Collective Dynamics of a Generalized Dicke Model
|
|
- April Blair
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Collective Dynamics of a Generalized Dicke Model J. Keeling, J. A. Mayoh, M. J. Bhaseen, B. D. Simons Harvard, January 212 Funding: Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
2 Coupling many atoms to light Old question: What happens to radiation when many atoms interact collectively with light. Superradiance dynamical and steady state. Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
3 Coupling many atoms to light Old question: What happens to radiation when many atoms interact collectively with light. Superradiance dynamical and steady state. New relevance Superconducting qubits Quantum dots Nitrogen-vacancies in diamond Ultra-cold atoms κ κ Cavity Pump Rydberg atoms Pump Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
4 Dicke effect: Enhanced emission H int = k,i ) g k (ψ k S i e ik r i + H.c. Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
5 Dicke effect: Enhanced emission H int = k,i ) g k (ψ k S i e ik r i + H.c. If r i r j λ, use i S i S Collective decay: dρ dt = Γ 2 [ S + S ρ S ρs + + ρs + S ] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
6 Dicke effect: Enhanced emission H int = k,i ) g k (ψ k S i e ik r i + H.c. If r i r j λ, use i S i S Collective decay: dρ dt = Γ 2 [ S + S ρ S ρs + + ρs + S ] If S z = S = N/2 initially: I Γ d Sz dt = ΓN2 4 sech2 [ ] ΓN 2 t S z N/2 -N/2 t D t D ΓN 2 /2 I=-Γd S z /dt Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
7 Dicke effect: Enhanced emission H int = k,i ) g k (ψ k S i e ik r i + H.c. If r i r j λ, use i S i S Collective decay: dρ dt = Γ 2 [ S + S ρ S ρs + + ρs + S ] If S z = S = N/2 initially: I Γ d Sz dt = ΓN2 4 sech2 [ ] ΓN 2 t S z N/2 -N/2 t D t D ΓN 2 /2 I=-Γd S z /dt Problem: dipole interactions dephase. [Friedberg et al, Phys. Lett. 1972] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
8 Collective radiation with a cavity: Dynamics H int = i ( ψ S i + ψs + i ) Single cavity mode: oscillations [Bonifacio and Preparata PRA 7; JK PRA 9] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
9 Collective radiation with a cavity: Dynamics H int = i ( ψ S i + ψs + i ) Single cavity mode: oscillations If S z = S = N/2 initially: ψ(t) 2 16 T=2ln( N )/ N / N Time [Bonifacio and Preparata PRA 7; JK PRA 9] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
10 Collective radiation with a cavity: Dynamics H int = i ( ψ S i + ψs + i ) Single cavity mode: oscillations If S z = S = N/2 initially: ψ(t) 2 16 T=2ln( N )/ N / N Time [Bonifacio and Preparata PRA 7; JK PRA 9] ψ(t) 2 16 N= Time Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
11 Dicke model: Equilibrium superradiance transition ( H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g ψ S + ψs +). Coherent state: Ψ e λψ +ηs + Ω Energy: E = ω λ 2 + ω N η η gn η λ + λ η 1 + η 2 Small g, min at λ, η = [Hepp, Lieb, Ann. Phys. 73] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
12 Dicke model: Equilibrium superradiance transition ( H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g ψ S + ψs +). Coherent state: Ψ e λψ +ηs + Ω Energy: E = ω λ 2 + ω N η η gn η λ + λ η 1 + η 2 Small g, min at λ, η = [Hepp, Lieb, Ann. Phys. 73] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
13 Dicke model: Equilibrium superradiance transition ( H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g ψ S + ψs +). Coherent state: Ψ e λψ +ηs + Ω Energy: E = ω λ 2 + ω N η η gn η λ + λ η 1 + η 2 Small g, min at λ, η = [Hepp, Lieb, Ann. Phys. 73] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
14 Dicke model: Equilibrium superradiance transition ( H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g ψ S + ψs +). Coherent state: Ψ e λψ +ηs + Ω Energy: E = ω λ 2 + ω N η η gn η λ + λ η 1 + η 2 Small g, min at λ, η = ω ḡ N SR Spontaneous polarisation if: Ng 2 > ωω [Hepp, Lieb, Ann. Phys. 73] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
15 No go theorem and transition Spontaneous polarisation if: Ng 2 > ωω [Rzazewski et al PRL 75] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
16 No go theorem and transition Spontaneous polarisation if: Ng 2 > ωω No go theorem:. Minimal coupling (p ea) 2 /2m i e m A p i g(ψ S + ψs + ), i A 2 2m Nζ(ψ + ψ ) 2 [Rzazewski et al PRL 75] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
17 No go theorem and transition Spontaneous polarisation if: Ng 2 > ωω No go theorem:. Minimal coupling (p ea) 2 /2m i e m A p i g(ψ S + ψs + ), For large N, ω ω + 2Nζ. (RWA) i A 2 2m Nζ(ψ + ψ ) 2 [Rzazewski et al PRL 75] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
18 No go theorem and transition Spontaneous polarisation if: Ng 2 > ωω No go theorem:. Minimal coupling (p ea) 2 /2m i e m A p i g(ψ S + ψs + ), For large N, ω ω + 2Nζ. (RWA) Need Ng 2 > ω (ω + 2Nζ). i A 2 2m Nζ(ψ + ψ ) 2 [Rzazewski et al PRL 75] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
19 No go theorem and transition Spontaneous polarisation if: Ng 2 > ωω No go theorem:. Minimal coupling (p ea) 2 /2m i e m A p i g(ψ S + ψs + ), i A 2 2m Nζ(ψ + ψ ) 2 For large N, ω ω + 2Nζ. (RWA) Need Ng 2 > ω (ω + 2Nζ). But Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule states: g 2 /ω < 2ζ. No transition [Rzazewski et al PRL 75] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
20 Dicke phase transition: ways out Problem: g 2 /ω < 2ζ for intrinsic parameters. Solutions: Non-solution Ferroelectric transition in D r gauge. [JK JPCM 7 ] See also [Nataf and Ciuti, Nat. Comm. 1; Viehmann et al. PRL 11] Grand canonical ensemble: If H H µ(s z + ψ ψ), need only: g 2 N > (ω µ)(ω µ) Incoherent pumping polariton condensation. Dissociate g, ω, e.g. Raman scheme: ω ω. [Dimer et al. PRA 7; Baumann et al. Nature 1. Also, Black et al. PRL 3 ] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
21 Dicke phase transition: ways out Problem: g 2 /ω < 2ζ for intrinsic parameters. Solutions: Non-solution Ferroelectric transition in D r gauge. [JK JPCM 7 ] See also [Nataf and Ciuti, Nat. Comm. 1; Viehmann et al. PRL 11] Grand canonical ensemble: If H H µ(s z + ψ ψ), need only: g 2 N > (ω µ)(ω µ) Incoherent pumping polariton condensation. Dissociate g, ω, e.g. Raman scheme: ω ω. [Dimer et al. PRA 7; Baumann et al. Nature 1. Also, Black et al. PRL 3 ] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
22 Dicke phase transition: ways out Problem: g 2 /ω < 2ζ for intrinsic parameters. Solutions: Non-solution Ferroelectric transition in D r gauge. [JK JPCM 7 ] See also [Nataf and Ciuti, Nat. Comm. 1; Viehmann et al. PRL 11] Grand canonical ensemble: If H H µ(s z + ψ ψ), need only: g 2 N > (ω µ)(ω µ) Incoherent pumping polariton condensation. Dissociate g, ω, e.g. Raman scheme: ω ω. [Dimer et al. PRA 7; Baumann et al. Nature 1. Also, Black et al. PRL 3 ] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
