Control System Design


 Buck Merritt
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 ELEC4410 Control System Design Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States and DiscreteTime Control Design Julio H. Braslavsky School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 1
2 Outline Feedback from Estimated States DiscreteTime Control Design DeadBeat Control Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 2
3 Feedback from Estimated States In the last lecture we discussed the general scheme for feedback control from estimated states, involving Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 3
4 Feedback from Estimated States In the last lecture we discussed the general scheme for feedback control from estimated states, involving a state feedback gain K Plant Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 3
5 Feedback from Estimated States In the last lecture we discussed the general scheme for feedback control from estimated states, involving a state feedback gain K a state estimator (observer), with gain L Plant Observer Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 3
6 Feedback from Estimated States In the last lecture we discussed the general scheme for feedback control from estimated states, involving a state feedback gain K a state estimator (observer), with gain L To design we used the BassGura formula to make Plant Hurwitz To design in the observer, we used duality and the same BassGura formula to make Observer Hurwitz Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 3
7 Feedback from Estimated States By designing K such that (A BK) is Hurwitz, with the desired eigenvalues, we can guarantee that the closedloop system will be asymptotically and BIBO stable, and will have the specified dynamic response. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 4
8 Feedback from Estimated States By designing K such that (A BK) is Hurwitz, with the desired eigenvalues, we can guarantee that the closedloop system will be asymptotically and BIBO stable, and will have the specified dynamic response. By designing L such that (A LC) is Hurwitz, we guarantee that the observer will be asymptotically stable, and the estimate of the states ^x(t) will converge to the real states x(t) as t. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 4
9 Feedback from Estimated States By designing K such that (A BK) is Hurwitz, with the desired eigenvalues, we can guarantee that the closedloop system will be asymptotically and BIBO stable, and will have the specified dynamic response. By designing L such that (A LC) is Hurwitz, we guarantee that the observer will be asymptotically stable, and the estimate of the states ^x(t) will converge to the real states x(t) as t. But K and the observer are designed independently... Will they work the same when we put them together in a feedback from estimated states scheme? Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 4
10 Feedback from Estimated States Three basic questions arise regarding feedback from estimated states: The closedloop eigenvalues were set as those of (A BK) by using state feedback u = Kx. Would we still have the same eigenvalues if we do feedback from estimated states u = K^x? Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 5
11 Feedback from Estimated States Three basic questions arise regarding feedback from estimated states: The closedloop eigenvalues were set as those of (A BK) by using state feedback u = Kx. Would we still have the same eigenvalues if we do feedback from estimated states u = K^x? Would the interconnection affect the observer eigenvalues, those of (A LC)? Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 5
12 Feedback from Estimated States Three basic questions arise regarding feedback from estimated states: The closedloop eigenvalues were set as those of (A BK) by using state feedback u = Kx. Would we still have the same eigenvalues if we do feedback from estimated states u = K^x? Would the interconnection affect the observer eigenvalues, those of (A LC)? What would be the effect of the observer in the closedloop transfer function? Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 5
13 Feedback from Estimated States To answer these questions we take a look at the state equations of the full system, putting together plant and observer, that is, ẋ = Ax+Bu ^x = (A LC)^x + LCx+Bu plant observer Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 6
14 Feedback from Estimated States To answer these questions we take a look at the state equations of the full system, putting together plant and observer, that is, ẋ = Ax BK^x + BNr ^x = (A LC)^x + LCx BK^x + BNr plant observer after replacing u = Nr K^x. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 6
15 Feedback from Estimated States To answer these questions we take a look at the state equations of the full system, putting together plant and observer, that is, ẋ = Ax BK^x + BNr ^x = (A LC)^x + LCx BK^x + BNr plant observer after replacing u = Nr K^x. Packaging these equations in a more compact form we have ẋ = A BK x^x + BN r ^x LC (A LC BK) BN [ ] y = C 0 x ^x Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 6
16 Feedback from Estimated States Let s make a change of coordinates, so that the new coordinates are the plant state x and the estimation error ε = x ^x, = x = I 0 x ε x ^x Note that P 1 = [ ] I 0 1 [ I I = I 0 ] I I = P. I I } {{ } P x^x Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 7
17 Feedback from Estimated States Let s make a change of coordinates, so that the new coordinates are the plant state x and the estimation error ε = x ^x, = x = I 0 x ε x ^x I I } {{ } P x^x BK Note that P 1 = [ ] I 0 1 [ I I = I 0 ] I I = P. With this equivalence transformation we get the matrices in the new coordinates as Ā KL = PA KL P 1 (A BK) =, B KL = PB KL = BN 0 C KL = C KL P 1 = [ ] C 0 0 (A LC) Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 7
