SEAoT State Conference Seminar Topics. Early knowledge needed. 11/5/2009. Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? The Code

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SEAoT State Conference Seminar Topics. Early knowledge needed. 11/5/2009. Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? The Code"

Transcription

1 /5/29 SEAoT State Conference 29 Austin, Texas Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? by Larry Griffis P.E. Walter P. Moore and Associates, Inc. Seminar Topics ASCE 7 Simplified Wind Provisions ASCE 7 Seismic Provisions: ELF Method Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure Controlling Wind and Seismic Torsion Other Design Tips Preliminary design example for wind and seismic loads The Code The Challenge East Coast Engineers 26 IBC invokes seismic design all across US not just western US Seismic design impacts many more designs than in previous codes Engineers need to know early in design: Does wind or seismic control the design Early knowledge needed. Selection of proper structural system Architectural planning for structural system Budgeting for structural costs Fast-track structural delivery

2 /5/29 Wind versus Seismic Behavior V E Elastic Response Lateral Load V y V s R R d Fully Yielded Strength Design Force Level First Significant Yield Ω ο Seismic Requirements D s C d D E Drift Spectral Accelerations S S, S (S DS, S D ) ASCE 7 Seismic Map USGS web site: Latitude / Longitude Importance Factor I 2

3 /5/29 Site Soil Conditions Strong Influence on Seismic Design Site Coefficients F a, F v Design Spectral Accelerations S DS, S D Fundamental Period T Fundamental Period T Base Shear (V) Seismic Design T C u T a ASCE 7-5 addendum or C s =.44S DS I 3

4 F x /5/29 Response Modification Coefficient R Concrete Systems Seismic Design Category Restrictions B C D E System Category R Ω o C d A F Concrete: Shear Wall Frame Interaction SW/Frame Interaction 4 /2 2 /2 4 NL NL NP NP NP NP (Ord SW + Ord MF) 2 Ordinary Shear Wall Building Frame System 5 2 /2 4 /2 NL NL NL NP NP NP 3 Ordinary Shear Wall + IMF Dual System 5 /2 2 /2 4 /2 NL NL NL NP NP NP 4 Ordinary Shear Wall + SMF Dual System 6 2 /2 5 NL NL NL NP NP NP 5 Special Shear Wall + Int MF Dual System 6 /2 2 /2 5 NL NL NL 6 / 24 / 6 6 Special Shear Wall + SMF Dual System 7 2 /2 /2 NL NL NL NL NL NL 5 7 Special Moment Frame Moment Frame /2 NL NL NL NL NL NL Response Modification Coefficient R Steel Systems Steel: Steel Systems w/o Seismic Steel Sys w/o Seismic NL NL NL NP NP NP 2 Ord Steel Conc Braced Frame Building Frame System 3 /4 2 3 /4 NL NL NL 35 / 6 35 / 6 NP / 6 3 Ord Moment Frame Moment Frame System 3 /2 3 NL NL NL NP / 65 NP / 65 NP / Int Moment Frame Moment Frame System 4 /2 3 4 NL NL NL 35 / 65 NP / 65 NP / 65 5 Sp Steel Conc Braced Frame Building Frame System NL NL NL Sp Steel Conc Br Frame + IMF Dual System 6 2 /2 5 NL NL NL 35 / 65 NP / 65 NP / 65 6 Sp Steel Plate Shear Wall Building Frame System NL NL NL Buckling Restr Braced Frame Building Frame System /2 NL NL NL 6 6 (w/o MC) 6 Steel Ecc Braced Frame Building Frame System NL NL NL 6 6 (w/o MC) 6 Special Truss MF Moment Frame /2 NL NL NL 6 NP 6 Sp Stl Conc Br Frame + SMF Dual System 7 2 /2 5 /2 NL NL NL NL NL NL 7 Buckling Restr Braced Frame Building Frame System 8 2 /2 5 NL NL NL 6 6 (w/ MC) 7 Steel Ecc Braced Frame Building Frame System NL NL NL 6 6 (w/ MC) 7 Special Steel Moment Frame Moment Frame System /2 NL NL NL NL NL NL 7 Buckling Restr Br Frame + SMF Dual System 8 2 /2 5 NL NL NL NL NL NL 7 Steel Ecc Braced Frame + SMF Dual System 8 2 /2 4 NL NL NL NL NL NL 7 Sp Steel Plate Shear Wall + SMF Dual System 8 2 /2 6 /2 NL NL NL NL NL NL Bldg. Density (pcf) Building Weight W vs No. Floors Building Wt. (pcf) No. Floors Stl Conc Building Density Concrete Steel Period T (sec) T=.28h.8 MF Conc. T=.6h.9 MF Steel. T=.232h.5 h > 3 ft. T=h / 75 h < 3 ft. Period Formulas Wind and Seismic T=h/75 h/ h/5 EBF Steel All other No. Floors Building Ht. h (ft.) Distribution of Base Shear F x Seismic Force Diagram Seismic Force F x k= k=.25 k=.5 k=.75 k= F x 7 6 Height h

5 /5/29 Seismic Shear Diagram Seismic Moment Diagram Story V Overturning Moment k = 2. 7 Building Height h k =. Building Height h k =. k = Story Shear Overturning Moment C vx versus k C vx vs k Calculation Base M from V k vs M arm -jh k= k=.25 k=.5 k=.75 k= V % Building Height h M = V x jh jh Eqv Moment Arm M = V x jh V = Base shear C vx k The Wind Pressure Equation p = I ½ ρv 2 K d Kz K zt C p G f Wind Requirements I ½ρV 2 K z K d K zt C p G f Importance of Building Velocity Pressure Terrain Exposure Directionality Factor Topographic Effect (Wind speed up) Shape Coefficient Gust Effect Factor 5