23 Dicke phase transition: ways out Problem: g 2 /ω < 2ζ for intrinsic parameters. Solutions: Non-solution Ferroelectric transition in D r gauge. [JK JPCM 7 ] See also [Nataf and Ciuti, Nat. Comm. 1; Viehmann et al. PRL 11] Grand canonical ensemble: If H H µ(s z + ψ ψ), need only: g 2 N > (ω µ)(ω µ) Incoherent pumping polariton condensation. Dissociate g, ω, e.g. Raman scheme: ω ω. [Dimer et al. PRA 7; Baumann et al. Nature 1. Also, Black et al. PRL 3 ] Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
24 Dicke phase transition: ways out Problem: g 2 /ω < 2ζ for intrinsic parameters. Solutions: Non-solution Ferroelectric transition in D r gauge. [JK JPCM 7 ] See also [Nataf and Ciuti, Nat. Comm. 1; Viehmann et al. PRL 11] Grand canonical ensemble: If H H µ(s z + ψ ψ), need only: g 2 N > (ω µ)(ω µ) Incoherent pumping polariton condensation. Dissociate g, ω, e.g. Raman scheme: ω ω. [Dimer et al. PRA 7; Baumann et al. Nature 1. Also, Black et al. PRL 3 ] κ Pump κ Cavity Pump Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
25 Outline 1 Introduction: Dicke model and superradiance Rayleigh scheme: Generalised Dicke model 2 Attractors of dynamics (fixed points) Phase diagram: comparison to experiment 3 Approach to attractors: timescales Why slow timescales emerge 4 Attractors of dynamics (oscillations) Reaching other parameter ranges Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
26 Outline 1 Introduction: Dicke model and superradiance Rayleigh scheme: Generalised Dicke model 2 Attractors of dynamics (fixed points) Phase diagram: comparison to experiment 3 Approach to attractors: timescales Why slow timescales emerge 4 Attractors of dynamics (oscillations) Reaching other parameter ranges Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
27 Extended Dicke model [Baumann et al. Nature 1] z x κ Pump κ gψ Ω 2 Level System 2 Level system,, : : Ψ(x, z) = 1 : Ψ(x, z) = ω = 2ω recoil e ik(σx+σ z) σ,σ =± H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g(ψ + ψ )(S + S + )+US z ψ ψ. t ρ = i[h, ρ] κ(ψ ψρ 2ψρψ + ρψ ψ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
28 Extended Dicke model [Baumann et al. Nature 1] z x κ Pump κ gψ Ω 2 Level System 2 Level system,, : : Ψ(x, z) = 1 : Ψ(x, z) = ω = 2ω recoil e ik(σx+σ z) σ,σ =± H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g(ψ + ψ )(S + S + )+US z ψ ψ. t ρ = i[h, ρ] κ(ψ ψρ 2ψρψ + ρψ ψ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
29 Extended Dicke model [Baumann et al. Nature 1] z x κ Pump κ gψ Ω 2 Level System 2 Level system,, : : Ψ(x, z) = 1 : Ψ(x, z) = ω = 2ω recoil e ik(σx+σ z) σ,σ =± Feedback: U g2 ω c ω a H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g(ψ + ψ )(S + S + )+US z ψ ψ. t ρ = i[h, ρ] κ(ψ ψρ 2ψρψ + ρψ ψ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
30 Extended Dicke model [Baumann et al. Nature 1] z x κ Pump κ gψ Ω 2 Level System 2 Level system,, : : Ψ(x, z) = 1 : Ψ(x, z) = ω = 2ω recoil e ik(σx+σ z) σ,σ =± Feedback: U g2 ω c ω a H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g(ψ + ψ )(S + S + )+US z ψ ψ. t ρ = i[h, ρ] κ(ψ ψρ 2ψρψ + ρψ ψ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
31 Extended Dicke model [Baumann et al. Nature 1] z x κ Pump κ gψ Ω 2 Level System 2 Level system,, : : Ψ(x, z) = 1 : Ψ(x, z) = ω = 2ω recoil e ik(σx+σ z) σ,σ =± Feedback: U g2 ω c ω a H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g(ψ + ψ )(S + S + )+US z ψ ψ. t ρ = i[h, ρ] κ(ψ ψρ 2ψρψ + ρψ ψ) Semiclassical EOM ( S = N/2 1) Ṡ = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
32 Extended Dicke model [Baumann et al. Nature 1] z x κ Pump κ gψ Ω 2 Level System 2 Level system,, : : Ψ(x, z) = 1 : Ψ(x, z) = ω = 2ω recoil e ik(σx+σ z) σ,σ =± Feedback: U g2 ω c ω a H = ωψ ψ + ω S z + g(ψ + ψ )(S + S + )+US z ψ ψ. t ρ = i[h, ρ] κ(ψ ψρ 2ψρψ + ρψ ψ) Semiclassical EOM ( S = N/2 1) Ṡ = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) ω khz ω, κ, g N MHz. Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
33 Outline 1 Introduction: Dicke model and superradiance Rayleigh scheme: Generalised Dicke model 2 Attractors of dynamics (fixed points) Phase diagram: comparison to experiment 3 Approach to attractors: timescales Why slow timescales emerge 4 Attractors of dynamics (oscillations) Reaching other parameter ranges Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
34 Fixed points (steady states) = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) ψ =, S = (,, ±N/2) always a solution. If g > g c, ψ too A S y = I[S ] = B ψ = R[ψ] = Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
35 Fixed points (steady states) = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) ψ =, S = (,, ±N/2) always a solution. If g > g c, ψ too A S y = I[S ] = B ψ = R[ψ] = S z S y S x Small g:, only. (ω = 3MHz, UN = 4MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
36 Fixed points (steady states) = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) ψ =, S = (,, ±N/2) always a solution. If g > g c, ψ too A S y = I[S ] = B ψ = R[ψ] = S z S y S x Small g:, only. Larger g: SR too. (ω = 3MHz, UN = 4MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
37 Steady state phase diagram UN=, κ= = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z ω SR = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) ḡ N See also Domokos and Ritsch PRL 2, Domokos et al. PRL 1 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
38 Steady state phase diagram = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) 4 UN= ω UN=, κ= ḡ N SR SR(A): S y = 2 SR -2 SR g N (MHz) See also Domokos and Ritsch PRL 2, Domokos et al. PRL 1 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
39 Steady state phase diagram = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) 4 UN=-1 ω UN=, κ= ḡ N SR SR(A): S y = SRB + SR(B): ψ = g N (MHz) See also Domokos and Ritsch PRL 2, Domokos et al. PRL 1 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
40 Steady state phase diagram = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) 4 UN= SRB g N (MHz) See also Domokos and Ritsch PRL 2, Domokos et al. PRL 1 ω UN=, κ= ḡ N SR SR(A): S y = + SR(B): ψ = Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
41 Steady state phase diagram = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) 4 UN=-2 ω UN=, κ= ḡ N SR SR(A): S y = SRB + SR(B): ψ = g N (MHz) See also Domokos and Ritsch PRL 2, Domokos et al. PRL 1 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
