arxiv:solv-int/ v1 18 Oct 1999

Transcription

1 January 5 08 N = Hamiltonians wit sl) coalgebra symmetry and teir integrable deformations arxiv:solv-int/990009v 8 Oct 999 ANGEL BALLESTEROS Departamento de Física Universidad de Burgos Pa. Misael Bañuelos s.n Burgos Spain ORLANDO RAGNISCO Dipartimento di Fisica Universitá di Roma TRE Via della Vasca Navale Roma Italy Abstract Two dimensional classical integrable systems and different integrable deformations for tem are derived from pase space realiations of classical sl) Poisson coalgebras and teir q deformed analogues. Generaliations of Morse oscillator and centrifugal potentials are obtained. Te N = Calogero system is sown to be sl) coalgebra invariant and te well-known Jordan-Scwinger realiation can be also derived from a non-coassociative) coproduct on sl). Te Gaudin Hamiltonian associated to suc Jordan-Scwinger construction is presented. Troug tese examples it can be clearly appreciated ow te coalgebra symmetry of a amiltonian system allows a straigtforward construction of different integrable deformations for it. Introduction A Poisson coalgebra A ) is a Poisson algebra A endowed wit a Poisson map between A and A A. In oter words if we assume tat A is te dynamical algebra for a one-particle problem te coproduct provides a two-particle realiation of te same dynamical symmetry. In fact under certain conditions te coproduct can be uniquely generalied to a Poisson map between A and A A... N) A and te N-particle realiation of te symmetry arises. By following tis approac a systematic construction of N-dimensional completely integrable Hamiltonians from any coalgebra wit Casimir element C as been introduced in []. Moreover since q deformations see for instance []-[5]) can be translated in a classical mecanical context as deformations of Poisson algebras preserving a coalgebra structure suc construction can be applied for tem and leads to a systematic derivation of integrable deformations of Hamiltonian systems.

2 Te aim of te present paper is two-fold. On one and we use te sl) Poisson coalgebra and its deformations to provide new classical mecanical examples of tis general construction. In Section we recall suc Poisson sl) coalgebras; in Section 3 te general construction is reviewed troug an example based on te Gelfan d-dyson realiation [6] of sl) and in Section 4 new N = integrable systems related to Morse oscillator and centrifugal problems are given. Anoter interesting example of two-dimensional coalgebra symmetry is provided by te N = Calogero system [7] tat is sown to be canonically equivalent to one of te systems tat ave been previously derived. Terefore te results ere presented can be used to construct two new different integrable deformations of tis remarkable Hamiltonian. As a general fact q deformations introduce yperbolic functions of te canonical variables and te associated integrals of te motion ave also suc kind of yperbolic terms depending on positions and/or momenta. Note also tat te existence of te N- dimensional generaliation of all tese systems is ensured altoug we will not describe teir explicit form ere) and tat pase space realiations of coalgebras play an essential role in te formalism. Secondly in Section 5 we present te generaliation of tis construction to systems in wic te dynamical symmetry algebra A is given in terms of an elementary canonical realiation tat already contains two pairs of conjugated variables. By using te classical Jordan-ScwingerJS) realiation [8 9] as an outstanding axample of tis kind of situation we sow ow complete integrability is also preserved for te corresponding system now wit N degrees of freedom. Consequently te deformation of suc systems poses te interesting problem of deforming te JS map. It turns out tat coalgebra symmetry is also essential at tis point since we sow tat te Jordan-Scwinger JS) realiation of sl) is canonically equivalent to a reducible representation of sl) given by a non-coassociative coproduct. From it a standard deformation of te JS realiation is given and related N dimensional integrable systems can be defined. sl) Poisson coalgebras Let us consider classical angular momentum variables J 3 J ± and te associated sl) Poisson-Lie algebra wit Casimir function {J 3 J ± = ±J ± {J + J = J 3..) CJ 3 J + J ) = 4 J 3 +J +J..) Te Poisson algebra.) is endowed wit a coalgebra structure by te usual primitive coproduct defined between sl) and sl) sl) J 3 ) = J 3 +J 3 J ± ) = J ± +J ±..3) Compatibility between.3) and.) means tat is a Poisson map: te tree functions defined troug.3) close also a Poisson sl) algebra. Tere are few deformations of te sl) algebra for wic tere exist compatible deformations of te coproduct.3). In fact two relevant and distinct structures appeared in

