arxiv: v1 [physics.class-ph] 1 Aug 2012

Transcription

1 ON THE INTERACTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES WITH CONDUCTORS. B.V. Paranjape 1 and M. B. Paranjape 2 1 Professor Eeritus, Departent of Physics, University of Alberta and 2 Groupe de physique des particules, Départeent de physique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succ. centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7 arxiv: v1 [physics.class-ph] 1 Aug 2012 We study the interaction of electroagnetic waves with electrons. Our results can be applied to radio waves in the ionosphere or to lasers ipinging on etals causing elting. We generalize the classical analysis of Zener to the case which includes the interactions of the electrons with lattice vibrations or the positive ions. We use the induced polarization to give a globally coherent and unifying analysis of the two cases, where collisions are iportant and where they are negligible. PACS nubers: Jb, Hr INTRODUCTION Born and Wolf [1] in their faous book Optics have devoted a chapter on the Optics of etals. They have discussed the subject exhaustively, explaining the Drude [2] theory of conductivity, taking into account the free electrons, which are free to ove inside the etal, except for occasional collisions with lattice vibrations. The electrons have a finite conductivity as a consequence of these collisions with the lattice vibrations. Born and Wolf have calculated reflection and transission coefficients of electroagnetic waves. A very siple odel of the electrons in etals, which assues no collisions, was given by Zener [3]. Zener s odel is applicable where the electron density is very low and there are alost no collisions with the positive ions. Zener s theory is actually well suited for applications to the response of electroagnetic waves in the ionosphere. He has shown that electroagnetic waves of frequency less than the plasa frequency of the ionosphere are reflected copletely. Radio waves can be transitted over long distances on the earth, by reflecting the off the ionosphere. Zener s theory also explains the qualitative behaviour of electroagnetic waves incident on thin plates of alkaline etals. It was Kronig [4] who pointed out that Zener s theory will only work well in etals if the frequency of the electroagnetic waves is higher than the frequency of collisions of the electrons with the lattice. Although Zener s theory is restrictive to certain conditions, it provides a good odel for understanding the process, and is useful for students at the undergraduate level. In the present paper, we extend Zener s theory to include collisions with the lattice vibrations. Our results are applicable to the case when the frequency of the electroagnetic wave is uch lower than the frequency of the collisions of the electrons with the lattice vibrations. The erit of Zener s approach is in its siplicity; and our approach is just as siple and gives a clear picture of the process. Thus teachers can use our theory to teach at the undergraduate level. In another experiental situation, an intense laser bea can produce local elting in etal plates [5]. We can conclude fro our discussions that the frequency of laser should be lower that the collision frequency, in that way leading to the transfer of energy to the lattice fro the laser through collisions of electrons with the lattice vibrations, and induce the elting. Early experients on reflection and transission of electro-agnetic radiation fro thin plates of alkali etals were done by Woods [6]. His observations were explained by Zener, who assued that the electrons in alkali etals are copletely free, and they respond to the electric field of the incident radiation. It was observed by Kronig that although the electrons in these etals are free to ove inside, they are in fact scattered by lattice vibrations. They are not copletely free. If τ is the ean tie between successive collisions, then the electrons are really free, only for a tie t τ; and consequently, Zener s theory is only good as long as the period of oscillation of the radiation 1/ω is saller than τ. That eans ωτ 1. If ωτ 1, then Zener s theory cannot be applied. In the present paper we extend Zener s analysis exactly to the case ωτ 1. Our analysis presents this interaction through the use of the polarization that the electroagnetic wave induces in the conductor. We can then present the two cases where collisions are iportant and where they are negligible in a single, logically coherent and unifying fashion POLARIZATION When an electric field is applied to a conducting ediu, the obile charges iediately react to the field and rearrange in an effort to cancel it. In the cases that we shall consider, it is the electrons that ove, while the uch heavier positive ions are essentially fixed in position. They ay actually be stuck in place, as in a solid conductor or, siply being uch heavier than the electrons, their otion occurs an a uch longer tie scale

