Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Piles XX
|
|
- Shannon Hodges
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC ) 40 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal steel, f y 460 N/mm 2 Yield strength of shear link steel, f yv 460 N/mm 2 Type of concrete and density, ρ c 24 kn/m 3 Factor of Safety Factor of safety (overall base (effective) bearing and shaft (effective) friction 2.0 Factor of safety (base (effective) bearing), FOS 2 (usually 3.5) 3.0 Factor of safety (shaft (effective) friction), FOS 3 (usually 1.0 to 1.5) 1.5 Loading factor, K (between 1.40 and 1.60 depending on DL to LL ratio) 1.50 BS8110 Note loading factor K multiplies SLS loads for ULS loads for section (reinforcement) design; cl Soil Description Water unit weight, γ w = 9.81kN/m kn/m 3 Soil name Dry bulk unit weight, γ dry 20.0 kn/m 3 Saturated bulk unit weight, γ sat 20.0 kn/m 3 Undrained shear strength, S u (z) z kpa Note that S u can be obtained from SPT (Stroud) or SPT (Fukuoka) values; Tomlinson Effective cohesion, c' 0.0 kpa Effective angle of shear resistance, φ' 38.0 degrees Note that φ ' can be obtained from SPT (Peck) or CPT (Durgunoglu and Mitchell) values; Effective angle of friction on shaft, δ' 25.1 degrees Tomlinson SPT, N(z) z Factor for SPT, N value (base effective bearing), K SPT,b 250 Pile (drilled shaft) in sands with L 10m, Q b ' 2900kPa 57.5L/10 Quiros and Ree Pile (drilled shaft) in sands with L > 10m, Q b ' 2900kPa 57.5 Quiros and Ree Pile (drilled shaft) in sands with L 10m, Q b ' 2900kPa 100 Shioi and Fuk Pile in undrained cohesive soils 200 Neoh Pile (driven displacement) in non-plastic silts 38L/D 300 Pile (driven displacement) in sands and gravels 38L/D 380 Meyerhof Pile in drained cohesionless soils 400 Neoh Factor for SPT, N value (shaft effective friction), K SPT,s 2.0 Pile in undrained cohesive or drained cohesionless soils 2.0 Neoh
2 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 2 Analysis Method Undrained, drained or empirical analysis? For clays, perform undrained, drained and empirical analyses; For sands / gravels, perform drained and empirical analyses; For rocks, perform drained and empirical analyses; Gross (effective) bearing capacity limit, q flimit (z=l-l 0 ) or q flimit '(z=l-l 0 ) kpa Note that the base gross (effective) bearing capacity is limited to values up to 15000kPa because Vesic showed that at penetration depths greater than 20 pile diameters, a peak value of base resistance is reached which is not exceeded at greater penetrations depths; Note that this limiting value is D- and L- dependent, thus affecting the multi-d multi-l pile capacity charts which has thus been set to be limited by the automatically calculated value; q flimit (z=l-l 0 ) or q flimit '(z=l-l 0 ) = N q,strip.σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) 15MPa kpa 48.9 σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +20D) Invalid kpa 1 σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c +20D-z u )+γ dry.z u 208 kpa σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c +20D) Invalid kpa Tomlinson Shaft adhesion limit or shaft effective stress limit, S alimit (z) or τ alimit '(z) 89 kpa Note that the shaft adhesion or the shaft effective stress is limited to 110kPa because Vesic showed that at penetration depths greater than 20 pile diameters, a peak value of skin friction is reached which is not exceeded at greater penetrations depths; Note that this limiting value is D- and L- dependent, thus affecting the multi-d multi-l pile capacity charts which has thus been set to be limited by the automatically calculated value; ese S alimit (z) or τ alimit '(z) = K s.tanδ'.σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) 110kPa 89 kpa ese σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +20D) Invalid kpa kui σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c +20D-z u )+γ dry.z u 208 kpa σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c +20D) Invalid kpa Tomlinson Include or exclude base resistance? Note that in general, the contribution of base resistance in bored piles should be ignored due to difficulty of proper base cleaning, especially in wet hole (with drilling fluid); The contribution of base resistance should only be used if it is constructed in dry hole, if proper inspection of the base can be carried out or if base grouting is implemented; Furthermore, a relatively larger base movement is required to mobilise the maximum base resistance as compared to the displacement needed to fully mobilise shaft resistance; The base displacement of approximately 5% to 10% of the pile diameter is generally required to mobilise the ultimate base resistance provided that the base is properly cleaned and checked; Gue and Partners
3 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 3 Pile Group Dimensions Width of pile group (pile cap) in x, B cap Length of pile group (pile cap) in y, L cap m m Pile Dimensions Pile section shape Pile shaft diameter (circular) or width (square), D 750 mm Pile shaft cross sectional area, A ps = πd 2 /4 (circular) or D 2 (square) mm 2 Pile base diameter (circular) or width (square), D b 750 mm OK Pile base cross sectional area, A pb = πd b 2 /4 (circular) or D 2 (square) mm 2 OK L c L 0 z u z L Depth of pile cap base from ground level, L c (>= 0.000m) m OK Depth of pile z=0 level from pile cap base, L 0 (>= 0.000m) m OK Depth of pile founding level from pile cap base, L (>=L 0 ) m OK Note that L 0 accounts for poor ground near surface level where no contribution of shaft skin friction capacity is adopted, in fact negative skin friction is considered over L 0 length if requested; Depth of water table from ground level, z u m Note that the soil beneath the water table has an effective submerged unit weight of about half of the soil above the water table, thus reducing the drained overall pile effective capacity; Hence use the highest water table forseeable; Enter a negative z u value for water table above ground level, this representing a flood event or a bridge pier within a sea or river with the ground level being the sea or river bed; However, a water table above ground level may unconservatively decrease the overall pile (effective) capacity utilisation, thus consider also the case when the water table is at ground level;