42 Steady state phase diagram = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) 4 2 UN=-4 ω UN=, κ= ḡ N SR SR(A): S y = -2 + SRB + SR(B): ψ = g N (MHz) See also Domokos and Ritsch PRL 2, Domokos et al. PRL 1 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
43 Steady state phase diagram = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) SRB SRB+ SRB+ UN=-4 SRB g N (MHz) See also Domokos and Ritsch PRL 2, Domokos et al. PRL 1 ω UN=, κ= ḡ N SR SR(A): S y = + SR(B): ψ = Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
44 Comparison to experiment (ω p -ω c ) (2π MHz) g 2 N (MHz) 2 UN = 1MHz Adapted from: [Bhaseen et al. PRA 12] [Baumann et al Nature 1 ] ω = ω c ω p UN, UN = g 2 4(ω a ω c ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
45 Outline 1 Introduction: Dicke model and superradiance Rayleigh scheme: Generalised Dicke model 2 Attractors of dynamics (fixed points) Phase diagram: comparison to experiment 3 Approach to attractors: timescales Why slow timescales emerge 4 Attractors of dynamics (oscillations) Reaching other parameter ranges Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
46 Dynamics: Evolution from normal state 4 2 (ii) (i) UN=-4 + SRB -2 (iii) g N (MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
47 Dynamics: Evolution from normal state Gray: S = ( N, N, N/2) Black: Wigner distribution of S, ψ (ii) (i) UN=-4 SRB (i) SR(A) ψ t (ms) -2 (iii) g N (MHz) Oscillations:.1ms Decay: 2ms Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
48 Dynamics: Evolution from normal state Gray: S = ( N, N, N/2) Black: Wigner distribution of S, ψ (ii) g N (MHz) (i) (iii) Oscillations:.1ms Decay: 2ms,.1ms UN=-4 SRB (i) SR(A) (ii) SR(B) ψ 2 ψ t (ms) t (ms) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
49 Dynamics: Evolution from normal state Gray: S = ( N, N, N/2) Black: Wigner distribution of S, ψ (ii) g N (MHz) (i) (iii) Oscillations:.1ms Decay: 2ms,.1ms, 2ms UN=-4 SRB (i) SR(A) (ii) SR(B) (iii) SR(A) ψ 2 ψ 2 ψ t (ms) t (ms) t (ms) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
50 Dynamics: Evolution from normal state Gray: S = ( N, N, N/2) Black: Wigner distribution of S, ψ (ii) g N (MHz) (i) (iii) Oscillations:.1ms Decay: 2ms,.1ms, 2ms UN=-4 SRB (i) SR(A) (ii) SR(B) (iii) SR(A) ψ 2 ψ 2 ψ t (ms) t (ms) t (ms) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
51 Asymptotic state: Evolution from normal state (Near to experimental UN = 13MHz). All stable attractors: 4 UN= SRB g N (MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
52 Asymptotic state: Evolution from normal state (Near to experimental UN = 13MHz). Starting from All stable attractors: Asymptotic state UN= SRB SRB ψ g N (MHz) g N (MHz) 1-1 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
53 Timescales for dynamics: What are they? Asymptotic state SRB g N (MHz) ψ No unstable directions Initial growth time One unstable direction Two unstable directions g N (MHz) 1s 1s 1ms 1ms 1ms 1µs 1µs Growth Most unstable eigenvalues near S = (,, N/2) Decay Slowest stable eigenvalues near final state Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
54 Timescales for dynamics: What are they? Asymptotic state SRB g N (MHz) ψ No unstable directions Initial growth time One unstable direction Two unstable directions g N (MHz) 1s 1s 1ms 1ms 1ms 1µs 1µs Growth Most unstable eigenvalues near S = (,, N/2) Decay Slowest stable eigenvalues near final state Expand in ω /κ: Oscillations: ω, Decay: ω or ω 2 /κ Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
55 Timescales for dynamics: What are they? Asymptotic state SRB g N (MHz) Growth Most unstable eigenvalues near S = (,, N/2) Decay Slowest stable eigenvalues near final state Expand in ω /κ: Oscillations: ω, Decay: ω or ω 2 /κ ψ No unstable directions Initial growth time One unstable direction Two unstable directions g N (MHz) Asymptotic decay time SRB g N (MHz) 1s 1s 1ms 1ms 1ms 1µs 1µs 1s 1s 1ms 1ms 1ms 1µs 1µs Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
56 Timescales for dynamics: Consequences for experiment 4 Asymptotic state SRB 1 1 ψ g N (MHz) 1-1 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
57 Timescales for dynamics: Consequences for experiment 6 1ms sweep Asymptotic state SRB ψ g 2 N (MHz 2 ) g N (MHz) 1-1 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
58 Timescales for dynamics: Consequences for experiment 6 1ms sweep Asymptotic state SRB ψ g 2 N (MHz 2 ) ms sweep g N (MHz) g 2 N (MHz 2 ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
59 Timescales for dynamics: Why so slow and varied? Suppose co- and counter-rotating terms differ a b Ω a Ωb g ψ g ψ H =... + g(ψ S + ψs + ) + g (ψ S + + ψs ) Level System SR(A) near phase boundary at small δg Critical slowing down SR(A), SR(B) continuously connect Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
60 Timescales for dynamics: Why so slow and varied? Suppose co- and counter-rotating terms differ a b Ω a Ωb g ψ g ψ H =... + g(ψ S + ψs + ) + g (ψ S + + ψs ) Level System 4 UN= SRB g N (MHz) SR(A) near phase boundary at small δg Critical slowing down SR(A), SR(B) continuously connect Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
61 Timescales for dynamics: Why so slow and varied? Suppose co- and counter-rotating terms differ a b Ω a Ωb g ψ g ψ H =... + g(ψ S + ψs + ) + g (ψ S + + ψs ) Level System δg = g g, 2ḡ = g + g 4 2 UN= ḡ N=1 + SRB g N (MHz) δg/ḡ SR(A) near phase boundary at small δg Critical slowing down SR(A), SR(B) continuously connect Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
62 Timescales for dynamics: Why so slow and varied? Suppose co- and counter-rotating terms differ a b Ω a Ωb g ψ g ψ H =... + g(ψ S + ψs + ) + g (ψ S + + ψs ) Level System δg = g g, 2ḡ = g + g 4 2 UN= ḡ N=1 + SRB g N (MHz) δg/ḡ SR(A) near phase boundary at small δg Critical slowing down SR(A), SR(B) continuously connect Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
63 Outline 1 Introduction: Dicke model and superradiance Rayleigh scheme: Generalised Dicke model 2 Attractors of dynamics (fixed points) Phase diagram: comparison to experiment 3 Approach to attractors: timescales Why slow timescales emerge 4 Attractors of dynamics (oscillations) Reaching other parameter ranges Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
64 Regions without fixed points Changing U: gψ Ω U g2 ω c ω a 2 Level System 4 2 UN=-4 + SRB g N (MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
65 Regions without fixed points g ψ Changing U: Ω U g2 ω c ω a 2 Level System 4 2 UN=-4 + SRB g N (MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
66 Regions without fixed points g ψ Changing U: Ω U g2 ω c ω a 2 Level System 4 UN= 2 SR -2 SR g N (MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