2 2 and hence is negligible. On the other hand even the obile charges are assued to be at theral equilibriu. Such an equilibriu is only established through the existence of collisions. However, there is a tie scale associated with the collisions and a length scale which depend on the teperature and the density. Taking a Maxwell-Boltzann distribution [7] for the obile charge carriers, which is a very good approxiation for atospheric plasas and for etals that are not too cold (so that the electrons are not degenerate), the relations are v (k B T/ e ) (1/2) l 1/(nσ) τ l/v (1) where v is the root ean square velocity, l is the ean free path, and τ is the collision tie, which are functions of k B the Boltzann constant, T the teperature, e the electron ass, n the density of the electrons, and σ the total scattering cross-section. But for the Coulob interaction without screening, the total cross-section diverges, hence it is necessary to take into account the screening of the electric field. In a conductor, the electric field is screened by rearrangeent of the charges. The Debye length [8], l D, is the distance over which charge is screened within a conductor. The derivation of the Debye length is straightforward and yields [9] l D ( k B T/ne 2) (1/2). (2) Calculation of the scattering cross-section crucially requires taking into account the screening length, otherwise the results are divergent. Now for an electroagnetic wave, the electric field is oscillating back and forth with frequency ω, and depending on how high the frequency is, it is iportant to either neglect collisions or to take collisions into account. Thus there are two natural regies, ωτ 1 and ωτ 1. In the forer, collisions are uniportant and we treat the electrons in the section below called Free Electrons. In the latter, the collision are iportant, and our corresponding section following is called Scattered Electrons. In both regies, the electrons are able to ove relative to the heavy or stationary positive ions. This relative oveent induces a local, icroscopic dipole oent throughout the conductor, albeit for a finite aount of tie proportional the inverse of the frequency of the electroagnetic radiation. This local, icroscopic dipole oent is entirely analogous to the way an electric field induces a polarization in a dielectric (non-conducting) ediu, although the clear difference is that a dielectric can support static electric fields and static dipole oents, while a conductor cannot. The local, icroscopic dipole oent fluctuates wildly over distances coparable with the inter-particle separation, however it is the averaged value of the field produced that is iportant. The analysis is again very straightforward, we refer the interested reader to the classic reference by Jackson [10]. The result is that there is a polarization induced throughout the ediu which tries to copensate the applied electric field. This polarization field, P, is given by P = n p ol (3) where p ol is the dipole oent of each icroscopic olecule and indicates averaging over a acroscopically sall volue, which nevertheless contains any icroscopic olecules. The induced electric field is siply 4π P and the displaceent is defined as D = E +4π P. (4) Coputing the average polarization is very easy. The dynaics of the individual electron otion is governed by Newton s law, the forces acting on the electron are the electric field (the agnetic field also exercises a force on the electrons, but this is down by a power of v/c) and the frictional forces if there are collisions. If x(t) is the electron position (considering for siplicity otion along the x direction), the icroscopic dipole oent is p ol = ex(t) as the corresponding positive ion is assued to stay iobile at x = 0, and the consequent polarization per unit volue is obtained by ultiplying by the nuber density, P = nex(t). FREE ELECTRONS As stated above, Zener s odel is well suited for treating electrons in the ionosphere. The density of electrons in the ionosphere is very low, and the electrons hardly ever collide with the ions. Then, Zener s approach is ost appropriate for dealing with the reflection of electro-agnetic waves. It is well known that radio signals can be sent across oceans or over long distances across continents because they can be reflected off the ionosphere. The ionosphere is a collection of electrons and an equal nuber of protons foring a shell around the earth. The theory of reflections by free-electrons is easy to understand: If an electroagnetic wave is incident on the ionosphere, the electrons which are uch lighter than the ions, are accelerated by the electric field of the electroagnetic wave. Without loss of generality, take the direction of the electric field to be along the x direction. All quantities will have a periodic variation of angular frequency ω. Thus, the electric field will be E x = Ee i(kz ωt). (5) We also know this periodic variation exists in all quantities we deal with as the equations are linear. We will choose not to write the exponential which is there in all quantities of interest. Of course the electric field is actually a real quantity, hence what we ean is the real part

