GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT
|
|
- Hillary Dawson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT BRIDGE OVER BIG CREEK APPROXIMATELY.8 MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD EW1546 AND COUNTY ROAD 193 LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA PROJECT No. J2-8616(5), STATE JOB No (4) Prepared For: Circuit Engineering District 3 Prepared By: EST, Inc. Approved by: Alseny Diop, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer EST PROJECT NUMBER 6289 April 11, 213
2 Engineering Services and Testing 321 S. Berry Road Norman, Oklahoma 7372 Phone (45) Fax (45) C.A No. 3639, Ren. Date 6/3/214 April 11, 213 Circuit Engineering District 3 P.O. Box 13 Hugo, Oklahoma Attn.: Mr. MC Ollar, P.E. Transmit via to: me ollar@yahoo.com RE: Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Bridge over Big Creek Approx..8 Miles East of the Intersection of County Rd. EW1546 and County Rd. 193 Le Flore County, Oklahoma EST Project Number: 6289 Dear Mr. Ollar: EST, Inc. has completed the Geotechnical Engineering Services for the proposed bridge over Big Creek located along County Road EWl 546, approximately.8 miles east of the intersection with County Road 193 in Le Flore County, Oklahoma. The following report describes the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings, furnishes the laboratory data acquired, and provides geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of foundations for the proposed bridge. This geotechnical report should be read in its entirety prior to utilizing any presented information for design or construction purposes. Additionally, we recommend that EST, Inc. be retained to provide construction monitoring and testing services to verify that soil conditions are consistent with our geotechnical report. EST, Inc. will not be responsible for the misinterpretation of the recommendations for this project. Furthermore, EST, Inc. is not responsible for any conditions that deviate from those described in this report. Mr. Ollar, we appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this report or if we can be of further assistance, please call us at (45) Respectfully, EST, Inc. fjr~ Bryce R. Hanlon, E.I. Project Manager Copy: Gary Cluck: gcluck@sbcglobal.net Ardmore Colorado McAlester Moore Norman Oklahoma City Stillwater Tulsa
3 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, 213 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary Project Description Subsurface Exploration Subsurface Conditions Site Geology Soil Conditions Groundwater Laboratory Evaluation Evaluation and Recommendations Driven Pile Foundations Drilled Shafts General... 7 Appendix A Boring Location Diagram Appendix B Foundation Logs Appendix C Boring Logs Appendix D General Notes, Boring Log Acronym Library, General Notes for Rock Classification Ardmore Colorado McAlester Moore Norman Oklahoma City Stillwater Tulsa
4 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, Executive Summary The subsurface exploration and geotechnical evaluation are complete for the proposed bridge over Big Creek to be located along County Road EW1546, approximately.8 miles east of the intersection with County Road 193 in Le Flore County, Oklahoma. This report describes the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings, furnishes the laboratory data acquired, and provides geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of foundations for the proposed bridge. Exploration of the subsurface materials at the project site consisted of four (4) borings drilled to depths of approximately 26 to 4 feet below the existing ground surface elevation. The samples obtained from the borings were brought to our laboratory for further evaluation. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings during or immediately after completion of the subsurface exploration. The final boring logs along with a diagram showing the approximate locations of the borings are included in this report. The engineer s evaluation and laboratory test results indicate the subsurface materials generally consist of cohesive and cohesionless fine and coarse grain overburden soils over soft to hard shale with sandstone seams encountered at depths ranging from 13 to 3 feet. We understand that driven H-piles are planned to support the abutments, and drilled, cast-in-place, concrete piers may be used to support the internal spans of the bridge. Specific recommendations regarding the proposed project are presented further in this report. 2. Project Description We understand the proposed project consists of the construction of a new three-span (65-1, 63-6, 65-1 ) bridge, approximately in length over Big Creek. The bridge is located along County Road EW1546, approximately.8 miles east of the intersection with County Road 193 in Le Flore County, Oklahoma. Based on the general plan and elevation sheet provided to us by the project engineer, the new bridge will be a rolled beam, three-span bridge with a 26 - clear roadway and traffic rails (TR3). 3. Subsurface Exploration The subsurface exploration was performed between December 3, 212 and February 8, 213. The exploration for the bridge consisted of four (4) structural borings advanced to depths ranging from 26 to 4 feet below the existing ground surface elevation. The borings were advanced using hollow stem augers in the overburden and a rock bit or double-walled, diamond bit core barrel in the bedrock. Representative soil samples were obtained using the standard penetration test (SPT) sampling 1
5 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, 213 procedures in general accordance with ASTM Specification D The sedimentary rock core samples were obtained using the wire-line coring techniques in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-2113 and AASHTO Specification T-255. The SPT process requires a split-barrel (two-piece) sampling tube be used to obtain soil samples. A 2-inch outside diameter sampling tube is hammered into the bottom of the boring with a 14-pound weight falling 3 inches. The number of blows required to advance the tube the last 12 inches of an 18-inch sampling interval or portion thereof, is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, N. The in-situ relative density of granular soils, the consistency of cohesive soils, and the hardness of weathered bedrock can be estimated from the N value. The N values recorded for each test are shown on the attached boring logs at their relative sampling depths. In addition, the hardness of portions of the bedrock was evaluated using the Texas Highway Department cone penetration () test. The is a standard test developed by the Texas Highway Department to evaluate the strength and hardness of subsurface bearing materials for bridge foundations. The process requires use of a solid steel 3-inch diameter cone of standard dimensions attached to the drill rod. The cone is hammered at the bottom of the boring with a 14- pound weight falling 3-inches. After the cone is seated with 1 blows, the penetrations for two 5- blow intervals are recorded. If the number of blows to advance the cone six inches is less than 5, then the number of blows for the 6-inch interval is recorded. If the amount of penetration is less than 6 inches for 5 blows, the amount of penetration is recorded for the 5 blows. The number of blows with penetrations recorded for each test is shown on the attached boring logs at their relative test depths. A CME automatic drive hammer was used to advance the split-barrel sampler and. A greater mechanical efficiency is achieved with the automatic drive hammer when compared to a conventional safety drive hammer operated with a cathead and rope. The effect of this higher efficiency on the N values has been considered in our interpretation and analysis of the subsurface information provided with this report. The soil test borings were located in the field by EST personnel using the plans provided. The approximate locations of the borings have been identified and are shown on the boring location plan included in this report. The surface elevations at the boring locations were estimated by EST personnel using a level and rod. Benchmark #3 (cut X on top of the southeast wingwall of the existing bridge at station , feet right of the of the CL survey) with a given elevation of feet was used as the benchmark. 2