4 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 4 Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Piles XX Pile Reinforcement Pile type 40 N/mm 2 Precast Driven Square RC Pile or Insitu Bored Circular RC Pile Pile compression capacity design method Cover to all reinforcement, cover 4 (usually 75) 75 mm Longitudinal steel reinforcement diameter, φ p 32 mm Longitudinal steel reinforcement number, n p 12 Longitudinal steel area provided, A s,prov,p = n p.π.φ 2 p / mm 2 Shear link diameter, φ link,p 10 mm Number of links in a cross section, i.e. number of legs, n link,p 2 Area provided by all links in a cross-section, A sv,prov,p = n link,p.π.φ 2 link,p /4 157 mm 2 Pitch of links, S p 150 mm Estimated steel reinforcement quantity 171 kg/m 3 [ A s,prov,p / A ps ]; No laps; Links ignored;
5 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 5
6 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 6 Precast (Pretensioned Spun) Driven Circular RC Pile Effective area of concrete, A eff mm 2 Effective prestress, f pe 6.3 N/mm 2
7 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 7 Insitu Bored Circular RC Pile (API Micropile) Yield strength of API pipe, f y,api 552 N/mm 2 Outer diameter of API pipe, OD API Wall thickness of API pipe, t API mm 9.19 mm Cross sectional area of API pipe, A API = π.[od 2 API -(OD API -2.t API ) 2 ]/4 mm 2 Cross sectional area of grout, A c,api = A ps -A API mm 2 Elastic modulus of concrete, E c = 5500.(f cu /1.5) N/mm 2 BS8110 Elastic modulus of steel, E s N/mm 2 cl API PIPE SIZES FOS str = 2.0 Grade N80 ( f y = 80,000 PSI / 552 MPa ) OD (mm) ickness (mmid (mm) Q ult (kn) Q all (kn) , , , ,247 1, ,517 1, , ,076 1, ,361 1, ,471 1, ,896 1, ,268 1, ,370 1, ,687 1, ,008 1, ,319 1, ,623 1, ,904 1, ,041 1, ,461 1, ,986 1, ,440 2, ,891 2, ,116 2, ,546 2, ,029 2, ,078 2, ,473 2, ,796 2, ,536 2, ,185 2, ,677 2, ,160 3, ,398 3,699
8 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 8 Pile SLS Loading (Including Negative Skin Friction) Surcharge at surface, p surface 0 kpa Pile SLS vertical load, F pile,v,n 3000 kn Pile group (pile cap) SLS vertical load, F pilecap,v kn Note that F pile,v,n and F pilecap,v can be positive (downward) or negative (upwards); Pile SLS vertical (compressive) NSF load, F pile,v,nsf 0 kn Note NSF = negative skin friction; Note F pile,v,nsf = ( πd or 4D).L 0. β.[ σ v '(z=-l 0 )+ σ v '(z=0)]/2; Consideration of NSF? Not Considered NSF reduction factor, β 0.30 Meyerhof Clay Garlanger Silt Garlanger Sand Garlanger Effective vertical stress at z=-l 0 level, σ v '(z=-l 0 ) 50 kpa Case when (z u L c ) >= MAX (B cap, L cap ) Invalid σ v '(z=-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.l c Case when 0 < (z u L c ) < MAX (B cap, L cap ) Valid σ v '(z=-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.l c 50 kpa Case when (z u L c ) = 0 Invalid σ v '(z=-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.l c Case when (z u L c ) < 0 and z u >= 0 Invalid σ v '(z=-l 0 ) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c -z u )+γ dry.z u Case when z u < 0 Invalid σ v '(z=-l 0 ) = p surface +γ sat.l c +γ w.(-z u )-γ w.(l c +(-z u )) Note that the above equation reduces to σ v '(z=-l 0 ) = p surface +( γ sat - γ w ).L c ; Effective vertical stress at z=0 level, σ v '(z=0) 50 kpa Case when (z u L c L 0 ) >= MAX (B cap, L cap ) Invalid σ v '(z=0) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +L 0 ) Case when 0 < (z u L c L 0 ) < MAX (B cap, L cap ) Valid σ v '(z=0) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +L 0 ) 50 kpa Case when (z u L c L 0 ) = 0 Invalid σ v '(z=0) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +L 0 ) Case when (z u L c L 0 ) < 0 and z u >= 0 Invalid σ v '(z=0) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c +L 0 -z u )+γ dry.z u Case when z u < 0 Invalid σ v '(z=0) = p surface +γ sat.(l c +L 0 )+γ w.(-z u )-γ w.(l c +L 0 +(-z u )) Note that the above equation reduces to σ v '(z=0) = p surface +( γ sat - γ w ).(L c +L 0 ); Total pile SLS vertical (compressive) load (per pile), F pile,v,comp Note F pile,v,comp = MAX(0, F pile,v,n )+F pile,v,nsf ; Total pile SLS vertical (tensile) load (per pile), F pile,v,tens Note F pile,v,tens = ABS(MIN(0, F pile,v,n )); 3000 kn 0 kn Pile ULS Loading (Including Negative Skin Friction) Total pile ULS vertical (compressive) load (per pile), F pile,v,comp,uls = K.F pile,v,com Total pile ULS vertical (tensile) load (per pile), F pile,v,tens,uls = K.F pile,v,tens 4500 kn 0 kn
9 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 9 Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Piles XX Executive Summary Undrained overall pile capacity Drained overall pile effective capacity Empirical overall pile effective capacity 89% OK Pile axial compression capacity 68% OK Pile axial tension capacity 0% OK Pile detailing requirements OK Undrained overall pile group capacity Drained overall pile group capacity Empirical overall pile group capacity Overall utilisation summary 89% % Vertical reinforcement in pile 2.18 % Estimated pile steel reinforcement quantity 171 kg/m 3 [Note that steel quantity in kg/m 3 can be obtained from 78.5 x % rebar]; Material cost: concrete, c 300 units/m 3 steel, s 3500 units/tonne Reinforced concrete material cost = c+(est. rebar quant).s 900 units/m 3
10 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 10 Undrained Overall Pile Capacity Undrained shear strength at z=0 level, S u (z=0) Undrained shear strength at z=l-l 0 level, S u (z=l-l 0 ) Base bearing capacity, Q b = (πd 2 b /4 or D 2 b ).q f (z=l-l 0 ) Gross bearing capacity, q f (z=l-l 0 ) = N c.s u (z=l-l 0 ) (<=q flimit (z=l- Terzaghi Note gross bearing capacity set to 0.0kPa if base resistance excluded; Bearing capacity factor, N c = 9.0 Meyerhof Shaft friction capacity, Q s = (πd or 4D).(L-L 0 ).S a Average shaft adhesion, S a = [S a (z=0)+s a (z=l-l 0 )]/2 S a (z=0) = F.α(z=0).S u (z=0) (<=S alimit (z)) S a (z=l-l 0 ) = F.α(z=L-L 0 ).S u (z=l-l 0 ) (<=S alimit (z)) Note that S a (z=0) is the shaft adhesion at z=0 level and S a (z=l-l 0 ) is the shaft adhesion at z=l-l 0 level; Shaft adhesion factor, α(z=0) 0.80 McClelland, Nord Shaft adhesion factor, α(z=l-l 0 ) 0.80 McClelland, Nord Shaft adhesion length factor, F = function (L/D) 1.00 Note that α is 0.30 (under-reamed base piles); Note that α is (stiff over-consolidated clays); Note that α is 0.30 (heavily fissured clay); Note that α is 0.45 (very stiff clays, S u >= 150kPa); Note that α is (firm to stiff clays, eg. London Clay); Note that α is 0.45 (bored piles), 0.80 (driven piles); Note that α is 0.50 (firm to stiff clays, S u >= 70kPa); Note that α is 1-[(S u -25)/90] (soft to firm clays, 25kPa < S u < 70kPa); Note that α is (soft Malaysian Clay); Note that α is 1.00 (very soft clays, S u <= 25kPa); Tomlinson Whitaker and Co Tomlinson Neoh Tomlinson Sutton API API Gue and Partn Neoh, API
