 Bending moment about local axis 3 knm V2 Shear along local axis 2 kn M2-2 Bending moment about local axis 3 knm V3 Shear along local axis 2 kn Figure: sign conventions for walls

25 Actions and design loads Self-weight of structural materials The weights of the structural materials are shown in the table below. Description Specific weight ɣ [kn/m 3 ] GL 24h 6 C 24 LAM 6 Snow loads The snow load is evaluated in accordance with the Italian Standard (3.4 - NTC 08). Snow load on the roof can be evaluated using expression NTC 08 where qq ss = μμ ii qq ssss CC EE CC tt qq ss μμ ii qq ssss CC EE CC tt is the value of the snow load on the roof is the shape coefficient is the characteristic ground snow load is the exposure coefficient is the thermal coefficient Characteristic ground snow load at the site Province: Trento Elevation mamsl: 193 m Snow load zone: Zone I - Alpine Characteristic ground snow load: 1.50 kn/m 2 Topographic category: Normal topography : Exposure coefficient: 1 Thermal coefficient: 1 Snow is not prevented from sliding off: No

26 Snow load on the roof The value of the snow load acting on each roof is shown in the following table. Roof name Snow load [kn/m 2 ] Floor Floor Wind actions The wind load is evaluated in accordance with the Italian standard (section 3.3 of NTC 08). The wind action is represented by a simplified set of pressures or forces whose effects are equivalent to the extreme effects of the turbulent wind. For the usual structures the wind action are considered as equivalent static actions evaluated as described in NTC 08. Project data Province: Trento Elevation mamsl: 193 m Wind load zone: Zone 1 Terrain roughness class: Distance from the coast: Exposure category: Class A Hinterland V Reference mean (basic) velocity The fundamental value of the basic wind velocity, vb, is the characteristic 10 minutes mean wind velocity, irrespective of wind direction and time of year, at 10 m above ground level in terrain with exposure category II (Tab. 3.3.II) and referring to a return period of 50 years. The value of the basic wind velocity vv bb is given by the expression: vv bb = vv bb,0 vv bb = vv bb,0 + kk aa (aa ss aa 0 ) for as a0 for a0 < as 1500 m where: vv bb,0, aa 0, kk aa aa ss vv bb,0 aa 0 are factors which are dependent on the site where the building is located (Fig ) is the altitude above sea level (in m) of the site where the building is located. 25 m/s 1000 m

27 kk aa /s Reference velocity: m/s Reference velocity pressure The reference velocity pressure qb (in N/m²) is given by the expression: where qq bb = 1 2 ρρ vv bb 2 vv bb is the reference velocity of the wind (in m/s); ρρ is the air density conventionally assumed constant and equal to 1,25 kg/m 3. So qq bb N/m 2 Wind pressure acting on the building surfaces The wind pressure acting on the building surfaces is given by the following expression where pp = qq bb cc ee cc pp cc dd qq bb cc ee is reference velocity pressure is the exposure factor depending on the height z on the ground; it can be calculated with the following expression: cc ee (zz) = kk rr 2 cc tt ln zz zz cc tt ln zz zz 0 cc ee (zz) = cc ee (zz min ) for z z min for z<z min where cc tt cc pp cc dd is the topography factor is the pressure coefficient is the dynamic factor which takes into account the increasing effect from vibrations due to turbulence The values assumed in the calculations for the coefficients mentioned above are reported in the following tables. Description Value Dynamic factor 1

28 Figure: Values of the coefficient c pe depending on the inclination of the surface. Below are the values of c pe e c pi. The internal pressure coefficient, which gives the effect of the wind on the internal surfaces of buildings, is equal to zero if the building is airtight, conversely it is equal to ±0.2 if the building has openings. Internal and external pressures are considered to act at the same time. The worst combination of external and internal pressures are considered for every combination of possible openings. Building element Inclined at an angle [ ] cpe Windward wall Leeward wall Leeward roof pitch Windward pitch Type of construction cpi Airtight 0

29 Loads acting on the walls The following table shows the loads acting on the walls. Load name: Position: g 1,k: g 2,k: q,wind,k: Load ID Position of the wall: internal or external Permanent action: self-weight Permanent action Variable actions: wind load Wall name Position Load name g1,k [kn/m 2 ] g2,k [kn/m 2 ] q,wind,k downwind [kn/m 2 ] q,wind,k windward [kn/m 2 ] Wall 1 External External wall load Wall 3 External External wall load Wall 4 External External wall load Wall 6 External External wall load Wall 8 External External wall load Wall 9 External External wall load Wall 11 External External wall load Wall 13 External External wall load Wall 14 External External wall load Wall 15 External External wall load Wall 20 External External wall load Wall 21 External External wall load Wall 22 External External wall load Wall 23 External External wall load Wall 25 External External wall load Wall 26 External External wall load Wall 27 External External wall load

30 Wall 29 External External wall load Wall 30 External External wall load Wall 31 External External wall load Wall 33 External External wall load Wall 34 External External wall load Wall 35 External External wall load Wall 36 External External wall load Wall 37 External External wall load Wall 38 External External wall load Wall 39 External External wall load Wall 42 External External wall load Wall 43 External External wall load Wall 46 External External wall load Wall 54 External External wall load Wall 61 External External wall load Wall 62 External External wall load Wall 63 External External wall load Wall 64 External External wall load Wall 66 External External wall load Wall 67 External External wall load Wall 71 External External wall load Wall 72 External External wall load Wall 72 External External wall load Wall 73 External External wall load Wall 74 External External wall load Wall 75 External External wall load

31 Wall 76 External External wall load Wall 77 External External wall load Wall 78 External External wall load Wall2 External External wall load Wall3 External External wall load Loads acting on the floors The following table shows the characteristic values of the loads acting on the decks. Load name: Position: Load ID Position of the floor: internal or external Environment: Load category α: Roof pitch angle g 1,k: g 2,k: q,k: q,snow,k: q,wind,k: Permanent action: self-weight Permanent action Variable actions Variable actions: snow load Variable actions: wind load Floor name Position α [ ] Load name Environment g1,k [kn/m 2 ] g2,k [kn/m 2 ] q,k [kn/m 2 ] q,snow,k [kn/m 2 ] q,wind,k leeward [kn/m 2 ] q,wind,k windward [kn/m 2 ] Floor 1 Internal floor 0 Residential environment load Live loads cat. A - Residential rooms and related services, hotels Floor 3 Roof 22 Roof load Live loads cat. H1 - Roofs accessible only for maintenance and repair Floor 12 Internal floor 25 Residential environment load Live loads cat. A - Residential rooms and related services, hotels Floor 13 Internal floor 25 Residential environment load Live loads cat. A - Residential rooms and related services, hotels Floor 14 Roof 22 Roof load Live loads cat. H1 - Roofs accessible only for maintenance and repair Floor 15 Internal floor 0 Residential environment load Live loads cat. A - Residential rooms and related services, hotels

32 action The seismic action was evaluated according to the Italian standard NTC '08. The response spectra are calculated using three parameters depending on the characteristic of the site in question: aa gg FF 0 TT CC is the design ground acceleration on type A ground (Peak Acceleration) is the horizontal spectral acceleration amplification factor is the period when the spectrum constant-velocity starts The main parameters regarding the structure and the seismic parameters of the site are summarized below with reference to different limit states. Type of construction: Ordinary structures Nominal service life of the structure: 50 Use Class: Class II Building with normal crowding, without hazardous contents to the environment and without essential public functions Use Class parameter C u: 1 Reference Service Life (VV RR = VV NN CC UU ): 50 Limit States PVR TR [years] ag [g] F0 TC* SLO Operational Limit State 81% SLD Damage Limit State 63% SLV Life Safety Limit State 10% SLC Collapse Prevention Limit State 5% The following are the parameters of the site affecting the local seismic response. type: B - Tab. 3.2.II Deposits of very dense sand, gravel, or very stiff clay, at least several tens of metres in thickness, characterised by a gradual increase of mechanical properties with depth Topographic category: isolated cliffs with average slope angles i 15 T1 - Tab. 3.2.IV Plains, slopes and Topographic amplification factor S T: Limit states SS CC S TB [s] TC [s] TD [s] SLO Operational Limit State SLD Damage Limit State SLV Life Safety Limit State SLC Collapse Prevention Limit State

33 where S S s C C TB TC TD is the Soil Factor stratigraphic amplification factor a coefficient depending on the category of subsoil is the period when the plateau at constant acceleration of the spectrum starts is the period when this plateau ends is the value defining the beginning of the constant displacement response range of the spectrum Horizontal elastic response spectra Horizontal elastic response spectra are reported below; they are calculated using the following values of the parameters η e ξ η 1.00 ξ 5% η is the damping correction factor with a reference value of η = 1 for 5% viscous damping. Design spectra ULS To avoid explicit inelastic structural analysis in design, the capacity of the structure to dissipate energy, through mainly ductile behaviour of its elements and/or other mechanisms, is taken into account by performing an elastic analysis based on a response spectrum reduced with respect to the elastic one, henceforth called a ''design spectrum''. This reduction is accomplished by introducing the behaviour factor q. The design spectrum for elastic analysis Sd(T) can be calculated by substituting η with 1/q in formulas NTC 08 where q is the behaviour factor.

34 qq = qq 0 KK RR K R is a reduction factor of the value of the behaviour factor q for buildings non-regular in elevation Below are the parameters relating to the characteristics of the building: Elevation Regularity: es K R: 1.0 Ductility class: Ductility class "B" Structural typology: Glued wall panels - Tab. 7.7.I Glued wall panels with glued diaphragms, connected with nails and bolts Base value of the behavior factor q 0: 2.00 Behaviour factor q: 2.00 The horizontal elastic response spectra and the horizontal design spectrum (Life Safety Limit State) are shown below.