6 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, 213 As part of the drilling operations, an engineer prepared field boring logs. The engineer examined the samples retrieved during drilling operations and recorded a material description on the field boring logs. The split-barrel and auger samples were packaged in plastic bags to reduce moisture loss, tagged for identification and transported to our laboratory for further evaluation. The field boring logs also include visual classifications of the auger sample materials encountered during drilling and the driller s interpretation of the subsurface conditions between split-barrel samples. This report contains the final boring logs that represent modifications based on laboratory test results of the soil samples. 4. Subsurface Conditions 4.1 Site Geology The subject bridge is located in a geologic area best described as being part of the Atoka Unit (Pa). According to published materials (Engineering Classification of Geologic Materials, Division Two, 1966, Oklahoma Highway Department), the Atoka Unit consists dominantly of shale alternating with sandstones. The sandstones make up less than 25 percent of the unit. Near the base, the unit contains a relatively high proportion of sandstone which forms prominent ridges. The first ridge-forming sandstones occur 3 to 5 feet above the base. 4.2 Soil Conditions The near surface cohesive soils varied from medium stiff to hard in consistency. Cohesionless materials were generally dense to very dense in relative density. The sedimentary shale bedrock encountered in the borings exhibited SPT refusal (i.e., 5 blows for 6 inches or less of penetration) at depths indicated in the boring logs. It should be noted, that an approximately 12 inch thick seam was encountered in boring B-4 at a depth of approximately 5 feet. 4.3 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings during or immediately after completion of the subsurface explorations. Once bedrock was encountered, a rock bit or diamond bit core barrel with water to wash and stabilize the borings was used to advance the borings to the required rock testing depths. As a result, water level observations are based on observation of the augered materials while drilling and the field Engineer s judgment of the samples retrieved during drilling operations. Groundwater level fluctuations and perched water conditions may occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall and other factors such as drainage characteristics. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered during the preparation of construction plans. The borings were plugged in accordance with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OW) requirements. 3
7 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, Laboratory Evaluation All samples obtained from the project site were transferred to the EST laboratory in Moore, Oklahoma for laboratory processing and testing. Laboratory tests were performed on select soil samples in general accordance with their applicable ASTM test procedures. Laboratory tests included the natural moisture content (ASTM D2266), Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318), and sieve analysis (ASTM D2487), and unconfined compressive strength of the rock cores (ASTM D2938). The above test results can be found in the appropriate column of the boring logs included in appendix C of this report. 6. Evaluation and Recommendations End bearing steel H-piles can be used to support the abutments of the three-span bridge, and drilled piers can be used to support the interior spans. The following presents geotechnical recommendations concerning these and other geotechnical issues related to the project. 6.1 Driven Pile Foundations The proposed bridge abutments can be supported using end bearing steel H-piles. Driven piles will develop their capacity from end bearing in the bedrock. Because of the relatively high driving forces required to penetrate the bedrock, we recommend using low displacement piles such as H-piles. Piles should be spaced at minimum center-to-center distances equal to three times the maximum pile width. The estimated rock penetration and allowable foundation pile design capacities for HP 12X53 and HP 1X42 piles are shown in table I. It is important to note that variations in the overburden soils and in the depth and quality of the bedrock will occur with distance away from the soil borings. Therefore, we recommend the piles be driven until the maximum factored pile load is achieved. Additionally, an approximately 12 inch thick sandstone seam was encountered in boring B-4 at a depth of 5 feet. Because of the hardness and relatively high quality of the bedrock encountered, pilot holes may be required to obtain a satisfactory pile penetration into the bedrock. Probing of the bedrock during construction to verify its consistency is highly recommended. We recommend probing be extended to a depth no less than 4 times the shaft diameter or as directed by the resident engineer. 4
8 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, 213 Boring Number Table I Maximum Factored Pile Loads and Estimated Bedrock Penetrations Pile Type Proposed Three-Span Bridge over Big Creek Approx. Surface Elev.(feet) Le Flore County, Oklahoma Approx. Bedrock Elev.(feet) Estimated Pile Tip Elev. (feet) B-1 HP 1x HP 12x < 715.8* B-4 HP 1x HP 12x < 722.1* *The minimum tip elevation is based on a resistance factor of at least.75 ( See Table II) Maximum Pile Load (tons) 69.6 The above maximum factored loads must be verified through load testing the piles during construction. Depending on the load testing method utilized, the appropriate resistance factors as shown in table II below should be applied. Additionally, the 212 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications should be followed for more information about the design and construction of driven piles. Nominal Bearing Resistance of Single Pille Dynamic Analysis and Static Load test Methods, φ dyn Table II Condition / Resistance Determination Driving criteria established by successful static load test of at least one pile per site condition and dynamic testing of at least two piles per site condition, but no less than 2% of the production piles Driving criteria by successful static load test of at least one pile per site condition without dynamic testing Driving established by dynamic testing conducted on 1% of production piles Driving criteria established by dynamic testing, quality control by dynamic testing of at least two piles per site condition, but no less than 2% of the production piles Wave equation analysis, without pile dynamic measurements or load test but with field confirmation of hammer performance FHWA-modified Gates dynamic pile formula (End of Drive condition only) Engineering News (as defined in Article ) dynamic pile formula (End of Drive condition only) Resistance Factor Notes: additional information about the use of these load factors can be found in Table of the 212 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
