# Control System Design

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 ELEC4410 Control System Design Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States and Discrete-Time Control Design Julio H. Braslavsky School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 1

2 Outline Feedback from Estimated States Discrete-Time Control Design Dead-Beat Control Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 2

3 Feedback from Estimated States In the last lecture we discussed the general scheme for feedback control from estimated states, involving Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 3

4 Feedback from Estimated States In the last lecture we discussed the general scheme for feedback control from estimated states, involving a state feedback gain K Plant Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 3

5 Feedback from Estimated States In the last lecture we discussed the general scheme for feedback control from estimated states, involving a state feedback gain K a state estimator (observer), with gain L Plant Observer Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 3

6 Feedback from Estimated States In the last lecture we discussed the general scheme for feedback control from estimated states, involving a state feedback gain K a state estimator (observer), with gain L To design we used the Bass-Gura formula to make Plant Hurwitz To design in the observer, we used duality and the same Bass-Gura formula to make Observer Hurwitz Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 3

7 Feedback from Estimated States By designing K such that (A BK) is Hurwitz, with the desired eigenvalues, we can guarantee that the closed-loop system will be asymptotically and BIBO stable, and will have the specified dynamic response. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 4

8 Feedback from Estimated States By designing K such that (A BK) is Hurwitz, with the desired eigenvalues, we can guarantee that the closed-loop system will be asymptotically and BIBO stable, and will have the specified dynamic response. By designing L such that (A LC) is Hurwitz, we guarantee that the observer will be asymptotically stable, and the estimate of the states ^x(t) will converge to the real states x(t) as t. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 4

9 Feedback from Estimated States By designing K such that (A BK) is Hurwitz, with the desired eigenvalues, we can guarantee that the closed-loop system will be asymptotically and BIBO stable, and will have the specified dynamic response. By designing L such that (A LC) is Hurwitz, we guarantee that the observer will be asymptotically stable, and the estimate of the states ^x(t) will converge to the real states x(t) as t. But K and the observer are designed independently... Will they work the same when we put them together in a feedback from estimated states scheme? Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 4

10 Feedback from Estimated States Three basic questions arise regarding feedback from estimated states: The closed-loop eigenvalues were set as those of (A BK) by using state feedback u = Kx. Would we still have the same eigenvalues if we do feedback from estimated states u = K^x? Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 5

11 Feedback from Estimated States Three basic questions arise regarding feedback from estimated states: The closed-loop eigenvalues were set as those of (A BK) by using state feedback u = Kx. Would we still have the same eigenvalues if we do feedback from estimated states u = K^x? Would the interconnection affect the observer eigenvalues, those of (A LC)? Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 5

12 Feedback from Estimated States Three basic questions arise regarding feedback from estimated states: The closed-loop eigenvalues were set as those of (A BK) by using state feedback u = Kx. Would we still have the same eigenvalues if we do feedback from estimated states u = K^x? Would the interconnection affect the observer eigenvalues, those of (A LC)? What would be the effect of the observer in the closed-loop transfer function? Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 5

13 Feedback from Estimated States To answer these questions we take a look at the state equations of the full system, putting together plant and observer, that is, ẋ = Ax+Bu ^x = (A LC)^x + LCx+Bu plant observer Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 6

14 Feedback from Estimated States To answer these questions we take a look at the state equations of the full system, putting together plant and observer, that is, ẋ = Ax BK^x + BNr ^x = (A LC)^x + LCx BK^x + BNr plant observer after replacing u = Nr K^x. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 6

15 Feedback from Estimated States To answer these questions we take a look at the state equations of the full system, putting together plant and observer, that is, ẋ = Ax BK^x + BNr ^x = (A LC)^x + LCx BK^x + BNr plant observer after replacing u = Nr K^x. Packaging these equations in a more compact form we have ẋ = A BK x^x + BN r ^x LC (A LC BK) BN [ ] y = C 0 x ^x Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 6

