PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED"

Transcription

1 Ministry of Municipal Affairs PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED CHANGE NUMBER: SOURCE: B Ontario-NBC CODE REFERENCE: Division B / Division B / Division B / DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT This proposed change captures changes to Articles , and required as a result of an update to the seismic hazard model. EXISTING 2012 BUILDING CODE PROVISION(S) Notation (See Appendix A.) (1) In this Subsection, A r = response amplification factor to account for type of attachment of mechanical/electrical equipment, as defined in Sentence (1), A x = amplification factor at level x to account for variation of response of mechanical/electrical equipment with elevation within the building, as defined in Sentence (1), B x = ratio at level x used to determine torsional sensitivity, as defined in Sentence (9), B = maximum value of B x, as defined in Sentence (9), C p = seismic coefficient for mechanical/electrical equipment, as defined in Sentence (1), D nx = plan dimension of the building at level x perpendicular to the direction of seismic loading being considered, e x = distance measured perpendicular to the direction of earthquake loading between centre of mass and centre of rigidity at the level being considered, F a = acceleration-based site coefficient, as defined in Sentence (4), F t = portion of V to be concentrated at the top of the structure, as defined in Sentence (6), F v = velocity-based site coefficient, as defined in Sentence (4), F x = lateral force applied to level x, as defined in Sentence (6), h i, h n, h x = the height above the base (i = 0) to level i, n, or x respectively, where the base of the structure is the level at which horizontal earthquake motions are considered to be imparted to the structure, h s = interstorey height (h i - h i-1 ), I E = earthquake importance factor of the structure, as described in Sentence (1), Page 1 Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2016

2 J = numerical reduction coefficient for base overturning moment, as defined in Sentence (5), J X = numerical reduction coefficient for overturning moment at level x, as defined in Sentence (7), Level i = any level in the building, i =1 for first level above the base, Level n = level that is uppermost in the main portion of the structure, Level x = level that is under design consideration, M v = factor to account for higher mode effect on base shear, as defined in Sentence (5), M x = overturning moment at level x, as defined in Sentence (7), N = total number of storeys above exterior grade to level n, N 60 = Average Standard Penetration Resistance for the top 30 m, corrected to a rod energy efficiency of 60% of the theoretical maximum, PGA = Peak Ground Acceleration expressed as a ratio to gravitational acceleration, as defined in Sentence (1), PI = plasticity index for clays, R d = ductility-related force modification factor reflecting the capability of a structure to dissipate energy through reversed cyclic inelastic behaviour, as given in Article , R o = overstrength-related force modification factor accounting for the dependable portion of reserve strength in a structure designed according to these provisions, as defined in Article , S P = horizontal force factor for part or portion of a building and its anchorage, as given in Sentence (1), S(T) = design spectral response acceleration, expressed as a ratio to gravitational acceleration, for a period of T, as defined in Sentence (7), S a (T) = 5% damped spectral response acceleration, expressed as a ratio to gravitational acceleration, for a period of T, as defined in Sentence (1), SFRS = Seismic Force Resisting System(s) is that part of the structural system that has been considered in the design to provide the required resistance to the earthquake forces and effects defined in Subsection , S u = average undrained shear strength in the top 30 m of soil, T = period in seconds, T a = fundamental lateral period of vibration of the building or structure in seconds in the direction under consideration, as defined in Sentence (3), T x = floor torque at level x, as defined in Sentence (10), V = lateral earthquake design force at the base of the structure, as determined by Article , V d = lateral earthquake design force at the base of the structure, as determined by Article , V e = lateral earthquake elastic force at the base of the structure, as determined by Article , V ed = lateral earthquake design elastic force at the base of the structure, as determined by Article , V P = lateral force on a part of the structure, as determined by Article , V s = average shear wave velocity in the top 30 m of soil or rock, W = dead load, as defined in Article , except that the minimum partition load as defined in Sentence (3) need not exceed 0.5 kpa, plus 25% of the design snow load specified in Subsection , plus 60% of the storage load for areas used for storage, except that storage garages need not be considered storage areas, and the full contents of any tanks, W i, W x = portion of W that is located at or is assigned to level i or x respectively, Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 2

3 W P = weight of a part or portion of a structure, e.g., cladding, partitions and appendages, δ ave = average displacement of the structure at level x, as defined in Sentence (9), and δ max = maximum displacement of the structure at level x, as defined in Sentence (9) Site Properties (1) The peak ground acceleration (PGA) and the 5% damped spectral response acceleration values, S a (T), for the reference ground conditions ( C in Table A.) for periods T of 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1.0 s, and 2.0 s, shall be determined in accordance with Subsection and are based on a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years. (2) Site classifications for ground shall conform to Table A. and shall be determined using Vs except as provided in Sentence (3). (3) If average shear wave velocity, V s, is not known, shall be determined from energy-corrected Average Standard Penetration Resistance, N 60, or from soil average undrained shear strength, s u, as noted in Table A., N60 and s u being calculated based on rational analysis. (See Appendix A.) (4) Acceleration- and velocity-based site coefficients, F a and F v, shall conform to Tables B. and C. using linear interpolation for intermediate values of S a (0.2) and S a (1.0). (5) Site-specific evaluation is required to determine F a and F v for F. (6) For structures with a fundamental period of vibration equal to or less than 0.5 s that are built on liquefiable soils, and the corresponding values of F a and F v may be determined as described in Tables A., B., and C. by assuming that the soils are not liquefiable. Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 3

4 Ground Profile Name Table A. ification for Seismic Site Response Forming Part of Sentences (1) to (3) Average Shear Wave Velocity, V (m/s) s Average Properties in Top 30 m Average Standard Penetration Soil Undrained Shear Strength, Resistance, N 60 su A Hard rock (1)(2) V s > 1500 N/A N/A B Rock (1) 760 < V s 1500 N/A N/A C Very dense soil and soft rock 360 < V s < 760 N 60 > 50 su > 100 kpa D Stiff soil 180 < V s < N kpa < su 100 kpa V s < 180 N 60 < 15 su < 50 kpa Any profile with more than 3 m of soil with the following characteristics: E Soft soil plasticity index: PI > 20 moisture content w 40%, and undrained shear strength: su < 25 kpa F Other soils (3) Site-specific evaluation required Column Notes to Table A.: (1) es A and B, hard rock and rock, are not to be used if there is more than 3 m of softer materials between the rock and the underside of footing or mat foundations. The appropriate for such cases is determined on the basis of the average properties of the total thickness of the softer materials. (See Appendix A.) (2) If V s has been measured in-situ, the Fa and Fv values derived from Tables B. and C. may be multiplied by (1500 / V s ) 1/2. (3) Other soils include: (a) liquefiable soils, quick and highly sensitive clays, collapsible weakly cemented soils, and other soils susceptible to failure or collapse under seismic loading, (b) peat and/or highly organic clays greater than 3 m in thickness, (c) highly plastic clays (PI > 75) more than 8 m thick, and (d) soft to medium stiff clays more than 30 m thick. Table B. Values of Fa as a Function of and Sa(0.2) Forming Part of Sentence (4) Values of Fa Sa(0.2) 0.25 Sa(0.2) = 0.5 Sa(0.2) = 0.75 Sa(0.2) = 1.00 Sa(0.2) 1.25 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Column Notes to Table B.: (1) See Sentence (5). Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 4