67 Regions without fixed points g ψ Changing U: Ω U g2 ω c ω a 2 Level System 4 UN= g N (MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
68 Regions without fixed points g ψ Changing U: Ω U g2 ω c ω a 2 Level System 4 2 UN= g N (MHz) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
69 Regions without fixed points g ψ Changing U: Ω U g2 ω c ω a 2 Level System 4 UN=4 2 Persistent Oscillations g N (MHz) ψ t (ms) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
70 Persistent (optomechanical) oscillations ψ t (ms) Ṡ = i(ω + U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω + US z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
71 Persistent (optomechanical) oscillations ψ t (ms) Ṡ = i(ω + U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω + US z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) Fix ω + US z = if ψ =. Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
72 Persistent (optomechanical) oscillations ψ t (ms) Ṡ = i(ω + U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω + US z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) Fix ω + US z = if ψ =. Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
73 Persistent (optomechanical) oscillations ψ t (ms) Fix ω + US z = if ψ =. N S = re iθ 2 r = 4 (Sz ) 2 Ṡ = i(ω + U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω + US z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) Get: θ = ω + U ψ 2 ψ + κψ = 2igr cos(θ) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
74 Persistent (optomechanical) oscillations ψ t (ms) Fix ω + US z = if ψ =. N S = re iθ 2 r = 4 (Sz ) 2 ψ ψ 2 S x S y S z Ṡ = i(ω + U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω + US z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) Get: θ = ω + U ψ 2 ψ + κψ = 2igr cos(θ) t(ms) Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / S x, S y, S z
75 Tuning g, g, U [Dimer et al. Phys. Rev. A. (27)] Ω a a b Ω Separate pump strength/detuning b g ψ g ψ 2 2 Level System g g Ω b, g g Ω a b, U g g a a 2 b Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
76 Tuning g, g, U [Dimer et al. Phys. Rev. A. (27)] Ω a a b Ω Separate pump strength/detuning b g ψ g ψ 2 2 Level System g g Ω b, g g Ω a b Possible realization: Hyperfine levels, U g g a a 2 b σ σ + m = 1 F m = F m =+1 F Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
77 Tuning g, g, U [Dimer et al. Phys. Rev. A. (27)] Ω a a b Ω Separate pump strength/detuning b g ψ g ψ 2 2 Level System g g Ω b, g g Ω a b Possible realization: Hyperfine levels, U g g a a 2 b σ σ + Atoms m = 1 F m = F m =+1 F B Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
78 Summary Wide variety of dynamical phases 4 2 UN=4 4 2 UN= SR 4 2 UN= ḡ N=1 + SRB -2-2 SR g N (MHz) g N (MHz) g N (MHz) δg/ḡ Slow dynamics ψ t (ms) 4 Initial growth time No unstable directions 2 One unstable direction -2 Two unstable directions g N (MHz) 1s 1s 1ms 1ms 1ms 1µs 1µs 4 Asymptotic decay time 2 SRB g N (MHz) 1s 1s 1ms 1ms 1ms 1µs 1µs Persistent oscillations if U > ψ t (ms) ψ 2 12 ψ 2 S.4 1 x S y S 8 z t(ms) JK et al. PRL 1, Bhaseen et al. PRA 12 S x, S y, S z Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 25
79 Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
80 Extra slides 5 Ferroelectric phase transition 6 Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick 7 Tricritical point Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
81 Ferroelectric transition Atoms in Coulomb gauge H = ω k a k a k + i [p i ea(r i )] 2 + V coul Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
82 Ferroelectric transition Atoms in Coulomb gauge H = ω k a k a k + i [p i ea(r i )] 2 + V coul Two-level systems dipole-dipole coupling H = ω S z + ωψ ψ + g(s + + S )(ψ + ψ ) + Nζ(ψ + ψ ) 2 η(s + S ) 2 (nb g 2, ζ, η 1/V ). Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
83 Ferroelectric transition Atoms in Coulomb gauge H = ω k a k a k + i [p i ea(r i )] 2 + V coul Two-level systems dipole-dipole coupling H = ω S z + ωψ ψ + g(s + + S )(ψ + ψ ) + Nζ(ψ + ψ ) 2 η(s + S ) 2 (nb g 2, ζ, η 1/V ). Ferroelectric polarisation if ω < 2ηN Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
84 Ferroelectric transition Atoms in Coulomb gauge H = ω k a k a k + i [p i ea(r i )] 2 + V coul Two-level systems dipole-dipole coupling H = ω S z + ωψ ψ + g(s + + S )(ψ + ψ ) + Nζ(ψ + ψ ) 2 η(s + S ) 2 (nb g 2 Ferroelectric polarisation if ω, ζ, η 1/V ). < 2ηN Gauge transform to dipole gauge D r H = ω S z + ωψ ψ + ḡ(s + S )(ψ ψ ) Dicke transition at ω < Nḡ 2 /ω 2ηN But, ψ describes electric displacement Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
85 Timescales for dynamics: U = and Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Since κ ω, can consider eliminating ψ If U =, simple result: Ṡ = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) t S = {S, H} ΓS (S ẑ), H = ω S z Λ + S 2 x Λ S 2 y with: Λ ± ω (g ± g ) 2, Γ 2κ (g 2 g 2 ) κ 2 +ω 2 κ 2 +ω 2 NB, g = g, no dissipation. Dissipation restored by finite κ. Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
86 Timescales for dynamics: U = and Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Since κ ω, can consider eliminating ψ If U =, simple result: Ṡ = i(ω +U ψ 2 )S + 2ig(ψ + ψ )S z Ṡ z = ig(ψ + ψ )(S S + ) ψ = [κ + i(ω+us z )] ψ ig(s + S + ) t S = {S, H} ΓS (S ẑ), H = ω S z Λ + S 2 x Λ S 2 y with: Λ ± ω (g ± g ) 2, Γ 2κ (g 2 g 2 ) κ 2 +ω 2 κ 2 +ω 2 NB, g = g, no dissipation. Dissipation restored by finite κ. Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
87 Tricritical point UN=-4 SRB g N (MHz) SRB SRB SRB SRB g N (MHz) If ω u = UN/2 > κ, crossing of boundaries at: ω = ωu 2 κ 2 g ω UN N = 4 For g > g, 2 region exists at edge of SRB. ψ 2 Arg(ψ) S z /N 15 (a) 1 5 π (c) π/2 -π/2 -π.5 (e) g N =1. (MHz) SRB (b) 2 SRB (d) (f) π/16 π/2 7π/ Jonathan Keeling Collective dynamics Harvard, January / 3
Polariton and photon condensates in organic materials. Jonathan Keeling. Sheffield, October 2014
Polariton and photon condensates in organic materials Jonathan Keeling SUPA University of St Andrews 1413-213 Sheffield, October 214 Jonathan Keeling Polariton and photon condensates Sheffield, October
More informationPolariton and photon condensates with organic molecules
Polariton and photon condensates with organic molecules Jonathan Keeling University of St Andrews 6 YEARS Telluride, July 213 Jonathan Keeling Polariton and photon condensates Telluride, July 213 1 / 37
More informationTowards new states of matter with atoms and photons
Towards new states of matter with atoms and photons Jonas Larson Stockholm University and Universität zu Köln Aarhus Cold atoms and beyond 26/6-2014 Motivation Optical lattices + control quantum simulators.
