Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)
|
|
- Reynold Woods
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake Design Philosophy Analysis for Seismic Loads References 2 1
2 Earth s Interior Introduction 3 Introduction Earthquake results from the sudden movement of the tectonic plates in the earth s crust. 4 2
3 Effect of Earthquake Introduction The movement, taking place at the fault lines, causes energy release which is transmitted through the earth in the form of waves. These waves reach the structure causing shaking. 5 Introduction Seismic Events around the globe Mostly takes place at boundaries of Tectonic plates Dots represents an earthquake 6 3
4 Introduction Types of Waves Generated Due to Earthquake Body Waves Surface Waves 7 Introduction Displacement due to Earthquake 8 4
5 Introduction Horizontal and Vertical Shaking Earthquake causes shaking of the ground in all three directions. The structures designed for gravity loading (DL+LL) will be normally safe against vertical component of ground shaking. The vertical acceleration during ground shaking either adds to or subtracts from the acceleration due to gravity. 9 Introduction Horizontal and Vertical Shaking The structures are normally designed for horizontal shaking to minimize the effect of damages due to earthquakes. 10 5
6 Introduction Earthquake Types with respect to Depth of Focus Shallow Depth of focus varies between 0 and 70 km. Deep Depth of focus varies between 70 and 700 km. 11 Introduction Earthquake characteristics with respect to distance from epicenter 1.0 T 10 sec 1 Hz f 0.1 Hz Near Field: 0 to 25 km Intermediate Field: 25 to 50 km Far Field: Beyond 50 km 0.3 T 1.0 sec 3.33 Hz f 1 Hz 0.05 T Hz f 3.33 Hz 25 km Low period & high frequency field Epicenter Moderate period & low frequency field Large period & low frequency field 12 6
7 Introduction Resonance risk for structures w.r.t near, intermediate and far field earthquakes The natural time period of a structure is its important characteristic to predict behavior during an earthquake of certain time period (Resonance phenomenon). For a particular structure, the natural time period is a function of mass and stiffness {T = 2p (m/k)} T can be roughly estimated from: T = 0.1 number of stories 13 Introduction Resonance risk for structures w.r.t near, intermediate and far field earthquakes High rise Structure (Above 5 stories) Medium rise Structure (upto 5 stories) Epicenter Low rise Structure (upto 3 stories) 14 7
8 Introduction Earthquake Recording Seismograph Using multiple seismographs around the world, accurate location of the epicenter of the earthquake, as well as its magnitude or size can be determined. Working of seismograph shown in figure. 15 Introduction Earthquake Recording Richter Scale In 1935, Charles Richter (US) developed this scale. The Richter scale is logarithmic, So, a magnitude 5 Richter measurement is ten times greater than a magnitude 4; while it is 10 x 10, or 100 times greater than a magnitude 3 measurement. 16 8
9 Introduction Earthquake Recording Some of the famous earthquake records 17 Introduction Earthquake Occurrence 18 9
10 Introduction Seismic Zones 19 Introduction Importance of Architectural Features The behavior of a building during earthquakes depend critically on its overall shape, size and geometry, in addition to how the earthquake forces are carried to the ground
11 Introduction Importance of Architectural Features At the planning stage, architects and structural engineers must work together to ensure that the unfavorable features are avoided and a good building configuration is chosen. 21 Introduction Other Undesirable Scenarios 22 11
12 Introduction Soft Storey 23 Earthquake Design Philosophy Performance level 24 12
13 Building Code of Pakistan In Pakistan, the design criteria for earthquake loading are based on design procedures presented in chapter 5, division II of Building Code of Pakistan, seismic provision 2007 (BCP, SP 2007), which have been adopted from chapter 16, division II of UBC-97 (Uniform Building Code), volume Lateral Force Determination Procedures The total design seismic force imposed by an earthquake on the structure at its base is referred to as base shear V in the UBC-97. The design seismic force can be determined based on: Dynamic lateral force procedure [sec. 1631, UBC-97 or sec. 5.31, BCP-2007]. Static lateral force procedure [sec , UBC-97 or Sec , BCP 2007], 26 13
14 Dynamic Lateral Force Procedure UBC-97 section 1631 include information on dynamic lateral force procedures that involve the use of: Time history analysis. Response spectrum analysis. The details of these methods are presented in sections and of the UBC Dynamic Lateral Force Procedure Time History Analysis (THA) Lateral Displacement Ground acceleration T T 28 14