16 Feedback from Estimated States Let s make a change of coordinates, so that the new coordinates are the plant state x and the estimation error ε = x ^x, = x = I 0 x ε x ^x Note that P 1 = [ ] I 0 1 [ I I = I 0 ] I I = P. I I } {{ } P x^x Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 7

17 Feedback from Estimated States Let s make a change of coordinates, so that the new coordinates are the plant state x and the estimation error ε = x ^x, = x = I 0 x ε x ^x I I } {{ } P x^x BK Note that P 1 = [ ] I 0 1 [ I I = I 0 ] I I = P. With this equivalence transformation we get the matrices in the new coordinates as Ā KL = PA KL P 1 (A BK) =, B KL = PB KL = BN 0 C KL = C KL P 1 = [ ] C 0 0 (A LC) Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 7

18 Feedback from Estimated States The full system in the new coordinates is thus represented as (A BK) ẋ = BK x + BN r ε 0 (A LC) ε 0 [ ] y = C 0 x ε Because Ā KL is triangular, its eigenvalues are the union of those of (A BK) and (A LC). Controller and observer do not affect each other in the interconnection. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 8

19 Feedback from Estimated States Note that the estimation error is uncontrollable, hence the observer eigenvalues will not appear in the closed loop transfer function. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 9

20 Feedback from Estimated States The property of independence between control and state estimation is called the Separation Principle Separation Principle: The design of the state feedback and the design of the state estimator can be carried out independently. The eigenvalues of the closed-loop system are as designed by the state feedback law, unaffected by the use of a state estimator. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 10

21 Feedback from Estimated States The property of independence between control and state estimation is called the Separation Principle Separation Principle: The design of the state feedback and the design of the state estimator can be carried out independently. The eigenvalues of the closed-loop system are as designed by the state feedback law, unaffected by the use of a state estimator. The eigenvalues of the observer are unaffected by the state feedback law. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 10

22 Feedback from Estimated States The closed-loop transfer function will only have the eigenvalues arising from (A BK), since the estimation error is uncontrollable, G cl (s) = C(sI A + BK) 1 BN. Transients in state estimation, however, will be seen at the output, since the estimation error is observable. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 11

23 Outline Feedback from Estimated States Discrete-Time Control Design Dead-Beat Control Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 12

24 Discrete-Time Control Design For discrete-time state equations x[k + 1] = Ax[k] + Bu[k], y[k] = Cx[k], the design procedure for a state feedback law u[k] = Kx[k] is the same as for continuous-time systems. The same goes for a discrete-time state observer, ^x[k + 1] = (A LC)^x[k] + Bu[k] + Ly[k]. One difference is the location of the desired eigenvalues. E.g., for asymptotic stability, they should be inside the unit circle. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 13

25 Discrete-Time Control Design For discrete-time state equations x[k + 1] = Ax[k] + Bu[k], y[k] = Cx[k], the design procedure for a state feedback law u[k] = Kx[k] is the same as for continuous-time systems. The same goes for a discrete-time state observer, ^x[k + 1] = (A LC)^x[k] + Bu[k] + Ly[k]. One difference is the location of the desired eigenvalues. E.g., for asymptotic stability, they should be inside the unit circle. A practical rule to choose desired discrete-time eigenvalues is 1. choose a desired location in continuous-time, say p i 2. translate it to discrete-time using the relation λ i = e p it. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 13

26 Discrete-Time Control Design 0.3 Imaginary j Loci with constant damping and constant frequencies the discrete in complex plane ωt 2π Real In MATLAB this grid may be obtained with the zgrid command ζ j Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 14

27 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete-time speed control of a DC motor). We return to the DC motor we considered in the examples of the last lecture. We will suppose that the motor is to be controlled with a PC. Hence, the controller has to be discrete-time. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 15

28 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete-time speed control of a DC motor). We return to the DC motor we considered in the examples of the last lecture. We will suppose that the motor is to be controlled with a PC. Hence, the controller has to be discrete-time. This time, with a view to design a discrete-time control law, we first discretise the continuoustime model h 5 i The first design parameter to define is the sampling period. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 15

