arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 29 Jun 2001

Transcription

1 Atomic wave packet basis for quantum information Ashok Muthukrishnan an C. R. Strou, Jr. The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York (March 15, 2001) arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 29 Jun 2001 We propose a wave packet basis for storing an processing several qubits of quantum information in a single multilevel atom. Using raially localize wave packet states in the Ryberg atom, we construct an orthogonal basis that is relate to the usual energy level basis by a quantum Fourier transform. A transform-limite laser pulse that is short compare with the classical Kepler perio of the system interacts mainly with the wave packet state localize near the atomic core, allowing selective control in this basis. We argue that wave packet control in this regime is useful for multilevel quantum information processing. PACS numbers: a, Qk Quantum information processing is a growing interisciplinary fiel that has seen rapi progress in the last few years [1]. However physical implementations of large scale quantum networks are severely limite by ecoherence [2], the loss of coherence in the superposition state of the system. This is especially true of extene systems that involve entanglement of macroscopic egrees of freeom, such as the center-of-mass motion of atoms in a trap [3]. We consier multiple computational levels in each atom to store information more ensely. The raiative lifetime of Ryberg levels scales as n 3, where n is the principal quantum number, an approaches a millisecon for n > 100. In most atomic quantum logic schemes, the bottleneck for the coherence time is the macroscopic entanglement of two or more atoms. The multilevel approach minimizes this ecoherence by reucing the number of atoms in the quantum network, with each -level atom representing log 2 qubits of information [4]. In a = 8 level scheme, for example, the number of atoms that nee to be entangle is less by a factor of three. A great eal of research has been carrie out in the past few years eveloping techniques for controlling multilevel Ryberg wave packets using shape short pulses. It is attractive to exploit this work by eveloping an alternative wave packet basis for the quantum information store in the atomic energy levels. Ryberg wave packets are coherent superpositions of atomic energy eigenstates with large principal quantum numbers. We can use the relative phases of the ifferent eigenstates in the superposition to store information. Using the energy-time Fourier kernel in unitary time evolution, we efine an orthogonal, iscrete wave packet basis that is relate to the energy levels by a quantum Fourier transform. This transform plays a key role in quantum computing applications [5], an we show how it naturally permits complementary bases for representing the information store in a multilevel quantum system. In the optical omain, a iscrete Fourier transform connects the spectral an temporal moes of the raiation fiel in a cavity. Iaconis et al. [6] use this approach to characterize the Husimi istribution of a multimoe quantum fiel in heteroyne etection. Tittel et al. [7] exploit the complementarity of energy an time in their scheme for quantum cryptography using entangle photons. In the atomic case, Muller an Nooram [8] introuce a Fourier relation between the energy quantum number an a continuous phase coorinate to stuy the photoexcitation of Ryberg states. We show how the quantum Fourier transform of the energy levels correspons exactly to a iscrete temporal basis of wave packets in cyclic motion about the nucleus. We consier raial wave packets, which are superpositions of Ryberg states with low angular momentum. These states are raially localize in probability an evolve perioically for short times, or in the classical corresponence limit [9]. The wave packet basis we introuce correspons to iscrete times in this classical evolution, when each wave packet state is centere at a ifferent raius from the atomic nucleus. This basis is non-stationary in time, with wave function amplitues evolving cyclically uring a classical perio. Due to the unequal spacing of the energy levels, the wave function unergoes ispersion, which leas to revivals an super revivals in the wave packet amplitues. The classical motion an quantum revival structure of this free time evolution allows for the possibility of conveniently controlling the wave function at suitably chosen intervals of time. We propose using short optical pulses to couple coherently the Ryberg manifol to a low-lying energy level in the atom. A transform-limite pulse that is short compare to the classical Kepler perio of the system interacts with all the energy levels but couples only to the wave packet state that is nearest the atomic core, a phenomenon familiar in the excitation an photoionization of Ryberg states [10]. The classical electron has the largest momentum, an hence absorbs energy most efficiently, when near the core. During the pulse, the wave packet state nearest the nucleus an the groun state form an effectively two-level system, an unergo Rabi oscillations. 1