9 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, Drilled Shafts Drilled shaft foundations can be used to support the proposed interior spans of the bridge. Drilled pier foundations should extend through the overburden soils and bear in the bedrock encountered in the borings. The allowable design criteria for the drilled shaft foundations are displayed in table III. A minimum shaft diameter of at least 2 feet for drilled pier foundations should be constructed to use the design criteria listed. The table includes the allowable end bearing pressure and allowable side friction. The allowable end bearing pressure is the bearing pressure at the foundation bearing level in excess of the minimum surrounding overburden pressure. The allowable side friction value should only be used for that portion of the drilled pier that penetrates bedrock. Excavation of the overburden soils can be accomplished using an earth auger. However, rock teeth may be required to penetrate the bedrock. Based on the soil conditions observed in the test borings, we anticipate that casing may be required to prevent caving of the soils encountered at the site. A sufficient head of concrete having a slump of 5 to 7 inches should be maintained in the casing as it is being pulled to prevent an influx of soil and water into the excavation. Seepage of groundwater into the pier excavations should be anticipated and the need for dewatering or slurry construction procedures will depend on the actual groundwater and soil conditions at the time of construction. Any loose or sloughed material should be removed from the bottom of the drilled piers prior to placing concrete. If the shaft drilling equipment used is not capable of thoroughly cleaning the bearing surface, a larger shaft diameter may be required to permit sufficient cleaning. The drilled shafts, and all materials and construction procedures shall be in accordance with the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), 29 Standard Specification for Highway Construction and the latest special provisions adopted by ODOT to supplement the Standard Specifications. Table III Maximum Allowable Capacities for Drilled Shafts Design and Recommended Bedrock Boring Number Penetrations for the Proposed Three-Span Bridge over Big Creek Surface Elev. (feet) Approx. Bedrock Elev. (feet) Le Flore County, Oklahoma Minimum Bearing Elevation (feet) Allowable Bearing Pressure (tsf) Allowable Side Friction (tsf) B < B < Note: The above allowable capacities have a factor of safety of 3 6
10 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, General This report was prepared for Circuit Engineering District 3 in reference to the proposed bridge over Big Creek to be located along County Road EW1546, approximately.8 miles east of the intersection with County Road 193 in Le Flore County. This report provides geotechnical recommendations based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings. The scope of services and recommendations contained in this report do not include any environmental assessment or identification of contaminated or hazardous materials. Any statements in this report or in the boring logs concerning suspicious odors, colors, irregular textures or abnormal conditions are for informational purpose only and have not been verified by the engineer or testing. Subsurface conditions may vary between borings. Therefore, we recommend EST be retained to provide construction testing and inspection. If variations appear during construction, it may be necessary to revise the recommendations contained in this report. However, EST warrants that the findings and recommendations contained herein have been made with generally accepted professional geotechnical practices in the local area. No other warranties are implied or expressed. 7
11 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, 213 Appendix A Boring Location Diagram
12 IS' _yj'iy&-~ [) D~O 7)-t ~~ ~... ~~I In :;; ii ::!le; o" ""111 o" u; I I '....,.,.,. \. \ ~ \ \. \ \ \ \ \ l l t I f I I I f l J -s -# w SR. \ \. \ ~,.,,.. ~ / :""~HJ7+6-4 / B ~~~T~ OGE ~ \ \ i r.r \ ~ Sra. 1 24"X3Q Hi.A' 1l w/-11 J + IJJ --l m ~ VJ D )> ".'.; z r1 f;; --l.j>.. """' """' (/) N N o:i l> ~ r (1) rr1 (.N BR IDGE OVER BIG CR EEK J (5), J/ P (4) CO UNTY ROA D EW-1546, LE FLORE CO UNTY, OK LAHOMA BOR IN G LO CATION DIAGRAM ' I 32 1 S. BERRY ROAD NORMAN, OK 7372 (45) CA# 3639 (PE/LS) EXP. DATE 6/3/14
13 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, 213 Appendix B Foundation Logs
14 74 BORING NO. B-1 STATION 17'17, 14' RIGHT OF CLS (DRILLED FEBRUARY ) SURFACE ELEVATION MEDIUM STIFF, RED-BROWN, SANDY LEAN CLAY VERY DENSE, OLIVE-GRAY, CLAYEY SAND WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL STIFF TO VERY STIFF, OLIVE-GRAY, SILT WITH GRAVEL SOFT TO MODERATELY HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE l'llth SANDSTONE SEAMS HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS BOTTOM OF BORING BO - ss-1; N = 7: MC= 11.8%; RECOVERY= 4'' LL= 33; Pl= 14; #2 = 67.1% ss-2; N = 52: MC = 9.6%; RECOVERY = 18'' LL = 23; Pl = 9~ #2 = 49.6%; SS-3; N = 15: MC= 1.1%; RECOVERY= 18" LL =NP; Pl =NP; #2 = 81.7% ss-4 N = 11 /6 Q" 22/6 Q" 5/5 Q": MC = 8.2% 1 LL = 35; Pl = 13; #2 ~ 72.% ; = 5/3.63"; 5/2.38" ; 5/1.38"; 5/.63" ; 5/.13"; 5/.13" - -4; 5/.25"; 5/.13" - -5; 5/.13"; 5/." BORING NO. B-2 STATION 18-+, 33' RIGHT OF CLS (DRILLED DECEMBER 'i, 21 2l SURFACE ELEVATION HARD, OLIVE-GRAY, SANDY LEAN CLAY l'llth SANDSTONE GRAVEL SS-1; N = 41/6.''; 5/6.'':MC = 5. 7%; RECOVERY = LL = 26; Pl = 8; #2 = 5.9% ; = 5/1.5"; 5/1." SOFT TO MODERATELY HARD, GRAY, ; = 5/1.''~ 5/.38" WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS ; = 5/1.''; 5/.38" 75.3 HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH ; = 5/.63"; 5/.19" SANDSTONE SEAMS BOTTOM OF BORING ; = 5/.75"; 5/.13" 12" SITE GEOLOGY THE SUBJECT BRIDGE IS LOCATED IN A GEOLOGIC AREA BEST DESCRIBED AS BEING PART OF THE ATOKA UNIT (pal. ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED MATERIALS (ENGINEERING CLASSIFICATION OF GEOLOGIC MATERIALS, DIVISION TWO, 1966, OKLAHOMA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT), THE ATOKA UNIT CONSISTS DOMINANTLY OF SHALE ALTERNATING WITH SANDSTONES. THE SANDSTONES MAKE UP LESS THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE UNIT. NEAR THE BASE, THE UNIT CONTAINS A RELATIVELY HIGH PROPORTION OF SANDSTONE WHICH FORMS PROMINENT RIDGES. THE FIRST RIDGE-FORMING SANDSTONES OCCUR 3 TO 5 FEET ABOVE THE BASE. SS = SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER N = NUMBER OF BLOWS PER 12 INCHES MC = MOISTURE CONTENT LL = LIQUID LIMIT Pl = PLASTICITY INDEX #2 = PERCENT PASSING #2 SIEVE KP = TEXAS CONE PENETROMETER LEGEND DCD = DIAMOND CORE BARREL DRILLING UCS = UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH DD = DRY DENSITY RQD = ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION 'Sl- = WATER LEVEL WHILE DRILLING OR SAMPLING ~ = WATER LEVEL AFTER DRILLING Sf_ = WATER LEVEL 24 HOURS AFTER DRILLING NOTE: WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS SHOWN WERE OBTAINED AT THE TIME THE BORINGS WERE DRILLED AND MAY FLUCTUATE THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. TO OBTAIN THE COMPLETE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CONTACT THE BRIDGE DIVISION OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AT (45l COUNTY ROAD EW1 546 OVER BIG CREEK FOUNDATION BORING LOGS <SHEET NO. 1 OF 2l LEFLORE COUNTY STATE JOB NO (LJJ SHEET NO. 1
15 BORING NO. B-3 ST A TION 19-8, 14' RIGHT OF CLS!DRILLED DECEMBER 4, 212) SURFACE ELEVATION HARD, OLIVE-GRAY, SANDY LEAN CLAY (AUGER SAMPLE TAKEN AT 7_5 FEETJ SOFT TO MODERATELY HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS 722.LJO 78.9 SURFACE ELEVATION OLIVE-GRAY, SANDY LEAN CLAY WITH SANDSTONE GARVEL OLIVE-GRAY, SANDY LEAN CLAY WITH LIGHT BROWN SANDSTONE SEAMS, " THICK SANDSTONE SEAM AT 5 FEET THEN POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SANDSTONE GRAVEL 73.1 O DENSE, OLIVE-GRAY, POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT AND SS-1; N = 38: MC = 9.6%; RECOVERY= 18" SANDSTONE GRAVEL LL= 31; Pl= 11; #2 = 57.6% WELL CEMENTED, LIGHT BROWN, WEATHERED SANDSTONE WITH SHALE SEAMS SS-2; N = 25/6."; 5/6.": MC = 7.4%; RECOVERY = O'' LL = 33; Pl = 16; #2 = 65.3% LIGHT BROWN, WEATHERED SANDSTONE WITH SHALE SEAMS (HARD, THIN ; = 5/3.13"; 5/1.38" BEDDED, HIGHLY JOINTED, JOINT SPACING FROM <1 INCH TO 4 INCHES, -2; = 5/3.63"; 5/2.5" HIGHLY FRACTURED, ROD = 2% ; = 5/1.25"; 5/.63" ; = 5/.38"; 5/.13" ; = 5/.75"; 5/.25" GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS (MODERATELY HARD, THIN BEDDED, HIGHLY JOINTED, RQD = %) DARK GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE (MODERATELY HARD, THIN BEDDED, HIGHLY JOINTED, ROD = %) BORING NO. B-4 STATION 1 9"12, 11 ' RIGHT OF CLS ID RILLED DECEMBER 3, 21 2) 711 _ BOTTOM OF BORING SS-1; N = 5/2.": MC= 8.9%; RECOVERY= 2" LL = 26; Pl = 8; #2 = 52.7% = 5/ SO" 5/ " DCD-1'. RECOVERY = "12" SS-2; N = 33: MC= 11.5%; RECOVERY= 1" 73 LL= NP; Pl= NP; #2 = 11.5% SS-3; N = 18/6."; 41 /6."; 5/3.": MC = 16.6%; RECOVERY = 15 LL= 31; Pl = 1; #2 = 72.1% ; = 5/.63; 5/.19" ; = 5/.6"; 5/.'' DCD-2; RECOVERY= 48 'i USC= psf; DD= pcf DCD-3; RECOVERY= 48 ';USC= psf; DD= pcf DCD-4; RECOVERY = 6'' DCD-5; RECOVERY = 6'' BOTTOM OF BORING ; = 5/.75"; 5/." SITE GEOLOGY THE SUBJECT BRIDGE IS LOCATED IN A GEOLOGIC AREA BEST DESCRIBED AS BEING PART OF THE ATOKA UNIT (PAl. ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED MATERIALS (ENGINEERING CLASSIFICATION OF GEOLOGIC MATERIALS, DIVISION TWO, 1966, OKLAHOMA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTJ, THE ATOKA UNIT CONSISTS DOMINANTLY OF SHALE ALTERNATING WITH SANDSTONES. THE SANDSTONES MAKE UP LESS THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE UNIT. NEAR THE BASE, THE UNIT CONTAINS A RELATIVELY HIGH PROPORTION OF SANDSTONE WHICH FORMS PROMINENT RIDGES. THE FIRST RIDGE-FORMING SANDSTONES OCCUR 3 TO 5 FEET ABOVE THE BASE. SS = SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER N = NUMBER OF BLOWS PER 12 INCHES MC = MOISTURE CONTENT LL = LIQUID LIMIT Pl = PLASTICITY INDEX #2 = PERCENT PASSING #2 SIEVE KP = TEXAS CONE PENETROMETER LEGEND DCD = DIAMOND CORE BARREL DRILLING UCS = UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH DD = DRY DENSITY ROD = ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION 'Sl- = WATER LEVEL WHILE DRILLING OR SAMPLING ~ = WATER LEVEL AFTER DRILLING Sf_ = WATER LEVEL 24 HOURS AFTER DRILLING NOTE: WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS SHOWN WERE OBTAINED AT THE TIME THE BORINGS WERE DRILLED AND MAY FLUCTUATE THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. TO OBTAIN THE COMPLETE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CONTACT THE BRIDGE DIVISION OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AT (45l COUNTY ROAD EW1 546 OVER BIG CREEK FOUNDATION BORING LOGS <SHEET NO. 2 OF 2l LEFLORE COUNTY STATE JOB NO (LJJ SHEET NO. 2
16 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, 213 Appendix C Boring Logs
17 BORING LOG CLIENT: Circuit Engineering District #3 LOCATION: County Road EW-1546, Le Flore County, Oklahoma BORING NO. B-1 ENGINEER: EST, Inc. PROJECT: Bridge over Big Creek, J/P 28616(4) SAMPLES PAGE 1 OF 2 TESTS GRAPHICS LOG LAYER / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Station= 17+47, 14' RT of CLS Surface Elev. = feet VegetationThickness : 1" Grass Cover DEPTH, FT. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, IN. SPT- N BLOWS / FT. MOISTURE, % DRY DENSITY, PCF UNCONFINED STRENGTH, PSF LIMITS (LL) (PL) INDEXES (PI) #2 SIEVE HS MEDIUM STIFF, RED-BROWN, SANDY LEAN CLAY 5 CL 1 SS LL = 33 PL = 19 PI = 14 -#2 = 67.1% El. = HS VERY DENSE, OLIVE-GRAY, CLAYEY SAND WITH TRACES OF GRAVEL 1 SC 2 SS LL = 23 PL = 14 PI = 9 -#2 = 49.6% El. = HS STIFF TO VERY STIFF, OLIVE-GRAY, SILT WITH GRAVEL 15 ML 3 SS HS LL = NP PL = NP PI = NP -#2 = 81.7% El. = SS 17 11/6." 22/6." 5/5." 5/3.63" 5/2.38" 8.2 LL = 35 PL = 22 PI = 13 -#2 = 72.% L:\GEOTECH\2KEPSL~2\6WAZKU~M\GINT\6289.GPJ FIRE REMARKS: SOFT TO MODERATELY HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS El. = 79.8 HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATIONS ARE FROM DISTUED SAMPLES. CORE SAMPLES AND FURTHER LABORATORY TESTING MAY 2 REVEAL OTHER ROCK AND/OR SOIL TYPES. THE STRATIFICATION SHOWN IN THE SOIL AND ROCK ABOVE IS AN ESTIMATION OF IN-SITU CONDITIONS. THEREFORE, THE NATURAL TRANSITION BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES MAY BE GRADUAL. * ESTIMATED FROM POCKET PENETROMETER 321 S. Berry Road Norman, OK 7372 (OFF.) (45) (FAX) (45) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None-WD None-AB BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG 5/1.38" 5/.63" CME-75 APPROVED A.D. 2/8/13 2/8/13 FOREMAN JOB# 6289 R.J.
18 BORING LOG CLIENT: Circuit Engineering District #3 LOCATION: County Road EW-1546, Le Flore County, Oklahoma BORING NO. B-1 ENGINEER: EST, Inc. PROJECT: Bridge over Big Creek, J/P 28616(4) SAMPLES PAGE 2 OF 2 TESTS GRAPHICS LOG LAYER / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Station= 17+47, 14' RT of CLS (Continued) SANDSTONE SEAMS DEPTH, FT. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER 3 TYPE RECOVERY, IN. SPT- N BLOWS / FT. 5/.13" 5/.13" MOISTURE, % DRY DENSITY, PCF UNCONFINED STRENGTH, PSF LIMITS (LL) (PL) INDEXES (PI) #2 SIEVE HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS (continued) /.25" 5/.13" Bottom of Boring at 4.4 feet El. = /.13" 5/." L:\GEOTECH\2KEPSL~2\6WAZKU~M\GINT\6289.GPJ FIRE REMARKS: SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATIONS ARE FROM DISTUED SAMPLES. CORE SAMPLES AND FURTHER LABORATORY TESTING MAY REVEAL OTHER ROCK AND/OR SOIL TYPES. THE STRATIFICATION SHOWN IN THE SOIL AND ROCK ABOVE IS AN ESTIMATION OF IN-SITU CONDITIONS. THEREFORE, THE NATURAL TRANSITION BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES MAY BE GRADUAL. * ESTIMATED FROM POCKET PENETROMETER 321 S. Berry Road Norman, OK 7372 (OFF.) (45) (FAX) (45) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED 2/8/13 None-WD None-AB 2/8/13 RIG CME-75 APPROVED A.D. FOREMAN JOB# 6289 R.J.
19 BORING LOG CLIENT: Circuit Engineering District #3 LOCATION: County Road EW-1546, Le Flore County, Oklahoma BORING NO. B-2 ENGINEER: EST, Inc. PROJECT: Bridge over Big Creek, J/P 28616(4) SAMPLES PAGE 1 OF 1 TESTS GRAPHICS LOG LAYER / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Station= 18+, 33' RT of CLS Surface Elev. = feet VegetationThickness : None DEPTH, FT. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, IN. SPT- N BLOWS / FT. MOISTURE, % DRY DENSITY, PCF UNCONFINED STRENGTH, PSF LIMITS (LL) (PL) INDEXES (PI) #2 SIEVE HARD, OLIVE-GRAY, SANDY LEAN CLAY WITH SANDSTONE GRAVEL HS El. = SS 12 41/6." 5/6." 5/1.5" 5/1." 5.7 LL = 26 PL = 18 PI = 8 -#2 = 5.9% L:\GEOTECH\2KEPSL~2\6WAZKU~M\GINT\6289.GPJ FIRE REMARKS: SOFT TO MODERATELY HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS El. = 75.3 HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS Bottom of Boring at 26.1 feet El. = SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATIONS ARE FROM DISTUED SAMPLES. CORE SAMPLES AND FURTHER LABORATORY TESTING MAY REVEAL OTHER ROCK AND/OR SOIL TYPES. THE STRATIFICATION SHOWN IN THE SOIL AND ROCK ABOVE IS AN ESTIMATION OF IN-SITU CONDITIONS. THEREFORE, THE NATURAL TRANSITION BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES MAY BE GRADUAL. * ESTIMATED FROM POCKET PENETROMETER 321 S. Berry Road Norman, OK 7372 (OFF.) (45) (FAX) (45) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None-WD None-AB RIG 5/1." 5/.38" 5/1." 5/.38" 5/.63" 5/.19" 5/.75" 5/.13" BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED CME-85 APPROVED A.D. 12/4/12 JOB# 12/4/12 FOREMAN 6289 W.N.
20 BORING LOG CLIENT: Circuit Engineering District #3 LOCATION: County Road EW-1546, Le Flore County, Oklahoma BORING NO. B-3 ENGINEER: EST, Inc. PROJECT: Bridge over Big Creek, J/P 28616(4) SAMPLES PAGE 1 OF 2 TESTS GRAPHICS LOG LAYER / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Station= 19+8, 14' RT of CLS Surface Elev. = feet VegetationThickness : None DEPTH, FT. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, IN. SPT- N BLOWS / FT. MOISTURE, % DRY DENSITY, PCF UNCONFINED STRENGTH, PSF LIMITS (LL) (PL) INDEXES (PI) #2 SIEVE HARD, OLIVE-GRAY, SANDY LEAN CLAY (AUGER SAMPLE TAKEN AT 7.5 FEET) El. = CL HS SS HS SS /6." 5/6." 5/3.13" 5/1.38" LL = 31 PL = 2 PI = 11 -#2 = 57.6% LL = 33 PL = 17 PI = 16 -#2 = 65.3% SOFT TO MODERATELY HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS /3.63" 5/2.5" El. = /1.25" 5/.63" L:\GEOTECH\2KEPSL~2\6WAZKU~M\GINT\6289.GPJ FIRE REMARKS: HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS 4 5 SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATIONS ARE FROM DISTUED SAMPLES. CORE SAMPLES AND FURTHER LABORATORY TESTING MAY REVEAL OTHER ROCK AND/OR SOIL TYPES. THE STRATIFICATION SHOWN IN THE SOIL AND ROCK ABOVE IS AN ESTIMATION OF IN-SITU CONDITIONS. THEREFORE, THE NATURAL TRANSITION BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES MAY BE GRADUAL. * ESTIMATED FROM POCKET PENETROMETER 321 S. Berry Road Norman, OK 7372 (OFF.) (45) (FAX) (45) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None-WD None-AB BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG 5/.38" 5/.13" 5/.75" 5/.25" CME-85 APPROVED A.D. 12/3/12 12/4/12 FOREMAN JOB# 6289 W.N.