6 /5/29 ASCE 7-5 Wind Speed Map ASCE 7-5 Wind Pressure Equation Involves 48 different variables Requires solution to 24 equations Wind Variable Categories (6 categories, 48 variables) Building Geometry (5 variables) : B, L, h, Cpw, Cpw, z Building Properties (3 variables) I, T, β Wind Speed (4 variables) V, V z, qz, qh Wind Climate (8 variables) Kz, Gf, I z, z, gq, gr, gv, Q, R, L z, RN, Rh, RB, RL, N, ηh, ηl, ηb Terrain Exposure (8 variables) α, zg, α, b, c, l, ε, zmin Site Topographic Features (9 variables) Kzt, K, K2, K3, H, LB, x, μ, γ Metal Building Type Residential Low Rise Simple Diaphragm Wind Load Method Building Types -Use Method 2: Low Rise (Figure 6-) Envelope Approach from ASCE 7-5 Commentary C6.5. -Use Method : Low Rise (Figure 6-2) Simplified Envelope Approach from ASCE 7-5 Commentary C6.4 Low Rise Building Mean roof height h 6 feet Mean roof height h does not exceed least horizontal dimension Simple Diaphragm Building Building in which both windward and leeward wind loads are transmitted through floor and roof diaphragms to the same MWFRS 6

7 /5/29 Simple Diaphragm Building Main Wind Force Resisting System ( MWFRS) floor diaphragms The Basis of Simplification Simplified Wind Design Simple diaphragm buildings h 6 feet Generally flat roofs Based on ASCE 7-5 Figure 6-6 Method 2 Traditional Directional Approach from ASCE 7-5 Commentary C6.5. Assumptions Rigid diaphragm buildings h = 5 6 ft. Period T = h/75 seconds (upper bound) Damping = % (lower bound) L/B =.5.., 2. (interpolate between) I =. No topographic effects (k zt = ) Simplified Method Figure 6-6. The building shall be a simple diaphragm building as defined in Section The building shall have a mean roof height h 6 ft. 3. The ratio of L/B shall not be less than.5 nor more than The fundamental frequency (hertz) of the building used to determine the Gust Effect Factor Gf defined in Section shall not be less 75/h where h is in feet. 5. The structural damping ratio β of the building used to determine the Gust Effect Factor Gf defined in Section shall not be less than one percent (%) of critical. 6. The arrangement of elements of the MWFRS (walls, braced frames, moment frames) is symmetric about each principal building axis direction. 7

8 /5/29 Wind Pressure Equation p= qgf Cp qi ( GC ) p - General Equation (6-23) p = qg f C p - For simple diaphragm buildings ( q C q C ) p z = Gf z pw + h pl - windward, leeward walls Height (ft) h=6 ft. V=2 MPH Exposure C T=h/75 Damping=% Wind Pressure Vs Height ASCE 7-5 ASCE 7-5 Exact Simplified p =.4p 6 2 p Pressure (psf) Height (ft) Story Shear Vs Height Exact vs Simplified Story Shear (pounds) Story Moment Vs Height Exact vs Simplified Wind Load Equations Height (ft) Moment (foot-pounds) Pressure (psf): p z = p ( - z / h) + (z / h) p h Story Shear (pounds): v z =.5(h - z) [(p ( - z / h) + p h ( + z / h)] Overturning Moment (ft.-pounds): m z = /3 (h - z) 2 [.5p ( z / h) + p h ( +.5 z / h)] z p z p p h z z v z m z 8

9 /5/29 Why is Building Period Important? Related to mass and stiffness of building Stiffness affects drift and motion perception Mass affects wind forces Mass affects seismic forces Mass affects motion perception Period affects Gust Effect Factor, thus p Buildings with high periods interact more with the wind Note: Higher Period T is conservative (opposite from seismic!) Higher T is softer more flexible building Period Building Period T T = f { ( mass / stiffness ) } n T = 4 i= m i k i m i = w i / g floor i k i = story stiffness floor i w i = weight floor i Period Formulas Wind Load Proposed Period Formulas Period T (sec). h/75 h/ h/ h Recommended 4. h/75 Period Equations: 3. T = h/.75 h < 3 ft 2. T =.232h.5 h > 3 ft. 3 ft Bldg Ht h (ft) Period T (sec) Period Formulas Wind and Seismic T=.28h.8 9 MF Conc. T=h/75 h/ h/5 8 T=.6h.9 7 MF Steel. 6 T=.232h.5 h > 3 ft. EBF Steel 5 T=h / 75 4 h < 3 3 All other Building Ht. h (ft.) T Service or Ultimate? Steel Buildings: T proportional (/.8 stiffness).5 =.2 Concrete Buildings: T proportional (/.7 stiffness).5 =.2 9

