arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 14 May 2015

Transcription

1 Spin Amplification with Inhomogeneous Broaening Suguru Eno, 1 Yuichiro Matsuzaki, William J. Munro, an Shiro Saito 1 rauate School of Funamental Science an Technology, Keio University,Yokohama 3-85, Japan NTT Basic Research Laboratories, NTT Corporation, 3-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa, , Japan. A long-live qubit is usually well-isolate from all other systems an the environments, an so is not easy to couple with measurement apparatus. It is sometimes ifficult to implement reliable projective measurements on such a qubit. One potential solution is spin amplification with many ancillary qubits. Here, we propose a spin amplification technique, where the ancillary qubits state change epening on the state of the target qubit. The technique works even in the presence of inhomogeneous broaening. We show that fast an accurate amplification is possible even if the coupling an frequency of the ancillary qubits is inhomogeneous. Since our scheme is robust against realistic imperfections, this coul provie a new mechanism for reaing out a single spin that coul not have been measure using the previous approaches. arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 14 May 015 PACS numbers: Accurate quantum measurements an long coherence times are typical requirements for quantum information processing. It is essential to perform quantum measurements when we require quantum error correction[1] or nee quantum feeback technology []. Moreover, long coherence time is important in terms of retaining the quantum information uring the waiting time for the next operations. A lot of progress has been mae on the technique for fabricating a long-live qubit with many physical systems, an the coherence time has been significantly improve. For example, an electron spin has a coherence time longer than a secon[3], while the coherence time of a nuclear spin is longer than a minute[4]. Even for an artificial two-level system such as a superconucting qubit, the coherence time is of the orer of tens of microsecons[5]. It is sometimes ifficult to rea out the signal from a long-live qubit, because long-live qubits o not generally couple well with the measurement apparatus. To increase the coherence time, the qubit shoul be isolate so that it has a tiny coupling strength with other external systems. On the other han, to rea out a qubit with high fielity requires a strong coupling with the measurement apparatus, which may be contraicte by the fact that the qubit is isolate from other systems. One solution for this problem is spin amplification. If we couple the target qubit to rea out with many ancillary qubits, we can use the ancillary qubits to increase the effective signals, even if there is little iniviual coupling between the target qubit an ancillary qubits. If the target qubit is in the groun state, the ancillary qubits remain in the groun state, while the ancillary qubits will beexciteifthetargetqubitisintheexcitestate. There has been a lot of researches in this irection. A simple quantum circuit, which consists of controlle-not gates, is a well-known example [6 8]. However, in this scheme each spin must be inepenently accessible an interact with the target qubit an it is ifficult to increase the scale of such a scheme. Although there have been some proposals as regars a scalable spin amplification, they require a special configuration for ancillary qubits with tailore couplings[9 1] an/or the protocol is fragile with respect to certain some imperfections such as the inhomogeneous broaening or thermal excitation of the ancillary qubits[13, 14]. In this paper, we suggest another way to amplify the signal of the target qubit where many ancillary qubits are collectively couple with the target qubit. Since this is a simple experimental setup, there are many physical systems that have this configuration. A superconucting qubit couple with a spin ensemble is one caniate for realizing our scheme [15 18]. A nuclear(or electron) spin couple with many satellite nuclear (or electron) spins with ifferent frequencies is another caniate [19]. In this paper, we aress the problem of the inhomogeneous broaening in particular[0, 1]. In reality, it is very ifficult to fabricate ientical qubits so that every ancillary qubit can have a ifferent frequency an also have a ifferent coupling strength with the target qubit. Interestingly, in our scheme, we can realize rapi an reliable spin amplification even uner the influence of inhomogeneous broaening. The