18 Feedback from Estimated States The full system in the new coordinates is thus represented as (A BK) ẋ = BK x + BN r ε 0 (A LC) ε 0 [ ] y = C 0 x ε Because Ā KL is triangular, its eigenvalues are the union of those of (A BK) and (A LC). Controller and observer do not affect each other in the interconnection. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 8
19 Feedback from Estimated States Note that the estimation error is uncontrollable, hence the observer eigenvalues will not appear in the closed loop transfer function. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 9
20 Feedback from Estimated States The property of independence between control and state estimation is called the Separation Principle Separation Principle: The design of the state feedback and the design of the state estimator can be carried out independently. The eigenvalues of the closedloop system are as designed by the state feedback law, unaffected by the use of a state estimator. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 10
21 Feedback from Estimated States The property of independence between control and state estimation is called the Separation Principle Separation Principle: The design of the state feedback and the design of the state estimator can be carried out independently. The eigenvalues of the closedloop system are as designed by the state feedback law, unaffected by the use of a state estimator. The eigenvalues of the observer are unaffected by the state feedback law. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 10
22 Feedback from Estimated States The closedloop transfer function will only have the eigenvalues arising from (A BK), since the estimation error is uncontrollable, G cl (s) = C(sI A + BK) 1 BN. Transients in state estimation, however, will be seen at the output, since the estimation error is observable. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 11
23 Outline Feedback from Estimated States DiscreteTime Control Design DeadBeat Control Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 12
24 DiscreteTime Control Design For discretetime state equations x[k + 1] = Ax[k] + Bu[k], y[k] = Cx[k], the design procedure for a state feedback law u[k] = Kx[k] is the same as for continuoustime systems. The same goes for a discretetime state observer, ^x[k + 1] = (A LC)^x[k] + Bu[k] + Ly[k]. One difference is the location of the desired eigenvalues. E.g., for asymptotic stability, they should be inside the unit circle. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 13
25 DiscreteTime Control Design For discretetime state equations x[k + 1] = Ax[k] + Bu[k], y[k] = Cx[k], the design procedure for a state feedback law u[k] = Kx[k] is the same as for continuoustime systems. The same goes for a discretetime state observer, ^x[k + 1] = (A LC)^x[k] + Bu[k] + Ly[k]. One difference is the location of the desired eigenvalues. E.g., for asymptotic stability, they should be inside the unit circle. A practical rule to choose desired discretetime eigenvalues is 1. choose a desired location in continuoustime, say p i 2. translate it to discretetime using the relation λ i = e p it. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 13
26 DiscreteTime Control Design 0.3 Imaginary j Loci with constant damping and constant frequencies the discrete in complex plane ωt 2π Real In MATLAB this grid may be obtained with the zgrid command ζ j Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 14
27 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discretetime speed control of a DC motor). We return to the DC motor we considered in the examples of the last lecture. We will suppose that the motor is to be controlled with a PC. Hence, the controller has to be discretetime. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 15
28 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discretetime speed control of a DC motor). We return to the DC motor we considered in the examples of the last lecture. We will suppose that the motor is to be controlled with a PC. Hence, the controller has to be discretetime. This time, with a view to design a discretetime control law, we first discretise the continuoustime model h 5 i The first design parameter to define is the sampling period. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 15
29 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 1: choice of sampling period). From Shannon s Sampling Theorem, the sampling frequency ω s = 2π/T should be at least twice the bandwidth of the closedloop system (because we will change the system bandwidth with the control action). Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 16
30 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 1: choice of sampling period). From Shannon s Sampling Theorem, the sampling frequency ω s = 2π/T should be at least twice the bandwidth of the closedloop system (because we will change the system bandwidth with the control action). The specification that we had for the previous continuoustime design was a settling time t s of about 1s. The rule based on Shannon s Theorem would then give a sampling time of less than T = 0.5s. In practice T is chosen at least 10 to 20 times faster than the desired closedloop settling time. Here we choose T = 0.1s Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 16