15 Dynamic Lateral Force Procedure a (ft/sec 2 ) Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) Response D 1 a (ft/sec 2 ) T T s1 = 0.3 sec Response D 2 T Peak Response (T s1,d 1 ) (T s2,d 2 ) a (ft/sec 2 ) T T s2 = 1.0 sec Response T (T s3,d 3 ) T T T s3 = 2.0 sec D 3 Structural Time period 29 Dynamic Lateral Force Procedure Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) UBC-97 Response Spectrum Curve (Acceleration vs. Time period) 30 15
16 Static Lateral Force Procedure = 31 Static Lateral Force Procedure The total design base shear (V) in a given direction can be determined from the following formula: Where, V = (C ν I/RT) W C ν = Seismic coefficient (Table 16-R of UBC-97). I = Seismic importance factor (Table 16-K of UBC-97 ) R = numerical coefficient representative of inherent over strength and global ductility capacity of lateral force-resisting systems (Table 16-N or 16-P). W = the total seismic dead load defined in Section
17 Static Lateral Force Procedure The total design base need not exceed [ V = (2.5C a I/R) W ] Where, C a = Seismic coefficient (Table 16-Q of UBC-97) The total design base shear shall not be less than [ V = 0.11C a IW ] In addition for seismic zone 4, the total base shear shall also not be less [ V = (0.8ZN ν I/R) W ] Where, N ν = near source factor (Table 16-T of UBC-97); Z = Seismic zone factor (Table 16-I of UBC-97) 33 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 1: Find Site Specific details. Step 2: Determine Seismic Coefficients Step 3: Determine Seismic Importance factor I Step 4: Determine R factor Step 5: Determine structure s time period Step 6:Determine base shear V and apply code maximum and minimum. Step 7: Determine vertical distribution of V
18 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 1: Find Site Specific details. Following list of data needs to be obtained: Seismic Zone Soil type Past earthquake magnitude (required only for highest seismic zone). Closest distance to known seismic source (required only for highest seismic zone). 35 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 1: Site Specific details. i. Seismic Zone Source: BCP SP
19 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 1: Find Site Specific details. ii. Soil Type As per UBC code, if soil type is not known, type S D shall be taken. 37 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 1: Find Site Specific details. iii. Past Earthquake magnitude: This is required only for seismic zone 4 to decide about seismic source type so that certain additional coefficients can be determined. iv. Distance to known seismic zone is also required to determine additional coefficients for zone
20 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 2: Determination of Seismic Coefficients. C v : N v (required only for zone 4): 39 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 2: Determination of Seismic Coefficients. C a : N a (required only for zone 4): 40 20
21 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 3: Determination of Seismic Importance Factor. 41 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 4: Determination of R Factor. R factor basically reduces base shear V to make the system economical. However the structure will suffer some damage as explained in the earthquake design philosophy. R factor depends on overall structural response of the structure under lateral loading. For structures exhibiting good performance, R factor will be high
22 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 4: Determination of R Factor. 43 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 5: Determination of structure s time period. Structural Period (By Method A, UBC 97): For all buildings, the value T may be approximated from the following formula: T = C t (h n ) 3/4 Where, C t = (0.0853) for steel moment-resisting frames. C t = (0.0731) for reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames and eccentrically braced frames. C t = (0.0488) for all other buildings. h n = Actual height (feet or meters) of the building above the base to the nth level
23 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 6: Determination of Base Shear (V). Calculate base shear meeting the following criteria: 0.11C a IW V = (C ν I/RT) W (2.5C a I/R) W For zone 4, the total base shear shall also not be less than: V = (0.8ZN ν I/R) W 45 Static Lateral Force Procedure Steps for Calculation of V : Step 7: Vertical Distribution of V to storeys. The joint force at a particular level x of the structure is given as: F x = (V F t )ω x h x / ω i h i (UBC sec ) { i ranges from 1 to n, where n = number of stories } F t = Additional force that is applied to the top level (i.e., the roof) in addition to the F x force at that level. F t = 0.07TV {for T > 0.7 sec} F t = 0 {for T 0.7 sec} 46 23