11 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 11 Co Compressive a Co Co dlund dlund ooke ers Note that B in the term L/B above is D;
12 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 12 Pile weight minus soil weight removed, F pile = A ps.l.(ρ c -γ dry ) Note under-reamed base dimensions ignored in calculation of F pile as deemed negligible; Note conservatively, dry bulk unit weight assumed for density of displaced soil; Combined base bearing and shaft friction capacity, P f = Q b + Q s Base and Shaft Capacity Factored Individually mpressive Undrained pile base capacity (factored), Q b / FOS 2 nd Tensile Undrained pile shaft capacity (factored), Q s / FOS 3 mpressive Undrained pile base and shaft capacity (factored), Q b / FOS 2 + Q s Base and Shaft Capacity Factored Together mpressive Undrained pile base and shaft capacity (factored), P f / FOS 1 Tensile Undrained pile base and shaft capacity (factored), Q s / FOS 1 Undrained overall pile capacity for vertical (compressive) load, MIN (Q b / FOS Undrained overall pile capacity for vertical (tensile) load, MIN (Q s / FOS 3, Q s Undrained overall pile capacity utilisation = MAX (F pile,v,comp / (MIN (Q b / FOS 2
13 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 13 Undrained Overall Pile (Compressive) Capacity Chart 1000 Undrained Overall Pile (Compressive) Capacity, MIN (Q b / FOS 2 + Q s / FOS 3, P f / FOS 1 ) - F pile (kn) Length of Pile, L (m) D = Db = 300mm D = Db = 450mm D = Db = 600mm D = Db = 750mm D = Db = 900mm D = Db = 1050mm D = Db = 1200mm D = Db = 1350mm D = Db = 1500mm D = Db = 1650mm D = Db = 1800mm D = Db = 1950mm D = Db = 2100mm
14 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 14 Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Piles XX Drained Overall Pile Effective Capacity L c L 0 z u z L Effective vertical stress at pile top z=0 level, σ v '(z=0) Case when (z u L c L 0 ) >= 0 σ v '(z=0) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +L 0 ) Case when (z u L c L 0 ) < 0 and z u >= 0 σ v '(z=0) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c +L 0 -z u )+γ dry.z u Case when z u < 0 σ v '(z=0) = p surface +γ sat.(l c +L 0 )+γ w.(-z u )-γ w.(l c +L 0 +(-z u )) Note that the above equation reduces to σ v '(z=0) = p surface +( γ sat - γ w ).(L c +L 0 ); Effective vertical stress at water table z=z u -L c -L 0 level, σ v '(z=z u -L c -L 0 ) Case when z u >= 0 σ v '(z=z u -L c -L 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.z u Case when z u < 0 σ v '(z=z u -L c -L 0 ) = 0 Effective vertical stress at critical depth z=20d-l 0 level, σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) Case when (z u L c 20D) >= 0 σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +20D) Case when (z u L c 20D) < 0 and z u >= 0 σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c +20D-z u )+γ dry.z u Case when z u < 0 σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +γ sat.(l c +20D)+γ w.(-z u )-γ w.(l c +2 Note that the above equation reduces to σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) = p surface +( γ sat - γ w ).(L c +20D Effective vertical stress at pile base z=l-l 0 level, σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) Unit weight, γ' /m 3 Case when (z u L c L) >= MAX (B cap, L cap ) σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +L) γ' = γ dry /m 3 Case when 0 < (z u L c L) < MAX (B cap, L cap ) σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +L) γ' = z u /MAX(B cap, L cap ). [γ dry - (γ sat - γ w )] + (γ sat - γ w ) /m 3 Case when (z u L c L ) = 0 σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) = p surface +γ dry.(l c +L) γ' = γ sat - γ w /m 3 Case when (z u L c L ) < 0 and z u >= 0 σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) = p surface +(γ sat -γ w ).(L c +L-z u )+γ dry.z u γ' = γ sat - γ w /m 3 Case when z u < 0 σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) = p surface +γ sat.(l c +L)+γ w.(-z u )-γ w.(l c +L+(-z u ) Note that the above equation reduces to σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) = p surface +( γ sat - γ w ).(L c +L); γ' = γ sat - γ w /m 3
15 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 15 Base effective bearing capacity, Q b ' = (πd 2 b /4 or D 2 b ).q f '(z=l-l 0 ) Gross effective bearing capacity, q f '(z=l-l 0 ) (<=q flimit '(z=l-l 0 )) Terzaghi = s c.d c.n c,strip.c' + s q.d q.n q,strip.σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) + s γ.d γ.n γ,strip.d b /2.γ' Note gross effective bearing capacity set to 0.0kPa if base resistance excluded; Note for piles bored in rock, s c.d c = 1.2, s q.d q = 1.0 and s γ.d γ = 0.7; Note for piles bored in rock, q f ' = 0.3q uc, where Gue and Partn Neoh q f ' for weak rock 1500 kpa Neoh q f ' for medium rock kpa Neoh q f ' for strong fresh rock kpa Neoh D); Note typically for driven piles, N q = 20 (loose sand) to 100 (very dense sand), and for bored piles N q = 12 (loose sand) to 40 (very dense sand); Equations for bearing capacity factors Cohesion Factors Surcharge Factors Neoh Shape factor, EC7 Depth factor, Note D and B in the above equation are L c +L and D b, respectively; Bearing capacity factor, N c,strip Soils N c,strip = (N q,strip -1).cotφ' EC7 (Prandtl Rocks N c,strip Kulhawy and Goo Shape factor, EC7 Note B' and L' in the above equation are D b and D b, respectively; Depth factor, d q Self Weight Factors Note D and B' in the above equation are L c +L and D b, respectively; Bearing capacity factor, N q,strip Soils EC7 (Reissne Rocks N q,strip Kulhawy and Goo Shape factor, EC7 Note B' and L' in the above equation are D b and D b, respectively; Depth factor, Bearing capacity factor, N γ,strip Soils N γ,strip = 2.0(N q,strip -1).tanφ' EC7 (Hansen Rocks N γ,strip Kulhawy and Goo