21 BORING LOG CLIENT: Circuit Engineering District #3 LOCATION: County Road EW-1546, Le Flore County, Oklahoma BORING NO. B-3 ENGINEER: EST, Inc. PROJECT: Bridge over Big Creek, J/P 28616(4) SAMPLES PAGE 2 OF 2 TESTS GRAPHICS LOG LAYER / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Station= 19+8, 14' RT of CLS (Continued) HARD, GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS (continued) El. = Bottom of Boring at 32.9 feet DEPTH, FT. 35 USCS SYMBOL NUMBER 6 TYPE RECOVERY, IN. SPT- N BLOWS / FT. 5/.75" 5/." MOISTURE, % DRY DENSITY, PCF UNCONFINED STRENGTH, PSF LIMITS (LL) (PL) INDEXES (PI) #2 SIEVE L:\GEOTECH\2KEPSL~2\6WAZKU~M\GINT\6289.GPJ FIRE REMARKS: 321 S. Berry Road Norman, OK 7372 (OFF.) (45) (FAX) (45) None-WD 6 SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATIONS ARE FROM DISTUED SAMPLES. CORE SAMPLES AND FURTHER LABORATORY TESTING MAY REVEAL OTHER ROCK AND/OR SOIL TYPES. THE STRATIFICATION SHOWN IN THE SOIL AND ROCK ABOVE IS AN ESTIMATION OF IN-SITU CONDITIONS. THEREFORE, THE NATURAL TRANSITION BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES MAY BE GRADUAL. * ESTIMATED FROM POCKET PENETROMETER WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None-AB BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME-85 APPROVED A.D. 12/3/12 12/4/12 FOREMAN JOB# 6289 W.N.
22 BORING LOG BORING NO. B-4 CLIENT: Circuit Engineering District #3 LOCATION: County Road EW-1546, Le Flore County, Oklahoma ENGINEER: EST, Inc. PROJECT: Bridge over Big Creek, J/P 28616(4) SAMPLES PAGE 1 OF 2 TESTS GRAPHICS LOG LAYER / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Station= 19+42, 11' LT of CLS Surface Elev. = 74.1 feet VegetationThickness : 5" Grass Cover DEPTH, FT. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, IN. SPT- N BLOWS / FT. MOISTURE, % DRY DENSITY, PCF UNCONFINED STRENGTH, PSF LIMITS (LL) (PL) INDEXES (PI) #2 SIEVE OLIVE-GRAY, SANDY LEAN CLAY WITH SANDSTONE GRAVEL HS L:\GEOTECH\2KEPSL~2\6WAZKU~M\GINT\6289.GPJ FIRE REMARKS: El. = OLIVE-GRAY, SANDY LEAN CLAY WITH LIGHT BROWN SANDSTONE SEAMS, 12" THICK SANDSTONE SEAM AT 5 FEET THEN POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SANDSTONE GRAVEL El. = 73.1 DENSE, OLIVE-GRAY, POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT AND SANDSTONE GRAVEL El. = WELL CEMENTED, LIGHT BROWN, WEATHERED SANDSTONE WITH SHALE SEAMS El. = LIGHT BROWN, WEATHERED SANDSTONE WITH SHALE SEAMS (HARD, THIN BEDDED, HIGHLY JOINTED, JOINT SPACING FROM <1 INCH TO 4 INCHES, HIGHLY FRACTURED, RQD = 33%) El. = GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE WITH SANDSTONE SEAMS (MODERATELY HARD, THIN BEDDED, HIGHLY JOINTED, RQD = 53%) El. = /2." 5/.5" 5/." 33 18/6." 41/6." 5/3." 5/.63 5/.19" 5/.6" 5/." BORING COMPLETED A.D SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATIONS ARE FROM DISTUED SAMPLES. CORE SAMPLES AND FURTHER LABORATORY TESTING MAY REVEAL OTHER ROCK AND/OR SOIL TYPES. THE STRATIFICATION SHOWN IN THE SOIL AND ROCK ABOVE IS AN ESTIMATION OF IN-SITU CONDITIONS. THEREFORE, THE NATURAL TRANSITION BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES MAY BE GRADUAL. * ESTIMATED FROM POCKET PENETROMETER 321 S. Berry Road Norman, OK 7372 (OFF.) (45) (FAX) (45) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None-WD None-AB SS DCD SS HS SS DCD DCD BORING STARTED RIG CME-85 APPROVED 12/3/12 FOREMAN JOB# 12/3/ LL = 26 PL = 18 PI = 8 -#2 = 52.7% LL = NP PL = NP PI = NP -#2 = 11.5% LL = 31 PL = 21 PI = 1 -#2 = 72.1% W.N.
23 BORING LOG CLIENT: Circuit Engineering District #3 LOCATION: County Road EW-1546, Le Flore County, Oklahoma BORING NO. B-4 ENGINEER: EST, Inc. PROJECT: Bridge over Big Creek, J/P 28616(4) SAMPLES PAGE 2 OF 2 TESTS GRAPHICS LOG LAYER / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Station= 19+42, 11' LT of CLS (Continued) DEPTH, FT. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, IN. SPT- N BLOWS / FT. MOISTURE, % DRY DENSITY, PCF UNCONFINED STRENGTH, PSF LIMITS (LL) (PL) INDEXES (PI) #2 SIEVE DARK GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE (MODERATELY HARD, THIN BEDDED, HIGHLY JOINTED, RQD = %) (continued) 4 DCD 6 El. = DARK GRAY, WEATHERED SHALE (MODERATELY HARD, THIN BEDDED, HIGHLY JOINTED, RQD = %) 35 5 DCD 6 El. = Bottom of Boring at 38.8 feet L:\GEOTECH\2KEPSL~2\6WAZKU~M\GINT\6289.GPJ FIRE REMARKS: 321 S. Berry Road Norman, OK 7372 (OFF.) (45) (FAX) (45) None-WD 6 SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATIONS ARE FROM DISTUED SAMPLES. CORE SAMPLES AND FURTHER LABORATORY TESTING MAY REVEAL OTHER ROCK AND/OR SOIL TYPES. THE STRATIFICATION SHOWN IN THE SOIL AND ROCK ABOVE IS AN ESTIMATION OF IN-SITU CONDITIONS. THEREFORE, THE NATURAL TRANSITION BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES MAY BE GRADUAL. * ESTIMATED FROM POCKET PENETROMETER WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None-AB BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME-85 APPROVED A.D. 12/3/12 12/3/12 FOREMAN JOB# 6289 W.N.
24 Bridge over Big Creek EST Project Number: 6289 Le Flore County, Oklahoma April 11, 213 Appendix D General Notes Boring Acronym Library General Notes for Rock Classification
25 GENERAL NOTES Water levels measured in low permeability soils (clays & unfractured rock) may require long term observations and therefore, the depths shown may not be accurate. Sample Classification and Descriptions Soil Classification: The soil description and classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) unless noted otherwise Description Modifier: Trace - material slightly present in sample, less than 15% Rock: Rock samples are described according to the General Notes for Rock Classification Consistency of Fine-Grained Soils: Qu, Unconfined Compressive Strength (psf) SPT Consistency < 5-2 Very Soft 5-1, 2-5 Soft 1,1-2, 5-1 Medium 2,1-4, 1-2 Stiff 4,1-8, 2-3 Very Stiff 8,1-16, 3-6 Hard > 16, > 6 Very Hard Relative Density of Coarse-Grained Soils: N-Blows/ft. Relative Density -4 Very Loose 5-1 Loose Medium Dense 25-5 Dense 51-8 Very Dense 8+ Extremely Dense Grain Size Terminology: Major Component of Sample Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Silt or Clay Size Range Over 12 in. (35mm) 12 in. to 3 in. (3mm to 76mm) 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75mm) #4 to #2 sieve (4.75mm to.75mm) Passing #2 sieve (.75mm) EST, INC.