5 Table C. Values of Fv as a Function of and Sa(1.0) Forming Part of Sentence (4) Values of Fv Sa(1.0) 0.1 Sa(1.0) = 0.2 Sa(1.0) = 0.3 Sa(1.0) = 0.4 Sa(1.0) 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Column Notes to Table C.: (1) See Sentence (5). (7) The design spectral acceleration values of S(T) shall be determined as follows, using linear interpolation for intermediate values of T: S(T) = F a S a (0.2) for T 0.2 s = F v S a (0.5) or F a S a (0.2), whichever is smaller for T = 0.5 s = F v S a (1.0) for T = 1.0 s = F v S a (2.0) for T = 2.0 s = F v S a (2.0) / 2 for T 4.0 s Elements of Structures, Non-Structural Components and Equipment (See Appendix A.) (1) Except as provided in Sentences (2) and (8), elements and components of buildings described in Table and their connections to the structure shall be designed to accommodate the building deflections calculated in accordance with Article and the element or component deflections calculated in accordance with Sentence (10), and shall be designed for a lateral force, V P, applied through the centre of mass of the element or component that is equal to: where, F a = as defined in Table B., V p = 0.3F a S a (0.2) I E S p W p S a (0.2) = spectral response acceleration value at 0.2 s, as defined in Sentence (1), I E = importance factor for the building, as defined in Article , S p = C p A r A x /R p (the maximum value of S p shall be taken as 4.0 and the minimum value of S p shall be taken as 0.7), where, C p = element or component factor from Table , A r = element or component force amplification factor from Table , A x = height factor (1 + 2 h x / h n ), R p = element or component response modification factor from Table , and W p = weight of the component or element. Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 5

6 PROPOSED CODE CHANGE Revise existing Articles , and as follows: Notation (See Appendix A.) (1) In this Subsection, A r = response amplification factor to account for type of attachment of mechanical/electrical equipment, as defined in Sentence (1), A x = amplification factor at level x to account for variation of response of mechanical/electrical equipment with elevation within the building, as defined in Sentence (1), B x = ratio at level x used to determine torsional sensitivity, as defined in Sentence (9), B = maximum value of B x, as defined in Sentence (9), C p = seismic coefficient for mechanical/electrical equipment, as defined in Sentence (1), D nx = plan dimension of the building at level x perpendicular to the direction of seismic loading being considered, e x = distance measured perpendicular to the direction of earthquake loading between centre of mass and centre of rigidity at the level being considered (See Appendix A), F a = acceleration-based site coefficient for application in Subsection , as defined in Sentence (4)Sentence (7), F(PGA) = site coefficient for PGA, as defined in Sentence (5), F(PGV) = site coefficient for PGV, as defined in Sentence (5), F s = site coefficient as defined in Sentence (2) for application in Article F(T) = site coefficient for spectral acceleration, as defined in Sentence (5), F t = portion of V to be concentrated at the top of the structure, as defined in Sentence (6), F v = velocity-based site coefficient for application in Subsection , as defined in Sentence (4) (7), F x = lateral force applied to level x, as defined in Sentence (6), h i, h n, h x = the height above the base (i = 0) to level i, n, or x respectively, where the base of the structure is the level at which horizontal earthquake motions are considered to be imparted to the structure, h s = interstorey height (h i - h i-1 ), I E = earthquake importance factor of the structure, as described in Sentence (1), J = numerical reduction coefficient for base overturning moment, as defined in Sentence (5), J X = numerical reduction coefficient for overturning moment at level x, as defined in Sentence (7), Level i = any level in the building, i =1 for first level above the base, Level n = level that is uppermost in the main portion of the structure, Level x = level that is under design consideration, M v = factor to account for higher mode effect on base shear, as defined in Sentence (5), M x = overturning moment at level x, as defined in Sentence (7), N = total number of storeys above exterior grade to level n, Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 6

7 N 60 = Average Standard Penetration Resistance for the top 30 m, corrected to a rod energy efficiency of 60% of the theoretical maximum, PGA = Peak Ground Acceleration expressed as a ratio to gravitational acceleration, as defined in Sentence (1), PGA ref = reference PGA for determining F(T), F(PGA) and F(PGV), as defined in Sentence (4), PGV = Peak Ground Velocity, in m/s, as defined in Sentence (1), PI = plasticity index for clays, R d = ductility-related force modification factor reflecting the capability of a structure to dissipate energy through reversed cyclic inelastic behaviour, as given in Article , R o = overstrength-related force modification factor accounting for the dependable portion of reserve strength in a structure designed according to these provisions, as defined in Article , R s = combined overstrength and ductility-related modification factor, as defined in Sentence (7), for application in Article , S P = horizontal force factor for part or portion of a building and its anchorage, as given in Sentence (1), S(T) = design spectral response acceleration, expressed as a ratio to gravitational acceleration, for a period of T, as defined in Sentence (7), S a (T) = 5% damped spectral response acceleration, expressed as a ratio to gravitational acceleration, for a period of T, as defined in Sentence (1), SFRS = Seismic Force Resisting System(s) is that part of the structural system that has been considered in the design to provide the required resistance to the earthquake forces and effects defined in Subsection , S u = average undrained shear strength in the top 30 m of soil, T = period in seconds, T a = fundamental lateral period of vibration of the building or structure in seconds in the direction under consideration, as defined in Sentence (3), T x = floor torque at level x, as defined in Sentence (10), V = lateral earthquake design force at the base of the structure, as determined by Article , V d = lateral earthquake design force at the base of the structure, as determined by Article , V e = lateral earthquake elastic force at the base of the structure, as determined by Article , V ed = lateral earthquake design elastic force at the base of the structure, as determined by Article , V P = lateral force on a part of the structure, as determined by Article , V s = lateral earthquake design force at the base of the structure, as determined by Sentence (7), for application in Article , V s30 = average shear wave velocity in the top 30 m of soil or rock, W = dead load, as defined in Article , except that the minimum partition load as defined in Sentence (3) need not exceed 0.5 kpa, plus 25% of the design snow load specified in Subsection , plus 60% of the storage load for areas used for storage, except that storage garages need not be considered storage areas, and the full contents of any tanks (See Appendix A), W i, W x = portion of W that is located at or is assigned to level i or x respectively, W P = weight of a part or portion of a structure, e.g., cladding, partitions and appendages, Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 7