More informationProspects for a superradiant laser
Prospects for a superradiant laser M. Holland murray.holland@colorado.edu Dominic Meiser Jun Ye Kioloa Workshop D. Meiser, Jun Ye, D. Carlson, and MH, PRL 102, 163601 (2009). D. Meiser and MH, PRA 81,
More informationIntroduction to Classical and Quantum FEL Theory R. Bonifacio University of Milano and INFN LNF
Introduction to Classical and Quantum FEL Theory R. Bonifacio University of Milano and INFN LNF Natal 2016 1 1 OUTLINE Classical SASE and spiking Semi-classical FEL theory: quantum purification Fully quantum
More informationFrom cavity optomechanics to the Dicke quantum phase transition
From cavity optomechanics to the Dicke quantum phase transition (~k; ~k)! p Rafael Mottl Esslinger Group, ETH Zurich Cavity Optomechanics Conference 2013, Innsbruck Motivation & Overview Engineer optomechanical
More informationSUPA. Quantum Many-Body Physics with Multimode Cavity QED. Jonathan Keeling FOUNDED. University of St Andrews
Quantum Many-Body Physics with Multimode Cavity QED Jonathan Keeling University of St Andrews FOUNDED 113 SUPA CONDMAT17, Copenhagen, May 17 Jonathan Keeling Multimode cavity QED CONDMAT17 1 What can quantum
More informationQuantum Reservoir Engineering
Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Quantum Reservoir Engineering Towards Quantum Simulators with Superconducting Qubits SMG Claudia De Grandi (Yale University) Siddiqi Group (Berkeley)
More informationQuantum structures of photons and atoms
Quantum structures of photons and atoms Giovanna Morigi Universität des Saarlandes Why quantum structures The goal: creation of mesoscopic quantum structures robust against noise and dissipation Why quantum
More information9 Atomic Coherence in Three-Level Atoms
9 Atomic Coherence in Three-Level Atoms 9.1 Coherent trapping - dark states In multi-level systems coherent superpositions between different states (atomic coherence) may lead to dramatic changes of light
More informationQuantum Simulation with Rydberg Atoms
Hendrik Weimer Institute for Theoretical Physics, Leibniz University Hannover Blaubeuren, 23 July 2014 Outline Dissipative quantum state engineering Rydberg atoms Mesoscopic Rydberg gates A Rydberg Quantum
More informationLight-matter coupling: from the weak to the ultrastrong coupling and beyond. Simone De Liberato Quantum Light and Matter Group
Light-matter coupling: from the weak to the ultrastrong coupling and beyond Simone De Liberato Quantum Light and Matter Group General theory Open quantum systems Material implementations Advanced topics
More informationQuantum Light-Matter Interactions
Quantum Light-Matter Interactions QIC 895: Theory of Quantum Optics David Layden June 8, 2015 Outline Background Review Jaynes-Cummings Model Vacuum Rabi Oscillations, Collapse & Revival Spontaneous Emission
More informationQuantum Feedback Stabilized Solid-State Emitters
FOPS 2015 Breckenridge, Colorado Quantum Feedback Stabilized Solid-State Emitters Alexander Carmele, Julia Kabuss, Sven Hein, Franz Schulze, and Andreas Knorr Technische Universität Berlin August 7, 2015
More informationNon-equilibrium quantum phase transition with ultracold atoms in optical cavity
Non-equilibrium quantum phase transition with ultracold atoms in optical cavity P. Domokos, D. Nagy, G. Kónya, G. Szirmai J. Asbóth, A. Vukics H. Ritsch (Innsbruck) MTA Szilárdtestfizikai és Optikai Kutatóintézete
More information8 Quantized Interaction of Light and Matter
8 Quantized Interaction of Light and Matter 8.1 Dressed States Before we start with a fully quantized description of matter and light we would like to discuss the evolution of a two-level atom interacting
More informationQuantum information processing with individual neutral atoms in optical tweezers. Philippe Grangier. Institut d Optique, Palaiseau, France
Quantum information processing with individual neutral atoms in optical tweezers Philippe Grangier Institut d Optique, Palaiseau, France Outline Yesterday s lectures : 1. Trapping and exciting single atoms
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.atom-ph] 9 Nov 2013
Beyond the Dicke Quantum Phase Transition with a Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Ring Resonator D. Schmidt, H. Tomczyk, S. Slama, C. Zimmermann Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard-Karls-Universität
More informationCoherence and optical electron spin rotation in a quantum dot. Sophia Economou NRL. L. J. Sham, UCSD R-B Liu, CUHK Duncan Steel + students, U Michigan
Coherence and optical electron spin rotation in a quantum dot Sophia Economou Collaborators: NRL L. J. Sham, UCSD R-B Liu, CUHK Duncan Steel + students, U Michigan T. L. Reinecke, Naval Research Lab Outline
More informationCoupling n-level Atoms with l-modes of Quantised Light in a Resonator
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Coupling n-level Atoms with l-modes of Quantised Light in a Resonator To cite this article: O Castaños et al 016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 698 01006 View
More informationSelf organization of a Bose Einstein Condensate in an optical cavity
Self organization of a Bose Einstein Condensate in an optical cavity Mayukh Nilay Khan December 14, 2011 Abstract Here, we discuss the spatial self organization of a BEC in a single mode optical cavity
More informationDoing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED
Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED Ren-Shou Huang, Alexandre Blais, Andreas Wallraff, David Schuster, Sameer Kumar, Luigi Frunzio, Hannes Majer, Steven Girvin, Robert
More informationCollective excitations of ultracold molecules on an optical lattice. Roman Krems University of British Columbia
Collective excitations of ultracold molecules on an optical lattice Roman Krems University of British Columbia Collective excitations of ultracold molecules trapped on an optical lattice Sergey Alyabyshev
More informationPolariton Condensation
Polariton Condensation Marzena Szymanska University of Warwick Windsor 2010 Collaborators Theory J. Keeling P. B. Littlewood F. M. Marchetti Funding from Macroscopic Quantum Coherence Macroscopic Quantum
More informationOIST, April 16, 2014
C3QS @ OIST, April 16, 2014 Brian Muenzenmeyer Dissipative preparation of squeezed states with ultracold atomic gases GW & Mäkelä, Phys. Rev. A 85, 023604 (2012) Caballar et al., Phys. Rev. A 89, 013620
More information7 Three-level systems
7 Three-level systems In this section, we will extend our treatment of atom-light interactions to situations with more than one atomic energy level, and more than one independent coherent driving field.