31 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 1: choice of sampling period). From Shannon s Sampling Theorem, the sampling frequency ω s = 2π/T should be at least twice the bandwidth of the closedloop system (because we will change the system bandwidth with the control action). The specification that we had for the previous continuoustime design was a settling time t s of about 1s. The rule based on Shannon s Theorem would then give a sampling time of less than T = 0.5s. In practice T is chosen at least 10 to 20 times faster than the desired closedloop settling time. Here we choose T = 0.1s Note that the maximum sampling speed is limited by the available computer clock frequency, and thus the time required for computations and signal processing operations. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 16
32 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 2: discretisation of the plant). Having defined the samplingtime T, we compute the discretetime state matrices A d = e At, and B d = T 0 e Aτ B dτ From MATLAB, we do [Ad,Bd]=c2d(A,B,0.1) and obtain A d =, B d = As we can verify, the open loop discretetime eigenvalues are = e ( ) and = e ( ) Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 17
33 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 3: design of discrete feedback gain). The discretetime characteristic polynomial is Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 18
34 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 3: design of discrete feedback gain). The discretetime characteristic polynomial is For the desired discrete characteristic polynomial, we first obtain the discrete mapping for the continuoustime system, i.e., of the eigenvalues specified which yield the desired discrete characteristic polynomial Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 18
35 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 3: design of discrete feedback gain). The discretetime characteristic polynomial is For the desired discrete characteristic polynomial, we first obtain the discrete mapping for the continuoustime system, i.e., of the eigenvalues specified which yield the desired discrete characteristic polynomial From the coefficients of feedback gain h and we get the discrete state i h i Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 18
36 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design, step 3, continuation). We then compute, just following the same procedure used in continuoustime, from the discrete matrices A d and B d, the discrete controllability matrices C d and C d, C d = , and C d = We thus obtain, in the original coordinates, the discretetime feedback gain ] K d = K d C d C 1 d [ = As can be verified with MATLAB, (A d B d K d ) will have the desired discrete eigenvalues. 1 Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 19
37 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design: continuation). In a similar fashion, we can carry out the design of the discretetime observer, based on the discretetime model of the plant. The output feedback design is finally implemented on the continuoustime plant through a Zero Order Hold and a Sampler. Discrete equivalent plant Continuous time plant ZOH T Discretetime Observer Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 20
38 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design: MATLAB script). We used the following MATLAB script to compute the gains and run the simulations. % Continuoustime matrices A=[10 1; ];B=[0;2];C=[1 0];D=0; G=ss(a,B,C,D); % state space system definition T=0.1; % Sampling time Gd=c2d(G,T, zoh ) % discretisation % Discretetime feedback gain Kd=place(Gd.a,Gd.b,exp([5i,5+i]*T)) % Discretetime observer gain Ld=place(Gd.a,Gd.c,exp([6i,6+i]*T)) % steady state error compensation N=inv(Gd.c*inv(eye(2)Gd.a+Gd.b*Kd)*Gd.b) % Run simulink diagram sim( dmotorofbk ) % Plots (after simulations have been run) subplot(211),plot(y(:,1),y(:,2));grid subplot(212),stairs(u(:,1),u(:,2));grid Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 21
39 DiscreteTime Control Design Example (Discrete design: SIMULINK diagram). We used the following SIMULINK diagram to run the simulations. N G.b* u 1 s G.c* u r Gain Zero Order Hold Matrix Gain1 Integrator Matrix Gain2 y(t) G.a* u Matrix Gain Gd.b* u u[k] Kd* u 1 z Unit Delay Ld* u Gd.a Ld*Gd.c* u Notice the sampled signals coloured in red (check the option Sample Time Colors in the Format menu). All blocks with discretetime signals include a sampler at their input. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 22
40 DiscreteTime Control Design: Example Example (Discrete design: simulations). The following plots show the response of the closedloop sampleddata controlled system: continuoustime output 1.2 and discretetime control signal y(t) time [s] u[k] kt [s] Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 23
41 DiscreteTime Design: Peculiarities Two special differences in the discretetime design procedure: The gain for steady state error compensation is, as in continuoustime, the inverse of the steadystate DC gain of the closedloop transfer function. Notice though, that in discretetime Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 24
42 DiscreteTime Design: Peculiarities Two special differences in the discretetime design procedure: The gain for steady state error compensation is, as in continuoustime, the inverse of the steadystate DC gain of the closedloop transfer function. Notice though, that in discretetime If we implement robust tracking by adding Integral Action into the state feedback design, notice that the plant augmentation is different in discretetime, since the discreteintegration of the tracking error has to be implemented as Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 24
43 DiscreteTime Design: Peculiarities The implementation of the discretetime integral action in the diagram should be consistent, i.e. discreteintegration of the tracking error. ZOH Apart from these two differences, and the locations for the eigenvalues/poles, the discretetime design is obtained by performing the same computations for continuoustime state feedback and observer design. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 25
