arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 22 Apr 2015

Transcription

1 Mirowve mgnetohirl effet in Cu 2 OSeO 3 Mshito Mohizuki 1,2 1 Deprtment of Physis nd Mthemtis, Aoym Gkuin University, Sgmihr, Kngw , Jpn 2 PRESTO, Jpn Siene nd Tehnology Ageny, Kwguhi, Sitm , Jpn rxiv: v1 [ond-mt.str-el] 22 Apr 5 We theoretilly find tht in multiferroi hirl mgnet Cu 2OSeO 3, resonnt mgneti exittions re oupled to olletive osilltion of eletri polriztion, nd therey ttin simultneous tivity to mgneti field nd eletri field. Beuse of interferene etween these mgneti nd eletri tivtion proesses, this mteril hosts gignti mgnetohirl dihroism on mirowves, tht is, the diretionl dihroism t gighertz frequenies in Frdy geometry. The sorption intensity of mirowve differs y s muh s 3% depending on whether its propgtion diretion is prllel or ntiprllel to the externl mgneti field. PACS numers: g,78.2.Ls,78.2.Bh,78.7.Gq Colletive exittions of spins in mgnets, so-lled mgnons or spin wves, n e tivted not only vi diret proess with mgneti field oupled to mgnetiztions ut lso vi n eletri exittion y eletri field oupled to hrge degrees of freedom. When the mgnon or spin-wve modes hve simultneous tivity to the nd omponents of eletromgneti wves, interferene etween the two tivtion proesses, tht is, the mgnetilly tivting nd the eletrilly tivting proesses, gives rise to peulir optil nd/or mirowve phenomen, so-lled optil ME effet. One of the most importnt exmples is the diretionl dihroism, tht is, oppositely propgting eletromgneti wves exhiit different sorptions. Multiferroi mterils with onurrent mgneti nd ferroeletri orders [1 8] provide n opportunity to relize the eletri-dipole tive mgnons (so-lled eletromgnons) [9 13], nd thus the optil ME effet vi the mgnetoeletri oupling [14 16]. Indeed oservtions of the diretionl dihroism hve een reported for severl multiferroi mterils suh s B 2 CoGe 2 O 7 [17 19], RMnO 3 (R =rre-erth ions) [2, ], nd CuFe 1 x G x O 2 [22], in whih nontrivil spin orders indue the ferroeletri polriztion vi the reltivisti spin-orit intertion. In these mterils, the optil ME effet is oserved t the eletromgnon resonne frequenies in the terhertz (Tz) regime. The diretionl dihroism is oserved lso t higher frequenies, i.e., x-ry nd visile-light regimes in severl polr mgnets, whih is used y eletron trnsitions mong the spin-orit multiplets [23 29]. owever, oservtions of the effet t gighertz (Gz) frequenies re quite limited nd the effet oserved so fr is very tiny whose differene in sorption intensity is only 2.5% t most [32], while the diretionl dihroism t Gz frequenies is ntiipted for pplition to mirowve devies [3]. This is euse most of the well-known multiferroi mterils sed on simple spirl or ntiferromgneti spin strutures with short-period modultion tend to hve reltively lrge spin-wve gps of severl mev, whih inevitly results in rther high resonne frequenies in Tz regime. To hieve the mirowve ME effet, long-period mgneti textures with tiny spin-wve gp should e exmined, nd slowly modulting mgneti strutures indued y the Dzyloshinskii-Moriy intertion (DMI) re promising for this purpose. Indeed, the nonreiprol diretionl dihroism of mirowves in Voigt geometry ws theoretilly predited for the DMIindued skyrmion