26 Boring Log Symbol Library BORING LOG ACRONYM LIBRARY SPT-N: Blow or strike count for the Standard Penetration Test or the Texas Cone Penetrometer Test. In general, the Standard Penetration Test N is the numbers of strikes required to advance a standard 2-inch outside diameter split-spoon a distance of 1-foot, or portion thereof, with a 14 pound hammer falling 3 inches. In general, the Texas Cone Penetrometer Test N is the numbers of strikes with penetration depths required to advance a solid steel three-inch diameter cone of standard dimensions with a17-pound weight falling 24-inches. Two 5 strike intervals or two 6-inch penetration intervals is recorded. WOH: Weight of Hammer WOR: Weight of Drilling Rod USCS Symbol: The Unified Soil Classification System Identification Symbol ATV: All-Terrain Vehicle Mounted Drill Rig EL: Elevation Lt: Left Rt: Right LL, PL, PI: Atterberg Limits (Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index) -#2: Percent Passing Standard No. 2 Sieve NP Non Plastic Drilling & Sampling Symbol Library AS: Auger Sample BS: Bucket Sample DB: Diamond Drilling Bit (Truck Rotary Drilling using air or water to remove cuttings) DCD: Diamond Core Barrel Drilling HA: Hand Auger HS: Hollow Stem Auger (Truck Rotary Drilling) PA: Power Auger (Truck Rotary Drilling) PM: Pressure Meter : Rock Bit (Truck Rotary Drilling using air or water to remove cuttings) RQD: Rock Quality Designation SS: Standard Penetration Test (Split-Spoon): a 1 3/8 inch I.D. and 2 O.D. tube, unless noted ST: Thin-Wall Tube Sample (Shelby Tube): a 3 O.D. tube, unless noted otherwise : Texas Cone Penetrometer Test WS: Wash Sample WB: Wash Bore Water Level Symbol Library AB: After Boring Complete DCI: Dry Cave In WCI: Wet Cave In WD: While Drilling : Water Level Depth From Boring Surface Elevation WS: While Sampling EST, INC.
27 GENERAL NOTES FOR ROCK CLASSIFICATION Igneous Rock Igneous rock is formed from the cooling process of molten material (magna) beneath the earth s surface (plutonic or intrusive rock) or from the rapid cooling at or near the earth s surface (volcanic or extrusive rock). The rate of cooling, mineral composition, and mode of deposition control the type, texture, and shape of Igneous rocks. However, the most common Igneous rocks are: Granite: Intrusive rock; very hard; generally coarse-grained; usually light colored (pink, red or gray); typically lighter weight than most rocks (specific gravity = 2.6); and for the most part composed of Quartz, Feldspar, and some dark minerals, usually Mica, crystalline texture; usually even-grained or grains are equal in size. Basalt: Extrusive rock; very hard; generally fine-grained; usually dark colored (green, gray, or black); typically heavier weight than most rocks (specific gravity = 2.9); and has a glassy texture. Sedimentary Rock Sedimentary rock is formed from the deposition of material (previous rock fragments, soil and minerals) by erosion or precipitation. The loose deposited material slowly hardens and develops into rock from the processes of compaction, cementation, and/or recrystallization. Sedimentary rocks are composted of cemented boulders, cobbles, gravels, sands, silts and clay size particles. The most common minerals composing Sedimentary rock are quartz, kaolinite, feldspar, mica, and iron oxides, together with those precipitated from solution such as carbonates (dolomite, calcite, and siderite) and the sulfates gypsum and anhydrite. The most common Sedimentary rocks are: Limestone: White to light gray or bluish-gray in color; crystalline to fine-grained texture; varies in hardness from soft to very hard; chiefly composed of calcium carbonate which will effervesce upon contact with dilute hydrochloric acid. Dolomite: Very similar to limestone. Usually harder than limestone and usually does not effervesce upon contact with dilute hydrochloric acid. However, will effervesce upon contact with dilute hydrochloric acid if in powered state. Shale: Light to dark colored; very fine-grained texture; composed of consolidated clay or silt; bedded in thin layers. Siltstone: Very similar to shale, but unlaminated. Usually more cemented and less cohesive to non-cohesive. Sandstone: Commonly light colored; coarse to fine-grained texture; composed of cemented sand size particles. Conglomerate: Varies in color; composed of boulder size material to silt, generally sand to cobble size; cemented together with various cementing agents. Chert: Light to dark colored; very fined-grained texture; common constituent of conglomerates; breaks conchoidally or into angular fragments; will scratch glass. Degree of Weathering Slight: Noted predominantly by color change with no disintegrated zones. May have slight decomposition of parent material at joints. Moderate: Noted by color change throughout and some decomposition. High: Noted by complete color change throughout, highly decomposed, may be extremely broken, general appearance approaching soil. EST, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge B Bridge Crossing: South 257 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Polecat Creek Bridge (Bridge A) June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. TABLE
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge D Bridge Crossing: South 209 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationB-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232
More informationProject: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Downtown Greenville Future Conveyance Study December 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 86155032 Prepared for: Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. December 1, 2015 561 Mauldin Road
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT HARPER ROAD BRIDGE OVER POLECAT CREEK APPROXIMATELY ~ MILE EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HARPER ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD N31 GRANT COUNTY, OKLAHOMA STATE JOB No. 28412(4)
More informationSOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART COARSE-GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO.200 SIEVE FINE-GRAINED SOILS 50% OR MORE PASSES THE NO.200 SIEVE PRIMARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED
More informationCivil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx
2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report SH-9 Bridge over Wewoka Creek Hughes County, Oklahoma Job Piece No. 27059(04) July 16, 2015 Terracon Project No. 04125055 Prepared for: Holloway, Updike, and Bellen, Inc.
More informationDepth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF
Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense,
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT. STATE HIGHWAY 48 BRIDGE 'A' OVER INTERSTATE 40 OKFUSKEE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA STATE JOB PIECE No.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT STATE HIGHWAY 48 BRIDGE 'A' OVER INTERSTATE 4 OKFUSKEE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA STATE JOB PIECE No. 2755(4) Prepared For: Oklahoma Department of Transportation Prepared
More informationAPPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION
Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Single-Span Bridge North Western Road & Hall of Fame Avenue August 25, 2015 Terracon Project No. 03155156 Prepared for: Olsson Associates Prepared by: Terracon Consultants,
More informationField Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:
March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin
More informationPhoto 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking
More informationBoreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.
Implementation Boreholes 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3. Rotary Drilling Boring Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 4. Percussion Drilling The right choice of method depends on: Ground
More informationDATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS
DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS SUBMITTED TO PORT OF GALVESTON 123 ROSENBERG AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR GALVESTON, TEXAS 77553 BY HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSTON,
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky
Environmental & Geoscience, LLC 834 Madisonville Road Hopkinsville, KY 440 70.44.000 FAX 70.44.8300 www.wedrill.com A member of Trinity Energy & Infrastructure Group, LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
More informationAPPENDIX C. Borehole Data
APPENDIX C Borehole Data MAJOR DIVISIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
More informationSITE INVESTIGATION 1
SITE INVESTIGATION 1 Definition The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as site investigation.
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report ReWa Solar Farm at Durbin Creek Fountain Inn, South Carolina September 1, 2017 Terracon Project No. 86165043 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina
More informationChapter 12 Subsurface Exploration
Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface
More informationENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods
ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods Geotechnical Involvement in Project Phases Planning Design Alternatives Preparation of Detailed Plans Final Design
More informationREPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY HULBERT 69 KV SWITCHING STATION S. 440 Road Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma ENERCON PROJECT NO. GRDA006 MARCH 7, 2012 PREPARED FOR: C/O ENERCON
More informationAPPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols
APPENDIX A Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols Page 153 of 168 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS The terms and symbols used on the borehole logs to summarize the results of field investigation
More informationDecember 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.
