February 16, 2015 File No Ms. Robin Yates TRC Engineers Inc N. Fresno Street, Suite 200 Fresno, California 93710

Similar documents
New WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1



Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF


CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols

December 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

Geotechnical Data Report

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

SOIL FORMATION SOIL CLASSIFICATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. Soil Properties and Classification

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data


Geotechnical Data Report

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS Soil Sampling, Testing, & Classification Review

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

DRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01

Geotechnical Engineering Report

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants


Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils. C L o r O L C H o r O H

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3

SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource Evaluation Proposed Bernand Quarry San Diego County, California

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY

Attachment B. Grain Size Distribution Curves


Northern Colorado Geotech

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.

Chapter 6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION, CLASSIFICATION, AND LOGGING

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II

Dry Muliwai Sample Location Map

Parsons APPENDIX A BORING LOGS AND DEVELOPMENT LOG

Page 4.1 Overview 4-3

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

GEOLOGIC/GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR TENTATIVE MAP LAVENIDA SUBDIVISION (APN # ) ORINDA, CALIFORNIA

APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4)

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014)

Geotechnical Engineering Report

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.


Fauquier County Cedar Lee Middle School Safety Routes to School Bealeton, Virginia

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project

Geotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:

Technical Memorandum. Soil Borings

UAS Student Residence

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Geotechnical Data Report

Appendix A. Producer Statement Advisory Note

Safe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along Syafrubesi-Rasuwagadhi road, Central Nepal

December 13, Washington County Public Works Department Myeron Road North Stillwater, MN Attn: Mr. Andrew Giesen

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. VCU Basketball Practice Facility 1300/1328 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia.

APPENDIX B GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

Correlation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT

PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY

Assessment of accuracy in determining Atterberg limits for four Iraqi local soil laboratories

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK. ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No.

Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. Alaska Field Guide for Soil Classification

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303

Assistant Chief-Bureau of Structures and Geotechnical Services

Log of Monitoring Well D58B

SOIL STABILITY ANALYSES

May 8, Mr. Jeff Dingman Abundant Land Partners LLC P.O. Box 471 Genoa, Nevada 89411

Transcription:

February 16, 2015 File No. 20152738 Ms. Robin Yates TRC Engineers Inc. 6051 N. Fresno Street, Suite 200 Fresno, California 93710 SUBJECT: Geotechnical Design Memorandum Fresno BPMP Scour Countermeasure Project El Dorado Avenue at Arroyo Pasajero (Bridge No. 42C0097) Fresno County, California Dear Ms. Yates: This letter presents the results of the geotechnical investigation for the proposed Fresno BPMP Scour Countermeasure project for the subject location in Fresno County, California. This letter describes the study, findings, conclusions, and recommendations for use in project design. Kleinfelder appreciates the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services during the design phase of this project. If there are any questions concerning the information presented in this letter, please contact this office at your convenience. PROJECT Understanding of the project is based upon discussions with representatives of TRC Engineers Inc. It is understood the project will consist of a scour evaluation at the El Dorado Avenue at Arroyo Pasajero bridge (Bridge No. 42C0097) location. FIELD EXPLORATION Field exploration included one (1) hand auger boring at the bridge site, which was performed on September 26, 2014. The boring was advanced to a depth of 3 feet below the existing creek bed. The soil encountered in the hand auger boring was visually classified in the field and a continuous log was recorded. A bulk sample was obtained from the auger cuttings at the obtained depth. Upon completion, the exploration location was backfilled with soil cuttings. The bulk sample was transported back to our Fresno Lab for testing. 20152738/FRE15L14464 Page 1 of 3 February 16, 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder, Inc. 5125 North Gates Avenue, Suite 102, Fresno, CA 3722 p 559-486-0750 f 559-442-5081