phse [31]. In this Letter, we theoretilly predit tht eletromgnon exittions in mgnetilly ordered phses of Cu 2 OSeO 3 exhiits unpreedentedly lrge mgnetohirl dihroism t Gz frequenies, tht is, the mirowve diretionl dihroism in Frdy geometry. In the presene of, the onil spin phse or the field-polrized ferrimgneti phse emerges in the ulk smples depending on the strength of. When is pplied in ertin diretion, nd mirowve is irrdited prllel or ntiprllel to, the sorption intensities for the oppositely propgting mirowves differ y s muh s 3%. Suh huge diretionl dihroism t mirowve frequenies hs never een oserved in single mteril. This effet is tred k to the resonntly enhned mgnetoeletri oupling, nd therefore essentilly distint in mirosopi mehnism from the trditionl mirowve non-reiprol devie sed on mirowve polriztion, potentilly leding to unique mirowve devie. TherystlndmgnetistruturesofCu 2 OSeO 3 onsist of network of tetrhedr omposed of four Cu 2+ (S=1/2) ions t their pexes s shown in Figs. 1() nd (). In eh tetrhedron, three-up nd one-down olliner spin onfigurtion is relized elow T 58 K [33, 34]. This four-spin ssemly n e regrded s mgneti unit, nd is desried y lssil mgnetiztion vetor m i whose norm m is unity. We employ lssil eisenerg model on ui lttie to desrie the mgnetism in ulk speimen of Cu 2 OSeO 3 [35 37], whih ontins the ferromgneti-exhnge intertion nd the Dzyloshinskii-Moriy intertion mong the effetive mgnetiztions m i nd the Zeemn oupling to

2 2 () () Conil (f) M [11] P [1] (g) M [1] P= () 691 Oe P (µc/m 2 ) Ferromgneti (h) (d) (e) M <1> 3 <111> θ(>) P=(λ/2V) sin2θ 15 3 θ (deg) M Q FIG. 1: (olor online). () Crystl struture of Cu 2OSeO 3. () Mgneti struture of Cu 2OSeO 3. () Phse digrm of the spin model given y Eq. (1) with J=1 mev nd D/J=.9. (d) Shemti figure of the onil spin struture. (e) Symmetry xes in the hirl ui P2 13 rystl. (f) Ferroeletri polriztion P [1] under [11]. (g) Asene of P under [1]. (h) Clulted net polriztion P in the field-polrized ferromgneti stte under s funtion of the ngle θ etween nd the xis. the externl. The miltonin is given y, = J <i,j>m i m j D m i m i+ˆγ ˆγ i,ˆγ gµ B µ m i, (1) i where g=2, nd ˆγ runs over â, ˆ, nd ĉ in the ui setting. ere detils of the exhnge intertions within eh tetrhedron re negleted nd only the effetive intertions mong these mgneti units m i re tken into ount. Suh orse grining is justified s fr s low-energy exittions with long-wve-length mgneti modultions re onsidered. We tke J=1 mev nd D/J=.9 so s to reprodue the experimentlly oserved T nd periodiity ( 5 nm) of the onil stte. Figure1()showsphsedigrmofthisspinmodelt T=sfuntion ofthe mgnetifield, whihexhiits phse trnsition etween the onil phse nd the ferromgneti phse t =691 Oe, in greement with the experiments for the ulk speimen [38, 39]. Shemti figure of the spin struture in the onil phse is shown in Fig. 1(d), in whih oth the propgtion vetor Q nd 45 the net mgnetiztion M re prllel to. Note tht the spin textures onsidered here re slowly vrying in spe, nd thus the oupling to the kground rystl struture is signifintly wek. This justifies our tretment with spin model on the ui lttie fter the orse grining of mgnetiztions. The presene or sene of the ferroeletri polriztion P nd, if