target qubit is couple with the collective moe of the ancillary qubits. On the other han, the collective moe of the ancillary qubits is couple with the subraiant moes of the qubits, which inuces issipation. If we try to realize coherence transfer between the target spin an the collective moe, the existence of the subraiant moes inuces ecoherence, which means the fielity of the coherent transfer ecreases. However, with spin amplification, coherence is notrequirebecausethe purposeisto reaoutthe target qubit, which eliminates the iagonal term of the ensity matrix of the target spin if the quantum measurement is successfully implemente. Moreover, we have shown that coupling between the collective moe an subraiant moe only inuces an energy transfer from the former to the latter that can be also measure as well as the former. Our technique can provie a reliable reaout

2 of a qubit couple with many inhomogeneous ancillary qubits. The Hamiltonian of our hybri system compose of the target qubit an ancillary qubits can be escribe by FI. 1: Schematic of our hybri system. The central target qubit is collectively couple with the ensemble of ancillary qubits. The target qubit can be reaout via the ancillary qubits after the amprification technique Ĥ TA = ω T ˆσ z + g j (ˆσ ˆσ N + j + ˆσ+ˆσ j )+ +λ cos(ω t)(ˆσ + + ˆσ ) ω j ˆσ zj (1) where we set = 1. Here, ˆσ z enotes the Pauli z operator for the target qubit an ˆσ (+) enotes the laer operator. ω T an ω j enote the resonant frequencies of the target qubit an the j th spin, respectively. ˆσ (+) j an ˆσ zj enote the laer operator an Pauli z operator of the j th ancillary qubit, respectively. It is worth mentioning that, as long as most of the ancillaryqubits arein the groun state an only a small portion of the ancillary qubits are excite for the amplification, we can consier the ancillary qubit to be a harmonic oscillator. So we can replace ˆσ (+) j with the annihilation(creation) operator â ( ) j. g j is a real number an enotes the coupling strength between the target qubit an the j th ancillary qubit. λ enotes the Rabi frequency of the microwave applie to the target qubit. We assume that the couplingstrengthg j ismuchsmallerthantheinhomogeneous broaening with of this system. By employing a rotating frame efine by Û(t) = exp[ iωt(ˆσz + N â jâj)] an performing a rotating wave approximation, we have Ĥ RWA ω T ω + ˆσ z + g j (ˆσ â j + ˆσ+ â j ) () (ω j ω )â jâj + λ (ˆσ+ + ˆσ ) We will now moel the effect of inhomogeneous broaening with a Lorentzian istribution of the resonant frequencies of the spin ensemble as f(ω) = 1 π γ/ (ω ω) +(γ/) (3) where, γ enotes the with of the Lorentzian, an ω enotes the average spin ensemble resonant frequency. We efine the collective moe as follows  1 g j â j (4) N where = g j. Since we are mainly intereste in the target qubit an collective moe, we can trace out the sub-raiant moes. In this case, the collective Hamiltonian can be written as [] Ĥ = Ĥc +Ĥ (5) Ĥ c = ω T ω ˆσ z +(ˆσ+ + ˆσ )+( ω ω )  (6) Ĥ = λ (ˆσ+ + ˆσ ) (7) The with of the Lorentzian γ can be incorporate in the ynamics as the ecay term of the master equation, which we will iscuss later. In ourscheme, we will rivethe targetqubit with amicrowave pulse for the spin amplification. The collective moe couple with the target qubit may iffer from the collective moe couple with the microwave line, which is calle a moe mismatch[3]. This problem means that riving the collective moe by the coupling between the microwave line an ancillary qubits is not straightforwar. On the other han, as we explain later, it is possible to rive the collective moe of the ancillary qubits by riving the target qubit. We have evelope an efficient technique for calculating the number of excitations in the spin ensemble after riving. If we inclue the all freeom of N ancillary qubits, we nee to eal with N+1 size matrix, which is intractable. On the other han, with the technique that we propose here, we nee to solve a Hamiltonian that inclues a single qubit an a harmonic oscillator, which is much easier to simulate. Using Eq. as a basis, we can write the Heisenberg equation, tâ(t) j = ig jˆσ(t) i(ω j ω i Γ )â(t) j (8) where we a the energy ecay term Γ of the ancillary qubit. However, this ecay rate is usually negligible compare with that of other noise. For example, the energy relaxation time of an electron such as the NV center excees 00 secons [4]. So we aopt a limit of Γ 0, later. Now t â(t) jâj = i(ˆσ + Â(t) Â(t) ˆσ ) Γ â(t) jâ(t) j (9)