2 Coherent control of wave packets base on spatial localization has been stuie by Ahn et al. [11], who show that half-cycle pulses can be use to extract binary phase information store in a raial wave packet. The use of optical pulses shorter than a Kepler perio for quantum control of atomic wave packets in the strong-fiel regime has been stuie analytically by Arauo et al. [12]. A weak fiel analysis by Noel an Strou [13] showe that a uniform train of pulses within one Kepler perio can be use to create an arbitrary Ryberg state of levels whose amplitues are relate by a iscrete Fourier transform to the pulse amplitues. We propose to use such pulses for selective processing of quantum information in the wave packet basis. Consier Ryberg energy levels with angular momentum l = 1 in a hyrogen or alkali atom as a quantum information basis, ν = n +, 1, 0, (1) = /2 + 1, /2 + 2,..., /2, where n is the mean value for the principal quantum number in the wave packet superposition, an the subscript ν is use to enote a state in the energy basis. We have assume above that the number of levels is an even number, but the arguments below are easily extene to o. These levels can be excite simultaneously from the groun state by a strong linearly polarize laser pulse with sufficient banwith to overlap all the levels. The pulse excitation creates a wave packet which evolves in time as ψ(t) = n b exp( iω t) ν, (2) where ω is the energy of the th Ryberg level an the amplitues b are etermine by the spectrum of the exciting pulse. If we assume that the pulse spectrum, centere at ω 0, is uniform over the computational levels an falls off rapily outsie this manifol, we have a uniform amplitue istribution, b = 1/, which is time inepenent in the absence of external fiels. The raial wave packet was first stuie by Parker an Strou [9], who showe that it correspons to a raially localize shell of probability istribution moving perioically between the classical turning points for short times. Eventually, the uneven spacing in the energies of the levels in Eq. (1) leas to ispersions an revivals of the wave packet, corresponing to the time-epenent phases in Eq. (2) interfering estructively or constructively. The rates at which the phases evolve with respect to each other epen on the frequencies ω relative to the average frequency ω 0, which can be expane in a Taylor series in = n n, 1 ω 0 = ω ω 0 = 2( n + ) n 2 [ ] = 2π 2 + 3, (3) T K T rev T sr >ν >ν >ν FIG. 1. Illustration of conugate bases: Energy eigenstates ν relate by a Fourier transform to wave packet states k τ evenly istribute in time aroun a classical orbit. A raial wave packet basis can be thought of as an ensemble of such orbits with ifferent orientations for the ellipses. where in atomic units, T K = 2π n 3 is the classical Kepler perio for roun trip motion, T rev /2! = 2π n 4 /3 is when the wave packet revives first, T sr /3! = π n 5 /6 is when the wave packet super-revives first, etc. At n = 180 for example, T K 0.89 ns, T rev 106 ns, an T sr 14 µs. For large n, the ifferent time scales are well separate in magnitue, an for a small number of levels, the wave packet is more sprea out in space an isperses more slowly in time. For 2 n, we see from Eq. (3) that the revival ynamics of the wave packet can be neglecte to goo approximation uring the first few Kepler perios, an Eq. (2) becomes ψ(t) 1 exp ( i2πt/t K ) ν, = ψ K (t) (4) which evolves perioically in time with perio T K. The Fourier kernel in Eq. (4) involves an t, an can be thought of as unerlying an uncertainty relation between energy an time, with more levels leaing to greater spatio-temporal localization of the wave packet. Although the Ryberg energies are iscrete, the time t for the wave packet varies continuously aroun the orbit. However, if we consier iscrete times uring any Kepler perio, t k = k(t K /), (5) k = /2 + 1, /2 + 2,..., /2, we can construct an alternate iscrete wave packet basis k τ for the system of energy levels in Eq. (1) base on the quantum Fourier transform (QFT), 2

3 k τ = ψ K (t k ) = 1 exp ( i2πk/) ν. (6) This is an orthogonal basis in time (enote by the subscript τ), an the basis amplitues evolve perioically with the classical perio T K, as illustrate in Fig. 1. Thus k = 0 an k = /2 correspon to wave packet states centere at the inner an outer turning points of the classical orbit respectively. The sign of k inicates the irection of propagation of the wave packet. We can also efine the basis for o, except that in this case k = ±( 1)/2 correspon to wave packet states centere near (but not exactly at) the outer turning point, having nonzero an opposite momenta. The energy eigenstates can be recovere from k τ by an inverse QFT, ν = 1 exp (i2πk/) k τ. (7) k In general, any excite state Ψ(t) of the Ryberg levels can be expane in either basis, Ψ(t) = b (t) exp( iω t) ν (8) = exp( iω 0 t) k bk (t) k τ, (9) where we have remove