ny, its diretion n e known from the symmetry onsidertion[38, 4]. The rystl struture of Cu 2 OSeO 3 elongs to the hirl ui P2 1 3 point group, whih hs three-fold rottion xes, 3, long 111, nd two-fold srew xis, 2 1, long 1 s shown in Fig. 1(e). This rystl symmetry is not polr, nd thus there exists no spontneous P. Although the onil nd the ferromgneti spin sttes re not polr, either, omintion of the rystl nd the mgneti symmetries renders the system polr, nd llows the emergene of P. As shown in Fig. 1(f), the emergene of P [1] perpendiulr to the net mgnetiztion M( ) is expeted for the onil nd the ferromgneti sttes formed under [11] sine only the 2 1 xis long [1] remins s symmetry xis. On the other hnd, the emergene of P is foridden under [1] sine three 2 1 xes survive s shown in Fig. 1(g). Mirosopilly the lol polriztion p i t the ith tetrhedron is given using the mgnetiztion omponents m i, m i, nd m i s, p i = (p i,p i,p i ) = λ(m i m i,m i m i,m i m i ). (2) The net mgnetiztion M nd the ferroeletri polriztion P re lulted y sums of the lol ontriutions s M= gµb N NV i=1 m i nd P= 1 N NV i=1 p i, respetively, where the index i runs over the Cu-ion tetrhedr, N is thenumerofthetetrhedr,ndv(= m 3 )is the volume per tetrhedron. The oupling onstnt λ is evluted s λ= µcm from the experimentl dt [31]. Figure 1(h) shows lulted net polriztion P in the field-polrized ferromgneti stte when is pplied within the -plne s funtion of the ngle θ etween nd the xis (see the inset). We find tht the positive (negtive) P emerges long [1] when θ is negtive (positive). Aording to Fig. 1(h), one relizes tht osilltion of M ( M ω [1]) indues osilltion of P ( P ω [1]) when M [1] [see Figs. 2()-()], nd onversely P ω [1] indues M ω [1] vi the mgnetoeletri oupling. This mens tht oth [1] nd [1] omponents of mirowve n tivte the oupled osilltion of M nd P (Note tht the response time of M (P) ginstthe hngeof P (M) is governedy the eletron trnsitions mong the oritl multiplets, nd thus is muh shorter thn the typil time sle of the osilltions). To see this, we lulte the following dynmil suseptiilities y numerilly solving the Lndu- Lifshitz-Gilert (LLG) eqution using the fourth-order

3 3 () () ω () P= P ω M M ω (d) k ω [1], [1], [1] dditive strongly sored K ω K ω sgn(rek ω )= -1 P ω ω M ω sutrtive Imχ µν αβ k ω [1], [1], [1] onil stte (=518.4Oe) Imχ mm Imχ me =Imχ em Imχ ee ferromg. stte (=1382.4Oe) Imχ mm Imχ me =Imχ em Imχ ee Frequeny (Gz) FIG. 3: (olor online). Imginry prts of the lulted dynmil mgneti, dieletri, nd mgnetoeletri suseptiilities, Imχ mm, Imχ ee, nd Imχ em, s funtions of the frequeny for the onil stte t =518.4 Oe nd the ferromgneti stte t = Oe when the stti mgneti field [1]( ) is pplied. sgn(rek ω )=+1 wekly sored FIG. 2: (olor online). ()-() In the presene of net mgnetiztion M under [1], osillting mgnetiztion omponent M ω ( [1]) is ompnied y the osillting polriztion omponent P ω ( [1]). (d) Configurtion of mirowve nd omponents, for whih the mgnetohirl dihroism ours under [1]: k ω ±, [1] nd [1]. Runge-Kutt method: χ mm αβ (ω) = Mω α µ β χ ee αβ(ω) = Pω α ǫ β χ em αβ (ω) = χ me αβ(ω) = P ω α ǫ µ β µ ǫ M ω α β mgneti suseptiility, dieletri suseptiility, mgnetoeletri suseptiility, eletromgneti suseptiility. Beuse