16 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 16 Shaft effective friction capacity, Q s ' = (πd or 4D).Σ( L.τ a ') Equation for shaft effective stress Soils / Rocks τ a '(z=0) = K s.tanδ'.σ v '(z=0) (<=τ alimit '(z)) τ a '(z=z u -L c -L 0 ) = K s.tanδ'.σ v '(z=z u -L c -L 0 ) (<=τ alimit '(z)) τ a '(z=20d-l 0 ) = K s.tanδ'.σ v '(z=20d-l 0 ) (<=τ alimit '(z)) τ a '(z=z u -L c -L 0 ) = K s.tanδ'.σ v '(z=z u -L c -L 0 ) (<=τ alimit '(z)) ers τ a '(z=l-l 0 ) = K s.tanδ'.σ v '(z=l-l 0 ) (<=τ alimit '(z)) Note that τ a '(z=0) is the shaft effective stress at z=0 level and τ a '(z=l-l 0 ) is the shaft effective stress at z=l-l 0 level; Note τ a ' = σ h '.tan δ ' = K s σ v '.tan δ '; Note effective cohesion, c' ignored due to disturbed soil adjacent to pile foundation; K s.tanδ' 0.43 Calculated K s.tanδ' = k Ks.K 0.(OCR) 0.5.tanδ' = k Ks.(1-sinφ 0.22 Burland, Meyer Coefficient of horizontal soil stress, k Ks 1.25 Tomlinson Overconsolidation ratio, OCR 1.0 Effective angle, δ ' for sandy gravel 40.0 degrees Neoh Effective angle, δ ' for sand 32.0 degrees Neoh Effective angle, δ ' for silts and clays degrees Neoh Effective angle, δ ' for bored pile residual angle degrees Neoh Manual K s.tanδ' 0.43 Pile bored in very loose to dense Ksands s.tan δ (Mey ' = Pile bored in loose sands (Davies K s and.tanchan) δ ' = Pile bored in dense sands (Davies K s and.tanchan δ ' = Neoh, Meyerh Gue and Partn Gue and Partn Pile CFA in chalk K s.tan δ ' = 0.45 CIRIA574 Pile CFA in chalk with N >= 10, q uc >= K s.tan 4MPδ ' = 0.80 CIRIA86 Pile bored or driven cast-in-place in chalk K s.tan δ ' = 0.80 Pile driven in very loose to dense K s sands.tan δ (Me ' = CIRIA574 Neoh, Meyerh Rocks τ a '(z=0) = αβq uc (<=τ alimit '(z)) e and Partn l) τ a '(z=l-l 0 ) = αβq uc (<=τ alimit '(z)) e and Partn odman Note that τ a '(z=0) is the shaft effective stress at z=0 level and τ a '(z=l-l 0 ) is the shaft effective stress at z=l-l 0 level; Reduction factor, α 0.30 Correlation factor, β 0.25 Unconfined uniaxial compressive strength, q uc 1500 kpa r) odman Note typically τ a ' = 0.05q uc, where Neoh τ a ' for weak rock kpa Neoh τ a ' for medium rock kpa Neoh n) τ a ' for strong rock kpa Neoh odman
17 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 17 Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Piles XX rhof hof ers ers hof ers ers
18 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 18 Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Piles XX Co Compressive a Co Co
19 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 19 Pile weight minus soil weight removed, F pile = A ps.l.(ρ c -γ dry ) Note under-reamed base dimensions ignored in calculation of F pile as deemed negligible; Note conservatively, dry bulk unit weight assumed for density of displaced soil; Combined base effective bearing and shaft effective friction capacity, P f ' = Q Base and Shaft Effective Capacity Factored Individually mpressive Drained pile base effective capacity (factored), Q b ' / FOS 2 nd Tensile Drained pile shaft effective capacity (factored), Q s ' / FOS 3 mpressive Drained pile base and shaft effective capacity (factored), Q b ' / FOS Base and Shaft Effective Capacity Factored Together mpressive Drained pile base and shaft effective capacity (factored), P f ' / FOS Tensile Drained pile base and shaft effective capacity (factored), Q s ' / FOS Drained overall pile effective capacity for vertical (compressive) load, MIN (Q Drained overall pile effective capacity for vertical (tensile) load, MIN (Q s ' / FO Drained overall pile effective capacity utilisation = MAX (F pile,v,comp / (MIN (Q b
20 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx Drained Overall Pile Effective (Compressive) Capacity Chart Empirical Overall Pile Effective (Compressive) Capacity, MIN (Q b ' / FOS 2 + Q s '/ FOS 3, P f ' / FOS 1 ) - F pile (kn) Co Compressive a Co Co Length of Pile, L (m) D = Db = 300mm D = Db = 450mm D = Db = 600mm D = Db = 750mm D = Db = 900mm D = Db = 1050mm D = Db = 1200mm D = Db = 1350mm D = Db = 1500mm D = Db = 1650mm D = Db = 1800mm D = Db = 1950mm D = Db = 2100mm
21 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 21 Empirical Overall Pile Effective Capacity SPT at z=0 level, N(z=0) 5 SPT at z=l-l 0 level, N(z=L-L 0 ) 305 Base effective bearing capacity, Q b ' = (πd 2 b /4 or D 2 b ).q f '(z=l-l 0 ) 0 kn Gross effective bearing capacity, q f '(z=l-l 0 )=K SPT,b.N(z=L-L 0 ) (<= 0 kpa Note gross effective bearing capacity set to 0.0kPa if base resistance excluded; Shaft effective friction capacity, Q s ' = (πd or 4D).(L-L 0 ).τ a ' 6985 kn Average shaft effective stress, τ a ' = [τ a '(z=0)+τ a '(z=l-l 0 )]/2 49 kpa τ a '(z=0) = K SPT,s.N(z=0) (<=τ alimit '(z)) 10 kpa τ a '(z=l-l 0 ) = K SPT,s.N(z=L-L 0 ) (<=τ alimit '(z)) 89 kpa Note that τ a '(z=0) is the shaft effective stress at z=0 level and τ a '(z=l-l 0 ) is the shaft effective stress at z=l-l 0 level; Pile weight minus soil weight removed, F pile = A ps.l.(ρ c -γ dry ) 106 kn Note under-reamed base dimensions ignored in calculation of F pile as deemed negligible; Note conservatively, dry bulk unit weight assumed for density of displaced soil; Combined base effective bearing and shaft effective friction capacity, P f ' = Q 6985 kn Base and Shaft Effective Capacity Factored Individually mpressive Empirical pile base effective capacity (factored), Q b ' / FOS 2 nd Tensile Empirical pile shaft effective capacity (factored), Q s ' / FOS 3 mpressive Empirical pile base and shaft effective capacity (factored), Q b ' / FO 0 kn 4657 kn 4657 kn Base and Shaft Effective Capacity Factored Together mpressive Empirical pile base and shaft effective capacity (factored), P f ' / FO Tensile Empirical pile base and shaft effective capacity (factored), Q s ' / FO 3492 kn 3492 kn Empirical overall pile effective capacity for vertical (compressive) load, MIN ( 3386 kn Empirical overall pile effective capacity for vertical (tensile) load, MIN (Q s ' / F 3492 kn Empirical overall pile effective capacity utilisation = MAX (F pile,v,comp / (MIN (Q 89% OK
22 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx Empirical Overall Pile Effective (Compressive) Capacity Chart Empirical Overall Pile Effective (Compressive) Capacity, MIN (Q b ' / FOS 2 + Q s '/ FOS 3, P f ' / FOS 1 ) - F pile (kn) Length of Pile, L (m) D = Db = 300mm D = Db = 450mm D = Db = 600mm D = Db = 750mm D = Db = 900mm D = Db = 1050mm D = Db = 1200mm D = Db = 1350mm D = Db = 1500mm D = Db = 1650mm D = Db = 1800mm D = Db = 1950mm D = Db = 2100mm