December 5, 2014 Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 90046 Attn: Re: Mr. James Frost P: 323.883.1800 Geotechnical Update Letter Sunset & Effie Mixed Use Development 4301 to 4311 Sunset
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION 42-INCH FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT CHIQUITA BOULEVARD S AND SW 34 TH STREET CAPE CORAL, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials
More informationLimited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming
Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus 2300 Missile Drive, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 Phone 307-635-0222 www.stratageotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report SH-10 Bridge Over Council Hollow Creek Ottawa County, Oklahoma Project No. STPY-255F (191) EC Job Piece No. 30308 (06) April 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 04155008 Prepared
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania CMT Laboratories File No. 1638700 Prepared for: National Development Council One Battery Park
More informationThe process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally
The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as sub surface investigation 2 1 For proper
More informationAPPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS
Otsego County, NY Site Work Specifications APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS Blue Wing Services, Inc. July 1, 2010 Blue Wing Services May 20, 2010 Page 2 the site, was not made available to Empire at this
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI
M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical
More informationAN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY
CTL Engineering, Inc. 2860 Fisher Road, P.O. Box 4448, Columbus, Ohio 43204338 Phone: 614/2768123 Fax: 614/2766377 Email: ctl@ctleng.com AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY Consulting Engineers Testing Inspection
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR STATIC TEST FACILITY FOR PROPELLANTS AT BDL, IBRAHIMPATNAM. Graphics Designers, M/s Architecture & Engineering 859, Banjara Avenue, Consultancy
More informationSoil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.
Soil Mechanics Brief Review Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E. 1 BASIC ROCK TYPES Igneous Rock (e.g. granite, basalt) Rock formed in place by cooling from magma Generally very stiff/strong and often abrasive
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HENDRY COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants OFFICES Orlando, 88 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando,
More informationGEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.
Matanuska-Susitna Borough GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska March 2, 20 Prepared By: John Thornley, PE Geotechnical Engineer 333 Arctic Blvd.,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado
2390 South Lipan Street Denver, CO 80223 phone: (303) 742-9700 fax: (303) 742-9666 email: kadenver@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, and Frisco,
More informationENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
July 16, 211 Vista Design, Inc. 11634 Worcester Highway Showell, Maryland 21862 Attention: Reference: Dear Mr. Polk: Mr. Richard F. Polk, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Report Charles County RFP No. 11-9
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LELY AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (LASIP) COUNTY BARN ROAD AND WING SOUTH CHANNELS NAPLES, COLLIER CO., FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
More informationIntroduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II
Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II ground SIVA Dr. Attaullah Shah 1 Soil Formation Soil derives from Latin word Solum having same meanings as our modern world. From Geologist point
More informationATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY Kevin M. Martin, P.E. KMM Geotechnical Consultants, LLC 7 Marshall Road Hampstead, NH 0384 603-489-6 (p)/ 603-489-8 (f)/78-78-4084(m) kevinmartinpe@aol.com
More informationPierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section
Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
More informationKDOT Geotechnical Manual Edition. Table of Contents
KDOT Geotechnical Manual 2007 Edition The KDOT Geotechnical Manual is available two volumes. Both volumes are very large electronic (pdf) files which may take several minutes to download. The table of
More informationNorthern Colorado Geotech
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED CECIL FARMS DEVELOPMENT WELD COUNTY ROAD 7, BETWEEN ROADS 7 AND 7 SEVERANCE, COLORADO NORTHERN COLORADO GEOTECH PROJECT NO. 0-6 APRIL 0, 06 Prepared
More informationLEGEND ODOT CLASS. A-4b. A-6a. A-6b TOTAL VISUAL WEATHERED SANDSTONE VISUAL BORING LOCATION - PLAN VIEW
PROJECT THE PROJECT CONSISTS IN PART OF ACING TWO STRUCTURES, EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND STRUCTURES, RESPECTIVELY FOR THE PROPOSED SR OVER BLUE ROAD (CR 9). THE TWO STRUCTURES AS ANNED, ARE SINGLE-SPAN STRUCTURES
More informationAssistant Chief-Bureau of Structures and Geotechnical Services
MEMO DATE: 2/10//2016 Bureau of Structures and Geotechnical Services TO: John Jones, P.E. Assistant Chief-Bureau of Structures and Geotechnical Services ATTENTION: Mark Hurt, P.E. Senior Bridge Squad Leader
More informationLEGEND ODOT CLASS A-3. A-3a. A-4a. A-6a. A-6b TOTAL VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL BORING LOCATION - PLAN VIEW
PROJECT THE PROJECT CONSISTS IN PART OF CONSTRUCTING A SINGLE-SPAN BRIDGE ON RELOCATED SHUMWAY HOOW ROAD OVER THE CSXT RAILROAD. THE STRUCTURE AS ANNED, IS A SINGLE-SPAN STRUCTURE WITH MSE WAS AT THE ABUTMENTS.
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011
11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -
More informationLAB 2 IDENTIFYING MATERIALS FOR MAKING SOILS: ROCK AND PARENT MATERIALS
LAB 2 IDENTIFYING MATERIALS FOR MAKING SOILS: ROCK AND PARENT MATERIALS Learning outcomes The student is able to: 1. understand and identify rocks 2. understand and identify parent materials 3. recognize
More informationFINAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BURNS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COLORADO RIVER ROAD BURNS, COLORADO. December 12, 2012
FINAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BURNS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COLORADO RIVER ROAD BURNS, COLORADO December 12, 2012 Prepared For: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 2000 South Colorado Boulevard, Suite 21000
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Richland Creek Trunk Sewer Greenville, South Carolina March 31, 2014 Terracon Project No. 86145008 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina Prepared
More informationGZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
GZA BORING NO.: GZ-1 SHEET: 1 of 1 PROJECT NO: 9.223. Drilling Co.: Geologic Type of Rig: Skid Boring Location: See Plan H. Datum: See Plan Rig Model: Mudline : Foreman: Ray Eastwood CME -.8 Final Boring
More informationADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
F I N A L A D D E N D U M 1 R E P O R T ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION URS JOB NO. 3376186 Prepared for Tetra Tech Inc. 142
More information3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
AECOM 500 W Jefferson St. Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 www.aecom.com 502-569-2301 tel 502-569-2304 fax October 17, 2018 Big Rivers Electric Corporation Sebree Generating Station 9000 Highway 2096 Robards,
More informationGeology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.
Geology and Soil Mechanics 55401 /1A (2003-2004) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. 1. Soil mechanics is the application of hydraulics, geology and mechanics to problems relating
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts Prepared For: Meridian Associates, Inc. 500 Cummings Center, Suite 5950 Beverly, Massachusetts
More informationAPPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
The City of Winnipeg Bid Opportunity No. 529-2017 Template Version: C420170317 - RW APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Quality Engineering Valued Relationships KGS Group 2017 Industrial Street Rehabilitation
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
REPORT COVER PAGE Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed T-Line Structure Tahlequah, Oklahoma October 17, 2018 Terracon Project No. 04185192 Prepared for: GRDA Tulsa, Oklahoma Prepared by: Terracon Consultants,
More informationTP-1 N61E 0 DARK BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) stiff, wet with roots (Disturbed Surficial Soil) DEPTH (FEET) 5 REDDISH BROWN SANDSTONE intensely fractured, weak to friable, deeply weathered, tight (Franciscan
More informationCITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT City of Cape Coral Procurement Division Cultural Park Boulevard, nd Floor Cape Coral, FL ISSUED FOR BID VOLUME of GEOTECHNICAL
More informationAppendix J. Geological Investigation
Appendix J Geological Investigation Appendix J Geological Environment Table of Contents Page 1 INTRODUCTION...J-1 1.1 Purpose of the Investigation...J-1 1.2 Scope of the Investigation...J-1 2 METHODO OF
More informationB-1 SURFACE ELEVATION
5A 5B LOGGED BY El. S. Bhangoo DRILLING CONTRACTOR Pitcher Drilling DRILLING METHOD Rotary Wash BEGIN DATE 12-14-12 SAMPLER TYPE(S) AND SIZE(S) (ID) SPT, MC BOREHOLE BACKFILL AND COMPLETION COMPLETION
More informationWikipedia.org BUILDING STONES. Chapter 4. Materials of Construction-Building Stones 1
Wikipedia.org BUILDING STONES Chapter 4 Materials of Construction-Building Stones 1 What is Stone? Stone is a concretion of mineral matter. Used either as a; Construction material, Manufacture of other
More informationBR-01 PAINT BRIDGE NO. 55 C GENERAL PLAN 720'-0" VC 605'-0" VC 1. FOR INDEX TO PLANS, QUANTITIES, AND GENERAL NOTES, SEE "INDEX TO PLANS" SHEET.