of the symmetry, the reltion χ em αβ (ω) = χme βα (ω) holds. The LLG eqution is given y dm i dt = m i eff i + α G m m i dm i dt, (3) where α G (=.4) is the Gilert-dmping oeffiient. The effetive field i eff is lulted from the miltonin = + (t) s i eff = / m i. The first term is the model miltonin given y Eq. (1). The perturtion term (t) represents short retngulr pulse of mgneti field (t) or eletri field E(t), whih re given, respetively, y, (t) = gµ B µ (t) m i (4) i nd (t) = i E(t) p i. (5) After pplying the pulse t t=, we tre time profiles of M(t) nd P(t), nd otin their Fourier trnsforms Mα ω nd Pα. ω Dividing these quntities y Fourier omponents of the field pulses, nd, we otin the suseptiilities. The lultions re performed using system of N= sites with the periodi oundry ondition. In Fig 3, we disply imginry prts of the lulted dynmil mgneti, dieletri, nd mgnetoeletri suseptiilities, i.e., Imχ mm, Imχ ee, ndimχ em, sfuntions of the frequeny for the onil stte nd the ferromgneti stte when the stti mgneti field [1]( ) is pplied. These suseptiilities hve resonnt peks in the Gz regime in greement with the mirowve experiments [32, 41]. Moreover ll of these dynmil suseptiilities in eh phse hve peks t the sme frequeny inditing tht the resonnt modes hve simultneous tivity to [1]( ) nd [1]( ). This mgnetoeletri tivity uses the mirowve mgnetohirleffetincu 2 OSeO 3 [seefig.2(d)]. Forthe eletromgneti wve, the reltion k ω holds, inditing tht reltive diretions of the nd omponents re determined y the propgtion vetor k ω, nd their reltionship should e reversed upon the sign reversl of k ω. When the linelly polrized eletromgneti wve with nd propgtes prllel (ntiprllel) to, tht is, sgn[rek ω ]=+1 (sgn[rek ω ]= 1) with k ω =k ωˆ, the nd omponents ontriute in n dditive ( sutrtive) wy to exite the oupled osilltion of M nd P, resulting in weker (stronger) sorption of the eletromgneti

4 4 α+, α (m -1 ) α+, α (m -1 ) () Conil phse gµbµ/j=.8.6 α α+. α(m -1 ) () Ferromgneti phse gµbµ/j= α α α(m -1 ) gµbµ/j= ω(gz) Frequeny (Gz) ω(gz) FIG. 4: (olor online). Clulted frequeny-dependene of the sorption oeffiients, α + nd α, for mirowves with sgn(rek ω )=+1 nd sgn(rek ω )= 1, respetively, t severl vlues of when K ω [1], [1] nd [1] in the onil stte () nd the ferromgneti stte (). Frequeny (Gz) Mgneti Field (A/m) Conil FM Mgneti Field (Oe) FIG. 5: (olor online). Clulted mgneti-field dependene of resonne frequeny nd mgnitude of the mgnetohirl dihroism α/α. wve. The expression of the omplex refrtive index N(ω) is derived y solving the Fourier-formed Mxwell s equtions s [17], α/α- (%) N(ω) = ω kω [ǫ +χ ee (ω)][µ +χ mm (ω)] + sgn(rek ω )[χ me (ω)+χ em (ω)]/2, (6) for k ω =k ωˆ [1], [1] nd [1]. The sorption oeffiient α(ω) is relted to N(ω) s, α(ω) = 2ωκ(ω) = 2ω ImN(ω), (7) nd thus ttins the diretionl dependene vi the sign of Rek ω. ere κ(ω) = ImN(ω) is the extintion oeffiient. Figures 4() nd () disply lulted frequenydependene of α + nd α in the onil phse nd the ferromgneti phse, respetively, for severl vlues of, where α + nd α re the sorption oeffiients for mirowves propgting prllel nd ntiprllel to [1], respetively. In the lultion, we tke ǫ zz =8 nd µ zz=1 ording to the experimentl dt [42, 43]. We find tht the mirowve