44 Outline Feedback from Estimated States DiscreteTime Control Design DeadBeat Control Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 26
45 DiscreteTime Design: DeadBeat Control A special discretetime design that has no correlate in continuoustime is deadbeat control. A deadbeat response is a response that settles in its final value at a finite time. This feature arises in a discretetime system which has all its poles at z = 0, e.g., 1.5 Step Response 1 G(z) = (7z 1)(5z 1) 24z 3, Amplitude which will settle in 3 sampling periods (the dynamics is just a delay of 3 sample periods). Time (sec) Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 27
46 DiscreteTime Design: DeadBeat Control To design a deadbeat controller, we just have to find the closedloop poles at designed deadbeat, with to place all. The discretetime observer can also be to place all the observer poles at. The plot shows the response of the DC motor of the example controlled to have deadbeat response (state feedback no observer). There is not much flexibility in deadbeat control, the only parameter to change the response is the sampling period. y(t) u[k] time [s] Deadbeat usually requires large control action, which may saturate actuators kt [s] Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 28
47 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29
48 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discretetime state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuoustime, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29
49 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discretetime state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuoustime, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) We presented a special discrete design: deadbeat control. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29
50 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discretetime state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuoustime, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) We presented a special discrete design: deadbeat control. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29
51 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discretetime state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuoustime, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) We presented a special discrete design: deadbeat control. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29
52 Conclusions We have reviewed the state feedback and state estimator design procedure, and showed that the Separation Principle holds: the two designs can be carried out independently We have discussed the design of discretetime state feedback controllers and observers. The procedures are the same as in continuoustime, save for the choice of desired eigenvalues (which have to be in the unit circle for stability) the compensation of steady state tracking error via the feedforward gain N (be careful with the formula used) the implementation of integral action to achieve robust tracking and disturbance rejection (be careful, use discrete integration) We presented a special discrete design: deadbeat control. Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States p. 29
Control Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 14: Controllability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 14: Controllability p.1/23 Outline
More informationModelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. Stability of Linear Systems. Sven Laur University of Tartu
Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems Stability of Linear Systems Sven Laur University of Tartu Motivating Example Naive openloop control r[k] Controller Ĉ[z] u[k] ε 1 [k] System Ĝ[z] y[k] ε 2 [k]
More information5. Observerbased Controller Design
EE635  Control System Theory 5. Observerbased Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback poleplacement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 51
More informationEEE582 Homework Problems
EEE582 Homework Problems HW. Write a statespace realization of the linearized model for the cruise control system around speeds v = 4 (Section.3, http://tsakalis.faculty.asu.edu/notes/models.pdf). Use
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More information4F3  Predictive Control
4F3 Predictive Control  Discretetime systems p. 1/30 4F3  Predictive Control Discretetime State Space Control Theory For reference only Jan Maciejowski jmm@eng.cam.ac.uk 4F3 Predictive Control  Discretetime
More informationModule 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background
Module 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background Ahmad F. Taha EE 5243: Introduction to CyberPhysical Systems Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ taha/index.html September
More informationAdvanced Control Theory
State Feedback Control Design chibum@seoultech.ac.kr Outline State feedback control design Benefits of CCF 2 Conceptual steps in controller design We begin by considering the regulation problem the task
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationEL 625 Lecture 10. Pole Placement and Observer Design. ẋ = Ax (1)
EL 625 Lecture 0 EL 625 Lecture 0 Pole Placement and Observer Design Pole Placement Consider the system ẋ Ax () The solution to this system is x(t) e At x(0) (2) If the eigenvalues of A all lie in the
More informationFall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) FengLi Lian. NTUEE Sep07 Jan08
Fall 2007 線性系統 Linear Systems Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) FengLi Lian NTUEE Sep07 Jan08 Materials used in these lecture notes are adopted from Linear System Theory & Design, 3rd.