3 3 of Equation (5). This does not ean that the periodic behaviour is always necessarily cos(kz ωt), we allow E to be in general a coplex nuber, which then perits any real cobination of cosines and sines. Indeed, there ay appear explicit factors of i in the subsequent equations, this siply corresponds to a relative phase difference of π/2, i.e. cosines becoe sines and vice versa. In this electric field, electrons will be accelerated according to Newton s law, the following equation: or ẍ = ee ω 2 x = ee (6) (7) The contribution to the dipole oent by one electron is then ex = e2 E ω 2. (8) If n is the density of electrons per unit volue, the total dipole oent per unit volue is given siply by P = ne2 E ω 2. (9) The dielectric constant at frequency ω is easily found through the relation This gives ǫe = D = E +4πP. (10) ǫ(ω) = 1+ 4πne2 ω 2 = 1 ω2 p ω2, (11) whereωp 2 = 4πne2, is known as the (square of the) plasa frequency. The electroagnetic wave equation in a nonagnetic, isotropic ediu is Which yields D = c 2 2 E. (12) ω 2 ǫ = c 2 k 2 (13) ω 2 (1 ω2 p ω 2) = c2 k 2. (14) This is called the dispersion relation. At frequencies less than ω p, k 2 will be negative and hence k will be iaginary. If k is iaginary, the wave cannot propagate and it will be totally reflected. The above analysis can be directly applied to the case of free electrons in etals. The plasa frequency, ω p, of the conduction electrons in etals is very high and uch higher than the frequency of visible light, which is reflected by etals. Thus, etals look shiny. SCATTERED ELECTRONS We are successful in explaining why the etals shine, but we note that the free electrons in conducting solids are free only for a short interval of tie. They interact with lattice vibrations and are scattered after a tie τ, the average tie between successive collisions. The above analysis can only be applied to conductors if the frequency is large ωτ 1. The electrons can be accelerated only for a tie τ. At low frequencies, the period of oscillation of the electric field is uch larger than the tie between successive collisions τ. As a consequence of suffering any collisions, the electrons are not accelerated indefinitely, and acquire a drift velocity ẋ = eeτ. (15) Equation (15) is the defining relation for the collision tie τ. At low frequencies ωτ 1. We ust replace equation (6) by equation (15) giving us iωx = eeτ, (16) Since the polarization, P is given by we get which gives x = eτ E. (17) P = nex = ne2 τ E, (18) ǫe = ( 1 4πne2 τ) E (19) ǫ = 1 4πne2 τ (20) ǫ = 1 ω2 p τ iω. (21) Define α = ω2 p τ ω, then ǫ = 1+iα. (22) The dispersion relation in equation (14) becoes If k = k 1 +ik 2, then ω 2 (1+iα) = c 2 k 2. (23) ω 2 (1+iα) = c 2 (k 2 1 k2 2 +2ik 1k 2 ). (24)

4 4 Equating the real and iaginary parts, we find ω 2 c 2 = k2 1 k 2 2, (25) ω 2 c 2 α = 2k 1k 2, (k 2 1 k 2 2)α = 2k 1 k 2 ; (26) k k 1 α k 2 k1 2 = 0. (27) Then we find for the iaginary part k 2 = k 1 α ± = k 1 α ±k 1 (1+ 1 )1 2 α 2 k ( 1 α ±k ) 2α 2 k 2 1 α 2 +k2 1 (28) (29) (30) where the approxiation is valid for α 1 which is the sae as assuing a low frequency ω. k 2 = k 1 ( 1+ 1 α + 1 2α 2 ). (31) The iaginary part is slightly larger than k 1. This indicates that the wave is absorbed in a distance of less than one wave length, and does not penetrate into the conductor. We have chosen to take the + sign of the radical in equation (31) because the negative sign will give us a negative value of k 2 which would iply the unphysical result that the wave is aplified. There is no reason for the aplification. In our analysis, we have introduced collisions of electron which is a dissipative echanis. We expect the wave to lose energy and not gain it. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION In conclusion, we observe introduction of scattering and interactions of electrons brusquely ipacts the behaviour of electroagnetic wave in conducting edia. The analysis of Zener for the free electron odel cannot be applied, specifically in the case ωτ 1. However a odification of that analysis can be applied to this region taking into account the collisions and the drift velocity that they produce. The analysis presented here is siilar in spirit to Drude s original analysis [2], however there one passes through the conductivity induced in the electron current, rather than the ore direct route presented here of the polarization induced and its effect on the Maxwell equations. Thus we see, in a very siple and pedagogical anner, that at radio frequencies an electroagnetic wave will travel a great distance along the surface of the earth due to ultiple