10 /5/29 Anatomy of Wind p = I ½ ρv 2 K d * K z K zt C p G I Importance of Building ½ρV 2 Velocity Pressure K z Terrain Exposure K d Directionality Factor K zt Topographic Effect (Wind speed up) C p Shape Coefficient Gust Effect Factor G f h (ft) Velocity Pressure Exposure Cofficient vs Height Exp B: Kz = 2.(h/2) 2/7 Exp C: Kz = 2.(h/9) 2/9.5 Exp D: Kz = 2.(h/7) 2/ Kz Normalized Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficients Normalized Gust Effect Factor x Vel. Pressure Exp. Coef. Gust Effect Factor Height h (ft) V = 9 mph β = % T =.232 h.5 h > 3 ft. T = h/75 h 3 ft. Kz: Exp C/B Gf x Kz: Exp C/B Kz: Exp D/B Gf x Kz: Exp D/B ft. 5 ft. Rato (Kz Exp C,D/ Kz Exp B), Ratio [(Gf x Kz) Exp C,D/ (Gf x Kz) Exp B] Wind Amplification Factor - Gustiness of the wind Accounts for the loading effects in the along-wind direction (parallel to the direction of the wind) due to wind turbulence-structure interaction. Accounts for along-wind loading effects due to dynamic amplification for flexible structures. Complex equation: ( gq Q + g R R ) +. 7I zbar G = f gv I zbar 5 Gust Effect Factor ( V, terrainexposure, B, L,h,T ) G f = f,β Seven key parameters Wind velocity (V) Building geometry (B, L, h) Building properties (T,β) Terrain exposure parameters (Table 6-2 ASCE 7-5) Exposure α zg ε zmin α b c l ft. ft. ft. B 7. 2 / /3 3 C / /5 5 D.5 7 / /8 7 Gust Factor Simplification Use L/B ratio instead B, L separately (reduces one variable) Relate T to building height (reduces one variable) Use lower bound damping ratio (β = %) β = % for typical steel buildings β = 2% for typical concrete buildings Thus, G f = f (V, exposure, h)

11 /5/29 Height (ft) Exp B; V = 9 mph Exp B; V = 2 mph Exp B; V = 5 mph Exp C; V = 9 mph Exp C; V = 2 mph Exp C; V = 5 mph Exp D; V = 9 mph Exp D; V = 2 mph Exp D; V = 5 mph Gust Effect Factor Vs Height L/B= T=h/75 % Damping β = % T = h/75 sec. L/B = Gust Effect Factor Height h (ft.) Gust Effect Factor vs Height V = 9 mph V = 2 mph V = 5 mph L = 5 ft. Exp C Wind Exp D B =5 ft. Exp B L/B = T = h/75 h < 75 ft. T =.232h.5 h 75 ft. β = 2% Gust Effect Factor G f Height h (ft.) L = ft. Exp C Wind Exp D B = 2 ft. Exp B L/B =.5 T = h/75 ft. h 75 ft. T =.236 h.5 h > 75 ft. β = 2% Gust Effect Factor vs Height V = 9 mph V = 2 mph V = 5 mph Gust Effect Factor Gf Height (ft.) Wind L = 2 ft. Gust Effect Factor vs Height B = ft. Exp C Exp D Exp B L/B = 2. T = h/75 h 75 ft T =.232h.5 h > 75 ft. β = 2% Gust Effect Factor Gf Solve Wind Pressure Equation at Height h and z = 5 ft. ( q C q C ) p z = Gf z pw + h pl p top = Cxp h h Pressure (psf): p = p 5 p z = p ( - z / h) + (z / h) p top C varies:. at h=5 ft to.4 at h=6 ft p z Wind Pressure MWFRS (psf) Exposure C 2 V(mph) h(ft.), L/B Notes: V=basic wind speed (mph), Figure 6- L=horizontal building dimension measured parallel to direction of wind (ft) B=horizontal building dimension measured normal to direction of wind (ft) Wind L B h ph p5

12 /5/29 Wind Load Equations Pressure (psf): p z = p ( - z / h) + (z / h) p h z p z p h p Story Shear (pounds): v z =.5(h - z) [(p ( - z / h) + p h ( + z / h)] z v z Dealing with Torsion Overturning Moment (ft.-pounds): m z = /3 (h - z) 2 [.5p ( z / h) + p h ( +.5 z / h)] z m z Sources of Wind Torsion Inherent torsion Center of pressure not at center of rigidity (e ip ) Center of mass not at center of rigidity (e im ) Accidental torsion Variation in center of pressure caused by turbulence (e a ) Causes - Torsional Wind Loading Center of pressure not at center of rigidity Strive for e ip = e ip.5b Center of mass not at center of rigidity Strive for e im = -.5B e im.5b Accidental wind torsion e a =.5B at.75w Minimizing the Effects Torsional Wind Loads Wind Torsion Align the center of pressure and center of rigidity as close as possible (Goal is zero inherent torsion). Maximum eccentricity e ip =.5B Avoid putting too much lateral load resistance at or near the center of the building. Spread some resistance at building perimeter if possible. Avoid having the torsional period as the first period (should be third period for normal - 2 ft buildings in plan) Study mode shapes Conform to minimum period recommendations Principal axis y x Principal axis 2 ki = k c.r. c.r. c.p. k2 k2j = k2 k22 k23 k3 d2j = d2 d23 d22.5b e2 B W.75W di = di d3 d2 e L Control location and stiffness of outer MWFRS s 2