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 13: Stability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 13: Stability p.1/20 Outline InputOutput
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationSAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequencydomain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101  Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationDigital Control: Part 2. ENGI 7825: Control Systems II Andrew Vardy
Digital Control: Part 2 ENGI 7825: Control Systems II Andrew Vardy Mapping the splane onto the zplane We re almost ready to design a controller for a DT system, however we will have to consider where
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observerbased output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More information1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole
EECS C8/ME C34 Fall Problem Set 9 Solutions (3 pts) Dominant Pole For the following transfer function: Y (s) U(s) = (s + )(s + ) a) Give state space description of the system in parallel form (ẋ = Ax +
More informationCBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using Statespace Methods. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using Statespace Methods Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University Korea University III 1 Overview States What
More informationEE480.3 Digital Control Systems. Part 7. Controller Design I.  Pole Assignment Method  State Estimation
EE480.3 Digital Control Systems Part 7. Controller Design I.  Pole Assignment Method  State Estimation Kunio Takaya Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Saskatchewan February 10, 2010 **
More informationModule 9: State Feedback Control Design Lecture Note 1
Module 9: State Feedback Control Design Lecture Note 1 The design techniques described in the preceding lectures are based on the transfer function of a system. In this lecture we would discuss the state
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationMethods for analysis and control of. Lecture 6: Introduction to digital control
Methods for analysis and of Lecture 6: to digital O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.inpg.fr www.lag.ensieg.inpg.fr/sename 6th May 2009 Outline Some interesting books:
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.fr www.gipsalab.fr/ o.sename based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationControl Design. Lecture 9: State Feedback and Observers. Two Classes of Control Problems. State Feedback: Problem Formulation
Lecture 9: State Feedback and s [IFAC PB Ch 9] State Feedback s Disturbance Estimation & Integral Action Control Design Many factors to consider, for example: Attenuation of load disturbances Reduction
More informationD(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
More informationEEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems
EEE 84: Introduction to feedback systems Summary 6 8 8 x 7 7 6 Level() 6 5 4 4 5 5 time(s) 4 6 8 Time (seconds) Fig.. Illustration of BIBO stability: stable system (the input is a unit step) Fig.. step)
More informationFeedback Control part 2
Overview Feedback Control part EGR 36 April 19, 017 Concepts from EGR 0 Open and closedloop control Everything before chapter 7 are openloop systems Transient response Design criteria Translate criteria
More informationIntegral action in state feedback control
Automatic Control 1 in state feedback control Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 1 Academic year 21211 1 /
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationESC794: Special Topics: Model Predictive Control
ESC794: Special Topics: Model Predictive Control DiscreteTime Systems Hanz Richter, Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University DiscreteTime vs. SampledData Systems A continuoustime
More informationDigital Control Systems State Feedback Control
Digital Control Systems State Feedback Control Illustrating the Effects of ClosedLoop Eigenvalue Location and Control Saturation for a Stable OpenLoop System ContinuousTime System Gs () Y() s 1 = =
More informationChap 8. State Feedback and State Estimators
Chap 8. State Feedback and State Estimators Outlines Introduction State feedback Regulation and tracking State estimator Feedback from estimated states State feedbackmultivariable case State estimatorsmultivariable
More informationModule 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems
Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha November
More informationTRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION
TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 13 General objective: The output to track a reference
More informationAdvanced Digital Controls
Advanced Digital Controls University of California, Los Angeles Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Report Author David Luong Winter 8 Table of Contents Abstract 4 Introduction..5 Physical
More informationsc Control Systems Design Q.1, Sem.1, Ac. Yr. 2010/11
sc46  Control Systems Design Q Sem Ac Yr / Mock Exam originally given November 5 9 Notes: Please be reminded that only an A4 paper with formulas may be used during the exam no other material is to be
More informationChapter 13 Digital Control
Chapter 13 Digital Control Chapter 12 was concerned with building models for systems acting under digital control. We next turn to the question of control itself. Topics to be covered include: why one
More informationCONTROL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS
AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND SYSTEM THEORY CONTROL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS Gianluca Palli Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell Energia Elettrica e dell Informazione (DEI) Università di Bologna Email: gianluca.palli@unibo.it
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationControl Systems. Design of State Feedback Control.
Control Systems Design of State Feedback Control chibum@seoultech.ac.kr Outline Design of State feedback control Dominant pole design Symmetric root locus (linear quadratic regulation) 2 Selection of closedloop
More information10/8/2015. Control Design. Poleplacement by statespace methods. Process to be controlled. State controller
Poleplacement by statespace methods Control Design To be considered in controller design * Compensate the effect of load disturbances * Reduce the effect of measurement noise * Setpoint following (target
More informationVideo 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh
Video 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh Robo3x1.1 1 The Purpose of Control Input/Stimulus/ Disturbance System or Plant Output/ Response Understand the Black Box Evaluate the Performance Change the Behavior
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 5
Outline Outline Outline 1 What is 2 Outline What is Why use? Sketching a 1 What is Why use? Sketching a 2 Gain Controller Lead Compensation Lag Compensation What is Properties of a General System Why use?
More informationAutomatique. A. Hably 1. Commande d un robot mobile. Automatique. A.Hably. Digital implementation
A. Hably 1 1 Gipsalab, GrenobleINP ahmad.hably@grenobleinp.fr Commande d un robot mobile (Gipsalab (DA)) ASI 1 / 25 Outline 1 2 (Gipsalab (DA)) ASI 2 / 25 of controllers Signals must be sampled and
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are
More informationChapter 3. State Feedback  Pole Placement. Motivation
Chapter 3 State Feedback  Pole Placement Motivation Whereas classical control theory is based on output feedback, this course mainly deals with control system design by state feedback. This modelbased
More informationModule 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems
Module 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha October
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.04A Systems and Controls Spring 2013
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.04A Systems and Controls Spring 2013 Problem Set #4 Posted: Thursday, Mar. 7, 13 Due: Thursday, Mar. 14, 13 1. Sketch the Root
More informationState Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.
1 Linear System Theory and Design, http://zitompul.wordpress.com 2 0 1 4 2 Homework 7: State Estimators (a) For the same system as discussed in previous slides, design another closedloop state estimator,
More informationLaboratory 11 Control Systems Laboratory ECE3557. State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint
Laboratory 11 State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint 11.1 Objective The objective of this laboratory is to design a full state feedback controller for endpoint position control
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Model reduction. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Lecture: Automatic Control 2 Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 20102011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 20102011 1 / 17 Lecture:
More information6.1 Sketch the zdomain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closedloop characteristic equation is K + z 0.