3 quantum group literature during last years and tey can be realied as Poisson algebras as follows: Te standard deformation [ 3 0] sl q ) q = e ) given by te following deformed Poisson brackets { J3 J + = J + { J3 J = J wic are compatible wit te deformed coproduct { J+ J = sin J 3 ).4) J 3 ) = J 3 + J 3 J + ) = e J 3 J + + J + e J 3 ;.5) J ) = e J 3 J + J e J 3 ; in te sense tat tat.5) is a Poisson algebra omomorpism wit respect to.4). Te function C J 3 J sin ± ) = J ) 3 ) + J + J.6) is te deformed Casimir for tis Poisson coalgebra. Te non-standard deformation [ 3] sl ) wose defining relations are { J3 J + = sin J ) { J3 J = J cos J + ) { J+ J = J 3..7) J + ) = J + + J + J ) = e J + J + J e J + ; J 3 ) = e J + J 3 + J 3 e J + ;.8) Te non standard deformed Casimir is now C J 3 J + J ) = 4 J 3 + sin J + ) J.9) Equivalently an isomorpic non-standard Poisson deformation is obtained by coosing J as te primitive generator. We ten find tat { J3 J + = J + cos J ) { J3 J = sin J ) { J+ J = J 3..0) J ) = J + J J + ) = e J J + + J + e J ; J 3 ) = e J J 3 + J 3 e J ;.) Te non standard deformed Casimir is now C J 3 J + J ) = 4 J 3 + J + sin J ).) In wat follows we sall make use of tese coalgebra symmetries in order to construct new integrable systems. Note tat te undeformed sl) structure is smootly recovered wen deformation parameters vanis. Jacobi identity can be also easily cecked for.4).7) and.0). 3

4 3 Gelfan d-dyson map Gaudin magnet and deformations Let us now recall te general construction [] troug an example provided by te classical pase space analogue of te one-boson polynomial) Gelfan d-dyson GD) realiation of sl): J 3 = pq b J + = p J = pq +bq 3.) were b is a real constant tat labels te representation troug te Casimir.) wic turns out to be b /4 under 3.). Let us now consider an arbitrary function HJ 3 J ± ). Since te coproduct.3) is an algebra omomorpism it is immediate to prove tat te two-particle Hamiltonian tat can be defind troug te coproduct of H in te form H ) = HJ 3 J ± )) = H J 3 ) J ± )) 3.) will commute wit te coproduct C ) of te Casimir element: { H ) C ) = { H) C) = {HC) = ) Terefore any function of te generators defines a two-site integrable Hamiltonian. In particular te Casimir itself can be taken as te function H. In tat case te oter integral of motion will be given by te coproduct of any of te generators of te algebra. Explicitly in te sl) case we ave H ) C := C J) J +) J )) = 4 J 3 +J 3 ) + J + +J + ) J +J ) = C +C + J 3 J 3 +J J + +J + J 3.4) wic is just te two-site Gaudin magnet [4 5 6]. Once 3.4) is realied in terms of two copies of 3.) we sall obtain te integrable two-particle Hamiltonian H ) C q q p p ) := b 4 + b 4 + p q b)p q b) + p q +bq )p +p p q +bq ) = p p q q ) bp p )q q )+b. 3.5) Since H ) C is te coproduct of C it will commute wit for instance wit J +) wic is just te total momentum p +p and gives us te additional integral of te motion. Te generaliation of tis result to an N-site Gaudin magnet is straigtforward by taking into account te appropriate N-t generaliation of te coproduct. By following [] we obtain tat N N H N) = C i + Ji 3 Jj 3 +Ji Jj + +J+ i Jj ) 3.6) i= i<j N { = p i p j q i q j ) bp i p j )q i q j ) + b 4 N. 3.7) i<j Te m =...N amiltonians H m) togeter wit te total momentum N) J + ) = p +p +...+p N are again N functionally independent integrals of motion in involution. 4