24 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Calculation of V for E-W interior frame of the given structure. Structure is located in Peshawar. Soil type is stiff. SDL = Nil LL = 144 psf SDL = Nil LL = 144 psf f c = 4 ksi f y = 60 ksi 10 ft (floor to floor) SDL = Nil LL = 144 psf 25 ft 25 ft 10 ft 10 ft 25 ft 25 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft Slab-Beam Frame Structure 47 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: E-W interior frame l 2 =
25 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 1: Site specific details. i. Seismic Zone: From seismic zoning map of Pakistan, Peshawar lies in seismic zone 2B (Z = 0.20) 49 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 1: Site specific details. ii. Soil Type: Stiff soil is classified as S D (stiff soil)
26 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 1: Site specific details. iii. Past earthquake magnitude: Not determined as it required for zone 4 only. iv. Distance to known seismic zone: Not determined as it is required for zone 4 only. 51 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 2: Determination of Seismic Coefficients. For seismic zone 2B, only C a and C v determination is required
27 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 3: Determination of Seismic Importance Factor. I = 1.00 (Standard Occupancy Structures) 53 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 4: Determination of R Factor. R = 8.5 (Concrete SMRF) 54 27
28 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 5: Determination of Structure s time period. By method A: T = C t (h n ) 3/4 C t = 0.003; h n = 30 ft T = (30) 3/4 = sec 55 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 6: Determination of base shear (V). Base Shear (V) = {C v I/RT}W W (self weight of E-W interior frame + super imposed dead load) = 613 kips 25 % floor live load will also be added up (for warehouses, see UBC sec ) W = (4 25) = 685 kips 56 28
29 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 6: Determination of base shear (V). V = {C v I/RT}W = { / ( )} 685 = kips The total design base need not exceed the following: V = (2.5C a I/R) W = {( )/ (8.5)} 685 = kips, The total design base shear shall not be less than the following: V = 0.11C a IW = = kips, O.K. Therefore, V = kip (8 % of seismic weight W) 57 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example: Step 7: Vertical distribution of V to storeys. F x = (V F t )ω x h x / ω i h i ω i h i = = kip F 1 = ( ) / {(13680)} = kip Storey forces for other stories are given in table below: Table Storey shears. Level x h x (ft) w x (kip) w x h x (ft-kip) w x h x /(Sw i h i ) F x (kip) Sw i h i = Check SF x =V = kip OK 58 29
30 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example (Storey Forces): Same forces will be obtained for other E-W interior frame because it has same dimensions and loading conditions as of E-W interior frame considered. Half values shall be applied to E-W exterior frames. 59 Static Lateral Force Procedure Example (Storey Forces): 14.1 kips kips Note: Base shear can also be computed for complete structure and then can be divided to different frames. 9.3 kips kips 4.68 kips 9.36 kips kips 14.1 kips kips 9.3 kips 20 ft 20 ft 9.36 kips 4.68 kips 20 ft 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft 60 30
31 Base Shear using UBC Response Spectra Spectral Acceleration (g s) Example: 2.5C a = 0.7 Line at T = sec C v /T C a = 0.28 C v = 0.4 T s = C v /2.5C a = 0.57 sec T o = 0.2T s = sec R = 8.5; W = 685 kips Now, T of given structure = sec At T = sec, Spectral acceleration = 0.7g V = W (a/g)/r = 56 kips C a = Period (sec) Base shear computed here is same as computed using the static lateral force procedure. 61 Automated lateral force procedure of SAP2000 Steps for the given 3D structure are shown next. SAP2000 3D Model (20ft 15 ft) panels Seismic Zone: 2B Soil Type: SD Method A used for time period calculation Mass source: SDL only 62 31
32 Static Lateral Force Procedure 1. Automated Lateral Force Procedure of SAP2000 It is important to add SDL as Load for mass source with 3 rd option selected to avoid load to be taken two times. 63 Static Lateral Force Procedure 1. Automated Lateral Force Procedure of SAP2000 Case Study 2: Base shear calculation for E-W direction using SAP2000 automated lateral load feature and comparison with results of manually applied lateral loads
33 Analysis for Seismic Loads Methods of Seismic (lateral load) Analysis Exact: FEM using SAP 2000, etc. This method was demonstrated in previous example Approximate lateral load analysis: This will be discussed next 65 ACI Requirements on Lateral Load Analysis Unlike ACI 6.4 which allows separate floor analysis for gravity loads, ACI R6.4 states that for lateral load analysis, a full frame from top to bottom must be considered. For Gravity Load For Lateral Load 66 33