3 3 Now, taking the Laplace transforms of both sies of Eq.8, unertheinitialconitionsa j (0) = 0,σ (0) = 0, wehave ig jˆβ(s) ˆα j (s) = s+i(ω j ω i Γs ) (10) Here, ˆα j (s) = L[â j (t)], ˆβ(s) = L[ˆσ (t)]. Using the Lorentzian istribution (3) an aopting resiual integration, we obtain 1 iˆβ(s) g jˆα j (s) = s+i( ω ω i γ+γ ) (11) Taking the inverse Laplace transformation of both sies, we obtain iσ (t) = tâ(t) i(ω ω i γ +Γ s )Â(t) (1) By using Eq.1 an Eq.9, in the limit of γ >> Γ we obtain N t (  (t)â(t)+ â j (t)â(t) j) = γâ (t)â(t) (13) This means that the rate of increase of the subraiant moes (  (t)â(t) + N â j (t)â j(t)) epens on the collective moe ( (t)â(t)) an the inhomogeneous with (γ). By integrating Eq.13, we obtain â(t) jâ(t) j = Â(t) Â(t)+γ t 0 Â(t ) Â(t )t (14) By calculating he ynamics of A(t), we can estimate the excitation number N âj(t) â j (t) We intuitively explain how our amplification works. If the etuning between the energy of the target qubit an the frequency of the collective moe is much larger than the coupling strength, we can erive the ispersive Hamiltonian as follows [5]. Ĥ isp = ω T ω ˆσ z + ˆσ+ˆσ +( ω ω + ˆσ z)â  (15) where λ = 0 an = (ω T ω ) ( ω ω ). This means that, epening on the state of the target qubit, there is a ispersive energy shift as follows. ω ω ± (16) So, if the rivingfrequency is ω+ an the targetqubit is in an excite state, the ensemble ofthe ancillaryqubits is efficiently excite. On the other han, if the riving frequency is ω+ an the target qubit is in the groun state, the spin ensemble is not significantly affecte by the riving cause by the etuning. Throughout this paper, we fix the riving frequency as ω +. Although we later solve the master equation numerically, it is also possible to escribe the ynamics of the collective moe in an analytical way by using an approximation. By iagonalizing the H c in Eq.6, we obtain[5] Ĥ c = n Ĥ n (17) Ĥ n = Ω + (n) +,n +,n +Ω (n),n,n (18) Ω ± (n) = (n+ 1 )( ω ω +4 )± (n+1) (19) (0) The eigenstate of the Hamiltonian is +,n = cos(φ n /) e,n +sin(φ n /) g,n+1 (1),n = sin(φ n /) e,n +cos(φ n /) g,n+1 () ( ) n+1 φ n = tan 1 (3) where e ( g ) enotes the excite (groun) state of the target qubit an n enotes the number state of the collective moe. Since we can iagonalize the Hamiltonian H c, we can efficiently use an interaction picture where we efine Û = e ihct an H I (t) = Û Ĥ Û. By using the contion, we obtain ( H I (t) λ eff e e (Â+ ) g g (Âei t + e i (4) where λ eff = λ enotes the effective Rabi frequency of the collective moe. If the initial state of the target qubit is e an it remains unchange uring the time evolution, we can erive the Hamiltonian for the collective moe H (anc) I (t) λ eff (Â+ ). On the other han, if the target qubit is kept in the groun state, we obtain H I (t) λ eff (Âei t +  e i t ). By returning to the Schroinger picture, we obtain Ĥ anc = ( ω ω ± ) ±λ eff (Â+ ) (5) wherethe sign±epensonthestateofthe targetqubit. With this Hamiltonian, we obtain the Heisenberg equation of  as follows, tâ = i( ω ω ± iγ ) iλ eff (6) γ wherewe aethe energyrelaxationterm iâ. When the target qubit is in an excite state, we solve this equation analytically with ω = ω +, an obtain  (t)â(t) = 4λ eff γ ( 1 e γ t ) (7) t ) )

4 4 On the other han, when the target spin is in the groun state, we obtain  (t)â(t) = λ [ ( ] eff ( ) +( γ 1 cos )e ) t γ t +e γt (8) It shoul be note that, if the effective Rabi frequency is far smaller than the ispersive energy shift such as λ eff, the excitation of the collective moe is significantly suppresse when the target qubit is prepare in the groun state. So we retain this conition throughout this paper. FI. 3: Spin amplification process in our scheme. Depening on theinitial state of thetarget qubit( e or g ), the ancillary qubit excitations numbers iffer, an we plot this ifference against time. We set the parameters at /π = 75 MHz, λ /π = 40 MHz, /π = 41.5 MHz FI. : Collective moe excitation number against time. Soli lines show analytical solutions an ashe lines show numerical calculations where we set γ/π = 1.5 MHz, /π=75 MHz, /π = 41.5 MHz, an λ /π = 40 MHz. These are typical parameters of the hybri system compose of superconucting flux qubit an NV- centers[16]. When obtaining analytical solutions, we use a ispersive Hamiltonian where the state of the target qubit is not change, which is a vali approximation for a short time region (ispersive region). However, for a numerical simulation, the excite state of the target qubit ecays into the groun state ue to the flip flop term of the JC Hamiltonian an subraient moe, which leas a ifference from the analytical approach for a