5 Note also tat we could ave taken a different realiation on eac lattice site troug different b i constants in 3.) and te formalism will guarantee te integrability in te same manner tis kind of realiations will be relevant wen te coalgebra symmetry of te Calogero system is analysed in Section 4). Now te same construction can be applied to deformed sl) coalgebras. We sall consider te non-standard one.7-.9). Te following deformed pase-space realiation of.7) can be found J + = p J = sinp) sinp) J = q b cosp) q +b cosp)q b 4 sinp) 3.8) wic leads again te same b /4 constant wen substituted in te deformed Casimir function.9). Terefore an integrable deformation of te system 3.5) will be given by te deformed coproduct of te also deformed) Casimir.9). In terms of two pase space realiations of te type 3.8) te coproduct.8) defines te two-particle functions f + = J + ) = p +p { f = J ) = e p sinp ) q +b cosp )q b 4 sinp ) { + sinp ) q +b cosp )q b 4 sinp ) e p ; { f 3 = J 3 ) = e p sinp ) q b cosp ) { + sinp ) q b cosp ) e p ; 3.9) Te corresponding Hamiltonian is obtained as H ) q q p p ) = 4 J 3 + sin J + ) J ) = 4 f 3 ) + sin f + ) = sinp e p p ) sinp q q ) b e p p ) ) q q )+ b +e p +e p +e p p ). 3.0) 4 Tis Hamiltonian will commute by construction wit te coproduct of J + i.e. te total momentum p +p again) and te limit 0 of tis expression leads to 3.5). Te N-t dimensional integrable generaliation of tis system is given by te N-t coproduct of te deformed Casimir and te integrals of motion will be te lower degree coproducts of suc Casimir and te N-t total momenta. Apart from te GD realiation 3.) te essential ingredients for te explicit formulation of suc system can be extracted from []. In wat follows we sall restrict our study to te construction of two-body problems. However we stress tat due to te underlying coalgebra symmetry all te systems constructed in tis way will ave N-dimensional integrable generaliations. f 4 N = systems and teir integrable deformations Let us now use realiations of sl) linked to well-known dynamical symmetries of pysically relevant potentials like te Morse and te oscillator wit centrifugal term in order 5

6 to obtain new systems wit sl) coalgebra symmetry. 4. Morse potential realiation If we consider te following sl) pase space realiation Te dynamical Hamiltonian leads to te Morse one: Te corresponding Casimir is J 3 = p J + = e q J = p e q a e q 4.) H m = 8 J 3 4sJ + +4sJ + 4.) H m = p +se q e q ). 4.3) C m = J 3 +J +J = a/. 4.4) Te two-body system is obtained by applying te metod described above. Te coproduct of te Hamiltonian 4.) in te realiation 4.) is H ) m = p +p ) +se q e q )+se q e q )+se q +q ). 4.5) Note tat wecan take different realiations on eac copy of te algebra a and a ave not to be te same). Terefore te coproduct of te Casimir gives a two-parametric family of constants of te motion in te form: C ) m = a +a ) a +p )eq q a +p )e q q ) +p p. 4.6) Te Hamiltonian 4.5) can be diagonalied if we consider te canonical transformation P = p +p P = p Q = q Q = q q. 4.7) Tis leads to a Hamiltonian in wic P does not appear and consequently te relative position between bot particles Q = q q is a constant of te motion. Namely H ) Q = P +se Q +e Q ) e Q +e Q )). 4.8) Note tat 4.8) is a Morse-type problem depending on te constant parameter Q. Actually in te limit Q we recover te original Morse potential. It is wort recalling tat tis kind of parameter-dependent dynamics was already observed in [7] were te classical motion on te Poisson-Lie sl) group was considered. On te oter and it is immediate to ceck tat te N-dimensional generaliation of te system 4.5) can be reduced to te same type of one dimensional Morse-type problem now wit N parameters) troug a canonical transformation containing te new total momenta P = N i= p i. 6

7 4.. Deformed Morse systems Te standard case. Te pase space realiation J 3 = p J + = e q ) sinp ) J = e q ae q 4.9) leads to te sl q ) Poisson algebra.4). Terefore te one-particle Hamiltonian does not cange under deformation: and te deformed Casimir element.6) is just a/. H = 8 J 3 4s J + +4s J + 4.0) H = p +se q e q ) 4.) Let us now construct te associated two-body integrable deformation. By applying te deformed coproduct onto 4.0) and wit te aid of two copies of te realiation 4.9) we get H ) = p +p ) +se q p ) e q p ) )+ +se q +p ) e q +p ) )+se {q p )+q +p ). 4.) If we substitute again in terms of P we see tat P does appear witin te Hamiltonian and te deformation would imply tat Q is no longer a constant of motion owever note te persistent coupling of te type q p and q +p ). Te additional integral of motion for 4.) is obtained as te pase space realiation of C ) = C ) = sin J 3 )) Explicitly 4.3) gives te following two-particle function: ) + J + ) J ). 4.3) ) C ) sinp +p )) sinp ) = + a ) ) e p +e q q ) p p ) sinp ) + a ) ) e p +e q q ) p p ). 4.4) Note tat te limit 0 of 4.4) leads to 4.6). Te non standard case. Te deformed pase space realiation corresponding to te a/ value of te deformed Casimir is now J 3 = sine q /) e q p /) J + = e q J = e q sine q /) e q p a /) sine q. 4.5) /) 7