34 Portal Method This is a method used to estimate the effects of side sway due to lateral forces acting on multistory building frame. This method is specialized form of point of inflection method. F 3 Side sway (Δ) F 2 F 1 67 Portal Method Prepositions: 1. The total horizontal shear in all columns of a given storey is equal and opposite to the sum of all horizontal loads acting above that storey. This preposition follows from the requirement that horizontal forces be in equilibrium at any level. F 3 H 31 H 32 H 31 + H 32 = F 3 F 2 H 21 H 22 H 21 + H 22 = F 3 + F 2 F 1 H 11 H 12 H 11 + H 12 = F 3 + F 2 + F
35 Portal Method Prepositions: 2. The horizontal shear is the same in both exterior columns. The horizontal shear in each interior column is twice that in exterior column. This preposition is due to the fact that interior columns are generally more rigid than exterior columns (interior column with larger axial load will require larger cross section). 6 H 3 = F 3 or H 3 = F 3 /6 H 3 = F 3 / 2n Where n= no. of bays And 2H 3 = F 3 / n F 3 F 2 F 1 H 3 2H 3 2H 3 H 2 2H 2 2H 2 H 3 H 2 H 1 2H 1 2H 1 H1 69 Portal Method Prepositions: 3. The inflection points of all members (columns and beams) are located midway between the joints except for bottom storey. F 3 Point of Inflection F 2 2h/3 F 1 h/3 Location of P.O.I depends on end restraints: 2h/3 (restraints with more resistance to rotation) h/3 (restraints with less resistance to rotation) At base (ideal hinge) 70 35
36 Portal Method Analysis Steps Step 1: Location of points of inflection on frame using preposition 3. F 3 F 2 F 1 l 1 l 2 l 3 71 Portal Method Analysis Steps Step 2: Determine column shears using proposition 1 and 2. F 3 H 3ext =F 3 /2n H 3int =F 3 /n H 3int =F 3 /n H 3ext =F 3 /2n F 2 H 2ext =(F 3 + F 2 )/2n H 2int =(F 3 + F 2 )/n H 2int =(F 3 + F 2 )/n H 2ext =(F 3 + F 2 )/2n F 1 H 1ext =(F 3 + F 2 + F 1 )/2n H 1int =(F 3 + F 2 + F 1 )/n H 1int =(F 3 + F 2 + F 1 )/n H 1ext =(F 3 + F 2 + F 1 )/2n n = number of bays l 1 l 2 l
37 Portal Method Analysis Steps Step 3a: Determine column moments from statics. F 3 M 3ext = H 3ext h/2 M 3int = H 3int h/2 M 3int = H 3int h/2 M 3ext = H 3ext h/2 F 2 F 1 H 3ext H 3int H 3int H 3ext M 3ext = H 3ext h/2 M 2ext = H 2ext h/2 H 2ext H 2int H 2int H 2ext M 2ext = H 2ext h/2 M 1ext = H 1ext h/3 H 1ext H 1int H 1int H 1ext M 1ext = H 1ext 2h/3 M 3int = H 3int h/2 M 2int = H 2int h/2 M 2int = H 2int h/2 M 1int = H 1int h/3 M 1int = H 1int 2h/3 M 3int = H 3int h/2 M 2int = H 2int h/2 M 2int = H 2int h/2 M 1int = H 1int h/3 M 1int = H 1int 2h/3 M 3ext = H 3ext h/2 M 2ext = H 2ext h/2 M 2ext = H 2ext h/2 M 1ext = H 1ext h/3 M 1ext = H 1ext 2h/3 h h h l 1 l 2 l 3 73 Portal Method Analysis Steps Step 3b: Determine beam moments from statics. Beam moments at a joint can be determined from equilibrium. The beam moments to the left (M BL ) and right (M BR ) of a joint can be determined from the following formulae: M BL = M col /m M BR = M col /m Where, m = # of connecting beams at a joint. M col = summation of column moments at a joint
38 Portal Method Analysis Steps F 3 F 2 Step 3b: Determine beam moments from statics. M BL = M 3ext /1 M BL = M 3int /2 M 3ext M BR = M 3int /2 M 3int M3int M BR = (M 3int +M 2int )/2 M BL = (M 3int +M 2int )/2 M 2int Note: The direction of beam moment shall be opposite to the direction of column moment. F 1 l 1 l 2 l 3 75 Portal Method Analysis Steps Step 3c: Determine beam shear from statics. As the point of inflection is assumed to lie at mid span, the beam shear equals beam end moment divided by ½ beam span
39 Portal Method Analysis Steps Step 3c: Determine beam shear from statics. F 3 M BL M BR M BL M BR P L =M BL /0.5l 1 P R =M BR /0.5l 1 P L =M BL /0.5l 2 P R =M BR /0.5l 2 P L P R F 2 P L P R P L P R P L P R F 1 P L P R P L P R P L P R l 1 l 2 l 3 77 Portal Method Analysis Steps Step 3d: Determine column axial force from statics. F 3 For a segment (abc for example), the axial force shall be arithmetic sum of beam shears within that segment, but in opposite direction. Axial force in lower storey shall be the sum of axial force in storey under question plus the axial forces in all above stories. a c P L P R P L P R P R b F 2 P L P R P L P R P L P R F 1 P L P R P L P R P L P R l 1 l 2 l
40 Portal Method Analysis Steps Step 3d: Determine column axial force from statics. F 3 P L3 P R3 +P L3 P L3 P R3 P L3 P R3 PL3 P R3 F 2 F 1 P L3 +P L2 P L2 P R2 P L2 P R2 P L2 P R2 Similarly all other column axial forces can be determined P L1 P R1 P L1 P R1 P L1 P R1 P L3 +P L2 +P L1 l 1 l 2 l 3 79 Portal Method (Case Study 1) Lateral load analysis for E-W Interior Frame of given 3D structure by portal method and its comparison with SAP2000. The objective of this study is to check the level of accuracy of portal method