13 /5/29 Wind Torsion Wind Torsion B = horizontal plan dimension of the building normal to the wind L = horizontal plan dimension of the building parallel to the wind c.r. = center of rigidity, c.p. = center of wind pressure ki = stiffness of frame I parallel to major axis k2j = stiffness of frame J parallel to major axis 2 di = distance of frame I to c.r. perpendicular to major axis d2j = distance of frame J to c.r. perpendicular to major axis 2 e = distance from c.p. to c.r. perpendicular to major axis e2 = distance from c.p. to c.r. perpendicular to major axis 2 J = polar moment of inertial of all MWFRS wind frames in the building W = wind load as required by standard Vi = wind force in frame i parallel to major axis V2j = wind force in frame j parallel to major axis 2 x, y = coordinates for center of rigidity from the origin of any convenient x,y axes n i= i= n x iki y iki n m i= i= 2 x = y = n J = n xi d i + x2 jd k i k i= j= i V i = (.75W ) k (.75W )( e +.5B) n i= k i i + J k d i i (.75W ) k2 j (.75W )( e2 +.5B) k2 j d V2 j = + m J k2 j j= 2 j 2 2 j Accidental Wind Torsion ASCE 7-5 Lateral Deflection e =.5B W V V 2 e a =.5B δ δ2 δmax X axis k k 2 k = k 2 Elastic shear center k.5r.5r R B Y axis k 2 δavg =.5(δ + δ 2 ) δ max from computer analysis Minimizing Torsional Effects Place MWFRS s to minimize inherent torsion Controlling Wind Torsion d i J n (.45B e ) ki (.45B e2 ) i= and d 2 j J m j= k 2 j Maintain : δmax δ avg =.5(δ + δ 2 ).4 under wind and seismic loading - including req d code eccentricty (see similar equations for using simplified seismic provisions ASCE 7-5 Section 2.4..) 3

14 /5/29 Simplified Method Maximize distance Wind Torsion 7. For square buildings with L/B=., the combined stiffness of the two most separated lines of the MWFRS in each direction shall be at least two thirds of the total stiffness in each principal axis direction. For rectangular buildings, as L/B increases from. to 2. or decreases from. to.5, the combined stiffness of the two most separated lines of the MWFRS in each direction shall be proportionally increased from two thirds of the total stiffness to at least 8% of the total stiffness in each principal axis direction. Principal axis Principal axis 2 ki = k c.r. c.r. c.p. k2 k2j = k2 k22 k23 di = di d3 d2 e L 8. For square buildings with L/B =., the distance between the two most separated lines of the MWFRS in each major axis direction shall be at least two thirds of the dimension of the building perpendicular to the axis direction under consideration. For rectangular buildings as L/B increases from. to 2. or decreases from. to.5, the distance between the two most separated lines of the MWFRS in each principal axis direction shall be proportionally increased from two thirds of the dimension of the building perpendicular to the axis direction under consideration to % of the dimension. y x k3 d2j = d2 d23 d22.5b e2 B W.75W Control location and stiffness of outer MWFRS s Seismic Detailing Always (even when wind controls) Horizontal Structural Irregularities Table 2.2- System Requirements Avoid horizontal structural irregularities Table 2.3- Avoid vertical structural irregularities Table Vertical Structural Irregularities Obtain wind p from simplified method Obtain seismic base shear from ELF method Compute base shears for each Obtain forces at each level Draw/compare story V, M diagrams for building Minimize torsion Seismic detailing - always 4

15 /5/29 Example Problem story Concrete Building Hotel with large ballroom Downtown St. Louis Missouri Exposure C wind Site Class D - seismic Seismic: Obtain site latitude, longitude Latitude: deg, Longitude: -9.2 deg 2. Obtain S DS, S D Fa =.337 Fv = 2.3 S DS =.56 g S D =.238 g 3. Determine Occupancy Category: (from ASCE 7-5 Table -) Occupancy Category III 4. Determine seismic design category: (from Tables.6-,.6-2) S DS =.56 g 5. Determine Importance Factor (seismic) (Table.5- ASCE 7-5) S D =.238 g Seismic Design Category (SDC) D 6. Determine structural system type (Table 2.2- ASCE 7-5) 5

16 /5/29 Structural System Selection 7. Determine Building Period T a Seismic Design Category Restrictions B C D E System Category R Ω o C d A F Concrete: Shear Wall Frame Interaction SW/Frame Interaction 4 /2 2 /2 4 NL NL NP NP NP NP (Ord SW + Ord MF) 2 Ordinary Shear Wall Building Frame System 5 2 /2 4 /2 NL NL NL NP NP NP 3 Ordinary Shear Wall + IMF Dual System 5 /2 2 /2 4 /2 NL NL NL NP NP NP 4 Ordinary Shear Wall + SMF Dual System 6 2 /2 5 NL NL NL NP NP NP 5 Special Shear Wall + Int MF Dual System 6 /2 2 /2 5 NL NL NL 6 / 24 / 6 6 Special Shear Wall + SMF Dual System 7 2 /2 /2 NL NL NL NL NL NL 5 7 Special Moment Frame Moment Frame /2 NL NL NL NL NL NL T a =.2 h.75 =.2 ().75 T a =.632 seconds Special Shear wall + IMF (Dual System) R = 6 Ω = 2.5 C D = 5 8. Obtain Seismic Response Coefficient C s Design Response Spectrum Specytral Acceleration (%g) S a = S D / (T a ) SD.238 Cs = = R 6.5 T.632 I.25 = C S = T a = Period (sec) Bldg. Density (pcf) 9. Determine estimated building weight W Building Density 3 Building Wt. (pcf) No. Floors Stl Conc Concrete Steel 5 3 pcf No. Floors W = weight density x bldg volume = 3 x [ 5x5x] / = 29,25 kips W = 29, 25 kips. Determine base shear V V = C s W =.724 x 29,25 = 2,8 kips V = 2,8 kips 6