8 Terefore te one-particle Hamiltonian H = 8 J 3 4s J + +4s J + 4.6) leads to: H ) = sine q /) e q /) ) p +se q e q ). 4.7) Te two-particle Hamiltonian is obtained from te deformed coproduct.8) of 4.6): ) H ) = e e q sine q /) 4 e q p + sine q /) /) e q e e q p + /) +se q e q )+se q e q )+se q +q ). 4.8) Again te role of te p +p dynamical variable is no longer relevant under deformation. Te two-particle Casimir would be obtained as te pase space realiation of C ) = 4 J 3 )) + sin J + )) in terms of two copies of te non-standard deformation 4.5). J ) 4.9) 4. Te potential x +/x Te following realiation of sl) J 3 = p q J + = p + c q J = q 4.0) underlies te sl) dynamical symmetry of te above potential since by defining H c = J + ω J 4.) we obtain tat H = p +ω q)+ c q. 4.) Note tat te Casimir function is related to te centrifugal potential: C c = 4 J 3 +J + J = c /. 4.3) A two-particle Hamiltonian wit coalgebra symmetry can be immediately derived by computing te coproduct of 4.). Since tis dynamical Hamiltonian is linear in te generators we ave tat H ) = p +p )+ ω q +q )+ c q + c q 4.4) in case we assume bot pase space representations not to be te same c c ). Te Casimir function for tis well-known Hamiltonian is again te coproduct of C c in te actual representation wic reads C c ) = C ) q q p p ) = 4 p q p q ) q +q ) c q + c ) q. 4.5) 8

9 4.. Deformed x +/x systems Te very same deformation macinery can be now used provided suitable deformed realiations generaliing 4.0) are found. Hereafter it will be useful to consider te function I { Note tat lim t 0 I { [tx] = /. Te standard case. Te deformed realiation is J 3 = p q sintx/) [tx] :=. 4.6) tx J + = I { [p q ]p + Te one-particle Hamiltonian derived from in tis realiation becomes: I { [p q ] J = I { [p q ]q. 4.7) H = I { [p q ] c q H = J + ω J 4.8) ) p +ω q + I { [p q ] c q. 4.9) Te deformed Casimir function is again ) sin J3 /) C = + J + J = c /. 4.30) Wen te deformed coproduct of 4.8) is realied in terms of two pase space realiations of te type 4.7) leads to te following integrable two-particle Hamiltonian: ) H ) = I { [p q ] p +ω q c + I { [p q ] q e p q / + ) I { [p q ] p +ω q c + I { [p q ] q e p q / = H ) + {p q p + ω q + c ) p q q p + ω q + c ) q +o[ ].4.3) Note tat tis power series expansion sows ow te undeformed one-particle Hamiltonians arises in te first order of te perturbation. As usual te constant of te motion wil be given by 4.3) were we sould use two copies of te proper realiation 4.7). As a result we obtain ) sinp +p )/) C ) = {e p q I { I { [p q ]I { [p q ] p q + c )+e p q [p q ] p q + p q)+ 9 [p q ] p q + c ) 4.3) c q c [p q ] q + q I { [p q ] q I { I {