35 Sections of the structural elements CLT walls The following table shows the CLT walls characteristics. Section name CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 100 mm - 3 layers Manufacturer Panel name Material Layers number Thickness [mm] Predefinito 100 5s T C 24 LAM Layers Orientation of the outer layers Vertical Predefinito 100 3s T C 24 LAM Vertical The characteristics of the walls with vertical joints between the CLT panels are summarized below. Section name CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints Type of joint between the panels Inclined screws Length of the single panel bp [mm] Metal fastener Spacing of the fasteners sc [mm] 1250 HBS 10 x Figure: Vertical wall panels joint joint with inclined screws

36 Floors with timber joists Elements geometric characteristics h b: b b: i b: Cross section height Cross section width Joists spacing Figure: geometric characteristics of the floor The following table sets out the details concerning the floor with joists. Section name Material Cross section height hb [mm] Cross section width bb [mm] Joists spacing ib [mm] Joist floor 160x240 GL 24h CLT floors Floor geometric characteristic h b: CLT panel thickness Figure: CLT floor geometric characteristics The following table sets out the details concerning the CLT floors. Section name Manufacturer CLT panel name Material Number of layers Thickness hb[mm] CLT floor Predefinito 140 5s L C 24 LAM Layers External layers orientation Parallel to the calculation direction

37 Cross section of timber linear elements The following table sets out the details concerning the cross section of every linear element. Section name Material Width b [mm] Height h [mm] Area A [mm 2 ] Jy-y [mm 4 ] Jz-z [mm 4 ] Section 200x240 GL 24h GL 24h E8 1.60E8 Section 200x440 GL 24h GL 24h E9 2.93E8 Section 200x520 GL 24h GL 24h E9 3.47E8 Figure: Geometric size of every timber cross section Connections Hold Down Figure: graphical representation of a hold-down in a base connection (timber wall foundation connection)

38 Connection name connection - hold down - shear angle connection - hold down - shear angle 3 connection - hold down - shear angle 2 connection - hold down - shear angle 4 Connection position connection connection connection connection Manufacture r Description Fasteners number Rotho Blass WHT Rotho Blass WHT Rotho Blass WHT Rotho Blass WHT Fastener typology Chiodi Anker 4,0 40 Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 Anchor M M M M Type of anchor Resina vinilestere ETA-09/0078 Resina vinilestere ETA-09/0078 Resina vinilestere ETA-09/0078 Resina vinilestere ETA-09/0078 Anchorage depth [mm] Number of hold-down at each wall end Timber-reinforced concrete connection Figure: graphical representation of the shear connection with angle s Connection name connection - hold down - shear angle connection - hold down - shear angle 3 connection - hold down - shear angle 2 connection - hold down - shear angle 4 Connection position connection connection connection connection Manufactur er Rotho Blaas Rotho Blaas Rotho Blaas Rotho Blaas Descripti on Titan TCN 200 WBR100 con rinforzo Titan TCN 200 Titan TCN 240 Fasteners number on the vertical plate Fastener typology Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 Anchors number Anchor 2 M M M12 2 M16 Type of anchor Resina vinilestere ETA- 09/0078 Resina vinilestere ETA- 09/0078 Ancorante avvitabile SKR Ancorante pesante AB ETA- 07/0067 Number of sides Angle s spacing i [mm]

39 Double Hold Down Figure: graphical representation of the hold-down connection at the upper floors Connection name Connection position Manufacturer Description Fasteners number Fastener typology Bolt Number of connections at each wall end Upper level - 2 hold down - shear angle Upper level Rotho Blass WHT Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 M Upper level - User connection Upper level Rotho Blass WHT Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 M Angle - Timber to timber connection Figure: graphical representation of the timber to timber shear connection with angle s

40 Connection name Upper level - 2 hold down - shear angle Connection position Manufacturer Description Number of fasteners on the vertical plate Number of fasteners on the horizontal plate Upper level Rotho Blaas Titan TTN Fasteners typology vertical plate Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 Fasteners typology horizontal plate Chiodi Anker 4,0 60 SIdes number Angle s spacing i [mm] Upper level - User connection Upper level Definito da utente Definito da utente 1 1 Utente Utente 1 500

41 Combinations of actions For each critical load case, the design values of the effects of actions shall be determined by combining the values of actions that are considered to occur simultaneously. Combination of actions for persistent or transient design situations (fundamental combination - ULS): γγ GG1 GG 1 + γγ GG2 GG 2 + γγ PP PP + γγ QQ QQ kk1 + γγ QQ2 ψψ 02 QQ kk2 + γγ QQ3 ψψ 03 QQ kk3 + Combination of actions for seismic design situations E: being EE + GG 1 + GG 2 + PP + ψψ 21 QQ kk1 + ψψ 22 QQ kk2 + G1 G2 Q1 Qki γγ GG1 γγ GG2 permanent action: self weight permanent actions characteristic value of the main variable action characteristic value of the i-th variable action is the partial factor for the self-weight action is the partial factor for the permanent actions action The following are the values of the combination coefficients used. Snow/wind loads Load name Description Load-duration ψ0 ψ1 ψ2 Wind Wind pressure Instantaneous 0,6 0,2 0 Snow Snow load (altitude 1000 mamsl) Short-term 0,5 0,2 0 Snow Snow load (altitude> 1000 mamsl) Medium-term 0,7 0,5 0,2 Variable actions Recommended values of ψ factors for buildings Category name Description Load-duration ψ0 ψ1 ψ2 Live load cat.a Live load cat.a: domestic, residential areas Medium-term 0,7 0,5 0,3 Live load cat.b Live load cat.b: office areas Medium-term 0,7 0,5 0,3 Live load cat.c Live load cat.c: shopping areas Medium-term 0,7 0,7 0,6

42 Live load cat.d Live load cat.d: storage areas Medium-term 0,7 0,7 0,6 Live load cat.e Live load cat.f Live load cat.g Live load cat.h Live load cat.h2-a Live load cat.h2-b Live load cat.h2-c Live load cat.h2-d Live load cat.h2-e Live load cat.e: Libraries, archives, warehouses and industrial areas Live load cat.f: traffic area, vehicle weight 30kN Live load cat.g: traffic area, vehicle weight > 30 kn Live load cat.h: roofs accessible only for maintenance Live load cat.h2-a: Practicable roofs of category A areas Live load cat.h2-b: Practicable roofs of category B areas Live load cat.h2-c: Practicable roofs of category C areas Live load cat.h2-d: Practicable roofs of category D areas Live load cat.h2-e: Practicable roofs of category E areas Long-term 1,0 0,9 0,8 Long-term 0,7 0,7 0,6 Long-term 0,7 0,5 0,3 Medium-term Medium-term Medium-term Medium-term Medium-term Medium-term 0 0 0

43 Combinations of actions used Vertical ULS loads combinations The following table shows the ULS load combinations relevant for verifications in conditions of vertical load. The coefficient values listed correspond to the product of the partial safety factor γγ jj and the combination factors ψψ 0jj. The action of the wind is schematized with a uniform load orthogonal to each external wall. Nome Durata G1 G2 Variable Variable Orthogonal Wind Wind Snow cat.a cat.h wind ULS ULS SLS SLS ULS 1 Permanent ULS 2 Medium-term ULS 3 Short-term ULS 4 Instantaneous ULS 5 Instantaneous ULS 6 Medium-term ULS 7 Medium-term ULS 8 Short-term ULS 9 Short-term ULS 10 Instantaneous ULS 11 Instantaneous ULS 12 Instantaneous ULS 13 Instantaneous ULS 14 Short-term ULS 15 Short-term ULS 16 Instantaneous ULS 17 Instantaneous ULS 18 Instantaneous ULS 19 Instantaneous ULS 20 Instantaneous ULS 21 Instantaneous ULS 22 Permanent ULS 23 Medium-term ULS 24 Short-term ULS 25 Instantaneous ULS 26 Instantaneous ULS 27 Medium-term ULS 28 Medium-term ULS 29 Short-term ULS 30 Short-term ULS 31 Instantaneous ULS 32 Instantaneous ULS 33 Instantaneous ULS 34 Instantaneous ULS 35 Short-term ULS 36 Short-term ULS 37 Instantaneous ULS 38 Instantaneous ULS 39 Instantaneous ULS 40 Instantaneous ULS 41 Instantaneous ULS 42 Instantaneous ULS 43 Permanent ULS 44 Medium-term ULS 45 Short-term ULS 46 Instantaneous ULS 47 Instantaneous ULS 48 Medium-term ULS 49 Medium-term ULS 50 Short-term ULS 51 Short-term ULS 52 Instantaneous ULS 53 Instantaneous ULS 54 Instantaneous ULS 55 Instantaneous ULS 56 Short-term ULS 57 Short-term ULS 58 Instantaneous ULS 59 Instantaneous ULS 60 Instantaneous ULS 61 Instantaneous ULS 62 Instantaneous ULS 63 Instantaneous ULS 64 Permanent ULS 65 Medium-term ULS 66 Short-term ULS 67 Instantaneous ULS 68 Instantaneous ULS 69 Medium-term ULS 70 Medium-term ULS 71 Short-term ULS 72 Short-term ULS 73 Instantaneous ULS 74 Instantaneous ULS 75 Instantaneous

44 ULS 76 Instantaneous ULS 77 Short-term ULS 78 Short-term ULS 79 Instantaneous ULS 80 Instantaneous ULS 81 Instantaneous ULS 82 Instantaneous ULS 83 Instantaneous ULS 84 Instantaneous Horizontal ULS loads combinations The following table shows the ULS load combinations relevant for verifications in conditions of vertical load. The coefficient values listed correspond to the product of the partial safety factor γγ jj and the combination factors ψψ 0jj. The action of the wind is schematized with a uniform load orthogonal to each external wall and it acts separately in the directions x, -x, y, -y. Name Horizontal ULS 1 Horizontal ULS 2 Horizontal ULS 3 Horizontal ULS 4 Horizontal ULS 5 Horizontal ULS 6 Horizontal ULS 7 Horizontal ULS 8 Load-duration Variable Variable Orthogonal Wind Wind G1 G2 Snow class cat.a cat.h wind ULS ULS SLS SLS Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Combination of actions for rare SLS Name SLS characteristic 1 SLS characteristic 2 SLS characteristic 3 SLS characteristic 4 SLS characteristic 5 SLS characteristic 6 SLS characteristic 7 SLS characteristic 8 SLS characteristic 9 SLS characteristic 10 SLS characteristic 11 SLS characteristic 12 SLS characteristic 13 SLS characteristic 14 SLS characteristic 15 SLS characteristic 16 SLS characteristic 17 SLS characteristic 18 SLS characteristic 19 SLS characteristic 20 SLS characteristic 21 Load-duration Variable Variable Orthogonal Wind Wind G1 G2 Snow class cat.a cat.h wind ULS ULS SLS SLS Permanent Medium-term Short-term Instantaneous Instantaneous Medium-term Medium-term Short-term Short-term Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Short-term Short-term Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous

45

46 load combinations The seismic load combination used are those proposed by Italian technical standards NTC 08. The action effects due to the combination of the horizontal components of the seismic action are computed using the following combinations: with rotation of the multipliers. 1,00 EE xx + 0,3 EE yy Combinations of actions for Life Safety Limit State (SLV) Name 1 ex+ ey+ 1 ex+ ey- 1 ex- ey+ 1 ex- ey- 2 ex+ ey+ 2 ex+ ey- 2 ex- ey+ 2 ex- ey- 3 ex+ ey+ 3 ex+ ey- 3 ex- ey+ 3 ex- ey- 4 ex+ ey+ 4 ex+ ey- 4 ex- ey+ 4 ex- ey- 5 ex+ ey+ 5 ex+ ey- 5 ex- ey+ 5 ex- ey- 6 ex+ ey+ 6 ex+ ey- 6 ex- ey+ 6 ex- ey- 7 ex+ ey+ 7 ex+ ey- 7 ex- ey+ 7 ex- ey- 8 ex+ ey+ 8 ex+ ey- 8 ex- ey+ 8 ex- ey- Load-duration Variable Variable Orthogonal Wind Wind G1 G2 Snow class cat.a cat.h wind ULS ULS SLS SLS Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous

47 Combinations of actions for Damage Limit State (SLD) Name SLS 1 ex+ ey+ SLS 1 ex+ ey- SLS 1 ex- ey+ SLS 1 ex- ey- SLS 2 ex+ ey+ SLS 2 ex+ ey- SLS 2 ex- ey+ SLS 2 ex- ey- SLS 3 ex+ ey+ SLS 3 ex+ ey- SLS 3 ex- ey+ SLS 3 ex- ey- SLS 4 ex+ ey+ SLS 4 ex+ ey- SLS 4 ex- ey+ SLS 4 ex- ey- SLS 5 ex+ ey+ SLS 5 ex+ ey- SLS 5 ex- ey+ SLS 5 ex- ey- SLS 6 ex+ ey+ SLS 6 ex+ ey- SLS 6 ex- ey+ SLS 6 ex- ey- SLS 7 ex+ ey+ SLS 7 ex+ ey- SLS 7 ex- ey+ SLS 7 ex- ey- SLS 8 ex+ ey+ SLS 8 ex+ ey- SLS 8 ex- ey+ SLS 8 ex- ey- Load-duration Variable Variable Orthogonal Wind Wind G1 G2 Snow class cat.a cat.h wind ULS ULS SLS SLS Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous

48

49 Horizontal actions analysis The analysis of the structure subject to seismic action is performed using linear equivalent static analysis which involves the application of equivalent static horizontal forces to all storeys. For buildings with heights of up to 40 m the value of T1 (in s) may be approximated by the following expression: where: TT 1 = CC 1 HH 3 4 HH CC 1 is the height of the building, in m, from the foundation or from the top of a rigid basement is 0,05 as proposed by NTC 08 for structures different from moment resistant space steel frames, moment resistant space concrete frames and eccentrically braced steel frames. The structure has a period TT 1 equal to 0.23 s. When the fundamental mode shape is approximated by horizontal displacements increasing linearly along the height, the horizontal forces Fi should be taken as being given by: where: FF h = SS dd (TT 1 ) WW λλ gg is the base shear force FF ii = FF h zz ii WW ii jj zz jj WW jj FF ii WW ii e WW jj zz ii e zz jj is the horizontal force acting on storey i are the storey weights are the heights, with respect to the foundation, of the masses i and j SS dd (TT 1 ) is the ordinate of the design spectrum at period T 1 WW λλ gg is the total weight of the construction is the correction factor, the value of which is equal to: λλ = 0,85 if T1 < 2 T C and the building has more than two storeys, or λλ = 1,0 otherwise is the acceleration of gravity

50 The inertial effects of the design seismic action shall be evaluated by taking into account the presence of the masses associated with all gravity loads appearing in the following combination of actions: G 1 + G 2 + ψ 2j Q kj The base shear forces for SLD and SLV and the respective acceleration values are given below. j Ordinate of the design spectrum SLV Sd (T 1): Total base shear force F h SLV: Ordinate of the spectrum SLD Sd (T 1): Total base shear force F h SLD: 0.12 g kn 0.11 g kn The table below illustrates the horizontal forces acting on the storeys due to the seismic action and the coordinates of their respective application points. Storey Height above foundation zi [m] xg [m] yg [m] Mass i [kg] Fi,SLV [kn] Fi,SLD [kn] Wind The table below illustrates the horizontal forces acting on the storeys due to the wind action and the coordinates of their respective application points. Storey Height above foundation [m] xg,wind [m] yg,wind [m] Fx [kn] Fy [kn]

51 The action effects In this chapter are reported the internal stresses present in the structural elements and their connections caused by the different loads. Walls Wall name: Wall ID N: Total axial force V2: Shear force (in-plane) V3: Shear force (out-of-plane) M2-2: M3-3: Va: Ta: dr: Bending moment (out-of-plane) Bending moment (in-plane) Shear force on the single connection Tensile force on the single anchor Interstory drift Load Wall name N [kn] V2 [kn] V3 [kn] G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall M2-2 [knm] M3-3 [knm] Va [kn] Ta [kn] dr [mm]

52 G1 Wall G1 Wall G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall N/D G1 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall N/D G2 Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall

53 Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall N/D Variable cat.a Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall N/D Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall N/D Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall N/D Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall Variable cat.h Wall N/D

54 Variable cat.h Wall N/D Variable cat.h Wall N/D Variable cat.h Wall N/D Variable cat.h Wall N/D Variable cat.h Wall N/D Variable cat.h Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall N/D Snow Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal wind Wall Orthogonal Wall

55 wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Orthogonal wind Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall

56 Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall N/D

57 Wind Wall N/D Wind Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall

58 Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall

59 SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall

60 SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS SLS Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall N/D Wall

61 Columns Column name: Column ID N: Total axial force Load Column name N [kn] G1 Column G1 Column G1 Column G1 Column G1 Column G1 Column G1 Column G1 Column G1 Column G2 Column G2 Column G2 Column G2 Column G2 Column G2 Column G2 Column G2 Column G2 Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.a Column Variable cat.h Column Variable cat.h Column Variable cat.h Column Variable cat.h Column Variable cat.h Column Variable cat.h Column Variable cat.h Column Variable cat.h Column Variable cat.h Column Snow Column Snow Column Snow Column Snow Column Snow Column Snow Column Snow Column Snow Column Snow Column Orthogonal wind Column Orthogonal wind Column Orthogonal wind Column Orthogonal wind Column Orthogonal wind Column Orthogonal wind Column Orthogonal wind Column Orthogonal wind Column Orthogonal wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column

62 Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Wind Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column SLS Column Floors Floor name: Floor ID V2: Maximum shear stress along the local axis 2 for the most stressed element of the floor M3-3: w ist: Maximum bending moment around local axis 3 for the most stressed element of the floor Maximum deformation for the most stressed element of the floor

63 Load Floor name V2 [kn] M3-3 [knm] wist [mm] G1 Floor G1 Floor G1 Floor G1 Floor G1 Floor G1 Floor G2 Floor G2 Floor G2 Floor G2 Floor G2 Floor G2 Floor Variable cat.a Floor Variable cat.a Floor Variable cat.a Floor Variable cat.a Floor Variable cat.a Floor Variable cat.a Floor Variable cat.h Floor Variable cat.h Floor Variable cat.h Floor Variable cat.h Floor Variable cat.h Floor Variable cat.h Floor Snow Floor Snow Floor Snow Floor Snow Floor Snow Floor Snow Floor Orthogonal wind Floor Orthogonal wind Floor Orthogonal wind Floor Orthogonal wind Floor Orthogonal wind Floor Orthogonal wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Wind Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor

64 SLS Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor SLS Floor Beams Beam name: Beam ID V2: Maximum shear stress along the local axis 2 M3-3: Maximum bending moment around local axis 3 w ist: Maximum deformation for the most stressed element of the floor Load Beam name V2 [kn] M3-3 [knm] wist [mm] G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G1 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam G2 Beam

65 G2 Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.a Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Variable cat.h Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam Snow Beam

66 Snow Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Orthogonal wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam Wind Beam

67 Wind Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam

68 SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam SLS Beam

69 Forces and moments acting on foundations In this chapter are reported the values of actions acting at the base of the walls and columns of the ground floor. They refer to the ULS combination that maximizes the axial loads and to the different loads considered individually. Walls Wall name: Wall ID N: Total axial force V2: Shear force (in-plane) V3: Shear force (out-of-plane) M2-2: M3-3: Bending moment (out-of-plane) Bending moment (in-plane) Wall name Length N V2 V3 M2-2 M3-3 Load / Comb. [m] [kn] [kn] [kn] [knm] [knm] Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G

70 G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS

71 Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS

72 SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Wall ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h Snow Orthogonal wind Wind Wind SLS SLS Columns Column name: Column ID N: Total axial force Column name Load / Comb. N [kn] Column 1 ULS G G Variable cat.a 6.86 Variable cat.h 0.00 Snow 0.00 Orthogonal wind 0.00 Wind 0.00 Wind SLS 0.00 SLS 0.00 Column 2 ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h 0.00 Snow 0.00 Orthogonal wind 0.00 Wind 0.00 Wind

73 SLS 0.00 SLS 0.00 Column 3 ULS G G Variable cat.a 6.91 Variable cat.h 0.00 Snow 0.00 Orthogonal wind 0.00 Wind 0.00 Wind SLS 0.00 SLS 0.00 Column 11 ULS G G Variable cat.a Variable cat.h 0.00 Snow 0.00 Orthogonal wind 0.00 Wind 0.00 Wind SLS 0.00 SLS 0.00

74

75 Design of the structural elements CLT floors The calculation model adopted for the design of CLT in bending out-of-plane is that of mechanically jointed beams with deformable connection in accordance with Appendix B of EN The shear flexibility of the transverse layers is considered using the γ-method (gamma): namely with Möhler theory for CLT panel having up to 3 layers oriented in the direction of calculation and with Shelling theory for CLT panel having more than 3 layers oriented in the direction of calculation. The effective bending stiffness is taken as: where: nn EEJJ eeeeee = EE ii JJ ii + γγ ii EE ii AA ii aa ii 2 ii=1 γγ ii = 1 + ππ2 EE ii AA ii GG RR bb dd ll 2 rrrrrr 1 JJ ii AA ii aa ii ll rrrrrr GG RR is the moment of inertia of layer i in reference to its neutral axis is the cross-sectional area of layer i is the distance between the centre of gravity of layer i and centre of gravity of the CLT element is the reference length of the span is the rolling shear modulus (mean value) The reference length of the spans (l ref) is taken, depending on the static scheme, as reported in the following table. Structural scheme Simply supported beam Span of a continuous beam Internal support of a continuous beam Cantilever Reference length of the span l ref = l l ref = 0.8 l l ref = 0.8 l min l ref = 2 l The following table shows, for each floor and relatively to the different spans, the values of the reference lengths of the spans, the effective moment of inertia of the cross-sections of the CLT floor and the structural scheme adopted.