41 Portal Method (Case Study 1) SDL = Nil LL = 144 psf Given 3D structure. f c = 4 ksi f y = 60 ksi Note: Zone 2B SDL = Nil LL = 144 psf Slab = 7 SDL = Nil LL = 144 psf SDL = Nil LL = 144 psf 10 ft (floor to floor) 10 ft 10 ft 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft Slab-Beam Frame Structure 81 Portal Method (Case Study 1) F 3 =28.21 kip E-W Interior Frame F 2 =18.61 kip h=10 ft F 1 =9.36 kip h=10 ft h=10 ft l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 82 41
42 Portal Method (Case Study 1) F 3 =28.21 kip Step 1: Locate points of inflection. F 2 =18.61 kip F 1 =9.36 kip For Hinge l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 83 Portal Method (Case Study 1) F 3 =28.21 kip Step 2: Determine column shear. n = 4 F 2 =18.61 kip H 3ext =F 3 /2n H 3int =F 3 /n H 2ext =(F 3 + F 2 )/2n 5.85 F 1 =9.36 kip H 1ext =(F 3 + F 2 + F 1 )/2n H 2int =(F 3 + F 2 )/n H 1int =(F 3 + F 2 + F 1 )/n l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 84 42
43 Portal Method (Case Study 1) Portal Method SAP 3D Step 2: Determine column shear (comparison with SAP). 3.5 (4) 7.05 (7) 7.05 (7) 5.85 (7) 11.7 (13) 11.7 (12) 7.00 (11) 14.0 (13) 14.0 (13) l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 85 F 3 = kip F 2 = kip F 1 = 9.36 kip Portal Method (Case Study 1) Step 3a: Determine column moments M = H h/2 (for all stories except bottom) M = H h (for bottom storey) l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft
44 Portal Method (Case Study 1) Portal Method SAP 3D 17.5 (28) Step 3a: Determine column moments (comparison with SAP) (39) (37) 17.5 (20) 29.3 (45) (33) 58.5 (69) (32) 58.5 (65) 29.3 (28) 70 (111) 58.5 (62) 140 (133) 58.5 (56) 140 (129) l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 87 F 3 = kip F 2 = kip F 1 = 9.36 kip Portal Method (Case Study 1) Step 3b: Determine beam moments M BL = M col /m M BR = M col /m l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 88 44
45 Portal Method (Case Study 1) Portal Method SAP 3D 17.5 (19) Step 3b: Determine beam moments (comparison with SAP) (14) 17.5 (16) 17.5 (14) 46.8 (46) 99 (99) 46.8 (37) 99 (68) 46.8 (41) 99 (81) 46.8 (37) 99 (70) l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 89 F 3 = kip Portal Method (Case Study 1) Step 3c: Determine beam shear. P L = M BL /0.5l P R = M BR /0.5l F 2 = kip F 1 = 9.36 kip l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 90 45
46 Portal Method (Case Study 1) Portal Method SAP 3D Step 3c: Determine beam shear (comparison with SAP). 1.4 (1.8) 1.4 (1.5) 3.74 (4.4) 3.74 (4) 7.92 (9) 7.92 (7) l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft Portal Method (Case Study 1) F 3 = kip F 2 = kip F 1 = 9.36 kip Step 3d: Determine column axial loads l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 92 46
47 Portal Method (Case Study 1) Portal Method SAP 3D Step 3d: Determine column axial loads (comparison with SAP). 1.4 (2) 0 (-0.5) 0 (0) 5.14 (7) 0 (-1.4) 0 (0) (17) 0 (-4.4) 0 (0) l 1 =25 ft l 2 =25 ft l 3 =25 ft l 4 =25 ft 93 Portal Method (Case Study 1) Portal Method SAP 3D Similar comparison for ft structure is shown below: 16 (16) 31 (22) 16 (13) 26 (26) 31 (20) 52 (38) 26 (19) 61 (68) 52 (36) 123 (77) l 1 =20 ft l 2 =20 ft l 3 =20 ft l 4 =20 ft 94 47
48 Portal Method (Case Study 1) Portal Method SAP 3D 16 (12) Similar comparison for ft structure is shown below: 16 (8) 16 (9) 16 (8.5) 41 (29) 41 (22) 41 (25) 41 (22) 87 (64) 87 (40) 87 (50) 87 (43) l 1 =20 ft l 2 =20 ft l 3 =20 ft l 4 =20 ft 95 Portal Method (Case Study 2) Lateral Load Analysis of a frame corresponding to seismic demand in seismic zones 1 to 4 using Portal Method
49 Portal Method (Case Study 2) SDL = 40 psf LL = 60 psf SDL = 40 psf LL = 60 psf SDL = 40 psf LL = 60 psf 10.5 ft 10.5 ft f c = 3 ksi f y = 40 ksi 10.5 ft (floor to floor) 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft Slab-Beam Frame Structure 97 Portal Method (Case Study 2) Zone 1 (Bending moments) C a = 0.12 C v = 0.18 R = 8.5 V = kips 98 49
50 Portal Method (Case Study 2) Zone 2A (Bending moments) C a = 0.22 C v = 0.32 R = 8.5 V = kips 99 Portal Method (Case Study 2) Zone 2B (Bending moments) C a = 0.28 C v = 0.40 R = 8.5 V = kips
51 Portal Method (Case Study 2) Zone 3 (Bending moments) C a = 0.36 C v = 0.54 R = 8.5 V = kips 101 Portal Method (Case Study 2) Zone 4 (Bending moments) C a = 0.44 C v = 0.64 R = 8.5 V = kips
52 Portal Method (Case Study 2) Comparison (Interior Negative Beam Moment) Top Intermediate Bottom 103 Portal Method (Case Study 2) Comparison (Column Moment) Top Intermediate Bottom
53 References ACI UBC-97 BCP SP-2007 Earthquake tips from IITK. Intermediate Bottom 105 The End
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More informationCHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.
CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus
More informationChapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures
Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings
More informationSupplement: Statically Indeterminate Frames
: Statically Indeterminate Frames Approximate Analysis - In this supplement, we consider another approximate method of solving statically indeterminate frames subjected to lateral loads known as the. Like
More informationDesign of a Multi-Storied RC Building
Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23
More informationCodal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002
Abstract Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 00 Paresh V. Patel Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Nirma Institute of Technology, Ahmedabad 38481 In this article codal provisions of IS 1893
More information[Hussain, 4(9): September 2017] ISSN DOI /zenodo Impact Factor
GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND RESEARCHES SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI STOREYED BUILDING WITH SOFT STOREY Mohammed Irfan Hussain* *Asst. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Chaitanya Institute
More informationNonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER
Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER Adrian DOGARIU European Erasmus Mundus Master Course Sustainable Constructions under Natural Hazards and Catastrophic Events 520121-1-2011-1-CZ-ERA MUNDUS-EMMC Structural
More informationSupplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames
: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames Approximate Analysis - In this supplement, we consider an approximate method of solving statically indeterminate trusses and frames subjected to lateral loads
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular
More informationon the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2
1) A two-story building frame is shown below. The mass of the frame is assumed to be lumped at the floor levels and the floor slabs are considered rigid. The floor masses and the story stiffnesses are
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More information3.4 Analysis for lateral loads
3.4 Analysis for lateral loads 3.4.1 Braced frames In this section, simple hand methods for the analysis of statically determinate or certain low-redundant braced structures is reviewed. Member Force Analysis
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationPortal Frame Calculations Lateral Loads
Portal Frame Calculations Lateral Loads Consider the following multi-story frame: The portal method makes several assumptions about the internal forces of the columns and beams in a rigid frame: 1) Inflection
More informationLecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension
More informationDesign of RC Retaining Walls
Lecture - 09 Design of RC Retaining Walls By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Retaining Walls Terms Related to Retaining Walls Types of Retaining
More informationLecture 7 Two-Way Slabs
Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Two-way slabs have tension reinforcing spanning in BOTH directions, and may take the general form of one of the following: Types of Two-Way Slab Systems Lecture 7 Page 1 of 13 The
More informationEvaluating the effects of near-field earthquakes on the behavior of moment resisting frames
Comp. Meth. Civil Eng., Vol. 3, 2 (2012) 79-91 Copyright by the University of Guilan, Printed in I.R. Iran CMCE Computational Methods in Civil Engineering Evaluating the effects of near-field earthquakes
More informationLecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads
Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.
More informationPEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2
PEER/SSC Tall Building Design Case study #2 Typical Plan View at Ground Floor and Below Typical Plan View at 2 nd Floor and Above Code Design Code Design Shear Wall properties Shear wall thickness and
More informationEarthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept
Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum
More informationCharacteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD
Architecture 314 Structures I Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake Load Combinations ASD LRFD University of Michigan, TCAUP Structures I Slide 1 of 27
More informationINELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION
INEASTIC SEISMIC DISPACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVAENT INEARIZATION M. S. Günay 1 and H. Sucuoğlu 1 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University,
More informationSway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318
Sway Column Example PCA Notes on ACI 318 ASDIP Concrete is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com Example 11.2 Slenderness Effects for Columns in a Sway Frame Design columns C1 and C2 in the
More informationTABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).
TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 2-1. Wind loads calculation 2-2. Seismic loads 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). 4-1.
More informationCase Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.
ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building
More information1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29
1. Background In close collaboration with local partners, Earthquake Damage Analysis Center (EDAC) of Bauhaus Universität Weimar initiated a Turkish German joint research project on Seismic Risk Assessment
More informationCE6701 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK UNIT I THEORY OF VIBRATIONS PART A
CE6701 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK UNIT I THEORY OF VIBRATIONS PART A 1. What is mean by Frequency? 2. Write a short note on Amplitude. 3. What are the effects of vibration?
More informationMECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT - I
MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT - I Engineering Mechanics Branch of science which deals with the behavior of a body with the state of rest or motion, subjected to the action of forces.
More informationApplication of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames
Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames Kawai, N. 1 ABSTRACT Relating to the revision of Building Standard Law of Japan, the application
More informationRigid and Braced Frames
RH 331 Note Set 12.1 F2014abn Rigid and raced Frames Notation: E = modulus of elasticit or Young s modulus F = force component in the direction F = force component in the direction FD = free bod diagram
More informationFRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building
More informationThe Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS A Thesis in Architectural Engineering by Bradley S. Frederick
More informationSeismic design of bridges
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Seismic design of bridges Lecture 3 Ioannis N. Psycharis Capacity design Purpose To design structures of ductile behaviour
More informationDEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy)
DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy) The deflection of a uniformly loaded flat plate, flat slab, or two-way slab supported by beams on column lines can be calculated by an equivalent method that
More informationEarthquakes. Forces Within Eartth. Faults form when the forces acting on rock exceed the rock s strength.