10 A straigtforward computation sows tat te limit 0 of tis integral gives te undeformed one 4.5). Te non-standard case. Te deformed realiation for te non-standard sl ) Poisson algebra wit J as primitive generator.0) is: J 3 = I { [q ]q p J + = I { [q ]p + c I { [q ]q J = q. 4.33) If we consider again te dynamical one-particle Hamiltonian as we obtain te following deformation of 4.): H = J + ω J 4.34) H = p I { [q ]+ ω q + c I { [q ]q. 4.35) Note tat as a particular feature of tis case if we consider te dynamical Hamiltonian H = sin J / J ) H we obtain a natural Hamiltonian wit te usual kinetic term p ) in wic te deformation implies tat te motion is not expected to be always periodic in fact as long as is increasing non-periodic motions become more relevant). Under suc deformed realiation 4.33) te Casimir.9) turns into c/. Te corresponding two-body system is as usual provided by te non-standard coproduct of te dynamical Hamiltonian 4.34) tat reads H ) = I { [q ]p + + = H ) + c I { [q ]q I { [q ]p + c I { { q p + c q [q ]q ) q e q / + e q / + ω q +q ) p + c q ) +o[ ]. 4.36) Note tat tis power series expansion sows te presence of crossed oscillator and centrifugal terms coming from te deformation. Finally te associated constant of te motion can be deduced from te coproduct of te non-standard Casimir.) under two realiations of te type 4.33). 4.. Coalgebra symmetry of te N = Calogero system Let us now consider te N = Calogero Hamiltonian [7] H ) αβ QP) = P +P)+Ω Q +Q α )+ Q Q ) + β Q +Q ). 4.37) It turns out tat te canonical transformation Q := q +q )/ Q := q q )/ P := p +p P := p p. 4.38) 0

11 leads to te identification H ) αβ qp) = H) qp) 4.39) were H ) qp) is given by 4.4) wit Ω = ω / α = c and β = c. Terefore te Calogero amiltonian 4.37) does ave sl) coalgebra symmetry being canonically equivalent to te non-deformed) coproduct H := J + ω J ) and provided two appropriate and in general different) pase space realiations of sl) are considered. Moreover an integral of te motion for 4.37) is immediately deduced from te coalgebra symmetry since it will be given by te canonically transformed) coproduct of te sl) Casimir given by 4.5) wic takes te following form in terms of te Calogero variables: ) C ) αβ QP) = P 4 Q P Q ) Q +Q ) α/ Q Q ) + β/ Q +Q ). 4.40) As a furter consequence te coalgebra symmetry provides a systematic procedure to get integrable deformations of te N = Calogero system. In particular a factor times te deformed Hamiltonians 4.3) and 4.36) will give rise respectively and by using te inverse of te canonical transformation 4.38)) to te standard and non-standard deformations of H ) αβ QP). Once again correspondingdeformed integrals would begiven by te inverse canonical transformation of te coproduct of te deformed Casimirs in te original q p) variables. 5 Two-particle realiations and N dimensional systems So far we ave considered one-particle pase space realiations of coalgebras but tis is not te most general possibility. For instance te classical analogue of te so called Jordan-Scwinger JS) realiation of sl) would be J 3 = a + a b + b = N a Nb J + = b a + 5.) J = a b + { { were a a + = b b + =. Tis realiation can be used to construct integrable systems by using te coalgebra approac but now eac sl) copy will ave two degrees of freedom and we would obtain a N dimensional system wose complete integrability will be linked to te existence of N quantities in involution. Te previous formalism provides us wit N of tem te m-t coproducts of te Casimir and te N-t coproduct of te dynamical Hamiltonian). However N more integrals are also available if we take into account tat under 5.) te Casimir of sl) is no longer a numerical constant but a two-particle function. Namely C i = 4 Ji 3 ) +J i + Ji = 4 a+ i a i +b + i b i ) = 4 Na i +N b i ). 5.) And we ave N of tis quantities in terms of classical number operators) tat by construction will commute wit te N integrals coming from te coproduct. For instance from 3.6) we find tat te JS classical Gaudin magnet is H N) N JS = N C i + Ji 3J j 3 +Ji J j + +J +J i ) j i= i<j