76 Floor name Calculation width of the strip of floor [m] Reference length lref [m] Jeff [mm 4 ] Structural scheme Floor E E8 Floor E8 Bending strength The checks are conducted according to of EN The following expression shall be satisfied: being σσ mm,dd the design bending stress ff mm,dd the design bending strength σσ mm,dd ff mm,dd 1 The following table illustrates the structural schemes and the envelopes of the diagram of the bending moment for the part of each floor where the checks are more severe.

77 Floor name Combination Duration Diagram M3-3 Bending stresses Floor 1 ULS 65 Medium-term Floor 15 ULS 65 Medium-term The checks are summarized below. The values resulting from the calculations, relating to each verification, are reported in the form of a percentage. Floor name Section M3-3 [knm] Floor 1 CLT floor Floor 15 CLT floor 4.99 Jeff [mm 4 ] Comb. kmod γm fm,d [MPa] σm,d [MPa] Check ULS % ULS % Shear strength Shear strength of the layers parallel to the calculation direction The checks are conducted according to of EN The following expression shall be satisfied: being: ττ vv,dd the design shear stress ττ vv,dd ff vv,dd 1 ff vv,dd the design shear strength for the actual condition The maximum design shear stress in the longitudinal layers can be evaluated using the following expression: where: ττ vv,dd = VV dd SS mmmmmm JJ eeeeee bb

78 VV dd is the total shear force at the location in question SS mmmmmm is the first moment of area JJ eeeeee is the effective moment of inertia of the CLT element cross section bb is the width of the CLT element cross section (kk cccc = 1) Rolling shear strength of the transversal layers The checks are conducted according to of EN The following expression shall be satisfied: being: ττ RR,dd ff vv,rr,dd 1 ττ RR,dd ff vv,rr,dd the design rolling shear stress the design shear strength The maximum design shear stress in the transversal layers can be evaluated using the following expression: where: ττ RR,dd = VV dd SS RR,mmmmmm JJ eeeeee bb VV dd is the total shear force at the location in question SS RR,mmmmmm is the first moment of area JJ eeeeee is the effective moment of inertia of the CLT element cross section bb is the width of the CLT element cross section (kk cccc = 1) The following table illustrates the structural schemes and the envelopes of the diagram of the shear force for the part of each floor where the checks are more severe. Floor name Combination Duration Diagram V2 Shear stresses Floor 1 ULS 65 Medium-term

79 Floor 15 ULS 65 Medium-term The checks are summarized below. The values resulting from the calculations, relating to each verification, are reported in the form of a percentage. Floor name Cross section V2 [kn] Jeff [mm 4 ] Comb. kmod γm fv,d [MPa] τv,d [MPa] Check fr,d [MPa] τr,d [MPa] Check Floor 1 CLT floor ULS % % Floor 15 CLT floor ULS % %

80 Joist floors / Glued laminated timber floors Bending strength The checks are conducted according to of EN The following expression shall be satisfied: where: σσ mm,dd is the design bending stress ff mm,dd is the design bending strength σσ mm,dd kk cccccccc ff mm,dd 1 kk cccccccc is a factor which takes into account the reduced bending strength due to lateral buckling. k crit is assumed equal to 1.0 for beams in which the lateral displacement of the compressed edge is prevented over the entire length and the torsional rotation is prevented at the supports. Floor name Combination Duration Diagram M3-3 Floor 3 ULS 64 Permanent Floor 12 ULS 65 Medium-term

81 Floor 13 ULS 65 Medium-term Floor 14 ULS 64 Permanent The checks are summarized below. The values resulting from the calculations, relating to each verification, are reported in the form of a percentage. Floor name Floor 3 Floor 12 Floor 13 Floor 14 Section Joist floor 160x240 Joist floor 160x240 Joist floor 160x240 Joist floor 160x240 M3-3 max [knm] W [mm 3 ] kcrit Comb. kmod γm fm,d [MPa] σm,d [MPa] ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % Check

82 Shear strength The checks are conducted according to of EN The following expression shall be satisfied: where: ττ dd ff vv,dd 1 ττ dd is the design shear stress ff vv,dd is the design shear strength for the actual condition For the verification of shear resistance of members in bending, the influence of cracks should be taken into account using an effective width of the member given as: bb eeee = kk cccc bb where b is the width of the relevant section of the member. The following value of k cr are used k cr = 0.67 for solid timber k cr = 0.67 for glued laminated timber The maximum design shear stress in a rectangular cross section can be evaluated using the following expression: where A is the area of a joist cross section. VV dd ττ dd = 3 2 kk cccc AA The following table illustrates the structural schemes and the envelopes of the shear force diagram for the joist of each floor where the checks are more severe. Floor name Combination Duration Diagram V2 Floor 3 ULS 64 Permanent

83 Floor 12 ULS 65 Medium-term Floor 13 ULS 65 Medium-term Floor 14 ULS 64 Permanent The checks are summarized below. The values resulting from the calculations, relating to each verification, are reported in the form of a percentage. Floor name Floor 3 Floor 12 Floor 13 Floor 14 Section Joist floor 160x240 Joist floor 160x240 Joist floor 160x240 Joist floor 160x240 V2 max [kn] Area [mm 2 ] kcr Comb. kmod γm fv,d [MPa] τ2,d [MPa] ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % Check

84 Floors deflections (SLS) The deflection checks are carried out according to of EN The net deflection below a straight line between the supports, w net,fin, is taken as: where: ww nnnnnn,ffffff = ww iiiiiiii + ww cccccccccc ww cc = ww ffffff ww cc ww nnnnnn,ffffff ww iiiiiiii ww cccccccccc ww cc ww ffffff is the net final deflection is the instantaneous deflection is the creep deflection is the precamber (if applied) is the final deflection The limiting values for deflections of floors are assumed as shown in the following table. winst wnet,fin Beam on two supports l/300 l/250 Cantilevering beams l/150 l/125 Instantaneous deflection The instantaneous deflection winst is calculated for the characteristic (rare) combination of actions. The following table shows the deformation of each floor (relative to the element in which the deformation checks are more severe).

85 Floor name Combination Instantaneous deflection Floor 1 SLS characteristic 2 Floor 3 SLS characteristic 14 Floor 12 SLS characteristic 2 Floor 13 SLS characteristic 2

86 Floor 14 SLS characteristic 14 Floor 15 SLS characteristic 2 The table below shows the instantaneous deflection checks of the floor elements. Floor name Combination More restrictive check winst [mm] winst limit [mm] Check Floor 1 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Floor 3 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Floor 12 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Floor 13 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Floor 14 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Floor 15 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Final deflection For structures consisting of members, components and connections with the same creep behaviour and under the assumption of a linear relationship between the actions and the corresponding deformations the final deformation, wfin, may be taken as: ww ffffff = ww ffffff,gg + ww ffffff,qq1 + ww ffffff,qqqq

87 where: ww ffffff,gg = ww iiiiiiii,gg 1 + kk dddddd for a permanent action, G ww ffffff,qq,1 = ww iiiiiiii,qq,1 1 + Ψ 2,1 kk dddddd for the leading variable action, Q 1 ww ffffff,qq,ii = ww iiiiiiii,qq,ii Ψ 0,ii + Ψ 2,1 kk dddddd for accompanying variable actions, Q i (i>1) The following table shows the deformation of each floor (relative to the element in which the deformation checks are more severe). Floor name Combination Final deflection Floor 1 SLS characteristic 2 Floor 3 SLS characteristic 14 Floor 12 SLS characteristic 2

88 Floor 13 SLS characteristic 2 Floor 14 SLS characteristic 14 Floor 15 SLS characteristic 2 The table below shows the final deflection checks of the floor elements. Floor name Combination More restrictive check wfin [mm] wfin limit [mm] Check Floor 1 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Floor 3 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Floor 12 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Floor 13 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Floor 14 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Floor 15 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span %

89 Beams Bending strength The checks are conducted according to of EN The following expression shall be satisfied: where: σσ mm,dd is the design bending stress ff mm,dd is the design bending strength σσ mm,dd kk cccccccc ff mm,dd 1 kk cccccccc is a factor which takes into account the reduced bending strength due to lateral buckling. k crit is assumed equal to 1.0 for beams in which the lateral displacement of the compressed edge is prevented over the entire length and the torsional rotation is prevented at the supports. Beam name Combination Duration Diagram M3-3 Beam 2 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 3 ULS 64 Permanent

90 Beam 4 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 5 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 6 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 10 ULS 65 Medium-term

91 Beam 11 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 16 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 17 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 18 ULS 64 Permanent

92 Beam 19 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 20 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 21 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 37 ULS 43 Permanent

93 Beam 42 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 47 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 48 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 49 ULS 64 Permanent

94 Beam 50 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 51 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 52 ULS 43 Permanent Beam 53 ULS 65 Medium-term

95 Beam 54 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 56 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 57 ULS 64 Permanent The checks are summarized below. The values resulting from the calculations, relating to each verification, are reported in the form of a percentage. Beam name Beam 2 Beam 3 Beam 4 Beam 5 Beam 6 Beam 10 Section Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h Section 200x520 GL 24h M3-3 max [knm] W [mm 3 ] kcrit Comb. kmod γm fm,d [MPa] σm,d [MPa] ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % Check

96 Beam 11 Beam 16 Beam 17 Beam 18 Beam 19 Beam 20 Beam 21 Beam 37 Beam 42 Beam 47 Beam 48 Beam 49 Beam 50 Beam 51 Beam 52 Beam 53 Beam 54 Beam 56 Beam 57 Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x520 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS %

97 Shear strength The checks are conducted according to of EN The following expression shall be satisfied: where: ττ dd ff vv,dd 1 ττ dd is the design shear stress ff vv,dd is the design shear strength for the actual condition For the verification of shear resistance of members in bending, the influence of cracks should be taken into account using an effective width of the member given as: bb eeee = kk cccc bb where b is the width of the relevant section of the member. The following value of k cr are used k cr = 0.67 for solid timber k cr = 0.67 for glued laminated timber The maximum design shear stress in a rectangular cross section can be evaluated using the following expression: where A is the area of a joist cross section. VV dd ττ dd = 3 2 kk cccc AA The following table illustrates the structural schemes and the envelopes of the shear force diagram for each beam. Beam name Combination Duration Diagram V2 Beam 2 ULS 64 Permanent

98 Beam 3 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 4 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 5 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 6 ULS 65 Medium-term

99 Beam 10 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 11 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 16 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 17 ULS 64 Permanent

100 Beam 18 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 19 ULS 64 Permanent Beam 20 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 21 ULS 65 Medium-term

101 Beam 37 ULS 43 Permanent Beam 42 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 47 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 48 ULS 70 Medium-term

102 Beam 49 ULS 70 Medium-term Beam 50 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 51 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 52 ULS 43 Permanent

103 Beam 53 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 54 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 56 ULS 65 Medium-term Beam 57 ULS 64 Permanent

104 The checks are summarized below. The values resulting from the calculations, relating to each verification, are reported in the form of a percentage. Beam name Beam 2 Beam 3 Beam 4 Beam 5 Beam 6 Beam 10 Beam 11 Beam 16 Beam 17 Beam 18 Beam 19 Beam 20 Beam 21 Beam 37 Beam 42 Beam 47 Beam 48 Beam 49 Beam 50 Beam 51 Beam 52 Beam 53 Beam 54 Beam 56 Beam 57 Section Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h Section 200x520 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x520 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h Section 200x240 GL 24h Section 200x440 GL 24h V2 max [kn] Area [mm 2 ] kcr Comb. kmod γm fv,d [MPa] τ2,d [MPa] ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % Check

105 Beams deflections (SLS) The deflection checks are carried out according to of EN The net deflection below a straight line between the supports, w net,fin, is taken as: where: ww nnnnnn,ffffff = ww iiiiiiii + ww cccccccccc ww cc = ww ffffff ww cc ww nnnnnn,ffffff ww iiiiiiii ww cccccccccc ww cc ww ffffff is the net final deflection is the instantaneous deflection is the creep deflection is the precamber (if applied) is the final deflection The limiting values for deflections of beams are assumed as shown in the following table. winst wnet,fin Beam on two supports l/300 l/250 Cantilevering beams l/150 l/125

106 Instantaneous deflection The instantaneous deflection winst is calculated for the characteristic (rare) combination of actions. The following table shows the deformation of each beam. Beam name Combination Instantaneous deflection Beam 2 SLS characteristic 1 Beam 3 SLS characteristic 1 Beam 4 SLS characteristic 15

107 Beam 5 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 6 SLS characteristic 3 Beam 10 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 11 SLS characteristic 15

108 Beam 16 SLS characteristic 14 Beam 17 SLS characteristic 14 Beam 18 SLS characteristic 14 Beam 19 SLS characteristic 14

109 Beam 20 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 21 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 37 SLS characteristic 1 Beam 42 SLS characteristic 2

110 Beam 47 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 48 SLS characteristic 15 Beam 49 SLS characteristic 15 Beam 50 SLS characteristic 2

111 Beam 51 SLS characteristic 3 Beam 52 SLS characteristic 1 Beam 53 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 54 SLS characteristic 2

112 Beam 56 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 57 SLS characteristic 15 The table below shows the instantaneous deflection checks of the beams. Beam name Combination More restrictive check winst [mm] winst limit [mm] Check Beam 2 SLS characteristic 1 Internal span % Beam 3 SLS characteristic 1 Internal span % Beam 4 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Beam 5 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 6 SLS characteristic 3 Internal span % Beam 10 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 11 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Beam 16 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Beam 17 SLS characteristic 14 Internal span % Beam 18 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Beam 19 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Beam 20 SLS characteristic 2 Overhang % Beam 21 SLS characteristic 2 Overhang % Beam 37 SLS characteristic 1 Internal span %

113 Beam 42 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 47 SLS characteristic 2 Overhang % Beam 48 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Beam 49 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Beam 50 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 51 SLS characteristic 3 Internal span % Beam 52 SLS characteristic 1 Internal span % Beam 53 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 54 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 56 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 57 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Final deflection For structures consisting of members, components and connections with the same creep behaviour and under the assumption of a linear relationship between the actions and the corresponding deformations the final deformation, wfin, may be taken as: where: ww ffffff = ww ffffff,gg + ww ffffff,qq1 + ww ffffff,qqqq ww ffffff,gg = ww iiiiiiii,gg 1 + kk dddddd for a permanent action, G ww ffffff,qq,1 = ww iiiiiiii,qq,1 1 + Ψ 2,1 kk dddddd for the leading variable action, Q 1 ww ffffff,qq,ii = ww iiiiiiii,qq,ii Ψ 0,ii + Ψ 2,1 kk dddddd for accompanying variable actions, Q i (i>1)

114 The following table shows the deformation of each floor (relative to the element in which the deformation checks are more severe). Beam name Combination Final deflection Beam 2 SLS characteristic 1 Beam 3 SLS characteristic 1 Beam 4 SLS characteristic 15 Beam 5 SLS characteristic 2

115 Beam 6 SLS characteristic 3 Beam 10 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 11 SLS characteristic 15 Beam 16 SLS characteristic 14

116 Beam 17 SLS characteristic 14 Beam 18 SLS characteristic 14 Beam 19 SLS characteristic 14 Beam 20 SLS characteristic 2

117 Beam 21 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 37 SLS characteristic 1 Beam 42 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 47 SLS characteristic 2

118 Beam 48 SLS characteristic 15 Beam 49 SLS characteristic 15 Beam 50 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 51 SLS characteristic 3

119 Beam 52 SLS characteristic 1 Beam 53 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 54 SLS characteristic 2 Beam 56 SLS characteristic 2

120 Beam 57 SLS characteristic 15 The table below shows the final deflection checks for every beam. Beam name Combination More restrictive check wfin [mm] wfin limit [mm] Check Beam 2 SLS characteristic 1 Internal span % Beam 3 SLS characteristic 1 Internal span % Beam 4 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Beam 5 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 6 SLS characteristic 3 Internal span % Beam 10 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 11 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Beam 16 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Beam 17 SLS characteristic 14 Internal span % Beam 18 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Beam 19 SLS characteristic 14 Overhang % Beam 20 SLS characteristic 2 Overhang % Beam 21 SLS characteristic 2 Overhang % Beam 37 SLS characteristic 1 Internal span % Beam 42 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 47 SLS characteristic 2 Overhang % Beam 48 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Beam 49 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span % Beam 50 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 51 SLS characteristic 3 Internal span %

121 Beam 52 SLS characteristic 1 Internal span % Beam 53 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 54 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 56 SLS characteristic 2 Internal span % Beam 57 SLS characteristic 15 Internal span %

122 Columns Stability of columns The stability of columns subjected to compression is verified in accordance with of EN The relative slenderness ratios should be taken as: λλ rrrrrr,yy = λλ,yy ππ ff cc,0,kk EE 0,05 and λλ rrrrrr,zz = λλ,zz ππ ff cc,0,kk EE 0,05 where λλ,yy e λλ rrrrrr,yy are the slenderness ratios corresponding to bending about the y-axis (deflection in the z-direction); λλ,zz e λλ rrrrrr,zz are the slenderness ratios corresponding to bending about the z-axis (deflection in the y- direction); Where both λ rel,z 0,3 and λ rel,y 0,3, the stresses should satisfy the expressions (6.19) e (6.20) in of EN In all other cases the stresses, which will be increased due to deflection, should satisfy the following expressions: σσ cc,0,dd kk cc,yy ff cc,0,dd + σσ mm,yy,dd ff mm,yy,dd + kk mm σσ mm,zz,dd ff mm,zz,dd 1 where the symbols are defined as follows: σσ cc,0,dd kk cc,zz ff cc,0,dd + kk mm σσ mm,yy,dd ff mm,yy,dd + σσ mm,zz,dd ff mm,zz,dd 1 kk cc,yy = 1 kk yy + kk 2 2 yy λλ rrrrrr,yy kk cc,zz = 1 kk zz + kk 2 2 zz λλ rrrrrr,zz where: 2 kk yy = 0,5 1 + ββ cc λλ rrrrrr,yy 0,3 + λλ rrrrrr,yy 2 kk zz = 0,5 1 + ββ cc λλ rrrrll,zz 0,3 + λλ rrrrrr,zz

123 ββ cc is a factor for members within the straightness limits defined in Section 10 of EN and assumes the following values 0,2 ffffff ssssssssss tttttttttttt ββ cc = 0,1 ffffff gggggggggg llllllllllllllllll tttttttttttt aaaaaa LLLLLL The values of the actions in the tables below are related, for each pillar, to the more severe combination of load for the Ultimate Limit State of instability. Comb.: Dur.: More severe combination of load Load duration N: Axial force V 2: Shear force along the local axis 2 V 3: Shear force along the local axis 3 M 2-2: Bending moment about local axis 2 M 3-3: Bending moment about local axis 3 Column name Comb. Dur. N [kn] V2 [kn] V3 [kn] M2-2 [knm] M3-3 [knm] Column 1 ULS 65 Medium-term Column 2 ULS 65 Medium-term Column 3 ULS 65 Medium-term Column 6 ULS 64 Permanent Column 7 ULS 65 Medium-term Column 9 ULS 65 Medium-term Column 10 ULS 65 Medium-term Column 12 ULS 65 Medium-term Column 11 ULS 65 Medium-term The following table summarizes the stability checks for the columns. Sect.: Column cross section h: Column height Area: J y: J z: Cross sectional area of the column Area moment of inertia with respect to the y axis Area moment of inertia with respect to the z axis