6. Sketch the zdomain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K (i) Gz () z 4. (ii) Gz K () ( z+ 9. )( z 9. ) (iii) Gz () Kz ( z. )( z ) (iv) Gz () Kz ( + 9. ) ( z. )( z 8. ) (i)
More informationProperties of OpenLoop Controllers
Properties of OpenLoop Controllers Sven Laur University of Tarty 1 Basics of OpenLoop Controller Design Two most common tasks in controller design is regulation and signal tracking. Regulating controllers
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Steadystate error Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling Analysis Design Laplace
More information1 Steady State Error (30 pts)
Professor Fearing EECS C28/ME C34 Problem Set Fall 2 Steady State Error (3 pts) Given the following continuous time (CT) system ] ẋ = A x + B u = x + 2 7 ] u(t), y = ] x () a) Given error e(t) = r(t) y(t)
More informationComparison of four state observer design algorithms for MIMO system
Archives of Control Sciences Volume 23(LIX), 2013 No. 2, pages 131 144 Comparison of four state observer design algorithms for MIMO system VINODH KUMAR. E, JOVITHA JEROME and S. AYYAPPAN A state observer
More informationState Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Link
Laboratory 12 Control Systems Laboratory ECE3557 Laboratory 12 State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Link 12.1 Objective The objective of this laboratory is to design a full state
More informationSYSTEMTEORI  ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER
SYSTEMTEORI  ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER Exercise 54 Consider the system: ẍ aẋ bx u where u is the input and x the output signal (a): Determine a state space realization (b): Is the
More informationPOLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19
POLE PLACEMENT Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 Outline 1 State Feedback 2 Observer 3 Observer Feedback 4 Reduced Order
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : RouthHurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More information1 x(k +1)=(Φ LH) x(k) = T 1 x 2 (k) x1 (0) 1 T x 2(0) T x 1 (0) x 2 (0) x(1) = x(2) = x(3) =
567 This is often referred to as Þnite settling time or deadbeat design because the dynamics will settle in a Þnite number of sample periods. This estimator always drives the error to zero in time 2T or
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems
Topic #16 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Add reference inputs for the DOFB case Reading: FPE 7.8, 7.9 Fall 2010 16.30/31 16 2 Reference Input  II On page 156, compensator implemented with reference
More information1 An Overview and Brief History of Feedback Control 1. 2 Dynamic Models 23. Contents. Preface. xiii
Contents 1 An Overview and Brief History of Feedback Control 1 A Perspective on Feedback Control 1 Chapter Overview 2 1.1 A Simple Feedback System 3 1.2 A First Analysis of Feedback 6 1.3 Feedback System
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 81 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 81 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 9 Solutions. HW 9 Solutions. 10(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
1. Pole Placement Given the following openloop plant, HW 9 Solutions G(s) = 1(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) design the statevariable feedback controller u = Kx + r, where K = [k 1 k 2 k 3 ] is the feedback
More informationDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering. EE461: Digital Control  Lab Manual
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering EE461: Digital Control  Lab Manual Winter 2011 EE 461 Experiment #1 Digital Control of DC Servomotor 1 Objectives The objective of this lab is to introduce
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Sixth Edition International Student Version
CONTROL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Sixth Edition International Student Version Norman S. Nise California State Polytechnic University, Pomona John Wiley fir Sons, Inc. Contents PREFACE, vii 1. INTRODUCTION, 1
More informationLab 6a: Pole Placement for the Inverted Pendulum
Lab 6a: Pole Placement for the Inverted Pendulum Idiot. Above her head was the only stable place in the cosmos, the only refuge from the damnation of the Panta Rei, and she guessed it was the Pendulum
More informationECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design
ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design A Brief Tutorial on Control Design Instructor: Professor John T. Wen TA: Ben Potsaid http://www.cat.rpi.edu/~wen/ecse4962s04/ Don t Wait Until The Last Minute! You got
More informationECE 388 Automatic Control
Controllability and State Feedback Control Associate Prof. Dr. of Mechatronics Engineeering Çankaya University Compulsory Course in Electronic and Communication Engineering Credits (2/2/3) Course Webpage:
More informationCHAPTER 6 FAST OUTPUT SAMPLING CONTROL TECHNIQUE
80 CHAPTER 6 FAST OUTPUT SAMPLING CONTROL TECHNIQUE 6.1 GENERAL In this chapter a control strategy for hyperthermia system is developed using fast output sampling feedback control law which is a type of
More informationControl of Electromechanical Systems
Control of Electromechanical Systems November 3, 27 Exercise Consider the feedback control scheme of the motor speed ω in Fig., where the torque actuation includes a time constant τ A =. s and a disturbance
More informationLinear Control Systems
Linear Control Systems Project session 3: Design in statespace 6 th October 2017 Kathleen Coutisse kathleen.coutisse@student.ulg.ac.be 1 Content 1. Closed loop system 2. State feedback 3. Observer 4.