the center frequency ω 0 from the wave packet amplitues b k. A classical iscrete Fourier transform (DFT) relates the two sets of amplitues, bk (t) = 1 b (t) exp( iω 0 t) exp (i2πk/). (10) For free time evolution, b (t) = b (0), an Eq. (10) can be written as b k (t) = k b k (0) u k k(t), (11) where u k k(t) is the DFT of the time evolution kernel, u k k(t) = 1 exp [ iω 0 t i2π(k k)/]. (12) In the Kepler regime of Eq. (3), the levels are equally space, ω 0 2π/T K, an u k k becomes a elta function in k, resulting in a cyclic permutation of the wave packet amplitues in Eq. (11), bk (nt K /) = b k n (0), (13) where n is an integer an k n is taken moulo. Equation (13) amounts to a SHIFT gate in the wave packet basis, the multivalue equivalent of the NOT gate for binary logic. More complex unitary transforms occur for longer times, when the revival an superrevival ynamics become relevant. Thus free time evolution alone becomes useful for quantum information processing in the wave packet basis. This is a consequence of the nonstationary character of the basis an the unequally space energy levels. We now turn to the control of the multilevel atomic basis using laser fiels. Universal multilevel transforms of the amplitues b can in principle be achieve using narrow-ban lasers to couple neighboring transitions among the energy levels [4]. However this requires multiple laser frequencies tune to the 1 transitions. A simpler control scheme is possible for the wave packet amplitues b k, as shown below. This involves short broaban pulses an takes avantage of the cyclic evolution of the wave packet states escribe above. A laser pulse with a spectrum overlapping the Ryberg levels couples most strongly to only that combination of the levels with a phase relation between them that localizes the electron near the core. This correspons to the wave packet state 0 τ, for which all the phases are equal since k = 0. Consier a pulse fiel with a carrier frequency ω ω 0 an pulse profile f(t), E(t) = ɛe 0 f(t) exp( iωt) + c.c., (14) where E 0 an ɛ are the amplitue an polarization of the fiel. Assume that the pulse couples the Ryberg levels to the groun state g in the atom. In the energy level basis for the Ryberg states, the ipole interaction with the fiel yiels the following couple equations for time evolution in the rotating wave approximation, ḃ g = i 2 f(t) Ω exp( i t)b, (15) ḃ = i 2 f(t)ω exp(i t)b g, (16) where Ω an are the Rabi frequency an fiel etuning efine as Ω = 2 g ˆ ν ɛe 0 /, (17) = ω ω, (18) an we have taken Ω to be real in Eqs. (15) an (16). Using the Fourier inverse of Eq. (10), we rewrite the equation of motion for b g in terms of the wave packet amplitues, ḃ g = i 2 f(t) exp( i 0t) k Ω k bk, (19) where 0 is the mean etuning of the fiel, an Ω k is the DFT of the Rabi frequency Ω, Ω k = 1 Ω exp ( i2πk/). (20) To fin the equation of motion for the wave packet amplitue b k, we take the time erivative of Eq. (10) an 3

4 ~ > ν ω ω > > FIG. 2. Creation of a ark wave packet at n = 180 an = 8. The spectral with (FWHM) of the π pulse is approximately 1.3/T K. The wave packet populations b k 2 are shown before (t = T K/), uring (t = 0) an after (t = T K/) the pulse. FIG. 3. Wave packet control for quantum information processing. The energy level basis is ν = n +, 1, 0. Broaban π pulses e-excite two wave packet amplitues in the conugate wave packet basis. The groun levels g an e are couple by a laser with frequency ω ω e. use Eq. (16) for ḃ. Assuming that the pulse with is short compare to a Kepler perio, we can ignore the free atomic evolution uring the pulse that le to Eq. (11). In the short pulse regime, we are left with b k = i 2 f(t) Ω k exp(i 0t)b g. (21) Equations (19) an (21) escribe Rabi oscillations between the groun state an the wave packet states, where the Rabi frequencies Ω k are Fourier transforms of their energy level counterparts Ω. For Ryberg levels, Ω varies slowly with, Ω ( n + ) 3/2, (22) making only the c component Ω 0 significant for large n. For n = 180 an = 8, we fin Ω ± Ω 0. Thus to goo approximation, we can ignore the Rabi frequencies Ω k 0 in Eqs. (19) an (21). These equations reuce to ḃ g i = 2 f(t) Ω 0 exp( i 0 t) b 0, (23) b 0 i = 2 f(t) Ω 0 exp(i 0 t)b g. (24) These escribe two-level Rabi oscillations between the groun state an the innermost wave packet state uring the pulse, with a etuning 0 = ω 0 ω between the peak of the pulse spectrum an the average Ryberg frequency. The two-level approximation is vali only for short pulses. To affect only the k = 0 wave packet state, we nee the pulse with τ p to be less than T K /, the time taken for this wave packet element to leave the atomic core. However, the banwith of the pulse cannot be much larger than the atomic frequencies spanning the -level basis, to avoi coupling into levels outsie this basis. Since the Ryberg frequency spacing is approximately 1/T K, this implies a banwith ω/2π /T K. To summarize, we require that τ p < T K 2π ω, (25) or that the pulse be transform-limite. For n = 180 an = 8 levels, we