longer time scale. We calculate the time evolution of the collective moe by solving the following master equation. ˆρ t = i[ĥ, ˆρ]+ γ [ˆρ  ˆρ ˆρ Â] (9) It is worth mentioning that the inhomogeneous broaening of the frequency can be consiere an energy loss of the collective moe []. In Fig., we plot the time evolution of the collective moe by using the analytical approach escribe above an a numerical approach to solve the master equation of Eq. 9. We assume that the initial state is e,0 or g,0. In the analytical approach, the state of the target spin oes not change uring the time evolution, because we use a ispersive Hamiltonian. When the initial state of the target qubit is an excite state, the collective moe of the spin ensemble is excite efficiently in both the numerical simulation an the analytical calculation for a short time scale. However, since the energy of the target qubit is graually transfere to the subraiant moes of the ancillary qubits, the target qubit ecays into the groun state an so the collective moe will not be efficiently excite over a long time perio in the numerical simulation [6]. This inuces a isagreement between the analytical solution an numerical simulation in this regime. On the other han, when the initial state of the target qubit is the groun state, the state of the target will not be significantly change, an so there is an excellent agreement between all t values of the analytical solution an numerical simulation where the excitation of the collective moes is efficiently suppresse. We plot the ifference in the excitation population of the ensemble when the target qubit is in its excite an groun states in Fig.3. Although the inhomogeneous broaening reuces the efficiency of the amplification, we can still obtain a ifference of more than 10 excitations in the ancillary qubits for γ/π = 10 MHz. This means that we will have a 10 times better signal with our amplification technique than without any amplification, which woul provie us with a practical tool with which to rea out a single qubit such as an electron spin or a nuclear spin. In conclusion, we have propose a spin amplification techniquethat canbe usein the presenceofthe inhomogeneous broaening. We consiere a simple experimental system where a target qubit is collectively couple with many ancillary qubits. We showe that, even if the ancillary qubits are inhomogeneous, we can amplify the signal from the target spin, an obtain a gain of 10 in

5 5 such a system by applying a continuous microwave. Our technique opens the way to the fast an robust reaout of a single spin. WethankH.YamaguchianJ.Hayaseforvaluableiscussions. We thank T. Koike for encouraging S. Eno s research. This work was supporte by Commissione Research No of National Institute of Information an Communication 87 Technology (NICT). [1] D.A. Liner et al., Quantum error correction. Cambrige University Press, 013. [] W. M. Howar et al., Quantum measurement an control. Cambrige University Press, 009. [3] A.M. Tyryshkin et al., Nature Materials 11, (011). [4] K. Saeei et al., Science 34, 830 (013). [5] C. Rigetti et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, (01). [6] D. P. DiVincenzo, et al., Phys. 48, 771 (000). [7] P. Cappellaro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 0050 (005). [8] J. A. Jones et al., Science 34, 1166 (009). [9] C. A. Peŕez-Delgao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, (006). [10] A. Kay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, (007). [11] J. A. Jones et al., Science 34, 1166 (009). [1] J. S. Lee et al., New J. Phys. 9, 83 (007). [13] T. Close et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (011). [14] M. Negoro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, (011). [15] S. Saito et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, (013). [16] X. Zhu et al., Nature 478, 1 (011). [17] Y. Kubo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 0501 (011). [18] X. Zhu et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 344 (014). [19] H. Weimer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, (013). [0] B. Kraus et al., Phys. Rev. A 73, 0030 (006). [1] J. H. Wesenberg, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, (009). [] I. Diniz et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, (011). [3] J. Wei et al., Phys. Rev. A 69, (004). [4] R. Amss et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, (011). [5] C.C. erry et al., Introuctory Quantum Optics Cambrige University Press, 004. [6] Y. Matsuzaki et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, (01).