LABORATORY TESTING Kleinfelder performed laboratory tests on the selected sample to evaluate certain physical characteristics that will be necessary to assist TRC in their analysis. The laboratory test performed was a grain-size distribution. Results are shown on Figure 6. SITE CONDITIONS AND SUBSURFACE SOILS ENCOUNTERED The banks of the creek supported vegetation, with some trees, debris and gravel. Riprap is placed around the adjacent canal overflow pipe. The following description provides a general summary of the subsurface soil conditions encountered during the field exploration and further verified by the laboratory testing program. For a more thorough description of the actual conditions encountered at the specific boring location, refer to the boring log presented in Figure 5. All soils have been classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2487). The earth material at the site generally consists of poorly-graded sand (SP) to the maximum exploration depth of 3 feet. The boring was terminated at a final depth of 3 feet due to caving of the sands. SCOUR POTENTIAL The mean grain size (D 50 ) and 90% passing grain size (D 90 ) of the soil anticipated to be exposed in the channel is about 0.69 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively. Should the scour exceed the expected limits, mitigation measures, such as rip rap, may be used. LIMITATIONS Recommendations contained in this letter are based on the field observations and subsurface explorations, laboratory tests, and present knowledge of the proposed project. It is possible that soil conditions could vary between or beyond the points explored. Additional soil exploration may be necessary if better definition of any conditions is desired. If the scope of the proposed improvements changes from that described in this letter, the recommendations provided should also be reviewed. This letter has been prepared in substantial accordance with the generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice, as it exists in the general area at the time of the study. No warranty, express or implied, is provided or intended. The preliminary recommendations provided in this letter are based on the assumption that Kleinfelder will conduct an adequate program of tests and observations during the additional phases of the project in order to evaluate compliance with the recommendations. This letter may be used only by Fresno County, TRC Engineers Inc., other project subconsultants and reviewing regulatory agencies and only for the purposes stated within a 20152738/FRE15L14464 Page 2 of 3 February 16, 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder, Inc.

reasonable time from its issuance. Land use, site conditions or other factors may change over time, and additional work may be required with the passage of time. Any other party who wishes to use this letter shall notify Kleinfelder of such intended use. Based on the intended use of the letter, Kleinfelder may require that additional work be performed and that an updated letter be issued. Non-compliance with any of these requirements by the client or anyone else will release Kleinfelder from any liability resulting from the misuse of this letter by any unauthorized party. CLOSING We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services to TRC Engineers Inc. and Fresno County. We trust this information meets your current needs. If there are any questions concerning the information presented in this letter, please contact this office at your convenience. Respectfully Submitted, KLEINFELDER, INC. Steven Linton, EIT Staff Engineer Neva M. Popenoe, PE, GE Project Manager Attachments Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map Figure 2 Boring Location Map Figure 3 Graphics Key Figure 4 Soil Description Key Figure 5 Boring Log B-4 Figure 6 Grain-Size Distribution 06/30/15 20152738/FRE15L14464 Page 3 of 3 February 16, 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder, Inc.

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHED IMAGES: Images: USGS_GuijarralHills-CA_1956_Quad.jpg ATTACHED XREFS: LONG BEACH, CA CAD FILE: L:CADD\2015\20152738\FresnoBridge-BPMP_01-2015\4_ElDoradoAve\ C:\CADD\2015\20152738\FresnoBridge-BPMP_012015\4_ElDoradoAve\ LAYOUT: 4 4 PLOTTED: 10 Jan 2015, 2:59pm, MGriffin SOURCE: U.S.G.S. 7.5' Topographic series, Guijarral Hills, California Quadrangle Dated, 1956. The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a construction design document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphic representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information. www.kleinfelder.com PROJECT NO. DRAWN: 20152738 1/2015 MRG FILE NAME: 20152738-fig1_SVM_4.dwg NP 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 APPROXIMATE SCALE (feet) SITE VICINITY MAP EL DORADO AVENUE AT ARROYO PASAJERO (BRIDGE NO. 42C0097) FRESNO COUNTY BRIDGE BPMP, PHASE 2 FRESNO COUNTY, CA 1

PLOTTED: 10 Jan 2015, 3:05pm, MGriffin ATTACHED IMAGES: Images: Aerial_Image_Site-4_El-DoradoAve_200_4-13-13.jpg ATTACHED XREFS: C:\CADD\2015\20152738\FresnoBridge-BPMP_012015\4_ElDoradoAve\ LAYOUT: 44 CAD FILE: FILE: L:CADD\2015\20152738\FresnoBridge-BPMP_01-2015\4_ElDoradoAve\ LAYOUT: LONG BEACH, CA B-4 60 30 0 60 APPROXIMATE SCALE (feet) The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a construction design document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphic representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information. EXPLANATION B-4 PROJECT NO. DRAWN: APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION 20152738 1/2015 MRG FILE NAME: SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH PRO 2015, IMAGE DATE 4/13/13. www.kleinfelder.com BORING LOCATION MAP 20152738-fig2_BLM_4.dwg NP EL DORADO AVENUE AT ARROYO PASAJERO (BRIDGE NO. 42C0097) FRESNO COUNTY BRIDGE BPMP, PHASE 2 FRESNO COUNTY, CA 2