8 W t = sum of W i over the height of the building, for application in Sentence (7), δ ave = average displacement of the structure at level x, as defined in Sentence (9), and δ max = maximum displacement of the structure at level x, as defined in Sentence (9) Site Properties (1) The peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), and the 5% damped spectral response acceleration values, S a (T), for the reference ground conditions ( C in Table A.) for periods T of 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1.0 s, and 2.0 s, 5.0 s and 10.0 s shall be determined in accordance with Subsection and are based on a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years. Table A. ification for Seismic Site Response Forming Part of Sentences (1) to (3) Ground Profile Name Average Shear Wave Velocity, V s30 (m/s) Average Properties in Top 30 m Average Standard Penetration Resistance, N 60 Soil Undrained Shear Strength, su A Hard rock (1)(2) V s30 > 1500 N/A N/A B Rock (1) 760 < V s N/A N/A C Very dense soil and soft rock 360 < V s30 < 760 N 60 > 50 su > 100 kpa D Stiff soil 180 < V s30 < N kpa < su 100 kpa V s30 < 180 N 60 < 15 su < 50 kpa E Soft soil Any profile with more than 3 m of soil with the following characteristics: plasticity index: PI > 20 moisture content w 40%, and undrained shear strength: su < 25 kpa F Other soils (3) Site-specific evaluation required Column Notes to Table A.: (1) es A and B, hard rock and rock, are not to be used if there is more than 3 m of softer materials between the rock and the underside of footing or mat foundations. The appropriate for such cases is determined on the basis of the average properties of the total thickness of the softer materials. (See Appendix A.) (2) If Where V s30 has been measured in-situ, the Fa and Fv the F(T) values for A derived from Tables B. to G are permitted to be multiplied and C. may be multiplied by the factor 0.04+(1500 / V s30 ) 1/2. (3) Other soils include: (a) liquefiable soils, quick and highly sensitive clays, collapsible weakly cemented soils, and other soils susceptible to failure or collapse under seismic loading, (b) peat and/or highly organic clays greater than 3 m in thickness, (c) highly plastic clays (PI > 75) more than 8 m thick, and (d) soft to medium stiff clays more than 30 m thick. Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 8

9 (2) Site classifications for ground shall conform to Table A. and shall be determined using V s30 provided in, or where V s30 is not known, using Sentence (3). except as (3) If average shear wave velocity, V s30, is not known, shall be determined from energy-corrected Average Standard Penetration Resistance, N 60, or from soil average undrained shear strength, s u, as noted in Table A., N60 and s u being calculated based on rational analysis. (See Appendix A.) (4) For the purpose of determining the values of F(T) to be used in the calculation of design spectral acceleration, S(T), in Sentence (9), and the values of F(PGA) and F(PGV), the value of PGA ref to be used with Tables B. to I. shall be taken as (a) 0.8 PGA where the ratio S a (0.2)/PGA < 2.0, and (b) 1 PGA otherwise. (45) The values of the site coefficient for design spectral acceleration at period T, F(T), and of similar coefficients F(PGA) and F(PGV), Acceleration- and velocity-based site coefficients, F a and F v, shall conform to Tables B. and C.to I. using linear interpolation for intermediate values of PGA ref S a (0.2) and S a (1.0). Table B. Values of FaF(0.2) as a Function of and Sa(0.2)PGAref Forming Part of Sentence (4) and (5) Sa(0.2) 0.25 PGAref 0.1 Sa(0.2) = 0.5 PGAref = 0.2 Values of Fa(0.2) Sa(0.2) = 0.75 PGAref = 0.3 Sa(0.2) = 1.00 PGAref = 0.4 Sa(0.2) 1.25 PGAref 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Column Notes to Table B.: (1) See Sentence (5).Sentence (6) Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 9

10 Table C. Values of Fv(0.5) as a Function of and Sa(1.0)PGAref Forming Part of Sentence (4) and (5) Sa(1.0) 0.1 PGAref 0.1 Sa(1.0) = 0.2 PGAref = 0.2 Values of F(0.5)v Sa(1.0) = 0.3 PGAref = 0.3 Sa(1.0) = 0.4 PGAref = 0.4 Sa(1.0) 0.5 PGAref 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Column Notes to Table C.: (1) See Sentence (5).Sentence (6). Table D. Values of F(1.0) as a Function of and PGA ref Forming part of Sentence (4) and (5) Values of F(1.0) PGA ref 0.1 PGA ref = 0.2 PGA ref = 0.3 PGA ref = 0.4 PGA ref 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Note to Table D.: (1) See Sentence (6). Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 10

11 Table E. Values of F(2.0) as a Function of and PGA ref Forming part of Sentence (4) and (5) Values of F(2.0) PGA ref 0.1 PGA ref = 0.2 PGA ref = 0.3 PGA ref = 0.4 PGA ref 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Note to Table E.: (1) See Sentence (6). Table F. Values of F(5.0) as a Function of and PGA ref Forming part of Sentence (4) and (5) Values of F(5.0) PGA ref 0.1 PGA ref = 0.2 PGA ref = 0.3 PGA ref = 0.4 PGA ref 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Note to Table F.: (1) See Sentence (6). Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 11

12 Table G. Values of F(10.0) as a Function of and PGA ref Forming part of Sentence (4) and (5) Values of F(10.0) PGA ref 0.1 PGA ref = 0.2 PGA ref = 0.3 PGA ref = 0.4 PGA ref 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Note to Table G.: (1) See Sentence (6). Table H. Values of F(PGA) as a Function of and PGA ref Forming part of Sentence (4) and (5) Values of F(PGA) PGA ref 0.1 PGA ref = 0.2 PGA ref = 0.3 PGA ref = 0.4 PGA ref 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Note to Table H.: (1) See Sentence (6). Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 12