More informationSemester project report: Simulations for one ion experiments
Semester project report: Simulations for one ion experiments Matteo Marinelli 1 Introduction In the last few decades many experimental and theoretical reports have shown the ability to coherently control
More informationControlling discrete and continuous symmetries in superradiant phase transitions
Controlling discrete and continuous symmetries in superradiant phase transitions Alexandre Baksic, Cristiano Ciuti To cite this version: Alexandre Baksic, Cristiano Ciuti. Controlling discrete and continuous
More informationCooling Using the Stark Shift Gate
Imperial College London Cooling Using the Stark Shift Gate M.B. Plenio (Imperial) A. Retzker (Imperial) Maria Laach 7/3/007 Department of Physics and Institute for Mathematical Sciences Imperial College
More informationCluster mean-field approach to the steady-state phase diagram of dissipative spin systems. Davide Rossini. Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (Italy)
Cluster mean-field approach to the steady-state phase diagram of dissipative spin systems Davide Rossini Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (Italy) Quantum simulations and many-body physics with light Orthodox
More informationPart3:Superfluidity: k Flow via obstacles, Persistent Currents & Quantised Vortices. Marzena Szymanska
Part3:Superfluidity: k Flow via obstacles, Persistent Currents & Quantised Vortices Marzena Szymanska Collaborators Theory F. M. Marchetti E. Cancellieri C. Tejedor D. Whittaker Experiment D. Sanvitto,
More informationSolid State Physics IV -Part II : Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena
Solid State Physics IV -Part II : Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena Koji Usami (Dated: January 6, 015) In this final lecture we study the Jaynes-Cummings model in which an atom (a two level system) is coupled
More informationVortices and superfluidity
Vortices and superfluidity Vortices in Polariton quantum fluids We should observe a phase change by π and a density minimum at the core Michelson interferometry Forklike dislocation in interference pattern
More informationNon-relativistic Quantum Electrodynamics
Rigorous Aspects of Relaxation to the Ground State Institut für Analysis, Dynamik und Modellierung October 25, 2010 Overview 1 Definition of the model Second quantization Non-relativistic QED 2 Existence
More informationCavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris
Cavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris A three lecture course Goal of lectures Manipulating states of simple quantum systems has become an important
More informationCooperative atom-light interaction in a blockaded Rydberg ensemble
Cooperative atom-light interaction in a blockaded Rydberg ensemble α 1 Jonathan Pritchard University of Durham, UK Overview 1. Cooperative optical non-linearity due to dipole-dipole interactions 2. Observation
More informationSpin-Boson Model. A simple Open Quantum System. M. Miller F. Tschirsich. Quantum Mechanics on Macroscopic Scales Theory of Condensed Matter July 2012
Spin-Boson Model A simple Open Quantum System M. Miller F. Tschirsich Quantum Mechanics on Macroscopic Scales Theory of Condensed Matter July 2012 Outline 1 Bloch-Equations 2 Classical Dissipations 3 Spin-Boson
More informationDicke quantum spin glass of atoms and photons
Dicke quantum spin glass of atoms and photons The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Published Version Accessed
More informationA theory for localized low-frequency ideal MHD modes in axisymmetric toroidal systems is generalized to take into account both toroidal and poloidal
MHD spectra pre-history (selected results I MHD spectra pre-history (selected results II Abstract A theory for localized low-frequency ideal MHD modes in axisymmetric toroidal systems is generalized to
More informationRelational time and intrinsic decoherence
Relational time and intrinsic decoherence G. J. Milburn David Poulin Department of Physics, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072 Australia. 1 Quantum state of the universe. Page & Wooters,Phys. Rev 1983.
More informationAbsorption-Amplification Response with or Without Spontaneously Generated Coherence in a Coherent Four-Level Atomic Medium
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) pp. 425 430 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 42, No. 3, September 15, 2004 Absorption-Amplification Response with or Without Spontaneously Generated
More informationQuantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Lectures 14-15
Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Lectures 14-15 15 Marianna Safronova Department of Physics and Astronomy Back to the real world: What do we need to build a quantum computer? Qubits which retain
More informationResonantly Enhanced Microwave Photonics
Resonantly Enhanced Microwave Photonics Mankei Tsang Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Physics National University of Singapore eletmk@nus.edu.sg http://www.ece.nus.edu.sg/stfpage/tmk/
More informationKevin J. Weatherill. Joint Quantum Centre (Durham-Newcastle) Department of Physics Durham University
Non-equilibrium phase transition in a dilute thermal gas. Joint Quantum Centre (Durham-Newcastle) Department of Physics Durham University Non-equilibrium phase transition in a dilute thermal gas. Talk
More informationQuantum superpositions and correlations in coupled atomic-molecular BECs
Quantum superpositions and correlations in coupled atomic-molecular BECs Karén Kheruntsyan and Peter Drummond Department of Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA Quantum superpositions
More informationAtoms and photons. Chapter 1. J.M. Raimond. September 6, J.M. Raimond Atoms and photons September 6, / 36
Atoms and photons Chapter 1 J.M. Raimond September 6, 2016 J.M. Raimond Atoms and photons September 6, 2016 1 / 36 Introduction Introduction The fundamental importance of the atom-field interaction problem
More informationCoherent oscillations in a charge qubit
Coherent oscillations in a charge qubit The qubit The read-out Characterization of the Cooper pair box Coherent oscillations Measurements of relaxation and decoherence times Tim Duty, Kevin Bladh, David
More informationModulated superradiance and synchronized chaos in clouds of atoms in a bad cavity
Modulated superradiance and synchronized chaos in clouds of atoms in a bad cavity Emil Yuzbashyan Collaborators: Aniket Patra (Rutgers) and Boris Altshuler (Columbia) International orkshop Dissipative
More information6. Molecular structure and spectroscopy I
6. Molecular structure and spectroscopy I 1 6. Molecular structure and spectroscopy I 1 molecular spectroscopy introduction 2 light-matter interaction 6.1 molecular spectroscopy introduction 2 Molecular
More informationDispersion interactions with long-time tails or beyond local equilibrium
Dispersion interactions with long-time tails or beyond local equilibrium Carsten Henkel PIERS session Casimir effect and heat transfer (Praha July 2015) merci à : G. Barton (Sussex, UK), B. Budaev (Berkeley,
More informationPairing Phases of Polaritons
Pairing Phases of Polaritons Jonathan Keeling 1 University of St Andrews 6 YEARS Pisa, January 14 Jonathan Keeling Pairing Phases of Polaritons Pisa, January 14 1 / 34 Bose-Einstein condensation: macroscopic
More informationQuantum Optics exam. M2 LOM and Nanophysique. 28 November 2017
Quantum Optics exam M LOM and Nanophysique 8 November 017 Allowed documents : lecture notes and problem sets. Calculators allowed. Aux francophones (et francographes) : vous pouvez répondre en français.