124 Comb.: k mod: γ M: f c,0,k: σ c,0,d: More severe load combination Modification factor taking into account the effect of the duration of load and moisture content Partial factor for a material property Design compressive strength along the grain Design compressive stress along the grain Column name Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 6 Column 7 Column 9 Column 10 Column 12 Column 11 Sect. Section 200x24 0 GL 24h Section 200x24 0 GL 24h Section 200x24 0 GL 24h Section 200x24 0 GL 24h Section 200x24 0 GL 24h Section 200x24 0 GL 24h Section 200x24 0 GL 24h Section 200x24 0 GL 24h Section 200x24 0 GL 24h h [m] Area [mm 2 ] Jy [mm 4 ] Jz [mm 4 ] kc,y kc,z Comb kmod γm fc,0,k σc,0,d [MPa] E8 1.60E ULS % E8 1.60E ULS % E8 1.60E ULS % E8 1.60E ULS % E8 1.60E ULS % E8 1.60E ULS % E8 1.60E ULS % E8 1.60E ULS % E8 1.60E ULS % Check

125 CLT walls Buckling of CLT walls The stability checks of CLT walls are conducted with reference to what reported in of EN The values of the actions in the table below are related, for each wall, to the more severe combination of load for the Ultimate Limit State of stability. Wall name Length [m] Comb. Dur. N [kn] M2-2 [knm] Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 83 Instantaneous Wall ULS 83 Instantaneous Wall ULS 83 Instantaneous Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 82 Instantaneous Wall ULS 82 Instantaneous Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 84 Instantaneous Wall ULS 83 Instantaneous Wall ULS 83 Instantaneous Wall ULS 83 Instantaneous

126 Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 83 Instantaneous Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 84 Instantaneous Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 83 Instantaneous Wall ULS 82 Instantaneous Wall ULS 82 Instantaneous Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 84 Instantaneous Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 81 Instantaneous Wall ULS 64 Permanent The stability checks of the CLT panels are performed considering a wall portion of unitary length. Where both λ rel,z 0,3 and λ rel,y 0,3, the stresses should satisfy the expressions (6.19) and (6.20) in of EN In all other cases the stresses, which will be increased due to deflection, should satisfy the following expressions:

127 σσ cc,0,dd kk cc ff cc,0,dd + σσ mm,yy,dd ff mm,yy,dd 1 Mechanical model for the internal stress pattern in CLT elements The calculation model adopted for the design of CLT in bending out-of-plane is that of mechanically jointed beams with deformable connection in accordance with Appendix B of EN The shear flexibility of the transverse layers is considered using the γ-method (gamma): namely with Möhler theory for CLT panel having up to 3 layers oriented in the direction of calculation and with Shelling theory for CLT panel having more than 3 layers oriented in the direction of calculation. The effective bending stiffness is taken as: where: nn EEJJ eeeeee = EE ii JJ ii + γγ ii EE ii AA ii aa ii 2 ii=1 γγ ii = 1 + ππ2 EE ii AA ii GG RR bb dd h2 1 JJ ii AA ii aa ii h GG RR is the moment of inertia of layer i in reference to its neutral axis is the cross-sectional area of layer i is the distance between the centre of gravity of layer i and centre of gravity of the CLT element is the height of the wall is the rolling shear modulus (mean value) The results of the stability checks are reported below expressed as percentages. A net: J eff: Comb.: k mod: γ M: f c,0,k: f m,k: σ c,0,d: Cross sectional area of the wall portion considered in the verification (linear meter) Cross sectional effective moment of inertia of the wall portion More severe combination of load Modification factor taking into account the effect of the duration of load and moisture content Partial factor for a material property Design compressive strength along the grain Design bending strength Design compressive stress along the grain

128 Wall name Section h [m] Anet [mm 2 /m] Jeff [mm 4 /m] kc Comb. kmod γm fc,0,k [MPa] fm,k [MPa] σc,0,d [MPa] σm,d [MPa] Check Wall 1 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 3 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 4 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 6 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 8 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 9 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 11 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 13 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 14 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 15 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 20 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 21 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 22 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 23 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 25 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 26 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 27 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 29 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 30 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 31 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 33 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 34 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 35 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 36 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS %

129 Wall 37 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 38 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 39 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 42 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 43 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 46 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 54 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 61 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 62 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 63 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 64 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 66 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 67 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 71 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 72 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 72 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % Wall 73 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 74 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 75 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 76 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 77 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 78 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall2 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall3 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS %

130 Compression perpendicular to the grain In the area of wall support there are high local stresses perpendicular to the grain. The following expression shall be satisfied: σσ cc,90,dd kk cc,90,dd ff cc,90,dd with σσ cc,90,dd = FF cc,90,dd AA ffffffff where: σσ cc,90,dd FF cc,90,dd AA ffffffff ff cc,90,dd kk cc,90,dd is the design compressive stress in the contact area perpendicular to the grain is the design load of compression perpendicular to the grain is the contact area on which the compression load (perpendicular to the grain) acts is the design compressive strength perpendicular to the grain is a factor taking into account the load configuration, possibility of splitting and degree of compressive deformation The values of the actions in the table below are related, for each wall, to the more severe combination of load for the Ultimate Limit State. Wall name Length [m] Comb. Dur. N [kn] Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent 9.74

131 Wall ULS 64 Permanent 9.76 Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 65 Medium-term Wall ULS 64 Permanent 4.07 Wall ULS 64 Permanent 2.35 Wall ULS 64 Permanent 2.35 Wall ULS 64 Permanent 2.69

132 Wall ULS 64 Permanent 2.91 Wall ULS 64 Permanent Wall ULS 64 Permanent The compression checks of the CLT panels are performed considering a wall portion of unitary length. Section: A full: Comb.: k mod: γ M: f c,90,k: σ c,90,d: CLT element section Contact area on which the compression load (perpendicular to the grain) acts More severe combination of load Modification factor taking into account the effect of the duration of load and moisture content Partial factor for a material property Design compressive strength perpendicular to the grain Design compressive stress in the contact area perpendicular to the grain Wall name Wall 1 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 6 Wall 8 Wall 9 Wall 11 Wall 13 Wall 14 Wall 15 Wall 20 Wall 21 Wall 22 Section CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 100 mm - 3 layers Afull [mm 2 /m] kc,90 Comb. kmod γm fc,90,k [MPa] σc,90,d [MPa] ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % Check

133 Wall 23 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 25 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 26 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 27 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 29 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 30 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 31 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 33 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 34 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 35 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 36 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 37 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 38 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 39 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 42 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 43 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 46 Wall 54 Wall 61 Wall 62 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % Wall 63 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 64 Wall 66 Wall 67 Wall 71 Wall 72 Wall 72 Wall 73 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS % ULS %

134 Wall 74 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 75 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 76 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 77 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall 78 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS % Wall2 Wall3 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS % ULS %

135 Shear (load in-plane) The internal stress pattern in a CLT element subjected to shear forces can lead to failure of the material in two different mechanisms: shear bearing (mechanism I) in the boards and torsion-like (mechanism II) in the gluing interfaces. The values of the actions in the table below are related, for each wall, to the more severe combination of load for the shear Ultimate Limit State. Wall name Length [m] Comb. Dur. V2 [kn] Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall exey+ 1 exey+ 6 exey- 5 exey+ 1 exey+ 6 exey- 6 exey- 6 exey- 1 exey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 5 exey+ 6 exey- 6 exey- 6 exey- 1 exey+ 1 exey+ Instantaneous 3.44 Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous 8.02 Instantaneous 1.28 Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous 4.14 Instantaneous Instantaneous 7.50 Instantaneous 7.37 Instantaneous 8.73 Instantaneous 8.32 Instantaneous 9.60 Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous 5.73 Instantaneous 14.44

136 Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall exey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 5 exey+ 5 exey+ 6 exey- 5 exey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 5 exey+ 5 exey+ Instantaneous 1.10 Instantaneous Instantaneous 6.14 Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous 7.11 Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous 7.37 Instantaneous Mechanism I - shear The internal shear stress can be evaluated as where [omissis] vv 2 tt ii,eeeeee tt ii,iiiiii ττ zz ττ yy is the shear force per linear metre acting on the CLT element is the thickness of the i-th layer having orientation parallel to the external layers is the thickness of the i-th layer having orientation parallel to the internal layers is the shear stress acting on the layers having orientation parallel to the external layers is the shear stress acting on the layers having orientation parallel to the internal layers The stress to be used in the checks is the maximum between the two: The following expression shall be satisfied ττ dd = mmmmmm(ττ zz ; ττ yy ) ττ dd ff vv,llllllllllll,dd

137 being ff vv,dd the shear strength calculated as ff vv,dd = kk mmmmmm ff vv,kk γγ MM Mechanism II torsion The internal torsional stress can be expressed as [omissis] being: MM TT WW the internal torsional moment the polar moment of resistance The polar moment of resistance is defined by the following expression [omissis] where a ref is the average width of the boards assumed equal to 150 mm. [omissis] The following expression shall be satisfied being ττ TT,dd ff TT,dd ff TT,dd the design value of the torsional strength of glued interfaces ff TT,dd = kk mmmmmm ff TT,kk γγ MM Below is the table with the shear checks for each CLT wall. The two different mechanisms (shear and torsion) are verified. Comb.: k mod: γ M: More severe combination of load Modification factor taking into account the effect of the duration of load and moisture content Partial factor for a material property f v,k: CLT characteristic shear strength (Mechanism I) τ d: Design shear stress in the layers

138 M T: Torsional moment on every glued interfaces W: Polar moment of resistance f T,k: τ T,d: Characteristic value of the torsional shear strength of the glued interfaces Design shear stress (due to torsion) in the external layers Wall name Wall 1 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 6 Wall 8 Wall 9 Wall 11 Wall 13 Wall 14 Wall 15 Wall 20 Wall 21 Wall 22 Wall 23 Wall 25 Wall 26 Wall 27 Wall 29 Section Comb. kmod γm CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 6 ex- ey- ULS 5 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 6 ex- ey- ULS 6 ex- ey- ULS 6 ex- ey- ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 2 ex+ ey+ ULS 2 ex+ ey+ ULS 2 ex+ ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ fv,lastra,k [MPa] τd [MPa] Check - shear MT [Nmm] W [mm 3 ] ft,k [MPa] τt,d [MPa] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Check - torsion % %

139 Wall 31 Wall 33 Wall 34 Wall 35 Wall 36 Wall 38 Wall 39 Wall 42 Wall 43 Wall 46 Wall 54 Wall 61 Wall 62 Wall 63 Wall 66 Wall 67 Wall 71 Wall 72 Wall 72 Wall 73 Wall3 CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints CLT 100 mm - 3 layers CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints ULS 5 ex- ey+ ULS 6 ex- ey- ULS 6 ex- ey- ULS 6 ex- ey- ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 2 ex+ ey+ ULS 2 ex+ ey+ ULS 5 ex- ey+ ULS 5 ex- ey+ ULS 6 ex- ey- ULS 5 ex- ey+ ULS 2 ex+ ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 1 ex- ey+ ULS 5 ex- ey+ ULS 5 ex- ey % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