29 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 1: choice of sampling period). From Shannon s Sampling Theorem, the sampling frequency ω s = 2π/T should be at least twice the bandwidth of the closed-loop system (because we will change the system bandwidth with the control action). Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 16

30 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 1: choice of sampling period). From Shannon s Sampling Theorem, the sampling frequency ω s = 2π/T should be at least twice the bandwidth of the closed-loop system (because we will change the system bandwidth with the control action). The specification that we had for the previous continuous-time design was a settling time t s of about 1s. The rule based on Shannon s Theorem would then give a sampling time of less than T = 0.5s. In practice T is chosen at least 10 to 20 times faster than the desired closed-loop settling time. Here we choose T = 0.1s Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 16

31 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 1: choice of sampling period). From Shannon s Sampling Theorem, the sampling frequency ω s = 2π/T should be at least twice the bandwidth of the closed-loop system (because we will change the system bandwidth with the control action). The specification that we had for the previous continuous-time design was a settling time t s of about 1s. The rule based on Shannon s Theorem would then give a sampling time of less than T = 0.5s. In practice T is chosen at least 10 to 20 times faster than the desired closed-loop settling time. Here we choose T = 0.1s Note that the maximum sampling speed is limited by the available computer clock frequency, and thus the time required for computations and signal processing operations. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 16

32 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 2: discretisation of the plant). Having defined the sampling-time T, we compute the discrete-time state matrices A d = e At, and B d = T 0 e Aτ B dτ From MATLAB, we do [Ad,Bd]=c2d(A,B,0.1) and obtain A d =, B d = As we can verify, the open loop discrete-time eigenvalues are = e ( ) and = e ( ) Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 17

33 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 3: design of discrete feedback gain). The discrete-time characteristic polynomial is Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 18

34 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 3: design of discrete feedback gain). The discrete-time characteristic polynomial is For the desired discrete characteristic polynomial, we first obtain the discrete mapping for the continuous-time system, i.e., of the eigenvalues specified which yield the desired discrete characteristic polynomial Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 18

35 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 3: design of discrete feedback gain). The discrete-time characteristic polynomial is For the desired discrete characteristic polynomial, we first obtain the discrete mapping for the continuous-time system, i.e., of the eigenvalues specified which yield the desired discrete characteristic polynomial From the coefficients of feedback gain h and we get the discrete state i h i Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 18

36 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 3, continuation). We then compute, just following the same procedure used in continuous-time, from the discrete matrices A d and B d, the discrete controllability matrices C d and C d, C d = , and C d = We thus obtain, in the original coordinates, the discrete-time feedback gain ] K d = K d C d C 1 d [ = As can be verified with MATLAB, (A d B d K d ) will have the desired discrete eigenvalues. 1 Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 19

37 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design: continuation). In a similar fashion, we can carry out the design of the discrete-time observer, based on the discrete-time model of the plant. The output feedback design is finally implemented on the continuous-time plant through a Zero Order Hold and a Sampler. Discrete equivalent plant Continuous time plant ZOH T Discrete-time Observer Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 20

38 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design: MATLAB script). We used the following MATLAB script to compute the gains and run the simulations. % Continuous-time matrices A=[-10 1; ];B=[0;2];C=[1 0];D=0; G=ss(a,B,C,D); % state space system definition T=0.1; % Sampling time Gd=c2d(G,T, zoh ) % discretisation % Discrete-time feedback gain Kd=place(Gd.a,Gd.b,exp([-5-i,-5+i]*T)) % Discrete-time observer gain Ld=place(Gd.a,Gd.c,exp([-6-i,-6+i]*T)) % steady state error compensation N=inv(Gd.c*inv(eye(2)-Gd.a+Gd.b*Kd)*Gd.b) % Run simulink diagram sim( dmotorofbk ) % Plots (after simulations have been run) subplot(211),plot(y(:,1),y(:,2));grid subplot(212),stairs(u(:,1),u(:,2));grid Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 21