17 /5/29. Distribute base shear up the bldg V = 2,8 kips w i = 2,925 kips ea floor T a =.624 sec >.5 seconds k =.7 by interpolation Seismic: height C vx Fx V M ft kips kips k-ft Draw F x, V and M diagram for seismic loading Wind:. Determine wind Importance Factor I (from ASCE 7-5 Table 6-) 2. Determine design wind pressures from pressure table p h =.5 x 27.7 = 3.9 psf p o =.5 x 2.7 = 25. psf I =.5 (wind) p h = 3.9 psf p o = 25. psf Wind Pressure MWFRS (psf) Exposure C 2 V(mph) h(ft.), L/B Notes: V=basic wind speed (mph), Figure 6- L=horizontal building dimension measured parallel to direction of wind (ft) B=horizontal building dimension measured normal to direction of wind (ft) L ph Wind h B p5 3. Determine F x, V, M at each floor Wind: height p Fx V M ft psf kips kips kip-ft Draw F x, V and M diagram for wind loading 7

18 /5/29 Compare loading diagrams Seismic/Wind Force (F x) vs Height 9 Compare Shear Diagrams Story Shear vs Height Wind 8 7 Height (ft) Seismic Height (ft) Wind Seismic Force (kips). 5.,.,5. 2,. 2,5. Story Shear (kips) Compare Moment Diagrams Height (ft) Overturning Moment vs Height Wind Seismic 25, 5, 75,, 25, 5, Moment (kip-ft) Conclusions Seismic loading may control design (even in the central US!) High seismic loads from low site classification (Site Class D) and Importance Factor (I =.25) Check wind and seismic drift Seismic detailing always! Control location of LLRS for wind and seismic torsion control Wrap-Up Simple procedures for wind and seismic load calculations Useful comparisons for preliminary design Control wind and seismic torsion Seismic detailing always! Minimize vertical and horizontal irregularities (trade steel/concrete for granite) 8

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No. CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus

More information

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings

More information

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum

More information

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. Example 10 - Sign

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. Example 10 - Sign CS09 Ver 10.01.10 www.struware.com STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR Example 10 - Sign Guide to Wind Load Procedures of ASCE 7-02 Code Search Code: ASCE 7-02 Occupancy: Occupancy Group = B Business Occupancy

More information

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship 2004 Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Abi Aghayere Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/other

More information

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS U09Y0061A - GaragePlus - RV Storage R1 of 12 1050 North Watery Lane Ph: (435) 919-3100 Brigham City, UT 84302Fax: (435) 919-3101 Page R1 of Date: 3/24/09 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS FOR

More information

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake

More information

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000

More information

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E.

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E. Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure Gordon Wray, P.E. SEAONC Protective Systems Subcommittee Objectives > Current Unique Code Requirements More sophisticated engineering analysis Geotechnical need

More information

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD Architecture 314 Structures I Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake Load Combinations ASD LRFD University of Michigan, TCAUP Structures I Slide 1 of 27

More information

HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK

HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK HELIODYNE RACK PROJECT: JOB NO: 2008-36 SHEET: DESIGNED BY: WCM DATE: CHECKED BY: SCOPE: KTD DATE: Racking Calculation Report 1 OF 1/22/2011 1/22/2011 17 Structural calculations for HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR

More information

Structural Calculations For:

Structural Calculations For: Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA 94551 D031014 Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical

More information

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS D-1 An extensive literature search revealed many methods for the calculation of live load distribution factors. This appendix will discuss, in detail,

More information

a 1 ft2 144 in 2 b 26 in.

a 1 ft2 144 in 2 b 26 in. 1 1. The floor of a heavy storage warehouse building is made of 6-in.-thick stone concrete. If the floor is a slab having a length of 15 ft and width of 10 ft, determine the resultant force caused by the

More information

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building

More information

Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Chapter 5 Commentary STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 5.1 GENERAL The equivalent lateral force (ELF) procedure specified in Sec. 5.2 is similar in its basic concept to SEAOC recommendations in 1968, 1973,

More information

10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax

10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. ATTN: Chris Hanstad 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 27 March 2013 SUBJ: CRL SRS STANDOFF RAILING SYSTEM GLASS BALUSTRADE GUARDS The SRS Standoff Railing System is an engineered

More information

New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16

New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16 New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16 Building EERI Seismic Seminar on Safety Next Generation Council Webinar Attenuation Models July 28, 2017 Charlie Kircher Kircher & Associates Palo Alto, California

More information

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth

More information

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >.

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >. 11 LIMITATION OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO----( ) 1-Nonsway (braced) frames: The ACI Code, Section 6.2.5 recommends the following limitations between short and long columns in braced (nonsway) frames: 1. The

More information

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002 Abstract Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 00 Paresh V. Patel Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Nirma Institute of Technology, Ahmedabad 38481 In this article codal provisions of IS 1893

More information

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings Fawad A. Najam Pennung Warnitchai Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand Email: fawad.ahmed.najam@ait.ac.th A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic

More information

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC. ICC ES Report ICC ES () 7 () www.icc es.org Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 1 Reissued /1 This report is subject to renewal /. DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: 1 STEEL ING REPORT

More information

APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS, NOTATIONS, AND SI CONVERSION FACTORS

APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS, NOTATIONS, AND SI CONVERSION FACTORS APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS, NOTATIONS, AND SI CONVERSION FACTORS A.1 DEFINITION OF STRUCTURE TYPES Tangent Structure: Minimum line deflection angle. Usually suspension or some type of post insulators (line

More information

Structural Specialization

Structural Specialization Structural Specialization Project: Size beams for the given structural layout using loading conditions specified in the International Building Code. Contents Typical Floor Beam Layout... 2 Building Sections...