PLOTTED: 01/29/2015 06:14 PM BY: npopenoe gint FILE: L:\drafting\2014\20152738\20152738.gpj gint TEMPLATE: PROJECTWISE: KLF_STANDARD_GINT_LIBRARY_2015.GLB [GEO-LEGEND 1 (GRAPHICS KEY) WITH USCS] SAMPLE/SAMPLER TYPE GRAPHICS BULK SAMPLE GROUND WATER GRAPHICS WATER LEVEL (level where first observed) WATER LEVEL (level after exploration completion) WATER LEVEL (additional levels after exploration) OBSERVED SEEPAGE NOTES The report and graphics key are an integral part of these logs. All data and interpretations in this log are subject to the explanations and limitations stated in the report. Lines separating strata on the logs represent approximate boundaries only. Actual transitions may be gradual or differ from those shown. No warranty is provided as to the continuity of soil or rock conditions between individual sample locations. Logs represent general soil or rock conditions observed at the point of exploration on the date indicated. In general, Unified Soil Classification System designations presented on the logs were based on visual classification in the field and were modified where appropriate based on gradation and index property testing. Fine grained soils that plot within the hatched area on the Plasticity Chart, and coarse grained soils with between 5% and 12% passing the No. 200 sieve require dual USCS symbols, ie., GW-GM, GP-GM, GW-GC, GP-GC, GC-GM, SW-SM, SP-SM, SW-SC, SP-SC, SC-SM. If sampler is not able to be driven at least 6 inches then 50/X indicates number of blows required to drive the identified sampler X inches with a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM D 2487) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (More than half of material is larger than the #200 sieve) SANDS WITH 5% TO 12% SANDS WITH > 12% Cu < 4 and/ or 1 > Cc > 3 Cu _ > 6 and 1 _ < Cc _< 3 Cu < 6 and/ or 1 > Cc > 3 SW-SM SILTY SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL-SILT MIXTURES Fresno County Bridge BPMP Phase 2 Fresno County, CA CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL-CLAY MIXTURES CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-SILT-CLAY MIXTURES KLEINFELDER - 5125 N. Gates Avenue, Suite 102 Fresno, CA 93722 PH: 559.486.0750 FAX: 559.442.5081 www.kleinfelder.com GRAVELS (More than half of coarse fraction is larger than the #4 sieve) SANDS (More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than the #4 sieve) FINE GRAINED SOILS (More than half of material is smaller than the #200 sieve) CLEAN GRAVEL WITH <5% GRAVELS WITH 5% TO 12% GRAVELS WITH > 12% CLEAN SANDS WITH <5% Cu >_ 4 and 1 _ < Cc _ < 3 Cu _ > 4 and 1 _ < Cc _< 3 Cu < 4 and/ or 1 > Cc > 3 Cu _ > 6 and 1 _ < Cc _ < 3 Cu < 6 and/ or 1 > Cc > 3 SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid Limit less than 50) SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid Limit greater than 50) PROJECT NO.: 20152738 SL NMP DATE: 1/29/2015 REVISED: - ML CL CL-ML OL MH CH OH GW GP GW-GM GW-GC GP-GM GP-GC GM GC GC-GM SW SP SW-SC SP-SM SP-SC SM SC SC-SM GRAPHICS KEY WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, LITTLE OR NO POORLY GRADED GRAVELS, LITTLE OR NO WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, LITTLE WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, LITTLE CLAY POORLY GRADED GRAVELS, LITTLE POORLY GRADED GRAVELS, LITTLE CLAY SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SILT-SAND MIXTURES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY-SILT MIXTURES WELL-GRADED SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH LITTLE OR NO POORLY GRADED SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH LITTLE OR NO WELL-GRADED SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH LITTLE WELL-GRADED SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH LITTLE CLAY POORLY GRADED SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH LITTLE POORLY GRADED SANDS, SAND-GRAVEL MIXTURES WITH LITTLE CLAY INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS, SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS INORGANIC CLAYS-SILTS OF LOW PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS ORGANIC SILTS & ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILT INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS ORGANIC CLAYS & ORGANIC SILTS OF MEDIUM-TO-HIGH PLASTICITY 3