12 N = 4 i= N a i +N b i ) + N N Ni a Ni b )Na j Nb j )+ a + i b + j a j b i +b + i a + j b j a i ). 5.3) i<j Terefore tis amiltonian is completely integrable since it is in involution wit bot te C i functions 5.) and te lower dimensional Hamiltonians H m) JS. Finally we remark tat te last term in 5.3) is just te classical counterpart of a longe-range interacting system wit a four-wave interaction Hamiltonian mixing eac pair of sites see [8] for related quantum optical integrable systems). i<j 5. Jordan-Scwinger map and coalgebra structure At tis point it becomes clear tat a suitable deformation of te classical JS map 5.) would give rise to a new class of N dimensional sl q ) invariant Hamiltonians. Te answer to tis question can be directly related to te study of te reducibility properties of teclassical JSmap and it will lead usto a newinteresting type of coalgebra structures. A straigtforward computation sows tat te J i functions J 3 = J 3 ) = J 3 +J 3 J + = J + ) = J + J + 5.4) J = J ) = J J. close a sl) algebra. We could now consider a pair of armonic oscillator realiations given by 4.0) wit c = 0 and obtain a realiation of 5.4) on te two-particle pase space in te form Now te following canonical transformation can be defined J 3 = p q +p q J + = p p ) J = q q ). 5.5) p = b + a+ q = a b+ p = b a+ q = a b+. 5.6) By substituting 5.6) onto 5.5) we recover 5.). Terefore te JS realiation is canonically equivalent to a fermionic coproduct 5.4) of two irreps of sl). Note tat te map defined by 5.4) is not coassociative since id ) id). 5.7) Te coalgebra structure allows us to perform te same trick in te deformed case were we can obtain te deformed realiation by setting J 3 ) = J 3 + J 3 J + ) = e J 3 J + J + e J 3 ; 5.8) J ) = e J 3 J J e J 3 ; Teseexpressionsarecompatiblewitsl q )brackets.4)anddefineanon-cocommutative and non-coassociative omomorpism. From tem te sl q ) generators can be expressed in terms of two pase space realiations 4.7) wit c = 0: f 3 = J 3 ) = p q +p q

13 f + = J + ) = e p q I { [q p ]p I { [q p ] p e p q ; 5.9) f = J ) = e p q I { [q p ]q +I { [q p ]q e p q ; Now if we apply te canonical transformation 5.6) onto te functions f i we sall obtain te appropriate standard deformation of te JS map 5.) tat can be recovered in te limit 0. Note tat te q-deformation of te JS map as been treated in te previous literature [9] by making use of a deforming functional approac [0 ]. However te discovery of its internal coalgebra structure makes it possible to give an answer in terms of te su q ) properties. It is also wort to stress tat te non-standard deformation seems not to be compatible wit suc fermionic comultiplication. Finally we mention tat te construction of a N dimensional standard deformation of te Gaudin-JS system 5.3) is straigtforward by considering N copies of te deformed JS map 5.9) and by representing troug tem te N-t deformed coproduct of te standard sl q ) Casimir.6). Te integrals of motion will be given by te M-t coproducts M =...N ) of suc deformed Casimir and by te N different functions C i defined by te expressions of te sl q ) Casimir on eac copy of te JS realiation. Acknowledgments A.B. as been partially supported by DGICYT Project PB94 5) from te Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia de España and by Junta de Castilla y León Projects CO/396 and CO/97) and acknowledges te ospitality during is stays in Rome. References [] A. Ballesteros and O. Ragnisco J. Pys. A: Mat. Gen ) 379. [] P. Kulis and N. Resetikin Proc. Steklov Mat. Inst. 0 98) 0. [3] V.G. Drinfel d Quantum Groups Proceedings of te International Congress of Matematics MRSI Berkeley 986) 798. [4] V. Cari and A. Pressley A Guide to Quantum Groups Cambridge University Press 994). [5] C. Góme M. Rui-Altaba and G. Sierra Quantum Groups in Two-Dimensional Pysics Cambridge University Press 995). [6] J.F. Dyson Pys. Rev ) 7. [7] F. Calogero J. Mat. Pys 97) 49. [8] P. Jordan Zeit. Pys ) 53. [9] J. Scwinger On Angular Momentum U.S. At. Energy Comm. NYO ). [0] M. Jimbo Lett. Mat. Pys 0 985) 63. 3

14 [] E.E. Demidov Yu I. Manin E.E. Mukin and D.V. Zdanovic Prog. Teor. Pys. Suppl ) 03. [] S. Zakrewski Lett. Mat. Pys. 99) 87. [3] C. On Lett. Mat. Pys. 5 99) 85. [4] M. Gaudin La Fonction d Onde de Bete Masson Paris) 983). [5] V.B. Kunetsov J. Mat. Pys ) 40. [6] F. Calogero Pys. Lett. A0 995) 306. [7] F. Lii G. Marmo G. Sparano and P. Vitale Mod. Pys. Lett. A 8 993) 973. [8] B. Jurco J. Mat. Pys ) 739. [9] V.I. Man ko G. Marmo P. Vitale and F. Zaccaria Int. J. Mod. Pys. A 9 994) 554. [0] T.L. Curtrigt and C.K. Zacos Pys. Lett. B43 990) 37. [] A. Ballesteros and J. Negro J. Pys. A: Mat. Gen ) 5945; Pys. Lett. A88 99). 4