More information

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf. C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 24 July 2009 SUBJ: CR LAURENCE UNIVERSAL SUN SHADES The CRL Universal Aluminum Sun Shades were evaluated in accordance with the 2006 International

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering

More information

4.3 Moment Magnification

4.3 Moment Magnification CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column

More information

Wind and Earthquake Loads On The Analysis of a Vertical Pressure Vessel For Oil Separator

Wind and Earthquake Loads On The Analysis of a Vertical Pressure Vessel For Oil Separator Wind and Earthquake Loads On The Analysis of a Vertical Pressure Vessel For Oil Separator Cokorda Prapti Mahandari a, Aji Abdillah Kharisma b a,b Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Industrial

More information

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown? 1 of 5 Continuing Education Course #274 What Every Engineer Should Know About Structures Part D - Bending Strength Of Materials NOTE: The following question was revised on 15 August 2018 1. The moment

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 3 ANALYSIS METHODS OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BRIDGES 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Loadings for the Analysis

More information

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil) QuickWall 8.0 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ================================================================================ Job ID : Job Description : Designed By : ================================================================================

More information

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23

More information

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Two-way slabs have tension reinforcing spanning in BOTH directions, and may take the general form of one of the following: Types of Two-Way Slab Systems Lecture 7 Page 1 of 13 The

More information

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 2-1. Wind loads calculation 2-2. Seismic loads 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). 4-1.

More information

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED Ministry of Municipal Affairs PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED CHANGE NUMBER: SOURCE: B-04-01-15 Ontario-NBC CODE REFERENCE: Division B / 4.1.8.2. Division B / 4.1.8.4.

More information

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames Kawai, N. 1 ABSTRACT Relating to the revision of Building Standard Law of Japan, the application

More information

From Table 1 4. DL = [12 lb/ft 2 # in.(6 in.)] (15 ft)(10 ft) = 10,800 lb. LL = (250 lb/ft 2 )(15 ft)(10 ft) = 37,500 lb.

From Table 1 4. DL = [12 lb/ft 2 # in.(6 in.)] (15 ft)(10 ft) = 10,800 lb. LL = (250 lb/ft 2 )(15 ft)(10 ft) = 37,500 lb. 1 1. The floor of a heavy storage warehouse building is made of 6-in.-thick stone concrete. If the floor is a slab having a length of 15 ft and width of 10 ft, determine the resultant force caused by the

More information

2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350)

2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350) 2018 WFCM Changes Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council Lori Koch, P.E. Manager,

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 24.4m x 12.2m x 6.4m The Platoon Tent Structure (3m Bay) for 80km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ

More information

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 2.5 x 6 Design Span (L):

More information

TORSIONAL EFFECTS AND REGULARITY CONDITIONS IN RC BUILDINGS

TORSIONAL EFFECTS AND REGULARITY CONDITIONS IN RC BUILDINGS TORSIONAL EFFECTS AND REGULARITY CONDITIONS IN RC BUILDINGS Edoardo COSENZA 1, Gaetano MANFREDI And Roberto REALFONZO 3 SUMMARY Earthquake damages at the perimeter of buildings are often the result of

More information

University of California at Berkeley Structural Engineering Mechanics & Materials Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Spring 2012 Student name : Doctoral Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics Name: University of California, Berkeley Fall Semester, 2018 Problem 1 (30% weight) Preliminary Examination - Dynamics An undamped SDOF system with mass m and stiffness k is initially at rest and is then

More information

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. GTE 2016 Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. D : SOLID MECHNICS Q.1 single degree of freedom vibrating system has mass of 5 kg, stiffness of 500 N/m and damping coefficient of 100 N-s/m. To make the system

More information

Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane

Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane Luan MURTAJ 1, Enkelejda MURTAJ 1 Pedagogue, Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads

More information

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TYPICAL ANALYSIS - POLE LOCATION, ANTENNA SIZING AND SOILS PROPERTIES REQUIRED FOR SPECIFIC ANALYSIS.

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TYPICAL ANALYSIS - POLE LOCATION, ANTENNA SIZING AND SOILS PROPERTIES REQUIRED FOR SPECIFIC ANALYSIS. STRUCTURL NLYSIS TYPICL NLYSIS - POLE LOCTION, NTENN SIZING ND SOILS PROPERTIES REQUIRED FOR SPECIFIC NLYSIS. 9.5 FOOT BOVE GRDE, 1" DI. CONCRETE NTENN POLE WITH POLE TOP '-0" DIMETER BY 5'-6" CYLINDRICL

More information

PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BUILDINGS IN JAPAN

PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BUILDINGS IN JAPAN Workshop: Bridges seismic isolation and large scale modeling, St.-Petersburg, Russia, June 9th - July 3rd, 1 PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BUILDINGS IN JAPAN Nagahide KANI 1, Demin FENG

More information

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability

More information

Insurer-Funded Non-Profit Promotes Resilient Construction Research & Communications. Tornado Proof Near Ultimate Protection Tornado Resistant

Insurer-Funded Non-Profit Promotes Resilient Construction Research & Communications. Tornado Proof Near Ultimate Protection Tornado Resistant Who is IBHS Tornado Resistant Construction: Design Issues Plus Pros and Cons of Various Building Systems Timothy Reinhold Sr. VP for Research, Chief Engineer Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR STEEL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR STEEL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR STEEL ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES Cem Topkaya Professor of Civil Engineering Middle East Technical University Ankara, Turkey e-mail: ctopkaya@metu.edu.tr Ahmet Kuşyılmaz