sorption is resonntly enhned t the eigen-frequeny of the eletromgnon exittion, nd there exists signifint differene etween α + nd α. Clulted mgnitude of the diretionl dihroism α/α where α = α + α is plotted in Fig. 5. This quntity is governed y the mplitude of ferroeletri polriztion P, whih is nerly proportionl to the squre of the net mgnetiztion M 2. The dihroism inreses in the onil stte with the growth of P nd M s the mgneti field inreses. In ontrst, one the system enters the ferromgneti stte, the sturted M gives nerly onstnt diretionl dihroism lthough there still exists slight field-dependene due to the field-dependent resonnt frequeny vi ω in Eq. (7). The diretionl dihroism is enhned t the phse oundry etween the onil nd the ferromgneti phses, nd its mgnitude rehes s muh s 3%. Clulted eletromgnon resonne frequeny plotted in Fig. 5 shows deresing ehvior in the onil stte, while inresing ehvior in the ferromgneti stte s the mgneti field inreses. This ehvior is in good greement with the experimentl oservtions [32, 41] nd oinides with nlytil formul of the spin-wve gp given in Ref. [44]. In summry, we hve theoretilly predited tht mgnetilly ordered phses in the hirl multiferrois Cu 2 OSeO 3 host gignti mirowve mgnetohirl dihroism. This phenomenon results from interferene etween the mgneti nd eletri tivtion proesses of eletromgnons with Gz resonne frequenies. It hs een demonstrted tht long-period mgneti strutures in the hirl multiferrois without inversion symmetry n host gignti dynmil mgnetoeletri phenomen t Gz regime. In order to further enhne the effet, serh for novel hirl multiferrois with lrger P or stronger mgnetoeletri oupling is needed. For exmple, hirl multiferrois sed on the inverse Dzyloshinskii-Moriy mehnism [2] s n origin of its P is worth trying to serh euse this mehnism tends to indue lrge P reltive to the spin-dependent metllignd hyridiztion mehnism in Cu 2 OSeO 3. Metmterils, thin films, nd syntheti nnomterils re n-

5 5 other promising ndidte to relize enhned mirowve ME effets through rtifiilly designing lrge mgnetoeletri suseptiilities nd intense eletromgnon resonnes [45 5]. The uthor thnks I. Kézsmárki, F. Kgw, Y. Okmur, S. Seki, Y. Tokur for disussions. This reserh ws in prt supported y JSPS KAKENI (Grnt Numers nd ). [1] T. Kimur, T. Goto,. Shintni, K. Ishizk, T. Arim, nd Y. Tokur, Nture 426, 55 (23). [2]. Ktsur, N. Ngos, nd A. V. Bltsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 5725 (25). [3] M. Fieig, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, R123 (25). [4] Y. Tokur, Siene 312, 1481 (26). [5] Y. Tokur, J. Mgn. Mgn. Mter. 31, 1145 (27). [6] S.-W. Cheong nd M. Mostovoy, Nture Mter. 6, 13 (27). [7] W. Eerenstein, N. D. Mthur, nd J. F. Sott, Nture 442, 759 (26). [8] T. Kimur, Annu. Rev. Mter. Res. 37, 387 (27). [9] G. A. Smolenski nd I. E. Chupis, Sov. Phys. Usp. 25, 475 (1982). [1]. Ktsur, A. V. Bltsky, nd N. Ngos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 2723 (27). [11] A.Pimenov, A.A.Mukhin, V.Yu.Ivnov,V.D.Trvkin, A. M. Blshov, nd A. Loidl, Nture Phys. 2, 97 (26). [12] A.Pimenov, T. Rudolf, F. Myr, A. Loidl, A. A. Mukhin, nd A. M. Blshov, Phys. Rev. B 74, 143(R) (26). [13] N. Kid, Y. Tkhshi, J. S. Lee, R. Shimno, Y. Ymski, Y. Kneko, S. Miyhr, N. Furukw, T. Arim, nd