use a Gaussian pulse of with τ p = 0.5 ln2 T K / 110 ps (FWHM amplitue), corresponing to a spectral with ω/2π = (8/2π) /T K for the electric fiel. Figure 2 shows an exact numerical solution for the wave packet amplitues before, uring an after the pulse. Assuming that the population is uniformly istribute initially, we fin that a π pulse transfers nearly all the population in the k = 0 state to the groun state, creating a ark wave packet in the Ryberg basis that evolves cyclically in the Kepler evolution. About 5% of the population is lost from neighboring states k = ±1 uring the pulse. Thus a coherent coupling of iniviual wave packet states with the groun state can be moele as a two-level system to goo approximation. Since the wave packet basis is nonstationary in time, the Ryberg wave function unergoes ispersion an revivals as the energy level phases evolve in the Schröinger picture. This leas to aperioicity in the free time evolution of the wave packet amplitues b k, going beyon the cyclic regime of Eq. (13). At n = 180 an = 8 for example, we fin that the population in a wave packet state ecays by about 5% after a Kepler perio, but recovers to within 2-4% at a revival or super-revival. This scales as n 2, making ispersion losses less significant for larger n. By appropriate timing of successive laser pulses, we can thus take avantage of the revival structure of the atomic energy spectrum when aressing the wave packet amplitues in the basis. An arbitrary unitary transform of the wave packet states can be ecompose into a prouct of O[ 2 ] twoimensional transforms [14], each of which can be implemente sequentially on two e-excite wave packet amplitues at a time, as shown in Fig. 3. Two low lying energy levels g an e temporarily store the wave packet amplitues in the form b k g + b k e. Phase shifts or ro- 4

5 tations of this state are accomplishe by coupling the two levels with a pulse of appropriate length, Rabi frequency an etuning. The transforme state is then restore to the Ryberg basis. Thus multilevel transforms in the atom are possible with a time sequence of laser pulses, without the nee for multiple lasers to aress the ifferent Ryberg transitions. Moreover the fielity of the gate operations compares favorably with that in an equivalent system of entangle two-level atoms [3]. For efficiently scalable quantum computing, we require conitional transforms on two entangle multilevel atoms. The metho use in Ref. [3] is base on the linear ion trap scheme for binary quantum logic [15]. This scheme provies a means to evolve one two-level atom in the trap array conitional on the state of another twolevel atom. Since the wave packet approach allows each basis amplitue in the atom to be aresse sequentially through low-lying energy levels, conitional transforms on other atoms can be carrie out using the same methos as in the binary scheme. That is, conitional on a given wave packet state (vis à vis energy level) in the control atom, a -imensional transform is performe on the wave packet basis of the target atom using the methos outline above. The time taken to couple two atoms in this approach can be on the orer of the atomic Kepler perio, which permits a fast non-aiabatic coupling scheme. Also, the mean energy an number of Ryberg levels use epen ultimately on the ionization threshol impose by external fiels in the environment. We anticipate that neutral atom schemes that allow fast coupling times, as have been suggeste recently [16], will provie a useful setting for multilevel quantum information applications. This work was supporte by the Army Research Office through the MURI Center for Quantum Information. [12] L. E. E. e Arauo, I. A. Walmsley, an C. R. Strou, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 955 (1998). [13] M. W. Noel an C. R. Strou, Jr., Optics Express 1, 176 (1997). [14] A. Ekert an R. Josza, Rev. Mo. Phys. 68, 733 (1996). [15] J. I. Cirac an P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995). [16] D. Jaksch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000). Electronic Aress: amuthuk@optics.rochester.eu [1] D. Bouwmeester, A. K. Ekert, an A. Zelinger, The Physics of Quantum Information (Springer, New York, 2000). [2] W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. A 51, 992 (1995). [3] C. A. Sackett et al., Nature 404, 256 (2000). [4] A. Muthukrishnan an C. R. Strou, Jr., Phys. Rev. A 62, (2000). [5] R. Jozsa, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lon. A 454, 323 (1998). [6] C. Iaconis, E. Mukamel, an I. A. Walmsley, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 2, 510 (2000). [7] W. Tittel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4737 (2000). [8] H. G. Muller an L. D. Nooram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5024 (1999). [9] J. Parker an C. R. Strou, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 716 (1986). [10] A. ten Wole et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2099 (1988). [11] J. Ahn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1179 (2001). 5