13 Table I. Values of F(PGV) as a Function of and PGA ref Forming part of Sentence (4) and (5) Values of F(PGV) PGA ref 0.1 PGA ref = 0.2 PGA ref = 0.3 PGA ref = 0.4 PGA ref 0.5 A B C D E F (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Note to Table I.: (1) See Sentence (6). (56) Site-specific evaluation is required to determine F a and F(T) v, F(PGA) and F(PGV) for F. (7) For all applications in Subsection , F a = F(0.2) and F v = F(1.0). (68) For structures with a fundamental period of vibration equal to or less than 0.5 s that are built on liquefiable soils, and the corresponding values of F(T) a and F v may be determined as described in Tables A., B., and C. by assuming that the soils are not liquefiable. (79) The design spectral acceleration values of S(T) shall be determined as follows, using linear interpolation for intermediate values of T: S(T) = F(0.2) a S a (0.2) or F(0.5)S a (0.5), whichever is larger for T 0.2 s = F(0.5) v S a (0.5) or F a S a (0.2), whichever is smaller for T = 0.5 s = F(1.0) v S a (1.0) for T = 1.0 s = F(2.0) v S a (2.0) for T = 2.0 s = F(5.0) v S a (5.0)(2.0)/2 for T 4.0= 5.0 s = F(10.0)S a (10.0) for T 10.0 S Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 13

14 Elements of Structures, Non-Structural Components and Equipment (See Appendix A.) (1) Except as provided in Sentences (2) and (8), elements and components of buildings described in Table and their connections to the structure shall be designed to accommodate the building deflections calculated in accordance with Article and the element or component deflections calculated in accordance with Sentence (10), and shall be designed for a lateral force, V P, applied through the centre of mass of the element or component that is equal to: where, V p = 0.3F a S a (0.2) I E S p W p F a = as defined in Sentence (7)Table B., S a (0.2) = spectral response acceleration value at 0.2 s, as defined in Sentence (1), I E = importance factor for the building, as defined in Article , S p = C p A r A x /R p (the maximum value of S p shall be taken as 4.0 and the minimum value of S p shall be taken as 0.7), where, C p = element or component factor from Table , A r = element or component force amplification factor from Table , A x = height factor (1 + 2 h x / h n ), R p = element or component response modification factor from Table , and W p = weight of the component or element. RATIONALE FOR CHANGE Problem/General Background A major update of seismic hazard model in Canada has been undertaken to incorporate current knowledge on the subject and alignment with modern seismic hazard maps used in building codes in the United States and other jurisdictions. The update of seismic model involves incorporation of new GMPE (Ground Motion Prediction Equations) for most locations in Canada, inclusion of Cascadia subduction source probabilistically to seismic hazard for areas of western Canada and the explicit inclusion of fault sources such as those in Haida Gwaii and the Yukon. Some provisions in Article and are not aligned with the new seismic hazard model and need to be revised. Justification/Explanation This proposed change would harmonize requirements with the model National Building Code of Canada. The major changes required as a result of adoption of new hazard values are as follows: Article : Notation for terms F(T), F(PGA),F(PGV), PGA ref, PGV added as these are new terms introduced in the Building Code, Notation for Fa and Fv revised to align with the changes proposed in the Building Code Sentence (1) Spectral acceleration values for 5 and 10 s have been added in subsection on the Building Code, Peak Ground Velocity ( PGV) has also been added. Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 14

15 Sentence (4) The attenuation of ground motion in Eastern Canada is less than in the West. The direct use of PGA would give F(T) values with larger non-linear de-amplification effects in the east than is appropriate for their sustained level of shaking. This would be unconservative and thus have potential safety implications. Consequently an adjustment factor is needed to provide for appropriate foundation factors at eastern sites Sentence (5) A much expanded database of ground motion recordings in earthquakes, since the current Fa and Fv factors were established, allows determination of site amplifications at a wide range of horizontal periods of vibration, which have been incorporated into modern Ground Motion Prediction Equations. Accordingly, period dependant foundation factors and foundation factors for PGA and PGV have been proposed. Sentence (6) Editorial revision to coordinate shift from Fa and Fv to F(T), F(PGA) and F(PGV) Sentence (7) Definition of Fa and Fv in terms of F(T) to coordinate with other provisions in Article as triggers and other formulae in Article are currently using Fa and Fv instead of F(T). Sentence (8) Editorial revision to coordinate with shift from Fa and Fv to F(T) Sentence (9) Formulae for Design Spectral response acceleration are now expressed in terms of F(T) to incorporate use of period based foundation factors. The values for design spectral response at 5 and 10 seconds have been added. For some localities, S(0.5) is larger than S(0.2). Considering that it is not a good practice to design on the basis of a spectrum in which the S value increases with period, the design spectral acceleration expression has been modified. Article : Editorial revision to correct reference for Fa Cost/Benefit Implications In some location the assessed hazard has gone up and in other areas it has gone down. There may be cost increases or decreases wherever the estimated hazard has changed. In many localities in eastern Canada the estimated hazard has decreased, which will result in cost savings.. There may be cost increase or decrease of the order of 1% of the overall cost of the building wherever the estimated hazard has changed. Enforcement Implications None Who is Affected Building officials, Consultants, builders and Building Owners. Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 15

16 Objective Based Analysis Provision Objective/Functional Statement Division B (1) Division B (1) 1 [F20-OS2.1] (1) 1 [F20-OP2.1][F22-OP2.4] (2) 2 [F20-OS2.1] (2) 2 [F20-OP2.1][F22-OP2.4] (3) 3 (4) [F20-OS2.1] (4) [F20-OP2.1][F22-OP2.4] (5) 4 [F20-OS2.1] (5) 4 [F20-OP2.1][F22-OP2.4] (6) 5 [F20-OS2.1] (6) 5 [F20-OP2.1][F22-OP2.4] (7) (8) 6 (9) 7 [F20-OS2.1] (9) 7 [F20-OP2.1][F22-OP2.4] Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 16

17 Provision Objective/Functional Statement Division B (1) [F20, F22-OP2.3] [F22-OP2.4] (1) [F20, F22-OS2.4] OTHER SUPPORTING MATERIALS Copyright Queen s Printer for Ontario 2015 Page 17

Overview of National Seismic Hazard Maps for the next National Building Code

Overview of National Seismic Hazard Maps for the next National Building Code Overview of National Seismic Hazard Maps for the next National Building Code John Adams Earthquakes Canada Geological Survey of Canada Copyright. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2004 CSCE Workshop

More information

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No. CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus

More information

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum

More information

Geotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual. Stuart Edwards, P.E Geotechnical Consultant Workshop

Geotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual. Stuart Edwards, P.E Geotechnical Consultant Workshop Geotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual Stuart Edwards, P.E. 2017 Geotechnical Consultant Workshop Changes Role of Geotechnical Engineer Background Methodology Worked

More information

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt EN 1998 - Design of structures for earthquake resistance Jean-Armand Calgaro Chairman of CEN/TC250 Organised with the support of the Egyptian Organization

More information

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. Background to Some of the Seismic Design Provisions of the 2015 National Building Code of Canada

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. Background to Some of the Seismic Design Provisions of the 2015 National Building Code of Canada Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering Background to Some of the Seismic Design Provisions of the 2015 National Building Code of Canada Journal: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering Manuscript ID cjce-2014-0385.r1

More information

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings

More information

Evaluating the Seismic Coefficient for Slope Stability Analyses

Evaluating the Seismic Coefficient for Slope Stability Analyses Evaluating the Seismic Coefficient for Slope Stability Analyses by Edward Kavazanjian, Jr., Ph.D., P.E.,D.GE., NAE Ira A. Fulton Professor of Geotechnical Engineering School of Sustainable Engineering

More information

New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16

New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16 New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16 Building EERI Seismic Seminar on Safety Next Generation Council Webinar Attenuation Models July 28, 2017 Charlie Kircher Kircher & Associates Palo Alto, California

More information

Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code

Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code Tuna Onur, Ph.D. Onur Seemann Consulting, Inc. NICC, Vancouver, BC, 28-30 September 2016 Southwestern Canada: Cascadia Subduction Zone + Crustal

More information

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1 SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1 Seismic Hazard Analysis Deterministic procedures Probabilistic procedures USGS hazard

More information

Micro Seismic Hazard Analysis

Micro Seismic Hazard Analysis Micro Seismic Hazard Analysis Mark van der Meijde INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION Overview Site effects Soft ground effect Topographic effect Liquefaction Methods

More information

Lecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings

Lecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings 1 Lecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings Course Instructor: Dr. Carlos E. Ventura, P.Eng. Department of Civil Engineering The University of British Columbia ventura@civil.ubc.ca Short Course for CSCE

More information

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent

More information

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads 1 7 SEISMIC LOADS 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads 7.1.1 Seismic load and design earthquake motion (1) For ordinary buildings, seismic load is evaluated using the acceleration response spectrum (see Sec.7.2)

More information

An Overview of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

An Overview of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering An Overview of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Sudhir K Jain Slide 1 Outline Introduction to Seismic Design Principle Dynamic Soil Properties Site Effects Soil Structure Interaction Issues for Foundation

More information

Seismic Evaluation of Tailing Storage Facility

Seismic Evaluation of Tailing Storage Facility Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2010 Conference, Perth, Western Australia Seismic Evaluation of Tailing Storage Facility Jonathan Z. Liang 1, David Elias 2 1 Senior Geotechnical Engineer, GHD

More information

Chapter 3. Geotechnical Design Considerations

Chapter 3. Geotechnical Design Considerations Chapter 3 Geotechnical Design Considerations Marshall Lew, Ph.D., G.E. Corporate Consultant, Law/Crandall, a division of Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (A LAWGIBB Group Member), Los Angeles

More information

Engineering Characteristics of Ground Motion Records of the Val-des-Bois, Quebec, Earthquake of June 23, 2010

Engineering Characteristics of Ground Motion Records of the Val-des-Bois, Quebec, Earthquake of June 23, 2010 CSCE 2011 General Conference - Congrès générale 2011 de la SCGC Ottawa, Ontario June 14-17, 2011 / 14 au 17 juin 2011 Engineering Characteristics of Ground Motion Records of the Val-des-Bois, Quebec, Earthquake

More information

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Wood-frame Buildings in Southwestern British Columbia

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Wood-frame Buildings in Southwestern British Columbia Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Wood-frame Buildings in Southwestern British Columbia K. Goda University of Bristol, United Kingdom G.M. Atkinson University of Western Ontario, Canada ABSTRACT: The

More information

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303 City of Newark - 36120 Ruschin Drive Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C: Geologic Information FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4554\45540001\ISMND\45540001 36120

More information

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes JRC Ispra, 1-2 October 2012 1 EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue: Construction Sector Subgroup Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes JRC-Ispra, 1-2 October 2012 Organized

More information

APPENDIX J. Dynamic Response Analysis

APPENDIX J. Dynamic Response Analysis APPENDIX J Dynamic Response Analysis August 25, 216 Appendix J Dynamic Response Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS J1 INTRODUCTION... 1 J2 EARTHQUAKE TIME HISTORIES... 1 J3 MODEL AND INPUT DATA FOR SITE RESPONSE

More information

Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil

Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil H. J. Bowen, M. Cubrinovski University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. M. E. Jacka Tonkin and Taylor Ltd., Christchurch, New

More information

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship 2004 Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Abi Aghayere Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/other

More information

Comparison of Base Shear Force Method in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe

Comparison of Base Shear Force Method in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 66-69 (202) pp 2345-2352 Online available since 202/May/4 at www.scientific.net (202) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi:0.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.66-69.2345

More information

Chapter 6 Seismic Design of Bridges. Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology

Chapter 6 Seismic Design of Bridges. Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology Chapter 6 Seismic Design of Bridges Kazuhiko Kawashima okyo Institute of echnology Seismic Design Loading environment (dead, live, wind, earthquake etc) Performance criteria for gravity (deflection, stresses)

More information

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD Architecture 314 Structures I Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake Load Combinations ASD LRFD University of Michigan, TCAUP Structures I Slide 1 of 27

More information

THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM

THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM (NBCC 25) Gail M. The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Vancouver Section THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM Seismic Hazard Analysis to obtain Uniform Hazard Response Spectrum (NBCC 25) Gail M. Department of

More information

CHAPTER 3 VIBRATION THEORY. Single Degree of Freedom Systems (SDOF) Stiffness, k Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity).