PLOTTED: 01/29/2015 06:15 PM BY: npopenoe GRAIN SIZE Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Fines coarse fine coarse medium fine ANGULARITY SIEVE SIZE >12 in. (304.8 mm.) 3-12 in. (76.2-304.8 mm.) 3/4-3 in. (19-76.2 mm.) #4-3/4 in. (#4-19 mm.) #10 - #4 #40 - #10 #200 - #10 Passing #200 GRAIN SIZE >12 in. (304.8 mm.) 3-12 in. (76.2-304.8 mm.) 3/4-3 in. (19-76.2 mm.) 0.19-0.75 in. (4.8-19 mm.) 0.079-0.19 in. (2-4.9 mm.) 0.017-0.079 in. (0.43-2 mm.) 0.0029-0.017 in. (0.07-0.43 mm.) <0.0029 in. (<0.07 mm.) APPROXIMATE SIZE Larger than basketball-sized Fist-sized to basketball-sized Thumb-sized to fist-sized Pea-sized to thumb-sized Rock salt-sized to pea-sized Sugar-sized to rock salt-sized Flour-sized to sugar-sized Flour-sized and smaller Munsell Color NAME Red Yellow Red Yellow Green Yellow Green Blue Green Blue Purple Blue Purple Red Purple Black ABBR R YR Y GY G BG B PB P RP N gint FILE: L:\drafting\2014\20152738\20152738.gpj gint TEMPLATE: PROJECTWISE: KLF_STANDARD_GINT_LIBRARY_2015.GLB [GEO-LEGEND 2 (SOIL KEY)] Angular Subangular Subrounded Rounded PLASTICITY Non-plastic Low (L) Medium (M) High (H) APPARENT DENSITY Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense Homogeneous MODIFIED CA CALIFORNIA SPT-N 60 SAMPLER SAMPLER (# blows/ft) (# blows/ft) (# blows/ft) <4 <4 <5 4-10 5-12 5-15 10-30 12-35 15-40 30-50 35-60 40-70 >50 >60 >70 NOTE: AFTER TERZAGHI AND PECK, 1948 Stratified Laminated Fissured Slickensided Blocky Lensed NP FIELD TEST CRITERIA Particles have sharp edges and relatively plane sides with unpolished surfaces Particles are similar to angular description but have rounded edges Particles have nearly plane sides but have well-rounded corners and edges Particles have smoothly curved sides and no edges LL A 1/8-in. (3 mm.) thread cannot be rolled at any water content. The thread can barely be rolled and the lump < 30 or thread cannot be formed when drier than the plastic limit. The thread is easy to roll and not much time is required to reach the plastic limit. 30-50 The thread cannot be rerolled after reaching the plastic limit. The lump or thread crumbles when drier than the plastic limit It takes considerable time rolling and kneading to reach the plastic limit. The thread can be > 50 rerolled several times after reaching the plastic limit. The lump or thread can be formed without crumbling when drier than the plastic limit APPARENT / RELATIVE DENSITY - COARSE-GRAINED SOIL STRUCTURE CRITERIA RELATIVE DENSITY (%) 0-15 15-35 35-65 65-85 85-100 Alternating layers of varying material or color with layers at least 1/4-in. thick, note thickness Alternating layers of varying material or color with the layer less than 1/4-in. thick, note thickness Breaks along definite planes of fracture with little resistance to fracturing Fracture planes appear polished or glossy, sometimes striated Cohesive soil that can be broken down into small angular lumps which resist further breakdown Inclusion of small pockets of different soils, such as small lenses of sand scattered through a mass of clay; note thickness Same color and appearance throughout Rounded Subrounded Subangular Angular Fresno County Bridge BPMP Phase 2 Fresno County, CA KLEINFELDER - 5125 N. Gates Avenue, Suite 102 Fresno, CA 93722 PH: 559.486.0750 FAX: 559.442.5081 www.kleinfelder.com Dry Moist Wet None Weak Strong Soft Firm Hard Very Hard Damp but no visible water Visible free water, usually soil is below water table 1000-2000 2000-4000 4000-8000 > 8000 Weakly Moderately Strongly FIELD TEST Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch No visible reaction FIELD TEST Some reaction, with bubbles forming slowly Violent reaction, with bubbles forming immediately CONSISTENCY - FINE-GRAINED SOIL UNCONFINED CONSISTENCY COMPRESSIVE CRITERIA STRENGTH (q u )(psf) Very Soft < 1000 Thumb will penetrate soil more than 1 in. (25 mm.) PROJECT NO.: 20152738 MOISTURE CONTENT REACTION WITH HYDROCHLORIC ACID SL NMP DATE: 1/29/2015 REVISED: - CEMENTATION Thumb will penetrate soil about 1 in. (25 mm.) Thumb will indent soil about 1/4-in. (6 mm.) Thumb will not indent soil but readily indented with thumbnail Thumbnail will not indent soil FIELD TEST Crumbles or breaks with handling or slight finger pressure Crumbles or breaks with considerable finger pressure Will not crumble or break with finger pressure SOIL KEY Particles Present Amount trace few little some and mostly Percentage <5 5-10 15-25 30-45 50 50-100 4