23 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 23 Pile Reinforcement Design Precast Driven Square RC Pile or Insitu Bored Circular RC Pile Pile Longitudinal Reinforcement Design Percentage of reinforcement A s,prov,p /A ps x 100% 2.18 % Axial compression capacity, N cap,pile,comp 4418 kn SLS Design N cap,pile,comp = 0.25f cu.a ps 4418 kn e and Partn ULS Design N cap,pile,comp = 0.35f cu.a ps + (0.67f y -0.35f cu ).A Note alternatively, SLS design including steel reinforcement can be estimated by N cap,pile,comp = 0.275f cu.a ps f y.a s,prov,p with 0.55f y limited to 175N/mm 2 ; Total pile vertical (compressive) load (per pile), F pile,v,comp,(uls) SLS Design F pile,v,comp 3000 kn 3000 kn BS8004 ULS Design F pile,v,comp,uls Axial compression capacity utilisation = F pile,v,comp,(uls) /N cap,pile,comp 68% OK Axial tension capacity, N cap,pile,tens 2442 kn SLS Design N cap,pile,tens = 0.55f y.a s,prov,p 2442 kn ULS Design N cap,pile,tens = 0.95f y.a s,prov,p Total pile vertical (tensile) load (per pile), F pile,v,tens,(uls) 0 kn SLS Design F pile,v,tens 0 kn ULS Design F pile,v,tens,uls Axial tension capacity utilisation = F pile,v,tens,(uls) /N cap,pile,tens 0% OK Pile Shear Reinforcement Design Note that pile shear design to be performed as per column design; Pile Detailing Requirements All detailing requirements met? OK Min longitudinal steel reinforcement number, n p (>=6 circular; >=4 square) 12 OK Min longitudinal steel reinforcement diameter, φ p (>=12mm) 32 mm OK Percentage of reinforcement A s,prov,p /A ps x 100% (>0.4% and <5.0%) 2.18 % OK Longitudinal steel reinforcement pitch (>=75mm+φ p but >=100mm+φ p for T 143 mm OK Circular pile bar pitch = π.(d-2.cover 4-2.φ link,p -φ p )/n p 143 mm Square pile bar pitch = 4.(D-2.cover 4-2.φ link,p -φ p )/n p mm Min link diameter, φ link,p (>=0.25φ p ; >=8mm) 10 mm OK Max link pitch, S p (<=12φ p, <=300mm, <=D) 150 mm OK Require an overall enclosing link.
24 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 24 Precast (Pretensioned Spun) Driven Circular RC Pile SLS axial compression capacity, N cap,pile,comp = 0.25.(f cu -f pe ).A eff SLS total pile vertical (compressive) load (per pile), F pile,v,comp Axial compression capacity utilisation = F pile,v,comp /N cap,pile,comp Insitu Bored Circular RC Pile (API Micropile) ers SLS axial compression capacity, N cap,pile,comp Reinforcement only N cap,pile,comp = f y,api.a API /2.0 Composite section (strain compatibility) N cap,pile,comp = 0.5f y,api.(a API +A c,api 04 cl Concrete filled CHS N cap,pile,comp = (0.91f y,api.a API cl. 11. SLS total pile vertical (compressive) load (per pile), F pile,v,comp Axial compression capacity utilisation = F pile,v,comp /N cap,pile,comp
25 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 25 Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Piles XX Accounting for Tolerance in Pile Installation Moment induced at head due to out-of-position, M = 0.075F pile,v,comp,uls Lateral force induced at head due to out-of-vertical, H = F pile,v,comp,uls / knm 60 kn
26 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 26 Group Pile Design Undrained Analysis Consideration of NSF? Total pile group SLS vertical (compressive) NSF load, F pilegroup,v,nsf Tomlinson Note NSF = negative skin friction; Note F pilegroup,v,nsf = B cap.l cap. γ dry or sat.l 0 ; Pile group capacity, Tomlinson Note D, B, L, s and s b in the above equation are L-L 0, B cap, L cap, S a, S u (z=l-l 0 ) and D, respectively; Undrained overall pile group capacity for vertical (compressive) lo Undrained overall pile group capacity utilisation Note utilisation is (F pilecap,v + F pilegroup,v,nsf ) / (Q u / FOS 1 );
27 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 27 Drained Analysis Note there is no risk of drained overall pile group failure if FOS of individual piles are adequate; Gue and Partn Empirical Analysis Note perform undrained or drained analysis;
28 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 28 Scheme Design (Cohesive Soils) ers
29 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 29
30 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 30 Scheme Design (Non Cohesive Soils)
31 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 31
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 25 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
More informationChapter (11) Pile Foundations
Chapter (11) Introduction Piles are structural members that are made of steel, concrete, or timber. They are used to build pile foundations (classified as deep foundations) which cost more than shallow
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal steel, f y 460 N/mm 2 Yield
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Pad, Strip and Raft XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC ) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 30 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
More informationEngineeringmanuals. Part2
Engineeringmanuals Part2 Engineering manuals for GEO5 programs Part 2 Chapter 1-12, refer to Engineering Manual Part 1 Chapter 13. Pile Foundations Introduction... 2 Chapter 14. Analysis of vertical load-bearing
More informationINTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013
INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013 What is Pile Capacity? When we load a pile until IT Fails what is IT Strength Considerations Two Failure Modes 1. Pile structural failure controlled by allowable
More informationS E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S
1. P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S Helical foundation pile includes a lead and extension(s). The lead section is made of a central steel
More informationCHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY
CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY. Volume 2 CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY Detailed in this chapter: the theories behind the program the equations and methods that are use to perform the analyses. CONTENTS CHAPTER
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
More informationEN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.