39 Discrete-Time Control Design Example (Discrete design: SIMULINK diagram). We used the following SIMULINK diagram to run the simulations. N G.b* u 1 s G.c* u r Gain Zero Order Hold Matrix Gain1 Integrator Matrix Gain2 y(t) G.a* u Matrix Gain Gd.b* u u[k] Kd* u 1 z Unit Delay Ld* u Gd.a Ld*Gd.c* u Notice the sampled signals coloured in red (check the option Sample Time Colors in the Format menu). All blocks with discrete-time signals include a sampler at their input. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 22

40 Discrete-Time Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design: simulations). The following plots show the response of the closed-loop sampled-data controlled system: continuous-time output 1.2 and discrete-time control signal y(t) time [s] u[k] kt [s] Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 23

41 Discrete-Time Design: Peculiarities Two special differences in the discrete-time design procedure: The gain for steady state error compensation is, as in continuous-time, the inverse of the steady-state DC gain of the closed-loop transfer function. Notice though, that in discrete-time Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 24

42 Discrete-Time Design: Peculiarities Two special differences in the discrete-time design procedure: The gain for steady state error compensation is, as in continuous-time, the inverse of the steady-state DC gain of the closed-loop transfer function. Notice though, that in discrete-time If we implement robust tracking by adding Integral Action into the state feedback design, notice that the plant augmentation is different in discrete-time, since the discrete-integration of the tracking error has to be implemented as Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 24

43 Discrete-Time Design: Peculiarities The implementation of the discrete-time integral action in the diagram should be consistent, i.e. discrete-integration of the tracking error. ZOH Apart from these two differences, and the locations for the eigenvalues/poles, the discrete-time design is obtained by performing the same computations for continuous-time state feedback and observer design. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 25

44 Outline Feedback from Estimated States Discrete-Time Control Design Dead-Beat Control Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 26

45 Discrete-Time Design: Dead-Beat Control A special discrete-time design that has no correlate in continuous-time is dead-beat control. A dead-beat response is a response that settles in its final value at a finite time. This feature arises in a discrete-time system which has all its poles at z = 0, e.g., 1.5 Step Response 1 G(z) = (7z 1)(5z 1) 24z 3, Amplitude which will settle in 3 sampling periods (the dynamics is just a delay of 3 sample periods). Time (sec) Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 27

46 Discrete-Time Design: Dead-Beat Control To design a dead-beat controller, we just have to find the closed-loop poles at designed dead-beat, with to place all. The discrete-time observer can also be to place all the observer poles at. The plot shows the response of the DC motor of the example controlled to have dead-beat response (state feedback no observer). There is not much flexibility in dead-beat control, the only parameter to change the response is the sampling period. y(t) u[k] time [s] Dead-beat usually requires large control action, which may saturate actuators kt [s] Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 28

47 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29

48 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discrete-time state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuous-time, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29

49 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discrete-time state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuous-time, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) We presented a special discrete design: dead-beat control. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29

50 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discrete-time state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuous-time, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) We presented a special discrete design: dead-beat control. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29

51 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discrete-time state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuous-time, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) We presented a special discrete design: dead-beat control. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29

52 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discrete-time state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuous-time, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) We presented a special discrete design: dead-beat control. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29

### SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequency-domain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a

### EL 625 Lecture 10. Pole Placement and Observer Design. ẋ = Ax (1)

EL 625 Lecture 0 EL 625 Lecture 0 Pole Placement and Observer Design Pole Placement Consider the system ẋ Ax () The solution to this system is x(t) e At x(0) (2) If the eigenvalues of A all lie in the

### Topic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback

Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall

### Methods for analysis and control of. Lecture 6: Introduction to digital control

Methods for analysis and of Lecture 6: to digital O. Sename 1 1 Gipsa-lab, CNRS-INPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsa-lab.inpg.fr www.lag.ensieg.inpg.fr/sename 6th May 2009 Outline Some interesting books:

### Integral action in state feedback control

Automatic Control 1 in state feedback control Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 1 Academic year 21-211 1 /

Advanced Digital Controls University of California, Los Angeles Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Report Author David Luong Winter 8 Table of Contents Abstract 4 Introduction..5 Physical

### Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems

Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha November

### CONTROL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS

AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND SYSTEM THEORY CONTROL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS Gianluca Palli Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell Energia Elettrica e dell Informazione (DEI) Università di Bologna Email: gianluca.palli@unibo.it

### Comparison of four state observer design algorithms for MIMO system

Archives of Control Sciences Volume 23(LIX), 2013 No. 2, pages 131 144 Comparison of four state observer design algorithms for MIMO system VINODH KUMAR. E, JOVITHA JEROME and S. AYYAPPAN A state observer

### Laboratory 11 Control Systems Laboratory ECE3557. State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint

Laboratory 11 State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint 11.1 Objective The objective of this laboratory is to design a full state feedback controller for endpoint position control

### 1 Steady State Error (30 pts)

Professor Fearing EECS C28/ME C34 Problem Set Fall 2 Steady State Error (3 pts) Given the following continuous time (CT) system ] ẋ = A x + B u = x + 2 7 ] u(t), y = ] x () a) Given error e(t) = r(t) y(t)

### POLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19

POLE PLACEMENT Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 Outline 1 State Feedback 2 Observer 3 Observer Feedback 4 Reduced Order

### Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 1 Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin Discrete-Time

### DESIGN OF LINEAR STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL LAWS

7 DESIGN OF LINEAR STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL LAWS Previous chapters, by introducing fundamental state-space concepts and analysis tools, have now set the stage for our initial foray into statespace methods

### EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.

Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8- am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total

### Control Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli

Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)

### Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:

### Introduction to Feedback Control

Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System

### The output voltage is given by,

71 The output voltage is given by, = (3.1) The inductor and capacitor values of the Boost converter are derived by having the same assumption as that of the Buck converter. Now the critical value of the

### Discrete-time linear systems

Automatic Control Discrete-time linear systems Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2-2 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 / 34 Introduction

### Root Locus. Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples. School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Root Locus - 1

Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus - 1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: D 0.09 Position

### Implementation of a Communication Satellite Orbit Controller Design Using State Space Techniques

ASEAN J Sci Technol Dev, 29(), 29 49 Implementation of a Communication Satellite Orbit Controller Design Using State Space Techniques M T Hla *, Y M Lae 2, S L Kyaw 3 and M N Zaw 4 Department of Electronic

### Dynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.

Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control

### 7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM

ROOT LOCUS TECHNIQUE. Values of on the root loci The value of at any point s on the root loci is determined from the following equation G( s) H( s) Product of lengths of vectors from poles of G( s)h( s)

### Course Outline. Higher Order Poles: Example. Higher Order Poles. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. State Space Design. 1 G(s) = s(s + 2)(s +10)

Amme 35 : System Dynamics Control State Space Design Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 1 Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 15 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane

### Pitch Rate CAS Design Project

Pitch Rate CAS Design Project Washington University in St. Louis MAE 433 Control Systems Bob Rowe 4.4.7 Design Project Part 2 This is the second part of an ongoing project to design a control and stability

### FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS

FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and Closed-Loop Control Systems 3. Why Closed-Loop Control? 4. Case Study --- Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. Steady-State Errors in Unity Feedback Control

### Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control

Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals

### Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain

Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.

### Regulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii

Regulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii Hua Zhong and Lucy Y. Pao Abstract A tape system is time-varying as tape winds from one reel to the other. The variations in reel radii consist

### Lecture: Sampling. Automatic Control 2. Sampling. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Automatic Control 2 Sampling Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of rento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of rento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011 1 / 31 ime-discretization

### Chapter 7 - Solved Problems

Chapter 7 - Solved Problems Solved Problem 7.1. A continuous time system has transfer function G o (s) given by G o (s) = B o(s) A o (s) = 2 (s 1)(s + 2) = 2 s 2 + s 2 (1) Find a controller of minimal

### About closed-loop control and observability of max-plus linear systems: Application to manufacturing systems

About closed-loop control and observability of max-plus linear systems: Application to manufacturing systems Laurent Hardouin and Xavier David-Henriet perso-laris.univ-angers.fr/~hardouin/ ISTIA-LARIS,

### Richiami di Controlli Automatici

Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici

### ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =

ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 7 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW7 AP9.5 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = K(s +.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) (1) and unity negative feedback.

Control Systems Robert Stengel Robotics and Intelligent Systems MAE 345, Princeton University, 2017 Analog vs. digital systems Continuous- and Discretetime Dynamic Models Frequency Response Transfer Functions

### Homework 7 - Solutions

Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the

### Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization

Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization 1 1, The Netherlands DISC Course Mathematical Models of Systems Outline 1 Stability of autonomous systems 2 The pole placement problem 3 Stabilization

### Observability. It was the property in Lyapunov stability which allowed us to resolve that

Observability We have seen observability twice already It was the property which permitted us to retrieve the initial state from the initial data {u(0),y(0),u(1),y(1),...,u(n 1),y(n 1)} It was the property

### 6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN

6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN When the whole sate vector is not available for feedback, i.e, we can measure only y = Cx. 6.1 Review of observer design Recall from the first class in linear systems that a simple

### (b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.

### PID Control. Objectives

PID Control Objectives The objective of this lab is to study basic design issues for proportional-integral-derivative control laws. Emphasis is placed on transient responses and steady-state errors. The

### Designing Information Devices and Systems II Fall 2015 Note 22

EE 16B Designing Information Devices and Systems II Fall 2015 Note 22 Notes taken by John Noonan (11/12) Graphing of the State Solutions Open loop x(k + 1) = Ax(k) + Bu(k) y(k) = Cx(k) Closed loop x(k

### MATH4406 (Control Theory) Unit 6: The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Model Predictive Control (MPC) Prepared by Yoni Nazarathy, Artem

MATH4406 (Control Theory) Unit 6: The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Model Predictive Control (MPC) Prepared by Yoni Nazarathy, Artem Pulemotov, September 12, 2012 Unit Outline Goal 1: Outline linear

### EL2520 Control Theory and Practice

So far EL2520 Control Theory and Practice r Fr wu u G w z n Lecture 5: Multivariable systems -Fy Mikael Johansson School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SISO control revisited: Signal

### School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Feedback Control - 1

Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System

### Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control

ME 233, UC Berkeley, Spring 2014 Xu Chen Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control Big picture review of integral control in PID design example: 0 Es) C s) Ds) + + P s) Y s) where P s)

### Alireza Mousavi Brunel University

Alireza Mousavi Brunel University 1 » Control Process» Control Systems Design & Analysis 2 Open-Loop Control: Is normally a simple switch on and switch off process, for example a light in a room is switched

### Chapter 12. Feedback Control Characteristics of Feedback Systems

Chapter 1 Feedbac Control Feedbac control allows a system dynamic response to be modified without changing any system components. Below, we show an open-loop system (a system without feedbac) and a closed-loop

### 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise

EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically

### Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback

### Autonomous Mobile Robot Design

Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic: Guidance and Control Introduction and PID Loops Dr. Kostas Alexis (CSE) Autonomous Robot Challenges How do I control where to go? Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic:

### LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL IN A SINGLE AREA POWER SYSTEM

LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL IN A SINGLE AREA POWER SYSTEM PRANAB PATNAIK (109EE0294) Department of Electrical Engineering National Institute of Technology Rourkela LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL IN A SINGLE AREA POWER

### RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing

RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl

### Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 10 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley

Professor Fearing EE C28 / ME C34 Problem Set Solution Fall 2 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. (5 pts) Final Value Given the following continuous time (CT) system ẋ = Ax+Bu = 5 9 7 x+ u(t), y

### EE451/551: Digital Control. Chapter 8: Properties of State Space Models

EE451/551: Digital Control Chapter 8: Properties of State Space Models Equilibrium State Definition 8.1: An equilibrium point or state is an initial state from which the system nevers departs unless perturbed

### APPLICATION OF ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER TO WATER HYDRAULIC SERVO CYLINDER

APPLICAION OF ADAPIVE CONROLLER O WAER HYDRAULIC SERVO CYLINDER Hidekazu AKAHASHI*, Kazuhisa IO** and Shigeru IKEO** * Division of Science and echnology, Graduate school of SOPHIA University 7- Kioicho,

### Essence of the Root Locus Technique

Essence of the Root Locus Technique In this chapter we study a method for finding locations of system poles. The method is presented for a very general set-up, namely for the case when the closed-loop

### Chapter 5 HW Solution

Chapter 5 HW Solution Review Questions. 1, 6. As usual, I think these are just a matter of text lookup. 1. Name the four components of a block diagram for a linear, time-invariant system. Let s see, I

### Outline. Linear regulation and state estimation (LQR and LQE) Linear differential equations. Discrete time linear difference equations

Outline Linear regulation and state estimation (LQR and LQE) James B. Rawlings Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering 1 Linear Quadratic Regulator Constraints The Infinite Horizon LQ Problem

### Control engineering sample exam paper - Model answers

Question Control engineering sample exam paper - Model answers a) By a direct computation we obtain x() =, x(2) =, x(3) =, x(4) = = x(). This trajectory is sketched in Figure (left). Note that A 2 = I

### Chapter 5. Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup. 5.1 The Canonical Setup

Chapter 5 Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup Efficient LTI feedback optimization algorithms comprise a major component of modern feedback design approach: application problems involving complex models

### PD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada

PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closed-loop

### Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -

### Chapter 2 Discrete-Time Sliding Mode Control

Chapter 2 Discrete-Time Sliding Mode Control Abstract In this study, two different approaches to the sliding surface design are presented. First, a discrete-time integral sliding mode ISM control scheme

### 9/9/2011 Classical Control 1

MM11 Root Locus Design Method Reading material: FC pp.270-328 9/9/2011 Classical Control 1 What have we talked in lecture (MM10)? Lead and lag compensators D(s)=(s+z)/(s+p) with z < p or z > p D(s)=K(Ts+1)/(Ts+1),

### Exam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time

Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (5-59-L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages

### Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part

### Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability

Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability Passivity: Memoryless Functions y y y u u u (a) (b) (c) Passive Passive Not passive y = h(t,u), h [0, ] Vector case: y = h(t,u), h T =

### 9 Controller Discretization

9 Controller Discretization In most applications, a control system is implemented in a digital fashion on a computer. This implies that the measurements that are supplied to the control system must be

### 06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance.

Chapter 06 Feedback 06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance. Lesson of the Course Fondamenti di Controlli Automatici of

### Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid

### Lyapunov Stability Theory

Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous

### Mathematics for Control Theory

Mathematics for Control Theory Outline of Dissipativity and Passivity Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Reading materials Only as a reference: Charles A. Desoer

### School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by:

Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus - 1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: θ D 0.09 See

### Robust Anti-Windup Controller Synthesis: A Mixed H 2 /H Setting

Robust Anti-Windup Controller Synthesis: A Mixed H /H Setting ADDISON RIOS-BOLIVAR Departamento de Sistemas de Control Universidad de Los Andes Av. ulio Febres, Mérida 511 VENEZUELA SOLBEN GODOY Postgrado

### Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017

Control Systems II MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 8 28/04/2017 G. Ducard Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded

### Control Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli

Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli

### Control Systems II. ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017. G. Ducard

Control Systems II ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017 Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded Control

### CHAPTER 4 STATE FEEDBACK AND OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS

54 CHAPTER 4 STATE FEEDBACK AND OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS 4.1 INTRODUCTION In control theory, a controller is a device which monitors and affects the operational conditions of a given dynamic system.