CHAPTER 3 VIBRATION THEORY. Single Degree of Freedom Systems (SDOF) Stiffness, k Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity). HPTER 3 VIRTION THEORY Single egree of Freedom Systems (SOF).. 3- Stiffness, k. 3- Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity). 3-3 Natural Period.. 3-3 Natural Frequency... 3-5 ngular Natural Frequency 3-5 Structural

More information

Characterization and modelling of seismic action

Characterization and modelling of seismic action COST C26: Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events Final Conference, 16-18 September 2010, Naples, Italy Characterization and modelling of seismic action Report of WG2: Earthquake resistance

More information

NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION UNDER SEISMIC LOADS

NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION UNDER SEISMIC LOADS NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION UNDER SEISMIC LOADS Yingcai Han 1 and Shin-Tower Wang 2 1 Fluor Canada Ltd., Calgary AB, Canada Email: yingcai.han@fluor.com 2 Ensoft, Inc. Austin,

More information

THE USE OF INPUT ENERGY FOR SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT WITH DIFFERENT DUCTILITY LEVEL

THE USE OF INPUT ENERGY FOR SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT WITH DIFFERENT DUCTILITY LEVEL th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, Paper No. 8 THE USE OF INPUT ENERGY FOR SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT WITH DIFFERENT DUCTILITY LEVEL Mao-Sheng GONG And Li-Li

More information

Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading

Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading Jorge Castillo, Yong-Beom Lee Ausenco, USA Aurelian C. Trandafir Fugro GeoConsulting Inc., USA ABSTRACT

More information

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures Basic principles Ioannis N. Psycharis Basic considerations Design earthquake: small

More information

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes 2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes Lecture 10: Characterisation of seismic motion Aurel Stratan, Politehnica University of Timisoara 07/04/2017 European Erasmus Mundus Master Course Sustainable

More information

Numerical analysis of effect of mitigation measures on seismic performance of a liquefiable tailings dam foundation

Numerical analysis of effect of mitigation measures on seismic performance of a liquefiable tailings dam foundation Numerical analysis of effect of mitigation measures on seismic performance of a liquefiable tailings dam foundation Yong-Beom Lee, Jorge Castillo Ausenco, USA Aurelian C. Trandafir Fugro GeoConsulting

More information

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE FOR SITE- SPECIFIC AMPLIFICATION FACTORS USED IN US BUILDING CODES

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE FOR SITE- SPECIFIC AMPLIFICATION FACTORS USED IN US BUILDING CODES EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE FOR SITE- SPECIFIC AMPLIFICATION FACTORS USED IN US BUILDING CODES Roger D BORCHERDT And Thomas E FUMAL SUMMARY Site-specific amplification factors, F

More information

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS INFORMATION BULLETIN / PUBLIC - BUILDING CODE REFERENCE NO.: LABC 7006.3, 7014.1 Effective: 01-01-2017 DOCUMENT NO.: P/BC 2017-049 Revised: 12-21-2016 Previously Issued As: P/BC 2014-049 SLOPE STABILITY

More information

RECORD OF REVISIONS. Page 2 of 17 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.06, Rev. 0

RECORD OF REVISIONS. Page 2 of 17 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.06, Rev. 0 Page 2 of 17 RECORD OF REVISIONS Rev. No. Reason for Revision Revision Date 0 Initial Report - this work is being tracked under Notification SAPN 50638425-1 8/6/2014 Page 3 of 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

More information

Seismic design of bridges

Seismic design of bridges NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Seismic design of bridges Lecture 3 Ioannis N. Psycharis Capacity design Purpose To design structures of ductile behaviour

More information

SOIL-BASEMENT STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS ON DYNAMIC LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE ON BASEMENT WALL

SOIL-BASEMENT STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS ON DYNAMIC LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE ON BASEMENT WALL International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Mitigation, Jakarta, April 1-15, SOIL-BASEMENT STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS ON DYNAMIC LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE ON BASEMENT WALL Nurrachmad

More information

DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA

DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA ABSTRACT Y. Bozorgnia, M. Hachem, and K.W. Campbell Associate Director, PEER, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA Senior Associate,

More information

DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.4 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.4 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.4 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES Parsons P:\Honeywell -SYR\444576 2008 Capping\09 Reports\9.3 December 2009_Capping and

More information

Gravity dam and earthquake

Gravity dam and earthquake Gravity dam and earthquake Tardieu s Dynamic simplified method Patrick LIGNIER, Tractebel Engineering Coyne et Bellier Château des Comtes de Challes 9 octobre 2014 CONTENTS 2 Vulnerability of gravity dam

More information

Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed by the RPA for the evaluation of seismic reduction coefficient

Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed by the RPA for the evaluation of seismic reduction coefficient 33, Issue (27) 5-23 Journal of Advanced Research in Materials Science Journal homepage: www.akademiabaru.com/arms.html ISSN: 2289-7992 Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed

More information

Seismic Design of a Hydraulic Fill Dam by Nonlinear Time History Method

Seismic Design of a Hydraulic Fill Dam by Nonlinear Time History Method Seismic Design of a Hydraulic Fill Dam by Nonlinear Time History Method E. Yıldız & A.F. Gürdil Temelsu International Engineering Services Inc., Ankara, Turkey SUMMARY: Time history analyses conducted

More information

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002 Abstract Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 00 Paresh V. Patel Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Nirma Institute of Technology, Ahmedabad 38481 In this article codal provisions of IS 1893

More information

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake

More information

CHAPTER 11 OTHER GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ANALYSES

CHAPTER 11 OTHER GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ANALYSES CHAPTER 11 OTHER GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ANALYSES The following notation is used in this chapter: SYMBOL DEFINITION a Acceleration a max Maximum horizontal acceleration at ground surface (also

More information

Liquefaction Assessment using Site-Specific CSR

Liquefaction Assessment using Site-Specific CSR Liquefaction Assessment using Site-Specific CSR 1. Arup, Sydney 2. Arup Fellow, Adelaide M. M. L.SO 1, T. I. MOTE 1, & J. W. PAPPIN 2 E-Mail: minly.so@arup.com ABSTRACT: Liquefaction evaluation is often

More information

An Approach for Seismic Design in Malaysia following the Principles of Eurocode 8

An Approach for Seismic Design in Malaysia following the Principles of Eurocode 8 An Approach for Seismic Design in Malaysia following the Principles of Eurocode 8 by Dr J. W. Pappin, Ms. P. H. I. Yim and Mr. C. H. R. Koo 1. INTRODUCTION Eurocode 8 is a useful document providing systematic

More information

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR STEEL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR STEEL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR STEEL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES Cem Topkaya Professor of Civil Engineering Middle East Technical University Ankara, Turkey e-mail: ctopkaya@metu.edu.tr Ahmet Kuşyılmaz

More information

A GEOTECHNICAL SEISMIC SITE RESPONSE EVALUATION PROCEDURE

A GEOTECHNICAL SEISMIC SITE RESPONSE EVALUATION PROCEDURE A GEOTECHNICAL SEISMIC SITE RESPONSE EVALUATION PROCEDURE Adrian RODRIGUEZ-MAREK 1, Jonathan D BRAY 2 And Norman A ABRAHAMSON 3 SUMMARY A simplified empirically-based seismic site response evaluation procedure