EN 1997 1: Sections 3 and 6 Your logo Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7 Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations Trevor L.L. Orr
More informationAxially Loaded Piles
Axially Loaded Piles 1 t- Curve Method using Finite Element Analysis The stress-strain relationship for an axially loaded pile can be described through three loading mechanisms: axial deformation in the
More information3-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS
3-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS INTRODUCTION The soil must be capable of carrying the loads from any engineered structure placed upon it without a shear failure and with the resulting settlements being tolerable
More informationAnalysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile
Engineering manual No. 16 Updated: 07/2018 Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile Program: Soubor: Pile Demo_manual_16.gpi The objective of this engineering manual is to explain how
More informationINTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA
EGC373 (F) / Page 1 of 5 INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA UK DEGREE TRANSFER PROGRAMME INTI ADELAIDE TRANSFER PROGRAMME EGC 373: FOUNDATION ENGINEERING FINAL EXAMINATION : AUGUST 00 SESSION This paper consists of
More informationBoreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.
Implementation Boreholes 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3. Rotary Drilling Boring Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 4. Percussion Drilling The right choice of method depends on: Ground
More informationBEARING CAPACITY SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATIONS
BEARING CAPACITY SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATIONS CONTENTS: 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS 2.1 Design criteria 2.2 Spreading load 2.3 Types of foundations 2.4 Ground failure modes 2.5 Definitions
More informationTable 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.
Hatanaka and Uchida (1996); ' 20N 20 12N 20 ' 45 A lower bound for the above equation is given as; 12N 15 ' 45 Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation A Angularity 1) A (degrees) Rounded 0
More informationTheory of Shear Strength
SKAA 1713 SOIL MECHANICS Theory of Shear Strength Prepared by, Dr. Hetty 1 SOIL STRENGTH DEFINITION Shear strength of a soil is the maximum internal resistance to applied shearing forces The maximum or
More informationTheory of Shear Strength
MAJ 1013 ADVANCED SOIL MECHANICS Theory of Shear Strength Prepared by, Dr. Hetty 1 Strength of different materials Steel Concrete Soil Tensile strength Compressive strength Shear strength Complex behavior
More informationDeep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile
Deep Foundations 2 Load Capacity of a Single Pile All calculations of pile capacity are approximate because it is almost impossible to account for the variability of soil types and the differences in the
More informationCPT Guide 5 th Edition. CPT Applications - Deep Foundations. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Dr. Peter K. Robertson Webinar # /2/2013
Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Site Investigation Experts CPT Applications - Deep Foundations Dr. Peter K. Robertson Webinar #6 2013 CPT Guide 5 th Edition Robertson & Cabal (Robertson) 5 th Edition 2012
More informationClayey sand (SC)
Pile Bearing Capacity Analysis / Verification Input data Project Task : PROJECT: "NEW STEAM BOILER U-5190 Part : A-1 Descript. : The objective of this Analysis is the Pile allowable bearing Capacity Analysis
More informationThe Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh
The Bearing Capacity of Soils Dr Omar Al Hattamleh Example of Bearing Capacity Failure Omar Play the move of bearing Capacity failure The Philippine one Transcona Grain Silos Failure - Canada The Bearing
More informationSHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL
Soil Failure Criteria SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL Knowledge about the shear strength of soil important for the analysis of: Bearing capacity of foundations, Slope stability, Lateral pressure on retaining structures,
More informationD1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.
(d) COMPRESSIBILITY AND CONSOLIDATION D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test. (a) Plot the e - σ curve. (b)
More information8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.