Earthquakes Vocabulary: Stress Strain Elastic Deformation Plastic Deformation Fault Seismic Wave Primary Wave Secondary Wave Focus Epicenter Define stress and strain as they apply to rocks. Distinguish
More informationDynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading
Dynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading Paleti Teja M.Tech (Structural Engineering) Department of Civil Engineering Jogaiah Institute of Technology & Sciences College of Engineering Kalagampudi,
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads
More informationExplanatory Examples for Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings
Document No. :: IITK-GSD-EQ-V3.0 Final Report :: - Earthquake Codes IITK-GSD Project on Building Codes Explanatory Examples or Ductile Detailing o RC Buildings by Dr. R. K. Ingle Department o pplied echanics
More informationCOLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES
th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, Paper No. 6 COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES Jaime DE-LA-COLINA, MariCarmen HERNANDEZ
More informationSeismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8
1 Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8 Ioannis P. GIANNOPOULOS 1 Key words: Pushover analysis, FEMA 356, Eurocode 8, seismic assessment, plastic rotation, limit states
More informationGeneral Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth
More informationChapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES
Chapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES READING QUIZ 1. In a multiforce member, the member is generally subjected to an internal. A) normal force B) shear force C) bending moment D) All of the above. 2. In mechanics,
More informationA Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings
Fawad A. Najam Pennung Warnitchai Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand Email: fawad.ahmed.najam@ait.ac.th A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic
More informationDesign of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge
Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder
More informationA Comparative Study on RC Frame Structure Considering Lead Rubber Bearing and Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing
A Comparative Study on RC Frame Structure Considering Lead Rubber Bearing and Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing Dr. H.M.Somasekharaiah 1, Er. Dharmesh. N 2, Mohammed Ghouse 3 Professor, Department of Civil
More informationDesign of Earthquake-Resistant Structures
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures Basic principles Ioannis N. Psycharis Basic considerations Design earthquake: small
More information4.3 Moment Magnification
CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column
More informationEARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS with SAP2000
EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS with SAP2000 Prepared by Bob Matthews 2004 Robert Matthews Page 1 EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS EXAMPLE The earthquake analysis capabilities of SAP2000 are demonstrated using a railroad bridge
More informationSection Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes
Section 19.1 - Forces Within Earth 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes Stress and Strain Stress - is the total force acting on crustal rocks per unit of area (cause) Strain deformation of materials
More informationSTUDY ON MASS IRREGULARITY OF HIGH RISE BUILDINGS
STUDY ON MASS IRREGULARITY OF HIGH RISE BUILDINGS Darshan D 1, Shruthi H K 2, 1MTech student, dept of civil Engineering, EWIT, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 2Asst professor, dept of civil Engineering, EWIT,
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic
More informationSeismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code
Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship 2004 Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Abi Aghayere Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/other
More information7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads
1 7 SEISMIC LOADS 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads 7.1.1 Seismic load and design earthquake motion (1) For ordinary buildings, seismic load is evaluated using the acceleration response spectrum (see Sec.7.2)
More informationSlenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )
Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a
More informationUNIT II SLOPE DEFLECION AND MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD
SIDDHARTH GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS :: PUTTUR Siddharth Nagar, Narayanavanam Road 517583 QUESTION BANK (DESCRIPTIVE) Subject with Code : SA-II (13A01505) Year & Sem: III-B.Tech & I-Sem Course & Branch: B.Tech
More informationENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC
ENERGY DIAGRAM ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS INELASTIC WORK DONE HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION DUCTILITY
More informationLecture 11: The Stiffness Method. Introduction
Introduction Although the mathematical formulation of the flexibility and stiffness methods are similar, the physical concepts involved are different. We found that in the flexibility method, the unknowns
More informationSoil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition
ABSTRACT: Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition G. Dok ve O. Kırtel Res. Assist., Department of Civil Engineering, Sakarya University,
More informationCAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 24 Paper No. 2367 CAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM M.UMA MAHESHWARI 1 and A.R.SANTHAKUMAR 2 SUMMARY
More informationSection 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.
CH Earthquakes Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating Earthquakes Section 19.4: Earthquakes and Society Section 19.1 Forces
More informationSupport Idealizations
IVL 3121 nalysis of Statically Determinant Structures 1/12 nalysis of Statically Determinate Structures nalysis of Statically Determinate Structures The most common type of structure an engineer will analyze
More informationENVELOPES FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE VECTORS IN NONLINEAR STRUCTURES
ENVEOPES FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE VECTORS IN NONINEAR STRUCTURES Charles MENUN And Armen DER KIUREGHIAN SUMMARY In earthquake engineering, the effects of responses acting simultaneously in a structure must
More informationtwo structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS
APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability
More informationDETERMINATION OF PERFORMANCE POINT IN CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD
ISSN (Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization, Volume 2, Special Issue
More informationWhere and are the factored end moments of the column and >.
11 LIMITATION OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO----( ) 1-Nonsway (braced) frames: The ACI Code, Section 6.2.5 recommends the following limitations between short and long columns in braced (nonsway) frames: 1. The
More informationFailure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas
Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!
More informationPreliminary Examination - Dynamics
Name: University of California, Berkeley Fall Semester, 2018 Problem 1 (30% weight) Preliminary Examination - Dynamics An undamped SDOF system with mass m and stiffness k is initially at rest and is then
More informationA q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e
A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000
More informationModule 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 6 Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis Lesson 35 Indeterminate Trusses and Industrial rames Instructional Objectives: After reading this chapter the student will be able to
More informationTheory of structure I 2006/2013. Chapter one DETERMINACY & INDETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES
Chapter one DETERMINACY & INDETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES Introduction A structure refers to a system of connected parts used to support a load. Important examples related to civil engineering include buildings,
More informationPUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT
Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified
More informationLecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement
Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections
More informationStructural Steel Design Project
Job No: Sheet 1 of 6 Rev Worked Example - 1 Made by Date 4-1-000 Checked by PU Date 30-4-000 Analyse the building frame shown in Fig. A using portal method. 15 kn C F I L 4 m 0 kn B E H K 6 m A D G J 4
More informationFinite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges
01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only
More informationAn entire branch of Earth science, called, is devoted to the study of earthquakes.