### Proportional, Integral & Derivative Control Design. Raktim Bhattacharya

AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Proportional, ntegral & Derivative Control Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University

### EL2520 Control Theory and Practice

EL2520 Control Theory and Practice Lecture 8: Linear quadratic control Mikael Johansson School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Stockholm, Sweden Linear quadratic control Allows to compute the controller

### Simulation and Implementation of Servo Motor Control

Simulation and Implementation of Servo Motor Control with Sliding Mode Control (SMC) using Matlab and LabView Bondhan Novandy http://bono02.wordpress.com/ Outline Background Motivation AC Servo Motor Inverter

### FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequency-response methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins

### Root Locus Design Example #3

Root Locus Design Example #3 A. Introduction The system represents a linear model for vertical motion of an underwater vehicle at zero forward speed. The vehicle is assumed to have zero pitch and roll

### Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter

Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter i i in R out Assignment: Perform a Complete e in C e Dynamic System Investigation out of the RC Low-Pass

### ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s) - H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)

### Computer Problem 1: SIE Guidance, Navigation, and Control

Computer Problem 1: SIE 39 - Guidance, Navigation, and Control Roger Skjetne March 12, 23 1 Problem 1 (DSRV) We have the model: m Zẇ Z q ẇ Mẇ I y M q q + ẋ U cos θ + w sin θ ż U sin θ + w cos θ θ q Zw

### Teaching State Variable Feedback to Technology Students Using MATLAB and SIMULINK

Teaching State Variable Feedback to Technology Students Using MATLAB and SIMULINK Kathleen A.K. Ossman, Ph.D. University of Cincinnati Session 448 I. Introduction This paper describes a course and laboratory

### Stochastic Optimal Control!

Stochastic Control! Robert Stengel! Robotics and Intelligent Systems, MAE 345, Princeton University, 2015 Learning Objectives Overview of the Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) Regulator Introduction to Stochastic

### x(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =!

1 Time-Delay Systems 1.1 Introduction Recitation Notes: Time Delays and Nyquist Plots Review In control systems a challenging area is operating in the presence of delays. Delays can be attributed to acquiring

### OUTPUT-FEEDBACK CONTROL

ECE4520/5520: Multivariable Control Systems I. 1 OUTPUT-FEEDBACK CONTROL.1: Open-loop and closed-loop estimators Open-loop estimators State feedback is impractical since we don t know the state! But, what

### Linear-time invariant Positive Systems: Stabilization and the Servomechanism Problem. Bartek Roszak

Linear-time invariant Positive Systems: Stabilization and the Servomechanism Problem by Bartek Roszak A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate

### Simple Learning Control Made Practical by Zero-Phase Filtering: Applications to Robotics

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I: FUNDAMENTAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 49, NO 6, JUNE 2002 753 Simple Learning Control Made Practical by Zero-Phase Filtering: Applications to Robotics Haluk

### Digital Control Semester Project

Digital Control Semester Project Part I: Transform-Based Design 1 Introduction For this project you will be designing a digital controller for a system which consists of a DC motor driving a shaft with

### Problem Set 5 Solutions 1

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 5 Solutions The problem set deals with Hankel

### Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley

Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the

### Reglerteknik Allmän Kurs. Del 2. Lösningar till Exempelsamling. Läsår 2015/16

Reglerteknik Allmän Kurs Del Lösningar till Exempelsamling Läsår 5/6 Avdelningen för Reglerteknik, KTH, SE 44 Stockholm, SWEDEN AUTOMATIC CONTROL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LINKÖPINGS UNIVERSITET Reglerteknik