gint FILE: L:\drafting\2014\20152738\20152738.gpj gint TEMPLATE: PROJECTWISE: KLF_STANDARD_GINT_LIBRARY_2015.GLB [KLF_BORING/TEST PIT SOIL LOG] PLOTTED: 01/29/2015 06:16 PM BY: npopenoe Date Begin - End: Logged By: Hor.-Vert. Datum: Plunge: Weather: 5Depth (feet) 10 Graphical Log 9/26/2014 T. DeSouza Not Available -90 degrees Sunny/warm Lithologic Description FIELD EXPLORATION Surface Condition: Stream bed Drilling Company: Drill Crew: Poorly-graded SAND (SP): fine to coarse grained, non-plastic, gray, moist Drilling Equipment: Drilling Method: The boring was terminated at approximately 3 ft. below ground surface. The exploration was backfilled with auger cuttings on September 26, 2014. Kleinfelder T. DeSouza Hand Auger Exploration Diameter: 4 in. O.D. Sample Type Hand Auger Recovery (NR=No Recovery) USCS Symbol Water Content (%) Dry Unit Wt. (pcf) Passing #4 (%) SP-SM 94 5.2 LABORATORY RESULTS Passing #200 (%) BORING LOG B-4 GROUNDWATER LEVEL INFORMATION: Groundwater was not encountered during drilling or after completion. GENERAL NOTES: Caving was observed at a depth of 2 to 3 ft ft. below ground surface during drilling. BORING LOG B-4 Liquid Limit Plasticity Index (NP=NonPlastic) Fresno County Bridge BPMP Phase 2 Fresno County, CA KLEINFELDER - 5125 N. Gates Avenue, Suite 102 Fresno, CA 93722 PH: 559.486.0750 FAX: 559.442.5081 www.kleinfelder.com Blow Counts(BC)= Uncorr. Blows/6 in. PROJECT NO.: 20152738 SL TD DATE: 9/30/2014 REVISED: - PAGE: Additional Tests/ Remarks 5 1 of 1

gint FILE: L:\drafting\2014\20152738\20152738.gpj gint TEMPLATE: PROJECTWISE: KLF_STANDARD_GINT_LIBRARY_2015.GLB [KLF_SIEVE ANALYSIS] PLOTTED: 01/29/2015 06:20 PM BY: npopenoe PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 BOULDER Exploration ID B-4 Exploration ID COBBLE U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 12 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 3 4 6 810 14 16 20 30 40 50 60 100 140 200 100 coarse Depth (ft.) 2-3 Depth (ft.) GRAVEL Sieve Analysis and Hydrometer Analysis testing performed in general accordance with ASTM D422. NP = Nonplastic NM = Not Measured D 100 fine 10 coarse medium D 60 D 30 D 10 1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 0.1 0.01 0.001 Sample Description LL PL PI Cc Cu Passing 3/4" Passing #4 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER Passing #200 B-4 2-3 25 0.835 0.447 0.196 1.22 4.26 97 94 5.2 NM NM PROJECT NO.: 20152738 SAND fine POORLY GRADED SAND (SP) SILT Coefficients of Uniformity - C u = D 60 / D 10 Coefficients of Curvature - C C = (D 30 ) 2 / D 60 D 10 D 60 = Grain diameter at 60% passing D 30 = Grain diameter at 30% passing D 10 = Grain diameter at 10% passing Fresno County Bridge BPMP Phase 2 Fresno County, CA KLEINFELDER - 5125 N. Gates Avenue, Suite 102 Fresno, CA 93722 PH: 559.486.0750 FAX: 559.442.5081 www.kleinfelder.com SL TD DATE: 9/30/2014 REVISED: - NM CLAY %Silt NM 6 NM %Clay