reflections off the ionosphere. Here the free electron odel is sufficient to explain this behaviour. On the other hand, the sae electroagnetic wave will be daped in a real conductor, in which electrons interact with the lattice. Here the scattering of the electrons with the lattice vibrations cannot be neglected. Thus, for exaple, a superconductor, where electron scattering fro the lattice is copletely absent, will reflect radio waves, but if it becoes noral it will suddenly absorb the waves. Although it is well understood that superconductivity owes its existence to electron lattice interactions, nevertheless, the electrons in the superconducting state absorb energy, due to interactions with the phonons, but at an exponentially suppressed rate copared to noral conduction electrons [12]. Hence in the superconductor, for teperatures significantly below the transition teperature, the attenuation of ultrasonic waves vanishes. In this sense, it is correct to interpret this fact siply as the coplete transparency of the superconducting electrons to sound vibrations ipressed upon the theral phonon distribution. Our presentation akes use of the induced polarization in the conductor to analyze the interaction in the two regies in a globally coherent, unifying and logical fashion. We find that this way of presenting the analysis bypasses the necessity of introducing the conductivity, which is only defined without subtlety in one of the regies. In such analyses, the conductivity is coputed, and then fed back in to Maxwell s equations to obtain the dispersion relation [11]. The conductivity σ is defined by the relation J = σ E. (32) This relation is the icroscopic basis of electrical resistivity. For a linear, hoogeneous conductor of length L and sectional area A, we get (taking all vectors in one given direction for siplicity and so dropping the vectorial signs) I = J A = σ A L E L = 1 V (33) R where I is the current, V is the voltage difference and R is the resistivity. In a collisionless plasa, the resistance is zero, thus the notion of conductivity is subtle. In fact it can be defined, but turns out to be purely iaginary. Thus it represents in fact a phase lag between the applied electric field and the corresponding current. Thus using the conductivity, for exaple as in [11], to approach the liit of a collisionless electron gas to arrive at the plasa frequency is not as direct an approach, as we have done in our section on Free Electrons. The polarization however is a globally well defined concept in both regies whether collisions are negligible or

5 5 iportant. Therefore we find that our presentation is sipler, globally coherent and a logical ethod for exposing and studying the interaction of electroagnetic waves on conductors. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank NSERC of Canada for partial financial support and the Perieter Institute for Theoretical Physics for hospitality where this paper was revised. bhala.jape@gail.co paranj@lps.uontreal.ca [1] M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics. Oxford: Pergaon, 6th ed., (1980) [2] P. Drude, Zur Elektronentheorie der Metalle, 1.Teil, Annalen der Physik, 1, , (1900); Zur Elektronentheorie der Metalle, 2.Teil, ibid, 3, (1900). [3] C. Zener, Rearkable optical properties of the alkali etals, Nature, , (1933). [4] R. de L. Kronig, Rearkable optical properties of the alkali etals, Nature, , (1933). [5] P. N. Saeta, J. K. Wang, Y. Siegal, N. Bloebergen, and E. Mazur, Ultrafast electronic disordering during fetosecond laser elting of GaAs, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, , (1991); D. v. d. Linde and K. Sokolowski- Tinten, The physical echaniss of short-pulse laser ablation, Appl. Surf. Sci, vol , 1-10, (2000). [6] R. W. Woods, Rearkable optical properties of the alkali etals, Physical Review,44, , (1933) [7] see for exaple the textbook A Course in Statistical Therodynaics, J. Kestin and J. R. Dorfan, Acadeic Press, (1971). [8] P. Debye and E. Hückel Zur Theorie der Elektrolyte. I. Gefrierpunktserniedrigung und verwandte Erscheinungen [The theory of electrolytes. I. Lowering of freezing point and related phenoena] Physikalische Zeitschrift 24: (1923). [9] Statistical Physics Part 1, Landau and Lifshitz Course of Theoretical Physics Volue 5, enlarged and revised by E. M. Lifshtiz and L. P. Pitaevsi, Pergaon Press (1980). [10] Classical Electrodynaics, J. D. Jackson, John Wiley (1962). [11] Solid State Physics, N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Merin, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, (1976). [12] J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of the superconductivity", Physical Review, 108, , (1959); T. Tsuneto, Ultrasonic attenuation in superconductors", Physical Review, , (1961); L. P. Kadanoff and A. B. Pippard, Ultrasonic attenuation in superconductors", Proc. Royal Soc. London A31, vol. 292, no. 1430, , (1966)