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of Client: ProVent PV1805 Project: CBISC-05 Iso Curb CBISPRS Upper curb rail Unit: YORK ZX 04-07; XX A7; ZY, ZQ, XY, XQ 04-06 Curb Information Hcurb upper = 5.5 in (Height of upper curb rail) Lcurb = 70.375

More information

COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES

COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, Paper No. 6 COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES Jaime DE-LA-COLINA, MariCarmen HERNANDEZ

More information

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318 Sway Column Example PCA Notes on ACI 318 ASDIP Concrete is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com Example 11.2 Slenderness Effects for Columns in a Sway Frame Design columns C1 and C2 in the

More information

Seismic Performance of High-rise RC Wall-type Buildings in Korea

Seismic Performance of High-rise RC Wall-type Buildings in Korea Seismic Performance of High-rise RC Wall-type Buildings in Korea December 2 th, 24 Han Seon Lee Professor, Korea University, Seoul, Korea Structural Concrete Engineering Lab. Ratio of Apartments / Total

More information

TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY IN MULTI-STORY STRUCTURES

TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY IN MULTI-STORY STRUCTURES TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY IN MULTI-STORY STRUCTURES Günay Özmen Konuralp Girgin Yavuz Durgun ABSTRACT In contemporary earthquake-regulations, effects of torsional irregularity are represented by augmenting

More information

Control of Earthquake Induced Vibrations in Asymmetric Buildings Using Passive Damping

Control of Earthquake Induced Vibrations in Asymmetric Buildings Using Passive Damping Control of Earthquake Induced Vibrations in Asymmetric Buildings Using Passive Damping Rakesh K. Goel, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Abstract This paper summarizes the results

More information

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ).

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ). Architectural Railing Division C.R.Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 E Vernon Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90058 (T) 800.421.6144 (F) 800.587.7501 www.crlaurence.com 12 JAN 2011 SUBJ: TAPER-LOC SYSTEM DRY-GLAZE LAMINATED

More information

of I Section Members

of I Section Members IMPROVED DESIGN ASSESSMENT OF LTB OF I-SECTION MEMBERS VIA MODERN COMPUTATIONAL METHODS Improved Design Assessment of LTB of I Section Members Donald W. White (with credits to Dr. Woo Yong Jeong & Mr.

More information

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics Fall Semester 2017 Problem 1 The simple structure shown below weighs 1,000 kips and has a period of 1.25 sec. It has no viscous damping. It is subjected to the impulsive load shown in the figure. If the

More information

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B Volume B 3.1.4 Diaphragmatic behaviour In general, when there is eccentric loading at a floor, e.g. imposed by the horizontal seismic action, the in-plane rigidity of the slab forces all the in-plane points

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic

More information

LATERAL STABILITY OF BEAMS WITH ELASTIC END RESTRAINTS

LATERAL STABILITY OF BEAMS WITH ELASTIC END RESTRAINTS LATERAL STABILITY OF BEAMS WITH ELASTIC END RESTRAINTS By John J. Zahn, 1 M. ASCE ABSTRACT: In the analysis of the lateral buckling of simply supported beams, the ends are assumed to be rigidly restrained

More information

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Project: Design check 6m, 8m, 8m, 10m, 12m, 14m & 16m Single Pole Star Shade Structure for 45km/hr Wind Spead Reference: Extreme Marquees Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked

More information

Beam Design - Pine Tree

Beam Design - Pine Tree - Pine Tree 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Southern Pine Grade: SP DSS Size: 2 x 8 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear Span: 11.67 ft. Total

More information

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures Basic principles Ioannis N. Psycharis Basic considerations Design earthquake: small

More information

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDINGS BASED ON THE CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDINGS BASED ON THE CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD SEISMIC PERFORMACE ESTIMATIO OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDIGS BASED O THE CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD Tatsuya AZUHATA, Taiki SAITO, Masaharu TAKAYAMA And Katsumi AGAHARA 4 SUMMARY This paper presents the procedure

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of 6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-91 (80-266-18**) Unit: YORK ZJ,ZR 180-300 / ZF 210-300 / XP 180-240 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 126.25 in (Length

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180 6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 (80-266-19**) Unit: ZF180 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 115.25 in (Length of curb) wcurb = 84 in (Width of curb)

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Easy Signs Pty. Ltd. Project: Design check 3m 3m, 3m 4.5m & 3m 6m Folding Marquees for Pop-up Gazebos for 45km/hr Wind Speed Reference: Easy Signs Pty. Ltd. Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked

More information

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3.1 General In the previous chapters of Draft IS: 800 LSM version, we have stipulated the codal provisions for determining the stress distribution in

More information

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft. ME 323 - Final Exam Name December 15, 2015 Instructor (circle) PROEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) Krousgrill 11:30AM-12:20PM Ghosh 2:30-3:20PM Gonzalez 12:30-1:20PM Zhao 4:30-5:20PM M (x) y 20 kip ft 0.2

More information

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN Original Title Presented by Northwest Signal copyright 2010 Designing & Building Structural Steel Products since 1976 Primary Users Traffic Signal Strain & Mast Arm Poles Cantilever & Bridge Sign Structures

More information

Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal Unbraced Lengths

Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal Unbraced Lengths Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference Structural Stability Research Council San Antonio, Texas, March 21-24, 2017 Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal

More information

Support Idealizations

Support Idealizations IVL 3121 nalysis of Statically Determinant Structures 1/12 nalysis of Statically Determinate Structures nalysis of Statically Determinate Structures The most common type of structure an engineer will analyze