8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses. 8.2. Some soils show a peak shear strength. Why and what type(s)
More informationReinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai
Geosynthetics and Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls continued Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai e-mail: gopalkr@iitm.ac.inac in Outline of the Lecture
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 07 3.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES LEARNING OUTCOMES Learning outcomes: At the end of this lecture/week the students would be able to: Understand
More informationPiles and Pile Foundations
Piles and Pile Foundations Carlo Viggiani, Alessandro Mandolini and Gianpiero Russo * j \ Spon Press an imprint of Taylor & Francis LONDON AND NEWYORK Contents List of illustrations Introduction PART I
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More informationChapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations Introduction To perform satisfactorily, shallow foundations must have two main characteristics: 1. They have to be safe against overall shear
More informationTHE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATIONS BASED ON LRFD FOR JAPANESE HIGHWAYS
THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATIONS BASED ON LRFD FOR JAPANESE HIGHWAYS Hideaki Nishida 1,Toshiaki Nanazawa 2, Masahiro Shirato 3, Tetsuya Kohno 4, and Mitsuaki Kitaura 5 Abstract One of the motivations
More informationPractical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30
Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction, Background and Codes 2 28 Sep Charles Goodchild EC2 Background,
More informationChapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil
Page 5 Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil. The internal resistance per unit area that the soil mass can offer to resist failure and sliding along any plane inside it is called (a) strength (b) shear strength
More informationHKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May Shallow Foundations. Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
HKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May 2011 Shallow Foundations Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 1 Outline Summary of design requirements Load eccentricity Bearing
More informationEvaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil
Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil [Jafar Bolouri Bazaz, Javad Keshavarz] Abstract Almost all types of piles are subjected to lateral loads. In many cases,
More information1.8 Unconfined Compression Test
1-49 1.8 Unconfined Compression Test - It gives a quick and simple measurement of the undrained strength of cohesive, undisturbed soil specimens. 1) Testing method i) Trimming a sample. Length-diameter
More informationOP-13. PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN OF EMBANKMENT
Page 1 of 8 WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS TYC Compiled by : LSS Checked by : GSS Approved by : OP-13. PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN OF EMBANKMENT Page of 8 13.0 13.1. OVERALL PROCEDURES This section will briefly
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0
More informationClass Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530
Class Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530 1-1 General Information Lecturer: Scott A. Barnhill, P.E. Lecture Time: Thursday, 7:10 pm to 9:50 pm Classroom: Kaufmann, Room 224 Office Hour: I have
More informationBearing Capacity of Soils in Deep Foundations Course No. CE0148 PDH: 5
Bearing Capacity of Soils in Deep Foundations Course No. CE0148 PDH: 5 ** PLEASE NOTE: THIS COURSE IS A SUBSECTION OF COURSE # CE0009 ** In order to obtain credit for this course, the following steps listed
More informationVerification of a Micropile Foundation
Engineering manual No. 36 Update 02/2018 Verification of a Micropile Foundation Program: File: Pile Group Demo_manual_en_36.gsp The objective of this engineering manual is to explain the application of
More informationShear Strength of Soils
Shear Strength of Soils STRESSES IN A SOIL ELEMENT t s v Analyze Effective Stresses (s ) Load carried by Soil t Where: s H t t s H s = t f = s v = s H = t = s v Stresses in a Soil Element after Figure
More informationAnnex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
More informationIntroduction to Soil Mechanics
Introduction to Soil Mechanics Sela Sode and Colin Jones WILEY Blackwell Contents Preface Dedication and Acknowledgments List of Symbols Soil Structure 1.1 Volume relationships 1.1.1 Voids ratio (e) 1.1.2
More informationGeotechnical Properties of Soil
Geotechnical Properties of Soil 1 Soil Texture Particle size, shape and size distribution Coarse-textured (Gravel, Sand) Fine-textured (Silt, Clay) Visibility by the naked eye (0.05 mm is the approximate
More informationOP-023. INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT
INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT Page 1 of 9 WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS GSJ Compiled by : Checked by KYW : LSS Approved by : OP-23. INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT INTERPRETATION
More informationSoil and Rock Strength. Chapter 8 Shear Strength. Steel Strength. Concrete Strength. Dr. Talat Bader May Steel. Concrete.
Chapter 8 Shear Strength Dr. Talat Bader May 2006 Soil and Rock Strength Unconfined compressive strength (MPa) Steel Concrete 20 100 250 750 0.001 0.01 Soil 0.1 1.0 10 Rock 100 250 F y = 250 to 750 MPa
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0 kn OK Design shear force, V d 4223 kn
More informationPILE LOAD TEST IN OLD ALLUVIUM
An evening talk organized by GeoSS PILE LOAD TEST IN OLD ALLUVIUM Wong Kai Sin 25 August 2016 1 PILE LOAD TEST IN OLD ALLUVIUM 1.Should we accept or reject the test results? 2.What are the expected unit
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0
More informationAssessment of Calculation Procedures for Piles in Clay based on Static Loading Tests Anders Hust Augustesen
Assessment of Calculation Procedures for Piles in Clay based on Static Loading Tests By Anders Hust Augustesen 1 Agenda Presentation of calculation procedures Basis for the evaluation of the calculation
More informationAnalysis of a single pile settlement
Engineering manual No. 14 Updated: 06/2018 Analysis of a single pile settlement Program: Pile File: Demo_manual_14.gpi The objective of this engineering manual is to explain the application of the GEO
More informationA. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1
Geology and Soil Mechanics 55401 /1A (2002-2003) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. 1. Soil mechanics is the application of hydraulics, geology and mechanics to problems relating
More informationAnalysis of Pile Foundation Subjected to Lateral and Vertical Loads
Analysis of Pile Foundation Subjected to Lateral and Vertical Loads Thadapaneni Kanakeswararao 1, B.Ganesh 2 1,2 Department of soil mechanics and foundation engg, Lenora college of Engineering and technology,
More informationPiles Capacity Reference Manual
Piles Capacity Reference Manual hetge hetge geotechnics on the go Piles Capacity Reference Manual January 3, 2013 Version: PC-1.3.130103 hetge LLC Moscow Virginia Istanbul E info@hetge.com W www.hetge.com
More informationTechnical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method
Technical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method Contents Technical Note 21 -... 1 1 Introduction... 1 2 Operational Strain in the Pipeline... 2 3 Seismicity... 2 4 Vertical Uplift... 3 5 Vertical Bearing...
More informationInterpretation of Pile Integrity Test (PIT) Results
Annual Transactions of IESL, pp. 78-84, 26 The Institution of Engineers, Sri Lanka Interpretation of Pile Integrity Test (PIT) Results H. S. Thilakasiri Abstract: A defect present in a pile will severely
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLE LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF SYMBOLS LIST OF APENDICES i ii iii iv v
More informationvulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net since 1997, your source for engineering information for the deep foundation and marine construction industries, and the historical site for Vulcan Iron Works
More informationChapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)
Chapter (4) Ultimate earing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases) Ultimate.C. of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases) Introduction The ultimate bearing capacity theories discussed in Chapter 3
More informationCavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics
Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics by Hai-Sui Yu School of Civil Engineering, University of Nottingham, U. K. KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS DORDRECHT / BOSTON / LONDON TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Preface
More informationAPPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests
APPENDIX F 1 APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS F 1 In-Situ Tests 1. SPT (1) Sand (Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996), = effective vertical stress = effective friction angle = atmosphere pressure (Shmertmann, 1975)
More informationChapter 12 Subsurface Exploration
Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface
More informationGeology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.