Y. Tokur, J. Opt. So. Am. B 26, A35 (29). [14] D. Szller, S. Bordás, nd I. Kézsmárki, Phys. Rev. B 87, 144 (3). [15] S. Miyhr nd N. Furukw, J. Phys. So. Jpn. 81, (2). [16] S. Miyhr nd N. Furukw, Phys. Rev. B 89, (4). [17] I. Kézsmárki, N. Kid,. Murkw, S. Bordás, Y. Onose, nd Y. Tokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 5743 (1). [18] S. Bordás, I. Kézsmárki, D. Szller, L. Demko, N. Kid,.Murkw, Y.Onose, R.Shimno, T.Rõõm, U.Ngel, S. Miyhr, N. Furukw, nd Y. Tokur, Nture Phys. 8, 734 (2). [19] I. Kézsmárki, N. Szller, S. Bordás,. Murkw, Y. Tokur,. Engelkmp, T. Rõõm, nd U. Ngel, Nture Commun. 5, 323 (4). [2] Y. Tkhshi, R. Shimno, Y. Kneko,. Murkw, nd Y. Tokur, Nture Phys. 8, 1 (2). [] Y. Tkhshi, Y. Ymski, nd Y. Tokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 3724 (3). [22] S. Kiyshi, Y. Tkhshi, S. Seki, nd Y. Tokur, Nture Commun. 5, 4583 (4). [23] G. L. J. A. Rikken, nd E. Ruph, Nture 39, 493 (1997). [24] G. L. J. A. Rikken, C. Strohm, nd P. Wyder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 1335 (22). [25] T. Arim, J. Phys. Condens. Mtter 2, 4341 (28). [26] M. Kuot, T. Arim, Y. Kneko, J. P. e, X. Z. Yu, nd Y. Tokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, (24). [27] J.. Jung, M. Mtsur, T. Arim, J. P. e, Y. Kneko, nd Y. Tokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 3743 (24). [28] M. Sito, K. Tniguhi, nd T. Arim, J. Phys. So. Jpn. 77, 1375 (28). [29] M. Sito, K. Ishikw, K. Tniguhi, nd T. Arim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, (28). [3] A. G. Gurevih nd G. A. Melkov, Mgnetiztion Osilltions nd Wves (CRC Press, 1996). [31] M. Mohizuki nd S. Seki, Phys. Rev. B. 87, (3). [32] Y. Okmur, F. Kgw, M. Mohizuki, M. Kuot, S. Seki, S. Ishiwt, M. Kwski, Y. Onose, nd Y. Tokur, Nture Commun. 4, 2391 (3). [33] Jn-Willem G. Bos, C. V. Colin, nd T. T. M. Plstr, Phys. Rev. B 78, (28). [34] M. Belesi, I. Rousohtzkis,. C. Wu,. Berger, I. V. Shvets, F. Mil, nd J. P Ansermet, Phys. Rev. B 82, (). [35] P. Bk nd M.. Jensen, J. Phys. C 13, L881 (198). [36] S. D. Yi, S. Onod, N. Ngos, nd J.. n, Phys. Rev. B 8, (29). [37] J.. n, J. Zng, Z. Yng, J.-. Prk, nd N. Ngos, Phys. Rev. B 82, (). [38] S. Seki, X. Z. Yu, S. Ishiwt, nd Y. Tokur, Siene 336, 198 (2). [39] T. Adms, A. Chon, M. Wgner, A. Buer, G. Brndl, B. Pedersen,. Berger, P. Lemmens, nd C. Pfleiderer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, (2). [4] S. Seki, S. Ishiwt, nd Y. Tokur, Phys. Rev. B 86, 643 (2). [41] Y. Onose, Y. Okmur, S. Seki, S. Ishiwt, nd Y. Tokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 3763 (2). [42] M. Belesi, I. Rousohtzkis, M. Aid, U. K. Rößler,. Berger, nd J.-Ph. Ansermet, Phys. Rev. B 85, (2). [43] K.. Miller, X. S. Xu,. Berger, E. S. Knowles, D. J. Arens, M. W. Meisel, nd D. B. Tnner, Phys. Rev. B 82, (). [44] M. Ktok, J. Phys. So. Jpn. 56, 3635 (1987). [45] A. Sihvol, Metmterils 1, 2 (27). [46] Y. A. Urzhumov nd G. Shvets, Solid Stte Commun. 146, 28 (28). [47] R. Zivieri, Solid Stte Phys. 63,151 (2). [48] V. Vlmink nd M. Billeul, Siene 322, 41 (28). [49] V. Vlmink nd M. Billeul, Phys. Rev. B 81, (). [5] C. Bilzer, T. Devolder, P. Crozt, C. Chppert, S. Crdoso, nd P. P. Freits, J. Appl. Phys. 11, 7455 (27).