More information

NOVEL FLOWCHART TO COMPUTE MOMENT MAGNIFICATION FOR LONG R/C COLUMNS

NOVEL FLOWCHART TO COMPUTE MOMENT MAGNIFICATION FOR LONG R/C COLUMNS NOVEL FLOWCHART TO COMPUTE MOMENT MAGNIFICATION FOR LONG R/C COLUMNS Abdul Kareem M. B. Al-Shammaa and Ehsan Ali Al-Zubaidi 2 Department of Urban Planning Faculty of Physical Planning University of Kufa

More information

Chapter 7: Solving Structural Dynamic Problems Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E.* September 2008

Chapter 7: Solving Structural Dynamic Problems Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E.* September 2008 Chapter 7: Solving Structural Dynamic Problems Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E.* September 2008 7.1 Introduction: The last chapter presented the fundamental methods used in structural dynamics to

More information

An Investigation of the Fundamental Period of Vibration of Irregular Steel Structures THESIS

An Investigation of the Fundamental Period of Vibration of Irregular Steel Structures THESIS An Investigation of the Fundamental Period of Vibration of Irregular Steel Structures THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School

More information

Comparison of Base Shear Force Method in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe

Comparison of Base Shear Force Method in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 66-69 (202) pp 2345-2352 Online available since 202/May/4 at www.scientific.net (202) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi:0.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.66-69.2345

More information

THE EFFECTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON BUILDINGS WITH A FLEXIBLE FIRST STORY 1

THE EFFECTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON BUILDINGS WITH A FLEXIBLE FIRST STORY 1 EFFECTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON A FLEXIBLE FIRST STORY 167 THE EFFECTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON BUILDINGS WITH A FLEXIBLE FIRST STORY 1 BY R. R. MARTEL 2 The title of this paper is a misnomer, purposely selected to

More information

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of

More information

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3.1 Definitions Build-up members, made out by coupling two or more simple profiles for obtaining stronger and stiffer section are very common in steel structures,

More information

DUCTILITY BEHAVIOR OF A STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL BY EXPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING

DUCTILITY BEHAVIOR OF A STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL BY EXPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING The 4 th World Conference on arthquake ngineering October -7, 008, Beijing, China ABSTRACT : DCTILITY BHAVIOR OF A STL PLAT SHAR WALL BY XPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING P. Memarzadeh Faculty of Civil ngineering,

More information

Equilibrium in Three Dimensions

Equilibrium in Three Dimensions C h a p t e r 7 Equilibrium in Three Dimensions In this chapter, you will learn the following to World Class standards: Forces in Three Different Axis Wind Load on the Antennae Pole Practice Problem -

More information

host structure (S.F.D.)

host structure (S.F.D.) TABLE 00.4 FBC Typical Mansard Beam [AAF] Allowable Span of Mansard Screen Enclosure Self-Mating Beams in accordance with requirements of Table 00.4 (and the 005 Aluminum Design Manual) using 6005T5 alloy:

More information

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110 CTS Netherlands B.V. Riga 10 2993 LW Barendrecht The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)180 531027 (office) Fax: +31 (0)180 531848 (office) E-mail: info@cts-netherlands.com Website: www.cts-netherlands.com Chamber

More information

What s New In ASCE 7-16?

What s New In ASCE 7-16? What s New In ASCE 7-16? Ronald O. Hamburger SE, SECB Senior Principal Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. Presented to: TMS San Diego, CA Nov. 4 2017 www.sgh.com The Big Changes Title Change Chapter 1 Performance

More information

7.2 Design of minaret: Geometry:

7.2 Design of minaret: Geometry: 7. Design of minaret: Geometry: The figure below shows the longitudinal section in the minaret and the cross section will be shown when start calculate the self-weight of each section. Figure 7..1 Longitudinal

More information

Unit 21 Couples and Resultants with Couples

Unit 21 Couples and Resultants with Couples Unit 21 Couples and Resultants with Couples Page 21-1 Couples A couple is defined as (21-5) Moment of Couple The coplanar forces F 1 and F 2 make up a couple and the coordinate axes are chosen so that

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

Wind Resistant Design AIJ Recommendations for Wind Loads on Buildings

Wind Resistant Design AIJ Recommendations for Wind Loads on Buildings Lecture 6 Wind Resistant Design AIJ Recommendations for Wind Loads on Buildings Tokyo Polytechnic University The 1st Century Center of Excellence Program Yukio Tamura Background Building Standard Law of

More information

Software Verification

Software Verification EXAMPLE 6-6 LINK SUNY BUFFALO DAMPER WITH LINEAR VELOCITY EXPONENT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION This example comes from Section 5 of Scheller and Constantinou 1999 ( the SUNY Buffalo report ). It is a two-dimensional,

More information

Serviceability Deflection calculation

Serviceability Deflection calculation Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning

More information

DEPENDENCE OF ACCIDENTAL TORSION ON STRUCTURAL SYSTEM PROPERTIES

DEPENDENCE OF ACCIDENTAL TORSION ON STRUCTURAL SYSTEM PROPERTIES th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, 4 Paper No. 6 DEPENDENCE OF ACCIDENTAL TORSION ON STRUCTURAL SYSTEM PROPERTIES Julio J. HERNÁNDEZ and Oscar A. LÓPEZ SUMMARY

More information

SIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 02 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA

SIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 02 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA NTA IM 14 TIP 0 SIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 0 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA INTRODUCTION It is intended that this document e used in conjunction with competent engineering

More information

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.

More information