More informationOptomechanics and spin dynamics of cold atoms in a cavity
Optomechanics and spin dynamics of cold atoms in a cavity Thierry Botter, Nathaniel Brahms, Daniel Brooks, Tom Purdy Dan Stamper-Kurn UC Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Ultracold atomic
More informationSlow and stored light using Rydberg atoms
Slow and stored light using Rydberg atoms Julius Ruseckas Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University, Lithuania April 28, 2016 Julius Ruseckas (Lithuania) Rydberg slow light April
More informationNon-equilibrium spin systems - from quantum soft-matter to nuclear magnetic resonance
Non-equilibrium spin systems - from quantum soft-matter to nuclear magnetic resonance Igor Lesanovsky Daejeon 24/10/2017 Postdocs Federico Carollo Carlos Espigares Perez Ricardo Gutierrez Alexander Karabanov
More informationSurvey on Laser Spectroscopic Techniques for Condensed Matter
Survey on Laser Spectroscopic Techniques for Condensed Matter Coherent Radiation Sources for Small Laboratories CW: Tunability: IR Visible Linewidth: 1 Hz Power: μw 10W Pulsed: Tunabality: THz Soft X-ray
More informationSynthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator
Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator Max Hofheinz, Haohua Wang, Markus Ansmann, R. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. O Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J.M. Martinis,
More informationExploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities. Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris
Exploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris Experiments in which single atoms and photons are manipulated in high Q cavities are modern
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v3 19 May 1997
Correcting the effects of spontaneous emission on cold-trapped ions C. D Helon and G.J. Milburn Department of Physics University of Queensland St Lucia 407 Australia arxiv:quant-ph/9610031 v3 19 May 1997
More informationCircuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing
Circuit QED: A promising advance towards quantum computing Himadri Barman Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research Bangalore, India. QCMJC Talk, July 10, 2012 Outline Basics of quantum
More informationAdiabatic quantum motors
Felix von Oppen Freie Universität Berlin with Raul Bustos Marun and Gil Refael Motion at the nanoscale Brownian motion Directed motion at the nanoscale?? 2 Directed motion at the nanoscale Nanocars 3 Nanoscale
More informationTheory of bifurcation amplifiers utilizing the nonlinear dynamical response of an optically damped mechanical oscillator
Theory of bifurcation amplifiers utilizing the nonlinear dynamical response of an optically damped mechanical oscillator Research on optomechanical systems is of relevance to gravitational wave detection
More informationMeasurement Based Quantum Computing, Graph States, and Near-term Realizations
Measurement Based Quantum Computing, Graph States, and Near-term Realizations Miami 2018 Antonio Russo Edwin Barnes S. E. Economou 17 December 2018 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University A.
More informationConference on Research Frontiers in Ultra-Cold Atoms. 4-8 May Generation of a synthetic vector potential in ultracold neutral Rubidium
3-8 Conference on Research Frontiers in Ultra-Cold Atoms 4-8 May 9 Generation of a synthetic vector potential in ultracold neutral Rubidium SPIELMAN Ian National Institute of Standards and Technology Laser
More informationCollège de France abroad Lectures Quantum information with real or artificial atoms and photons in cavities
Collège de France abroad Lectures Quantum information with real or artificial atoms and photons in cavities Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris www.college-de-france.fr A
More informationQuantum Microwave Photonics:
Quantum Microwave Photonics:Coupling quantum microwave circuits to quantum optics via cavity electro-optic modulators p. 1/16 Quantum Microwave Photonics: Coupling quantum microwave circuits to quantum
More informationDifferent ion-qubit choises. - One electron in the valence shell; Alkali like 2 S 1/2 ground state.
Different ion-qubit choises - One electron in the valence shell; Alkali like 2 S 1/2 ground state. Electronic levels Structure n 2 P 3/2 n 2 P n 2 P 1/2 w/o D Be + Mg + Zn + Cd + 313 nm 280 nm 206 nm 226
More informationPART 2 : BALANCED HOMODYNE DETECTION
PART 2 : BALANCED HOMODYNE DETECTION Michael G. Raymer Oregon Center for Optics, University of Oregon raymer@uoregon.edu 1 of 31 OUTLINE PART 1 1. Noise Properties of Photodetectors 2. Quantization of
More informationSupplemental Information for Single-photon bus connecting spin-wave quantum memories
NPHYS-007-05-0053 Supplemental Information for Single-photon bus connecting spin-wave quantum memories Jonathan Simon, 1, Haruka Tanji, 1, Saikat Ghosh, and Vladan Vuletić 1 Department of Physics, Harvard
More informationQuantum optics of many-body systems
Quantum optics of many-body systems Igor Mekhov Université Paris-Saclay (SPEC CEA) University of Oxford, St. Petersburg State University Lecture 4 Previous lectures Classical optics light waves material
More informationGraduate Class, Atomic and Laser Physics: Rabi flopping and quantum logic gates
Graduate Class, Atomic and Laser Physics: Rabi flopping and quantum logic gates Prof Andrew Steane April 17, 2008 Weeks 1 3 Trinity term. The 1st class will be introductory. To prepare for it, please do
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 24 Sep 2012
Excited-state phase transition leading to symmetry-breaking steady states in the Dicke model Ricardo Puebla, Armando Relaño, and Joaquín Retamosa Grupo de Física Nuclear, Departamento de Física Atómica,
More informationCavity optomechanics in new regimes and with new devices
Cavity optomechanics in new regimes and with new devices Andreas Nunnenkamp University of Basel 1. What? Why? How? 2. Single-photon regime 3. Dissipative coupling Introduction Cavity optomechanics radiation
More informationQuantum optics and optomechanics
Quantum optics and optomechanics 740nm optomechanical crystals LIGO mirror AMO: Alligator nanophotonic waveguide quantum electro-mechanics Oskar Painter, Jeff Kimble, Keith Schwab, Rana Adhikari, Yanbei
More informationSuperfluidity and Condensation
Christian Veit 4th of June, 2013 2 / 29 The discovery of superfluidity Early 1930 s: Peculiar things happen in 4 He below the λ-temperature T λ = 2.17 K 1938: Kapitza, Allen & Misener measure resistance
More informationEE-LE E OPTI T C A L S Y TE
1> p p γ 1 γ > 3 c 3> p p +> > 1> THREE-LEVEL OPTICAL SYSTEMS . THREE-LEVEL OPTICAL SYSTEMS () OUTLINE.1 BASIC THEORY.1 STIRAP: stimulated raman adiabatic passage. EIT: electromagnetically induced transparency.3
More informationRetract. Press down D RG MG LG S. Recess. I-V Converter VNA. Gate ADC. DC Bias. 20 mk. Amplifier. Attenuators. 0.