Geology and Soil Mechanics 55401 /1A (2003-2004) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet. 1. Soil mechanics is the application of hydraulics, geology and mechanics to problems relating
More informationFoundation Analysis LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE
Foundation Analysis LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE INTRODUCTION Vertical or near-vertical slopes of soil are supported by retaining walls, cantilever sheet-pile walls, sheet-pile bulkheads, braced cuts, and other
More informationLandslide FE Stability Analysis
Landslide FE Stability Analysis L. Kellezi Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, GEO-Danish Geotechnical Institute, Denmark S. Allkja Altea & Geostudio 2000, Albania P. B. Hansen Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering,
More informationA presentation of UniPile software for calculation of Capacity, Drag Force, Downdrag, and Settlement for Piles and Piled Foundations
528 River Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1V 1E9 E: info@unisoftgs.com A presentation of UniPile software for calculation of Capacity, Drag Force, Downdrag, and Settlement for Piles and Piled Foundations
More informationTower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership
Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership EXAMPLES OF TOWER CRANE FOUNDATION TYPES Rail mounted Pad Base Piled Base
More informationCPT: Geopractica Contracting (Pty) Ltd Total depth: m, Date:
The plot below presents the cross correlation coeficient between the raw qc and fs values (as measured on the field). X axes presents the lag distance (one lag is the distance between two sucessive CPT
More informationCh 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing
Ch. 4a - Stress, Strain, Shearing Page 1 Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing Reading Assignment Ch. 4a Lecture Notes Sections 4.1-4.3 (Salgado) Other Materials Handout 4 Homework Assignment 3 Problems 4-13,
More informationLecture 7. Pile Analysis
Lecture 7 14.5 Release Pile Analysis 2012 ANSYS, Inc. February 9, 2013 1 Release 14.5 Pile definition in Mechanical - There are a number of methods that can be used to analyze piled foundations in ANSYS
More informationLATERAL EARTH PRESSURE AND RETAINING STRUCTURES
Topic Outline LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE AND RETAINING STRUCTURES Types of retaining structures Lateral earth pressure Earth pressure at rest Rankine s Theory Coulomb s Theory Cullman s graphic solution Braced
More informationFoundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Module 01 Lecture - 03 Shallow Foundation So, in the last lecture, we discussed the
More informationCE : CIVIL ENGINEERING
2009 CE : CIVIL ENGINEERING Duration : Three Hours Read the following instructions carefully. l. This question paper contains 16 printed pages including pages for rough work. Please check all pages and
More informationBack-analysis and interpretations of driven and bored pile tests data in Bangkok sub-soils
Back-analysis and interpretations of driven and bored pile tests data in Bangkok sub-soils Author Balasubramaniam, Bala, Phienwej, N., Oh, Erwin, Kamalarasa, Sanmugarasa Published 24 Conference Title To
More informationCHAPTER 8 ANALYSES OF THE LATERAL LOAD TESTS AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE
CHAPTER ANALYSES OF THE LATERAL LOAD TESTS AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE.1 INTRODUCTION An important objective of this research is to determine whether accurate analyses of the lateral load-deflection behavior
More informationCollapsible Soils Definitions
Collapsible Soils Definitions Collapsible soils are also known as metastable soils. They are unsaturated soils that undergo a large volume change upon saturation. The sudden and usually large volume change
More informationSHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University
SHEET PILE WALLS Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University Lateral Support In geotechnical engineering, it is often necessary to prevent lateral soil movements. Tie rod Anchor Sheet pile Cantilever retaining
More information(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management
GEOTECHNCIAL ASSESSMENT OF PART OF PORT HARCOURT, NIGER DELTA FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Warmate Tamunonengiyeofori Geostrat International Services Limited, www.geostratinternational.com. *Correspondence
More informationFinite Element Investigation of the Interaction between a Pile and a Soft Soil focussing on Negative Skin Friction
NGM 2016 Reykjavik Proceedings of the 17 th Nordic Geotechnical Meeting Challenges in Nordic Geotechnic 25 th 28 th of May Finite Element Investigation of the Interaction between a Pile and a Soft Soil
More informationChapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement
Chapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement Introduction As we discussed previously in Chapter 3, foundations should be designed for both shear failure and allowable settlement. So the allowable
More informationLiquefaction and Foundations
Liquefaction and Foundations Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings 26 30 November, 2012 What is Liquefaction? Liquefaction
More information1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6
Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L
More informationNEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS
NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS 1 2 C. Vipulanandan 1, Ph.D., M. ASCE and Omer F. Usluogullari 2 Chairman, Professor, Director of Center for Innovative Grouting Materials
More informationfile:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]
Objectives_template Objectives In this section you will learn the following Introduction Different Theories of Earth Pressure Lateral Earth Pressure For At Rest Condition Movement of the Wall Different
More informationChapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations
Chapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations Introduction The settlement of a shallow foundation can be divided into two major categories: (a) elastic, or immediate settlement and (b) consolidation settlement.
More informationRETAINING WALL ANALYSIS
GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN997:2004 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with
More informationCalibration of Resistance Factors for Drilled Shafts for the 2010 FHWA Design Method
Calibration of Resistance Factors for Drilled Shafts for the 21 FHWA Design Method Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh, Ph.D., P.E. Qiming Chen, Ph.D., P.E. Md Nafiul Haque, MS Feb 2, 213 213 Louisiana Transportation
More informationYOUR HW MUST BE STAPLED YOU MUST USE A PENCIL (no pens)
Spring 2008 CIVE 462 HOMEWORK #1 1. Print out the syllabus. Read it. Write the grade percentages in the first page of your notes. 2. Go back to your 301 notes, internet, etc. and find the engineering definition
More informationTC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS
Jérôme Racinais September 15, 215 TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS Table of contents 1. Reminder about pressuremeter tests 2. General behaviour
More informationSoil strength. the strength depends on the applied stress. water pressures are required
Soil Strength Soil strength u Soils are essentially frictional materials the strength depends on the applied stress u Strength is controlled by effective stresses water pressures are required u Soil strength
More informationLesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18
Lesson 25 Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic Reference Manual Chapter 18 STATIC LOAD TESTING Most accurate method to determine static pile capacity Perform at design or construction stage
More informationGapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil
Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil Satyawan Pranjoto Engineering Geology, Auckland, New Zealand. M. J. Pender Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University
More informationBored and driven pile testing in Bangkok sub-soils
Bored and driven pile testing in Bangkok sub-soils Author Balasubramaniam, Bala, Oh, Erwin, Phienwej, N. Published 29 Journal Title Lowland Technology International Copyright Statement The Author(s) 29.
More informationDESIGNING FOR DOWNDRAG ON UNCOATED AND BITUMEN COATED PILES
DESIGNING FOR DOWNDRAG ON UNCOATED AND BITUMEN COATED PILES Jean-Louis BRIAUD, PhD, PE President of ISSMGE Professor and Holder of the Buchanan Chair Texas A&M University Piling and Deep Foundations Middle
More informationOVERVIEW REVIEW OF FOUNDATIONS & SOILS ENG.
Soil Borings. 14.485 CAPSTONE DESIGN OVERVIEW REVIEW OF 14.431 FOUNDATIONS & SOILS ENG. Geotechnical Report (not covered). Bearing Pressure Calculations. Settlement Calculations. Lateral Earth Pressure
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More information