2'-" VC 6'-" VC BB EB 1 1 1 1 1 TV - " TV CONDUITS (COX E 8 - " ELECTRIC CONDUITS (SDG & E T - " TELEPHONE CONDUITS 1. FOR INDEX TO PLANS, QUANTITIES, AND GENERAL NOTES, SEE "INDEX TO PLANS" SHEET. 2.
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Emergency Bridge Package 6 Richland County, South Carolina May 12, 2016 SCDOT Project ID.: P029942, P029943, P029944 Terracon Project No. 73100L (Rev. 1) Prepared for: South Carolina
More informationpatersongroup Design for Earthquakes Consulting Engineers May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01
patersongroup May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01 Hydro Ottawa Limited c/o Cresa Toronto 170 University Avenue, Suite 1 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3B3 Attention: Ms. Barbara Wright Consulting Engineers 154 Colonnade
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. VCU Basketball Practice Facility 1300/1328 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia.
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VCU Basketball Practice Facility 100/18 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia For Mr. Carl F. Purdin, AIA Assistant Director of Design Services VCU
More informationGeotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: June 28, 218 PROJECT NUMBER: 697482
More informationJune 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON
PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MARTIN RIVER BRIDGE MILE 306.7 MACKENZIE HIGHWAY Submitted by : R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No
Duane Miller & Associates 5821 Arctic Boulevard, Suite A Anchorage, AK 99518-1654 (907) 644-3200 Fax 644-0507 Arctic & Geotechnical Engineering May 4, 2006 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1971 First Avenue Seattle,
More informationSUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO.
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO. G1G PREPARED FOR KS ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY PRO GEOTECH, INC.
More informationA. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1
Geology and Soil Mechanics 55401 /1A (2002-2003) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. 1. Soil mechanics is the application of hydraulics, geology and mechanics to problems relating
More informationNAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans
More informationCITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014
CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: 13-3-1.32 Contract No.: 11 TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 214 SUBJECT: Addendum No.1 This seventeen (17) page Addendum forms a
More informationAppendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION JOB NUMBER: 3268.001 DATE: 10-14-13 BY: CC SITE 0 2000 1"=2000' VICINITY MAP CARGILL PARCEL HICKORY STREET AND ENTERPRISE DRIVE NEWARK, CALIFORNIA FOR
More informationGotechnical Investigations and Sampling
Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Geotechnical Investigations for Structural Engineering 12 14 October, 2017 1 Purpose of
More informationNew WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1
88 E. Marshall Street, Suite 0 Tulsa, OK 76 98 8 9 Phone 98 8 798 FAX DATE: April 9, 0 ADDENDUM NO.: PROJECT: New WW Hastings Hospital BID PACKAGE NO: Geotechnical Investigation RFP SUBMITTED BY: CNCR
More informationManual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC
Manual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI-01-031 Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC Geotechnical Site Characterization July 2001 by Paul W. Mayne,
More informationGEOLOGIC/GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR TENTATIVE MAP LAVENIDA SUBDIVISION (APN # ) ORINDA, CALIFORNIA
GEOLOGIC/GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR TENTATIVE MAP LAVENIDA SUBDIVISION (APN #271-120-011) ORINDA, CALIFORNIA A 580 Ts 590 HMA-1 600 HMA-2 70 Ts 610 Ts HMA-3 HLA-5 GJA-6 LD-2 23
More informationIN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION
IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity
More informationGeotechnical Engineering I CE 341
Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341 What do we learn in this course? Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering (1) Formation, Soil Composition, Type and Identification of Soils (2) Soil Structure and Fabric
More informationRED ROCK. Report of Geotechnical Investigation TRIPLE SPAN BRIDGE OVER THE WASHITA RIVER CADDO COUNTY, OKLAHOMA STP-108C(299)CI; 28389(04)
RED ROCK CONSULTING Report of Geotechnical Investigation OF TRIPLE SPAN BRIDGE OVER THE WASHITA RIVER CADDO COUNTY, OKLAHOMA STP-18C(299)CI; 28389(4) Prepared For: Cobb Engineering 4516 Northwest 36th
More informationGeotechnical Properties of Soil
Geotechnical Properties of Soil 1 Soil Texture Particle size, shape and size distribution Coarse-textured (Gravel, Sand) Fine-textured (Silt, Clay) Visibility by the naked eye (0.05 mm is the approximate
More informationI m good. Thank you.
I m good. Thank you. The Rock Cycle Ag Earth Science Chapter 3.1 A natural occurring, inorganic crystalline material with a unique chemical composition. mineral A consolidated mixture of minerals rock
More informationJim Christal Rd B2 B1 B3
Jim Christal Rd B1 B2 B3 KEY O YMBOL AND ERM LIHOLOGIC YMBOL Asphalt ARIFICIAL Aggregate Base Concrete Fill CH: High Plasticity Clay CL: Low Plasticity Clay Consistency Very oft oft Medium tiff tiff Very
More informationAppendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
Appendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation 11.0 Soil, Geology, and Seismology PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION ENGINEERING REPORT CPV VALLEY ENERGY CENTER Wawayanda,
More informationSOIL STABILITY ANALYSES
AMERICAN WATER ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC SOIL STABILITY ANALYSES OMLR 1 PERMIT APPLICATION VARRA PIT 2 AWES PROJECT # 0-0-VARRA July 27, 1 Prepared for: Prepared by: Varra Companies, Inc. AWES, LLC 80
More informationPREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION MACON WATER AUTHORITY (MWA) SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION MACON, GEORGIA GEC PROJECT NO. 14077.2 PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC.
More informationProject No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD
Boring: SB-1 (1 of 1) Moist, brown to orange brown CLAY and SILT, trace sand with fine weathered rock fragments. POSSIBLE FILL. Dry, orange brown sandy SILT trace clay (SM-ML). RESIDUAL SOIL : Not Surveyed
More informationR-1 Conveyor Relocation Project Legend 0 500 1000 1500 ft. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map
More informationR.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE. HELAVA CREEKl MILE MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973
El R.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE HELAVA CREEKl MILE 616.4 MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973 R,M,HARDV & ASSOCIATES LTD. CONSULTING ENGINEERING & TESTING
More informationSafe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along Syafrubesi-Rasuwagadhi road, Central Nepal
Bulletin of the Department of Geology Bulletin of the Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal, Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 95 100 Safe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along
More informationDrilled Shaft Foundations in Limestone. Dan Brown, P.E., Ph.D. Dan Brown and Associates
Drilled Shaft Foundations in Limestone Dan Brown, P.E., Ph.D. Dan Brown and Associates Foundation Engineering How we teach our students Fundamental understanding of soil and rock behavior (good!) Focus
More informationCONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.
CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Concrete Technology, Blasting Consultants Construction Quality Assurance / Quality Control 8 Bluewater Road, Bedford, NS BB J6 Phone (9)85-7
More informationChapter 1 - Soil Mechanics Review Part A
Chapter 1 - Soil Mechanics Review Part A 1.1 Introduction Geotechnical Engineer is concerned with predicting / controlling Failure/Stability Deformations Influence of water (Seepage etc.) Soil behavour
More informationFIGURES 200 200 200 SW 175TH AVE 350 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD SW FRIENDLY LN Area 64 SW ROY ROGERS RD 300 250 SW ONEILL CT SW LUKE LN SW LEEDING LN SW TUSCANY ST SW 164TH AVE SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD SW 164TH AVE
More information10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM
Geotechnical site investigations should be conducted in multiple phases to obtain data for use during the planning and design of the tunnel system. Geotechnical investigations typically are performed in
More information