140 Vertical joints among CLT panels of a wall The values of the actions in the vertical joints are summarized in the table below. They are related, for each wall, to the more severe combination of load for the shear Ultimate Limit State. Wall name Wall height [m] Comb. Dur. V2 [kn] Vjoint,d [kn] Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall exey+ 1 exey+ 6 exey- 5 exey+ 1 exey+ 6 exey- 6 exey- 6 exey- 1 exey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 2 ex+ ey+ 5 exey+ 6 exey- 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 1 exey+ 5 exey+ Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Instantaneous Vertical joints in CLT walls Fasteners strength The resistance of vertical joints in CLT walls is calculated in accordance to EN The resistance of the joints of each wall can be calculated by the following formula where R v,k = F v,k h s

141 R v,k F v,k h s is the characteristic shear resistance of the vertical joints among CLT panels of a wall is the characteristic load-carrying capacity of a single fastener is the height of the wall in correspondence of the joint is the spacing of the vertical joint fasteners The characteristic shear resistance of the vertical joint is where RR vv,dd = kk mmmmmm R v,k γγ MM kk mmmmmm γγ MM is the modification factor taking into account the effect of the duration of load and moisture content is the partial factor for connections Characteristic load-carrying capacity of the fasteners The load-carrying capacity of the fasteners is calculated in accordance with Johansen theory (8.2.2 of EN ) for the case timber-to-timber connection in single shear. The characteristic load-carrying capacity per shear plane per fastener, should be taken as the minimum value found from the following expressions: - Single shear FF vv,rrrr,aa = ff h,1,kk tt 1 dd FF vv,rrrr,bb = ff h,2,kk tt 2 dd FF vv,rrrr,cc = ff h,1,kk tt 1 dd ββ + 2ββ 1 + ββ tt 2 + tt ββ 3 tt 2 2 ββ 1 + tt 2 tt 1 tt 1 tt 1 tt 1 FF vv,rrrr,dd = 1,05 ff h,1,kk tt 1 dd 2ββ(1 + ββ) + 4ββ(2+ββ)MM yy,rrrr 2+ββ ff h,1,kk dd tt2 ββ 1 FF vv,rrrr,ee = 1,05 ff h,1,kk tt 2 dd 2ββ 1 + 2ββ 2 (1 + ββ) + 4ββ(1 + 2ββ)MM yy,rrrr 2 ββ ff h,1,kk dd tt 2 FF vv,rrrr,ff = 1,15 2ββ 1 + ββ 2 MM yy,rrrr ff h,1,kk dd Figura: Failure modes for timber and panel connections (Single shear).

142 - Double shear FF vv,rrrr,gg = ff h,1,kk tt 1 dd FF vv,rrrr,h = 0.5 ff h,2,kk tt 2 dd FF vv,rrrr,jj = 1,05 ff h,1,kk tt 1 dd 2ββ(1 + ββ) + 4ββ(2 + ββ)mm yy,rrrr 2 ββ 2 + ββ ff h,1,kk dd tt 1 FF vv,rrrr,kk = 1,15 2ββ 1 + ββ 2 MM yy,rrrr ff h,1,kk dd Figura: Failure modes for timber and panel connections (Double shear). Below is the table with the characteristic load-carrying capacity of the fasteners. Section CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints Fastener Kser [N/mm] Failure mode Fv,Rk [N] HBS 10 x c 4668 Vertical joints in CLT walls Fasteners strength check The table below illustrates the geometric characteristics of the panels of every wall and the shear bearing capacity R v,k of the vertical joints. Wall name Section Height of the joint [mm] sc [mm] Rv,k [kn] Wall 1 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints Wall 3 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints Wall 4 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints Wall 6 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints Wall 8 CLT 120 mm - 5 layers - vertical joints

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt EN 1998 - Design of structures for earthquake resistance Jean-Armand Calgaro Chairman of CEN/TC250 Organised with the support of the Egyptian Organization

More information

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No. CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus

More information

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building

More information

Balcony balustrades using the SG12 laminated glass system: PAGE 1 (SG12FF010717) Structural Calculations for SG12 System balustrades using 21.5mm laminated toughened glass without the need for a handrail

More information

Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER

Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER Adrian DOGARIU European Erasmus Mundus Master Course Sustainable Constructions under Natural Hazards and Catastrophic Events 520121-1-2011-1-CZ-ERA MUNDUS-EMMC Structural

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes JRC Ispra, 1-2 October 2012 1 EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue: Construction Sector Subgroup Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes JRC-Ispra, 1-2 October 2012 Organized

More information

Entrance exam Master Course

Entrance exam Master Course - 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points

More information

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum

More information

Comparison of Base Shear Force Method in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe

Comparison of Base Shear Force Method in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 66-69 (202) pp 2345-2352 Online available since 202/May/4 at www.scientific.net (202) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi:0.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.66-69.2345

More information

9-3. Structural response

9-3. Structural response 9-3. Structural response in fire František Wald Czech Technical University in Prague Objectives of the lecture The mechanical load in the fire design Response of the structure exposed to fire Levels of

More information

Module 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS

Module 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS Module 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS Topics Check for Bearing Capacity Failure Example Factor of Safety Against Overturning Factor of Safety Against Sliding Factor of Safety Against Bearing Capacity Failure

More information

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings

More information

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 2-1. Wind loads calculation 2-2. Seismic loads 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). 4-1.

More information

COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES

COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, Paper No. 6 COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES Jaime DE-LA-COLINA, MariCarmen HERNANDEZ

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 24.4m x 12.2m x 6.4m The Platoon Tent Structure (3m Bay) for 80km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ

More information

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise

More information

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only

More information

Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane

Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane Luan MURTAJ 1, Enkelejda MURTAJ 1 Pedagogue, Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering

More information

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B Volume B 3.1.4 Diaphragmatic behaviour In general, when there is eccentric loading at a floor, e.g. imposed by the horizontal seismic action, the in-plane rigidity of the slab forces all the in-plane points

More information

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511

More information

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability

More information

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads 1 7 SEISMIC LOADS 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads 7.1.1 Seismic load and design earthquake motion (1) For ordinary buildings, seismic load is evaluated using the acceleration response spectrum (see Sec.7.2)

More information

Module 4 (Lecture 16) SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT

Module 4 (Lecture 16) SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT Topics Module 4 (Lecture 16) SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT 1.1 STRIP FOUNDATION ON GRANULAR SOIL REINFORCED BY METALLIC STRIPS Mode of Failure Location of Failure Surface

More information

S TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES

S TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES M a d e f o r b u i l d i n g b u i l t f o r l i v i n g S TRUTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA LES I M P R I N T KLH Massivholz GmbH Publisher and responsible for the content: KLH Massivholz GmbH Version:

More information

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29 1. Background In close collaboration with local partners, Earthquake Damage Analysis Center (EDAC) of Bauhaus Universität Weimar initiated a Turkish German joint research project on Seismic Risk Assessment

More information

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017 Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail PAGE 1 (ref: JULB2NB280317) Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail Our ref: JULB2NB280317 Date

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads

More information

Module 7 (Lecture 27) RETAINING WALLS

Module 7 (Lecture 27) RETAINING WALLS Module 7 (Lecture 27) RETAINING WALLS Topics 1.1 RETAINING WALLS WITH METALLIC STRIP REINFORCEMENT Calculation of Active Horizontal and vertical Pressure Tie Force Factor of Safety Against Tie Failure

More information

TECHNICAL REPORT. Bending tests on glulam-clt beams connected with double-sided punched metal plate fasteners and inclined screws.

TECHNICAL REPORT. Bending tests on glulam-clt beams connected with double-sided punched metal plate fasteners and inclined screws. TECHNICAL REPORT Bending tests on glulam-clt beams connected with double-sided punched metal plate fasteners and inclined screws Nicolas Jacquier ISSN 14-1536 ISBN 978-91-7583-1-8 (pdf) Luleå 15 www.ltu.se

More information

Structural Calculations For:

Structural Calculations For: Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA 94551 D031014 Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical

More information

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings Fawad A. Najam Pennung Warnitchai Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand Email: fawad.ahmed.najam@ait.ac.th A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Project: Extreme Marquees Design check 5m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for 80km/hr Wind 4m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for 80km/hr Wind 3m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for

More information

Seismic design of bridges

Seismic design of bridges NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Seismic design of bridges Lecture 3 Ioannis N. Psycharis Capacity design Purpose To design structures of ductile behaviour

More information

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002 Abstract Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 00 Paresh V. Patel Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Nirma Institute of Technology, Ahmedabad 38481 In this article codal provisions of IS 1893

More information

Evaluation of the ductility demand in partial strength steel structures in seismic areas using non-linear static analysis

Evaluation of the ductility demand in partial strength steel structures in seismic areas using non-linear static analysis Evaluation of the ductility demand in partial strength steel structures in seismic areas using non-linear static analysis Pedro Nogueiro Department of Applied Mechanics, ESTiG, Polytechnic Institute of

More information

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EUROCODE EN1998-2 SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Basil Kolias Basic Requirements Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information

More information

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. D : SOLID MECHANICS Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. Q.2 Consider the forces of magnitude F acting on the sides of the regular hexagon having

More information

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads Chapter Objectives Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads A Bridge Deck under Bending Action Castellated Beams Post-tensioned Concrete Beam Lateral Distortion of a Beam Due to Lateral Load

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example

More information

Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report

Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report Company Name Or Logo Here Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report In accordance with Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems 2012 2 nd Edition Reference number 001 Company Name Solar

More information

Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed by the RPA for the evaluation of seismic reduction coefficient

Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed by the RPA for the evaluation of seismic reduction coefficient 33, Issue (27) 5-23 Journal of Advanced Research in Materials Science Journal homepage: www.akademiabaru.com/arms.html ISSN: 2289-7992 Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed

More information

Module 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Module 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Module 6 Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis Lesson 35 Indeterminate Trusses and Industrial rames Instructional Objectives: After reading this chapter the student will be able to

More information

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602 Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded

More information

DETERMINATION OF PERFORMANCE POINT IN CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD

DETERMINATION OF PERFORMANCE POINT IN CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD ISSN (Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization, Volume 2, Special Issue

More information

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC ENERGY DIAGRAM ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS INELASTIC WORK DONE HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION DUCTILITY

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. GTE 2016 Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. D : SOLID MECHNICS Q.1 single degree of freedom vibrating system has mass of 5 kg, stiffness of 500 N/m and damping coefficient of 100 N-s/m. To make the system

More information

STEEL JOINTS - COMPONENT METHOD APPLICATION

STEEL JOINTS - COMPONENT METHOD APPLICATION Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol. 5 (54) - 2012 Series 1: Special Issue No. 1 STEEL JOINTS - COPONENT ETHOD APPLICATION D. RADU 1 Abstract: As long as the rotation joint stiffness

More information

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,

More information

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent

More information

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

Downloaded from   Downloaded from   / 1 PURWANCHAL UNIVERSITY III SEMESTER FINAL EXAMINATION-2002 LEVEL : B. E. (Civil) SUBJECT: BEG256CI, Strength of Material Full Marks: 80 TIME: 03:00 hrs Pass marks: 32 Candidates are required to give their

More information

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310

More information

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures Basic principles Ioannis N. Psycharis Basic considerations Design earthquake: small

More information

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify

More information

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Verification of a Micropile Foundation Engineering manual No. 36 Update 02/2018 Verification of a Micropile Foundation Program: File: Pile Group Demo_manual_en_36.gsp The objective of this engineering manual is to explain the application of

More information

TECHNICAL NOTE AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF POINT SPRING SUPPORTS BASED ON DEFINED SOIL PROFILES AND COLUMN-FOOTING PROPERTIES

TECHNICAL NOTE AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF POINT SPRING SUPPORTS BASED ON DEFINED SOIL PROFILES AND COLUMN-FOOTING PROPERTIES COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., FEBRUARY 2016 TECHNICAL NOTE AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF POINT SPRING SUPPORTS BASED ON DEFINED SOIL PROFILES AND COLUMN-FOOTING PROPERTIES Introduction This technical note

More information

Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings

Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings Dj. Ladjinovic, A. Raseta, A. Radujkovic & R. Folic University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad,

More information

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Practical Design to Eurocode 2 Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,

More information

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E.

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E. Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure Gordon Wray, P.E. SEAONC Protective Systems Subcommittee Objectives > Current Unique Code Requirements More sophisticated engineering analysis Geotechnical need

More information

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames Kawai, N. 1 ABSTRACT Relating to the revision of Building Standard Law of Japan, the application

More information

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement. Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic

More information

Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )

Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING ) Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING ) 5.1 DEFINITION A construction member is subjected to centric (axial) tension or compression if in any cross section the single distinct stress

More information

Limit analysis of brick masonry shear walls with openings under later loads by rigid block modeling

Limit analysis of brick masonry shear walls with openings under later loads by rigid block modeling Limit analysis of brick masonry shear walls with openings under later loads by rigid block modeling F. Portioli, L. Cascini, R. Landolfo University of Naples Federico II, Italy P. Foraboschi IUAV University,

More information

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes

More information

Compression perpendicular to the grain

Compression perpendicular to the grain Compression perpendicular to the grain Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Hans Joachim Blass Dr.-Ing. Rainer Görlacher Universität Karlsruhe Kaiserstr. 1 71 Karlsruhe Blass@holz.uka.de Goerlacher@holz.uka.de Summary

More information

Earthquake Simulation Tests on a 1:5 Scale 10 - Story RC Residential Building Model

Earthquake Simulation Tests on a 1:5 Scale 10 - Story RC Residential Building Model Earthquake Simulation Tests on a 1:5 Scale 1 - Story RC Residential Building Model H. S. Lee, S. J. Hwang, K. B. Lee, & C. B. Kang Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea S. H. Lee & S. H. Oh Pusan

More information

CALCULATION MODE FOR ALUHD23/SH18 Traction and shear aluminium plate for Alufoot R system

CALCULATION MODE FOR ALUHD23/SH18 Traction and shear aluminium plate for Alufoot R system CALCULATION MODE FOR ALUHD23/SH18 Traction and shear aluminium plate for Alufoot R system INTRODUCTION ALUHD23/SH18 plate, being part of Alufoot system, is used in order to connect the CLT wall to the

More information

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD Architecture 314 Structures I Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake Load Combinations ASD LRFD University of Michigan, TCAUP Structures I Slide 1 of 27

More information

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 Structure & Loads Determine forces that act on structures causing it to deform, bend, and stretch Forces push/pull on objects Structures are loaded by: > Dead loads permanent

More information

Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition

Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition ABSTRACT: Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition G. Dok ve O. Kırtel Res. Assist., Department of Civil Engineering, Sakarya University,

More information

Dynamic behavior of turbine foundation considering full interaction among facility, structure and soil

Dynamic behavior of turbine foundation considering full interaction among facility, structure and soil Dynamic behavior of turbine foundation considering full interaction among facility, structure and soil Fang Ming Scholl of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, China Wang Tao Institute of

More information

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3.1 Definitions Build-up members, made out by coupling two or more simple profiles for obtaining stronger and stiffer section are very common in steel structures,

More information

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2 Detailing Lecture 9 16 th November 2017 Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2 EC2 Section 8 - Detailing of Reinforcement - General Rules Bar spacing, Minimum bend diameter Anchorage of reinforcement

More information

Coulomb s Law and Coulomb s Constant

Coulomb s Law and Coulomb s Constant Pre-Lab Quiz / PHYS 224 Coulomb s Law and Coulomb s Constant Your Name: Lab Section: 1. What will you investigate in this lab? 2. Consider a capacitor created when two identical conducting plates are placed

More information

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.

More information

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State

More information

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).

More information

Dynamic Analysis and Modeling of Wood-framed Shear Walls

Dynamic Analysis and Modeling of Wood-framed Shear Walls Dynamic Analysis and Modeling of Wood-framed Shear Walls Yasumura, M. 1 ABSTRACT Dynamic performance of wood-framed shear walls was analyzed by means of the non-linear earthquake response analysis and

More information

KIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES. Static calculations of 12 m tent. Prepared for: Kibæk pressening. Revision 0, March 23, 2016

KIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES. Static calculations of 12 m tent. Prepared for: Kibæk pressening. Revision 0, March 23, 2016 Svend Ole Hansen ApS SCT. JØRGENS ALLÉ 5C DK-1615 KØBENHAVN V DENMARK TEL: (+45) 33 25 38 38 WWW.SOHANSEN.DK WIND ENGINEERING FLUID DYNAMICS KIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES Static calculations

More information

Load combinations will be created according to the below option.

Load combinations will be created according to the below option. Eurocode Wizards The Eurocode Wizard option shows a dialogue box where various pre-defined beams, frames, rafters and trusses can be stated easily and roof, snow, wind and imposed loads as well as load

More information

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED Ministry of Municipal Affairs PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED CHANGE NUMBER: SOURCE: B-04-01-15 Ontario-NBC CODE REFERENCE: Division B / 4.1.8.2. Division B / 4.1.8.4.

More information

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 1 st. Semester Examination 2004/2005 Academic Session October 2004 EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design Time : 3 hours Instruction to candidates: 1. Ensure that this paper contains

More information

Influence of column web stiffening on the seismic behaviour of beam-tocolumn

Influence of column web stiffening on the seismic behaviour of beam-tocolumn Influence of column web stiffening on the seismic behaviour of beam-tocolumn joints A.L. Ciutina & D. Dubina The Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania ABSTRACT: The present paper summarises the

More information

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum Overview of Structural Dynamics Structure Members, joints, strength, stiffness, ductility Structure

More information

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110 CTS Netherlands B.V. Riga 10 2993 LW Barendrecht The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)180 531027 (office) Fax: +31 (0)180 531848 (office) E-mail: info@cts-netherlands.com Website: www.cts-netherlands.com Chamber

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

Special edition paper

Special edition paper Development of New Aseismatic Structure Using Escalators Kazunori Sasaki* Atsushi Hayashi* Hajime Yoshida** Toru Masuda* Aseismatic reinforcement work is often carried out in parallel with improvement

More information

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder 16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders

More information

STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706. Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD

STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706. Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706 Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD 1 By the end of today s course You will be able to answer: What are NSA advantages over other structural

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 3 ANALYSIS METHODS OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BRIDGES 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Loadings for the Analysis

More information

Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna APPLICATION OF CRESCENT-SHAPED BRACES IN REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES

Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna APPLICATION OF CRESCENT-SHAPED BRACES IN REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna Faculty of Engineering and Architecture INTERNATIONAL MASTER COURSE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Master thesis in ADVANCED DESIGN OF STRUCTURES APPLICATION OF CRESCENT-SHAPED

More information

Aim of the study Experimental determination of mechanical parameters Local buckling (wrinkling) Failure maps Optimization of sandwich panels

Aim of the study Experimental determination of mechanical parameters Local buckling (wrinkling) Failure maps Optimization of sandwich panels METNET Workshop October 11-12, 2009, Poznań, Poland Experimental and numerical analysis of sandwich metal panels Zbigniew Pozorski, Monika Chuda-Kowalska, Robert Studziński, Andrzej Garstecki Poznan University

More information

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes October 2014 Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of Abstract tubular columns and arches Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Contact:

More information

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR SG10 SYSTEM BALUSTRADES USING 21.5mm LAMINATED TOUGHENED GLASS without the need for a handrail BY BALCONY SYSTEMS LIMITED Unit 6 Systems House Eastbourne Road Blindly Heath

More information

Seismic Performance of RC Building Using Spectrum Response and Pushover Analyses

Seismic Performance of RC Building Using Spectrum Response and Pushover Analyses Seismic Performance of RC Building Using Spectrum Response and Pushover Analyses Mehani Youcef (&), Kibboua Abderrahmane, and Chikh Benazouz National Earthquake Engineering Research Center (CGS), Algiers,

More information

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION INEASTIC SEISMIC DISPACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVAENT INEARIZATION M. S. Günay 1 and H. Sucuoğlu 1 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University,

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Easy Signs Pty. Ltd. Project: Design check 3m 3m, 3m 4.5m & 3m 6m Folding Marquees for Pop-up Gazebos for 45km/hr Wind Speed Reference: Easy Signs Pty. Ltd. Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked

More information