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5059000) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationECEEN 5448 Fall 2011 Homework #4 Solutions
ECEEN 5448 Fall 2 Homework #4 Solutions Professor David G. Meyer Novemeber 29, 2. The statespace realization is A = [ [ ; b = ; c = [ which describes, of course, a free mass (in normalized units) with
More informationNPTEL Online Course: Control Engineering
NPTEL Online Course: Control Engineering Ramkrishna Pasumarthy Assignment11 : s 1. Consider a system described by state space model [ ] [ 0 1 1 x + u 5 1 2] y = [ 1 2 ] x What is the transfer function
More informationStability of CL System
Stability of CL System Consider an open loop stable system that becomes unstable with large gain: At the point of instability, K( j) G( j) = 1 0dB K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) =± 180 o 180 o Closed
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steadystate Steadystate errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #5 6.3 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Fullstate Feedback Control How do we change the poles of the statespace system? Or,evenifwecanchangethepolelocations. Where do we put the poles? Linear
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #1 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Motivation Basic Linear System Response Fall 2007 16.31 1 1 16.31: Introduction r(t) e(t) d(t) y(t) G c (s) G(s) u(t) Goal: Design a controller G c (s) so that the
More informationDESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8 am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total
More informationDiscretetime Controllers
Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Automatik Association Suisse pour l Automatique Associazione Svizzera di Controllo Automatico Swiss Society for Automatic Control Advanced Control Discretetime Controllers
More informationDESIGN OF LINEAR STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL LAWS
7 DESIGN OF LINEAR STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL LAWS Previous chapters, by introducing fundamental statespace concepts and analysis tools, have now set the stage for our initial foray into statespace methods
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationAnalysis of DiscreteTime Systems
TU Berlin DiscreteTime Control Systems 1 Analysis of DiscreteTime Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin DiscreteTime
More informationCONTROL * ~ SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
CONTROL * ~ SYSTEMS ENGINEERING H Fourth Edition NormanS. Nise California State Polytechnic University, Pomona JOHN WILEY& SONS, INC. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction, 2 1.2 A History of Control
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 58 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3
More informationToday (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING SUBJECT QUESTION BANK : EC6405 CONTROL SYSTEM ENGINEERING SEM / YEAR: IV / II year
More informationIntermediate Process Control CHE576 Lecture Notes # 2
Intermediate Process Control CHE576 Lecture Notes # 2 B. Huang Department of Chemical & Materials Engineering University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada February 4, 2008 2 Chapter 2 Introduction
More informationBangladesh University of Engineering and Technology. EEE 402: Control System I Laboratory
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department EEE 402: Control System I Laboratory Experiment No. 4 a) Effect of input waveform, loop gain, and system
More informationEE480.3 Digital Control Systems. Part 7. Controller Design I.  Pole Assignment Method
EE480.3 Digital Control Systems Part 7. Controller Design I.  Pole Assignment Method Kunio Takaya Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Saskatchewan March 3, 2008 ** Go to fullscreen mode
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationCourse Outline. Higher Order Poles: Example. Higher Order Poles. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. State Space Design. 1 G(s) = s(s + 2)(s +10)
Amme 35 : System Dynamics Control State Space Design Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 1 Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 15 Mar Transient Performance and the splane
More informationDiscrete and continuous dynamic systems
Discrete and continuous dynamic systems Bounded input bounded output (BIBO) and asymptotic stability Continuous and discrete time linear timeinvariant systems Katalin Hangos University of Pannonia Faculty
More information