More information

Case Study - Undisturbed Sampling, Cyclic Testing and Numerical Modelling of a Low Plasticity Silt

Case Study - Undisturbed Sampling, Cyclic Testing and Numerical Modelling of a Low Plasticity Silt 6 th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering 1-4 November 2015 Christchurch, New Zealand Case Study - Undisturbed Sampling, Cyclic Testing and Numerical Modelling of a Low Plasticity

More information

Geo-Marine Letters Volume 36, 2016, electronic supplementary material

Geo-Marine Letters Volume 36, 2016, electronic supplementary material 1 Geo-Marine Letters Volume 36, 016, electronic supplementary material Submarine landslides offshore Vancouver Island along the northern Cascadia margin, British Columbia: why preconditioning is likely

More information

Displacement ductility demand and strength reduction factors for rocking structures

Displacement ductility demand and strength reduction factors for rocking structures Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures VI 9 Displacement ductility demand and strength reduction factors for rocking structures M. Trueb, Y. Belmouden & P. Lestuzzi ETHZ-Swiss Federal Institute of

More information

Dynamic Loads CE 543. Examples. Harmonic Loads

Dynamic Loads CE 543. Examples. Harmonic Loads CE 543 Structural Dynamics Introduction Dynamic Loads Dynamic loads are time-varying loads. (But time-varying loads may not require dynamic analysis.) Dynamics loads can be grouped in one of the following

More information

3-D Numerical simulation of shake-table tests on piles subjected to lateral spreading

3-D Numerical simulation of shake-table tests on piles subjected to lateral spreading 3-D Numerical simulation of shake-table tests on piles subjected to lateral spreading M. Cubrinovski 1, H. Sugita 2, K. Tokimatsu 3, M. Sato 4, K. Ishihara 5, Y. Tsukamoto 5, T. Kamata 5 1 Department of

More information

Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand

Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand K. Tarbali & B.A. Bradley Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.

More information

Dynamic Analyses of an Earthfill Dam on Over-Consolidated Silt with Cyclic Strain Softening

Dynamic Analyses of an Earthfill Dam on Over-Consolidated Silt with Cyclic Strain Softening Keynote Lecture: Dynamic Analyses of an Earthfill Dam on Over-Consolidated Silt with Cyclic Strain Softening W.D. Liam Finn University of British Columbia, BC, Canada Guoxi Wu BC Hydro, Burnaby, BC, Canada

More information

Unique Site Conditions and Response Analysis Challenges in the Central and Eastern U.S.

Unique Site Conditions and Response Analysis Challenges in the Central and Eastern U.S. Unique Site Conditions and Response Analysis Challenges in the Central and Eastern U.S. James R. Martin, C. Guney Olgun, & Morgan Eddy Civil and Environmental Engineering World Institute for Disaster Risk

More information

Improvements to the Development of Acceleration Design Response Spectra. Nicholas E. Harman, M.S., P.E., SCDOT

Improvements to the Development of Acceleration Design Response Spectra. Nicholas E. Harman, M.S., P.E., SCDOT Improvements to the Development of Acceleration Design Response Spectra Nicholas E. Harman, M.S., P.E., SCDOT Thanks Clemson University Dr. Ron Andrus Co-Principal Investigator Dr. Nadarajah Ravichandran

More information

CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN

CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN 13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 004 Paper No. 653 CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN B. K. Raghu Prasad 1, A. Seetha Ramaiah and A.

More information

SHAKE TABLE STUDY OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS

SHAKE TABLE STUDY OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS 13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 1918 SHAKE TABLE STUDY OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE AND ADJACENT

More information

Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER

Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER Adrian DOGARIU European Erasmus Mundus Master Course Sustainable Constructions under Natural Hazards and Catastrophic Events 520121-1-2011-1-CZ-ERA MUNDUS-EMMC Structural

More information

Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 5.1 GENERAL The equivalent lateral force (ELF) procedure specified in Sec. 5.2 is similar in its basic concept to SEAOC recommendations in 1968, 1973,

More information

SHAKE MAPS OF STRENGTH AND DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS FOR ROMANIAN VRANCEA EARTHQUAKES

SHAKE MAPS OF STRENGTH AND DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS FOR ROMANIAN VRANCEA EARTHQUAKES SHAKE MAPS OF STRENGTH AND DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS FOR ROMANIAN VRANCEA EARTHQUAKES D. Lungu 1 and I.-G. Craifaleanu 2 1 Professor, Dept. of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Technical University of Civil Engineering

More information

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS 3 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, 4 Paper No. 377 SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS Ramiro VARGAS and Michel BRUNEAU

More information

Amplification of Seismic Motion at Deep Soil Sites

Amplification of Seismic Motion at Deep Soil Sites 20th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 20) Espoo, Finland, August 9-14, 2009 SMiRT 20-Division 5, Paper 1740 Amplification of Seismic Motion at Deep Soil Sites

More information

Proposed Approach to CENA Site Amplification

Proposed Approach to CENA Site Amplification Proposed Approach to CENA Site Amplification Gail Atkinson with acknowledgement to many co-authors, especially Ghofrani, Hassani, Assatourians, and Braganza. The model is a team effort reflecting their

More information

Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East

Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 2007; 36:1275 1301 Published online 27 February 2007 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com)..679 Prediction of elastic

More information

IZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT

IZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT Istanbul Bridge Conference August 11-13, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey IZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT A. Giannakou 1, J. Chacko 2 and W. Chen 3 ABSTRACT

More information

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown? 1 of 5 Continuing Education Course #274 What Every Engineer Should Know About Structures Part D - Bending Strength Of Materials NOTE: The following question was revised on 15 August 2018 1. The moment

More information

1D Analysis - Simplified Methods

1D Analysis - Simplified Methods 1D Equivalent Linear Method Page 1 1D Analysis - Simplified Methods Monday, February 13, 2017 2:32 PM Reading Assignment Lecture Notes Pp. 255-275 Kramer (EQL method) p. 562 Kramer (Trigonometric Notation

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 3 ANALYSIS METHODS OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BRIDGES 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Loadings for the Analysis

More information

BOĞAZİÇİ UNIVERSITY KANDILLI OBSERVATORY AND EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHANGING NEEDS OF ENGINEERS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN

BOĞAZİÇİ UNIVERSITY KANDILLI OBSERVATORY AND EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHANGING NEEDS OF ENGINEERS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN BOĞAZİÇİ UNIVERSITY KANDILLI OBSERVATORY AND EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHANGING NEEDS OF ENGINEERS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN Erdal Şafak Department of Earthquake Engineering Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake

More information

Interpretive Map Series 24

Interpretive Map Series 24 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Interpretive Map Series 24 Geologic Hazards, Earthquake and Landslide Hazard Maps, and Future Earthquake Damage Estimates for Six Counties in the Mid/Southern

More information

Liquefaction and Foundations

Liquefaction and Foundations Liquefaction and Foundations Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings 26 30 November, 2012 What is Liquefaction? Liquefaction

More information

Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk

Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk Prepared for: The Municipality of Anchorage Planning Department and the Geotechnical Advisory Commission Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk Prepared

More information

EVALUATION OF SECOND ORDER EFFECTS ON THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC FRAMED STRUCTURES: A FRAGILITY ANALYSIS

EVALUATION OF SECOND ORDER EFFECTS ON THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC FRAMED STRUCTURES: A FRAGILITY ANALYSIS 13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 428 EVALUATION OF SECOND ORDER EFFECTS ON THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC FRAMED STRUCTURES: A FRAGILITY

More information

Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment of Newcastle and Lake Macquarie Part 1 Seismic Hazard.

Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment of Newcastle and Lake Macquarie Part 1 Seismic Hazard. Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment of Newcastle and Lake Macquarie Part 1 Seismic Hazard. T. Dhu, D. Robinson, C. Sinadinovski, T. Jones, A. Jones & J. Schneider Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia.

More information

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC ENERGY DIAGRAM ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS INELASTIC WORK DONE HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION DUCTILITY

More information

Cyclic Behavior of Sand and Cyclic Triaxial Tests. Hsin-yu Shan Dept. of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University

Cyclic Behavior of Sand and Cyclic Triaxial Tests. Hsin-yu Shan Dept. of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University Cyclic Behavior of Sand and Cyclic Triaxial Tests Hsin-yu Shan Dept. of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University Causes of Pore Pressure Buildup due to Cyclic Stress Application Stress are due

More information

Sensitivity of Liquefaction Triggering Analysis to Earthquake Magnitude

Sensitivity of Liquefaction Triggering Analysis to Earthquake Magnitude Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2013 Conference, Nov 15-17, Hobart, Tasmania Sensitivity of Liquefaction Triggering Analysis to Earthquake Magnitude Dr Timothy I Mote 1 and Minly M. L. So 2 1.

More information

Japan Seismic Hazard Information Station

Japan Seismic Hazard Information Station Japan Seismic Hazard Information Station (J-SHIS) Hiroyuki Fujiwara National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) Background of the Project Headquarters for Earthquake Research

More information

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS INFORMATION BULLETIN / PUBLIC - BUILDING CODE REFERENCE NO.: LAMC 98.0508 Effective: 1-26-84 DOCUMENT NO. P/BC 2002-049 Revised: 11-1-02 Previously Issued As: RGA #1-84 SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE

More information

The Effect of Using Hysteresis Models (Bilinear and Modified Clough) on Seismic Demands of Single Degree of Freedom Systems

The Effect of Using Hysteresis Models (Bilinear and Modified Clough) on Seismic Demands of Single Degree of Freedom Systems American Journal of Applied Sciences Original Research Paper The Effect of Using Hysteresis Models (Bilinear and Modified Clough) on Seismic Demands of Single Degree of Freedom Systems 1 Ahmad N. Tarawneh,

More information

Seismic site response analysis for Australia

Seismic site response analysis for Australia Seismic site response analysis for Australia Anita Amirsardari 1, Elisa Lumantarna 2, Helen M. Goldsworthy 3 1. Corresponding Author. PhD Candidate, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University

More information

2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam. 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room

2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam. 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room 2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room Attention: The exam consists of five questions for which you are provided with five answer sheets. Write

More information

ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS

ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS Transactions, SMiRT-24 ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS 1 Principal Engineer, MTR & Associates, USA INTRODUCTION Mansour Tabatabaie 1 Dynamic response

More information

Evaluation of the Seismic Load Level in Korea based on Global Earthquake Records

Evaluation of the Seismic Load Level in Korea based on Global Earthquake Records Proceedings of the Tenth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building an Earthquake-Resilient Pacific 6-8 November 215, Sydney, Australia Evaluation of the Seismic Load Level in Korea based on

More information

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B Volume B 3.1.4 Diaphragmatic behaviour In general, when there is eccentric loading at a floor, e.g. imposed by the horizontal seismic action, the in-plane rigidity of the slab forces all the in-plane points

More information

SITE ANALYSIS USING RANDOM VIBRATION THEORY

SITE ANALYSIS USING RANDOM VIBRATION THEORY Transactions, SMiRT-23, Paper ID 050 SITE ANALYSIS USING RANDOM VIBRATION THEORY 1 President APA Consulting, USA Alejandro P. Asfura 1 ABSTRACT This paper compares two methods for the seismic analysis

More information

RESPONSE ANALYSIS STUDY OF A BASE-ISOLATED BUILDING BASED

RESPONSE ANALYSIS STUDY OF A BASE-ISOLATED BUILDING BASED 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering Taipei, Taiwan October 12-13, 2006 Paper No. 224 RESPONSE ANALYSIS STUDY OF A BASE-ISOLATED BUILDING BASED ON SEISMIC CODES WORLDWIDE Demin Feng 1,

More information

Dynamic Soil Pressures on Embedded Retaining Walls: Predictive Capacity Under Varying Loading Frequencies

Dynamic Soil Pressures on Embedded Retaining Walls: Predictive Capacity Under Varying Loading Frequencies 6 th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering 1-4 November 2015 Christchurch, New Zealand Dynamic Soil Pressures on Embedded Retaining Walls: Predictive Capacity Under Varying Loading

More information

COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES

COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, Paper No. 6 COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES Jaime DE-LA-COLINA, MariCarmen HERNANDEZ

More information

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations Chapter (11) Introduction Piles are structural members that are made of steel, concrete, or timber. They are used to build pile foundations (classified as deep foundations) which cost more than shallow

More information

Ground Motions and Liquefaction Potential

Ground Motions and Liquefaction Potential Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics 2010 - Fifth International Conference

More information

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Research Objectives and Literature Review..1 1.1 Introduction...1 1.2 Literature Review......3 1.2.1 Describing Vibration......3 1.2.2 Vibration Isolation.....6 1.2.2.1 Overview.

More information