a Press down b Retract D RG S c d 2 µm Recess 2 µm.5 µm Supplementary Figure 1 CNT mechanical transfer (a) Schematics showing steps of pressing down and retracting during the transfer of the CNT from the
More informationCavity Quantum Electrodynamics Lecture 2: entanglement engineering with quantum gates
DÉPARTEMENT DE PHYSIQUE DE L ÉCOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE LABORATOIRE KASTLER BROSSEL Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Lecture : entanglement engineering with quantum gates Michel BRUNE Les Houches 003 1 CQED
More informationLie algebraic aspects of quantum control in interacting spin-1/2 (qubit) chains
.. Lie algebraic aspects of quantum control in interacting spin-1/2 (qubit) chains Vladimir M. Stojanović Condensed Matter Theory Group HARVARD UNIVERSITY September 16, 2014 V. M. Stojanović (Harvard)
More informationQuantum Memory in Atomic Ensembles BY GEORG BRAUNBECK
Quantum Memory in Atomic Ensembles BY GEORG BRAUNBECK Table of contents 1. Motivation 2. Quantum memory 3. Implementations in general 4. Implementation based on EIT in detail QUBIT STORAGE IN ATOMIC ENSEMBLES
More informationΓ43 γ. Pump Γ31 Γ32 Γ42 Γ41
Supplementary Figure γ 4 Δ+δe Γ34 Γ43 γ 3 Δ Ω3,4 Pump Ω3,4, Ω3 Γ3 Γ3 Γ4 Γ4 Γ Γ Supplementary Figure Schematic picture of theoretical model: The picture shows a schematic representation of the theoretical
More informationCoherent Backscattering, Photon Localization and Random Laser with Cold Atoms
Coherent Backscattering, Photon Localization and Random Laser with Cold Atoms Robin Kaiser CLXXIII International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" "Nano optics and atomics: transport of light and matter
More informationDriving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian
Qubit Control Driving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian Hamiltonian for microwave drive Unitary transform with and Results in dispersive approximation up to 2 nd order in g Drive induces Rabi oscillations
More information4. Spontaneous Emission october 2016
4. Spontaneous Emission october 016 References: Grynberg, Aspect, Fabre, "Introduction aux lasers et l'optique quantique". Lectures by S. Haroche dans "Fundamental systems in quantum optics", cours des
More informationMotion and motional qubit
Quantized motion Motion and motional qubit... > > n=> > > motional qubit N ions 3 N oscillators Motional sidebands Excitation spectrum of the S / transition -level-atom harmonic trap coupled system & transitions
More informationRydberg excited Calcium Ions for quantum interactions. Innsbruck Mainz Nottingham
Rydberg excited Calcium Ions for quantum interactions Innsbruck Mainz Nottingham Brussels 26.03.2013 The R-ION Consortium Ferdinand Schmidt-Kaler University of Mainz/Germany Trapped ions Experiment Jochen
More informationMODERN OPTICS. P47 Optics: Unit 9
MODERN OPTICS P47 Optics: Unit 9 Course Outline Unit 1: Electromagnetic Waves Unit 2: Interaction with Matter Unit 3: Geometric Optics Unit 4: Superposition of Waves Unit 5: Polarization Unit 6: Interference
More informationVariational analysis of dissipative Ising models
GRK Workshop Hildesheim 2016 Institute for Theoretical Physics Leibniz University Hannover 08.02.2016 Outline 1 Dissipative quantum systems 2 Variational formulation and dynamics 3 Non-Markovianity 4 Steady
More informationAxion Detection With NMR
PRD 84 (2011) arxiv:1101.2691 + to appear Axion Detection With NMR Peter Graham Stanford with Dmitry Budker Micah Ledbetter Surjeet Rajendran Alex Sushkov Dark Matter Motivation two of the best candidates:
More informationMicrocavity Exciton-Polariton
Microcavity Exciton-Polariton Neil Na ( 那允中 ) Institute of Photonics Technologies National Tsing-Hua University 5/3/2012 Outline Microcavity Exciton-polariton QW excitons Microcavity photons Strong coupling
More informationQuantum Computation with Neutral Atoms
Quantum Computation with Neutral Atoms Marianna Safronova Department of Physics and Astronomy Why quantum information? Information is physical! Any processing of information is always performed by physical
More informationAtomic Physics with Stored and Cooled Ions
Lecture #5 Atomic Physics with Stored and Cooled Ions Klaus Blaum Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, GSI, Darmstadt and CERN, Physics Department, Geneva, Switzerland Summer School, Lanzhou, China,
More informationLONG-LIVED QUANTUM MEMORY USING NUCLEAR SPINS
LONG-LIVED QUANTUM MEMORY USING NUCLEAR SPINS Laboratoire Kastler Brossel A. Sinatra, G. Reinaudi, F. Laloë (ENS, Paris) A. Dantan, E. Giacobino, M. Pinard (UPMC, Paris) NUCLEAR SPINS HAVE LONG RELAXATION
More informationQuantum optics of many-body systems
Quantum optics of many-body systems Igor Mekhov Université Paris-Saclay (SPEC CEA) University of Oxford, St. Petersburg State University Lecture 2 Previous lecture 1 Classical optics light waves material
More informationDicke model and environment-induced entanglement in ion-cavity QED Harkonen, Kari; Plastina, Francesco; Maniscalco, Sabrina
Heriot-Watt University Heriot-Watt University Research Gateway Dicke model and environment-induced entanglement in ion-cavity QED Harkonen, Kari; Plastina, Francesco; Maniscalco, Sabrina Published in:
More informationClassical and quantum simulation of dissipative quantum many-body systems
0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 0 20 32 Classical and quantum simulation of dissipative quantum many-body systems
More informationIntroduction. Resonant Cooling of Nuclear Spins in Quantum Dots
Introduction Resonant Cooling of Nuclear Spins in Quantum Dots Mark Rudner Massachusetts Institute of Technology For related details see: M. S. Rudner and L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 036602 (2007);
More informationSpontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Bose-Einstein Condensates
The 10th US-Japan Joint Seminar Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Bose-Einstein Condensates Masahito UEDA Tokyo Institute of Technology, ERATO, JST collaborators Yuki Kawaguchi (Tokyo Institute of Technology)
More informationOptomechanically induced transparency of x-rays via optical control: Supplementary Information
Optomechanically induced transparency of x-rays via optical control: Supplementary Information Wen-Te Liao 1, and Adriana Pálffy 1 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg,
More informationTime-dependent DMRG:
The time-dependent DMRG and its applications Adrian Feiguin Time-dependent DMRG: ^ ^ ih Ψ( t) = 0 t t [ H ( t) E ] Ψ( )... In a truncated basis: t=3 τ t=4 τ t=5τ t=2 τ t= τ t=0 Hilbert space S.R.White
More information