Lesson One Essential Question Where do earthquakes take place? What causes earthquakes? What are three different types of faults that occur at plate boundaries? How does energy from earthquakes travels
More informationFLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES
UNIT - I FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES 1. What is meant by indeterminate structures? Structures that do not satisfy the conditions of equilibrium are called indeterminate structure. These
More informationUC Berkeley CE 123 Fall 2017 Instructor: Alan Kren
CE 123 - Reinforced Concrete Midterm Examination No. 2 Instructions: Read these instructions. Do not turn the exam over until instructed to do so. Work all problems. Pace yourself so that you have time
More informationCAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 004 Paper No. 653 CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN B. K. Raghu Prasad 1, A. Seetha Ramaiah and A.
More informationChapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams
Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Introduction A beam is a long, slender structural member that resists loads that are generally applied transverse (perpendicular) to its longitudinal axis.
More informationTHE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS
EUROSTEEL 2002, Coimbra, 19-20 September 2002, p.987-996 THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS Fernando C. T. Gomes 1 ABSTRACT The Eurocode 3 proposes a classification of beam-to-column
More informationUNIT - 7 EARTHQUAKES
UNIT - 7 EARTHQUAKES WHAT IS AN EARTHQUAKE An earthquake is a sudden motion or trembling of the Earth caused by the abrupt release of energy that is stored in rocks. Modern geologists know that most earthquakes
More informationEarthquakes Chapter 19
Earthquakes Chapter 19 Does not contain complete lecture notes. What is an earthquake An earthquake is the vibration of Earth produced by the rapid release of energy Energy released radiates in all directions
More informationEffects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device
Effects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device A. Krishnamoorthy Professor, Department of Civil Engineering Manipal
More informationProbabilistic damage control seismic design of bridges using structural reliability concept
Probabilistic damage control seismic design of bridges using structural reliability concept A. Saini Doctoral Student, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA A. Vosooghi Bridge Engineer III, Ph.D., P.E.,
More informationDesign of Shear Tab Connections for Gravity and Seismic Loads
June 2005 Design of Shear Tab Connections for Gravity and Seismic Loads By Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, Ph.D., P.E. Professor University of California, Berkeley (A copy of this report can be downloaded for
More informationDUCTILITY BEHAVIOR OF A STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL BY EXPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING
The 4 th World Conference on arthquake ngineering October -7, 008, Beijing, China ABSTRACT : DCTILITY BHAVIOR OF A STL PLAT SHAR WALL BY XPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING P. Memarzadeh Faculty of Civil ngineering,
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering
More informationChapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations
Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations Introduction As we stated in Chapter 3, foundations are considered to be shallow if if [D (3 4)B]. Shallow foundations have several advantages: minimum
More informationΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B
Volume B 3.1.4 Diaphragmatic behaviour In general, when there is eccentric loading at a floor, e.g. imposed by the horizontal seismic action, the in-plane rigidity of the slab forces all the in-plane points
More informationUniversity of California at Berkeley Structural Engineering Mechanics & Materials Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Spring 2012 Student name : Doctoral Preliminary Examination in Dynamics
More informationSeismic Evaluation of Auxiliary Buildings and Effects of 3D Locational Dynamic Response in SPRA
Seismic Evaluation of Auxiliary Buildings and Effects of 3D Locational Dynamic Response in SPRA PSA 2017, Pittsburgh September 25 th, 2017 Brian Cohn Jieun Hur, Eric Althoff, Halil Sezen, and Richard Denning
More informationSeismic performance evaluation of existing RC buildings designed as per past codes of practice
Sādhanā Vol. 37, Part 2, April 2012, pp. 281 297. c Indian Academy of Sciences Seismic performance evaluation of existing RC buildings designed as per past codes of practice 1. Introduction K RAMA RAJU,
More informationComparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings
Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings Dj. Ladjinovic, A. Raseta, A. Radujkovic & R. Folic University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad,
More informationSeismic performance of buildings resting on sloping ground A review
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-issn: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 11, Issue 3 Ver. III (May- Jun. 2014), PP 12-19 Seismic performance of buildings resting on sloping
More informationThe Comparison of Seismic Effects of Near-field and Far-field Earthquakes on Relative Displacement of Seven-storey Concrete Building with Shear Wall
Current World Environment Vol. 10(Special Issue 1), 40-46 (2015) The Comparison of Seismic Effects of Near-field and Far-field Earthquakes on Relative Displacement of Seven-storey Concrete Building with
More informationSHAKING TABLE TEST OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS
3 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, 24 Paper No. 354 SHAKING TABLE TEST OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS In-Kil Choi, Young-Sun
More informationAnnex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
More information